<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Hardware Sector and Stocks Analysis from Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>'Hardware' Tag RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/sector/hardware</link>
    <item>
      <title>More Product Wins at Immersion Corporation </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/262930-more-product-wins-at-immersion-corporation?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">262930</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Outside of the usual suspects (new handsets or tablets introduced by its mobility partners), Immersion Corporation (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/immr' title='Immersion Corp.'>IMMR</a>) seems to be experiencing good momentum in several other segments, having recently achieved a few product wins that include both existing and new licensees.</p><p>As a reminder: Checking new products launched in the market by Immersion's partners is the best way to forecast the company's future success; the implementation of its haptic technology into more and more products is key to the company's  financial performance, as Immersion collects a royalty per unit sold.</p><p>Checking Immersion's <a href="http://www.immersion.com/about/news-room/partner-news/index.html" rel="nofollow">partner news</a> web page is the best (and easiest) way to get confirmation about new product wins, even if they are not officially announced through a press release. The most recent update highlights at least three interesting devices -- one in the gaming segment and two in the commercial vertical.</p><p>Lexmark (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lxk' title='Lexmark International Inc.'>LXK</a>) recently introduced a color laser printer</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:32:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Paolo Gorgo</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://nortiaresearch.blogspot.com/'>Paolo Gorgo</a> submits: </strong><p>Outside of the usual suspects (new handsets or tablets introduced by its mobility partners), Immersion Corporation (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/immr' title='Immersion Corp.'>IMMR</a>) seems to be experiencing good momentum in several other segments, having recently achieved a few product wins that include both existing and new licensees.</p><p>As a reminder: Checking new products launched in the market by Immersion's partners is the best way to forecast the company's future success; the implementation of its haptic technology into more and more products is key to the company's  financial performance, as Immersion collects a royalty per unit sold.</p><p>Checking Immersion's <a href="http://www.immersion.com/about/news-room/partner-news/index.html" rel="nofollow">partner news</a> web page is the best (and easiest) way to get confirmation about new product wins, even if they are not officially announced through a press release. The most recent update highlights at least three interesting devices -- one in the gaming segment and two in the commercial vertical.</p><p>Lexmark (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lxk' title='Lexmark International Inc.'>LXK</a>) recently introduced a color laser printer</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/262930-more-product-wins-at-immersion-corporation?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/immr">IMMR</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/paolo-gorgo">Paolo Gorgo</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>3 Option Scenarios for Apple Investors</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/262883-3-option-scenarios-for-apple-investors?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">262883</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>This is the eleventh article in a series on Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>) option strategy. Apple is a very unique company due its combination of size ($310B), earnings growth rate (75%), and volatility (1.4β). This presents an exceptional opportunity for investors to capitalize on both its long-term capital gain prospects and short-term option premiums. For reference, please view <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/author/paul-zimbardo/articles">the first and other articles in the series </a>to fully understand the strategy and its strong potential returns.</p> <p>A brief recap of this week in Apple [Down $6.31 (-1.8%)]:</p> <ul><li><span><span><span/></span>iPad 2 Shipping Time Reduced to 2-3 Weeks (Apr. 4 <a href="http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/shop_ipad/family/ipad" rel="nofollow">Apple</a>)</span></li>     <li><span><span><span/></span>Apple Wins Reversal of $625M Patent Suit (Apr. 4 <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-04/apple-wins-reversal-of-mirror-worlds-patent-verdict.html" rel="nofollow">Bloomberg</a>)</span></li>     <li><span><span><span/></span>NASDAQ 100 Rebalancing To Reduce Apple Weighting (<a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/261931-nasdaq-100-rebalancing-to-rely-less-on-apple">Apr. 5 Seeking Alpha</a>)</span></li>     <li><span><span><span/></span>Consumer Reports Ranks iPad 2 As Best Tablet (Apr. 5 <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/11/04/05/consumer_reports_ranks_apples_ipad_2_best_tablet_on_the_market.html" rel="nofollow">Apple Insider</a>)</span></li>     <li><span><span><span/></span>Apple Ordering Storage In Preparation For Possible Media Streaming (Apr. 6 <a href="http://www.storagenewsletter.com/news/business/apple-isilon-itunes" rel="nofollow">Storage Newsletter</a>)</span></li>     <li><span><span><span/></span>Motorola (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mmi' title='Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc.'>MMI</a>) Xoom Sales Forecast Reduced Dramatically (Apr. 6 <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/11/04/06/motorolas_android_3_0_honeycomb_xoom_sales_forecast_slashed_to_100000_units.html" rel="nofollow">Apple Insider</a>)</span></li>     <li><span><span><span/></span>Apple Dominating Supply of Touch Panels (Apr.</span></li></ul>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:44:18 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Paul Zimbardo</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This is the eleventh article in a series on Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>) option strategy. Apple is a very unique company due its combination of size ($310B), earnings growth rate (75%), and volatility (1.4β). This presents an exceptional opportunity for investors to capitalize on both its long-term capital gain prospects and short-term option premiums. For reference, please view <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/author/paul-zimbardo/articles">the first and other articles in the series </a>to fully understand the strategy and its strong potential returns.</p> <p>A brief recap of this week in Apple [Down $6.31 (-1.8%)]:</p> <ul><li><span><span><span/></span>iPad 2 Shipping Time Reduced to 2-3 Weeks (Apr. 4 <a href="http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/shop_ipad/family/ipad" rel="nofollow">Apple</a>)</span></li>     <li><span><span><span/></span>Apple Wins Reversal of $625M Patent Suit (Apr. 4 <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-04/apple-wins-reversal-of-mirror-worlds-patent-verdict.html" rel="nofollow">Bloomberg</a>)</span></li>     <li><span><span><span/></span>NASDAQ 100 Rebalancing To Reduce Apple Weighting (<a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/261931-nasdaq-100-rebalancing-to-rely-less-on-apple">Apr. 5 Seeking Alpha</a>)</span></li>     <li><span><span><span/></span>Consumer Reports Ranks iPad 2 As Best Tablet (Apr. 5 <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/11/04/05/consumer_reports_ranks_apples_ipad_2_best_tablet_on_the_market.html" rel="nofollow">Apple Insider</a>)</span></li>     <li><span><span><span/></span>Apple Ordering Storage In Preparation For Possible Media Streaming (Apr. 6 <a href="http://www.storagenewsletter.com/news/business/apple-isilon-itunes" rel="nofollow">Storage Newsletter</a>)</span></li>     <li><span><span><span/></span>Motorola (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mmi' title='Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc.'>MMI</a>) Xoom Sales Forecast Reduced Dramatically (Apr. 6 <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/11/04/06/motorolas_android_3_0_honeycomb_xoom_sales_forecast_slashed_to_100000_units.html" rel="nofollow">Apple Insider</a>)</span></li>     <li><span><span><span/></span>Apple Dominating Supply of Touch Panels (Apr.</span></li></ul><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/262883-3-option-scenarios-for-apple-investors?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqq">QQQ</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/paul-zimbardo">Paul Zimbardo</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple: Not Spending Enough on R&amp;D? </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/262877-apple-not-spending-enough-on-r-d?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">262877</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div>Over at<em> Forbes</em>, Martin T. Sosnoff made it pretty clear. He thinks GM (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gm' title='General Motors Corporation'>GM</a>) is “<a href="http://www.forbes.com/2011/04/05/apple-general-motors-ford-polaroid-markets-xerox-steve-jobs-sosnoff.html" rel="nofollow">a more viable investment</a>” than Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>).</div>  <div> </div>  <div>Why? Well in part because he thinks Apple isn’t spending enough on research and development, fearing the company may become “the next Polaroid,” the camera/film company that lost its way as quick film</div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:24:28 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Richard Bloch</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/author/richard-bloch'>Richard Bloch</a> submits:</strong><div>Over at<em> Forbes</em>, Martin T. Sosnoff made it pretty clear. He thinks GM (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gm' title='General Motors Corporation'>GM</a>) is “<a href="http://www.forbes.com/2011/04/05/apple-general-motors-ford-polaroid-markets-xerox-steve-jobs-sosnoff.html" rel="nofollow">a more viable investment</a>” than Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>).</div>  <div> </div>  <div>Why? Well in part because he thinks Apple isn’t spending enough on research and development, fearing the company may become “the next Polaroid,” the camera/film company that lost its way as quick film</div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/262877-apple-not-spending-enough-on-r-d?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gm">GM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/intc">INTC</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/richard-bloch">Richard Bloch</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple Investors: Time for Caution Heading Into Q2 Earnings</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/262746-apple-investors-time-for-caution-heading-into-q2-earnings?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">262746</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>When was the last time an analyst had a 'sell' recommendation on <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>? Can't remember? Neither can I. But recently we have seen a few analysts and respected bloggers beginning to think the unthinkable - could AAPL's formidable track record be about to hit a blip?</p> <p>All of this started with <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/11/03/16/deceleration_in_foxconn_manufacturing_seen_as_a_concern_for_apple.html" rel="nofollow">JMP Securities analyst Alex Gauna</a> downgrading AAPL to Market Perform. Shocking, misguided, or possibly brave? JMP may have gone out on a limb to hit the headlines, and in that sense they certainly succeeded, but whatever you think about the legitimacy of that infamous downgrade it has prompted a flurry of speculation about AAPL's short-term health.  With almost universally bullish sentiment surrounding the company, investors would be wise to take this opportunity to reflect.</p> <p>There has been furious speculation about the condition of Apple's supply chain in light of the earthquake and tsunami in Japan. Just how much is</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 07:42:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>David Room</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/author/david-room'>David Room</a> submits:</strong><p>When was the last time an analyst had a 'sell' recommendation on <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>? Can't remember? Neither can I. But recently we have seen a few analysts and respected bloggers beginning to think the unthinkable - could AAPL's formidable track record be about to hit a blip?</p> <p>All of this started with <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/11/03/16/deceleration_in_foxconn_manufacturing_seen_as_a_concern_for_apple.html" rel="nofollow">JMP Securities analyst Alex Gauna</a> downgrading AAPL to Market Perform. Shocking, misguided, or possibly brave? JMP may have gone out on a limb to hit the headlines, and in that sense they certainly succeeded, but whatever you think about the legitimacy of that infamous downgrade it has prompted a flurry of speculation about AAPL's short-term health.  With almost universally bullish sentiment surrounding the company, investors would be wise to take this opportunity to reflect.</p> <p>There has been furious speculation about the condition of Apple's supply chain in light of the earthquake and tsunami in Japan. Just how much is</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/262746-apple-investors-time-for-caution-heading-into-q2-earnings?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/david-room">David Room</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Motorola Mobility Gears for Smartphone Battle </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/262681-motorola-mobility-gears-for-smartphone-battle?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">262681</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>I am recommending risk tolerant investors take a short position in Motorola Mobility (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mmi' title='Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc.'>MMI</a>) and risk averse shareholders that already own MMI</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 16:45:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Chris Versace</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.think2020research.com/'>Chris Versace</a> submits: </strong><p>I am recommending risk tolerant investors take a short position in Motorola Mobility (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mmi' title='Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc.'>MMI</a>) and risk averse shareholders that already own MMI</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/262681-motorola-mobility-gears-for-smartphone-battle?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mmi">MMI</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/chris-versace">Chris Versace</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BlackBerry Playbook: You Had Me at Hello... But What About Others?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/262447-blackberry-playbook-you-had-me-at-hello-but-what-about-others?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">262447</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>
  <a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2011/4/7/saupload_tablet.jpg"/>
</p> <p>Not everyone wants an iPad.  Sure, I’ve played with Apple’s (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>) hot device, but I belong to another  tribe; I love Research In Motion's (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rimm' title='Research In Motion Ltd.'>RIMM</a>) Blackberry. That’s my disclaimer; I’m a Blackberry  fan and brand evangelist. So while others rejoice in iPad 2 news, I’m  eagerly awaiting the launch of the <a href="http://us.blackberry.com/playbook-tablet/" rel="nofollow">Blackberry Playbook</a>.  I actually expected to find RIM and the Playbook front and center at  the CTIA Wireless show in March but was disappointed to find that they  skipped the event this year to focus on their own Blackberry World conference in May.</p> <p>With all of the buzz surrounding iPad 2, Samsung’s Galaxy Tab, and Motorola’s (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mmi' title='Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc.'>MMI</a>) Xoom, I began to wonder how the Playbook will fare when it launches on April 19th.  For answers, I leveraged the Compete panel of connected device  users–part of our Smartphone Intelligence Report – and I was able to  gather insights from consumers</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 15:30:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Compete</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://compete.com">Compete</a> submits: </strong><p>
  <a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2011/4/7/saupload_tablet.jpg"/>
</p> <p>Not everyone wants an iPad.  Sure, I’ve played with Apple’s (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>) hot device, but I belong to another  tribe; I love Research In Motion's (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rimm' title='Research In Motion Ltd.'>RIMM</a>) Blackberry. That’s my disclaimer; I’m a Blackberry  fan and brand evangelist. So while others rejoice in iPad 2 news, I’m  eagerly awaiting the launch of the <a href="http://us.blackberry.com/playbook-tablet/" rel="nofollow">Blackberry Playbook</a>.  I actually expected to find RIM and the Playbook front and center at  the CTIA Wireless show in March but was disappointed to find that they  skipped the event this year to focus on their own Blackberry World conference in May.</p> <p>With all of the buzz surrounding iPad 2, Samsung’s Galaxy Tab, and Motorola’s (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mmi' title='Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc.'>MMI</a>) Xoom, I began to wonder how the Playbook will fare when it launches on April 19th.  For answers, I leveraged the Compete panel of connected device  users–part of our Smartphone Intelligence Report – and I was able to  gather insights from consumers</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/262447-blackberry-playbook-you-had-me-at-hello-but-what-about-others?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rimm">RIMM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mmi">MMI</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/compete">Compete</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Smart Cloud to Boost IBM's Cloud</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/262389-smart-cloud-to-boost-ibm-s-cloud?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">262389</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Information Technology giant, <strong>International Business Machines Corp. (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm' title='International Business Machines Corp.'>IBM</a>)</strong> is set to boost its cloud computing ambitions with the launch of its new computing service “Smart Cloud”.</p><p>Smart Cloud offers cost-effective data analysis, supply chain  management and sales management capabilities to big companies that incur  significant IT costs related to these operations. The Smart Cloud would  enable the companies to store their data on IBM’s servers and access it  securely over the Internet.</p> <p>IBM’s sales pitch is focused on security and reliability, since the  tech behemoth will be allowing the companies to configure resources to  suit their own requirements for security, government compliance and  backup.</p> <p>According to IBM, the Smart Cloud will enable it to differentiate its  cloud services from the usage-based resources currently offered by its  rivals <strong>Amazon Inc. (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn' title='Amazon.com Inc.'>AMZN</a>)</strong><strong>, Microsoft Corp. (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='Microsoft Corp.'>MSFT</a>)</strong><strong> </strong>and <strong>Google Inc. (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='Google Inc.'>GOOG</a>)</strong>.  We tend to agree, since the services provided by these companies are  more</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:54:02 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Zacks.com</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://register.zacks.com/ucd/step1.php?ALERT=alpha&ADID=ALPHA_content_welcome">Zacks.com</a> submits: </strong>
<p>Information Technology giant, <strong>International Business Machines Corp. (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm' title='International Business Machines Corp.'>IBM</a>)</strong> is set to boost its cloud computing ambitions with the launch of its new computing service “Smart Cloud”.</p><p>Smart Cloud offers cost-effective data analysis, supply chain  management and sales management capabilities to big companies that incur  significant IT costs related to these operations. The Smart Cloud would  enable the companies to store their data on IBM’s servers and access it  securely over the Internet.</p> <p>IBM’s sales pitch is focused on security and reliability, since the  tech behemoth will be allowing the companies to configure resources to  suit their own requirements for security, government compliance and  backup.</p> <p>According to IBM, the Smart Cloud will enable it to differentiate its  cloud services from the usage-based resources currently offered by its  rivals <strong>Amazon Inc. (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn' title='Amazon.com Inc.'>AMZN</a>)</strong><strong>, Microsoft Corp. (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='Microsoft Corp.'>MSFT</a>)</strong><strong> </strong>and <strong>Google Inc. (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='Google Inc.'>GOOG</a>)</strong>.  We tend to agree, since the services provided by these companies are  more</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/262389-smart-cloud-to-boost-ibm-s-cloud?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ibm">IBM</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/zacks-com">Zacks.com</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hewlett-Packard: Low Exposure to Positive Economic Momentum</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/262319-hewlett-packard-low-exposure-to-positive-economic-momentum?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">262319</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>The next Dow Industrial member to pass through our quantitative modeling framework is Hewlett-Packard. Results of historical simulation suggest that Hewlett-Packard stock offers only a modest upside, even in the face of improving economic conditions. And the downside risks remain too large considering the existing alternatives.</p> <p>At BCMC, we specialize in quantitative economic modeling. One of the applications we have developed is a quantitative framework for assessing the influence of economic growth on financial assets. This modeling framework can be split into two major components:</p> <ol><li>Forecasting the U.S. business cycle using statistical models.</li>     <li>Simulating stock performance based on business cycle swings over the past 20 years. </li> </ol><p>We start by projecting economic outlook by means of statistical modeling to get an idea of where we are in the business cycle and what lies ahead of us. The main tool in our toolbox – <a href="http://www.bcmcenter.com/content/us-gdp-improving-even-sooner-expected" rel="nofollow"><em>U.S. Monthly GDP model</em></a> – suggests that economic</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 09:42:53 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>BCMC</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.bcmcenter.com/'>BCMC</a> submits:</strong>
<p>The next Dow Industrial member to pass through our quantitative modeling framework is Hewlett-Packard. Results of historical simulation suggest that Hewlett-Packard stock offers only a modest upside, even in the face of improving economic conditions. And the downside risks remain too large considering the existing alternatives.</p> <p>At BCMC, we specialize in quantitative economic modeling. One of the applications we have developed is a quantitative framework for assessing the influence of economic growth on financial assets. This modeling framework can be split into two major components:</p> <ol><li>Forecasting the U.S. business cycle using statistical models.</li>     <li>Simulating stock performance based on business cycle swings over the past 20 years. </li> </ol><p>We start by projecting economic outlook by means of statistical modeling to get an idea of where we are in the business cycle and what lies ahead of us. The main tool in our toolbox – <a href="http://www.bcmcenter.com/content/us-gdp-improving-even-sooner-expected" rel="nofollow"><em>U.S. Monthly GDP model</em></a> – suggests that economic</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/262319-hewlett-packard-low-exposure-to-positive-economic-momentum?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hpq">HPQ</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/bcmc">BCMC</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Are People Selling Apple? Just Look at the Chart</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/262243-why-are-people-selling-apple-just-look-at-the-chart?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">262243</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>When Rocco Pendola announced that <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/261486-why-i-m-selling-apple">he’s selling his stake in Apple</a> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>) – he noted that the stock has traded in a “frustrating range” this year. That may be true, but stocks often consolidate for weeks or months at a time, especially if they’ve enjoyed big runs to the upside.</p>        <p>But I think I know why people are selling Apple. Take a look at this weekly chart going back to late 2007 (click to enlarge): <br/><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2011/4/6/863379-130211029792527-Richard-Bloch_origin.png" rel="lightbox"/></p>    <p>The bars at the bottom show volume by price, in other words how much volume was traded at various price levels. Consider how many investors, whether individuals or institutions,<span> </span>bought the stock somewhere around $165.</p>      <p>If you were such an investor, your holdings doubled when Apple reached $330. That’s the magical level where you can sell half of your holdings and reduce your cost basis to zero. <span/></p>    <p>Some would even consider that foolish. Others might</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 05:05:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Richard Bloch</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/author/richard-bloch'>Richard Bloch</a> submits:</strong><p>When Rocco Pendola announced that <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/261486-why-i-m-selling-apple">he’s selling his stake in Apple</a> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>) – he noted that the stock has traded in a “frustrating range” this year. That may be true, but stocks often consolidate for weeks or months at a time, especially if they’ve enjoyed big runs to the upside.</p>        <p>But I think I know why people are selling Apple. Take a look at this weekly chart going back to late 2007 (click to enlarge): <br/><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2011/4/6/863379-130211029792527-Richard-Bloch_origin.png" rel="lightbox"/></p>    <p>The bars at the bottom show volume by price, in other words how much volume was traded at various price levels. Consider how many investors, whether individuals or institutions,<span> </span>bought the stock somewhere around $165.</p>      <p>If you were such an investor, your holdings doubled when Apple reached $330. That’s the magical level where you can sell half of your holdings and reduce your cost basis to zero. <span/></p>    <p>Some would even consider that foolish. Others might</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/262243-why-are-people-selling-apple-just-look-at-the-chart?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/richard-bloch">Richard Bloch</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>iPad's Outlook Encouraging but Impact on Stock Limited</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/262199-ipad-s-outlook-encouraging-but-impact-on-stock-limited?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">262199</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Apple’s (NASDAQ:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>) iPad 2 is off to a great start, building on momentum from the original version launched in April 2010. Apple recorded iPad 2 unit sales of close to 1 million in the very first week. Comparatively, it took the original version 28 days to hit that mark.<sup> [<a href="#footnote_0_47065" rel="nofollow">1</a>]</sup> Although these figures are highly encouraging, the iPad 2 will have tough competition from other products like Research in Motion’s (NASDAQ:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rimm' title='Research In Motion Ltd.'>RIMM</a>) PlayBook, as well as Samsung’s Galaxy tablet, Motorola Mobility’s (NYSE:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mmi' title='Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc.'>MMI</a>) Xoom, and Dell's (NASDAQ:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dell' title='Dell Inc.'>DELL</a>) Streak – all of which are based on Google’s (NASDAQ:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='Google Inc.'>GOOG</a>) Android OS.</p> <p>
  <span>Amid the excitement and competition for the iPad, it’s interesting to note that the iPad represents only 7% of Apple’s stock value by our analysis. Hence any sudden surge in iPad unit sales actually has a limited impact on Apple’s stock value.</span>
</p> <p>While we anticipate that Apple’s iPad 2 unit sales will cross</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 16:16:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Trefis</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.trefis.com/splash?to=/'>Trefis</a> submits: </strong>
<p>Apple’s (NASDAQ:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>) iPad 2 is off to a great start, building on momentum from the original version launched in April 2010. Apple recorded iPad 2 unit sales of close to 1 million in the very first week. Comparatively, it took the original version 28 days to hit that mark.<sup> [<a href="#footnote_0_47065" rel="nofollow">1</a>]</sup> Although these figures are highly encouraging, the iPad 2 will have tough competition from other products like Research in Motion’s (NASDAQ:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rimm' title='Research In Motion Ltd.'>RIMM</a>) PlayBook, as well as Samsung’s Galaxy tablet, Motorola Mobility’s (NYSE:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mmi' title='Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc.'>MMI</a>) Xoom, and Dell's (NASDAQ:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dell' title='Dell Inc.'>DELL</a>) Streak – all of which are based on Google’s (NASDAQ:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='Google Inc.'>GOOG</a>) Android OS.</p> <p>
  <span>Amid the excitement and competition for the iPad, it’s interesting to note that the iPad represents only 7% of Apple’s stock value by our analysis. Hence any sudden surge in iPad unit sales actually has a limited impact on Apple’s stock value.</span>
</p> <p>While we anticipate that Apple’s iPad 2 unit sales will cross</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/262199-ipad-s-outlook-encouraging-but-impact-on-stock-limited?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/trefis">Trefis</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dell's Silicon Valley Move Unlikely to Benefit Bottom Line</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/262143-dell-s-silicon-valley-move-unlikely-to-benefit-bottom-line?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">262143</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>The morning paper <a href="http://www.siliconvalley.com/ci_17775868" rel="nofollow">reports</a>  that Dell (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dell' title='Dell Inc.'>DELL</a>) is the latest major IT company to be lured by the sirens of  Silicon Valley. I suspect it won’t be much more successful than any of  its predecessors.</p><p>The Merc leveraged <a href="http://content.dell.com/us/en/corp/d/press-releases/2011-04-05-silicon-valley-research-center.aspx" rel="nofollow">Dell’s Tuesday press release</a> to extend <a href="http://www.siliconvalley.com/sv2020/ci_17744376" rel="nofollow">its report last week </a>that the company was leasing 240,000 square feet  in Santa Clara, and had 341 open jobs posted in the Bay Area.</p><p>The Dell news release summarized the decision:</p><blockquote class="quote">
  <p>Dell today announced plans to open the Dell Silicon  Valley Research and Development Center, a new facility that will support  Dell’s strategic expansion of solutions capabilities, including the  areas of networking design and development, storage development and  cloud computing. The new site complements Dell’s Israel Research and  Development Center, announced last month in Ra’anana. Dell believes that  with recruitment of additional staff, its workforce at the Silicon  Valley site will grow to more than</p></blockquote>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 13:25:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Joel West</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://blog.openitstrategies.com/'>Joel West</a> submits: </strong><p>The morning paper <a href="http://www.siliconvalley.com/ci_17775868" rel="nofollow">reports</a>  that Dell (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dell' title='Dell Inc.'>DELL</a>) is the latest major IT company to be lured by the sirens of  Silicon Valley. I suspect it won’t be much more successful than any of  its predecessors.</p><p>The Merc leveraged <a href="http://content.dell.com/us/en/corp/d/press-releases/2011-04-05-silicon-valley-research-center.aspx" rel="nofollow">Dell’s Tuesday press release</a> to extend <a href="http://www.siliconvalley.com/sv2020/ci_17744376" rel="nofollow">its report last week </a>that the company was leasing 240,000 square feet  in Santa Clara, and had 341 open jobs posted in the Bay Area.</p><p>The Dell news release summarized the decision:</p><blockquote class="quote">
  <p>Dell today announced plans to open the Dell Silicon  Valley Research and Development Center, a new facility that will support  Dell’s strategic expansion of solutions capabilities, including the  areas of networking design and development, storage development and  cloud computing. The new site complements Dell’s Israel Research and  Development Center, announced last month in Ra’anana. Dell believes that  with recruitment of additional staff, its workforce at the Silicon  Valley site will grow to more than</p></blockquote><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/262143-dell-s-silicon-valley-move-unlikely-to-benefit-bottom-line?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dell">DELL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/joel-west">Joel West</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5 Bargain Tech Stocks to Buy Now</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/262128-5-bargain-tech-stocks-to-buy-now?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">262128</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div>Tech stocks provide some of the best values in the stock market today.  Many of them have huge cash hoards on their balance sheets, pay dividends, offer growth, and have PE ratios well below the market average.  The market is giving us a great opportunity to buy tech stocks cheap right now, while many other sectors are overbought.  These stocks are likely to provide strong returns for investors as our economy and lives continue to become ever more dependent on technology.</div><div>Also, if we see a market correction, I expect that these tech stock bargains will outperform, when compared to high PE stocks.  It's best to buy stocks when they are out of favor and sell when everyone loves them.  That's why I am selling energy and buying tech.  You can read why I am selling some oil stocks in this <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/261985-why-i-m-selling-oil-stocks">article</a>. Look at some of the valuations and PE</div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 12:41:32 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Rougemont</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/author/rougemont'>Rougemont</a> submits: </strong><div>Tech stocks provide some of the best values in the stock market today.  Many of them have huge cash hoards on their balance sheets, pay dividends, offer growth, and have PE ratios well below the market average.  The market is giving us a great opportunity to buy tech stocks cheap right now, while many other sectors are overbought.  These stocks are likely to provide strong returns for investors as our economy and lives continue to become ever more dependent on technology.</div><div>Also, if we see a market correction, I expect that these tech stock bargains will outperform, when compared to high PE stocks.  It's best to buy stocks when they are out of favor and sell when everyone loves them.  That's why I am selling energy and buying tech.  You can read why I am selling some oil stocks in this <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/261985-why-i-m-selling-oil-stocks">article</a>. Look at some of the valuations and PE</div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/262128-5-bargain-tech-stocks-to-buy-now?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hpq">HPQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/intc">INTC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/glw">GLW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lxk">LXK</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/rougemont">Rougemont</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nasdaq Changes Impact Apple, Microsoft, Oracle, Cisco and Google</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/261929-nasdaq-changes-impact-apple-microsoft-oracle-cisco-and-google?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">261929</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>For those considering Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>) as a winner and for those watching Cisco (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/csco' title='Cisco Systems Inc.'>CSCO</a>) as a possible recovery story, the announcement by Nasdaq that it's reformulating the weighting for the Nasdaq 100 has at least short-term performance significance.</p><p>The AAPL weight will be cut by about 40%, creating selling pressure. The weights for Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='Microsoft Corp.'>MSFT</a>) and Oracle (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl' title='Oracle Corp.'>ORCL</a>) will approximately double, creating buying pressure.  The weights for Intel (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/intc' title='Intel Corp.'>INTC</a>) and CSCO will more than double, creating buying pressure, and the weight for Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='Google Inc.'>GOOG</a>) will go up about 40%, creating buying pressure.</p><p>[Click all to enlarge]<br/><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2011/4/5/377194-130201209967282-Richard-Shaw_origin.png" rel="lightbox"/><br/> All index funds tracking the Nasdaq 100 (proxy <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqq' title='PowerShares QQQ Trust ETF'>QQQ</a>) will be required to rebalance as of May 2, creating a lot of trading activity around that time.<br/><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2011/4/5/377194-130201212696122-Richard-Shaw_origin.jpg" rel="lightbox"/><br/> For those of you holding AAPL, expect some short-term price turbulence due to Nasdaq reweighting.  The stock has taken some lumps recently, and the weight change won't</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:19:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Richard Shaw</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/rshaw2sm.jpg' title='richard shaw' alt='richard shaw' width="70" height="92" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong>Richard Shaw (<a href="http://www.qvmgroup.com/">QVM Group</a>) submits: </strong><p>For those considering Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>) as a winner and for those watching Cisco (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/csco' title='Cisco Systems Inc.'>CSCO</a>) as a possible recovery story, the announcement by Nasdaq that it's reformulating the weighting for the Nasdaq 100 has at least short-term performance significance.</p><p>The AAPL weight will be cut by about 40%, creating selling pressure. The weights for Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='Microsoft Corp.'>MSFT</a>) and Oracle (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl' title='Oracle Corp.'>ORCL</a>) will approximately double, creating buying pressure.  The weights for Intel (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/intc' title='Intel Corp.'>INTC</a>) and CSCO will more than double, creating buying pressure, and the weight for Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='Google Inc.'>GOOG</a>) will go up about 40%, creating buying pressure.</p><p>[Click all to enlarge]<br/><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2011/4/5/377194-130201209967282-Richard-Shaw_origin.png" rel="lightbox"/><br/> All index funds tracking the Nasdaq 100 (proxy <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqq' title='PowerShares QQQ Trust ETF'>QQQ</a>) will be required to rebalance as of May 2, creating a lot of trading activity around that time.<br/><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2011/4/5/377194-130201212696122-Richard-Shaw_origin.jpg" rel="lightbox"/><br/> For those of you holding AAPL, expect some short-term price turbulence due to Nasdaq reweighting.  The stock has taken some lumps recently, and the weight change won't</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/261929-nasdaq-changes-impact-apple-microsoft-oracle-cisco-and-google?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqq">QQQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/orcl">ORCL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/intc">INTC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/richard-shaw">Richard Shaw</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to Outperform the Nasdaq 100 With Apple</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/261920-how-to-outperform-the-nasdaq-100-with-apple?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">261920</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://dynamic.nasdaq.com/dynamic/nasdaq100_activity.stm" rel="nofollow">Nasdaq 100</a> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqq' title='PowerShares QQQ Trust ETF'>QQQ</a>) <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704587004576243231566493842.html" rel="nofollow">announced</a> this morning that effective May 2, Apple's (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>) weighting in the widely followed tech index will decline significantly. Specifically, Apple’s weight will decline eight percent, from over 20% to nearly to 12%. Due in part to Apple's recent success, the index was weighting the company twice as highly as it should have on a per-share basis. It appears that the “<a href="http://seekingalpha.com/news-article/872173-the-nasdaq-100-index-to-undergo-a-special-rebalance">special rebalance</a>” is necessary because Apple was pushing against the index’s <a href="https://indexes.nasdaqomx.com/docs/NDXSpecialRebalanceFAQ.pdf" rel="nofollow">rule</a> that “any individual component security [cannot] represent more than 24% of the total market value of the index.”</p><p>Effectively Apple is being punished for being a well-managed high performer while Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='Microsoft Corp.'>MSFT</a>), Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='Google Inc.'>GOOG</a>), and others are being rewarded for lagging. While I understand the benefits of periodic rebalancing, I like to be in control and not be forced to sell great stocks to buy perpetual underperformers, especially in the same industry. I</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 12:55:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Paul Zimbardo</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://dynamic.nasdaq.com/dynamic/nasdaq100_activity.stm" rel="nofollow">Nasdaq 100</a> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqq' title='PowerShares QQQ Trust ETF'>QQQ</a>) <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704587004576243231566493842.html" rel="nofollow">announced</a> this morning that effective May 2, Apple's (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>) weighting in the widely followed tech index will decline significantly. Specifically, Apple’s weight will decline eight percent, from over 20% to nearly to 12%. Due in part to Apple's recent success, the index was weighting the company twice as highly as it should have on a per-share basis. It appears that the “<a href="http://seekingalpha.com/news-article/872173-the-nasdaq-100-index-to-undergo-a-special-rebalance">special rebalance</a>” is necessary because Apple was pushing against the index’s <a href="https://indexes.nasdaqomx.com/docs/NDXSpecialRebalanceFAQ.pdf" rel="nofollow">rule</a> that “any individual component security [cannot] represent more than 24% of the total market value of the index.”</p><p>Effectively Apple is being punished for being a well-managed high performer while Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='Microsoft Corp.'>MSFT</a>), Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='Google Inc.'>GOOG</a>), and others are being rewarded for lagging. While I understand the benefits of periodic rebalancing, I like to be in control and not be forced to sell great stocks to buy perpetual underperformers, especially in the same industry. I</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/261920-how-to-outperform-the-nasdaq-100-with-apple?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqq">QQQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/paul-zimbardo">Paul Zimbardo</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EMC Bolsters Security Portfolio With NetWitness</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/261870-emc-bolsters-security-portfolio-with-netwitness?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">261870</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>
  <em>By Brenon Daly</em>
</p><p>Announcing its first deal in almost five months, <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/emc' title='EMC Corp.'>EMC</a> moved to bolster  its security management portfolio by picking up fast-growing  NetWitness. The purchase adds the rich network data and powerful  analysis capabilities of the NetWitness NextGen platform, which is a bit  like a TiVo for network traffic – capturing, indexing and storing  massive amounts of network traffic. From a financial point of view, it  is EMC’s first significant security acquisition since buying RSA  Security in mid-2006.</p> <p>In fact, we would estimate that the price of NetWitness tops</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 09:41:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>The 451 Group: Inorganic Growth</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://blogs.the451group.com/techdeals/'>The 451 Group: Inorganic Growth</a> submits: </strong><p>
  <em>By Brenon Daly</em>
</p><p>Announcing its first deal in almost five months, <a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/emc' title='EMC Corp.'>EMC</a> moved to bolster  its security management portfolio by picking up fast-growing  NetWitness. The purchase adds the rich network data and powerful  analysis capabilities of the NetWitness NextGen platform, which is a bit  like a TiVo for network traffic – capturing, indexing and storing  massive amounts of network traffic. From a financial point of view, it  is EMC’s first significant security acquisition since buying RSA  Security in mid-2006.</p> <p>In fact, we would estimate that the price of NetWitness tops</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/261870-emc-bolsters-security-portfolio-with-netwitness?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/emc">EMC</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/the-451-group-inorganic-growth">The 451 Group: Inorganic Growth</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Do 7-Inch Tablets Stand a Chance?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/261700-do-7-inch-tablets-stand-a-chance?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">261700</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>A few months back, Apple’s (NASDAQ:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>) Steve Jobs called competitors’ 7-inch tablets “Dead on Arrival.”<sup> [<a href="#footnote_0_47371" rel="nofollow">1</a>]</sup> Naturally, tablet manufacturers are a bit more optimistic.<sup> [<a href="#footnote_1_47371" rel="nofollow">2</a>]</sup> So who is right? Here we take a look a closer look at Jobs’ case. Challengers to Apple’s market share in the tablet space include Research in Motion (NASDAQ:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rimm' title='Research In Motion Ltd.'>RIMM</a>), Motorola Mobility (NYSE:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mmi' title='Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc.'>MMI</a>), Samsung, Dell (NASDAQ:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dell' title='Dell Inc.'>DELL</a>) and LG.</p> <p>
  <span/>
</p> <p>We maintain a <a href="https://www.trefis.com/company?hm=AAPL.trefis" rel="nofollow">$420 price estimate for Apple stock</a>, which is about 20% above market price.</p> <p>
  <strong>A Look at Steve Jobs’ Comments</strong>
</p> <p>Steve Jobs took a shot at the usability of the 7-inch tablets, claiming that tablets should have a 10-inch screen at a minimum. Apple has performed extensive user-testing, he noted, to reach these conclusions.</p> <p>According to Jobs:</p> <blockquote class="quote">
  <p>
    <em>“One naturally thinks that a seven-inch screen would offer 70% of the benefits of a 10-inch screen. Unfortunately, this is far from the truth. The screen measurements are diagonal,</em></p></blockquote>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:36:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Trefis</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.trefis.com/splash?to=/'>Trefis</a> submits: </strong>
<p>A few months back, Apple’s (NASDAQ:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>) Steve Jobs called competitors’ 7-inch tablets “Dead on Arrival.”<sup> [<a href="#footnote_0_47371" rel="nofollow">1</a>]</sup> Naturally, tablet manufacturers are a bit more optimistic.<sup> [<a href="#footnote_1_47371" rel="nofollow">2</a>]</sup> So who is right? Here we take a look a closer look at Jobs’ case. Challengers to Apple’s market share in the tablet space include Research in Motion (NASDAQ:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rimm' title='Research In Motion Ltd.'>RIMM</a>), Motorola Mobility (NYSE:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mmi' title='Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc.'>MMI</a>), Samsung, Dell (NASDAQ:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dell' title='Dell Inc.'>DELL</a>) and LG.</p> <p>
  <span/>
</p> <p>We maintain a <a href="https://www.trefis.com/company?hm=AAPL.trefis" rel="nofollow">$420 price estimate for Apple stock</a>, which is about 20% above market price.</p> <p>
  <strong>A Look at Steve Jobs’ Comments</strong>
</p> <p>Steve Jobs took a shot at the usability of the 7-inch tablets, claiming that tablets should have a 10-inch screen at a minimum. Apple has performed extensive user-testing, he noted, to reach these conclusions.</p> <p>According to Jobs:</p> <blockquote class="quote">
  <p>
    <em>“One naturally thinks that a seven-inch screen would offer 70% of the benefits of a 10-inch screen. Unfortunately, this is far from the truth. The screen measurements are diagonal,</em></p></blockquote><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/261700-do-7-inch-tablets-stand-a-chance?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rimm">RIMM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mmi">MMI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dell">DELL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/trefis">Trefis</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Waiting to Buy an iPad? Buy Apple Stock Instead</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/261647-waiting-to-buy-an-ipad-buy-apple-stock-instead?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">261647</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>This is the tenth article in a series on Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>) option strategy. Apple is a unique company due its combination of size ($315B), earnings growth rate (75%), and volatility (1.4β). This presents an exceptional opportunity for investors to capitalize on both its long-term capital gain prospects and short-term option premiums. For reference, please view the <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/248194-want-an-apple-dividend-create-your-own">first</a> and <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/author/paul-zimbardo/articles/symbol/aapl">other articles</a> in the series to fully understand the strategy and its strong potential returns.</p> <p>A brief recap of this week in Apple [Down $8.59 (-2.4%)]:</p>  <p>
  <font size="3"> </font>
</p> <ul type="disc"><li>Potential Apple Battery Delays (Mar. 28 <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704471904576228390400576486.html" rel="nofollow"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a>)</li>     <li>iPhone 5 May Not Launch Until Fall (Mar. 28 <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/11/03/28/apple_not_yet_aligning_iphone_5_part_suppliers_handset_may_miss_fiscal_2011.html" rel="nofollow"><em>Apple Insider</em></a>)</li>     <li>Apple WWDC Scheduled for June 6 (Mar. 28 <a href="http://developer.apple.com/wwdc/" rel="nofollow">Apple</a>)</li>     <li>Amazon Launches Cloud Drive (Mar. 30 <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/31/technology/personaltech/31pogue.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=all" rel="nofollow"><em>New York Time</em>s</a>)</li>     <li>Apple Accepting Higher Costs to Secure iPad Components (Mar. 31 <a href="http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-strengthens-supply-chain-to-handle-strong-ipad-2-demand" rel="nofollow"><em>Gigaom</em></a>)</li> </ul><p><br/>This week in Apple stands in contrast to the past few because there was minimal real news</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 10:19:39 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Paul Zimbardo</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This is the tenth article in a series on Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>) option strategy. Apple is a unique company due its combination of size ($315B), earnings growth rate (75%), and volatility (1.4β). This presents an exceptional opportunity for investors to capitalize on both its long-term capital gain prospects and short-term option premiums. For reference, please view the <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/248194-want-an-apple-dividend-create-your-own">first</a> and <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/author/paul-zimbardo/articles/symbol/aapl">other articles</a> in the series to fully understand the strategy and its strong potential returns.</p> <p>A brief recap of this week in Apple [Down $8.59 (-2.4%)]:</p>  <p>
  <font size="3"> </font>
</p> <ul type="disc"><li>Potential Apple Battery Delays (Mar. 28 <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704471904576228390400576486.html" rel="nofollow"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a>)</li>     <li>iPhone 5 May Not Launch Until Fall (Mar. 28 <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/11/03/28/apple_not_yet_aligning_iphone_5_part_suppliers_handset_may_miss_fiscal_2011.html" rel="nofollow"><em>Apple Insider</em></a>)</li>     <li>Apple WWDC Scheduled for June 6 (Mar. 28 <a href="http://developer.apple.com/wwdc/" rel="nofollow">Apple</a>)</li>     <li>Amazon Launches Cloud Drive (Mar. 30 <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/31/technology/personaltech/31pogue.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=all" rel="nofollow"><em>New York Time</em>s</a>)</li>     <li>Apple Accepting Higher Costs to Secure iPad Components (Mar. 31 <a href="http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-strengthens-supply-chain-to-handle-strong-ipad-2-demand" rel="nofollow"><em>Gigaom</em></a>)</li> </ul><p><br/>This week in Apple stands in contrast to the past few because there was minimal real news</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/261647-waiting-to-buy-an-ipad-buy-apple-stock-instead?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/paul-zimbardo">Paul Zimbardo</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why I'm Selling Apple </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/261486-why-i-m-selling-apple?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">261486</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>I don't own a massive amount of Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>), but I am going to sell what I do hold. Shares of America's favorite company have traded in a frustrating range this year. I fully realize how my use of the word "frustrating" should serve as a red flag vis-a-vis my decision to sell. I've thought about it long and hard, however, and I know that I assume the risk of missing the run to $400 and beyond.</p>  <p>AAPL closed at $344.56 on Friday in a week that saw it range from a low of $343.30 to a high of $354.32. While I hardly view the stock as a</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 04:18:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Rocco Pendola</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/author/rocco-pendola'>Rocco Pendola</a> submits:</strong><p>I don't own a massive amount of Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>), but I am going to sell what I do hold. Shares of America's favorite company have traded in a frustrating range this year. I fully realize how my use of the word "frustrating" should serve as a red flag vis-a-vis my decision to sell. I've thought about it long and hard, however, and I know that I assume the risk of missing the run to $400 and beyond.</p>  <p>AAPL closed at $344.56 on Friday in a week that saw it range from a low of $343.30 to a high of $354.32. While I hardly view the stock as a</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/261486-why-i-m-selling-apple?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/rocco-pendola">Rocco Pendola</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>14 Tech Companies With 1+% Dividend Yields, Low Debt, And Attractive Valuations</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/261488-14-tech-companies-with-1-dividend-yields-low-debt-and-attractive-valuations?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">261488</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Using the Screener.co <a href="https://screener.co" rel="nofollow">stock screener</a>, and configuring the Markets to only include U.S. traded companies (NASDAQ, American Stock Exchange, New York Stock Exchange, and Over the Counter), we are able to construct a screen for dividend-paying technology companies that meet the following criteria:</p><table border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="480">
  <tr><td width="248"><div><b>Field</b></div></td>   <td width="36"><div><b>op</b></div></td>   <td width="228"><div><b>Criteria</b></div></td>  </tr>
  <tr><td width="248"><div>Sector</div></td>   <td width="36"><div>=</div></td>   <td width="228"><div>"Technology"</div></td>  </tr>
  <tr><td width="248"><div>Current   Dividend Yield-Common Stock Primary Issue-LTM</div></td>   <td width="36"><div>&gt;</div></td>   <td width="228"><div>0.01</div></td>  </tr>
  <tr><td width="248"><div>Current   year dividend per share estimate</div></td>   <td width="36"><div>&lt;</div></td>   <td width="228"><div>Current   year consensus EPS estimate</div></td>  </tr>
  <tr><td width="248"><div>Current   EV/EBITDA</div></td>   <td width="36"><div>&lt;=</div></td>   <td width="228"><div>7</div></td>  </tr>
  <tr><td width="248"><div>Total   Debt&#40;I&#41;</div></td>   <td width="36"><div>&lt;</div></td>   <td width="228"><div>2   * EBITDA&#40;A&#41;</div></td></tr>
</table><p><br/>In addition to the conditions mentioned in the article title, we also require that forward EPS &gt; DPS.  When looking for operating companies that pay dividends, I tend to avoid firms that have dividends greater than their earnings.  Another way to look at this would be to require DPS &lt; operating cash flow per share; in both cases, the objective is to exclude companies whose dividend payments may not be sustainable.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 04:08:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Screener.co</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://screener.co/'>Screener.co</a> submits:</strong><p>Using the Screener.co <a href="https://screener.co" rel="nofollow">stock screener</a>, and configuring the Markets to only include U.S. traded companies (NASDAQ, American Stock Exchange, New York Stock Exchange, and Over the Counter), we are able to construct a screen for dividend-paying technology companies that meet the following criteria:</p><table border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="480">
  <tr><td width="248"><div><b>Field</b></div></td>   <td width="36"><div><b>op</b></div></td>   <td width="228"><div><b>Criteria</b></div></td>  </tr>
  <tr><td width="248"><div>Sector</div></td>   <td width="36"><div>=</div></td>   <td width="228"><div>"Technology"</div></td>  </tr>
  <tr><td width="248"><div>Current   Dividend Yield-Common Stock Primary Issue-LTM</div></td>   <td width="36"><div>&gt;</div></td>   <td width="228"><div>0.01</div></td>  </tr>
  <tr><td width="248"><div>Current   year dividend per share estimate</div></td>   <td width="36"><div>&lt;</div></td>   <td width="228"><div>Current   year consensus EPS estimate</div></td>  </tr>
  <tr><td width="248"><div>Current   EV/EBITDA</div></td>   <td width="36"><div>&lt;=</div></td>   <td width="228"><div>7</div></td>  </tr>
  <tr><td width="248"><div>Total   Debt&#40;I&#41;</div></td>   <td width="36"><div>&lt;</div></td>   <td width="228"><div>2   * EBITDA&#40;A&#41;</div></td></tr>
</table><p><br/>In addition to the conditions mentioned in the article title, we also require that forward EPS &gt; DPS.  When looking for operating companies that pay dividends, I tend to avoid firms that have dividends greater than their earnings.  Another way to look at this would be to require DPS &lt; operating cash flow per share; in both cases, the objective is to exclude companies whose dividend payments may not be sustainable.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/261488-14-tech-companies-with-1-dividend-yields-low-debt-and-attractive-valuations?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/csc">CSC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lps">LPS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/intc">INTC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hrs">HRS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/avx">AVX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nok">NOK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/txn">TXN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/kyo">KYO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/stm">STM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jbl">JBL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/caj">CAJ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/molx">MOLX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lnvgy.pk">LNVGY.PK</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/screener-co">Screener.co</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>An Eye on Investing in the Era of Mass Computing</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/261396-an-eye-on-investing-in-the-era-of-mass-computing?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">261396</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div>There is a new technology infrastructure under construction with significant implications for companies and technology users. In 1999, in the midst of the “dot.com boom” there were less than 100 million IP addresses. We are entering a stage of mass adoption of technology in which the dot.com adoption pales in comparison. Hundreds of millions of IP addresses are now being added each year. Those who understand the depth and breadth of the implications of this accelerated adoption of computing technology will stand to benefit from yet another technology disruption.</div> <div>The investing advantage often goes to those who know where to look. Technology-disruption today is very likely to happen in areas where mass adoption creates new demands, areas like specialty silicon (endpoint processors and touchscreens), infrastructure 2.0 networks, virtualization and cloud (IT automation and optimization) and wholesale <a href="http://www.vantagedatacenters.com/" rel="nofollow">data centers</a> (the mass computing era wheelhouses) are all worth reviewing.</div> <div>My apologies for</div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 13:40:28 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Gregory Ness</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.bluelane.com/'>Gregory Ness</a> submits:</strong><div>There is a new technology infrastructure under construction with significant implications for companies and technology users. In 1999, in the midst of the “dot.com boom” there were less than 100 million IP addresses. We are entering a stage of mass adoption of technology in which the dot.com adoption pales in comparison. Hundreds of millions of IP addresses are now being added each year. Those who understand the depth and breadth of the implications of this accelerated adoption of computing technology will stand to benefit from yet another technology disruption.</div> <div>The investing advantage often goes to those who know where to look. Technology-disruption today is very likely to happen in areas where mass adoption creates new demands, areas like specialty silicon (endpoint processors and touchscreens), infrastructure 2.0 networks, virtualization and cloud (IT automation and optimization) and wholesale <a href="http://www.vantagedatacenters.com/" rel="nofollow">data centers</a> (the mass computing era wheelhouses) are all worth reviewing.</div> <div>My apologies for</div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/261396-an-eye-on-investing-in-the-era-of-mass-computing?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cy">CY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/atml">ATML</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/csco">CSCO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ffiv">FFIV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jnpr">JNPR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rvbd">RVBD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hpq">HPQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/intc">INTC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vmw">VMW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ctxs">CTXS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dlr">DLR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cor">COR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dft">DFT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/gregory-ness">Gregory Ness</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
