<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>HDTV Magazine – Articles</title>
        <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com</link>
        <description>HDTV Magazine – Articles</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 06:50:20 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <docs>https://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/rss2.html</docs>
        <generator>https://github.com/jpmonette/feed</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>© 2026 HDTV Magazine</copyright>
        <atom:link href="https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/feeds/sections/articles.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Living with 4K - Bought an UHDTV? wait, is it Upgradeable?]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2014/02/living-with-4k-bought-an-uhdtv-wait-is-it-upgradeable/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2014/02/living-with-4k-bought-an-uhdtv-wait-is-it-upgradeable/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 06:50:20 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Early UHDTV adopters face potential obsolescence as the ITU Rec. 2020 standard introduces features beyond 4K pixel resolution, including 10/12-bit color depth, 4:2:2 and 4:4:4 chroma subsampling, HDCP 2.2 content protection, and HDMI 2.0 support for 4K at 60fps - capabilities many current displays cannot handle. Most manufacturers offer no upgrade path, while Samsung's replaceable connectivity box and Sony's in-home hardware upgrades for models like the $25,000 VW-1000 projector represent notable exceptions. Buyers should carefully evaluate upgrade commitments before purchasing, as connectivity gaps similar to the HDTV-to-HDMI transition of 1998-2003 could strand millions of early adopters again.]]></description>
            <category>Home Theater</category>
            <category>HDMI</category>
            <category>Standards</category>
            <category>4K Ultra HD</category>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Living with 4K - Nuvola 4K Player NP-1]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2014/02/living-with-4k-nuvola-4k-player-np-1/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2014/02/living-with-4k-nuvola-4k-player-np-1/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 20:45:50 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[The Nuvola NP-1 is a $299 4K media player powered by an NVIDIA Tegra 4 quad-core processor with 72 GPU cores, running Android 4.2 and featuring a single HDMI 1.4 output limited to 4:2:0 chroma subsampling at 8-bit depth and 24/30 fps. It supports H.264-based 4K streaming and local playback via USB 3.0 storage, with H.265/HEVC support promised via firmware update, but its single-HDMI design forces buyers to use an HDMI splitter or sacrifice multichannel audio. Compared to Sony's $699 FMP-X1, the NP-1 offers broader TV compatibility and lower cost, though its video and audio connectivity limitations have real consequences for home theater installations.]]></description>
            <category>Home Theater</category>
            <category>4K Ultra HD</category>
            <category>HDMI</category>
            <category>Standards</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/291/hero.png" length="0" type="image/png"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Kaleidescape Cinema One - Review]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2014/02/kaleidescape-cinema-one-review/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2014/02/kaleidescape-cinema-one-review/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 20:30:14 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[The Kaleidescape Cinema One is a 4TB media server priced at $3,995, capable of storing up to 100 Blu-ray-quality or 600 DVD-quality movies, with bitstream pass-through of Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD Master Audio over HDMI. Testing against an Oppo reference player in a high-end home theater revealed that a default-enabled detail enhancement setting degraded image quality when used alongside a Darblet video processor, and AACS licensing requires the physical Blu-ray disc to be present during playback of imported titles unless a $3,995 DV700 vault is added. Factoring in hardware amortization, per-movie cost-of-ownership for Blu-ray collectors ranges from roughly $60 to $105 depending on system configuration, making the value proposition heavily dependent on collection size and usage pattern.]]></description>
            <category>Home Theater</category>
            <category>Blu-ray</category>
            <category>HD Media Centers</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/293/hero.png" length="0" type="image/png"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Living with 4K - Here is the 4K Content]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2013/03/living-with-4k-here-is-the-4k-content/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2013/03/living-with-4k-here-is-the-4k-content/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 07:25:23 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Sony's 4K demo server for projector owners is an HP-based system delivering up to 2 hours of 4K content, including the 48-minute TimeScapes nature film, connected via hi-speed HDMI with only stereo or Dolby 5.1 audio tracks via Toslink. Content is encoded at 8-bit, 4:2:0, Rec-709 color space at 24fps, the same baseline as Blu-ray, leaving the full potential of 4K unrealized in many clips. Viewers evaluating on a 130-inch Stewart Firehawk screen found that well-shot material like the Rocky Mountain Express clips delivered a convincing sense of realism, but inconsistent lighting and compression in other clips made some 4K content indistinguishable from 1080p Blu-ray.]]></description>
            <category>Home Theater</category>
            <category>Projection HD</category>
            <category>Calibration</category>
            <category>4K Ultra HD</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/290/hero.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[HDTV Adoption - Not as High in Number of HDTV Sets]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2013/02/hdtv-adoption-not-as-high-in-number-of-hdtv-sets/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2013/02/hdtv-adoption-not-as-high-in-number-of-hdtv-sets/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 07:40:48 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[CEA data shows 244 million DTVs shipped since 1998, representing 68% penetration of the estimated 357 million TV sets in U.S. households (119 million households at 3 TVs each), yet Leichtman Research Group survey data extrapolates to as many as 198 million analog TVs still in use, or 55% of all sets. The gap between household-level adoption figures (CEA's 68-88%) and actual TV-set-level penetration reveals a more sobering picture of the DTV transition. At the current shipping rate of roughly 33 million DTVs per year, full analog replacement could take 4 to 6 additional years, excluding sets that replace already-digital units.]]></description>
            <category>DTV Transition</category>
            <category>Market Trends &amp; Analysis</category>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[3DTV is Not Dead, It's Just Facing Reality Beyond the Hype]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2013/02/3dtv-is-not-dead-it-s-just-facing-reality-beyond-the-hype/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2013/02/3dtv-is-not-dead-it-s-just-facing-reality-beyond-the-hype/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 07:48:40 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[The ATSC A/104 Service Compatible Hybrid Coding (SCHC) standard, approved December 2012, defines a 3DTV broadcast framework using MPEG-2 for the base view and AVC/H.264 for the additional view within a single 6MHz terrestrial channel. Europe's Sisvel Technology offers a competing approach via its 3DZ Tile Format, which encodes dual 1280x720p eye images plus a depth map within a single 1920x1080 MPEG-4 frame, leaving roughly 230,400 pixels for auto-stereoscopic data. Both systems prioritize backward compatibility with legacy HDTVs, meaning viewers can receive 3D broadcasts on existing sets without a channel change, though a firmware or hardware update to MPEG-4 set-top-boxes is required for full 3D decoding.]]></description>
            <category>Standards</category>
            <category>3DTV</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/286/clip_image014_3.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Living with 4K - Blu-ray Association Evaluating Adding 4K - How to see 4K now]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2013/02/living-with-4k-blu-ray-association-evaluating-adding-4k-how-to-see-4k-now/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2013/02/living-with-4k-blu-ray-association-evaluating-adding-4k-how-to-see-4k-now/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:10:02 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[The Blu-ray Disc Association has formed a 'format extension study task force' to evaluate adding 4K, high frame rate, and other technologies to the Blu-ray specification, assessing technical feasibility, market demand, and backward compatibility with existing players. Meanwhile, Sony is demonstrating native 4K content recorded with its F65 camera on dedicated servers, viewable on its $25,000 4K ES projector, with the author noting a perceptible quality difference over upscaled 1080p Blu-ray even at 15 feet on a 10-foot wide Cinemascope screen. For collectors, the prospect of 4K discs - potentially supporting DCI 4K or UHDTV color specs beyond the current 8-bit, 4:2:0, Rec. 709 standard - represents a meaningful upgrade worth watching.]]></description>
            <category>Blu-ray</category>
            <category>4K Ultra HD</category>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Living with 4K - No disc? The end of Collecting Movies?]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2013/01/living-with-4k-no-disc-the-end-of-collecting-movies/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2013/01/living-with-4k-no-disc-the-end-of-collecting-movies/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 07:47:20 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[With Red's Redray player ($1,450 MSRP) and Sony's mid-2013 4K media server both relying on download-and-store delivery rather than physical disc formats, the 4K content landscape is shaping up to bypass pre-recorded media entirely. The Blu-ray Association has stated it is not working on a 4K disc standard, echoing the 8-year gap between 1080i HDTV's 1998 debut and Blu-ray's 2006 introduction. For collectors accustomed to owning lossless-quality physical media with full language tracks, subtitle control, and permanent access, a streaming-only 4K ecosystem raises serious concerns about long-term quality and ownership.]]></description>
            <category>Home Theater</category>
            <category>Streaming HD</category>
            <category>4K Ultra HD</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/287/image_3.png" length="0" type="image/png"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Living with 4K - The REDRAY 4K Digital Cinema Player]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2013/01/living-with-4k-the-redray-4k-digital-cinema-player/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2013/01/living-with-4k-the-redray-4k-digital-cinema-player/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 20:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[The REDRAY 4K player from RED DIGITAL CINEMA is a download-and-playback device priced at $1,450 that uses a proprietary .RED compression format requiring only 20 Mbps to deliver 4K content, comparable to MPEG-2 HD broadcast bitrates. The player outputs up to 4096x2160 resolution with 12-bit 4:2:2 color, supports 24-bit 7.1-channel LPCM audio at 48 kHz via dual HDMI outputs (1.4 for video, 1.3 for audio), and connects to RED's Odemax distribution platform. For early 4K adopters, this represents one of the only available 4K signal sources, though its content library and audio specs fall short of Blu-ray's 96 kHz or 192 kHz audio capabilities.]]></description>
            <category>Home Theater</category>
            <category>4K Ultra HD</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/285/hero.png" length="0" type="image/png"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[OLED TV Demystified]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2013/01/oled-tv-demystified/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2013/01/oled-tv-demystified/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 07:51:09 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[LG's 55-inch WOLED HDTV uses a 4-sub-pixel white OLED architecture with color filters and passive 3D at half resolution per eye, priced at $12,000 for Q1 2013 US availability, while Samsung's Super OLED employs a filterless RGB design with active-shutter 3D delivering full resolution per eye. The RGB approach conserves the shorter-lived blue organic material by activating it only when blue output is needed, whereas WOLED continuously drives all sub-pixels to produce white light regardless of the target color. Consumers evaluating these displays should weigh Samsung's potential longevity and wide-angle image quality advantages against LG's near-term market availability.]]></description>
            <category>OLED TVs</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/284/hero.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Living with 4K (Part 6) - Which 4K? Sony - DCI 4K and Ultra-HD Capable]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/12/living-with-4k-part-6-which-4k-sony-dci-4k-and-ultra-hd-capable/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/12/living-with-4k-part-6-which-4k-sony-dci-4k-and-ultra-hd-capable/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 07:39:17 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Sony's 4K projector uses a native 4096-pixel DCI 4K chip, displaying 3840x2160 Ultra-HD content via center pixels with 128 unused pixels on each side rather than uneven upscaling, making it genuinely compliant with both DCI 4K and the CEA's Ultra-HD standard. The CEA's adoption of the 3840x2160 'Ultra HD' label introduced naming friction with the broader UHDTV framework already covering 2160p and 4320p formats. Understanding these distinctions matters for buyers evaluating whether a display is a true 4K DCI device or a 16:9 Ultra-HD panel with a different pixel grid.]]></description>
            <category>Standards</category>
            <category>Home Theater</category>
            <category>Projection HD</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/283/hero.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Living with 4K (Part 5) - Which 4K ... DCI 4K, Ultra-HDTV, Ultra-HD, Quad-Full-HD?]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/12/living-with-4k-part-5-which-4k-dci-4k-ultra-hdtv-ultra-hd-quad-full-hd/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/12/living-with-4k-part-5-which-4k-dci-4k-ultra-hdtv-ultra-hd-quad-full-hd/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 07:34:59 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[The CEA's October 2012 Ultra-HD specification defines a minimum display resolution of 3840x2160 at 16:9 aspect ratio, yet omits minimum requirements for bit depth, frame rates, or HDMI 2.0 signal acceptance beyond the current HDMI 1.4 standard's 4K 24/30fps limit. This creates direct nomenclature conflicts with the EBU's UHD-1/UHD-2 framework and the ITU's established Ultra-HDTV standards, which also encompass the 7680x4320 (8K) format. Consumers shopping for next-generation displays face compounding confusion from overlapping terms across DCI 4K, Ultra-HDTV, and Ultra-HD, making it difficult to evaluate whether a product meets any consistent technical benchmark.]]></description>
            <category>Standards</category>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Living with 4K (Part 4) - Which 4K ... DCI 4K, Ultra-HDTV, Ultra-HD, Quad-Full-HD?]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/12/living-with-4k-part-4-which-4k-dci-4k-ultra-hdtv-ultra-hd-quad-full-hd/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/12/living-with-4k-part-4-which-4k-dci-4k-ultra-hdtv-ultra-hd-quad-full-hd/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 07:24:27 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[The DCI 4K standard, published in 2005 by seven major studios, defines a 4096x2160 resolution format using JPEG2000 encoding, 12-bit XYZ color space, and a maximum data rate of 250 Mbit/s, while the ITU-R BT.2020 UHDTV specification sets 3840x2160 and 7680x4320 resolutions with 10/12-bit quantization and up to 120fps progressive scan. These two competing standards use different pixel counts and color spaces, meaning a DCI 4K projector and a consumer Ultra-HDTV display are not interchangeable formats despite sharing the '4K' label. Understanding these distinctions is essential for anyone evaluating 4K display hardware or content pipelines.]]></description>
            <category>Digital Cinema</category>
            <category>Standards</category>
            <category>4K Ultra HD</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/281/hero.gif" length="0" type="image/gif"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Living with 4K (Part 3) - Which 4K ... DCI 4K, Ultra-HDTV, Ultra-HD, Quad-Full-HD?]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/12/living-with-4k-part-3-which-4k-dci-4k-ultra-hdtv-ultra-hd-quad-full-hd/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/12/living-with-4k-part-3-which-4k-dci-4k-ultra-hdtv-ultra-hd-quad-full-hd/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 07:07:50 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[The Sony VPL-VW1000ES home cinema projector ($25,000 MSRP) uses a true DCI 4K chip with 4096x2160 pixels (17:9 aspect ratio), distinguishing it from consumer Ultra-HDTV panels that offer only 3840x2160 (3.75K by binary measure). Standards bodies including DCI, EBU, ITU, and CEA each define 4K and Ultra-HD differently, creating a fragmented naming landscape that affects how buyers interpret product specifications. Understanding these distinctions matters practically when choosing between a cinema-grade projector and a 16:9 Ultra-HD panel for home use.]]></description>
            <category>Digital Cinema</category>
            <category>Standards</category>
            <category>Home Theater</category>
            <category>Projection HD</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/280/hero.gif" length="0" type="image/gif"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Living with 4K: 4K Content, when? (Part 2)]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/10/living-with-4k-4k-content-when-part-2/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/10/living-with-4k-4k-content-when-part-2/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:15:10 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Sony's 4K SXRD projector, featuring a 4096x2160 native chip and proprietary Reality Creation upscaling, can deliver a compelling viewing experience even before dedicated 4K content becomes widely available, by intelligently interpolating 1080p Blu-ray sources to near-4K quality. The pending H.265/HEVC standard, promising 50% greater compression efficiency over H.264, is expected to unlock practical 4K distribution and pre-recorded media in the near term. For early adopters, the projector's ability to accept native 4K input, support 12-bit color, and render full 4K resolution per eye in 3D mode makes it a forward-compatible investment worth considering now.]]></description>
            <category>4K Ultra HD</category>
            <category>Home Theater</category>
            <category>Projection HD</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/279/hero.gif" length="0" type="image/gif"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Living with 4K: Getting the Beautiful Monster (Part 1)]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/10/living-with-4k-getting-the-beautiful-monster-part-1/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/10/living-with-4k-getting-the-beautiful-monster-part-1/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 07:59:36 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Sony's VPL-VW1000ES consumer 4K projector delivers 2000 lumens and supports up to 300-inch screens at roughly a quarter of the $80,000 price of its 2005 SRX-R110 predecessor, making true 4096x2160 projection accessible to home theater enthusiasts for the first time. The UHDTV standard encompasses both 4K and 8K resolutions, with 4K offering approximately four times the pixel density of 1080p HD and 8K projecting 16 times the detail. Viewers considering the investment should understand that optimal results require correct viewing distance and native 4K source material, though the display itself delivers meaningful improvements even with upscaled content.]]></description>
            <category>Standards</category>
            <category>4K Ultra HD</category>
            <category>Home Theater</category>
            <category>Projection HD</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/278/hero.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[A Relative Twist to TV Calibration]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/09/a-relative-twist-to-tv-calibration/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/09/a-relative-twist-to-tv-calibration/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 07:46:19 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Professional TV calibration costs ranging from $250 to $900 are increasingly difficult to justify as panel prices fall, raising the question of whether consumers should bear the full cost of achieving a display standard the manufacturer was supposed to meet at the factory. The author distinguishes between calibrating to a grayscale and gamma standard (a manufacturer responsibility) versus adapting image settings to a specific viewing environment such as a bright room or dark home theater. As TV prices drop toward or below calibration costs, the traditional 10% cost ratio that once made sense on an $8,000 Pioneer Elite no longer holds, pushing many buyers toward upgrading hardware rather than calibrating existing sets.]]></description>
            <category>Calibration</category>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[How Much for an OLED?]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/06/how-much-for-an-oled/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/06/how-much-for-an-oled/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 07:02:38 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[LG has confirmed a $10,000 price point for its 55-inch OLED TV, while Samsung's set is positioned at approximately $9,000, both targeting a 2012 launch. LG faces manufacturing challenges with oxide backplane stability, a problem Samsung has reportedly resolved, and Samsung has also claimed its blue sub-pixel organic material can reach an estimated 50,000 hours to mid-life. Prospective buyers should weigh these pricing tiers against the absence of independent calibrated lab reviews and official longevity specifications before committing.]]></description>
            <category>OLED TVs</category>
            <category>Market Trends &amp; Analysis</category>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Does Your LCD Image Look the Same from an Angled View? (Part 3) - How the 3M Solution Applies to Your LCD]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/06/does-your-lcd-image-look-the-same-from-an-angled-view-part-3-how-the-3m-solution-applies-to-your-lcd/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/06/does-your-lcd-image-look-the-same-from-an-angled-view-part-3-how-the-3m-solution-applies-to-your-lcd/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 07:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[3M's optical film system, combining Light Distribution Films and a Reflective Polarizer (DBEF/APF families), addresses the longstanding LCD viewing angle limitation by recycling off-axis polarized light to broaden the output cone beyond the standard collimated beam. In a Q&A with 3M's Dr. David Lamb, key findings include an estimated 60-degree effective viewing angle improvement (120 degrees left-to-right) and a per-panel film cost on the order of $10, with potential system savings from reduced LED count or lower drive power. Consumers considering LCD sets should note that this technology is already deployed in high-end locally dimmed panels from major brands, though cross-talk effects on dynamic contrast ratio remain unquantified.]]></description>
            <category>LCD TVs</category>
            <category>LED TVs</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/276/hero.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Does your LCD image look the same from an angled view? (Part 2 - The 3M Solution)]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/05/does-your-lcd-image-look-the-same-from-an-angled-view-part-2-the-3m-solution/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/05/does-your-lcd-image-look-the-same-from-an-angled-view-part-2-the-3m-solution/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 07:01:50 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[LCD panels suffer measurable color, brightness, and contrast degradation at off-axis viewing angles, a limitation that becomes more apparent after calibration away from the high-output torch mode used in retail displays. 3M physicist Dr. Dave Lamb demonstrated at CES 2012 how the company's Reflective Polarizer films, including the DBEF and APF product families, redirect wide-angle light through backlight recycling to enhance both axial and off-axis luminance simultaneously. For households where viewers sit at angles beyond 20 degrees from center, this technology offers a practical path to more consistent image quality without requiring panel-level redesign.]]></description>
            <category>LCD TVs</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/273/hero.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Does Your LCD Image Look the Same from an Angled View? (Part 1 - The Concept)]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/05/does-your-lcd-image-look-the-same-from-an-angled-view-part-1-the-concept/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/05/does-your-lcd-image-look-the-same-from-an-angled-view-part-1-the-concept/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 07:45:32 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[LCD panels suffer measurable color, brightness, and contrast degradation at viewing angles beyond 20 degrees off-center, despite manufacturer claims of 170-plus degree viewing capability - a gap that becomes especially apparent after calibrating sets away from the high-output torch mode used on retail floors. A 3M-commissioned study of nearly 600 consumers found that 84 percent view their TVs from multiple angles, yet 44 percent were initially unaware of quality differences until shown a side-by-side comparison. Understanding this limitation before purchase - by asking dealers to calibrate sets to home-viewing levels and testing from your actual seating angles - can prevent a costly mismatch between showroom impressions and real-world performance.]]></description>
            <category>Calibration</category>
            <category>LCD TVs</category>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Who Wants to Copy Whom Regarding OLED?]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/05/who-wants-to-copy-whom-regarding-oled/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/05/who-wants-to-copy-whom-regarding-oled/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 08:13:33 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[LG's White OLED (WOLED) design uses organic white emitters with color filters in a transmissive-style configuration, contrasting sharply with Samsung's RGB OLED sub-pixels that emit colored light directly without filters, a true emissive approach comparable to plasma phosphor technology. An anonymous LG executive claimed Samsung was abandoning its RGB OLED design in favor of WOLED for manufacturing scalability, a claim Samsung declined to confirm or deny. Separately, Korean police investigated 10 LG Display employees, former Samsung Mobile Display staff, for allegedly leaking AMOLED intellectual property, raising pointed questions about competitive practices ahead of both companies' planned 55-inch OLED TV launches.]]></description>
            <category>OLED TVs</category>
            <category>Manufacturing</category>
            <category>Standards</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/274/hero.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[CES (Consumer Electronics Show) 2012 on the Hill, And the Digital Patriots Honoring Dinner]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/05/ces-consumer-electronics-show-2012-on-the-hill-and-the-digital-patriots-honoring-dinner/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/05/ces-consumer-electronics-show-2012-on-the-hill-and-the-digital-patriots-honoring-dinner/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 07:34:19 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[The 2012 CES on the Hill event at the Rayburn House Office Building showcased select consumer electronics innovations for Washington policymakers, including LG's passive 3D LCD TV, DISH Network's Hopper whole-house DVR, and a notable H.265 versus H.264 MPEG-4 compression comparison demo by Qualcomm. The Open Mobile Video Coalition demonstrated mobile TV delivery requiring only a few Kbps from the 19 Mbps typically needed for an HDTV signal within a 6 MHz channel, while H.265 was highlighted as a potential enabler of 4K Blu-ray on existing disc formats. For industry professionals, the event offered a rare convergence of technology demonstrations and direct access to legislators shaping broadcast spectrum policy.]]></description>
            <category>Standards</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/271/hero.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Who Has a Better OLED?]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/04/who-has-a-better-oled/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/04/who-has-a-better-oled/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 07:17:40 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Samsung's 55-inch Super OLED and LG's 55-inch White OLED (WOLED) debuted at CES 2012 with fundamentally different architectures: Samsung uses true RGB emissive OLED with active-shutter 3D at full 1080p per eye, while LG uses white OLED sub-pixels behind RGB color filters with passive FPR 3D at half resolution per eye. Samsung addressed the historically weak blue sub-pixel by doubling its longevity to 50,000 hours, a critical reliability milestone. Both panels delivered stunning images, but production units priced between $5,000 and $10,000 will require independent calibration and objective measurement before a definitive quality verdict is possible.]]></description>
            <category>Events &amp; Trade Shows</category>
            <category>OLED TVs</category>
            <category>Home Theater</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/270/hero.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Is CES Worth Attending Anymore?]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/02/is-ces-worth-attending-anymore/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2012/02/is-ces-worth-attending-anymore/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 07:42:40 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[A veteran HDTV press attendee with 15 years of CES experience critically examines whether the 153,000-person Las Vegas show still serves serious technology evaluation, citing specific image quality issues observed across OLED, 4K, and 8K displays - including color over-saturation, bleeding edges, and a Sony logo rendering as pink. Six days and 80-plus exhibitor meetings revealed that crowd conditions and inconsistent viewing angles made objective comparative judgment of competing OLED panels nearly impossible. The author suggests CEDIA, with roughly one-sixth the attendance, may offer a more productive alternative for professionals needing rigorous display assessment.]]></description>
            <category>OLED TVs</category>
            <category>Events &amp; Trade Shows</category>
            <category>4K Ultra HD</category>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Perception of Passive 3DTV - A No-Brainer Analogy]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/12/perception-of-passive-3dtv-a-no-brainer-analogy/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/12/perception-of-passive-3dtv-a-no-brainer-analogy/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 08:09:51 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Passive polarized 3DTVs, including LG's Frame Patterned Retarder (FPR) system, deliver only 540 horizontal lines per eye rather than the full 1080p resolution of 3D Blu-ray, while LG's dual 120Hz cycle approach attempts to compensate through a method the author argues introduces reverse-polarity artifacts. LG recommends a 15-foot viewing distance for their 60-inch passive 3DTV to mask FPR grid artifacts, nearly double the conventional 3x-image-height guideline of 7-8 feet. Buyers weighing active-shutter versus passive systems face a real trade-off between per-eye resolution integrity and the practical cost advantage of inexpensive polarized glasses for multiple viewers.]]></description>
            <category>3DTV</category>
            <category>Home Theater</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/267/hero.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Hi-End Audio Legend McIntosh Labs Meets HDTV Magazine on the East Coast]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/12/hi-end-audio-legend-mcintosh-labs-meets-hdtv-magazine-on-the-east-coast/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/12/hi-end-audio-legend-mcintosh-labs-meets-hdtv-magazine-on-the-east-coast/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 08:46:42 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[McIntosh Labs, the American audio manufacturer founded in 1949 and known for its Unity Coupled Circuit design and iconic blue-metered displays, hosted an Experience Center event in Fairfax, VA, drawing a notably young and diverse crowd. The MC275 50th anniversary limited-edition vacuum tube amplifier, limited to 275 units, exemplifies the brand's continued commitment to triode technology, which audiophiles have long favored for its superior harmonic distortion profile compared to early transistor designs. For buyers navigating hi-end audio investments, the piece raises pointed questions about upgrade costs, HDMI compatibility, and codec support in premium preamps priced well above mass-market AV receivers.]]></description>
            <category>HD Audio</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/268/hero.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Would you prefer ugly 3D glasses or ugly 3DTV images? Maybe neither.]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/10/would-you-prefer-ugly-3d-glasses-or-ugly-3dtv-images-maybe-neither/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/10/would-you-prefer-ugly-3d-glasses-or-ugly-3dtv-images-maybe-neither/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 07:00:41 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Active-shutter and passive polarized 3DTV technologies differ fundamentally in how they deliver stereoscopic images: active-shutter alternates two full-resolution frames time-sequentially, while passive Film-Patterned Retarder (FPR) displays interleaved half-resolution lines per eye, with LG's variant inverting line-pairs on every second 120Hz cycle. This means passive FPR viewers never receive a complete 1080-line image to either eye, and LG's implementation introduces upside-down content artifacts that distort real scene geometry. For buyers, the cheaper and lighter passive glasses come at a measurable image-quality cost that warrants hands-on evaluation before purchase.]]></description>
            <category>3DTV</category>
            <category>Home Theater</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/264/hero.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Passive 3DTV Brain Perception - An Excuse for Technical Limitations?]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/10/passive-3dtv-brain-perception-an-excuse-for-technical-limitations/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/10/passive-3dtv-brain-perception-an-excuse-for-technical-limitations/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 08:06:34 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Passive 3DTV technology from LG delivers only 540 lines of vertical resolution per eye, rendering each eye half the resolution of a 3D Blu-ray source, while active-shutter displays preserve full 1080p per eye. LG's consumer tests in retail centers prioritize viewer perception over measurable image quality metrics, sidestepping established Imaging Science calibration standards used to evaluate HDTV fidelity. For buyers seeking accurate reproduction of native dual-1080p 3D content, this resolution trade-off represents a permanent hardware limitation that no firmware update can correct.]]></description>
            <category>Calibration</category>
            <category>3DTV</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/266/hero.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[3D World Conference 2011 in NYC: Are you ready for 4K? How about 3D in 4K?]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/10/3d-world-conference-2011-in-nyc-are-you-ready-for-4k-how-about-3d-in-4k/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/10/3d-world-conference-2011-in-nyc-are-you-ready-for-4k-how-about-3d-in-4k/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:21:05 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Coverage from the 3D World conference at CCW 2011 examines the emerging 4K display ecosystem, where Sony's VPL-VW1000ES projector offers true 4096x2160 Digital Cinema Initiative resolution for under $25K while JVC's competing lineup uses e-Shift optical processing to simulate 4K precision from a native 1080p DiLA chip. A key panel finding suggests 4K distribution may require only 5% more bandwidth than HDTV using MPEG-2, and 4K source material downconverted to HD outperforms native HD acquisition. For home theater enthusiasts, the convergence of 4K and passive 3D technology could finally deliver true 1080p per eye without active-shutter glasses.]]></description>
            <category>3DTV</category>
            <category>4K Ultra HD</category>
            <category>Home Theater</category>
            <category>Projection HD</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/265/hero.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[LG's Passive-Polarized-Glasses 3DTV - Where is my Pixel?]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/08/lg-s-passive-polarized-glasses-3dtv-where-is-my-pixel/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/08/lg-s-passive-polarized-glasses-3dtv-where-is-my-pixel/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 11:11:08 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[LG's passive polarized 3DTV uses two sequential 120Hz cycles to claim full 1080p resolution per eye, but each cycle only delivers 540 lines through fixed Film-Patterned-Retarder polarization, and the second cycle displays adjacent video lines in inverted vertical order. The panel's 5ms pixel response time operates within an 8.33ms frame window, yet the effective 3D refresh rate is limited to 60Hz since two cycles are required to present all picture data. In practice, this means neither eye can simultaneously view all 1080 lines, and the line-inversion artifact introduces potential image quality concerns that active-shutter technology avoids by delivering full-resolution, correctly ordered frames per eye.]]></description>
            <category>3DTV</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/263/hero.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Typical Passive 3DTVs - Displaying and Perceiving 3D Images]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/07/typical-passive-3dtvs-displaying-and-perceiving-3d-images/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/07/typical-passive-3dtvs-displaying-and-perceiving-3d-images/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 07:43:27 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Passive 3DTVs interleave alternating lines from left and right camera images, each captured at 1920x1080 pixels with a 65 mm inter-camera separation matching average adult eye distance, resulting in each eye receiving only half the vertical resolution. Active-shutter displays, by contrast, alternate full 1920x1080p frames per eye using synchronized LCD glasses, preserving per-eye pixel integrity at the cost of simultaneity. Understanding this line-interleaving trade-off helps viewers evaluate real-world sharpness and depth accuracy differences between passive and active 3DTV systems.]]></description>
            <category>3DTV</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/262/hero.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Displaying 3DTV Images - What is Wrong with this Picture]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/07/displaying-3dtv-images-what-is-wrong-with-this-picture/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/07/displaying-3dtv-images-what-is-wrong-with-this-picture/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 07:38:44 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Passive 3DTVs interleave left- and right-eye image lines, discarding half the original resolution per eye, while LG's variant attempts to recover those discarded pixels by overlapping them at the same pixel positions 120 times per second across a full 1920x1080 frame. Active-shutter displays avoid this compromise by rendering both eye images at full resolution in sequential frames. For viewers prioritizing image quality, the cognitive load of reconstructing interleaved pixel structures, compounded by LCD pixel-response-time blur, may outweigh the cost savings of passive glasses.]]></description>
            <category>3DTV</category>
            <category>Market Trends &amp; Analysis</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/261/clip_image002-6-_dc71151a-b897-4623-9ab3-ea6ed8d8032c.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[3DTV - The Battle of Passive vs. Active Methods]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/07/3dtv-the-battle-of-passive-vs-active-methods/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/07/3dtv-the-battle-of-passive-vs-active-methods/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 07:45:46 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[The passive vs. active-shutter 3DTV debate centers on a fundamental resolution trade-off: passive polarized displays use a film-patterned retarder to split images into fixed 540-line interleaved rows per eye, while active-shutter glasses deliver full 1080p resolution per eye at higher cost. LG's passive implementation attempts to address this by cycling at 120Hz to overlap pixel data from both half-resolution frames, though this overlapping method raises legitimate image quality concerns that only calibrated lab testing could fully resolve. For consumers, the choice involves weighing affordable glasses and reduced eye strain against measurable resolution loss and potential ghosting within 6 feet of the screen.]]></description>
            <category>Home Theater</category>
            <category>3DTV</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/260/hero.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Streaming Inflation]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/06/streaming-inflation/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/06/streaming-inflation/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 07:17:16 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Streaming video at 2-5 Mbps versus Blu-ray's 30+ Mbps transfer rate represents a significant quality gap that becomes apparent on large screens at proper viewing distances, particularly given that many streaming services deliver lossy stereo audio rather than lossless formats. A key technical nuance often overlooked is that 720p/60fps actually requires 12% more bandwidth than 1080p/24fps (55M vs. 49M pixels per second), making frame rate as critical as resolution when evaluating format efficiency. For viewers prioritizing convenience on small screens or at extended viewing distances, streaming serves as a practical alternative, but those with large displays and quality-focused setups will find the compression trade-offs difficult to ignore.]]></description>
            <category>Blu-ray</category>
            <category>Streaming HD</category>
            <category>Codecs &amp; Compression</category>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Auto-Stereoscopic 3DTV (Glasses-Free) - One Company's "picture perfect" Solution, How Does it Work?]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/06/auto-stereoscopic-3dtv-glasses-free-one-company-s-picture-perfect-solution-how-does-it-work/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/06/auto-stereoscopic-3dtv-glasses-free-one-company-s-picture-perfect-solution-how-does-it-work/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 07:00:50 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[3DFusion's 42-inch auto-stereoscopic 3DTV panel uses real-time 2D-plus-depth mapping, re-rendering depth maps 30 times per second to deliver glasses-free 3D from any source, including side-by-side DirecTV or Blu-ray signals. Unlike competing approaches that rely on image stitching for multi-view output, 3DFusion's proprietary server software converts incoming 3D signals into stereoscopic depth-map encoded streams on the fly, enabling adjustable depth intensity similar to a volume control. This means viewers can reduce eye strain during extended viewing sessions while the platform remains compatible with active, passive, and auto-stereoscopic displays from any manufacturer.]]></description>
            <category>3DTV</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/87/hero.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Auto-Stereoscopic 3DTV (Glasses-Free) - Who Made it Work Right - and Now]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/06/auto-stereoscopic-3dtv-glasses-free-who-made-it-work-right-and-now/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/06/auto-stereoscopic-3dtv-glasses-free-who-made-it-work-right-and-now/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 07:34:18 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[3DFusion's 42-inch auto-stereoscopic LCD panel, built on a lenticular lens design licensed from Philips after a roughly half-billion-dollar R&D investment, stood out at CES 2011 by allowing viewers to move freely side-to-side without losing the 3D effect - a persistent weakness in competing prototypes from Sony and Toshiba that required viewers to stand on marked floor positions. The company's proprietary 3DFMax software engine smooths transitions between viewing zones, addressing ghosting and sweet-spot problems that plagued the original Philips design. For consumers, this means glasses-free 3D viewing closer to the natural experience of a standard flat-panel TV rather than a constrained, position-dependent demo.]]></description>
            <category>3DTV</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/131/hero.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[3D Technology Damaging HD Viewing]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/06/3d-technology-damaging-hd-viewing/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/06/3d-technology-damaging-hd-viewing/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 07:50:45 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Passive polarized 3DTVs incorporate a fixed polarization layer over the primary LCD panel to enable cheap glasses-based 3D, but this added material remains in the light path during standard HD viewing and cannot be removed, potentially degrading 2D image quality. Recent reports from commercial theaters revealed that 3D projection filters left in place during 2D screenings reduced light output by at least 50%, producing visibly substandard presentations. Consumers considering passive polarized displays should understand that unlike active-shutter systems, which deliver full resolution per eye and impose no optical compromise during 2D viewing, passive sets offer no user control over what remains between the light source and the viewer.]]></description>
            <category>Home Theater</category>
            <category>3DTV</category>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[CES (Consumer Electronics Show) 2011 at the Hill, and the Digital Patriots Event - Who can actually use more innovation?]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/05/ces-consumer-electronics-show-2011-at-the-hill-and-the-digital-patriots-event-who-can-actually-use-more-innovation/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/05/ces-consumer-electronics-show-2011-at-the-hill-and-the-digital-patriots-event-who-can-actually-use-more-innovation/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 18:30:55 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[CES 2011 drew 149,000+ attendees from 140 countries across 1.6 million net square feet of exhibit space, showcasing an estimated 20,000 new products from over 2,700 exhibiting companies. The Digital Patriots dinner honored Dr. Robert E. Kahn, co-founder of the TCP/IP protocol, alongside legislators recognized for advancing consumer electronics innovation. For industry stakeholders, the event underscored how policy alignment with technology development, including contested issues like FCC broadcast spectrum reallocation, directly shapes the competitive landscape.]]></description>
            <category>Events &amp; Trade Shows</category>
            <category>Standards</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/85/hero.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[CES (Consumer Electronics Show) 2011 at the Hill, and the Digital Patriots Event - Is Government actually listening to what Innovation can do?]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/05/ces-consumer-electronics-show-2011-at-the-hill-and-the-digital-patriots-event-is-government-actually-listening-to-what-innovation-can-do/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/05/ces-consumer-electronics-show-2011-at-the-hill-and-the-digital-patriots-event-is-government-actually-listening-to-what-innovation-can-do/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 22:45:27 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[The 2011 International CES drew 149,529 attendees across 1.6 million net square feet of exhibit space, with international attendance up 30 percent year-over-year to set a record in the show's 45-year history. A curated CES at the Hill event brought key product introductions - including 3DTV systems from Sony, Panasonic, and Samsung alongside Google TV and RCA's portable ATSC and Mobile DTV devices - directly to Congress members in Washington D.C. For policymakers and industry professionals alike, the event offered a focused look at the consumer technologies most likely to shape regulatory and business decisions in the near term.]]></description>
            <category>Events &amp; Trade Shows</category>
            <category>Standards</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/84/hero.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[3DTV Going South]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/04/3dtv-going-south/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/04/3dtv-going-south/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 07:33:55 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[A field report from Buenos Aires finds Samsung 46-inch LCD/LED 3DTVs (model UN46C7000) retailing at roughly three times U.S. prices, with active-shutter glasses unavailable separately at retail. Argentina's ISDB-T terrestrial broadcast standard remains in testing, creating an unusual market where 1080p Blu-ray and 3D content are commercially available before over-the-air HDTV is fully operational. Consumers face compounding risks from undertrained sales staff and passive 3DTV sets that deliver only half-resolution per eye, dropping to 25% of original resolution with side-by-side content.]]></description>
            <category>3DTV</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/203/hero.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[True 3D Standardization]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/04/true-3d-standardization/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/04/true-3d-standardization/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 07:31:39 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Active-shutter 3D glasses standardization efforts from CEA, XPAND 3D, Panasonic, and Monster address synchronization protocols but overlook a critical technical gap: proprietary lens tints are color-matched to specific manufacturer 3DTV calibrations, meaning neutral-tint standard glasses require TVs to be recalibrated or ISF-calibrated at additional consumer cost. Backward compatibility with existing proprietary glasses remains unresolved, as recalibrating a 3DTV to match neutral-tint standard glasses would render previously purchased proprietary glasses mismatched. Consumers considering a 3DTV purchase should wait until manufacturers commit to factory color calibration aligned with a single neutral-tint standard before investing in universal glasses.]]></description>
            <category>Standards</category>
            <category>3DTV</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/202/hero.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[3DTV Over-the-air Broadcasting in a Bind]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/03/3dtv-over-the-air-broadcasting-in-a-bind/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/03/3dtv-over-the-air-broadcasting-in-a-bind/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 10:25:38 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Over-the-air 3DTV broadcasting faces a fundamental bandwidth constraint within the existing 6 MHz ATSC channel allocation, forcing broadcasters to choose between frame-compatible formats (side-by-side or top-bottom) that halve per-eye resolution and leave no room for a simultaneous 2D signal. With roughly 260 million DTVs projected by end of 2012 versus only a few million 3DTVs sold, abandoning 2D viewers is impractical, yet compressing both signals into a single channel risks degrading quality for both formats. The service-compatible 2D-plus-Delta approach, favored by European broadcasters for its full-resolution 2D backward compatibility, remains a viable but so far overlooked alternative in U.S. ATSC planning.]]></description>
            <category>Standards</category>
            <category>OTA HD &amp; Antennas</category>
            <category>3DTV</category>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Is 3DTV a Replacement of Digital Television? Would 2D Viewing be affected?]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/03/is-3dtv-a-replacement-of-digital-television-would-2d-viewing-be-affected/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/03/is-3dtv-a-replacement-of-digital-television-would-2d-viewing-be-affected/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 07:44:03 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Early 3DTV implementations, including passive LCD panels with pattern retarder films and auto-stereoscopic displays, introduce hardware and processing layers that can degrade everyday 2D HDTV image quality in ways that casual retail viewing rarely reveals. Passive 3D technologies halve per-eye resolution during 3D playback, while broadcast 3D signals rely on frame-compatible formats like side-by-side or top-bottom that further reduce quality compared to lossless Blu-ray codecs such as DTS Master Audio. Consumers evaluating a 3DTV purchase should scrutinize independent reviews and account for hidden costs, including the potential need for dual projection screens or external scalers, before committing to a system that may compromise the 2D performance they will use most.]]></description>
            <category>Home Theater</category>
            <category>3DTV</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/258/hero.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[3DTV Technologies - Which one for you?]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/03/3dtv-technologies-which-one-for-you/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/03/3dtv-technologies-which-one-for-you/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 07:05:21 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[3DTV adoption hinges on a fragmented technology landscape spanning active-shutter glasses at full 1080p resolution per eye, passive polarized panels at half-resolution, and glasses-free auto-stereoscopic displays with viewing zone constraints. Health concerns including crosstalk, flicker, and eye fatigue affect an estimated 5 to 20 percent of viewers, prompting LG Display to discontinue active-shutter production in favor of pattern-retarder passive panels. For consumers, the coexistence of these competing technologies is not a liability but a practical necessity, enabling individuals to match display choice to their specific visual tolerance, budget, and viewing environment.]]></description>
            <category>3DTV</category>
            <category>Home Theater</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/257/hero.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[3DTV - Are Competing Technologies Necessary? Including Auto-stereoscopic?]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/03/3dtv-are-competing-technologies-necessary-including-auto-stereoscopic/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/03/3dtv-are-competing-technologies-necessary-including-auto-stereoscopic/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 07:27:39 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[The 3DTV market in 2011 presents consumers with competing display technologies - active-shutter, passive polarized (FPR at half resolution), and auto-stereoscopic glasses-free - each with distinct trade-offs in resolution, flicker sensitivity, cost, and usability. Drawing a parallel to HDTV's fragmented introduction in 1998, which saw simultaneous 480p, 720p, and 1080p formats coexist across DLP, LCD, plasma, and LCoS panels, the case is made that parallel 3DTV technologies serve different visual tolerances and budgets rather than creating harmful confusion. Retail education, not technology consolidation, is the critical factor in helping consumers identify the right 3DTV solution for their specific viewing environment and physiological needs.]]></description>
            <category>3DTV</category>
            <category>Home Theater</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/256/clip_image002_5073279a-742f-472b-9e0e-b442b7ceb8ab.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Glasses-Free (Auto-stereoscopic) 3DTV - When?]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/03/glasses-free-auto-stereoscopic-3dtv-when/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/03/glasses-free-auto-stereoscopic-3dtv-when/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 08:02:40 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Auto-stereoscopic (glasses-free) 3DTV technology faces criticism over limited viewing zones, low per-eye resolution, and positional 3D disruption, but 3DFusion's CES 2011 demo challenged that narrative with a proprietary software engine that makes zone transitions nearly imperceptible. Their roadmap targets 17 viewing zones, per-eye resolution beyond 900x500 pixels, and panel resolution 1.5 times current 1080p in screen sizes exceeding 40 inches. For consumers willing to pay a premium, viable glasses-free 3DTV may arrive sooner than the decade-long timeline critics suggest.]]></description>
            <category>3DTV</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/255/hero.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Glasses-Free 3D at CES 2011 - Improving, but no Cigar, Except for the Queen of CES]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/01/glasses-free-3d-at-ces-2011-improving-but-no-cigar-except-for-the-queen-of-ces/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2011/01/glasses-free-3d-at-ces-2011-improving-but-no-cigar-except-for-the-queen-of-ces/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 20:37:45 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Auto-stereoscopic (glasses-free) 3D displays were a key technical battleground at CES 2011, with Sony's 56-inch 4K and Toshiba's LCD prototypes showing visible disruption when viewers shifted position between viewing zones. 3DFusion's 42-inch LCD demo, using a lenticular screen and proprietary real-time software, delivered 9 viewing zones at approximately 900x500 pixels per zone via sub-pixel sharing from a 1920x1080 panel, with nearly imperceptible zone-transition breaks at wide lateral angles. For consumers weighing glasses-free options, 3DFusion's per-eye pixel count is comparable to side-by-side 3D broadcast on passive-glasses displays, making the glasses-free trade-off more competitive than it first appears.]]></description>
            <category>3DTV</category>
            <category>Events &amp; Trade Shows</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/254/hero.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Avatar - Why not a CinemaScope Option on Blu-ray?]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2010/12/avatar-why-not-a-cinemascope-option-on-blu-ray/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2010/12/avatar-why-not-a-cinemascope-option-on-blu-ray/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 07:49:11 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Avatar was filmed natively in 16:9 and a CinemaScope (2.39:1) version was dynamically extracted by James Cameron for theatrical release, yet the Blu-ray disc was issued only in 16:9, leaving CinemaScope home-theater owners unable to replicate the theatrical experience. A static center-crop from the 16:9 disc fails to match the director's dynamic vertical pan extraction, producing over-cropped close-ups and misplaced subtitles on anamorphic lens setups. The omission directly affects a growing segment of home-theater enthusiasts who invested in projectors and anamorphic lenses specifically to reproduce the wider CinemaScope presentation.]]></description>
            <category>Home Theater</category>
            <category>Blu-ray</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/253/hero.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[3D World 2010 Conference in NYC]]></title>
            <link>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2010/11/3d-world-2010-conference-in-nyc/index.html</link>
            <guid>https://www.hdtvmagazine.com/articles/2010/11/3d-world-2010-conference-in-nyc/index.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 20:50:32 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[The 3D World 2010 Conference in New York City showcased professional 3D production workflows, with demonstrations using a Sony 4K projector delivering dual 1080p interleaved images viewed through RealD polarized glasses. A notable Avatar 3D trailer screening revealed a CinemaScope crop applied to a native 16:9 source, contradicting James Cameron's stated preference for preserving full image height, while CBS Sports' US Open 3D demo exhibited motion artifacts likely tied to pixel-splitting between interleaved stereo views. Attendees also spotted an LG passive-glasses LCD panel of approximately 50 inches, hinting at a broader shift toward passive 3D display designs ahead of CES 2011.]]></description>
            <category>3DTV</category>
            <enclosure url="https://media.hdtvmagazine.com/images/articles/252/hero.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>