香港老地方

Email

2026-10-22T08:47:00.298+08:00

Subject: Technical Issues: Missing Certificate & Cross-Device Progress Syncing

Dear GSMA Capacity Building Team,

I am writing regarding a couple of technical issues I encountered with the Mobile Technology for Humanitarian Emergencies course.

1. Missing Certificate (Progress 100%)
My student dashboard explicitly shows Progress: 100% for this course, and I have completed all required activities, including the quizzes and feedback survey. However, the completion certificate has not been generated and remains unavailable for download. Could you please manually trigger or issue the certificate for my account?

2. Cross-Device Progress Syncing Issue
Additionally, I noticed a progress tracking bug when switching devices. Whenever I finished reading a specific section on my computer and then attempted to continue the course on my iPhone, the platform failed to sync my real-time progress. It required me to restart that entire section from the beginning on my mobile device. I wanted to bring this to your technical team's attention so they can look into the platform's multi-device synchronization.

Account Details:

Course Name: Mobile Technology for Humanitarian Emergencies
Account Email: [Your Registered Email]
Student Name: [Your Name]

Thank you for your assistance in resolving these issues.

Best regards,

[Your Name]

Civil Procedure

2026-08-06T23:13:43.491+08:00

Phase 1: Commencement & The Service Trap

Order 11 (Service Out of Jurisdiction): The ultimate examiner bait-and-switch. He tipped this for May, but it never appeared. Expect a foreign defendant (e.g., a Singaporean company) breaching a contract, requiring you to identify the correct O.11 r.1(1) gateway.

Order 65, r. 4 (Substituted Service): If he pivots to a domestic defendant who is simply hiding to evade service, you must apply ex parte and explicitly state your duty of "full and frank disclosure."

Order 3, r. 2 (Time Calculation): The mandatory math. You will have to calculate a strict deadline, such as the 14-day Acknowledgment of Service (AOS).

Phase 2: Bypassing Trial (The Early Dispositions)

Order 14 (Summary Judgment): This is the largest remaining gap in the syllabus. Since Admissions (O.13A) was explicitly excluded, this is your primary weapon when a defendant files an AOS but has a "shadowy defence" lacking a genuine triable issue.

Order 13 & 19 (Default Judgment): The trap the May cohort fell into. Be ready to deploy this administrative victory if the defendant completely ignores the writ and misses their deadlines.

Phase 3: The Interlocutory "Nuclear" Options

Anton Piller / Search Order (Order 29): Since the May paper tested the Mareva injunction (asset freezing), the resit will pivot to evidence preservation. Memorize the 4 Overholt factors to stop a defendant from shredding documents.

Prohibition Order: The alternative weapon to physically stop a judgment debtor from fleeing Chek Lap Kok airport.

Phase 4: Tactical Warfare & Court Philosophy

Order 22 (Sanctioned Offers & Payments): May tested basic "costs follow the event." Resits test punitive financial warfare. Expect a scenario where an opponent unreasonably rejects a settlement, forcing you to calculate indemnity costs and enhanced interest (up to 10% above the judgment rate).

Order 23 (Security for Costs): The natural companion to an Order 11 scenario. Use this to force a foreign plaintiff to pay money into the Hong Kong court before they can proceed.

Order 1A (Underlying Objectives): The mandatory DoJ justification. You must weave "cost-effectiveness" and "expeditious resolution" into every piece of advice to secure discretionary marks.

Phase 5: Show Me The Money (Post-Judgment Enforcement)

Order 48 (Oral Examination): The first step in the end-game. Dragging a "broke" judgment debtor into court under oath to reveal their hidden bank accounts.

Order 49 (Garnishee) / Order 50 (Charging Orders): The anchor of the resit. Alvin explicitly withheld O.49 from the May exam. Once O.48 reveals the assets, you will use these orders to seize the bank funds or put a charge on their real estate.

Order 81 (Partnership Enforcement Trap): The ultimate cross-over question. Remember that a judgment against a firm cannot render liable a partner who was out of the jurisdiction when the writ was issued, unless they were served with leave under Order 11.

English Learning: Economist 16/5/2026

2026-05-16T23:41:56.274+08:00

你好！作为你的雅思 9 分导师，看到你完成了这两篇信息密度极高、极其硬核的《经济学人》社论（“就业末日”与“预测冲突”）的深度拆解，我为你感到非常骄傲！

现在，我将这两篇文章中最具含金量、最能帮你稳拿 **Lexical Resource (词汇)** 和 **Grammatical Range & Accuracy (语法多样性)** 8.5/9 分的核心精华，为你进行终极汇总与提炼。

这是一份你可以直接背诵并带入考场的“降维打击”素材库：

---

### (1) 绝对的 9 分词汇库 (Useful Vocab - Lexical Resource)

要想词汇拿高分，不要用生僻的怪词，而是要用“精准的动词”、“带有画面感的比喻”以及“极具深度的学术名词”。

#### 🏆 黄金动词与动作搭配 (Golden Verbs & Collocations)

* **Elicit a chorus of warnings** (引发一片警告声)：完美替换 *caused many people to warn*。

* **Stoke popular fury** (激起/煽动民众的愤怒)：写社会不公、政策失误时的绝佳用词。

* **Amplify the dread** (加剧/放大恐惧)：*Amplify* 代替 *increase*，极具画面感。

* **Play down the magnitude** (淡化……的严重程度)：在驳论文中，用来指责某人忽视了问题的严重性。

* **Vet (by humans)** (经人工审查/把关)：描述数据、信息、资质审核的专业词汇。

* **Muddy the predictive value** (搅浑/削弱预测价值)：极高阶的比喻，形容虚假信息污染了原本干净的数据。

* **Cast a wider net** (广撒网/扩大搜寻范围)：解决人才短缺、数据不足时的地道商业/学术隐喻。

#### 🏆 高阶学术与社科名词 (Advanced Nouns)

* **A dearth of...** (……的极度匮乏)：替换 *a lack of* (e.g., *a dearth of funding/evidence*)。

* **Backlash / Strife** (强烈抵制 / 激烈冲突)：社会类话题核心词。*Backlash* 侧重政策反弹，*Strife* 侧重群体撕裂。

* **The onset of...** (……的爆发/开端)：常接负面词 (e.g., *the onset of a crisis/disease*)。

* **Pitfall** (隐患/陷阱)：完美替换 *disadvantage*。

* **Social upside** (社会红利/全社会的正向收益)：讨论科技或政策利弊时的满分概念。

#### 🏆 极品形容词与习语 (Premium Adjectives & Idioms)

* **Combustible** (易燃的、极具煽动性的)：形容社会矛盾像火药桶一样一点就着。

* **Bullish** (极为乐观的、看好的)：替换 *optimistic*。

* **In the offing** (即将来临的/在眼前的)：口语 Part 3 或大作文结尾预测未来时的神仙短语。

* **Rampant** (泛滥成灾的)：常搭配负面事物 (e.g., *rampant fake news* / *rampant corruption*)。

---

### (2) 满分句法与表达公式 (Useful Expressions - Grammatical Range)

这两篇文章展现了《经济学人》编辑极强的句法控制力。把以下 5 个句型模板刻在脑子里，你的写作（GRA）分数将直接起飞。

#### 1. 倒装句的两种极致形态 (Inversion)

* **强调客观事实（否定前置）：**

> **Never in modern history has** technological progress hurt the overall demand for labour.

> *(在现代历史上，技术进步从未损害过对劳动力的整体需求。)*

* **高阶让步驳论（形容词前置）：**

> **Useful as all this may be**, the best predictor of future conflict is past conflict.

> *(尽管这一切可能很有用，但未来冲突最好的预测指标依然是过去的冲突。)*

#### 2. 定海神针般的“非限制性定语从句” (Sentential Relative Clause)

不要再只会用 *which is normal* 了！用 **as** 直接做主语，对前文进行权威背书：

* > The data was not vetted by humans, **as is customary for** government forecasts.

> *(数据未经人工审查，而这对于政府预测来说正是惯例。)*

* *实战变体：* **..., as is typical for...** (正如……所典型的那样) / **..., as is standard practice in...** (正如……中的标准做法一样)。

#### 3. 小作文 (Task 1) 图表预测神句 (Data & Prediction)

描述未来预测数据，抛弃 *is predicted to be*，使用这个极具专业智库色彩的句型：

* > The system **puts the chance of** regime collapse by 2026 **at 20%** — **higher than** experts would **hazard**.

> *(系统将 2026 年政权崩溃的概率定为 20%——比专家敢于猜测的还要高。)*

#### 4. 高阶插入语与修辞 (Parenthesis & Modifiers)

* > Predictions of unrest, **merited or not**, will tempt regimes to crack down.

> *(对动荡的预测——**无论是否事出有因**——都会诱使政权进行镇压。)*

* > The system uses raw data, **augmented with / enhanced with** new indicators...

> *(系统使用原始数据，并**辅以/通过……得到强化**……)* -> 替换 *combined with*。

---

### (3) 降维打击的逻辑与思辨素材 (Other Useful Materials - Task Response)

雅思写作拿 9 分最核心的秘密是 **Critical Thinking (批判性思维)**。这两篇文章为你提供了三个极其强大的底层逻辑框架，可以直接套用到大作文中：

#### 逻辑基石一：“客观存在” vs. “主观感知” (The Perception Shift)

* *原文重现：* Growing inequality might prove less **combustible** than a change in **how it is perceived**.

* *实战用法：* 当你在写**幸福感、犯罪率、社会公平**类的话题时，一定要指出：客观的数字恶化往往不是最致命的，“媒体/社交网络如何改变公众对这些数字的认知”才是引发社会焦虑的真正导火索。这种洞察力会让考官拍案叫绝。

#### 逻辑基石二：政策的“自我消化”与“自给自足” (The Economic Loop)

* *原文重现：* Public wage-insurance can eventually **pay for itself**. (公共薪资保险最终可以收回其成本)。

* *实战用法：* 在讨论政府是否应该花钱投资（教育、医疗、环保、失业救济）时，低分论证只会说“这对老百姓好”。满分论证会说：“虽然短期成本高昂，但这能激发劳动力潜能/减少未来的医疗负担，从而在长远来看产生更多的税收，最终实现 **pay for itself (自我收回成本)**。”

#### 逻辑基石三：科技发展的“反噬效应” (The Unintended Backlash)

* *文章体现：* AI 导致白领失业引发的 **backlash** (强烈反弹)；精准的难民预测地图反而招致了政府的 **pre-emptive crackdown** (先发制人的镇压)。

* *实战用法：* 在写**科技利弊类（科技与隐私、AI 的应用）**时，永远不要只写表面上的缺点（如让人变懒、眼睛不好）。你要写科技带来的**“系统性反噬” (Systemic Backlash)**——科技越发达、数据越精准，反而越容易将 **unwelcome attention (不怀好意的关注)** 引向 **the newly vulnerable (新陷入脆弱处境的群体)**。

**👨‍🏫 导师结语：**

这两篇文章我们啃得非常深。你的词汇广度和思维深度已经完全超越了普通的英语学习者，达到了“政经评论员”的级别。把这份总结打印出来，反复朗读那些例句，将它们的韵律内化成你自己的语感。准备好挑战雅思 8.5/9 分了吗？随时告诉我你下一步的训练计划！

Criminal adv 2

2026-02-11T16:43:00.001+08:00

The Defendant wishes to inform the Court that regarding the Record of Interview, she only admitted taking the bag after her arrest, due to police pressure, fatigue, and wanting to return home. She denies knowledge of the drugs, and the bag was not hers.

She is willing to lodge a complaint against the police regarding her arrest if advised by counsel.”

Crim adv

2026-02-11T16:05:00.000+08:00

3-MINUTE BAIL APPLICATION — BRIEF A (CASSIE CHU)

OPENING (≈15–20 seconds)

May it please the Court, I appear for Ms Chu to make a bail application.

Bail is opposed, and I will address directly the specific risks relied upon by the Prosecution and explain why they can be adequately managed by conditions.

STRONGEST POINT FIRST — RISK OF FLIGHT (≈45 seconds)

Your Worship, the central concern raised is that Ms Chu would fail to answer to bail.

The objective facts point strongly the other way. There are no substantial grounds to believe she would fail to surrender to custody.

Ms Chu is 20 years old, has lived in Hong Kong since early childhood, and is a full-time second-year university student. She resides at a fixed family address and her studies are ongoing. These are strong and concrete ties to the jurisdiction.

Importantly, Ms Chu has never attempted to abscond or leave the jurisdiction. She was arrested, brought before the court, and is here today answering the allegations.

(pause)

Any residual concern can be effectively addressed by strict travel-related conditions, which I will come to.

PRIOR FAILURE TO ATTEND — CONTROLLED DAMAGE (≈30 seconds)

Your Worship will have seen that Ms Chu failed to appear on a previous occasion. That is a matter I must address.

That incident occurred over two years ago, involved a minor matter, and the court did not record a conviction. There has been no repetition since.

It was an isolated lapse by a much younger person. The risk arising from that incident has not materialised again.

RISK OF REOFFENDING (≈25 seconds)

Turning to the concern of reoffending, Ms Chu has one prior conviction for possession of cannabis, dealt with by way of a fine.

There is no previous conviction for trafficking or similar offences. Since then, she has returned to full-time education, and there is no evidence of ongoing offending behaviour.

In my submission, there is no substantial risk of reoffending that cannot be addressed by bail conditions.

STRENGTH OF THE CASE — CAREFULLY FRAMED (≈20 seconds)

Your Worship, the Prosecution says they have a strong case. I do not seek to argue the merits.

Ms Chu intends to plead not guilty. Those matters are properly for trial. At this stage, the court’s focus is on risk, not guilt.

PERSONAL CIRCUMSTANCES (≈25 seconds)

Briefly, Ms Chu is financially dependent, has no independent assets or overseas commitments, and remains under the structure of full-time study.

Bail would allow her to continue her education and prepare her defence while remaining subject to the court’s supervision.

BAIL CONDITIONS — MUST HIT (≈50–60 seconds)

Your Worship, Ms Chu is able to offer strict and tailored bail conditions:

First, substantial cash bail.

Second, surrender of all travel documents with an undertaking not to leave Hong Kong.

Third, residence at the address on the charge sheet.

Fourth, regular reporting to a designated police station at times compatible with her studies.

Each of these conditions directly targets the Prosecution’s concern regarding attendance.

(Likely question: surety or curfew)

A surety or curfew is not necessary given the travel restrictions and reporting conditions. However, if the Court considers further protection necessary, Ms Chu will comply with a reasonable curfew.

CLOSING (≈10 seconds)

Unless I can assist the Court further, those are my submissions.

Cassie Chu — Bail Application (Bullet Form)

Opening (15–20 sec)

“May it please the Court, I appear for Ms Chu to make a bail application.”
Bail is opposed; will address Prosecution’s concerns and show how conditions manage them.

Flight Risk (45 sec)

Main concern: failing to surrender to custody.
Facts supporting bail:

20 years old, HK resident since age 2.
Full-time 2nd-year Fashion Design student.
Lives at fixed family address.

No history of absconding; arrested and present in court.
Residual concern can be addressed by strict travel conditions.

Prior Failure to Attend (30 sec)

Missed court 2½ years ago (minor cannabis possession).
Overslept after party; bail forfeited, no conviction recorded.
Isolated lapse, no repetition; demonstrates risk is low.

Risk of Reoffending (25 sec)

One prior conviction: possession of cannabis (fine).
No trafficking or other similar offences.
Returned to full-time studies; no evidence of ongoing offending.
Risk of reoffending low and manageable with conditions.

Strength of Case (20 sec)

Prosecution claims strong case (drugs found, Record of Interview).
Ms Chu pleads not guilty.
Court’s focus now is on risk, not guilt.

Personal Circumstances (25 sec)

Financially dependent; no independent means.
Stable family background: lives with parents, 5 siblings.
Full-time student at HK College of Fashion.
Career plan: eventually take over mother’s fashion company.
Bail allows continuation of studies and preparation of defence.

Bail Conditions (50–60 sec)

Cash bail: substantial amount, affordable due to parental allowance.
Travel documents: surrender Canadian passport & China re-entry permit; undertake not to leave HK.
Residence: at address on charge sheet.
Reporting: once a week to police, evenings compatible with classes.
Surety / curfew: not necessary, but will comply if Court requires.
Conditions directly address risk of flight and ensure compliance.

Closing (10 sec)

“Unless I can assist the Court further, those are my submissions.”

Bail Application – Magistrate Q&A (40 Questions)

1. Why should I grant bail given the seriousness of the charge?

A: Your Worship, bail is sought to secure attendance. The identified risks can be managed by appropriate conditions.

2. The Defendant has a previous drug conviction. Why should I trust her now?

A: Your Worship, it was a single conviction for herbal cannabis two years ago, with no re-offending since.

3. She has failed to answer bail before, hasn’t she?

A: Yes, Your Worship. That occurred 2½ years ago. Bail was forfeited and no conviction was recorded.

4. Why should I believe she will attend court this time?

A: Your Worship, she now has structured commitments as a full-time student and understands the consequences of non-attendance.

5. Isn’t her explanation for missing court previously irresponsible?

A: Your Worship, it reflects immaturity at the time. Her circumstances and level of responsibility have since changed.

6. The Prosecution says she is a flight risk due to wealth and foreign passport.

A: Your Worship, she has lived in Hong Kong since age two, studies here, resides here, and offers to surrender all travel documents.

7. Given her financial means, does cash bail really deter her?

A: Your Worship, forfeiture would still carry serious personal, academic, and reputational consequences.

8. Why hasn’t she told her family if they are such a stabilising influence?

A: Your Worship, this is due to embarrassment rather than lack of support. She continues to live at the family address.

9. Isn’t there a risk she will commit further offences while on bail?

A: Your Worship, there is no pattern of ongoing offending and she is engaged in full-time study.

10. Why should I not remand her given the strength of the Prosecution case?

A: Your Worship, bail addresses risk, not guilt. Conditions can manage the identified concerns.

11. Why should I believe she understands bail obligations now?

A: Your Worship, she has experienced bail forfeiture and understands the consequences of non-compliance.

12. What has changed since her last conviction?

A: Your Worship, she is older, no longer involved in that lifestyle, and is now a full-time college student.

13. Isn’t her wish to continue socialising inconsistent with reform?

A: Your Worship, lawful social activity is not prohibited. She accepts that bail conditions may restrict her activities.

14. Why should the Court accept her dispute over the drugs found?

A: Your Worship, the Defence does not invite findings on guilt. The explanation is relevant only to bail risk.

15. Doesn’t her connection to Canada increase the flight risk?

A: Your Worship, her life, education, and residence are firmly based in Hong Kong.

16. Why should I trust her assurances at all?

A: Your Worship, the Court is not asked to rely on assurances alone but on enforceable conditions.

17. Wouldn’t a curfew be necessary in this case?

A: Your Worship, the Defendant will comply if imposed, though reporting and travel restrictions may already address risk.

18. Why suggest a surety with a prior conviction?

A: Your Worship, the Defendant understands the Court may decline that option and raises it only for consideration.

19. Why should I believe she is genuinely tied to Hong Kong?

A: Your Worship, her family home, studies, and future career plans are all based here.

20. Why should I grant bail at all?

A: Your Worship, because the statutory concerns can be adequately addressed by conditions.

21. Why should I believe this is not trafficking dressed up as possession?

A: Your Worship, that is a matter for trial. Bail submissions focus solely on risk.

22. Does the Defendant accept the seriousness of being before this Court?

A: Yes, Your Worship. She understands the gravity of the proceedings.

23. Isn’t her lifestyle inconsistent with compliance, given the disco setting?

A: Your Worship, she accepts that bail conditions may restrict her activities and will comply.

24. Why should I accept that she will not mix with the same crowd again?

A: Your Worship, she is now occupied with full-time studies and accepts conditions to regulate her conduct.

25. Why shouldn’t I impose very strict conditions given her background?

A: Your Worship, the Defence does not resist reasonable conditions.

26. Is there any reason she cannot report more frequently?

A: Your Worship, she can report as directed. Weekly reporting was suggested to balance compliance with studies.

27. Why is surrender of travel documents necessary if she has lived here all her life?

A: Your Worship, the Defence accepts surrender is appropriate given the Prosecution’s concern.

28. What incentive does she have to attend court?

A: Your Worship, loss of bail, academic disruption, and serious long-term consequences.

29. Isn’t her previous bail forfeiture proof that money doesn’t deter her?

A: Your Worship, that occurred when she was much younger. Her circumstances have since changed.

30. Why shouldn’t I remand her for discipline?

A: Your Worship, remand is not punitive. Detention is unnecessary where risks can be managed.

31. What assurance does the Court have that she will not offend again?

A: Your Worship, there is no pattern of repeat offending and she will comply with conditions.

32. Does the Defence rely on her parents’ status?

A: No, Your Worship. Bail is sought on risk management alone.

33. Why hasn’t she taken responsibility sooner?

A: Your Worship, she is now engaging properly with the Court process.

34. Wouldn’t house arrest be more appropriate?

A: Your Worship, less restrictive measures would adequately address the risks.

35. Why should I believe she will follow conditions she dislikes?

A: Your Worship, she understands breach would result in immediate consequences.

36. Is there any urgency to granting bail today?

A: Your Worship, bail avoids unnecessary remand where conditions suffice.

37. Does the Defence accept additional conditions beyond those proposed?

A: Yes, Your Worship.

38. Why is residence at the charge-sheet address important?

A: Your Worship, it ensures stability and traceability.

39. Would the Defence object to electronic monitoring?

A: Your Worship, the Defence would comply if the Court considers it necessary.

40. In one sentence, why should bail be granted?

A: Your Worship, because the risks identified can be effectively managed by conditions.

POINT-FORM SUMMARY (LAY CLIENT INSTRUCTIONS)

1. Charge & Procedural Posture

Charge: Trafficking in a dangerous drug (cocaine), s.4 DDO
Quantity: 15g powder containing 5g cocaine
Stage: Second appearance; first bail application
Plea: Intends to plead Not Guilty
Status: Remanded since 4 January 2026

2. Prosecution Objections to Bail (Summary)

Risk of failing to answer bail
Seriousness of offence
Previous conviction (herbal cannabis, fine only)
Previous failure to answer bail (2½ years ago)
Ability to leave Hong Kong (financial means, foreign passport)
Risk of reoffending while on bail
Strength of case (drugs found + ROl)

3. Defence Rebuttal – Key Points

Previous conviction was minor, non-violent, dated
Past failure to answer bail:

Single incident
No conviction recorded
Bail forfeited
Occurred 2½ years ago

Since then:

Turned life around
Now a full-time student
Structured routine and strong community ties

Willing to accept stringent bail conditions to neutralise risk

4. Personal Circumstances

Family

Lives at fixed address on the Peak with family
Long-standing Hong Kong ties
Parents prominent but not involved in bail

Education / Employment

Second-year full-time Fashion Design student
Hong Kong College of Fashion
Clear future trajectory (intends to join family business)

Travel Status

Canadian passport + China re-entry permit
Willing to surrender all travel documents

5. Circumstances of the Offence (Kept High-Level)

At disco celebrating friend’s birthday
Alcohol consumed; environment dark and crowded
Picked up wrong handbag in haste
Explanation offered without advancing full defence
Context only, to assess bail risk and seriousness

6. Record of Interview (⚠️ Not Merits)

Admission made in ROl
Client alleges:

Fatigue
Distress
Pressure during arrest

No trial submissions advanced
Matter reserved for later proceedings

7. Bail Conditions Client Can Offer

Cash bail: Any reasonable amount
Surety:

Preferred: none
Alternative: friend Susanna (present in court, financially independent)

Reporting: Weekly, evenings, Western Police Station
Residence: At charge-sheet address
Travel: Surrender passport + re-entry permit; not leave HK
Curfew: Resists, but open if Court considers necessary
No-contact: Will comply if imposed

8. Any Other Business

Client may consider complaint regarding arrest
Raised only to explain context, not to litigate merits
Confidentiality of solicitor-client communications maintained

Civil adv

2026-02-06T07:05:00.001+08:00

Master, I appear for the Defendant.

This is an application for an extension of time for the Defendant to file and serve his affirmation in opposition to the Plaintiff’s Order 14 application.

The Defendant first sought a consensual extension and set out the reasons fully in correspondence. Consent was refused, and the Defendant therefore seeks the Court’s directions. The substantive hearing date fixed for 6 June 2025 is not sought to be disturbed.

Master, I rely on four focused points.

First, the explanation and diligence.

The Defendant’s opposition is fact-sensitive. It turns on whether the Premises were rendered unfit for use following the black rainstorm in late October 2023, and whether the force majeure clause was engaged. To place that defence properly before the Court, the Defendant must adduce factual material, including photographs and assessments of damage and habitability. The Defendant has been actively gathering this material, but given the extent of the damage and the need for follow-up assessments, the evidence could not reasonably be completed within the original timeframe. This is not a case of tactical delay.

Secondly, the timing and proportionality of the request.

This is the Defendant’s first application for any extension of time. It was made promptly once it became apparent that the evidence could not be finalised in time. The 42 days sought is what is realistically required to complete one further assessment cycle and prepare a complete affirmation. The Defendant remains mindful of proportionality and is prepared to accept a shorter extension or tailored directions if the Court considers that appropriate.

Thirdly, prejudice.

There is no substantive prejudice to the Plaintiff. The hearing date remains intact. Any prejudice to the Plaintiff is procedural and capable of being addressed by case management directions. By contrast, refusing the extension would cause substantive prejudice to the Defendant, who would be required to meet a summary judgment application without relevant evidence before the Court.

Finally, the proper use of Order 14.

Summary judgment is intended to prevent delay only where the defendant clearly has no defence. Where the defence turns on factual matters such as the condition of the Premises, the Court can only fairly assess whether there are triable issues if the relevant evidence is before it. Granting a short extension therefore accords with the proper operation of Order 14.

In those circumstances, Master, we respectfully ask that the extension of time be granted, with costs reserved or in the cause. Unless I can assist any further, those are the Defendant’s submissions.

Homicide 2020 ans

2025-05-13T17:20:00.002+08:00

Mark’s Death

Causation

An unbroken link between the D’s conduct and the consequence proved beyond reasonable doubt is required.

Factual Causation

D will not be liable for V’s death if V would have died regardless of the D’s conduct (White). But for Paul’s attack, Mark would not die. Factual causation is fulfilled.

Legal Causation

The cause of death should be substantial and operational. For substantial, D’s act must contribute to the result to a significant extent (Cheshire). Mark’s attack was more than a slight or trifling cause and thus fulfills the test (Kinsey).

For operational, the causation chain should not be broken (Rafferty). Medical negligence is unlikely to break the chain unless ‘in itself so potent in causing death’ (Cheshire) or it is ‘palpably wrong’ (Jordan). Jordan involved a positive administration of drugs while the Cheshire involved only omission. Omission would not normally amount to an intervening act (Morby). Thus, the doctor’s omission would not break the causation.

Also, in Jordan, the V was virtually healed, and the treatment was abnormal and grossly negligent. This was not the case for Mark.

As such, causation is established.

It was criticized by Sullivan and Simester (2012) that the causation rule is policy-driven and the underlying principle of the rule is not strong nowadays. Glanville William (1983) stated that the legal causation is indeed an “imputable causation”.

Murder

Paul could be charged with murder.

Murder is the unlawful killing of a person in the queen’s peace with malice aforethought (Cunningham). Since Mark is killed by Paul in peace time, this AR is fulfilled.

Direct intention required that it was D’s aim or purpose to cause death or serious harm (Moloney). Jury may find that there could be direct intention depending on the nature of Paul’s attack (e.g. force and number of blows).

Alternatively, oblique intent could be found when death or grievous bodily harm (GBH) was a virtually certain consequence of D’s act (objective test) and D foresaw it (subjective test) (Woollin). The jury is likely to find oblique intent on causing GBH as Paul repeatedly attack Mark’s head.

Paul may be guilty of murder.

Unlawful Act Manslaughter (UAM) (AG’s Reference No.3 of 1994)

UAM will be a safer charge.

Intention to commit the act

The necessary MR is an intention to commit the underlying crime. Paul’s battery is intentionally carried out and fulfilled this requirement.

Unlawful act which must be criminal (Lamb)

Paul’s attack could at least be a battery that forms the underlying offence of UAM (Church).

Act must be dangerous

Attacking someone’s head repeatedly will cause some harm and a sober and reasonable person will recognize risk of it (Church). Thus, it is dangerous.

The act causes the death

This is established in the causation part above.

Paul will be convicted of UAM.

Sarah’s Death

Causation

Factual Causation

But for Paul’s push, Sarah would not die. Factual causation is fulfilled.

Legal Causation

Depending on the force of the push, Paul’s push was unlikely to be slight or trifling. The push is thus substantial. Concerning the operational requirement, Sarah’s weak skull should be considered. The eggshell skull rule applies that D must take V as they find them. D cannot escape liability simply because of V’s susceptibility to injury (Hayward). Thus, Sarah’s latent issue did not break the causation.

As such, causation is established,

UAM

Paul could be charged with UAM.

Intention to commit the act

Paul’s attack was intentionally carried out.

Unlawful act which must be criminal (Lamb)

The push was battery that constitutes underlying offence of UAM (Church).

Act must be dangerous

It requires only to foresee some harm, it is not necessary to foresee the sort of harm (M). If the force of the push is gentle, Paul may argue that no harm is foreseeable.

However, some offence itself is not dangerous, but it would become dangerous in view of the surrounding circumstances (Bristow). Being Sarah’s husband, it is very likely that Paul knows of Sarah’s special condition. This may render his push a dangerous act.

The act causes the death

This is established in the causation part above.

Paul will be convicted of UAM.

Erine’s Death

Causation

Factual Causation

But for Paul’s driving, Erine would not die. Factual causation is fulfilled.

Legal Causation

Switching off a life support machine which comes bona fide is not an intervening act (Malcherek). The causation chain is not broken.

As such, causation is established.

Gross Negligence Manslaughter (GNM) (Adomako)

Careless/dangerous driving is a crime of strict liability (Andrews) hence there is no UAM.

Existence of Duty of Care

Drivers owe a duty to other road users (Nettleship).

Breach of Duty

D must do something that a reasonable person would not have done or fail to do something should be done (Blyth). Paul failed to drive with care, the duty of care was breached.

Causing the death

Causation is established above.

Gross Negligence

The breach should be gross and far below the standard of reasonable person (Adomako) and shows disregard of other’s life and safety (Bateman). This depend of the driving speed.

It is criticized that if V dies, they must be clearly a risk of death and the proof will be easy (Elloitt, 2014).

Alternatively, as Paul created a danger situation, he has the duty to eliminate it (Miller). His refusal to ask help breach the duty..

Paul may be convicted of GNM.

Homicide 2020

2025-05-13T17:19:00.003+08:00

Paul and Mark were out hiking together when they got into an argument

about politics. During the argument, Paul lost his temper and punched

Mark several times to the face. When Mark was lying on the floor, Paul

stamped on Mark’s head four times. Paul then fled the scene, but some

other hikers called an ambulance and Mark was taken to the hospital in

a serious condition. At the hospital, an overworked consultant, who had

been on duty for 15 hours, failed to notice that Mark had suffered a

blood clot on the brain. Mark died several hours after being admitted to

hospital and being sent to a normal ward, rather than intensive care.

When Paul got home, he told his wife, Sarah, what had happened with

Mark. Sarah became very upset and told Paul that he must tell the police

and also telephone the hospital to check on Mark’s condition. Paul

panicked and pushed Sarah hard in the chest. This caused Sarah to fall

down and hit her head on the corner of a table. Due to having an

exceptionally weak skull, Sarah died immediately.

Terrified about what had happened, Paul decided to drive to the

countryside, where he owned a small cottage. As he was driving there

and feeling terrible about what he had done, he failed to notice that the

car ahead of him had stopped and crashed into the back of it. When he

got out of the car, he saw that Ernie, the driver of the car, was seriously

injured and unconscious. Paul tried to call an ambulance, but there was

no reception on his mobile phone. As a result, he walked a few hundred

yards up the road until he had reception, but then decided that he might

be traced if he made the call. Paul then got in his car and left Ernie, who

was later found, taken to hospital and put on a life support machine.

Two days later the doctors decided that Ernie would not recover and

switched the life support off.

Advise Paul on his liability for the deaths.

Note: You do not need to deal with the partial defences to murder

when answering this question.

Ending

2025-03-03T09:38:00.001+08:00

(p 300)

⚫ Refined the 2nd part of proportionality test

◼ Application: varied according to the nature of the right at issue

⚫ 1

st part of proportionality test: largely similar way

◼ Requirement:

◆ The party defending the restriction on a particular right → prove:

rationally connected with legitimate purposes

⚫ Legitimate purposes

◼ ICCPR

◼ No reasons listed → court to decide

⚫ Difficult to prove

◼ Kong Yunming

◼ Chan Kim Sum

(p 302 - 303)

⚫ 2

nd part of the test: “minimal impairment’ test - necessary extent of the

restriction

◼ Chan Kin Sum

◼ Ng Kung Siu

(p 303)

⚫ 2

nd part: applied varied according to nature of rights at issue

◼ Violate the “respect and dignity that society accords to a human being”

◆ Particular severe scrutiny

◆ Weighty evidence

◆ Fok Chun Wa: extremely rarely

◼ (p 304 – 305)

Social and economic rights involving public funds expenditure: Much

milder form

◆ Examples

⚫ Fok Chun Wa + Kong Yunming

⚫ Still failed: Kong Yunming

◆ Deference: margin of appreciation

⚫ Examples: life sentence + time limit on appeals against

electoral rsutls

◆ Criticism: no universal suffrag

Programme title

2024-12-02T09:47:00.001+08:00

на полі бою.

на поле боя

Analysis

2024-11-23T15:46:00.002+08:00

Partiality Due to Lack of Russian Perspectives

Focus on Human Impact: The program primarily aims to highlight the experiences of civilians affected by the war, particularly in Ukraine. This focus is intentional, as it seeks to shed light on the humanitarian crises resulting from the conflict. While the absence of Russian perspectives may suggest partiality, it is crucial to recognize that the program's goal is to amplify the voices of those most directly impacted by the violence. By prioritizing these narratives, the program fosters empathy and understanding of the war's consequences on innocent lives.
Potential for Future Inclusion: The current lack of Russian viewpoints does not preclude the possibility of including them in future episodes. The program can evolve to present a more comprehensive view of the conflict, and viewers should remain open to the idea that subsequent segments may address the complexities of the situation from multiple angles. This adaptability can enhance the program's relevance and provide a more balanced perspective over time.
Contextual Understanding of Conflict: The program's current focus does not imply a disregard for the broader geopolitical context. Understanding the motivations and actions of all parties involved in the conflict is essential. The program can serve as a starting point for discussions about the multifaceted nature of war, encouraging viewers to seek out additional information and perspectives to gain a fuller understanding of the situation. This approach promotes critical thinking and informed discourse among audiences.

Unnerving and Offensive Content

Realistic Portrayal of Conflict: The program aims to provide an authentic representation of the harsh realities of war. While some viewers may find this unsettling, it is essential to understand that the intention is to educate and inform rather than to sensationalize violence. By confronting the realities of conflict, the program encourages viewers to engage with important humanitarian issues. This realistic portrayal can serve as a catalyst for awareness and advocacy, prompting viewers to consider the implications of war on global stability.
Focus on Human Stories: The narratives presented in the program often center around the experiences of individuals affected by war. This human-centric approach is designed to foster empathy and understanding, rather than merely shocking the audience. While the content may evoke strong emotions, it serves a purpose in highlighting the human cost of conflict. By sharing personal stories, the program allows viewers to connect emotionally with the subjects, promoting a sense of solidarity and compassion.
Content Warnings and Viewer Discretion: The program includes content warnings to prepare viewers for potentially distressing material. This allows audiences to make informed decisions about their viewing experience, acknowledging that some may find the subject matter challenging. By providing this context, the program respects the viewer's autonomy and encourages responsible media consumption. This practice is particularly important in maintaining a balance between raising awareness and ensuring viewer comfort.

Negative Influence on Children

Educational Value: Contrary to the notion that the program negatively influences children, it can serve as an educational tool that raises awareness about the realities of war. By presenting factual information and personal stories, the program can help children develop a deeper understanding of global issues and the importance of humanitarian efforts. This educational aspect can empower children to think critically about the world around them and the impact of conflict on their peers.
Promoting Resilience and Empathy: The program often highlights the resilience of children living in conflict zones, showcasing their strength in the face of adversity. This portrayal can inspire hope and encourage young viewers to empathize with those less fortunate, fostering a sense of social responsibility rather than fear or negativity. By illustrating how children cope with challenging circumstances, the program can serve as a source of inspiration for young audiences.
Encouraging Discussion: The content can prompt important conversations between parents and children about war, peace, and humanitarian issues. Engaging in these discussions can help children process complex emotions and develop critical thinking skills regarding global conflicts, rather than simply absorbing distressing images without context. This dialogue can also strengthen family bonds and promote a shared understanding of important social issues.
Respecting Parental Guidance: The inclusion of content warnings allows parents to assess the suitability of the program for their children. This empowers families to engage with the material in a way that aligns with their values and the maturity of their children, ensuring that the program can be a constructive part of their media consumption. By facilitating parental involvement, the program acknowledges the importance of guidance in children's media experiences.

Summary

2024-11-13T09:21:00.003+08:00

Two episodes followed the hostess in war-torn Ukraine where she interviewed civilians. The first episode started with an introductory segment involving rhetorical questions, interview excerpts and brief description of Ukrainian history.

During the first visit of the hostess, she met a retired couple who had a frightening experience of war. Their son revealed that a local was shot dead after going next door for charging the phone. This family survived with limited supplies under the Russian occupation.

Allegations

2024-11-13T06:55:00.003+08:00

The racial hatred against Russia and the negative image of Russia were spread, and the hostility against China could be found as well.

The remarks from the voice-over, hostess and interviewees were inaccurate, serving as tools for brainwashing and disseminating unverified information. They were also misleading due to the absence of references to the causes of the Russia-Ukraine war.

By portraying Russia as the guilty party, an incomplete picture of the Russian-Ukrainian war was presented with a predetermined political stance. The contents were partial due to the unavailability of objective reports on the backgrounds and political positions of the countries participating in the war and interviews with Russians. With the negligence of Russian misery, the war was analysed from the Ukrainian, European, and American perspectives to smear Russia and glorify war.

The programme contents misled and harmed young and immature viewers.

TVB was requested to immediately cancel the program and issue an apology.

Given the presence of interviews relating to the Azov Battalion which was linked to neo-Nazism and terrorism, the programme was politically sensitive and tarnished the image of Hong Kong. Since the programme contained elements which advocated colour revolutions and white terror and twisted the normal understanding of the China-Russia relationship and its end credits recognised the contributions from United 24, Superhumans and Lena Demme, the programme was suspected to be under sponsorship from foreign countries and also accused to be a mouthpiece for the US. The Gaza Strip and Lebanon were more worthy of being included in the program.

薑蔥炒蟹

2024-09-07T18:58:00.002+08:00

慢火爆薑，攞起，保留已用的油
蟹蓋加生粉，猛火煎
蟹其餘部分加生粉，猛火煎
有焦香，加薑、蔥白
加酒、水
加蠔油、生抽、糖、胡椒粉、老抽
加蟹蓋
焗兩至三分鐘
加蔥
加生粉水
加喼汁

English

2022-06-13T00:24:00.003+08:00

blab

to talk carelessly or too much, often telling others something you should keep secret

（因不慎或亂說而）洩密

Someone blabbed to the press.

有人向新聞界洩露了情況。

bozo

a stupid person

傻瓜，笨蛋

Some bozo on a motorcycle almost ran me over.

一個騎機車的笨蛋差點兒把我撞倒了。

cabal

a small group of people who plan secretly to take action, especially political action

（尤指策劃政治行動的）陰謀小集團，陰謀團夥

He was assassinated by a cabal of aides within his own regime.

他被自己政權內部的幕僚所組成的陰謀集團暗殺了。

辯論

2022-04-21T23:01:00.002+08:00

辯題分為三種。

第一種叫做「應然性」辯題。這類辯題的重點在於辯論「應該」與否，雙方最重要的是提出支持立場的「理念」（或價值觀），如上述辯題可以「快樂成長」、「學生健康」為理念。

第二種叫做「實然性」辯題。這類辯題的重點是留意辯題的「現實背景」，如「在什麼情況 / 條件下」，失敗可以孕育成功。

第三種叫做「比較型」辯題。「比較型」辯題的重點在於要提出清晰的衡量「準則」，例如︰怎樣才算好的社會領袖？衡量利弊的標準是什麼？

中文齊齊學

2022-04-21T22:54:00.004+08:00

犯怵：害怕

忙不迭的：十分匆忙

踮起腳尖：抬起腳跟而靠腳尖著地

薑蔥金蒜炒龍蝦

2022-03-26T22:08:00.004+08:00

食材：

龍蝦尾*1

蔥*3棵

薑*5片

金蒜*3湯匙

做法：

洗淨龍蝦，印乾水份、切件，放少許油大火快炒，盛起備用

加少許油，爆香薑片，再加蔥及少許鹽

加入龍蝦炒勻，加入少許水，蓋上焗3至5分鐘

最後加入金蒜

好好學習天天學中文

2022-03-03T18:02:00.000+08:00

近日工作的需要，漸覺每天閱讀是必須的，只有這樣才好寫出好文章。因此，我會在此記錄每日新學的字彙。

獨闢蹊徑

獨自開闢新路。比喻獨創新方法，而營造出一番新氣象。清．葉燮《原詩．卷三．外篇上》：「抹倒體裁、聲調、氣象、格力諸說，獨闢蹊徑，而栩栩然自是也。」

醍醐灌頂

比喻灌輸智慧，使人得到啟發，澈底醒悟。

佝僂

因缺乏鈣質而引起的軟骨症

無獨有偶

兩件事物恰巧相同或類似

一晃

眼前一現即逝。如：「窗外有人一晃。」也作「一晃兒」

離群索居

索：孤單，離開集體或民眾，過孤獨的生活。離群索居的意思就是遠離人群，自己一個人居住，泛指不合群，孤獨的人。出自於《禮記·檀弓上》。

晨光 20200807

2020-10-09T00:18:00.000+08:00

普通嘅書一本百科全書佢更加唔係一本普通嘅百科全書因為佢係一本聽得嘅唔會有一啲嘅呢條㗎咁如果影響出你以為聽到呢個環節嘅就應該係幾點幾點咩今天呢會有一啲嘅唔一樣呀希望唔好嚇親你呀新光百貨都會同大家呢睇睇一啲嘅成語法科呀既然係咁啦咁阿彭仔啦都周圍搵下一啲嘅成語故事呀有啲乜嘢可以同大家去分享呢其中啦我都係同一啲嘅新聞事件當中呢去搵題材啊會唔會有一啲呢都係呀呢一兩天呀大家可能會有機會接觸得到又係屬於成語科目嘅下就話畀我今天呢搵到一個教材喎就係呀一件事啦喺香港發生啦咁易得手啦尋日就話公開之前呢係呢個局方處理認真就抽出呢教育界嘅害群之馬咁講好啦今天

睇返佢嗰個架來源出處呢我去原來呢就喺呢個宋朝時候嘅咁就阿露安細呀下佢嘅進研習應少見閘入面呢就有來自呢一句嘅說話啦下劉安世呢佢就係北宋嘅官員嚟嘅呢就話你知其為與群之馬起而輕易栽咁樣呢一個當中呢都隱含住一個呢成語故事嘅成語故事呢就要講返呢就係我哋炎黃子孫嘅祖先呀皇帝呀皇帝啦一次出行啦迷路喎咁咪遇見呢因為呢喺度放媽嘅男孩放唔係放馬過嚟呀就會可能拖隻狗仔去放狗呀人哋以前隻馬出嚟呀好似牧羊咁樣下男孩都問下呢個全部都話知道咁即係皇帝問佢乜嘢佢都話知道就連那皇帝后嚟考佢呀就咁你知唔知道如何治理天下咁呢個嘅男孩子啦都話知道好啦天下呢就係好似呀佢看管嗰啲嘅馬匹咁樣啫只不過係淨係要張危害馬群嘅衰媽話阿媽就驅逐出去咁就得㗎喇咁話講到好似頭頭是道㗎嘛

咁就得㗎喇咁話講到好似頭頭是道㗎嘛咁我亦都因為咁呢就出現咗有呢一個四字成語害群之馬即係借用咩危害馬群嘅劣媽喇佢比喻呀作社會上危害我哋集體嘅人呀自必然係屬於一種嘅貶義詞啦你嘅身邊會唔會有啲害群之馬出現呀或者喺你個界別呀你嘅朋友圈中呀係咪需要趕佢扯呢定還是不如既然佢係你嘅朋友又或者係你嘅夥伴嘅話咁呀有冇得糾正下佢呀會唔會可以幫佢改善佢嘅辦事吖或者係思想方面呀令到佢唔會成為害群之馬變返做你嘅同伴即係返回正軌咁會唔會好啲啦唔好下下呢一諗呢就踢人請先得㗎好多個可同大家喇佢傾講下

小巴司機案

2020-10-09T00:15:00.004+08:00

(WONG CHIM YING vs CHENG KAM WING [1990] 2HKLR 111)

Wong Chim-Ying v Cheng Kam-Wing ([1991] 2 HKLR 253)

DBS Black World Master「與友共賞」推薦計劃

2016-11-29T21:39:00.003+08:00

http://www.dbs.com.hk/personal-zh/credit-cards/promotions/black-mgm-201611.html?RefCode=5600114541&fb_ref=Default

觀塘工廈＄50素菜真‧清新

2016-06-14T23:02:00.001+08:00

【晴報專訊】昔日的觀塘工業區，工廈林立，好不熱鬧；漸漸地工業北上，大部分工廠大廈人已去，但幸好樓不空，皆因食店相繼進駐，令這裏再度熱鬧起來。區內食店種類繁多，今次帶大家上樓歎清新素食、嘗足料意菜、Fusion菜，再吃20元有找的下午茶餐。

1. $70素鰻魚雙拼飯 i素食

素食文化近年再度興起，進駐觀塘工廈的「i素食」，開業短短兩年，已成功吸引不少捧場客。但回想創業路，並非一帆風順。老闆Ella是「佛家子弟」，因為信仰加上個人心願，便打算與朋友合資，更請來大廚助陣。開素食店不是易事，開樓上舖挑戰就更大，Ella對素食有種執着，卻因此與朋友的合作告吹。為了延續心願，不懂煮食的Ella毅然穿上圍裙。她一面認真道：「我有太多堅持，例如，我堅持一定要用過濾水，唔用味精同白糖，而且無任何奶類、蛋類食品。」
這裏在中午時段會供應素食套餐，Ella表示附近OL都愛光顧。另外，晚上也會有素食私房菜，菜式由Ella親自設計，她表示：「其實每次見到家庭來試私房菜，也會深深感到愛，見到客人食得開心，係令我堅持落去嘅原因。」

i素食
地址：觀塘成業街19-21號成業工業大廈2樓24室
電話：3565 5203
備註：晚上素食私房菜，須提前一天預訂。星期六、日休息。

2. $82抹茶卡邦尼鮮蝦意粉慕茶

甫踏入「慕茶」，仿如走進寧靜的森林。工廈中竟也有幽靜的樂土？店主之一的Elaine道：「『慕茶』的意思是有渴慕，而茶等於TEA，合起來就是渴慕Tea一Tea，希望客人在忙碌的生活中休息一下。」

小店開業兩年，三位股東Elaine、Maggie與Michelle因參演音樂劇結緣，老友鬼鬼，看中觀塘工廈變天的先機，合資開Cafe。三位股東亦十分有創意，將中國茶配Gelato為主打，吸引了不少愛新鮮又嗜甜的顧客。這裏最受歡迎是濃香鐵觀音配Gelato，Elaine更曾拜師學做Gelato，將心意全盤傾盡到小小的Cafe。
三位女生屢有創意，亦不斷以「茶」為題，創出不同菜式。抹茶近年大熱，製成甜品再不是單一菜式，將抹茶配卡邦尼意粉，就為味覺帶來大衝擊，就算不是抹茶控，也會愛上這種出奇的味道。這裏亦會不定期舉行活動，如插花、製雪糕與音樂會等，讓客人可在忙碌的生活中，有喘息的機會。小店早前裝修過，地方更大，不再是開放式廚房，油煙味也減少了，相信會更受食客歡迎。

慕茶
地址：觀塘開源道55號開聯工業中心A座726室
電話：6257 9982

3. $30Fusion下午茶米克諾斯

香港有個小希臘，說的是這間觀塘樓上餐廳「米克諾斯」。店名取自愛琴海一個小島，餐廳以希臘風海水藍及白色為主調，並掛上希臘藍海小白屋的相片，餐廳更設藍色陽台。熱愛旅遊及夾Band的店主，希望打造如度假般的悠閒感覺。店內播放結他Music，客人也可任彈場內的結他，隨意翻閱旅遊書。
餐廳暫時只開午市及下午茶時段，主打西班牙x韓國Fusion菜，晚市地中海私房菜須特別預訂。大廚曾在本地的西班牙餐廳及韓國餐廳當廚，於是將兩地菜式結合。最爆趣是融合了鐵板概念的石頭燒飯，由客人自選飯底、肉類、配料及醬汁。

米克諾斯Kallisti
地址：觀塘成業街30號華富工貿中心401室
電話：6010 1635
備註：星期日休息

4. $18豬扒包餐百喜茶餐廳

除了走上不同工廈，穿梭這區的地舖，亦可找到抵食小店。這間百喜茶餐廳，位置雖然隱蔽，但下午時間人頭湧湧，捧場客甚多，皆因一個字─平。下午茶豬扒包餐連凍飲，只需18元，味道不過不失，但勝在夠分量。店內感覺頗寬敞，一大班同事、朋友到來開餐，想坐在一起「吹水」不成問題。

百喜茶餐廳
地址：觀塘鴻圖道55號地下C室
電話：2797 0200
備註：星期日休息

【MV中字】t 尹美萊(t 윤미래) - ALWAYS 太陽的後裔(태양의 후예) OST Pt.1(Chinese│Han Lyric)

2016-03-20T23:12:00.001+08:00

張國榮 @ 今夜不設防（1989）

2016-03-20T21:53:00.001+08:00

香港老地方

Email

Civil Procedure

English Learning: Economist 16/5/2026

Criminal adv 2

Crim adv

Civil adv

Homicide 2020 ans

Homicide 2020

Ending

Programme title

Analysis

Partiality Due to Lack of Russian Perspectives

Unnerving and Offensive Content

Negative Influence on Children

Summary

Allegations

薑蔥炒蟹

English

辯論

中文齊齊學

薑蔥金蒜炒龍蝦

好好學習 天天學中文

晨光 20200807

小巴司機案

DBS Black World Master「與友共賞」推薦計劃

觀塘工廈 ＄50素菜真‧清新

【MV中字】t 尹美萊(t 윤미래) - ALWAYS 太陽的後裔(태양의 후예) OST Pt.1(Chinese│Han Lyric)

張國榮 @ 今夜不設防 （1989）

好好學習天天學中文

觀塘工廈＄50素菜真‧清新

張國榮 @ 今夜不設防（1989）