<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Human Security Gateway: All Updates</title>
<link><![CDATA[http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/]]></link>
<description>The Human Security Gateway is a rapidly expanding searchable online database of human security-related resources including reports, journal articles, news items and fact sheets. It is designed to make human security-related research more accessible to the policy and research communities, the media, educators and the interested public.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 1:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 1:14:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<webMaster>robert_hartfiel@sfu.ca (Robert Hartfiel)</webMaster>


   <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/hsg_main" /><feedburner:info uri="hsg_main" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
	   <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:58:19 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>La responsabilité de protéger: Un nouveau concept pour de vieilles pratiques?</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/CKM4v6fjtoM/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36862</guid>
		 <description>La communauté internationale, partagée entre le respect de la souveraineté nationale et l’impératif
d’intervenir à des fins humanitaires, n’a pas toujours su comment réagir face aux atrocités de masse. Le
débat relatif à l’action onusienne en situation de crise a connu de nombreuses évolutions mais une étape
fondamentale a été franchie en 2000 avec le concept de responsabilité de protéger, permettant de
concilier ces deux principes. Adopté par les États membres des Nations unies en 2005, ce principe a été
appliqué pour la première fois en Libye et en Côte d’Ivoire en 2011. Pourtant, cette mise en oeuvre pose
question quant à savoir si elle résulte d’un nouveau consensus plus large au sein de la communauté
internationale ou si elle reflète finalement la simple poursuite des intérêts nationaux. 	   SOURCE: Group for Research and Information on Peace and Security (Groupe de Recherche et d’Information sur la Paix et la Sécurité)&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=CKM4v6fjtoM:UHPPbDxFaR8:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=CKM4v6fjtoM:UHPPbDxFaR8:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/CKM4v6fjtoM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Group for Research and Information on Peace and Security (Groupe de Recherche et d’Information sur la Paix et la Sécurité)</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36862</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:37:18 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Disaster Risk Management for Insecure Contexts</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/tX8e887dJ0U/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36861</guid>
		 <description>In insecure contexts there is often a self-reinforcing spiral: conflict creates more vulnerability to disaster and more vulnerability to disaster creates further conflict. This is compounded by climate change, environmental degradation, market fragility, economic marginalisation, migration and unplanned urbanisation. Aid is currently too disjointed to address this spiral effectively. Each agency has disparate policies, teams and operations for disaster risk management [DRM] and for insecurity programming [IP]. However, the common objectives and the combined impact of the various approaches to DRM, IP and relief and recovery operations can be harnessed to develop a long-term strategy promoting peace and resilience to all forms of threats and hazards. Such integration would lead to more streamlined operations and a more efficient use of funds. 	   SOURCE: Action Contre la Faim&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=tX8e887dJ0U:CsOEDEewvNQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=tX8e887dJ0U:CsOEDEewvNQ:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/tX8e887dJ0U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Action Contre la Faim</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36861</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:38:34 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>“No Safe Places”: Yemen’s Crackdown on Protests in Taizz</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/YtBIT03eNHw/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36860</guid>
		 <description>When Yemenis took to the streets in January 2011 to demand an end to Saleh’s 33-year rule, Taizz, 250 kilometers south of the capital, Sanaa, became a center of both peaceful and armed resistance – and the scene of numerous human rights abuses and violations of the laws of war. “No Safe Places”is based on more than 170 interviews with protesters, doctors, human rights defenders, and other witnesses to attacks in Taizz by state security forces and pro-Saleh gangs from February to December 2011.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; 	   SOURCE: Human Rights Watch&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=YtBIT03eNHw:cbcBppZpTVs:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=YtBIT03eNHw:cbcBppZpTVs:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/YtBIT03eNHw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Human Rights Watch</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36860</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:34:55 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Regional Security Cooperation in the Maghreb and Sahel: Algeria’s Pivotal Ambivalence</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/leH0m7oVGgc/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36859</guid>
		 <description>Despite growing concerns across the Sahel and Maghreb over the increasing potency of al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, the diffusion of heavily armed mercenaries from Libya, the expanding influence of arms and drugs trafficking, and the widening lethality of Boko Haram, regional security cooperation to address these transnational threats remains fragmented.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

Algeria is well-positioned to play a central role in defining this cooperation, but must first reconcile the complex domestic, regional, and international considerations that shape its decision-making. 	   SOURCE: Africa Center for Strategic Studies&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=leH0m7oVGgc:QmwgcN-A5Xg:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=leH0m7oVGgc:QmwgcN-A5Xg:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/leH0m7oVGgc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Africa Center for Strategic Studies</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36859</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:08:58 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Post-conflict Peacebuilding and Prospects for Democracy with Reference to Africa</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/n2dSkeQ8hH8/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36858</guid>
		 <description>The destructive conflicts that plagued much of Africa including those still lingering
in the Horn and the Great Lakes Regions are presently moving to the postconflict
stage. This phase has its own particular characteristics that need renewed
analyses and understanding of the realignment of actors and their behaviour, as
well as the nature of incompatibilities and the reformulation of strategies and
methods, in order to meaningfully respond to the urgent needs of consolidating
the peace process. Democratic transition is a pronounced aim in every case. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
This paper, based on earlier research and lectures by the author,
argues that sound representative institutions, based on the principles of democracy
and human rights and creatively integrating traditional values and wisdom
of each society, have a good chance to usher in a hopeful system where future
violent conflicts can be averted and peaceful mechanisms prevail.
The discussion highlights the challenges of democratic transition in war-torn
conditions, weak or shattered political institutions, economic underdevelopment
and confusing identity complex. Besides these hurdles, external unfair economic
exchange and global relations play a negative role. Briefly examining the prevailing
theoretical discussion on the issue, the paper suggests an analytical tool
for clarifying the complex entanglement between transitional democracy on one
hand, and identity/ ethnicity, on the other. 	   SOURCE: Life &amp; Peace Institute&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=n2dSkeQ8hH8:BdVae653_qo:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=n2dSkeQ8hH8:BdVae653_qo:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/n2dSkeQ8hH8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Life &amp; Peace Institute</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36858</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:57:45 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Divine Disputes? Exploring the Religious Dimensions of Armed Conflicts</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/UOHOr0TTXYQ/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36857</guid>
		 <description>A growing literature has started to explore the relationship between
religious dimensions and the escalation, duration and termination of
armed conflicts. This study examines the conditions for negotiated
settlements. The author argues that if the demands of the belligerents
are explicitly anchored in a religious tradition, they will come to perceive
the conflicting issues as indivisible, and the conflict will be less likely to
be settled through negotiations. Utilising unique data on the religious
demands and identities of the primary parties, all intrastate conflictdyads
in the Uppsala Conflict Data Program, 1989-2003, are examined.
The study finds that if governments or rebel groups have made explicit
religious claims, these conflict-dyads are significantly less likely than
others to be terminated through negotiated settlement. By contrast,
whether the primary parties come from different religious traditions does
not affect the chances for negotiated settlement. 	   SOURCE: Life and Peace Institute&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=UOHOr0TTXYQ:rLt6-KTl1Iw:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=UOHOr0TTXYQ:rLt6-KTl1Iw:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/UOHOr0TTXYQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Life and Peace Institute</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36857</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:52:58 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Heroes and Villains: Ijaw Nationalist Narratives of the Nigerian Civil War</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/KnlcH7xHBS0/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36856</guid>
		 <description>Numerous explanations of the failure of the Biafran enterprise highlight the
absence of legitimacy and support for the Biafran effort among the Niger Delta
‘minorities’. In the aftermath of the Civil War, popular narratives among the Ijaw,
arguably Nigeria’s fourth largest ethnic group, tended to tie them closely to the
Federal side. In this paper, we examine the transformations of the relationship
between Southern minorities and the Biafran cause, with a particular focus on
the Ijaw. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The fiscal centralization of oil resources that followed the war and the
persistence of minority exclusion within the Nigerian polity have encouraged
Ijaw elites, and other southern minorities, to review their commitment to Nigerian
federalism. Conflicting tales of the Ijaw nationalist hero Isaac Boro testify to
a growing ‘revisionism’ in interpretations of the Biafran War. Today the resurgence
of militant forms of Ijaw ethnic nationalism, against the backdrop of oil
community protests which have been taking place since the early 1990s, has
given rise to new interpretations of the war, and the creation of new political
linkages between Ijaw nationalists, other Niger Delta minorities and Igbo pro-
Biafra movements. While resistance to Biafra catalyzed Ijaw nationalism in the
fighting and aftermath of the Civil War, Biafra has now become a symbol of
contemporary Ijaw nationalism. By drawing on new ‘revisionist’ histories of
Biafra, this paper considers the complex interaction of ethnic nationalism, oil
and secessionist conflict in Nigeria. 	   SOURCE: Africa Development // Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=KnlcH7xHBS0:ujS-MOGOvgU:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=KnlcH7xHBS0:ujS-MOGOvgU:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/KnlcH7xHBS0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Africa Development // Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36856</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:26:26 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Humanitarian Aid and the Biafra War: Lessons not Learned</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/r5YVA_9Lnlw/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36855</guid>
		 <description>In African contemporary history, Biafra is not only remembered as one of the
worst humanitarian crises on the continent, but also as a tragedy that gave rise
to the concept of ingérence or the international responsibility to protect. Unfortunately,
the controversies about the impact of aid during the conflict have been
forgotten. Today, the humanitarian legend of Biafra celebrates the saving of
starving children and the birth of the famous NGO Médecins sans Frontières,
but it does not acknowledge the military impact of relief operations that helped
the secessionists continue the war for over a year after it was lost militarily. As
it prolonged the suffering of local populations, relief was a matter of discussion
during and just after the war. Since then, this strategic debate has been ‘lost in
translation’. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
This paper will argue that the contemporary idea of humanitarian aid
that advocates a right of intervention in order to save innocents confuses the
issue for at least two reasons. First, it leads us to think wrongly that Biafra gave
birth to the concept of an international responsibility to protect, something that
had existed previously. Secondly, it overshadows the dark side of humanitarian
aid, where international intervention often assists belligerents rather than civilians,
prolongs suffering, and poses new threats to national sovereignty. 	   SOURCE: Africa Development // Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=r5YVA_9Lnlw:iEhqmXrA19A:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=r5YVA_9Lnlw:iEhqmXrA19A:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/r5YVA_9Lnlw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Africa Development // Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36855</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:56:40 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Violence, Identity Mobilization and the Reimagining of Biafra</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/b3oc7ujiOk4/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36854</guid>
		 <description>The events leading to the Nigeria Civil War marked the triumph of force and
violence over dialogue and negotiation as a means of conflict resolution. The
success of the Nigerian state in imposing a military solution on the preceding
political crisis, and then suppressing the ensuing Biafran rebellion, has had a
lasting effect on state–society relations. As a result, the state has not refrained
from using violence at the slightest provocation against competing and conflicting
ethno-religious groups. The tendency of the state to exercise domination
through the deployment of violence implies an ongoing crisis of state hegemony
rather than a resolution of civil unrest. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
This article argues that state
violence was more important than ethnic divisions in triggering the secessionist
attempt of Biafra, and has continued to create rather than resolve ethnic divisions
across the country. The emergence in post-Civil War Nigeria of regimes
that perpetrated or permitted mass violence against restive social groups remains
critical to understanding the contemporary rise of ethno-nationalist movements
and waning allegiance to the Nigerian state, particularly among the Igbo.
The aim of the article is to underscore the understated salience of state violence
in the debates on identity and citizenship in multi-ethnic societies. 	   SOURCE: Africa Development // Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=b3oc7ujiOk4:__rswgQ1ggk:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=b3oc7ujiOk4:__rswgQ1ggk:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/b3oc7ujiOk4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Africa Development // Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36854</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:35:12 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>La Côte d’Ivoire dans la dynamique d’instabilité ouest-africaine Les racines de la crise post-électorale 2010-2011</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/00mzeAufh9U/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36853</guid>
		 <description>Le conflit en Côte d’Ivoire à l’issue de l’élection présidentielle du 28 novembre 2010 n’est pas un
phénomène nouveau ni surprenant. Il s’inscrit dans la continuité d’une décennie de crise, qui
trouve ses origines dans des causes internes diverses et qui s’est cristallisé autour du concept
d’« ivoirité ». Par ailleurs, ces tensions internes ont été exacerbées par un contexte régional
instable. Cette analyse sur les racines du conflit ivoirien est complétée par un rapport sur les
impacts de la crise ivoirienne. 	   SOURCE: Group for Research and Information on Peace and Security (Groupe de Recherche et d’Information sur la Paix et la Sécurité)&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=00mzeAufh9U:TKygHEaSC_E:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=00mzeAufh9U:TKygHEaSC_E:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/00mzeAufh9U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Group for Research and Information on Peace and Security (Groupe de Recherche et d’Information sur la Paix et la Sécurité)</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36853</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:30:42 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Iraq and the Challenge of Continuing Violence</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/C-g-8B72Wn4/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36852</guid>
		 <description>The withdrawal of U.S. combat forces from Iraq at the end of 2011 did not leave that country with a functioning democracy or effective governance; nor has it put an end to high levels of local violence, or ethnic and sectarian tension. In the wake of the developing leadership crisis between Iraqi Prime Minister Maliki and Vice President Hashimi which began on December 17, 2011, the decreased U.S. presence in Iraq seems to guarantee future sectarian violence and instability. 
&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
In spite of the massive investment of U.S. and Coalition aid, Iraq continues to struggle with crippling levels of poverty and unemployment; its per capita income is 159th in the world; and Iraq’s population and armed forces continually come under attack from insurgents.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
The U.S. Department of Energy estimates that Iraq’s wealth is likely to increase by less than half the production rate called for in Iraqi plans, as the country must deal with critical problems in health, education, local governance, and reforming its agriculture and state industries. The United States is seeking a new role in Iraq that can help that country deal with these issues and counter Iranian influence, but persistent ethnic and sectarian violence, power struggles among Iraqi leadership, the lack of strong governance at all levels, and continuing attacks by insurgents on Iraq’s population and security forces demonstrate Iraq’s significant security challenges in the face of continuing violence. 	   SOURCE: Center for Strategic and International Studies&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=C-g-8B72Wn4:ywHWptYfqIk:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=C-g-8B72Wn4:ywHWptYfqIk:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/C-g-8B72Wn4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Center for Strategic and International Studies</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36852</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:15:13 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Civil Society and Peace Building in the Republic of Congo</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/j0e0csK01Wk/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36851</guid>
		 <description>The following report by Lindsey Weber is an English synopsis of three
studies on the role of the civil society in the pursuit of peace and democracy
in the Republic of Congo. The studies, based upon empirical analysis of surveys and personal interviews
conducted with members of civil society, approach the issue of the
role of civil society in the Republic of Congo from different but complementary
perspectives. They explore the local understandings of the concepts of
civil society and peace as well as highlight the role played by the civil society
in the peace process and the complex and often-incongruous relationship
between the state and civil society. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The first study, Congolese Civil Society: How does it Express Itself?, defines
the presence of civil society in the Congo and presents an overview of its
impact. The other two, Outcome of the Role and Means of Action of Female Civil
Society in the Construction of Peace and Horizontal Solidarity and Civil Society
in Perspective: the State of Horizontal Society in Brazzaville are appropriate
case studies of the role of specific components of Congolese civil society.
The former study describes the activities and role of female civil society in
the peace process. It is written by a historian, and discusses developments
in the entire country. The latter progresses beyond the contentious issue of
ethnicity to explore the concept of circulation, or interaction, as a catalyst for
the consolidation of civil society independent of state guidance. This study
is authored by a sociologist, and focuses on the city of Brazzaville. Therefore,
the perspectives and levels of analysis are different for each study. 	   SOURCE: Life &amp; Peace Institute&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=j0e0csK01Wk:HxM0aB24jO4:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=j0e0csK01Wk:HxM0aB24jO4:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/j0e0csK01Wk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Life &amp; Peace Institute</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36851</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:50:52 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Russia's Line in the Sand on Syria: Why Moscow Wants To Halt the Arab Spring</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/Xf8k44OFWhA/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36850</guid>
		 <description>Syria is often called Russia’s last remaining ally in the Middle East, and Moscow’s continuing refusal to support the United States, the European Union, and the Arab League in condemning the Assad regime certainly appears to support that claim. The reasons cited for Russia’s allegiance to Damascus are many: Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and Syrian President Bashar al-Assad are said to have a sort of autocratic solidarity, with Putin afraid that the Arab Spring encourages challenges to his own rule; at the same time, Russia is thought to have major economic interests in Syria, including arms contracts, a Russian-leased naval base, and plans for nuclear energy cooperation.
&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
There are elements of truth in all these assertions - but they offer only glimpses of the broader picture. Moscow’s position on Syria is shaped even more by the recent experience of Libya, strong doubts concerning the Syrian opposition, and suspicions about the motives of the United States. 	   SOURCE: Foreign Affairs // Council on Foreign Relations&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=Xf8k44OFWhA:E47MJxVZ7V4:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=Xf8k44OFWhA:E47MJxVZ7V4:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/Xf8k44OFWhA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Foreign Affairs // Council on Foreign Relations</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36850</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:45:38 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Girls and Warzones: Troubling Questions</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/Sk6j3TT9eoA/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36849</guid>
		 <description>In following the threads of war and its impact on the lives of girls globally, this study finds
that - experientially - the plight of war-victims, of girls sold into sexual or physical labor, of
street children, and of girls harmed in their own homes and communities is qualitatively
similar in many respects. In looking at the actual lives of girls, it becomes difficult to draw
easy lines between wartime and peacetime. What people tolerate in peace shapes what they
will tolerate in war. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
In following girl's stories, this study asks not only what girls in war and peace face, but why it
is so difficult to gather information about girls at all. Limited studies and statistics are
available, blunted by walls of silence over the state of the world's girls today. This silence
hides a world of human rights abuses. It also obscures, however, an instrumental fact: girls
are political actors and moral architects of their worlds. They fight and fight back, and many
construct peaceful solutions for a better world. When we begin to listen to the girl's own
stories, solutions begin to replace silence. 	   SOURCE: Life &amp; Peace Institute&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=Sk6j3TT9eoA:EuzVhXN6zrE:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=Sk6j3TT9eoA:EuzVhXN6zrE:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/Sk6j3TT9eoA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Life &amp; Peace Institute</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36849</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:44:15 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Scenarios for Syria [Meeting Summary]</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/QiuyxzbmH5o/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36848</guid>
		 <description>This paper is a summary of the discussions that took place during a small closed-door study group convened at Chatham House in December 2011 to discuss possible future scenarios for Syria.
&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
The main findings of the meeting are as follows:
&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
Predictions for the country's future vary considerably – and are often politicized. While increasing numbers of observers believe President Assad’s days are numbered, the timescale and endgame are still unclear.
 &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
The regime, like other Arab regimes that have faced uprisings, is trying to send the message that the only alternative to its rule is chaos and conflict. Yet so far most of the violence has come from the regime, which seems to be prepared to take the country into further conflict in a bid to preserve its power.
 &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
Overall, there is a serious deficit of provable, hard data on events in Syria, especially as the government is trying to block foreign journalists and NGOs from entering the country.
 &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
Western countries have called for Assad to leave but, lacking the appetite for an intervention, are hoping for a regional solution involving Turkey and the Arab League.
 &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
The Arab League is placing increasing diplomatic and economic pressure on Syria, but its members have mixed feelings about regime change. The Arab League's position may influence China's stance in efforts to deal with the crisis through the UN.
 &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
The regime is assuming that there will be no international military intervention, but the situation remains deeply unpredictable. A massacre could yet trigger international action. 	   SOURCE: Chatham House&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=QiuyxzbmH5o:Z2ZWJbt9qhI:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=QiuyxzbmH5o:Z2ZWJbt9qhI:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/QiuyxzbmH5o" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Chatham House</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36848</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:05:19 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Analyse des Dynamiques Locales de Cohabitation avec Groupes Armes FDLR a Bunyakiri, Hombo Nord, Hombo Sud et Chambucha</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/DgXVv1TsueQ/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36847</guid>
		 <description>Ce rapport est le fruit d’un travail de terrain réalisé par le Life &amp; Peace Institute en
collaboration avec son partenaire, l’ONG locale PADEBU, dans les territoires de Kalehe
(Sud Kivu) et de Walikale (Nord Kivu) au cours du dernier trimestre de 2006. Basé sur
des entretiens menés avec des acteurs locaux à Bunyakiri, Hombo Sud, Hombo Nord et
Chambucha entre octobre et décembre 2006, il a pour objectif d’aider à la compréhension
des dynamiques locales de cohabitation entre autorités civiles et militaires, populations
civiles et groupes armés FDLR/FoCA1 telles qu’elles se dessinent à l’aube de la mise en
place des institutions congolaises au niveau national. Le rapport explique les différentes
stratégies mises en place par chaque groupe d’acteurs pour assurer leur survie dans un
contexte politique, social et économique complexe, ainsi que les différents équilibres
auxquels ces stratégies sont susceptibles d’aboutir. Au-delà de la volonté de mieux
comprendre l’un de ses milieux d’intervention clés et de dégager des pistes d’action
concrètes pour l’avenir de son programme de transformation de conflits à l’est du Congo,
l’objectif du Life &amp; Peace Institute est ici de partager l’information recueillie avec les
autres acteurs du milieu, tant locaux qu’internationaux, dans l’optique d’un plaidoyer
pour l’amélioration de la situation sécuritaire et humanitaire des populations de
Bunyakiri et environs. 	   SOURCE: Life &amp; Peace Institute&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=DgXVv1TsueQ:Cx6-0UgFi0w:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=DgXVv1TsueQ:Cx6-0UgFi0w:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/DgXVv1TsueQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Life &amp; Peace Institute</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36847</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:53:16 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Au-delà des Groupes Armés: Conflits locaux et connexions sous-regionales, L’exemple de Fizi et Uvira (Sud- Kivu, RDC)</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/G5i5sHBdFmY/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36846</guid>
		 <description>Adepae, Arche d’Alliance, RIO et Life &amp; Peace Institute sont fiers de vous présenter le rapport de recherche portant sur les conflits intercommunautaires en Territoire d’Uvira et Fizi, Sud-Kivu, RD Congo. Ce rapport, qui est le produit d’une Recherche Action Participative menée pendant plusieurs années, avait initialement été finalisé en 2010. Depuis là, il a fait l’objet de plusieurs enrichissements par les communautés en question. Le fait de bien expliquer les différents points de vue des communautés était plus important pour LPI et ses partenaires qu’une publication rapide, à fin de ne pas perturber le processus de transformation de conflits en cours. 	   SOURCE: Action pour le Développement et la Paix Endogènes // Arche d’Alliance // Réseau d'Innovation Organisationnelle // Life &amp; Peace Institute&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=G5i5sHBdFmY:DS5FKTFOfbY:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=G5i5sHBdFmY:DS5FKTFOfbY:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/G5i5sHBdFmY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Action pour le Développement et la Paix Endogènes // Arche d’Alliance // Réseau d'Innovation Organisationnelle // Life &amp; Peace Institute</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36846</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:57:24 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>ACAS Bulletin 85: US Militarization of the Sahara Sahel: Security, Space &amp; Imperialism</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/rA6wkA7elhk/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36845</guid>
		 <description>Despite this commitment from the US government to the Sahara-Sahel, there is no consensus among policy makers, observers, regional governments and locals on-the-ground as to the ultimate rationale for these security initiatives. The primary justification for the US militarization of the Sahel is the existence of a small number of self-proclaimed ‘Islamist’ groups operating in the deserts connecting Mauritania, Mali, Burkina, Niger, Algeria, Tunisia, Chad and Libya, not to mention groups already active in northern Morocco Algeria, Tunisia and Libya. Debate has focused on whether or not these armed groups, individually or taken as a dis-articulated whole, present a potential and significant threat to local and international interests. It is hoped that this collection of essays sheds new light and, eventually, brings fresh eyes to a series of securitizing practices occurring on the ‘margins’ of empire, generally, and US hegemony specifically. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Articles in this issue include:&lt;br&gt;
1. From GSPC to AQIM: The evolution of an Algerian islamist terrorist group into an Al-Qa‘ida Affiliate and its implications for the Sahara-Sahel region | Stephen Harmon &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
2. War on ‘terror’: Africom, the Kleptocratic State and Under-class Militancy in West Africa-Nigeria | Caroline Ifeka &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

3. Counterterrorism and democracy promotion in the Sahel under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama from September 11, 2001, to the Nigerien Coup of February 2010 | Alex Thurston &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

4. Western Sahara and the United States’ Geographical Imaginings | Konstantina Isidoros &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

5. The Western Sahara Conflict: Regional and International Repercussions | Yahia H Zoubir &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

6. Sahelian blowback: what’s happening in Mali? | Vijay Prashad &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

7. All quiet on the West Africa front: Terrorism, Tourism and Poverty in Mauritania | Anne E. McDougall 	   SOURCE: The Association of Concerned Africa Scholars&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=rA6wkA7elhk:07FnPhqeM9E:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=rA6wkA7elhk:07FnPhqeM9E:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/rA6wkA7elhk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>The Association of Concerned Africa Scholars</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36845</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:20:43 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>ACAS Bulletin 68: The Warri Crisis, the Niger Delta, and the Nigerian State [Fall 2004]</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/8ka4A1DoGjo/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36844</guid>
		 <description>Warri is a strategic city in the Niger Delta. As the second major oil city after Port Harcourt, Warri is the center of scores of oil installations and the nerve center of the operations of oil companies in the western Niger Delta, particularly the U.S. major, Chevron-Texaco. Since colonial times, control of Warri has been the principal casus belli in a lingering conflict among the three ethnic groups (Itsekiri, Ijaw and Urhobo). Although initially the conflict was over land, fishing rights and cultural differences, oil has become the highly charged political issue, as a huge oil economy has grown around the city. The insecurity produced by the Warri crisis has repeatedly led to the shut down of oil installations, leading many to believe that Warri is now the litmus test for measures to resolve the problems of the Niger Delta. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
This issue of the ACAS Bulletin is the result of preparatory work done with Michael Watts, Okey Ibeanu and Ike Okonta for a workshop to address the crisis in Warri. The meeting, now postponed, was to have taken place in May 2004 at Blue Mountain Center in New York State. The workshop’s aim was to address the need to understand fully the political dynamics of the contemporary struggles over Warri in order to provide a framework within which government, local communities and the oil transnationals can all be held accountable; we also hoped to lay out some dimensions of a just and responsible political machinery for the governance of Warri. The meeting would bring together a group of participants from the three main ethnic groups who are in regular contact with the communities in the Delta and who could reflect the sentiments of people; as well, representatives of two of the most important and central NGOs operating in the Niger Delta — Leaders of Our Niger Delta and Environmental Rights Action — were to participate. Working with other Nigerians who could contribute their related experiences and a team of conflict resolution specialists from Rutgers, we hoped the outcome would be a new frame for a solution to the crisis.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Articles in this issue include:&lt;br&gt;
1. The Political Economy of Oil and Violence in the Niger Delta | Ben Naanen &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
2. Is it the Warri Crisis or the Crisis of the Nigerian State? | Daniel A. Omoweh &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
3. The Rhetoric of Rights: Understanding the Changing Discourses of Rights in the Niger Delta | Okechukwu Ibeanu &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
4. The Warri Crisis – A Case of Three in One | Kayode Soremekun &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
5. Death-Agony of a Malformed Political Order | Ike Okonta &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
6. Violence Used Against Unarmed Women in Peaceful Protests Against Oil Companies | Environmental Rights Action, Nigeria &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
7. African Women, Oil and Resistance | Terisa E. Turner and Leigh S. Brownhill 	   SOURCE: The Association of Concerned Africa Scholars&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=8ka4A1DoGjo:B5pRZaFoj5Q:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=8ka4A1DoGjo:B5pRZaFoj5Q:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/8ka4A1DoGjo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>The Association of Concerned Africa Scholars</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36844</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:00:12 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>ACAS Bulletin 83: Sexual and Gender Based Violence in Africa [Fall 2009]</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/id8rTUR30EU/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36843</guid>
		 <description>This Bulletin began in response to news reports of “corrective” and “curative” gang rapes of lesbians in South Africa. These were then followed by news reports of a study in South Africa that found that one in four men in South Africa had committed rape, many of them more than once. We wanted to bring together concerned Africa scholars and committed African activists and practitioners, to help contextualize these reports. We wanted to address the ongoing situation of sexual and gender based violence on the continent, the media coverage of sexual and gender based violence in Africa, and possibilities for responses, however partial, that might offer alternatives to the discourse of the repeated profession of shock or the endless, and endlessly reiterated, cycle of lamentation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

To that end, we have brought together writers of prose fiction (Megan Voysey-Braig), lawyer-advocates (Salma Maoulidi, Ann Njogu), poets (Chinwe Azubuike), trauma scholars (Sariane Leigh), human righs and women’s rights advocates (Michelle McHardy), gender and transgender advocates (Liesl Theron), activist researchers (Sasha Gear). Methodologically, the authors argue for the importance of respecting the multiple intersections and convergences, the multiple layerings, that underwrite and comprise any single event of sexual or gender based violence, and that necessarily complicate any discussion of these at a broader level.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Articles in this issue include:&lt;br&gt;
1. Sexual and gender based violence: everyday, everywhere, and yet… | Daniel Moshenberg &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
2. Untitled | Megan Voysey-Braig &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
3. Zanzibar GBV advocacy: important lessons for future legal reform strategies | Salma Maoulidi&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
4. Searching for the will to conscientiously prosecute sexual crimes in Zanzibar | Salma Maoulidi &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
5. Post conflict recovery in Sierra Leone: the spiritual self and the transformational state | Sariane Leigh&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
6. To be a woman in Kenya: a look at sexual and gender-based violence | Ann Njogu and Michelle McHardy&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
7. Trans-hate at the core of gender based violence? | Liesl Theron &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
8. Manhood, violence and coercive sexualities in men’s prisons: dynamics and consequences behind bars and beyond | Sasha Gear 	   SOURCE: The Association of Concerned Africa Scholars&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=id8rTUR30EU:80nekVDEoDs:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=id8rTUR30EU:80nekVDEoDs:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/id8rTUR30EU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>The Association of Concerned Africa Scholars</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36843</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:32:16 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Demography Is Destiny in Syria</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/ELpsdHF21YE/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36842</guid>
		 <description>Among the second wave of Arab Spring uprisings that followed Tunisia, Syria was the most spectacular "out of the blue" that suddenly arose in the face of the media and analytic community. Just days before Deraa exploded with protests last March, some analysts were still scrutinizing Syria's circumstances and declaring the country to be immune from the Arab Spring. Nor did reporters who visited the country spot signs of a brewing storm.
&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
In fact, throughout the Arab Spring, the media and experts repeatedly fell into the same trap of confusing the capital city with the whole country. On the eve of the Islamist landslide in Egypt's elections various polls and informed individuals were putting the popularity of radical Salafis at between 5% and 10%. The Salafis have indeed won about 10% of the vote… but only in Cairo. Nationwide they took almost 30%, beating even those unrepentant pessimists who were betting on a Muslim Brotherhood spring. In some provinces they grabbed all of 50%.
&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
This routine of the periphery ambushing the media and analysts during the Arab Spring and making a mockery of their reports and predictions has reached such grotesque proportions in Syria partly thanks to the media restrictions imposed by the regime, but mostly owing to the very peripheral nature of the Syrian uprising itself. This "peripheralism" has also laid waste to the best efforts of Iranian advisers who came to Syria to share with their Syrian colleagues the know-how accumulated by the regime in Tehran in crushing the Greens.
&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
In truth, the escalation in Syria took by surprise only the people who never bothered to examine Syria's population pyramid. It was no "out of the blue" to anybody even slightly familiar with the basic facts on demography and climate in the region. In the Middle East's long list of hopeless basket cases Yemen is surely beyond competition. However, for quite a while Syria has positioned herself as a formidable contender for respectable second place. 	   SOURCE: Middle East Forum&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=ELpsdHF21YE:uDx_aya37FE:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=ELpsdHF21YE:uDx_aya37FE:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/ELpsdHF21YE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Middle East Forum</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36842</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:22:41 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Roots of Violent Radicalisation</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/idQjBK_UqaI/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36841</guid>
		 <description>The Home Affairs Committee of the British House of Commons has released its long awaited report on “The Roots of Violent Radicalisation”.  Based on nine months of hearings, site visits and numerous written submissions, the report provides a comprehensive overview of recent developments and trends.

It highlights, in particular, the increasing role of the internet, the emergence of “lone wolf” terrorists, and the potential threat from far-right extremists. It also assesses the UK government’s revised Prevent strategy. 	   SOURCE: United Kingdom House of Commons // Home Affairs Committee&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=idQjBK_UqaI:7Lvv6f5C2Ak:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=idQjBK_UqaI:7Lvv6f5C2Ak:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/idQjBK_UqaI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>United Kingdom House of Commons // Home Affairs Committee</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36841</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:07:32 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Zimbabwe’s Sanctions Standoff</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/BXtkl4PQGHE/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36840</guid>
		 <description>Zimbabwe must hold elections before the end of June 2013, but the reforms needed to ensure appropriate conditions are critically wanting. The regional organisation – the Southern African Development Community – calls for the removal of sanctions, claiming they are a serious political impediment to reform. Those who have imposed the measures – in particular, the European Union and the U.S. – argue the reform deficits justify their continuation, though they have been more symbolic than drivers of change. The sanctions gridlock now reflects the broader paralysis that characterises Zimbabwean politics. Opportunity for a calibrated, full removal of sanctions before the next elections, geared to broad progress on reform, such as perhaps existed three years ago when the Global Political Agreement was fresh and the Inclusive Government formed, has probably passed. But a chance to promote progress and break the current deadlock still exists through a coordinated approach that distinguishes types of sanctions and focuses on specific reforms needed for those elections. It should be seized.
&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
The political situation is fragile, with growing fears the country may be heading toward new repression and conflict as the era dominated by the 88-year old President Robert Mugabe comes inevitably closer to an end, and elections draw nearer. Mugabe’s Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front [ZANU-PF] claims the GPA and subsequent negotiated reform process have run their course, and conditions are conducive to a free and fair vote. The Movement for Democratic Change [MDC] formations disagree but do not specify what they consider to be the minimum necessary reforms. SADC and most international observers believe the foundation for free and fair elections has not yet been laid. There has been some economic and social progress, but major deficits and deadlock persist on core reforms and implementation of some already agreed matters. Most significantly, ZANU-PF retains full control of the security apparatus, raising legitimate fears elections could lead to a repeat of the 2008 violence and refusal to accept the democratic will of the people.
&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
In response to human rights and election-related abuses perpetrated between 2001 and 2008, the U.S. and EU adopted a variety of measures designed to promote reform. Some are targeted at specific individuals [eg, asset freezes and travel bans]; others involve policies that relate to the international financial institutions and government-to-government relations [eg, restrictions on loans, credit and developmental assistance and arms embargoes]. While there are exceptions within and distinctions between many of these measures, including for humanitarian aid and basic development cooperation, this briefing applies the generic term “sanctions” to them for the sake of simplicity, but also because this is how Zimbabwean and southern African political dialogue commonly addresses the concept. Those who have imposed and maintained them have not communicated their concept effectively, as linked to specific reforms or the broader struggle for democracy, and have never gained regional support for them. 	   SOURCE: International Crisis Group&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=BXtkl4PQGHE:jlcCCaU2o_M:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=BXtkl4PQGHE:jlcCCaU2o_M:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/BXtkl4PQGHE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>International Crisis Group</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36840</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:01:03 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Afghanistan: Annual Report 2011: Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/4HLChneMqPg/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36839</guid>
		 <description>This annual report on the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict in Afghanistan for
2011 was prepared by the Human Rights Unit of the United Nations Assistance Mission
in Afghanistan (UNAMA) and covers the period 01 January to 31 December 2011.
&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
This report is compiled in pursuance of UNAMA’s mandate under United Nations
Security Council Resolution 1974 (2011) “to monitor the situation of civilians, to
coordinate efforts to ensure their protection, to promote accountability, and to assist in
the full implementation of the fundamental freedoms and human rights provisions of the
Afghan Constitution and international treaties to which Afghanistan is a State party, in
particular those regarding the full enjoyment by women of their human rights.”
&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
UNAMA undertakes a range of activities aimed at minimizing the impact of the armed
conflict on civilians including: independent and impartial monitoring of incidents involving
loss of life or injury to civilians; advocacy activities to strengthen protection of civilians
affected by the armed conflict; and, initiatives to promote compliance with international
humanitarian and human rights law, and the Constitution and laws of Afghanistan among
all parties to the conflict. 	   SOURCE: United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=4HLChneMqPg:o5bP7VOMceo:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=4HLChneMqPg:o5bP7VOMceo:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/4HLChneMqPg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36839</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:59:07 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>ACAS Bulletin 50/51: Health and Political Violence [Winter/Spring 1998]</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/t9jA1h9GHfc/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36838</guid>
		 <description>This issue of the Bulletin on health and political violence continues the theme of intervention and conflict presented in &lt;a href="http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36837"&gt;issue no. 48/49 (Fall 1997)&lt;/a&gt;, this time from the perspective of those who suffer the consequences. With conflict in Africa so pervasive--more than twenty countries have been or are involved in recent wars - there is growing recognition that the development business cannot go on as usual, that policy makers have vastly underestimated the extent of war damage, and that planners must take into account the psychic as well as the physical devastation of war.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

Articles in this issue include:&lt;br&gt;
1. Reconstructing Health in Post-War Mozambique | Julie Cliff &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
2. A Critical Comment on “Reconstructing Health in Post-War Mozambique” | Karim Hirji &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
3. Violence, Gender and Illness in Post-War Mozambique | Robert P. Marlin &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
4. The Uprooted and the Forgotten | Asma Abdel Halim &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
5. Women and Conflict in Africa | Meredeth Turnshen &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
6. Some Reflections Arising from “Women’s War Stories” | Karim Hirji &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
7. Removing Landmines - One Limb at a Time? | Warren “Bud” Day &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
8. The Photographer, His Editor, Her Audience, Their Humanitarians: How Rwanda’s Pictures Travel Through the American Psyche | Niranjan S. Karnik &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
9. Professional Accountability: Lessons from the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission | H. Jack Geiger 	   SOURCE: The Association of Concerned Africa Scholars&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=t9jA1h9GHfc:ifegSW-JvmM:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=t9jA1h9GHfc:ifegSW-JvmM:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/t9jA1h9GHfc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>The Association of Concerned Africa Scholars</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36838</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:33:46 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>ACAS Bulletin No. 48/49: Perspectives on Intervention and Conflict Resolution in Africa [Fall 1997]</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/KGvr8t0eifU/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36837</guid>
		 <description>Since the end of the Cold War, internal violence resulting from ethnic and sectarian conflict has erupted in a number of African countries, most notably Somalia, Liberia, Burundi, Rwanda, and Zaire/Democratic Republic of Congo. The United Nations, other international and regional organizations, and interested foreign powers first responded to this explosion of internal violence by employing the traditional methods of conflict resolution that had been used with some success to resolve conflicts during the Cold War period.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Many of the leaders of multilateral international and regional organizations, foreign powers, and other interested parties quickly became frustrated by their inability to use these traditional methods to resolve internal conflicts. They therefore concluded that the traditional methods of conflict resolution were insufficient for dealing with internal violence and sought to develop and employ new methods of conflict resolution which involved the use of sanctions, investigations of human rights abuses, the imposition of legal penalties, and the use of military force.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
This issue of the Bulletin presents the views of a wide variety of concerned scholars and activists who, although passionate and involved, seek to provide principled and practical perspectives on these questions.
William Minter and Alex de Waal discuss the broad ethical and political issues raised by intervention in African conflicts since the end of the Cold War. Anna Simons, Joost Hiltermann, and Stephen Weissman explore the lessons to be learned from the attempts by the international community to intervene in Somalia, Rwanda, and Burundi. Herb Howe examines Executive Outcomes - the best known of a number of private security firm that are increasingly active in Africa - and its role in African conflicts. And Adekeye Adebajo looks at the potential for an all-African intervention force, an idea first proposed by Kwame Nkrumah in the 1960s.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Articles in this issue include:&lt;br&gt;
1. “Intervention:” The Folly of Formulas | William Minter &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
2. African Encounters | Alex de Waal &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
3. Hardly Innocent: Armed Humanitarian Intervention in Somalia | Anna Simons &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
4. Post-Mortem on the International Commission of Inquiry (Rwanda) | Joost R. Hiltermann &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
5. Peacekeeping and Peace Enforcement in Burundi | Stephen R. Weissman &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
6. Executive Outcomes and African Stability | Herb Howe &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
7. An African High Command | Adekeye Adebajo 	   SOURCE: The Association of Concerned Africa Scholars&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=KGvr8t0eifU:lPVt8Ol3oFI:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=KGvr8t0eifU:lPVt8Ol3oFI:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/KGvr8t0eifU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>The Association of Concerned Africa Scholars</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36837</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:23:28 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>The Association of Concerned Africa Scholars</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/GXRAbsLSerQ/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36836</guid>
		 <description>The Association of Concerned Africa Scholars (ACAS) is an organization of scholars and students of Africa dedicated to formulating alternative scholarly analysis of U.S. government policy, mobilizing support in the United States on critical current issues related to Africa, developing communication and action networks among scholars in the United States and Africa, and collaborating with other organizations that share our concerns. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Our interdisciplinary approach supports rethinking conventional interpretations of social and economic policy, globalization, development strategies, media representations, and nation building. For three decades, the Concerned African Scholars Bulletin has been a centerpiece of ACAS’s work. It continues to provide timely, relevant and incisive analysis of developments in Africa while promoting alternative views and policies. 	   SOURCE: The Association of Concerned Africa Scholars&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=GXRAbsLSerQ:j1IA_k5ENO8:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=GXRAbsLSerQ:j1IA_k5ENO8:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/GXRAbsLSerQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>The Association of Concerned Africa Scholars</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36836</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:06:30 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Establishing an Early Warning System in the African Peace and Security Architecture: Challenges and Prospects</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/zC9RlpRnClw/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36835</guid>
		 <description>Conflict Prevention includes a wide range of actions, interventions, programmes,
activities, mechanisms and procedures that address structural risks to prevent the
escalation of tension into violent conflict, the continuation of conflict or the
reoccurrence of armed conflicts in post-conflict situations.1 This in turn broadens and
diversifies the purpose of early warning, which is a tool responsible for data
collection, analysis and communication of the information for conflict prevention. In
2004, the African Union launched the Continental Early Warning System as part of the African Peace and Security Architecture. This was done in
acknowledgement of the effectiveness of conflict prevention, which is proactive than
the traditional reactive system in AU. Now the CEWS has been in place for almost
half a decade. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
This paper examines the progress and challenges of this system by
looking at the African Union and other African regional organisations. Key issues to
be discussed include a historical background to the CEWS and commonly contested
issues in the system. Using different facts and the experiences of the regional
organisations, this paper tries to show the challenges and merits of early warning
systems in Africa. It also argues that the early warning systems should be included in
every stage of conflict and explains that the core value of early warning should be the
protection of individuals by the state or by the regional organizations if the state fails
to do so. 	   SOURCE: Kofi Annan International Peacekeeping Training Centre&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=zC9RlpRnClw:eB6ad2z2wEY:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=zC9RlpRnClw:eB6ad2z2wEY:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/zC9RlpRnClw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Kofi Annan International Peacekeeping Training Centre</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36835</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:59:43 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Policing in Palestine: Analyzing the EU Police Reform Mission in the West Bank</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/U1f64GMkOZc/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36834</guid>
		 <description>Police reform in the Palestinian Territories has faced many challenges. Rebuilding the police force in a post-conflict environment is not an easy task, and must take into account the community’s needs in order to build legitimacy. In 2006, the European Union Police Coordinating Office for Palestinian Police Support was established to support the short-term objectives of the Palestinian Civil Police and provide longer-term transformational change assistance. This issue paper discusses a number of questions to address gaps in the evaluation of police reform efforts. It concludes with a series of recommendations, but maintains that building legitimate and sustainable institutions will not be possible without a credible Palestinian-Israeli peace process. 	   SOURCE: The Centre for International Governance Innovation&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=U1f64GMkOZc:3qa8TIStNh4:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=U1f64GMkOZc:3qa8TIStNh4:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/U1f64GMkOZc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>The Centre for International Governance Innovation</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36834</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:57:02 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>State-Civil Society Interface in Liberia’s Post-Conflict Peacebuilding</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/v1hq7JL7NGE/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36833</guid>
		 <description>Post-conflict peacebuilding demands concerted efforts from all stakeholders
to ensure its success; particularly, civil society must complement the
capacity of the conflict-weary state. A successful peacebuilding, however,
requires a harmonious relationship between the state and civil society. This
paper analyses state-civil society relations at different phases of Liberia’s
protracted post-conflict peacebuilding process. The paper argues that civil
society groups have played and continue to play important role in the
peacebuilding process in Liberia and therefore need the support of the
Liberian state and the international community to continue their watchdog
role. The paper concludes by drawing lessons from the Liberian experience
for other post-conflict states. 	   SOURCE: Kofi Annan International Peacekeeping Training Centre&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=v1hq7JL7NGE:Fe8CG3CZgzo:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=v1hq7JL7NGE:Fe8CG3CZgzo:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/v1hq7JL7NGE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Kofi Annan International Peacekeeping Training Centre</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36833</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:51:16 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Toward a Euro-Atlantic Security Community</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/7BALIVXWfp0/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36832</guid>
		 <description>The report we present here is the product of two years of effort by a group of former senior officials from government, the private sector, and nongovernmental organizations who came together as participants in the Euro-Atlantic Security Initiative. Our agenda has been to address the future security needs of the Euro-Atlantic region. We set as our goal the development of an intellectual framework for our nations, societies, and peoples to build a security system that will meet the twenty-first-century security challenges that face our region.  
&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
Our report sets forth practical steps to begin building this future and calls upon our leaders, governments, and societies to act. As co-chairmen of the Euro-Atlantic Security Commission, we present this report with the endorsement and support of all commission members. We hope that our effort will lead to greater security for all in our region and to our region’s strengthened capacity for global leadership in the promotion of increased stability, safety, and progress in the world beyond. 	   SOURCE: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace // Euro-Atlantic Security Initiative&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=7BALIVXWfp0:a2334pLs0eY:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=7BALIVXWfp0:a2334pLs0eY:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/7BALIVXWfp0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Carnegie Endowment for International Peace // Euro-Atlantic Security Initiative</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36832</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:45:59 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Liberia: A Briefing Paper On The Truth and Reconciliation Commission Report</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/Ak6rGHCz3Ck/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36831</guid>
		 <description>The issues of national healing, reconciliation, truth and justice are crucial and significant
for what happens next in countries emerging out of conflicts such as Liberia. Importantly,
these issues constitute a real challenge as well as moral and political dilemmas for
countries that are making a transition from war to peace. The real problem is that while
Truth Commissions have the potential of creating an enabling environment for truth
telling and forgiveness through amnesty, reparations and other things, there are doubts as
to whether people and societies torn asunder by protracted period of war can easily be
reconciled and healed through forgiveness and impunity.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Liberia is no exception to the above. When the decision to establish the Truth and
Reconciliation Commission (TRC) was made at the Accra peace talks and the
Commission was subsequently established in May 2005 by an Act of Legislature, it was
clear that the country was bent on seeking the truth in order to create an enabling
environment for national healing and reconciliation but without necessarily burying
justice.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;.
The main purpose of this policy brief is to critically examine, and provide a capsule
analysis and nuanced understanding of the context, mandate, reactions and key issues
emerging out of the TRC report and recommendations. Subsequently, the essay puts
forward some recommendations for immediate actions by the Government and people of
Liberia as well as the broader international community of state and non-state actors in
order to facilitate dialogue and informed social debates around the issues emerging out of
the report. 	   SOURCE: Kofi Annan International Peacekeeping Training Centre&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=Ak6rGHCz3Ck:iLWe27BCFxM:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=Ak6rGHCz3Ck:iLWe27BCFxM:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/Ak6rGHCz3Ck" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Kofi Annan International Peacekeeping Training Centre</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36831</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:41:59 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Historical Reconciliation and Protracted Conflicts</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/jHTxJkFxliw/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36830</guid>
		 <description>One of the fundamental impediments to molding the Euro-Atlantic nations
into a more unified and workable security community, as became apparent
early in the deliberations of the Euro-Atlantic Security Initiative, is the
lingering distrust that poisons too many of the region’s key relationships.
For this reason we organized a working group to explore deeper solutions to the challenges of
achieving historical reconciliation between countries divided by deep-seated historical grievances
and of breaking through the long-standing impasse in resolving a number of protracted conflicts
within the region. The two problems have as a common base the pernicious influence of that
underlying mistrust of the other side. In this report, the Euro-Atlantic Security Initiative’s Working
Group on Historical Reconciliation and Protracted Conflicts offers an approach that goes beyond
traditional diplomacy to get at the root causes of the problem and urges a broader strategy for
engaging society at large, the level at which solutions must be found. 	   SOURCE: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace // Euro-Atlantic Security Initiative&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=jHTxJkFxliw:7iZDzTabc70:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=jHTxJkFxliw:7iZDzTabc70:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/jHTxJkFxliw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Carnegie Endowment for International Peace // Euro-Atlantic Security Initiative</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36830</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:36:46 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Violent Islamic Uprising in Northern Nigeria: From the "Taleban" to Boko Haram II</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/dyKkkpBlr-Q/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36829</guid>
		 <description>There is a tradition of Islamic radicalism in northern Nigeria, but this has mainly been non-worldly, advocating a purer way of Islamic life. This changed at the turn of the millennium with the emergence of the so-called “Taleban” groups, which were not only more coherent in their worldview, arguing for the establishment of an Islamic government in Nigeria, but were willing to use violence to further their objectives. These groups were crushed by the Nigerian state in 2004, but Boko Haram, which had been established in 2002, continued to exist, as initially it was seen by the government as an unthreatening religious organisation. However, when it turned violent, its original leader, Mohammed Yusuf, was arrested and killed in 2009.
&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
At the time this was seen as putting an end to the organisation, but this was not the case. Boko Haram has re-emerged from the ashes of the death of its original leader as an avant-garde organisation embracing the strategy of hyperviolent, spectacular and deadly terrorist attacks. The question is how this could happen. The marginalisation of the north and the inequality between the north and south of Nigeria and how this may have alienated some of the inhabitants of the north is one factor that must be taken into consideration.
&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
However, this article attempts to place Boko Haram into a broader context by exploring not only the historical factors leading to its emergence, but also issues concerning internal collusion between Boko Haram activists and wellconnected Nigerian “Big Men”, as well as the question of external support for the organisation through emerging African jihadist networks. 	   SOURCE: Norwegian Peacebuilding Resource Centre&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=dyKkkpBlr-Q:Yb0WeV1uohA:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=dyKkkpBlr-Q:Yb0WeV1uohA:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/dyKkkpBlr-Q" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Norwegian Peacebuilding Resource Centre</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36829</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:21:48 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Nigeria's Boko Haram Militants Remain a Regional Threat</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/f1lLd2bYrYY/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36828</guid>
		 <description>The Nigerian militant group Boko Haram conducted a series of bombing attacks and armed assaults Jan. 20 in the northern city of Kano, the capital of Kano state and second-largest city in Nigeria. The attacks, which reportedly included the employment of at least two suicide vehicle-borne improvised explosive devices (VBIEDs), targeted a series of police facilities in Kano. These included the regional police headquarters, which directs police operations in Kano, Katsina and Jigawa states, as well as the State Security Service office and the Nigerian Immigration Service office. At least 211 people died in the Kano attacks, according to media reports. 	   SOURCE: STRATFOR&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=f1lLd2bYrYY:3czTvnsnlc8:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=f1lLd2bYrYY:3czTvnsnlc8:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/f1lLd2bYrYY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>STRATFOR</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36828</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:19:18 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Mali Besieged by Fighters Fleeing Libya</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/HiBU6UWaa3w/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36827</guid>
		 <description>Mali has experienced perhaps the most significant external repercussions from the downfall of the regime of Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi. Stratfor has discussed the impact of the conflict in Libya on the wider region since international intervention began in March 2011. Instability in Libya due to that country's deep internal fault lines meant that re-establishing a government would prove difficult. As we pointed out, that instability could spread to neighboring countries as weapons and combatants flow outward from Libya.
&lt;BR&gt; &lt;BR&gt;
Reports now indicate that thousands of armed Tuareg tribesmen who previously served in Gadhafi's military have returned home to Mali. The influx of this large number of well-armed and well-trained fighters, led by a former Libyan army colonel, has re-energized the long-simmering Tuareg insurgency against the Malian government. These Tuareg insurgents have formed a new group, the National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad (MNLA). In mid-January, they began a military campaign to free three northern regions of Mali from Bamako's control.
&lt;BR&gt; &lt;BR&gt;
The government of Mali has claimed that the MNLA is aligned with al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM). MNLA, however, has strongly denied any link to the group and said it will serve as a bulwark against AQIM. Given the U.S. and European interest in preventing the strengthening of AQIM, both sides have considerable incentive to take their respective positions. These developments make it an opportune time to examine the MNLA, its current offensive and the potential implications for Mali and the region. 	   SOURCE: STRATFOR&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=HiBU6UWaa3w:xAEDpXrNkQ8:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=HiBU6UWaa3w:xAEDpXrNkQ8:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/HiBU6UWaa3w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>STRATFOR</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36827</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:16:41 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Negotiations Between the Two Sudans: Where They Have Been, Where They Are Going</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/zxTcmn9ARn4/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36826</guid>
		 <description>The last round of negotiations between the government of Sudan, or GoS, and the
Sudan People’s Liberation Movement/Republic of South Sudan, or SPLM/RSS, saw
significant concessions made by the SPLM/RSS and a lack of political will to negotiate
on the part of Khartoum. Although the two parties remain far apart in their positions,
the SPLM/RSS proposal put forward in the last round paves the way for a comprehensive
deal going forward. By virtue of the dynamics between the two parties, a package
deal inclusive of a transitional financial arrangement for the North, Abyei, and the
border is still the only feasible endgame. 	   SOURCE: Enough Project&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=zxTcmn9ARn4:6IMp4ypg9p0:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=zxTcmn9ARn4:6IMp4ypg9p0:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/zxTcmn9ARn4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Enough Project</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36826</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:44:52 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>De-Radicalising Islamists: Programmes and Their Impact in Muslim Majority States</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/yjJq2uo4oAo/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36825</guid>
		 <description>This report is part of a larger project funded by the Norwegian
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and will be published by Routledge
in early 2012. The Report examines the approaches of eight
Muslim-majority states1 known to have developed ‘soft’
strategies to counter this problem, and demonstrates how
all of these countries have developed varied approaches,
strategies and processes. For example, some focus more
on countering and preventing further radicalisation in their
societies (what we refer to in this report as ‘counterradicalisation
strategy’). Countries that fall in this category
include Morocco and Bangladesh. Others, such as Yemen
and Egypt, focus more on rehabilitating and counselling those
who have already become radicalised (De-radicalisation).

Some have developed well-structured official programmes
(Saudi Arabia), while others rely more on individual initiatives
(Jordan). Finally, some have experienced collective deradicalisation,
whereby a group of former radicals decide to
take a collective decision to denounce violence, admit their
mistake and rejoin society. Such collective de-radicalisation
can, and has taken place inside prisons (e.g. Islamic
Jihad and Jihad Organisation in Egypt in 1997 and 2007,
respectively) and outside prisons (e.g. the Algerian Islamic
Salvation Army in 1997).
&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
By studying the counter-radicalisation and de-radicalisation
policies implemented in our eight Muslim-majority states, the
report identifies certain key factors which can be considered
as conducive to successful de-radicalisation programmes.
These include the following: the role of popular support
combined with a committed, charismatic, political leadership;
the role of families; the role of civil society; and the role and
quality of the clerics and scholars involved. The political and
developmental strength of the state is also important, as is
the relationship between national counter-radicalisation and
de-radicalisation efforts on the one hand, and external factors
and interventions on the other.
&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
Finally, no single formula can deal with all cases of violent
extremism, even within a single region. Counter-radicalisation
and de-radicalisation efforts must take account of the culture,
mores, traditions, history, and rules and regulations of
each country. 	   SOURCE: The International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=yjJq2uo4oAo:aeIeRuGto2I:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=yjJq2uo4oAo:aeIeRuGto2I:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/yjJq2uo4oAo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>The International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36825</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:21:54 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Timeline for Negotiations between the Two Sudans [Factsheet]</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/wvdaRQpZqpk/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36823</guid>
		 <description>Since June 2010, the African Union High Level Implementation Panel, or AUHIP, led by
former South African President Thabo Mbeki, has facilitated “Post-Referendum
Arrangements Negotiations” between the Government of Sudan, or GoS, and the Sudan
People’s Liberation Movement, or SPLM, and the Government of Southern Sudan.
Following South Sudan’s declaration of independence on July 9, 2011, negotiations have
continued between the GoS and the SPLM/Government of the Republic of South Sudan,
or RSS. &lt;br&gt;
The AUHIP-facilitated negotiations have largely been an opaque process, leading to
much speculation in the press and elsewhere regarding the current status of talks
between the two parties. As discussed in a December 2011 Enough Project report on
the negotiations, the process has also undergone a number of structural iterations,
adding to speculation concerning the negotiations’ status and results. &lt;br&gt;
In an attempt to shed light on what has occurred in the negotiations to date, as well as
to inform future discussions concerning the process, and the AUHIP’s contribution to it,
Enough has compiled the following timeline. This timeline provides an overview of the
negotiations to date, and reflects the various changes to the process’ structure. 	   SOURCE: Enough Project&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=wvdaRQpZqpk:wvndcgq-1Vs:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=wvdaRQpZqpk:wvndcgq-1Vs:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/wvdaRQpZqpk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Enough Project</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36823</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:15:56 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Ensuring Success: Four Steps Beyond U.S. Troops to End the War with the LRA</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/g0boClfHjH4/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36822</guid>
		 <description>The deployment of U.S. military advisors to central Africa is potentially the most
significant step in a decade to end the war against the Lord’s Resistance Army, or LRA.
The comprehensive strategy to end the LRA that U.S. forces should help develop as
a result of their deployment will only have a chance of being successful if American
forces are supplemented by four additional ingredients from the United States and
other supportive countries: troops, transport, intelligence, and a defections strategy, or
TTID for short. This includes additional special forces troops, enhanced transport and
logistics, upgraded intelligence capacities, and a more effective strategy to increase LRA
defections.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
If the mission is to succeed, it is essential for the U.S. advisors to stay in the field for a
significant amount of time and be buttressed by TTID support. The LRA has decreased
its attacks by two-thirds over the past six months in an effort to reorganize and lie
low.1 But this is not a sign of LRA weakness. It is part of the group’s historical pattern
of waiting out military incursions and then launching attacks. The LRA are among the
best survivors on the planet—and they could simply be playing a waiting game for the
departure of the U.S. soldiers. If the advisors withdraw prematurely and TTID support is
not given, the LRA will likely reemerge and resume its attacks on civilians.

&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Despite the U.S. deployment and a new African Union, or AU, initiative, which essentially
is a rehatting of the military operation by the four countries involved under
AU auspices, there is a serious danger of the LRA reorganizing for attacks because of
disturbing trends on both the military and civilian side. On the military side, Uganda
is the main force undertaking operations against the LRA, but its current capacity and
troop numbers—approximately half of what they were in 2010—are inadequate to be
able to pin the group down in the vast territory within which it operates, roughly the
size of Arizona and extending into four countries. Moreover, Uganda’s best soldiers are
deployed as peacekeepers in Somalia. Some 90 percent of LRA attacks over the past six
months have taken place in Congo, but Uganda does not have bases there at the request of the Congolese authorities. The shortage of troops is also hurting civilian protection
efforts, which are in urgent need of a boost. And the existing deployment is hampered
by a lack of mobility and intelligence capacity over the large territory. 	   SOURCE: Enough Project&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=g0boClfHjH4:yxmQlZYgMOY:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=g0boClfHjH4:yxmQlZYgMOY:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/g0boClfHjH4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Enough Project</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36822</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:36:35 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Implementing a Negotiated Settlement on the Palestinian Refugee Question: The International Dimensions</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/z0c_QtE5HYo/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36821</guid>
		 <description>Today there are an estimated six million Palestinian refugees. Resolving their plight
has been a core part of the peace agenda in the Middle East since 1948. While
considerable diplomatic effort in the past two decades has centred on reaching a
bilateral Israeli–Palestinian permanent status agreement, implementing any such
agreement will present an equally massive challenge.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Any permanent status agreement that would see the end of conflict would have to
address the moral, legal, and material aspects of the refugee question, including
the provision of durable solutions to ensure permanent national protection and
socio-economic development for the refugees. The vast scale and complexities
involved in implementing a solution for some six million persons residing in more
than five geographical areas following more than 60 years of conflict would render
implementation a major operational task.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Third parties and international agency representatives will be especially critical for
lending political, financial, and logistical support and needed technical expertise in
seeing through the implementation process. Such support and expertise are likely
to be channelled through an ‘implementation mechanism’ (or agreed institutional
arrangement).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The implementation mechanism should account for both dimensions of a
comprehensive solution to the refugee question: repatriation, resettlement and
rehabilitation and reparations (i.e., restitution and compensation), with the former
likely to require significant international resources, policy engagement, and
monitoring and oversight.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Early preparations by the international community in consultation with refugees,
refugee-hosting governments and the parties would benefit an eventual
implementation phase. The contributions of the international community will be
influenced by the agreed design and mandate of the institutional mechanism for
implementation. Preparations should avoid prejudicing any future agreement to be
decided by the parties while anticipating measures that the international community
may need to take in order to facilitate implementation and the policy options with
respect to them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
This paper outlines possible international contributions and their implications based
on wide consultations and reflection on existing technical preparatory activities
produced through Track II initiatives. 	   SOURCE: Chatham House&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=z0c_QtE5HYo:n9vrYtbT5eQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=z0c_QtE5HYo:n9vrYtbT5eQ:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/z0c_QtE5HYo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Chatham House</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36821</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:16:45 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Social Mobility in Times of Crisis: Militant Youth and the Politics of Impersonation in Cote d'Ivoire (2002-2011)</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/RnTs4DiYuoI/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36820</guid>
		 <description>This paper explores critical aspects of the agency of youngsters in situations of crisis. Throughout
the political-military conflict in Côte d‟Ivoire (2002-2011), the patriotic militias were the locus of
extensive networking and, to the extent that this was informed by political or ideological choices,
vast enterprises of civil society building. In this paper, I focus on the performative and social
dimension of youth militia activity: (a) the sustained attempts by youngsters to insinuate
themselves into the armed forces by „impersonation‟, and (b) the wider and often intricate
processes of networking and hierarchism within which these persistent pursuits of social mobility
took place. Rather than to capture the wider transformations triggered by these processes in
narrow analytical concepts such as „brutalisation‟ and „militianisation‟, this paper considers them
to be the contingent outcome of competencies, mobility, and creativity of youngsters whose
performative, social, and physical trajectories transform public life. This paper thus seeks to make
the point that the long post-war (post-2002), or rather pre-peace, multiplication of militias and
their growing impact on social and political life, constituted a protracted, multifaceted and multisited
process which we can productively begin to disentangle in terms of social mobility albeit of a
juvenile and subaltern kind. 	   SOURCE: MICROCON&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=RnTs4DiYuoI:HCtypwSBARI:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=RnTs4DiYuoI:HCtypwSBARI:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/RnTs4DiYuoI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>MICROCON</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36820</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:16:46 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Displacement in Post-War Southern Sudan: Survival and Accumulation within Urban Perimeters</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/FMAbkokTmH8/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36819</guid>
		 <description>This paper is about Southern Sudanese IDPs and refugees who, after the 2005 Comprehensive
Peace Agreement, chose not to return to their areas of origin, but instead to resettle elsewhere. Rather than
exploring the push and pull factors of this decision, this paper documents the ways in which they have
organised their lives in their places of post-war resettlement. More particularly, it explores their selfemployment
strategies in an institutional context characterised by weak state regulation and high reliance
on self-governance institutions, especially social networks. One observation in particular intrigued us: the
fact that some displaced were more successful than others in making a living in their places of
resettlement. Consequently, uncovering why some individuals and groups were wealthier than others
inspired and structured the research. In order to understand the difference between “networks of survival”
and “networks of accumulation” – a twin phrase we borrowed from Meagher (2006) – it was imperative
to comprehend the economy as a political terrain and to explore the structural position of groups. To this
end it was necessary to complement a social capital perspective with a political economy approach. 	   SOURCE: MICROCON&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=FMAbkokTmH8:R0Xe-KeDslo:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=FMAbkokTmH8:R0Xe-KeDslo:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/FMAbkokTmH8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>MICROCON</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36819</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:12:24 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Forced Migration, Female Labour Force Participation, and Intra-household Bargaining: Does Conflict Empower Women?</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/hgADHOIfDJg/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36818</guid>
		 <description>Civilian displacement is a common phenomenon in developing countries confronted
with internal conflict. While displacement directly affects forced migrants, it also contributes to
deteriorating labour conditions of vulnerable groups in receiving communities. For the
displaced population, the income losses are substantial, and as they migrate to cities, they
usually end up joining the informal labour force. Qualitative evidence reveals that displaced
women are better suited to compete in urban labour markets, as their labour experience is more
relevant with respect to certain urban low-skilled occupations. Our study uses this exogenous
change in female labour force participation to test how it affects female bargaining power within
the household. Our results show that female displaced women work longer hours, earn similar
wages and contribute in larger proportions to household earnings relative to rural women who
remain in rural areas. However, as measured by several indicators, their greater contribution to
households’ earnings does not strengthen their bargaining power. Most notably, domestic
violence have increased among displaced women. The anger and frustration of displaced
women also increases the level of violence directed at children. Because the children of
displaced families have been the direct victims of conflict and domestic violence, the intragenerational
transmission of violence is highly likely. 	   SOURCE: MICROCON&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=hgADHOIfDJg:v_JQfVu5CKU:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=hgADHOIfDJg:v_JQfVu5CKU:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/hgADHOIfDJg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>MICROCON</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36818</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:04:24 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Conflict Through a Gender Lens</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/F-4ncuT9o9U/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36817</guid>
		 <description>This brief suggests that those seeking an in-depth understanding of the social and political world need to apply a feminist curiosity – that is, a curiosity about the roles gender plays at all levels of human life, including politics. In other words, since gender is central to all inter-personal relationships and influences much of human activity, it clearly needs to be integral to all attempts to understand these. This includes not only situations on the ground but also at the top level of global politics. Finally, the brief demonstrates the important policy implications of using a gender lens in conflict analysis and suggests the penalties for failing to do this may be severe. 	   SOURCE: MICROCON&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=F-4ncuT9o9U:FW39jpItOas:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=F-4ncuT9o9U:FW39jpItOas:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/F-4ncuT9o9U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>MICROCON</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36817</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:58:24 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>"All the Information I've Given You, I Faced It Myself": Rural Testimony on Abuse in Eastern Burma Since November 2010</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/u7fOm6vSA14/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36816</guid>
		 <description>Human rights abuses faced by ethnic communities across rural eastern Burma have continued since November 2010, and are consistent with patterns KHRG has documented since 1992. Drawing from a dataset of 1,270 oral testimonies, sets of images and documentation written and collected over the last year by villagers trained to monitor human rights conditions in their own communities, this report presents information on 17 categories of abuse and quantifies their occurrence across KHRG research areas. By placing recent testimony from villagers in the context of twenty years of abusive practices, this report should make clear that developments since the 2010 elections have neither expanded villagers' options for claiming their human rights, nor addressed the root causes of abuse in rural eastern Burma. External assessments of developments in Burma that ignore local perspectives on continuing human rights abuse thus exclude the input of the most knowledgeable and engaged stakeholders – who also stand to lose the most from inaccurate conclusions drawn without their participation. The testimony presented in the report should thus function as a critique of any attempt to assess changes in Burma that ignores local perspectives, and a call to heed the concerns of rural people who are gauging, on a day-to-day basis, the way past, present and continuing abuse impacts the future for communities in eastern Burma. 	   SOURCE: Karen Human Rights Group&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=u7fOm6vSA14:avVzfNtKOeQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=u7fOm6vSA14:avVzfNtKOeQ:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/u7fOm6vSA14" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Karen Human Rights Group</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36816</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:53:58 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Attacks on Health and Education: Trends and Incidents from Eastern Burma, 2010-2011</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/qrZonEphD5w/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36815</guid>
		 <description>This report presents primary evidence of attacks on education and health in eastern Burma collected by KHRG during the period February 2010 to May 2011. Section I of this report details KHRG research methodology; Section II analyses general trends in armed conflict and details a loose typology of attacks identified during the reporting period. Section III applies this typology to 16 particularly illustrative incidents, and analyses them in light of relevant international humanitarian law and UN Security Council resolutions 1612, 1882 and 1998. These incidents were selected from a database detailing 59 attacks on civilians documented by KHRG between February 2010 and May 2011. 	   SOURCE: Karen Human Rights Group&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=qrZonEphD5w:Cq282atnLrY:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=qrZonEphD5w:Cq282atnLrY:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/qrZonEphD5w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Karen Human Rights Group</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36815</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:51:14 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Definitional Ambiguity and UNSCR 1998: Impeding UN-led Responses to Attacks on Health and Education in Eastern Burma</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/d59VDSCb24s/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36814</guid>
		 <description>This paper highlights impediments to effective international responses to attacks on health and education in eastern Burma presented by lack of clarity regarding the meaning of "attacks" within the monitoring and reporting framework established by UN Security Council resolutions 1612 and 1998. In order to address this definitional ambiguity and enable recent developments in the UN Security Council to potentially provide support to communities facing attacks in eastern Burma, this paper argues for interpreting "attacks" in a fashion that is consistent with applicable international humanitarian law. The analysis below concludes that UN-led monitoring, reporting and response pursuant to UNSCRs 1612 and 1998 should include acts by parties to armed conflict that both: a) violate relevant international law; and b) attack or threaten to attack personnel related to schools or medical facilities and/ or destroy, damage or force the closure of a school or medical facility. 	   SOURCE: Karen Human Rights Group&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=d59VDSCb24s:5dZYBLrbnnY:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=d59VDSCb24s:5dZYBLrbnnY:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/d59VDSCb24s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Karen Human Rights Group</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36814</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:37:17 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>International Engagement in Fragile States: Can’t We Do Better?</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/Le6tKaE79_A/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36813</guid>
		 <description>The Principles for Good International Engagement in Fragile States and Situations [FSFSPs] provide a framework to guide international actors in achieving better results in the most challenging development contexts. In 2011, the Second FSP Monitoring Survey was conducted in 13 countries: Burundi, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Timor-Leste and Togo. This followed a baseline survey in 2009 covering six countries [Afghanistan, CAR, DRC, Haiti, Sierra Leone and Timor-Leste]. This synthesis report reflects the overall picture that has emerged from the second survey. International performance against these Fragile States Principles is seriously off-track. Overall, in the thirteen countries under review in 2011, international stakeholder engagement is partially or fully off-track for eight out of ten of the FSPs. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
The Principles for Good International Engagement in Fragile States and Situations seem to have stimulated relatively limited change in international engagement at the country level since their endorsement by the OECD Development Assistance Committee [DAC] member countries in 2007 and their validation by both development partners1 and partner countries in Accra in 2008. According to the 2011 Survey, development partner practice has not improved significantly to achieve better results. The main message of this report is that a significant gap still exists between policy and practice. The findings of this survey challenge development partners to complement their focus on results, effectiveness and value for money with a focus on the field-level organisational and paradigm changes necessary for achieving better results. In addition, partner countries have underlined the need for stronger mutual accountability frameworks to guide and monitor joint efforts between them and their international counterparts. Such frameworks should be mutually agreed and results-oriented, reflecting the specific and changing needs and priorities of countries in situations of conflict and fragility.
&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
The variation among the countries surveyed means that findings for individual countries may differ significantly from the overall picture. A distinction also needs to be made between the findings for the five countries that volunteered to monitor FSP implementation in 2009 and the eight countries where the monitoring was carried out for the first time in 2011. 	   SOURCE: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=Le6tKaE79_A:muggPynN_pc:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=Le6tKaE79_A:muggPynN_pc:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/Le6tKaE79_A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36813</feedburner:origLink></item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:54:40 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Kosovo and Serbia: A Little Goodwill Could Go a Long Way</title>
	   <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/hsg_main/~3/pJMNrGpIXY4/showRecord.php</link>
	   <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36812</guid>
		 <description>A violent standoff in northern Kosovo risks halting Kosovo’s and Serbia’s fragile dialogue and threatens Kosovo’s internal stability and Serbia’s EU candidacy process. Pristina’s push to control the whole territory of the young state, especially its borders with Serbia, and northern Kosovo Serbs’ determination to resist could produce more casualties. Belgrade has lost control and trust of the northern Kosovo Serb community, which now looks to homegrown leaders. The international community, especially the EU and U.S., should encourage Belgrade to accept the government in Pristina as an equal, even if without formal recognition, but not expect it can force local compliance in northern Kosovo. All sides should seek ways to minimise the risk of further conflict, while focusing on implementing what has been agreed in the bilateral technical dialogue. They should build confidence and lay the groundwork for the political talks needed to guide a gradual transformation in northern Kosovo and eventually lead to normal relations between Kosovo and Serbia.
&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
The current flare-up of tensions began on 25 July 2011, when Pristina sent police to two customs gates along the border with Serbia. Local Serbs surrounded the police and forced them to retreat; one officer was killed in an ambush, and a border post was burned. On 16 September, EULEX, the EU rule of law mission, started to airlift Kosovo officials to the border. All roads leading to the customs points were barricaded by Kosovo Serbs intent on obstructing deployment of Kosovo officials. While the roadblocks have generally been peaceful, violence ensued on at least three occasions during the last months of the year, when NATO’s peace enforcement mission (KFOR) attempted to dismantle the barricades, and Kosovo Serbs pushed back. It is perhaps some testament to the general commitment to limiting casualties that while there have been many injuries, only two persons have died. 	   SOURCE: International Crisis Group&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=pJMNrGpIXY4:I-evpgwMCkA:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?a=pJMNrGpIXY4:I-evpgwMCkA:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hsg_main?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hsg_main/~4/pJMNrGpIXY4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	 <source>International Crisis Group</source>
		 <feedburner:origLink>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=36812</feedburner:origLink></item>
	

</channel>

</rss>

