<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" gd:etag="W/&quot;CUQFRnk8fCp7ImA9WhRUEEk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467200146203940685</id><updated>2012-01-19T23:08:37.774-08:00</updated><category term="ruby" /><category term="fake news" /><category term="bots are cool" /><category term="android" /><category term="eclipse" /><category term="intellij" /><category term="commodore64" /><category term="real news" /><category term="netbeans" /><title>IDE Lampoon</title><subtitle type="html">Precisely because the stakes are so low.</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://idelampoon.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://idelampoon.blogspot.com/" /><author><name>IL</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03336958205072260221</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_nmAFOAdSE-0/R1Hv0QmtTXI/AAAAAAAAAAs/x9wV6tz9BCE/S220/face.jpg" /></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>6</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IdeLampoon" /><feedburner:info uri="idelampoon" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D04ERn8ycCp7ImA9WxRbGEs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467200146203940685.post-2287319125732064152</id><published>2007-12-03T17:21:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-09T15:38:27.198-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-12-09T15:38:27.198-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ruby" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="fake news" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="commodore64" /><title>Ruby Support comes to Commodore 64?</title><summary>Ok, this is a sign that Ruby has gone too freaking far. I thought I was sick of hearing about ruby running on this, ruby running on that.  Now there are rumors (see screenshot) of a group of German hackers that have managed to smash ruby down to 27k and run it on a Commodore 64. IL</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://idelampoon.blogspot.com/feeds/2287319125732064152/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=467200146203940685&amp;postID=2287319125732064152" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/467200146203940685/posts/default/2287319125732064152?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/467200146203940685/posts/default/2287319125732064152?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IdeLampoon/~3/FPZd83D6v0s/ruby-support-comes-to-commodore-64.html" title="Ruby Support comes to Commodore 64?" /><author><name>IL</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03336958205072260221</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_nmAFOAdSE-0/R1Hv0QmtTXI/AAAAAAAAAAs/x9wV6tz9BCE/S220/face.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_nmAFOAdSE-0/R1SvdAmtTbI/AAAAAAAAABM/Nh0_6uc3Lzk/s72-c/ruby64.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://idelampoon.blogspot.com/2007/12/ruby-support-comes-to-commodore-64.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D04ERn0_eCp7ImA9WxRbGEs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467200146203940685.post-8267768513982571219</id><published>2007-12-03T16:43:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-09T15:38:27.340-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-12-09T15:38:27.340-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="eclipse" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="real news" /><title>Eclipse goes blind-man-tin-cupping</title><summary> Ian on planeteclipse shows off a new tin cup approach to fund raising.  Should be interesting to see who actually tosses a few quarters in.  While I would love to make merciless fun of this, it actually makes a lot of sense.  Foundations like wikipedia, FSF and Apache need to agressively raise funds to keep the goodness coming.  Just like companies like IDEA, Oracle and SUN need to have great </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://idelampoon.blogspot.com/feeds/8267768513982571219/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=467200146203940685&amp;postID=8267768513982571219" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/467200146203940685/posts/default/8267768513982571219?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/467200146203940685/posts/default/8267768513982571219?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IdeLampoon/~3/iu1C9pDUezQ/eclipse-goes-blind-man-tin-cupping.html" title="Eclipse goes blind-man-tin-cupping" /><author><name>IL</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03336958205072260221</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_nmAFOAdSE-0/R1Hv0QmtTXI/AAAAAAAAAAs/x9wV6tz9BCE/S220/face.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_nmAFOAdSE-0/R1So7wmtTaI/AAAAAAAAABE/BUHZiM-mj78/s72-c/tincup.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://idelampoon.blogspot.com/2007/12/eclipse-goes-blind-man-tin-cupping.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D04ERno8eyp7ImA9WxRbGEs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467200146203940685.post-7081861466495142399</id><published>2007-12-03T05:05:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-09T15:38:27.473-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-12-09T15:38:27.473-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="netbeans" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="real news" /><title>Bloggers Ask Tough Questions as NetBeans 6.0 Launches</title><summary>As predicted, NetBeans 6.0 launched today to much hooplah.  Here is some of the early blogger reaction:1. "Is Eclipse 3.3.1.1 better and Jdeveloper 10g"Mike makes many controversial comments like that Eclipse runs very fast, but is difficult for some developers to start using.  JDeveloper on the other hand is easy for some developers to start using by is very resource intensive.  Whoa, I haven't </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://idelampoon.blogspot.com/feeds/7081861466495142399/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=467200146203940685&amp;postID=7081861466495142399" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/467200146203940685/posts/default/7081861466495142399?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/467200146203940685/posts/default/7081861466495142399?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IdeLampoon/~3/xPYGzECiWHA/bloggers-ask-tough-questions-as.html" title="Bloggers Ask Tough Questions as NetBeans 6.0 Launches" /><author><name>IL</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03336958205072260221</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_nmAFOAdSE-0/R1Hv0QmtTXI/AAAAAAAAAAs/x9wV6tz9BCE/S220/face.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_nmAFOAdSE-0/R1QAKQmtTYI/AAAAAAAAAA0/zUpJQO5-Dy8/s72-c/gmj.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://idelampoon.blogspot.com/2007/12/bloggers-ask-tough-questions-as.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D04ERncycSp7ImA9WxRbGEs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467200146203940685.post-7025505849808159627</id><published>2007-12-01T11:07:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-09T15:38:27.999-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-12-09T15:38:27.999-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="intellij" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="fake news" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="android" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="bots are cool" /><title>IntelliJ to sue Google over Android logo?</title><summary>Rumor is that IntelliJ marketing drones are pissed. Here is their kick ass logo for the 70 launch (frig I hope they didn't pay much for this):Cool. Yeah, associate your ide with cute little robots, I, uh, get it. I bet some marketing peon has associated each robot with some sort of functionality. Oh there is the communications-ready bot, and the ease of use bot, and the round button bot.Here is </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://idelampoon.blogspot.com/feeds/7025505849808159627/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=467200146203940685&amp;postID=7025505849808159627" title="7 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/467200146203940685/posts/default/7025505849808159627?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/467200146203940685/posts/default/7025505849808159627?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IdeLampoon/~3/APo--UJ0iU8/intellij-to-sue-google-over-android.html" title="IntelliJ to sue Google over Android logo?" /><author><name>IL</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03336958205072260221</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_nmAFOAdSE-0/R1Hv0QmtTXI/AAAAAAAAAAs/x9wV6tz9BCE/S220/face.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_nmAFOAdSE-0/R1GyyQmtTTI/AAAAAAAAAAM/fq3gfwcM7rI/s72-c/ideadroids.PNG" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>7</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://idelampoon.blogspot.com/2007/12/intellij-to-sue-google-over-android.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DE4ASXk-eCp7ImA9WB9VFkU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467200146203940685.post-8383049454440753529</id><published>2007-12-01T11:01:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2007-12-03T05:02:28.750-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2007-12-03T05:02:28.750-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="eclipse" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="real news" /><title>99% of Eclipse users surf at work</title><summary>Wayne on planeteclipse notes in a strictly scientific survey that 99% of eclipse live attendees find the webinars useful. What Wayne didn't report is that 97% of those found it useful to make it look like they were doing something useful while in fact trolling /.IL</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://idelampoon.blogspot.com/feeds/8383049454440753529/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=467200146203940685&amp;postID=8383049454440753529" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/467200146203940685/posts/default/8383049454440753529?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/467200146203940685/posts/default/8383049454440753529?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IdeLampoon/~3/U_h5RNXL1gU/99-of-eclipse-users.html" title="99% of Eclipse users surf at work" /><author><name>IL</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03336958205072260221</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_nmAFOAdSE-0/R1Hv0QmtTXI/AAAAAAAAAAs/x9wV6tz9BCE/S220/face.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://idelampoon.blogspot.com/2007/12/99-of-eclipse-users.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DE4CR3syeCp7ImA9WB9VFkU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467200146203940685.post-7578060199160869416</id><published>2007-12-01T10:36:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2007-12-03T05:02:46.590-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2007-12-03T05:02:46.590-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="fake news" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="netbeans" /><title>NetBeans 6.0 Launch Plans Unveiled</title><summary>Geertjan notes on planetnetbeans Sun's plans for launching NetBeans 6.0 - they're going on safari and humping everything they can find.Expect NetBeans 6.0 to be launched this week to much fanfare, but cool reception. It's turned into a bloated tangled mess of goop a-la-eclipse.IL</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://idelampoon.blogspot.com/feeds/7578060199160869416/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=467200146203940685&amp;postID=7578060199160869416" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/467200146203940685/posts/default/7578060199160869416?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/467200146203940685/posts/default/7578060199160869416?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IdeLampoon/~3/WgIDQ6xUpYg/netbeans-60-launch-plans-unveiled.html" title="NetBeans 6.0 Launch Plans Unveiled" /><author><name>IL</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03336958205072260221</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_nmAFOAdSE-0/R1Hv0QmtTXI/AAAAAAAAAAs/x9wV6tz9BCE/S220/face.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://idelampoon.blogspot.com/2007/12/netbeans-60-launch-plans-unveiled.html</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>

