<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" gd:etag="W/&quot;DUcGQXc6eyp7ImA9WhRUGUs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-504124510701283693</id><updated>2012-01-31T05:13:40.913+05:30</updated><category term="shanghai expo 2010" /><category term="Chinese law" /><category term="Pakistan" /><category term="media" /><category term="Naxal movement" /><category term="US double standards" /><category term="uk riots" /><category term="chinese football" /><category term="South Tibet" /><category term="indian culture" /><category term="China" /><category term="cross strait relations" /><category term="Xinjiang riots" /><category term="China mining industry" /><category term="Death Penalty" /><category term="scientific research" /><category term="sino indian relations" /><category term="Simla agreement" /><category term="religious freedom" /><category term="Sino-Indian border dispute" /><category term="Akmal Shaikh" /><category term="McMahon Line" /><category term="sports" /><category term="Ambrose Evans-Pritchard" /><category term="debt crisis" /><category term="Tibet" /><category term="soft power" /><category term="China's Border disputes" /><category term="expo 2010" /><category term="us-china relations" /><category term="chinese soft power" /><category term="football" /><category term="libya" /><category term="Dalai Lama" /><category term="India" /><category term="humor" /><category term="Aksai Chin" /><category term="chinese culture" /><category term="China environment" /><category term="economic development" /><category term="Tibet Uprising" /><category term="Human Rights" /><category term="Arunachal Pradesh" /><category term="culture" /><category term="indian soft power" /><category term="indian pavilion" /><category term="Double Standards" /><category term="UK" /><category term="internet censorship" /><category term="China mine safety" /><category term="World Uyghur Congress" /><category term="time" /><category term="Britain" /><category term="india expo 2010" /><category term="taiwan" /><category term="sun tzu" /><category term="British India" /><category term="taiwan elections" /><category term="media bias" /><category term="telegraph" /><category term="Simla accord" /><category term="Heroin Smuggling" /><category term="Hacking" /><category term="India vs China" /><category term="india china comparison" /><category term="the economist" /><title>India's China Blog</title><subtitle type="html">&lt;center&gt;Welcome to Maitreya Bhakal's Blog - Where I discuss Current Affairs, Past Affairs and Foreign Affairs - especially about India and China&lt;/center&gt;</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/" /><author><name>Maitreya Bhakal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14995317283182467753</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>13</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/indiaschinablog" /><feedburner:info uri="indiaschinablog" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>indiaschinablog</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0ABQXo8fyp7ImA9WhRUFEU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-504124510701283693.post-7995526889581677362</id><published>2012-01-25T03:30:00.000+05:30</published><updated>2012-01-25T15:32:30.477+05:30</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-25T15:32:30.477+05:30</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="us-china relations" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="cross strait relations" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="taiwan" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="taiwan elections" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="US double standards" /><title>Five reasons why China will not invade Taiwan, and an analysis of Cross-strait Relations</title><summary type="html">



‘So solidly built into our consciousness is the concept that China  is conducting a rapacious and belligerent foreign policy, that whenever a  dispute arises in which China is involved, she is instantly assumed to  have provoked it.’

— Felix Greene, 1965.

When a superpower is engaging in full hegemonic and supercilious display, another country with slowly increasing economic clout and &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/indiaschinablog/~4/we67j95q3F0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/feeds/7995526889581677362/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/2011/08/analysing-cross-strait-relations-and-5.html#comment-form" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/504124510701283693/posts/default/7995526889581677362?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/504124510701283693/posts/default/7995526889581677362?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/indiaschinablog/~3/we67j95q3F0/analysing-cross-strait-relations-and-5.html" title="&lt;center&gt;Five reasons why China will not invade Taiwan, and an analysis of Cross-strait Relations&lt;/center&gt;" /><author><name>Maitreya Bhakal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14995317283182467753</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-uFeGseMhHyE/Txxq2CnbJdI/AAAAAAAAAmw/HUdPLFu9eEQ/s72-c/us_allies_seasia.JPG" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>2</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/2011/08/analysing-cross-strait-relations-and-5.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUACQX47fip7ImA9WhRXGU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-504124510701283693.post-2819192272708414404</id><published>2011-12-17T12:57:00.000+05:30</published><updated>2011-12-26T18:19:20.006+05:30</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-12-26T18:19:20.006+05:30</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="media bias" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="sports" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="football" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="the economist" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="media" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="chinese football" /><title>The Soccer Mocker: The Economist gets a kick out of ridiculing Chinese football</title><summary type="html">


As I discussed in my previous post, The Economist has published two special articles about China as part of its special Christmas-holiday double issue. I discussed the first of the two in my last post, and intend to discuss the second one here. 





In "Little Red Card", The Economist mocks China's attempts at becoming a 
proficient footballing nation, and, no pun intended, gets a kick out of&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/indiaschinablog/~4/J-JNpF4t4NU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/feeds/2819192272708414404/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/2011/12/soccer-mocker-getting-kick-out-of.html#comment-form" title="10 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/504124510701283693/posts/default/2819192272708414404?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/504124510701283693/posts/default/2819192272708414404?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/indiaschinablog/~3/J-JNpF4t4NU/soccer-mocker-getting-kick-out-of.html" title="&lt;center&gt;The Soccer Mocker: &lt;i&gt;The Economist&lt;/i&gt; gets a kick out of ridiculing Chinese football&lt;/center&gt;" /><author><name>Maitreya Bhakal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14995317283182467753</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>10</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/2011/12/soccer-mocker-getting-kick-out-of.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkUARXwzeSp7ImA9WhRXGU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-504124510701283693.post-789939782610266358</id><published>2011-12-17T12:27:00.000+05:30</published><updated>2011-12-26T18:27:24.281+05:30</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-12-26T18:27:24.281+05:30</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="media bias" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="sun tzu" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="the economist" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="chinese soft power" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="media" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="soft power" /><title>The Economist and China's Soft Power: Et tu, Sun Tzu?</title><summary type="html">
A pathetic attempt to discredit Sun Tzu as an instrument of Chinese Soft Power

As part of its Christmas-holiday double issue, The Economist has published two articles about China: one about its Soft Power and another about the dismal state of Chinese football. John Micklethwait, the Editor-in-Chief, describes the double issue as one in which "Journalists write about odd subjects, pet subjects, &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/indiaschinablog/~4/3bYI75jWwmo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/feeds/789939782610266358/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/2011/12/economist-and-chinas-soft-power-et-tu.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/504124510701283693/posts/default/789939782610266358?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/504124510701283693/posts/default/789939782610266358?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/indiaschinablog/~3/3bYI75jWwmo/economist-and-chinas-soft-power-et-tu.html" title="&lt;center&gt;&lt;i&gt;The Economist&lt;/i&gt; and China's Soft Power: Et tu, Sun Tzu?&lt;/center&gt;" /><author><name>Maitreya Bhakal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14995317283182467753</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/2011/12/economist-and-chinas-soft-power-et-tu.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A08ASXY9fyp7ImA9WhRXGUs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-504124510701283693.post-2568356117983644282</id><published>2011-12-01T13:30:00.001+05:30</published><updated>2011-12-27T12:40:48.867+05:30</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-12-27T12:40:48.867+05:30</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="media bias" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="india china comparison" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="India" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Human Rights" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="humor" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="time" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="scientific research" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="internet censorship" /><title>India v/s China: We've got Facebook! What've you got?</title><summary type="html">






An interesting analysis in TIME magazine, to the extent that it tries to be an analysis:



The ChIndian Century


And don't forget to check out these two accompanying arguments, one for India and one for China:

The Case for India: Free to Succeed

The Case for China: The Power of Planning


I plan to blog about this general issue sometime soon. 
Right now however, I just can't help &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/indiaschinablog/~4/27_ox0HAsGk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/feeds/2568356117983644282/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/2011/12/india-vs-china-weve-got-facebook-whatve.html#comment-form" title="12 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/504124510701283693/posts/default/2568356117983644282?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/504124510701283693/posts/default/2568356117983644282?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/indiaschinablog/~3/27_ox0HAsGk/india-vs-china-weve-got-facebook-whatve.html" title="&lt;center&gt;India v/s China: We've got Facebook! What've you got?&lt;/center&gt;" /><author><name>Maitreya Bhakal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14995317283182467753</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>12</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/2011/12/india-vs-china-weve-got-facebook-whatve.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkQMRnY9fip7ImA9WhRXGU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-504124510701283693.post-3404794589584975461</id><published>2011-11-15T19:02:00.001+05:30</published><updated>2011-12-26T18:29:47.866+05:30</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-12-26T18:29:47.866+05:30</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="media bias" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="the economist" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="libya" /><title>China, Libya, and Political Bullshittery from The Economist</title><summary type="html">



The Economist, my favorite newspaper, has been engaging
 in its own peculiar style of political bullshit reporting about 
geopolitics and Chinese foreign policy nowadays. Take a look at this:



It is not just in Sri Lanka that the hypocrisy of Western attitudes has rankled. In China, a commentary in Global Times, a Beijing newspaper, highlighted another aspect of it: “The more urgent &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/indiaschinablog/~4/-u_gpmhfJLg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/feeds/3404794589584975461/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/2011/11/china-libya-and-political-bullshittery.html#comment-form" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/504124510701283693/posts/default/3404794589584975461?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/504124510701283693/posts/default/3404794589584975461?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/indiaschinablog/~3/-u_gpmhfJLg/china-libya-and-political-bullshittery.html" title="&lt;center&gt;China, Libya, and Political Bullshittery from &lt;i&gt;The Economist&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/center&gt;" /><author><name>Maitreya Bhakal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14995317283182467753</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>2</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/2011/11/china-libya-and-political-bullshittery.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkMCQ3o9fCp7ImA9WhRXGU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-504124510701283693.post-8562203359715014854</id><published>2011-08-19T18:04:00.000+05:30</published><updated>2011-12-26T18:31:02.464+05:30</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-12-26T18:31:02.464+05:30</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="media bias" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="debt crisis" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="uk riots" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="media" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Double Standards" /><title>All your Schadenfreude are belong to us?</title><summary type="html">
Lecturing others amounts to schadenfreude. 
Wait. What?



An interesting phenomenon seems to be in the air. With the current financial crisis in America and unrest in Britain, it appears that multiple western media outlets cannot resist the temptation to interpret China's and other countries' responses in terms of "schadenfreude". Although not as amusing as accusing the politburo of smoking &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/indiaschinablog/~4/2JC8WTD0PdE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/feeds/8562203359715014854/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/2011/08/all-your-schadenfreude-are-belong-to-us.html#comment-form" title="4 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/504124510701283693/posts/default/8562203359715014854?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/504124510701283693/posts/default/8562203359715014854?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/indiaschinablog/~3/2JC8WTD0PdE/all-your-schadenfreude-are-belong-to-us.html" title="All your Schadenfreude are belong to us?" /><author><name>Maitreya Bhakal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14995317283182467753</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>4</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/2011/08/all-your-schadenfreude-are-belong-to-us.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkENSXs4fyp7ImA9WhRXGU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-504124510701283693.post-2758972601068817209</id><published>2010-06-09T16:54:00.029+05:30</published><updated>2011-12-26T18:34:58.537+05:30</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-12-26T18:34:58.537+05:30</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China environment" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="shanghai expo 2010" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="culture" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="indian pavilion" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="expo 2010" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="sino indian relations" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="chinese culture" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="india expo 2010" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="chinese soft power" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="indian soft power" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="indian culture" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="soft power" /><title>India at the Shanghai World Expo 2010 and  its significance in Sino-Indian Relations</title><summary type="html">

In the midst of the concrete and steel jungle that is the Shanghai World Expo, stands the Indian Pavilion, the 'greenest' of them all, built entirely of environment-friendly materials, showcasing India's unique brand of Culture, History and Soft Power and offering an unprecedented opportunity to further improve Sino-Indian relations and India's Soft Power in China.


The Expo has finally come &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/indiaschinablog/~4/oHdya7lL_JQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/feeds/2758972601068817209/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/2010/06/india-at-shanghai-world-expo-2010-and.html#comment-form" title="10 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/504124510701283693/posts/default/2758972601068817209?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/504124510701283693/posts/default/2758972601068817209?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/indiaschinablog/~3/oHdya7lL_JQ/india-at-shanghai-world-expo-2010-and.html" title="&lt;center&gt;India at the Shanghai World Expo 2010 and  its significance in Sino-Indian Relations&lt;/center&gt;" /><author><name>Maitreya Bhakal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14995317283182467753</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_vA-vZ7A30vw/TA9rHU6WF2I/AAAAAAAAAb4/UEDYRm3SWhQ/s72-c/expo0.JPG" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>10</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/2010/06/india-at-shanghai-world-expo-2010-and.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUAEQ3k6fSp7ImA9WhRXGUs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-504124510701283693.post-463001497447592292</id><published>2010-04-17T23:17:00.030+05:30</published><updated>2011-12-27T12:05:02.715+05:30</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-12-27T12:05:02.715+05:30</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="media bias" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China environment" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China mining industry" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="media" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China mine safety" /><title>China mine disaster: A 'Miracle' rescue or a Miracle rescue?</title><summary type="html">


We all know about the irresponsible reporting and bias that many elements in the western media have against China, but when they start using mine disaster survivors to further their 'agenda', then it simply borders on the inhuman. 



A few days ago, about 115 miners were rescued from a flooded mine in China's Shaanxi Province, in what is the latest in a string of disasters which have plagued &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/indiaschinablog/~4/z7YqiU7ycAo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/feeds/463001497447592292/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/2010/04/china-mine-disaster-miracle-rescue-or.html#comment-form" title="12 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/504124510701283693/posts/default/463001497447592292?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/504124510701283693/posts/default/463001497447592292?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/indiaschinablog/~3/z7YqiU7ycAo/china-mine-disaster-miracle-rescue-or.html" title="&lt;center&gt;China mine disaster: A 'Miracle' rescue or a Miracle rescue?&lt;/center&gt;" /><author><name>Maitreya Bhakal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14995317283182467753</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>12</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/2010/04/china-mine-disaster-miracle-rescue-or.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0AHSXw-fip7ImA9WhRWF0k.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-504124510701283693.post-3905031054054421281</id><published>2010-03-26T20:41:00.020+05:30</published><updated>2012-01-05T13:18:58.256+05:30</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-05T13:18:58.256+05:30</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="South Tibet" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Tibet" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Aksai Chin" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Simla agreement" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Simla accord" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="India" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="UK" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="British India" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China's Border disputes" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Sino-Indian border dispute" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Arunachal Pradesh" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="McMahon Line" /><title>A Brief History of the Sino-Indian Border Dispute and the role of Tibet</title><summary type="html">

On the 3rd of July, 1914, as Ivan Chen made his way down the steps of the Summit Hall building in Simla, he must have been aware of mixed feelings rising up inside him.  He had done something which would have far-reaching repercussions; and which would for years be remembered by many people on both sides of the Sino-Indian border, albeit in very different ways - He had just left the Simla &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/indiaschinablog/~4/yT5TgCjBHwE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/feeds/3905031054054421281/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/2010/03/brief-history-of-sino-indian-border.html#comment-form" title="18 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/504124510701283693/posts/default/3905031054054421281?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/504124510701283693/posts/default/3905031054054421281?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/indiaschinablog/~3/yT5TgCjBHwE/brief-history-of-sino-indian-border.html" title="&lt;center&gt;A Brief History of the Sino-Indian Border Dispute and the role of Tibet&lt;/center&gt;" /><author><name>Maitreya Bhakal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14995317283182467753</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vA-vZ7A30vw/S6zbtMKrH3I/AAAAAAAAAak/LCGOZknW2bM/s72-c/map_disputedterritories.JPG" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>18</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/2010/03/brief-history-of-sino-indian-border.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEcCR386eyp7ImA9WhRXGUw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-504124510701283693.post-6971383437335727893</id><published>2010-03-16T22:53:00.008+05:30</published><updated>2011-12-26T21:44:26.113+05:30</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-12-26T21:44:26.113+05:30</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="media bias" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ambrose Evans-Pritchard" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="humor" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="telegraph" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="media" /><title>Is the Politiburo smoking weed?</title><summary type="html">

Surprised? No sir, this is not some comment that a random user made at an online forum. This is the question that The Telegraph poses to its readers, in a recently published article entitled – ‘Is China’s Politburo spoiling for a showdown with America?’.


Now, we are all aware of the severe Cold-waresque bias against China in large parts of the Western media, amounting to literally a childlike&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/indiaschinablog/~4/RShF-_GShoU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/feeds/6971383437335727893/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/2010/03/is-politiburo-smoking-weed.html#comment-form" title="5 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/504124510701283693/posts/default/6971383437335727893?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/504124510701283693/posts/default/6971383437335727893?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/indiaschinablog/~3/RShF-_GShoU/is-politiburo-smoking-weed.html" title="&lt;center&gt;Is the Politiburo smoking weed?&lt;/center&gt;" /><author><name>Maitreya Bhakal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14995317283182467753</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>5</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/2010/03/is-politiburo-smoking-weed.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C04GRnk6cSp7ImA9WhRWFkU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-504124510701283693.post-2569621032553048200</id><published>2010-03-06T21:09:00.093+05:30</published><updated>2012-01-04T18:28:47.719+05:30</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-04T18:28:47.719+05:30</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="South Tibet" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="India" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China's Border disputes" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="British India" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Sino-Indian border dispute" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Simla agreement" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Arunachal Pradesh" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Aksai Chin" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Simla accord" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="McMahon Line" /><title>The Sino-Indian Border dispute: You Scratch my Back, But I Won’t Scratch yours</title><summary type="html">


The two Asian Giants are still not able to figure out the line dividing them – in the longest running border dispute in modern history. This dispute offers interesting lessons on how to, and how not to, handle boundary issues. The analysis of Chinese behavior in the negotiations is doubly important given China’s perception in the west of its ‘flexing its muscles’, and China’s theory of ‘&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/indiaschinablog/~4/VDeVTUxdJAU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/feeds/2569621032553048200/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/2010/03/you-scratch-my-back-but-i-wont-scratch.html#comment-form" title="40 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/504124510701283693/posts/default/2569621032553048200?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/504124510701283693/posts/default/2569621032553048200?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/indiaschinablog/~3/VDeVTUxdJAU/you-scratch-my-back-but-i-wont-scratch.html" title="&lt;center&gt;The Sino-Indian Border dispute: You Scratch my Back, But I Won’t Scratch yours&lt;/center&gt;" /><author><name>Maitreya Bhakal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14995317283182467753</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_vA-vZ7A30vw/S5JiPSLDBeI/AAAAAAAAAYg/YQkvCGfKnds/s72-c/map_disputedterritories.JPG" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>40</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/2010/03/you-scratch-my-back-but-i-wont-scratch.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0UHSH48cCp7ImA9WhRXGU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-504124510701283693.post-873652396271072727</id><published>2010-02-08T22:17:00.044+05:30</published><updated>2011-12-26T18:43:59.078+05:30</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-12-26T18:43:59.078+05:30</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="World Uyghur Congress" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="India" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Human Rights" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Naxal movement" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="economic development" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Xinjiang riots" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="religious freedom" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Dalai Lama" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Tibet Uprising" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="India vs China" /><title>The difference in the Indian and Chinese governments' approaches towards Separatism and Dissent - and what they can learn from each other</title><summary type="html">



While the Chinese government prefers development over human rights (like freedom of religion and speech), the Indian government, while guaranteeing these rights, neglects development.


Both India and China face the problems of separatism. Indian Naxalite movements and the recent riots and uprisings in Xinjiang and Tibet further highlights the need for respective governments to tackle the &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/indiaschinablog/~4/SYlvdPzjcRc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/feeds/873652396271072727/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/2010/02/difference-in-indian-and-chinese.html#comment-form" title="47 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/504124510701283693/posts/default/873652396271072727?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/504124510701283693/posts/default/873652396271072727?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/indiaschinablog/~3/SYlvdPzjcRc/difference-in-indian-and-chinese.html" title="&lt;center&gt;The difference in the Indian and Chinese governments' approaches towards Separatism and Dissent - and what they can learn from each other&lt;/center&gt;" /><author><name>Maitreya Bhakal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14995317283182467753</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>47</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/2010/02/difference-in-indian-and-chinese.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0UGSXYzfCp7ImA9WhRXGU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-504124510701283693.post-8494762151263286781</id><published>2010-02-02T21:28:00.004+05:30</published><updated>2011-12-26T18:43:48.884+05:30</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-12-26T18:43:48.884+05:30</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Britain" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="UK" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="India" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Akmal Shaikh" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Human Rights" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Hacking" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Death Penalty" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Heroin Smuggling" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Pakistan" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Double Standards" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chinese law" /><title>Akmal Shaikh, Britain’s Double Standards, and Lessons for India</title><summary type="html">

 The execution of a Britain in China for Drug Smuggling raises some interesting questions



Recently the news was packed with what they called the execution by the Chinese Government of a "mentally ill" Britain,. He was caught carrying 4 kgs of heroin in China. His family (surprise surprise!) said that he was mentally ill. And then human rights groups, that  are always more than ready to jump &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/indiaschinablog/~4/mitn0_2pXxc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/feeds/8494762151263286781/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/2010/02/akmal-shaikh-britains-double-standards.html#comment-form" title="14 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/504124510701283693/posts/default/8494762151263286781?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/504124510701283693/posts/default/8494762151263286781?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/indiaschinablog/~3/mitn0_2pXxc/akmal-shaikh-britains-double-standards.html" title="&lt;center&gt;Akmal Shaikh, Britain’s Double Standards, and Lessons for India&lt;/center&gt;" /><author><name>Maitreya Bhakal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14995317283182467753</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>14</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/2010/02/akmal-shaikh-britains-double-standards.html</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>

