<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" gd:etag="W/&quot;C0AESHk-fyp7ImA9WxBUEE0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7473375840262512544</id><updated>2010-02-24T00:55:09.757-08:00</updated><title>enEquities</title><subtitle type="html" /><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.enequities.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.enequities.com/" /><link rel="next" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25&amp;redirect=false&amp;v=2" /><author><name>Brian P.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06048584414298188710</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>91</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/inequities" /><feedburner:info uri="inequities" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>inequities</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUYBQnk7cCp7ImA9WxRbFEs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7473375840262512544.post-3356194125758096588</id><published>2008-12-04T16:23:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-04T23:45:53.708-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-12-04T23:45:53.708-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="valuations" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Basketball" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="sports" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="NBA" /><title>Most Valuable NBA Teams</title><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7473375840262512544&amp;postID=3356194125758096588&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/3356194125758096588?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/3356194125758096588?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/inequities/~3/ZPyR0_8K1Ro/most-valuable-nba-teams.html" title="Most Valuable NBA Teams" /><author><name>Brian P.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06048584414298188710</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="02014519021462739878" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html"> Forbes has released their valuations of NBA teams for the year 2008. Do the teams at the top really deserve to bet there?Let's take a closer look at the top 5:1) New York Knickes.Valuation: $613 MillionCurrent Record: 8-102) Los Angeles LakersValuation: $584 millionCurrent Record: 15-23) Chicago BullsValuation: $504 millionCurrent Record: 8-114) Detroit PistonsValuation: $480 millionCurrent 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4gSuvEkFrWvdsoqRzVtmUc_tNgk/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4gSuvEkFrWvdsoqRzVtmUc_tNgk/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4gSuvEkFrWvdsoqRzVtmUc_tNgk/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4gSuvEkFrWvdsoqRzVtmUc_tNgk/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/inequities/~4/ZPyR0_8K1Ro" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.enequities.com/2008/12/most-valuable-nba-teams.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUQAR34yfip7ImA9WxRbE08.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7473375840262512544.post-8099517868753264914</id><published>2008-12-03T08:51:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-03T08:55:46.096-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-12-03T08:55:46.096-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="SNL" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="economy" /><title>Back From Hiatus:  When Will the Economy Be Fixed?</title><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7473375840262512544&amp;postID=8099517868753264914&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/8099517868753264914?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/8099517868753264914?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/inequities/~3/2-GZMCSSlhc/back-from-hiatus-when-will-economy-be.html" title="Back From Hiatus:  When Will the Economy Be Fixed?" /><author><name>Brian P.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06048584414298188710</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="02014519021462739878" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Back from a small hiatus (sorry!) to bring you more comedy to feed your economically destroyed heart.  When is all of this going to be fixed?
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/kUEFjxEyFkfTLFQtMeLm1GZPw_A/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/kUEFjxEyFkfTLFQtMeLm1GZPw_A/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/kUEFjxEyFkfTLFQtMeLm1GZPw_A/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/kUEFjxEyFkfTLFQtMeLm1GZPw_A/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/inequities/~4/2-GZMCSSlhc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.enequities.com/2008/12/back-from-hiatus-when-will-economy-be.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUMGR34yfSp7ImA9WxRbE08.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7473375840262512544.post-3516570220170679334</id><published>2008-10-15T02:19:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-12-03T08:57:06.095-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-12-03T08:57:06.095-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="SNL" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="AIG" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="economy" /><title>SNL knows it's stuff.  "Really AIG??"</title><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7473375840262512544&amp;postID=3516570220170679334&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/3516570220170679334?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/3516570220170679334?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/inequities/~3/Qz9ZKrS4b00/snl-knows-its-stuff-really-aig.html" title="SNL knows it's stuff.  &quot;Really AIG??&quot;" /><author><name>Brian P.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06048584414298188710</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="02014519021462739878" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">I love it when the mainstream media actually gets it right.  This is from "Really? With Seth and Amy."AIG execs what are you doing??  Do you really think this is the time to try to sneak away some presents for yourself?  Only the entire nation is watching you right now.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/oga3spzURuLoB1MwqJOraf1JZxU/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/oga3spzURuLoB1MwqJOraf1JZxU/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/oga3spzURuLoB1MwqJOraf1JZxU/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/oga3spzURuLoB1MwqJOraf1JZxU/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/inequities/~4/Qz9ZKrS4b00" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.enequities.com/2008/10/snl-knows-its-stuff-really-aig.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkUMQnY_fCp7ImA9WxRRFUo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7473375840262512544.post-378086376997279430</id><published>2008-09-27T21:49:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-09-27T22:04:43.844-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-09-27T22:04:43.844-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="bailout" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="government" /><title>Any More Bank Bailouts?</title><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7473375840262512544&amp;postID=378086376997279430&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/378086376997279430?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/378086376997279430?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/inequities/~3/8yT33-e8Ito/any-more-bank-bailouts.html" title="Any More Bank Bailouts?" /><author><name>Brian P.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06048584414298188710</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="02014519021462739878" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Via lol-cats
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AnLqUyW1SmX7du_MK4HJdvevV7s/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AnLqUyW1SmX7du_MK4HJdvevV7s/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AnLqUyW1SmX7du_MK4HJdvevV7s/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AnLqUyW1SmX7du_MK4HJdvevV7s/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/inequities/~4/8yT33-e8Ito" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.enequities.com/2008/09/any-more-bank-bailouts.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkcMQXw6fip7ImA9WxRSFkg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7473375840262512544.post-6602515516826989283</id><published>2008-09-17T03:36:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2008-09-17T04:14:40.216-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-09-17T04:14:40.216-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="New York" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="AIG" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Federal Reserve" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="American International Group" /><title>AIG Gets It's Wish: Bailout</title><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7473375840262512544&amp;postID=6602515516826989283&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/6602515516826989283?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/6602515516826989283?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/inequities/~3/OqJskuyB1xk/aig-gets-its-wish-bailout.html" title="AIG Gets It's Wish: Bailout" /><author><name>Brian P.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06048584414298188710</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="02014519021462739878" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">There was only one thing that AIG was wishing for before it went to sleep on Tuesday.  A Bailout.And a bailout was what it got as the Federal Reserve just announced that indeed they will be granting AIG it's wish.  Why?  The same old same old.  The Fed decided that AIG is too big to fail.In short the terms of the deal are that:The New York Fed will loan AIG up to $85 billion worth of taxpayer 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ABHaKsu1U3peey1dSuFuIFuV9kw/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ABHaKsu1U3peey1dSuFuIFuV9kw/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ABHaKsu1U3peey1dSuFuIFuV9kw/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ABHaKsu1U3peey1dSuFuIFuV9kw/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/inequities/~4/OqJskuyB1xk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.enequities.com/2008/09/aig-gets-its-wish-bailout.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkEBSX06fCp7ImA9WxRSFkg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7473375840262512544.post-943746289273707146</id><published>2008-09-16T15:27:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2008-09-17T04:24:18.314-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-09-17T04:24:18.314-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Goldman Sachs" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Lehman Brothers" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="news" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Hedge Fund" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Investment Banks" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Morgan Stanley" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Nouriel Roubini" /><title>Lehman Bankruptcy Freezes Hedge Funds</title><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7473375840262512544&amp;postID=943746289273707146&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/943746289273707146?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/943746289273707146?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/inequities/~3/K_24UKPlQS8/lehman-bankruptcy-freezes-hedge-funds.html" title="Lehman Bankruptcy Freezes Hedge Funds" /><author><name>Brian P.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06048584414298188710</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="02014519021462739878" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">In this globally interconnected world, everything effects everything.  And those Hedge Funds loyal enough to trust Lehman and stick with them through uncertain times are now getting thrown under a dead 500lb gorilla.About 100 hedge funds that used Lehman Brothers as their prime broker had positions held via the failed bank frozen on Monday as administrators took charge of the London business and 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/YEdWx_VDjKMRiOuLIe8-Qq3qytE/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/YEdWx_VDjKMRiOuLIe8-Qq3qytE/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/YEdWx_VDjKMRiOuLIe8-Qq3qytE/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/YEdWx_VDjKMRiOuLIe8-Qq3qytE/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/inequities/~4/K_24UKPlQS8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.enequities.com/2008/09/lehman-bankruptcy-freezes-hedge-funds.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C04FRHw-cCp7ImA9WxRTGUQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7473375840262512544.post-8830404945927856897</id><published>2008-09-09T13:18:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2008-09-09T13:25:15.258-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-09-09T13:25:15.258-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Henry Paulson" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="economy" /><title>Flashback - Henry Paulson April 2007</title><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7473375840262512544&amp;postID=8830404945927856897&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/8830404945927856897?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/8830404945927856897?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/inequities/~3/cJ6EasVc_jU/flashback-henry-paulson-april-2007.html" title="Flashback - Henry Paulson April 2007" /><author><name>Brian P.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06048584414298188710</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="02014519021462739878" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">I ran across this old quote from Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson from April 20, 2007.  Rather hilarious:U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said on Friday the housing market correction appears to be at or near its bottom and that troubles in the subprime mortgage market will not likely spread throughout the economy."We've clearly had a big correction in the housing market. Retail housing was 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/DmVaap2fukZz86IiyGFOHfUamQI/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/DmVaap2fukZz86IiyGFOHfUamQI/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/DmVaap2fukZz86IiyGFOHfUamQI/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/DmVaap2fukZz86IiyGFOHfUamQI/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/inequities/~4/cJ6EasVc_jU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.enequities.com/2008/09/flashback-henry-paulson-april-2007.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUAGSH8-eSp7ImA9WxRTFks.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7473375840262512544.post-8725575658825967592</id><published>2008-09-05T17:59:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-09-05T18:15:29.151-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-09-05T18:15:29.151-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="recession" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="eonomy" /><title>Everything is Okay...</title><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7473375840262512544&amp;postID=8725575658825967592&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/8725575658825967592?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/8725575658825967592?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/inequities/~3/xvAdMeOg3BU/everything-is-okay.html" title="Everything is Okay..." /><author><name>Brian P.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06048584414298188710</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="02014519021462739878" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Despite what many professors will tell you (okay maybe one in particular that I didn't agree with), a recession is not defined as 2 successive quarters of negative GDP.  And it shouldn't be.The latest 3.3% GDP growth in Q2 should be enough to tell you that mode of thinking is horrendously wrong.From the National Bureau of of Economic ResearchThe NBER does not define a recession in terms of two 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/v6bqIEDRyVuITWZEo0Ph1iisI-w/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/v6bqIEDRyVuITWZEo0Ph1iisI-w/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/v6bqIEDRyVuITWZEo0Ph1iisI-w/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/v6bqIEDRyVuITWZEo0Ph1iisI-w/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/inequities/~4/xvAdMeOg3BU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.enequities.com/2008/09/everything-is-okay.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEEAQ3c5fSp7ImA9WxRTFUQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7473375840262512544.post-5202656180518760494</id><published>2008-09-04T16:58:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-09-04T22:30:42.925-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-09-04T22:30:42.925-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="tech" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="biotech" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="cleantech" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="commodities" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="macro-economics" /><title>A Broken Economy</title><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7473375840262512544&amp;postID=5202656180518760494&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/5202656180518760494?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/5202656180518760494?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/inequities/~3/RKdkLSGn7Jk/broken-economy.html" title="A Broken Economy" /><author><name>Brian P.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06048584414298188710</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="02014519021462739878" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Terrific piece from Joseph Stiglitz entitled:  Falling Down - No manufacturing. No new ideas. What's our economy based on?Stiglitz is a Columbia University Professor and won the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics in 2001.Too much energy has been spent trying to make an easy buck; too much effort has been devoted to increasing profits and not enough to increasing real wealth, whether that wealth 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7VWOT6epBezDKzvYyNir-f-C9Bg/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7VWOT6epBezDKzvYyNir-f-C9Bg/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7VWOT6epBezDKzvYyNir-f-C9Bg/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7VWOT6epBezDKzvYyNir-f-C9Bg/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/inequities/~4/RKdkLSGn7Jk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.enequities.com/2008/09/broken-economy.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEEDSH8_eyp7ImA9WxRTFUo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7473375840262512544.post-5314461950941139661</id><published>2008-09-04T16:04:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-09-04T16:57:59.143-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-09-04T16:57:59.143-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Bunge" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="commodities" /><title>Citi Slashes Bunge Price Targets</title><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7473375840262512544&amp;postID=5314461950941139661&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/5314461950941139661?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/5314461950941139661?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/inequities/~3/hdKy_n3pmcQ/citi-slashes-bunge-price-targets.html" title="Citi Slashes Bunge Price Targets" /><author><name>Brian P.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06048584414298188710</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="02014519021462739878" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">A Citi analyst cut their price target on Bunge (BG) from $130 to $95--a 27% drop.  Despite the drop, they maintain a "hold" rating.  But, I would take their "ratings" with a grain of salt.However, their comments do shed some light on the commodities markets in general.  Bunge has continually raised earnings estimates, but I question what assumptions those estimates are based off of.  Emerging 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FMJbSKb8lsbiVJVeZ2SHvZsEyBw/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FMJbSKb8lsbiVJVeZ2SHvZsEyBw/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FMJbSKb8lsbiVJVeZ2SHvZsEyBw/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FMJbSKb8lsbiVJVeZ2SHvZsEyBw/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/inequities/~4/hdKy_n3pmcQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.enequities.com/2008/09/citi-slashes-bunge-price-targets.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0cNRn88cSp7ImA9WxRTGUQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7473375840262512544.post-7054933420335131367</id><published>2008-09-04T14:10:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-09-09T15:24:57.179-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-09-09T15:24:57.179-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="housing bubble" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="economy" /><title>Home Price/ Income Ratio - Long Way to Fall</title><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7473375840262512544&amp;postID=7054933420335131367&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/7054933420335131367?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/7054933420335131367?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/inequities/~3/N4s2QPX65eU/home-price-income-ratio-long-way-to.html" title="Home Price/ Income Ratio - Long Way to Fall" /><author><name>Brian P.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06048584414298188710</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="02014519021462739878" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Via LA Times Land BlogScary chart.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/nTwtHquuWiSsYMvXDRCVLFpKY18/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/nTwtHquuWiSsYMvXDRCVLFpKY18/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/nTwtHquuWiSsYMvXDRCVLFpKY18/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/nTwtHquuWiSsYMvXDRCVLFpKY18/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/inequities/~4/N4s2QPX65eU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.enequities.com/2008/09/home-price-income-ratio-long-way-to.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkcDQHw8cCp7ImA9WxRTEkQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7473375840262512544.post-2275602355782923452</id><published>2008-09-01T11:19:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-09-01T11:34:31.278-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-09-01T11:34:31.278-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Bill Miller" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="mutual fund" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Legg Mason" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="value trap" /><title>The Perils of Being a Value Investor</title><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7473375840262512544&amp;postID=2275602355782923452&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/2275602355782923452?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/2275602355782923452?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/inequities/~3/gI9DIFqM3LM/perils-of-being-value-investor.html" title="The Perils of Being a Value Investor" /><author><name>Brian P.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06048584414298188710</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="02014519021462739878" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">A lot has been made over Bill Miller's love affair with Freddie Mac.  I feel for the guy I really do.  I'm sure many of you have been in similar situations where you see that the shares of a company have dropped by nearly half.... only to drop by another 50% later.If you thought it was cheap then, it must be cheaper now right?  "Good investing is all about consistency!"  "Be true to your beliefs!
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/hwx5sFHaQ8EejD1H_pU7oWS2Iz0/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/hwx5sFHaQ8EejD1H_pU7oWS2Iz0/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/hwx5sFHaQ8EejD1H_pU7oWS2Iz0/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/hwx5sFHaQ8EejD1H_pU7oWS2Iz0/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/inequities/~4/gI9DIFqM3LM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.enequities.com/2008/09/perils-of-being-value-investor.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEEAQHY8cSp7ImA9WxRTEUg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7473375840262512544.post-4978082226497375719</id><published>2008-08-30T14:26:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-30T20:17:21.879-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-08-30T20:17:21.879-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="POT" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="MOS" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="news" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="AGU" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="potash" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="IPI" /><title>Tracking the Potash Strike</title><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7473375840262512544&amp;postID=4978082226497375719&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/4978082226497375719?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/4978082226497375719?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/inequities/~3/vfoLIN0zn40/tracking-potash-strike.html" title="Tracking the Potash Strike" /><author><name>Brian P.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06048584414298188710</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="02014519021462739878" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_iHL1BnWMkHs/SLn2tarX3jI/AAAAAAAAAmQ/Ld_V974Vt54/s72-c/potash.PNG" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">There's turmoil in the fertilizer market as the largest producer of potash, a necessary ingredient in fertilizer, Potash Corp of Saskatchewan, has faced strikes at 3 of its mines.  These mines account for 6 percent of total supply for the mineral.The strike began about a month ago, but hasn't shown any progress in being resolved thus far.  Here we're going to recount what's been happening 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/B6ifECghAS3pu2yn8MQOl7dPjts/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/B6ifECghAS3pu2yn8MQOl7dPjts/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/B6ifECghAS3pu2yn8MQOl7dPjts/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/B6ifECghAS3pu2yn8MQOl7dPjts/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/inequities/~4/vfoLIN0zn40" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.enequities.com/2008/08/tracking-potash-strike.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkAARn8_fip7ImA9WxRTEE4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7473375840262512544.post-5931462269074101699</id><published>2008-08-29T12:22:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-29T12:39:07.146-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-08-29T12:39:07.146-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="news" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="food inflation" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="spending" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="economy" /><title>July Spending Down, Inflation Still Powers Through</title><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7473375840262512544&amp;postID=5931462269074101699&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/5931462269074101699?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/5931462269074101699?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/inequities/~3/o8ovY-GkfqM/july-spending-down-inflation-still.html" title="July Spending Down, Inflation Still Powers Through" /><author><name>Brian P.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06048584414298188710</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="02014519021462739878" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Consumer spending for the month of July slowed to a 0.2% increase over June.  This is down from a 0.6% increase in June.  It seems like the tax rebates are wearing off.  We can see that in America at least consumers want to spend.  They just don't know what to spend!  Bloomberg reports:Incomes dropped 0.7 percent, the first decrease since August 2005, reflecting the end of the rebates. That was 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/mnXKUd8kQczrjGt8awOYVU2zCRs/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/mnXKUd8kQczrjGt8awOYVU2zCRs/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/mnXKUd8kQczrjGt8awOYVU2zCRs/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/mnXKUd8kQczrjGt8awOYVU2zCRs/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/inequities/~4/o8ovY-GkfqM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.enequities.com/2008/08/july-spending-down-inflation-still.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkQDSXs7fSp7ImA9WxRTEU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7473375840262512544.post-3682237468074654288</id><published>2008-08-29T12:00:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-30T07:59:38.505-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-08-30T07:59:38.505-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="news" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="GDP" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="economy" /><title>2nd Quarter GDP revised to 3.3% growth</title><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7473375840262512544&amp;postID=3682237468074654288&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/3682237468074654288?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/3682237468074654288?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/inequities/~3/YHfTUgvFUPI/2nd-quarter-gdp-revised-to-33-growth.html" title="2nd Quarter GDP revised to 3.3% growth" /><author><name>Brian P.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06048584414298188710</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="02014519021462739878" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">The markets have been holding up lately and one of the little surprises life threw at us was that 2nd quarter GDP was revised up from 0.9% growth to 3.3% growth.  3.3% is no insignificant number.  In any other situation I would say that our economy is rollin!But that`s any other situation.Economists had predicted GDP to be around 2.7% based off the fact that the tax rebates would help stimulate 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FkswGCXpwQ419jFglUxh711DuMc/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FkswGCXpwQ419jFglUxh711DuMc/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FkswGCXpwQ419jFglUxh711DuMc/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FkswGCXpwQ419jFglUxh711DuMc/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/inequities/~4/YHfTUgvFUPI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.enequities.com/2008/08/2nd-quarter-gdp-revised-to-33-growth.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkcHRn05fyp7ImA9WxdaF0Q.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7473375840262512544.post-5380067939407341333</id><published>2008-08-26T16:16:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-26T16:40:37.327-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-08-26T16:40:37.327-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="housing bubble" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="news" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="housing" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Housing report" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="economy" /><title>It's That Time Again--Housing Report</title><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7473375840262512544&amp;postID=5380067939407341333&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/5380067939407341333?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/5380067939407341333?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/inequities/~3/v6yM8lw9CIY/its-that-time-again-housing-report.html" title="It's That Time Again--Housing Report" /><author><name>Brian P.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06048584414298188710</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="02014519021462739878" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Yesterday, the NAR released housing data for the month of July.  I would've had this up for you yesterday, but being that this site just relaunched today you'll have to forgive me.  Next time you are free to comment-bash however!Before I give you data, remember that monthly housing data needs to be compared year over year, and not month to month because of seasonal effects.  So knowing that:
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/gxEAdCLrOu7lmBrCScNn-spW714/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/gxEAdCLrOu7lmBrCScNn-spW714/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/gxEAdCLrOu7lmBrCScNn-spW714/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/gxEAdCLrOu7lmBrCScNn-spW714/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/inequities/~4/v6yM8lw9CIY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.enequities.com/2008/08/its-that-time-again-housing-report.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkECQnoyfCp7ImA9WxRTEk4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7473375840262512544.post-4706143350072430918</id><published>2008-08-26T16:03:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-31T20:11:03.494-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-08-31T20:11:03.494-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="news" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="analysts" /><title>Analyst's Forward Estimates - A Lagging Indicator</title><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7473375840262512544&amp;postID=4706143350072430918&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/4706143350072430918?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/4706143350072430918?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/inequities/~3/EK0WPY6RwLc/analysts-forward-estimates-lagging.html" title="Analyst's Forward Estimates - A Lagging Indicator" /><author><name>Brian P.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06048584414298188710</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="02014519021462739878" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">It's quite ironic, but can we now all agree that the forward estimates analysts project are very much a lagging indicator on the performance of a company?In this whole credit crisis we've been experiencing, the economy turned sour and the outlook for businesses looked worse and worse.  We were simply waiting for analysts to downward revise earning's estimates.  We knew it was coming, we just 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/CtXyVu-97ut3SgRK23etjLfhiPs/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/CtXyVu-97ut3SgRK23etjLfhiPs/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/CtXyVu-97ut3SgRK23etjLfhiPs/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/CtXyVu-97ut3SgRK23etjLfhiPs/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/inequities/~4/EK0WPY6RwLc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.enequities.com/2008/08/analysts-forward-estimates-lagging.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DU4GRHw6fip7ImA9WxdbGE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7473375840262512544.post-8966624878183116975</id><published>2008-08-09T14:10:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-15T12:18:45.216-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-08-15T12:18:45.216-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="insider trading" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chesapeake Energy" /><title>Chesapeake insider trading indications</title><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7473375840262512544&amp;postID=8966624878183116975&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/8966624878183116975?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/8966624878183116975?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/inequities/~3/k78ayAmBw8c/chesapeake-insider-trading-indications.html" title="Chesapeake insider trading indications" /><author><name>Andy S</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00635382870080926904</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="13068398801871814912" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Insider trading is technically legal so long as insiders buying or selling shares of their own company properly report their actions in advance. Therefore, these filings are made public, even if it is several weeks after the activity. If there is anyone that knows a company in and out, it would be the insiders of a company, such as the chief executive, financial officers, directors, and 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/02gtCHTPmyOSsZ4zVg-3G16qJzM/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/02gtCHTPmyOSsZ4zVg-3G16qJzM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/02gtCHTPmyOSsZ4zVg-3G16qJzM/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/02gtCHTPmyOSsZ4zVg-3G16qJzM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/inequities/~4/k78ayAmBw8c" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.enequities.com/2008/08/chesapeake-insider-trading-indications.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Ak8CSHc8eyp7ImA9WxdbEUo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7473375840262512544.post-5409665405501661836</id><published>2008-08-06T06:26:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-08T00:01:09.973-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-08-08T00:01:09.973-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="PCFS" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="First Cash Financial" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="EZPW" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="EZCorp" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="CSH" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Cash America Intl" /><title>Benefactors from the subprime fallout and the tightening credit aftermath</title><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7473375840262512544&amp;postID=5409665405501661836&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/5409665405501661836?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/5409665405501661836?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/inequities/~3/hct8pi--F0o/benefactors-from-subprime-fallout-and.html" title="Benefactors from the subprime fallout and the tightening credit aftermath" /><author><name>Andy S</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00635382870080926904</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="13068398801871814912" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_iHL1BnWMkHs/SJvibs_V_mI/AAAAAAAAAik/UyiyoPG5Wsk/s72-c/EZcorp+comparison.PNG" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Back when I didn't know anything about stocks, I discovered stock screeners, such as the ones on Yahoo Finance. I thought I was some sort of genius and used that to cut down a list to around ten stocks. I have no idea what numbers I put in as the requirements, but one of the first stocks I ever put money into, either second or third, was EZCorp. Maybe my mind is filled with too much useless stuff
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/W6ERFJUrgxGbC7fML0QyZ2oIeCg/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/W6ERFJUrgxGbC7fML0QyZ2oIeCg/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/W6ERFJUrgxGbC7fML0QyZ2oIeCg/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/W6ERFJUrgxGbC7fML0QyZ2oIeCg/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/inequities/~4/hct8pi--F0o" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.enequities.com/2008/08/benefactors-from-subprime-fallout-and.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Ck4EQX4-cCp7ImA9WxdUFUg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7473375840262512544.post-6527269472847291163</id><published>2008-07-31T15:56:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-07-31T17:35:00.058-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-07-31T17:35:00.058-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="pension funds" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="endowments" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="commodities" /><title>Pension Funds hold back on commodities exposure</title><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7473375840262512544&amp;postID=6527269472847291163&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/6527269472847291163?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/6527269472847291163?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/inequities/~3/Yp7AKvvxaoA/pension-funds-hold-back-on-commodities.html" title="Pension Funds hold back on commodities exposure" /><author><name>Brian P.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06048584414298188710</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="02014519021462739878" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Interesting article out of Reuters concerning commodities investing.They state that Pension funds have started to curtail their investment in commodities.Barclays estimates that new money inflows into commodities in the second quarter fell by 51 percent from the first quarter to $6.4 billion.       "We're not saying money flowed out, we're saying less money flowed in the second quarter.""The end 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/J5is6dmCVhvF21b36Rrr91vsQXQ/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/J5is6dmCVhvF21b36Rrr91vsQXQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/J5is6dmCVhvF21b36Rrr91vsQXQ/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/J5is6dmCVhvF21b36Rrr91vsQXQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/inequities/~4/Yp7AKvvxaoA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.enequities.com/2008/07/pension-funds-hold-back-on-commodities.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUMBSH86fSp7ImA9WxdUFEk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7473375840262512544.post-5137964542433244232</id><published>2008-07-29T18:05:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-07-30T12:50:59.115-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-07-30T12:50:59.115-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="OPEC" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ethanol" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="oil" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="crude oil" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="price of oil" /><title>The Villainous OPEC doesn't look to decrease supply. (Understanding OPEC's bias)</title><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7473375840262512544&amp;postID=5137964542433244232&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/5137964542433244232?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/5137964542433244232?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/inequities/~3/MY_cOlpQFYw/villainous-opec-doesnt-look-to-decrease.html" title="The Villainous OPEC doesn't look to decrease supply. (Understanding OPEC's bias)" /><author><name>Brian P.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06048584414298188710</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="02014519021462739878" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://bp0.blogger.com/_iHL1BnWMkHs/SJAQuD964gI/AAAAAAAAAhg/ywhBWFjo1p4/s72-c/us+refineries+in+use.PNG" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">If I were a politician, I would be telling you: that OPEC is the villain; the arab states are the bad guys; that the oil run up is due to us not controlling our own oil production; that instead, we should make corn ethanol (Obama) or drill our own extra oil (McCain).Luckily, I'm not a politician.Very telling statements from the OPEC president Chakib Khelil:OPEC should not consider cutting 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VZo5WsHQAUvuQXpRIPUe7IyYzSs/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VZo5WsHQAUvuQXpRIPUe7IyYzSs/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VZo5WsHQAUvuQXpRIPUe7IyYzSs/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VZo5WsHQAUvuQXpRIPUe7IyYzSs/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/inequities/~4/MY_cOlpQFYw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.enequities.com/2008/07/villainous-opec-doesnt-look-to-decrease.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEYNRHc6eip7ImA9WxdUFUo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7473375840262512544.post-4331445006738934623</id><published>2008-07-24T11:58:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-01T00:36:35.912-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-08-01T00:36:35.912-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Bunge" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="BG" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="commodities" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="agriculture" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="agribusiness" /><title>Meeting the demands of tomorrow - Bunge</title><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7473375840262512544&amp;postID=4331445006738934623&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/4331445006738934623?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/4331445006738934623?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/inequities/~3/--gu5y3rCM0/meeting-demands-of-tomorrow.html" title="Meeting the demands of tomorrow - Bunge" /><author><name>Andy S</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00635382870080926904</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="13068398801871814912" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://bp2.blogger.com/_iHL1BnWMkHs/SIjiXngyZ2I/AAAAAAAAAd0/cQ3DUWexZAg/s72-Rc/BG+value+chain.PNG" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Meeting the demands of tomorrow comes from an organization able to add value to an integrated value chain.Brian and Ravi described in previous articles the commodities run-up as we are using these crops demanded all around the world not only as food products, but for biodiesels. We are seeing record prices in the raw materials going into the products offered by these agricultural/fertilizer 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/a8Kfm3wVsalkdNESQqDJS70eyRg/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/a8Kfm3wVsalkdNESQqDJS70eyRg/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/a8Kfm3wVsalkdNESQqDJS70eyRg/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/a8Kfm3wVsalkdNESQqDJS70eyRg/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/inequities/~4/--gu5y3rCM0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.enequities.com/2008/07/meeting-demands-of-tomorrow.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0QNRH49eSp7ImA9WxdVGEQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7473375840262512544.post-754387305694211041</id><published>2008-07-24T02:37:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-07-24T03:29:55.061-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-07-24T03:29:55.061-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ken Griffin" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="bubble" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Hedge Fund" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="reflexivity" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Steven Cohen" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="George Soros" /><title>These Hedge Funds are the Benchmark</title><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7473375840262512544&amp;postID=754387305694211041&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/754387305694211041?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/754387305694211041?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/inequities/~3/0BG80v8To-s/these-hedge-funds-are-benchmark.html" title="These Hedge Funds are the Benchmark" /><author><name>Brian P.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06048584414298188710</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="02014519021462739878" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Kenneth Griffin.Steven Cohen.George Soros.Three of the biggest names in investing behind Warren Buffet.  They each operate a "hedge fund."  A phrase that has become somewhat taboo recently for the industry's suspected involvement in "speculation" and the oil run up.Institutional Investor recently interviewed each (and a slew of other famous hedge fund managers).Kenneth Griffin on the Wall St. 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VF777fZE12BDAcveBrOyv0XR6VQ/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VF777fZE12BDAcveBrOyv0XR6VQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VF777fZE12BDAcveBrOyv0XR6VQ/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VF777fZE12BDAcveBrOyv0XR6VQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/inequities/~4/0BG80v8To-s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.enequities.com/2008/07/these-hedge-funds-are-benchmark.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0QAQHk6eyp7ImA9WxdVFU4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7473375840262512544.post-8204658206937342007</id><published>2008-07-18T23:12:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-07-19T23:29:01.713-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-07-19T23:29:01.713-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Barron's" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="oil" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="crude oil" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="price of oil" /><title>Barron's Called The Top On Oil, too.</title><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7473375840262512544&amp;postID=8204658206937342007&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/8204658206937342007?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/8204658206937342007?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/inequities/~3/fqPkRYMT22Q/barrons-called-top-on-oil-too.html" title="Barron's Called The Top On Oil, too." /><author><name>Brian P.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06048584414298188710</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="02014519021462739878" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">The cover article for the last week of June in Barron's was titled:Bye, Bubble? The Price of Oil May be Peaking.The article is dated on their website: June 23, 2008.  The subtitle:The price of oil may be peaking in the current range of $130 to $140 a barrel. Here's where you want to be when the bubble bursts.Their timing was impeccable.  Although it wasn't July 9, 2008, it was very close.I must 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Tp5brwXRVEjqIjrVfI1-l8HH0Zs/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Tp5brwXRVEjqIjrVfI1-l8HH0Zs/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Tp5brwXRVEjqIjrVfI1-l8HH0Zs/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Tp5brwXRVEjqIjrVfI1-l8HH0Zs/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/inequities/~4/fqPkRYMT22Q" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.enequities.com/2008/07/barrons-called-top-on-oil-too.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkIBRnc9fip7ImA9WxdVFEw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7473375840262512544.post-9220779484377543133</id><published>2008-07-18T13:56:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2008-07-18T15:02:37.966-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-07-18T15:02:37.966-07:00</app:edited><title>Did Fox Business Ruin the Market?</title><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7473375840262512544&amp;postID=9220779484377543133&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/9220779484377543133?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7473375840262512544/posts/default/9220779484377543133?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/inequities/~3/z-KkW08XGHc/did-fox-business-ruin-market.html" title="Did Fox Business Ruin the Market?" /><author><name>Brian P.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06048584414298188710</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="02014519021462739878" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://bp0.blogger.com/_iHL1BnWMkHs/SIEPKkq3HkI/AAAAAAAAAc0/1RoDEDCzxtc/s72-c/fox+business+screwed+the+market.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Now, I'm not crying out against conservative journalism or anything.  Heck, I won't even go so far as to say that Fox News is a conservatively biased network.  They are what they are.And the facts are what they are as well.Before Fox Business launched the stock market was hitting all time highs.  We had taken a hit from the subprime mortgage debacle in July 2007, but bounced back on the wings of 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4zDiaGdRwrHI24lbe8j4uasoPGw/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4zDiaGdRwrHI24lbe8j4uasoPGw/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4zDiaGdRwrHI24lbe8j4uasoPGw/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4zDiaGdRwrHI24lbe8j4uasoPGw/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/inequities/~4/z-KkW08XGHc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.enequities.com/2008/07/did-fox-business-ruin-market.html</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>
