
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Información Cívica</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informacioncivica.info/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informacioncivica.info</link>
	<description>La Nueva Sociedad Civil en Latinoamérica</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:39:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Technology of Corporate Accountability by Ben Cokelet / PODER</title>
		<link>http://informacioncivica.info/mexico/the-technology-of-corporate-accountability/#comment-3578</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Cokelet / PODER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 22:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://informacioncivica.info/?p=281#comment-3578</guid>
		<description>Hi David,

I join Greg and certainly others in congratulating you on the tour de force of corporate transparency and accountability posts. While the T/A movement has taken ahold in Latin America&#039;s public sector in recent years, corporate T/A initiatives remain nascent and disparate, as you well point out. In order to build a similar movement in Latin America&#039;s private sector, PODER in Mexico, Fundación Ciudadano Inteligente and Poderopedia in Chile, Dejusticia in Colombia, and others must seek opportunities for synergy and collaboration. For our movement to succeed, the basic principles of corporate responsibility, sustainability, and transparency must emerge beyond legal texts, annual reports, and business school classrooms to become cultural, economic, political, and social norms. As a society, we must demand of the corporations that operate in our communities the same standards of compliance, disclosure, and justice that we expect from our governments. These are matters of public interest. However, for these principles to become norms and for all sectors of society to agree on their importance for democracy and development, our movement must be seen, heard, and read. This is where your blog post fits perfectly, providing a panorama and a forum upon which to build. I look forward to further conversation, and action!

Regarding PODER&#039;s Quién es Quien Wiki (Who&#039;s Who Wiki), which you mention in your post (thanks for the plug for the programmer position we seek to fill), we&#039;re eager to collaborate and share information in order to build this movement more effectively. In fact, we&#039;re already in communication with some of the whistleblower platforms that you name to do just that -- build from points of mutual strength instead of reinvent the wheel.

As for inequality and elite influence over public decision-making, at PODER our latest research on Mexican corporations and investors, for example, reveals that 48 men and their families – all members of the über exclusive Mexican Council of Businessmen – exercise heavy albeit indirect influence over 27% of the country’s GDP. And this does not even include two of the country’s three richest men: Carlos Slim and Ricardo Salinas Pliego! Perhaps unsurprisingly, this concentration of capital has only increased since 2008.

Thanks again for the important contribution.

Ben Cokelet / PODER</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p>
<p>I join Greg and certainly others in congratulating you on the tour de force of corporate transparency and accountability posts. While the T/A movement has taken ahold in Latin America&#8217;s public sector in recent years, corporate T/A initiatives remain nascent and disparate, as you well point out. In order to build a similar movement in Latin America&#8217;s private sector, PODER in Mexico, Fundación Ciudadano Inteligente and Poderopedia in Chile, Dejusticia in Colombia, and others must seek opportunities for synergy and collaboration. For our movement to succeed, the basic principles of corporate responsibility, sustainability, and transparency must emerge beyond legal texts, annual reports, and business school classrooms to become cultural, economic, political, and social norms. As a society, we must demand of the corporations that operate in our communities the same standards of compliance, disclosure, and justice that we expect from our governments. These are matters of public interest. However, for these principles to become norms and for all sectors of society to agree on their importance for democracy and development, our movement must be seen, heard, and read. This is where your blog post fits perfectly, providing a panorama and a forum upon which to build. I look forward to further conversation, and action!</p>
<p>Regarding PODER&#8217;s Quién es Quien Wiki (Who&#8217;s Who Wiki), which you mention in your post (thanks for the plug for the programmer position we seek to fill), we&#8217;re eager to collaborate and share information in order to build this movement more effectively. In fact, we&#8217;re already in communication with some of the whistleblower platforms that you name to do just that &#8212; build from points of mutual strength instead of reinvent the wheel.</p>
<p>As for inequality and elite influence over public decision-making, at PODER our latest research on Mexican corporations and investors, for example, reveals that 48 men and their families – all members of the über exclusive Mexican Council of Businessmen – exercise heavy albeit indirect influence over 27% of the country’s GDP. And this does not even include two of the country’s three richest men: Carlos Slim and Ricardo Salinas Pliego! Perhaps unsurprisingly, this concentration of capital has only increased since 2008.</p>
<p>Thanks again for the important contribution.</p>
<p>Ben Cokelet / PODER</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Technology of Corporate Accountability by Too much information: links for week ending 26 August 2011 &#124; The Barefoot Technologist</title>
		<link>http://informacioncivica.info/mexico/the-technology-of-corporate-accountability/#comment-3388</link>
		<dc:creator>Too much information: links for week ending 26 August 2011 &#124; The Barefoot Technologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://informacioncivica.info/?p=281#comment-3388</guid>
		<description>[...] The technology of corporate accountability David Sasaki tracks the history of corporate accountability tools &#8211; from crowd-sourced wikis to recent data mashing projects and beyond &#8211; in this epic post for his Latin America-focussed blog Informacion Civica. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The technology of corporate accountability David Sasaki tracks the history of corporate accountability tools &#8211; from crowd-sourced wikis to recent data mashing projects and beyond &#8211; in this epic post for his Latin America-focussed blog Informacion Civica. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Technology of Corporate Accountability by Greg Michener</title>
		<link>http://informacioncivica.info/mexico/the-technology-of-corporate-accountability/#comment-3277</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Michener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://informacioncivica.info/?p=281#comment-3277</guid>
		<description>David, 
Congratulations on a well-researched marathon post. Very important topic, especially with the U.S. election ramping-up, and demands for positive political change sweeping the globe. This is great material and analysis-- journal-worthy. 

I think we should look at these innovations as aids in accomplishing the sleuthing required to expose hidden conflicts of interest. Politicians often register assets or interests in the name of other people, even unassuming people. In Brazil they call these people &quot;laranjas&quot; (oranges). It takes the elbow-grease of investigative reporting strategies to reveal these deep cover-ups. However, if we were to map these laranjas, we might also see that they&#039;re unconnected nodes, and thus suspicious in-and-of themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,<br />
Congratulations on a well-researched marathon post. Very important topic, especially with the U.S. election ramping-up, and demands for positive political change sweeping the globe. This is great material and analysis&#8211; journal-worthy. </p>
<p>I think we should look at these innovations as aids in accomplishing the sleuthing required to expose hidden conflicts of interest. Politicians often register assets or interests in the name of other people, even unassuming people. In Brazil they call these people &#8220;laranjas&#8221; (oranges). It takes the elbow-grease of investigative reporting strategies to reveal these deep cover-ups. However, if we were to map these laranjas, we might also see that they&#8217;re unconnected nodes, and thus suspicious in-and-of themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Mint.com for Government: The Future of Budget Monitoring by Albert l Open Budgets Blog</title>
		<link>http://informacioncivica.info/mexico/a-mint-com-for-government-the-future-of-budget-monitoring/#comment-3240</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert l Open Budgets Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 09:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://informacioncivica.info/?p=268#comment-3240</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the mention, David. It is true that the mere availability of budget information creates some incentive for government to change behavior. Such mechanisms work even better when citizens and democratic institutions (like legislatures, courts, audit bodies) can monitor and participate in government decisions.The sad truth is that most governments do not facilitate citizen participation in the budget process. For this reason participation in government decisions has to keep running through indirect routes like CSOs, media and social networks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention, David. It is true that the mere availability of budget information creates some incentive for government to change behavior. Such mechanisms work even better when citizens and democratic institutions (like legislatures, courts, audit bodies) can monitor and participate in government decisions.The sad truth is that most governments do not facilitate citizen participation in the budget process. For this reason participation in government decisions has to keep running through indirect routes like CSOs, media and social networks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Mint.com for Government: The Future of Budget Monitoring by Fabrizio Scrollini</title>
		<link>http://informacioncivica.info/mexico/a-mint-com-for-government-the-future-of-budget-monitoring/#comment-2746</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabrizio Scrollini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://informacioncivica.info/?p=268#comment-2746</guid>
		<description>This is a very good post on the state of the art on budget spending. A good website coming from the government side is  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mapyourtaxes.mo.gov&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Map your Taxes &lt;/a&gt; which allows you to drill down the expenditure (and also get the raw data in case you want to something better). Yet, my feeling on all these initiatives is that there are important challenges around data collection of actual expenditure vs planned one (this one easy to find in budgets, even not in nice formats sometime). At a national level, States are sometimes unable to identify exactly where they are spending their money (to much frustration of Treasury officials). What kind of links civil society can build with treasury officials who have all the incentives to control expenditure or to make it more efficient (oddly enough in some coutnries like Peru the problem is that agencies don&#039;t have the capacit to execute the budget?)
On a second note, if budget information is mashed up with providers (this information should be available and most states at least in Latin America) could give a massive insight on the impact of government expenditure in several market, and possibly expose &quot;lock in&quot; situations, which should actually arise in public debate. Still someone with knowledge of the system and voice needs to provide a narrative around this. I guess is not just the data, but the story around it that can creat some possitive change and more accountability.
Cheers,
F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very good post on the state of the art on budget spending. A good website coming from the government side is  <a href="http://www.mapyourtaxes.mo.gov" rel="nofollow"> Map your Taxes </a> which allows you to drill down the expenditure (and also get the raw data in case you want to something better). Yet, my feeling on all these initiatives is that there are important challenges around data collection of actual expenditure vs planned one (this one easy to find in budgets, even not in nice formats sometime). At a national level, States are sometimes unable to identify exactly where they are spending their money (to much frustration of Treasury officials). What kind of links civil society can build with treasury officials who have all the incentives to control expenditure or to make it more efficient (oddly enough in some coutnries like Peru the problem is that agencies don&#8217;t have the capacit to execute the budget?)<br />
On a second note, if budget information is mashed up with providers (this information should be available and most states at least in Latin America) could give a massive insight on the impact of government expenditure in several market, and possibly expose &#8220;lock in&#8221; situations, which should actually arise in public debate. Still someone with knowledge of the system and voice needs to provide a narrative around this. I guess is not just the data, but the story around it that can creat some possitive change and more accountability.<br />
Cheers,<br />
F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Critique of Legislative Monitoring Websites by La paire anonymat et activisme sur Internet: indispensable? &#187; OWNI, News, Augmented</title>
		<link>http://informacioncivica.info/mexico/a-critique-of-legislative-monitoring-websites-2/#comment-1564</link>
		<dc:creator>La paire anonymat et activisme sur Internet: indispensable? &#187; OWNI, News, Augmented</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 10:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://informacioncivica.info/?p=228#comment-1564</guid>
		<description>[...] online les plus connus de Mexico [es, pdf]. C’est ce groupe qui avait aidé à supprimer la taxe de 3% sur l’accès à Internet et avait bloqué la construction de la Via Express [es] à Guadalajara et de la Super Via [es] de [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] online les plus connus de Mexico [es, pdf]. C’est ce groupe qui avait aidé à supprimer la taxe de 3% sur l’accès à Internet et avait bloqué la construction de la Via Express [es] à Guadalajara et de la Super Via [es] de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Critique of Legislative Monitoring Websites by Greg Michener</title>
		<link>http://informacioncivica.info/mexico/a-critique-of-legislative-monitoring-websites-2/#comment-1533</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Michener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 22:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://informacioncivica.info/?p=228#comment-1533</guid>
		<description>If someone were to collect all the useful things that NGOs are finding on a day-to-day basis and send it out as a newsletter or establish it as a website, people would have far more incentive to get involved. The point about generalized ignorance surrounding how the legislative process is well taken, but people will not learn about the process unless their interest is piqued by a story surrounding the legislation. Hence the need for NGO-aggregating journalism. How about it? Great article and analysis here, David.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If someone were to collect all the useful things that NGOs are finding on a day-to-day basis and send it out as a newsletter or establish it as a website, people would have far more incentive to get involved. The point about generalized ignorance surrounding how the legislative process is well taken, but people will not learn about the process unless their interest is piqued by a story surrounding the legislation. Hence the need for NGO-aggregating journalism. How about it? Great article and analysis here, David.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Critique of Legislative Monitoring Websites by The death of Fame: anonimity in the age of digital activism &#187; OWNI.eu, News, Augmented</title>
		<link>http://informacioncivica.info/mexico/a-critique-of-legislative-monitoring-websites-2/#comment-1441</link>
		<dc:creator>The death of Fame: anonimity in the age of digital activism &#187; OWNI.eu, News, Augmented</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 09:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://informacioncivica.info/?p=228#comment-1441</guid>
		<description>[...] beers with some of Mexico City’s most well known online activists. It was this group that helped remove a 3% tax on Internet accessand stalled the construction of Vía Express here in Guadalajara and Super Via in Mexico City. As [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] beers with some of Mexico City’s most well known online activists. It was this group that helped remove a 3% tax on Internet accessand stalled the construction of Vía Express here in Guadalajara and Super Via in Mexico City. As [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Critique of Legislative Monitoring Websites by El Oso &#187; Archive &#187; Fame, Followers, Anonymity and Activism</title>
		<link>http://informacioncivica.info/mexico/a-critique-of-legislative-monitoring-websites-2/#comment-1421</link>
		<dc:creator>El Oso &#187; Archive &#187; Fame, Followers, Anonymity and Activism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 20:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://informacioncivica.info/?p=228#comment-1421</guid>
		<description>[...] beers with some of Mexico City&#8217;s most well known online activists. It was this group that helped remove a 3% tax on Internet access and stalled the construction of V&#237;a Express here in Guadalajara and Super Via in Mexico [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] beers with some of Mexico City&#8217;s most well known online activists. It was this group that helped remove a 3% tax on Internet access and stalled the construction of V&iacute;a Express here in Guadalajara and Super Via in Mexico [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Q&amp;A with Elizabeth Eagen on Human Rights and Technology by Links for week ending 1 April 2011 &#124; The Barefoot Technologist</title>
		<link>http://informacioncivica.info/argentina/qa-with-elizabeth-eagen-on-human-rights-and-technology/#comment-1380</link>
		<dc:creator>Links for week ending 1 April 2011 &#124; The Barefoot Technologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://informacioncivica.info/?p=221#comment-1380</guid>
		<description>[...] Interview: Elizabeth Eagen Information Program Officer Elizabeth Eagen outlines the strategy behind the Human Rights and Information Initiative, a joint initiative with the Human Rights and Governance Grants Program that focuses on equipping human rights practitioners with documentary and advocacy tools and skills fit for the digital world, in this interview with David Sasaki. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Interview: Elizabeth Eagen Information Program Officer Elizabeth Eagen outlines the strategy behind the Human Rights and Information Initiative, a joint initiative with the Human Rights and Governance Grants Program that focuses on equipping human rights practitioners with documentary and advocacy tools and skills fit for the digital world, in this interview with David Sasaki. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 1.337 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-01-31 16:02:00 -->
<!-- super cache -->

