<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>information strategy</title>
	
	<link>http://informationstrategy.com</link>
	<description />
	<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 07:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/informationstrategy/new" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="informationstrategy/new" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>DW appliances versus clouds</title>
		<link>http://informationstrategy.com/2008/05/04/dw-appliances-versus-the-cloud</link>
		<comments>http://informationstrategy.com/2008/05/04/dw-appliances-versus-the-cloud#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 06:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Bair</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[appliance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[BI]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[clouds]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[data warehouse]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[DW]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[EC2]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SaaS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://informationstrategy.com/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Database vendors may try to differentiate by building appliances, but if cloud computing services like EC2 keep advancing, cloud computing may eventually give traditional vendors a run for their money.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://informationstrategy.com/2008/05/04/dw-appliances-versus-the-cloud/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enterprise strategy</title>
		<link>http://informationstrategy.com/2008/05/03/enterprise-strategy</link>
		<comments>http://informationstrategy.com/2008/05/03/enterprise-strategy#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 16:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Bair</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[enterprise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://informationstrategy.com/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ideally, data across the enterprise should conform to a common information model - a model that supports current and planned business goals, and with the ability to gracefully adapt to meet future needs. In reality, the typical enterprise contains scores of information silos, independently built to support individual lines of business or business regions.

As long [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://informationstrategy.com/2008/05/03/enterprise-strategy/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Architecture values</title>
		<link>http://informationstrategy.com/2008/05/02/architecture-values</link>
		<comments>http://informationstrategy.com/2008/05/02/architecture-values#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 00:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Bair</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[principles]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[TOGAF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://informationstrategy.com/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Information architecture should be founded on basic principles. These principles can also be used to evaluate the “goodness” of a given architecture. A good discussion of the characteristics and components of architecture principles can be found in the TOGAF chapter on Architecture Principles.
I think that principles, in turn, should be founded on a set of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://informationstrategy.com/2008/05/02/architecture-values/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The early days of BI</title>
		<link>http://informationstrategy.com/2008/04/14/the-evolution-of-business-intelligence</link>
		<comments>http://informationstrategy.com/2008/04/14/the-evolution-of-business-intelligence#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 01:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Bair</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[BI]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[business intelligence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[data warehouse]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[DW]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ETL]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[OLAP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://informationstrategy.com/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the article The origins of today&#8217;s OLAP products, Nigel Pendse chronicles the history of OLAP (On-line Analytical Processing), tracing the ancestry of the technology as far back as 1962. 
Personally, my introduction to BI (Business Intelligence) technologies doesn&#8217;t go back quite as far. In the late 1980&#8217;s, I worked for a systems integrator, developing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://informationstrategy.com/2008/04/14/the-evolution-of-business-intelligence/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

