<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>The International Law Notepad</title>
	<atom:link href="https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
	<link>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Sharing thoughts on international law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2013 12:18:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">16615188</site><cloud domain="internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com" path="/?rsscloud=notify" port="80" protocol="http-post" registerProcedure=""/>

	<atom:link href="https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/osd.xml" rel="search" title="The International Law Notepad" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml"/>
	<atom:link href="https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/?pushpress=hub" rel="hub"/>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Sharing thoughts on international law</itunes:subtitle><item>
		<title>Business, Children and Human Rights</title>
		<link>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2013/12/30/business-children-and-human-rights/</link>
					<comments>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2013/12/30/business-children-and-human-rights/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[olgamartinortega]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2013 12:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business & human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN guiding principles]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/?p=999</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Olga Martin-Ortega and Rebecca M.M.Wallace The concern over the role of the private business sector with regards to the fulfilment of children’s rights is relatively recent. International attention on the effects business activities have on children has been fragmented until now, focussing on specific sectors, mainly child labour and economic exploitation. Recent international developments in [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2013/12/30/business-children-and-human-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">999</post-id>
		<media:content medium="image" url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c0d9aca09aaff9ac25eb3e6eb1cd4e63a79484fefaaa4e87ad8938d910439491?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G">
			<media:title type="html">olgamartinortega</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disappointed in justice</title>
		<link>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2013/12/02/disappointed-in-justice-icty/</link>
					<comments>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2013/12/02/disappointed-in-justice-icty/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Int'Law Notepad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 15:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Working Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICTY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international criminal law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/?p=994</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Iva Vukusic, researcher, Sense Agency, the Hague As teams of forensic experts and investigators near Prijedor dig through what is claimed to be the biggest mass grave in Bosnia and the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in The Hague slowly progresses towards closure, a sense of disappointment spreads among many victim [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2013/12/02/disappointed-in-justice-icty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">994</post-id>
		<media:content medium="image" url="https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/2f628912b504d533d4ef584854a7742c35fc10aed0bb777418639b68d8658d41?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G">
			<media:title type="html">lawnotepad</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Spanish judicial decision on universal jurisdiction for Female Genital Mutilation committed abroad</title>
		<link>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2013/07/31/first-spanish-judicial-decision-on-universal-jurisdiction-for-female-genital-mutilation-committed-abroad/</link>
					<comments>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2013/07/31/first-spanish-judicial-decision-on-universal-jurisdiction-for-female-genital-mutilation-committed-abroad/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Int'Law Notepad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 13:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisdiction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/?p=986</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Professo Nicolás Zambrana-Tévar, Study Group of Private International Law and Human Rights, University of Navarra The first Spanish judicial decision sentencing a person for the crime of Genital Mutilation carried out outside Spain was issued last 4 April, 2013 by the Spanish Audiencia Nacional of Madrid. The Spanish Criminal Code was amended in 2003 (art. 149.2) [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2013/07/31/first-spanish-judicial-decision-on-universal-jurisdiction-for-female-genital-mutilation-committed-abroad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">986</post-id>
		<media:content medium="image" url="https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/2f628912b504d533d4ef584854a7742c35fc10aed0bb777418639b68d8658d41?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G">
			<media:title type="html">lawnotepad</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Made in Bangladesh: corporations and the common good</title>
		<link>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2013/06/10/made-in-bangladesh-corporations-and-the-common-good/</link>
					<comments>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2013/06/10/made-in-bangladesh-corporations-and-the-common-good/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Int'Law Notepad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 08:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bengladesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international corporate liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multinational corporations]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/?p=983</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Nicolás Zambrana-Tévar, Professor (Private International Law), University of Navarra The recent death of over a thousand workers in a textile factory in Bangladesh necessarily poses again the question of the responsibility of multinational businesses, not for the harm they cause –which may indeed be big, in some cases- but because of what they do [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2013/06/10/made-in-bangladesh-corporations-and-the-common-good/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">983</post-id>
		<media:content medium="image" url="https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/2f628912b504d533d4ef584854a7742c35fc10aed0bb777418639b68d8658d41?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G">
			<media:title type="html">lawnotepad</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Arctic Council: Transformation and Expansion</title>
		<link>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2013/05/31/the-arctic-council-transformation-and-expansion/</link>
					<comments>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2013/05/31/the-arctic-council-transformation-and-expansion/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Int'Law Notepad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 08:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arctic Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kiruna]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/?p=981</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Edward Phillips, Principal Lecturer, Law School, University of Greenwich The Arctic Council was set up in 1996, following on from the Ottawa Declaration, and compromises the States who border the Arctic Circle: Canada, Denmark (Faroe Islands and Greenland), Finland, Iceland, Norway, Russia, Sweden and the USA. In addition, there are also a number of [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2013/05/31/the-arctic-council-transformation-and-expansion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">981</post-id>
		<media:content medium="image" url="https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/2f628912b504d533d4ef584854a7742c35fc10aed0bb777418639b68d8658d41?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G">
			<media:title type="html">lawnotepad</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>ICSID v. UNASUR: same game, new rules?</title>
		<link>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2013/04/30/icsid-v-unasur-same-game-new-rules/</link>
					<comments>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2013/04/30/icsid-v-unasur-same-game-new-rules/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Antoine Martin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Direct Investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecuador]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICSID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transnational politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNASUR]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/?p=975</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Dr Antoine P. Martin Attempts to limit the jurisdiction and reach of ICSID seem to be progressing as South American states’ efforts to foster regional cooperation through a new regional organisation (regrouping Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Paraguay, Peru, Suriname, Uruguay and Venezuela) gain in precision. Given the numerous investment claims brought [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2013/04/30/icsid-v-unasur-same-game-new-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">975</post-id>
		<media:content medium="image" url="https://1.gravatar.com/avatar/45457e923f97ebb5e00c721833c8d81f98ea8d90f3beac643ba669ffa2edd1ad?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G">
			<media:title type="html">apemartin</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kiobel, extraterritoriality and the ATCA</title>
		<link>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2013/03/07/kiobel-extraterritoriality-atca-zamora-cabot/</link>
					<comments>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2013/03/07/kiobel-extraterritoriality-atca-zamora-cabot/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Int'Law Notepad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 08:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Published Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business & human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extraterritorialiy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kiobel]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/?p=956</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Francisco J. ZAMORA CABOT, Professor of Private International Law at the University Jaume I, Castellon, Spain. The issue of extraterritoriality is currently envisaged as one of the keys to the resolution of the well-known and crucial Kiobel case, before the Supreme Court of the United States, which we are expecting any time now. However, [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2013/03/07/kiobel-extraterritoriality-atca-zamora-cabot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">956</post-id>
		<media:content medium="image" url="https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/2f628912b504d533d4ef584854a7742c35fc10aed0bb777418639b68d8658d41?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G">
			<media:title type="html">lawnotepad</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>BH in the UK Supreme Court: Weighing the best interests of the child</title>
		<link>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2013/02/04/bh-uk-supreme-court-childbest-interests-of-the-child/</link>
					<comments>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2013/02/04/bh-uk-supreme-court-childbest-interests-of-the-child/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Int'Law Notepad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 08:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/?p=953</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Rebecca M.M. Wallace (Professor of International Human Rights and Justice, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK) and Karen Wylie (Research Assistant, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK) The principle of the best interests of the child is enshrined in international law by Article 3 of the 1989 UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2013/02/04/bh-uk-supreme-court-childbest-interests-of-the-child/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">953</post-id>
		<media:content medium="image" url="https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/2f628912b504d533d4ef584854a7742c35fc10aed0bb777418639b68d8658d41?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G">
			<media:title type="html">lawnotepad</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Note On The ICJ Judgement In NICARAGUA v COLOMBIA and its relevance to International Crime and Criminal Law</title>
		<link>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2013/01/04/icj-judgement-nicaragua-colombia-territorial-maritime-dispute-criminal-law/</link>
					<comments>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2013/01/04/icj-judgement-nicaragua-colombia-territorial-maritime-dispute-criminal-law/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[olgamartinortega]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 18:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seen Elsewhere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international criminal law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/?p=939</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Dr Olga Martin-Ortega, Reader in Public International Law, Greenwich University Seen on another blog, an interesting comment by Professor Steven Haines on the potential impacts of a recent Judgement of the International Court of Justice, The Hague. In November 2012, the ICJ released its decision on the Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Colombia. Right after [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2013/01/04/icj-judgement-nicaragua-colombia-territorial-maritime-dispute-criminal-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">939</post-id>
		<media:content medium="image" url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c0d9aca09aaff9ac25eb3e6eb1cd4e63a79484fefaaa4e87ad8938d910439491?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G">
			<media:title type="html">olgamartinortega</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Relevance of the Gotovina Judgment</title>
		<link>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2012/12/03/relevance-gotovina-judgment/</link>
					<comments>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2012/12/03/relevance-gotovina-judgment/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Int'Law Notepad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 19:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peace & Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[armed conflicts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICTY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/?p=929</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Iva Vukusic, The Hague &#160; The Appeals Judgment &#160; ‘I fundamentally dissent from the entire Appeal Judgment, which contradicts any sense of justice’# is what judge Fausto Pocar, one of the five appellate judges in the Gotovina and Markac trial at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), states in his Dissenting [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://internationallawnotepad.wordpress.com/2012/12/03/relevance-gotovina-judgment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">929</post-id>
		<media:content medium="image" url="https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/2f628912b504d533d4ef584854a7742c35fc10aed0bb777418639b68d8658d41?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G">
			<media:title type="html">lawnotepad</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>