<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>Tax Disputes</title><link>http://www.internationaltaxreview.comhttp://feeds.feedburner.com/internationaltaxreview/fLlp</link><description /><copyright>&amp;copy;2013 International Tax Review</copyright><ttl>60</ttl><category>Tax Disputes</category><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/internationaltaxreview/fLlp" /><feedburner:info uri="internationaltaxreview/fllp" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item><title>Hogan Lovells hires dispute resolution specialist from Herbert Smith</title><description>Hogan Lovells has hired Rupert Shiers from Herbert Smith Freehills to lead its direct tax disputes practice.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/5BvFd4RepdA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/5BvFd4RepdA/Hogan-Lovells-hires-dispute-resolution-specialist-from-Herbert-Smith.html</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3219584/Hogan-Lovells-hires-dispute-resolution-specialist-from-Herbert-Smith.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>What you have missed on ITR Premium</title><description>UK Patent Box versus Dutch Innovation Box; Dave Camp on BEPS; Writ of payments benefits; Israel’s attempts to deny Medinol relief on Boston Scientific payout; Brazil scraps IOF on foreign investment in domestic bonds; Swiss VAT rise; EC’s tougher rules on EoI; Authorised tax collection in China.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/IYYta3wm_oE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/IYYta3wm_oE/What-you-have-missed-on-ITR-Premium.html</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3219481/What-you-have-missed-on-ITR-Premium.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Dealing with the State Administration of Taxation in Chinese disputes</title><description>Vincent Pang, of KPMG, offers multinationals some guidance on reducing the risk of becoming involved in Chinese tax disputes, the options available for resolving disputes and the trends the Chinese tax authorities will follow in the next few years.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/wHzT9UeET38" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/wHzT9UeET38/Dealing-with-the-State-Administration-of-Taxation-in-Chinese-disputes.html</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3218981/Dealing-with-the-State-Administration-of-Taxation-in-Chinese-disputes.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Benefit of using writ of payment for taxpayers, states and the federal union </title><description>Renata Correia Cubas and Alessandra Gomensoro, of Mattos Filho, explain how using writ of payments benefits taxpayers paying debts in Brazil.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/REAzqKHJsHA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/REAzqKHJsHA/Benefit-of-using-writ-of-payment-for-taxpayers-states-and-the-federal-union.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3218351/Benefit-of-using-writ-of-payment-for-taxpayers-states-and-the-federal-union.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Israeli tax authority tries to deny Medinol relief on Boston Scientific payout</title><description>The Israeli tax authorities are claiming that medical technology firm Medinol owes between $150 and $225 million in capital gains tax on a $750 million compensation payout it received from US company Boston Scientific in 2005.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/vk1NOsxvP9o" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/vk1NOsxvP9o/Israeli-tax-authority-tries-to-deny-Medinol-relief-on-Boston-Scientific-payout.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3218312/Israeli-tax-authority-tries-to-deny-Medinol-relief-on-Boston-Scientific-payout.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>No capital gains tax on acquiring Brazilian companies through incorporation of shares</title><description>Domestic and foreign companies acquiring Brazilian entities through the incorporation, as opposed to the sale, of shares should pay no capital gains tax, according to the country’s Administrative Council of Tax Appeals (Conselho Administrativo de Recursos Fiscais).&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/IV8SltTgMBg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/IV8SltTgMBg/No-capital-gains-tax-on-acquiring-Brazilian-companies-through-incorporation-of-shares.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3218342/No-capital-gains-tax-on-acquiring-Brazilian-companies-through-incorporation-of-shares.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Swiss move closer to ending US dispute over bank secrecy</title><description>Switzerland’s upper house of Parliament approved a draft proposal to let the country’s banks forgo secrecy laws to appease the US yesterday, but some taxpayers may fear that tax information exchange agreements (TIEA) will see information transferred beyond the US.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/I9ppJwGULF4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/I9ppJwGULF4/Swiss-move-closer-to-ending-US-dispute-over-bank-secrecy.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3218348/Swiss-move-closer-to-ending-US-dispute-over-bank-secrecy.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Vodafone defends position in UK and Indian tax disputes</title><description>UK telecommunications group Vodafone has defended its position in its dispute with the Indian tax authorities and in the much scrutinised settlement with HM Revenue &amp; Customs (HMRC) in 2010 in its sustainability report 2012/13. The report also includes an overview of the total tax contribution of the group on a country-by-country basis for the first time.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/hC7tdjf_Ums" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/hC7tdjf_Ums/Vodafone-defends-position-in-UK-and-Indian-tax-disputes.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3218248/Vodafone-defends-position-in-UK-and-Indian-tax-disputes.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>What you have missed on ITR Premium</title><description>China – Netherlands tax treaty; German patent box; Vijai Electricals judgement; Vodafone conciliation; China VAT pilot; Luxembourg accounting systems; Authorised tax collection in China; OECD mutual administrative assistance in tax matters.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/2G_jc0GG7wY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/2G_jc0GG7wY/What-you-have-missed-on-ITR-Premium.html</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3216777/What-you-have-missed-on-ITR-Premium.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Indian taxpayers must be cautious in TP reporting despite Vijai Electricals judgment</title><description>Multinationals in India must maintain caution in their transfer pricing reporting of transactions involving investment into foreign subsidiaries even though the Hyderabad Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) said transfer pricing rules do not apply in these circumstances.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/mm4pJMRdCh4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/mm4pJMRdCh4/Indian-taxpayers-must-be-cautious-in-TP-reporting-despite-Vijai-Electricals-judgment.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3215579/Indian-taxpayers-must-be-cautious-in-TP-reporting-despite-Vijai-Electricals-judgment.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Potential Vodafone conciliation could open door for alternative dispute resolution in India</title><description>If Vodafone accepts the Indian cabinet’s offer to enter a conciliation process under the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act to try and resolve its longstanding tax dispute, the Indian government may have to open up such a resolution mechanism to other multinationals.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/HSSbgTdyh4w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/HSSbgTdyh4w/Potential-Vodafone-conciliation-could-open-door-for-alternative-dispute-resolution-in-India.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3215587/Potential-Vodafone-conciliation-could-open-door-for-alternative-dispute-resolution-in-India.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>When multinationals should use ADR to resolve UK tax disputes</title><description>HM Revenue &amp; Customs’ (HMRC) head of dispute resolution, Val Hennelly, and Malcolm Twyman, an accredited mediator at HMRC, explained when taxpayers should consider using alternative dispute resolution (ADR) to resolve large and complex tax cases at an event hosted by accountancy firm BDO in London last night.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/QMlulA7rI1U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/QMlulA7rI1U/When-multinationals-should-use-ADR-to-resolve-UK-tax-disputes.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3215575/When-multinationals-should-use-ADR-to-resolve-UK-tax-disputes.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Speak to Pascal Saint-Amans about the BEPS project at the upcoming Global Transfer Pricing Forum in New York</title><description>International Tax Review and TPWeek’s 13th Annual Global Transfer Pricing Forum will be held on September 18 and 19 at the Crowne Plaza in Times Square, New York, in association with Deloitte.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/_rLDra3Jtss" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/_rLDra3Jtss/Speak-to-Pascal-Saint-Amans-about-the-BEPS-project-at-the-upcoming-Global-Transfer-Pricing-Forum-in.html</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3214877/Speak-to-Pascal-Saint-Amans-about-the-BEPS-project-at-the-upcoming-Global-Transfer-Pricing-Forum-in.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>What you have missed on ITR Premium</title><description>Tax planning deadline India; Tax reform; Expert evidence in Canadian tax cases; ATO challenges to energy companies; China carbon emissions pilot; Germany and France on FTT; Beneficial ownership form.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/lNJWBb6iS70" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/lNJWBb6iS70/What-you-have-missed-on-ITR-Premium.html</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3214223/What-you-have-missed-on-ITR-Premium.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Former Tax Court Chief Justice on expert evidence in Canadian tax cases: Part four</title><description>In the last of his four-part series for International Tax Review, Donald Bowman QC, former Chief Justice of the Tax Court of Canada, now counsel to Dentons’ national tax group, examines the increased use of expert testimony in disputes involving R&amp;D tax credits.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/04h74CIGNG0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/04h74CIGNG0/Former-Tax-Court-Chief-Justice-on-expert-evidence-in-Canadian-tax-cases-Part-four.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3212261/Former-Tax-Court-Chief-Justice-on-expert-evidence-in-Canadian-tax-cases-Part-four.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>How energy companies can avoid ATO challenges when deducting exploration expenses</title><description>Energy groups with petroleum projects in Australia need to change the way they document expenditure to ensure they can successfully substantiate exploration expense deductions, following a judgment published by the country’s Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) yesterday.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/w8GaVNWqHjs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/w8GaVNWqHjs/How-energy-companies-can-avoid-ATO-challenges-when-deducting-exploration-expenses.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3212424/How-energy-companies-can-avoid-ATO-challenges-when-deducting-exploration-expenses.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Indian tax authorities ask Supreme Court to reverse Sanofi decision and reconsider Vodafone</title><description>India’s tax authority has filed a special leave petition with the Supreme Court attempting to overturn the High Court’s ruling in the Sanofi case, and is also asking the court to reassess the principles set down in its Vodafone judgment.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/kxb7_V7fUho" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/kxb7_V7fUho/Indian-tax-authorities-ask-Supreme-Court-to-reverse-Sanofi-decision-and-reconsider-Vodafone.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3212470/Indian-tax-authorities-ask-Supreme-Court-to-reverse-Sanofi-decision-and-reconsider-Vodafone.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Ryanair loses Irish High Court appeal on VAT refund</title><description>Sonya Manzor, of William Fry, explains how Ryanair’s recent High Court defeat highlights that an intention to provide management services is not sufficient to enable taxpayers to claim a VAT refund.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/gqIVPoAidWM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/gqIVPoAidWM/Ryanair-loses-Irish-High-Court-appeal-on-VAT-refund.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3215619/Ryanair-loses-Irish-High-Court-appeal-on-VAT-refund.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Switzerland’s head of foreign tax negotiation resigns</title><description>Michael Ambuehl, Switzerland’s state secretary for international financial matters, who is leading negotiations in disputes with US and European tax authorities over Swiss corporate tax laws and banking secrecy is stepping down.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/L32nicTfAwQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/L32nicTfAwQ/Switzerlands-head-of-foreign-tax-negotiation-resigns.html</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3211069/Switzerlands-head-of-foreign-tax-negotiation-resigns.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Uncertainty on Brazilian CFC regime remains after Supreme Court ruling</title><description>In 2001, Provisional Measure No. 2,158 was published in Brazil which allowed the Brazilian tax authorities to tax the profits of controlled and affiliated companies established in other countries, even if they had not been distributed to the Brazilian parent.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/_MKdCoDxmLU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/_MKdCoDxmLU/Uncertainty-on-Brazilian-CFC-regime-remains-after-Supreme-Court-ruling.html</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3211080/Uncertainty-on-Brazilian-CFC-regime-remains-after-Supreme-Court-ruling.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>What you have missed on ITR Premium</title><description>BCA on Australian budget; SAT on secondments; US SC PPL ruling; Expert evidence in Canadian court rulings; FTT potential delay; Mexican VAT; beneficial ownership; compliance in UK public sector procurement.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/cnv0WZCdMQ0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/cnv0WZCdMQ0/What-you-have-missed-on-ITR-Premium.html</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3211180/What-you-have-missed-on-ITR-Premium.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>How Supreme Court’s PPL ruling will reduce transaction costs for US multinationals</title><description>US multinationals should see their transaction costs reduced when investing in foreign jurisdictions following the Supreme Court’s judgment in favour of energy company PPL.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/SRTbcNxPHTE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/SRTbcNxPHTE/How-Supreme-Courts-PPL-ruling-will-reduce-transaction-costs-for-US-multinationals.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3209830/How-Supreme-Courts-PPL-ruling-will-reduce-transaction-costs-for-US-multinationals.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Former Tax Court Chief Justice on expert evidence in Canadian tax cases: Part three</title><description>In the third of his four-part series for International Tax Review, Donald Bowman QC, former Chief Justice of the Tax Court of Canada, now counsel to Dentons’ national tax group, discusses the increased use of expert testimony in disputes involving tax treaty interpretation.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/sFnjuSiq_AQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/sFnjuSiq_AQ/Former-Tax-Court-Chief-Justice-on-expert-evidence-in-Canadian-tax-cases-Part-three.html</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3209375/Former-Tax-Court-Chief-Justice-on-expert-evidence-in-Canadian-tax-cases-Part-three.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>UK Supreme Court’s M&amp;S ruling provides “useful tool” for taxpayers claiming cross-border group relief</title><description>The UK Supreme Court dismissed HM Revenue &amp; Customs’ (HMRC) appeal in the first part of its judgment in the Marks &amp; Spencer (M&amp;S) dispute. The court’s answer means taxpayers will have more flexibility when claiming cross-border group relief.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/A7MjO3L7Z7E" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/A7MjO3L7Z7E/UK-Supreme-Courts-M-S-ruling-provides-useful-tool-for-taxpayers-claiming-cross-border-group-relief.html</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3209370/UK-Supreme-Courts-M-S-ruling-provides-useful-tool-for-taxpayers-claiming-cross-border-group-relief.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>How taxpayers should manage their global disputes</title><description>International Tax Review has produced tax disputes reference guides for 26 countries. The guides look at how multinationals can avoid and manage tax disputes in each jurisdiction as well as offering insight about the future litigation strategies of individual tax authorities.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/APjJjDe-puc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/APjJjDe-puc/How-taxpayers-should-manage-their-global-disputes.html</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3208111/How-taxpayers-should-manage-their-global-disputes.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>What you have missed on ITR Premium</title><description>Australian budget; Brazil income tax exemptions; Dutch Supreme Court tax ruling; Germany DTA arbitration; France invoicing; Croatia’s EU membership; Tax compliance rules; FATCA&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/dvteeKuAj58" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/dvteeKuAj58/What-you-have-missed-on-ITR-Premium.html</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3208072/What-you-have-missed-on-ITR-Premium.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Exception to shareholder loan doctrine established by Dutch Supreme Court </title><description>The Supreme Court of the Netherlands has delivered a judgment which allows a Dutch taxpayer to deduct losses incurred on a related party loan, creating an exception to the shareholder loan doctrine set out by the court in November 2011.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/VeTb7W9qqUo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/VeTb7W9qqUo/Exception-to-shareholder-loan-doctrine-established-by-Dutch-Supreme-Court.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3206605/Exception-to-shareholder-loan-doctrine-established-by-Dutch-Supreme-Court.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Germany to include mandatory binding arbitration in DTAs to eliminate double taxation risk</title><description>Germany’s intent to incorporate mandatory binding arbitration provisions in current and future double taxation agreements (DTA) should allow taxpayers to eliminate the risk of double taxation in cross-border cases and help them exert pressure on tax authorities to reduce the length of disputes.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/ZNwCV6KdRFI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/ZNwCV6KdRFI/Germany-to-include-mandatory-binding-arbitration-in-DTAs-to-eliminate-double-taxation-risk.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3206717/Germany-to-include-mandatory-binding-arbitration-in-DTAs-to-eliminate-double-taxation-risk.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Taxpayers should use ITAT’s Convergys ruling when attributing profit to Indian PEs</title><description>Taxpayers with a permanent establishment (PE) in India can use a profit attribution method described in the Delhi Income Tax Appellate Tribunal’s (ITAT) Convergys judgment to guide their behaviour in what remains an area of legal uncertainty in India.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/MqjvX3pgrag" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/MqjvX3pgrag/Taxpayers-should-use-ITATs-Convergys-ruling-when-attributing-profit-to-Indian-PEs.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3206545/Taxpayers-should-use-ITATs-Convergys-ruling-when-attributing-profit-to-Indian-PEs.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Trusts must file protective VAT reclaims against HMRC by next month</title><description>Venture Capital Trusts (VTC) and Investment Trust Companies (ITC) risk losing out on reclaiming VAT mistakenly paid to HM Revenue &amp; Customs (HMRC) if they do not act now.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~4/VFXweBXn71g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internationaltaxreview/fLlp/~3/VFXweBXn71g/Trusts-must-file-protective-VAT-reclaims-against-HMRC-by-next-month.html</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3206075/Trusts-must-file-protective-VAT-reclaims-against-HMRC-by-next-month.html</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>
