<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
    <title>BLOG@IPJUR.COM</title>
    <link>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/</link>
    <description>Patent Attorney Axel H. Horns' Blog on Intellectual Property</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.3.1 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:23:39 GMT</pubDate>

    

<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ipjur" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:browserFriendly>This is an XML content feed. It is intended to be viewed in a newsreader or syndicated to another site.</feedburner:browserFriendly><item>
    <title>File Inspection: EU Council Still Not Disclosing ECJ Referral for Unified Patent Litigation System (Cont'd)</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ipjur/~3/lasRsdoC9m8/index.php</link>
            <category>EU</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/93-File-Inspection-EU-Council-Still-Not-Disclosing-ECJ-Referral-for-Unified-Patent-Litigation-System-Contd.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/wfwcomment.php?cid=93</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=93</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Axel H Horns)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    
<p>As explained <a title="BLOG@IP::JUR" target="_blank" href="http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/90-File-Inspection-EU-Council-Still-Not-Disclosing-ECJ-Referral-for-Unified-Patent-Litigation-System.html">in my earlier posting</a>, on June 07, 2009, I had electronically filed <a href="http://www.consilium.europa.eu/showPage.aspx?id=928&mode=g&lang=en" target="_blank" title="Request Form">a formal request</a> in accordance with <a title="Regulation 1049/2001" target="_blank" href="http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2001:145:0043:0048:EN:PDF">Regulation 1049/2001</a> regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission Documents to be allowed to have a number of Council Documents as listed below:</p>
<ul><li>9669/09: Enhancing the patent system in Europe (c) Request for an opinion by the European Court of Justice on the compatibility with the EC Treaty of the envisaged Agreement creating a Unified Patent Litigation System - Agreement in principle</li><li>9550/09: Preparation of the Competitiveness Council of 28 - 29 May 2009 Enhancing the patent system in Europe (c) Request for an opinion by the European Court of Justice on the compatibility with the EC Treaty of the envisaged Agreement creating a Unified Patent Litigation System - Agreement in principle</li><li>9076/09: Request for an opinion by the European Court of Justice on the compatibility with the EC Treaty of the envisaged Agreement creating a unified patent litigation system</li></ul>
<p>The reason for this undertaking was by intention to learn some facts about the questions referred or soon to be referred to the ECJ. Of what kind of legal aspect might those concerns be, leading the EU Council to do this referral? Or, if they refuse to disclose anything substantial, why are they doing so?</p><p>Today I have received an Official Communication concerning my above-identified request, concluding:</p> <br /><a href="http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/93-File-Inspection-EU-Council-Still-Not-Disclosing-ECJ-Referral-for-Unified-Patent-Litigation-System-Contd.html#extended">Continue reading "File Inspection: EU Council Still Not Disclosing ECJ Referral for Unified Patent Litigation System (Cont'd)"</a>
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ipjur/~4/lasRsdoC9m8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:14:00 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/93-guid.html</guid>
    
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/93-File-Inspection-EU-Council-Still-Not-Disclosing-ECJ-Referral-for-Unified-Patent-Litigation-System-Contd.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Mr Bruno van Pottelsberghe Calling For European Patent Revolution</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ipjur/~3/2TQptjN3tf4/index.php</link>
            <category>EP</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/94-Mr-Bruno-van-Pottelsberghe-Calling-For-European-Patent-Revolution.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/wfwcomment.php?cid=94</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=94</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Axel H Horns)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    
<p><!-- s9ymdb:85 --><img height="99" width="75" src="http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/uploads/varia/Pottelsberghe.jpg" style="border: 0px none ; float: left; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px;" class="serendipity_image_left" />Mr <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/bruno-van-pottelsberghe/0/706/908" target="_blank" title="Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie" class="linkedin-profileinsider-popup">Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie</a> is a Senior Research Fellow at <a title="Bruegel" target="_blank" href="http://www.bruegel.org/">Bruegel</a> and Professor at the <a title="Université Libre de Bruxelles" target="_blank" href="http://www.ulb.ac.be/">Université Libre de Bruxelles</a> (ULB), <a title="Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management" target="_blank" href="http://www.solvay.edu/">Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management</a> (SBS-EM), where he holds the <a title="Solvay S.A. Chair of Innovation" target="_blank" href="http://www.solvay.edu/SBS-EM/Research-Chairs.php">Solvay S.A. Chair of Innovation</a>. He joined Bruegel in December 2007.  Mr Bruno van Pottelsberghe was Chief Economist at the <a title="EPO" target="_blank" href="http://www.epo.org/">European
Patent Office </a>from November 2005 to the end of 2007.</p>

<p>Mr van Pottelsberghe recently has <a title="Lost property: The European patent system and why it doesn't work" target="_blank" href="http://www.bruegel.org/nc/publications/show/publication/lost-property-the-european-patent-system-and-why-it-doesnt-work.html">published a paper</a> titled <i>'Lost property: The European patent system and why it doesn't work'</i> (PDF). Using new and hard-hitting data, van Pottelsberghe paints a dark picture of today's patent landscape both in Europe and internationally.  According to his paper, it is a tale of failed public cooperation at all levels and of a regime in danger of rampant patent inflation unless minds and resources are focused on tackling the root causes of the problem.</p> <br /><a href="http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/94-Mr-Bruno-van-Pottelsberghe-Calling-For-European-Patent-Revolution.html#extended">Continue reading "Mr Bruno van Pottelsberghe Calling For European Patent Revolution"</a>
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ipjur/~4/2TQptjN3tf4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:01:48 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/94-guid.html</guid>
    
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/94-Mr-Bruno-van-Pottelsberghe-Calling-For-European-Patent-Revolution.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>More Work On Draft Council Regulation On The EU Community Patent</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ipjur/~3/PuU-L4bcRUo/index.php</link>
            <category>EU</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/92-More-Work-On-Draft-Council-Regulation-On-The-EU-Community-Patent.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/wfwcomment.php?cid=92</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=92</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Axel H Horns)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    
<p><!-- s9ymdb:39 --><img width="143" height="95" class="serendipity_image_left" style="border: 0px none ; float: left; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px;" src="http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/uploads/varia/europa.jpg" />On June 25, 2009, the General Secretariat of the Council has issued Document <a href="http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/09/st11/st11417.en09.pdf" target="_blank" title="Document 11417/09">11417/09</a>, addressing the Working Party on Intellectual Property (Patents) and bearing the title <i>'Revised proposal for a Council Regulation on the Community patent'</i>. It replaces previous Document <a href="http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/09/st08/st08588.en09.pdf" target="_blank" title="Document 8588/09">8588/09</a>; see my earlier posting <a href="http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/77-2945th-session-of-the-Council-of-the-European-Union-Competitiveness-Configuration-Internal-Market,-Industry-and-Research.html" target="_blank" title="BLOG@IP::JUR">here</a>. The Working Party has been invited to have an exchange of views on this Working document <a href="http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/09/cm02/cm02860.en09.pdf" target="_blank" title="Working Group Meeting">at its
meeting on July 08, 2009</a>.</p> <br /><a href="http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/92-More-Work-On-Draft-Council-Regulation-On-The-EU-Community-Patent.html#extended">Continue reading "More Work On Draft Council Regulation On The EU Community Patent"</a>
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ipjur/~4/PuU-L4bcRUo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 08:53:00 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/92-guid.html</guid>
    
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/92-More-Work-On-Draft-Council-Regulation-On-The-EU-Community-Patent.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>BREAKING NEWS: It's Official: David Kappos Next Director USPTO</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ipjur/~3/Ws-njHmGSR8/index.php</link>
            <category>US</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/91-BREAKING-NEWS-Its-Official-David-Kappos-Next-Director-USPTO.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/wfwcomment.php?cid=91</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=91</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Axel H Horns)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    
<p /><div class="serendipity_imageComment_left" style="width: 75px;"><div class="serendipity_imageComment_img"><!-- s9ymdb:98 --><img width="75" height="97" class="serendipity_image_left" src="http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/uploads/varia/David_Kappos-1.png" /></div><div class="serendipity_imageComment_txt">David Kappos</div></div>Just seen on the <a title="website of the Office of Senator Leahy" target="_blank" href="http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200906/061809f.html">website of  the Office of Senator Leahy</a>,  Chairman, Senate Judiciary Committee:<p>
</p><blockquote><i>“I am pleased that the President has announced his intent nominate David J. Kappos to be the Undersecretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.  [...]&quot;</i></blockquote>
<p>This is exactly what has been expected and awaited since weeks; see my earlier postings <a href="http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/26-Who-Will-Be-Posted-As-Next-Director-Of-The-U.S.-PTO-And-Some-Other-Questions.html" target="_blank" title="BLOG@IP::JUR">here</a>, <a href="http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/51-Mr-Francis-Gurry,-Director-General-of-WIPO,-On-Open-Innovation..html" target="_blank" title="BLOG@IP::JUR">here</a>, and <a href="http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/72-Staff-Matters.html" target="_blank" title="BLOG@IP::JUR">there</a>.</p>
 <br /><a href="http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/91-BREAKING-NEWS-Its-Official-David-Kappos-Next-Director-USPTO.html#extended">Continue reading "BREAKING NEWS: It's Official: David Kappos Next Director USPTO"</a>
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ipjur/~4/Ws-njHmGSR8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 01:12:50 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/91-guid.html</guid>
    
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/91-BREAKING-NEWS-Its-Official-David-Kappos-Next-Director-USPTO.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>File Inspection: EU Council Still Not Disclosing ECJ Referral for Unified Patent Litigation System</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ipjur/~3/5mBsVyomX6k/index.php</link>
            <category>EU</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/90-File-Inspection-EU-Council-Still-Not-Disclosing-ECJ-Referral-for-Unified-Patent-Litigation-System.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/wfwcomment.php?cid=90</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=90</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Axel H Horns)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    
<p align="center"><!-- s9ymdb:114 --><img width="485" height="364" class="serendipity_image_center" style="border: 0px none ; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px;" src="http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/uploads/varia/file_cabinet.jpg" /></p>
<p>In <a href="http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/77-2945th-session-of-the-Council-of-the-European-Union-Competitiveness-Configuration-Internal-Market,-Industry-and-Research.html" target="_blank" title="BLOG@IP::JUR">my earlier posting</a> I had reported that, on the occasion of the 2945<sup>th</sup> session of the Council of the European Union - Competitiveness Configuration (Internal Market, Industry and Research) - held on May 28, 2009, and in accordance with a Presidency proposal, a decision was taken to allow for a re-examination by the European Court of Justice of the compatibility of the drafted agreement on a single court system for solving patent disputes. However, the EU Council did not publish any Documents from which the gist of the questions put before the ECJ could be derived.</p>
<p>On June 07, 2009, I electronically filed <a href="http://www.consilium.europa.eu/showPage.aspx?id=928&mode=g&lang=en" target="_blank" title="Request Form">a formal request</a> in accordance with <a title="Regulation 1049/2001" target="_blank" href="http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2001:145:0043:0048:EN:PDF">Regulation 1049/2001</a> regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission Documents to be allowed to have a number of Council Documents as listed below:</p> <br /><a href="http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/90-File-Inspection-EU-Council-Still-Not-Disclosing-ECJ-Referral-for-Unified-Patent-Litigation-System.html#extended">Continue reading "File Inspection: EU Council Still Not Disclosing ECJ Referral for Unified Patent Litigation System"</a>
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ipjur/~4/5mBsVyomX6k" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:54:57 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/90-guid.html</guid>
    
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/90-File-Inspection-EU-Council-Still-Not-Disclosing-ECJ-Referral-for-Unified-Patent-Litigation-System.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Linkdump 2009-06-18</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ipjur/~3/3AZAPzd68ns/index.php</link>
            <category>Linkdump</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/89-Linkdump-2009-06-18.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/wfwcomment.php?cid=89</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=89</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Axel H Horns)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    
<p><a title="Richard Susskind" target="_blank" href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/article6523920.ece">Rio Tinto deal heralds huge changes</a> - <a href="http://www.susskind.com/about.html" target="_blank" title="Mr Richard Susskind">Mr Richard Susskind</a> writes on a ground-breaking move of <a title="Rio Tinto" target="_blank" href="http://www.riotinto.com/">Rio Tinto</a>, a leading international mining group,  <a target="_blank" href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/natural_resources/article6524531.ece">announcing 
today</a> that it is outsourcing its legal work to India — triggering what is predicted to be an irreversible trend in the legal sector. The international mining group has concluded a deal with <a title="CPA Global" target="_blank" href="http://www.cpaglobal.com/">CPA Global</a>, a leading outsourcing provider of legal services, and expects savings on its legal costs of up to 20 per cent.</p>

<p><a title="p2p" target="_blank" href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/23551">EFF, Public Knowledge, drop ACTA lawsuit</a> - The Electronic Frontier Foundation and Public Knowledge have dropped their Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) lawsuit. The two organisations were demanding access to important documents about the secret intellectual property enforcement treaty. They say, the Obama administration’s decision to support 'Bush-era concealment policies' has forced them to abandon their case. Federal judges have very little discretion to overrule executive branch decisions to classify information on “national security” grounds, “and the Obama administration has recently informed the court that it intends to defend the classification claims originally made by the Bush Administration,” says the EFF.</p>

<p><a title="Way Forward on IP Issues at the WTO Still Unclear" target="_blank" href="http://ictsd.net/i/news/bridgesweekly/49064/">Way Forward on IP Issues at the WTO Still Unclear</a> - Last week’s WTO Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights saw very little, if any, progress towards resolving TRIPS issues in the context of the Doha negotiations.</p> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ipjur/~4/3AZAPzd68ns" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:57:29 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/89-guid.html</guid>
    
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/89-Linkdump-2009-06-18.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Linkdump 2009-06-17</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ipjur/~3/Tx9JDKnMpHw/index.php</link>
            <category>Linkdump</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/88-Linkdump-2009-06-17.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/wfwcomment.php?cid=88</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=88</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Axel H Horns)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    
<p><a href="http://www.zacco.com/News/NewsDetails.aspx?zaccoNId=33" target="_blank" title="Albihns and Zacco announce merger">Albihns and Zacco announced today</a> that that they have signed an agreement signifying that two of the leading IP firms in Europe will be one as of July 1st, 2009. </p>

<p><a title="OECD Report" target="_blank" href="http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2009/06/16/oecd-report-%e2%80%9ccreative-destruction%e2%80%9d-innovation-focus-needed-in-economic-crisis/"> OECD Report: “Creative Destruction,” Innovation Focus Needed In Economic Crisis</a> - The document entitled <i>Policy Responses to the Economic Crisis: Investing in Innovation for Long-Term Growth</i>  was prepared by <a title="Dominique Guellec" target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominique_Guellec">Dominique Guellec</a> and <a title="Sacha Wunsch-Vincent" target="_blank" href="http://www.xing.com/profile/Sacha_WunschVincent">Sacha Wunsch-Vincent</a> of the OECD Secretariat.</p>

<p><a title="OAMI" target="_blank" href="http://oami.europa.eu/ows/rw/news/item1014.en.do">New timeliness standard for OHIM Service Charter</a> - The OHIM Service Charter for the first quarter of this year has now been published with a new set of timeliness standards designed to ensure more equal treatment of files of the same type. </p> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ipjur/~4/Tx9JDKnMpHw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:57:00 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/88-guid.html</guid>
    
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/88-Linkdump-2009-06-17.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Linkdump 2009-06-16</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ipjur/~3/R_NyhQS3fo4/index.php</link>
            <category>Linkdump</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/87-Linkdump-2009-06-16.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/wfwcomment.php?cid=87</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=87</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Axel H Horns)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    
<p><a href="http://www.iam-magazine.com/blog/detail.aspx?g=25edbb2c-2bcc-4fd4-864d-c69fb952a900" target="_blank" title="IAM">What on earth was the Wall Street Journal thinking?</a> - <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/joff-wild/8/bb/6a8" target="_blank" title="Joff Wild" class="linkedin-profileinsider-popup">Mr Joff Wild</a> in IAM Blog on a substandard piece of writing on patent law recently published on WSJ. <a class="linkedin-profileinsider-popup" title="Mr Gordon Crovitz" target="_blank" href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/gordoncrovitz">Mr Gordon Crovitz</a> claims that: &quot;The Patent Office now gets some 500 million applications a year, leading to litigation costs of over $10 billion a year to define who has what rights.&quot; It is absolutely unbelievable that Crovitz could have got this so wrong. How on earth any self-respecting journalist can allow such an obvious error to run in an article he or she has produced is beyond me. And what on earth were the WSJ subs up to?</p>

<p><a title="Interview with Pirate Party Leader: " target="_blank" href="http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/osrc/article.php/12068_3825206_1/Interview-with-Pirate-Party-Leader-These-are-Crucial-Freedoms.htm">Interview with Pirate Party Leader: &quot;These are Crucial Freedoms&quot;</a> - <a title="Mr Bruce Byfield" target="_blank" href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/bruce-byfield/0/6b5/871" class="linkedin-profileinsider-popup">Mr Bruce Byfield</a> talking to <a title="Mr Rickard Falkvinge" target="_blank" href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/rickard-falkvinge/0/839/578" class="linkedin-profileinsider-popup">Mr Rickard Falkvinge</a>, Head of Swedish Pirate Party. &quot;All patents, at their base, are innovation inhibitors,&quot; he maintains. &quot;First of all, we're part of the next generation civil liberties movement. This is a civil liberties movement. These are crucial freedoms and crucial rights that are being jeopardized by people wanting to close down the Net, and we want to safeguard those rights. We basically want the fundamental rights and freedoms to apply online as well as off-line. The second thing I want to emphasize is that we've grown only by people talking to one another. We've grown almost a quarter million votes, 50,000 members, 17,000 activists, by one person talking to another, one conversation at a time, one colleague, kin or class mate at a time over a three year period. This, if nothing else, shows that you can do that. You are not dependent on old media any more. If you have a strong message and it concerns people, then you can drive that yourself.&quot;</p>

<p><a href="http://www.dcms.gov.uk/what_we_do/broadcasting/6216.aspx" target="_blank" title="Digital Britain: The Final Report">Digital Britain: The Final Report</a> - The Digital Britain Report is the UK Government's strategic vision for ensuring that the UK is at the leading edge of the global digital economy. The report contains actions and recommendations to ensure first rate digital and communications infrastructure to promote and protect talent and innovation in our creative industries, to modernize TV and radio frameworks, and support local news, and it introduces policies to maximize the social and economic benefits from digital technologies. </p> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ipjur/~4/R_NyhQS3fo4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:04:31 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/87-guid.html</guid>
    
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/87-Linkdump-2009-06-16.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Linkdump 2009-06-15</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ipjur/~3/XQLDW9bPtGU/index.php</link>
            <category>Linkdump</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/85-Linkdump-2009-06-15.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/wfwcomment.php?cid=85</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=85</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Axel H Horns)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    
<p><a title="ACTA" target="_blank" href="http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/fo/press-release-communique.aspx">Joint Statement: Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement</a> -  The participants in the ACTA negotiations will next meet in Morocco in July to continue their discussions with a view to reaching an agreement in 2010.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ag-ip-news.com/GetArticle.asp?Art_ID=7226&lang=en" target="_blank" title="ACTA">Ambassador Kirk Announces Plan to Move Forward with the ACTA Negotiation</a> - In keeping with President Obama's transparency goals, USTR will continue its efforts to ensure that the public is well-informed about the negotiations. In addition to the April 6 release of a detailed summary of issues under negotiation, USTR has established a dedicated ACTA page on the USTR website. Also, USTR will maintain our &quot;open-door&quot; policy toward all stakeholders, and will hold &quot;town hall&quot; meetings to engage with members of the public.</p>
<p><a title="USTR on ACTA" target="_blank" href="http://www.ustr.gov/trade-topics/intellectual-property/anti-counterfeiting-trade-agreement-acta">Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA)</a> - Website of United States Trade Representative (USTR) - still lacking substantial disclosure of ACTA negotiation documents.</p><p><a href="http://www.google.com/trends?q=piratpartiet%2C+piratenpartei" target="_blank" title="Google Trends">Google Trends</a> on 'piratpartiet' (Swedish Pirate Party) and 'piratenpartei' (German Pirate Party) - soaring interest in related Google searches:</p><p /><div style="width: 485px;" class="serendipity_imageComment_center"><div class="serendipity_imageComment_img"><!-- s9ymdb:105 --><img width="485" height="251" src="http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/uploads/varia/090613PIRATES_TREND.png" class="serendipity_image_center" /></div><div class="serendipity_imageComment_txt">Source: Google Trends</div></div><p /> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ipjur/~4/XQLDW9bPtGU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:44:00 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/85-guid.html</guid>
    
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/85-Linkdump-2009-06-15.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Who Might be Next EPO President</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ipjur/~3/ZsGdVm-UKWY/index.php</link>
            <category>EP</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/84-Who-Might-be-Next-EPO-President.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/wfwcomment.php?cid=84</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=84</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Axel H Horns)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    
<p><table><tbody><tr><td><div style="width: 225px;" class="serendipity_imageComment_center"><div class="serendipity_imageComment_img"><!-- s9ymdb:113 --><img width="225" height="150" src="http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/uploads/varia/kongstadt-dkpto-1.jpg" class="serendipity_image_center" /></div><div class="serendipity_imageComment_txt">Mr Jesper Kongstad</div></div></td><td><div style="width: 225px;" class="serendipity_imageComment_center"><div class="serendipity_imageComment_img"><!-- s9ymdb:111 --><img width="225" height="150" src="http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/uploads/varia/gossenbacher-1.jpg" class="serendipity_image_center" /></div><div class="serendipity_imageComment_txt">Dr. Roland Grossenbacher</div></div></td></tr>
</tbody></table></p>
<p>In May this year<a title="BLOG@IP::JUR" target="_blank" href="http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/72-Staff-Matters.html"> I had reported</a> that <a title="Ms Brimelow" target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alison_Brimelow"> Ms Brimelow</a> is not going to apply for a second term in Office as President of the European Patent Office beyond her first term ending in June 2010. Who will follow her in Office?</p><p>
Previous Presidents of the European Patent Office have been:
</p><ol><li>Mr <a title="Johannes Bob van Benthem" target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_Bob_van_Benthem">Johannes Bob van Benthem</a> (November 01, 1977 - April 30, 1985, NL)
</li><li>Mr<a title="Paul Brändli" target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Br%C3%A4ndli"> Paul Brändli</a> (May 01, 1985 - December 31, 1995, CH)
</li><li>Mr <a title="Ingo Kober" target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ingo_Kober">Ingo Kober</a> (January 01, 1996 - June 30, 2004, DE)
</li><li>Mr <a title="Alain Pompidou" target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alain_Pompidou">Alain Pompidou</a> (July 01, 2004 - June 30, 2007, FR)

</li></ol><p>Including Ms Brimelow (UK), each of the 'big three' of the EPC Member States (DE, UK, FR) has seen a citizen of their own serving at least half of a regular term as President of the EPO. The Netherlands played a special role during constitution of the EPO and got their President, too. In fact, Mr  van Benthem led the Office during the crucial startup years. And Switzerland also had a citizen presiding over the EPO.</p> <br /><a href="http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/84-Who-Might-be-Next-EPO-President.html#extended">Continue reading "Who Might be Next EPO President"</a>
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ipjur/~4/ZsGdVm-UKWY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 22:14:16 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/84-guid.html</guid>
    
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/84-Who-Might-be-Next-EPO-President.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Linkdump 2009-06-11</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ipjur/~3/XmtNJ-833S8/index.php</link>
            <category>Linkdump</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/83-Linkdump-2009-06-11.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/wfwcomment.php?cid=83</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=83</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Axel H Horns)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    
<p><a title="The Globe and Mail" target="_blank" href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/technology/all-in-favour-say-yar-har/article1176721/">All in favour say ‘Yar har!'</a> -  “ We're basically a civil rights movement. The Internet is not a toy that the politicians can take away from children when we're being naughty. It's an important part of the infrastructure of society. ” <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/ivor-tossell/a/aba/2b" target="_blank" title="Mr Ivor Tossell" class="linkedin-profileinsider-popup">Mr Ivor Tossell</a> for The Globe and Mail interviews the deputy chairman of Sweden's Pirate Party and new member of the 2009 European Parliamentary elections.</p>

<p><a title="IP Watch" target="_blank" href="http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2009/06/11/copyright-holders-acknowledge-losing-battle-for-public-consciousness-at-world-copyright-summit/"> Copyright Holders Acknowledge Losing Battle For Public Consciousness At World Copyright Summit</a> - Report by <a title="Ms Liza Porteus Viana" target="_blank" href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/liza-porteus-viana/0/471/607" class="linkedin-profileinsider-popup">Ms Liza Porteus Viana</a> for Intellectual Property Watch.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/986d8406-5620-11de-ab7e-00144feabdc0.html" target="_blank" title="FT.com">HADOPI: French anti-piracy drive ruled illegal</a> - Report by <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/peggy-hollinger/6/7a/936" target="_blank" title="Ms Peggy Hollinger"  class="linkedin-profileinsider-popup">Ms Peggy Hollinger</a> for FT on France’s controversial attempt to crack down on internet pirates by unilaterally cutting off internet access which was dealt a severe blow after the country’s highest court ruled that the draconian legislation violated human rights.</p> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ipjur/~4/XmtNJ-833S8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:08:37 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/83-guid.html</guid>
    
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/83-Linkdump-2009-06-11.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Linkdump 2009-06-10</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ipjur/~3/AiFeBN4LcHQ/index.php</link>
            <category>Linkdump</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/82-Linkdump-2009-06-10.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/wfwcomment.php?cid=82</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=82</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Axel H Horns)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    
<p><a href="http://www.iam-magazine.com/blog/Detail.aspx?g=a9fda9cf-f353-4493-a87c-8b10c209578a" target="_blank" title="IAM">China plans for 50% increase in number of patent agents</a> - Mr Joff Wild reports in IAM Blog that China's State Intellectual Property Office has formulated a Plan for the Development of the Patent Agency Industry (2009-2015).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE5576DM20090608" target="_blank" title="Reuters">Reuters: Most firms unaware of Web domain changes</a> - Two thirds of businesses are unaware they will be able to use their own name in place of domain extensions such as .com, .org, or .net when Internet domains are liberalized next year, according to a survey.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.ie/national-news/cox-is-favourite-to--replace-mccreevy-in-eu-commission-1739888.html" target="_blank" title="Cox">Cox is favourite to replace McCreevy in EU Commission</a> - The former President of the European Parliament Pat Cox has emerged as the new favourite to replace Charlie McCreevy as EU Commissioner this autumn.</p> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ipjur/~4/AiFeBN4LcHQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:21:17 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/82-guid.html</guid>
    
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/82-Linkdump-2009-06-10.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Mr Howard Knopf on ACTA</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ipjur/~3/coQT8ObUZ8k/index.php</link>
            <category>IP Politics</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/81-Mr-Howard-Knopf-on-ACTA.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/wfwcomment.php?cid=81</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=81</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Axel H Horns)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    
<p>I repeatedly have posted on this blog articles concerning the ongoing negotiations on the ACTA Agreement which are conducted in secrecy, see e.g. <a title="BLOG@IP::JUR" target="_blank" href="http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/76-News-from-ACTA.html">here</a>, <a title="BLOG@IP::JUR" target="_blank" href="http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/61-IP,-The-Internet,-And-The-Ancien-Regime.html">here</a> and <a title="BLOG@IP::JUR" target="_blank" href="http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/60-More-Insights-into-ACTA.html">there</a>. </p><p /><div style="width: 110px;" class="serendipity_imageComment_left"><div class="serendipity_imageComment_img"><!-- s9ymdb:104 --><img width="110" height="110" src="http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/uploads/varia/howard_knopf_3.serendipityThumb.jpg" class="serendipity_image_left" /></div><div class="serendipity_imageComment_txt">Mr Howard Knopf</div></div>Just now I have spotted <a title="Presentation" target="_blank" href="http://www.brighttalk.com/summit/copyrightwar">an on-line presentation</a> (free but registration is required; kudos to <a href="https://twitter.com/Ivoryblossum" target="_blank" title="@Ivoryblossum">@Ivoryblossum</a> on <a href="https://twitter.com/Ivoryblossum/status/2093595356" target="_blank" title="Twitter">Twitter</a>) by <a title="Mr Howard Knopf" target="_blank" href="http://www.macerajarzyna.com/pages/h_knopf.htm">Mr Howard Knopf</a> (<a href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/8/189/118" target="_blank" title="LinkedIn" class="linkedin-profileinsider-popup">LinkedIn</a>),  titled <i>Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), WIPO and in Canada</i>. Mr Howard Knopf practises mainly in the areas of copyright, trade marks, cyberlaw, and related issues. He is the Chairman of the Copyright Policy Committee of the Canadian Bar Association and was recently advisor to the Law Commission of Canada on security interests in intellectual property.<p>
</p> <br /><a href="http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/81-Mr-Howard-Knopf-on-ACTA.html#extended">Continue reading "Mr Howard Knopf on ACTA"</a>
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ipjur/~4/coQT8ObUZ8k" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:36:17 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/81-guid.html</guid>
    
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/81-Mr-Howard-Knopf-on-ACTA.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Pirates Entering European Parliament</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ipjur/~3/vAx9J--oyeM/index.php</link>
            <category>IP Politics</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/80-Pirates-Entering-European-Parliament.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/wfwcomment.php?cid=80</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=80</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Axel H Horns)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    
<p><!-- s9ymdb:101 --><img width="110" height="110" src="http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/uploads/varia/155px-Piratpartiet.svg.serendipityThumb.png" style="border: 0px none ; float: left; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px;" class="serendipity_image_left" />Incoming early reports suggest that the <a title="Swedish Pirate Party" target="_blank" href="http://www.piratpartiet.se/international/english">Swedish Pirate Party</a> - which is expressively a patent abolitionist group - has won approximately 8% of the votes, well above the 4% quorum being in force in Sweden. Hence, it should be expected to see up to two parliamentarians of the Swedish Pirate Party in the new European Parliament. As I already indicated <a href="http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/74-Elections-to-the-European-Parliament-Coming-Soon..html" target="_blank" title="BLOG@IP::JUR">in my earlier posting on this subject</a>, even the appearance of a few MEPs of the Pirate Party in the new European Parliament does not mean that the IP revolution is nigh. However, the clock is ticking: The Intellectual Property people surely currently are merely enjoying something like a reprieve before the political clash of digital culture becomes imminent also in the field of patents.</p><p>Concerning the situation in Germany I expect the <a href="http://www.piratenpartei.de/" target="_blank" title="Piratenpartei">German Piratenpartei</a> to end up at approximately 1% of the votes. This would mean there will be no German Pirate MEPs in the next European Parliament as in Germany the quotum is at 5% of the votes. However, political parties gaining more than 0.5% of the votes are eligible for reimbursement of campaign costs by the state; they might get EUR 0.85 or so for every vote they have collected in Germany. Hence, at the end of the day the German Pirate Party might be entitled to cash in several hundred of thousands of Euros. This surely will boost their organisatorical strength in the coming months; currently they are preparing for the next German national general elections in September this year.</p> <br /><a href="http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/80-Pirates-Entering-European-Parliament.html#extended">Continue reading "Pirates Entering European Parliament"</a>
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ipjur/~4/vAx9J--oyeM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 21:38:10 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/80-guid.html</guid>
    
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/80-Pirates-Entering-European-Parliament.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>IP Patent Blog Survey</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ipjur/~3/yQvWgjFjn0E/index.php</link>
            <category>This Blog</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/79-IP-Patent-Blog-Survey.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/wfwcomment.php?cid=79</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=79</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Axel H Horns)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    
<p><!-- s9ymdb:103 --><img width="110" height="65" src="http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/uploads/varia/vote.serendipityThumb.jpg" style="border: 0px none ; float: left; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px;" class="serendipity_image_left" /><a title="Gene Quinn" target="_blank" href="http://www.ipwatchdog.com/about/ipwatchdog-authors/">Mr Gene Quinn</a> (<a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/ipwatchdog" target="_blank" title="Gene Quinn" class="linkedin-profileinsider-popup">LinkedIn</a>) from ipwatchdog.com has collceted on his <a title="Ipwatchdog Blog" target="_blank" href="http://www.ipwatchdog.com/">Blog</a> a shortlist of known IP Patent Blogs, and I'm pleased to see that IP::JUR is included. If you mind you can have a closer look and participate in a survey which only allows you to pick one top blog but which does give you the option to list all of the blogs you read regularly. The survey can be accessed <a title="Survey" target="_blank" href="http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/05/27/vote-for-the-top-patent-blogs/id=3780/">here</a>. It will be open until end of June 2009.</p> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ipjur/~4/yQvWgjFjn0E" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:39:19 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/79-guid.html</guid>
    
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/79-IP-Patent-Blog-Survey.html</feedburner:origLink></item>

</channel>
</rss>
