Rachel Maddow describes how Mitt Romney’s opponents are using his time at Bain Capital against him, to paint him as heartless and greedy at the expense of American taxpayers drawing parallels with bailout of the collapsed financial industry.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Elizabeth Warren on the fiasco at JPMorgan.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Martin Bashir – Grading Obama’s and Romney’s dueling commencement speeches

Good Morning.

As you make it through Hump Day, don’t forget JJP.

Drop those links. Engage in debate. Give us trivia and gossip too.

And always, have a peaceful day.

Ed Schultz on the happenings in Wisconsin.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Rachel Maddow on the GOP War on Women – some updates.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Ed Schultz on the President going on the offensive against Willard using Bain. Ed talks to a former union rep at the steel plant Bain looted and bankrupted in Kansas.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Ed Schultz talks about the GOP War on Healthcare and how, at the federal and state level, the GOP is doing what it can to hurt the American people.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Rev. Al discusses the GOP’s devotion to the Paul Ryan budget.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Rev. Al on the happenings with GOP Voter Suppression in Florida.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Lawrence O’Donnell discusses the commencement addresses of POTUS(Barnard C) and Willard(Liberty U).

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

While some continue to exert tireless effort and spend millions of tax payer dollars researching and improving upon alternative clean energy sources like wind and solar, others are wasting no time re-educating the public on the benefits of our existing clean energy source: nuclear.

As far back as his 2010 State of the Union address President Obama begin setting the record straight on what he felt nuclear energy brings to the table and why it’s a necessary part of this country’s energy portfolio:  “To create more clean energy jobs, we need more production, more efficiency, more incentives. And that means building a new generation of safe, clean nuclear power plants in this country.”

Building more nuclear energy facilities brings about a myriad of consumer benefits, including increased access to a reliable, less expensive form of energy. The National Academy of Sciences in a 2009 report said that the cost of nuclear power is equal to or lower than natural gas, wind, solar, or coal with carbon capture. Reactors can operate for 80 years, while wind and solar last about 25 years. And nuclear reactors operate 90 percent of the time, while wind and solar are only available about a third of the time. Reliability and cost-efficient translate into lower utility rates for consumers.

With a focus on the environment and in the wake of the Fukishima disaster, nuclear has had to battle some bad press. However, despite what extreme environmentalist might have you believe, nuclear is a clean source of energy.  Nuclear power emits zero greenhouse gases. Today it produces 20 percent of our nation’s electricity, but 70 percent of our carbon-free electricity; and due to vigorous safety inspections and regulations mandated by the industry, the United States has maintained its record of safety for over 30 years.

In the American Lung Association’s 2012 State of the Air report St. Lucie County in Florida was listed as one of America’s five cleanest in terms of air quality.  No coincidence, St. Lucie County is home to St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant.

read more…

President Obama delivered the Commencement Address at Barnard College.

President Barack Obama hugs Britney Wilson, class of 2012, after he delivered the commencement address at Barnard College’s graduation ceremony on May 14, 2012.
—-TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP/GettyImages

Good Afternoon.

As you go through the rest of your day, don’t forget JJP.

Drop those links. Engage in debate. Give us trivia and gossip too.

And continue to have a peaceful day.

US President Barack Obama laughs with Barnard College Board of Trustees chair Jolyne Caruso-FitzGerald before delivering the Commencement Address at Barnard College’s graduation ceremony in New York on May 14, 2012.
—TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP/GettyImages

U.S. President Barack Obama claps during the Barnard College’s 120th Commencement ceremony at Columbia University’s South Lawn in New York May 14, 2012.
—-REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton

US President Barack Obama makes the commencement address at Barnard College on May 14, 2012 in New York. Obama headed to New York to speak at the Barnard College commencement, for an interview on The View and to attend a campaign fundraiser.
—- MANDEL NGAN/AFP/GettyImages

U.S. President Barack Obama waves next to Barnard College President Debora Spar (L) and Jolyne Caruso-Fitzgerald (R) before delivering the commencement address for the 2012 graduating class at Barnard College in New York, May 14, 2012.
—REUTERS/Larry Downing

Even though conservatives accuse Democrats of moving to European-style socialism, you will never get conservatives to acknowledge that Europe can teach America quite a bit about economic mobility.

They do not do it through cutting regulations on business or perpetually cutting taxes on the wealthy. Instead, Europe invests in its citizens such as the 360 approach to Finnish schools.

In America, there are clear differences in economic mobility between the states. The South and Southeast are worse off than the rest of the nation. In other words, a child born poor in Louisiana, Texas, or South Carolina, has a much better chance of dying a poor adult than a poor child born in New England.

Several factors are at play, but three are critical.

First is the South’s history. We can reach back to the New Deal when southern politicians fought to ensure that agricultural workers would not receive the minimum wage. Wealthy landowners did not want their workers to receive just compensation for their labors. There are numerous other examples of Jim Crow-style racism that seeped into public policy and were designed precisely to limit African American mobility. Read Ira Katznelson’s When Affirmative Action Was White for a primer.

Second, there is a general consensus that…

Obama targets ‘Romney Economics’
By Steve Benen – Mon May 14, 2012 8:48 AM EDT.

Mitt Romney has spent the past couple of weeks arguing that presidential campaign has drifted too far from the “issues that matter.” Two weeks ago, this meant downplaying the significance of the mission that killed Osama bin Laden, and last week, it was marriage equality and his “youthful indiscretions” that were characterized as distractions.

The Republican said he wanted the focus to be on jobs and the economy. As of this morning, the “be careful what you wish for” adage comes to mind.

The Obama campaign unveiled this two-minute long video this morning, along with the launch of a new website: RomneyEconomics.com. It marks a new offensive, in which President Obama’s re-election team is highlighting Romney’s record of orchestrating mass layoffs and the significance of the underlying “business philosophy” the Republican displayed at his private-equity firm, Bain Capital.

This is not just a web video — the above ad is a trimmed-down version of a six-minute video, and it’s slated to air in Iowa, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Colorado.

If the message seems familiar, it’s because campaign watchers heard plenty about this during the Republican primaries, when Newt Gingrich, Rick Perry, and others targeted Romney for his callous, anti-worker “vulture” capitalism. Indeed, this has been a lingering issue for Romney for quite a while — in 2004, then-rival Mike Huckabee said, “I want to be a president who reminds you of the guy you work with, not the guy who laid you off.”

We know, of course, that these criticisms did not derail Romney’s primary campaign, but the message is more likely to resonate with a broader, national audience than with GOP voters exclusively.

It also underscores one of the great ironies of the 2012 campaign: voters consider job creation the nation’s #1 issue, and arguably Mitt Romney’s weakest issue and biggest vulnerability is … job creation.

——————————————————————————–

When we think about Romney’s record on jobs, the natural focus is on his tenure as governor, when he had a chance to put his job-creation know-how to good use. Regrettably, his efforts didn’t work in Massachusetts, and his state’s record on job creation was “one of the worst in the country,” ranking 47th out of 50 states in job growth. It’s one of the reasons Romney left office after one term deeply unpopular with his constituents.

But with Romney generally content to pretend his one term in office simply never occurred, and focusing almost exclusively on his private-sector background, his habit of making millions from companies by laying off their workers is politically problematic, to put it mildly.

What’s more, Democrats have some partisan cover on this — while the Romney campaign will almost certainly push back against this offensive by insisting that Obama’s criticisms are some kind of “attack on capitalism,” the fact remains that the president’s new tack isn’t much different than what Gingrich and Perry were saying a few months back.

Politico said the push casts Romney as “a greedy, job-killing corporate titan with little concern for the working class.” That’s true, but the president’s campaign can back up that characterization with ample evidence, all of which makes the Republican look pretty bad.

Romney has spent the last year urging voters to focus on his business record. Team Obama appears eager to oblige.
.

Good Morning.

As you go through your day, don’t forget JJP.

Drop those links. Engage in debate. Give us trivia and gossip too.

And always, have a peaceful day.

Last week, President Obama publicly supported same sex marriage and liberals celebrated. Many black bloggers and intellectuals heralded it as a historic leap forward for humanity. Not me. I don’t care what the media says. Right is right and wrong is wrong. I will never support same sex marriage.

In this secular and hedonistic society, religion and morality have become irrelevant. Although I am flawed, God is primary in my life. Everything else is secondary. Islam, Christianity and Judaism condemn homosexuality as a sin. No ultra-liberal distortion of scripture can negate that fact. Here are a few verses from the Holy Quran, Surah 7:

80. We also (sent) Lut:
He said to his people:
“Do ye commit lewdness
Such as no people
In creation (ever) committed
Before you?”

81. “For ye practice your lusts
On men in preference
To women: ye are indeed
A people transgressing
Beyond bounds.”

82. And his people gave
No answer but this:
They said, “Drive them out
Of your city: these are
Indeed men who want
To be clean and pure!”

83. But We saved him
And his family, except
His wife: she was
Of those who lagged behind.

84. And we rained down on them
A shower (of brimstone):
Then see what was the end
Of those who indulged
In sin and crime.

The Holy Bible contains similar verses in Genesis 19. Leviticus 20:13 states that:
“If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable…”

Yes. The Bible was deliberately misinterpreted to justify slavery and Jim Crow. However, like its stance against adultery and fornication, the Bible’s opposition to homosexuality is unambiguous. It is not a question of exploitation or misinterpretation of the Bible. Calling someone a “sexual redneck” does not change that reality.

Since the critics are unable to refute holy scripture, they mock God, scripture and believers. They desperately scour the Bible for other “objectionable” verses and exploit those verses to try invalidate the Bible. No one uses those “objectionable” verses to justify adultery or fornication. So why do they drag out those verses to justify homosexuality? For those of us who believe, God’s word is infallible and timeless. We are not fazed by current trends. God’s word is not subject to Gallup polls.

When that hustle does not work, people try to draw comparisons between the plight of African Americans and the plight of the LGBT community. However, such comparisons don’t hold. Unlike homosexuality, racial diversity and oneness of humanity are celebrated in holy scripture. Moreover, race is an immutable and obviously visible biological characteristic. One cannot hide one’s racial identity. Africans were enslaved, robbed of their identity, brutalized, lynched, segregated and humiliated just because of the color of their skin.

The oppression of LGBT people in America does not approach the scale and scope of the oppression of black people. Sexuality is a behavior pattern. Whether or not homosexuality is innate or learned is debatable. Unlike race, sexuality is not necessarily a visible trait. One can easily conceal one’s sexuality. However, one cannot hide being black. It is outrageous for anyone to exploit our history of suffering and pain to further their own unique and unrelated agenda.

Certainly, Martin Luther King, Jr. employed the nonviolent tactics and example of Gandhi to further the Civil Right Movement in America. Both movements shared many similarities. Both movements were fighting against racism and white supremacy. Therefore, a comparison between those two movements is more justified. Furthermore, Dr. King did not use Gandhi’s movement to morally justify the Civil Rights Movement. Instead, Dr. King relied on the Bible, the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of Independence to morally inspire the movement. I wish the LGBT community would stop pimping our movement to further their cause.

In addition to love, the primary purpose of marriage and sex is reproduction of the human species. In order to sustain strong communities, we must rebuild the most basic and fundamental component of society, the traditional nuclear family. With more than half of all black children being raised in single parent households, our focus should be on rebuilding the traditional family, not jumping on the same sex marriage bandwagon.

Finally, we must understand that this whole spectacle is just election year politics as usual. Other than sparking a conversation and gaining the political support of the gay community, the President’s statement did not make any practical difference. In fact, he essentially said that same sex marriage should be left to the states. Approximately thirty states ban same sex marriage. The President’s statement does not change any of that. I fear that he has only given the Right a reason to rally around Mitt Romney.

This article is cross-posted on New Possibilities. Please feel free to follow me on Twitter @NewPossBlog.

Not that you’d know about this, but African and indigenous South American women have been wearing their babies in wraps on their backs, and breastfeeding their kids through early childhood for centuries.  And many modern single moms, out of necessity, have been co-sleeping with their children through late childhood years since forever.

However, when a world renowned doctor and parenting expert Dr. Sears assembles those practices along with 6 other steps for growing confident children it is called “Attachment Parenting,” making news and going viral. It also gets a coveted TIME magazine cover.

The magazine this week released a  cover story about Dr. Sear’s attachment parenting theory which featured a 26-year old young White mom nursing her 3-year old child as he stood on stool.  Reaction has been mixed, but people are primarily outraged by what they see as a child too old to be noshing on his mama’s breasts.  Breastfeeding experts are perturbed because the image  could  cause more people already ambivalent and uncomfortable with nursing to solidify their negative impressions of a very human and natural practice.

And as perception can easily overshadow reality, had the woman on the cover been Latina, the response may have quickly turned into dialogue about so-called “anchor babies,” illegal immigration and…

Read more…

Good Afternoon.

As you go through the rest of your day, don’t forget JJP.

Drop those links. Engage in debate. Give us trivia and gossip too.

And continue to have a peaceful day.

It’s time for Willard’s Lies of the week.

Once again, I will point out the site on the blog roll: Romney The Liar: because there are Liars, Damn Liars, and then there’s Mitt Romney.

Steve Benen, now at The Maddow Blog:. Here’s last week’s entry of Chronicling Mitt’s mendacity:

The opening:

Chronicling Mitt’s Mendacity, Vol. XVII
By Steve Benen – Fri May 11, 2012 3:49 PM EDT.

As the 2012 presidential campaign advances, impatience with Mitt Romney’s penchant for falsehoods grows. Jamelle Bouie this week reflected on the the fact that “the former Massachusetts governor has no use for honesty in his campaign.”

“Constant mendacity is the norm for Romney and his campaign, and odds are good that he won’t suffer for it,” Bouie wrote. “Campaign reporters don’t have a strong incentive to challenge him on his misrepresentations, and interested parties have a hard time dealing with the deluge.”

And yet, we remain undeterred, as evidenced by the 17th installment of my weekly series, chronicling Mitt’s mendacity.

1. At an event in Euclid, Ohio, Romney argued, “We will not forget the fact that when [President Obama] was putting in place $787 billion of borrowing in his first few months in office that he said the borrowing would keep the unemployment rate below 8%.”

That’s a popular claim for Romney, but it’s completely untrue.

2. Romney said in the same remarks the only reason the unemployment rate dropped from 10% to 8.1% is “because of the people that dropped out of the work force.”

That’s demonstrably false.

3. At the event, Romney also said of the president, “[H]is vision is that it is ok for a small business to raise taxes from 35% to 40% of small businesses.”

In reality, Obama has cut taxes on small businesses, and raising the top income tax rate would not adversely affect small businesses, no matter how often Republicans argue to the contrary.

Tamron Hall Kicks Tim Carney Off Her Show

What Mitt Romney’s ‘Gay Bullying’ Tells Us

Chris Matthews and Barney Frank vs. Tony Perkins…

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Good Morning.

As you begin a new week, don’t forget JJP.

Drop those links. Engage in debate.

Give us trivia and gossip too.

And always, have a peaceful day.

………………………………………………………..

Bible Study: Parsing Scripture, From Slavery To Same-Sex Marriage

Mitt Romney’s Bullying at Elite Michigan Prep School

Jennifer Granholm Takes Mitt Romney to Task for Claim of Saving Detroit

watch this segment from the Rachel Maddow show about government regulations and the free cash you’ll be getting from the ACA (Obamacare).

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Trayvon Martin’s Mom, Sybrina Fulton’s Mother’s Day Message

Good Morning.

As you spend this weekend with family and friends, don’t forget JJP.

Drop those links. Engage in debate. Give us trivia and gossip too.

And always, have a peaceful day.

That didn’t happen. Not really.

I would have been sympathetic to the afro. I’d worn one myself as a junior, along with three associates who also took Malcolm’s message of black pride to heart. We wore black armbands when he was assassinated. If it was about an afro, it would have been one of us who would have been assaulted.

Or did it happen? Was I part of a posse that harmed someone–and I just don’t remember it? Maybe Malcolm’s philosophy wasn’t that important to me a year later. I could have done a 180 on the afro by then. And I could be rebellious, sometimes seemingly for its own sake. I’ll not divulge the riskier stuff. I live in Georgia and I’m not sure there’s a statute of limitations for anything in this place. Anyway, no matter how I mentally toss it about, I find it hard to see anyone forgetting an assault perpetrated against him or her or one he or she perpetrated—unless an emotion like shame or guilt demanded the death of that memory.

Mitt Romney can’t recall if he led a mob of fellow private high schoolers to capture a peer and then have Mitt cut the guy’s too long and dyed blond hair. Understand. Mitt’s not saying he didn’t do it. He’s just saying he can’t recall if he did. He did do some crazy stuff back in that old private high school, he admits, and maybe all that could have been part of it. Plus, Mitt apologized if he offended anybody with his offensive behavior.

Talk about taking lying mothafukka to a new level.

It’s good that his literal partners in crime didn’t forget so that they could tell us what happened now. It’s sad the guy they jumped died a few years ago and can’t tell his side. But according to one of Mitt’s boys, who ran into the victim when they were adults years later, the guy never did forget it either.

The boy was attacked because they thought him gay, according to those who have since fessed up. Mitt says that even if he did what he can’t recall what everyone else involved can, it wouldn’t have been because he thought the boy was gay. People weren’t concerned about such things in 1965, Mitt said. Hey, “f——” were left alone. No one bothered them.

Wow. The new level has just been replaced.

This guy is good.

“Caveman.” That’s what my wife says she sees when she sees Mitt. Me see. Me take. Interesting image, especially for a guy associated with well-tailored, oh so civilized suits.

I guess I’d never thought of him beyond being a typical majority society guy who feels entitled to run a major something. A lot of hard work went into construction of this enterprise, and it takes a special someone—someone, say, from the group that has benefitted most from all that blood, sweat, and theft—who can appreciate it enough to keep it running.

The Washington Post broke the piece about young Mitt’s rambunctiousness. It also said there is no evidence that Mitt has been a bully since he was a teen.

I don’t know. The very adult Mitt made his fortune heading a business that often profited from the failure of another business that his took over, leaving all those sappy employees behind. That’s hardly for the faint of heart. I think bully is great training for that position.

The piece also mentioned that Mitt led cheers for his high school football team. Wasn’t Bush a cheerleader too? A noble profession, to be sure, but not one typically confused with more virile pursuits such as the one representing the guys they cheered for or even ditch digging.

Bush’s overcompensation is the stuff of legend now.

Don’t even get me started on its legendary criminality.

Mob-jumping an innocent is not bombing brown people to show you’re tough, or to pilfer their resources, but it’s a crime nonetheless, whether the little rich kids go to jail for their crimes or not. And maybe you can find another name for a man who reportedly relished blowing up jobs to increase profits for the few. But knowing what we now know, does not this history provide some (disturbing) insight into such a character wishing to wield so much power?

Is Dr. Freud in?

The new “balance” of the mainstream media the right-wing rails against for daring to publicize a story that makes a rightwinger look bad is to say something bad about a Democrat. Did you hear that Obama said he sometimes forgets how harsh the recession is? They’re both, you see, equal. Right, CNN?

Really, is Dr. Freud in?

Refusing to accept the belief that Washington can’t get anything done, President Obama took to this week’s address with a “To-Do” List, asking Congress to jump on board. As the President discussed, the “To-Do” List focuses on jobs, mortgage refinancing, small businesses, tax credits for clean energy companies, and American troops returning home from Iraq and Afghanistan:

“First, Congress should stop giving tax breaks to companies that ship jobs overseas, and use that money to cover moving expenses for companies that bring jobs back to America.

Second, Congress should help the millions of Americans who have worked hard and made their mortgage payments on time refinance their mortgages at lower rates and save at least $3,000 a year.

Third, Congress should help small business owners by giving them a tax break for hiring more workers and paying them higher wages. Small businesses are the engine of economic growth in this country. We shouldn’t be holding them back — we should be making it easier for them to succeed.

Fourth, if Congress fails to act soon, clean energy companies will see their taxes go up and could be forced to lay off employees. These companies are putting Americans to work and helping break our dependence on foreign oil. Congress should extend these tax credits.

And finally, Congress should help our veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan by creating a Veterans Job Corps. Our men and women in uniform have served this country with honor. Now it’s our turn to serve them.”

President Obama urged Americans to contact their representatives and push them to act on behalf of creating jobs and growing the economy.

President Obama’s Weekly Address:

Good Morning.

As you spend this weekend with family and friends, don’t forget JJP.

Drop those links. Engage in debate. Give us trivia and gossip too.

And always, have a peaceful day.

US First Lady Michelle Obama greets children from military families as they create Mother’s Day cards and other crafts in the State Dining Room at the White House in Washington, DC, May 10, 2012, to present to their families.
—-SAUL LOEB/AFP/GettyImages

Good Afternoon.

As you go through the rest of your day, don’t forget JJP.

Drop those links. Engage in debate. Give us trivia and gossip too.

And continue to have a peaceful day.

US First Lady Michelle Obama greets guests during a reception for military children and their families in honor of Mother’s Day in the East Room at the White House in Washington, DC, May 10, 2012. Children created flower arrangements, Mother’s Day cards and cookies in the State Dining Room before presenting them to their families.
—SAUL LOEB/AFP/GettyImages

US First Lady Michelle Obama greets a young boy during a reception for military children and their families in honor of Mother’s Day in the East Room at the White House in Washington, DC, May 10, 2012. Children created flower arrangements, Mother’s Day cards and cookies in the State Dining Room before presenting them to their families.
—SAUL LOEB/AFP/GettyImages

US First Lady Michelle Obama holds a flower given to her by a child from a military family as children create Mother’s Day cards and other crafts in the State Dining Room at the White House in Washington, DC, May 10, 2012, to present to their families.
—SAUL LOEB/AFP/GettyImages

US First Lady Michelle Obama holds a flower given to her by a child from a military family as children create Mother’s Day cards and other crafts in the State Dining Room at the White House in Washington, DC, May 10, 2012, to present to their families. —SAUL LOEB/AFP/GettyImages

From The Hill:

Black Caucus members reject GOP proposal to ease Voting Rights Act
By Pete Kasperowicz – 05/10/12 08:42 AM ET

Reps. Jesse Jackson Jr. (D-Ill.), John Lewis (D-Ga.) and other House members on Wednesday rejected a Republican proposal to ease certain rules in the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and said ongoing racial prejudices mean it is too early to even start discussing these changes.

The discussion came up after Rep. Paul Broun (R-Ga.) offered an amendment to the 2013 Justice Department appropriations bill that would prevent Justice from enforcing Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act.

Under Section 5, seven states and several counties in other states in the South are required to get federal clearance before they make any changes to their election laws. Under the law, Alabama, Alaska, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina and Virginia must pre-clear all changes to voting procedures with the U.S. attorney general. Some counties in Arizona, Hawaii, Idaho and North Carolina face the same requirement.

The rule was originally designed to be a temporary way to ensure certain Southern states did not try to disenfranchise black voters. But it has since been extended several times — the last extension was in 2006, when it was extended through 2031.

But Broun said the law is outdated and unnecessary.

“This section of Federal statute treats some States more equal than other States,” he said. “There are States being discriminated against. My home State of Georgia is one of those. It’s time for us to go to what the Constitution says is the way we should all be treated: equal under the law.”

Broun’s proposal drew sharp criticism from Republicans and Democrats, many of whom said a change the historic law should not be considered so quickly, as an amendment to an appropriations bill in a late-night debate.

Jackson said the Voting Rights Act, for the first time in history, required states to consider ways to give racial minorities their own districts, giving them a chance to elect a representative to Congress. He implied that it is still too early to trust some states to make election choices that are considerate of blacks and other minorities.

“Both Democrats and Republicans, through history … have used race as a partisan advantage in trying to draw congressional districts and legislative districts,” he said. “I appeal to you, Mr. Chairman, to reject this amendment at midnight; reject this unconstitutional, unprecedented attack on the civil rights of every American.”

Civil rights icon John Lewis was angered by Broun’s proposal, prompting Broun to withdraw it.

“It’s shameful that you would come here tonight and say to the Department of Justice that you must not use one penny, one cent, one dime, one dollar to carry out the mandate of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act,” Lewis said. “We should open up the political process and let all of our citizens come in and participate. People died for the right to vote — friends of mine, colleagues of mine — to speak out against this amendment. It doesn’t have a place.”

TGIF and Good Morning.

As you go through your day, don’t forget JJP.

Drop those links. Engage in debate. Give us trivia and gossip too.

And always, have a peaceful day.

President Obama introduces his “to-do list” for Congress, a list of initiatives that will create jobs and help the middle class, and calls on Congress to take action on the list’s first item by passing legislation that rewards companies who bring jobs back to American with lower taxes and pay for it by eliminating tax incentives for companies to ship jobs overseas.

Good Afternoon.

As you go through the rest of your day, don’t forget JJP.

Drop those links. Engage in debate. Give us trivia and gossip too.

And continue to have a peaceful day.

Tweety covers the President’s statement on single sex marriage.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

More from Tweety on single sex marriage.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Good Morning.

As you make it through the day, don’t forget JJP.

Drop those links. Engage in debate. Give us trivia and gossip too.

And always, have a peaceful day.

Tweety uses his last segment comment to expand on the President’s historical decision.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Ed Schultz talks about the President’s decision.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Rachel Maddow on the President.

He died last week. He was 102.

Yeah, I know. I was thinking the same thing.

If I, or if my spirit gets to ascend opposite to where Reagan’s has likely torpedoed down, I too would be that person, with hand properly raised—during initiation in that great celestial ballroom—asking the Bearded One up front: What’s up with the not-so-good getting to expire way beyond those who don’t at least reach out to hurt others, often—of all things—in your name?

(We could go on for pages, couldn’t we, with examples, but why bother. Oh, is Cheney still around?)

Bibi’s dad, Benzion Netanyahu, and other aggressively old school settlers of pre-Israel invoked God’s name to run off Arabs who had been living on the land for centuries. (Before that, just to show they hardly come with a pristine history, Arabs ran off Africans, according to some black historians.) A lot of Zionists, as was Bibi’s dad, don’t have much patience for the Palestinians with whom they’re supposed to be living side by side. They could be downright nasty to them, in fact.

After I wrote my first piece about Bibi, fellow Jack and Jill Politics blogger RobM offered up a link to a New Yorker article. The piece, written by David Remnick, links Bibi’s beliefs and later behavior as Israel’s prime minister to that of Papa Benzion.

The apple, that is, that didn’t fall from the tree.

“I am not sure that I have ever heard more outrageously reactionary table talk,” Remnick writes after visiting the elder Netanyahu for lunch. “The disdain for Arabs, for Israeli liberals, for any Americans to the left of the neoconservatives was chilling.”

Remnick refuses to specify one “chilling” comment. But it’s pretty much well-documented what Zionist leaders have said about Palestinians and other Arabs. Many have to do with them being sub-humans.

One infamous assertion, from none other than a council of rabbis: “A thousand non-Jewish lives are not worth a Jew’s fingernail.” The council also had no prob subjecting Arab terrorists to medical experiments.

A 2004 U.S. State Department Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for Israel and the Occupied Territories stated the Israeli government itself had done “little to reduce institutional, legal, and societal discrimination against the country’s Arab citizens.”

According to Zionists, God chose them for that land and that’s why they should be there. It really gets no more complicated than that. American politicians, even those who embrace the theology, are too smart to admit they do. (I mean, they would sound too similar to those Moooslem zealots.) Israel, they remind us, is our ally, one of our closest. They’re the lone democracy in that area. I guess that doesn’t count the official status of Palestinians as second class citizens.

As you know, Bibi wants to bomb Iran now. They’re too bomb building and stuff. Plus they’re crazy. Bibi reportedly remains pissed he can’t get Obama to knee-jerk back him. I read today that Bibi’s joined forces with a just-two-days-ago opposition party for more people to see things Bibi’s way–with our without the help of that stealth Muslim in the White House.

Father-son relations are complicated things. Sons love the fathers, emulate them, then often despise them for being so powerful in their lives. Many provide for a breakaway, or, if they’re lucky, one’s provided for them. The less fortunate may be blinded, try as they might not to, by all they know.

Bibi’s dad is dead. So Bibi is suddenly freer, as if he needed help, to be more like the old man.

President Obama took a big step forward today and announced that he finally and wholeheartedly supports the ability of men to marry men, women to marry women and men to marry women. And vice versa. You know what I mean. And he made it in a pretty black way, talking to a black woman – Robin Roberts of ABC. This may be causing some confusion and conflict among some black Christians (or Muslims) you know personally.

Now a slim majority of Americans support gay marriage. And others have spoken pretty loudly in their warm embrace of a popular tv sitcoms, Modern Family, which features a fictional gay marriage with children and of a popular TV show featuring a real-life lesbian who sees herself as married: Ellen Degeneres.

Look in a world where Queen Latifah can finally tell the world she’s gay, be in a gay pride parade and still be in cosmetics commercials, it’s time for an update. I just came home from a family funeral last week. My uncle passed and his funeral took place at the church my grandparents helped to found way back when – Enon Baptist. I’m pretty sure that among my large group of relatives, all of whom voted for Obama, there are some, both young and old (but especially old), who might be startled and even confused at the news that Barack Obama supports same-sex marriage and not just civil unions.

They are like – “What the what?! Wait — he said what now?!? I just voted for a same-sex marriage ban in North Carolina as my pastor said I should. Now I don’t know what’s up and what’s down.”

Ok, so for those of us who are up to date with 21st century realities and culture, it’s up to us to talk to our relations and help them come to grips with this announcement. People need help out there – I know. Mama understands. Here’s some ideas for how to approach this delicate subject with your loved ones.

First, there’s no need in arguing the point about the end times coming. That’s obvious given the impact climate change is clearly having on our weird weather. I recommend conceding that particular point.

That notwithstanding, the President is in no way devaluing traditional marriage between a man and a woman. What does that is when a man beats a woman. Or when a woman has an affair with the deacon of her church. No one is suggesting that you have to go out and marry someone of the same sex. There’s no peer pressure here – it’s not like drugs, per se. Homosexuality doesn’t work like that. You’re either born gay or you’re not. Supporting gay marriage doesn’t mean you’re gay.

Furthermore, marriage is not like your neighborhood. It’s not like if a gay couple moves in, it’s going to run down the values of everyone else’s house. In fact, if anything, your home values may go up! Let’s keep it real, folks.

Those of us who support marriage equality understand that you may believe sincerely and deeply that gay marriage is wrong and sinful and hellfire, damnation, etc, etc. You have every right to that view. We know how much you love Jesus. Do you have the right to impose your deeply-held religious views on others? The U.S. Constitution says you do not. If there are others whose religion says otherwise, do you support the right of others to exercise their religion, even if it means their marriage is recognized by a church not your own?

Here’s a tack: it benefits everyone if same-sex marriage is the law of the land – more stable gay marriages mean less “recruiting”, right? Everyone wins! Try that one and see how it flies.

It would have been helpful if the President had said this yesterday or the day before yesterday before Amendment One in NC passed. Perhaps he was disappointed like the rest of us. (Or under considerable pressure from his own party, big donors and Vice President but let’s not split hairs here.) Still, it’s clear that he’s willing to make a stand. Americans respect a man who stands strongly for his convictions and can justify them morally, even if they disagree. I think Rick Santorum is a great example of that – most people would reject most of his policy remedies outright and are say, pro-contraception for example, but he drew a hardcore audience who liked that he was firmly rooted in a belief system.

The challenge in America is that marriage is something both the state and the church (or temple or mosque) provide. It would be clearer perhaps if the state sanctioned civil unions for everyone and marriage was something that you did in the religious tradition of your choice. Sadly it doesn’t work like that – if it did, I suspect this sitch would be less fraught with emotion. I’d recommend that the President use some Biblical Scripture as he continues to talk about his support for same-sex marriage. Matthew 7:1 comes to mind:

“Judge not, lest ye be judged.”

That will help people understand where he’s coming from. That he’s coming at this from an angle of love, compassion, humanity and tolerance. Talking on TV (video above) about how this is generational and how some of Malia and Sasha’s friends have parents who are gay or lesbian is nice. But more helpful to those who are Christian (or Muslim) might be taking examples of love and tolerance from scripture that bring spiritual light into the darkness of fear, suspicion and hate.

As someone who is straight but has many gay and lesbian friends, some of whom have become parents and some of whom have gotten married, I can say that going to a same-sex wedding is more or less the same as going to a traditional wedding. There’s a lot of love, it’s a happy day filled with poignant memories of people getting a little drunk, dancing and gossiping about each other’s outfits. There’s of course the inevitable relative or two who are salty about the choice of spouse or the choice to marry at all. Just like any marriage between a man and a woman.

Bottom line in talking to your Christian relations: It doesn’t hurt anyone if two people fall in love and want to spend all or part of their lives together, does it? What would Jesus say today, do you think? If you’ve really read about his life in the New Testament, I think you can search in your heart and find the answer.