<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jake Kappus.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jakekappus.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jakekappus.com</link>
	<description>adventures in exchange, music, pro wrestling and whatever else I get myself into</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 21:35:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New design</title>
		<link>http://www.jakekappus.com/2012/02/19/new-design-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jakekappus.com/2012/02/19/new-design-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 20:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Kappus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jakekappus.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jakekappus.com/?p=467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought that with the new adventure, I&#8217;d unveil a new design.  I think it is very appropriate for where things are heading, eh?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought that with the new adventure, I&#8217;d unveil a new design.  I think it is very appropriate for where things are heading, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jakekappus.com/2012/02/19/new-design-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m heading to Microsoft!</title>
		<link>http://www.jakekappus.com/2012/02/19/im-heading-to-microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jakekappus.com/2012/02/19/im-heading-to-microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 19:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Techie Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Kappus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jakekappus.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Premier Field Engineer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jakekappus.com/?p=453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To be candid, Jake – you’re probably about to go through one of the most enriching, and simultaneously humbling, experiences of your technical life. - a former coworker &#38; former Microsoft PFE. After 2 months, 8 interviews (I was interviewing for 3 different roles), some background check drama (no thanks to RMM!), and a few [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"><em>To be candid, Jake – you’re probably about to go through one of the most enriching, and simultaneously humbling, experiences of your technical life. </em>- a former coworker &amp; former Microsoft PFE.</p>
<p>After 2 months, 8 interviews (I was interviewing for 3 different roles), some background check drama (no thanks to RMM!), and a few meetings on where I would best fit, I was finally offered a role at Microsoft.  Next week I will heading to Dallas to start a new adventure as a Premier Field Engineer focusing on Exchange!   I was selected to work with the Public Sector PFE team, so I&#8217;m double happy that I&#8217;ll hopefully get to work with the government again as well.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m excited and yet scared to death.   I&#8217;m still in awe at the thought that I would ever even be considered for employment at Microsoft!  Anyone that knew me coming out of high school, would have never thought in a million years that I would end up where I am today.  Thanks to them, I&#8217;m here today.  Keep on counting me out people!</p>
<p>Like Mike Goldberg of the UFC says before the main event.  Here. We. Go!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jakekappus.com/2012/02/19/im-heading-to-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Autodiscover and you (External Access)&#8230;Part Deux</title>
		<link>http://www.jakekappus.com/2012/02/03/autodiscover-and-you-external-access-part-deux/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jakekappus.com/2012/02/03/autodiscover-and-you-external-access-part-deux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Techie Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ActiveSync]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autodiscover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Client Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange Client Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Kappus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jakekappus.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Guillet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Feltmann]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jakekappus.com/?p=444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, let's talk about how external Exchange 2010 clients discover and are updated when you are not within the friendly confines of your company's network. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I apologize for not writing  part two of this article in a timely matter, then again, when is  anything timely on this blog?  I seem to only get inspiration to write  when it&#8217;s the most inconvenient, of course.  Like at 30,000 feet and all  you have with you is your iPad.  Oh well, adapt and overcome.   If you  want timely news and articles, go visit my boy <a href="http://www.scottfeltmann.com" target="_blank">Scott Feltmann</a>.  Just be  sure to click on his ads there, he needs to buy his future NHL star a new hockey stick.  <img src='http://www.jakekappus.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>So, let&#8217;s talk about how external Exchange 2010 clients discover and are  updated when you are not within the friendly confines of your company&#8217;s  network.</p>
<p>By default, when first creating your profile, if you hadn&#8217;t already  configured it, the Outlook client (2007/2010/2011) will query the  following URL&#8217;s in the following order:</p>
<ol>
<li>The autodiscover service connection point URL (if you are on an active  directory joined workstation).  From the outside this should fail, and  if it doesn&#8217;t, you need a new network security guy.</li>
<li>Then it will query the base domain of the email address you entered in  the second line of the profile creation wizard.  So if your email is  Jake@domain.com, that address would be: https://domain.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml.</li>
<li>Should that fail, it will immediately try http://domain.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml.</li>
<li>When/if that fails, it will then switch to https://autodiscover.domain.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml</li>
<li>Should that fail, it will then try http://autodiscover.domain.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml</li>
</ol>
<p>If you are a visual kind of person (like me), here is the picture of how it works:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="External Autodiscover access" src="http://i.technet.microsoft.com/dynimg/IC114168.gif" alt="External Autodiscover Access" width="429" height="306" /></p>
<p>Now, if your environment is properly configured, this should be all you  need, but there are two other ways that your client can use to find your  shiny new Exchange 2010 environment.</p>
<ol>
<li>The good old fashioned SRV record in DNS.   This method can be used  internally as well.  This can be handy in multiple mail domain scenarios  or migrations between forests.</li>
<li>You can also hard code Autodiscover settings into the registry and  ensure your client doesn&#8217;t have to bother with going to look up it&#8217;s  settings.   Unfortunately, in the event of a change in your Exchange  environment to Autodiscover, this may not get updated and your clients  could be left in the dark.</li>
</ol>
<p>You must be asking at this point &#8220;what method should I configure  here?&#8221;.   Well, it depends on your environment.  Most security conscious  admins really do not like opening port 80 inbound to their Exchange  servers, unless you have something like TMG and UAG and can use the  handy dandy redirect rules there to redirect the client to https, aka  tcp/443.</p>
<p>Since most organizations do not host their own website, it can be  difficult to create a virtual directory under the base domain to forward  to the CAS servers, I usually do not go the first route.</p>
<p>I usually always recommend creating an external DNS record for  autodiscover.domain.com and point that to the same external IP address  as you would for OWA, ActiveSync, Outlook Anywhere, etc.  Finding the  record may take a few extra milliseconds, but it works flawlessly and  doesn&#8217;t require getting the web developers involved and having to  translate your communications to Linux/Apache for them, causing all  sorts of confusion for those that don&#8217;t understand the Microsoft  language of love.  If you have TMG or UAG in your environment, then  publish both http (with a redirect)and https there and off you go!</p>
<p>What&#8217;s that I hear?  You want to know what this does for you?  Well, the  same thing as it does for internal clients!  If you need a refresher,  scroll down and read part 1 of this article.  After the client  authenticates to active directory, which the client will be prompted for  if the client hasn&#8217;t already asked you for your active directory  credentials in the wizard, it will send down to the client the same .XML  file that you get as an internal user, except that since you are now  outside of the company network, the client will read the second half of  the .XML file after the EXPR section, and use those URL&#8217;s to connect to  the various Exchange services such as The availability service, offline  address book, Active Sync (if you are using your phone or tablet) and  the Exchange Control Panel via OWA.  This ensures you can connect to all  of the features of Exchange that you know and love when you are in the  office, but now from that Caribou Coffee shop that you love to sit at  when not in the office.   Pretty cool huh?</p>
<p>You can configure these URL&#8217;s either via the Exchange Management Console  GUI or via the Exchange Management Shell, if you have confidence in  your Powershell-fu.   I have a nifty little script that I <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">stole</span> borrowed from Pat Richard and Patricio Anderson that does the trick, by  setting all of the URL&#8217;s for me automagically with only a few  keystrokes.   Saves me the embarrassment of going back and fixing a typo  later on.</p>
<p>Note that autodiscover does not have a GUI tab to set it&#8217;s URL&#8217;s, and  the external URL is not set by default.   You have to use the EMS to set  the URL&#8217;s for autodiscover.   Note:  if you have multiple sites with  Exchange CAS role servers, do not set the external URL on the sites that  are not Internet facing, this will break your proxy between sites and  will attempt to redirect externally instead.  Only set the external  URL&#8217;s on Internet facing CAS servers!</p>
<p><strong>Pro tip: </strong> Technically, you do not need to add the external URL for Autodiscover as long as your DNS names are correct.  But it is helpful to add them if you are integrated with Lync and/or Sharepoint.</p>
<p>The Powershell command to set autodiscover URL&#8217;s are:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Set-autodiscovervirtualdirectory -identity &#8220;server name/autodiscover (default web site)&#8221; &#8211; externalurl https://autodiscover.domain.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Set this on all of your Internet facing CAS servers (this is where the script comes in handy!) or use remote Powershell instead.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Set the other external URL&#8217;s for the other services as follows:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Set-ewsvirtualdirectory -identity &#8220;server name/EWS (Default web site) -externalurl https://owahostname.domain.com/EWS/exchange.asmx</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Set-owavirtualdirectory -identity &#8220;server name&#8221;/owa (default web site) -externalurl https://owahostname.domain.com/owa</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Set-ecpvirtualdirectory -identity &#8220;server name&#8221;/ecp (default web site) -externalurl https://owahostname.domain.com/ecp</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Set-oabvirtualdirectory -identity &#8220;server name/oab (default web site) -externalurl https://owahostname.domain.com/oab</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Set-activesyncvirtualdirectory -identity &#8220;server name&#8221;/Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync (default web site) -externalurl https://owahostname.domain.com/Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Set-umvirtualdirectory -identity &#8220;server name&#8221;/unifiedmessaging (default web site) -externalurl https://owahostname.domain.com/unifiedmessaging</p>
<p><strong>Pro tip:</strong> you can just type in -id server name/autodiscover* as a faster  way to enter the server name and to prevent using quotes in your  command.</p>
<p>Whew!  That was a lot of commands!  Especially while typing on an iPad!   ensuring your external URL&#8217;s are set properly is a key component to  ensuring your Exchange environment works as designed and keeps your  users happy, which is why we all do this, right?</p>
<p><strong>Pro tip:</strong> do not use your CAS array name as your external URL name.    This can cause performance issues upon connecting to Exchange externally  as the CAS array internal name and IP address are cached and will attempt to  connect to that IP address first before attempting to connect to the external  URL&#8217;s.  Ross Smith of the Exchange Product Team has a great article  about this <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2010/05/20/3409978.aspx" target="_blank">here</a>:</p>
<p>Finally, a lot of my clients ask me if there is any way to control  access to those services from the outside.  Some go as far as not  configuring the external URL&#8217;s, thinking it will prevent access.  Well,  it does, in theory, but then your services do not work properly!  If  security is a concern, consider using Microsoft Unified Access Gateway to lock down access to these  services to specific groups of users, or even specific workstations.    There are ways to only allow specific types of phones and active sync  devices via the active sync policies.  You could even go as far as  implementing certificate based authentication with TMG.  My compadre  Jeff Gulliet has a phenomenal article about how to implement that  solution <a href="http://www.expta.com/2010/02/how-to-securely-deploy-iphones-with.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>Thats all folks!  As usual, leave your comments below and have a great day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jakekappus.com/2012/02/03/autodiscover-and-you-external-access-part-deux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Autodiscover and you&#8230;part 1</title>
		<link>http://www.jakekappus.com/2011/10/04/autodiscover-and-you-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jakekappus.com/2011/10/04/autodiscover-and-you-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 04:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Techie Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autodiscover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Kappus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jakekappus.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outlook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jakekappus.com/?p=431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may be tempted to wing it Use a hardcoded link submit it But performance will suffer When you’re left to your druthers Should have Autodiscovered Then all would be well The Autodiscover Song http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2008/08/08/3406026.aspx I usually don&#8217;t like to write how-to articles.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I love helping people and that&#8217;s why I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #808080;"><em>You may be tempted to wing it<br />
Use a hardcoded link submit it<br />
But performance will suffer<br />
When you’re left to your druthers<br />
Should have Autodiscovered<br />
Then all would be well</em></span><br />
<strong>The Autodiscover Song<br />
</strong><a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2008/08/08/3406026.aspx">http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2008/08/08/3406026.aspx</a><strong> </strong></p>
<p>I usually don&#8217;t like to write how-to articles.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I love helping people and that&#8217;s why I love consulting, but I leave the how-to articles to my friends <a href="http://www.scottfeltmann.com/" target="_blank">Scott Feltmann</a>, <a href="http://www.shudnow.net/" target="_blank">Elan Shudnow</a> and <a href="http://www.expta.com/" target="_blank">Jeff Guillet</a>.   Me on the other hand, am an <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjtyR2oxZKk" target="_blank">entertainer</a>, always have been.   I like to hit the topics that no one usually wants to touch.  Like our friend the Exchange Autodiscover service.</p>
<p>Over the past few months, I&#8217;ve been called in by several clients to clean up the work of other &#8220;Exchange experts&#8221; who underbid me (well, the company I work for), and then pass off the work as a job well done.   Then, when they leave and move on to their next work of art, the clients call me back and ask them to fix the laundry list of &#8220;out of scope&#8221; issues the &#8220;expert&#8221; left behind.</p>
<p>More times than most, one thing fixes 90% of these issues.  Sing it with me kids&#8230;.A-U-T-O-D-I-S-C-O-V-E-R.</p>
<p><strong>What Does Autodiscover do?</strong></p>
<p>Why, I&#8217;m so glad you asked!    Here is the official Technet description of the service.  (Yes, I am the MASTER of cut and paste!)</p>
<p>The Autodiscover service does the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>Automatically configures user profile settings for clients running Microsoft Office Outlook 2007 or Outlook 2010, as well as supported mobile phones. Phones running Windows Mobile 6.1 or a later version are supported. If your phone isn&#8217;t a Windows Mobile phone, check your mobile phone documentation to see if it&#8217;s supported.</li>
<li>Provides access to Exchange features for Outlook 2007 or Outlook 2010 clients that are connected to your Exchange messaging environment.</li>
<li>Uses a user&#8217;s e-mail address and password to provide profile settings to Outlook 2007 or Outlook 2010 clients and supported mobile phones. If the Outlook client is joined to a domain, the user&#8217;s domain account is used.</li>
</ul>
<p>Now, that&#8217;s pretty self-explanatory, right?   From what I&#8217;m seeing in the field, I think most people are reading the first sentence and clicking the next link.  (<em>&#8230;and I thought I had a severe case of ADD!</em>)<em> </em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong><em>AUTODISCOVER DOES MUCH MORE THAN PROFILE CREATION PEOPLE!</em></strong></span></p>
<p>Let’s read the second bullet, <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong><em>you know, the one they didn&#8217;t read!</em></strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Provides access to Exchange features for Outlook 2007 or Outlook 2010 clients that are connected to your Exchange messaging environment.</li>
</ul>
<p>Now, first a little bit of side info that&#8217;s pretty valuable for this topic.  Exchange 2007 and 2010 uses Exchange Web Services (EWS) to serve clients like Outlook 2007, 2010, (2011 for you Mac users), OWA, ActiveSync, and even that waste of silicon the Blackberry.</p>
<p>No really, I may end up voting Republican if Obama doesn&#8217;t ditch the BB and get a <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/" target="_blank">real phone</a>.</p>
<p>Outlook 2000 or 2003 does not use the Autodiscover service.  But that doesn&#8217;t mean you shouldn&#8217;t deploy it if you use those clients exclusively.  Remember those ActiveSync clients, they need some Autodiscover love too!</p>
<p>If you are still on Office 98 call me, please. I&#8217;ll steal some 2007 or 2010 licenses for you somehow.  (Kidding!)</p>
<p>With EWS, these clients get the much improved Availability Service (Free/Busy for those of you still suck on 2003), Out of Office, MailTips, Offline Address Book and even access to the new, and seriously cool Exchange Control Panel, securely and efficiently! (read: No WebDav!)</p>
<p>Besides, when you take advantage of that new kick-ass cross-site DAG you just implemented, how are your Outlook clients going to find their mailbox after your basement datacenter just took in several hundred gallons of the Minnesota River, and you (thankfully) failed over to the backup datacenter?  Magic?  A quick desktop support staff?  Nope, Autodiscover.</p>
<p><strong>So here’s how it works:</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><img class="alignnone" title="Autodiscover Graphic" src="http://i.technet.microsoft.com/dynimg/IC81000.gif" alt="Autodiscover Graphic " width="448" height="287" /><br />
</strong></p>
<p>When you first setup the Outlook or ActiveSync client internally from a domain joined client, the client will query the Autodiscover Service Connection Point for the list of CAS servers. The client sends an HTTP POST command to the Autodiscover service. This command includes XML data that requests the connection settings and URLs for the Exchange services that are associated with the Outlook provider. The service will gather the locations of the different Exchange Web Services (EWS) from Active Directory which will then present the client with the results in an HTTP request formatted in XML.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jakekappus.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/autodiscoverxml.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-436" title="autodiscover xml" src="http://www.jakekappus.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/autodiscoverxml.png" alt="" width="448" height="220" /></a></p>
<p><strong>What if something changes or breaks?</strong></p>
<p>The Outlook client queries Autodiscover periodically (<a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee237674%28EXCHG.80%29.aspx" target="_blank">1 hour</a>).  If there are changes in the Exchange architecture, Autodiscover will change the profile automatically. If Outlook fails to connect to the Exchange server, it will attempt to connect to the URL’s it was presented every five minutes.</p>
<p>Now when the underlying network layer disconnects, after the first initial reconnection, Outlook’s MAPI layer will attempt to query Autodiscover every six hours.</p>
<p><strong>Note:  For the client changes to take effect, you still need to restart the client or do a manual “Repair” under Account Settings. </strong></p>
<p><strong>The Service Connection Point</strong></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s talk about the SCP Connection point.  This is AUTOMAGICALLY created by setup when you install the Client Access Role.   Setup will register this connection point under the CN=Services, CN=Microsoft Exchange, CN=Administrative Groups, CN=”AG NAME”, CN=Servers, CN=Servername, CN=Protocols, CN=Autodiscover container.  The Internal domain joined Outlook client will query AD for these connection points.  AD will return a list (one for every CAS server in the organization and another set of lists with the CAS servers in your site and outside your site), and will usually take the first one in the closest or same AD Site on the list.</p>
<p>Now before you go all ADSIEdit on your NTDS.dit, hold yer horses!  You do realize you have options that do not involve an authoritative restore after you accidentally bump the delete key on the root container, right?   In the Exchange Management Shell (oh come on, Powershell isn&#8217;t that bad!), you can use your carefully planned out Autodiscover URL to set the Autodiscover Internal URI value.</p>
<p>Set-ClientAccessServer -Identity &#8220;CAS-01&#8243; -AutoDiscoverServiceInternalUri <a href="https://cas01.contoso.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml">https://cas01.contoso.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml</a></p>
<p>Do this on every CAS server in your organization and it will return a properly formatted list to you every time.   Well, maybe.  Unless you neglected to plan for Autodiscover properly and did not include the server (or another hostname like Autodiscover) name on your brand new and very carefully crafted SAN certificate.</p>
<p>If this happens, you get the dreaded certificate error!  Plan, plan, plan, I say!</p>
<p><a href="../../../../../wp-content/uploads/2011/10/certerror.png"></a><a href="http://www.jakekappus.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/certerror.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-433" title="certificate error" src="http://www.jakekappus.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/certerror.png" alt="" width="405" height="289" /></a></p>
<p>Certificates are another thing that gets a lot of “experts” into trouble.    Microsoft recommends using a SAN (Subject Alternative Name) Certificate, also called a UC (Unified Communications) Certificate.    A lot of them try get away with using a single name certificate, but it really is more trouble than it is worth.  I never recommend their use.</p>
<p>Make sure whatever name you use for your Autodiscover url, there is a valid certificate imported and assigned in Exchange with that name in the SAN field!</p>
<p>The names Microsoft recommends are:</p>
<p>CN (Common Name): *owaname*. Domain.com<br />
SAN: Autodiscover.domain.com<br />
SAN: legacy.domain.com (for legacy coexistience to Exchange 2003, if needed)</p>
<p><em>Note:  Personally, I like to add the local CAS server names into the cert as well, just to cover for any static client issues or testing.  It is not required though by any means.  With properly configured URL’s, you do not need to add them.  It’s just my personal preference after some late nights of troubleshooting some wacky environments. YMMV </em><em>J</em></p>
<p>I could go much deeper into this subject, but I’m out of…ahem, beverages.   In Part II of this thrilling series on Autodiscover, I will go into external Autodiscover configuration, OCS/Lync dependencies, and how your phone finds Exchange from anywhere in the world.</p>
<p>For more information:</p>
<p><strong>White Paper: Exchange 2007 Autodiscover Service<br />
</strong><a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb332063%28EXCHG.80%29.aspx">http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb332063%28EXCHG.80%29.aspx</a></p>
<p><strong>Understanding the Autodiscover Service: Exchange 2010 SP1</strong><br />
<a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124251.aspx">http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124251.aspx</a></p>
<p>And if you’re really geeky:<br />
<strong>[MS-OXDISCO]: Autodiscover HTTP Service Protocol Specification<br />
</strong><a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc433481%28EXCHG.80%29.aspx">http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc433481%28EXCHG.80%29.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jakekappus.com/2011/10/04/autodiscover-and-you-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oops&#8230; Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010 update snafu!</title>
		<link>http://www.jakekappus.com/2011/07/22/oops-forefront-endpoint-protection-2010-update-snafu/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jakekappus.com/2011/07/22/oops-forefront-endpoint-protection-2010-update-snafu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jakekappus.com/?p=424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday&#8217;s definition update for Forefront Endpoint Protection and Security Essentials apparently wasn&#8217;t tested by Microsoft as the engines flagged a temp file in the update as Adware:Win32/Hotbar. I experienced this as well, but just removed after some investigation, I just let FEP remove the file and all was fine.  It was a temp file anyway [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday&#8217;s definition update for Forefront Endpoint Protection and Security Essentials apparently wasn&#8217;t tested by Microsoft as the engines flagged a temp file in the update as <strong>Adware:Win32/Hotbar. </strong>I experienced this as well, but just removed after some investigation, I just let FEP remove the file and all was fine.  It was a temp file anyway and the definition was already installed and fine as is.</p>
<p>Before going to bed I checked, and sure enough at 9:30pm CDT, the updated definition files were installed by Windows Update.  I could see where this could be a problem for large FEP environments though.  I would think though that you can use SCCM to suppress the warnings for the user and then just deal with the reports and alerts from there.</p>
<p>This was posted on the Microsoft Malware Protection Center:</p>
<blockquote><p>On Jul 21, 2011 05:35 AM UTC, an update caused a temporary file related to the next Microsoft definition update to be incorrectly detected as Adware:Win32/Hotbar. At 08:51 PM UTC, Microsoft released a new signature to address the issue. Signature versions 1.109.92.0 and higher include this fix.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m hearing a lot of upset customers screaming at Microsoft for this.   Really?  No sense in getting wound up over a simple mistake.  It wasn&#8217;t even a virus, but just a typo in signature file that was caught.  Things happen, people make mistakes.  Exchange volumes were not formatted twice over because of it&#8230; move on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jakekappus.com/2011/07/22/oops-forefront-endpoint-protection-2010-update-snafu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Determining the Exchange 2010 build number via the Exchange Management Shell</title>
		<link>http://www.jakekappus.com/2011/07/17/determining-the-exchange-2010-build-number-via-the-exchange-management-shell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jakekappus.com/2011/07/17/determining-the-exchange-2010-build-number-via-the-exchange-management-shell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 01:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Techie Stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jakekappus.com/?p=407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was doing some ancillary work for a client this week and decided to do a quickie look over of their Exchange 2010 environment.  First thing I usually check is what service pack and update rollup they are running on their Exchange servers.   I&#8217;ll admit, I&#8217;ve been working on a pretty big Exchange 2007 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="line-height: normal;"><br />
</span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="line-height: normal;">I was doing some ancillary work for a client this week and decided to do a quickie look over of their Exchange 2010 environment.  First thing I usually check is what service pack and update rollup they are running on their Exchange servers.   I&#8217;ll admit, I&#8217;ve been working on a pretty big Exchange 2007 months so my 2010-fu may be rusty.</span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="line-height: normal;"><br />
</span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="line-height: normal;">So, I did the usual:</span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="line-height: normal;"><br />
</span></span></div>
<p><a href="http://www.jakekappus.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/image0011.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-409" title="Get-ExchangeServer | ft AdminDisplayVersion" src="http://www.jakekappus.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/image0011.png" alt="" width="602" height="98" /></a></p>
<p>I think&#8230; hmmm&#8230; client didn&#8217;t install any of the roll-ups since SP1 .   So I look at Windows Update&#8217;s Check Updates screen.</p>
<p>Windows Update says:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jakekappus.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/image002.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-410" title="Windows Update Says Update Rollup 2 is installed" src="http://www.jakekappus.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/image002.png" alt="" width="392" height="63" /></a></p>
<p>Google time!   Microsoft says this is the build number for UR2:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jakekappus.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/image003.png"><img title="Exchange 2010 Build Numbers" src="http://www.jakekappus.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/image003.png" alt="" width="572" height="195" /></a></p>
<p>I knew at this point something was up.  Then I remembered a<a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh135098.aspx" target="_blank"> post</a> I read on Technet a while back, but never bothered to file back into the inner caverns of my brain and decided to try another method.  I knew that this command:</p>
<p><strong> GCM exsetup |%{$_.Fileversioninfo}</strong></p>
<p>Would pull the correct file version number from AD and voila!  You get the correct build number.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jakekappus.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/image005.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-412" title="GCM exsetup |%{$_.Fileversioninfo}" src="http://www.jakekappus.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/image005.png" alt="" width="779" height="89" /></a></p>
<p>Sneaky bastages!</p>
<p>Now what bothers me is that Microsoft still mentions the incorrect way in the Technet article:</p>
<p><a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh135098.aspx">http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh135098.aspx</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.jakekappus.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/buildnumbers1.png"><img title="buildnumbers" src="http://www.jakekappus.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/buildnumbers1-1024x304.png" alt="" width="614" height="182" /></a></p>
<p>But then at the very bottom:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jakekappus.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Untitled-picture.png"><img class="alignnone size-large wp-image-415" title="Explanation" src="http://www.jakekappus.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Untitled-picture-1024x82.png" alt="" width="717" height="57" /></a></p>
<p>Why do they make this so difficult for us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jakekappus.com/2011/07/17/determining-the-exchange-2010-build-number-via-the-exchange-management-shell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TechEd 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.jakekappus.com/2011/05/15/teched-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jakekappus.com/2011/05/15/teched-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 14:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Techie Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Kappus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechEd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jakekappus.com/2011/05/15/teched-2011/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Didn&#8217;t think I would make it this year, but I made it to TechEd 2011 in Atlanta. This year I even smartened up by not lugging my beast of a laptop and dealing with a four hour battery life. This year I&#8217;ve armed myself with a shiny new iPad! Not to mention, I&#8217;ve finally gone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t think I would make it this year, but I made it to TechEd 2011 in Atlanta.  This year I even smartened up by not lugging my beast of a laptop and dealing with a four hour battery life. This year I&#8217;ve armed myself with a shiny new iPad!  Not to mention, I&#8217;ve finally gone with just a carryon instead of checking luggage, but that&#8217;s another post. </p>
<p>This morning I&#8217;m sitting with my coworker <a href=<a href="http://www.scottfeltmann.com">Scott Feltmann</a> taking in the Mastering Exchange 2010  High Availability pre-conference seminar.  A little early on a Sunday to be talking Exchange, but hey, it&#8217;s TechEd!</p>
<p>Now I just need to find some good southern BBQ here in Hotlanta. How many miles is it to Fat Boys in Montgomery AL?   The south&#8217;s best BBQ!   </p>
<p>I digress, again&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jakekappus.com/2011/05/15/teched-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beware of &#8220;computer experts&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.jakekappus.com/2011/04/25/beware-of-computer-experts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jakekappus.com/2011/04/25/beware-of-computer-experts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 05:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Techie Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad recommendations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Kappus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NTFS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stone Cold Steve Austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WCCO Tech Guy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jakekappus.com/?p=398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On my way home from Chicago this weekend I was scanning the radio for things to listen to.  I was almost to Eau Claire when I hit WCCO in Minneapolis and they were airing a call-in show that had a local &#8220;computer expert&#8221; talking and helping people with their home computer issues. I normally just [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On my way home from Chicago this weekend I was scanning the radio for things to listen to.  I was almost to Eau Claire when I hit <a href="http://wcco.com" target="_blank">WCCO</a> in Minneapolis and they were airing a call-in show that had a local &#8220;computer expert&#8221; talking and helping people with their home computer issues.</p>
<p>I normally just take these shows with a grain of salt and move on, but this guy really struck a nerve with me for some reason.   He did have some good recommendations, for example he recommended to a caller, as do I, to use  <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/security/pc-security/mse.aspx" target="_blank">Microsoft Security Essentials</a> for home anti-virus.   However, I&#8217;m pretty sure this guy owns stock in Google because every other word out of his mouth was promoting some Google app.</p>
<p>His first recommendation was for everyone to organize their files into folders (which I agree with), but he said emphatically that this would &#8220;greatly speed up your computer&#8221;.</p>
<p>Really?  Let&#8217;s debunk that one right now.</p>
<p>Sure, you&#8217;ll be able to find that picture that your camera named &#8220;pic20382172934.jpg&#8221; easier by organizing them in folders (which Windows Photo Viewer does by default anyway), but with a little research about <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc781134(WS.10).aspx" target="_blank">NTFS</a>, which is the file system that Windows XP and newer uses by default, you&#8217;ll know that it does not significantly improve disk or Windows performance.</p>
<p>NTFS uses a relational database to keep track of where files and folders on your disk.  When you create, delete, rename, move, whatever, a file, it just updates the entry in the MFT (Master File Table).</p>
<p>First, a little info on how disks actually store your data.  When you create a new Word document called &#8220;Document1.docx&#8221; , hopefully if there is room, Windows will try to write the file intact to a place on the hard disk (or multiple disks if you use RAID), if not, it will fragment it and squeeze it into places where it can fit the pieces into.  NTFS will document the locations on the disk where the file pieces are located in the MFT.  It&#8217;s much more complicated than this, but I&#8217;m trying to keep this article on level 100 here.</p>
<p>Now let&#8217;s draw this out a little bit:  (Assume we are on Windows XP)</p>
<p>When you access <em>filename.doc</em> in C:\Documents and Settings\Jake\My Documents (wait, that&#8217;s a pretty good folder structure right there!) , Windows will look for the location(s) of the file in the MFT and begin the process of putting the pieces back together in RAM (physical or virtual) and present to to the application (Word).</p>
<p>If I put that file into a folder, all that is happening is the entry in the MFT is being updated.  And technically, if you consider there are change logs and junction points to consider in all of this, if you were to suddenly reorganize that 1000 picture gallery into photos in a weekend, technically you could slow Windows down for a little while until the Change Journal fills up and then purges, or even while the indexing service catches up with your changes.</p>
<p>But, I suppose it will <em>feel faster </em>if you sort those files into a pretty folder structure.  I&#8217;m saying you shouldn&#8217;t organize your files, because you should just for your own sanity and others who may access your systems.  But to think that it will in any way speed things up is ludicrous.</p>
<p>His second <em>recommendation </em> was to move everything to the cloud, <em>INCLUDING </em> private personal financial data.  He went as far as recommending a service that I had never heard of just because &#8220;they encrypt your data&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jakekappus.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Really-Really.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-399" title="The Miz - Really?" src="http://www.jakekappus.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Really-Really-223x300.jpg" alt="" width="223" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>As the &#8220;Awesome&#8221; one says.  So, this expert is telling people to upload your budgets, or maybe the doc about your 401K, or maybe even the files with your passwords to your credit card websites, to &#8220;the Cloud&#8221;.  I&#8217;m down with the cloud for some things.  Music, video, gaming.  But like hell can I ever recommend you put your ultra personal files to someone else&#8217;s datacenter in god knows what country.   It&#8217;s the same idea as me collecting the copies of your birth certificates and saying &#8220;they&#8217;ll be fine here in my bottom drawer&#8230; I lock it.&#8221;   If you trust that, then I&#8217;ve got a new business idea! <img src='http://www.jakekappus.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Did this guy ever bother to read the <a href="http://www.google.com/accounts/TOS?hl=en" target="_blank">Terms of Use</a> for Google Docs?</p>
<blockquote><p>4.1	Google has subsidiaries and affiliated legal entities around the world (“Subsidiaries and Affiliates”). Sometimes, these companies will be providing the Services to you on behalf of Google itself. You acknowledge and agree that Subsidiaries and Affiliates will be entitled to provide the Services to you.</p>
<p>4.3	As part of this continuing innovation, you acknowledge and agree that Google may stop (permanently or temporarily) providing the Services (or any features within the Services) to you or to users generally at Google’s sole discretion, without prior notice to you. You may stop using the Services at any time. You do not need to specifically inform Google when you stop using the Services.</p>
<p>4.4	You acknowledge and agree that if Google disables access to your account, you may be prevented from accessing the Services, your account details or any files or other content which is contained in your account.</p></blockquote>
<p>And, if you sign up now, you also get:</p>
<blockquote><p>1.3	You understand that Google, in performing the required technical steps to provide the Services to our users, may (a) transmit or distribute your Content over various public networks and in various media; and (b) make such changes to your Content as are necessary to conform and adapt that Content to the technical requirements of connecting networks, devices, services or media. You agree that this license shall permit Google to take these actions.</p></blockquote>
<p>So, not only can Google take away your access to your docs, but they can also transmit them over public networks and make any changes they want to it.</p>
<p>Now&#8230; how&#8217;s that cloud looking now?    His idea of moving all of your pics to Picasa was equally as short sighted.  With the Feds having access to Google&#8217;s datacenter, do you really want those<a title="Link to ABC News story" href="http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Weekend/parents-sue-wal-mart-children-bath-time-photos/story?id=8622696" target="_blank"> bathtub pics of the kids</a> (come on, we all have them) up where someone could take those pics the wrong way and suddenly your in deep doo doo over them.  (And yes, it&#8217;s safe to click that link, it&#8217;s not pics of my kids in the bathtub.  It&#8217;s a link to an ABC News story about a family that was terrorized by Child Protective Services over bathtub photos. )</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying don&#8217;t use Google Docs or that Google is evil because I use their services too.  But I keep my important data in places that I always have access to.   I use Google Docs for quick access to some things, but nothing involving personal data.</p>
<p>My point in all of this is that with technology, no matter what it is, is so deep an wide.  No one knows everything about anything in this field and it takes a lot of work to get good at a very very small subset of this technology thing.  A lot of people will project themselves as experts or professionals, and either know just enough to be dangerous, or really will be an expert.  Unfortunately, there are FAR more of the dangerous type out there than the true experts.</p>
<p>How do you weed the dangerous clowns out?   Get multiple opinions, check credentials, look to see if the person quotes official  documentation and best practices when making a recommendation.  If they tell you &#8220;trust me, I&#8217;ve been doing this for X years&#8221;, run away.  Look for someone who has done it for X amount of years <strong>AND</strong> has the credentials and documentation behind them to prove it.     And don&#8217;t believe everything you hear in the media or god forbid Facebook.  If I hear another virus hoax or viral post about using HTTPS on Facebook will prevent someone from hacking your account, I&#8217;ll go<a title="Steve Austin and a beer truck" href="http://cdn.bleacherreport.net/images_root/slides/photos/000/725/051/22steveaustinbeertruck_display_image.jpg?" target="_blank"> Stone Cold Steve Austin</a> on everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jakekappus.com/2011/04/25/beware-of-computer-experts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This is why you should not delete the transaction logs&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.jakekappus.com/2011/02/01/how-not-to-spend-your-weekends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jakekappus.com/2011/02/01/how-not-to-spend-your-weekends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 04:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Techie Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESEUtil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacob Kappus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Kappus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kroll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jakekappus.com/?p=391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cost of Exchange Consultant to help attempt to recover your database = $124,000 Cost for Kroll OnTrack to write custom software to recover your damaged database = $120,000 Reliable and verified Exchange aware backups: Nice Implementing high availability using best practices: Priceless]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jakekappus.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/eseutil.gif"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-390" title="eseutil" src="http://www.jakekappus.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/eseutil.gif" alt="" width="627" height="432" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Cost of Exchange Consultant to help attempt to recover your database</strong> = <span style="color: #ff0000;">$124,000</span></p>
<p><strong>Cost for Kroll OnTrack to write custom software to recover your damaged database</strong> = <span style="color: #ff0000;">$120,000</span></p>
<p><strong>Reliable and verified Exchange aware backups</strong>: <span style="color: #008000;"><strong><span style="color: #000080;">Nice</span></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #008000;"><strong><span style="color: #000000;">Implementing high availability using best practices: <span style="color: #008000;">Priceless</span></span></strong></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jakekappus.com/2011/02/01/how-not-to-spend-your-weekends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Be careful what you wish for&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://www.jakekappus.com/2011/01/16/be-careful-what-you-wish-for/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jakekappus.com/2011/01/16/be-careful-what-you-wish-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Kappus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jakekappus.com/?p=383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I laugh when people rejoice about the iPhone coming to the Verizon network.  I usually just think, good, now they can feel the pain that us AT&#38;T users have been feeling for years.  And maybe it will take some of the strain off of AT&#38;T&#8217;s network when we finally get HSPA+.  I have an iPhone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I laugh when people rejoice about the iPhone coming to the Verizon network.  I usually just think, good, now they can feel the pain that us AT&amp;T users have been feeling for years.  And maybe it will take some of the strain off of AT&amp;T&#8217;s network when we finally get HSPA+.  I have an iPhone and haven&#8217;t had an issue yet other than in high concentrated areas of cellular users (TechEd in New Orleans or in Manhattan).   I will never go back to an Android phone either, but that&#8217;s another blog post.</p>
<p>This article goes in depth into why the Verizon iPhone offering may not be as cool as everyone thinks&#8230;</p>
<h2><a href="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/2011/01/verizons_iphone_full_of_tradeoffs_good_and_bad.html" target="_blank">Verizon&#8217;s iPhone Full of Tradeoffs, Good and Bad</a></h2>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jakekappus.com/2011/01/16/be-careful-what-you-wish-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
