<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Jenkins Blog</title>
	
	<link>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog</link>
	<description>Collaborative blog written by the staff of the Philadelphia-based Jenkins Law Library</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:09:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/jenkinsblog" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
		<title>MS Office on the Web</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/jenkinsblog/~3/KWjHolMoLsE/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/14/ms-office-on-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Giancaterino, Internet Librarian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/?p=2831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Monday Microsoft announced Office 2010, which will feature Web versions of Word, Excel, OneNote, and PowerPoint. Here are the high points, according to Wired&#8217;s Webmonkey blog:

The Web apps will be free if      you have a Windows Live account.  However, they will feature ads.
The apps will feature    [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Monday Microsoft <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2009/jul09/07-13Office2010WPCPR.mspx">announced</a> <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/office/2010/">Office 2010</a>, which will feature Web versions of Word, Excel, OneNote, and PowerPoint. Here are the high points, according to <a href="http://www.webmonkey.com/blog/Microsoft_Office_on_the_Web%3A_What_it_Is_and_What_it_Isn_t">Wired&#8217;s Webmonkey blog</a>:</p>
<ul>
<li>The Web apps will be free if      you have a <a href="https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?rollrs=12&amp;lic=1">Windows Live</a> account.  However, they will feature ads.</li>
<li>The apps will feature      &#8220;easy viewing and lightweight editing&#8221;, meaning you&#8217;ll probably      have to rely on desktop apps to create documents first, then upload them      to the Web.</li>
<li>The Web apps will work with      IE, Firefox and Safari, but not Chrome. (Take that, Google!)</li>
<li>Eventually all the Web apps      will feature real-time collaboration, so two people can simultaneously edit      the same doc.</li>
</ul>
<p>Is there anything here that would make me want to switch from Google Docs or <a href="http://www.zoho.com/">Zoho</a>? In a word, Nah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/14/ms-office-on-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/14/ms-office-on-the-web/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#x2019;m Not Passing Judgement &#x2026;</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/jenkinsblog/~3/yKwwkhMyqRM/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/13/im-not-passing-judgement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Giancaterino, Internet Librarian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets & Tech Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/?p=2825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; But this story is, well, amusing. Especially since the girl didn&#8217;t get hurt. I&#8217;m just glad my own King of Texts &#8212; 7513 last month! &#8212; does the bulk of his from the couch.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; But <a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/07/girl-falls-into-manhole-while-texting-parents-sue/">this story</a> is, well, amusing. Especially since the girl didn&#8217;t get hurt. I&#8217;m just glad my own <a href="http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/05/14/new-personal-record/">King of Texts</a> &#8212; 7513 last month! &#8212; does the bulk of his from the couch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/13/im-not-passing-judgement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/13/im-not-passing-judgement/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7? Let Me Sleep On That.</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/jenkinsblog/~3/OeY_esoGp7s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/13/windows-7-let-me-sleep-on-that/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Giancaterino, Internet Librarian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/?p=2816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A survey by ScriptLogic Corp indicates that most companies will not switch over to Windows 7 when it ships this coming October. About 60% of the 1,000 companies responding indicated that they do not intend to use Windows 7. Of the remainder, 34% &#8220;will deploy it by the end of 2010&#8243; &#8212; meaning that they&#8217;ll [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE56C0NC20090713">A survey by ScriptLogic Corp</a> indicates that most companies will not switch over to Windows 7 when it ships this coming October. About 60% of the 1,000 companies responding indicated that they do not intend to use Windows 7. Of the remainder, 34% &#8220;will deploy it by the end of 2010&#8243; &#8212; meaning that they&#8217;ll wait for Windows 7 Service Pack 1, a wise policy if you ask me.</p>
<p>Win7 is a <a href="http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/06/03/stuff-only-an-operating-system-geek-could-love/">breath of fresh air</a> after Vista. Why are companies so skitterish about it?</p>
<p>&#8220;Forty-two percent said their biggest reason for avoiding Windows 7 was a &#8216;lack of time and resources&#8217;. That dovetailed with another part of the survey, which found that 35 percent had already skipped upgrades or delayed purchases to save money. But there were reasons other than money for staying away from Windows 7. Another 39 percent of those surveyed said they had concern about the compatibility of Windows 7 with existing applications.&#8221;</p>
<p>Lack of time and resources to upgrade the OS. Saving money. Compatibility issues. Now who&#8217;s been talking about addressing these problems lately? Right, <a href="http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/08/im-ready-just-tell-me-when-i-can-download-it/">I remember now</a> &#8230; Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/13/windows-7-let-me-sleep-on-that/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/13/windows-7-let-me-sleep-on-that/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Please Help Me By Clicking On This Blog Post</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/jenkinsblog/~3/aBEA3yauFdw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/13/please-help-me-by-clicking-on-this-blog-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Giancaterino, Internet Librarian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/?p=2810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington Post allegedly let a contract columnist go because his Web traffic had plummeted in recent months. Dan Froomkin, who authored the White House Watch blog, was fired in late June. (He&#8217;s since been hired by The Huffington Post.) According to an article in the NY Times:
&#8220;The paper’s ombudsman, Andrew Alexander, said in a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The Washington Post</em> allegedly let a contract columnist go because his Web traffic had plummeted in recent months. Dan Froomkin, who authored the <a href="http://busharchive.froomkin.com/goodbye.htm">White House Watch blog</a>, was fired in late June. (He&#8217;s since been hired by <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dan-froomkin">The Huffington Post</a>.) According to an <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/13/business/media/13froomkin.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss">article in the NY Times</a>:</p>
<p>&#8220;The paper’s ombudsman, Andrew Alexander, said in a blog post that &#8216;reduced traffic played a big role&#8217; in the decision. Fred Hiatt, the editorial page editor of The Post, told The City Paper that &#8216;his traffic had gone way down.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>IMHO much of Froomkin&#8217;s problem stems from the fact that he was a one-trick pony. He made his rep by attacking the Bush Administration. In hindsight, I guess it was inevitable that his page hits would go down after the inauguration in January.</p>
<p>But not me. I love everybody. OK, maybe not Microsoft all that much. But everybody else. So spread the love and help me with my page hits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/13/please-help-me-by-clicking-on-this-blog-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/13/please-help-me-by-clicking-on-this-blog-post/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Lentz School Security, 2008-2009 ed.</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/jenkinsblog/~3/ivGOZKvtxIk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/13/lentz-school-security-2008-2009-ed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malgorzata Pawska, Web Content Coordinator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New & Noteworthy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/7/13/lentz-school-security,-2008-2009-ed./</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ By Mary A. LentzThis title provides useful guidance, practical advice, relevant statutes, and case law for addressing school security and safety issues. Topics include interviewing children, identifying volatile situations, and techniques for intervention. Additional administrative tools include expertly drafted checklists on issues from hiring procedures and attendance to addressing bomb threats, making this title [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.jenkinslaw.org/collection/images/july09-13Lentzschoolsec.jpg" border="" hspace="5" vspace="3" align="left"/><font color="#777777"><b> By Mary A. Lentz</b></font><br /><p>This title provides useful guidance, practical advice, relevant statutes, and case law for addressing school security and safety issues. Topics include interviewing children, identifying volatile situations, and techniques for intervention. Additional administrative tools include expertly drafted checklists on issues from hiring procedures and attendance to addressing bomb threats, making this title an all-in-one resource for attorneys, teachers, principals, sheriffs, superintendents, school board members, and anyone else dedicated to making their schools safer.</p>
<br /><font size=1><a href="http://jac.jenkinslaw.org/record=b764305">Library Record</a> &#149; <a href="http://www.jenkinslaw.org/services/documents.php">Borrow it</a> &#149; <a href="http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/category/new-n-noteworthy/">More Titles</a></font>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/13/lentz-school-security-2008-2009-ed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/13/lentz-school-security-2008-2009-ed/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Sixty Bucks a Year for the Online NY Times?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/jenkinsblog/~3/mAu9JyqT4pQ/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/10/sixty-bucks-a-year-for-the-online-ny-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Giancaterino, Internet Librarian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/?p=2802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or maybe $30. They&#8217;re testing the waters. It&#8217;s not stated specifically in the article, but I think these rates would apply to existing print subscribers, just like the online WSJ is $21 extra for people who get the dead tree version.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or maybe $30. They&#8217;re <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=a8GofbbtFf8w">testing the waters</a>. It&#8217;s not stated specifically in the article, but I think these rates would apply to existing print subscribers, just like the online WSJ is <a href="https://order.wsj.com/sub/f2">$21 extra</a> for people who get the dead tree version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/10/sixty-bucks-a-year-for-the-online-ny-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/10/sixty-bucks-a-year-for-the-online-ny-times/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Kindle 2 Now $299</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/jenkinsblog/~3/aFgLMZdUnf0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/08/kindle-2-now-299/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Giancaterino, Internet Librarian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets & Tech Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leisure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libraries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/?p=2797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WSJ&#8217;s Digits blog reports that Amazon has lowered the price of the Kindle 2 by $60 to $299. That&#8217;s good news &#8212; almost as good as the $99 iPhone 3G.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WSJ&#8217;s Digits blog <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/07/08/amazon-cuts-kindle-price-by-50/">reports</a> that Amazon has lowered the price of the <a href="http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/02/09/kindle-2-unveiled/">Kindle 2</a> by $60 to $299. That&#8217;s good news &#8212; almost as good as the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5283419/">$99 iPhone 3G</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/08/kindle-2-now-299/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/08/kindle-2-now-299/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#x2019;m Ready. Just Tell Me When I Can Download It.</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/jenkinsblog/~3/WEGX3Yznmnc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/08/im-ready-just-tell-me-when-i-can-download-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Giancaterino, Internet Librarian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/?p=2788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, there was Android. Now Google has announced the Google Chrome Operating System. It&#8217;ll be free, open source, and linux-based (actually &#8220;Google Chrome running within a new windowing system on top of a Linux kernel&#8221;).  According to the Big G, it&#8217;ll be:
&#8220;&#8230; fast and lightweight, to start up and get you onto the web in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, there was <a href="http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2008/12/09/buyers-remorse-nah/">Android</a>. Now Google has <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/introducing-google-chrome-os.html">announced</a> the Google Chrome Operating System. It&#8217;ll be free, open source, and linux-based (actually &#8220;Google Chrome running within a new windowing system on top of a Linux kernel&#8221;).  According to the Big G, it&#8217;ll be:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230; fast and lightweight, to start up and get you onto the web in a few seconds. The user interface is minimal to stay out of your way, and most of the user experience takes place on the web.&#8221;</p>
<p>And what would an OS announcement be without a shot at Microsoft?</p>
<p>&#8220;We hear a lot from our users and their message is clear &#8212; computers need to get better. People want to get to their email instantly, without wasting time waiting for their computers to boot and browsers to start up. They want their computers to always run as fast as when they first bought them. They want their data to be accessible to them wherever they are and not have to worry about losing their computer or forgetting to back up files. Even more importantly, they don&#8217;t want to spend hours configuring their computers to work with every new piece of hardware, or have to worry about constant software updates.&#8221;</p>
<p>Google says their new OS will be available in about a year. I&#8217;ll convert my <a href="http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/05/19/my-first-week-with-a-netbook/">new netbook</a> to GCOS as soon as I can. Where&#8217;s the link? I&#8217;m ready to download.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/08/im-ready-just-tell-me-when-i-can-download-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/08/im-ready-just-tell-me-when-i-can-download-it/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>And So It Goes &#x2026;</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/jenkinsblog/~3/kmGKQLld-So/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/08/and-so-it-goes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Giancaterino, Internet Librarian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/?p=2780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jammie Thomas wants a new trial (even though she&#8217;s oh-for-two). The RIAA wants an injunction to keep her from sharing more songs. Wake me when it&#8217;s over.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jammie Thomas <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/07/thomas-seeks-new-riaa-trial-says-192-million-verdict-monstrous/">wants a new trial</a> (even though she&#8217;s <a href="http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/06/19/be-careful-what-you-ask-for/">oh-for-two</a>). The RIAA wants an <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/07/riaa-fears-thomas-is-file-sharing/">injunction</a> to keep her from sharing more songs. Wake me when it&#8217;s over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/08/and-so-it-goes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/08/and-so-it-goes/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Do You Get This Joke?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/jenkinsblog/~3/d-NBoAG6ex0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/08/do-you-get-this-joke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Giancaterino, Internet Librarian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/?p=2770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I stumbled onto this comic with a Twitter-inspired punchline. It was amusing to me. Do you get it? Just in case, I&#8217;ll translate:

Bird 1 is happily chirping away.


Bird 2, next to him, thinks Bird 1&#8217;s chirps are laugh-out-loud funny, so he repeats them to all his friends and characterizes them as &#8220;funny bird noises&#8221;.


Bird 3, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stumbled onto <a href="http://www.microsyntax.org/post/134888805/cartoon-based-on-microsyntax-via-kathysierra">this comic</a> with a Twitter-inspired punchline. It was amusing to me. Do you get it? Just in case, I&#8217;ll translate:</p>
<ul>
<li>Bird 1 is happily chirping away.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Bird 2, next to him, thinks Bird 1&#8217;s chirps are laugh-out-loud funny, so he repeats them to all his friends and characterizes them as &#8220;funny bird noises&#8221;.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Bird 3, listening to all this, is like, &#8220;Huh?&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<p>So I got it. But I wondered how many other people would also get it. And so I devised a totally un-scientific experiment. I asked the following group of people to tell me what the comic meant:</p>
<ol>
<li>Daughter, 21, pharmacy student</li>
<li>Daughter&#8217;s friend, 25, fellow pharma-geek</li>
<li>Son, 15, <a href="http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/05/14/new-personal-record/">King of Texting</a></li>
<li>Wife, let&#8217;s call her &#8220;mature&#8221;, <a href="http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/05/05/in-a-moment-of-temporary-insanity/">territorial Mac user</a></li>
<li>Boss, also &#8220;mature&#8221;, has no patience with most social networking tools</li>
<li>IT Whiz Kid, 22, annoyingly smart</li>
</ol>
<p>Only IT Whiz Kid got it. Everyone else was clueless about what Bird 2 was saying. Which got me thinking: Twitter is touted as being so simple to use, yet Twitter-speak is still complicated for most people.  It actually reminds me of typing DOS commands back in the day. On the other hand, text-shorthand is sort of universal at this point.  Everybody got what Bird 3 was saying. So I&#8217;m wondering if Twitter will ever catch on with the general population the way SMS has.</p>
<p>Just a thought &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/08/do-you-get-this-joke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.jenkinslaw.org/blog/2009/07/08/do-you-get-this-joke/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
