<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>JGRChJ (Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism)</title><link>http://jgrchj.net</link><description>Journal for the study of the texts, languages and cultures of the Greco-Roman world of early Christianity and Judaism.</description><language>en-gb</language><copyright>Copyright 2000-2007, Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</copyright><managingEditor>matt@opentext.org</managingEditor><webMaster>matt@opentext.org</webMaster><item><title>21.8. Craig A. Evans, 'Were Samaritans Cursed in Pre-70 Jewish Synagogues? Did the People of Ephesus Thank Jesus for Casting Out Evil Spirits?—Why Research Autopsy Is Mandatory', JGRChJ 21 (2025), pp. 187-94</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume21#21.8</link><description><p>Article from Volume 21 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Craig A. Evans (The Bible Seminary, Katy, TX, USA)</p><p>'Were Samaritans Cursed in Pre-70 Jewish Synagogues? Did the People of Ephesus Thank Jesus for Casting Out Evil Spirits?—Why Research Autopsy Is Mandatory', <i>JGRChJ</i> 21 (2025), pp. 187-94</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume21#21.8</guid><pubDate>2025</pubDate></item><item><title>21.7. Andrew Steinmann, 'The Twenty-Second Year of Tiberius and the Death of Herod the Great: A Reply to Raymond J. Jachowski', JGRChJ 21 (2025), pp. 177-86</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume21#21.7</link><description><p>Article from Volume 21 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Andrew Steinmann (Concordia University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA)</p><p>'The Twenty-Second Year of Tiberius and the Death of Herod the Great: A Reply to Raymond J. Jachowski', <i>JGRChJ</i> 21 (2025), pp. 177-86</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume21#21.7</guid><pubDate>2025</pubDate></item><item><title>21.6. Thomas Haviland-Pabst, 'The Genealogy of Jesus in the Gospel of Luke: A Window into the Activities of the Relatives of Jesus in the Early Church', JGRChJ 21 (2025), pp. 153-76</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume21#21.6</link><description><p>Article from Volume 21 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Thomas Haviland-Pabst (One Family Ministries, Asheville, NC, USA)</p><p>'The Genealogy of Jesus in the Gospel of Luke: A Window into the Activities of the Relatives of Jesus in the Early Church', <i>JGRChJ</i> 21 (2025), pp. 153-76</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume21#21.6</guid><pubDate>2025</pubDate></item><item><title>21.5. Qiaoqiao Chen, 'A Reexamination of the Historicity of Jesus' Encounter with the Gerasene Demoniac in Mark 5.1-20', JGRChJ 21 (2025), pp. 130-52</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume21#21.5</link><description><p>Article from Volume 21 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Qiaoqiao Chen (Asbury Seminary, Wilmore, KY)</p><p>'A Reexamination of the Historicity of Jesus' Encounter with the Gerasene Demoniac in Mark 5.1-20', <i>JGRChJ</i> 21 (2025), pp. 130-52</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume21#21.5</guid><pubDate>2025</pubDate></item><item><title>21.4. Jihye Yu, 'Paul's Speech in Acts 26 and Socrates's Speech in Plato's Apology: Beyond Forensic Oratory', JGRChJ 21 (2025), pp. 104-129</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume21#21.4</link><description><p>Article from Volume 21 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Jihye Yu (Asbury Seminary, Wilmore, KY)</p><p>'Paul's Speech in Acts 26 and Socrates's Speech in Plato's Apology: Beyond Forensic Oratory', <i>JGRChJ</i> 21 (2025), pp. 104-129</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume21#21.4</guid><pubDate>2025</pubDate></item><item><title>21.3. Sung Min Park, 'Peter’s Code Choice in the Pentecost Sermon: A Historical Sociolinguistic Approach to the Prestige Religious Language of the Jerusalem Church', JGRChJ 21 (2025), pp. 71-102</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume21#21.3</link><description><p>Article from Volume 21 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Sung Min Park (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, ON)</p><p>'Peter’s Code Choice in the Pentecost Sermon: A Historical Sociolinguistic Approach to the Prestige Religious Language of the Jerusalem Church', <i>JGRChJ</i> 21 (2025), pp. 71-102</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume21#21.3</guid><pubDate>2025</pubDate></item><item><title>21.2. Reuben Y.T. Lee, 'Proselytes in Late Second Temple Judea: Conversion Requirements and Ethnic, Social and Cultural Boundaries in a Judean Area', JGRChJ 21 (2025), pp. 29-70</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume21#21.2</link><description><p>Article from Volume 21 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Reuben Y.T. Lee (Canadian Chinese School of Theology Vancouver, Richmond, BC)</p><p>'Proselytes in Late Second Temple Judea: Conversion Requirements and Ethnic, Social and Cultural Boundaries in a Judean Area', <i>JGRChJ</i> 21 (2025), pp. 29-70</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume21#21.2</guid><pubDate>2025</pubDate></item><item><title>21.1. Craig S. Keener, 'Salting Everyone with Fire (Mark 9.49-50): Purification, Preservation or Punishment?', JGRChJ 21 (2025), pp. 9-28</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume21#21.1</link><description><p>Article from Volume 21 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Craig S. Keener (Asbury Seminary, Wilmore, KY)</p><p>'Salting Everyone with Fire (Mark 9.49-50): Purification, Preservation or Punishment?', <i>JGRChJ</i> 21 (2025), pp. 9-28</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume21#21.1</guid><pubDate>2025</pubDate></item><item><title>20.6. Mariano A. Splendido, ''They were Fishermen': Peter and Andrew’s Trade in the Memory and Discourse of the First Churches', JGRChJ 20 (2024), pp. 157-92</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume20#20.6</link><description><p>Article from Volume 20 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Mariano A. Splendido (Instituto de Investigación en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales (CONICET)
Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina)</p><p>''They were Fishermen': Peter and Andrew’s Trade in the Memory and Discourse of the First Churches', <i>JGRChJ</i> 20 (2024), pp. 157-92</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume20#20.6</guid><pubDate>2024</pubDate></item><item><title>20.5. David E. Malick, 'Selected Characterization of Women in Mark: Based on an Anthropology of Gender from Pierre Bourdieu and the First Century', JGRChJ 20 (2024), pp. 119-56</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume20#20.5</link><description><p>Article from Volume 20 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by David E. Malick (Independent Expositor, Birmingham, AL)</p><p>'Selected Characterization of Women in Mark: Based on an Anthropology of Gender from Pierre Bourdieu and the First Century', <i>JGRChJ</i> 20 (2024), pp. 119-56</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume20#20.5</guid><pubDate>2024</pubDate></item><item><title>20.4. Daniel Aaron Webster, 'The Father, Son and Spirit Taught in Ante-Nicene Hymns', JGRChJ 20 (2024), pp. 98-118</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume20#20.4</link><description><p>Article from Volume 20 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Daniel Aaron Webster (Welch College, Gallatin, TN)</p><p>'The Father, Son and Spirit Taught in Ante-Nicene Hymns', <i>JGRChJ</i> 20 (2024), pp. 98-118</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume20#20.4</guid><pubDate>2024</pubDate></item><item><title>20.3. Benjamin G. Frostad, 'Luke's Reading of Pauline Justification and Torah', JGRChJ 20 (2024), pp. 74-97</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume20#20.3</link><description><p>Article from Volume 20 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Benjamin G. Frostad ()</p><p>'Luke's Reading of Pauline Justification and Torah', <i>JGRChJ</i> 20 (2024), pp. 74-97</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume20#20.3</guid><pubDate>2024</pubDate></item><item><title>20.2. Zachary K. Dawson, 'Peter's Vision in Acts 10.1–11.18, the Book of Dreams in 1 Enoch and Luke's Subversion of Jewish Purity Laws', JGRChJ 20 (2024), pp. 37-73</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume20#20.2</link><description><p>Article from Volume 20 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Zachary K. Dawson (Regent University School of Divinity, Virginia Beach, VA, USA)</p><p>'Peter's Vision in Acts 10.1–11.18, the Book of Dreams in 1 Enoch and Luke's Subversion of Jewish Purity Laws', <i>JGRChJ</i> 20 (2024), pp. 37-73</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume20#20.2</guid><pubDate>2024</pubDate></item><item><title>20.1. Stanley E. Porter, 'Jews, Gentiles and Salvation in Luke–Acts', JGRChJ 20 (2024), pp. 11-36</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume20#20.1</link><description><p>Article from Volume 20 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Stanley E. Porter (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, ON, Canada)</p><p>'Jews, Gentiles and Salvation in Luke–Acts', <i>JGRChJ</i> 20 (2024), pp. 11-36</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume20#20.1</guid><pubDate>2024</pubDate></item><item><title>19.6. John D. Doss, 'The Expansion of Associations and Christianity in the Book of Acts: A Comparative Study', JGRChJ 19 (2023), pp. 128-60</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume19#19.6</link><description><p>Article from Volume 19 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by John D. Doss (Asbury Theological Seminary, Wilmore, KY)</p><p>'The Expansion of Associations and Christianity in the Book of Acts: A Comparative Study', <i>JGRChJ</i> 19 (2023), pp. 128-60</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume19#19.6</guid><pubDate>2023</pubDate></item><item><title>19.5. Kennedy K. Ekeocha, 'No Longer a People-Pleaser: Narratio and Defensive Refutation in Galatians 1.10–2.21', JGRChJ 19 (2023), pp. 104-27</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume19#19.5</link><description><p>Article from Volume 19 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Kennedy K. Ekeocha (West Africa Theological Seminary, Lagos, Nigeria)</p><p>'No Longer a People-Pleaser: Narratio and Defensive Refutation in Galatians 1.10–2.21', <i>JGRChJ</i> 19 (2023), pp. 104-27</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume19#19.5</guid><pubDate>2023</pubDate></item><item><title>19.4. Christopher M. Hansen, 'A Response to David Allen's 'A Model Reconstruction of What Josephus Would Have Realistically Written about Jesus'', JGRChJ 19 (2023), pp. 94-103</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume19#19.4</link><description><p>Article from Volume 19 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Christopher M. Hansen (Independent Scholar, Grand Blanc, MI)</p><p>'A Response to David Allen's 'A Model Reconstruction of What Josephus Would Have Realistically Written about Jesus'', <i>JGRChJ</i> 19 (2023), pp. 94-103</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume19#19.4</guid><pubDate>2023</pubDate></item><item><title>19.3. Robin Thompson, 'Paul's Collection and a Slave's Dilemma: Give to the Poor or Save for Freedom?', JGRChJ 19 (2023), pp. 73-93</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume19#19.3</link><description><p>Article from Volume 19 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Robin Thompson (Grand Canyon University, Phoenix, AZ)</p><p>'Paul's Collection and a Slave's Dilemma: Give to the Poor or Save for Freedom?', <i>JGRChJ</i> 19 (2023), pp. 73-93</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume19#19.3</guid><pubDate>2023</pubDate></item><item><title>19.2. Daryn Graham, 'Trial by Ordeal: The Development of the Neronian Persecution', JGRChJ 19 (2023), pp. 40-72</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume19#19.2</link><description><p>Article from Volume 19 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Daryn Graham (Independent Scholar, Sydney, NSW, Australia)</p><p>'Trial by Ordeal: The Development of the Neronian Persecution', <i>JGRChJ</i> 19 (2023), pp. 40-72</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume19#19.2</guid><pubDate>2023</pubDate></item><item><title>19.1. Tyler Hallstrom, 'Stephen’s Use of χειροποίητος in Acts 7.48 and its Meaning in Jewish and Greco-Roman Literature', JGRChJ 19 (2023), pp. 9-39</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume19#19.1</link><description><p>Article from Volume 19 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Tyler Hallstrom (Asbury Theological Seminary, Wilmore, KY)</p><p>'Stephen’s Use of χειροποίητος in Acts 7.48 and its Meaning in Jewish and Greco-Roman Literature', <i>JGRChJ</i> 19 (2023), pp. 9-39</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume19#19.1</guid><pubDate>2023</pubDate></item><item><title>18.7. Prince Peters, 'Ἀληθῶς Θεοῦ Υἱὸς Ἦν Οὗτος (Matthew 27.54): A Centurion’s View of Jesus through the Lens of Roman Demigods', JGRChJ 18 (2022), pp. 168-84</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume18#18.7</link><description><p>Article from Volume 18 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Prince Peters (University of Nigeria)</p><p>'Ἀληθῶς Θεοῦ Υἱὸς Ἦν Οὗτος (Matthew 27.54): A Centurion’s View of Jesus through the Lens of Roman Demigods', <i>JGRChJ</i> 18 (2022), pp. 168-84</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume18#18.7</guid><pubDate>2022</pubDate></item><item><title>18.6. Matthew J. Korpman, 'Is It False Testimony? Studying Luke 16.1-13 as the Rehabilitation of a Rejected Parable', JGRChJ 18 (2022), pp. 144-67</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume18#18.6</link><description><p>Article from Volume 18 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Matthew J. Korpman (Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley, CA)</p><p>'Is It False Testimony? Studying Luke 16.1-13 as the Rehabilitation of a Rejected Parable', <i>JGRChJ</i> 18 (2022), pp. 144-67</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume18#18.6</guid><pubDate>2022</pubDate></item><item><title>18.5. David Allen, 'A Model Reconstruction of What Josephus Would Have Realistically Written about Jesus', JGRChJ 18 (2022), pp. 113-43</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume18#18.5</link><description><p>Article from Volume 18 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by David Allen (UCC, Cork, Ireland)</p><p>'A Model Reconstruction of What Josephus Would Have Realistically Written about Jesus', <i>JGRChJ</i> 18 (2022), pp. 113-43</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume18#18.5</guid><pubDate>2022</pubDate></item><item><title>18.4. Colin A. Green, 'Paul's Letter to Philemon: Manumission ... or What?', JGRChJ 18 (2022), pp. 92-112</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume18#18.4</link><description><p>Article from Volume 18 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Colin A. Green (University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK)</p><p>'Paul's Letter to Philemon: Manumission ... or What?', <i>JGRChJ</i> 18 (2022), pp. 92-112</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume18#18.4</guid><pubDate>2022</pubDate></item><item><title>18.3. Sean du Toit, 'Ethical Lists in 1 Peter', JGRChJ 18 (2022), pp. 59-91</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume18#18.3</link><description><p>Article from Volume 18 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Sean du Toit (Alphacrucis College, Auckland, New Zealand)</p><p>'Ethical Lists in 1 Peter', <i>JGRChJ</i> 18 (2022), pp. 59-91</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume18#18.3</guid><pubDate>2022</pubDate></item><item><title>18.2. Craig S. Keener and Keldie Paroschi, 'Sleepless Nights in a Greco-Roman Context', JGRChJ 18 (2022), pp. 37-58</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume18#18.2</link><description><p>Article from Volume 18 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Craig S. Keener and Keldie Paroschi (Asbury Theological Seminary, Wilmore, KY, USA)</p><p>'Sleepless Nights in a Greco-Roman Context', <i>JGRChJ</i> 18 (2022), pp. 37-58</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume18#18.2</guid><pubDate>2022</pubDate></item><item><title>18.1. Michael Kok, 'Justin Martyr and the Authorship of Luke's Gospel', JGRChJ 18 (2022), pp. 9-36</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume18#18.1</link><description><p>Article from Volume 18 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Michael Kok (Morling College, Australian College of Theology, Bentley, WA, Australia)</p><p>'Justin Martyr and the Authorship of Luke's Gospel', <i>JGRChJ</i> 18 (2022), pp. 9-36</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume18#18.1</guid><pubDate>2022</pubDate></item><item><title>17.8. John-Christian Eurell, 'The Saying Attributed to Jesus in Acts 20.35', JGRChJ 17 (2021), pp. 197-205</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume17#17.8</link><description><p>Article from Volume 17 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by John-Christian Eurell (Stockholm School of Theology, Stockholm, Sweden)</p><p>'The Saying Attributed to Jesus in Acts 20.35', <i>JGRChJ</i> 17 (2021), pp. 197-205</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume17#17.8</guid><pubDate>2021</pubDate></item><item><title>17.7. David H. Wenkel, 'Military Camps around Jerusalem and the Meaning of Στρατόπεδον in Luke 21.20', JGRChJ 17 (2021), pp. 181-196</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume17#17.7</link><description><p>Article from Volume 17 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by David H. Wenkel (LCC International University, Klaipėda, Lithuania)</p><p>'Military Camps around Jerusalem and the Meaning of Στρατόπεδον in Luke 21.20', <i>JGRChJ</i> 17 (2021), pp. 181-196</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume17#17.7</guid><pubDate>2021</pubDate></item><item><title>17.6. Andrew Simmonds, 'Judas Iscariot and Joseph of Arimathea: Two Gentile Graves for Two Jewish Corpses', JGRChJ 17 (2021), pp. 147-80</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume17#17.6</link><description><p>Article from Volume 17 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Andrew Simmonds (White Plains, NY)</p><p>'Judas Iscariot and Joseph of Arimathea: Two Gentile Graves for Two Jewish Corpses', <i>JGRChJ</i> 17 (2021), pp. 147-80</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume17#17.6</guid><pubDate>2021</pubDate></item><item><title>17.5. George P. Carras, 'Jewish Sensibilities in the Lukan Paul, the Historical Paul and Josephan Judaism', JGRChJ 17 (2021), pp. 118-146</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume17#17.5</link><description><p>Article from Volume 17 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by George P. Carras (Washington and Lee University, Lexington, VA, USA)</p><p>'Jewish Sensibilities in the Lukan Paul, the Historical Paul and Josephan Judaism', <i>JGRChJ</i> 17 (2021), pp. 118-146</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume17#17.5</guid><pubDate>2021</pubDate></item><item><title>17.4. Lydia McGrew, 'Truth, Historiography, and the Gospels’ Genre: Classical and Patristic Considerations', JGRChJ 17 (2021), pp. 88-117</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume17#17.4</link><description><p>Article from Volume 17 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Lydia McGrew (Kalamazoo, MI)</p><p>'Truth, Historiography, and the Gospels’ Genre: Classical and Patristic Considerations', <i>JGRChJ</i> 17 (2021), pp. 88-117</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume17#17.4</guid><pubDate>2021</pubDate></item><item><title>17.3. Lydia McGrew, 'Time and Narrative: Clarity and Chronology in Reading the Gospels', JGRChJ 17 (2021), pp. 62-87</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume17#17.3</link><description><p>Article from Volume 17 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Lydia McGrew (Kalamazoo, MI)</p><p>'Time and Narrative: Clarity and Chronology in Reading the Gospels', <i>JGRChJ</i> 17 (2021), pp. 62-87</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume17#17.3</guid><pubDate>2021</pubDate></item><item><title>17.2. Sanghwan Lee, 'An Illiterate Fisherman and Impressive Letter: A Dialogue with Bart D. Ehrman', JGRChJ 17 (2021), pp. 38-61</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume17#17.2</link><description><p>Article from Volume 17 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Sanghwan Lee (Dallas Theological Seminary, Dallas, TX, USA)</p><p>'An Illiterate Fisherman and Impressive Letter: A Dialogue with Bart D. Ehrman', <i>JGRChJ</i> 17 (2021), pp. 38-61</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume17#17.2</guid><pubDate>2021</pubDate></item><item><title>17.1. Klaus Vibe, 'Freedom from Necessity in Philo of Alexandria's Ethical Thought', JGRChJ 17 (2021), pp. 9-37</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume17#17.1</link><description><p>Article from Volume 17 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Klaus Vibe (Fjellhaug International University College, Aarhus, Denmark)</p><p>'Freedom from Necessity in Philo of Alexandria's Ethical Thought', <i>JGRChJ</i> 17 (2021), pp. 9-37</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume17#17.1</guid><pubDate>2021</pubDate></item><item><title>16.10. Craig S. Keener, 'Wedding Torches', JGRChJ 16 (2020), pp. 200-204</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume16#16.10</link><description><p>Article from Volume 16 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Craig S. Keener (Asbury Theological Seminary, Wilmore, KY, USA)</p><p>'Wedding Torches', <i>JGRChJ</i> 16 (2020), pp. 200-204</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume16#16.10</guid><pubDate>2020</pubDate></item><item><title>16.9. Sanghwan Lee, 'Defending Multilingual Galilee from its Literary and Archaeological Objections', JGRChJ 16 (2020), pp. 183-199</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume16#16.9</link><description><p>Article from Volume 16 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Sanghwan Lee (Dallas Theological Seminary, Dallas, TX, USA)</p><p>'Defending Multilingual Galilee from its Literary and Archaeological Objections', <i>JGRChJ</i> 16 (2020), pp. 183-199</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume16#16.9</guid><pubDate>2020</pubDate></item><item><title>16.8. Nathan Nadeau, 'The First Pauline Chronologist? Probably Not: A Review of Ryan Schellenberg's 'The First Pauline Chronologist' from a Bayesian Perspective', JGRChJ 16 (2020), pp. 150-182</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume16#16.8</link><description><p>Article from Volume 16 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Nathan Nadeau (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, ON, Canada)</p><p>'The First Pauline Chronologist? Probably Not: A Review of Ryan Schellenberg's 'The First Pauline Chronologist' from a Bayesian Perspective', <i>JGRChJ</i> 16 (2020), pp. 150-182</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume16#16.8</guid><pubDate>2020</pubDate></item><item><title>16.7. Christopher M. Hansen, 'Lord Raglan's Hero and Jesus: A Rebuttal to Methodologically Dubious Uses of the Raglan Archetype', JGRChJ 16 (2020), pp. 129-149</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume16#16.7</link><description><p>Article from Volume 16 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Christopher M. Hansen (Saginaw Valley State University, University Center, MI, USA)</p><p>'Lord Raglan's Hero and Jesus: A Rebuttal to Methodologically Dubious Uses of the Raglan Archetype', <i>JGRChJ</i> 16 (2020), pp. 129-149</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume16#16.7</guid><pubDate>2020</pubDate></item><item><title>16.6. Jeffrey M. Hubbard, 'Flipped Scripts in Hermas's Erotic Dreams: A Reading of the Shepherd's Virgins in Light of Roman Oneiric Literature', JGRChJ 16 (2020), pp. 117-128</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume16#16.6</link><description><p>Article from Volume 16 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Jeffrey M. Hubbard (Yale Divinity School, New Haven, CT, USA)</p><p>'Flipped Scripts in Hermas's Erotic Dreams: A Reading of the Shepherd's Virgins in Light of Roman Oneiric Literature', <i>JGRChJ</i> 16 (2020), pp. 117-128</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume16#16.6</guid><pubDate>2020</pubDate></item><item><title>16.5. Stuart Squires, 'Jerome's View of the Connection between the Priscillianists and Pelagians', JGRChJ 16 (2020), pp. 105-116</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume16#16.5</link><description><p>Article from Volume 16 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Stuart Squires (University of St. Thomas, Houston, TX, USA)</p><p>'Jerome's View of the Connection between the Priscillianists and Pelagians', <i>JGRChJ</i> 16 (2020), pp. 105-116</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume16#16.5</guid><pubDate>2020</pubDate></item><item><title>16.4. Doosuk Kim, 'Romans 14 and Impurity in the Mishnah', JGRChJ 16 (2020), pp. 79-104</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume16#16.4</link><description><p>Article from Volume 16 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Doosuk Kim (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, ON, Canada)</p><p>'Romans 14 and Impurity in the Mishnah', <i>JGRChJ</i> 16 (2020), pp. 79-104</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume16#16.4</guid><pubDate>2020</pubDate></item><item><title>16.3. Michael J.G. Gray-Fow, 'Pomponia Graecina: How Could She Have Heard about Christians and What Did 'Christian' Mean?', JGRChJ 16 (2020), pp. 65-78</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume16#16.3</link><description><p>Article from Volume 16 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Michael J.G. Gray-Fow (Episcopal Diocese of Milwaukee, WI, USA)</p><p>'Pomponia Graecina: How Could She Have Heard about Christians and What Did 'Christian' Mean?', <i>JGRChJ</i> 16 (2020), pp. 65-78</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume16#16.3</guid><pubDate>2020</pubDate></item><item><title>16.2. Andrew Simmonds, ''His Blood on Us and on Our Children' (Mt. 27.25) is Modeled on Oedipus's Unwitting Kinship Oath to His Father in Sophocles' Oedipus Tyrannus', JGRChJ 16 (2020), pp. 30-64</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume16#16.2</link><description><p>Article from Volume 16 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Andrew Simmonds (White Plains, NY, USA)</p><p>''His Blood on Us and on Our Children' (Mt. 27.25) is Modeled on Oedipus's Unwitting Kinship Oath to His Father in Sophocles' Oedipus Tyrannus', <i>JGRChJ</i> 16 (2020), pp. 30-64</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume16#16.2</guid><pubDate>2020</pubDate></item><item><title>16.1. Andrew R. Talbert, 'The Synonymous Rendering of Aristotelian φιλέω with ἀγαπάω in the Gospel of John', JGRChJ 16 (2020), pp. 9-29</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume16#16.1</link><description><p>Article from Volume 16 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Andrew R. Talbert (Caldwell Academy, Greensboro, NC, USA)</p><p>'The Synonymous Rendering of Aristotelian φιλέω with ἀγαπάω in the Gospel of John', <i>JGRChJ</i> 16 (2020), pp. 9-29</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume16#16.1</guid><pubDate>2020</pubDate></item><item><title>15.6. Andrew R. Krause, '(Ritually) Slaying the Dragon: Apocalyptic Justification of Historical Violence in Psalms of Solomon 2', JGRChJ 15 (2019), pp. 173-94</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume15#15.6</link><description><p>Article from Volume 15 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Andrew R. Krause (ACTS Seminaries of Trinity Western University, Langley, BC, Canada)</p><p>'(Ritually) Slaying the Dragon: Apocalyptic Justification of Historical Violence in Psalms of Solomon 2', <i>JGRChJ</i> 15 (2019), pp. 173-94</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume15#15.6</guid><pubDate>2019</pubDate></item><item><title>15.5. Michael T. Miller and Mariano Troiano, 'The Name of God and the Name of the Messiah: Jewish and Christian Parallels in Late Antiquity', JGRChJ 15 (2019), pp. 148-72</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume15#15.5</link><description><p>Article from Volume 15 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Michael T. Miller and Mariano Troiano (Friedrich-Alexander-Universitat Erlangen-Nurnberg, Germany; Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina)</p><p>'The Name of God and the Name of the Messiah: Jewish and Christian Parallels in Late Antiquity', <i>JGRChJ</i> 15 (2019), pp. 148-72</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume15#15.5</guid><pubDate>2019</pubDate></item><item><title>15.4. Bart B. Bruehler, 'The Rhetorical Force of Early Christian Writings: Definition, Dynamics and Discourses about Mary', JGRChJ 15 (2019), pp. 116-47</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume15#15.4</link><description><p>Article from Volume 15 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Bart B. Bruehler (Indiana Wesleyan University, Marion, IN, USA)</p><p>'The Rhetorical Force of Early Christian Writings: Definition, Dynamics and Discourses about Mary', <i>JGRChJ</i> 15 (2019), pp. 116-47</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume15#15.4</guid><pubDate>2019</pubDate></item><item><title>15.3. Peter Reynolds, 'Room in the Boat: Luke 5:1-11 and the Symbol of the Boat', JGRChJ 15 (2019), pp. 77-115</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume15#15.3</link><description><p>Article from Volume 15 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Peter Reynolds (Southwestern Assemblies of God University, Waxahachie, TX, USA)</p><p>'Room in the Boat: Luke 5:1-11 and the Symbol of the Boat', <i>JGRChJ</i> 15 (2019), pp. 77-115</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume15#15.3</guid><pubDate>2019</pubDate></item><item><title>15.2. Jason J. Ripley, 'Glorious Death, Imperial Rome and the Gospel of John', JGRChJ 15 (2019), pp. 31-76</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume15#15.2</link><description><p>Article from Volume 15 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Jason J. Ripley (St Olaf College, Northfield, MN, USA)</p><p>'Glorious Death, Imperial Rome and the Gospel of John', <i>JGRChJ</i> 15 (2019), pp. 31-76</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume15#15.2</guid><pubDate>2019</pubDate></item><item><title>15.1. Adam Z. Wright, 'A Challenge to Literary Dependency: Deficiencies in Memory to Explain Differences in Oral Tradition', JGRChJ 15 (2019), pp. 9-30</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume15#15.1</link><description><p>Article from Volume 15 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Adam Z. Wright (College of Emmanuel and St. Chad, Saskatoon, SK, Canada)</p><p>'A Challenge to Literary Dependency: Deficiencies in Memory to Explain Differences in Oral Tradition', <i>JGRChJ</i> 15 (2019), pp. 9-30</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume15#15.1</guid><pubDate>2019</pubDate></item><item><title>14.10. Raimondo Bacchisio Motzo (Translated by Tommaso Leoni), 'The Authenticity of the Roman Documents Contained in Josephus's Antiquities', JGRChJ 14 (2018), pp. 219-223</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume14#14.10</link><description><p>Article from Volume 14 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Raimondo Bacchisio Motzo (Translated by Tommaso Leoni) (York University, Toronto, ON, Canada)</p><p>'The Authenticity of the Roman Documents Contained in Josephus's Antiquities', <i>JGRChJ</i> 14 (2018), pp. 219-223</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume14#14.10</guid><pubDate>2018</pubDate></item><item><title>14.9. Raimondo Bacchisio Motzo (Translated by Tommaso Leoni), 'The Two Editions of Josephus's Life', JGRChJ 14 (2018), pp. 207-218</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume14#14.9</link><description><p>Article from Volume 14 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Raimondo Bacchisio Motzo (Translated by Tommaso Leoni) (York University, Toronto, ON, Canada)</p><p>'The Two Editions of Josephus's Life', <i>JGRChJ</i> 14 (2018), pp. 207-218</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume14#14.9</guid><pubDate>2018</pubDate></item><item><title>14.8. Stanley E. Porter, 'Two Translated Articles on Josephus', JGRChJ 14 (2018), pp. 204-206</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume14#14.8</link><description><p>Article from Volume 14 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Stanley E. Porter (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, ON, Canada)</p><p>'Two Translated Articles on Josephus', <i>JGRChJ</i> 14 (2018), pp. 204-206</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume14#14.8</guid><pubDate>2018</pubDate></item><item><title>14.7. Tamiko Isaka, 'Jerome's Interpretation of the Bread in the Lord's Prayer: ἐπιούσιος and Supersubstantialis', JGRChJ 14 (2018), pp. 182-203</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume14#14.7</link><description><p>Article from Volume 14 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Tamiko Isaka (Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo, Japan)</p><p>'Jerome's Interpretation of the Bread in the Lord's Prayer: ἐπιούσιος and Supersubstantialis', <i>JGRChJ</i> 14 (2018), pp. 182-203</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume14#14.7</guid><pubDate>2018</pubDate></item><item><title>14.6. Sanghwan Lee, 'Reexamining the Greek-Speaking Ability of Peter in Light of a Sociolinguistic Perspective', JGRChJ 14 (2018), pp. 158-181</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume14#14.6</link><description><p>Article from Volume 14 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Sanghwan Lee (Dallas Theological Seminary, Dallas, TX, USA)</p><p>'Reexamining the Greek-Speaking Ability of Peter in Light of a Sociolinguistic Perspective', <i>JGRChJ</i> 14 (2018), pp. 158-181</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume14#14.6</guid><pubDate>2018</pubDate></item><item><title>14.5. Ilaria L.E. Ramelli, 'The Role of Allegory, Allegoresis and Metaphor in Paul and Origen', JGRChJ 14 (2018), pp. 130-157</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume14#14.5</link><description><p>Article from Volume 14 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Ilaria L.E. Ramelli (Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit, MI, USA)</p><p>'The Role of Allegory, Allegoresis and Metaphor in Paul and Origen', <i>JGRChJ</i> 14 (2018), pp. 130-157</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume14#14.5</guid><pubDate>2018</pubDate></item><item><title>14.4. Frank Shaw, 'Three Developments in New Testament Textual Criticism: Wettlaufer, Houghton and Jongkind(-Williams)', JGRChJ 14 (2018), pp. 89-129</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume14#14.4</link><description><p>Article from Volume 14 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Frank Shaw (Cincinnati, OH)</p><p>'Three Developments in New Testament Textual Criticism: Wettlaufer, Houghton and Jongkind(-Williams)', <i>JGRChJ</i> 14 (2018), pp. 89-129</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume14#14.4</guid><pubDate>2018</pubDate></item><item><title>14.3. Benjamin Marx, ''Wifely Submission' and 'Husbandly Authority' in Plutarch's Moralia and the Corpus Paulinum: A Comparison', JGRChJ 14 (2018), pp. 56-88</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume14#14.3</link><description><p>Article from Volume 14 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Benjamin Marx (Instituto Superior de Teología Arequipa, Arequipa, Peru)</p><p>''Wifely Submission' and 'Husbandly Authority' in Plutarch's Moralia and the Corpus Paulinum: A Comparison', <i>JGRChJ</i> 14 (2018), pp. 56-88</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume14#14.3</guid><pubDate>2018</pubDate></item><item><title>14.2. Matthew Oseka, 'Christian Patristic and Mediaeval Interpretation of the Plural Forms in Genesis 1.26, 3.5 and 3.22 Situated Against the Classic Jewish Exposition', JGRChJ 14 (2018), pp. 28–55</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume14#14.2</link><description><p>Article from Volume 14 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Matthew Oseka (Concordia Theological Seminary, Kowloon, Hong Kong)</p><p>'Christian Patristic and Mediaeval Interpretation of the Plural Forms in Genesis 1.26, 3.5 and 3.22 Situated Against the Classic Jewish Exposition', <i>JGRChJ</i> 14 (2018), pp. 28–55</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume14#14.2</guid><pubDate>2018</pubDate></item><item><title>14.1. Joshua Ezra Burns, 'Why Did Romans Believe Jews Fast on the Sabbath?', JGRChJ 14 (2018), pp. 9-27</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume14#14.1</link><description><p>Article from Volume 14 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Joshua Ezra Burns (Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA)</p><p>'Why Did Romans Believe Jews Fast on the Sabbath?', <i>JGRChJ</i> 14 (2018), pp. 9-27</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume14#14.1</guid><pubDate>2018</pubDate></item><item><title>13.8. Adam Booth, 'Long Live the King: The Fourth Gospel's Responses to Greco-Roman Suspicions
				Concerning Monarchy', JGRChJ 13 (2017), pp. 189-212</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume13#13.8</link><description><p>Article from Volume 13 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Adam Booth (Duke University, Durham, NC, USA)</p><p>'Long Live the King: The Fourth Gospel's Responses to Greco-Roman Suspicions
				Concerning Monarchy', <i>JGRChJ</i> 13 (2017), pp. 189-212</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume13#13.8</guid><pubDate>2017</pubDate></item><item><title>13.7. Craig A. Evans and Stanley E. Porter, 'A Recent Discovery in Byzantine-Era Galilee and the Problem of 'Regularized'
				Spelling of Koine and Byzantine Greek', JGRChJ 13 (2017), pp. 172-188</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume13#13.7</link><description><p>Article from Volume 13 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Craig A. Evans and Stanley E. Porter (Houston Baptist University, Houston, TX, USA and McMaster Divinity College,
				Hamilton, ON, Canada)</p><p>'A Recent Discovery in Byzantine-Era Galilee and the Problem of 'Regularized'
				Spelling of Koine and Byzantine Greek', <i>JGRChJ</i> 13 (2017), pp. 172-188</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume13#13.7</guid><pubDate>2017</pubDate></item><item><title>13.6. Karl L. Armstrong, 'The Meaning of ὑποτάσσω in Ephesians 5.21-33: A Linguistic
				Approach', JGRChJ 13 (2017), pp. 152-171</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume13#13.6</link><description><p>Article from Volume 13 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Karl L. Armstrong (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, ON, Canada)</p><p>'The Meaning of ὑποτάσσω in Ephesians 5.21-33: A Linguistic
				Approach', <i>JGRChJ</i> 13 (2017), pp. 152-171</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume13#13.6</guid><pubDate>2017</pubDate></item><item><title>13.5. Gregory Goswell, 'The Early Readership of the Catholic Epistles', JGRChJ 13 (2017), pp. 129-151</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume13#13.5</link><description><p>Article from Volume 13 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Gregory Goswell (Christ College, Sydney, Australia)</p><p>'The Early Readership of the Catholic Epistles', <i>JGRChJ</i> 13 (2017), pp. 129-151</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume13#13.5</guid><pubDate>2017</pubDate></item><item><title>13.4. Peter Cresswell, 'Another Scribe or Another Exemplar? Examining Textual Patterns in Codex
				Sinaiticus Matthew and Mark', JGRChJ 13 (2017), pp. 111-128</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume13#13.4</link><description><p>Article from Volume 13 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Peter Cresswell (Devon, UK)</p><p>'Another Scribe or Another Exemplar? Examining Textual Patterns in Codex
				Sinaiticus Matthew and Mark', <i>JGRChJ</i> 13 (2017), pp. 111-128</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume13#13.4</guid><pubDate>2017</pubDate></item><item><title>13.3. Karl L. Armstrong, 'A New Plea for an Early Date of Acts', JGRChJ 13 (2017), pp. 79-110</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume13#13.3</link><description><p>Article from Volume 13 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Karl L. Armstrong (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, ON, Canada)</p><p>'A New Plea for an Early Date of Acts', <i>JGRChJ</i> 13 (2017), pp. 79-110</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume13#13.3</guid><pubDate>2017</pubDate></item><item><title>13.2. Craig S. Keener, 'Weighing T.J. Weeden’s Critique of Kenneth Bailey’s Approach to Oral Tradition in
				the Gospels', JGRChJ 13 (2017), pp. 41-78</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume13#13.2</link><description><p>Article from Volume 13 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Craig S. Keener (Asbury Theological Seminary, Wilmore, KY, USA)</p><p>'Weighing T.J. Weeden’s Critique of Kenneth Bailey’s Approach to Oral Tradition in
				the Gospels', <i>JGRChJ</i> 13 (2017), pp. 41-78</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume13#13.2</guid><pubDate>2017</pubDate></item><item><title>13.1. Zachary K. Dawson, 'The Books of Acts and Jubilees in Dialogue: A
				Literary-Intertextual Analysis of the Noahide Laws in Acts 15 and 21', JGRChJ 13 (2017), pp. 9-40</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume13#13.1</link><description><p>Article from Volume 13 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Zachary K. Dawson (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, ON, Canada)</p><p>'The Books of Acts and <i>Jubilees</i> in Dialogue: A
				Literary-Intertextual Analysis of the Noahide Laws in Acts 15 and 21', <i>JGRChJ</i> 13 (2017), pp. 9-40</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume13#13.1</guid><pubDate>2017</pubDate></item><item><title>12.10. Stanley E. Porter, 'The Use Of Greek In First-Century Palestine: A Diachronic And Synchronic
				Examination', JGRChJ 12 (2016), pp. 203-228</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume12#12.10</link><description><p>Article from Volume 12 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Stanley E. Porter (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, ON, Canada)</p><p>'The Use Of Greek In First-Century Palestine: A Diachronic And Synchronic
				Examination', <i>JGRChJ</i> 12 (2016), pp. 203-228</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume12#12.10</guid><pubDate>2016</pubDate></item><item><title>12.9. Jonathan M. Watt, 'Semitic Language Resources of Ancient Jewish Palestine', JGRChJ 12 (2016), pp. 191-202</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume12#12.9</link><description><p>Article from Volume 12 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Jonathan M. Watt (Geneva College &amp; Reformed Presbyterian Theological Seminary,
				Pittsburgh, PA, USA )</p><p>'Semitic Language Resources of Ancient Jewish Palestine', <i>JGRChJ</i> 12 (2016), pp. 191-202</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume12#12.9</guid><pubDate>2016</pubDate></item><item><title>12.8. Hughson T. Ong, 'The Language of the New Testament from a Sociolinguistic Perspective', JGRChJ 12 (2016), pp. 163-190</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume12#12.8</link><description><p>Article from Volume 12 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Hughson T. Ong (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, ON, Canada)</p><p>'The Language of the New Testament from a Sociolinguistic Perspective', <i>JGRChJ</i> 12 (2016), pp. 163-190</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume12#12.8</guid><pubDate>2016</pubDate></item><item><title>12.7. , 'The Languages Of First-Century Palestine: An Introduction To Three Papers', JGRChJ 12 (2016), pp. 160-161</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume12#12.7</link><description><p>Article from Volume 12 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by  ()</p><p>'The Languages Of First-Century Palestine: An Introduction To Three Papers', <i>JGRChJ</i> 12 (2016), pp. 160-161</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume12#12.7</guid><pubDate>2016</pubDate></item><item><title>12.6. Preston T. Massey, 'Women, Talking and Silence: 1 Corinthians 11.5 and 14.34-35 in the Light of
				Greco-Roman Culture', JGRChJ 12 (2016), pp. 127-160</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume12#12.6</link><description><p>Article from Volume 12 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Preston T. Massey (Indiana Wesleyan University, Marion, IN, USA)</p><p>'Women, Talking and Silence: 1 Corinthians 11.5 and 14.34-35 in the Light of
				Greco-Roman Culture', <i>JGRChJ</i> 12 (2016), pp. 127-160</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume12#12.6</guid><pubDate>2016</pubDate></item><item><title>12.5. Greg Stanton, 'Wealthier Supporters of Jesus of Nazareth', JGRChJ 12 (2016), pp. 99-126</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume12#12.5</link><description><p>Article from Volume 12 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Greg Stanton (University of New England, Armidale, Australia)</p><p>'Wealthier Supporters of Jesus of Nazareth', <i>JGRChJ</i> 12 (2016), pp. 99-126</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume12#12.5</guid><pubDate>2016</pubDate></item><item><title>12.4. Stanley E. Porter, 'The Synoptic Problem: The State of the Question', JGRChJ 12 (2016), pp. 73-98</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume12#12.4</link><description><p>Article from Volume 12 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Stanley E. Porter (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, ON, Canada)</p><p>'The Synoptic Problem: The State of the Question', <i>JGRChJ</i> 12 (2016), pp. 73-98</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume12#12.4</guid><pubDate>2016</pubDate></item><item><title>12.3. David I. Yoon, 'Ancient Letters of Recommendation and 2 Corinthians 3.1-3: A Literary
				Analysis', JGRChJ 12 (2016), pp. 45-72</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume12#12.3</link><description><p>Article from Volume 12 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by David I. Yoon (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, ON, Canada)</p><p>'Ancient Letters of Recommendation and 2 Corinthians 3.1-3: A Literary
				Analysis', <i>JGRChJ</i> 12 (2016), pp. 45-72</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume12#12.3</guid><pubDate>2016</pubDate></item><item><title>12.2. Matthew Oseka, 'Attentive to the Context: The Generic Name of God in The Classic Jewish Lexica
				and Grammars of the Middle Ages—A Historical and Theological Perspective', JGRChJ 12 (2016), pp. 17-44</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume12#12.2</link><description><p>Article from Volume 12 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Matthew Oseka (Concordia Theological Seminary, Kowloon, Hong Kong)</p><p>'Attentive to the Context: The Generic Name of God in The Classic Jewish Lexica
				and Grammars of the Middle Ages—A Historical and Theological Perspective', <i>JGRChJ</i> 12 (2016), pp. 17-44</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume12#12.2</guid><pubDate>2016</pubDate></item><item><title>12.1. Seth M. Ehorn and Mark Lee, 'The Syntactical Function of ἀλλὰ καί in Phil. 2.4', JGRChJ 12 (2016), pp. 9-16</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume12#12.1</link><description><p>Article from Volume 12 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Seth M. Ehorn and Mark Lee (Wheaton College, Wheaton, IL, USA)</p><p>'The Syntactical Function of ἀλλὰ καί in Phil. 2.4', <i>JGRChJ</i> 12 (2016), pp. 9-16</p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume12#12.1</guid><pubDate>2016</pubDate></item><item><title>11.9. Christopher B. Zeichmann, 'Herodian Kings and their Soldiers in the Acts of the Apostles: A Response to
				Craig Keener', JGRChJ 11 (2015), pp. 178-190</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume11?mode=abstracts#11.9</link><description><p>Article from Volume 11 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Christopher B. Zeichmann (Emmanuel College at the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON,
				Canada)</p><p>'Herodian Kings and their Soldiers in the Acts of the Apostles: A Response to
				Craig Keener', <i>JGRChJ</i> 11 (2015), pp. 178-190<blockquote> In a recent JGRChJ article (vol. 10.1, 2014), Craig Keener addresses
				the neglected topic of the military in early Christian literature, attempting to
				rehabilitate the historicity of the centurion Cornelius story (Acts 10.1–11.18). The
				present article responds to Keener and suggests that there is still reason to doubt
				the historicity of the stories in Acts with regard to military matters. This article
				focuses upon a different military unit in Acts—the ‘Augustan cohort’ (27.1). It
				argues that Acts does not refer to any known military unit, but simply chooses a
				name suitable for the author’s theological interests. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume11?mode=abstracts#11.9</guid><pubDate>2015</pubDate></item><item><title>11.8. Ryder Wishart, 'Paul and the Law: Mark Nanos, Brian Rosner and the Common-Law Tradition', JGRChJ 11 (2015), pp. 153-177</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume11?mode=abstracts#11.8</link><description><p>Article from Volume 11 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Ryder Wishart (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, ON, Canada)</p><p>'Paul and the Law: Mark Nanos, Brian Rosner and the Common-Law Tradition', <i>JGRChJ</i> 11 (2015), pp. 153-177<blockquote> This paper examines recent input by both Mark Nanos and Brian Rosner on the
				issue of Paul and the law. It highlights what it believes to be two crucial, but
				mutually exclusive, insights from each of the two positions. Nanos’s input is that
				Paul positively approves of the law because he did not find anything inherently
				wrong with either Judaism or the Jewish way of life, including Torah observance.
				Rosner’s input is that Paul’s negative assessment of the law is related to legalism.
				Because these positions are entrenched due to divergent views on Judaism, this study
				advances the conversation in the debate by offering an insight from contemporary
				legal theory that makes it possible to bring together the best insights of Rosner
				and Nanos on this issue. It outlines the difference between statutory and common-law
				legal systems, with reference to a study by Joshua Berman. It also demonstrates the
				impact of a common-law view on Pauline paraenesis on Christian ethics. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume11?mode=abstracts#11.8</guid><pubDate>2015</pubDate></item><item><title>11.7. Woojin Chung, 'The Use of the Old Testament and the Synoptic Problem: An Analysis of Francis
				Watson's 'L/M Theory' as a Test Case', JGRChJ 11 (2015), pp. 131-152</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume11?mode=abstracts#11.7</link><description><p>Article from Volume 11 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Woojin Chung (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, ON, Canada)</p><p>'The Use of the Old Testament and the Synoptic Problem: An Analysis of Francis
				Watson's 'L/M Theory' as a Test Case', <i>JGRChJ</i> 11 (2015), pp. 131-152<blockquote> Analysis of the use of the Old Testament in the Synoptic Gospels helps one
				examine the proposed theories of the Synoptic Problem. The method of investigating
				the scriptural quotations and allusions in the Gospels is similar to that of the
				Synoptic Problem in that it naturally turns one’s attention to earlier sources and
				traditions and their connection with the Gospel texts. In this article, Francis
				Watson’s ‘L/M Theory’ is evaluated through the examination of Matthew’s and Luke’s
				uses of the Old Testament, and it is argued that Watson’s suggestion is unconvincing
				and undermines the significance of the distinctive exegetical features and literary
				strategies of the two infancy narratives. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume11?mode=abstracts#11.7</guid><pubDate>2015</pubDate></item><item><title>11.6. Sunny Chen, 'The Distributive Singular In Paul: The Adequacy Of A Grammatical Category', JGRChJ 11 (2015), pp. 104-30</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume11?mode=abstracts#11.6</link><description><p>Article from Volume 11 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Sunny Chen (Pilgrim Theological College, The University of Divinity, Melbourne,
				Australia)</p><p>'The Distributive Singular In Paul: The Adequacy Of A Grammatical Category', <i>JGRChJ</i> 11 (2015), pp. 104-30<blockquote> The adequacy of the grammatical category ‘the distributive singular’ in
				Paul’s authentic letters has not been properly explored in previous scholarship.
				Many scholars ignore or provide limited analysis of a particular construct in which
				a singular noun is combined with a plural possessive pronoun. For those who attempt
				to explain this abnormal combination, the noun is usually interpreted as a
				distributive singular noun. This study demonstrates that this combination can be
				explained by other grammatical categories instead of the distributive singular.
				Specific focus is placed on Paul’s anthropological terms in this construct, showing
				that some terms illustrate the corporate and social dimensions of a community.
			</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume11?mode=abstracts#11.6</guid><pubDate>2015</pubDate></item><item><title>11.5. Jonathan Numada, 'Aristeas and Social Identity: Creating Similarity from Continued
				Difference', JGRChJ 11 (2015), pp. 82-103</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume11?mode=abstracts#11.5</link><description><p>Article from Volume 11 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Jonathan Numada (Northwest Baptist Seminary at ACTS Seminaries, Langley, BC,
				Canada)</p><p>'Aristeas and Social Identity: Creating Similarity from Continued
				Difference', <i>JGRChJ</i> 11 (2015), pp. 82-103<blockquote> This article utilizes Social Identity Theory and Social Memory Theory in an
				attempt to further describe the nature and character of the Letter of
					Aristeas’s strategy for engaging its Alexandrian Diaspora cultural setting.
				It argues that Aristeas is best understood as an attempt to chart a middle
				course between maintaining a distinct Jewish identity on the one hand, and total
				assimilation to Hellenistic culture on the other, by advocating participation and
				integration. Aristeas’s treatment of social categorizations, collective
				memory and appropriation of Alexandrian institutions and civic symbols in the
				translation narrative serve to further this agenda. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume11?mode=abstracts#11.5</guid><pubDate>2015</pubDate></item><item><title>11.4. Preston T. Massey, 'Dress Codes at Roman Corinth and Two Hellenic Sites: What do the Inscriptions at
				Andania and Lycosura Tell Us about 1 Corinthians 11.2-16?', JGRChJ 11 (2015), pp. 51-81</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume11?mode=abstracts#11.4</link><description><p>Article from Volume 11 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Preston T. Massey (Bloomington, IN, USA)</p><p>'Dress Codes at Roman Corinth and Two Hellenic Sites: What do the Inscriptions at
				Andania and Lycosura Tell Us about 1 Corinthians 11.2-16?', <i>JGRChJ</i> 11 (2015), pp. 51-81<blockquote> This study explores the principal evidence of epigraphy in order to probe
				into the background of 1 Cor. 11.2-16. The particular focus of this paper is to
				investigate the two key inscriptions found at Andania and Lycosura. From these
				inscriptions, an examination is made regarding the twin issues of a married woman’s
				head coverings and female hairstyles. A provisional conclusion is reached that the
				two inscriptions may indeed throw light on why Paul can mention both the ‘veil’ (vv.
				4-7, 13) and the ‘long hair’ (vv. 14-15) in 1 Corinthians. The conclusion is that
				the text’s inclusion of both veils and long hair is neither mutually exclusive nor
				contradictory. Given the cultural realities of the time, a reference to both makes
				logical sense and is appropriate. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume11?mode=abstracts#11.4</guid><pubDate>2015</pubDate></item><item><title>11.3. David J. Fuller, 'From Prophet to Waiter: Habakkuk's Cameo Appearance in the Apocryphal Additions
				to Daniel', JGRChJ 11 (2015), pp. 35-50</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume11?mode=abstracts#11.3</link><description><p>Article from Volume 11 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by David J. Fuller (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, ON, Canada)</p><p>'From Prophet to Waiter: Habakkuk's Cameo Appearance in the Apocryphal Additions
				to Daniel', <i>JGRChJ</i> 11 (2015), pp. 35-50<blockquote> In Bel and the Dragon, Habakkuk is flown in from Judah by an angel to deliver
				food to Daniel in the lions’ den. This study investigates the use of the Old
				Testament in Bel 33-39 and the significance of this intertextuality for a
				firstcentury BCE Jewish audience. Bel 33-39 uses various texts from the Old
				Testament, resulting in a creative story that summons up an array of images relating
				primarily to miraculous provision, for the purpose of informing a first-century BCE
				Jewish audience that God was with them and that a time of restoration was
				forthcoming. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume11?mode=abstracts#11.3</guid><pubDate>2015</pubDate></item><item><title>11.2. Chris S. Stevens, 'John 9.38-39a: A Scribal Interjection for Literary Reinforcement', JGRChJ 11 (2015), pp. 19-32</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume11?mode=abstracts#11.2</link><description><p>Article from Volume 11 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Chris S. Stevens (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, ON, Canada)</p><p>'John 9.38-39a: A Scribal Interjection for Literary Reinforcement', <i>JGRChJ</i> 11 (2015), pp. 19-32<blockquote> In the continued search for the ‘original’ text, John 9.38-39a proves to be
				an addition. Standard text critical practices of external and internal criteria are
				utilized. External evidence shows the textual absence is widespread and early.
				Internally, the text represents a marked break from Johannine style. Additionally, a
				new method of analysis is put forward using form criticism of the healing narratives
				in John and the Synoptics, which indicates that the text is inconsistent with other
				New Testament writings. John 9.38a-39 appears to be a later scribal emendation to
				strengthen literary features of John’s Gospel for liturgical and narratological
				purposes. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume11?mode=abstracts#11.2</guid><pubDate>2015</pubDate></item><item><title>11.1. Raymond J. Jachowski, 'The Death of Herod the Great and the Latin Josephus: Re-Examining the
				Twenty-Second Year of Tiberius', JGRChJ 11 (2015), pp. 9-18</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume11?mode=abstracts#11.1</link><description><p>Article from Volume 11 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Raymond J. Jachowski (Brownback’s United Church of Christ, Spring City, PA, USA)</p><p>'The Death of Herod the Great and the Latin Josephus: Re-Examining the
				Twenty-Second Year of Tiberius', <i>JGRChJ</i> 11 (2015), pp. 9-18<blockquote> It was W.E. Filmer who challenged the long-accepted date of 4 BCE interpreted
				by Emil Schürer for the death of Herod the Great, consequently proposing a date of
				1 BCE, basing this evidence, in part, on a sixth-century Latin translation of
				Josephus’s Antiquities of the Jews, which placed the death of Herod’s
				successor, Philip the Tetrarch, ‘during the twenty-second year of Tiberius’. This is
				contrary to the original Greek that reads the ‘twentieth year of Tiberius’. This
				article re-examines the historical evidence for the ‘twenty-second year of Tiberius’
				in the Latin Josephus and reaffirms the traditional date of Herod’s death in 4 BCE.
				It also proposes a solution to the apparent discrepancies between the years of the
				reign of Herod’s successors in the Jewish War and the Antiquities of the
					Jews and the dating of Jesus’ birth in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke.
			</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume11?mode=abstracts#11.1</guid><pubDate>2015</pubDate></item><item><title>10.9. James M. Petitfils, 'Martial Moses in Flavian Rome: Josephus's Antiquities 2-4 and
				Exemplary Roman Leadership', JGRChJ 10 (2014), pp. 194-208</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume10?mode=abstracts#10.9</link><description><p>Article from Volume 10 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by James M. Petitfils (Biola University, La Mirada, CA, USA)</p><p>'Martial Moses in Flavian Rome: Josephus's <i>Antiquities</i> 2-4 and
				Exemplary Roman Leadership', <i>JGRChJ</i> 10 (2014), pp. 194-208<blockquote>This article focuses on Josephus’s narrative presentation of Moses in
					Ant. 2–4 in light of a popular pedagogical discourse in Flavian Rome—the
				Roman discourse of exemplarity. Beginning with an overview of this Roman moral
				conversation and a brief spotlight on the premier leadership characteristic
				celebrated in discourse on exemplary leadership in Flavian Rome (martial prowess),
				this article argues that Josephus’s presentation of Moses aligns well with both the
				narratological form and the characteristic moral content of Roman exemplarity. This
				article situates Josephus in his Roman discursive environment and offers a
				contextually specific explanation for his narrative presentation of a particularly
				martial Moses. It also highlights the permeability of ancient cultural boundaries,
				as well as the utility of Hellenistic and Roman discursive practices and approaches
				for the construction of Jewish identities.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume10?mode=abstracts#10.9</guid><pubDate>2014</pubDate></item><item><title>10.8. Adam Z. Wright, 'Recognizing Jesus: A Study of Recognition Scenes in the Gospel of Mark', JGRChJ 10 (2014), pp. 174-93</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume10?mode=abstracts#10.8</link><description><p>Article from Volume 10 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Adam Z. Wright (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, ON, Canada)</p><p>'Recognizing Jesus: A Study of Recognition Scenes in the Gospel of Mark', <i>JGRChJ</i> 10 (2014), pp. 174-93<blockquote>This article examines the role of recognition scenes in Mark’s Gospel.
				Recognition scenes were a common feature in ancient literature and served to propel
				a narrative’s plot towards a definitive end. By examining the nature of recognition
				scenes as well as their functions within the narrative, a greater appreciation can
				be gained for the structure and purpose of Mark’s Gospel. What will be shown is that
				such recognition scenes, which revolve around the identity of Jesus, create an
				ironic tension that culminates in the crucifixion and subsequent resurrection of
				Jesus.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume10?mode=abstracts#10.8</guid><pubDate>2014</pubDate></item><item><title>10.7. Cynthia Long Westfall, 'The Meaning of αὐθεντέω in 1 Timothy 2.12', JGRChJ 10 (2014), pp. 138-73</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume10?mode=abstracts#10.7</link><description><p>Article from Volume 10 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Cynthia Long Westfall (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, ON, Canada)</p><p>'The Meaning of αὐθεντέω in 1 Timothy 2.12', <i>JGRChJ</i> 10 (2014), pp. 138-73<blockquote>The purpose of this article is to present an explicit methodology and
				procedure in the study of the word <span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Gentium, Athena Unicode">αὐθεντέω</span> based on current suggestions
				and procedures in lexicography and informed by linguistic theory. This is done by an
				attempt to map patterns of how the word was used. This study attempts to locate a
				single basic (but complex) semantic concept that could account for the diachronic
				occurrences of the verb and extended, peripheral or marginal meanings. This article
				tests the suggested range of meaning and identifies patterns in the occurrences of
				the word that shed light on how the word was used in contexts that assist us in
				finding a single basic semantic concept that accounts for this range of
				meanings.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume10?mode=abstracts#10.7</guid><pubDate>2014</pubDate></item><item><title>10.6. William Varner, 'A 'Majority' Reading for James 3.3 Supported by Both External and Internal
				Evidence', JGRChJ 10 (2014), pp. 132-137</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume10?mode=abstracts#10.6</link><description><p>Article from Volume 10 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by William Varner (The Master’s College and Seminary, Santa Clarita, CA, USA)</p><p>'A 'Majority' Reading for James 3.3 Supported by Both External and Internal
				Evidence', <i>JGRChJ</i> 10 (2014), pp. 132-137<blockquote>This article argues for a different textual reading in Jas 3.3a from what is
				found in the critical texts of NA27/28 and UBS4/5. The orienter ἴδε instead of the
				conditional <span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Gentium, Athena Unicode">εἰ δὲ</span> has both older external evidence and better argument
				based on the internal evidence for its adoption. The discourse marker <span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Gentium, Athena Unicode">ἴδε</span>
				in 3.3a combined with the <span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Gentium, Athena Unicode">ἰδού</span> in 3.4 and 3.5 call attention to the three
				examples from natural life—the horse/bridle, the ship/rudder and the fire/forest—and
				effectively combine to make a rhetorical argument for the power of the tongue, both
				for good and for evil.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume10?mode=abstracts#10.6</guid><pubDate>2014</pubDate></item><item><title>10.5. Jordan Henderson, 'Josephus's' Life and Jewish War Compared to the Synoptic Gospels', JGRChJ 10 (2014), pp. 113-131</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume10?mode=abstracts#10.5</link><description><p>Article from Volume 10 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Jordan Henderson (Asbury Theological Seminary, Wilmore, KY, USA)</p><p>'Josephus's' Life and Jewish War Compared to the Synoptic Gospels', <i>JGRChJ</i> 10 (2014), pp. 113-131<blockquote>While there is a growing recognition among scholars that the Synoptic Gospels
				fall within the genre of ancient biography, the differences in detail between these
				three accounts of Jesus’ life remain puzzling. As a case study, this article
				analogously compares the differences between Josephus’s Life and the
				autobiographical portions of his Jewish War to explore the outer range of
				variations that might have been acceptable for different works in the genre of
				ancient biography narrating the life of the same historical figure.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume10?mode=abstracts#10.5</guid><pubDate>2014</pubDate></item><item><title>10.4. Jennifer Shack, 'A Text without 1 Corinthians 14.34-35? Not according to the Manuscript
				Evidence', JGRChJ 10 (2014), pp. 90-112</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume10?mode=abstracts#10.4</link><description><p>Article from Volume 10 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Jennifer Shack (Concordia University College of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada)</p><p>'A Text without 1 Corinthians 14.34-35? Not according to the Manuscript
				Evidence', <i>JGRChJ</i> 10 (2014), pp. 90-112<blockquote>The text of 1 Cor. 14.34-35 is controversial in nature, and some have
				classified it as an interpolation in the text. This article contends that the theory
				that this text is an interpolation is unconvincing when the external evidence is
				reconsidered. This conclusion is shown through an analysis of the text and
				marginalia concerning these verses in Codex Vaticanus, Codex Fuldensis and
					MS 88.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume10?mode=abstracts#10.4</guid><pubDate>2014</pubDate></item><item><title>10.3. John Granger Cook, ' Matthew 5.39 and 26.67: Slapping Another's Cheek in Ancient Mediterranean
				Culture', JGRChJ 10 (2014), pp. 68-89</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume10?mode=abstracts#10.3</link><description><p>Article from Volume 10 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by John Granger Cook (LaGrange College, LaGrange, GA, USA)</p><p>' Matthew 5.39 and 26.67: Slapping Another's Cheek in Ancient Mediterranean
				Culture', <i>JGRChJ</i> 10 (2014), pp. 68-89<blockquote>This article examines the practice of slapping another’s cheek in the ancient
				Mediterranean world. Using texts from Latin and Greek writers and ancient Christian
				and pagan interpreters of Matt 5.39, this article shows that these ancient writers
				were probably unaware that backhanded (or left-handed) slaps were grossly insulting,
				a contention made occasionally in modern scholarship. Some Hebrew texts, on the
				other hand, may show awareness of more insult in left- handed slaps. This study will
				shed light on the significance and implication of the slaps Jesus suffered during
				his Passion according to Matthew.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume10?mode=abstracts#10.3</guid><pubDate>2014</pubDate></item><item><title>10.2. Lincoln H. Blumell, 'The Message and the Medium: Some Observations on Epistolary Communication in Late
				Antiquity', JGRChJ 10 (2014), pp. 24-67</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume10?mode=abstracts#10.2</link><description><p>Article from Volume 10 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Lincoln H. Blumell (Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA)</p><p>'The Message and the Medium: Some Observations on Epistolary Communication in Late
				Antiquity', <i>JGRChJ</i> 10 (2014), pp. 24-67<blockquote>In antiquity the most common form of communication between two or more parties
				who were physically separated was the letter. As a result, letters often constitute
				important source texts for a wide variety of issues and figure prominently in early
				Christian literature. To fully utilize the evidence provided by letters, it is
				important to realize that these texts are conditioned by a number of internal and
				external factors that can affect the message(s) they convey. To elucidate some of
				these factors, this study surveys the epistolary evidence from Late Antiquity and,
				as part of this analysis, pertinent issues like the use of scribes and letter
				carriers are also considered.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume10?mode=abstracts#10.2</guid><pubDate>2014</pubDate></item><item><title>10.1. Craig S. Keener, 'First-Person Claims in Some Ancient Historians and Acts', JGRChJ 10 (2014), pp. 9-23</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume10?mode=abstracts#10.1</link><description><p>Article from Volume 10 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Craig S. Keener (Asbury Theological Seminary, Wilmore, KY, USA)</p><p>'First-Person Claims in Some Ancient Historians and Acts', <i>JGRChJ</i> 10 (2014), pp. 9-23<blockquote>William Sanger Campbell rightly notes that historians used the first-person
				singular more as narrators than as actors. Nevertheless, historians do sometimes
				depict themselves in the first-person in narrative action, including in familiar
				biblical narratives. Although Luke includes notice of his participation, using the
				first-person plural minimizes focus on it far more than even third-person usage
				would have done. By simply including himself in group actions, he avoids distinct
				focus on himself, allowing him to maintain his focus on Paul. Like many authors, the
				author of Acts need not name himself because he was familiar to the first real
				audiences of Acts. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume10?mode=abstracts#10.1</guid><pubDate>2014</pubDate></item><item><title>9.8. John K. Goodrich, 'The Interpretation οf μέτρον πίστεως ιn Romans 12.3—Rejoinder τo Porter αnd
				Ong', JGRChJ 9 (2013), pp. 213-220</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume9?mode=abstracts#9.8</link><description><p>Article from Volume 9 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by John K. Goodrich (Moody Bible Institute, Chicago, IL, USA)</p><p>'The Interpretation οf μέτρον πίστεως ιn Romans 12.3—Rejoinder τo Porter αnd
				Ong', <i>JGRChJ</i> 9 (2013), pp. 213-220<blockquote>This article responds to Stanley Porter and Hughson Ong’s criticisms of my
				2012 Catholic Biblical Quarterly article on the phrase <span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Gentium, Athena Unicode">μέτρον
					πίστεως</span> (“‘Standard of Faith” or “Measure of a Trusteeship”: A Study in
				Romans 12:3’). After identifying various oversights in Porter and Ong’s
				argumentation, I respond to their critique in two parts, focusing initially on their
				methodological claims before addressing certain alleged omissions in my earlier
				piece. I thereby seek to show that my interpretation of Romans 12.3 is far more
				tenable than Porter and Ong lead one to believe.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume9?mode=abstracts#9.8</guid><pubDate>2013</pubDate></item><item><title>9.7. Alexandra Mileto Robinson, 'The Enoch Inclusio in Jude: A New Structural Possibility', JGRChJ 9 (2013), pp. 196-212</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume9?mode=abstracts#9.7</link><description><p>Article from Volume 9 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Alexandra Mileto Robinson (Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia)</p><p>'The Enoch Inclusio in Jude: A New Structural Possibility', <i>JGRChJ</i> 9 (2013), pp. 196-212<blockquote>This paper proposes that Jude v. 4 and vv. 14-15 function as an inclusio
				framing Jude’s case against the ungodly and shaping the flow of the entire letter.
				The second bracket of the inclusio, the Enoch citation (vv. 14-15), has been viewed
				as one example among many in Jude’s case. Instead, it is a prophetic declaration in
				light of the evidence, confirming the condemnation of the ungodly. Of all the
				theophany passages at Jude’s disposal, why did he select this text to build and
				finalize his charge against the ungodly? The paper offers seven suggestions why 1
					En 1.9 was appropriate for Jude’s situation.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume9?mode=abstracts#9.7</guid><pubDate>2013</pubDate></item><item><title>9.6. Travis B. Williams, 'Benefiting the Community through Good Works? The Economic Feasibility of Civic
				Benefaction in 1 Peter', JGRChJ 9 (2013), pp. 147-95</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume9?mode=abstracts#9.6</link><description><p>Article from Volume 9 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Travis B. Williams (Tusculum College, Greeneville, TN, USA)</p><p>'Benefiting the Community through Good Works? The Economic Feasibility of Civic
				Benefaction in 1 Peter', <i>JGRChJ</i> 9 (2013), pp. 147-95<blockquote>In 1 Peter, interpreters often reject the idea that civic benefaction stands
				behind the author’s instructions to ‘do good’, due in large part to the (perceived)
				lack of financial resources. To this point, however, no quantitative economic data
				has been produced to substantiate this claim. The purpose of this study, therefore,
				is to determine whether civic benefaction would have been economically feasible for
				the Petrine audience by calculating the total amount of disposable income that could
				have been accumulated within the average Christian community and weighing this
				amount against the known costs incurred in the practice of
				euergetism.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume9?mode=abstracts#9.6</guid><pubDate>2013</pubDate></item><item><title>9.5. Benjamin A. Edsall, 'Greco-Roman Costume and Paul’s Fraught Argument in 1 Corinthians 11.2-16', JGRChJ 9 (2013), pp. 132-46</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume9?mode=abstracts#9.5</link><description><p>Article from Volume 9 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Benjamin A. Edsall (Keble College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK)</p><p>'Greco-Roman Costume and Paul’s Fraught Argument in 1 Corinthians 11.2-16', <i>JGRChJ</i> 9 (2013), pp. 132-46<blockquote>Using as a point of entry the scholarly debate about whether head-coverings or
				hairstyles are in view in 1 Cor. 11.2–16, this article re-evaluates Paul's
				surprisingly difficult argument from the perspective of Greco-Roman costume and its
				attendant cultural baggage. In this light it appears that Paul is addressing what he
				views as a problem of social and sexual propriety for female conduct that has arisen
				from further Corinthian reflection on his own teaching. Paul's response tries to
				navigate between reinforcing expected propriety while not contradicting his initial
				teaching about equality in Christ.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume9?mode=abstracts#9.5</guid><pubDate>2013</pubDate></item><item><title>9.4. Bryan R. Dyer, 'The Epistle to the Hebrews in Recent Research: Studies on the Author's Identity,
				his Use of the Old Testament, and Theology', JGRChJ 9 (2013), pp. 104-31</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume9?mode=abstracts#9.4</link><description><p>Article from Volume 9 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Bryan R. Dyer (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, ON, Canada)</p><p>'The Epistle to the Hebrews in Recent Research: Studies on the Author's Identity,
				his Use of the Old Testament, and Theology', <i>JGRChJ</i> 9 (2013), pp. 104-31<blockquote>The Epistle to the Hebrews has been the focus of renewed interest in New
				Testament scholarship. Although it was once thought of as a neglected text in the
				canon, numerous commentaries, monographs, and other studies on Hebrews have appeared
				in the last decade. By examining nine monographs published between 2009 and 2012,
				this article offers a state-of-play of recent Hebrews scholarship. Three areas of
				interest emerge: authorship of Hebrews, its use of the Old Testament, and its
				theology. This recent interest in Hebrews is to be encouraged as it has offered
				fresh light on an important text from early Christianity. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume9?mode=abstracts#9.4</guid><pubDate>2013</pubDate></item><item><title>9.3. Stanley E. Porter and Hughson T. Ong, '‘Standard of Faith’ or 'Measure of Trusteeship?' A Study in Romans 12.3-A
				Response', JGRChJ 9 (2013), pp. 97-103</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume9?mode=abstracts#9.3</link><description><p>Article from Volume 9 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Stanley E. Porter and Hughson T. Ong (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, ON, Canada)</p><p>'‘Standard of Faith’ or 'Measure of Trusteeship?' A Study in Romans 12.3-A
				Response', <i>JGRChJ</i> 9 (2013), pp. 97-103<blockquote>This article responds to John Goodrich’s ‘“Standard of Faith” or “Measure of a
				Trusteeship”?’ published in the Catholic Biblical Quarterly (2012). Goodrich
				proposes that the <span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Gentium, Athena Unicode">μέτρον πίστεως</span> in Rom 12.3 refers to the believer’s
				charism and thus should be seen as ‘a trusteeship’ God grants to each believer. We,
				however, argue that the clause with <span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Gentium, Athena Unicode">μέτρον πίστεως</span> in Rom. 12.3 should be
				interpreted and translated as ‘to each God allocates his measure of faith’,
				highlighting a number of significant problems in the arguments and evidence Goodrich
				marshals in his article.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume9?mode=abstracts#9.3</guid><pubDate>2013</pubDate></item><item><title>9.2. Barry F. Parker, '‘Works of the Law’ and the Jewish Settlement in Asia Minor', JGRChJ 9 (2013), pp. 42-96</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume9?mode=abstracts#9.2</link><description><p>Article from Volume 9 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Barry F. Parker (California Baptist University, Riverside, CA, USA)</p><p>'‘Works of the Law’ and the Jewish Settlement in Asia Minor', <i>JGRChJ</i> 9 (2013), pp. 42-96<blockquote>This article begins with an historical study of the Jewish settlements in Asia
				Minor. The religious milieu is also examined. Although it appears that the Jewish
				identity remained intact, the social, cultural and religious pressures faced by
				Anatolian Jews were much greater for them than for the Palestinian Jews. It is
				maintained that Paul’s overriding concern in Galatians 3 is ‘faithfulness of
				Christ’. To explain this, Paul adapts Anatolian concepts and language to his own
				polemic. Paul’s phrase, ‘works of the law’, does not attack the law per se, but the
				selective understanding of the law by the Anatolian Jews.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume9?mode=abstracts#9.2</guid><pubDate>2013</pubDate></item><item><title>9.1. Christopher D. Land, 'Digitizing Ancient Inscriptions and Manuscripts: Some Thoughts about the
				Production of Digital Editions', JGRChJ 9 (2013), pp. 9-41</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume9?mode=abstracts#9.1</link><description><p>Article from Volume 9 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Christopher D. Land (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, ON, Canada)</p><p>'Digitizing Ancient Inscriptions and Manuscripts: Some Thoughts about the
				Production of Digital Editions', <i>JGRChJ</i> 9 (2013), pp. 9-41<blockquote>The digitization of ancient artefacts is becoming increasingly common. This
				essay draws upon a hierarchy of linguistic abstractions in order to organize the
				information that future scholars might wish to access in a digital edition, with the
				purpose being to inform the development of encoding standards. The first two parts
				of the essay introduce the digital humanities and discuss the impact of computer
				technology on New Testament scholarship. A third part outlines the theoretical
				distinctions that are relevant to the representation of ancient inscriptions and
				manuscripts. A final part then discusses the limitations of existing editions (both
				print and digital), before proposing a modular approach that would permit the
				production of more comprehensive editions.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume9?mode=abstracts#9.1</guid><pubDate>2013</pubDate></item><item><title>8.10. Kevin Daugherty, 'Naked Bodies and Heavenly Clothing: ΓΥΜΝΟΣ in 2 Corinthians 5.3', JGRChJ 8 (2011-2012), pp. 199-222</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume8?mode=abstracts#8.10</link><description><p>Article from Volume 8 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Kevin Daugherty (Briercrest College and Seminary, Caronport, SK, Canada)</p><p>'Naked Bodies and Heavenly Clothing: ΓΥΜΝΟΣ in 2 Corinthians 5.3', <i>JGRChJ</i> 8 (2011-2012), pp. 199-222<blockquote>Paul’s statement that believers will not be found ‘naked’ in 2 Cor. 5.3 has
				often been interpreted in terms of a period of disembodied existence after death.
				Instead, the background of the image in the Hebrew Bible, its meaning in the context
				of 2 Corinthians, and its relation to the broader teachings of Paul, all support the
				interpretation of ‘naked’ as a description of the present condition of the body,
				especially as it culminates in death. Nakedness indicates continued solidarity with
				the Adamic race and the present age, and Paul was encouraged that he would not
				appear before Christ at the judgment in this state.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume8?mode=abstracts#8.10</guid><pubDate>2011</pubDate></item><item><title>8.9. Stanley E. Porter, 'Early Apocryphal Non-Gospel Literature and the New Testament Text', JGRChJ 8 (2011-2012), pp. 192-98</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume8?mode=abstracts#8.9</link><description><p>Article from Volume 8 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Stanley E. Porter (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, ON, Canada)</p><p>'Early Apocryphal Non-Gospel Literature and the New Testament Text', <i>JGRChJ</i> 8 (2011-2012), pp. 192-98<blockquote>This paper examines the non-Gospel apocryphal documents originating before the
				rise of the major codexes in the fourth century. When this literature is examined,
				there are very few parallels to passages in the New Testament. Where there is
				evidence of parallel material, the apocryphal texts appear to use the text of the
				Greek New Testament directly or with contextual adaptations, indicating that the
				text of the Greek New Testament was relatively well established by the second and
				third centuries.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume8?mode=abstracts#8.9</guid><pubDate>2011</pubDate></item><item><title>8.8. Richard Carrier , 'Thallus and The Darkness at Christ’s Death', JGRChJ 8 (2011-2012), pp. 185-91</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume8?mode=abstracts#8.8</link><description><p>Article from Volume 8 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Richard Carrier  (Berkeley, CA, USA)</p><p>'Thallus and The Darkness at Christ’s Death', <i>JGRChJ</i> 8 (2011-2012), pp. 185-91<blockquote>It is commonly claimed that a chronologer named Thallus, writing shortly after
				52 CE, mentioned the crucifixion of Jesus and the noontime darkness surrounding it
				(which reportedly eclipsed the whole world for three hours), and attempted to
				explain it as an ordinary solar eclipse. But this is not a credible interpretation
				of the evidence. A stronger case can be made that we actually have a direct
				quotation of what Thallus said, and it does not mention Jesus. Rather, Thallus only
				wrote that in the year 32 “the sun was eclipsed, Bithynia was struck by an
				earthquake, and in the city of Nicaea many buildings fell.”</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume8?mode=abstracts#8.8</guid><pubDate>2011</pubDate></item><item><title>8.7. Horace Jeffery Hodges and John C. Poirier, 'Jesus as the Holy One of God: The Healing of the ZaVaH in Mark
				5.24b-34', JGRChJ 8 (2011-2012), pp. 151-84</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume8?mode=abstracts#8.7</link><description><p>Article from Volume 8 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Horace Jeffery Hodges and John C. Poirier (Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea and Kingswell Theological Seminary, Middletown, OH, USA)</p><p>'Jesus as the Holy One of God: The Healing of the <i>ZaVaH</i> in Mark
				5.24b-34', <i>JGRChJ</i> 8 (2011-2012), pp. 151-84<blockquote>The story of Jesus healing a woman of a chronic flow of blood (Mark 5.24b-34)
				speaks, on the surface, of the woman’s faith. It also reveals several things about
				the dynamics of ritual impurity and healing virtue, most notably about how those
				dynamics interact with the figure of Jesus as the “holy one” of God. This article
				revisits the question of what the healing signifies (esp. for the woman), and of how
				the narrative informs the larger Markan context. It also examines the figure of the
				“holy one” in Mark, and his effect upon the story’s ritual logic.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume8?mode=abstracts#8.7</guid><pubDate>2011</pubDate></item><item><title>8.6. E. K. McFall, 'Are Dionysos and Oedipus Name Variations for Satan and Antichrist?', JGRChJ 8 (2011-2012), pp. 106-50</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume8?mode=abstracts#8.6</link><description><p>Article from Volume 8 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by E. K. McFall (Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey)</p><p>'Are Dionysos and Oedipus Name Variations for Satan and Antichrist?', <i>JGRChJ</i> 8 (2011-2012), pp. 106-50<blockquote>The striking similarities between Dionysos and Satan, along with evident
				points of intersection and contention between Dionysos and both YHWH and Christ, are
				such that ‘no other deity from any other culture is as closely associated with both
				YHWH and Christ—and yet diametrically opposed to them—as Dionysos’. Connecting this
				view to close readings of the Attic tragedians that allow for the inference that
				Dionysos is Oedipus’s father-coupled to an understanding of Oedipus as a kind of
				‘anti-Moses’, and to commentaries that link Oedipus to Judas and Nero, both
					types of Antichrists—raises the question of the tradition of
				Antichrist in the context of Dionysos as Satan and Oedipus as Antichrist.
			</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume8?mode=abstracts#8.6</guid><pubDate>2011</pubDate></item><item><title>8.5. Wally V. Cirafesi, 'The Priestly Portrait Of Jesus In The Gospel Of John In The Light Of 1QS, 1QSa
				And 1QSb', JGRChJ 8 (2011-2012), pp. 83-105</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume8?mode=abstracts#8.5</link><description><p>Article from Volume 8 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Wally V. Cirafesi (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, ON, Canada)</p><p>'The Priestly Portrait Of Jesus In The Gospel Of John In The Light Of 1QS, 1QSa
				And 1QSb', <i>JGRChJ</i> 8 (2011-2012), pp. 83-105<blockquote>This article suggests that the priestly features of John’s Christology merit
				further exploration, and highlights several priestly elements of the Fourth Gospel’s
				presentation of Jesus based on three Qumran texts: 1QS, 1QSa and 1QSb. It argues
				that there were at least three key characteristics of the Zadokite priesthood at
				Qumran that find correspondences with the activities of Jesus in John’s Gospel.
				These characteristics are: (1) authority in legal scenarios; (2) leadership at the
				communal meal; and (3) the formation of a spiritualized temple. It concludes that,
				while there may not necessarily be a relation of causality, the Qumran texts and
				John’s Gospel share a similar theological perspective regarding the priesthood in
				Qumran and Jesus Christ in John.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume8?mode=abstracts#8.5</guid><pubDate>2011</pubDate></item><item><title>8.4. Greg Goswell, 'An Early Commentary on the Pauline Corpus: The Capitulation of Codex
				Vaticanus', JGRChJ 8 (2011-2012), pp. 51-82</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume8?mode=abstracts#8.4</link><description><p>Article from Volume 8 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Greg Goswell (Presbyterian Theological College, Melbourne, Australia)</p><p>'An Early Commentary on the Pauline Corpus: The Capitulation of Codex
				Vaticanus', <i>JGRChJ</i> 8 (2011-2012), pp. 51-82<blockquote>An examination of the system of chapters in Codex Vaticanus (B 03) of the
				early fourth century reveals that the divisions present in the Pauline epistles
				represent an evaluation of what are the sense-units of the biblical passages. This
				study explores the hermeneutical significance of the ancient chapters demarcated in
				the Pauline Epistles of this codex. It demonstrates that the study of divisions in
				ancient texts has the potential of generating new exegetical insights (or recovering
				old ones long forgotten) and of helping us to scrutinize and re-evaluate
				contemporary exegetical and homiletical practice.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume8?mode=abstracts#8.4</guid><pubDate>2011</pubDate></item><item><title>8.3. Tim Brookins, 'Dispute with Stoicism in the Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus', JGRChJ 8 (2011-2012), pp. 34-50</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume8?mode=abstracts#8.3</link><description><p>Article from Volume 8 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Tim Brookins (Baylor University, Waco, TX)</p><p>'Dispute with Stoicism in the Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus', <i>JGRChJ</i> 8 (2011-2012), pp. 34-50<blockquote>Setting aside questions of derivation, literary dependency, and textual
				integrity, this essay asks how a Greco-Roman comparative approach might enable
				present-day audiences to hear the parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus as it would
				have been heard by a philosophically- and rhetorically-educated first-century
				audience. It argues that the parable evokes the technical Stoic concepts of ‘good’
					(<span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Gentium, Athena Unicode">ἀγαθόν</span>) and ‘evil’ (<span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Gentium, Athena Unicode">κακόν</span>), as well as each of the items
				in the usual summary of Stoic ‘indifferents’ (<span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Gentium, Athena Unicode">ἀδιάφορα</span>) (life, pleasure,
				health, and wealth, and their opposites, death, pain, disease, and poverty), but
				that Luke deliberately upsets the Stoic understanding of these concepts.
				Accentuating this Stoic content is the fact that the parable uses a form of
				discourse that was, in the tradition preserved by Seneca, closely associated with
				the Stoics—that of ‘declamatory’ rhetoric.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume8?mode=abstracts#8.3</guid><pubDate>2011</pubDate></item><item><title>8.2. Jintae Kim, 'The Concept of Atonement in the Fourth Servant Song in the LXX', JGRChJ 8 (2011-2012), pp. 21-33</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume8?mode=abstracts#8.2</link><description><p>Article from Volume 8 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Jintae Kim (Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary)</p><p>'The Concept of Atonement in the Fourth Servant Song in the LXX', <i>JGRChJ</i> 8 (2011-2012), pp. 21-33<blockquote>This article seeks to find the origin of the New Testament concept of
				atonement. The writer suggests the presence of an ancient tradition behind the
				Fourth Servant Song of the LXX. The LXX (Isa. 52.13–53.12) eschatologizes the Old
				Testament sacrifices by identifying the Servant with a messianic figure who would
				suffer and die vicariously for the sins of others. The same idea was implicit in the
				Hebrew text of Isaiah 53 and is now made explicit in the translator’s interpretive
				rendering of the Hebrew text. In this article, the writer examines primarily the
				Fourth Servant Song in the LXX and demonstrates its eschatological interpretation of
				the Old Testament sacrifices.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume8?mode=abstracts#8.2</guid><pubDate>2011</pubDate></item><item><title>8.1. Brice C. Jones, 'The Bodmer ‘Miscellaneous’ Codex and the Crosby-Schøyen Codex MS 193: A New
				Proposal'', JGRChJ 8 (2011-2012), pp. 9-20</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume8?mode=abstracts#8.1</link><description><p>Article from Volume 8 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Brice C. Jones (McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada)</p><p>'The Bodmer ‘Miscellaneous’ Codex and the Crosby-Schøyen Codex MS 193: A New
				Proposal'', <i>JGRChJ</i> 8 (2011-2012), pp. 9-20<blockquote>This article examines the codex of P72 in an attempt to determine whether or
				not ‘miscellany’ is an appropriate designation on the basis of its contents. Some
				scholars have argued that the scribe of P72 brought together several texts that
				share a common theme, but there are indications that suggest this theory is
				unwarranted. This article proposes that the multi-text codex of P72 consists of a
				variety of texts that were brought together not because they share a single theme
				but because the compiler of the codex sought to establish a better reserve of
				biblical literature for private use, and that the term ‘composite’ is a more
				appropriate designation for the codex.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume8?mode=abstracts#8.1</guid><pubDate>2011</pubDate></item><item><title>7.10. Craig S. Keener, 'Acts 10: Were Troops Stationed in Caesarea during Agrippa's Rule?', JGRChJ 7 (2010), pp. 164-176</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume7?mode=abstracts#7.10</link><description><p>Article from Volume 7 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Craig S. Keener (Palmer Theological Seminary, Wynnewood, PA, USA)</p><p>'Acts 10: Were Troops Stationed in Caesarea during Agrippa's Rule?', <i>JGRChJ</i> 7 (2010), pp. 164-176<blockquote> Haenchen questions Luke’s report about the conversion of the Gentile
				Cornelius, contending that the narrative occurs during Agrippa’s reign (41–44 CE)
				and that no Roman soldiers were stationed in Caesarea during this time. Haenchen’s
				argument is, however, difficult to defend. First, we cannot be certain as to the
				time frame of the events described. Secondly, Josephus explicitly refers to
				auxiliaries of the Roman army in Caesarea during this period. Thirdly, some argue
				that Cornelius was retired anyway. Of these arguments, the most important is the
				second from Josephus.  Key words: Acts 10; Cornelius; centurion; Agrippa
			</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume7?mode=abstracts#7.10</guid><pubDate>2010</pubDate></item><item><title>7.9. Craig S. Keener, 'The Plausibility of Luke's Growth Figures in Acts 2.41; 4.4; 21.20', JGRChJ 7 (2010), pp. 140-63</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume7?mode=abstracts#7.9</link><description><p>Article from Volume 7 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Craig S. Keener (Palmer Theological Seminary, Wynnewood, PA, USA)</p><p>'The Plausibility of Luke's Growth Figures in Acts 2.41; 4.4; 21.20', <i>JGRChJ</i> 7 (2010), pp. 140-63<blockquote> Analogous periods of intensive growth attested for new religious movements
				render Luke’s reports of the church’s growth (Acts 2.41; 4.4; 21:.20) more plausible
				than is often assumed. Indeed, far from being absurd, Luke’s figures appear modest
				in comparison with significant growth rates in much of global Christianity and other
				mass movements today. This is not to deny that Luke may have preferred higher
				estimates where available, or to presume that careful statistics were kept. But
				concrete arguments against high figures for the Jerusalem church (addressed in this
				article) are not compelling, so if we have other reasons to respect Luke’s
				historiography, these reports remain plausible.  Keywords: Acts 2.41; Acts 4.4;
				Acts 21.20; church growth; Jerusalem church; Luke’s historiography </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume7?mode=abstracts#7.9</guid><pubDate>2010</pubDate></item><item><title>7.8. Craig S. Keener, 'Note on Athens: Do 1 Corinthians 16.15 and Acts 17.34 Conflict?', JGRChJ 7 (2010), pp. 137-39</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume7?mode=abstracts#7.8</link><description><p>Article from Volume 7 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Craig S. Keener (Palmer Theological Seminary, Wynnewood, PA, USA)</p><p>'Note on Athens: Do 1 Corinthians 16.15 and Acts 17.34 Conflict?', <i>JGRChJ</i> 7 (2010), pp. 137-39<blockquote> In contrast to those who argue that 1 Cor. 16.15 rules out the possibility of
				earlier converts in Athens, Athens was a ‘free city’, hence not officially part of
				the province of Achaia during this period.  Key words: Acts 17.34; 1 Cor.
				16.15; historiography; Athens; Achaia; free cities </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume7?mode=abstracts#7.8</guid><pubDate>2010</pubDate></item><item><title>7.7. Nijay K. Gupta and Fredrick J. Long, 'The Politics of Ephesians and the Empire: Accommodation or Resistance?', JGRChJ 7 (2010), pp. 112-36</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume7?mode=abstracts#7.7</link><description><p>Article from Volume 7 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Nijay K. Gupta and Fredrick J. Long (Asbury Theological Seminary, Wilmore, KY)</p><p>'The Politics of Ephesians and the Empire: Accommodation or Resistance?', <i>JGRChJ</i> 7 (2010), pp. 112-36<blockquote> Despite the trend to interpret New Testament texts as containing some form of
				imperial critique, the letter to the Ephesians is dismissed as advocating
				accommodation to empire. The charge is that the letter is escapist, emphasizing
				spiritual foes, and maintains the Roman status quo in its household code. However,
				particular language in Ephesians reveals a resistance to earthly ‘demonized’ powers
				and challenges imperial prerogatives through trumping and subverting them. God’s
				example of rule and living in Christ critiques imperialism. Furthermore, the
				household code promotes mutual submission and equal regard of respective members.
				When Ephesians is read within its own socio-political and religious context, clear
				signs of resistance to the empire are detected, possibly even involving
				confrontation of ‘the deeds of darkness’.    Key Words: Ephesians, Pauline
				Theology, Imperial Criticism, Household Codes, Roman Empire </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume7?mode=abstracts#7.7</guid><pubDate>2010</pubDate></item><item><title>7.6. Jintae Kim, 'The Concept of Atonement in the Qumran Literature and the New Covenant', JGRChJ 7 (2010), pp. 98-111</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume7?mode=abstracts#7.6</link><description><p>Article from Volume 7 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Jintae Kim ( Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary, Lynchburg, VA)</p><p>'The Concept of Atonement in the Qumran Literature and the New Covenant', <i>JGRChJ</i> 7 (2010), pp. 98-111<blockquote> In the New Testament, we find the fusion of the concept of atonement with the
				concept of eschatological forgiveness as promised in Jeremiah’s new covenant
				prophecy in connection with the atoning death of Christ (Lk. 22.20; 1 Cor. 11.25;
				Heb. 8.6-13; 9.15-28; 1 Jn 2.2, 12-14). Focusing on the peculiar use of the phrase
				h#dxh tyrbh in the Qumran literature, this paper will demonstrate that this way of
				interpreting Jeremiah’s new covenant is built upon a Jewish eschatologizing of
				forgiveness as evidenced at Qumran, where the community identified itself both as
				the new covenant and the true temple with spiritual sacrifices. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume7?mode=abstracts#7.6</guid><pubDate>2010</pubDate></item><item><title>7.5. Greg Goswell, 'Ancient Patterns of Reading: The Subdivision of the Acts of the Apostles in Codex
				Sinaiticus ', JGRChJ 7 (2010), pp. 68-97</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume7?mode=abstracts#7.5</link><description><p>Article from Volume 7 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Greg Goswell (Presbyterian Theological College, Melbourne, Australia)</p><p>'Ancient Patterns of Reading: The Subdivision of the Acts of the Apostles in Codex
				Sinaiticus ', <i>JGRChJ</i> 7 (2010), pp. 68-97<blockquote> The 42 numbered chapters and 27 kephalaia present in Codex Sinaiticus
				(fourth century) for the Acts of the Apostles give the contemporary reader access to
				ancient patterns of reading the book of Acts. The kephalaia take the form of
				running titles at the top of columns (titloi). The presupposition behind this
				study is that the breaking up of a long narrative text into smaller units is a
				significant factor that shapes readerly perceptions. The kephalaia of
				Sinaiticus give special prominence to certain persons, events and themes in Acts.
				The uncovered modes of reading sometimes challenge contemporary notions about Acts
				and even provide (what are to us) new exegetical insights. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume7?mode=abstracts#7.5</guid><pubDate>2010</pubDate></item><item><title>7.4. Craig S. Keener, 'The Nativity Cave and Gentile Myths', JGRChJ 7 (2010), pp. 59-67</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume7?mode=abstracts#7.4</link><description><p>Article from Volume 7 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Craig S. Keener (Palmer Theological Seminary, Wynnewood, PA, USA)</p><p>'The Nativity Cave and Gentile Myths', <i>JGRChJ</i> 7 (2010), pp. 59-67<blockquote> How would Gentiles have heard the early Christian tradition of Jesus’
				nativity in a cave, and Hadrian’s subsequent ‘defilement’ of that site with a sacred
				grove? This article briefly surveys some relevant or potentially relevant pagan
				analogies. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume7?mode=abstracts#7.4</guid><pubDate>2010</pubDate></item><item><title>7.3. Craig S. Keener, 'The Pillars and the Right Hand of Fellowship in Galatians 2.9', JGRChJ 7 (2010), pp. 51-58</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume7?mode=abstracts#7.3</link><description><p>Article from Volume 7 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Craig S. Keener (Palmer Theological Seminary, Wynnewood, PA, USA)</p><p>'The Pillars and the Right Hand of Fellowship in Galatians 2.9', <i>JGRChJ</i> 7 (2010), pp. 51-58<blockquote> In Gal. 2.9, the Jerusalem pillars entered an agreement with Paul by giving
				him ‘the right hand of fellowship’. This brief article surveys evidence involving
				agreements with the right hand, and also the figurative use of ‘pillars’ as images
				of strength, to explore more fully the sorts of connotations that Paul’s Galatian
				audience may have heard in both images. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume7?mode=abstracts#7.3</guid><pubDate>2010</pubDate></item><item><title>7.2. Michael Meerson, 'One God Supreme: A Case Study of Religious Tolerance and Survival', JGRChJ 7 (2010), pp. 32-50</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume7?mode=abstracts#7.2</link><description><p>Article from Volume 7 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Michael Meerson (Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA)</p><p>'One God Supreme: A Case Study of Religious Tolerance and Survival', <i>JGRChJ</i> 7 (2010), pp. 32-50<blockquote> The paper discusses an important Hellenistic inscription that was found on
				Mount Gerizim in Samaria, Israel. First, the paper analyzes the corpus of
				inscriptions with invocations to qeo\j u9yi/stoj and ei[j qeo/j (both posing a
				similar problem), trying to find out a social and cultural message in one’s choice
				to address the god with a name fitting both the Jewish and the pagan worship. After
				that, the paper attempts to date the inscription and to put it in a cultural and
				architectural context of Mount Gerizim, the focus of spiritual values for
				Samaritans. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume7?mode=abstracts#7.2</guid><pubDate>2010</pubDate></item><item><title>7.1. Craig A. Smith, 'The Development of Style (Fifth Century BCE to Second Century CE) and the
				Consequences for Understanding the Style of the New Testament', JGRChJ 7 (2010), pp. 9-31</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume7?mode=abstracts#7.1</link><description><p>Article from Volume 7 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Craig A. Smith (Sterling College, Sterling KS, USA)</p><p>'The Development of Style (Fifth Century BCE to Second Century CE) and the
				Consequences for Understanding the Style of the New Testament', <i>JGRChJ</i> 7 (2010), pp. 9-31<blockquote> There has been very little consideration given to the impact and consequences
				of writing style on the New Testament writings. This article is a push against this
				reality. There are three aims in this article. First, it will show how literary
				style developed over the period of time from the fifth century BCE to the second
				century CE, thereby providing a context for understanding literary style. Secondly,
				the reader will see how this development of style impacts the examination of style
				in the New Testament. Thirdly, 2 Tim. 4.1-8 is used as an example of how an
				understanding of style affects the interpretation of a New Testament text.
			</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume7?mode=abstracts#7.1</guid><pubDate>2010</pubDate></item><item><title>6.10. Cynthia Long Westfall, 'Blessed Be The Ties That Bind: Semantic Domains And Cohesive Chains In Hebrews
				1.1-2.4 And 12.5-8', JGRChJ 6 (2009), pp. 199-216</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume6?mode=abstracts#6.10</link><description><p>Article from Volume 6 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Cynthia Long Westfall (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, ON, Canada)</p><p>'Blessed Be The Ties That Bind: Semantic Domains And Cohesive Chains In Hebrews
				1.1-2.4 And 12.5-8', <i>JGRChJ</i> 6 (2009), pp. 199-216<blockquote>This article introduces the usefulness of semantic domain theory in discourse
				analysis. The theory of semantic domains relates directly to several core theories
				of discourse analysis, particularly cohesion,
					coherence and the recognition of topics.
				Semantic domains, cohesion and topics are examined in Heb. 12.5-8 and Heb. 1.1–2.4.
				The semantic and participant chains in Heb. 12.5-8 show that the topic is not so
				much ‘God disciplines his children’, as given in the TNIV, but ‘Endure hardship as
				God’s discipline’. An examination of semantic domains, cohesion and topics between
				Heb. 1.5-13 and Heb. 1.1-4 and 2.1-4 is conducted, showing that all three passages
				highlight God’s communication through the Son. The paper argues that an analysis of
				semantic domains provides a vital lens through which we can view every text, and
				that it sometimes sheds important light on interpretive puzzles. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume6?mode=abstracts#6.10</guid><pubDate>2009</pubDate></item><item><title>6.9. Lois K. Fuller Dow, 'Understanding κλῆσις in the New Testament', JGRChJ 6 (2009), pp. 191-198</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume6?mode=abstracts#6.9</link><description><p>Article from Volume 6 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Lois K. Fuller Dow (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, ON, Canada)</p><p>'Understanding κλῆσις in the New Testament', <i>JGRChJ</i> 6 (2009), pp. 191-198<blockquote><span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Gentium, Athena Unicode">κλῆσις</span> is defined in BDAG as a call (invitation)
				and as a position or condition. 1 Cor. 7.20 is the
				only place in Greek literature where it has been given the second meaning. The
				passages in non- Christian Greek literature given by BDAG for the meaning
					position are unable to support this meaning. In the Hellenistic
				world the word very often meant a name or
					appellation. A fresh look at 1 Cor 7.20 shows that the call
				there is God’s call, to be lived out in any life situation. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume6?mode=abstracts#6.9</guid><pubDate>2009</pubDate></item><item><title>6.8. Craig Keener, 'Heavenly Mindedness and Earthly Good: Contemplating Matters Above in Colossians
				3.1-2', JGRChJ 6 (2009), pp. 175-190</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume6?mode=abstracts#6.8</link><description><p>Article from Volume 6 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Craig Keener (Palmer Theological Seminary, Wynnewood, PA, USA)</p><p>'Heavenly Mindedness and Earthly Good: Contemplating Matters Above in Colossians
				3.1-2', <i>JGRChJ</i> 6 (2009), pp. 175-190<blockquote>Philosophers, mystics, and apocalyptic visionaries sought to visualize heaven,
				often to envision deity; philosophers emphasized specifically heavenly thinking. For
				philosophers, the pure and heavenly deity was abstract and transcendent; for
				Colossians, the heavenly focus is Christ, fitting the christocentric emphasis of
				this letter. For Colossians, contemplating Christ also leads naturally to Christlike
				character, in contrast to the pursuit of earthly passions. Although the writer’s
				articulation of the connection is distinctive, his connection of heavenly
				contemplation with appropriate behavior would have been intelligible to his
				contemporaries, including many philosophers. Colossians 3.1-2 addresses the sorts of
				conceptions in the larger milieu that the letter as a whole addresses, and connects
				the letter’s earlier theological arguments with the following parenetic material.
			</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume6?mode=abstracts#6.8</guid><pubDate>2009</pubDate></item><item><title>6.7. Greg Goswell, 'Early Readers of the Gospels: The KEPHALAIA and
					TITLOI of Codex Alexandrinus', JGRChJ 6 (2009), pp. 134-174</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume6?mode=abstracts#6.7</link><description><p>Article from Volume 6 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Greg Goswell (Presbyterian Theological College, Melbourne, Australia)</p><p>'Early Readers of the Gospels: The <i>KEPHALAIA</i> and
					<i>TITLOI</i> of Codex Alexandrinus', <i>JGRChJ</i> 6 (2009), pp. 134-174<blockquote>Codex Alexandrinus includes kephalaia (<span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Gentium, Athena Unicode">κεφάλια</span>), namely chapter
				divisions, for the Gospels. A survey of the kephalaia in the four Gospels indicates
				that their placement is not haphazard but reflects an evaluation the flow of the
				narratives and shows insight into the meaning of the story. They act as a commentary
				on the text that can at times be an insightful guide. I seek to demonstrate that
				there are four main possible effects of a textual break, namely to separate or join
				material, and to highlight or downplay features of the text, and I provide examples
				of each effect (function) using the kephalaia. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume6?mode=abstracts#6.7</guid><pubDate>2009</pubDate></item><item><title>6.6. David Lincicum, 'The Origin of ‘Alpha and Omega’ (Revelation 1.8; 21.6; 22.13): A
				Suggestion', JGRChJ 6 (2009), pp. 128-133</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume6?mode=abstracts#6.6</link><description><p>Article from Volume 6 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by David Lincicum (University of Oxford, UK)</p><p>'The Origin of ‘Alpha and Omega’ (Revelation 1.8; 21.6; 22.13): A
				Suggestion', <i>JGRChJ</i> 6 (2009), pp. 128-133<blockquote>This note takes up the suggestion that the title ‘Alpha and Omega’ (Rev. 1.8;
				21.6; 22.13) arose through reflection on the divine name, ΙΑΩ. The article commends
				the possibility that John ‘exegeted’ the divine name, in light of Isaiah 40–48 and
				emerging scribal practices of abbreviating the nomina sacra, as a reference to Jesus
				as the Alpha and Omega. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume6?mode=abstracts#6.6</guid><pubDate>2009</pubDate></item><item><title>6.5. Mark A. Jennings, 'Patronage and Rebuke in Paul's Persuasion in 2 Corinthians 8-9', JGRChJ 6 (2009), pp. 107-127</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume6?mode=abstracts#6.5</link><description><p>Article from Volume 6 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Mark A. Jennings (Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA )</p><p>'Patronage and Rebuke in Paul's Persuasion in 2 Corinthians 8-9', <i>JGRChJ</i> 6 (2009), pp. 107-127<blockquote>This study of 2 Corinthians 8–9 will show how Paul employs the language of
				patronal relationships in his attempt to gain the Corinthian church’s full
				participation in his collection for those in Jerusalem. This language includes his
				depictions of the various network relationships, the nature of the goods exchanged,
				the importance of honor and shame, as well as his use of ‘grace’. By gaining a
				better understanding of how Paul incorporates patron imagery into his rhetoric of 2
				Corinthians 8–9, we can see that Paul expected the cooperation of the Corinthian
				church on account of its place with the network of God’s churches. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume6?mode=abstracts#6.5</guid><pubDate>2009</pubDate></item><item><title>6.4. Martin M. Culy, 'Double Case Constructions in Koine Greek', JGRChJ 6 (2009), pp. 82-106</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume6?mode=abstracts#6.4</link><description><p>Article from Volume 6 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Martin M. Culy (Briercrest College and Seminary, Caronport, SK, Canada)</p><p>'Double Case Constructions in Koine Greek', <i>JGRChJ</i> 6 (2009), pp. 82-106<blockquote>Although students of Koine Greek are accustomed to encountering double
				accusative constructions, the occurrence of other double case constructions has
				generally been overlooked. This article shows that double case constructions are
				relatively common with all cases except the vocative, and appear in predictable
				syntactic environments. It also demonstrates that some putative double accusative
				constructions are better viewed as different phenomena altogether, and explains how
				the proposed analyses impact how we evaluate the relative importance of discourse
				themes. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume6?mode=abstracts#6.4</guid><pubDate>2009</pubDate></item><item><title>6.3. Erlend D. MacGillivray , 'Re-Evaluating Patronage and Reciprocity in Antiquity and New Testament
				Studies', JGRChJ 6 (2009), pp. 37-81</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume6?mode=abstracts#6.3</link><description><p>Article from Volume 6 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Erlend D. MacGillivray  (University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK)</p><p>'Re-Evaluating Patronage and Reciprocity in Antiquity and New Testament
				Studies', <i>JGRChJ</i> 6 (2009), pp. 37-81<blockquote>The concepts of ‘patronage’ and ‘reciprocity’ have increasingly been appealed
				to as being key social components in the world of the New Testament. Yet this
				article argues that the current confidence placed in the model’s definitions and in
				their capability to unlock classical reciprocal relationships is misplaced. Chiefly,
				it is argued that the current definition of ‘patronage’ is too broad, and that it
				obscures the complexities of ancient reciprocity. Greek euergetism should be
				considered as a distinct reciprocal phenomenon, and, significantly, Second Temple
				Jewish society largely abstained from, or was ignorant of the mechanics of,
				classical patronage and euergetism. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume6?mode=abstracts#6.3</guid><pubDate>2009</pubDate></item><item><title>6.2. Craig S. Keener, 'Human Stones in a Greek Setting: Luke 3.8; Matthew 3.9; Luke 19.40', JGRChJ 6 (2009), pp. 28-36</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume6?mode=abstracts#6.2</link><description><p>Article from Volume 6 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Craig S. Keener (Palmer Theological Seminary, Wynnewood, PA, USA)</p><p>'Human Stones in a Greek Setting: Luke 3.8; Matthew 3.9; Luke 19.40', <i>JGRChJ</i> 6 (2009), pp. 28-36<blockquote>Although affirming that Luke himself was presumably interested primarily in
				biblical rather than Greek mythological traditions, this article considers how early
				auditors may have visualized Luke’s depiction of rocks involved in humanlike
				activities. It surveys both stories of rocks and similar substances becoming human
				(as well as the reverse) and figurative use of such images. Although probably less
				often heard than the stories themselves, the application of such images for
				hyperbole was probably common enough that it would be understood figuratively in
				this case. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume6?mode=abstracts#6.2</guid><pubDate>2009</pubDate></item><item><title>6.1. Jintae Kim, 'The Concept of Atonement in the Gospel of John', JGRChJ 6 (2009), pp. 9-27</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume6?mode=abstracts#6.1</link><description><p>Article from Volume 6 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Jintae Kim (Alliance Theological Seminary, Nyack NY)</p><p>'The Concept of Atonement in the Gospel of John', <i>JGRChJ</i> 6 (2009), pp. 9-27<blockquote>The Gospel of John has been the object of scholarly debate because of its
				distinctive presentation of Jesus, and the significant differences between it and
				Synoptic Gospels. C.H. Dodd finds the theme of atonement lacking in the Gospel of
				John. Dodd’s view is for the most part closely followed by other scholars. However,
				is the idea of Christ’s atonement really absent from the sending statements in John?
				Kim answers this question in the negative. This paper presents the concrete evidence
				of the theme of atonement in the Gospel of John by examining selected passages in
				it. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume6?mode=abstracts#6.1</guid><pubDate>2009</pubDate></item><item><title>5.11. David Instone-Brewer and Philip A. Harland, 'Jewish Associations in Roman Palestine: Evidence from the Mishnah', JGRChJ 5 (2008), pp. 200-221</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume5?mode=abstracts#5.11</link><description><p>Article from Volume 5 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by David Instone-Brewer and Philip A. Harland (Tyndale House, Cambridge, UK and York University, Toronto, ON )</p><p>'Jewish Associations in Roman Palestine: Evidence from the Mishnah', <i>JGRChJ</i> 5 (2008), pp. 200-221<blockquote>Associations were a widespread social structure in the first century Roman
				world, of individuals who shared a common interest and bonded together by means of
				communal meals, often in temples that had dining facilities. Judaism used a
				comparable term (haburah) to describe similar gatherings especially
				at festival times. The Jewish associations included groups who met in public halls
				for a meal, reclining on triclinia and waited on by servants.
				Separate associations met privately, even though they occupied the same public hall
				as others. Unlike Gentile associations, Jewish associations appear to have rejected
				the custom of following the meal by a drinking party.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume5?mode=abstracts#5.11</guid><pubDate>2008</pubDate></item><item><title>5.10. Jake O’Connell, 'Did Greco-Roman Apparitional Models Influence Luke’s Resurrection Narrative? A
				Response to Deborah Thompson Prince', JGRChJ 5 (2008), pp. 190-199</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume5?mode=abstracts#5.10</link><description><p>Article from Volume 5 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Jake O’Connell (Assumption College, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA)</p><p>'Did Greco-Roman Apparitional Models Influence Luke’s Resurrection Narrative? A
				Response to Deborah Thompson Prince', <i>JGRChJ</i> 5 (2008), pp. 190-199<blockquote>In a recent issue of the Journal for the Study of the New
					Testament, Deborah Thompson Prince argues that Luke consciously
				utilizes Greco-Roman conceptions of apparitions in constructing his picture of the
				resurrected Jesus. This argument is largely predicated on the fact that Luke’s
				description of the resurrected Jesus does not fit precisely into any one Greco-Roman
				apparitional type; rather it is in some respects similar to, and in other respects
				different from, any given type of apparition. The shortcomings of Prince’s argument
				become clear when three factors are considered: 1) the picture of Jesus in the other
				three Gospels and Paul; 2) Jewish conceptions of apparitions; 3) the lack of
				anything distinctively Greco-Roman in Luke’s portrayal of the resurrected Jesus.
			</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume5?mode=abstracts#5.10</guid><pubDate>2008</pubDate></item><item><title>5.9. Stephen J. Bedard, 'Hellenistic Influence on the Idea of Resurrection in Jewish Apocalyptic
				Literature', JGRChJ 5 (2008), pp. 174-189</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume5?mode=abstracts#5.9</link><description><p>Article from Volume 5 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Stephen J. Bedard (Meaford, Ontario )</p><p>'Hellenistic Influence on the Idea of Resurrection in Jewish Apocalyptic
				Literature', <i>JGRChJ</i> 5 (2008), pp. 174-189<blockquote>It is common to encounter the assertion regarding ancient concepts of the
				afterlife that a bodily resurrection is a Jewish view and a bodiless spirit
				existence is a Greek view. However, an examination of resurrection texts within
				Jewish apocalyptic literature reveals much in common with Greek ideas of an
				afterlife. Jewish resurrection texts that describe an angelic transformation are
				remarkably similar to the Greek concept of apotheosis where a hero is transformed
				into a god at death. It is possible that apotheosis traditions played a significant
				role in the articulation of the Jewish belief in a bodily resurrection.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume5?mode=abstracts#5.9</guid><pubDate>2008</pubDate></item><item><title>5.8. Mariusz Rosik, 'The Greek Motif of the Cyclic Journey in the Gospel of Luke', JGRChJ 5 (2008), pp. 165-173</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume5?mode=abstracts#5.8</link><description><p>Article from Volume 5 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Mariusz Rosik (Pontifical Faculty of Theology, Wroclaw, Poland)</p><p>'The Greek Motif of the Cyclic Journey in the Gospel of Luke', <i>JGRChJ</i> 5 (2008), pp. 165-173<blockquote>Rosik shows that the motif of a cyclic journey used by Luke was known among
				the Greek readers of his Gospel, since it was present in their literature. Thus
				Luke’s use of the motif of a cyclic journey probably facilitated the reception of
				the Good News about salvation in the Hellenistic world.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume5?mode=abstracts#5.8</guid><pubDate>2008</pubDate></item><item><title>5.7. Jeffrey L. Staley, Matthew Forrest Lowe, Michael W. Pahl, Anne Moore and Paul N.
				Anderson, 'John Versus Jesus? Reviews of The Fourth Gospel And The Quest For
					Jesus by Paul N. Anderson and the Author’s Response', JGRChJ 5 (2008), pp. 125-164</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume5?mode=abstracts#5.7</link><description><p>Article from Volume 5 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Jeffrey L. Staley, Matthew Forrest Lowe, Michael W. Pahl, Anne Moore and Paul N.
				Anderson ( )</p><p>'John Versus Jesus? Reviews of <i>The Fourth Gospel And The Quest For
					Jesus</i> by Paul N. Anderson and the Author’s Response', <i>JGRChJ</i> 5 (2008), pp. 125-164<blockquote>Introducing this major engagement with Anderson’s provocative new book
					The Fourth Gospel and the Quest for Jesus, Staley provides a
				clear introduction to the work and its new paradigms impacting Johannine and Jesus
				studies alike. Lowe engages Part II featuring Anderson’s critique of twelve planks
				undergirding the dehistoricization of John and the de-Johannification of Jesus; Pahl
				reviews Part III involving Anderson’s new theory of John’s autonomy and distinctive
				relations to other traditions; and Moore addresses Part IV involving Anderson’s
				presentation of Jesus in bi-optic perspective. Anderson then responds to these
				essays arguing the need for a dialectical approach to gospel historiography
				including the Fourth Gospel within the mix.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume5?mode=abstracts#5.7</guid><pubDate>2008</pubDate></item><item><title>5.6. Hans Foerster, 'The Celebration of the Baptism of Christ by the Basilideans and the Origin of
				Epiphany: Is the Seemingly Obvious Correct? ', JGRChJ 5 (2008), pp. 110-124</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume5?mode=abstracts#5.6</link><description><p>Article from Volume 5 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Hans Foerster (Austrian National Library, Vienna, Austria )</p><p>'The Celebration of the Baptism of Christ by the Basilideans and the Origin of
				Epiphany: Is the Seemingly Obvious Correct? ', <i>JGRChJ</i> 5 (2008), pp. 110-124<blockquote>A celebration of the baptism of Christ by a Gnostic group in the second
				century (the Basilideans) is attested once in the writings of Clement of Alexandria.
				This is the earliest attestation of such a celebration. However, it is quite common
				to interpret this celebration as a forerunner of the Christian feast of Epiphany.
				This article calls into question the validity of the theological arguments used to
				defend this opinion, since it is quite probable that the Gnostic groups were
				virtually extinct by the fourth century. Thus, they probably had no influence on the
				Church at the time when this celebration was introduced in the Church.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume5?mode=abstracts#5.6</guid><pubDate>2008</pubDate></item><item><title>5.5. Michael Wojciechowski, 'Aesopic Tradition in the New Testament', JGRChJ 5 (2008), pp. 99-109</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume5?mode=abstracts#5.5</link><description><p>Article from Volume 5 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Michael Wojciechowski (University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland)</p><p>'Aesopic Tradition in the New Testament', <i>JGRChJ</i> 5 (2008), pp. 99-109<blockquote>Aesopic fables are an element of the New Testament background. Their general
				analogies include the similarity between parable and fable and a possibility of
				comparing transmission of fables and of Gospel material: first oral, next written.
				However, parables do not have many points of contact with the fable motifs (Mt.
				25.14-30 and fable 225 [Perry edition]; Mt. 13.47-48 and Perry 282). Some other
				teachings of Jesus seem to reflect fables (Mt. 11.16 par. is explained by Perry 11;
				Mk 9.43-47 and Mt. 19.12 allude to Perry 118; Mt. 7.15 has a parallel in Perry
				451—cf. Acts 20.29 and Perry 365). Minor parallels occur between Mt. 7.9 and Perry
				298, Mt. 19.30 par. and Perry 226, Mt. 7.13 and Perry 383, Lk. 4.23 and Perry 289.
				Lk. 5.1-11; Jn 21.1-11 is structured as Perry 21. In Paul 1 Cor. 12.12-30 appeals to
				a popular comparison, known also from a fable (Perry 130). These analogies are not
				accidental, but without a primary importance, remaining dispersed and
				partial.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume5?mode=abstracts#5.5</guid><pubDate>2008</pubDate></item><item><title>5.4. Jintae Kim, 'Targum Isaiah 53 and the New Testament Concept of Atonement', JGRChJ 5 (2008), pp. 81-98</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume5?mode=abstracts#5.4</link><description><p>Article from Volume 5 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Jintae Kim (Alliance Theological Seminary, Nyack NY)</p><p>'Targum Isaiah 53 and the New Testament Concept of Atonement', <i>JGRChJ</i> 5 (2008), pp. 81-98<blockquote>In this paper, the author attempts to shed light on the issue of the origin of
				the concept of atonement in the New Testament by examining the Servant passages in
					Targum Isaiah that are relevant to the origin of the concept of
				atonement in the New Testament. The examination of the passages shows that the
				typological interpretation of Christ’s death as an atoning sacrifice in the New
				Testament has a close parallel in the typological interpretation of the Servant’s
				role according to the Levitical atoning sacrifices in Targum
				Isaiah. Targum Isaiah preserves a tradition that
				typologically interpreted the Servant-Messiah according to the pattern of both the
				regular atoning sacrifices (Tg. Isa. 53.4, 12; cf. Lev. 4.20 etc.)
				and the sin offering on the Day of Atonement (Tg. Isa. 53.10; cf.
				Lev. 16.30).</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume5?mode=abstracts#5.4</guid><pubDate>2008</pubDate></item><item><title>5.3. Jae Hyun Lee, 'Against Richard B. Hays’s ‘Faith of Jesus Christ’', JGRChJ 5 (2008), pp. 51-80</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume5?mode=abstracts#5.3</link><description><p>Article from Volume 5 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Jae Hyun Lee (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, Ontario)</p><p>'Against Richard B. Hays’s ‘Faith of Jesus Christ’', <i>JGRChJ</i> 5 (2008), pp. 51-80<blockquote>Richard B. Hays’s understanding of ‘faith of Jesus Christ’ in Galatians
				consists of two factors. One is the divine-human antithesis around the concept of
				πίστις Χριστοῡ in his reconstructed narrative substructure. The other is the
				theological role of πίστις in Paul’s thought. However, this article demonstrates the
				instability of Hays’s arguments by pointing out his inconsistent use of textual
				information in establishing a narrative substructure, and by revealing Paul’s real
				emphasis in relation to the issue of πίστις in Galatians. Against Hays’s ‘faith of
				Jesus Christ’ this paper argues the reading of πίστις Ίησοῡ Χριστοῡ in Galatians as
				‘faith in Jesus Christ’. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume5?mode=abstracts#5.3</guid><pubDate>2008</pubDate></item><item><title>5.2. Craig S. Keener, 'Three Notes on Figurative Language: Inverted Guilt in Acts 7.55-60, Paul’s
				Figurative Vote in Acts 26.10, Figurative Eyes in Galatians 4.15', JGRChJ 5 (2008), pp. 42-50</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume5?mode=abstracts#5.2</link><description><p>Article from Volume 5 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Craig S. Keener (Palmer Theological Seminary, Wynnewood, PA)</p><p>'Three Notes on Figurative Language: Inverted Guilt in Acts 7.55-60, Paul’s
				Figurative Vote in Acts 26.10, Figurative Eyes in Galatians 4.15', <i>JGRChJ</i> 5 (2008), pp. 42-50<blockquote>These three brief articles address New Testament passages where knowledge of
				ancient background challenges some traditional readings. Paul ‘casting his vote’ in
				Acts 26.10 does not mean that he belonged to the Sanhedrin or other judicial body;
				this language was frequently used figuratively for consent and participation. Others
				also used wordplays similar to Luke’s play here between Saul ‘casting his pebble’
				and those who ‘stoned’ Stephen. Acts 7.55-60 ironically inverts the charge of guilt:
				by standing, the true judge supports Stephen; Stephen’s accusers strip their own
				cloaks, actions normally applied to one being executed; and whereas Jewish custom
				invited those being executed to confess their own sins, Stephen confesses those of
				his accusers. When Paul in Gal. 4.15 claims that the Galatians would have dug out
				their eyes and given them to Paul, interpretations suggesting a problem with Paul’s
				eyesight are misplaced. Rather, Paul uses a familiar ancient idiom of sacrificial
				devotion.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume5?mode=abstracts#5.2</guid><pubDate>2008</pubDate></item><item><title>5.1. Stanley E. Porter and Andrew W. Pitts, 'Paul’s Bible, His Education and His Access to the Scriptures of Israel', JGRChJ 5 (2008), pp. 9-41</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume5?mode=abstracts#5.1</link><description><p>Article from Volume 5 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Stanley E. Porter and Andrew W. Pitts (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, ON Canada)</p><p>'Paul’s Bible, His Education and His Access to the Scriptures of Israel', <i>JGRChJ</i> 5 (2008), pp. 9-41<blockquote>In this article the authors seek to address some of the technical issues that
				accompany the study of Paul’s use of Scripture. The questions they raise are related
				to how Paul had access to the texts that he drew upon. These include: (1) the
				educational level that Paul could reasonably have achieved; (2) the nature of the
				book culture in the ancient world; (3) the question of ancient reading; and (4) the
				process by which Old Testament texts became Pauline citations, and what we can
				determine from that process.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume5?mode=abstracts#5.1</guid><pubDate>2008</pubDate></item><item><title>4.6. Justin M. Smith, 'Genre, Sub-Genre and Questions of Audience: A Proposed Typology for Greco-Roman
				Biography', JGRChJ 4 (2007), pp. 184-216</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume4?mode=abstracts#4.6</link><description><p>Article from Volume 4 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Justin M. Smith (St. Mary’s College, University of St. Andrews, Scotland)</p><p>'Genre, Sub-Genre and Questions of Audience: A Proposed Typology for Greco-Roman
				Biography', <i>JGRChJ</i> 4 (2007), pp. 184-216<blockquote>The communicative and relational matrix of author-subject-audience serves as
				an important and valuable lens through which to understand and evaluate texts. This
				is especially true of the genre of Greco-Roman biography, which was written by
				individuals (author), about individuals (subject) and for readers/listeners
				(audience). A number of typologies have been offered as a means of sub-dividing
				Greco-Roman biography, yet none has taken into account the aforementioned
				communicative matrix. This article offers a new typology for Greco-Roman biography
				that takes into account the relationships among the authors, the subjects and the
				audiences of ancient biographies.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume4?mode=abstracts#4.6</guid><pubDate>2007</pubDate></item><item><title>4.5. David E. Malick, 'The Contribution of Codex Bezae Cantabrigiensis to an Understanding of Women in
				the Book of Acts', JGRChJ 4 (2007), pp. 158-83</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume4?mode=abstracts#4.5</link><description><p>Article from Volume 4 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by David E. Malick (Southeastern Bible College, Birmingham, AL)</p><p>'The Contribution of Codex Bezae Cantabrigiensis to an Understanding of Women in
				the Book of Acts', <i>JGRChJ</i> 4 (2007), pp. 158-83<blockquote>Codex Bezae, also known as Codex D, a primary representative of the ‘Western’
				text, has some significant differences in the Greek text of the book of Acts from
				Codex B and the readings normally followed in the NA27 and UBSGNT fourth edition
				texts. This article investigates those that appear to be intentional variants that
				reflect theological ideas about women in the early Church, in Acts 1:14; 16:14, 15,
				40; 17:4, 12, 34; 18:2-3, 7, 26, and concludes that Codex B pictures women as
				co-participants and co-workers with men in ministry to a greater degree than Codex
				D.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume4?mode=abstracts#4.5</guid><pubDate>2007</pubDate></item><item><title>4.4. Julie Ann Smith, '‘What Now Lies Before Their Eyes’: The Foundations of Early Pilgrim Visuality in
				the Holy Land', JGRChJ 4 (2007), pp. 135-57</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume4?mode=abstracts#4.4</link><description><p>Article from Volume 4 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Julie Ann Smith (University of Sydney, Australia)</p><p>'‘What Now Lies Before Their Eyes’: The Foundations of Early Pilgrim Visuality in
				the Holy Land', <i>JGRChJ</i> 4 (2007), pp. 135-57<blockquote>Pilgrims to the Holy Land in the late fourth and early fifth centuries
				practiced culturally specific visualities that allowed them to perceive the holy
				places as evidences that strengthened faith. This paper explores the writings of
				Eusebius of Caesarea, Cyril of Jerusalem, Gregory of Nyssa, Athanasius of
				Alexandria, Jerome, and Augustine about this kind of practice, and analyzes the
				recorded experiences of three pilgrims: the Bordeaux Pilgrim, Egeria and
				Paula.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume4?mode=abstracts#4.4</guid><pubDate>2007</pubDate></item><item><title>4.3. John C. Poirier, 'The Linguistic Situation in Jewish Palestine in Late Antiquity', JGRChJ 4 (2007), pp. 55-134</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume4?mode=abstracts#4.3</link><description><p>Article from Volume 4 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by John C. Poirier (Kingswell Theological Seminary, Cincinnati, OH)</p><p>'The Linguistic Situation in Jewish Palestine in Late Antiquity', <i>JGRChJ</i> 4 (2007), pp. 55-134<blockquote>The principal languages spoken in late antique Jewish Palestine, in descending
				order of frequency, were Aramaic, Greek, and Hebrew. This article seeks to
				establish, in the face of recent challenges, that Aramaic was indeed much more
				commonly spoken than Hebrew. While the argument for a vernacular Hebrew is found
				wanting, recent attempts to show the vernacular status of Greek in this same period
				are judged correct in most respects. This article engages the texts and the
				epigraphic evidence for this understanding of the linguistic situation, and briefly
				visits how this relates to the perennial question of Jesus’ language of
				instruction.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume4?mode=abstracts#4.3</guid><pubDate>2007</pubDate></item><item><title>4.2. Nathan Eubank, 'Bakhtin and Lukan Politics: A Carnivalesque Reading of the Last Supper in the
				Third Gospel', JGRChJ 4 (2007), pp. 32-54</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume4?mode=abstracts#4.2</link><description><p>Article from Volume 4 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Nathan Eubank (Duke University, Durham, NC)</p><p>'Bakhtin and Lukan Politics: A Carnivalesque Reading of the Last Supper in the
				Third Gospel', <i>JGRChJ</i> 4 (2007), pp. 32-54<blockquote>The third gospel does not proclaim a reversal of fortunes in which the lowly
				are exalted over the powerful, as is commonly assumed. Rather, Luke destabilizes the
				very definitions of lowliness and power in a manner that is best described by
				Mikhail Bakhtin’s concept of the carnivalesque. To be more specific, the Lukan Last
				Supper narrative rewrites the meaning of Jesus’ messianic status, poetically
				juxtaposing death with political victory. This dialogical definition of Jesus’
				identity is the proper framework through which to view Lukan politics as a
				whole.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume4?mode=abstracts#4.2</guid><pubDate>2007</pubDate></item><item><title>4.1. David Reis, 'Flip-Flop? John Chrysostom's Polytropic Paul', JGRChJ 4 (2007), pp. 9-31</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume4?mode=abstracts#4.1</link><description><p>Article from Volume 4 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by David Reis (University of Oregon, Eugene, OR)</p><p>'Flip-Flop? John Chrysostom's Polytropic Paul', <i>JGRChJ</i> 4 (2007), pp. 9-31<blockquote>In antiquity, consistency in both word and deed was the hallmark of a virtuous
				man. Alongside this discourse, however, a counter argument developed that praised
				variability in speech or action, equating it with intellectual dexterity. For
				ancient writers, Odysseus, the ‘man of many ways’, was the central character in this
				debate; for many early Christians, the primary figure was Paul. This paper explores
				polytropism through an analysis of Paul’s Corinthian correspondence and the writings
				of John Chrysostom. Paul and Chrysostom both appropriate argumentation from the
				Odyssean debate: the apostle finds it useful in defending his gospel, while the
				bishop sees Paul’s versatility as not only an instrumental feature of his missionary
				success, but a quality that his own Christian community should strive to
				emulate.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume4?mode=abstracts#4.1</guid><pubDate>2007</pubDate></item><item><title>3.10. Robert Stephen Reid, 'Ad Herennium Argument Strategies in 1 Corinthians', JGRChJ 3 (2006), pp. 192-222</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume3?mode=abstracts#3.10</link><description><p>Article from Volume 3 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Robert Stephen Reid (University of Dubuque, Dubuque, IA)</p><p>'<i>Ad Herennium</i> Argument Strategies in 1 Corinthians', <i>JGRChJ</i> 3 (2006), pp. 192-222<blockquote>Reid argues that Paul, in composing his argument in 1 Corinthians, made
				conscious and extensive use of the strategies found in the Ad Herennium.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume3?mode=abstracts#3.10</guid><pubDate>2006</pubDate></item><item><title>3.9. Sean A. Adams, 'Luke's Preface and its Relationship to Greek Historiography: A Response to
				Loveday Alexander', JGRChJ 3 (2006), pp. 177-91</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume3?mode=abstracts#3.9</link><description><p>Article from Volume 3 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Sean A. Adams (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, ON)</p><p>'Luke's Preface and its Relationship to Greek Historiography: A Response to
				Loveday Alexander', <i>JGRChJ</i> 3 (2006), pp. 177-91<blockquote>Adams argues that the closest parallels to Luke’s preface are found in the
				corpus of ancient classical historians, rather than the scientific prefaces.
			</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume3?mode=abstracts#3.9</guid><pubDate>2006</pubDate></item><item><title>3.8. Jonathan M. Watt, 'Contextual Disconnection in Bart Ehrman's Lost
				Christianities', JGRChJ 3 (2006), pp. 168-76</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume3?mode=abstracts#3.8</link><description><p>Article from Volume 3 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Jonathan M. Watt (Geneva College, Beaver Falls, PA)</p><p>'Contextual Disconnection in Bart Ehrman's <i>Lost
				Christianities</i>', <i>JGRChJ</i> 3 (2006), pp. 168-76<blockquote>Watt raises six objections to Ehrman’s work in terms of the context in which
				it is written and what it purports to accomplish.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume3?mode=abstracts#3.8</guid><pubDate>2006</pubDate></item><item><title>3.7. Lois K. Fuller, 'The 'Genitive Absolute' in New Testament/Hellenistic Greek: A Proposal for
				Clearer Understanding', JGRChJ 3 (2006), pp. 142-67</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume3?mode=abstracts#3.7</link><description><p>Article from Volume 3 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Lois K. Fuller (McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, ON)</p><p>'The 'Genitive Absolute' in New Testament/Hellenistic Greek: A Proposal for
				Clearer Understanding', <i>JGRChJ</i> 3 (2006), pp. 142-67<blockquote>Fuller argues that the ‘genitive absolute’, perhaps better called the genitive
				construction, provides necessary background information and provides textual
				cohesion in narrative.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume3?mode=abstracts#3.7</guid><pubDate>2006</pubDate></item><item><title>3.6. Craig S. Keener, 'Paul's 'Friends' The Asiarchs (Acts 19.31)', JGRChJ 3 (2006), pp. 134-41</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume3?mode=abstracts#3.6</link><description><p>Article from Volume 3 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Craig S. Keener (Palmer Theological Seminary, Wynnewood, PA)</p><p>'Paul's 'Friends' The Asiarchs (Acts 19.31)', <i>JGRChJ</i> 3 (2006), pp. 134-41<blockquote>Keener argues that the Asiarchs may have been those of the political elite who
				may have served as patrons to Paul, who would have been known as an important
				speaker.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume3?mode=abstracts#3.6</guid><pubDate>2006</pubDate></item><item><title>3.5. Barry F. Parker, 'Romans 7 and the Split Between Judaism and Christiainity', JGRChJ 3 (2006), pp. 110-33</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume3?mode=abstracts#3.5</link><description><p>Article from Volume 3 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Barry F. Parker (California Baptist University, Riverside, CA)</p><p>'Romans 7 and the Split Between Judaism and Christiainity', <i>JGRChJ</i> 3 (2006), pp. 110-33<blockquote>In addressing Romans 7 to Jewish within mainstream Judaism in Rome, Paul
				argues that rather than continuing to meet the demands of the law they should live
				by the Spirit.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume3?mode=abstracts#3.5</guid><pubDate>2006</pubDate></item><item><title>3.4. Michael Wojciechowski, 'Paul and Plutarch on Boasting', JGRChJ 3 (2006), pp. 99-109</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume3?mode=abstracts#3.4</link><description><p>Article from Volume 3 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Michael Wojciechowski (Wydzial Teologii UWM, Olsztyn, Poland)</p><p>'Paul and Plutarch on Boasting', <i>JGRChJ</i> 3 (2006), pp. 99-109<blockquote>Wojciechowski shows that Paul sometimes conforms to ancient rhetorical
				expectations regarding boasting, while other times he takes a bold and independent
				line that goes against the tradition.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume3?mode=abstracts#3.4</guid><pubDate>2006</pubDate></item><item><title>3.3. Ronald Weed, 'Aristotle on Justice (δικαιοσύνη): Character, Action and Some Pauline
				Counterparts', JGRChJ 3 (2006), pp. 72-98</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume3?mode=abstracts#3.3</link><description><p>Article from Volume 3 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Ronald Weed (Tyndale University College, Toronto, ON)</p><p>'Aristotle on Justice (δικαιοσύνη): Character, Action and Some Pauline
				Counterparts', <i>JGRChJ</i> 3 (2006), pp. 72-98<blockquote>Weed explores the notion of justice as requiring character and behavior in
				Aristotle, and finding correlates in the treatment of justice in Paul.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume3?mode=abstracts#3.3</guid><pubDate>2006</pubDate></item><item><title>3.2. Richard Van Egmond, 'The Messianic ‘Son of David’ in Matthew', JGRChJ 3 (2006), pp. 41-71</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume3?mode=abstracts#3.2</link><description><p>Article from Volume 3 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Richard Van Egmond (Hamilton, ON)</p><p>'The Messianic ‘Son of David’ in Matthew', <i>JGRChJ</i> 3 (2006), pp. 41-71<blockquote>Providing a detailed exploration of a single Gospel, Van Egmond explores the
				son of David messianic concept in Matthew’s Gospel, emphasizing how it is used
				throughout, including the passion account.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume3?mode=abstracts#3.2</guid><pubDate>2006</pubDate></item><item><title>3.1. Craig Evans, 'Messianic Hopes and Messianic Figures in Late Antiquity', JGRChJ 3 (2006), pp. 9-40</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume3?mode=abstracts#3.1</link><description><p>Article from Volume 3 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Craig Evans (Acadia Divinity College, Wolfville, NS)</p><p>'Messianic Hopes and Messianic Figures in Late Antiquity', <i>JGRChJ</i> 3 (2006), pp. 9-40<blockquote>Recognizing the importance of messianic expectation in the ancient world,
				Evans explores the range of messianic hopes and types of messianic figures to be
				found in late antique Judaism, the Roman world and early Christianity.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume3?mode=abstracts#3.1</guid><pubDate>2006</pubDate></item><item><title>2.10. Jesper Svartvik, 'How Noah, Jesus and Paul Became Captivating Biblical Figures: The Side Effects of
				the Canonization of Slavery Metaphors in Jewish and Christian Texts', JGRChJ 2 (2001-2005)</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume2?mode=abstracts#2.10</link><description><p>Article from Volume 2 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Jesper Svartvik ()</p><p>'How Noah, Jesus and Paul Became Captivating Biblical Figures: The Side Effects of
				the Canonization of Slavery Metaphors in Jewish and Christian Texts', <i>JGRChJ</i> 2 (2001-2005)<blockquote>Svartvik examines the Old Testament and New Testament passages on slavery. As
				a result, he notes that although Genesis 9 played an important role in pro-slavery
				discourse, the rights granted slaves in the Hebrew Bible meant that the Hebrew Bible
				was not used by the slavery movement. Similarly, the letters of Paul are seen by
				Svartvik to be less clear on the issue of slavery than is the synoptic portrait of
				Jesus. The parables, and especially Matthew’s teaching on eschatology, provided
				support for the pro-slavery movement. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume2?mode=abstracts#2.10</guid><pubDate>2001</pubDate></item><item><title>2.9. Patrick James, 'Participial Complementation in Roman and Byzantine Documentary Papyri:
					ἐπίσταμαι, μανθάνω, εὑρίσκω', JGRChJ 2 (2001-2005)</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume2?mode=abstracts#2.9</link><description><p>Article from Volume 2 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Patrick James ()</p><p>'Participial Complementation in Roman and Byzantine Documentary Papyri:
					ἐπίσταμαι, μανθάνω, εὑρίσκω', <i>JGRChJ</i> 2 (2001-2005)<blockquote>James examines participial complementation in Roman and Byzantine Greek
				documentary papyri, and concludes that the participial construction persisted
				because it was seen as an adjective. The accusative and infinitive construction was
				marginalized by the emergence of the direct object.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume2?mode=abstracts#2.9</guid><pubDate>2001</pubDate></item><item><title>2.8. Craig Keener, '‘Let the Wife have Authority Over Her Husband’ (1 Corinthians 11.10)', JGRChJ 2 (2001-2005)</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume2?mode=abstracts#2.8</link><description><p>Article from Volume 2 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Craig Keener ()</p><p>'‘Let the Wife have Authority Over Her Husband’ (1 Corinthians 11.10)', <i>JGRChJ</i> 2 (2001-2005)<blockquote>Keener understands the Greek term <span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Gentium, Athena Unicode">κεφαλή</span> in 1 Cor. 11.3-7 to be
				used to mean the wife’s husband and her own literal head. He then goes further and
				suggests the possibility that Paul’s play on words continues in 1 Cor. 11.10, and
				that he is saying that ‘the wife ought to have authority over her head [i.e. her
				husband]’.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume2?mode=abstracts#2.8</guid><pubDate>2001</pubDate></item><item><title>2.7. Jintae Kim, 'The Concept of Atonement in Early Rabbinic Thought and the New Testament
				Writings', JGRChJ 2 (2001-2005)</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume2?mode=abstracts#2.7</link><description><p>Article from Volume 2 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Jintae Kim ()</p><p>'The Concept of Atonement in Early Rabbinic Thought and the New Testament
				Writings', <i>JGRChJ</i> 2 (2001-2005)<blockquote>Kim surveys five different traditions in early rabbinic literature—the martyr
				tradition, an atonement tradition, the death of exemplary figures, God’s chastising
				the great, and some traditional sayings—and concludes that the there is continuity
				between the Old Testament, Second Temple period and rabbinic writings regarding
				atonement. He further notes that these traditions are in agreement with 1 John, even
				though some distinctives remain.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume2?mode=abstracts#2.7</guid><pubDate>2001</pubDate></item><item><title>2.6. Jintae Kim, 'The Concept of Atonement in Hellenistic Thought and 1 John', JGRChJ 2 (2001-2005)</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume2?mode=abstracts#2.6</link><description><p>Article from Volume 2 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Jintae Kim ()</p><p>'The Concept of Atonement in Hellenistic Thought and 1 John', <i>JGRChJ</i> 2 (2001-2005)<blockquote>Kim surveys the use of <span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Gentium, Athena Unicode">ἱλασμός</span> in Plutarch and 1 John in order to
				determine whether the background for the concept of atonement is found in
				non-Christian Greek sources. He concludes on the basis of the comparisons that the
				background is instead to be found in Jewish sources of the time.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume2?mode=abstracts#2.6</guid><pubDate>2001</pubDate></item><item><title>2.5. Douglas C. Mohrmann, 'Boast Not in your Righteousness from the Law: A New Reading of Romans
				10.6-8', JGRChJ 2 (2001-2005)</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume2?mode=abstracts#2.5</link><description><p>Article from Volume 2 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Douglas C. Mohrmann ()</p><p>'Boast Not in your Righteousness from the Law: A New Reading of Romans
				10.6-8', <i>JGRChJ</i> 2 (2001-2005)<blockquote>Mohrmann offers a new reading of the use of Deuteronomy 30 in Rom. 10.6-8. He
				contends that Paul creates ‘the-righteousness-from-faith’ as a substitute character,
				attempting to win over the Jews to his gospel. The choice that is offered is between
				a life guided by the law and faith in Christ.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume2?mode=abstracts#2.5</guid><pubDate>2001</pubDate></item><item><title>2.4. Galen K. Johnson, 'The Tribulation in Revelation and Its Literary-Theological Milieu', JGRChJ 2 (2001-2005)</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume2?mode=abstracts#2.4</link><description><p>Article from Volume 2 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Galen K. Johnson ()</p><p>'The Tribulation in Revelation and Its Literary-Theological Milieu', <i>JGRChJ</i> 2 (2001-2005)<blockquote>Johnson identifies three bodies of ancient literature that are concerned with
				great suffering before the end of the world—Jewish, Christian and the book of
				Revelation—and compares how they treat who may expect to endure the tribulation,
				what form the tribulation will take, the reason for the tribulation, how one endures
				the tribulation, and, finally, the meaning of the millennium.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume2?mode=abstracts#2.4</guid><pubDate>2001</pubDate></item><item><title>2.3. Malcolm Choat and Alanna Nobbs, 'Monotheistic Formulae of Belief in Greek Letters on Papyrus from the Second to
				the Fourth Century', JGRChJ 2 (2001-2005)</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume2?mode=abstracts#2.3</link><description><p>Article from Volume 2 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Malcolm Choat and Alanna Nobbs ()</p><p>'Monotheistic Formulae of Belief in Greek Letters on Papyrus from the Second to
				the Fourth Century', <i>JGRChJ</i> 2 (2001-2005)<blockquote>Choat and Nobbs identify what they call ‘formulae of belief’ in Greek letters
				from the second to the fourth century. On the basis of identifying these forms and
				the frequency of their occurrence, they note what they call a monotheistic impulse
				within the letters that is confirmed by other formulae found in the letters.
			</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume2?mode=abstracts#2.3</guid><pubDate>2001</pubDate></item><item><title>2.2. Hans Förster, '7Q5 = Mark 6.52-53: A Challenge for Textual Criticism?', JGRChJ 2 (2001-2005)</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume2?mode=abstracts#2.2</link><description><p>Article from Volume 2 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Hans Förster ()</p><p>'7Q5 = Mark 6.52-53: A Challenge for Textual Criticism?', <i>JGRChJ</i> 2 (2001-2005)<blockquote>Förster draws upon procedure for publishing a papyrus in order to examine the
				claims that 7Q5 is a fragment of Mark’s Gospel. He examines the claims made for this
				identification but rejects them on the basis of the papyrus readings, the text in
				Mark and the length of the lines.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume2?mode=abstracts#2.2</guid><pubDate>2001</pubDate></item><item><title>2.1. Zeba Crook, 'The Divine Benefactions of Paul the Client', JGRChJ 2 (2001-2005)</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume2?mode=abstracts#2.1</link><description><p>Article from Volume 2 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Zeba Crook ()</p><p>'The Divine Benefactions of Paul the Client', <i>JGRChJ</i> 2 (2001-2005)<blockquote>Crook draws upon the categories of patronage and clientage within ancient
				structures of benefaction to characterize Paul’s mission to the gentiles. Paul
				characterizes his own calling in terms of being called by a divine patron. This
				would have resonated with Paul’s audience at the time. He also describes his vision
				of the risen Lord and apostleship in terms of divine benefaction. He reciprocates by
				proclaiming a message of salvation.</blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume2?mode=abstracts#2.1</guid><pubDate>2001</pubDate></item><item><title>1.9. Michael Knowles, ''Wide is the Gate and Spacious the Road that Leads to Destruction': Matthew 7.13
				in Light of Archaeological Evidence', JGRChJ 1 (2000)</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume1?mode=abstracts#1.9</link><description><p>Article from Volume 1 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Michael Knowles (McMaster Divinity College, Ontario, Canada )</p><p>''Wide is the Gate and Spacious the Road that Leads to Destruction': Matthew 7.13
				in Light of Archaeological Evidence', <i>JGRChJ</i> 1 (2000)<blockquote>This study reviews Matthean redaction of 7.13-14, examines archaeological
				evidence concerning gates and roads in early Roman Palestine, and seeks to locate
				7.13-14 thematically within the wider context of Matthew's Gospel, in order to
				demonstrate that the references to 'wide' gates and 'spacious' roads convey
				specifically Roman (or more properly, anti-Roman) overtones. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume1?mode=abstracts#1.9</guid><pubDate>2000</pubDate></item><item><title>1.8. Al Wolters, 'A Semantic Study of αὐθέντης
				and its Derivatives', JGRChJ 1 (2000)</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume1?mode=abstracts#1.8</link><description><p>Article from Volume 1 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Al Wolters (Redeemer University College, Ontario, Canada )</p><p>'A Semantic Study of αὐθέντης
				and its Derivatives', <i>JGRChJ</i> 1 (2000)<blockquote>The word <span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Gentium, Athena Unicode">αὐθέντης</span> and its
				derivatives have occasioned a great deal of scholarly discussion. The difficulty is
				that <span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Gentium, Athena Unicode">αὐθέντης</span> appears to have
				three distinct senses in ancient Greek ('murderer', 'master', and 'doer'), and it is
				a matter of dispute both how these senses are related among themselves, and how they
				influence the meaning of the derivatives of
					<span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Gentium, Athena Unicode">αὐθέντης</span>. For New Testament
				scholars, the issue is whether
					<span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Gentium, Athena Unicode">αὐθεντέω</span> in 1 Tim. 2.12 is
				based on the meaning 'master', thus yielding the traditional rendering 'have
				authority over' (possibly with the pejorative connotation of 'domineering'), or
				whether it is semantically indebted to one or both of the other two senses of
					<span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Gentium, Athena Unicode">αὐθέντης</span>. The present
				article, without focusing specifically on the one occurrence of
					<span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Gentium, Athena Unicode">αὐθεντέω</span> in the New
				Testament, sketches the semantic contours of this word family from its earliest
				attestation in Attic drama to late antiquity. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume1?mode=abstracts#1.8</guid><pubDate>2000</pubDate></item><item><title>1.7. Anders Runesson, 'Particularistic Judaism and Universalistic Christianity? Some Critical Remarks on
				Terminology and Theology', JGRChJ 1 (2000)</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume1?mode=abstracts#1.7</link><description><p>Article from Volume 1 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Anders Runesson (University of Lund, Sweden )</p><p>'Particularistic Judaism and Universalistic Christianity? Some Critical Remarks on
				Terminology and Theology', <i>JGRChJ</i> 1 (2000)<blockquote>'Universalism' and 'particularism' are terms that mislead some into making
				historical statements that are untenable upon closer examination, and therefore are
				not useful terms for the study of ancient Judaism and Christianity. They simply
				cannot define the aspects of religion which they are supposed to define, and are
				unable to distinguish differences or show similarities between religions. Therefore,
				new terms are suggested that are adapted to the present state of research, with its
				emphasis on the diversity evident within these religions in ancient times. In this
				way, it is hoped that they will facilitate a search for new answers, as well as lead
				to a presentation of these results in more exact language. Finally, examples are
				offered of how the new terms can be applied to a selection of texts. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume1?mode=abstracts#1.7</guid><pubDate>2000</pubDate></item><item><title>1.6. Stanley E. Porter and Brook W.R. Pearson, 'Why the Split? Christians and Jews by the Fourth Century', JGRChJ 1 (2000)</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume1?mode=abstracts#1.6</link><description><p>Article from Volume 1 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Stanley E. Porter and Brook W.R. Pearson (University of Surrey Roehampton, London, England )</p><p>'Why the Split? Christians and Jews by the Fourth Century', <i>JGRChJ</i> 1 (2000)<blockquote>There has been much recent discussion of the split between Judaism and
				Christianity. Much of the discussion has been concerned with modern categories, and
				fails to place the separation within the larger context of the ancient world. This
				is especially true with regard to its bearing upon developments in the ancient
				world, including the growth of Christianity, up to the fourth century or Late
				Antique period. However, it seems that there are several pertinent questions about
				the development of this split between Judaism and early Christianity that have a
				direct bearing on several important elements within this period. Perhaps the most
				obvious question (and the one to which many have tried to provide an answer) relates
				to the defining characteristics of the split. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume1?mode=abstracts#1.6</guid><pubDate>2000</pubDate></item><item><title>1.5. Craig A. Evans, 'Mark's Incipit and the Priene Calendar Inscription: From Jewish Gospel to
				Greco-Roman Gospel', JGRChJ 1 (2000)</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume1?mode=abstracts#1.5</link><description><p>Article from Volume 1 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Craig A. Evans (Acadia Divinity College, Nova Scotia, Canada )</p><p>'Mark's Incipit and the Priene Calendar Inscription: From Jewish Gospel to
				Greco-Roman Gospel', <i>JGRChJ</i> 1 (2000)<blockquote>It was against the setting of Roman cynicism that the Markan evangelist dared
				to put forward the Christian gospel and declare that the true son of God was Jesus,
				the Messiah of Israel and 'king of the Jews'-not some would-be Roman emperor.
				Despite rejection at the hands of his own people (and the most important people, as
				importance would have been measured at that time), and a shameful death at the hands
				of the most powerful people, Jesus was indeed the son of God, humanity's true Savior
				and Lord. Mark's purpose is to narrate the story of Jesus in such a way that such a
				confession will appear compelling and plausible to Jews and Romans alike. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume1?mode=abstracts#1.5</guid><pubDate>2000</pubDate></item><item><title>1.4. Shaye J.D. Cohen, 'False Prophets (4Q339), Netinim (4Q340), and Hellenism at Qumran', JGRChJ 1 (2000)</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume1?mode=abstracts#1.4</link><description><p>Article from Volume 1 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Shaye J.D. Cohen (Brown University, Providence, RI)</p><p>'False Prophets (4Q339), Netinim (4Q340), and Hellenism at Qumran', <i>JGRChJ</i> 1 (2000)<blockquote>The creation of thematic lists based on data from a closed 'canon' of
				authoritative texts is an expression of Hellenistic textual scholarship. Ever since
				the nineteenth century, scholars have postulated the influence of Hellenistic
				scholarship on the textual scholarship of the Jews, especially the rabbis. The
				Qumran list of false prophets (4Q339) and perhaps also the list of netinim (4Q340)
				provide our earliest evidence for the penetration of this type of scholarship into
				Jewish circles, both those that wrote in Hebrew and those that wrote in Aramaic. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume1?mode=abstracts#1.4</guid><pubDate>2000</pubDate></item><item><title>1.3. Chrys C. Caragounis, 'Dionysios Halikarnasseus, the Art of Composition and the Apostle Paul', JGRChJ 1 (2000)</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume1?mode=abstracts#1.3</link><description><p>Article from Volume 1 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Chrys C. Caragounis (Lund University, Sweden)</p><p>'Dionysios Halikarnasseus, the Art of Composition and the Apostle Paul', <i>JGRChJ</i> 1 (2000)<blockquote>Dionysios Halikarnasseus was one of the most important literary critics of a
				generation or two before Paul, and who may rightly be taken as a representative of
				Greek literary tastes in general. Paul not infrequently exhibits elements that were
				deemed by Dionysios necessary to good composition, but seldom made a conscious
				effort to adhere to literary rules for elegance in style. Thus, his more felicitous
				choices of words and compositions seem most of the time to be the result of
				instinctive feeling and natural taste. Content was more important to Paul than form.
				But being a great and original thinker, a versatile writer with a fair grasp of the
				Greek language, and believing himself to have been entrusted with a message and a
				mission of momentous importance, it was inevitable that he would give expression to
				such spontaneous dynamism, and by it lay a claim for a place in Greek literature. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume1?mode=abstracts#1.3</guid><pubDate>2000</pubDate></item><item><title>1.2. Amphilochios Papathomas, 'A New Testimony to the Letter to the Hebrews', JGRChJ 1 (2000)</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume1?mode=abstracts#1.2</link><description><p>Article from Volume 1 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Amphilochios Papathomas (Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna)</p><p>'A New Testimony to the Letter to the Hebrews', <i>JGRChJ</i> 1 (2000)<blockquote>The papyrus fragment P.Vindob. G 42417 offers a new testimony to the New
				Testament Letter to the Hebrews. The fragment measures 3.3 x 5.2 cm.; its margins
				are no longer extant; there are parts of Heb. 2.9-11 on its recto and Heb. 3.3-6 on
				its verso. The script runs along the fibres on the recto, and across the fibres on
				the verso. With plates. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume1?mode=abstracts#1.2</guid><pubDate>2000</pubDate></item><item><title>1.1. Pieter W. Van der Horst, 'Ancient Jewish Bibliomancy', JGRChJ 1 (2000)</title><link>http://jgrchj.net/volume1?mode=abstracts#1.1</link><description><p>Article from Volume 1 of <i>Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism</i> by Pieter W. Van der Horst (University of Utrecht, The Netherlands)</p><p>'Ancient Jewish Bibliomancy', <i>JGRChJ</i> 1 (2000)<blockquote>The increasing centrality of the Torah in Judaism in the post-exilic period
				led to a heightened sense of holiness of the Torah. In the Hebrew Bible, the Torah
				itself is not yet adorned with the epithet 'holy'. One sees this starting to happen
				only in the Hellenistic period. Not surprisingly, inspiration theories on the
				genesis of this Holy Scripture soon begin to make their appearance. And it is in
				exactly the same period that we also see the beginnings of the use of the Torah for
				bibliomantic purposes. Bibliomancy is the practice of using the Bible in order to
				get to know what God has in store for individuals or groups, not by reading the
				biblical text but by using it as a lot oracle. </blockquote></p></description><guid>http://jgrchj.net/volume1?mode=abstracts#1.1</guid><pubDate>2000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
