<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Jim Hightower's Radio Lowdown]]></title><description><![CDATA[Author, agitator and activist Jim Hightower spreads the good word of true populism, under the simple notion that "everybody does better, when everybody does better."  <br/><br/><a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast">jimhightower.substack.com</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/podcast</link><generator>Substack</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 23:00:26 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/782570.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><author><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></author><copyright><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></copyright><language><![CDATA[en]]></language><webMaster><![CDATA[jimhightower@substack.com]]></webMaster><itunes:new-feed-url>https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/782570.rss</itunes:new-feed-url><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Author, agitator and activist Jim Hightower spreads the good word of true populism, under the simple notion that "everybody does better, when everybody does better." jimhightower.substack.com</itunes:subtitle><itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type><itunes:owner><itunes:name>Jim Hightower</itunes:name><itunes:email>jimhightower@substack.com</itunes:email></itunes:owner><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:category text="News"><itunes:category text="Politics"/></itunes:category><itunes:category text="News"><itunes:category text="News Commentary"/></itunes:category><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:summary>Author, agitator and activist Jim Hightower spreads the good word of true populism, under the simple notion that "everybody does better, when everybody does better." jimhightower.substack.com</itunes:summary><item><title><![CDATA[Rising Progressive Populist Revolt Stuns AI Profiteers]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>There’s a clique of plutocratic, high-tech billionaires who think they’re entitled to turn America’s farmlands and rural communities into their personal domain of predatory AI “data centers.” But <a target="_blank" href="https://magiccitybooks.com/">a little bookstore in Tulsa, Oklahoma</a>, recently hit those puffed-up elites where they’re most vulnerable: The funny bone.</p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://www.instagram.com/p/DWhGAcGEjge/">Magic City Books put up a sign </a>that rocketed through the Internet, mocking the fatuous potentates:</p><p><p><strong>SUPPORT THESE DATA CENTERS</strong></p><p><strong>Schools</strong></p><p><strong>Libraries</strong></p><p><strong>Bookstores</strong></p></p><p>Arrogantly, though, the likes of Amazon, Google, and Meta are frontloading <em>trillions of dollars</em> into creating a new social order managed by super-intelligent bots. This scheme, however, requires them to divert vast amounts of rural land, water, and energy to build and run their Orwellian empires. Yet, breathing the fumes of their own egos, the billionaires actually assumed that locals would welcome this dazzling bot wonderworld.</p><p>Bad assumption. Even in bastions of rural Republican rule, majorities are saying, “Uh… Hell No!” Indeed, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/26/business/economy/ai-data-centers-construction-local-opposition.html">at least 48 data centers were stopped last year by coordinated local opposition</a>, and public fury has largely driven data center developers out of Illinois, Michigan, Oregon, and Wisconsin. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.texastribune.org/2026/04/01/texas-congress-ai-super-pacs-artificial-intelligence-regulation-2026-midterms/">In Texas</a>, corrupt governor Greg Abbott openly takes AI cash to push data centers, yet rural counties are rejecting them – and the state’s far-right Republican Party has now voted to oppose building more of them.</p><p>Even Wall Street money managers are blinking, for there’s growing doubt that investors can get their money back. What’s happening is that the billionaire hucksters have run head-first into the rock-solid political belief that <em>The People</em> get to decide our common destiny, not a handful of techno-scammers.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/rising-progressive-populist-revolt</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:194084486</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/194084486/b9a30ea0cb44cb37e8c838dea7eb2918.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/194084486/fe9acef584e02347de06379c41798f41.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>There’s a clique of plutocratic, high-tech billionaires who think they’re entitled to turn America’s farmlands and rural communities into their personal domain of predatory AI “data centers.” But a little bookstore in Tulsa, Oklahoma, recently hit those puffed-up elites where they’re most vulnerable: The funny bone. Magic City Books put up a sign that rocketed through the Internet, mocking the fatuous potentates: SUPPORT THESE DATA CENTERS Schools Libraries Bookstores Arrogantly, though, the likes of Amazon, Google, and Meta are frontloading trillions of dollars into creating a new social order managed by super-intelligent bots. This scheme, however, requires them to divert vast amounts of rural land, water, and energy to build and run their Orwellian empires. Yet, breathing the fumes of their own egos, the billionaires actually assumed that locals would welcome this dazzling bot wonderworld. Bad assumption. Even in bastions of rural Republican rule, majorities are saying, “Uh… Hell No!” Indeed, at least 48 data centers were stopped last year by coordinated local opposition, and public fury has largely driven data center developers out of Illinois, Michigan, Oregon, and Wisconsin. In Texas, corrupt governor Greg Abbott openly takes AI cash to push data centers, yet rural counties are rejecting them – and the state’s far-right Republican Party has now voted to oppose building more of them. Even Wall Street money managers are blinking, for there’s growing doubt that investors can get their money back. What’s happening is that the billionaire hucksters have run head-first into the rock-solid political belief that The People get to decide our common destiny, not a handful of techno-scammers. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>There’s a clique of plutocratic, high-tech billionaires who think they’re entitled to turn America’s farmlands and rural communities into their personal domain of predatory AI “data centers.” But a little bookstore in Tulsa, Oklahoma, recently hit those puffed-up elites where they’re most vulnerable: The funny bone. Magic City Books put up a sign that rocketed through the Internet, mocking the fatuous potentates: SUPPORT THESE DATA CENTERS Schools Libraries Bookstores Arrogantly, though, the likes of Amazon, Google, and Meta are frontloading trillions of dollars into creating a new social order managed by super-intelligent bots. This scheme, however, requires them to divert vast amounts of rural land, water, and energy to build and run their Orwellian empires. Yet, breathing the fumes of their own egos, the billionaires actually assumed that locals would welcome this dazzling bot wonderworld. Bad assumption. Even in bastions of rural Republican rule, majorities are saying, “Uh… Hell No!” Indeed, at least 48 data centers were stopped last year by coordinated local opposition, and public fury has largely driven data center developers out of Illinois, Michigan, Oregon, and Wisconsin. In Texas, corrupt governor Greg Abbott openly takes AI cash to push data centers, yet rural counties are rejecting them – and the state’s far-right Republican Party has now voted to oppose building more of them. Even Wall Street money managers are blinking, for there’s growing doubt that investors can get their money back. What’s happening is that the billionaire hucksters have run head-first into the rock-solid political belief that The People get to decide our common destiny, not a handful of techno-scammers. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Billionaire Gangs Marauding Through Rural America]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Here they come again. Every couple of decades another infestation of smiling, winking, fast-talking, corporate hucksters descends on rural America.</p><p>The scammers have varied from Big Oil’s notorious land men to peddlers of private prisons. But this one is the biggest, most important flimflam yet, with Silicon Valley billionaires and Wall Street speculators rushing through the countryside buying up vast tracts of land.</p><p>Why? Because Amazon, Google, Meta, and dozens of other tech profiteers are converting their corporations into Artificial Intelligence robotic empires, and each AI facility is absolutely humongous, requiring airport-size swaths of land.</p><p>Acreage is the least of it though, for the data centers consume Niagara Falls-levels of water. So local families, farms, factories, and businesses suddenly find their essential water supply being raided by faraway corporate water suckers.</p><p>Also, local utility bills skyrocket as profiteers drain enormous amounts of electric power from the area’s grid. Worse, corporate lobbyists squeeze local officials to subsidize this thievery! For example, a private equity predator named <a target="_blank" href="https://truthout.org/articles/new-york-residents-are-fighting-a-data-center-backed-by-a-billionaire-trump-ally/">Apollo Global Management recently fleeced a New York county</a> for $1.4 billion in “job-creation” subsidies for a sprawling data center that will – get this – employ only 125 people. Yes, that’s $11 million per job – with actual workers only getting a pittance of it.</p><p>You don’t need a big schnoz to smell this stink. The good news is that county officials across the country are beginning to say “NO” to AI’s money grab. Also, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/mar/25/datacenters-bernie-sanders-aoc">Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have proposed a national moratorium</a> on this corporate frenzy to impose an AI future that We the People do not want. For more information and action, go to <a target="_blank" href="http://foodandwaterwatch.org">foodandwaterwatch.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/billionaire-gangs-marauding-through</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:193360563</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/193360563/8cfadeecbb4f1930ab420a1695564379.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/193360563/718cf0251da13cff0ff5a89529f70f2a.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Here they come again. Every couple of decades another infestation of smiling, winking, fast-talking, corporate hucksters descends on rural America. The scammers have varied from Big Oil’s notorious land men to peddlers of private prisons. But this one is the biggest, most important flimflam yet, with Silicon Valley billionaires and Wall Street speculators rushing through the countryside buying up vast tracts of land. Why? Because Amazon, Google, Meta, and dozens of other tech profiteers are converting their corporations into Artificial Intelligence robotic empires, and each AI facility is absolutely humongous, requiring airport-size swaths of land. Acreage is the least of it though, for the data centers consume Niagara Falls-levels of water. So local families, farms, factories, and businesses suddenly find their essential water supply being raided by faraway corporate water suckers. Also, local utility bills skyrocket as profiteers drain enormous amounts of electric power from the area’s grid. Worse, corporate lobbyists squeeze local officials to subsidize this thievery! For example, a private equity predator named Apollo Global Management recently fleeced a New York county for $1.4 billion in “job-creation” subsidies for a sprawling data center that will – get this – employ only 125 people. Yes, that’s $11 million per job – with actual workers only getting a pittance of it. You don’t need a big schnoz to smell this stink. The good news is that county officials across the country are beginning to say “NO” to AI’s money grab. Also, Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have proposed a national moratorium on this corporate frenzy to impose an AI future that We the People do not want. For more information and action, go to foodandwaterwatch.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Here they come again. Every couple of decades another infestation of smiling, winking, fast-talking, corporate hucksters descends on rural America. The scammers have varied from Big Oil’s notorious land men to peddlers of private prisons. But this one is the biggest, most important flimflam yet, with Silicon Valley billionaires and Wall Street speculators rushing through the countryside buying up vast tracts of land. Why? Because Amazon, Google, Meta, and dozens of other tech profiteers are converting their corporations into Artificial Intelligence robotic empires, and each AI facility is absolutely humongous, requiring airport-size swaths of land. Acreage is the least of it though, for the data centers consume Niagara Falls-levels of water. So local families, farms, factories, and businesses suddenly find their essential water supply being raided by faraway corporate water suckers. Also, local utility bills skyrocket as profiteers drain enormous amounts of electric power from the area’s grid. Worse, corporate lobbyists squeeze local officials to subsidize this thievery! For example, a private equity predator named Apollo Global Management recently fleeced a New York county for $1.4 billion in “job-creation” subsidies for a sprawling data center that will – get this – employ only 125 people. Yes, that’s $11 million per job – with actual workers only getting a pittance of it. You don’t need a big schnoz to smell this stink. The good news is that county officials across the country are beginning to say “NO” to AI’s money grab. Also, Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have proposed a national moratorium on this corporate frenzy to impose an AI future that We the People do not want. For more information and action, go to foodandwaterwatch.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[My Message to Billionaires: Money Is Like Manure]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Given the increasing dominance of right-wing politics by arrogant, super-rich Tech Bros, here’s a question about wealth inequality for you barroom philosophers to ponder: Does one have to be born a jackass to become a billionaire, or does becoming a billionaire cause jackassim?</p><p>Either way, they do seem to go together – as in Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, Peter Thiel, and so forth, ad nauseum. Oddly, the richer they get, the whinier they become, devolving into over-privileged crybabies.</p><p>Consider the appalling example of that California clique of Thiel, Zuck, and other Silicon super-richies. They’ve been caterwauling that if voters approve a proposed wealth tax on billionaires, By Gollies, they’ll just up and abandon the state. So? Do they not know that <em>voters know</em> that nearly all tax subsidies have long profited undeserving vainglorious elites like them at everyone else’s expense? So excuse us if we don’t join their pity party. In fact, most of us commoners would gladly trade that whole pack of pompous plutocrats for a dozen good kindergarten teachers.</p><p>Besides, it’s possible to be both very rich and a decent human being! I’ve known such people. For example, Texas businessman, Bernard Rapoport, who devoted millions to advancing labor, women, and our state’s progressive movement. Or my friends, Ben & Jerry, who’ve spent their lifetimes and fortunes delivering financial help – and even ice cream! – to grassroots democracy fighters. Then there’s the example of heirs to the Pillsbury family fortune – calling themselves the “Pillsbury Doughboys,” then later, “Doughgirls.” They have donated their inheritances to progressive causes benefitting the Common Good.</p><p>As an East Texas farmer pointed out to me years ago: “Money is like manure. You can’t just pile it up. It only works if you spread it across the grassroots.”</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/my-message-to-billionaires-money</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:193349719</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/193349719/132bbe1bd9023a322efb8c066e2565c1.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/193349719/7f602bee6b01e486a85e2278be38f5d3.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Given the increasing dominance of right-wing politics by arrogant, super-rich Tech Bros, here’s a question about wealth inequality for you barroom philosophers to ponder: Does one have to be born a jackass to become a billionaire, or does becoming a billionaire cause jackassim? Either way, they do seem to go together – as in Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, Peter Thiel, and so forth, ad nauseum. Oddly, the richer they get, the whinier they become, devolving into over-privileged crybabies. Consider the appalling example of that California clique of Thiel, Zuck, and other Silicon super-richies. They’ve been caterwauling that if voters approve a proposed wealth tax on billionaires, By Gollies, they’ll just up and abandon the state. So? Do they not know that voters know that nearly all tax subsidies have long profited undeserving vainglorious elites like them at everyone else’s expense? So excuse us if we don’t join their pity party. In fact, most of us commoners would gladly trade that whole pack of pompous plutocrats for a dozen good kindergarten teachers. Besides, it’s possible to be both very rich and a decent human being! I’ve known such people. For example, Texas businessman, Bernard Rapoport, who devoted millions to advancing labor, women, and our state’s progressive movement. Or my friends, Ben &amp; Jerry, who’ve spent their lifetimes and fortunes delivering financial help – and even ice cream! – to grassroots democracy fighters. Then there’s the example of heirs to the Pillsbury family fortune – calling themselves the “Pillsbury Doughboys,” then later, “Doughgirls.” They have donated their inheritances to progressive causes benefitting the Common Good. As an East Texas farmer pointed out to me years ago: “Money is like manure. You can’t just pile it up. It only works if you spread it across the grassroots.” Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Given the increasing dominance of right-wing politics by arrogant, super-rich Tech Bros, here’s a question about wealth inequality for you barroom philosophers to ponder: Does one have to be born a jackass to become a billionaire, or does becoming a billionaire cause jackassim? Either way, they do seem to go together – as in Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, Peter Thiel, and so forth, ad nauseum. Oddly, the richer they get, the whinier they become, devolving into over-privileged crybabies. Consider the appalling example of that California clique of Thiel, Zuck, and other Silicon super-richies. They’ve been caterwauling that if voters approve a proposed wealth tax on billionaires, By Gollies, they’ll just up and abandon the state. So? Do they not know that voters know that nearly all tax subsidies have long profited undeserving vainglorious elites like them at everyone else’s expense? So excuse us if we don’t join their pity party. In fact, most of us commoners would gladly trade that whole pack of pompous plutocrats for a dozen good kindergarten teachers. Besides, it’s possible to be both very rich and a decent human being! I’ve known such people. For example, Texas businessman, Bernard Rapoport, who devoted millions to advancing labor, women, and our state’s progressive movement. Or my friends, Ben &amp; Jerry, who’ve spent their lifetimes and fortunes delivering financial help – and even ice cream! – to grassroots democracy fighters. Then there’s the example of heirs to the Pillsbury family fortune – calling themselves the “Pillsbury Doughboys,” then later, “Doughgirls.” They have donated their inheritances to progressive causes benefitting the Common Good. As an East Texas farmer pointed out to me years ago: “Money is like manure. You can’t just pile it up. It only works if you spread it across the grassroots.” Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Corporations Pay Millions for Executive Mediocrity]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Most people believe the American economy is being rigged by and for bankers, CEOs, and other superrich elites, because… well, because it is!</p><p>With their hired armies of lawmakers, lobbyists, lawyers, and the like, they fix the economic rules so even-more of society’s money and power flows uphill to them. Take corporate CEOs. While the economy somewhere between a downer and devastating for most people, the CEO class made out like bandits, with each of the three top paid corporate honchos pocketing as much as a billion dollars in personal pay!</p><p>Are they geniuses, or what? What. All three of their corporations ended with big financial losses and declining value. So how can such mediocrity produce such lavish rewards? Simple – rig the pay machine.</p><p>Today’s corporate system of setting compensation for top executives is a flimflam disguised as a model of management rectitude. On its face, it sounds good – “Pay for performance,” it’s called, meaning the CEO does well if the company does well.</p><p>But who defines “doing well?” The scam at most major corporations is that the standard of corporate performance that the chief must meet to quality for a huge payday is set by each corporation’s board of directors. Guess who they are? Commonly, board members are the CEO’s handpicked brothers-in-law, golfing buddies, and corporate cronies. So, they set the bar for winning multimillion-dollar executive paychecks so low that a sack of concrete could jump over it.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying, well, can’t corporate shareholders just vote no on any executive excess? Yes, but corporate rules decree that votes by shareholders are merely advisory, meaning top executives can ignore them, grab the money, and run. The system is fixed and we need to break it!</p><p>Do something!</p><p>There’s a growing movement to crack down on excessive CEO pay that has us pretty excited— check out <a target="_blank" href="https://inequality.org/action/corporate-pay-equity/">this resource guide from Inequality.org</a> to join up!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-corporations-pay-millions-for</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:192627133</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594576" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/192627133/04542755c6c955af96552c3855caecfa.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/192627133/be3dc4f6c2fdbf91230e4aa2ca64140d.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Most people believe the American economy is being rigged by and for bankers, CEOs, and other superrich elites, because… well, because it is! With their hired armies of lawmakers, lobbyists, lawyers, and the like, they fix the economic rules so even-more of society’s money and power flows uphill to them. Take corporate CEOs. While the economy somewhere between a downer and devastating for most people, the CEO class made out like bandits, with each of the three top paid corporate honchos pocketing as much as a billion dollars in personal pay! Are they geniuses, or what? What. All three of their corporations ended with big financial losses and declining value. So how can such mediocrity produce such lavish rewards? Simple – rig the pay machine. Today’s corporate system of setting compensation for top executives is a flimflam disguised as a model of management rectitude. On its face, it sounds good – “Pay for performance,” it’s called, meaning the CEO does well if the company does well. But who defines “doing well?” The scam at most major corporations is that the standard of corporate performance that the chief must meet to quality for a huge payday is set by each corporation’s board of directors. Guess who they are? Commonly, board members are the CEO’s handpicked brothers-in-law, golfing buddies, and corporate cronies. So, they set the bar for winning multimillion-dollar executive paychecks so low that a sack of concrete could jump over it. This is Jim Hightower saying, well, can’t corporate shareholders just vote no on any executive excess? Yes, but corporate rules decree that votes by shareholders are merely advisory, meaning top executives can ignore them, grab the money, and run. The system is fixed and we need to break it! Do something! There’s a growing movement to crack down on excessive CEO pay that has us pretty excited— check out this resource guide from Inequality.org to join up! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Most people believe the American economy is being rigged by and for bankers, CEOs, and other superrich elites, because… well, because it is! With their hired armies of lawmakers, lobbyists, lawyers, and the like, they fix the economic rules so even-more of society’s money and power flows uphill to them. Take corporate CEOs. While the economy somewhere between a downer and devastating for most people, the CEO class made out like bandits, with each of the three top paid corporate honchos pocketing as much as a billion dollars in personal pay! Are they geniuses, or what? What. All three of their corporations ended with big financial losses and declining value. So how can such mediocrity produce such lavish rewards? Simple – rig the pay machine. Today’s corporate system of setting compensation for top executives is a flimflam disguised as a model of management rectitude. On its face, it sounds good – “Pay for performance,” it’s called, meaning the CEO does well if the company does well. But who defines “doing well?” The scam at most major corporations is that the standard of corporate performance that the chief must meet to quality for a huge payday is set by each corporation’s board of directors. Guess who they are? Commonly, board members are the CEO’s handpicked brothers-in-law, golfing buddies, and corporate cronies. So, they set the bar for winning multimillion-dollar executive paychecks so low that a sack of concrete could jump over it. This is Jim Hightower saying, well, can’t corporate shareholders just vote no on any executive excess? Yes, but corporate rules decree that votes by shareholders are merely advisory, meaning top executives can ignore them, grab the money, and run. The system is fixed and we need to break it! Do something! There’s a growing movement to crack down on excessive CEO pay that has us pretty excited— check out this resource guide from Inequality.org to join up! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Reality of the Virtual Metaverse]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Our future was pronounced dead last week.</p><p>I mean that glorious future of <em>The Metaverse</em>, promised to us by Silicon Valley’s tech and financial geniuses. Just a decade ago, they were promising us that by now we’d all be playing, working, and relating as digital avatars of ourselves, living out our lives in a phantasmagoric new world of virtual reality.</p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/video/2021/oct/29/facebook-gives-a-glimpse-of-metaverse-its-planned-virtual-reality-world-video">They boldly proclaimed that the next Big Thing in tech</a>, replacing smart phones and all other personal devices would be a “Metaverse,” digitally connecting everyone everywhere. They exclaimed that by purchasing goofy-looking, reality-augmenting headsets, interactions could be done without any in-person human contact. And who better to sell this future than the super-goofy gabillionaire, Mark Zuckerberg?</p><p>The CEO of Facebook, he was so bedazzled by the digital hokum of the metaverse that he even renamed his corporation “Meta.” Then he pumped a whopping <em>$80 billion</em> into developing and marketing his wondrous new world, including peddling a Meta brand of those magical headsets.</p><p>Not wanting to miss out on a bonanza, other tech billionaires geniuses joined the virtual reality rush. But it was just fool’s gold, for the geniuses had failed to consider an essential factor: Customers.  Far from dazzled, buyers pronounced the meta-mess: goofy.</p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/19/technology/mark-zuckerbergs-metaverse-vr-horizon-worlds.html">Even Zuckerberg has now pulled the plug on his fantasy</a> of a digital, virtual, immersive, avatar world of tech “reality.” Don’t think, however, that goofy, avaricious, egomaniacal billionaires have gained any modesty from their Metaverse misadventure. <a target="_blank" href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/ai-data-center-hucksters-wouldnt">They are the same ones now hurling </a><a target="_blank" href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/ai-data-center-hucksters-wouldnt"><em>trillions</em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/ai-data-center-hucksters-wouldnt"> of public and corporate dollars into erecting intrusive, massive, wasteful AI data centers all across America.</a> Why? To power their profiteering fantasy of replacing humans with AI bots.</p><p>Do something!</p><p>Has Big Tech got you down? Ensuring emerging technologies are safe, useful and accessible can feel daunting, but here are 2 great organizations who’ve been fighting for our rights for a long time:</p><p>* Electronic Frontier Foundation: <a target="_blank" href="https://act.eff.org/action">eff.org</a></p><p>* Fight for the Future: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.fightforthefuture.org/projects">fightforthefuture.org</a></p><p>On the AI data center front, our friend <a target="_blank" href="https://substack.com/profile/133947427-clayton-tucker">Clayton Tucker</a>, who is running for <a target="_blank" href="https://www.claytontuckertx.com/">Agriculture Commissioner here in Texas</a>, has made this issue a centerpiece of his campaign— these data centers are being forced upon rural areas all over the country. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.claytontuckertx.com/">Follow along with his campaign to see how the fights are being won.</a></p><p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-reality-of-the-virtual-metaverse</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:192624682</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/192624682/2927771e44af15cf20c184477bc08235.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/192624682/bef9286aee9e7c1755e6b825c8174c63.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Our future was pronounced dead last week. I mean that glorious future of The Metaverse, promised to us by Silicon Valley’s tech and financial geniuses. Just a decade ago, they were promising us that by now we’d all be playing, working, and relating as digital avatars of ourselves, living out our lives in a phantasmagoric new world of virtual reality. They boldly proclaimed that the next Big Thing in tech, replacing smart phones and all other personal devices would be a “Metaverse,” digitally connecting everyone everywhere. They exclaimed that by purchasing goofy-looking, reality-augmenting headsets, interactions could be done without any in-person human contact. And who better to sell this future than the super-goofy gabillionaire, Mark Zuckerberg? The CEO of Facebook, he was so bedazzled by the digital hokum of the metaverse that he even renamed his corporation “Meta.” Then he pumped a whopping $80 billion into developing and marketing his wondrous new world, including peddling a Meta brand of those magical headsets. Not wanting to miss out on a bonanza, other tech billionaires geniuses joined the virtual reality rush. But it was just fool’s gold, for the geniuses had failed to consider an essential factor: Customers. Far from dazzled, buyers pronounced the meta-mess: goofy. Even Zuckerberg has now pulled the plug on his fantasy of a digital, virtual, immersive, avatar world of tech “reality.” Don’t think, however, that goofy, avaricious, egomaniacal billionaires have gained any modesty from their Metaverse misadventure. They are the same ones now hurling trillions of public and corporate dollars into erecting intrusive, massive, wasteful AI data centers all across America. Why? To power their profiteering fantasy of replacing humans with AI bots. Do something! Has Big Tech got you down? Ensuring emerging technologies are safe, useful and accessible can feel daunting, but here are 2 great organizations who’ve been fighting for our rights for a long time: * Electronic Frontier Foundation: eff.org * Fight for the Future: fightforthefuture.org On the AI data center front, our friend Clayton Tucker, who is running for Agriculture Commissioner here in Texas, has made this issue a centerpiece of his campaign— these data centers are being forced upon rural areas all over the country. Follow along with his campaign to see how the fights are being won. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Our future was pronounced dead last week. I mean that glorious future of The Metaverse, promised to us by Silicon Valley’s tech and financial geniuses. Just a decade ago, they were promising us that by now we’d all be playing, working, and relating as digital avatars of ourselves, living out our lives in a phantasmagoric new world of virtual reality. They boldly proclaimed that the next Big Thing in tech, replacing smart phones and all other personal devices would be a “Metaverse,” digitally connecting everyone everywhere. They exclaimed that by purchasing goofy-looking, reality-augmenting headsets, interactions could be done without any in-person human contact. And who better to sell this future than the super-goofy gabillionaire, Mark Zuckerberg? The CEO of Facebook, he was so bedazzled by the digital hokum of the metaverse that he even renamed his corporation “Meta.” Then he pumped a whopping $80 billion into developing and marketing his wondrous new world, including peddling a Meta brand of those magical headsets. Not wanting to miss out on a bonanza, other tech billionaires geniuses joined the virtual reality rush. But it was just fool’s gold, for the geniuses had failed to consider an essential factor: Customers. Far from dazzled, buyers pronounced the meta-mess: goofy. Even Zuckerberg has now pulled the plug on his fantasy of a digital, virtual, immersive, avatar world of tech “reality.” Don’t think, however, that goofy, avaricious, egomaniacal billionaires have gained any modesty from their Metaverse misadventure. They are the same ones now hurling trillions of public and corporate dollars into erecting intrusive, massive, wasteful AI data centers all across America. Why? To power their profiteering fantasy of replacing humans with AI bots. Do something! Has Big Tech got you down? Ensuring emerging technologies are safe, useful and accessible can feel daunting, but here are 2 great organizations who’ve been fighting for our rights for a long time: * Electronic Frontier Foundation: eff.org * Fight for the Future: fightforthefuture.org On the AI data center front, our friend Clayton Tucker, who is running for Agriculture Commissioner here in Texas, has made this issue a centerpiece of his campaign— these data centers are being forced upon rural areas all over the country. Follow along with his campaign to see how the fights are being won. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Birds of Greed Flocking to Florida’s Tax-Free Nests]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Oh, gosh, there goes another one – another billionaire “flighty bird,” angrily flitting away from the home nest that long nurtured him.</p><p>This latest one is Howard Schultz, the high-flying avaricious avian who tucked away a multibillion-dollar personal fortune as the monopolistic, exploitative CEO of the Starbucks coffee chain. Howard has recently fallen into a deep pout over the downright rudeness he says he’s received from officials in his home base of Washington State.</p><p>What’s his gripe? Haven’t you heard, he squawks, the state legislature intends to make rich corporatists like me start paying income taxes!</p><p>Indeed, Washington is one of only nine states with no income tax, even on billionaires. Instead, to fund public needs, it relies on regressive sales taxes paid by poor and middle-income consumers. So, in an overdue stand for fairness and the Common Good, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/11/us/washington-millionaires-tax-bezos-schultz.html">the state is levying a minimal tax on those few elites who haul in </a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/11/us/washington-millionaires-tax-bezos-schultz.html"><em>more than a million bucks a year</em></a> – with the money going to such crucial public needs as child care.</p><p>But damn the need, Billionaire Schultz is foot-stomping furious that he would have to pay his fair share for the upkeep of the state that has helped him thrive. So, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/11/us/washington-millionaires-tax-bezos-schultz.html">Howard has taken flight, winging clear across the country to Florida, where the right-wing governor and legislature shields the rich from pesky taxes.</a></p><p>Proving that “Birds of a feather flock together,” the aristocratic chieftains of such other corporate fiefdoms as Amazon, Meta, and Google are also now nesting in Florida’s tax-evasion enclaves. When billionaires declare “We’re all in this together” – they don’t mean you me – only themselves and their tax lawyers.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/birds-of-greed-flocking-to-floridas</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:191913832</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/191913832/bd46b6840855196faf68ca4a71e14139.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/191913832/9104779830a877302e7b86f5f7adf5c9.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Oh, gosh, there goes another one – another billionaire “flighty bird,” angrily flitting away from the home nest that long nurtured him. This latest one is Howard Schultz, the high-flying avaricious avian who tucked away a multibillion-dollar personal fortune as the monopolistic, exploitative CEO of the Starbucks coffee chain. Howard has recently fallen into a deep pout over the downright rudeness he says he’s received from officials in his home base of Washington State. What’s his gripe? Haven’t you heard, he squawks, the state legislature intends to make rich corporatists like me start paying income taxes! Indeed, Washington is one of only nine states with no income tax, even on billionaires. Instead, to fund public needs, it relies on regressive sales taxes paid by poor and middle-income consumers. So, in an overdue stand for fairness and the Common Good, the state is levying a minimal tax on those few elites who haul in more than a million bucks a year – with the money going to such crucial public needs as child care. But damn the need, Billionaire Schultz is foot-stomping furious that he would have to pay his fair share for the upkeep of the state that has helped him thrive. So, Howard has taken flight, winging clear across the country to Florida, where the right-wing governor and legislature shields the rich from pesky taxes. Proving that “Birds of a feather flock together,” the aristocratic chieftains of such other corporate fiefdoms as Amazon, Meta, and Google are also now nesting in Florida’s tax-evasion enclaves. When billionaires declare “We’re all in this together” – they don’t mean you me – only themselves and their tax lawyers. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Oh, gosh, there goes another one – another billionaire “flighty bird,” angrily flitting away from the home nest that long nurtured him. This latest one is Howard Schultz, the high-flying avaricious avian who tucked away a multibillion-dollar personal fortune as the monopolistic, exploitative CEO of the Starbucks coffee chain. Howard has recently fallen into a deep pout over the downright rudeness he says he’s received from officials in his home base of Washington State. What’s his gripe? Haven’t you heard, he squawks, the state legislature intends to make rich corporatists like me start paying income taxes! Indeed, Washington is one of only nine states with no income tax, even on billionaires. Instead, to fund public needs, it relies on regressive sales taxes paid by poor and middle-income consumers. So, in an overdue stand for fairness and the Common Good, the state is levying a minimal tax on those few elites who haul in more than a million bucks a year – with the money going to such crucial public needs as child care. But damn the need, Billionaire Schultz is foot-stomping furious that he would have to pay his fair share for the upkeep of the state that has helped him thrive. So, Howard has taken flight, winging clear across the country to Florida, where the right-wing governor and legislature shields the rich from pesky taxes. Proving that “Birds of a feather flock together,” the aristocratic chieftains of such other corporate fiefdoms as Amazon, Meta, and Google are also now nesting in Florida’s tax-evasion enclaves. When billionaires declare “We’re all in this together” – they don’t mean you me – only themselves and their tax lawyers. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oh, the Horror! Billionaires Threatened with Taxation!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>We Americans are barraged these days with multiple crises, so, I hate to add anything else to our list of worries.</p><p>But I’m told this one is an epic disaster, so we must respond! It started in California, and one financial leader there now calls it “the greatest tragedy this state has ever felt.” Holy Titanic! What can it be?</p><p>Uh… it’s a tax. Does that mean it would add to the burden of hard-hit poor and middle-class families? No, it wouldn’t apply to them at all, or even to mere millionaires. Rather, <a target="_blank" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_California_One-Time_Wealth_Tax_for_State-Funded_Health_Care_Programs_Initiative">it’s a ballot initiative to put a one-time wealth tax on the über-rich – </a><a target="_blank" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_California_One-Time_Wealth_Tax_for_State-Funded_Health_Care_Programs_Initiative"><em>the billionaire class</em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_California_One-Time_Wealth_Tax_for_State-Funded_Health_Care_Programs_Initiative">.</a> Indeed, only about 200 royally rich California folks would pay anything under this proposal.</p><p>But those billionaires are squealing like stuck pigs, and <a target="_blank" href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/mar/18/google-sergey-brin-california-billionaire-tax">they’ve hired hoards of lobbyists, lawyers, PR flacks, and front groups to try killing the proposal.</a> Such overprivileged plutocratic ninnies as Peter Thiel and Mark Zuckerberg have even declared that, By Gollies, they will just pack up and leave California if required to pay a pittance of their fortunes to support the basic needs of common people.</p><p>Californians, though, seem not to care. In recent surveys, only 28 percent of the state’s voters oppose the wealth tax. Indeed, nationwide, 60 percent of us want billionaire tax dodgers to start paying their fair share.</p><p>People are sick of the greed of… well let’s call them what they are: The filthy rich. There’s a fast-spreading attitudinal shift from the right-wing’s long insistence that the rich are to be admired and coddled. Instead, majorities today are reconnecting to the eternal truth that “The love of money is the root of all evil.”</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/oh-the-horror-billionaires-threatened</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:191882929</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/191882929/f0c3c5ad444d3c68c27ae7549e56e18e.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/191882929/f633f719ddc630f17b26ccd7bf2a762d.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>We Americans are barraged these days with multiple crises, so, I hate to add anything else to our list of worries. But I’m told this one is an epic disaster, so we must respond! It started in California, and one financial leader there now calls it “the greatest tragedy this state has ever felt.” Holy Titanic! What can it be? Uh… it’s a tax. Does that mean it would add to the burden of hard-hit poor and middle-class families? No, it wouldn’t apply to them at all, or even to mere millionaires. Rather, it’s a ballot initiative to put a one-time wealth tax on the über-rich – the billionaire class. Indeed, only about 200 royally rich California folks would pay anything under this proposal. But those billionaires are squealing like stuck pigs, and they’ve hired hoards of lobbyists, lawyers, PR flacks, and front groups to try killing the proposal. Such overprivileged plutocratic ninnies as Peter Thiel and Mark Zuckerberg have even declared that, By Gollies, they will just pack up and leave California if required to pay a pittance of their fortunes to support the basic needs of common people. Californians, though, seem not to care. In recent surveys, only 28 percent of the state’s voters oppose the wealth tax. Indeed, nationwide, 60 percent of us want billionaire tax dodgers to start paying their fair share. People are sick of the greed of… well let’s call them what they are: The filthy rich. There’s a fast-spreading attitudinal shift from the right-wing’s long insistence that the rich are to be admired and coddled. Instead, majorities today are reconnecting to the eternal truth that “The love of money is the root of all evil.” Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>We Americans are barraged these days with multiple crises, so, I hate to add anything else to our list of worries. But I’m told this one is an epic disaster, so we must respond! It started in California, and one financial leader there now calls it “the greatest tragedy this state has ever felt.” Holy Titanic! What can it be? Uh… it’s a tax. Does that mean it would add to the burden of hard-hit poor and middle-class families? No, it wouldn’t apply to them at all, or even to mere millionaires. Rather, it’s a ballot initiative to put a one-time wealth tax on the über-rich – the billionaire class. Indeed, only about 200 royally rich California folks would pay anything under this proposal. But those billionaires are squealing like stuck pigs, and they’ve hired hoards of lobbyists, lawyers, PR flacks, and front groups to try killing the proposal. Such overprivileged plutocratic ninnies as Peter Thiel and Mark Zuckerberg have even declared that, By Gollies, they will just pack up and leave California if required to pay a pittance of their fortunes to support the basic needs of common people. Californians, though, seem not to care. In recent surveys, only 28 percent of the state’s voters oppose the wealth tax. Indeed, nationwide, 60 percent of us want billionaire tax dodgers to start paying their fair share. People are sick of the greed of… well let’s call them what they are: The filthy rich. There’s a fast-spreading attitudinal shift from the right-wing’s long insistence that the rich are to be admired and coddled. Instead, majorities today are reconnecting to the eternal truth that “The love of money is the root of all evil.” Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Let’s Stop Demonizing DEI, and Start Achieving It]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>At last, someone with some common sense in their head, some basic humanity in their heart, and some fundamental democratic values in their soul – is speaking out.</p><p>Many someones, actually. Indeed, a coalition of dozens of progressive groups representing millions of Americans is uniting in straightforward populist opposition to the far-out right wing’s loopy assault on diversity, equity, and inclusion.</p><p>Bizarrely, Trump’s menagerie of extremist Republican politicos has been waging a furious war against these basic egalitarian ideals, trying to turn DEI into a partisan bugaboo. That’s goofy and ultimately self-defeating, for they are asking voters to reject their lifelong admiration for these positive social goals. Consider the value of D, E, and I:</p><p>One, <em>diversity</em>. That’s “us,” the marvelous mix of common people, cultures, and beliefs that gives America vitality and resilience.</p><p>Two, <em>equity</em>. That’s just another word for “fairness,” so why do they want to demonize that?</p><p>Three, <em>inclusion</em>. Hello – that’s what “democracy” means – we all belong and our voice matters.</p><p>Yet, the Trumpians are using brute authoritarianism to try ripping these core democratic values out of the fabric of our society. And, pathetically, many major corporate powers, universities, media outlets, and other institutions that ought to stand against these Orwellian dictates, have pusillanimously capitulated, hoping the GOP’s imperious regime will reward them with financial favors.</p><p>When institutions fail the people, We the People have to rise up. That’s the momentous rallying cry of some 70 nationwide groups of gutsy democracy fighters organized by Color of Change to stand up for the invaluable Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion that make America… America! To connect, go to <a target="_blank" href="http://ColorOfChange.org">ColorOfChange.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/lets-stop-demonizing-dei-and-start</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:191269407</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 23:00:51 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/191269407/1d2074bd5656883c2301d2763a3a4e2e.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/191269407/b5b00b03686e82bf205e8686d7efb199.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>At last, someone with some common sense in their head, some basic humanity in their heart, and some fundamental democratic values in their soul – is speaking out. Many someones, actually. Indeed, a coalition of dozens of progressive groups representing millions of Americans is uniting in straightforward populist opposition to the far-out right wing’s loopy assault on diversity, equity, and inclusion. Bizarrely, Trump’s menagerie of extremist Republican politicos has been waging a furious war against these basic egalitarian ideals, trying to turn DEI into a partisan bugaboo. That’s goofy and ultimately self-defeating, for they are asking voters to reject their lifelong admiration for these positive social goals. Consider the value of D, E, and I: One, diversity. That’s “us,” the marvelous mix of common people, cultures, and beliefs that gives America vitality and resilience. Two, equity. That’s just another word for “fairness,” so why do they want to demonize that? Three, inclusion. Hello – that’s what “democracy” means – we all belong and our voice matters. Yet, the Trumpians are using brute authoritarianism to try ripping these core democratic values out of the fabric of our society. And, pathetically, many major corporate powers, universities, media outlets, and other institutions that ought to stand against these Orwellian dictates, have pusillanimously capitulated, hoping the GOP’s imperious regime will reward them with financial favors. When institutions fail the people, We the People have to rise up. That’s the momentous rallying cry of some 70 nationwide groups of gutsy democracy fighters organized by Color of Change to stand up for the invaluable Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion that make America… America! To connect, go to ColorOfChange.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>At last, someone with some common sense in their head, some basic humanity in their heart, and some fundamental democratic values in their soul – is speaking out. Many someones, actually. Indeed, a coalition of dozens of progressive groups representing millions of Americans is uniting in straightforward populist opposition to the far-out right wing’s loopy assault on diversity, equity, and inclusion. Bizarrely, Trump’s menagerie of extremist Republican politicos has been waging a furious war against these basic egalitarian ideals, trying to turn DEI into a partisan bugaboo. That’s goofy and ultimately self-defeating, for they are asking voters to reject their lifelong admiration for these positive social goals. Consider the value of D, E, and I: One, diversity. That’s “us,” the marvelous mix of common people, cultures, and beliefs that gives America vitality and resilience. Two, equity. That’s just another word for “fairness,” so why do they want to demonize that? Three, inclusion. Hello – that’s what “democracy” means – we all belong and our voice matters. Yet, the Trumpians are using brute authoritarianism to try ripping these core democratic values out of the fabric of our society. And, pathetically, many major corporate powers, universities, media outlets, and other institutions that ought to stand against these Orwellian dictates, have pusillanimously capitulated, hoping the GOP’s imperious regime will reward them with financial favors. When institutions fail the people, We the People have to rise up. That’s the momentous rallying cry of some 70 nationwide groups of gutsy democracy fighters organized by Color of Change to stand up for the invaluable Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion that make America… America! To connect, go to ColorOfChange.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Despised Billionaires Seek Refuge in Billionaire Bunker]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Trust me when I say that a home on I<a target="_blank" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Creek,_Florida">ndian Creek Island</a> is not for you.</p><p>First of all, you’re not a billionaire. But even a billion bucks wouldn’t buy your way onto this island in Florida’s Biscayne Bay. It’s the exclusive domain of such multi-multi-billionaires as <strong>Jeff Bezos, Larry Page, Ivanka Trump</strong>… and now <strong>Mark Zuckerberg,</strong> CEO of <strong>Facebook</strong> and <strong>Instagram</strong>.</p><p>Mark, nicknamed “Zuck,” <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/11/realestate/mark-zuckerberg-ivana-trump-david-lynch-real-estate.html">has just paid $170 million for a piece of this very special speck of turf,</a> including a “cottage” with 9 bedrooms, 11 baths, a gym, a massage room, and a 1,500-gallon <em>aquarium</em>. Also, he built-in his own personal hair salon, plus a library with – get this – a secret passageway. No clue as to whether he reads any books, or just uses the passage to escape.</p><p>Secondly, you wouldn’t really be happy on Indian Creek Island, because it’s a pretentious fake. This high-value enclave was constructed for low-value hucksters who’ve amassed outrageous fortunes by screwing over masses of workers, competitors, taxpayers, and others. Even the “island” is fake – it’s a man-made landfill built in the Bay so ten very, very rich swells can isolate themselves from us commoners. Also, it’s more of a doomsday compound than a community, with each of the über-rich hunkered down in what’s been dubbed “Billionaire Bunker.”</p><p>These demigods of gross inequality can buy any piece of paradise, but then they’re so spooked they lock themselves behind $170-million walls, afraid of their own shadows. So, here’s my free advice to Zuck to soothe his plutocratic trepidations: Steal a little less, practice being slightly likable, maybe downsize to only a $70 million mansion… and <em>live </em>more. You’re welcome.</p><p>Do something!</p><p>Want to help force billionaires to pay their fair share? Check out Americans for Tax Fairness at <a target="_blank" href="https://americansfortaxfairness.org/">americansfortaxfairness.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/despised-billionaires-seek-refuge</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:191257956</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 16:04:52 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/191257956/6f59fafbee317de7c7d5dea5c2faf03c.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/191257956/47b60ab61ae5d932af60b0a912b5dd50.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Trust me when I say that a home on Indian Creek Island is not for you. First of all, you’re not a billionaire. But even a billion bucks wouldn’t buy your way onto this island in Florida’s Biscayne Bay. It’s the exclusive domain of such multi-multi-billionaires as Jeff Bezos, Larry Page, Ivanka Trump… and now Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Facebook and Instagram. Mark, nicknamed “Zuck,” has just paid $170 million for a piece of this very special speck of turf, including a “cottage” with 9 bedrooms, 11 baths, a gym, a massage room, and a 1,500-gallon aquarium. Also, he built-in his own personal hair salon, plus a library with – get this – a secret passageway. No clue as to whether he reads any books, or just uses the passage to escape. Secondly, you wouldn’t really be happy on Indian Creek Island, because it’s a pretentious fake. This high-value enclave was constructed for low-value hucksters who’ve amassed outrageous fortunes by screwing over masses of workers, competitors, taxpayers, and others. Even the “island” is fake – it’s a man-made landfill built in the Bay so ten very, very rich swells can isolate themselves from us commoners. Also, it’s more of a doomsday compound than a community, with each of the über-rich hunkered down in what’s been dubbed “Billionaire Bunker.” These demigods of gross inequality can buy any piece of paradise, but then they’re so spooked they lock themselves behind $170-million walls, afraid of their own shadows. So, here’s my free advice to Zuck to soothe his plutocratic trepidations: Steal a little less, practice being slightly likable, maybe downsize to only a $70 million mansion… and live more. You’re welcome. Do something! Want to help force billionaires to pay their fair share? Check out Americans for Tax Fairness at americansfortaxfairness.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Trust me when I say that a home on Indian Creek Island is not for you. First of all, you’re not a billionaire. But even a billion bucks wouldn’t buy your way onto this island in Florida’s Biscayne Bay. It’s the exclusive domain of such multi-multi-billionaires as Jeff Bezos, Larry Page, Ivanka Trump… and now Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Facebook and Instagram. Mark, nicknamed “Zuck,” has just paid $170 million for a piece of this very special speck of turf, including a “cottage” with 9 bedrooms, 11 baths, a gym, a massage room, and a 1,500-gallon aquarium. Also, he built-in his own personal hair salon, plus a library with – get this – a secret passageway. No clue as to whether he reads any books, or just uses the passage to escape. Secondly, you wouldn’t really be happy on Indian Creek Island, because it’s a pretentious fake. This high-value enclave was constructed for low-value hucksters who’ve amassed outrageous fortunes by screwing over masses of workers, competitors, taxpayers, and others. Even the “island” is fake – it’s a man-made landfill built in the Bay so ten very, very rich swells can isolate themselves from us commoners. Also, it’s more of a doomsday compound than a community, with each of the über-rich hunkered down in what’s been dubbed “Billionaire Bunker.” These demigods of gross inequality can buy any piece of paradise, but then they’re so spooked they lock themselves behind $170-million walls, afraid of their own shadows. So, here’s my free advice to Zuck to soothe his plutocratic trepidations: Steal a little less, practice being slightly likable, maybe downsize to only a $70 million mansion… and live more. You’re welcome. Do something! Want to help force billionaires to pay their fair share? Check out Americans for Tax Fairness at americansfortaxfairness.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Friday Signpost: "You Just Land"—Stories from 40 Years of Grassroots Campaigning
]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Greetings, Lowdowners—Deanna here!</p><p>In January, p<a target="_blank" href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/video-happy-hour-what-to-do-in-red">aid subscribers got 45 minutes of unfiltered Hightower at our Happy Hour Q&A</a>. If you missed it—or if you’re a free subscriber wondering what these gatherings are like—here’s a taste.</p><p>We asked readers to bring questions, stories, anything. What we got was one of the best evenings we’ve had: Hightower on organizing in red states, the horror of what’s happening with ICE, why the Democrats need big ideas, and—because it’s Hightower—some absolutely wild stories from campaigning across Texas in small planes held together with duct tape and optimism. </p><p>The clip above is one of my favorite all-time stories: the famous beer run with <strong>Melvin Lowry</strong> out in West Texas. When you're a broke statewide candidate in Texas, you get where you're going however you can. In Hightower's case, that meant farmers with planes, county roads as landing strips, and pit stops for six-packs. "The secret to the high wire is never look at the high wire. You just land."</p><p>If you thought the beer run was something, wait until you hear about the plane where Hightower’s passenger seat was a kitchen chair with a seatbelt—and the only way to get airborne was for two guys to hold up the tail and run down the runway. “I am a serious candidate for statewide office in the state of Texas.”</p><p>One last gem from that night covers while the Populist movement of the late 1800s was so successful: they knew that politics couldn’t be just a bunch of committee meetings. They created <em>fun</em>. Here, Hightower shares an insight that <strong>Pete Seeger</strong> once told him about how he discovered politics through the Chautauqua movement.</p><p>These are the kinds of evenings paid subscribers get—stories you won’t hear anywhere else, and a chance to actually ask Hightower what’s on your mind.</p><p>The full 45-minute video, including Hightower on why organizing together beats just calling your red state Senator, how Democratic leadership is responding to our grassroots pressure, and the vision for getting money out of politics, is is available to paid subscribers <a target="_blank" href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/video-happy-hour-what-to-do-in-red">here</a>.</p><p>If last week’s C-SPAN video was a window into Hightower’s world, this is a seat at the table. More on that next week.</p><p>Happy Friday, everyone.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/friday-signpost-you-just-landstories</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:190840433</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Deanna Zandt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2543846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/190840433/1c2dc688edd1f05476ca61cae85db7ba.mp3"/><itunes:author>Deanna Zandt</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>159</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/190840433/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Greetings, Lowdowners—Deanna here! In January, paid subscribers got 45 minutes of unfiltered Hightower at our Happy Hour Q&amp;A. If you missed it—or if you’re a free subscriber wondering what these gatherings are like—here’s a taste. We asked readers to bring questions, stories, anything. What we got was one of the best evenings we’ve had: Hightower on organizing in red states, the horror of what’s happening with ICE, why the Democrats need big ideas, and—because it’s Hightower—some absolutely wild stories from campaigning across Texas in small planes held together with duct tape and optimism. The clip above is one of my favorite all-time stories: the famous beer run with Melvin Lowry out in West Texas. When you're a broke statewide candidate in Texas, you get where you're going however you can. In Hightower's case, that meant farmers with planes, county roads as landing strips, and pit stops for six-packs. "The secret to the high wire is never look at the high wire. You just land." If you thought the beer run was something, wait until you hear about the plane where Hightower’s passenger seat was a kitchen chair with a seatbelt—and the only way to get airborne was for two guys to hold up the tail and run down the runway. “I am a serious candidate for statewide office in the state of Texas.” One last gem from that night covers while the Populist movement of the late 1800s was so successful: they knew that politics couldn’t be just a bunch of committee meetings. They created fun. Here, Hightower shares an insight that Pete Seeger once told him about how he discovered politics through the Chautauqua movement. These are the kinds of evenings paid subscribers get—stories you won’t hear anywhere else, and a chance to actually ask Hightower what’s on your mind. The full 45-minute video, including Hightower on why organizing together beats just calling your red state Senator, how Democratic leadership is responding to our grassroots pressure, and the vision for getting money out of politics, is is available to paid subscribers here. If last week’s C-SPAN video was a window into Hightower’s world, this is a seat at the table. More on that next week. Happy Friday, everyone. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Greetings, Lowdowners—Deanna here! In January, paid subscribers got 45 minutes of unfiltered Hightower at our Happy Hour Q&amp;A. If you missed it—or if you’re a free subscriber wondering what these gatherings are like—here’s a taste. We asked readers to bring questions, stories, anything. What we got was one of the best evenings we’ve had: Hightower on organizing in red states, the horror of what’s happening with ICE, why the Democrats need big ideas, and—because it’s Hightower—some absolutely wild stories from campaigning across Texas in small planes held together with duct tape and optimism. The clip above is one of my favorite all-time stories: the famous beer run with Melvin Lowry out in West Texas. When you're a broke statewide candidate in Texas, you get where you're going however you can. In Hightower's case, that meant farmers with planes, county roads as landing strips, and pit stops for six-packs. "The secret to the high wire is never look at the high wire. You just land." If you thought the beer run was something, wait until you hear about the plane where Hightower’s passenger seat was a kitchen chair with a seatbelt—and the only way to get airborne was for two guys to hold up the tail and run down the runway. “I am a serious candidate for statewide office in the state of Texas.” One last gem from that night covers while the Populist movement of the late 1800s was so successful: they knew that politics couldn’t be just a bunch of committee meetings. They created fun. Here, Hightower shares an insight that Pete Seeger once told him about how he discovered politics through the Chautauqua movement. These are the kinds of evenings paid subscribers get—stories you won’t hear anywhere else, and a chance to actually ask Hightower what’s on your mind. The full 45-minute video, including Hightower on why organizing together beats just calling your red state Senator, how Democratic leadership is responding to our grassroots pressure, and the vision for getting money out of politics, is is available to paid subscribers here. If last week’s C-SPAN video was a window into Hightower’s world, this is a seat at the table. More on that next week. Happy Friday, everyone. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[AI Data Center Hucksters Wouldn’t Bribe Our Legislators… Would They?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Bribery of a lawmaker used to be a straightforward retail transaction between the special interest briber and a specific bribee. But the Silicon Valley billionaires now invading rural America with hundreds of their exploitative AI data centers are out to buy state lawmakers in bulk.</p><p>Instead of slipping cash-filled envelopes to individual politicos, tech giants like <strong>Amazon</strong>, <strong>Meta</strong>, and <strong>OpenAI</strong>, are putting up <em>hundreds of millions of dollars</em> in this spring’s midterm elections to pay for the campaigns of candidates who pledge to back their intrusive, water-sucking, energy-wasting, AI schemes. For example, <strong>Mark Zuckerberg</strong>, CEO of Meta, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/18/technology/meta-65-million-election-ai.html">has two super-PACs doling out $65 million to state and local politicians</a> who will oppose any regulation of sprawling data centers he wants to impose on rural Texas and Illinois.</p><p>Why such a barrage of corporate money in local legislative races? Because the countryside is aflame with fury that arrogant, avaricious AI profiteers think they’re entitled to walk over local communities – <a target="_blank" href="https://datacenterwatch.substack.com/">so these locals are demanding that their legislators regulate or even ban AI data centers</a>.</p><p>Unable (or unwilling) to win political support honestly, the corporate giants intend to overpower the democratic will of the people by effectively bribing submissive legislators with campaign cash – or by funding opponents for lawmakers who refuse to be bought.</p><p>Of course, bribers and bribees alike will piously pretend that the corporate ruse of buying government policy by buying legislative seats is technically not a bribe. But hello – rigging the system so billionaire donors can crush local democracy is not a “technicality.” If it looks, smells, and has the impact of a bribe… it is one.</p><p>Do something!</p><p>* To follow fights around the country and learn more about AI data centers, subscriber to <a target="_blank" href="https://open.substack.com/pub/datacenterwatch">Data Center Watch Briefing</a>: <a target="_blank" href="https://datacenterwatch.substack.com/">datacenterwatch.substack.com</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://mediajustice.org/resource/the-cost-of-data-centers/">MediaJustice has developed a toolkit</a> to understand and fight data centers, and were key in <a target="_blank" href="https://mediajustice.org/news/grassroots-opposition-forces-setback/">forcing a major setback to a planned data center in West Texas.</a></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/ai-data-center-hucksters-wouldnt</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:190423389</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/190423389/a02595f5996440e0c9c52e3cd88e117d.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/190423389/44ada6d252d22b247d3646c4b5b29e11.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Bribery of a lawmaker used to be a straightforward retail transaction between the special interest briber and a specific bribee. But the Silicon Valley billionaires now invading rural America with hundreds of their exploitative AI data centers are out to buy state lawmakers in bulk. Instead of slipping cash-filled envelopes to individual politicos, tech giants like Amazon, Meta, and OpenAI, are putting up hundreds of millions of dollars in this spring’s midterm elections to pay for the campaigns of candidates who pledge to back their intrusive, water-sucking, energy-wasting, AI schemes. For example, Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta, has two super-PACs doling out $65 million to state and local politicians who will oppose any regulation of sprawling data centers he wants to impose on rural Texas and Illinois. Why such a barrage of corporate money in local legislative races? Because the countryside is aflame with fury that arrogant, avaricious AI profiteers think they’re entitled to walk over local communities – so these locals are demanding that their legislators regulate or even ban AI data centers. Unable (or unwilling) to win political support honestly, the corporate giants intend to overpower the democratic will of the people by effectively bribing submissive legislators with campaign cash – or by funding opponents for lawmakers who refuse to be bought. Of course, bribers and bribees alike will piously pretend that the corporate ruse of buying government policy by buying legislative seats is technically not a bribe. But hello – rigging the system so billionaire donors can crush local democracy is not a “technicality.” If it looks, smells, and has the impact of a bribe… it is one. Do something! * To follow fights around the country and learn more about AI data centers, subscriber to Data Center Watch Briefing: datacenterwatch.substack.com * MediaJustice has developed a toolkit to understand and fight data centers, and were key in forcing a major setback to a planned data center in West Texas. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Bribery of a lawmaker used to be a straightforward retail transaction between the special interest briber and a specific bribee. But the Silicon Valley billionaires now invading rural America with hundreds of their exploitative AI data centers are out to buy state lawmakers in bulk. Instead of slipping cash-filled envelopes to individual politicos, tech giants like Amazon, Meta, and OpenAI, are putting up hundreds of millions of dollars in this spring’s midterm elections to pay for the campaigns of candidates who pledge to back their intrusive, water-sucking, energy-wasting, AI schemes. For example, Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta, has two super-PACs doling out $65 million to state and local politicians who will oppose any regulation of sprawling data centers he wants to impose on rural Texas and Illinois. Why such a barrage of corporate money in local legislative races? Because the countryside is aflame with fury that arrogant, avaricious AI profiteers think they’re entitled to walk over local communities – so these locals are demanding that their legislators regulate or even ban AI data centers. Unable (or unwilling) to win political support honestly, the corporate giants intend to overpower the democratic will of the people by effectively bribing submissive legislators with campaign cash – or by funding opponents for lawmakers who refuse to be bought. Of course, bribers and bribees alike will piously pretend that the corporate ruse of buying government policy by buying legislative seats is technically not a bribe. But hello – rigging the system so billionaire donors can crush local democracy is not a “technicality.” If it looks, smells, and has the impact of a bribe… it is one. Do something! * To follow fights around the country and learn more about AI data centers, subscriber to Data Center Watch Briefing: datacenterwatch.substack.com * MediaJustice has developed a toolkit to understand and fight data centers, and were key in forcing a major setback to a planned data center in West Texas. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Should Chuck Schumer Choose Maine’s US Senator?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The Democratic Party establishment is rolling out its arsenal of big funders and political consultants, trying to defeat… Democrats.</p><p>Huh? Yes, led by Sen. Chuck “Don’t-Rock-the-Corporate-Boat” Schumer, the party’s Washington hierarchy has been working to eliminate upstart Democratic contenders who are unabashedly progressive and popular! These candidates are generating new grassroots energy and hope for the party by bluntly challenging Washington’s meek, business-as-usual politics that Schumer embodies.</p><p>Pundits say Democrats need to find candidates who can appeal to workers. Well, here’s one who is full-blooded working class: Graham Platner. A 41-year old military combat veteran, Platner is a plain-spoken oyster farmer who’s running right at “the oligarchy – the billionaires who pay for it and the politicians who sell us out.” Platner’s fiery populist spirit has sparked statewide grassroots support, volunteers, funding, and enthusiasm that Maine Democrats have not had in years.</p><p>But, uninvited, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2026-election/unions-chuck-schumer-democratic-leaders-maine-senate-primary-rcna260797">here came Chuck</a> – lugging his ponderous wet blanket of high-dollar corporate politics to the state. Trying to stop a real democrat from being the party’s nominee, Schumer recruited Maine’s lame-duck, milquetoast governor to run against Platner, knowing she would not challenge the corporate order. He raised truckloads of corporate cash for her, hoping to suffocate the oysterman’s populist uprising.</p><p>But by assaulting Platner with a barrage of out-of-state of corporate money, Schumer and his hand-picked candidate are actually assaulting the “little-d,” working-class democrats who’ve rallied to the maverick. Attacking your own constituents is an odd strategy, and sure enough, it doesn’t seem to be selling in Maine – a recent poll of likely Democratic voters shows Platner with a <a target="_blank" href="https://wgme.com/news/local/unh-poll-shows-platner-leading-mills-by-38-points-in-maine-democratic-senate-primary">38-point lead</a> over Schumer’s choice to be Maine’s senator.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-should-chuck-schumer-choose-maines</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:190405068</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/190405068/ca24cbec545a103c9199c0cf9d1201a3.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/190405068/6e6bcde65a653fe6f8a3751273e64b6e.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>The Democratic Party establishment is rolling out its arsenal of big funders and political consultants, trying to defeat… Democrats. Huh? Yes, led by Sen. Chuck “Don’t-Rock-the-Corporate-Boat” Schumer, the party’s Washington hierarchy has been working to eliminate upstart Democratic contenders who are unabashedly progressive and popular! These candidates are generating new grassroots energy and hope for the party by bluntly challenging Washington’s meek, business-as-usual politics that Schumer embodies. Pundits say Democrats need to find candidates who can appeal to workers. Well, here’s one who is full-blooded working class: Graham Platner. A 41-year old military combat veteran, Platner is a plain-spoken oyster farmer who’s running right at “the oligarchy – the billionaires who pay for it and the politicians who sell us out.” Platner’s fiery populist spirit has sparked statewide grassroots support, volunteers, funding, and enthusiasm that Maine Democrats have not had in years. But, uninvited, here came Chuck – lugging his ponderous wet blanket of high-dollar corporate politics to the state. Trying to stop a real democrat from being the party’s nominee, Schumer recruited Maine’s lame-duck, milquetoast governor to run against Platner, knowing she would not challenge the corporate order. He raised truckloads of corporate cash for her, hoping to suffocate the oysterman’s populist uprising. But by assaulting Platner with a barrage of out-of-state of corporate money, Schumer and his hand-picked candidate are actually assaulting the “little-d,” working-class democrats who’ve rallied to the maverick. Attacking your own constituents is an odd strategy, and sure enough, it doesn’t seem to be selling in Maine – a recent poll of likely Democratic voters shows Platner with a 38-point lead over Schumer’s choice to be Maine’s senator. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>The Democratic Party establishment is rolling out its arsenal of big funders and political consultants, trying to defeat… Democrats. Huh? Yes, led by Sen. Chuck “Don’t-Rock-the-Corporate-Boat” Schumer, the party’s Washington hierarchy has been working to eliminate upstart Democratic contenders who are unabashedly progressive and popular! These candidates are generating new grassroots energy and hope for the party by bluntly challenging Washington’s meek, business-as-usual politics that Schumer embodies. Pundits say Democrats need to find candidates who can appeal to workers. Well, here’s one who is full-blooded working class: Graham Platner. A 41-year old military combat veteran, Platner is a plain-spoken oyster farmer who’s running right at “the oligarchy – the billionaires who pay for it and the politicians who sell us out.” Platner’s fiery populist spirit has sparked statewide grassroots support, volunteers, funding, and enthusiasm that Maine Democrats have not had in years. But, uninvited, here came Chuck – lugging his ponderous wet blanket of high-dollar corporate politics to the state. Trying to stop a real democrat from being the party’s nominee, Schumer recruited Maine’s lame-duck, milquetoast governor to run against Platner, knowing she would not challenge the corporate order. He raised truckloads of corporate cash for her, hoping to suffocate the oysterman’s populist uprising. But by assaulting Platner with a barrage of out-of-state of corporate money, Schumer and his hand-picked candidate are actually assaulting the “little-d,” working-class democrats who’ve rallied to the maverick. Attacking your own constituents is an odd strategy, and sure enough, it doesn’t seem to be selling in Maine – a recent poll of likely Democratic voters shows Platner with a 38-point lead over Schumer’s choice to be Maine’s senator. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Blast from the Past: Hightower, Molly Ivins and friends at Scholz Garten in 1994]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Greetings, Lowdowners—Deanna here.</p><p>This spring, we’re doing something a little different. Over the next few weeks, we’re opening the gates a bit — giving free subscribers a taste of some of the exclusive stories, video, and behind-the-scenes Hightower that paid subscribers get regularly. If you’ve been on the fence about upgrading, consider this your invitation to see what you’ve been missing.</p><p>And we’re kicking it off with a doozy.</p><p>Reader <strong>Elliot K.</strong> shared with us this video from C-SPAN that we didn’t know existed—and it’s a rollicking time capsule that you don’t want to miss. Hightower hosts a storytelling evening over beers with friends <a target="_blank" href="https://www.texasmonthly.com/news-politics/molly-ivins-matters-more-than-ever/"><strong>Molly Ivins</strong></a><strong>, </strong><a target="_blank" href="https://www.legacy.com/us/obituaries/statesman/name/ed-wendler-obituary?id=39692685"><strong>Ed Wendler</strong></a><strong>, </strong><a target="_blank" href="https://www.legacy.com/us/obituaries/legacyremembers/tyrus-fain-obituary?pid=161842324"><strong>Ty Fain</strong></a><strong>, </strong><a target="_blank" href="https://www.statesman.com/story/news/local/2020/07/03/champion-of-texas-election-law-and-ethics-buck-wood-dies-at-75/113870402/"><strong>Buck Wood</strong></a>, and more, plus a surprise visit (and great story) from <a target="_blank" href="https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth1040199/">State Sen. Gonzalo Barrientos</a>. </p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://www.scholzgarten.com/">Scholz Garten</a> in Austin, the setting for this gathering, is <a target="_blank" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholz_Garten">historic for a number of reasons</a>, but it’s long been a watering hole for politicos of all stripes. As <strong>Buck Wood</strong>, then the director of <a target="_blank" href="https://www.commoncause.org/texas/">Common Cause Texas</a>, explains:</p><p>Some of [the legislative bills] were literally hammered out right down here in the beer garden. There’s been some great political fights here, there’s been some pretty good fist fights here for years. Usually over political matters.</p><p>There are too many stories in here nail the spirit of Texas politics, but my favorite is a spicy one from heroine <strong>Molly Ivins</strong> that I’d never heard before:</p><p>One of great ongoing literary attractions of Scholz Beer Garden is the graffiti in the restrooms. And I myself have never frequented the men’s room here, no matter how serious the cause. I do remember an exchange. This was back when <strong>Frank Erwin,</strong> he was chairman of the UT Board of Regents, he was <strong>Lyndon Johnson’s</strong> man, and he really was in many ways a miserable sumbitch. I went to the ladies room one night and there was a note on the wall saying, “Do a good deed today, give Frank Erwin the clap.” Underneath which somebody else had written, “<em>Give</em> it to him? Hell, <em>charge</em> him for it!”</p><p>Happy Friday everyone—let us know your favorite parts in the comments. </p><p>PS—If you haven’t seen the documentary “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.magpictures.com/raisehell/">Raise Hell: The Life and Times of Molly Ivins,</a>” get thee to a streaming service immediately!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/blast-from-the-past-hightower-molly</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:189366671</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Deanna Zandt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="39187582" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/189366671/ef1400f0139dfc83b20aefde647032a5.mp3"/><itunes:author>Deanna Zandt</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>2449</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/189366671/3d3f1ec3d6989cd33ff000b132f20473.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Greetings, Lowdowners—Deanna here. This spring, we’re doing something a little different. Over the next few weeks, we’re opening the gates a bit — giving free subscribers a taste of some of the exclusive stories, video, and behind-the-scenes Hightower that paid subscribers get regularly. If you’ve been on the fence about upgrading, consider this your invitation to see what you’ve been missing. And we’re kicking it off with a doozy. Reader Elliot K. shared with us this video from C-SPAN that we didn’t know existed—and it’s a rollicking time capsule that you don’t want to miss. Hightower hosts a storytelling evening over beers with friends Molly Ivins, Ed Wendler, Ty Fain, Buck Wood, and more, plus a surprise visit (and great story) from State Sen. Gonzalo Barrientos. Scholz Garten in Austin, the setting for this gathering, is historic for a number of reasons, but it’s long been a watering hole for politicos of all stripes. As Buck Wood, then the director of Common Cause Texas, explains: Some of [the legislative bills] were literally hammered out right down here in the beer garden. There’s been some great political fights here, there’s been some pretty good fist fights here for years. Usually over political matters. There are too many stories in here nail the spirit of Texas politics, but my favorite is a spicy one from heroine Molly Ivins that I’d never heard before: One of great ongoing literary attractions of Scholz Beer Garden is the graffiti in the restrooms. And I myself have never frequented the men’s room here, no matter how serious the cause. I do remember an exchange. This was back when Frank Erwin, he was chairman of the UT Board of Regents, he was Lyndon Johnson’s man, and he really was in many ways a miserable sumbitch. I went to the ladies room one night and there was a note on the wall saying, “Do a good deed today, give Frank Erwin the clap.” Underneath which somebody else had written, “Give it to him? Hell, charge him for it!” Happy Friday everyone—let us know your favorite parts in the comments. PS—If you haven’t seen the documentary “Raise Hell: The Life and Times of Molly Ivins,” get thee to a streaming service immediately! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Greetings, Lowdowners—Deanna here. This spring, we’re doing something a little different. Over the next few weeks, we’re opening the gates a bit — giving free subscribers a taste of some of the exclusive stories, video, and behind-the-scenes Hightower that paid subscribers get regularly. If you’ve been on the fence about upgrading, consider this your invitation to see what you’ve been missing. And we’re kicking it off with a doozy. Reader Elliot K. shared with us this video from C-SPAN that we didn’t know existed—and it’s a rollicking time capsule that you don’t want to miss. Hightower hosts a storytelling evening over beers with friends Molly Ivins, Ed Wendler, Ty Fain, Buck Wood, and more, plus a surprise visit (and great story) from State Sen. Gonzalo Barrientos. Scholz Garten in Austin, the setting for this gathering, is historic for a number of reasons, but it’s long been a watering hole for politicos of all stripes. As Buck Wood, then the director of Common Cause Texas, explains: Some of [the legislative bills] were literally hammered out right down here in the beer garden. There’s been some great political fights here, there’s been some pretty good fist fights here for years. Usually over political matters. There are too many stories in here nail the spirit of Texas politics, but my favorite is a spicy one from heroine Molly Ivins that I’d never heard before: One of great ongoing literary attractions of Scholz Beer Garden is the graffiti in the restrooms. And I myself have never frequented the men’s room here, no matter how serious the cause. I do remember an exchange. This was back when Frank Erwin, he was chairman of the UT Board of Regents, he was Lyndon Johnson’s man, and he really was in many ways a miserable sumbitch. I went to the ladies room one night and there was a note on the wall saying, “Do a good deed today, give Frank Erwin the clap.” Underneath which somebody else had written, “Give it to him? Hell, charge him for it!” Happy Friday everyone—let us know your favorite parts in the comments. PS—If you haven’t seen the documentary “Raise Hell: The Life and Times of Molly Ivins,” get thee to a streaming service immediately! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Public Safety Down, CEO Pay Up. Corporations Play “Rig the System”]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>To see how the game of “Rig the System” is played, consider the shameful corporate gaming of the horror of California wildfires that have been devouring lives and entire communities.</p><p>Many of the worst fires have been ignited by the faulty wires, transformers, and other poorly functioning equipment of such profiteering electric utilities as <strong>Southern California Edison</strong>. The safety failures of this multibillion-dollar giant have been so awful that state lawmakers and regulators have rushed out fire-protection laws – not for the people, but for the corporate owners! <a target="_blank" href="https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2026-01-16/wildfire-victims-decry-state-law-protecting-utilities-from-cost-of-disasters-they-cause#:~:text=Edison%20last%20used%20that%20transmission,responsibility%20for%20damages%20is%20capped.">A 2019 law literally </a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2026-01-16/wildfire-victims-decry-state-law-protecting-utilities-from-cost-of-disasters-they-cause#:~:text=Edison%20last%20used%20that%20transmission,responsibility%20for%20damages%20is%20capped."><em>protects utilities</em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2026-01-16/wildfire-victims-decry-state-law-protecting-utilities-from-cost-of-disasters-they-cause#:~:text=Edison%20last%20used%20that%20transmission,responsibility%20for%20damages%20is%20capped."> from paying for fire damages they cause</a>, instead passing the costs to state taxpayers.</p><p>Wait, says Edison, if our annual safety record is poor, our top executives are punished with a cut in their annual bonuses. Ouch! Well, not really – the reduction is capped at 5 percent.</p><p>Take last year’s fire that destroyed nearly every home and building in the town of Altadena, killing 19 people. “It’s just a tragedy,” lamented <strong>Edison’s CEO</strong>, though he admits it was sparked by an Edison transmission line. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/18/business/energy-environment/edison-eaton-fire-altadena-executive-bonuses.html">Sure enough, the chief “suffered” a 5-percent bonus hickey</a>. Hold your pity, though, for that means he still collected 95 percent of his 2025 performance bonus, plus pocketing his extravagant salary, stock options, and benefits. In all, the man-in-charge of this corporate-made “tragedy” walked away with nearly $14 million in personal pay.</p><p>Meanwhile, Edison went to the Public Utility Commission, demanding that its customers be forced to pay 10 percent more on their electric bills. To keep score on utilities rigging the system, go to <strong>TURN, The Utility Reform Network</strong>: <a target="_blank" href="http://turn.org">turn.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/public-safety-down-ceo-pay-up-corporations</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:189669580</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598232" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/189669580/657600db778e4633645d03fffdfc0d12.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/189669580/871ca069dec9675556230137db4d1149.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>To see how the game of “Rig the System” is played, consider the shameful corporate gaming of the horror of California wildfires that have been devouring lives and entire communities. Many of the worst fires have been ignited by the faulty wires, transformers, and other poorly functioning equipment of such profiteering electric utilities as Southern California Edison. The safety failures of this multibillion-dollar giant have been so awful that state lawmakers and regulators have rushed out fire-protection laws – not for the people, but for the corporate owners! A 2019 law literally protects utilities from paying for fire damages they cause, instead passing the costs to state taxpayers. Wait, says Edison, if our annual safety record is poor, our top executives are punished with a cut in their annual bonuses. Ouch! Well, not really – the reduction is capped at 5 percent. Take last year’s fire that destroyed nearly every home and building in the town of Altadena, killing 19 people. “It’s just a tragedy,” lamented Edison’s CEO, though he admits it was sparked by an Edison transmission line. Sure enough, the chief “suffered” a 5-percent bonus hickey. Hold your pity, though, for that means he still collected 95 percent of his 2025 performance bonus, plus pocketing his extravagant salary, stock options, and benefits. In all, the man-in-charge of this corporate-made “tragedy” walked away with nearly $14 million in personal pay. Meanwhile, Edison went to the Public Utility Commission, demanding that its customers be forced to pay 10 percent more on their electric bills. To keep score on utilities rigging the system, go to TURN, The Utility Reform Network: turn.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>To see how the game of “Rig the System” is played, consider the shameful corporate gaming of the horror of California wildfires that have been devouring lives and entire communities. Many of the worst fires have been ignited by the faulty wires, transformers, and other poorly functioning equipment of such profiteering electric utilities as Southern California Edison. The safety failures of this multibillion-dollar giant have been so awful that state lawmakers and regulators have rushed out fire-protection laws – not for the people, but for the corporate owners! A 2019 law literally protects utilities from paying for fire damages they cause, instead passing the costs to state taxpayers. Wait, says Edison, if our annual safety record is poor, our top executives are punished with a cut in their annual bonuses. Ouch! Well, not really – the reduction is capped at 5 percent. Take last year’s fire that destroyed nearly every home and building in the town of Altadena, killing 19 people. “It’s just a tragedy,” lamented Edison’s CEO, though he admits it was sparked by an Edison transmission line. Sure enough, the chief “suffered” a 5-percent bonus hickey. Hold your pity, though, for that means he still collected 95 percent of his 2025 performance bonus, plus pocketing his extravagant salary, stock options, and benefits. In all, the man-in-charge of this corporate-made “tragedy” walked away with nearly $14 million in personal pay. Meanwhile, Edison went to the Public Utility Commission, demanding that its customers be forced to pay 10 percent more on their electric bills. To keep score on utilities rigging the system, go to TURN, The Utility Reform Network: turn.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Trump Brags That His Name Is “Golden.” But It’s Just Fool’s Gold]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>America’s present president is like those egos who feel entitled to carve their name into every park bench they sit on, apparently to “make their mark” and shout to the world, “I wuz here!”</p><p>Indeed, Trump has demanded that our government patch his “Donald J. Trump” onto such public facilities as the Kennedy Center, the Institute of Peace, Dulles Airport, Penn Station, the Hudson Tunnel – and he might as well add the US Capitol since he treats Congress like his personal possession.</p><p>Insecurity is what’s driving his egomaniacal rebranding frenzy. As Trump candidly explains, “You’ve got to put your name on stuff or no one will remember you.”</p><p>Oh, Donald, like the demagogic Joe McCarthy and other narcissistic politicos, you’re destined to be long remembered… <em>and mocked</em>! Moreover, those vainglorious, gold-plated Trump nameplates you’re tacking onto every public space will soon be unceremoniously stripped off and dumped into the trash bin of history.</p><p>My friend, Fred Harris, a great populist senator from Oklahoma, told about the fickle nature of political fame. It was a true story about a governor who backed a boondoggle construction project after lobbyists promised to name the structure after him. They did, but as soon as the governor left office, his name was removed. Fred said if anyone ever dedicated a bridge or building to him, he wanted his name built into the structure itself, so if they later tried to remove his name, “the damned thing would fall down.”</p><p>So don’t despair that this president seems omnipresent. This too, will pass. Keep whacking at the autocratic, plutocratic structure of Trumpism – it’s not built to withstand the winds time, much less the winds of democratic rebellion.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/trump-brags-that-his-name-is-golden</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:189664868</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600845" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/189664868/39f958db28d36af57f3414c12f3ca483.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/189664868/3a701f93291e0bd787eb0ee1f4187888.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>America’s present president is like those egos who feel entitled to carve their name into every park bench they sit on, apparently to “make their mark” and shout to the world, “I wuz here!” Indeed, Trump has demanded that our government patch his “Donald J. Trump” onto such public facilities as the Kennedy Center, the Institute of Peace, Dulles Airport, Penn Station, the Hudson Tunnel – and he might as well add the US Capitol since he treats Congress like his personal possession. Insecurity is what’s driving his egomaniacal rebranding frenzy. As Trump candidly explains, “You’ve got to put your name on stuff or no one will remember you.” Oh, Donald, like the demagogic Joe McCarthy and other narcissistic politicos, you’re destined to be long remembered… and mocked! Moreover, those vainglorious, gold-plated Trump nameplates you’re tacking onto every public space will soon be unceremoniously stripped off and dumped into the trash bin of history. My friend, Fred Harris, a great populist senator from Oklahoma, told about the fickle nature of political fame. It was a true story about a governor who backed a boondoggle construction project after lobbyists promised to name the structure after him. They did, but as soon as the governor left office, his name was removed. Fred said if anyone ever dedicated a bridge or building to him, he wanted his name built into the structure itself, so if they later tried to remove his name, “the damned thing would fall down.” So don’t despair that this president seems omnipresent. This too, will pass. Keep whacking at the autocratic, plutocratic structure of Trumpism – it’s not built to withstand the winds time, much less the winds of democratic rebellion. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>America’s present president is like those egos who feel entitled to carve their name into every park bench they sit on, apparently to “make their mark” and shout to the world, “I wuz here!” Indeed, Trump has demanded that our government patch his “Donald J. Trump” onto such public facilities as the Kennedy Center, the Institute of Peace, Dulles Airport, Penn Station, the Hudson Tunnel – and he might as well add the US Capitol since he treats Congress like his personal possession. Insecurity is what’s driving his egomaniacal rebranding frenzy. As Trump candidly explains, “You’ve got to put your name on stuff or no one will remember you.” Oh, Donald, like the demagogic Joe McCarthy and other narcissistic politicos, you’re destined to be long remembered… and mocked! Moreover, those vainglorious, gold-plated Trump nameplates you’re tacking onto every public space will soon be unceremoniously stripped off and dumped into the trash bin of history. My friend, Fred Harris, a great populist senator from Oklahoma, told about the fickle nature of political fame. It was a true story about a governor who backed a boondoggle construction project after lobbyists promised to name the structure after him. They did, but as soon as the governor left office, his name was removed. Fred said if anyone ever dedicated a bridge or building to him, he wanted his name built into the structure itself, so if they later tried to remove his name, “the damned thing would fall down.” So don’t despair that this president seems omnipresent. This too, will pass. Keep whacking at the autocratic, plutocratic structure of Trumpism – it’s not built to withstand the winds time, much less the winds of democratic rebellion. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Grassroots Activism Produces a “Mississippi Miracle”]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Here’s something we don’t get to say very often: “Way to go Mississippi!”</p><p>This state has long been ranked dead last in important measurements like healthcare, workers’ wages, and rural opportunities. In recent years, though, Mississippi has steadily been advancing to the top in one vital category: Best places for a poor child to get a good education. What a miracle!</p><p>No. It’s the product of ordinary citizens who got fed up with plutocratic state rule that lavishes taxpayer funds on corporate elites, while shortchanging the basic needs of workaday people. In the past decade, savvy grassroots coalitions like <a target="_blank" href="https://picayuneitem.com/2026/01/mississippians-urge-state-legislature-to-oppose-school-choice/"><strong>Mississppi United</strong></a> have arisen and spread, gaining local political punch in county after county that could not be ignored by legislators.</p><p>Early on they achieved major state investments in pre-K education, producing remarkable advances, especially by low-income children in many of the state’s poverty-stricken, rural counties.</p><p>This year, building on that success, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.mississippifreepress.org/private-school-voucher-bill-dies-amid-opposition-in-mississippi-senate-education-committee/">the movement scored two huge educational victories</a>. First, they produced a unanimous senate vote to defeat a school privatization scheme pushed by the right-wing governor, the corporate establishment, out-of-state school profiteers… and Donald Trump! Then, to emphasize and expand on the state’s commitment to quality <em>public</em> education, the legislature passed a $5,000 teacher pay raise.</p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://www.mississippifreepress.org/private-school-voucher-bill-dies-amid-opposition-in-mississippi-senate-education-committee/">As a legislative leader from Starkville said after the senate vote</a>: “Our public schools are the cornerstone of every community in this state, and this unanimous rejection sends a clear message: Mississippi will not abandon the students and families who depend on quality public education – no matter how much out-of-state money tries to buy our legislators.”</p><p>To learn more about the uplifting “Mississippi Miracle” go to ACLU-MS.org.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/grassroots-activism-produces-a-mississippi</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:188908365</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598232" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/188908365/a4a4e10ee3f49896f40375508842ef9b.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/188908365/eae1fa14008a04d811143ada3f65aaaf.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Here’s something we don’t get to say very often: “Way to go Mississippi!” This state has long been ranked dead last in important measurements like healthcare, workers’ wages, and rural opportunities. In recent years, though, Mississippi has steadily been advancing to the top in one vital category: Best places for a poor child to get a good education. What a miracle! No. It’s the product of ordinary citizens who got fed up with plutocratic state rule that lavishes taxpayer funds on corporate elites, while shortchanging the basic needs of workaday people. In the past decade, savvy grassroots coalitions like Mississppi United have arisen and spread, gaining local political punch in county after county that could not be ignored by legislators. Early on they achieved major state investments in pre-K education, producing remarkable advances, especially by low-income children in many of the state’s poverty-stricken, rural counties. This year, building on that success, the movement scored two huge educational victories. First, they produced a unanimous senate vote to defeat a school privatization scheme pushed by the right-wing governor, the corporate establishment, out-of-state school profiteers… and Donald Trump! Then, to emphasize and expand on the state’s commitment to quality public education, the legislature passed a $5,000 teacher pay raise. As a legislative leader from Starkville said after the senate vote: “Our public schools are the cornerstone of every community in this state, and this unanimous rejection sends a clear message: Mississippi will not abandon the students and families who depend on quality public education – no matter how much out-of-state money tries to buy our legislators.” To learn more about the uplifting “Mississippi Miracle” go to ACLU-MS.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Here’s something we don’t get to say very often: “Way to go Mississippi!” This state has long been ranked dead last in important measurements like healthcare, workers’ wages, and rural opportunities. In recent years, though, Mississippi has steadily been advancing to the top in one vital category: Best places for a poor child to get a good education. What a miracle! No. It’s the product of ordinary citizens who got fed up with plutocratic state rule that lavishes taxpayer funds on corporate elites, while shortchanging the basic needs of workaday people. In the past decade, savvy grassroots coalitions like Mississppi United have arisen and spread, gaining local political punch in county after county that could not be ignored by legislators. Early on they achieved major state investments in pre-K education, producing remarkable advances, especially by low-income children in many of the state’s poverty-stricken, rural counties. This year, building on that success, the movement scored two huge educational victories. First, they produced a unanimous senate vote to defeat a school privatization scheme pushed by the right-wing governor, the corporate establishment, out-of-state school profiteers… and Donald Trump! Then, to emphasize and expand on the state’s commitment to quality public education, the legislature passed a $5,000 teacher pay raise. As a legislative leader from Starkville said after the senate vote: “Our public schools are the cornerstone of every community in this state, and this unanimous rejection sends a clear message: Mississippi will not abandon the students and families who depend on quality public education – no matter how much out-of-state money tries to buy our legislators.” To learn more about the uplifting “Mississippi Miracle” go to ACLU-MS.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Jesse Jackson’s Most Consequential Power Was Not His Oratory, But His Vision]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>In 1988, I was one of only two white elected Democratic officials in all of America to endorse <strong>Jesse Jackson</strong> to be our party’s nominee for President. (The other was <strong>Bernie Sanders</strong>, then the mayor of Burlington Vermont).</p><p>As a Texas politico, my endorsement of the fiery Black leader was both derided as political suicide and hailed as gutsy. But it was neither – it was just the right thing to do. As I had learned from an old-time Texas Democrat, “Every now and then, a politician ought to do something just because it’s right.”</p><p>In the 1970s and 80s, I had gotten to know and work with Jackson. A renown orator, he was an even more effective thinker and uniter. For example, he was able to link white, conservative dirt farmers in common cause with impoverished farmworkers and inner-city families battling chain-store profiteers.</p><p>So, when he ran for president, I had to ask myself: If this guy (1) is standing for the progressive populist values I believe in, (2) is standing with the grassroots families I’m fighting for, and (3) has the populist grit to stand up to the moneyed elites – why am I not standing with him?</p><p>Millions of us responded to his deliberate campaign trying to forge a multi-racial populist movement, and it’s up to us to carry that historic mission forward. But Jackson’s “Rainbow” vision was not one of fluffy hope however, but one of profound “intentionality.” That means doing the grunt-level political work of strategizing, organizing, and mobilizing to make good things happen. Especially in these dark Trumpian times, emphasizing Jesse’s deliberate determination is the best way to honor this true champion of democracy.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/jesse-jacksons-most-consequential</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:188906429</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600845" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/188906429/3c6412661cc11a574b760a108f03fd82.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/188906429/c14529437694d9619838bef23ff99959.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>In 1988, I was one of only two white elected Democratic officials in all of America to endorse Jesse Jackson to be our party’s nominee for President. (The other was Bernie Sanders, then the mayor of Burlington Vermont). As a Texas politico, my endorsement of the fiery Black leader was both derided as political suicide and hailed as gutsy. But it was neither – it was just the right thing to do. As I had learned from an old-time Texas Democrat, “Every now and then, a politician ought to do something just because it’s right.” In the 1970s and 80s, I had gotten to know and work with Jackson. A renown orator, he was an even more effective thinker and uniter. For example, he was able to link white, conservative dirt farmers in common cause with impoverished farmworkers and inner-city families battling chain-store profiteers. So, when he ran for president, I had to ask myself: If this guy (1) is standing for the progressive populist values I believe in, (2) is standing with the grassroots families I’m fighting for, and (3) has the populist grit to stand up to the moneyed elites – why am I not standing with him? Millions of us responded to his deliberate campaign trying to forge a multi-racial populist movement, and it’s up to us to carry that historic mission forward. But Jackson’s “Rainbow” vision was not one of fluffy hope however, but one of profound “intentionality.” That means doing the grunt-level political work of strategizing, organizing, and mobilizing to make good things happen. Especially in these dark Trumpian times, emphasizing Jesse’s deliberate determination is the best way to honor this true champion of democracy. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>In 1988, I was one of only two white elected Democratic officials in all of America to endorse Jesse Jackson to be our party’s nominee for President. (The other was Bernie Sanders, then the mayor of Burlington Vermont). As a Texas politico, my endorsement of the fiery Black leader was both derided as political suicide and hailed as gutsy. But it was neither – it was just the right thing to do. As I had learned from an old-time Texas Democrat, “Every now and then, a politician ought to do something just because it’s right.” In the 1970s and 80s, I had gotten to know and work with Jackson. A renown orator, he was an even more effective thinker and uniter. For example, he was able to link white, conservative dirt farmers in common cause with impoverished farmworkers and inner-city families battling chain-store profiteers. So, when he ran for president, I had to ask myself: If this guy (1) is standing for the progressive populist values I believe in, (2) is standing with the grassroots families I’m fighting for, and (3) has the populist grit to stand up to the moneyed elites – why am I not standing with him? Millions of us responded to his deliberate campaign trying to forge a multi-racial populist movement, and it’s up to us to carry that historic mission forward. But Jackson’s “Rainbow” vision was not one of fluffy hope however, but one of profound “intentionality.” That means doing the grunt-level political work of strategizing, organizing, and mobilizing to make good things happen. Especially in these dark Trumpian times, emphasizing Jesse’s deliberate determination is the best way to honor this true champion of democracy. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Should We Allow Food Monopolies? Let’s Bust The System!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>How are monopolistic corporations able to gain their economic dominance? They get politicians to give it to them.</p><p>Consider the old robber barons. They weren’t brilliant investors or managers, they were ruthless exploiters of government giveaways, and they routinely bribed lawmakers and other officials to permit their monopolistic thievery.</p><p>Likewise, today’s monopoly players have captured local, state, and national markets – not through honest competition, but by getting public officials to subsidize their expansion and to rig the rules against small competitors. Monopolizers buy this favoritism with the legalized bribes of dark-money campaign donations they lavish on compliant lawmakers.</p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/12/food-deserts-robinson-patman/680765/">Investigative digger Stacy Mitchell recently documented</a> how this corrupt political favoritism has allowed massive retail chains like <strong>Walmart</strong>, <strong>Kroger</strong>, and <strong>Dollar Store</strong> to crush thousands of local grocers. This has left millions of Americans living in “food deserts” – worker class, poor, and rural communities with no food store.</p><p>What happened? As grocery chains spread from local to regional to national, they demanded that food manufacturers give them big discounts – a dramatic monopoly pricing advantage over independent rivals, so hometown grocers began hemorrhaging customers. This raw, anti-competitive, price discrimination was a flagrant violation of America’s anti-monopoly law – but here came Big Money to protect the monopolists.</p><p>In 1980, as <strong>Ronald Reagan</strong> was railing against “silly” consumer protection laws, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/12/food-deserts-robinson-patman/680765/">supermarket lobbyists poured campaign cash into top officials of both parties</a>. What they bought was bipartisan agreement to simply stop enforcing that “rusty” old antitrust law that had protected a competitive grocery economy for nearly 50 years.</p><p>But good news! That useful, highly-effective law is still on the books, so let’s build a long-term grassroots campaign to rejuvenate it and re-outlaw monopolization, redlining, and price gouging by food giants. <strong>For more information, go to </strong><a target="_blank" href="http://ilsr.org"><strong>ilsr.org</strong></a><strong>.</strong></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-should-we-allow-food-monopolies-6b9</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:188148719</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598232" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/188148719/3dd98d1254538f9e4d142e6e15aa0410.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/188148719/4dae31ca045c66dc328d16e99cc0caa2.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>How are monopolistic corporations able to gain their economic dominance? They get politicians to give it to them. Consider the old robber barons. They weren’t brilliant investors or managers, they were ruthless exploiters of government giveaways, and they routinely bribed lawmakers and other officials to permit their monopolistic thievery. Likewise, today’s monopoly players have captured local, state, and national markets – not through honest competition, but by getting public officials to subsidize their expansion and to rig the rules against small competitors. Monopolizers buy this favoritism with the legalized bribes of dark-money campaign donations they lavish on compliant lawmakers. Investigative digger Stacy Mitchell recently documented how this corrupt political favoritism has allowed massive retail chains like Walmart, Kroger, and Dollar Store to crush thousands of local grocers. This has left millions of Americans living in “food deserts” – worker class, poor, and rural communities with no food store. What happened? As grocery chains spread from local to regional to national, they demanded that food manufacturers give them big discounts – a dramatic monopoly pricing advantage over independent rivals, so hometown grocers began hemorrhaging customers. This raw, anti-competitive, price discrimination was a flagrant violation of America’s anti-monopoly law – but here came Big Money to protect the monopolists. In 1980, as Ronald Reagan was railing against “silly” consumer protection laws, supermarket lobbyists poured campaign cash into top officials of both parties. What they bought was bipartisan agreement to simply stop enforcing that “rusty” old antitrust law that had protected a competitive grocery economy for nearly 50 years. But good news! That useful, highly-effective law is still on the books, so let’s build a long-term grassroots campaign to rejuvenate it and re-outlaw monopolization, redlining, and price gouging by food giants. For more information, go to ilsr.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>How are monopolistic corporations able to gain their economic dominance? They get politicians to give it to them. Consider the old robber barons. They weren’t brilliant investors or managers, they were ruthless exploiters of government giveaways, and they routinely bribed lawmakers and other officials to permit their monopolistic thievery. Likewise, today’s monopoly players have captured local, state, and national markets – not through honest competition, but by getting public officials to subsidize their expansion and to rig the rules against small competitors. Monopolizers buy this favoritism with the legalized bribes of dark-money campaign donations they lavish on compliant lawmakers. Investigative digger Stacy Mitchell recently documented how this corrupt political favoritism has allowed massive retail chains like Walmart, Kroger, and Dollar Store to crush thousands of local grocers. This has left millions of Americans living in “food deserts” – worker class, poor, and rural communities with no food store. What happened? As grocery chains spread from local to regional to national, they demanded that food manufacturers give them big discounts – a dramatic monopoly pricing advantage over independent rivals, so hometown grocers began hemorrhaging customers. This raw, anti-competitive, price discrimination was a flagrant violation of America’s anti-monopoly law – but here came Big Money to protect the monopolists. In 1980, as Ronald Reagan was railing against “silly” consumer protection laws, supermarket lobbyists poured campaign cash into top officials of both parties. What they bought was bipartisan agreement to simply stop enforcing that “rusty” old antitrust law that had protected a competitive grocery economy for nearly 50 years. But good news! That useful, highly-effective law is still on the books, so let’s build a long-term grassroots campaign to rejuvenate it and re-outlaw monopolization, redlining, and price gouging by food giants. For more information, go to ilsr.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Who Were Those Masked Men? Feds Invade America!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Except for Zorro and Batman, people who put on masks to hide their identity when going to work are rarely up to any good.</p><p>And as Americans learned decades ago when Ku Klux Klanners covered themselves from head to toe, the bigger the mask, the greater the evil hiding behind it. Which brings us full circle to “Operation Metro Surge.”</p><p>OMS is the <em>muy macho</em> PR slogan for the Republican Party’s militaristic invasions of Chicago, Los Angeles, Minneapolis, and other American cities they hate. Deploying ICE and other bastions of authoritarian power, thousands of massively armed federal belligerents in full assault gear have been rampaging through peaceful neighborhoods in violent and murderous mass sweeps.</p><p>This is an un-American attack by America’s own government on America’s founding ideals of liberty and openness. The defining symbol of this government repression is that its forces are all hiding behind full-face masks.</p><p>Of course, if I was doing some of the stuff ICE commandos are doing, I’d want to cover my face, too. But, like the Klan, masking up the oppressors is not merely about cloaking their personal shame — it’s an added ploy by the perpetrators to terrify anyone who might dare to stand up to them.</p><p>As usual, though, the authoritarian powers misunderstood America and underestimated the deeply rebellious nature of our gutsy, grassroots people. Some 30,000 volunteers in Minneapolis, for example, have become trained “constitutional observers” to police the police, and a citywide “whistle brigade” rushes like Paul Revere to alert neighbors when ICE agents invade their neighborhoods.</p><p>Their ethic of neighbors-helping-neighbors recognizes their power to “do what’s right.” It’s the best of America standing up to confront the worst.</p><p>Do something!</p><p>Our friends at the <a target="_blank" href="https://workingfamilies.org/2026/01/stand-up-to-ice/">Working Families Party</a> are leading the charge to pressure Democrats to vote NO on any DHS bill that does not work to stop ICE’s reckless attacks. You can <strong>text “ICE OUT” to 30403 or dial 833-636-3260 </strong>to call your Senators. Need a sample script? Here you go:</p><p>When you connect, say your name and where you live to show that you’re a constituent. Then, you could say something like:</p><p>“ICE’s reckless and illegal attacks on our communities must be stopped. But instead of ending and investigating ICE’s abuses, the DHS spending bill would empower this rogue agency to terrorize and kill even more of our neighbors. As your constituent, I urge you to vote against the DHS funding bill and stand up to ICE.”</p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://workingfamilies.org/2026/01/stand-up-to-ice/">Here’s a whole set of actions</a> they’ve compiled to help direct your energy.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/who-were-those-masked-men-feds-invade</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:188143448</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600845" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/188143448/c10a77933813042a8b98b5053b06b93b.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/188143448/7189d3de16f75a065195a8431ad85889.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Except for Zorro and Batman, people who put on masks to hide their identity when going to work are rarely up to any good. And as Americans learned decades ago when Ku Klux Klanners covered themselves from head to toe, the bigger the mask, the greater the evil hiding behind it. Which brings us full circle to “Operation Metro Surge.” OMS is the muy macho PR slogan for the Republican Party’s militaristic invasions of Chicago, Los Angeles, Minneapolis, and other American cities they hate. Deploying ICE and other bastions of authoritarian power, thousands of massively armed federal belligerents in full assault gear have been rampaging through peaceful neighborhoods in violent and murderous mass sweeps. This is an un-American attack by America’s own government on America’s founding ideals of liberty and openness. The defining symbol of this government repression is that its forces are all hiding behind full-face masks. Of course, if I was doing some of the stuff ICE commandos are doing, I’d want to cover my face, too. But, like the Klan, masking up the oppressors is not merely about cloaking their personal shame — it’s an added ploy by the perpetrators to terrify anyone who might dare to stand up to them. As usual, though, the authoritarian powers misunderstood America and underestimated the deeply rebellious nature of our gutsy, grassroots people. Some 30,000 volunteers in Minneapolis, for example, have become trained “constitutional observers” to police the police, and a citywide “whistle brigade” rushes like Paul Revere to alert neighbors when ICE agents invade their neighborhoods. Their ethic of neighbors-helping-neighbors recognizes their power to “do what’s right.” It’s the best of America standing up to confront the worst. Do something! Our friends at the Working Families Party are leading the charge to pressure Democrats to vote NO on any DHS bill that does not work to stop ICE’s reckless attacks. You can text “ICE OUT” to 30403 or dial 833-636-3260 to call your Senators. Need a sample script? Here you go: When you connect, say your name and where you live to show that you’re a constituent. Then, you could say something like: “ICE’s reckless and illegal attacks on our communities must be stopped. But instead of ending and investigating ICE’s abuses, the DHS spending bill would empower this rogue agency to terrorize and kill even more of our neighbors. As your constituent, I urge you to vote against the DHS funding bill and stand up to ICE.” Here’s a whole set of actions they’ve compiled to help direct your energy. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Except for Zorro and Batman, people who put on masks to hide their identity when going to work are rarely up to any good. And as Americans learned decades ago when Ku Klux Klanners covered themselves from head to toe, the bigger the mask, the greater the evil hiding behind it. Which brings us full circle to “Operation Metro Surge.” OMS is the muy macho PR slogan for the Republican Party’s militaristic invasions of Chicago, Los Angeles, Minneapolis, and other American cities they hate. Deploying ICE and other bastions of authoritarian power, thousands of massively armed federal belligerents in full assault gear have been rampaging through peaceful neighborhoods in violent and murderous mass sweeps. This is an un-American attack by America’s own government on America’s founding ideals of liberty and openness. The defining symbol of this government repression is that its forces are all hiding behind full-face masks. Of course, if I was doing some of the stuff ICE commandos are doing, I’d want to cover my face, too. But, like the Klan, masking up the oppressors is not merely about cloaking their personal shame — it’s an added ploy by the perpetrators to terrify anyone who might dare to stand up to them. As usual, though, the authoritarian powers misunderstood America and underestimated the deeply rebellious nature of our gutsy, grassroots people. Some 30,000 volunteers in Minneapolis, for example, have become trained “constitutional observers” to police the police, and a citywide “whistle brigade” rushes like Paul Revere to alert neighbors when ICE agents invade their neighborhoods. Their ethic of neighbors-helping-neighbors recognizes their power to “do what’s right.” It’s the best of America standing up to confront the worst. Do something! Our friends at the Working Families Party are leading the charge to pressure Democrats to vote NO on any DHS bill that does not work to stop ICE’s reckless attacks. You can text “ICE OUT” to 30403 or dial 833-636-3260 to call your Senators. Need a sample script? Here you go: When you connect, say your name and where you live to show that you’re a constituent. Then, you could say something like: “ICE’s reckless and illegal attacks on our communities must be stopped. But instead of ending and investigating ICE’s abuses, the DHS spending bill would empower this rogue agency to terrorize and kill even more of our neighbors. As your constituent, I urge you to vote against the DHS funding bill and stand up to ICE.” Here’s a whole set of actions they’ve compiled to help direct your energy. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Beware of AI Billionaires Spreading “Swill Bucket” PR Campaigns]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>George Orwell spoke bluntly about the nefarious nature of advertising, calling it “the rattling of a stick inside a swill bucket.”</p><p>Even Orwell, though, would’ve been astonished by the cacophony of swill bucket advertising currently being blasted at us by <strong>Amazon, Google, Meta</strong>, and other profiteering tech giants. What are they trying to sell?</p><p>Pure hogwash. Having spent billions to develop artificial intelligence so humanoid robots can displace workers, the tech geniuses are now rushing to build thousands of vast computer data centers necessary to power their Brave New AI World. Each center wills suck up local water supplies, drastically raise people’s utility bills, create monstrous industrial blight and pollution, and enthrone such autocratic thugs as <strong>Bezos, Musk, and Zuckerberg</strong> as absentee bosses with domineering power over each locality.</p><p>But the billionaires forgot something: You and me. “We the People” are in open rebellion against this Orwellian future, with officials in multiple states and localities “Just Saying Hell No” to the profiteers’ invasive scams.</p><p>Thus, the billionaire hucksters are frantically rattling their swill sticks. For example, <strong>Mark Zuckerberg</strong> – whose <strong>Meta</strong> goliath already operates 26 massive data centers and is now spending $600 billion to plop more of them in our communities – has <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/27/technology/meta-data-center-ads.html">launched a multimillion-dollar offensive to beat back local opponents</a>. It’s running BS television ads in state capitol cities, financing political candidates to hype the data centers, deploying untold numbers of lobbyists to rig the rules against opponents, and hiring an army of “community affairs” agents to spread AI propaganda.</p><p>The swill bucket brigade has the fat cats, but a groundswell of us alley cats that has them on the run. To get involved, go to <a target="_blank" href="http://mediajustice.org/tools">mediajustice.org/tools</a>.</p><p>Do something!</p><p>The <strong>Center for Media Justice</strong> has been leading the way in fighting data centers in lots of communities around the country— <a target="_blank" href="https://mediajustice.org/news/grassroots-opposition-forces-setback/">here’s how they beat back one in Amarillo, TX, for example</a>. Get involved at <a target="_blank" href="http://mediajustice.org">mediajustice.org</a>!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/beware-of-ai-billionaires-spreading</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:187409528</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598232" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/187409528/35919123dab75364aa907b437ad16cd3.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/187409528/3cc3d8a72e3e39e755c14266154adb18.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>George Orwell spoke bluntly about the nefarious nature of advertising, calling it “the rattling of a stick inside a swill bucket.” Even Orwell, though, would’ve been astonished by the cacophony of swill bucket advertising currently being blasted at us by Amazon, Google, Meta, and other profiteering tech giants. What are they trying to sell? Pure hogwash. Having spent billions to develop artificial intelligence so humanoid robots can displace workers, the tech geniuses are now rushing to build thousands of vast computer data centers necessary to power their Brave New AI World. Each center wills suck up local water supplies, drastically raise people’s utility bills, create monstrous industrial blight and pollution, and enthrone such autocratic thugs as Bezos, Musk, and Zuckerberg as absentee bosses with domineering power over each locality. But the billionaires forgot something: You and me. “We the People” are in open rebellion against this Orwellian future, with officials in multiple states and localities “Just Saying Hell No” to the profiteers’ invasive scams. Thus, the billionaire hucksters are frantically rattling their swill sticks. For example, Mark Zuckerberg – whose Meta goliath already operates 26 massive data centers and is now spending $600 billion to plop more of them in our communities – has launched a multimillion-dollar offensive to beat back local opponents. It’s running BS television ads in state capitol cities, financing political candidates to hype the data centers, deploying untold numbers of lobbyists to rig the rules against opponents, and hiring an army of “community affairs” agents to spread AI propaganda. The swill bucket brigade has the fat cats, but a groundswell of us alley cats that has them on the run. To get involved, go to mediajustice.org/tools. Do something! The Center for Media Justice has been leading the way in fighting data centers in lots of communities around the country— here’s how they beat back one in Amarillo, TX, for example. Get involved at mediajustice.org! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>George Orwell spoke bluntly about the nefarious nature of advertising, calling it “the rattling of a stick inside a swill bucket.” Even Orwell, though, would’ve been astonished by the cacophony of swill bucket advertising currently being blasted at us by Amazon, Google, Meta, and other profiteering tech giants. What are they trying to sell? Pure hogwash. Having spent billions to develop artificial intelligence so humanoid robots can displace workers, the tech geniuses are now rushing to build thousands of vast computer data centers necessary to power their Brave New AI World. Each center wills suck up local water supplies, drastically raise people’s utility bills, create monstrous industrial blight and pollution, and enthrone such autocratic thugs as Bezos, Musk, and Zuckerberg as absentee bosses with domineering power over each locality. But the billionaires forgot something: You and me. “We the People” are in open rebellion against this Orwellian future, with officials in multiple states and localities “Just Saying Hell No” to the profiteers’ invasive scams. Thus, the billionaire hucksters are frantically rattling their swill sticks. For example, Mark Zuckerberg – whose Meta goliath already operates 26 massive data centers and is now spending $600 billion to plop more of them in our communities – has launched a multimillion-dollar offensive to beat back local opponents. It’s running BS television ads in state capitol cities, financing political candidates to hype the data centers, deploying untold numbers of lobbyists to rig the rules against opponents, and hiring an army of “community affairs” agents to spread AI propaganda. The swill bucket brigade has the fat cats, but a groundswell of us alley cats that has them on the run. To get involved, go to mediajustice.org/tools. Do something! The Center for Media Justice has been leading the way in fighting data centers in lots of communities around the country— here’s how they beat back one in Amarillo, TX, for example. Get involved at mediajustice.org! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[We Can Always Trust What the Pentagon Says, Right?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Years ago, when I announced that I was leaving my job as editor of <em>The Texas Observer</em> to run for political office, I had to admit that into politics is the only downward career move one can make from journalism!</p><p>But being a both a journalist and a politician does hone in one’s ability to detect the smell of BS – and we Americans are presently getting a noxious blast of that stench from our warmongering <strong>Department of Defense</strong>.</p><p>The vast, trillion-dollar Pentagon is the ultimate Big Brother bureaucracy, literally empowered to compel thousands of Americans to die in foolish military misadventures cooked up by political partisans and profiteering corporate contractors. That’s why it’s so alarming that Trump’s “<strong>Project 2025</strong>” autocrats are now rushing to slam an iron door of censorship on reporters trying to inform us commoners about the militaristic schemes and corporate fraud that come from inside this government fortress.</p><p>In the name of defending freedom, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.npr.org/2025/12/03/nx-s1-5630076/the-press-corps-at-the-defense-department-has-been-replaced-by-far-right-outlets">Trump’s palace guards are banning media outlets that displease his royal highness</a>. Also, <strong>“Pretty Boy Pete Hegseth,”</strong> Trump’s made-for-TV Pentagon honcho, has even decreed that reporters must be tightly monitored by military escorts while doing interviews, reviewing documents, and otherwise exorcising the essential Constitutional rights of our nation’s free press.</p><p>The good news is that rather than kowtowing to the autocrats, <a target="_blank" href="https://apnews.com/article/pentagon-press-access-hegseth-trump-restrictions-5d9c2a63e4e03b91fc1546bb09ffbf12">dozens of media organizations have told Pete to stuff it,</a> choosing to do old-school outsider digging into this insider war machine.</p><p>Meanwhile, the “Project 2025” authoritarians hail their clamp down on free press rights by touting their “fresh relationship” with what they call their “new Pentagon press corps.” Right – it’s <em>their</em> partisan press corps, not ours.</p><p>Do something!</p><p>Our friends over at <a target="_blank" href="https://www.freepress.net/">Free Press</a> have launched a newsletter, “<a target="_blank" href="https://pressingissues.org/">Pressing Issues</a>,” to cover the future of media—and advocate for the freedoms we need in journalism. Check it out at <a target="_blank" href="https://pressingissues.org/">pressingissues.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/we-can-always-trust-what-the-pentagon</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:187404251</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600845" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/187404251/d3ddae90d7efbfa41e992e6c88366776.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/187404251/e7250037ec95bc7611ad3db53cbf13a6.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Years ago, when I announced that I was leaving my job as editor of The Texas Observer to run for political office, I had to admit that into politics is the only downward career move one can make from journalism! But being a both a journalist and a politician does hone in one’s ability to detect the smell of BS – and we Americans are presently getting a noxious blast of that stench from our warmongering Department of Defense. The vast, trillion-dollar Pentagon is the ultimate Big Brother bureaucracy, literally empowered to compel thousands of Americans to die in foolish military misadventures cooked up by political partisans and profiteering corporate contractors. That’s why it’s so alarming that Trump’s “Project 2025” autocrats are now rushing to slam an iron door of censorship on reporters trying to inform us commoners about the militaristic schemes and corporate fraud that come from inside this government fortress. In the name of defending freedom, Trump’s palace guards are banning media outlets that displease his royal highness. Also, “Pretty Boy Pete Hegseth,” Trump’s made-for-TV Pentagon honcho, has even decreed that reporters must be tightly monitored by military escorts while doing interviews, reviewing documents, and otherwise exorcising the essential Constitutional rights of our nation’s free press. The good news is that rather than kowtowing to the autocrats, dozens of media organizations have told Pete to stuff it, choosing to do old-school outsider digging into this insider war machine. Meanwhile, the “Project 2025” authoritarians hail their clamp down on free press rights by touting their “fresh relationship” with what they call their “new Pentagon press corps.” Right – it’s their partisan press corps, not ours. Do something! Our friends over at Free Press have launched a newsletter, “Pressing Issues,” to cover the future of media—and advocate for the freedoms we need in journalism. Check it out at pressingissues.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Years ago, when I announced that I was leaving my job as editor of The Texas Observer to run for political office, I had to admit that into politics is the only downward career move one can make from journalism! But being a both a journalist and a politician does hone in one’s ability to detect the smell of BS – and we Americans are presently getting a noxious blast of that stench from our warmongering Department of Defense. The vast, trillion-dollar Pentagon is the ultimate Big Brother bureaucracy, literally empowered to compel thousands of Americans to die in foolish military misadventures cooked up by political partisans and profiteering corporate contractors. That’s why it’s so alarming that Trump’s “Project 2025” autocrats are now rushing to slam an iron door of censorship on reporters trying to inform us commoners about the militaristic schemes and corporate fraud that come from inside this government fortress. In the name of defending freedom, Trump’s palace guards are banning media outlets that displease his royal highness. Also, “Pretty Boy Pete Hegseth,” Trump’s made-for-TV Pentagon honcho, has even decreed that reporters must be tightly monitored by military escorts while doing interviews, reviewing documents, and otherwise exorcising the essential Constitutional rights of our nation’s free press. The good news is that rather than kowtowing to the autocrats, dozens of media organizations have told Pete to stuff it, choosing to do old-school outsider digging into this insider war machine. Meanwhile, the “Project 2025” authoritarians hail their clamp down on free press rights by touting their “fresh relationship” with what they call their “new Pentagon press corps.” Right – it’s their partisan press corps, not ours. Do something! Our friends over at Free Press have launched a newsletter, “Pressing Issues,” to cover the future of media—and advocate for the freedoms we need in journalism. Check it out at pressingissues.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Even in a Digital Age, Handwriting Remains Invaluable]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>While the production of my Lowdown commentaries is high-tech, I confess that I’m antiquated.</p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/behind-the-scenes-how-hightower-works">I still write each piece in longhand</a>, applying my ballpoint to paper. This has caused bewildered glances from some who see me scribbling away in local coffeeshops and bars. Recently, one fellow sidled up and whispered: “Watch out! If they see you doin’ this, they’ll haul you off to the Smithsonian.”</p><p>But we handwriters might not be as obsolete as the key-tappers assume. A fast-spreading grassroots movement is calling for schools to reemphasize the value of writing and printing by hand, instead of being wholly-dependent on machines. Already, 24 states – as varied as Mississippi and California– <a target="_blank" href="https://www.edweek.org/policy-politics/the-number-of-states-that-require-schools-to-teach-cursive-is-growing/2024/11">now require public schools to teach cursive handwriting</a> in third-through fifth grades.</p><p>This squares with new understanding of how brains absorb information. While keyboards are faster, the slower, more tactile act of handwriting creates longer lasing comprehension of letters – <a target="_blank" href="https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2024/05/11/1250529661/handwriting-cursive-typing-schools-learning-brain">and better retention of the thoughts they convey</a>. Neuroscientists find that rote keystrokes on a computer require little mental engagement, while physically drawing out words and ideas takes coordination of multiple areas of the brain to focus memory, eyes, and fingers on creating a written product.</p><p>Just writing this piece conjured up a fond remembrance of my early childhood: Sitting on the floor of our home learning to draw the ABCs, both print and cursive, on those lined practice pads. It was both an artistic exercise and the development of a foundational tool for a life of learning.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… Yes, computer literacy is an indispensable element of today’s childhood curriculum --- but so is the richer development of human thinking through putting pen to paper. So let’s teach both!</p><p><em>PS—Here’s a post we did a couple years ago about how Hightower’s work goes from handwritten on paper to whooshing through the ether into your inboxes:</em></p><p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/even-in-a-digital-age-handwriting</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:186643385</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598232" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/186643385/3c74242d8cdadfdac8599f5ef5f17243.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/186643385/b0f13327fe06d67505db92041c5efcdb.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>While the production of my Lowdown commentaries is high-tech, I confess that I’m antiquated. I still write each piece in longhand, applying my ballpoint to paper. This has caused bewildered glances from some who see me scribbling away in local coffeeshops and bars. Recently, one fellow sidled up and whispered: “Watch out! If they see you doin’ this, they’ll haul you off to the Smithsonian.” But we handwriters might not be as obsolete as the key-tappers assume. A fast-spreading grassroots movement is calling for schools to reemphasize the value of writing and printing by hand, instead of being wholly-dependent on machines. Already, 24 states – as varied as Mississippi and California– now require public schools to teach cursive handwriting in third-through fifth grades. This squares with new understanding of how brains absorb information. While keyboards are faster, the slower, more tactile act of handwriting creates longer lasing comprehension of letters – and better retention of the thoughts they convey. Neuroscientists find that rote keystrokes on a computer require little mental engagement, while physically drawing out words and ideas takes coordination of multiple areas of the brain to focus memory, eyes, and fingers on creating a written product. Just writing this piece conjured up a fond remembrance of my early childhood: Sitting on the floor of our home learning to draw the ABCs, both print and cursive, on those lined practice pads. It was both an artistic exercise and the development of a foundational tool for a life of learning. This is Jim Hightower saying… Yes, computer literacy is an indispensable element of today’s childhood curriculum --- but so is the richer development of human thinking through putting pen to paper. So let’s teach both! PS—Here’s a post we did a couple years ago about how Hightower’s work goes from handwritten on paper to whooshing through the ether into your inboxes: Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>While the production of my Lowdown commentaries is high-tech, I confess that I’m antiquated. I still write each piece in longhand, applying my ballpoint to paper. This has caused bewildered glances from some who see me scribbling away in local coffeeshops and bars. Recently, one fellow sidled up and whispered: “Watch out! If they see you doin’ this, they’ll haul you off to the Smithsonian.” But we handwriters might not be as obsolete as the key-tappers assume. A fast-spreading grassroots movement is calling for schools to reemphasize the value of writing and printing by hand, instead of being wholly-dependent on machines. Already, 24 states – as varied as Mississippi and California– now require public schools to teach cursive handwriting in third-through fifth grades. This squares with new understanding of how brains absorb information. While keyboards are faster, the slower, more tactile act of handwriting creates longer lasing comprehension of letters – and better retention of the thoughts they convey. Neuroscientists find that rote keystrokes on a computer require little mental engagement, while physically drawing out words and ideas takes coordination of multiple areas of the brain to focus memory, eyes, and fingers on creating a written product. Just writing this piece conjured up a fond remembrance of my early childhood: Sitting on the floor of our home learning to draw the ABCs, both print and cursive, on those lined practice pads. It was both an artistic exercise and the development of a foundational tool for a life of learning. This is Jim Hightower saying… Yes, computer literacy is an indispensable element of today’s childhood curriculum --- but so is the richer development of human thinking through putting pen to paper. So let’s teach both! PS—Here’s a post we did a couple years ago about how Hightower’s work goes from handwritten on paper to whooshing through the ether into your inboxes: Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Do We Let Profiteers Control Granny’s End-of-Life Care?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>There are industries that occasionally do something rotten. And there are industries like Big Oil, Big Pharma, and Big Tobacco – that persistently do rotten things.</p><p>Then there is the nursing home industry – where rottenness has become a core business principle. The end-of-life “experience” can be rotten enough on its own, with an assortment of natural indignities bedeviling us, and good nursing homes help gentle this time. In the past couple of decades, though, an entirely <em>unnatural</em> force has come to dominate the delivery of aged care: Profiteering corporate chains and Wall Street speculators.</p><p>The very fact that this essential and sensitive social function, which ought to be the domain of health professionals and charitable enterprises, is now called an “industry” reflects a total perversion of its purpose. <a target="_blank" href="https://fortune.com/2024/03/12/nursing-homes-for-profit-private-equity/">Some 70 percent of nursing homes are now corporate operations</a> run by absentee executives who have no experience in nursing homes and who’re guided by the market imperative of maximizing investor profits. They constantly demand “efficiencies” from their facilities, which invariably means reducing the number of nurses, which invariably reduces care, which means more injuries, illness… and deaths. As one nursing expert rightly says, “It’s criminal.”</p><p>But it’s not against the law, since the industry’s lobbying front – <a target="_blank" href="https://www.opensecrets.org/federal-lobbying/industries/summary?id=H02">a major donor to congressional campaigns</a> – effectively writes the laws, which allows corporate hustlers to provide only one nurse on duty, no matter how many patients are in the facility. A humane nurse-staffing requirement has been proposed, <a target="_blank" href="https://schakowsky.house.gov/media/press-releases/schakowsky-warren-slam-largest-nursing-home-lobbying-groups-sabotaging-biden">but the profiteering “industry” furiously opposes it</a>… and Congress is dutifully bowing to industry profits. After all, granny doesn’t make campaign donations.</p><p>To help push for sanity and humanity, contact <a target="_blank" href="http://TheConsumerVoice.org">TheConsumerVoice.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-do-we-let-profiteers-control</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:186625397</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600845" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/186625397/27480ccada0de9fe5c7ee47f9c9eb2d8.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/186625397/fdeb24f9da5c63ab45a3dcbc1ff0e84f.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>There are industries that occasionally do something rotten. And there are industries like Big Oil, Big Pharma, and Big Tobacco – that persistently do rotten things. Then there is the nursing home industry – where rottenness has become a core business principle. The end-of-life “experience” can be rotten enough on its own, with an assortment of natural indignities bedeviling us, and good nursing homes help gentle this time. In the past couple of decades, though, an entirely unnatural force has come to dominate the delivery of aged care: Profiteering corporate chains and Wall Street speculators. The very fact that this essential and sensitive social function, which ought to be the domain of health professionals and charitable enterprises, is now called an “industry” reflects a total perversion of its purpose. Some 70 percent of nursing homes are now corporate operations run by absentee executives who have no experience in nursing homes and who’re guided by the market imperative of maximizing investor profits. They constantly demand “efficiencies” from their facilities, which invariably means reducing the number of nurses, which invariably reduces care, which means more injuries, illness… and deaths. As one nursing expert rightly says, “It’s criminal.” But it’s not against the law, since the industry’s lobbying front – a major donor to congressional campaigns – effectively writes the laws, which allows corporate hustlers to provide only one nurse on duty, no matter how many patients are in the facility. A humane nurse-staffing requirement has been proposed, but the profiteering “industry” furiously opposes it… and Congress is dutifully bowing to industry profits. After all, granny doesn’t make campaign donations. To help push for sanity and humanity, contact TheConsumerVoice.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>There are industries that occasionally do something rotten. And there are industries like Big Oil, Big Pharma, and Big Tobacco – that persistently do rotten things. Then there is the nursing home industry – where rottenness has become a core business principle. The end-of-life “experience” can be rotten enough on its own, with an assortment of natural indignities bedeviling us, and good nursing homes help gentle this time. In the past couple of decades, though, an entirely unnatural force has come to dominate the delivery of aged care: Profiteering corporate chains and Wall Street speculators. The very fact that this essential and sensitive social function, which ought to be the domain of health professionals and charitable enterprises, is now called an “industry” reflects a total perversion of its purpose. Some 70 percent of nursing homes are now corporate operations run by absentee executives who have no experience in nursing homes and who’re guided by the market imperative of maximizing investor profits. They constantly demand “efficiencies” from their facilities, which invariably means reducing the number of nurses, which invariably reduces care, which means more injuries, illness… and deaths. As one nursing expert rightly says, “It’s criminal.” But it’s not against the law, since the industry’s lobbying front – a major donor to congressional campaigns – effectively writes the laws, which allows corporate hustlers to provide only one nurse on duty, no matter how many patients are in the facility. A humane nurse-staffing requirement has been proposed, but the profiteering “industry” furiously opposes it… and Congress is dutifully bowing to industry profits. After all, granny doesn’t make campaign donations. To help push for sanity and humanity, contact TheConsumerVoice.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[VIDEO: Happy hour! What to do in "red" states, flying farmers and lawyers, growing Democratic Party spines, and more ]]></title><description><![CDATA[This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_7">jimhightower.substack.com</a><br/><br/><p>Thanks to all of you who joined us last night for our first experiment with Substack’s live video feature! After reviewing the <a target="_blank" href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/ask-hightower-anything-winter-2026">questions that you left for us last week</a>, we got to tackling a few of them—Hightower gave advice to <strong>Maria in Wyoming</strong>, who’s frustrated with calling her Republican representatives, and the role of grassroots organizing in red states. We also got to hear some big stories about tiny airplanes (thanks, <strong>Shira!</strong>), and Hightower’s opinion about why some elected Democrats are loud and proud, while a lot of senators have not been taking strong action against the fascist invasion and occupation of many cities in the US, which was <strong>Fred’s</strong> question. <strong>Richard</strong> asked about a left-wing “Project 2025,” and as part of that answer, Hightower gave a rough estimate of how old Ralph Nader is— not to be missed.</p><p>We ironed out a few of the initial technical glitches, by the way, and I’m also working on making sure comments from everyone are enabled for the next live event, because we really missed hearing your live feedback! Let us know what your favorite parts were in the comments. Thanks again for watching!</p>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/video-happy-hour-what-to-do-in-red</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:185570880</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower and Deanna Zandt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 16:47:35 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="1553283" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/185570880/02fd00ec937e28fd2c61bed24aa296cb.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower and Deanna Zandt</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>97</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/185570880/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com Thanks to all of you who joined us last night for our first experiment with Substack’s live video feature! After reviewing the questions that you left for us last week, we got to tackling a few of them—Hightower gave advice to Maria in Wyoming, who’s frustrated with calling her Republican representatives, and the role of grassroots organizing in red states. We also got to hear some big stories about tiny airplanes (thanks, Shira!), and Hightower’s opinion about why some elected Democrats are loud and proud, while a lot of senators have not been taking strong action against the fascist invasion and occupation of many cities in the US, which was Fred’s question. Richard asked about a left-wing “Project 2025,” and as part of that answer, Hightower gave a rough estimate of how old Ralph Nader is— not to be missed. We ironed out a few of the initial technical glitches, by the way, and I’m also working on making sure comments from everyone are enabled for the next live event, because we really missed hearing your live feedback! Let us know what your favorite parts were in the comments. Thanks again for watching!</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com Thanks to all of you who joined us last night for our first experiment with Substack’s live video feature! After reviewing the questions that you left for us last week, we got to tackling a few of them—Hightower gave advice to Maria in Wyoming, who’s frustrated with calling her Republican representatives, and the role of grassroots organizing in red states. We also got to hear some big stories about tiny airplanes (thanks, Shira!), and Hightower’s opinion about why some elected Democrats are loud and proud, while a lot of senators have not been taking strong action against the fascist invasion and occupation of many cities in the US, which was Fred’s question. Richard asked about a left-wing “Project 2025,” and as part of that answer, Hightower gave a rough estimate of how old Ralph Nader is— not to be missed. We ironed out a few of the initial technical glitches, by the way, and I’m also working on making sure comments from everyone are enabled for the next live event, because we really missed hearing your live feedback! Let us know what your favorite parts were in the comments. Thanks again for watching!</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Is the Pentagon Barring Soldiers from Repairing Their Weapons?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Reminder: </em></strong><a target="_blank" href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/ask-hightower-anything-winter-2026"><strong><em>Join us TONIGHT at 6pm CT for Happy Hour with Hightower</em></strong></a><strong><em>!</em></strong></p><p>The US military has long been an easy mark – for our own avaricious corporate contractors, that is.</p><p>During the Civil War, for example, <a target="_blank" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hall_Carbine_Affair"><strong>J.P. Morgan</strong></a><a target="_blank" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hall_Carbine_Affair"> sold rifles to the Union army that cost him only $3.50 each, but he charged the military $22 each</a>. Worse, his rifles were defective, blowing off the thumbs of soldiers who fired them. Still, a Congressional committee ruled that Morgan had a “legal” contract and had to be paid in full.</p><p>Which brings us to the screwball contracts the Pentagon routinely signs these days with multibillion-dollar corporate con artists hawking weaponry. These gougers, though, have streamlined their taxpayer thievery by automatically inserting a corporate gotcha in nearly every Pentagon contract. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.wired.com/story/the-military-almost-got-the-right-to-repair-lawmakers-just-took-it-away/">It makes it </a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.wired.com/story/the-military-almost-got-the-right-to-repair-lawmakers-just-took-it-away/"><em>illegal </em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.wired.com/story/the-military-almost-got-the-right-to-repair-lawmakers-just-took-it-away/">for the military to repair the weapons and systems they have bought!</a></p><p>A drone won’t fly? An AI system goes haywire? Anti-aircraft rockets fail? DON’T touch the systems! No — you must call a corporate-approved tech repair person, or take the malfunctioning gizmo to the manufacturer.</p><p>Yes, this is insane, unworkable, immoral… and the very definition of “snafu.” But corporate profiteers have made it the law. At last, though, soldiers, battleground commanders and common-sense members of both parties are rebelling, supporting <strong>Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s “Warrior Right to Repair Act.”</strong> Pathetically, Congress and avaricious contractor lobbyists recently defeated this bill, wailing contractor property rights is more important than authorizing soldiers to make lifesaving repairs in the field.</p><p>The fight goes on, though, and you can help. Two lawmakers who engineered this travesty are <strong>Mike Rogers of Alabama</strong> and <strong>Adam Smith of Washington State</strong>, both of whom take hundreds of thousands of dollars from the war profiteers. To fight their insanity, go to <a target="_blank" href="http://pirg.org/repair">pirg.org/repair</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-is-the-pentagon-barring-soldiers</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:185861523</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598232" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/185861523/acfc3daac11b4fb57e0c13f739c61989.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/185861523/ce8059f8cfd4a269bd455364e7e65e36.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Reminder: Join us TONIGHT at 6pm CT for Happy Hour with Hightower! The US military has long been an easy mark – for our own avaricious corporate contractors, that is. During the Civil War, for example, J.P. Morgan sold rifles to the Union army that cost him only $3.50 each, but he charged the military $22 each. Worse, his rifles were defective, blowing off the thumbs of soldiers who fired them. Still, a Congressional committee ruled that Morgan had a “legal” contract and had to be paid in full. Which brings us to the screwball contracts the Pentagon routinely signs these days with multibillion-dollar corporate con artists hawking weaponry. These gougers, though, have streamlined their taxpayer thievery by automatically inserting a corporate gotcha in nearly every Pentagon contract. It makes it illegal for the military to repair the weapons and systems they have bought! A drone won’t fly? An AI system goes haywire? Anti-aircraft rockets fail? DON’T touch the systems! No — you must call a corporate-approved tech repair person, or take the malfunctioning gizmo to the manufacturer. Yes, this is insane, unworkable, immoral… and the very definition of “snafu.” But corporate profiteers have made it the law. At last, though, soldiers, battleground commanders and common-sense members of both parties are rebelling, supporting Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s “Warrior Right to Repair Act.” Pathetically, Congress and avaricious contractor lobbyists recently defeated this bill, wailing contractor property rights is more important than authorizing soldiers to make lifesaving repairs in the field. The fight goes on, though, and you can help. Two lawmakers who engineered this travesty are Mike Rogers of Alabama and Adam Smith of Washington State, both of whom take hundreds of thousands of dollars from the war profiteers. To fight their insanity, go to pirg.org/repair. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Reminder: Join us TONIGHT at 6pm CT for Happy Hour with Hightower! The US military has long been an easy mark – for our own avaricious corporate contractors, that is. During the Civil War, for example, J.P. Morgan sold rifles to the Union army that cost him only $3.50 each, but he charged the military $22 each. Worse, his rifles were defective, blowing off the thumbs of soldiers who fired them. Still, a Congressional committee ruled that Morgan had a “legal” contract and had to be paid in full. Which brings us to the screwball contracts the Pentagon routinely signs these days with multibillion-dollar corporate con artists hawking weaponry. These gougers, though, have streamlined their taxpayer thievery by automatically inserting a corporate gotcha in nearly every Pentagon contract. It makes it illegal for the military to repair the weapons and systems they have bought! A drone won’t fly? An AI system goes haywire? Anti-aircraft rockets fail? DON’T touch the systems! No — you must call a corporate-approved tech repair person, or take the malfunctioning gizmo to the manufacturer. Yes, this is insane, unworkable, immoral… and the very definition of “snafu.” But corporate profiteers have made it the law. At last, though, soldiers, battleground commanders and common-sense members of both parties are rebelling, supporting Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s “Warrior Right to Repair Act.” Pathetically, Congress and avaricious contractor lobbyists recently defeated this bill, wailing contractor property rights is more important than authorizing soldiers to make lifesaving repairs in the field. The fight goes on, though, and you can help. Two lawmakers who engineered this travesty are Mike Rogers of Alabama and Adam Smith of Washington State, both of whom take hundreds of thousands of dollars from the war profiteers. To fight their insanity, go to pirg.org/repair. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[GOP Solution to Congressional Corruption: Just Legalize It!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Reminder: </em></strong><a target="_blank" href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/ask-hightower-anything-winter-2026"><strong><em>Join us live this Thursday at 6pm CT for Happy Hour with Hightower</em></strong></a><strong><em>!</em></strong></p><p>If you’re ever asked to define the word oxymoron, just say, “Congressional ethics.” People instinctively burst out guffawing at the absurdity of linking Congress to upright behavior.</p><p>But, surprisingly, Republican congressional leaders say they’re now taking a bold stand for a little less corruption among their own members, targeting lawmakers who’ve been secretly enriching themselves through “insider stock trading.” Actually, the leaders were forced to support this bit of reform because of public outrage over the dirty dealing of <strong>Rep. Rob Bresnahan</strong>. This multimillionaire Republican was caught using his insider position last year to profit from the GOP’s gutting of Medicaid benefits for poor people.</p><p>So, last month, the party’s designated ethics watchdog, <strong>Bryan Steil,</strong> rose on his hind legs to introduce the <strong>Stop Insider Trading Act.</strong> “If you want to trade stocks,” Steil howled in operatic outrage, “go to Wall Street.”</p><p>Bravissimo! Except it was a fraud. Far from stopping the self-enriching stock scams of lawmakers like Bresnahan, Steil’s bill basically <em>legalizes</em> their corrupt transactions. For example, members could keep trading stocks in corporations they supposedly oversee. And, in the loopiest of loopholes, sneaky lawmakers are authorized to have their spouses buy and sell stocks on the member’s behalf.</p><p>Then, showing his party’s true colors, Steil exclaimed that we outsiders should not even push Congress to pass an honest, outright ban on insider trading – because that would discourage wealthy business executives from choosing to enter “public service.”</p><p>Hello, that gives us two reason to demand a ban – (first) to impose a minimal ethical standard on lawmakers, and (second) to shoo off self-serving monopolists and plutocrats from controlling the public’s agenda.</p><p>Do something!</p><p>If you’re fed up with rigged congressional systems of corruption, check out <a target="_blank" href="https://www.citizensforethics.org/">Citizens For Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW)</a>, who call Steil’s act a “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.citizensforethics.org/news/press-releases/crew-statement-on-stop-insider-trading-act/">joke</a>,” and are working to pass the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.citizensforethics.org/legal-action/letters/crew-9-groups-call-on-the-house-to-advance-the-restore-trust-in-congress-act/">Restore Trust in Congress Act</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/gop-solution-to-congressional-corruption</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:185852744</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600845" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/185852744/8ad7de7ce5b0ff1c7fb8fb9acd139806.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/185852744/1113266c6a48fc3ffce87f342537db5a.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Reminder: Join us live this Thursday at 6pm CT for Happy Hour with Hightower! If you’re ever asked to define the word oxymoron, just say, “Congressional ethics.” People instinctively burst out guffawing at the absurdity of linking Congress to upright behavior. But, surprisingly, Republican congressional leaders say they’re now taking a bold stand for a little less corruption among their own members, targeting lawmakers who’ve been secretly enriching themselves through “insider stock trading.” Actually, the leaders were forced to support this bit of reform because of public outrage over the dirty dealing of Rep. Rob Bresnahan. This multimillionaire Republican was caught using his insider position last year to profit from the GOP’s gutting of Medicaid benefits for poor people. So, last month, the party’s designated ethics watchdog, Bryan Steil, rose on his hind legs to introduce the Stop Insider Trading Act. “If you want to trade stocks,” Steil howled in operatic outrage, “go to Wall Street.” Bravissimo! Except it was a fraud. Far from stopping the self-enriching stock scams of lawmakers like Bresnahan, Steil’s bill basically legalizes their corrupt transactions. For example, members could keep trading stocks in corporations they supposedly oversee. And, in the loopiest of loopholes, sneaky lawmakers are authorized to have their spouses buy and sell stocks on the member’s behalf. Then, showing his party’s true colors, Steil exclaimed that we outsiders should not even push Congress to pass an honest, outright ban on insider trading – because that would discourage wealthy business executives from choosing to enter “public service.” Hello, that gives us two reason to demand a ban – (first) to impose a minimal ethical standard on lawmakers, and (second) to shoo off self-serving monopolists and plutocrats from controlling the public’s agenda. Do something! If you’re fed up with rigged congressional systems of corruption, check out Citizens For Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), who call Steil’s act a “joke,” and are working to pass the Restore Trust in Congress Act. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Reminder: Join us live this Thursday at 6pm CT for Happy Hour with Hightower! If you’re ever asked to define the word oxymoron, just say, “Congressional ethics.” People instinctively burst out guffawing at the absurdity of linking Congress to upright behavior. But, surprisingly, Republican congressional leaders say they’re now taking a bold stand for a little less corruption among their own members, targeting lawmakers who’ve been secretly enriching themselves through “insider stock trading.” Actually, the leaders were forced to support this bit of reform because of public outrage over the dirty dealing of Rep. Rob Bresnahan. This multimillionaire Republican was caught using his insider position last year to profit from the GOP’s gutting of Medicaid benefits for poor people. So, last month, the party’s designated ethics watchdog, Bryan Steil, rose on his hind legs to introduce the Stop Insider Trading Act. “If you want to trade stocks,” Steil howled in operatic outrage, “go to Wall Street.” Bravissimo! Except it was a fraud. Far from stopping the self-enriching stock scams of lawmakers like Bresnahan, Steil’s bill basically legalizes their corrupt transactions. For example, members could keep trading stocks in corporations they supposedly oversee. And, in the loopiest of loopholes, sneaky lawmakers are authorized to have their spouses buy and sell stocks on the member’s behalf. Then, showing his party’s true colors, Steil exclaimed that we outsiders should not even push Congress to pass an honest, outright ban on insider trading – because that would discourage wealthy business executives from choosing to enter “public service.” Hello, that gives us two reason to demand a ban – (first) to impose a minimal ethical standard on lawmakers, and (second) to shoo off self-serving monopolists and plutocrats from controlling the public’s agenda. Do something! If you’re fed up with rigged congressional systems of corruption, check out Citizens For Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), who call Steil’s act a “joke,” and are working to pass the Restore Trust in Congress Act. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dirty Coal v. Clean Energy: Guess Who’s Winning?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>WARNING: News headlines can give you a headache.</p><p>For example, take typical headlines on today’s environmental stories:</p><p>* Earth’s climate getting catastrophically <a target="_blank" href="https://www.science.org/content/article/over-past-2-years-earth-got-hotter-faster-ever">hotter, faster</a></p><p>* Greenhouse pollution <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/13/climate/us-emissions-2025-coal-power.html">increasing</a> again</p><p>* President calls global warming a “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/12/climate/trump-climate-change-emissions-fuel.html">hoax</a>” </p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Wright">Fracking executive</a> now runs Energy Department </p><p>* US <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/12/climate/trump-climate-change-emissions-fuel.html">funding</a> new coal plants </p><p>* White House abruptly <a target="_blank" href="https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/trump-order-halts-offshore-wind-projects-for-at-least-90-days">cancels</a> wind-power projects.</p><p>Whew! My head hurts. The negativity in such headlines tells people that grassroots activism demanding clean energy and environmental sanity is futile, for government has been shanghaied by a political cabal of corporate executives.</p><p>But wait – while it doesn’t get front page treatment, a bracing wind of change is blowing in from the countryside! It turns out that producers, funders, and consumers of alternative energy have not rejected a brighter, sustainable future just because profiteers and politicians command us to follow them off the cliff.</p><p>Indeed, here’s a surprising development that the calcified defenders of dirty monopolized fuels could not have imagined only 10 years ago: <strong>Even in the fossilized Kingdom of Texas,</strong><a target="_blank" href="https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/texas-makes-clean-power-breakthrough-solar-output-overtakes-coal-2025-12-09/"><strong> </strong></a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/texas-makes-clean-power-breakthrough-solar-output-overtakes-coal-2025-12-09/"><strong><em>solar power</em></strong></a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/texas-makes-clean-power-breakthrough-solar-output-overtakes-coal-2025-12-09/"><strong> now provides more electricity to our people than does King Coal!</strong></a> Despite relentless efforts by our corrupt governor and top Republican officials to rig the marketplace against renewable energy, solar arrays and wind turbines are soon to pass Big Oil’s fracked gas as the top supplier of electricity to Texas homes and businesses.</p><p>Here’s an uplifting headline for you: Last year, <a target="_blank" href="https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/us-electricity-2025-special-report/insight-1-wind-and-solar-overtake-coal-in-historic/">wind, sun, and other renewable sources </a><a target="_blank" href="https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/us-electricity-2025-special-report/insight-1-wind-and-solar-overtake-coal-in-historic/"><em>surged past coal as America’s number one source of electric power</em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/us-electricity-2025-special-report/insight-1-wind-and-solar-overtake-coal-in-historic/">.</a> As a leading climate scientist concludes: “We are at the end of the fossil fuel economy.” So, keep pushing.</p><p>Do something! </p><p>Want to keep pushing for environmental wins in Texas? Check out <a target="_blank" href="https://www.texasenvironment.org/">the Texas Campaign for the Environment</a>, who have scored some great <a target="_blank" href="https://www.instagram.com/p/DS7xOZ2j9lX/?img_index=1">wins</a> and continue to push for more. </p><p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/dirty-coal-v-clean-energy-guess-whos</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:185127687</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598232" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/185127687/92ee20e67d7a55f5c655274ff0a59c6e.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/185127687/3ebb9c1d318366cd7a8b0b27f31e4098.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>WARNING: News headlines can give you a headache. For example, take typical headlines on today’s environmental stories: * Earth’s climate getting catastrophically hotter, faster * Greenhouse pollution increasing again * President calls global warming a “hoax” * Fracking executive now runs Energy Department * US funding new coal plants * White House abruptly cancels wind-power projects. Whew! My head hurts. The negativity in such headlines tells people that grassroots activism demanding clean energy and environmental sanity is futile, for government has been shanghaied by a political cabal of corporate executives. But wait – while it doesn’t get front page treatment, a bracing wind of change is blowing in from the countryside! It turns out that producers, funders, and consumers of alternative energy have not rejected a brighter, sustainable future just because profiteers and politicians command us to follow them off the cliff. Indeed, here’s a surprising development that the calcified defenders of dirty monopolized fuels could not have imagined only 10 years ago: Even in the fossilized Kingdom of Texas, solar power now provides more electricity to our people than does King Coal! Despite relentless efforts by our corrupt governor and top Republican officials to rig the marketplace against renewable energy, solar arrays and wind turbines are soon to pass Big Oil’s fracked gas as the top supplier of electricity to Texas homes and businesses. Here’s an uplifting headline for you: Last year, wind, sun, and other renewable sources surged past coal as America’s number one source of electric power. As a leading climate scientist concludes: “We are at the end of the fossil fuel economy.” So, keep pushing. Do something! Want to keep pushing for environmental wins in Texas? Check out the Texas Campaign for the Environment, who have scored some great wins and continue to push for more. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>WARNING: News headlines can give you a headache. For example, take typical headlines on today’s environmental stories: * Earth’s climate getting catastrophically hotter, faster * Greenhouse pollution increasing again * President calls global warming a “hoax” * Fracking executive now runs Energy Department * US funding new coal plants * White House abruptly cancels wind-power projects. Whew! My head hurts. The negativity in such headlines tells people that grassroots activism demanding clean energy and environmental sanity is futile, for government has been shanghaied by a political cabal of corporate executives. But wait – while it doesn’t get front page treatment, a bracing wind of change is blowing in from the countryside! It turns out that producers, funders, and consumers of alternative energy have not rejected a brighter, sustainable future just because profiteers and politicians command us to follow them off the cliff. Indeed, here’s a surprising development that the calcified defenders of dirty monopolized fuels could not have imagined only 10 years ago: Even in the fossilized Kingdom of Texas, solar power now provides more electricity to our people than does King Coal! Despite relentless efforts by our corrupt governor and top Republican officials to rig the marketplace against renewable energy, solar arrays and wind turbines are soon to pass Big Oil’s fracked gas as the top supplier of electricity to Texas homes and businesses. Here’s an uplifting headline for you: Last year, wind, sun, and other renewable sources surged past coal as America’s number one source of electric power. As a leading climate scientist concludes: “We are at the end of the fossil fuel economy.” So, keep pushing. Do something! Want to keep pushing for environmental wins in Texas? Check out the Texas Campaign for the Environment, who have scored some great wins and continue to push for more. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sing Along to “The Wall Street Bankers’ Hard Time Blues”]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>One of the most obnoxious sounds in nature is the whine of a Wall Street banker. It’s a cross between the tantrum of a peevish brat and the blathering of a sputtering old plutocrat.</p><p>Consider the long, piteous whimper of <strong>Jamie Dimon</strong>, potentate of the powerful <strong>JPMorgan Chase</strong> banking empire. He <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/05/business/banking-deregulation-jamie-dimon.html">constantly whines about laws to restrict banker greed</a>, even toting around a Rube Goldberg-style cartoon depicting a tangle of rules that, he squeals, is choking poor Wall Streeters like him.</p><p>Before you break into tears about Jamie’s plight, though, notice that he and his bank are not choking on rules, but gorging on riches. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/05/business/banking-deregulation-jamie-dimon.html">Dimon himself pocketed – get this -- </a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/05/business/banking-deregulation-jamie-dimon.html"><em>$770 million in personal pay</em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/05/business/banking-deregulation-jamie-dimon.html"> last year</a>.</p><p>Golly, we should all suffer like poor Jamie!</p><p>And he’s hardly alone in singing the “Talking Banker Blues,” for that elite clique has long pouted that they’re paupers compared to the billionaires of high tech. So, mounting an odd boardroom “labor action,” bankers have been getting drastic payhikes. The <strong>CEO of Citigroup</strong>, for example, recently set a new bottom line expectation for top-floor bankers: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/05/business/banking-deregulation-jamie-dimon.html">A 2025 paycheck of more than $100 million!</a></p><p>How can a business lavish such a windfall on one guy? Easy. The CEO slashed tens of thousands of bank employees from Citi’s payroll last year, so he got their pay.</p><p><strong>Woody Guthrie</strong> once wrote a parody of such predatory behavior, singing “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-z5N8H5TaE">I am a jolly banker, A jolly banker am I.</a>” Today’s Wall Street aristocrats are jolly, too, bloating their extravagant wealth by taking wages and livelihoods from thousands of their own employees. As Woody might sing, that’s how inequality “happens.”</p><p>Do something!</p><p>Wanna fight the bankers and their rigged systems? <a target="_blank" href="https://ourfinancialsecurity.org/">Americans for Financial Reform</a> thinks that “the financial system should serve an economy where everyone can thrive, not just enrich a powerful few.” Sounds great to us! Check them out at <a target="_blank" href="https://ourfinancialsecurity.org/">ourfinancialsecurity.org.</a></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/sing-along-to-the-wall-street-bankers</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:185086764</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600845" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/185086764/063f6e1941af813c629e1c6675a425de.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/185086764/1930c539e9e3868b3c5ad0d59e6302c6.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>One of the most obnoxious sounds in nature is the whine of a Wall Street banker. It’s a cross between the tantrum of a peevish brat and the blathering of a sputtering old plutocrat. Consider the long, piteous whimper of Jamie Dimon, potentate of the powerful JPMorgan Chase banking empire. He constantly whines about laws to restrict banker greed, even toting around a Rube Goldberg-style cartoon depicting a tangle of rules that, he squeals, is choking poor Wall Streeters like him. Before you break into tears about Jamie’s plight, though, notice that he and his bank are not choking on rules, but gorging on riches. Dimon himself pocketed – get this -- $770 million in personal pay last year. Golly, we should all suffer like poor Jamie! And he’s hardly alone in singing the “Talking Banker Blues,” for that elite clique has long pouted that they’re paupers compared to the billionaires of high tech. So, mounting an odd boardroom “labor action,” bankers have been getting drastic payhikes. The CEO of Citigroup, for example, recently set a new bottom line expectation for top-floor bankers: A 2025 paycheck of more than $100 million! How can a business lavish such a windfall on one guy? Easy. The CEO slashed tens of thousands of bank employees from Citi’s payroll last year, so he got their pay. Woody Guthrie once wrote a parody of such predatory behavior, singing “I am a jolly banker, A jolly banker am I.” Today’s Wall Street aristocrats are jolly, too, bloating their extravagant wealth by taking wages and livelihoods from thousands of their own employees. As Woody might sing, that’s how inequality “happens.” Do something! Wanna fight the bankers and their rigged systems? Americans for Financial Reform thinks that “the financial system should serve an economy where everyone can thrive, not just enrich a powerful few.” Sounds great to us! Check them out at ourfinancialsecurity.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>One of the most obnoxious sounds in nature is the whine of a Wall Street banker. It’s a cross between the tantrum of a peevish brat and the blathering of a sputtering old plutocrat. Consider the long, piteous whimper of Jamie Dimon, potentate of the powerful JPMorgan Chase banking empire. He constantly whines about laws to restrict banker greed, even toting around a Rube Goldberg-style cartoon depicting a tangle of rules that, he squeals, is choking poor Wall Streeters like him. Before you break into tears about Jamie’s plight, though, notice that he and his bank are not choking on rules, but gorging on riches. Dimon himself pocketed – get this -- $770 million in personal pay last year. Golly, we should all suffer like poor Jamie! And he’s hardly alone in singing the “Talking Banker Blues,” for that elite clique has long pouted that they’re paupers compared to the billionaires of high tech. So, mounting an odd boardroom “labor action,” bankers have been getting drastic payhikes. The CEO of Citigroup, for example, recently set a new bottom line expectation for top-floor bankers: A 2025 paycheck of more than $100 million! How can a business lavish such a windfall on one guy? Easy. The CEO slashed tens of thousands of bank employees from Citi’s payroll last year, so he got their pay. Woody Guthrie once wrote a parody of such predatory behavior, singing “I am a jolly banker, A jolly banker am I.” Today’s Wall Street aristocrats are jolly, too, bloating their extravagant wealth by taking wages and livelihoods from thousands of their own employees. As Woody might sing, that’s how inequality “happens.” Do something! Wanna fight the bankers and their rigged systems? Americans for Financial Reform thinks that “the financial system should serve an economy where everyone can thrive, not just enrich a powerful few.” Sounds great to us! Check them out at ourfinancialsecurity.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Forget Justice, Our Supreme Court Rules for the Rich]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Interesting fact: While all federal officials take an oath that they will support the US Constitution, Supreme Court justices must also take a second (and very profound) oath of office.</p><p>As <em>New York Times</em> judicial columnist <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/05/us/politics/supreme-court-study-rich-poor.html"><strong>Adam Liptak</strong></a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/05/us/politics/supreme-court-study-rich-poor.html"> reports</a>, each of the nine “supremes” must swear that they will “<em>do equal right to the poor and the rich</em>.” Yes, class fairness is not only a core element of justice, but it’s supposed out to be a formal measure of Supreme Court behavior.</p><p>Every justice is aware of this consequential, ethical requirement, since each one took the oath. How damning, then, that the Court’s right-wing ideologues feel no twinge of conscience about flagrantly and frequently violating their own word of honor! Call the roll: <strong>Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh</strong>, and <strong>Barrett</strong>. In case after case that pits corporate power against workers, consumers, small business, voters, communities, our environment, farm families—i.e., you and me—this plutocratic cabal rules for the rich.</p><p>This month, an independent study of decisions by the Roberts Court revealed that two-thirds of its rulings favor wealthy powers over middle-income and poor people. Thus, our so-called “court of justice” is a primary pusher of inequality, especially through its farfetched decree that unlimited corporate political cash is “free speech,” and that corporations are “people.”</p><p><strong>Chief Justice</strong> <strong>Roberts</strong> smugly proclaims that the Constitution tells him whether the corporate giant or “the little guy” should win. “That’s the oath” I took, he sniffs.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… Bovine excrement! It’s obvious that plutocratic ideologues like him are using the Constitution like a ventriloquist dummy. And—hello, your honorableness—what about that other oath you took about equal fairness for the poor?</p><p>Do something!</p><p>There are groups that are working on holding the mighty Supremes accountable—what a world that will be! Check out:</p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://afj.org/accountable-to-none-the-urgent-need-for-supreme-court-ethics-reform/">The Alliance for Justice</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.commoncause.org/work/supreme-court-ethics/">Common Cause</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/policy-solutions/supreme-court-term-limits">Brennan Center for Justice</a></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/forget-justice-our-supreme-court</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:184326366</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598232" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/184326366/5883fd96f8edef10e67546314f1ed2b3.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/184326366/db5bff50656c6e85143f01418d64a427.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Interesting fact: While all federal officials take an oath that they will support the US Constitution, Supreme Court justices must also take a second (and very profound) oath of office. As New York Times judicial columnist Adam Liptak reports, each of the nine “supremes” must swear that they will “do equal right to the poor and the rich.” Yes, class fairness is not only a core element of justice, but it’s supposed out to be a formal measure of Supreme Court behavior. Every justice is aware of this consequential, ethical requirement, since each one took the oath. How damning, then, that the Court’s right-wing ideologues feel no twinge of conscience about flagrantly and frequently violating their own word of honor! Call the roll: Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett. In case after case that pits corporate power against workers, consumers, small business, voters, communities, our environment, farm families—i.e., you and me—this plutocratic cabal rules for the rich. This month, an independent study of decisions by the Roberts Court revealed that two-thirds of its rulings favor wealthy powers over middle-income and poor people. Thus, our so-called “court of justice” is a primary pusher of inequality, especially through its farfetched decree that unlimited corporate political cash is “free speech,” and that corporations are “people.” Chief Justice Roberts smugly proclaims that the Constitution tells him whether the corporate giant or “the little guy” should win. “That’s the oath” I took, he sniffs. This is Jim Hightower saying… Bovine excrement! It’s obvious that plutocratic ideologues like him are using the Constitution like a ventriloquist dummy. And—hello, your honorableness—what about that other oath you took about equal fairness for the poor? Do something! There are groups that are working on holding the mighty Supremes accountable—what a world that will be! Check out: * The Alliance for Justice * Common Cause * Brennan Center for Justice Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Interesting fact: While all federal officials take an oath that they will support the US Constitution, Supreme Court justices must also take a second (and very profound) oath of office. As New York Times judicial columnist Adam Liptak reports, each of the nine “supremes” must swear that they will “do equal right to the poor and the rich.” Yes, class fairness is not only a core element of justice, but it’s supposed out to be a formal measure of Supreme Court behavior. Every justice is aware of this consequential, ethical requirement, since each one took the oath. How damning, then, that the Court’s right-wing ideologues feel no twinge of conscience about flagrantly and frequently violating their own word of honor! Call the roll: Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett. In case after case that pits corporate power against workers, consumers, small business, voters, communities, our environment, farm families—i.e., you and me—this plutocratic cabal rules for the rich. This month, an independent study of decisions by the Roberts Court revealed that two-thirds of its rulings favor wealthy powers over middle-income and poor people. Thus, our so-called “court of justice” is a primary pusher of inequality, especially through its farfetched decree that unlimited corporate political cash is “free speech,” and that corporations are “people.” Chief Justice Roberts smugly proclaims that the Constitution tells him whether the corporate giant or “the little guy” should win. “That’s the oath” I took, he sniffs. This is Jim Hightower saying… Bovine excrement! It’s obvious that plutocratic ideologues like him are using the Constitution like a ventriloquist dummy. And—hello, your honorableness—what about that other oath you took about equal fairness for the poor? Do something! There are groups that are working on holding the mighty Supremes accountable—what a world that will be! Check out: * The Alliance for Justice * Common Cause * Brennan Center for Justice Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Look! Up in the Sky… It’s a Bird, a Plane… an AI Data Center!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>In my childhood years, I got to experience something I’ve cherished ever since: Starry nights.</p><p>I was lucky to spend time during the summers on my Aunt Eula’s and Uncle Ernest’s tenant farm in Northeast Texas. With no TV or electronics, we made our own entertainment in the evenings, including “turning on” nature’s Big Show. This meant rolling an old bed outdoors as darkness fell, so we could lay back, look up, and marvel at the endless expanse of constellations, comets, the Milky Way, planets, and other wonders of the cosmos. Today, though, 80 percent of Americans never see the starry night, for the artificial glare of city lights blots out nature’s spectacular display.</p><p></p><p>But wait – billionaires to the rescue! <strong>Musk, Bezos, Zuckerberg</strong>, and other high-tech demigods who’re spending trillions to foist a brave new world of artificial intelligence on us, claim that their scheme will actually relight the night sky!</p><p>For real? Of course not.</p><p>It turns out that they can’t get enough cheap land and energy on Earth to supply the phantasmagoric sprawl of data centers their AI hustle will demand. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/01/technology/space-data-centers-ai.html">So, they’re going to put massive clusters of these systems into orbit</a>, tethered to miles of solar mirrors stretching across our sky. While that means nature’s stars-and-stuff will be even more obscured, they say that instead of watching the cosmos, we Earthlings can enjoy the artificial twinkle of their corporate data centers.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… Lest you think that, surely they wouldn’t do this, note that those arrogant billionaire Lords of the Night are already investing humongous sums of money in space data centers As the CEO of one called “<strong>Starcloud</strong>” bluntly says: “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/01/technology/space-data-centers-ai.html">It’s not a debate. It’s going to happen.</a>”</p><p>Do something!</p><p>Not surprisingly, fighting for a quiet night sky is a difficult and overlooked area of activism. Here are some folks we found working on the issue—if you know of more, leave ‘em in the comments!</p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://darksky.org/">Dark Sky International</a> works to create and preserve localities from light pollution, and they’ve started to address the impact of satellites, too. <a target="_blank" href="https://darksky.org/news/how-satellite-constellations-are-reshaping-astrophotography/">Here’s a paper</a> they released late last year.</p><p>* On the nerdier side of things, <a target="_blank" href="https://cps.iau.org/">the International Astronomical Union (IAU)’s Centre for the Protection of the Dark and Quiet Sky (CPS) </a>— if that isn’t a mouthful, we don’t know what is — is working to mitigate the negative impact of satellite constellations. <em>(The image used above is courtesy of the IAU.)</em></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/look-up-in-the-sky-its-a-bird-a-plane</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:184324009</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600845" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/184324009/6be8361db07e581bb4a8c1e52a91dabe.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/184324009/317d4526db80b0842be3f5a87c44f5b8.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>In my childhood years, I got to experience something I’ve cherished ever since: Starry nights. I was lucky to spend time during the summers on my Aunt Eula’s and Uncle Ernest’s tenant farm in Northeast Texas. With no TV or electronics, we made our own entertainment in the evenings, including “turning on” nature’s Big Show. This meant rolling an old bed outdoors as darkness fell, so we could lay back, look up, and marvel at the endless expanse of constellations, comets, the Milky Way, planets, and other wonders of the cosmos. Today, though, 80 percent of Americans never see the starry night, for the artificial glare of city lights blots out nature’s spectacular display. But wait – billionaires to the rescue! Musk, Bezos, Zuckerberg, and other high-tech demigods who’re spending trillions to foist a brave new world of artificial intelligence on us, claim that their scheme will actually relight the night sky! For real? Of course not. It turns out that they can’t get enough cheap land and energy on Earth to supply the phantasmagoric sprawl of data centers their AI hustle will demand. So, they’re going to put massive clusters of these systems into orbit, tethered to miles of solar mirrors stretching across our sky. While that means nature’s stars-and-stuff will be even more obscured, they say that instead of watching the cosmos, we Earthlings can enjoy the artificial twinkle of their corporate data centers. This is Jim Hightower saying… Lest you think that, surely they wouldn’t do this, note that those arrogant billionaire Lords of the Night are already investing humongous sums of money in space data centers As the CEO of one called “Starcloud” bluntly says: “It’s not a debate. It’s going to happen.” Do something! Not surprisingly, fighting for a quiet night sky is a difficult and overlooked area of activism. Here are some folks we found working on the issue—if you know of more, leave ‘em in the comments! * Dark Sky International works to create and preserve localities from light pollution, and they’ve started to address the impact of satellites, too. Here’s a paper they released late last year. * On the nerdier side of things, the International Astronomical Union (IAU)’s Centre for the Protection of the Dark and Quiet Sky (CPS) — if that isn’t a mouthful, we don’t know what is — is working to mitigate the negative impact of satellite constellations. (The image used above is courtesy of the IAU.) Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>In my childhood years, I got to experience something I’ve cherished ever since: Starry nights. I was lucky to spend time during the summers on my Aunt Eula’s and Uncle Ernest’s tenant farm in Northeast Texas. With no TV or electronics, we made our own entertainment in the evenings, including “turning on” nature’s Big Show. This meant rolling an old bed outdoors as darkness fell, so we could lay back, look up, and marvel at the endless expanse of constellations, comets, the Milky Way, planets, and other wonders of the cosmos. Today, though, 80 percent of Americans never see the starry night, for the artificial glare of city lights blots out nature’s spectacular display. But wait – billionaires to the rescue! Musk, Bezos, Zuckerberg, and other high-tech demigods who’re spending trillions to foist a brave new world of artificial intelligence on us, claim that their scheme will actually relight the night sky! For real? Of course not. It turns out that they can’t get enough cheap land and energy on Earth to supply the phantasmagoric sprawl of data centers their AI hustle will demand. So, they’re going to put massive clusters of these systems into orbit, tethered to miles of solar mirrors stretching across our sky. While that means nature’s stars-and-stuff will be even more obscured, they say that instead of watching the cosmos, we Earthlings can enjoy the artificial twinkle of their corporate data centers. This is Jim Hightower saying… Lest you think that, surely they wouldn’t do this, note that those arrogant billionaire Lords of the Night are already investing humongous sums of money in space data centers As the CEO of one called “Starcloud” bluntly says: “It’s not a debate. It’s going to happen.” Do something! Not surprisingly, fighting for a quiet night sky is a difficult and overlooked area of activism. Here are some folks we found working on the issue—if you know of more, leave ‘em in the comments! * Dark Sky International works to create and preserve localities from light pollution, and they’ve started to address the impact of satellites, too. Here’s a paper they released late last year. * On the nerdier side of things, the International Astronomical Union (IAU)’s Centre for the Protection of the Dark and Quiet Sky (CPS) — if that isn’t a mouthful, we don’t know what is — is working to mitigate the negative impact of satellite constellations. (The image used above is courtesy of the IAU.) Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Billionaire Money is Corrupting Our Democracy]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Recent polling confirms what you’d hear if you talked to people at most any Chat & Chew Café across America – namely, our political system is broken.</p><p>In fact, nearly all of us feel that way. While people strongly believe that representative democracy is the best system, they can plainly see that what we have today is neither democracy nor representative. Washington and most state governments routinely enact policies and budgets benefitting über-rich political donors, while cutting programs that regular people want and need.</p><p>It’s not just that the system is failing to do what grassroots America wants done, while doing what most people oppose, but that the insiders in charge, whether Republican or Democrat, don’t listen… or really care.</p><p>At the core of this dangerous disconnect is the fact that our highly-touted democratic ambitions have devolved into a moneyed autocracy, a self-perpetuating political system operating independent of the popular will. <em>The issue</em> of all 2026 issues is this: Money rules. Very Big Money, mostly anti-democracy, billionaire money.</p><p>Trump, Congress, the courts, governors – and especially the billionaires – know this. They wink at it, rely on it, and even cynically proclaim that giving and receiving unlimited, secret, political money is the new coin of democratic policy making – even superior to winning electoral votes.</p><p>Now, however, We the People are also clearly seeing this perversion of our fundamental democratic ideals and rights. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2023/09/19/money-power-and-the-influence-of-ordinary-people-in-american-politics/">Some 80 percent of Americans (including 72% of Republicans) say people who donate to campaigns have too much influence</a>. Our job in 2026 is to confront the billionaire corrupters and political takers head-on, turning people’s rising awareness and anger into “little-d” democratic action.</p><p>Do something!</p><p>To fight the influence of big money in politics, check out these organizations’ work:</p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.citizen.org/topic/protecting-democracy/money-in-politics/">Public Citizen</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://ourrevolution.com/stand-with-bernie-get-oligarch-money-out-of-politics/">Our Revolution</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.commoncause.org/our-work/money-influence/">Common Cause</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.brennancenter.org/issues/reform-money-politics">Brennan Center</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="http://movetoamend.org">Move to Amend</a></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/billionaire-money-is-corrupting-our</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:183574006</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598232" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/183574006/cb8c237696fe4378a037d070d469a64c.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/183574006/f2b06ac69d82bc4fe5d4022abf959654.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Recent polling confirms what you’d hear if you talked to people at most any Chat &amp; Chew Café across America – namely, our political system is broken. In fact, nearly all of us feel that way. While people strongly believe that representative democracy is the best system, they can plainly see that what we have today is neither democracy nor representative. Washington and most state governments routinely enact policies and budgets benefitting über-rich political donors, while cutting programs that regular people want and need. It’s not just that the system is failing to do what grassroots America wants done, while doing what most people oppose, but that the insiders in charge, whether Republican or Democrat, don’t listen… or really care. At the core of this dangerous disconnect is the fact that our highly-touted democratic ambitions have devolved into a moneyed autocracy, a self-perpetuating political system operating independent of the popular will. The issue of all 2026 issues is this: Money rules. Very Big Money, mostly anti-democracy, billionaire money. Trump, Congress, the courts, governors – and especially the billionaires – know this. They wink at it, rely on it, and even cynically proclaim that giving and receiving unlimited, secret, political money is the new coin of democratic policy making – even superior to winning electoral votes. Now, however, We the People are also clearly seeing this perversion of our fundamental democratic ideals and rights. Some 80 percent of Americans (including 72% of Republicans) say people who donate to campaigns have too much influence. Our job in 2026 is to confront the billionaire corrupters and political takers head-on, turning people’s rising awareness and anger into “little-d” democratic action. Do something! To fight the influence of big money in politics, check out these organizations’ work: * Public Citizen * Our Revolution * Common Cause * Brennan Center * Move to Amend Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Recent polling confirms what you’d hear if you talked to people at most any Chat &amp; Chew Café across America – namely, our political system is broken. In fact, nearly all of us feel that way. While people strongly believe that representative democracy is the best system, they can plainly see that what we have today is neither democracy nor representative. Washington and most state governments routinely enact policies and budgets benefitting über-rich political donors, while cutting programs that regular people want and need. It’s not just that the system is failing to do what grassroots America wants done, while doing what most people oppose, but that the insiders in charge, whether Republican or Democrat, don’t listen… or really care. At the core of this dangerous disconnect is the fact that our highly-touted democratic ambitions have devolved into a moneyed autocracy, a self-perpetuating political system operating independent of the popular will. The issue of all 2026 issues is this: Money rules. Very Big Money, mostly anti-democracy, billionaire money. Trump, Congress, the courts, governors – and especially the billionaires – know this. They wink at it, rely on it, and even cynically proclaim that giving and receiving unlimited, secret, political money is the new coin of democratic policy making – even superior to winning electoral votes. Now, however, We the People are also clearly seeing this perversion of our fundamental democratic ideals and rights. Some 80 percent of Americans (including 72% of Republicans) say people who donate to campaigns have too much influence. Our job in 2026 is to confront the billionaire corrupters and political takers head-on, turning people’s rising awareness and anger into “little-d” democratic action. Do something! To fight the influence of big money in politics, check out these organizations’ work: * Public Citizen * Our Revolution * Common Cause * Brennan Center * Move to Amend Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Pollution Protector – for Profiteering Polluters]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>There’s greed… and then there’s the nauseating greed of profiteering corporations that make a killing – literally – by knowingly contaminating people’s water, air, land, and families.</p><p>Such rank, moral corruption is hard to fathom... but it’s not hard to find. For one breathtaking example, consider <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/26/climate/copper-smelter-arizona-pollution-trump.html"><strong>Freeport-McMoRan</strong></a>.</p><p>This global mining behemoth is one of America’s most aggressive spoliers of land, air, water, and health – including from its sprawling copper smelter near Phoenix, Arizona. This operation is a major spreader of lead pollution, a neurotoxin that’s particularly harmful to children, causing pain, seizures, and learning disabilities.</p><p>But wait, where’s our <strong>Environmental Protection Agency</strong>? Good question. In fact, until last year, EPA was requiring Freeport to install technology to cut those poisonous emissions. The giant <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/26/climate/copper-smelter-arizona-pollution-trump.html">squealed like a stuck pig, though, crying that the $60 million cost for the lifesaving equipment was too “burdensome</a>” – even though that wouldn’t even be a drop in Freeport’s <em>$2-billion-a-year</em> bucket of profits.</p><p>Sure enough, in October, <strong>Trump’s</strong> new EPA honcho rushed to provide pollution protection. Not for the children, but for the polluter! Indeed, Trump’s corporate-coddling agency “super-streamlined” the regulatory process by essentially eliminating it – no public hearing required, no presentation of facts, to chance for victims to object. All Freeport had to do was send an email requesting regulatory relief, and – BAM! – Trump promptly exempted its Arizona smelter from having to clean up its act.</p><p>Not only is this “free pass to pollute” a blunt proclamation of corporate rule, it also expresses Trump’s deep contempt for working-class people. Imagine if that smelter was in Florida, poisoning the elites in his Mar-a-Lago resort. Then, he’d jump on it like a gator on a poodle.</p><p>Do something!</p><p>The <strong>Environmental Defense Fund</strong> was one of the primary organizations working on the Freeport-McMoRan issue; they've launched a <a target="_blank" href="https://www.edf.org/maps/epa-pollution-pass/">Trump EPA Pollution Pass map</a> that shows you all the places that have applied for presidental exemptions from pollution laws. Support their work by getting involved at <a target="_blank" href="http://edf.org">edf.org</a>.</p><p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/pollution-protector-for-profiteering</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:183562987</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600845" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/183562987/545f9942734c507c2849be5f74c1cd03.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/183562987/78acaad77b8ddbae0de12416c11113d7.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>There’s greed… and then there’s the nauseating greed of profiteering corporations that make a killing – literally – by knowingly contaminating people’s water, air, land, and families. Such rank, moral corruption is hard to fathom... but it’s not hard to find. For one breathtaking example, consider Freeport-McMoRan. This global mining behemoth is one of America’s most aggressive spoliers of land, air, water, and health – including from its sprawling copper smelter near Phoenix, Arizona. This operation is a major spreader of lead pollution, a neurotoxin that’s particularly harmful to children, causing pain, seizures, and learning disabilities. But wait, where’s our Environmental Protection Agency? Good question. In fact, until last year, EPA was requiring Freeport to install technology to cut those poisonous emissions. The giant squealed like a stuck pig, though, crying that the $60 million cost for the lifesaving equipment was too “burdensome” – even though that wouldn’t even be a drop in Freeport’s $2-billion-a-year bucket of profits. Sure enough, in October, Trump’s new EPA honcho rushed to provide pollution protection. Not for the children, but for the polluter! Indeed, Trump’s corporate-coddling agency “super-streamlined” the regulatory process by essentially eliminating it – no public hearing required, no presentation of facts, to chance for victims to object. All Freeport had to do was send an email requesting regulatory relief, and – BAM! – Trump promptly exempted its Arizona smelter from having to clean up its act. Not only is this “free pass to pollute” a blunt proclamation of corporate rule, it also expresses Trump’s deep contempt for working-class people. Imagine if that smelter was in Florida, poisoning the elites in his Mar-a-Lago resort. Then, he’d jump on it like a gator on a poodle. Do something! The Environmental Defense Fund was one of the primary organizations working on the Freeport-McMoRan issue; they've launched a Trump EPA Pollution Pass map that shows you all the places that have applied for presidental exemptions from pollution laws. Support their work by getting involved at edf.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>There’s greed… and then there’s the nauseating greed of profiteering corporations that make a killing – literally – by knowingly contaminating people’s water, air, land, and families. Such rank, moral corruption is hard to fathom... but it’s not hard to find. For one breathtaking example, consider Freeport-McMoRan. This global mining behemoth is one of America’s most aggressive spoliers of land, air, water, and health – including from its sprawling copper smelter near Phoenix, Arizona. This operation is a major spreader of lead pollution, a neurotoxin that’s particularly harmful to children, causing pain, seizures, and learning disabilities. But wait, where’s our Environmental Protection Agency? Good question. In fact, until last year, EPA was requiring Freeport to install technology to cut those poisonous emissions. The giant squealed like a stuck pig, though, crying that the $60 million cost for the lifesaving equipment was too “burdensome” – even though that wouldn’t even be a drop in Freeport’s $2-billion-a-year bucket of profits. Sure enough, in October, Trump’s new EPA honcho rushed to provide pollution protection. Not for the children, but for the polluter! Indeed, Trump’s corporate-coddling agency “super-streamlined” the regulatory process by essentially eliminating it – no public hearing required, no presentation of facts, to chance for victims to object. All Freeport had to do was send an email requesting regulatory relief, and – BAM! – Trump promptly exempted its Arizona smelter from having to clean up its act. Not only is this “free pass to pollute” a blunt proclamation of corporate rule, it also expresses Trump’s deep contempt for working-class people. Imagine if that smelter was in Florida, poisoning the elites in his Mar-a-Lago resort. Then, he’d jump on it like a gator on a poodle. Do something! The Environmental Defense Fund was one of the primary organizations working on the Freeport-McMoRan issue; they've launched a Trump EPA Pollution Pass map that shows you all the places that have applied for presidental exemptions from pollution laws. Support their work by getting involved at edf.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can 2026 Finally Be a Year of Progressive Political Change?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Dare we think that the New Year holds tremendous promise for progressive change?</p><p>Yes! As practically every pundit notes, Trump’s White House menagerie of billionaires, grifters, haters, prima donnas, and ideological kooks has soured even many MAGA faithful. More importantly, grassroots progressives have been organizing and mobilizing across the country, and – like eager ball players looking forward to a good season – <em>they’re pumped up</em>!</p><p>So, what could go wrong?</p><p>Don’t look now, but the National Democratic Party’s “Washington Club” of high-dollar donors, clueless consultants, corporate lobbyists, and old-line politicos are still controlling much of the Party’s money, strategy, and message. Possessing all the magnetism of their go-slow leader, Chuck Schumer, their game plan is the same as always: Run a Big Money, don’t-rock-the-boat, Washington-based campaign, shove-aside grassroots activists, rely on negative attack ads, and tell everyone (again) that Trump will defeat himself.</p><p>As Casey Stengel wailed when he managed the comically inept 1962 New York Mets baseball team – “Can’t anyone here play this game?”</p><p>Luckily, though, those insider losers are no longer our real Democratic team. While they’ve been piddling around in Congress playing wiffle ball with the Trumpers, Bernie-style progressives have been rebuilding the Party of the People in every state with hard-hitting, slick-fielding, big-league DEMOCRATS.</p><p>And voters are responding with an enthusiastic YES! From Coast to coast – already lifting Zohran Mamdani to victory in New York, Katie Wilson in Seattle, and state legislative races in Iowa, Georgia, and Mississippi.</p><p>Let’s keep pushing to make 2026 the year we quit moaning about the lackluster Democratic Party… and turn it into the bright new majority party.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/can-2026-finally-be-a-year-of-progressive</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:182876936</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/182876936/ea91cf7ce4d8397878fca13f786330bd.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/182876936/9359a926977361dee5b95e2f002000bf.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Dare we think that the New Year holds tremendous promise for progressive change? Yes! As practically every pundit notes, Trump’s White House menagerie of billionaires, grifters, haters, prima donnas, and ideological kooks has soured even many MAGA faithful. More importantly, grassroots progressives have been organizing and mobilizing across the country, and – like eager ball players looking forward to a good season – they’re pumped up! So, what could go wrong? Don’t look now, but the National Democratic Party’s “Washington Club” of high-dollar donors, clueless consultants, corporate lobbyists, and old-line politicos are still controlling much of the Party’s money, strategy, and message. Possessing all the magnetism of their go-slow leader, Chuck Schumer, their game plan is the same as always: Run a Big Money, don’t-rock-the-boat, Washington-based campaign, shove-aside grassroots activists, rely on negative attack ads, and tell everyone (again) that Trump will defeat himself. As Casey Stengel wailed when he managed the comically inept 1962 New York Mets baseball team – “Can’t anyone here play this game?” Luckily, though, those insider losers are no longer our real Democratic team. While they’ve been piddling around in Congress playing wiffle ball with the Trumpers, Bernie-style progressives have been rebuilding the Party of the People in every state with hard-hitting, slick-fielding, big-league DEMOCRATS. And voters are responding with an enthusiastic YES! From Coast to coast – already lifting Zohran Mamdani to victory in New York, Katie Wilson in Seattle, and state legislative races in Iowa, Georgia, and Mississippi. Let’s keep pushing to make 2026 the year we quit moaning about the lackluster Democratic Party… and turn it into the bright new majority party. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Dare we think that the New Year holds tremendous promise for progressive change? Yes! As practically every pundit notes, Trump’s White House menagerie of billionaires, grifters, haters, prima donnas, and ideological kooks has soured even many MAGA faithful. More importantly, grassroots progressives have been organizing and mobilizing across the country, and – like eager ball players looking forward to a good season – they’re pumped up! So, what could go wrong? Don’t look now, but the National Democratic Party’s “Washington Club” of high-dollar donors, clueless consultants, corporate lobbyists, and old-line politicos are still controlling much of the Party’s money, strategy, and message. Possessing all the magnetism of their go-slow leader, Chuck Schumer, their game plan is the same as always: Run a Big Money, don’t-rock-the-boat, Washington-based campaign, shove-aside grassroots activists, rely on negative attack ads, and tell everyone (again) that Trump will defeat himself. As Casey Stengel wailed when he managed the comically inept 1962 New York Mets baseball team – “Can’t anyone here play this game?” Luckily, though, those insider losers are no longer our real Democratic team. While they’ve been piddling around in Congress playing wiffle ball with the Trumpers, Bernie-style progressives have been rebuilding the Party of the People in every state with hard-hitting, slick-fielding, big-league DEMOCRATS. And voters are responding with an enthusiastic YES! From Coast to coast – already lifting Zohran Mamdani to victory in New York, Katie Wilson in Seattle, and state legislative races in Iowa, Georgia, and Mississippi. Let’s keep pushing to make 2026 the year we quit moaning about the lackluster Democratic Party… and turn it into the bright new majority party. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why America’s Legislatures Routinely Screw Working Families]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>As we head into a momentous election year, with state and national legislative seats up for grabs, even let-them-eat-cake Republicans are scrambling to sound sympathetic to today’s hard-hit working-class families.</p><p>Of course, tongue-clucking concern doesn’t mean actually <em>doing anything</em> to help this majority of Americans – and most legislatures are doing exactly that: Nothing.</p><p>In fact, you’d think the ones hurting in America are billionaires, for those same tongue-clucking lawmakers have been laser-focused this year on delivering monopoly protections, multibillion-dollar government subsidies, exclusive tax breaks, and even top government positions to the richest and greediest corporate profiteers. This is personally disgraceful and socially destructive… yet it has become business as usual.</p><p>Why? What’s causing America’s so-called “representatives” to disregard the needs of a majority of their own constituents? The corrupting power of corporate money, of course, but a more fundamental cause is this: <em>The class make-up</em> of practically every legislative body. Millionaires-and-up now dominate. But most-telling, is who you don’t’ see: Working stiffs.</p><p>While more than half of Americans are wage workers who overwhelmingly support progressive reforms to advance economic fairness and social justice, the elitist legislative structure shuts them out. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/30/opinion/working-class-wealthy-legislators.html">Consider America’s 7,300 state legislative seats – only one percent of Republican members and two percent of Democrats are working class! Ten states have zero working class members!</a></p><p>As an old adage notes: If you’re not at the table, you’re on the menu. Labor laws, health care, campaign finance, AI regulation… again and again, workers are put on the corporate menu, because the lawmaking system is rigged to keep them from being at the table to represent themselves.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-americas-legislatures-routinely</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:182865415</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 16:59:33 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/182865415/c3d1f5eddfff06c7a64b90cbd987f3a9.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/182865415/9f120281be6571f78e8cbba2ee26a72e.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>As we head into a momentous election year, with state and national legislative seats up for grabs, even let-them-eat-cake Republicans are scrambling to sound sympathetic to today’s hard-hit working-class families. Of course, tongue-clucking concern doesn’t mean actually doing anything to help this majority of Americans – and most legislatures are doing exactly that: Nothing. In fact, you’d think the ones hurting in America are billionaires, for those same tongue-clucking lawmakers have been laser-focused this year on delivering monopoly protections, multibillion-dollar government subsidies, exclusive tax breaks, and even top government positions to the richest and greediest corporate profiteers. This is personally disgraceful and socially destructive… yet it has become business as usual. Why? What’s causing America’s so-called “representatives” to disregard the needs of a majority of their own constituents? The corrupting power of corporate money, of course, but a more fundamental cause is this: The class make-up of practically every legislative body. Millionaires-and-up now dominate. But most-telling, is who you don’t’ see: Working stiffs. While more than half of Americans are wage workers who overwhelmingly support progressive reforms to advance economic fairness and social justice, the elitist legislative structure shuts them out. Consider America’s 7,300 state legislative seats – only one percent of Republican members and two percent of Democrats are working class! Ten states have zero working class members! As an old adage notes: If you’re not at the table, you’re on the menu. Labor laws, health care, campaign finance, AI regulation… again and again, workers are put on the corporate menu, because the lawmaking system is rigged to keep them from being at the table to represent themselves. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>As we head into a momentous election year, with state and national legislative seats up for grabs, even let-them-eat-cake Republicans are scrambling to sound sympathetic to today’s hard-hit working-class families. Of course, tongue-clucking concern doesn’t mean actually doing anything to help this majority of Americans – and most legislatures are doing exactly that: Nothing. In fact, you’d think the ones hurting in America are billionaires, for those same tongue-clucking lawmakers have been laser-focused this year on delivering monopoly protections, multibillion-dollar government subsidies, exclusive tax breaks, and even top government positions to the richest and greediest corporate profiteers. This is personally disgraceful and socially destructive… yet it has become business as usual. Why? What’s causing America’s so-called “representatives” to disregard the needs of a majority of their own constituents? The corrupting power of corporate money, of course, but a more fundamental cause is this: The class make-up of practically every legislative body. Millionaires-and-up now dominate. But most-telling, is who you don’t’ see: Working stiffs. While more than half of Americans are wage workers who overwhelmingly support progressive reforms to advance economic fairness and social justice, the elitist legislative structure shuts them out. Consider America’s 7,300 state legislative seats – only one percent of Republican members and two percent of Democrats are working class! Ten states have zero working class members! As an old adage notes: If you’re not at the table, you’re on the menu. Labor laws, health care, campaign finance, AI regulation… again and again, workers are put on the corporate menu, because the lawmaking system is rigged to keep them from being at the table to represent themselves. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[A Christmas Message: There’s No Jesus in “Christian Nationalism”]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>In keeping with the season, I offer a little political anecdote about Christmas.</p><p>More specifically, it’s about the moral teachings of the biblical Jesus, which formed the ethical foundation of Christmas and gives Christianity itself its true gravity.</p><p>The story is about a political clash some 60 years ago in Houston, when a boorish right-winger accosted the feisty mother of a renowned progressive populist lawmaker, <a target="_blank" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Eckhardt">US Rep. Bob Eckhardt</a>. Bob, whom I later got to know and learn from, was a fierce battler for racial equality in a time when not all Texans were singing in Kumbaya harmony.</p><p>Sure enough, at a public forum where Bob’s mom was representing him, this bonehead loudly demanded to know why her son was trying to make “them [Black people] equal to whites.” Ms. Eckhardt cut off the fellow’s ugly diatribe by, of all things, offering an apology! Her son’s advocacy, she said, was not his fault, but hers: “You see, I raised him to be a Christian.”</p><p>Today, however, Mother Eckhardt’s put down might lack the clarity it had back then. This is a strange Christmas – concluding a year in which far right extremists have relentlessly perverted the profound and love-based Christianity of Jesus into a partisan ethic promising brutish rule. As we’ve seen, their “beatitudes” include repression of the poor, worship of Mammon, turning away strangers, hatred of thy neighbor… and so awful much more that rejects the values of Jesus – all in the name of establishing something they call “Christian Nationalism.”</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… God bless America. And please hurry! But remember, God helps those who help themselves. That means you and me. So, let’s work together to create a merrier, truer Christmas next year.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/a-christmas-message-theres-no-jesus</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:182250716</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2025 17:01:29 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/182250716/c879aaecd6c086f82ef4514ce30154cb.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/182250716/82a47201fc8a2cee3babc563aec1bee8.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>In keeping with the season, I offer a little political anecdote about Christmas. More specifically, it’s about the moral teachings of the biblical Jesus, which formed the ethical foundation of Christmas and gives Christianity itself its true gravity. The story is about a political clash some 60 years ago in Houston, when a boorish right-winger accosted the feisty mother of a renowned progressive populist lawmaker, US Rep. Bob Eckhardt. Bob, whom I later got to know and learn from, was a fierce battler for racial equality in a time when not all Texans were singing in Kumbaya harmony. Sure enough, at a public forum where Bob’s mom was representing him, this bonehead loudly demanded to know why her son was trying to make “them [Black people] equal to whites.” Ms. Eckhardt cut off the fellow’s ugly diatribe by, of all things, offering an apology! Her son’s advocacy, she said, was not his fault, but hers: “You see, I raised him to be a Christian.” Today, however, Mother Eckhardt’s put down might lack the clarity it had back then. This is a strange Christmas – concluding a year in which far right extremists have relentlessly perverted the profound and love-based Christianity of Jesus into a partisan ethic promising brutish rule. As we’ve seen, their “beatitudes” include repression of the poor, worship of Mammon, turning away strangers, hatred of thy neighbor… and so awful much more that rejects the values of Jesus – all in the name of establishing something they call “Christian Nationalism.” This is Jim Hightower saying… God bless America. And please hurry! But remember, God helps those who help themselves. That means you and me. So, let’s work together to create a merrier, truer Christmas next year. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>In keeping with the season, I offer a little political anecdote about Christmas. More specifically, it’s about the moral teachings of the biblical Jesus, which formed the ethical foundation of Christmas and gives Christianity itself its true gravity. The story is about a political clash some 60 years ago in Houston, when a boorish right-winger accosted the feisty mother of a renowned progressive populist lawmaker, US Rep. Bob Eckhardt. Bob, whom I later got to know and learn from, was a fierce battler for racial equality in a time when not all Texans were singing in Kumbaya harmony. Sure enough, at a public forum where Bob’s mom was representing him, this bonehead loudly demanded to know why her son was trying to make “them [Black people] equal to whites.” Ms. Eckhardt cut off the fellow’s ugly diatribe by, of all things, offering an apology! Her son’s advocacy, she said, was not his fault, but hers: “You see, I raised him to be a Christian.” Today, however, Mother Eckhardt’s put down might lack the clarity it had back then. This is a strange Christmas – concluding a year in which far right extremists have relentlessly perverted the profound and love-based Christianity of Jesus into a partisan ethic promising brutish rule. As we’ve seen, their “beatitudes” include repression of the poor, worship of Mammon, turning away strangers, hatred of thy neighbor… and so awful much more that rejects the values of Jesus – all in the name of establishing something they call “Christian Nationalism.” This is Jim Hightower saying… God bless America. And please hurry! But remember, God helps those who help themselves. That means you and me. So, let’s work together to create a merrier, truer Christmas next year. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[AI Profiteers Cash-In By Being Naughty This Christmas]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The high priests of Holy High Tech are in a huff, wailing that they’re being bothered by you busybodies, Luddites, and commoners – ie, The People.</p><p>Grandiose gabillionaires like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos assert that they’re not merely rich, but visionary pioneers! Stand back, they bark, for we’re going to re-populate the world with a new species of artificially-superintelligent humanoids. Yet, to their astonishment, rather being hailed as geniuses, the oligarchs are being widely berated by us old-fashioned humans. Indeed, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.ncsl.org/technology-and-communication/artificial-intelligence-2025-legislation">the level of public outrage has goaded lawmakers in </a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.ncsl.org/technology-and-communication/artificial-intelligence-2025-legislation"><em>all 50 states</em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.ncsl.org/technology-and-communication/artificial-intelligence-2025-legislation"> to enact some minimal protections</a> for workers, communities… and humanity.</p><p>Of course, Musk, Bezos, & Company have no tolerance for the democratic will, so they jetted to Congress, demanding passage of a 10-year ban on enforcing any state law regulating artificial intelligence. Shockingly, however the US Senate, normally a total corporate toady, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/senate-pulls-ai-regulatory-ban-from-gop-bill-after-complaints-from-states">rose up 99 to 1 to vote against the Silicon Valley potentates</a>. <em>Ninety-nine to one!</em></p><p>So, the billionaires are now playing their trusty Trump card. Having greased the corrupt pay-to-play president with about a billion-dollars in campaign cash and personal deals, the AI profiteers got their payback this month. Quicker than you can say “quid pro quo,” <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/11/technology/ai-trump-executive-order.html">Trump issued an executive order</a> that – get this – <em>orders himself</em> to block our state governments from enforcing their own AI laws.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… And here’s an extra fun fact: Trump didn’t even have to write the special interest executive order himself.<a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/30/technology/david-sacks-white-house-profits.html"> A Silicon Valley AI profiteer generously sent a draft for the president to sign</a>, effectively awarding more power and wealth to the profiteer. And that’s how Big Money rigs the system against you and me.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/ai-profiteers-cash-in-by-being-naughty</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:182248898</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/182248898/9be85ad30250fa359daf60238bb3a49e.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/182248898/7ccc80d88aaadf6f7b34861cf97f3be1.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>The high priests of Holy High Tech are in a huff, wailing that they’re being bothered by you busybodies, Luddites, and commoners – ie, The People. Grandiose gabillionaires like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos assert that they’re not merely rich, but visionary pioneers! Stand back, they bark, for we’re going to re-populate the world with a new species of artificially-superintelligent humanoids. Yet, to their astonishment, rather being hailed as geniuses, the oligarchs are being widely berated by us old-fashioned humans. Indeed, the level of public outrage has goaded lawmakers in all 50 states to enact some minimal protections for workers, communities… and humanity. Of course, Musk, Bezos, &amp; Company have no tolerance for the democratic will, so they jetted to Congress, demanding passage of a 10-year ban on enforcing any state law regulating artificial intelligence. Shockingly, however the US Senate, normally a total corporate toady, rose up 99 to 1 to vote against the Silicon Valley potentates. Ninety-nine to one! So, the billionaires are now playing their trusty Trump card. Having greased the corrupt pay-to-play president with about a billion-dollars in campaign cash and personal deals, the AI profiteers got their payback this month. Quicker than you can say “quid pro quo,” Trump issued an executive order that – get this – orders himself to block our state governments from enforcing their own AI laws. This is Jim Hightower saying… And here’s an extra fun fact: Trump didn’t even have to write the special interest executive order himself. A Silicon Valley AI profiteer generously sent a draft for the president to sign, effectively awarding more power and wealth to the profiteer. And that’s how Big Money rigs the system against you and me. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>The high priests of Holy High Tech are in a huff, wailing that they’re being bothered by you busybodies, Luddites, and commoners – ie, The People. Grandiose gabillionaires like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos assert that they’re not merely rich, but visionary pioneers! Stand back, they bark, for we’re going to re-populate the world with a new species of artificially-superintelligent humanoids. Yet, to their astonishment, rather being hailed as geniuses, the oligarchs are being widely berated by us old-fashioned humans. Indeed, the level of public outrage has goaded lawmakers in all 50 states to enact some minimal protections for workers, communities… and humanity. Of course, Musk, Bezos, &amp; Company have no tolerance for the democratic will, so they jetted to Congress, demanding passage of a 10-year ban on enforcing any state law regulating artificial intelligence. Shockingly, however the US Senate, normally a total corporate toady, rose up 99 to 1 to vote against the Silicon Valley potentates. Ninety-nine to one! So, the billionaires are now playing their trusty Trump card. Having greased the corrupt pay-to-play president with about a billion-dollars in campaign cash and personal deals, the AI profiteers got their payback this month. Quicker than you can say “quid pro quo,” Trump issued an executive order that – get this – orders himself to block our state governments from enforcing their own AI laws. This is Jim Hightower saying… And here’s an extra fun fact: Trump didn’t even have to write the special interest executive order himself. A Silicon Valley AI profiteer generously sent a draft for the president to sign, effectively awarding more power and wealth to the profiteer. And that’s how Big Money rigs the system against you and me. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Special Gifts for Special People]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Ho-Ho-Ho, wait till you hear about the gifts I’m giving to some of America’s power elites for Christmas.</p><p>To each of our Congress critters, I give my fondest wish that from now on they receive the exact same income, health care, and pensions that we average citizens get. If they receive only the American average, it might make them a bit more humble – and less cavalier about ignoring the needs of regular folks.</p><p>To the stockings of GOP leaders who’ve so eagerly debased themselves to serve the madness of Donald Trump, I’m adding individual spritzer bottles of fragrances like “Essence of Integrity” and “Eau de Self-respect” to help cover up their stench. And in the stockings of Democratic congressional leaders, I’m giving “Spice of Viagra” and “Bouquet du Grassroots” to stiffen their spines and remind them of who they represent.</p><p>For America’s CEO’s, my gift is a beautifully boxed, brand-new set of corporate ethics. It’s called the golden rule: “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” Going to pollute someone’s neighborhood? Then, you have to live there, too. Going to slash wages and benefits? Then, slash yours as well. Going to move your manufacturing to sweatshops in China? Then, put your office right inside the worst sweatshop. Executive life won’t be as luxurious, but CEO’s would glow with a new purity of spirit.</p><p>To the Wall Street hedge-fund hucksters who’ve conglomerated, plundered, and degraded hundreds of America’s newspapers, I’m sending copies of “Journalism for Dummies” and offered jobs for each of them in their stripped-down, Dickensian newsrooms. Good luck.</p><p>And what better gift to the Trump family – Donald, Ivanka and Jared, Eric, Donnie Jr., and the whole nest of them – than to wish that they live with each other constantly and permanently. No, really, each of you deserve it.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/special-gifts-for-special-people</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:181696539</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2582560" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/181696539/7f80a06d66179c9a893594f2a280a9e4.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>129</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/181696539/49dc8bfa145f7ba59ae606cee3b0e8f9.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Ho-Ho-Ho, wait till you hear about the gifts I’m giving to some of America’s power elites for Christmas. To each of our Congress critters, I give my fondest wish that from now on they receive the exact same income, health care, and pensions that we average citizens get. If they receive only the American average, it might make them a bit more humble – and less cavalier about ignoring the needs of regular folks. To the stockings of GOP leaders who’ve so eagerly debased themselves to serve the madness of Donald Trump, I’m adding individual spritzer bottles of fragrances like “Essence of Integrity” and “Eau de Self-respect” to help cover up their stench. And in the stockings of Democratic congressional leaders, I’m giving “Spice of Viagra” and “Bouquet du Grassroots” to stiffen their spines and remind them of who they represent. For America’s CEO’s, my gift is a beautifully boxed, brand-new set of corporate ethics. It’s called the golden rule: “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” Going to pollute someone’s neighborhood? Then, you have to live there, too. Going to slash wages and benefits? Then, slash yours as well. Going to move your manufacturing to sweatshops in China? Then, put your office right inside the worst sweatshop. Executive life won’t be as luxurious, but CEO’s would glow with a new purity of spirit. To the Wall Street hedge-fund hucksters who’ve conglomerated, plundered, and degraded hundreds of America’s newspapers, I’m sending copies of “Journalism for Dummies” and offered jobs for each of them in their stripped-down, Dickensian newsrooms. Good luck. And what better gift to the Trump family – Donald, Ivanka and Jared, Eric, Donnie Jr., and the whole nest of them – than to wish that they live with each other constantly and permanently. No, really, each of you deserve it. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Ho-Ho-Ho, wait till you hear about the gifts I’m giving to some of America’s power elites for Christmas. To each of our Congress critters, I give my fondest wish that from now on they receive the exact same income, health care, and pensions that we average citizens get. If they receive only the American average, it might make them a bit more humble – and less cavalier about ignoring the needs of regular folks. To the stockings of GOP leaders who’ve so eagerly debased themselves to serve the madness of Donald Trump, I’m adding individual spritzer bottles of fragrances like “Essence of Integrity” and “Eau de Self-respect” to help cover up their stench. And in the stockings of Democratic congressional leaders, I’m giving “Spice of Viagra” and “Bouquet du Grassroots” to stiffen their spines and remind them of who they represent. For America’s CEO’s, my gift is a beautifully boxed, brand-new set of corporate ethics. It’s called the golden rule: “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” Going to pollute someone’s neighborhood? Then, you have to live there, too. Going to slash wages and benefits? Then, slash yours as well. Going to move your manufacturing to sweatshops in China? Then, put your office right inside the worst sweatshop. Executive life won’t be as luxurious, but CEO’s would glow with a new purity of spirit. To the Wall Street hedge-fund hucksters who’ve conglomerated, plundered, and degraded hundreds of America’s newspapers, I’m sending copies of “Journalism for Dummies” and offered jobs for each of them in their stripped-down, Dickensian newsrooms. Good luck. And what better gift to the Trump family – Donald, Ivanka and Jared, Eric, Donnie Jr., and the whole nest of them – than to wish that they live with each other constantly and permanently. No, really, each of you deserve it. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[How New Mexico Got Child Care for All – And How You Can, Too]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, Christmas time! The joy of children’s laughter! A time for caring, sharing, and giving!</p><p>So, why not make this Christmas a time for giving something that most American children, families, and communities are now denied – and desperately need: a good child care system.</p><p>This is a basic element of civilization, yet the leaders of our fabulously-rich nation have not only failed to provide a world-class care system, but they’ve left the pre-school children of working-class families with a failed, expensive mishmash that is no system at all. These are the same so-called “leaders” who’re frantically spending trillions of dollars to create a new humanoid species powered by artificial intelligence – but they lack the common sense to invest a fraction of that on an early care network to nurture the human potential of America’s human infants and pre-school children.</p><p>The good news, however, is that we do not have to sit helplessly, wishing that Congress, Trump, or Santa Claus would deliver universal childcare to us. Rather We the People can give this gift to ourselves… and to our children’s future. For inspiration, look to New Mexico.</p><p>Twenty years ago, this very-low-income state ranked dead-last in child well-being. Finally, though, agitated parents, teachers, and children themselves became the agitators. Forging a fast-growing coalition called <a target="_blank" href="http://InvestInKidsNow.org">Invest in Kids Now</a>, they organized, protested, confronted and ran against the state’s moneyed establishment. With perseverance, their grassroots activism is now producing the change they want. <em>70 percent of voters</em> approved the coalition’s constitutional amendment requiring state funding for early childhood education. And last month, New Mexico became the first state in America to offer free childcare to every family.</p><p>For more on the work of the coalition, go to <a target="_blank" href="http://InvestInKidsNow.org">InvestInKidsNow.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/how-new-mexico-got-child-care-for</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:181695780</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/181695780/57a195dfaf31459e9e3b94dfc6246997.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/181695780/11f5e3ff576f42b27c3244e7d6f25e7e.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Ahh, Christmas time! The joy of children’s laughter! A time for caring, sharing, and giving! So, why not make this Christmas a time for giving something that most American children, families, and communities are now denied – and desperately need: a good child care system. This is a basic element of civilization, yet the leaders of our fabulously-rich nation have not only failed to provide a world-class care system, but they’ve left the pre-school children of working-class families with a failed, expensive mishmash that is no system at all. These are the same so-called “leaders” who’re frantically spending trillions of dollars to create a new humanoid species powered by artificial intelligence – but they lack the common sense to invest a fraction of that on an early care network to nurture the human potential of America’s human infants and pre-school children. The good news, however, is that we do not have to sit helplessly, wishing that Congress, Trump, or Santa Claus would deliver universal childcare to us. Rather We the People can give this gift to ourselves… and to our children’s future. For inspiration, look to New Mexico. Twenty years ago, this very-low-income state ranked dead-last in child well-being. Finally, though, agitated parents, teachers, and children themselves became the agitators. Forging a fast-growing coalition called Invest in Kids Now, they organized, protested, confronted and ran against the state’s moneyed establishment. With perseverance, their grassroots activism is now producing the change they want. 70 percent of voters approved the coalition’s constitutional amendment requiring state funding for early childhood education. And last month, New Mexico became the first state in America to offer free childcare to every family. For more on the work of the coalition, go to InvestInKidsNow.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Ahh, Christmas time! The joy of children’s laughter! A time for caring, sharing, and giving! So, why not make this Christmas a time for giving something that most American children, families, and communities are now denied – and desperately need: a good child care system. This is a basic element of civilization, yet the leaders of our fabulously-rich nation have not only failed to provide a world-class care system, but they’ve left the pre-school children of working-class families with a failed, expensive mishmash that is no system at all. These are the same so-called “leaders” who’re frantically spending trillions of dollars to create a new humanoid species powered by artificial intelligence – but they lack the common sense to invest a fraction of that on an early care network to nurture the human potential of America’s human infants and pre-school children. The good news, however, is that we do not have to sit helplessly, wishing that Congress, Trump, or Santa Claus would deliver universal childcare to us. Rather We the People can give this gift to ourselves… and to our children’s future. For inspiration, look to New Mexico. Twenty years ago, this very-low-income state ranked dead-last in child well-being. Finally, though, agitated parents, teachers, and children themselves became the agitators. Forging a fast-growing coalition called Invest in Kids Now, they organized, protested, confronted and ran against the state’s moneyed establishment. With perseverance, their grassroots activism is now producing the change they want. 70 percent of voters approved the coalition’s constitutional amendment requiring state funding for early childhood education. And last month, New Mexico became the first state in America to offer free childcare to every family. For more on the work of the coalition, go to InvestInKidsNow.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Instead of Monopolistic, Profiteering Corporations, Let’s Try Free Enterprise]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Having grown up in a small-business family, I’m a big proponent of free enterprise. But I detest corporatism.</p><p>The corporate powers try to co-opt the enterprise label, but in fact they are direct opposites and opponents. Indeed, the word “free” in free enterprise is not a benign adjective, but a fiery verb. It expresses the constant struggle by families like mine – Main Street businesses, farmers, artists, co-ops, and others – to <em>free-up</em> their enterprises from the monopoly control and raw political force of domineering financial elites.</p><p>That’s why I admire the spunk of <a target="_blank" href="https://azaleamarket.com/">Azalea Fresh Market</a> in Atlanta, Georgia. It’s a new supermarket offering high-quality fresh foods at affordable prices to the people in a poor, inner-city neighborhood. Until Azalea opened, a few sad convenience store bananas were the only “fresh” grocery items sold in the area. City officials kept trying to entice major corporate grocery chains to open a store to serve that community. But it was always “no.” Mayor Andre Dickens says: “That totally burned me up.” So, “Screw it,” he declared, “<a target="_blank" href="https://archive.is/MKeVG">We’re gonna do it ourselves.</a>”</p><p>And they have! Partnering with a small local chain of enterprising grocers, Atlanta’s public development fund financed Azalea, which is now providing good food at good prices for customers long disdained by corporatists.</p><p>Corporate ideologues mindlessly bark that the public should not be involved in business. Hogwash! When the corporate establishment fails to deliver such basic needs as healthy food, housing and health care, the public can – and must – step into the void. To learn more about the benefits and potential of <em>public</em> enterprises, go to Institute for Local Self-Reliance: <a target="_blank" href="http://ilsr.org">ilsr.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/instead-of-monopolistic-profiteering</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:181144038</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/181144038/1873c23fdd1c84e87a47fd79cffca223.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/181144038/bf4a3c9db95b9eb932240383622cdcb6.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Having grown up in a small-business family, I’m a big proponent of free enterprise. But I detest corporatism. The corporate powers try to co-opt the enterprise label, but in fact they are direct opposites and opponents. Indeed, the word “free” in free enterprise is not a benign adjective, but a fiery verb. It expresses the constant struggle by families like mine – Main Street businesses, farmers, artists, co-ops, and others – to free-up their enterprises from the monopoly control and raw political force of domineering financial elites. That’s why I admire the spunk of Azalea Fresh Market in Atlanta, Georgia. It’s a new supermarket offering high-quality fresh foods at affordable prices to the people in a poor, inner-city neighborhood. Until Azalea opened, a few sad convenience store bananas were the only “fresh” grocery items sold in the area. City officials kept trying to entice major corporate grocery chains to open a store to serve that community. But it was always “no.” Mayor Andre Dickens says: “That totally burned me up.” So, “Screw it,” he declared, “We’re gonna do it ourselves.” And they have! Partnering with a small local chain of enterprising grocers, Atlanta’s public development fund financed Azalea, which is now providing good food at good prices for customers long disdained by corporatists. Corporate ideologues mindlessly bark that the public should not be involved in business. Hogwash! When the corporate establishment fails to deliver such basic needs as healthy food, housing and health care, the public can – and must – step into the void. To learn more about the benefits and potential of public enterprises, go to Institute for Local Self-Reliance: ilsr.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Having grown up in a small-business family, I’m a big proponent of free enterprise. But I detest corporatism. The corporate powers try to co-opt the enterprise label, but in fact they are direct opposites and opponents. Indeed, the word “free” in free enterprise is not a benign adjective, but a fiery verb. It expresses the constant struggle by families like mine – Main Street businesses, farmers, artists, co-ops, and others – to free-up their enterprises from the monopoly control and raw political force of domineering financial elites. That’s why I admire the spunk of Azalea Fresh Market in Atlanta, Georgia. It’s a new supermarket offering high-quality fresh foods at affordable prices to the people in a poor, inner-city neighborhood. Until Azalea opened, a few sad convenience store bananas were the only “fresh” grocery items sold in the area. City officials kept trying to entice major corporate grocery chains to open a store to serve that community. But it was always “no.” Mayor Andre Dickens says: “That totally burned me up.” So, “Screw it,” he declared, “We’re gonna do it ourselves.” And they have! Partnering with a small local chain of enterprising grocers, Atlanta’s public development fund financed Azalea, which is now providing good food at good prices for customers long disdained by corporatists. Corporate ideologues mindlessly bark that the public should not be involved in business. Hogwash! When the corporate establishment fails to deliver such basic needs as healthy food, housing and health care, the public can – and must – step into the void. To learn more about the benefits and potential of public enterprises, go to Institute for Local Self-Reliance: ilsr.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Health Care by Kafka, Groucho, and Trump]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>What a mess.</p><p>I mean America’s corporatized, bureaucratic, profiteering medical system. It’s as though the Marx Brothers and Franz Kafka conspired to create it.</p><p>Yet, in the midst of that mess, there is one saving grace – namely the everyday workforce of dedicated nurses, therapists, hygienists, and other skilled, hands-on professionals who are the true heart of health <em>care</em>.</p><p>Astonishingly, though, when Trump & Co. bellowed this year that they intended to reform the medical system and slash costs, guess who they targeted for cuts? Certainly not the lavishly-paid CEOs and corporate price gougers who donate billions to Trump. Instead, they’re going after our frontline caregivers, the one segment of the system that prioritizes patient health over corporate profits.</p><p>Yet, channeling Kafka’s surrealism and Groucho’s slapstick, Trump and his GOP Congress are not only downgrading this vital workforce, but denigrating it. They’ve directed the US Education Department to <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nationalnursesunited.org/blog/what-is-all-the-buzz-about-nursing-no-longer-being-designated-as-a-professional-program">decree that nurses are no longer “professionals.”</a></p><p>One immediate impact is that many young people who want to pursue careers in patient care will no longer be eligible for the government’s student loans for advanced medical courses. This means that non-rich students will effectively be blocked from earning specialized degrees … and higher salaries. In the bigger picture, Trump’s insult to these essential medical professionals amounts to government-enforced plutocracy, mandating inequality, as well as inferior health care.</p><p>Moreover, <a target="_blank" href="https://19thnews.org/2021/05/women-health-care-leaving-breaking-point/">three-fourths of the health-provider jobs Trump wants to degrade are filled by women.</a> Apparently, it’s part of his increasing attempts to belittle and bully women. As one nurse says of his attack on her profession: “It’s just a smack in the face.” For information and action, go to <a target="_blank" href="http://NationalNursesUnited.org">NationalNursesUnited.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/health-care-by-kafka-groucho-and</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:181055598</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/181055598/4b385bc92fa215590fe933b2d25907ea.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/181055598/8b28a35e47f00ac3bb31b93e3e287433.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>What a mess. I mean America’s corporatized, bureaucratic, profiteering medical system. It’s as though the Marx Brothers and Franz Kafka conspired to create it. Yet, in the midst of that mess, there is one saving grace – namely the everyday workforce of dedicated nurses, therapists, hygienists, and other skilled, hands-on professionals who are the true heart of health care. Astonishingly, though, when Trump &amp; Co. bellowed this year that they intended to reform the medical system and slash costs, guess who they targeted for cuts? Certainly not the lavishly-paid CEOs and corporate price gougers who donate billions to Trump. Instead, they’re going after our frontline caregivers, the one segment of the system that prioritizes patient health over corporate profits. Yet, channeling Kafka’s surrealism and Groucho’s slapstick, Trump and his GOP Congress are not only downgrading this vital workforce, but denigrating it. They’ve directed the US Education Department to decree that nurses are no longer “professionals.” One immediate impact is that many young people who want to pursue careers in patient care will no longer be eligible for the government’s student loans for advanced medical courses. This means that non-rich students will effectively be blocked from earning specialized degrees … and higher salaries. In the bigger picture, Trump’s insult to these essential medical professionals amounts to government-enforced plutocracy, mandating inequality, as well as inferior health care. Moreover, three-fourths of the health-provider jobs Trump wants to degrade are filled by women. Apparently, it’s part of his increasing attempts to belittle and bully women. As one nurse says of his attack on her profession: “It’s just a smack in the face.” For information and action, go to NationalNursesUnited.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>What a mess. I mean America’s corporatized, bureaucratic, profiteering medical system. It’s as though the Marx Brothers and Franz Kafka conspired to create it. Yet, in the midst of that mess, there is one saving grace – namely the everyday workforce of dedicated nurses, therapists, hygienists, and other skilled, hands-on professionals who are the true heart of health care. Astonishingly, though, when Trump &amp; Co. bellowed this year that they intended to reform the medical system and slash costs, guess who they targeted for cuts? Certainly not the lavishly-paid CEOs and corporate price gougers who donate billions to Trump. Instead, they’re going after our frontline caregivers, the one segment of the system that prioritizes patient health over corporate profits. Yet, channeling Kafka’s surrealism and Groucho’s slapstick, Trump and his GOP Congress are not only downgrading this vital workforce, but denigrating it. They’ve directed the US Education Department to decree that nurses are no longer “professionals.” One immediate impact is that many young people who want to pursue careers in patient care will no longer be eligible for the government’s student loans for advanced medical courses. This means that non-rich students will effectively be blocked from earning specialized degrees … and higher salaries. In the bigger picture, Trump’s insult to these essential medical professionals amounts to government-enforced plutocracy, mandating inequality, as well as inferior health care. Moreover, three-fourths of the health-provider jobs Trump wants to degrade are filled by women. Apparently, it’s part of his increasing attempts to belittle and bully women. As one nurse says of his attack on her profession: “It’s just a smack in the face.” For information and action, go to NationalNursesUnited.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Big Oil’s Slick Attempt to Greenwash Its Massive Plastic Pollution]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Let’s all sing the holiday classic: “All I want for Christmas… Is Something Not Made of Plastic.”</p><p>Easier sung than done. Plastic is now ubiquitous in toys, electronics, tools, air, water… and us. And don’t forget the plastic Baby Jesus in Christmas tableaus.</p><p>What is plastic, anyway? It’s a toxic synthetic material mostly manufactured from petroleum by such giants as ExxonMobil, the globe’s top purveyor. So much is produced by these profiteers that plastic trash is now a planetary disaster.</p><p>But not to worry, for Big Oil’s lobbyists assure us gabillions of plastic bags, bottles, and such are being recycled, keeping them out of our landfills, water, bodies, etc. Swell! Except… they’re lying.</p><p>After all, Exxon is the same for-profit contaminator that lied for years that fossil fuels were not causing climate change, even though top executives knew they were. Their ethic of deceit continues today – Big Oil knows that<a target="_blank" href="https://www.beyondplastics.org/plastics-recycling-rates"> </a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.beyondplastics.org/plastics-recycling-rates"><em>94 percent</em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.beyondplastics.org/plastics-recycling-rates"> of US plastics are not recycled</a>. Indeed, they can’t be.</p><p>Faced with growing public alarm about the ever-growing glut of plastic pollution, the industry has doubled down on deceit by offering a snappy new PR slogan: “Advanced Recycling.” They say it’s a magical process dubbed “pyrolysis.” <a target="_blank" href="https://www.treehugger.com/nrdc-report-trashes-chemical-recycling-5221820">Only… it doesn’t work, it’s inordinately expensive, and it increases climate change emissions</a>. Still, Exxon exclaims its AR will soon be processing half a million tons of plastic waste! But that’s not even a drop in the plastic bucket, for more than <em>400 million tons</em> of plastic waste is discarded each year –and the oil industry is planning to double plastic production by 2040.</p><p>The only real way to stop runaway plastic pollution of us and our planet is to use less plastic. To learn more and help, go to Beyond Plastics: <a target="_blank" href="http://beyondplastics.org/">BeyondPlastics.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/big-oils-slick-attempt-to-greenwash-8e7</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:180527697</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 17:16:03 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2599801" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/180527697/80628890ec39cfbf8973a8b2031af519.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/180527697/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Let’s all sing the holiday classic: “All I want for Christmas… Is Something Not Made of Plastic.” Easier sung than done. Plastic is now ubiquitous in toys, electronics, tools, air, water… and us. And don’t forget the plastic Baby Jesus in Christmas tableaus. What is plastic, anyway? It’s a toxic synthetic material mostly manufactured from petroleum by such giants as ExxonMobil, the globe’s top purveyor. So much is produced by these profiteers that plastic trash is now a planetary disaster. But not to worry, for Big Oil’s lobbyists assure us gabillions of plastic bags, bottles, and such are being recycled, keeping them out of our landfills, water, bodies, etc. Swell! Except… they’re lying. After all, Exxon is the same for-profit contaminator that lied for years that fossil fuels were not causing climate change, even though top executives knew they were. Their ethic of deceit continues today – Big Oil knows that 94 percent of US plastics are not recycled. Indeed, they can’t be. Faced with growing public alarm about the ever-growing glut of plastic pollution, the industry has doubled down on deceit by offering a snappy new PR slogan: “Advanced Recycling.” They say it’s a magical process dubbed “pyrolysis.” Only… it doesn’t work, it’s inordinately expensive, and it increases climate change emissions. Still, Exxon exclaims its AR will soon be processing half a million tons of plastic waste! But that’s not even a drop in the plastic bucket, for more than 400 million tons of plastic waste is discarded each year –and the oil industry is planning to double plastic production by 2040. The only real way to stop runaway plastic pollution of us and our planet is to use less plastic. To learn more and help, go to Beyond Plastics: BeyondPlastics.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Let’s all sing the holiday classic: “All I want for Christmas… Is Something Not Made of Plastic.” Easier sung than done. Plastic is now ubiquitous in toys, electronics, tools, air, water… and us. And don’t forget the plastic Baby Jesus in Christmas tableaus. What is plastic, anyway? It’s a toxic synthetic material mostly manufactured from petroleum by such giants as ExxonMobil, the globe’s top purveyor. So much is produced by these profiteers that plastic trash is now a planetary disaster. But not to worry, for Big Oil’s lobbyists assure us gabillions of plastic bags, bottles, and such are being recycled, keeping them out of our landfills, water, bodies, etc. Swell! Except… they’re lying. After all, Exxon is the same for-profit contaminator that lied for years that fossil fuels were not causing climate change, even though top executives knew they were. Their ethic of deceit continues today – Big Oil knows that 94 percent of US plastics are not recycled. Indeed, they can’t be. Faced with growing public alarm about the ever-growing glut of plastic pollution, the industry has doubled down on deceit by offering a snappy new PR slogan: “Advanced Recycling.” They say it’s a magical process dubbed “pyrolysis.” Only… it doesn’t work, it’s inordinately expensive, and it increases climate change emissions. Still, Exxon exclaims its AR will soon be processing half a million tons of plastic waste! But that’s not even a drop in the plastic bucket, for more than 400 million tons of plastic waste is discarded each year –and the oil industry is planning to double plastic production by 2040. The only real way to stop runaway plastic pollution of us and our planet is to use less plastic. To learn more and help, go to Beyond Plastics: BeyondPlastics.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[AI Bots Aren’t Taking Our Jobs – Corporate Profiteers Are]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Look out – the corporate cat is out of the bag!</p><p>This particular “cat” is the fast-metastasizing software technology called “artificial intelligence.” A cadre of multibillion-dollar high-tech giants have surreptitiously been advancing AI for a couple of decades, literally creating a new, autonomous <em>species of thinking beings</em>. These are computer-powered humanoid bots, increasingly-able to do the intellectual, creative, managerial, and other complex jobs that millions of human beings now do.</p><p>The billionaire pushers of this brave new bot economy know that this amounts to placing a neutron bomb in the American workplace, so they have intentionally lied about its job-obliterating impact. However, after years of hush-hush development, the AI technology is now so advanced and the corporate investment in it is so gargantuan that the perpetrators no longer care what the public thinks.</p><p>This year, Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Oracle, and other Silicon Valley oligarchs have been feverishly dumping hundreds of billions of dollars each into a global corporate gold rush to supplant humans with AI bots in practically every economic sector. They expect to automate <a target="_blank" href="https://fortune.com/2025/05/28/anthropic-ceo-warning-ai-job-loss/">half of all entry-level white-collar jobs within five years.</a> And one Silicon Valley outfit (bluntly named “Mechanize”) calculates that its plan <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/11/technology/ai-mechanize-jobs.html">“to fully automate work” can be acheived within 30 years</a>. Indeed, BotWorld is now urging today’s AI technology to create super-intelligent systems that can out-think humans. Yes – bots themselves are working to produce more powerful bots to speed up AI’s bot takeover of work.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… If you think that, surely, this isn’t really happening, note that <a target="_blank" href="https://www.americanprogress.org/article/moratoriums-and-federal-preemption-of-state-artificial-intelligence-laws-pose-serious-risks/">Trump’s GOP Congress recently imposed a 10-year ban on any state laws attempting to regulate AI.</a> Just unleash the bots… and see what happens.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/ai-bots-arent-taking-our-jobs-corporate</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:180521238</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 17:27:48 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/180521238/3cd476e5b474e0ed5113327b926eac84.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/180521238/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Look out – the corporate cat is out of the bag! This particular “cat” is the fast-metastasizing software technology called “artificial intelligence.” A cadre of multibillion-dollar high-tech giants have surreptitiously been advancing AI for a couple of decades, literally creating a new, autonomous species of thinking beings. These are computer-powered humanoid bots, increasingly-able to do the intellectual, creative, managerial, and other complex jobs that millions of human beings now do. The billionaire pushers of this brave new bot economy know that this amounts to placing a neutron bomb in the American workplace, so they have intentionally lied about its job-obliterating impact. However, after years of hush-hush development, the AI technology is now so advanced and the corporate investment in it is so gargantuan that the perpetrators no longer care what the public thinks. This year, Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Oracle, and other Silicon Valley oligarchs have been feverishly dumping hundreds of billions of dollars each into a global corporate gold rush to supplant humans with AI bots in practically every economic sector. They expect to automate half of all entry-level white-collar jobs within five years. And one Silicon Valley outfit (bluntly named “Mechanize”) calculates that its plan “to fully automate work” can be acheived within 30 years. Indeed, BotWorld is now urging today’s AI technology to create super-intelligent systems that can out-think humans. Yes – bots themselves are working to produce more powerful bots to speed up AI’s bot takeover of work. This is Jim Hightower saying… If you think that, surely, this isn’t really happening, note that Trump’s GOP Congress recently imposed a 10-year ban on any state laws attempting to regulate AI. Just unleash the bots… and see what happens. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Look out – the corporate cat is out of the bag! This particular “cat” is the fast-metastasizing software technology called “artificial intelligence.” A cadre of multibillion-dollar high-tech giants have surreptitiously been advancing AI for a couple of decades, literally creating a new, autonomous species of thinking beings. These are computer-powered humanoid bots, increasingly-able to do the intellectual, creative, managerial, and other complex jobs that millions of human beings now do. The billionaire pushers of this brave new bot economy know that this amounts to placing a neutron bomb in the American workplace, so they have intentionally lied about its job-obliterating impact. However, after years of hush-hush development, the AI technology is now so advanced and the corporate investment in it is so gargantuan that the perpetrators no longer care what the public thinks. This year, Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Oracle, and other Silicon Valley oligarchs have been feverishly dumping hundreds of billions of dollars each into a global corporate gold rush to supplant humans with AI bots in practically every economic sector. They expect to automate half of all entry-level white-collar jobs within five years. And one Silicon Valley outfit (bluntly named “Mechanize”) calculates that its plan “to fully automate work” can be acheived within 30 years. Indeed, BotWorld is now urging today’s AI technology to create super-intelligent systems that can out-think humans. Yes – bots themselves are working to produce more powerful bots to speed up AI’s bot takeover of work. This is Jim Hightower saying… If you think that, surely, this isn’t really happening, note that Trump’s GOP Congress recently imposed a 10-year ban on any state laws attempting to regulate AI. Just unleash the bots… and see what happens. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Creating Our Own Thanksgiving Blessing]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>These days, with so much economic greed and political meanness in the news, it’s hard to lift your head up and notice the common goodness and community spirit that’s actually flourishing all around us.</p><p>So, this Thanksgiving season, why not shake off some of that debilitating negativity by focusing on the many, seemingly-small efforts by ordinary people who’re helping to make life just a little bit better… more connected… more joyful even! Consider, for example, a very neighborly phenomenon presently spreading across our country: “<a target="_blank" href="http://RepairCafe.org">Repair Cafes.</a>”</p><p><p>If you’re not already a paid subscriber, please consider upgrading to continue supporting my work. Sharing my commentaries also help a bunch!</p></p><p>The idea is simple and practical – rather than trashing that broken lamp, torn pair of jeans, wobbly chair, or blinking electronic device – repair them! Only, we’ve become a nation that doesn’t know how, and our corporate consumer economy – based on planned obsolescence – tells us to just throw it all away.</p><p>But that ignores a marvelous community asset: Grassroots talent. Every neighborhood and small town is blessed with many locals who’re “good with their hands.” So, in some 200 American communities, volunteer crews of these skilled repairers gather weekly or monthly, inviting us “under-skilled” folks to bring in practically any of our household “junk” to be fixed – for free – rather than sending it to the landfill.</p><p>There is one requirement though – we have to watch, listen, and participate in the repair, so we learn to trust our own hands… and maybe teach someone else later on. These repair cafes don’t merely provide a community service, they <em>create</em> community. Stuff gets fixed, but most importantly, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/21/climate/on-the-menu-in-new-york-one-repair-coming-right-up.html">as a café founder in East Harlem puts it</a>, as “mostly we just spend time together.”</p><p>Why not do that where you live? For guidance, go to <a target="_blank" href="http://RepairCafe.org">RepairCafe.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/creating-our-own-thanksgiving-blessing</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:179937529</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/179937529/d952ecec5ed48ca36179bacd592c0e58.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/179937529/efe6efb77396de2625c86c1f3201aaba.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>These days, with so much economic greed and political meanness in the news, it’s hard to lift your head up and notice the common goodness and community spirit that’s actually flourishing all around us. So, this Thanksgiving season, why not shake off some of that debilitating negativity by focusing on the many, seemingly-small efforts by ordinary people who’re helping to make life just a little bit better… more connected… more joyful even! Consider, for example, a very neighborly phenomenon presently spreading across our country: “Repair Cafes.” If you’re not already a paid subscriber, please consider upgrading to continue supporting my work. Sharing my commentaries also help a bunch! The idea is simple and practical – rather than trashing that broken lamp, torn pair of jeans, wobbly chair, or blinking electronic device – repair them! Only, we’ve become a nation that doesn’t know how, and our corporate consumer economy – based on planned obsolescence – tells us to just throw it all away. But that ignores a marvelous community asset: Grassroots talent. Every neighborhood and small town is blessed with many locals who’re “good with their hands.” So, in some 200 American communities, volunteer crews of these skilled repairers gather weekly or monthly, inviting us “under-skilled” folks to bring in practically any of our household “junk” to be fixed – for free – rather than sending it to the landfill. There is one requirement though – we have to watch, listen, and participate in the repair, so we learn to trust our own hands… and maybe teach someone else later on. These repair cafes don’t merely provide a community service, they create community. Stuff gets fixed, but most importantly, as a café founder in East Harlem puts it, as “mostly we just spend time together.” Why not do that where you live? For guidance, go to RepairCafe.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>These days, with so much economic greed and political meanness in the news, it’s hard to lift your head up and notice the common goodness and community spirit that’s actually flourishing all around us. So, this Thanksgiving season, why not shake off some of that debilitating negativity by focusing on the many, seemingly-small efforts by ordinary people who’re helping to make life just a little bit better… more connected… more joyful even! Consider, for example, a very neighborly phenomenon presently spreading across our country: “Repair Cafes.” If you’re not already a paid subscriber, please consider upgrading to continue supporting my work. Sharing my commentaries also help a bunch! The idea is simple and practical – rather than trashing that broken lamp, torn pair of jeans, wobbly chair, or blinking electronic device – repair them! Only, we’ve become a nation that doesn’t know how, and our corporate consumer economy – based on planned obsolescence – tells us to just throw it all away. But that ignores a marvelous community asset: Grassroots talent. Every neighborhood and small town is blessed with many locals who’re “good with their hands.” So, in some 200 American communities, volunteer crews of these skilled repairers gather weekly or monthly, inviting us “under-skilled” folks to bring in practically any of our household “junk” to be fixed – for free – rather than sending it to the landfill. There is one requirement though – we have to watch, listen, and participate in the repair, so we learn to trust our own hands… and maybe teach someone else later on. These repair cafes don’t merely provide a community service, they create community. Stuff gets fixed, but most importantly, as a café founder in East Harlem puts it, as “mostly we just spend time together.” Why not do that where you live? For guidance, go to RepairCafe.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Trump and Walmart Make a Hash of Thanksgiving Dinner]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Oh, thank goodness for Donald Trump!</p><p>As millions of families struggle with the ever-rising price of groceries, The Donald is bragging that his economic policies have miraculously lowered prices, just in time for Thanksgiving. As proof, he points to Walmart, America’s largest food marketer, boasting that it cut the price of its “complete Thanksgiving dinner package” by a <a target="_blank" href="https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2025/trump-walmart-thanksgiving-price-claim-fact-check/">whopping 25 percent from a year ago</a>! “That’s a tremendous number,” Trump exclaimed.</p><p><p>If you’re not already a paid subscriber, please consider upgrading to continue supporting my work. Sharing my commentaries also help a bunch!</p></p><p>But wait – before we swallow that whole,<a target="_blank" href="https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2025/trump-walmart-thanksgiving-price-claim-fact-check/"> let’s peek inside Walmart’s dinner package to see what’s in there… and what’s NOT.</a> Sure enough, using a trick called “shrinkflation,” the corporate giant has quietly removed basic Thanksgiving items that were in last year’s package, including cornbread mix, sweet potatoes, and pie. Then, it shrank the size of the servings of other items, such as cranberries and soup.</p><p>By shorting the food in each package, this year’s Walmart dinner actually costs <em>more</em> than last year’s. How tremendous is that?</p><p>Yet (like his wrecking ball demolition of the White House) Trump keeps trying to destroy the very idea of presidential honesty. He now rants that there is no affordability crisis in America. It’s “a complete CON JOB” by the media, he barks, consumer prices are “tumbling down”, we have “the greatest economy in history.” People should stop complaining and be grateful!</p><p>The problem for politicians who peddle such lies is that people’s everyday life experiences instantly reveal the huckster’s deception. Even for MAGA believers, it must be hard to give thanks for a president who demands praise for helping one of his profiteering backers scam millions of working-class families, who’re just trying to put food on their tables.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/trump-and-walmart-make-a-hash-of</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:179934155</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/179934155/d3f55e8de0f038f6272e37f616a92451.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/179934155/fac79d67149d4c17005f7a3417148c70.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Oh, thank goodness for Donald Trump! As millions of families struggle with the ever-rising price of groceries, The Donald is bragging that his economic policies have miraculously lowered prices, just in time for Thanksgiving. As proof, he points to Walmart, America’s largest food marketer, boasting that it cut the price of its “complete Thanksgiving dinner package” by a whopping 25 percent from a year ago! “That’s a tremendous number,” Trump exclaimed. If you’re not already a paid subscriber, please consider upgrading to continue supporting my work. Sharing my commentaries also help a bunch! But wait – before we swallow that whole, let’s peek inside Walmart’s dinner package to see what’s in there… and what’s NOT. Sure enough, using a trick called “shrinkflation,” the corporate giant has quietly removed basic Thanksgiving items that were in last year’s package, including cornbread mix, sweet potatoes, and pie. Then, it shrank the size of the servings of other items, such as cranberries and soup. By shorting the food in each package, this year’s Walmart dinner actually costs more than last year’s. How tremendous is that? Yet (like his wrecking ball demolition of the White House) Trump keeps trying to destroy the very idea of presidential honesty. He now rants that there is no affordability crisis in America. It’s “a complete CON JOB” by the media, he barks, consumer prices are “tumbling down”, we have “the greatest economy in history.” People should stop complaining and be grateful! The problem for politicians who peddle such lies is that people’s everyday life experiences instantly reveal the huckster’s deception. Even for MAGA believers, it must be hard to give thanks for a president who demands praise for helping one of his profiteering backers scam millions of working-class families, who’re just trying to put food on their tables. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Oh, thank goodness for Donald Trump! As millions of families struggle with the ever-rising price of groceries, The Donald is bragging that his economic policies have miraculously lowered prices, just in time for Thanksgiving. As proof, he points to Walmart, America’s largest food marketer, boasting that it cut the price of its “complete Thanksgiving dinner package” by a whopping 25 percent from a year ago! “That’s a tremendous number,” Trump exclaimed. If you’re not already a paid subscriber, please consider upgrading to continue supporting my work. Sharing my commentaries also help a bunch! But wait – before we swallow that whole, let’s peek inside Walmart’s dinner package to see what’s in there… and what’s NOT. Sure enough, using a trick called “shrinkflation,” the corporate giant has quietly removed basic Thanksgiving items that were in last year’s package, including cornbread mix, sweet potatoes, and pie. Then, it shrank the size of the servings of other items, such as cranberries and soup. By shorting the food in each package, this year’s Walmart dinner actually costs more than last year’s. How tremendous is that? Yet (like his wrecking ball demolition of the White House) Trump keeps trying to destroy the very idea of presidential honesty. He now rants that there is no affordability crisis in America. It’s “a complete CON JOB” by the media, he barks, consumer prices are “tumbling down”, we have “the greatest economy in history.” People should stop complaining and be grateful! The problem for politicians who peddle such lies is that people’s everyday life experiences instantly reveal the huckster’s deception. Even for MAGA believers, it must be hard to give thanks for a president who demands praise for helping one of his profiteering backers scam millions of working-class families, who’re just trying to put food on their tables. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Path to Winning in 2026… and Beyond]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>As one who ekes out a modest living running my mouth on radio and Substack, I hesitate to critique others who do the same – even though I might disagree entirely and emphatically with them.</p><p>But occasionally, I see influential purveyors of conventional wisdom tromping into my area of real-life experience, pushing some political nonsense that is not only wrong, but delusive. That’s when I intrude.</p><p>Like now, a whole posse of pundits is bellowing these days that Democrats have only one path forward to avoid perpetual defeat by MAGA Republicans: “Shift to the right!” For example, <em>New York Times </em>right-wing sermonizer <strong>Ross Douthat</strong>, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/01/opinion/democrats-tea-party-ideology.html">recently proclaimed</a> that the wisdom of Democrats “repositioning” their issues and message away from progressivism “ought to be plain to anyone with eyes.” To which I say: Bovine excrement.</p><p>What’s plain to most voters (and especially to fed-up nonvoters) is that cynical partisan shiftiness is what’s wrong with both parties, creating a plutocratic realpolitik run by and for avaricious moneyed powers. I’m no <em>New York Times </em>pontificator, but my ground-level experience in Texas tells me that what common people really want is not more precisely-calculated positioning, but an honest stand on “little-d” democratic principle. Say what you believe… and do it!</p><p>On the very day that the <em>Times</em> ran a Douthat column lecturing Democrats on how to “play politics,” <strong>Zohran Mamdani</strong> was elected mayor of New York City. He won by running an aggressively-progressive campaign against corporate elites, exciting the city’s widely-ignored working-class and poor voters. Instead of trying to manipulate the electorate, Mamdani expanded and inspired it. <em>That</em> is plainly the Democratic Party’s future.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-path-to-winning-in-2026-and-beyond</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:179128364</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/179128364/a9f2b967eaee6eebca12080aa2809f82.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/179128364/b25d5134b44d694b66b1840444d6141f.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>As one who ekes out a modest living running my mouth on radio and Substack, I hesitate to critique others who do the same – even though I might disagree entirely and emphatically with them. But occasionally, I see influential purveyors of conventional wisdom tromping into my area of real-life experience, pushing some political nonsense that is not only wrong, but delusive. That’s when I intrude. Like now, a whole posse of pundits is bellowing these days that Democrats have only one path forward to avoid perpetual defeat by MAGA Republicans: “Shift to the right!” For example, New York Times right-wing sermonizer Ross Douthat, recently proclaimed that the wisdom of Democrats “repositioning” their issues and message away from progressivism “ought to be plain to anyone with eyes.” To which I say: Bovine excrement. What’s plain to most voters (and especially to fed-up nonvoters) is that cynical partisan shiftiness is what’s wrong with both parties, creating a plutocratic realpolitik run by and for avaricious moneyed powers. I’m no New York Times pontificator, but my ground-level experience in Texas tells me that what common people really want is not more precisely-calculated positioning, but an honest stand on “little-d” democratic principle. Say what you believe… and do it! On the very day that the Times ran a Douthat column lecturing Democrats on how to “play politics,” Zohran Mamdani was elected mayor of New York City. He won by running an aggressively-progressive campaign against corporate elites, exciting the city’s widely-ignored working-class and poor voters. Instead of trying to manipulate the electorate, Mamdani expanded and inspired it. That is plainly the Democratic Party’s future. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>As one who ekes out a modest living running my mouth on radio and Substack, I hesitate to critique others who do the same – even though I might disagree entirely and emphatically with them. But occasionally, I see influential purveyors of conventional wisdom tromping into my area of real-life experience, pushing some political nonsense that is not only wrong, but delusive. That’s when I intrude. Like now, a whole posse of pundits is bellowing these days that Democrats have only one path forward to avoid perpetual defeat by MAGA Republicans: “Shift to the right!” For example, New York Times right-wing sermonizer Ross Douthat, recently proclaimed that the wisdom of Democrats “repositioning” their issues and message away from progressivism “ought to be plain to anyone with eyes.” To which I say: Bovine excrement. What’s plain to most voters (and especially to fed-up nonvoters) is that cynical partisan shiftiness is what’s wrong with both parties, creating a plutocratic realpolitik run by and for avaricious moneyed powers. I’m no New York Times pontificator, but my ground-level experience in Texas tells me that what common people really want is not more precisely-calculated positioning, but an honest stand on “little-d” democratic principle. Say what you believe… and do it! On the very day that the Times ran a Douthat column lecturing Democrats on how to “play politics,” Zohran Mamdani was elected mayor of New York City. He won by running an aggressively-progressive campaign against corporate elites, exciting the city’s widely-ignored working-class and poor voters. Instead of trying to manipulate the electorate, Mamdani expanded and inspired it. That is plainly the Democratic Party’s future. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Trump’s “Project 2025” Sings Woody Guthrie’s “Mean Talking Blues”]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Years ago, Woody Guthrie wrote “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1l38YDsq-4">Mean Talking Blues,</a>” a stinging satire of malicious right-wing officials who take perverse pleasure in demonizing, holding down, and punishing poor people:</p><p>“I’m a big disasterJust goin’ some place to happen</p><p>I’m an organized famineStudying how I can be a little bit meaner</p><p>I laugh my loudestWhen other people cry</p><p>I hate everybody don’t think like meI’m just mean.”</p><p>What a perfect theme song for Trump’s “Project 2025” – a MAGA crusade to stomp on millions of America’s poorest families, trying to deny them access to the most basic human needs.</p><p>Needs like… food. Brooke Rollins, Trump’s multi-millionaire agriculture secretary, made <a target="_blank" href="https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5577654-snap-benefits-usda-rollins-soros/">crude political jokes about poor people</a> during the GOP’s government shutdown, laughing as she schemed to cut off their food stamps. She was an “organized famine,” illegally maneuvering to deny food for 42 million hard-hit American citizens.</p><p>In addition, Project 2025 operatives want to yank health coverage from the poor – and just for meanness – they propose killing the modest program that helps impoverished families afford to have heat in their homes.</p><p>Meanwhile, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2025/nov/04/late-night-hosts-jon-stewart-stephen-colbert-jimmy-kimmel-seth-meyers">Trump poses as The Great Gatsby</a>, living in tacky opulence, while ignoring the economic mess and rank inequality created by his Roaring 20s plutocratic presidency. Indeed, the inequality is widening as he doles out hundreds of billions of our tax dollars in new giveaways to billionaires (including to his own sons).</p><p>Far from “Making America Great Again,” Trump’s most tangible achievement is to have had <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/31/us/politics/trump-lincoln-bathroom-white-house.html">the White House’s Lincoln bathroom remodeled</a>. And, in a royal touch, Trump even had a chandelier installed above the toilet. Imagine how proud Honest Abe would be.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/trumps-project-2025-sings-woody-guthries</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:179120691</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/179120691/cda70989bc5e19e43c74b90eb929a517.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/179120691/0ac2ced84b90d9695c21e0d1a33c6172.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Years ago, Woody Guthrie wrote “Mean Talking Blues,” a stinging satire of malicious right-wing officials who take perverse pleasure in demonizing, holding down, and punishing poor people: “I’m a big disasterJust goin’ some place to happen I’m an organized famineStudying how I can be a little bit meaner I laugh my loudestWhen other people cry I hate everybody don’t think like meI’m just mean.” What a perfect theme song for Trump’s “Project 2025” – a MAGA crusade to stomp on millions of America’s poorest families, trying to deny them access to the most basic human needs. Needs like… food. Brooke Rollins, Trump’s multi-millionaire agriculture secretary, made crude political jokes about poor people during the GOP’s government shutdown, laughing as she schemed to cut off their food stamps. She was an “organized famine,” illegally maneuvering to deny food for 42 million hard-hit American citizens. In addition, Project 2025 operatives want to yank health coverage from the poor – and just for meanness – they propose killing the modest program that helps impoverished families afford to have heat in their homes. Meanwhile, Trump poses as The Great Gatsby, living in tacky opulence, while ignoring the economic mess and rank inequality created by his Roaring 20s plutocratic presidency. Indeed, the inequality is widening as he doles out hundreds of billions of our tax dollars in new giveaways to billionaires (including to his own sons). Far from “Making America Great Again,” Trump’s most tangible achievement is to have had the White House’s Lincoln bathroom remodeled. And, in a royal touch, Trump even had a chandelier installed above the toilet. Imagine how proud Honest Abe would be. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Years ago, Woody Guthrie wrote “Mean Talking Blues,” a stinging satire of malicious right-wing officials who take perverse pleasure in demonizing, holding down, and punishing poor people: “I’m a big disasterJust goin’ some place to happen I’m an organized famineStudying how I can be a little bit meaner I laugh my loudestWhen other people cry I hate everybody don’t think like meI’m just mean.” What a perfect theme song for Trump’s “Project 2025” – a MAGA crusade to stomp on millions of America’s poorest families, trying to deny them access to the most basic human needs. Needs like… food. Brooke Rollins, Trump’s multi-millionaire agriculture secretary, made crude political jokes about poor people during the GOP’s government shutdown, laughing as she schemed to cut off their food stamps. She was an “organized famine,” illegally maneuvering to deny food for 42 million hard-hit American citizens. In addition, Project 2025 operatives want to yank health coverage from the poor – and just for meanness – they propose killing the modest program that helps impoverished families afford to have heat in their homes. Meanwhile, Trump poses as The Great Gatsby, living in tacky opulence, while ignoring the economic mess and rank inequality created by his Roaring 20s plutocratic presidency. Indeed, the inequality is widening as he doles out hundreds of billions of our tax dollars in new giveaways to billionaires (including to his own sons). Far from “Making America Great Again,” Trump’s most tangible achievement is to have had the White House’s Lincoln bathroom remodeled. And, in a royal touch, Trump even had a chandelier installed above the toilet. Imagine how proud Honest Abe would be. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Let’s Bust the Food Monopolists Profiteering on Thanksgiving]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Oh, happy day! Thanksgiving, I mean – our annual pause for family gatherings to celebrate the rich and tasty diversity of America’s harvests.</p><p>There is, however, something decidedly distasteful that has steadily been forcing its way onto our dinner tables: Raw monopoly power. This concentration of market control in the hands of a few domineering conglomerates is decimating farm families, swindling food industry workers, and gouging consumers. Economists have a technical term for what food industry profiteers are doing to us: The term is “stealing.”</p><p>Farmers know the evil of unrestrained monopolists all too well, for they are relentlessly squeezed by two sets of them. First, everything they must buy to produce food – from seed to tractors – is controlled by non-competitive giants that charge rip-off prices. Second, when selling their products, farmers and ranchers are boxed-in by corporate cartels that only offer take-it-or-leave-it, go-broke prices.</p><p>Then, this same anti-competitive system turns on us consumers, charging grossly-inflated grocery prices that give them monopoly profits and even more market power.</p><p>This Thanksgiving dinner is a good time to tally up <a target="_blank" href="https://www.agdaily.com/news/nfu-releases-2024-farmers-share-thanksgiving-food-dollar/">the ever-widening monopoly spread separating you from farmers</a>:</p><p>* A Butterball turkey costing you $2.42 a pound, pays the farmer 6 cents per pound.</p><p>* Potatoes costing $4 a bag returns only 55 cents to farmers.</p><p>* Wheat farmers only get 13 cents from a $4.50 loaf of whole wheat bread.</p><p>* Top sirloin steak cost $16.50 per pound, but ranchers get under $4.</p><p>* Even simple lettuce is $2 to you, but pays only 29 cents to farmers.</p><p>The very idea of Thanksgiving is that <em>We’re All In This Together</em>. So let’s get together and bust these greedheaded monopolies. For connections, go to Family Farm Action: <a target="_blank" href="http://farmaction.us">farmaction.us</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/lets-bust-the-food-monopolists-profiteering</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:178481717</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/178481717/47dad801b34895cc318268e68c2281b4.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/178481717/eae261acaa527e96d219d67acf78a869.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Oh, happy day! Thanksgiving, I mean – our annual pause for family gatherings to celebrate the rich and tasty diversity of America’s harvests. There is, however, something decidedly distasteful that has steadily been forcing its way onto our dinner tables: Raw monopoly power. This concentration of market control in the hands of a few domineering conglomerates is decimating farm families, swindling food industry workers, and gouging consumers. Economists have a technical term for what food industry profiteers are doing to us: The term is “stealing.” Farmers know the evil of unrestrained monopolists all too well, for they are relentlessly squeezed by two sets of them. First, everything they must buy to produce food – from seed to tractors – is controlled by non-competitive giants that charge rip-off prices. Second, when selling their products, farmers and ranchers are boxed-in by corporate cartels that only offer take-it-or-leave-it, go-broke prices. Then, this same anti-competitive system turns on us consumers, charging grossly-inflated grocery prices that give them monopoly profits and even more market power. This Thanksgiving dinner is a good time to tally up the ever-widening monopoly spread separating you from farmers: * A Butterball turkey costing you $2.42 a pound, pays the farmer 6 cents per pound. * Potatoes costing $4 a bag returns only 55 cents to farmers. * Wheat farmers only get 13 cents from a $4.50 loaf of whole wheat bread. * Top sirloin steak cost $16.50 per pound, but ranchers get under $4. * Even simple lettuce is $2 to you, but pays only 29 cents to farmers. The very idea of Thanksgiving is that We’re All In This Together. So let’s get together and bust these greedheaded monopolies. For connections, go to Family Farm Action: farmaction.us. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Oh, happy day! Thanksgiving, I mean – our annual pause for family gatherings to celebrate the rich and tasty diversity of America’s harvests. There is, however, something decidedly distasteful that has steadily been forcing its way onto our dinner tables: Raw monopoly power. This concentration of market control in the hands of a few domineering conglomerates is decimating farm families, swindling food industry workers, and gouging consumers. Economists have a technical term for what food industry profiteers are doing to us: The term is “stealing.” Farmers know the evil of unrestrained monopolists all too well, for they are relentlessly squeezed by two sets of them. First, everything they must buy to produce food – from seed to tractors – is controlled by non-competitive giants that charge rip-off prices. Second, when selling their products, farmers and ranchers are boxed-in by corporate cartels that only offer take-it-or-leave-it, go-broke prices. Then, this same anti-competitive system turns on us consumers, charging grossly-inflated grocery prices that give them monopoly profits and even more market power. This Thanksgiving dinner is a good time to tally up the ever-widening monopoly spread separating you from farmers: * A Butterball turkey costing you $2.42 a pound, pays the farmer 6 cents per pound. * Potatoes costing $4 a bag returns only 55 cents to farmers. * Wheat farmers only get 13 cents from a $4.50 loaf of whole wheat bread. * Top sirloin steak cost $16.50 per pound, but ranchers get under $4. * Even simple lettuce is $2 to you, but pays only 29 cents to farmers. The very idea of Thanksgiving is that We’re All In This Together. So let’s get together and bust these greedheaded monopolies. For connections, go to Family Farm Action: farmaction.us. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[How to Run a People’s Campaign and Win]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>An 1887 critic of Britain’s government rightly proclaimed that “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” For today’s American government, though, that adage needs a small but significant amendment: <em>Money </em>corrupts, and absolute money corrupts absolutely.”</p><p>Washington’s pay-to-play game has long been used by corporate powers to buy particular government favors, but now the money corruption “game” is so routine, so massive, and so flagrant that it has <em>become the government</em>. The likes of Big Oil, Elon Musk, Wall Street lords, and high-tech hucksters buy politicians in bulk, literally usurping the people’s authority to over public policy.</p><p>But what can we do about it, especially since Democratic Party officials also plays this plutocratic game? Well, <strong>Zohran Mamdani</strong> showed us one solution last week with his grassroots populist victory over New York’s Big Money establishment to become the city’s mayor.</p><p>He ran a true people’s campaign on progressive issues and values – which he was able to do because of a populist campaign funding option the city initiated years ago called small donor public financing. This alternative provides matching dollars from a public fund for candidates who rely on small donations from regular citizens, rather than begging for big bucks from billionaires.</p><p>In Mamdani’s case, his unabashed progressivism excited long-ignored working-class voters, who contributed a few dollars each. Then, the public match added up to $13 million – enough to get his message out and organize turnout. Though he was still outspent four to one, the small donor fund provided the margin he needed to be competitive in a big race.</p><p>So far, public financing options have been adopted in 17 jurisdictions, from Arizona to Maine, Seattle to Baltimore. Why not where you live? For guidance, go to <a target="_blank" href="https://www.commoncause.org/work/citizen-funded-elections/">CommonCause.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/how-to-run-a-peoples-campaign-and</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:178481170</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/178481170/830ad69aee336090cb01263d93ec9d1d.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/178481170/a170a4cfd41c5ec221383174a6def1bd.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>An 1887 critic of Britain’s government rightly proclaimed that “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” For today’s American government, though, that adage needs a small but significant amendment: Money corrupts, and absolute money corrupts absolutely.” Washington’s pay-to-play game has long been used by corporate powers to buy particular government favors, but now the money corruption “game” is so routine, so massive, and so flagrant that it has become the government. The likes of Big Oil, Elon Musk, Wall Street lords, and high-tech hucksters buy politicians in bulk, literally usurping the people’s authority to over public policy. But what can we do about it, especially since Democratic Party officials also plays this plutocratic game? Well, Zohran Mamdani showed us one solution last week with his grassroots populist victory over New York’s Big Money establishment to become the city’s mayor. He ran a true people’s campaign on progressive issues and values – which he was able to do because of a populist campaign funding option the city initiated years ago called small donor public financing. This alternative provides matching dollars from a public fund for candidates who rely on small donations from regular citizens, rather than begging for big bucks from billionaires. In Mamdani’s case, his unabashed progressivism excited long-ignored working-class voters, who contributed a few dollars each. Then, the public match added up to $13 million – enough to get his message out and organize turnout. Though he was still outspent four to one, the small donor fund provided the margin he needed to be competitive in a big race. So far, public financing options have been adopted in 17 jurisdictions, from Arizona to Maine, Seattle to Baltimore. Why not where you live? For guidance, go to CommonCause.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>An 1887 critic of Britain’s government rightly proclaimed that “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” For today’s American government, though, that adage needs a small but significant amendment: Money corrupts, and absolute money corrupts absolutely.” Washington’s pay-to-play game has long been used by corporate powers to buy particular government favors, but now the money corruption “game” is so routine, so massive, and so flagrant that it has become the government. The likes of Big Oil, Elon Musk, Wall Street lords, and high-tech hucksters buy politicians in bulk, literally usurping the people’s authority to over public policy. But what can we do about it, especially since Democratic Party officials also plays this plutocratic game? Well, Zohran Mamdani showed us one solution last week with his grassroots populist victory over New York’s Big Money establishment to become the city’s mayor. He ran a true people’s campaign on progressive issues and values – which he was able to do because of a populist campaign funding option the city initiated years ago called small donor public financing. This alternative provides matching dollars from a public fund for candidates who rely on small donations from regular citizens, rather than begging for big bucks from billionaires. In Mamdani’s case, his unabashed progressivism excited long-ignored working-class voters, who contributed a few dollars each. Then, the public match added up to $13 million – enough to get his message out and organize turnout. Though he was still outspent four to one, the small donor fund provided the margin he needed to be competitive in a big race. So far, public financing options have been adopted in 17 jurisdictions, from Arizona to Maine, Seattle to Baltimore. Why not where you live? For guidance, go to CommonCause.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Instead of Consumerism, Let’s Try Consumer Sharing]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>How about some <em>good</em> news for a change? News that has nothing to do with Donald Whatzizname. News you might even use.</p><p>It’s about “<a target="_blank" href="https://curtislibrary.com/library-of-things/">The Library of Things,</a>” a real library, but different. Just as our public libraries share a wealth of publications – this one in Brunswick, Maine, also maintains a wealth of tools, devices, equipment, and other “things” for people to check-out, use, and return.</p><p>Hazel Onsrud, a creative, can-do spirit on the staff of Brunswick’s Curtis Memorial Library, initiated this commonwealth of some 1,500 products that locals can borrow for free. The<em> </em><a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/20/climate/maine-library-of-things.html"><em>New York Times </em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/20/climate/maine-library-of-things.html">reports</a> that residents are flocking to this pragmatic, beneficial resource for the common good. And why wouldn’t they? After all, not everyone can afford a $350 KitchenAid mixer of their own, and a roto-tiller you might use once a year could be shared by many. Also, a bullhorn, a grain mill, a ukulele, an embossing machine – seriously, we should borrow, rather than thinking each of us must buy and store these things… or do without.</p><p>This concept reduces each family’s expenses, waste, and accumulation of “stuff,” while advancing cooperation and community. And the public library infrastructure is already in place to make it available.</p><p>This idea is not new, nor is it unique to Brunswick. In fact, <a target="_blank" href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-deep-lowdown-issue-1-what-is">America’s progressive populist movement of the 1870s</a> built an entire economic alternative to corporate monopoly around this very concept. And today, some 2,000 “libraries-of-things” are already functioning worldwide, giving ordinary people a grassroots way to avoid profiteering, corporate consumerism.</p><p>Hazel Onsrud has issued a challenge to us: “If a few of us can do this in Maine,” she says “anyone can.” And you and I are the anyones to do it.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/instead-of-consumerism-lets-try-consumer</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:178083254</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/178083254/37a921c998e5b23c8aa01826cadbda21.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/178083254/aaac15a08bff32cc728c20c9b764cc9e.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>How about some good news for a change? News that has nothing to do with Donald Whatzizname. News you might even use. It’s about “The Library of Things,” a real library, but different. Just as our public libraries share a wealth of publications – this one in Brunswick, Maine, also maintains a wealth of tools, devices, equipment, and other “things” for people to check-out, use, and return. Hazel Onsrud, a creative, can-do spirit on the staff of Brunswick’s Curtis Memorial Library, initiated this commonwealth of some 1,500 products that locals can borrow for free. The New York Times reports that residents are flocking to this pragmatic, beneficial resource for the common good. And why wouldn’t they? After all, not everyone can afford a $350 KitchenAid mixer of their own, and a roto-tiller you might use once a year could be shared by many. Also, a bullhorn, a grain mill, a ukulele, an embossing machine – seriously, we should borrow, rather than thinking each of us must buy and store these things… or do without. This concept reduces each family’s expenses, waste, and accumulation of “stuff,” while advancing cooperation and community. And the public library infrastructure is already in place to make it available. This idea is not new, nor is it unique to Brunswick. In fact, America’s progressive populist movement of the 1870s built an entire economic alternative to corporate monopoly around this very concept. And today, some 2,000 “libraries-of-things” are already functioning worldwide, giving ordinary people a grassroots way to avoid profiteering, corporate consumerism. Hazel Onsrud has issued a challenge to us: “If a few of us can do this in Maine,” she says “anyone can.” And you and I are the anyones to do it. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>How about some good news for a change? News that has nothing to do with Donald Whatzizname. News you might even use. It’s about “The Library of Things,” a real library, but different. Just as our public libraries share a wealth of publications – this one in Brunswick, Maine, also maintains a wealth of tools, devices, equipment, and other “things” for people to check-out, use, and return. Hazel Onsrud, a creative, can-do spirit on the staff of Brunswick’s Curtis Memorial Library, initiated this commonwealth of some 1,500 products that locals can borrow for free. The New York Times reports that residents are flocking to this pragmatic, beneficial resource for the common good. And why wouldn’t they? After all, not everyone can afford a $350 KitchenAid mixer of their own, and a roto-tiller you might use once a year could be shared by many. Also, a bullhorn, a grain mill, a ukulele, an embossing machine – seriously, we should borrow, rather than thinking each of us must buy and store these things… or do without. This concept reduces each family’s expenses, waste, and accumulation of “stuff,” while advancing cooperation and community. And the public library infrastructure is already in place to make it available. This idea is not new, nor is it unique to Brunswick. In fact, America’s progressive populist movement of the 1870s built an entire economic alternative to corporate monopoly around this very concept. And today, some 2,000 “libraries-of-things” are already functioning worldwide, giving ordinary people a grassroots way to avoid profiteering, corporate consumerism. Hazel Onsrud has issued a challenge to us: “If a few of us can do this in Maine,” she says “anyone can.” And you and I are the anyones to do it. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[A Biblical-Level Warning from a High School Student]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>An essential part of our children’s education is learning proper moral behavior. And who better to deliver that ethical guidance than politicians?</p><p>Huh? Bizarre, yet this is the conclusion of the GOP’s theocratic Christian Nationalist faction. They are demanding that legislatures across the country must intervene in local educational policy to <em>require</em> that all public schools plaster every classroom with Christianity’s Ten Commandments. It’s in-your-face religiosity, forcing one religious dogma on students of every faith. It’s also ludicrously hypocritical – after all, legislators are notorious for <em>committing</em> <em>adultery</em>, <em>stealing</em> from the poor,<em> killing </em>in the name of the state, <em>bearing false witness</em> against immigrants, <em>bowing down</em> to false gods… and otherwise mocking the Christian religion’s own commandments. Who do these nationalists and their politicians think they’re fooling?</p><p>Certainly not America’s free-thinking students. If you wonder whether young people will just go along, take heart in the uplifting thoughts of <a target="_blank" href="https://www.arjunsharda.com/">Arjun Sharda</a>, a high-school freshman in Round Rock, Texas. In a recent op-ed piece, he went right at the humbuggery of the state’s Republican leaders: “The same lawmakers who preach about freedom and limited government,” <a target="_blank" href="https://www.statesman.com/opinion/columns/your-voice/article/opinion-don-t-want-ten-commandments-texas-21112290.php">he wrote,</a> “are now legislating what we must hang on our classroom walls... But faith loses its power when it’s forced. True belief comes from conviction, not compulsion… Texas prides itself in independence, yet this law enforces conformity.”</p><p>The Christian Nationalist autocrats are not only trying to turn public classrooms into their exclusive pulpits, but to establish their repressive theology as America’s official religion. As <a target="_blank" href="https://www.statesman.com/opinion/columns/your-voice/article/opinion-don-t-want-ten-commandments-texas-21112290.php">Sharda warns</a>, “Texas should stop confusing religion with righteousness – before the wall between church and state becomes just another thing we’ve torn down.”</p><p>Do something!</p><p>To work on the fight to keep church and state actually separate, check out the Freedom from Religion Foundation at <a target="_blank" href="http://ffrf.org">ffrf.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/a-biblical-level-warning-from-a-high</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:178081167</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/178081167/39948510d52bdd6c2321e23a0f46232b.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/178081167/bba59f401ffc914297479446457bc716.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>An essential part of our children’s education is learning proper moral behavior. And who better to deliver that ethical guidance than politicians? Huh? Bizarre, yet this is the conclusion of the GOP’s theocratic Christian Nationalist faction. They are demanding that legislatures across the country must intervene in local educational policy to require that all public schools plaster every classroom with Christianity’s Ten Commandments. It’s in-your-face religiosity, forcing one religious dogma on students of every faith. It’s also ludicrously hypocritical – after all, legislators are notorious for committing adultery, stealing from the poor, killing in the name of the state, bearing false witness against immigrants, bowing down to false gods… and otherwise mocking the Christian religion’s own commandments. Who do these nationalists and their politicians think they’re fooling? Certainly not America’s free-thinking students. If you wonder whether young people will just go along, take heart in the uplifting thoughts of Arjun Sharda, a high-school freshman in Round Rock, Texas. In a recent op-ed piece, he went right at the humbuggery of the state’s Republican leaders: “The same lawmakers who preach about freedom and limited government,” he wrote, “are now legislating what we must hang on our classroom walls... But faith loses its power when it’s forced. True belief comes from conviction, not compulsion… Texas prides itself in independence, yet this law enforces conformity.” The Christian Nationalist autocrats are not only trying to turn public classrooms into their exclusive pulpits, but to establish their repressive theology as America’s official religion. As Sharda warns, “Texas should stop confusing religion with righteousness – before the wall between church and state becomes just another thing we’ve torn down.” Do something! To work on the fight to keep church and state actually separate, check out the Freedom from Religion Foundation at ffrf.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>An essential part of our children’s education is learning proper moral behavior. And who better to deliver that ethical guidance than politicians? Huh? Bizarre, yet this is the conclusion of the GOP’s theocratic Christian Nationalist faction. They are demanding that legislatures across the country must intervene in local educational policy to require that all public schools plaster every classroom with Christianity’s Ten Commandments. It’s in-your-face religiosity, forcing one religious dogma on students of every faith. It’s also ludicrously hypocritical – after all, legislators are notorious for committing adultery, stealing from the poor, killing in the name of the state, bearing false witness against immigrants, bowing down to false gods… and otherwise mocking the Christian religion’s own commandments. Who do these nationalists and their politicians think they’re fooling? Certainly not America’s free-thinking students. If you wonder whether young people will just go along, take heart in the uplifting thoughts of Arjun Sharda, a high-school freshman in Round Rock, Texas. In a recent op-ed piece, he went right at the humbuggery of the state’s Republican leaders: “The same lawmakers who preach about freedom and limited government,” he wrote, “are now legislating what we must hang on our classroom walls... But faith loses its power when it’s forced. True belief comes from conviction, not compulsion… Texas prides itself in independence, yet this law enforces conformity.” The Christian Nationalist autocrats are not only trying to turn public classrooms into their exclusive pulpits, but to establish their repressive theology as America’s official religion. As Sharda warns, “Texas should stop confusing religion with righteousness – before the wall between church and state becomes just another thing we’ve torn down.” Do something! To work on the fight to keep church and state actually separate, check out the Freedom from Religion Foundation at ffrf.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Uniting the United People of the United States of America]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>A headline on a recent news article caught my eye, for it declared, “Americans Disagree on Everything.”</p><p>I said to myself: “I disagree with that!”</p><p>Indeed, the untold story of today’s America is the good news that We the People fundamentally agree on more than what supposedly separates us. It is true that our daily media feed does relentlessly push political negativity and discord, and it’s true that hyper-partisan politicians grab attention by hammering their narrow views into swords of hatred. But that’s <em>them</em>, not the greater <em>us</em>.</p><p>Even hot-button issues which dominate the Internet and talk-shows are actually not all that divisive for the majority of us. For example, <a target="_blank" href="https://thehill.com/changing-america/enrichment/education/564333-majority-of-americans-want-history-of-racism-slavery/">nearly 90 percent of Americans</a> (including two-thirds of Republicans) oppose the right-wing attempt to whitewash our nation’s history by restricting teachers, museums etc. from addressing such realities as slavery.</p><p>More significantly, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2025/02/20/americans-continue-to-view-several-economic-issues-as-top-national-problems/pp_2025-2-20_national-problems_00-02/">consider the real needs of ordinary workaday families</a>. Basics like living wages, protecting Social Security, busting-up monopolies, cleaning up pollution, providing affordable housing, funding our parks and libraries, stopping price gouging. Overwhelmingly, Americans in red, blue, and purple areas agree on what government ought to be doing – and disagrees with what it is doing. But the plutocratic moneyed elites that now fund and perpetuate Americas corrupt and dysfunctional government profit by promoting hatreds to pit us against each other, praying that all of us don’t focus on them.</p><p>Don’t succumb to their self-serving lies, but seek ways to unite in what we Americans do agree on – specifically our historic commitment to the democratic values of economic fairness, social justice, and equal treatment for all. Anything less is BS.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/uniting-the-united-people-of-the</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:177389576</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/177389576/a6e359b1a8ef75594441651ad351824e.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/177389576/c5160d0d920ed27dd907fb3936a3e5ff.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>A headline on a recent news article caught my eye, for it declared, “Americans Disagree on Everything.” I said to myself: “I disagree with that!” Indeed, the untold story of today’s America is the good news that We the People fundamentally agree on more than what supposedly separates us. It is true that our daily media feed does relentlessly push political negativity and discord, and it’s true that hyper-partisan politicians grab attention by hammering their narrow views into swords of hatred. But that’s them, not the greater us. Even hot-button issues which dominate the Internet and talk-shows are actually not all that divisive for the majority of us. For example, nearly 90 percent of Americans (including two-thirds of Republicans) oppose the right-wing attempt to whitewash our nation’s history by restricting teachers, museums etc. from addressing such realities as slavery. More significantly, consider the real needs of ordinary workaday families. Basics like living wages, protecting Social Security, busting-up monopolies, cleaning up pollution, providing affordable housing, funding our parks and libraries, stopping price gouging. Overwhelmingly, Americans in red, blue, and purple areas agree on what government ought to be doing – and disagrees with what it is doing. But the plutocratic moneyed elites that now fund and perpetuate Americas corrupt and dysfunctional government profit by promoting hatreds to pit us against each other, praying that all of us don’t focus on them. Don’t succumb to their self-serving lies, but seek ways to unite in what we Americans do agree on – specifically our historic commitment to the democratic values of economic fairness, social justice, and equal treatment for all. Anything less is BS. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>A headline on a recent news article caught my eye, for it declared, “Americans Disagree on Everything.” I said to myself: “I disagree with that!” Indeed, the untold story of today’s America is the good news that We the People fundamentally agree on more than what supposedly separates us. It is true that our daily media feed does relentlessly push political negativity and discord, and it’s true that hyper-partisan politicians grab attention by hammering their narrow views into swords of hatred. But that’s them, not the greater us. Even hot-button issues which dominate the Internet and talk-shows are actually not all that divisive for the majority of us. For example, nearly 90 percent of Americans (including two-thirds of Republicans) oppose the right-wing attempt to whitewash our nation’s history by restricting teachers, museums etc. from addressing such realities as slavery. More significantly, consider the real needs of ordinary workaday families. Basics like living wages, protecting Social Security, busting-up monopolies, cleaning up pollution, providing affordable housing, funding our parks and libraries, stopping price gouging. Overwhelmingly, Americans in red, blue, and purple areas agree on what government ought to be doing – and disagrees with what it is doing. But the plutocratic moneyed elites that now fund and perpetuate Americas corrupt and dysfunctional government profit by promoting hatreds to pit us against each other, praying that all of us don’t focus on them. Don’t succumb to their self-serving lies, but seek ways to unite in what we Americans do agree on – specifically our historic commitment to the democratic values of economic fairness, social justice, and equal treatment for all. Anything less is BS. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Another Hellacious Idea from the Texas Laboratory of Bad Government]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Texas: What the Hell?</strong> The Lone Star State’s government, a wholly-owned corporate subsidiary, solidified its ranking this year as America’s #1 innovator of <em>really bad</em> public policies.</p><p>Branching out from their usual corrupt collusion with Big Oil, industrial polluters, and other profiteering hucksters, the governor and top lawmakers came up with a whole new batch of legalized slick-um, specifically to protect and profit a new Texas stock market for big money dealers. Who needs it? After all, beaucoup markets already exist for speculators and such. Yes – but those markets are at least loosely <em>regulated</em> to protect investors – plus, some states want to tax stock-trading profits.</p><p>So here come Texas politicos, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.texastribune.org/2025/10/06/texas-stock-exchange-dallas-txse-sec-approval/">pushing a cutely-named “Y’all Street” stock exchange, promising that it’ll be “speculator friendly.”</a> Friendly means limp regulation, little public disclosure of schemes, and hostility to taxation.</p><p>For example, to spare rich stock profiteers from paying their share of taxes (like working stiffs do), Republican leaders have graciously acted to prevent state taxation on the massive profits speculators get from selling stocks, bonds, real estate, etc. And, to prove their undying plutocratic love for the rich, lawmakers plan to engrave this special tax break in the Texas Constitution, effectively closing off rich people’s ill-gotten gains as a source of revenue for the state’s future needs.</p><p>This Lone Star stock market is a cynical big-government scam to further enrich the privileged few hoping to shift the cost of basic public services away from those most able to pay onto the backs of workaday families. If you wonder how inequality happens, study the Texas example. And hurry – the right-wing intends to bring it to your state next.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/another-hellacious-idea-from-the</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:177285233</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/177285233/ad43e3564e96f664d34843f0750a6184.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/177285233/2d58a2e0afc79a5e87a889ca3b3cb4cb.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Texas: What the Hell? The Lone Star State’s government, a wholly-owned corporate subsidiary, solidified its ranking this year as America’s #1 innovator of really bad public policies. Branching out from their usual corrupt collusion with Big Oil, industrial polluters, and other profiteering hucksters, the governor and top lawmakers came up with a whole new batch of legalized slick-um, specifically to protect and profit a new Texas stock market for big money dealers. Who needs it? After all, beaucoup markets already exist for speculators and such. Yes – but those markets are at least loosely regulated to protect investors – plus, some states want to tax stock-trading profits. So here come Texas politicos, pushing a cutely-named “Y’all Street” stock exchange, promising that it’ll be “speculator friendly.” Friendly means limp regulation, little public disclosure of schemes, and hostility to taxation. For example, to spare rich stock profiteers from paying their share of taxes (like working stiffs do), Republican leaders have graciously acted to prevent state taxation on the massive profits speculators get from selling stocks, bonds, real estate, etc. And, to prove their undying plutocratic love for the rich, lawmakers plan to engrave this special tax break in the Texas Constitution, effectively closing off rich people’s ill-gotten gains as a source of revenue for the state’s future needs. This Lone Star stock market is a cynical big-government scam to further enrich the privileged few hoping to shift the cost of basic public services away from those most able to pay onto the backs of workaday families. If you wonder how inequality happens, study the Texas example. And hurry – the right-wing intends to bring it to your state next. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Texas: What the Hell? The Lone Star State’s government, a wholly-owned corporate subsidiary, solidified its ranking this year as America’s #1 innovator of really bad public policies. Branching out from their usual corrupt collusion with Big Oil, industrial polluters, and other profiteering hucksters, the governor and top lawmakers came up with a whole new batch of legalized slick-um, specifically to protect and profit a new Texas stock market for big money dealers. Who needs it? After all, beaucoup markets already exist for speculators and such. Yes – but those markets are at least loosely regulated to protect investors – plus, some states want to tax stock-trading profits. So here come Texas politicos, pushing a cutely-named “Y’all Street” stock exchange, promising that it’ll be “speculator friendly.” Friendly means limp regulation, little public disclosure of schemes, and hostility to taxation. For example, to spare rich stock profiteers from paying their share of taxes (like working stiffs do), Republican leaders have graciously acted to prevent state taxation on the massive profits speculators get from selling stocks, bonds, real estate, etc. And, to prove their undying plutocratic love for the rich, lawmakers plan to engrave this special tax break in the Texas Constitution, effectively closing off rich people’s ill-gotten gains as a source of revenue for the state’s future needs. This Lone Star stock market is a cynical big-government scam to further enrich the privileged few hoping to shift the cost of basic public services away from those most able to pay onto the backs of workaday families. If you wonder how inequality happens, study the Texas example. And hurry – the right-wing intends to bring it to your state next. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[What Separates the Merely-Rich from the Filthy Rich?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Roaring 20s novelist, F. Scott Fitzgerald wrote: “Let me tell you about the very rich. They are different from you and me.”</p><p>Well, yes… they’re rich!</p><p>But maybe you’re doing pretty well these days, counting yourself among the rich. That’s charming, but let’s check the latest wealth indicator: Do you have a “private concierge?” You might live in a megahouse, have a maid and a nanny, travel First Class – but <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/04/business/dealbook/your-wealthiest-friend-has-a-private-concierge.html">having a private concierge</a> is what separates you commonplace millionaires from the filthy rich.</p><p>What do these personal servants actually do? “We fix problems,” says one owner of a boutique firm that offers “hyper-personalization” services to select clients worldwide. Want to get a table tonight at a fully-booked restaurant in Paris? Don’t call the restaurant – call your fixer,   gets it done. If you’re going to a formal ceremony in Hong Kong but – OMG you left your tuxedo back home in Oshkosh. Your concierge will find a courier to deliver it on time.</p><p>In addition to dealing with such upper-class urgencies, these “lifestyle managers” also relieve the überrich of having to cope with everyday details of real life. No need to call a plumber, plan a birthday party, shop for basics, and such – that’s why you pay about $75,000 a year to have your own handler. They’ve become such a must-have emblem of luxury that even Chase Bank and American Express now offer concierges to their high-end clients.</p><p>What’s at work here is a decadent ethic of royal entitlement. It’s a grandiose (and socially-destructive) assumption of superiority by the filthy rich – who misinterpret their wealth as worthiness. Oh, and <a target="_blank" href="https://www.cbpp.org/research/federal-tax/by-the-numbers-house-republican-tax-agenda-favors-the-wealthy-and-leaves">we common taxpayers get to subsidize</a> these personal concierges.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/what-separates-the-merely-rich-from</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:176837391</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/176837391/b9270d4deef16bd605ddc04332d852c5.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/176837391/24868a2eba0cbd04ce9101edc0247a7d.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Roaring 20s novelist, F. Scott Fitzgerald wrote: “Let me tell you about the very rich. They are different from you and me.” Well, yes… they’re rich! But maybe you’re doing pretty well these days, counting yourself among the rich. That’s charming, but let’s check the latest wealth indicator: Do you have a “private concierge?” You might live in a megahouse, have a maid and a nanny, travel First Class – but having a private concierge is what separates you commonplace millionaires from the filthy rich. What do these personal servants actually do? “We fix problems,” says one owner of a boutique firm that offers “hyper-personalization” services to select clients worldwide. Want to get a table tonight at a fully-booked restaurant in Paris? Don’t call the restaurant – call your fixer, gets it done. If you’re going to a formal ceremony in Hong Kong but – OMG you left your tuxedo back home in Oshkosh. Your concierge will find a courier to deliver it on time. In addition to dealing with such upper-class urgencies, these “lifestyle managers” also relieve the überrich of having to cope with everyday details of real life. No need to call a plumber, plan a birthday party, shop for basics, and such – that’s why you pay about $75,000 a year to have your own handler. They’ve become such a must-have emblem of luxury that even Chase Bank and American Express now offer concierges to their high-end clients. What’s at work here is a decadent ethic of royal entitlement. It’s a grandiose (and socially-destructive) assumption of superiority by the filthy rich – who misinterpret their wealth as worthiness. Oh, and we common taxpayers get to subsidize these personal concierges. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Roaring 20s novelist, F. Scott Fitzgerald wrote: “Let me tell you about the very rich. They are different from you and me.” Well, yes… they’re rich! But maybe you’re doing pretty well these days, counting yourself among the rich. That’s charming, but let’s check the latest wealth indicator: Do you have a “private concierge?” You might live in a megahouse, have a maid and a nanny, travel First Class – but having a private concierge is what separates you commonplace millionaires from the filthy rich. What do these personal servants actually do? “We fix problems,” says one owner of a boutique firm that offers “hyper-personalization” services to select clients worldwide. Want to get a table tonight at a fully-booked restaurant in Paris? Don’t call the restaurant – call your fixer, gets it done. If you’re going to a formal ceremony in Hong Kong but – OMG you left your tuxedo back home in Oshkosh. Your concierge will find a courier to deliver it on time. In addition to dealing with such upper-class urgencies, these “lifestyle managers” also relieve the überrich of having to cope with everyday details of real life. No need to call a plumber, plan a birthday party, shop for basics, and such – that’s why you pay about $75,000 a year to have your own handler. They’ve become such a must-have emblem of luxury that even Chase Bank and American Express now offer concierges to their high-end clients. What’s at work here is a decadent ethic of royal entitlement. It’s a grandiose (and socially-destructive) assumption of superiority by the filthy rich – who misinterpret their wealth as worthiness. Oh, and we common taxpayers get to subsidize these personal concierges. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[What If the Democrats Started to Support Democrats Again?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>When will top Democratic party officials recognize that today’s electorate is not made up of moderate centrists?</p><p>Rather, most Americans are anti-establishment rebels who’ve been knocked down, kicked out, and told that they don’t matter. <strong>Indeed, our country’s true political spectrum doesn’t run right to left, but </strong><strong><em>top to bottom</em></strong><strong>.</strong> Right-wing/left-wing is ideology. Top to bottom is life. And most people know that they’re no longer in shouting distance of the moneyed elites at the top.</p><p>This cries out for a “little-d” democratic party that goes right at the billionaires, autocrats, and kleptocrats. Instead, we get <strong>Chuck Schumer</strong>. This Senate Democratic leader’s idea of battling right-wing extremism is to say, “I sent a letter” in protest.</p><p>Worse, the corporatized hierarchy controlling the once-proud Party of the People reserve their aggressiveness for – guess what? – battling progressive Democratic activists and candidates! Yes, they keep blocking true Democrats who can win, nominating corporate-branded centrists instead – then wondering why voter turnout plummets and an angry electorate reaches for the Trump Hammer.</p><p>They are trying to do it to us again right now in Maine, where a plain-spoken, working-class progressive is poised to defeat a Trump Republican for a U.S. Senate seat. <strong>Graham Platner</strong>, a maverick, 41-year-old combat veteran and oyster farmer is drawing huge crowds, enthusiasm, volunteers, money… and grassroots hope. He’s a winner – exactly what Democrats need to become relevant again.</p><p>Yet, rather than embracing the grassroots enthusiasm to win the senate seat, Schumer is raising corporate cash to defeat Planter! The party’s leader is its own worst enemy. To learn more, go to: <a target="_blank" href="http://GrahamForSenate.com">GrahamForSenate.com</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/what-if-the-democrats-started-to</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:176663588</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/176663588/6231ea3792fb913403f911da32d10753.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/176663588/e2ac139268ae2be95d59478b0a812e11.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>When will top Democratic party officials recognize that today’s electorate is not made up of moderate centrists? Rather, most Americans are anti-establishment rebels who’ve been knocked down, kicked out, and told that they don’t matter. Indeed, our country’s true political spectrum doesn’t run right to left, but top to bottom. Right-wing/left-wing is ideology. Top to bottom is life. And most people know that they’re no longer in shouting distance of the moneyed elites at the top. This cries out for a “little-d” democratic party that goes right at the billionaires, autocrats, and kleptocrats. Instead, we get Chuck Schumer. This Senate Democratic leader’s idea of battling right-wing extremism is to say, “I sent a letter” in protest. Worse, the corporatized hierarchy controlling the once-proud Party of the People reserve their aggressiveness for – guess what? – battling progressive Democratic activists and candidates! Yes, they keep blocking true Democrats who can win, nominating corporate-branded centrists instead – then wondering why voter turnout plummets and an angry electorate reaches for the Trump Hammer. They are trying to do it to us again right now in Maine, where a plain-spoken, working-class progressive is poised to defeat a Trump Republican for a U.S. Senate seat. Graham Platner, a maverick, 41-year-old combat veteran and oyster farmer is drawing huge crowds, enthusiasm, volunteers, money… and grassroots hope. He’s a winner – exactly what Democrats need to become relevant again. Yet, rather than embracing the grassroots enthusiasm to win the senate seat, Schumer is raising corporate cash to defeat Planter! The party’s leader is its own worst enemy. To learn more, go to: GrahamForSenate.com. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>When will top Democratic party officials recognize that today’s electorate is not made up of moderate centrists? Rather, most Americans are anti-establishment rebels who’ve been knocked down, kicked out, and told that they don’t matter. Indeed, our country’s true political spectrum doesn’t run right to left, but top to bottom. Right-wing/left-wing is ideology. Top to bottom is life. And most people know that they’re no longer in shouting distance of the moneyed elites at the top. This cries out for a “little-d” democratic party that goes right at the billionaires, autocrats, and kleptocrats. Instead, we get Chuck Schumer. This Senate Democratic leader’s idea of battling right-wing extremism is to say, “I sent a letter” in protest. Worse, the corporatized hierarchy controlling the once-proud Party of the People reserve their aggressiveness for – guess what? – battling progressive Democratic activists and candidates! Yes, they keep blocking true Democrats who can win, nominating corporate-branded centrists instead – then wondering why voter turnout plummets and an angry electorate reaches for the Trump Hammer. They are trying to do it to us again right now in Maine, where a plain-spoken, working-class progressive is poised to defeat a Trump Republican for a U.S. Senate seat. Graham Platner, a maverick, 41-year-old combat veteran and oyster farmer is drawing huge crowds, enthusiasm, volunteers, money… and grassroots hope. He’s a winner – exactly what Democrats need to become relevant again. Yet, rather than embracing the grassroots enthusiasm to win the senate seat, Schumer is raising corporate cash to defeat Planter! The party’s leader is its own worst enemy. To learn more, go to: GrahamForSenate.com. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Let Me Take You Inside Michael Milken’s Museum of Greed]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Years ago in Juarez, Mexico, I wandered into a carnival sideshow that flabbergasted this Texas country boy. Stumbling out, I murmured: “Now I’ve seen everything… and then some.” But now, decades later, I’ve been even more stupefied by the news that <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/27/business/michael-milken-center-museum.html">convicted Wall Street swindler Michael Milken has just opened his own bizarre freak show in Washington, DC</a>.</p><p>Touted as a “tourist attraction,” his museum glorifies predatory capitalists (like him), hailing them as heroic American geniuses! The infamous junk-bond scammer grandiosely labels his monument the Milken Center for Advancing the American Dream. It’s located right across the street from the White House (though it’s rumored that even his buddy Trump considered Michael’s “Monument to Mammon” to be too explicitly obscene to attach it directly to the East Wing).</p><p>In a perverse bit of symbolism, the thing occupies the former headquarters of a bank that was forced to close 20 years ago because of a money-laundering scandal. How’s that for Karma? But, to gloss over such ugliness, Milken has gilded his legacy mausoleum with Trumpian gold. The rooms, draperies, furniture – and even a fake tree in the atrium – all gleam with gold leaf, emphasizing Milken’s credo that the goal of life is money… and the power to get it.</p><p>Educational exhibits include an interactive game on compound interest, as well as a display of Mike’s high school cheerleading uniform. Missing, though, is any mention of the full presidential pardon this avaricious criminal wrangled from Trump in 2020, letting the racketeer escape prison for stealing a billion dollars from people who trusted him.</p><p>Still, if you visit his Washington freak show, the gift shop offers a memento that sums up his life: A $22 Milken money clip.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/let-me-take-you-inside-michael-milkens</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:176052541</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/176052541/b7e36c79549c5ff5c8087f30103cd310.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/176052541/4e3910f7fb43293ead0985df0f22f743.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Years ago in Juarez, Mexico, I wandered into a carnival sideshow that flabbergasted this Texas country boy. Stumbling out, I murmured: “Now I’ve seen everything… and then some.” But now, decades later, I’ve been even more stupefied by the news that convicted Wall Street swindler Michael Milken has just opened his own bizarre freak show in Washington, DC. Touted as a “tourist attraction,” his museum glorifies predatory capitalists (like him), hailing them as heroic American geniuses! The infamous junk-bond scammer grandiosely labels his monument the Milken Center for Advancing the American Dream. It’s located right across the street from the White House (though it’s rumored that even his buddy Trump considered Michael’s “Monument to Mammon” to be too explicitly obscene to attach it directly to the East Wing). In a perverse bit of symbolism, the thing occupies the former headquarters of a bank that was forced to close 20 years ago because of a money-laundering scandal. How’s that for Karma? But, to gloss over such ugliness, Milken has gilded his legacy mausoleum with Trumpian gold. The rooms, draperies, furniture – and even a fake tree in the atrium – all gleam with gold leaf, emphasizing Milken’s credo that the goal of life is money… and the power to get it. Educational exhibits include an interactive game on compound interest, as well as a display of Mike’s high school cheerleading uniform. Missing, though, is any mention of the full presidential pardon this avaricious criminal wrangled from Trump in 2020, letting the racketeer escape prison for stealing a billion dollars from people who trusted him. Still, if you visit his Washington freak show, the gift shop offers a memento that sums up his life: A $22 Milken money clip. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Years ago in Juarez, Mexico, I wandered into a carnival sideshow that flabbergasted this Texas country boy. Stumbling out, I murmured: “Now I’ve seen everything… and then some.” But now, decades later, I’ve been even more stupefied by the news that convicted Wall Street swindler Michael Milken has just opened his own bizarre freak show in Washington, DC. Touted as a “tourist attraction,” his museum glorifies predatory capitalists (like him), hailing them as heroic American geniuses! The infamous junk-bond scammer grandiosely labels his monument the Milken Center for Advancing the American Dream. It’s located right across the street from the White House (though it’s rumored that even his buddy Trump considered Michael’s “Monument to Mammon” to be too explicitly obscene to attach it directly to the East Wing). In a perverse bit of symbolism, the thing occupies the former headquarters of a bank that was forced to close 20 years ago because of a money-laundering scandal. How’s that for Karma? But, to gloss over such ugliness, Milken has gilded his legacy mausoleum with Trumpian gold. The rooms, draperies, furniture – and even a fake tree in the atrium – all gleam with gold leaf, emphasizing Milken’s credo that the goal of life is money… and the power to get it. Educational exhibits include an interactive game on compound interest, as well as a display of Mike’s high school cheerleading uniform. Missing, though, is any mention of the full presidential pardon this avaricious criminal wrangled from Trump in 2020, letting the racketeer escape prison for stealing a billion dollars from people who trusted him. Still, if you visit his Washington freak show, the gift shop offers a memento that sums up his life: A $22 Milken money clip. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[America’s History, Says Lord Trump, Is Exactly What I Say It Is]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Our country’s magnificent National Park System has been called “America’s greatest idea.”</p><p>These 433 treasures – along with our rich diversity of national museums and historical sites – each have their own stories to tell. But the whole is greater than the sum of its parts, for together they express America’s egalitarian sprit and “little-d” democratic possibilities, urging us to keep pushing for economic fairness and social justice for all.</p><p>And that’s exactly why <strong>Trump</strong> and his cabal of moneyed elites and right-wing extremists are out to purge, erase and officially censor the parks’ historical presentations. After all, it’s hard to impose plutocratic autocracy if such tangible examples of historic truth and democratic rebellion are openly displayed!</p><p>Thus, as dictated by the GOP’s secretive anti-democracy clique, Project 2025, Trump’s ideological Thought Police have set themselves up as an Orwellian “Ministry of Truth” to sanitize and Disneyfy the telling of our people’s real history. For example, Trump complains that parks and museums hurt America’s self-image by telling “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/19/us/politics/trump-smithsonian-slavery.html">how bad slavery was.</a>”</p><p>Hello, Donald – that’s not an image, it’s <em>reality</em>, as central to our national character as our historic commitment to equality. And the explosive conflict between ugly repression and flowering egalitarianism is ever present today. Consider the push by <strong>Sen. Eric Schmitt</strong> and others in the GOP’s Christian Nationalist movement to deny the unifying principle that “<a target="_blank" href="https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2025/09/eric-schmitt-white-nationalism-national-conservatism-conference.html">all men are created equal.</a>”</p><p>There’s not enough whitewash in the world to cover up the deep ugliness of slavery, and it’s self-destructive for government to try. The fundamental purpose of recording our shared history is to learn from it.</p><p>Do something!</p><p>You might’ve heard about the Alt National Park Service, but they <a target="_blank" href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-hunt-for-liberal-qanon-premium-e297-sample/id1428209307?i=1000716908272">might not be quite who they say they are</a>, as it turns out. To support park rangers fighting the good fight in their work and off-duty, check out <a target="_blank" href="https://www.resistancerangers.org/">Resistance Rangers</a>.</p><p>On the museum front, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.ala.org/news/2025/09/ala-leads-libraries-museums-cultural-institutions-and-nations-largest-cultural-worker">AFSCME and the American Library Association</a> are actively fighting to block the dismantling of the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS).</p><p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/americas-history-says-lord-trump</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:176048543</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/176048543/d7754a65650d462be73fda5882331e54.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/176048543/658758d4c9384fdb728f1036ac79ea7f.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Our country’s magnificent National Park System has been called “America’s greatest idea.” These 433 treasures – along with our rich diversity of national museums and historical sites – each have their own stories to tell. But the whole is greater than the sum of its parts, for together they express America’s egalitarian sprit and “little-d” democratic possibilities, urging us to keep pushing for economic fairness and social justice for all. And that’s exactly why Trump and his cabal of moneyed elites and right-wing extremists are out to purge, erase and officially censor the parks’ historical presentations. After all, it’s hard to impose plutocratic autocracy if such tangible examples of historic truth and democratic rebellion are openly displayed! Thus, as dictated by the GOP’s secretive anti-democracy clique, Project 2025, Trump’s ideological Thought Police have set themselves up as an Orwellian “Ministry of Truth” to sanitize and Disneyfy the telling of our people’s real history. For example, Trump complains that parks and museums hurt America’s self-image by telling “how bad slavery was.” Hello, Donald – that’s not an image, it’s reality, as central to our national character as our historic commitment to equality. And the explosive conflict between ugly repression and flowering egalitarianism is ever present today. Consider the push by Sen. Eric Schmitt and others in the GOP’s Christian Nationalist movement to deny the unifying principle that “all men are created equal.” There’s not enough whitewash in the world to cover up the deep ugliness of slavery, and it’s self-destructive for government to try. The fundamental purpose of recording our shared history is to learn from it. Do something! You might’ve heard about the Alt National Park Service, but they might not be quite who they say they are, as it turns out. To support park rangers fighting the good fight in their work and off-duty, check out Resistance Rangers. On the museum front, AFSCME and the American Library Association are actively fighting to block the dismantling of the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS). Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Our country’s magnificent National Park System has been called “America’s greatest idea.” These 433 treasures – along with our rich diversity of national museums and historical sites – each have their own stories to tell. But the whole is greater than the sum of its parts, for together they express America’s egalitarian sprit and “little-d” democratic possibilities, urging us to keep pushing for economic fairness and social justice for all. And that’s exactly why Trump and his cabal of moneyed elites and right-wing extremists are out to purge, erase and officially censor the parks’ historical presentations. After all, it’s hard to impose plutocratic autocracy if such tangible examples of historic truth and democratic rebellion are openly displayed! Thus, as dictated by the GOP’s secretive anti-democracy clique, Project 2025, Trump’s ideological Thought Police have set themselves up as an Orwellian “Ministry of Truth” to sanitize and Disneyfy the telling of our people’s real history. For example, Trump complains that parks and museums hurt America’s self-image by telling “how bad slavery was.” Hello, Donald – that’s not an image, it’s reality, as central to our national character as our historic commitment to equality. And the explosive conflict between ugly repression and flowering egalitarianism is ever present today. Consider the push by Sen. Eric Schmitt and others in the GOP’s Christian Nationalist movement to deny the unifying principle that “all men are created equal.” There’s not enough whitewash in the world to cover up the deep ugliness of slavery, and it’s self-destructive for government to try. The fundamental purpose of recording our shared history is to learn from it. Do something! You might’ve heard about the Alt National Park Service, but they might not be quite who they say they are, as it turns out. To support park rangers fighting the good fight in their work and off-duty, check out Resistance Rangers. On the museum front, AFSCME and the American Library Association are actively fighting to block the dismantling of the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS). Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[While We Tout America’s Democracy, Plutocracy Is Taking Over]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Washington’s MAGA government is shoveling massive giveaways of public money to corporate elites. Worse, though, are its <em>takeaways</em> of people’s power to battle the abuse of those same plutocratic corporations. Consider just three recent examples:</p><p><strong>Travel</strong>. Perhaps your family plans a holiday flight to visit grandma. Flying itself has become dicey, but at least the government is requiring airlines that cause long delays or cancellations to compensate us passengers for our loss. Uh… no, no more. Trump’s transportation secretary (who was previously a LOBBYIST for the big airlines!) is “loosening” the rules so <a target="_blank" href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-drops-biden-plan-require-airlines-pay-compensation-disrupted-flights-2025-09-04/">monopolistic airlines owe nothing to abused customers</a>.</p><p><strong>Job opportunities</strong>. One of the nastiest wage suppression tactics of corporate bosses has been their collusion to make employees sign “noncompete” contracts. These amount to indentured servitude, preventing workers from quitting to take a better job with a competing firm. This corporate lockdown costs American workers some <em>$40 billion a year</em> in wages they could get in an open job market. The FTC was finally moving to ban these noncompete gimmicks – but <a target="_blank" href="https://prospect.org/labor/2025-09-09-trump-lets-bosses-grab-400-billion-worker-pay-noncompete-agreements/">Trump installed a corporate lackey at the FTC to snuff out this spark of workplace liberty</a>.</p><p><strong>Pollution</strong>. Corporate lobbyists and MAGA lawmakers are rigging the rules to let industrial giants escape responsibility for their massive environmental contamination. For example, the profiteering greedheads who’ve deceptively caused tons of deadly “forever chemicals” to be spread on our land, water, communities, and families are to be let off the hook by the new, corporate-hugging EPA honcho. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/28/climate/steven-cook-epa-pfas-forever-chemicals.html">He says we taxpayers must pay for the toxic cleanup, not the polluters</a>.</p><p>If you’re unclear about the meaning of “plutocracy,’ there it is: Government by and for the despotic rich.</p><p>Fighting plutocracy on multiple fronts is challenging work, and that’s why we recommend getting involved with <a target="_blank" href="http://citizen.org">Public Citizen</a>—they’re strategic and have a long track record of protecting Americans on many issues. Check them out at <a target="_blank" href="http://citizen.org">citizen.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/while-we-tout-americas-democracy</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:175532658</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/175532658/cea44c8431dc4b6ced7a26f59d199d8d.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/175532658/ad52f1fa1ec70bacc3082852f20165e3.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Washington’s MAGA government is shoveling massive giveaways of public money to corporate elites. Worse, though, are its takeaways of people’s power to battle the abuse of those same plutocratic corporations. Consider just three recent examples: Travel. Perhaps your family plans a holiday flight to visit grandma. Flying itself has become dicey, but at least the government is requiring airlines that cause long delays or cancellations to compensate us passengers for our loss. Uh… no, no more. Trump’s transportation secretary (who was previously a LOBBYIST for the big airlines!) is “loosening” the rules so monopolistic airlines owe nothing to abused customers. Job opportunities. One of the nastiest wage suppression tactics of corporate bosses has been their collusion to make employees sign “noncompete” contracts. These amount to indentured servitude, preventing workers from quitting to take a better job with a competing firm. This corporate lockdown costs American workers some $40 billion a year in wages they could get in an open job market. The FTC was finally moving to ban these noncompete gimmicks – but Trump installed a corporate lackey at the FTC to snuff out this spark of workplace liberty. Pollution. Corporate lobbyists and MAGA lawmakers are rigging the rules to let industrial giants escape responsibility for their massive environmental contamination. For example, the profiteering greedheads who’ve deceptively caused tons of deadly “forever chemicals” to be spread on our land, water, communities, and families are to be let off the hook by the new, corporate-hugging EPA honcho. He says we taxpayers must pay for the toxic cleanup, not the polluters. If you’re unclear about the meaning of “plutocracy,’ there it is: Government by and for the despotic rich. Fighting plutocracy on multiple fronts is challenging work, and that’s why we recommend getting involved with Public Citizen—they’re strategic and have a long track record of protecting Americans on many issues. Check them out at citizen.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Washington’s MAGA government is shoveling massive giveaways of public money to corporate elites. Worse, though, are its takeaways of people’s power to battle the abuse of those same plutocratic corporations. Consider just three recent examples: Travel. Perhaps your family plans a holiday flight to visit grandma. Flying itself has become dicey, but at least the government is requiring airlines that cause long delays or cancellations to compensate us passengers for our loss. Uh… no, no more. Trump’s transportation secretary (who was previously a LOBBYIST for the big airlines!) is “loosening” the rules so monopolistic airlines owe nothing to abused customers. Job opportunities. One of the nastiest wage suppression tactics of corporate bosses has been their collusion to make employees sign “noncompete” contracts. These amount to indentured servitude, preventing workers from quitting to take a better job with a competing firm. This corporate lockdown costs American workers some $40 billion a year in wages they could get in an open job market. The FTC was finally moving to ban these noncompete gimmicks – but Trump installed a corporate lackey at the FTC to snuff out this spark of workplace liberty. Pollution. Corporate lobbyists and MAGA lawmakers are rigging the rules to let industrial giants escape responsibility for their massive environmental contamination. For example, the profiteering greedheads who’ve deceptively caused tons of deadly “forever chemicals” to be spread on our land, water, communities, and families are to be let off the hook by the new, corporate-hugging EPA honcho. He says we taxpayers must pay for the toxic cleanup, not the polluters. If you’re unclear about the meaning of “plutocracy,’ there it is: Government by and for the despotic rich. Fighting plutocracy on multiple fronts is challenging work, and that’s why we recommend getting involved with Public Citizen—they’re strategic and have a long track record of protecting Americans on many issues. Check them out at citizen.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Abbott Says His Presidential Ambition Is “God’s Design”]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes, cosmic oddities come together in comic ways. For example, Google positions the biography of right-wing Texas governor Greg Abbott right under the one for yesteryear’s slapstick comedians, Abbott and Costello.</p><p>It’s almost cruel for Gov. Greg to be juxtaposed with that quick-witted duo, for he’s a dour, slow-witted, plutocratic pol, with no perceptible sense of humor. As governor, he has focused on demonizing poor people, rigging elections, and doing favors for moneyed elites. Unsurprisingly, only four out of 10 Texas voters now support him. Yet – don’t laugh – in a move of burlesque absurdity, Abbott now says he might choose to become president. Yes, of the US!</p><p>Filled with pomposity, he recently proclaimed, “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.statesman.com/politics/texas/article/greg-abbott-presidential-run-21069815.php">I will be guided by God.</a>” Well, maybe so, since the god he faithfully follows is <a target="_blank" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mammon">Mammon</a>. Indeed, his major credential for becoming the GOP nominee for prez is that he is a pro at the Pay-to-Play game of using taxpayer money to entice special interests to fund his political career. “You pay me, then I pay you” is his corrupt game plan, which he has used to amass a whopping $87 million for his next election.</p><p>For example, watchdog group <a target="_blank" href="https://www.citizen.org/news/public-citizen-report-abbott-donors-draw-nearly-1-billion-in-no-bid-state-contracts/">Public Citizen has documented</a> some $3 million that Abbott got from executives of eight corporations. In turn, those eight were given nearly a billion dollars in <em>no-bid</em> state contracts – a 33,000% profit on their donations to Abbott!</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… For high rollers, Abbott is better than a winning Powerball lottery ticket. Buy him, and the Pay-to-Play merry-go-round keeps spinning at taxpayer expense. To fight such big money corruption, go to Public Citizen: <a target="_blank" href="http://citizen.org">citizen.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/abbott-says-his-presidential-ambition</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:175530991</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/175530991/95cfc55470653bd02207119ed224f46f.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/175530991/c0c89fa747cc425eec5d32bd9656e61b.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Sometimes, cosmic oddities come together in comic ways. For example, Google positions the biography of right-wing Texas governor Greg Abbott right under the one for yesteryear’s slapstick comedians, Abbott and Costello. It’s almost cruel for Gov. Greg to be juxtaposed with that quick-witted duo, for he’s a dour, slow-witted, plutocratic pol, with no perceptible sense of humor. As governor, he has focused on demonizing poor people, rigging elections, and doing favors for moneyed elites. Unsurprisingly, only four out of 10 Texas voters now support him. Yet – don’t laugh – in a move of burlesque absurdity, Abbott now says he might choose to become president. Yes, of the US! Filled with pomposity, he recently proclaimed, “I will be guided by God.” Well, maybe so, since the god he faithfully follows is Mammon. Indeed, his major credential for becoming the GOP nominee for prez is that he is a pro at the Pay-to-Play game of using taxpayer money to entice special interests to fund his political career. “You pay me, then I pay you” is his corrupt game plan, which he has used to amass a whopping $87 million for his next election. For example, watchdog group Public Citizen has documented some $3 million that Abbott got from executives of eight corporations. In turn, those eight were given nearly a billion dollars in no-bid state contracts – a 33,000% profit on their donations to Abbott! This is Jim Hightower saying… For high rollers, Abbott is better than a winning Powerball lottery ticket. Buy him, and the Pay-to-Play merry-go-round keeps spinning at taxpayer expense. To fight such big money corruption, go to Public Citizen: citizen.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Sometimes, cosmic oddities come together in comic ways. For example, Google positions the biography of right-wing Texas governor Greg Abbott right under the one for yesteryear’s slapstick comedians, Abbott and Costello. It’s almost cruel for Gov. Greg to be juxtaposed with that quick-witted duo, for he’s a dour, slow-witted, plutocratic pol, with no perceptible sense of humor. As governor, he has focused on demonizing poor people, rigging elections, and doing favors for moneyed elites. Unsurprisingly, only four out of 10 Texas voters now support him. Yet – don’t laugh – in a move of burlesque absurdity, Abbott now says he might choose to become president. Yes, of the US! Filled with pomposity, he recently proclaimed, “I will be guided by God.” Well, maybe so, since the god he faithfully follows is Mammon. Indeed, his major credential for becoming the GOP nominee for prez is that he is a pro at the Pay-to-Play game of using taxpayer money to entice special interests to fund his political career. “You pay me, then I pay you” is his corrupt game plan, which he has used to amass a whopping $87 million for his next election. For example, watchdog group Public Citizen has documented some $3 million that Abbott got from executives of eight corporations. In turn, those eight were given nearly a billion dollars in no-bid state contracts – a 33,000% profit on their donations to Abbott! This is Jim Hightower saying… For high rollers, Abbott is better than a winning Powerball lottery ticket. Buy him, and the Pay-to-Play merry-go-round keeps spinning at taxpayer expense. To fight such big money corruption, go to Public Citizen: citizen.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yes, You Can Fight the B******s… and Win!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>It’s been my honor to know a few <em>real</em> heroes – people who’ve selflessly dared to fight greed and oppression to advance the common good. Diane Wilson, for example.</p><p>For <em>forty </em>years, this fiery, fourth-generation fisherwoman from the Texas Gulf Coast has battled tenaciously for the rights and very survival of the area’s hardscrabble fishing families. She and her grassroots allies have taken on Formosa Plastics, a $250 billion, global corporate beast that has routinely dumped its chemical waste around Matagorda Bay, poisoning life and livelihoods.</p><p>But in 2019, in a lawsuit based on massive evidence collected by Wilson and her armada of volunteer kayakers, she won a stunning court victory, f<a target="_blank" href="https://insideclimatenews.org/news/24122024/texas-coast-formosa-plastics-landmark-settlement-funds-fishing-cooperative/">orcing the contaminator to pay $50 million for its malfeasance</a>.</p><p>Wilson’s fight was not just for her, and she did not get a penny from the Formosa settlement. But she won something richer than money – “It felt like justice,” she said of the court’s judgement.</p><p>Importantly, the court didn’t award the $50 million to some regulatory agency, but to a public trust administered by – guess who? – Wilson’s allies! So she has been working tenaciously ever since to make sure the money directly benefits the poor families Formosa ran over. Especially promising is the trust’s major grant to create the people’s own <a target="_blank" href="https://insideclimatenews.org/news/24122024/texas-coast-formosa-plastics-landmark-settlement-funds-fishing-cooperative/">Matagorda Bay Fishing Cooperative</a>. It will provide dock space, supply contracts, processing ability, local jobs… and the power for local people to forge their own future.</p><p>Why fight against overpowering odds for 40 years? Because of her strong principles… and sheer stubbornness. “It’s my home,” Wilson says of the bay and its working-class community, “and I completely refuse to give it to that company to ruin.”</p><p><em>Learn more about Diane and support her work:</em></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/yes-you-can-fight-the-bastards-and-9a9</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:175118518</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2025 15:56:49 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598232" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/175118518/8d5c802620f121082c593f888570da81.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/175118518/4d131b312eec4e0a40bc1dfecb344b7b.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>It’s been my honor to know a few real heroes – people who’ve selflessly dared to fight greed and oppression to advance the common good. Diane Wilson, for example. For forty years, this fiery, fourth-generation fisherwoman from the Texas Gulf Coast has battled tenaciously for the rights and very survival of the area’s hardscrabble fishing families. She and her grassroots allies have taken on Formosa Plastics, a $250 billion, global corporate beast that has routinely dumped its chemical waste around Matagorda Bay, poisoning life and livelihoods. But in 2019, in a lawsuit based on massive evidence collected by Wilson and her armada of volunteer kayakers, she won a stunning court victory, forcing the contaminator to pay $50 million for its malfeasance. Wilson’s fight was not just for her, and she did not get a penny from the Formosa settlement. But she won something richer than money – “It felt like justice,” she said of the court’s judgement. Importantly, the court didn’t award the $50 million to some regulatory agency, but to a public trust administered by – guess who? – Wilson’s allies! So she has been working tenaciously ever since to make sure the money directly benefits the poor families Formosa ran over. Especially promising is the trust’s major grant to create the people’s own Matagorda Bay Fishing Cooperative. It will provide dock space, supply contracts, processing ability, local jobs… and the power for local people to forge their own future. Why fight against overpowering odds for 40 years? Because of her strong principles… and sheer stubbornness. “It’s my home,” Wilson says of the bay and its working-class community, “and I completely refuse to give it to that company to ruin.” Learn more about Diane and support her work: Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>It’s been my honor to know a few real heroes – people who’ve selflessly dared to fight greed and oppression to advance the common good. Diane Wilson, for example. For forty years, this fiery, fourth-generation fisherwoman from the Texas Gulf Coast has battled tenaciously for the rights and very survival of the area’s hardscrabble fishing families. She and her grassroots allies have taken on Formosa Plastics, a $250 billion, global corporate beast that has routinely dumped its chemical waste around Matagorda Bay, poisoning life and livelihoods. But in 2019, in a lawsuit based on massive evidence collected by Wilson and her armada of volunteer kayakers, she won a stunning court victory, forcing the contaminator to pay $50 million for its malfeasance. Wilson’s fight was not just for her, and she did not get a penny from the Formosa settlement. But she won something richer than money – “It felt like justice,” she said of the court’s judgement. Importantly, the court didn’t award the $50 million to some regulatory agency, but to a public trust administered by – guess who? – Wilson’s allies! So she has been working tenaciously ever since to make sure the money directly benefits the poor families Formosa ran over. Especially promising is the trust’s major grant to create the people’s own Matagorda Bay Fishing Cooperative. It will provide dock space, supply contracts, processing ability, local jobs… and the power for local people to forge their own future. Why fight against overpowering odds for 40 years? Because of her strong principles… and sheer stubbornness. “It’s my home,” Wilson says of the bay and its working-class community, “and I completely refuse to give it to that company to ruin.” Learn more about Diane and support her work: Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[CEOs Show Us How To Raise Everyone’s Pay]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Here’s a progressive idea I picked up from the unlikeliest of sources: Corporate CEOs!</p><p>For decades, these chieftains of our economic order have been steadily implementing a very visionary process for establishing corporate wage levels. The essence of it is this: <em>Let the workers set their own pay</em>! Since the 1970s, when the idea began taking hold in Corporate America, pay levels have zoomed up by more than 1,000 percent.</p><p>Well… not for you. This set-your-own pay movement has only been available to top corporate executives, whose median paychecks now top $16 million a year! But since it’s been a boon for this test group, I say it’s time to expand the no-hassle compensation concept to all employees. This would greatly boost grassroots purchasing power, economic growth, and fairness for all.</p><p>“Omigod no!” squawk corporate apologists, rushing to say that, technically, CEOs do not directly set their pay. Rather, the bosses have attached their earnings to their corporations’ ever-rising stock prices. Thus, astronomical rewards go to those who obsessively focus on jacking-up the price of their own stock, even though that’s a selfishly-narrow and false measure of a corporation’s performance.</p><p>Also, stock price is no indicator of a CEO’s worthiness. Even bosses who’re blockheads can still get a boost simply because they’ve rigged the system to hitch a free ride on inflated stock value.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… Still, if it’s good enough for them, why not an equal deal for working stiffs, who actually deliver the products and services that give a corporation some true value. I say, each worker should get the same percentage increase in pay that the top honcho takes. It’s a very simple process… and it’s only fair.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/ceos-show-us-how-to-raise-everyones-0e5</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:175023561</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/175023561/d90a39303488e86b791f13af42cc4fd1.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/175023561/5072b7f80f0322771d1c83261d567d36.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Here’s a progressive idea I picked up from the unlikeliest of sources: Corporate CEOs! For decades, these chieftains of our economic order have been steadily implementing a very visionary process for establishing corporate wage levels. The essence of it is this: Let the workers set their own pay! Since the 1970s, when the idea began taking hold in Corporate America, pay levels have zoomed up by more than 1,000 percent. Well… not for you. This set-your-own pay movement has only been available to top corporate executives, whose median paychecks now top $16 million a year! But since it’s been a boon for this test group, I say it’s time to expand the no-hassle compensation concept to all employees. This would greatly boost grassroots purchasing power, economic growth, and fairness for all. “Omigod no!” squawk corporate apologists, rushing to say that, technically, CEOs do not directly set their pay. Rather, the bosses have attached their earnings to their corporations’ ever-rising stock prices. Thus, astronomical rewards go to those who obsessively focus on jacking-up the price of their own stock, even though that’s a selfishly-narrow and false measure of a corporation’s performance. Also, stock price is no indicator of a CEO’s worthiness. Even bosses who’re blockheads can still get a boost simply because they’ve rigged the system to hitch a free ride on inflated stock value. This is Jim Hightower saying… Still, if it’s good enough for them, why not an equal deal for working stiffs, who actually deliver the products and services that give a corporation some true value. I say, each worker should get the same percentage increase in pay that the top honcho takes. It’s a very simple process… and it’s only fair. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Here’s a progressive idea I picked up from the unlikeliest of sources: Corporate CEOs! For decades, these chieftains of our economic order have been steadily implementing a very visionary process for establishing corporate wage levels. The essence of it is this: Let the workers set their own pay! Since the 1970s, when the idea began taking hold in Corporate America, pay levels have zoomed up by more than 1,000 percent. Well… not for you. This set-your-own pay movement has only been available to top corporate executives, whose median paychecks now top $16 million a year! But since it’s been a boon for this test group, I say it’s time to expand the no-hassle compensation concept to all employees. This would greatly boost grassroots purchasing power, economic growth, and fairness for all. “Omigod no!” squawk corporate apologists, rushing to say that, technically, CEOs do not directly set their pay. Rather, the bosses have attached their earnings to their corporations’ ever-rising stock prices. Thus, astronomical rewards go to those who obsessively focus on jacking-up the price of their own stock, even though that’s a selfishly-narrow and false measure of a corporation’s performance. Also, stock price is no indicator of a CEO’s worthiness. Even bosses who’re blockheads can still get a boost simply because they’ve rigged the system to hitch a free ride on inflated stock value. This is Jim Hightower saying… Still, if it’s good enough for them, why not an equal deal for working stiffs, who actually deliver the products and services that give a corporation some true value. I say, each worker should get the same percentage increase in pay that the top honcho takes. It’s a very simple process… and it’s only fair. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[How to “Rest In Peace” Naturally]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>May we take a minute to talk about your death?</p><p>And mine, too. I certainly don’t want to rush either one, but there is a matter we should all consider ahead of the “event.” Namely, the funeral.</p><p>The nature of one’s bodily disposal is, of course, unpleasant to discuss. So mostly we don’t. Thus, at our death, loved ones frantically try to decide between crematorium or a coffin.</p><p>Both processes are awful to contemplate, are environmentally harmful, can be exorbitantly expensive, and are often emotionally unsatisfying for survivors. I can’t say there’s any good way to go, but is there a better way?</p><p>Yes, says an interesting “green burial” movement, offering the alternative of an affordable “adios” that truly does bring life full circle. With no need for embalming, burning, or steel sarcophagus, it provides a simplicity and an organic authenticity to life’s end.</p><p>The essence of it is minimalism. The expired body is literally and gently covered with heated plant material for a month or so, accelerating the work of microbes and fungi to convert us into soil. Yes, in short order, we become about a cubic yard of compost – new nutrient-rich earth that family or others can even spread to foster future life.</p><p>Adding to the wholistic ethic, a cottage industry makes available home-made woven baskets, linen shrouds, and other organic provisions for our dearly departed. Also, rather than wearing mournful, black clothing to the funeral plot, mourners at a green burial gather in work clothes to assist in the farewell.</p><p>It’s a participatory continuum, carrying life forward. Maybe it’s not for you and yours – but maybe it is. To learn more, go to <a target="_blank" href="http://GreenBurialCouncil.org">GreenBurialCouncil.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/how-to-rest-in-peace-naturally</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:173104424</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 16:33:25 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/173104424/90f15759ef95004b007ff76d8ced886d.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/173104424/30ebd024af2c98f878858caaa9516cad.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>May we take a minute to talk about your death? And mine, too. I certainly don’t want to rush either one, but there is a matter we should all consider ahead of the “event.” Namely, the funeral. The nature of one’s bodily disposal is, of course, unpleasant to discuss. So mostly we don’t. Thus, at our death, loved ones frantically try to decide between crematorium or a coffin. Both processes are awful to contemplate, are environmentally harmful, can be exorbitantly expensive, and are often emotionally unsatisfying for survivors. I can’t say there’s any good way to go, but is there a better way? Yes, says an interesting “green burial” movement, offering the alternative of an affordable “adios” that truly does bring life full circle. With no need for embalming, burning, or steel sarcophagus, it provides a simplicity and an organic authenticity to life’s end. The essence of it is minimalism. The expired body is literally and gently covered with heated plant material for a month or so, accelerating the work of microbes and fungi to convert us into soil. Yes, in short order, we become about a cubic yard of compost – new nutrient-rich earth that family or others can even spread to foster future life. Adding to the wholistic ethic, a cottage industry makes available home-made woven baskets, linen shrouds, and other organic provisions for our dearly departed. Also, rather than wearing mournful, black clothing to the funeral plot, mourners at a green burial gather in work clothes to assist in the farewell. It’s a participatory continuum, carrying life forward. Maybe it’s not for you and yours – but maybe it is. To learn more, go to GreenBurialCouncil.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>May we take a minute to talk about your death? And mine, too. I certainly don’t want to rush either one, but there is a matter we should all consider ahead of the “event.” Namely, the funeral. The nature of one’s bodily disposal is, of course, unpleasant to discuss. So mostly we don’t. Thus, at our death, loved ones frantically try to decide between crematorium or a coffin. Both processes are awful to contemplate, are environmentally harmful, can be exorbitantly expensive, and are often emotionally unsatisfying for survivors. I can’t say there’s any good way to go, but is there a better way? Yes, says an interesting “green burial” movement, offering the alternative of an affordable “adios” that truly does bring life full circle. With no need for embalming, burning, or steel sarcophagus, it provides a simplicity and an organic authenticity to life’s end. The essence of it is minimalism. The expired body is literally and gently covered with heated plant material for a month or so, accelerating the work of microbes and fungi to convert us into soil. Yes, in short order, we become about a cubic yard of compost – new nutrient-rich earth that family or others can even spread to foster future life. Adding to the wholistic ethic, a cottage industry makes available home-made woven baskets, linen shrouds, and other organic provisions for our dearly departed. Also, rather than wearing mournful, black clothing to the funeral plot, mourners at a green burial gather in work clothes to assist in the farewell. It’s a participatory continuum, carrying life forward. Maybe it’s not for you and yours – but maybe it is. To learn more, go to GreenBurialCouncil.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Warning: Just Reading About Bayer’s Greed Can Cause Headaches]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Here they come again! Another far-right-wing mob, spurred on by Trump, is storming our US Capitol!</p><p>Only, these are not uncouth MAGA marauders wearing buffalo horns, breaking in, and attacking Capital police. No, this is a <em>very couth</em>, richly-attired, well-mannered political mob laying siege on Congress. And look: Instead of fighting or fleeing, Republican lawmakers are holding the Capitol’s doors wide open for this incursion! That’s because this is a swarm of always-welcome corporate lobbyists and campaign funders. In particular, they’re an army of global pesticide giants.</p><p>Led by Bayer, the multibillion-dollar German biochemical conglomerate, they’re demanding that Congress keep us commoners from interfering with their poisonous profiteering. Bayer reaps billions of dollars selling a killer pesticide named Roundup, which scientists increasingly consider a cause of cancer, especially in children. Thousands of afflicted families have filed major lawsuits holding Bayer responsible.</p><p>Of course, Bayer honchos did the honorable thing. Ha! Just kidding. Instead, its lobbyists rushed to Trump and GOP congressional leaders, who – shhhh – <a target="_blank" href="https://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/2025/09/16/lfl-cancer-gag-act-pesticide-immunity-bills/">quietly tucked a corporate “gotcha” into this month’s must-pass budget bill.</a> It would effectively hand retroactive <em>immunity</em> to chemical manufacturers, quashing all those lawsuits filed by families of Roundup victims. Sneaky, huh? Infuriated, grassroots leaders of MAHA (The “Make America Healthy Again” movement) say the Republican Party is being corrupted by false information from the pesticide companies.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… Actually, what’s corrupting the Party’s lawmakers is the gusher of campaign money they take from the poison pushers. For information and action on stopping this capitulation to what a Bayer, go to <a target="_blank" href="http://FoodAndWaterWatch.org">FoodAndWaterWatch.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/warning-just-reading-about-bayers</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:174357553</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 16:38:42 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/174357553/0d866ed76890c7f3c148c4b8490e7078.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/174357553/c62d16db2e22a10ffc5a8ee95ae9c6f4.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Here they come again! Another far-right-wing mob, spurred on by Trump, is storming our US Capitol! Only, these are not uncouth MAGA marauders wearing buffalo horns, breaking in, and attacking Capital police. No, this is a very couth, richly-attired, well-mannered political mob laying siege on Congress. And look: Instead of fighting or fleeing, Republican lawmakers are holding the Capitol’s doors wide open for this incursion! That’s because this is a swarm of always-welcome corporate lobbyists and campaign funders. In particular, they’re an army of global pesticide giants. Led by Bayer, the multibillion-dollar German biochemical conglomerate, they’re demanding that Congress keep us commoners from interfering with their poisonous profiteering. Bayer reaps billions of dollars selling a killer pesticide named Roundup, which scientists increasingly consider a cause of cancer, especially in children. Thousands of afflicted families have filed major lawsuits holding Bayer responsible. Of course, Bayer honchos did the honorable thing. Ha! Just kidding. Instead, its lobbyists rushed to Trump and GOP congressional leaders, who – shhhh – quietly tucked a corporate “gotcha” into this month’s must-pass budget bill. It would effectively hand retroactive immunity to chemical manufacturers, quashing all those lawsuits filed by families of Roundup victims. Sneaky, huh? Infuriated, grassroots leaders of MAHA (The “Make America Healthy Again” movement) say the Republican Party is being corrupted by false information from the pesticide companies. This is Jim Hightower saying… Actually, what’s corrupting the Party’s lawmakers is the gusher of campaign money they take from the poison pushers. For information and action on stopping this capitulation to what a Bayer, go to FoodAndWaterWatch.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Here they come again! Another far-right-wing mob, spurred on by Trump, is storming our US Capitol! Only, these are not uncouth MAGA marauders wearing buffalo horns, breaking in, and attacking Capital police. No, this is a very couth, richly-attired, well-mannered political mob laying siege on Congress. And look: Instead of fighting or fleeing, Republican lawmakers are holding the Capitol’s doors wide open for this incursion! That’s because this is a swarm of always-welcome corporate lobbyists and campaign funders. In particular, they’re an army of global pesticide giants. Led by Bayer, the multibillion-dollar German biochemical conglomerate, they’re demanding that Congress keep us commoners from interfering with their poisonous profiteering. Bayer reaps billions of dollars selling a killer pesticide named Roundup, which scientists increasingly consider a cause of cancer, especially in children. Thousands of afflicted families have filed major lawsuits holding Bayer responsible. Of course, Bayer honchos did the honorable thing. Ha! Just kidding. Instead, its lobbyists rushed to Trump and GOP congressional leaders, who – shhhh – quietly tucked a corporate “gotcha” into this month’s must-pass budget bill. It would effectively hand retroactive immunity to chemical manufacturers, quashing all those lawsuits filed by families of Roundup victims. Sneaky, huh? Infuriated, grassroots leaders of MAHA (The “Make America Healthy Again” movement) say the Republican Party is being corrupted by false information from the pesticide companies. This is Jim Hightower saying… Actually, what’s corrupting the Party’s lawmakers is the gusher of campaign money they take from the poison pushers. For information and action on stopping this capitulation to what a Bayer, go to FoodAndWaterWatch.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[CEOs of Tax-Exempt Hospitals Learn to Game the System]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>All across the country, nonprofit hospital chains are literally upping their game.</p><p>These corporate entities receive special tax exemptions because they provide some free and reduced-cost medical services to poor families. But, as one CEO put it, many chains are now going the extra yard to serve local folks “in new and exciting ways.”</p><p>Great! Our whole health system desperately needs better quality, more-affordable care for all!</p><p>Uh… no… that’s not what they mean.</p><p>Rather, the exciting new thing being pushed by non-profit hospitals is to spend big chunks of their tax-free revenue on their area’s professional and college sports teams. For what? <a target="_blank" href="https://stateline.org/2025/08/01/nonprofit-hospitals-spend-millions-on-stadium-naming-rights-raising-eyebrows/">Get this: </a><a target="_blank" href="https://stateline.org/2025/08/01/nonprofit-hospitals-spend-millions-on-stadium-naming-rights-raising-eyebrows/"><em>To buy the naming rights</em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://stateline.org/2025/08/01/nonprofit-hospitals-spend-millions-on-stadium-naming-rights-raising-eyebrows/"> to the teams’ stadiums and ballparks!</a> A children’s hospital in Fresno, California, for example, has put down $10 million to slap its name on Fresno State University’s football stadium. And a Tennessee “safety-net” hospital has committed millions to emblazon its corporate name on the ballpark of Chattanooga’s pro-baseball franchise.</p><p>Sweet Jesus, what the hell? One university marketing professor even tried to rationalize these diabolical, high-dollar transactions by comparing them to community-spirited doctors buying jerseys for a town’s Little League team! Excuse me, but this is a big-league perversion of the healthcare mission. Indeed, the Fresno State deal included special perks for the hospital’s top honchos – including a skybox suite at FSU games, food & drink for them, seats on the team’s charter plane, and a bundle of free tickets to home games.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… As the Republican mayor of Chattanooga gently noted: “At a time of severe nursing shortages and quality of care concerns, this decision is hard to explain.”</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/ceos-of-tax-exempt-hospitals-learn</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:173802140</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/173802140/601097da44f8c2daf66ff0c6c49cbefc.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/173802140/c4eac0d07790c2f96cc41cf52a081712.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>All across the country, nonprofit hospital chains are literally upping their game. These corporate entities receive special tax exemptions because they provide some free and reduced-cost medical services to poor families. But, as one CEO put it, many chains are now going the extra yard to serve local folks “in new and exciting ways.” Great! Our whole health system desperately needs better quality, more-affordable care for all! Uh… no… that’s not what they mean. Rather, the exciting new thing being pushed by non-profit hospitals is to spend big chunks of their tax-free revenue on their area’s professional and college sports teams. For what? Get this: To buy the naming rights to the teams’ stadiums and ballparks! A children’s hospital in Fresno, California, for example, has put down $10 million to slap its name on Fresno State University’s football stadium. And a Tennessee “safety-net” hospital has committed millions to emblazon its corporate name on the ballpark of Chattanooga’s pro-baseball franchise. Sweet Jesus, what the hell? One university marketing professor even tried to rationalize these diabolical, high-dollar transactions by comparing them to community-spirited doctors buying jerseys for a town’s Little League team! Excuse me, but this is a big-league perversion of the healthcare mission. Indeed, the Fresno State deal included special perks for the hospital’s top honchos – including a skybox suite at FSU games, food &amp; drink for them, seats on the team’s charter plane, and a bundle of free tickets to home games. This is Jim Hightower saying… As the Republican mayor of Chattanooga gently noted: “At a time of severe nursing shortages and quality of care concerns, this decision is hard to explain.” Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>All across the country, nonprofit hospital chains are literally upping their game. These corporate entities receive special tax exemptions because they provide some free and reduced-cost medical services to poor families. But, as one CEO put it, many chains are now going the extra yard to serve local folks “in new and exciting ways.” Great! Our whole health system desperately needs better quality, more-affordable care for all! Uh… no… that’s not what they mean. Rather, the exciting new thing being pushed by non-profit hospitals is to spend big chunks of their tax-free revenue on their area’s professional and college sports teams. For what? Get this: To buy the naming rights to the teams’ stadiums and ballparks! A children’s hospital in Fresno, California, for example, has put down $10 million to slap its name on Fresno State University’s football stadium. And a Tennessee “safety-net” hospital has committed millions to emblazon its corporate name on the ballpark of Chattanooga’s pro-baseball franchise. Sweet Jesus, what the hell? One university marketing professor even tried to rationalize these diabolical, high-dollar transactions by comparing them to community-spirited doctors buying jerseys for a town’s Little League team! Excuse me, but this is a big-league perversion of the healthcare mission. Indeed, the Fresno State deal included special perks for the hospital’s top honchos – including a skybox suite at FSU games, food &amp; drink for them, seats on the team’s charter plane, and a bundle of free tickets to home games. This is Jim Hightower saying… As the Republican mayor of Chattanooga gently noted: “At a time of severe nursing shortages and quality of care concerns, this decision is hard to explain.” Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[No Need to Raise Social Security Taxes – Make the Rich Pay Their Full Share!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>My life goals have never included making a lot of money… and I’ve certainly succeeded in that regard.</p><p>Yet, I do consider myself rich. Not like the Wall Street “richie-rich,” but in the modest sense of middle-class well-being – basically, enough to make ends meet. It’s not my good looks that puts me in this lucky zone, but one particular public asset that has long been serving the common good for decades, lifting millions of workaday Americans to some decent level of shared prosperity: <em>Social Security</em>.</p><p>Plutocratic elites and their political puppets constantly wail that it’s a socialist scam, a wasteful giveaway to old people. But regular folks know that’s hokum, since nearly all of us pay into the plan every month of our working lives. In short, it’s <em>our </em>money!</p><p>Moreover, each of our Social Security accounts steadily build up. So, consider this: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/05/business/social-security-wealth-benefits.html">The most valuable financial asset </a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/05/business/social-security-wealth-benefits.html"><em>for 9 out of 10 American families,</em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/05/business/social-security-wealth-benefits.html"> is not their houses or Aunt Tillie’s will – but their Social Security holdings.</a> Even for rock-solid, middle-class families, Social Security provides for about a third of their total lifetime wealth.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… When right-wingers screech that “fiscal prudence” demands they slash the program’s benefits, that’s bank-robber code for looting wealth you’ve banked for years in this People’s retirement system. Plus, there is absolutely no excuse for such thievery, since an honest, fair, and simple adjustment would keep the program fully funded in perpetuity: Rather than letting gabillionaires like Elon Musk put practically none of their massive incomes into this egalitarian effort to provide a decent retirement for all, make them pay Social Security taxes exactly like regular workers do.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/no-need-to-raise-social-security</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:173779380</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 18:31:10 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/173779380/7ab827b954d2f994033a846187553939.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/173779380/4ae1d3d12d4c859be93f6b11bda263fb.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>My life goals have never included making a lot of money… and I’ve certainly succeeded in that regard. Yet, I do consider myself rich. Not like the Wall Street “richie-rich,” but in the modest sense of middle-class well-being – basically, enough to make ends meet. It’s not my good looks that puts me in this lucky zone, but one particular public asset that has long been serving the common good for decades, lifting millions of workaday Americans to some decent level of shared prosperity: Social Security. Plutocratic elites and their political puppets constantly wail that it’s a socialist scam, a wasteful giveaway to old people. But regular folks know that’s hokum, since nearly all of us pay into the plan every month of our working lives. In short, it’s our money! Moreover, each of our Social Security accounts steadily build up. So, consider this: The most valuable financial asset for 9 out of 10 American families, is not their houses or Aunt Tillie’s will – but their Social Security holdings. Even for rock-solid, middle-class families, Social Security provides for about a third of their total lifetime wealth. This is Jim Hightower saying… When right-wingers screech that “fiscal prudence” demands they slash the program’s benefits, that’s bank-robber code for looting wealth you’ve banked for years in this People’s retirement system. Plus, there is absolutely no excuse for such thievery, since an honest, fair, and simple adjustment would keep the program fully funded in perpetuity: Rather than letting gabillionaires like Elon Musk put practically none of their massive incomes into this egalitarian effort to provide a decent retirement for all, make them pay Social Security taxes exactly like regular workers do. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>My life goals have never included making a lot of money… and I’ve certainly succeeded in that regard. Yet, I do consider myself rich. Not like the Wall Street “richie-rich,” but in the modest sense of middle-class well-being – basically, enough to make ends meet. It’s not my good looks that puts me in this lucky zone, but one particular public asset that has long been serving the common good for decades, lifting millions of workaday Americans to some decent level of shared prosperity: Social Security. Plutocratic elites and their political puppets constantly wail that it’s a socialist scam, a wasteful giveaway to old people. But regular folks know that’s hokum, since nearly all of us pay into the plan every month of our working lives. In short, it’s our money! Moreover, each of our Social Security accounts steadily build up. So, consider this: The most valuable financial asset for 9 out of 10 American families, is not their houses or Aunt Tillie’s will – but their Social Security holdings. Even for rock-solid, middle-class families, Social Security provides for about a third of their total lifetime wealth. This is Jim Hightower saying… When right-wingers screech that “fiscal prudence” demands they slash the program’s benefits, that’s bank-robber code for looting wealth you’ve banked for years in this People’s retirement system. Plus, there is absolutely no excuse for such thievery, since an honest, fair, and simple adjustment would keep the program fully funded in perpetuity: Rather than letting gabillionaires like Elon Musk put practically none of their massive incomes into this egalitarian effort to provide a decent retirement for all, make them pay Social Security taxes exactly like regular workers do. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Secret History of “Wokeness”]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>In <em>Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland</em>, Humpty Dumpty scornfully declares that, “When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean.”</p><p>So what does “woke” mean? It’s become the pet political aspersion that today’s kooky right-wing hucksters hurl at liberals, but the hurlers would be whopperjawed to learn that it’s was actually coined by and for <em>progressives</em>! Indeed, it admonishes people to be awake to the dangers posed by hate-filled bigots and reactionaries like… well, like today’s right-wing extremists.</p><p><strong>SURPRISING HISTORICAL TIDBIT:</strong> The first person reported to have used the word was Huddie Ledbetter, the legendary Black blues artist known as Lead Belly. Among his many classic songs was “Scottsboro Boys,” about nine Black teenagers falsely accused in 1931 of raping two Alabama white women. As a Black musician who traveled the backroads of the Jim Crow South, Lead Belly warned others to pay attention when in a viciously racist state: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.vox.com/culture/21437879/stay-woke-wokeness-history-origin-evolution-controversy">“Best stay woke,” he cautioned.</a></p><p>But—out of blind ignorance, blind arrogance, or both—today’s adaptors of the Jim Crow mentality have perverted common-sense wokeness into a verbal whip to lash African-Americans, immigrants, Democrats, women, LGBTQ+ people and all others they don’t like (pretty much everyone who looks, thinks, prays and acts different from them). How kooky? They’ve declared librarians, science, Mickey Mouse, and Bud Light to be their evil enemies. “Don’t be woke,” they bark, demanding autocratic, plutocratic, and theocratic laws to coerce compliance with their own retrogressive bigotries.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… Bear in mind that this is no longer a fringe cult, but the mainstream of the Republican Party, including its top congressional leaders, presidential wannabes, and state officials. Actually, you can easily comprehend what these Humpty-Dumpties really mean by their “Don’t Be Woke” war cry. Just substitute the word “sane” for “woke.”</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-secret-history-of-wokeness-979</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:173365677</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/173365677/33351b79dc609d199037458a5924f20c.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/173365677/3f9716cc61a53c8ce9357e9bf70fbf6f.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>In Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, Humpty Dumpty scornfully declares that, “When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean.” So what does “woke” mean? It’s become the pet political aspersion that today’s kooky right-wing hucksters hurl at liberals, but the hurlers would be whopperjawed to learn that it’s was actually coined by and for progressives! Indeed, it admonishes people to be awake to the dangers posed by hate-filled bigots and reactionaries like… well, like today’s right-wing extremists. SURPRISING HISTORICAL TIDBIT: The first person reported to have used the word was Huddie Ledbetter, the legendary Black blues artist known as Lead Belly. Among his many classic songs was “Scottsboro Boys,” about nine Black teenagers falsely accused in 1931 of raping two Alabama white women. As a Black musician who traveled the backroads of the Jim Crow South, Lead Belly warned others to pay attention when in a viciously racist state: “Best stay woke,” he cautioned. But—out of blind ignorance, blind arrogance, or both—today’s adaptors of the Jim Crow mentality have perverted common-sense wokeness into a verbal whip to lash African-Americans, immigrants, Democrats, women, LGBTQ+ people and all others they don’t like (pretty much everyone who looks, thinks, prays and acts different from them). How kooky? They’ve declared librarians, science, Mickey Mouse, and Bud Light to be their evil enemies. “Don’t be woke,” they bark, demanding autocratic, plutocratic, and theocratic laws to coerce compliance with their own retrogressive bigotries. This is Jim Hightower saying… Bear in mind that this is no longer a fringe cult, but the mainstream of the Republican Party, including its top congressional leaders, presidential wannabes, and state officials. Actually, you can easily comprehend what these Humpty-Dumpties really mean by their “Don’t Be Woke” war cry. Just substitute the word “sane” for “woke.” Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>In Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, Humpty Dumpty scornfully declares that, “When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean.” So what does “woke” mean? It’s become the pet political aspersion that today’s kooky right-wing hucksters hurl at liberals, but the hurlers would be whopperjawed to learn that it’s was actually coined by and for progressives! Indeed, it admonishes people to be awake to the dangers posed by hate-filled bigots and reactionaries like… well, like today’s right-wing extremists. SURPRISING HISTORICAL TIDBIT: The first person reported to have used the word was Huddie Ledbetter, the legendary Black blues artist known as Lead Belly. Among his many classic songs was “Scottsboro Boys,” about nine Black teenagers falsely accused in 1931 of raping two Alabama white women. As a Black musician who traveled the backroads of the Jim Crow South, Lead Belly warned others to pay attention when in a viciously racist state: “Best stay woke,” he cautioned. But—out of blind ignorance, blind arrogance, or both—today’s adaptors of the Jim Crow mentality have perverted common-sense wokeness into a verbal whip to lash African-Americans, immigrants, Democrats, women, LGBTQ+ people and all others they don’t like (pretty much everyone who looks, thinks, prays and acts different from them). How kooky? They’ve declared librarians, science, Mickey Mouse, and Bud Light to be their evil enemies. “Don’t be woke,” they bark, demanding autocratic, plutocratic, and theocratic laws to coerce compliance with their own retrogressive bigotries. This is Jim Hightower saying… Bear in mind that this is no longer a fringe cult, but the mainstream of the Republican Party, including its top congressional leaders, presidential wannabes, and state officials. Actually, you can easily comprehend what these Humpty-Dumpties really mean by their “Don’t Be Woke” war cry. Just substitute the word “sane” for “woke.” Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[I Ask You: Is This How to "Fix" Congress?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Nearly all Americans agree that Congress has become a sad joke – a blight of irritating gnats.</p><p>How exciting, then, that a consultant to top Republican lawmakers has figured out how to make Congress better. Ready? Raise the members’ pay!</p><p>Golly, why didn’t I think of that? After all, who wants to work for only $174,000 a year (plus full health care, a really nice lifetime pension, and a flock of personal staffers to do the heavy lifting)? This congressional insider insists that such compensation is way too paltry for the best-and-brightest types Congress needs, so they choose Wall Street or corporate careers, rather than public service.</p><p>“Ask any corporate leader,” <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/25/opinion/congress-salary-stock-trading.html">he asserts</a>, and they’ll say “talent is everything.” And, he explains, it takes serious bucks to “attract and retain talent.” So, the answer to getting a better Congress is easy, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/25/opinion/congress-salary-stock-trading.html">he writes:</a> “Let’s start by doubling their salaries.”</p><p>Excuse me, but let’s not.</p><p>While money <em>is</em> the reason Congress fails to represent the common good of America’s workday majority, their paychecks aren’t to blame. Rather, it’s the corrupting power of the unlimited dollars that corporations and billionaires are spewing into our elections and lobbying campaigns, literally buying the special-interest Congress that Americans despise.</p><p>The obvious problem with Congress is not that members don’t get enough money, but that they take too much. Don’t even think about raising congressional pay before outlawing congressional <em>payoffs</em>! Besides, anyone who’ll only commit to public service work if their pay is doubled is not committed to the public, to service, or even to work. They’re narcissists, committed to themselves – and Congress already has an excess of those.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/i-ask-you-is-this-how-to-fix-congress</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:173102490</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/173102490/f1ed93ea6aaa6ccf6e23b252d8182d07.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/173102490/7225598edb0ae87c25745423f57b551e.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Nearly all Americans agree that Congress has become a sad joke – a blight of irritating gnats. How exciting, then, that a consultant to top Republican lawmakers has figured out how to make Congress better. Ready? Raise the members’ pay! Golly, why didn’t I think of that? After all, who wants to work for only $174,000 a year (plus full health care, a really nice lifetime pension, and a flock of personal staffers to do the heavy lifting)? This congressional insider insists that such compensation is way too paltry for the best-and-brightest types Congress needs, so they choose Wall Street or corporate careers, rather than public service. “Ask any corporate leader,” he asserts, and they’ll say “talent is everything.” And, he explains, it takes serious bucks to “attract and retain talent.” So, the answer to getting a better Congress is easy, he writes: “Let’s start by doubling their salaries.” Excuse me, but let’s not. While money is the reason Congress fails to represent the common good of America’s workday majority, their paychecks aren’t to blame. Rather, it’s the corrupting power of the unlimited dollars that corporations and billionaires are spewing into our elections and lobbying campaigns, literally buying the special-interest Congress that Americans despise. The obvious problem with Congress is not that members don’t get enough money, but that they take too much. Don’t even think about raising congressional pay before outlawing congressional payoffs! Besides, anyone who’ll only commit to public service work if their pay is doubled is not committed to the public, to service, or even to work. They’re narcissists, committed to themselves – and Congress already has an excess of those. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Nearly all Americans agree that Congress has become a sad joke – a blight of irritating gnats. How exciting, then, that a consultant to top Republican lawmakers has figured out how to make Congress better. Ready? Raise the members’ pay! Golly, why didn’t I think of that? After all, who wants to work for only $174,000 a year (plus full health care, a really nice lifetime pension, and a flock of personal staffers to do the heavy lifting)? This congressional insider insists that such compensation is way too paltry for the best-and-brightest types Congress needs, so they choose Wall Street or corporate careers, rather than public service. “Ask any corporate leader,” he asserts, and they’ll say “talent is everything.” And, he explains, it takes serious bucks to “attract and retain talent.” So, the answer to getting a better Congress is easy, he writes: “Let’s start by doubling their salaries.” Excuse me, but let’s not. While money is the reason Congress fails to represent the common good of America’s workday majority, their paychecks aren’t to blame. Rather, it’s the corrupting power of the unlimited dollars that corporations and billionaires are spewing into our elections and lobbying campaigns, literally buying the special-interest Congress that Americans despise. The obvious problem with Congress is not that members don’t get enough money, but that they take too much. Don’t even think about raising congressional pay before outlawing congressional payoffs! Besides, anyone who’ll only commit to public service work if their pay is doubled is not committed to the public, to service, or even to work. They’re narcissists, committed to themselves – and Congress already has an excess of those. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[This Trump Looniness Is Even Too Much for Marjorie Taylor Greene!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Some days I don’t know whether to rage in fury, weep quietly, or just throw up.</p><p>This, however, is definitely a throw-up day. That’s because our US Secretary of State (a once-honorable position that advocated humanitarian values) has just decreed that war-torn Palestinian children from Gaza will be denied medical visas that would let them come here for life-saving surgeries. Yes, innocent children horribly maimed by the US bombs, bullets, and billions of our tax dollars that our government sends to prop up the corrupt Israeli regime of <strong>Netanyahu</strong>, have now had America’s door slammed in their faces by <strong>Trump’s</strong> nutball extremists.</p><p>How extreme? <a target="_blank" href="https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5459634-greene-gaza-visitor-visas/">Even bulldog right-winger </a><a target="_blank" href="https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5459634-greene-gaza-visitor-visas/"><strong>Marjorie Taylor Greene</strong></a><a target="_blank" href="https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5459634-greene-gaza-visitor-visas/"> is appalled</a> that top USA officials have turned so cold as to reject common decency for “Palestinian kids who had their limbs and bodies blown apart.” But Secretary of State <strong>Marco Rubio</strong>, who reportedly once had a smidgeon of political integrity, immediately snapped to attention when someone named <strong>Laura Loomer</strong> – one of Trump’s loopy “influencers” – proclaimed that these Palestinian medical seekers were “pro-Hamas.”</p><p>Hello… they’re children! To which the Loomer lady <a target="_blank" href="https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/08/loomer-gaza-medical-visas-us-palestine/">summoned this piece of ignorance</a> from deep within her dark soul: “They are not that sick if they can sit on a plane for 22 hours to get to America.”</p><p>Okay, she’s just a doofus, but Rubio? He’s a practicing Catholic, so he surely knows Jesus’ biblical admonition: “Suffer the little children to come unto me.” Yet, he has officially banned them from the compassionate arms of the American people, darkly warning: “It’s not just kids… a bunch of adults are accompanying them.”</p><p>Yeah – their parents, guardians, <em>good Samaritans</em>. Gotta watch out for those types.</p><p><em>To stay on top of everything happening to Gaza, and to find solid actions you can take to fight and end the genocide, we recommend following </em><a target="_blank" href="https://www.lindasarsour.com/"><strong><em>Linda Sarsour</em></strong></a><em>, a Palestinian-American organizer and strategist who was also a surrogate for Bernie Sanders during his 2016 campaign.</em></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/this-trump-looniness-is-even-too</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:172698695</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/172698695/afe652f042262d6d5cbe0bf6a657b93d.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/172698695/0773f658f9cf106da3e617baaf39f841.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Some days I don’t know whether to rage in fury, weep quietly, or just throw up. This, however, is definitely a throw-up day. That’s because our US Secretary of State (a once-honorable position that advocated humanitarian values) has just decreed that war-torn Palestinian children from Gaza will be denied medical visas that would let them come here for life-saving surgeries. Yes, innocent children horribly maimed by the US bombs, bullets, and billions of our tax dollars that our government sends to prop up the corrupt Israeli regime of Netanyahu, have now had America’s door slammed in their faces by Trump’s nutball extremists. How extreme? Even bulldog right-winger Marjorie Taylor Greene is appalled that top USA officials have turned so cold as to reject common decency for “Palestinian kids who had their limbs and bodies blown apart.” But Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who reportedly once had a smidgeon of political integrity, immediately snapped to attention when someone named Laura Loomer – one of Trump’s loopy “influencers” – proclaimed that these Palestinian medical seekers were “pro-Hamas.” Hello… they’re children! To which the Loomer lady summoned this piece of ignorance from deep within her dark soul: “They are not that sick if they can sit on a plane for 22 hours to get to America.” Okay, she’s just a doofus, but Rubio? He’s a practicing Catholic, so he surely knows Jesus’ biblical admonition: “Suffer the little children to come unto me.” Yet, he has officially banned them from the compassionate arms of the American people, darkly warning: “It’s not just kids… a bunch of adults are accompanying them.” Yeah – their parents, guardians, good Samaritans. Gotta watch out for those types. To stay on top of everything happening to Gaza, and to find solid actions you can take to fight and end the genocide, we recommend following Linda Sarsour, a Palestinian-American organizer and strategist who was also a surrogate for Bernie Sanders during his 2016 campaign. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Some days I don’t know whether to rage in fury, weep quietly, or just throw up. This, however, is definitely a throw-up day. That’s because our US Secretary of State (a once-honorable position that advocated humanitarian values) has just decreed that war-torn Palestinian children from Gaza will be denied medical visas that would let them come here for life-saving surgeries. Yes, innocent children horribly maimed by the US bombs, bullets, and billions of our tax dollars that our government sends to prop up the corrupt Israeli regime of Netanyahu, have now had America’s door slammed in their faces by Trump’s nutball extremists. How extreme? Even bulldog right-winger Marjorie Taylor Greene is appalled that top USA officials have turned so cold as to reject common decency for “Palestinian kids who had their limbs and bodies blown apart.” But Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who reportedly once had a smidgeon of political integrity, immediately snapped to attention when someone named Laura Loomer – one of Trump’s loopy “influencers” – proclaimed that these Palestinian medical seekers were “pro-Hamas.” Hello… they’re children! To which the Loomer lady summoned this piece of ignorance from deep within her dark soul: “They are not that sick if they can sit on a plane for 22 hours to get to America.” Okay, she’s just a doofus, but Rubio? He’s a practicing Catholic, so he surely knows Jesus’ biblical admonition: “Suffer the little children to come unto me.” Yet, he has officially banned them from the compassionate arms of the American people, darkly warning: “It’s not just kids… a bunch of adults are accompanying them.” Yeah – their parents, guardians, good Samaritans. Gotta watch out for those types. To stay on top of everything happening to Gaza, and to find solid actions you can take to fight and end the genocide, we recommend following Linda Sarsour, a Palestinian-American organizer and strategist who was also a surrogate for Bernie Sanders during his 2016 campaign. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Kennedy’s “Healthy Food” Reform Gets Eaten Up by Big Food Corporations]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Bobby Kennedy, Jr. seemed on the right track when he launched his “Make America Healthy Again” campaign.</p><p>Well, not the wacky-quacky part of that agenda, where he teeters off into the prickly thicket of medical voodoo and vaccine bugaboos. But he was onto something fundamentally important when he began to rally public opposition to the arrogance, greed, and willful destructiveness of pesticide peddlers and other Big Food profiteers.</p><p>As Secretary of Health, Kennedy pushed Trump’s “presidential commission on children’s health” to take long-overdue action to rein-in those agribusiness contaminators of our food supply and natural resources. He called for limits and outright bans on industrial ag and food processing abuses that grow corporate profits at the expense of healthy kids.</p><p>Great!</p><p>But wait – <a target="_blank" href="https://consumerfed.org/maha-strategy-report-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/">the commission’s draft report is now out</a>, and none of Kennedy’s most meaningful stuff is in it. None! There’s no suggestion, for example, that even the most toxic cancer-causing pesticides should be outlawed, permanently removed from food products and our environment.</p><p>What happened? Money. While Kennedy was publicly talking a good game, Big Food profiteers were paying a million dollars each to have intimate talks at private dinners with Trump. And when money talks, political integrity walks.</p><p>Sadly, rather than resigning in protest of Trump’s whitewash and rallying America’s families to carry this betrayal into next year’s elections, Kennedy is hyping the report’s empty calories as a people’s victory! But he can’t make chicken salad out of chicken manure. Grassroots groups themselves call the gutted report “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.momsacrossamerica.com/moms_across_america_responds_to_the_maha_commission_report">beyond laughable,</a>” “profoundly disappointing” and “dangerous.”</p><p>For genuine, structural change in food policy, go to Environmental Working Group: <a target="_blank" href="http://ewg.org">ewg.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/kennedys-healthy-food-reform-gets</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:172585318</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 17:24:51 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/172585318/a9adf3e9f902d7525962fc755431b771.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/172585318/be87ba90a7a176e22584cbc9cb4f134d.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Bobby Kennedy, Jr. seemed on the right track when he launched his “Make America Healthy Again” campaign. Well, not the wacky-quacky part of that agenda, where he teeters off into the prickly thicket of medical voodoo and vaccine bugaboos. But he was onto something fundamentally important when he began to rally public opposition to the arrogance, greed, and willful destructiveness of pesticide peddlers and other Big Food profiteers. As Secretary of Health, Kennedy pushed Trump’s “presidential commission on children’s health” to take long-overdue action to rein-in those agribusiness contaminators of our food supply and natural resources. He called for limits and outright bans on industrial ag and food processing abuses that grow corporate profits at the expense of healthy kids. Great! But wait – the commission’s draft report is now out, and none of Kennedy’s most meaningful stuff is in it. None! There’s no suggestion, for example, that even the most toxic cancer-causing pesticides should be outlawed, permanently removed from food products and our environment. What happened? Money. While Kennedy was publicly talking a good game, Big Food profiteers were paying a million dollars each to have intimate talks at private dinners with Trump. And when money talks, political integrity walks. Sadly, rather than resigning in protest of Trump’s whitewash and rallying America’s families to carry this betrayal into next year’s elections, Kennedy is hyping the report’s empty calories as a people’s victory! But he can’t make chicken salad out of chicken manure. Grassroots groups themselves call the gutted report “beyond laughable,” “profoundly disappointing” and “dangerous.” For genuine, structural change in food policy, go to Environmental Working Group: ewg.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Bobby Kennedy, Jr. seemed on the right track when he launched his “Make America Healthy Again” campaign. Well, not the wacky-quacky part of that agenda, where he teeters off into the prickly thicket of medical voodoo and vaccine bugaboos. But he was onto something fundamentally important when he began to rally public opposition to the arrogance, greed, and willful destructiveness of pesticide peddlers and other Big Food profiteers. As Secretary of Health, Kennedy pushed Trump’s “presidential commission on children’s health” to take long-overdue action to rein-in those agribusiness contaminators of our food supply and natural resources. He called for limits and outright bans on industrial ag and food processing abuses that grow corporate profits at the expense of healthy kids. Great! But wait – the commission’s draft report is now out, and none of Kennedy’s most meaningful stuff is in it. None! There’s no suggestion, for example, that even the most toxic cancer-causing pesticides should be outlawed, permanently removed from food products and our environment. What happened? Money. While Kennedy was publicly talking a good game, Big Food profiteers were paying a million dollars each to have intimate talks at private dinners with Trump. And when money talks, political integrity walks. Sadly, rather than resigning in protest of Trump’s whitewash and rallying America’s families to carry this betrayal into next year’s elections, Kennedy is hyping the report’s empty calories as a people’s victory! But he can’t make chicken salad out of chicken manure. Grassroots groups themselves call the gutted report “beyond laughable,” “profoundly disappointing” and “dangerous.” For genuine, structural change in food policy, go to Environmental Working Group: ewg.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Beware! Congress Is Driving Backward Down a Wrong Way Street]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>At about 12 years of age, I began working for my father, loading bundles into the two delivery trucks used in his small business. This required that, first, I back the trucks down an alley and into the loading bay. Thus, I learned to drive going backward, which probably says something fundamental about me.</p><p>But even at 12, I didn’t get stuck in reverse, as today’s Republican Congress has. The GOP’s autocratic ideologues and corporate toadies are spurning hard-won, economic, social, environmental, and other progress made by generations of grassroots Americans. They are trying to drive our people back to Robber Baron rule and Jim Crow law.</p><p>Indeed, no progressive advance today escapes the wrath of the GOP’s ideological swat squad. Consider the operatic political frenzy they’re now stirring up over Post Office trucks. Yes, that ubiquitous fleet of red, white, and blue mail delivery vehicles you see on every street and rural road in America.</p><p>Those gas-powered workhorses, now 35 years old, are way overdue for replacement. Sensibly, the Postal Service is buying <a target="_blank" href="https://about.usps.com/newsroom/national-releases/2024/1030-usps-headquarters-showcases-new-next-generation-delivery-vehicle.htm">fuel-efficient, non-polluting, electric vehicles, which include such basics as airbags and air conditioning</a>.</p><p>But no, squealed extreme right-wingers like <strong>Sen. Joni Ernst</strong> of Iowa. She condemns the very idea of a battery-powered fleet as lefty “wokeness.” So she’s demanding that Congress<a target="_blank" href="https://apnews.com/article/postal-service-electric-vehicles-trump-biden-reversal-03958ff70e8209ee2bf91c266c6d4b6f"> literally defund the purchase of EVs</a>, forcing the Postal Service to go backward to inefficient, polluting trucks fueled by Big Oil – an industry that just happens to be a generous funder of her career.</p><p>To get a clear-eyed view of which are the best vehicles to take us way forward, don’t ask a corporate-owned ideologue; ask the postal workers who drive them. Go to <a target="_blank" href="http://apwu.com">apwu.com</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/beware-congress-is-driving-backward</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:171898897</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/171898897/3ce24e9d81a574218fc7b285abc40c90.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/171898897/5ce0fd35c7d3bb1ff8a0e10356631b2f.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>At about 12 years of age, I began working for my father, loading bundles into the two delivery trucks used in his small business. This required that, first, I back the trucks down an alley and into the loading bay. Thus, I learned to drive going backward, which probably says something fundamental about me. But even at 12, I didn’t get stuck in reverse, as today’s Republican Congress has. The GOP’s autocratic ideologues and corporate toadies are spurning hard-won, economic, social, environmental, and other progress made by generations of grassroots Americans. They are trying to drive our people back to Robber Baron rule and Jim Crow law. Indeed, no progressive advance today escapes the wrath of the GOP’s ideological swat squad. Consider the operatic political frenzy they’re now stirring up over Post Office trucks. Yes, that ubiquitous fleet of red, white, and blue mail delivery vehicles you see on every street and rural road in America. Those gas-powered workhorses, now 35 years old, are way overdue for replacement. Sensibly, the Postal Service is buying fuel-efficient, non-polluting, electric vehicles, which include such basics as airbags and air conditioning. But no, squealed extreme right-wingers like Sen. Joni Ernst of Iowa. She condemns the very idea of a battery-powered fleet as lefty “wokeness.” So she’s demanding that Congress literally defund the purchase of EVs, forcing the Postal Service to go backward to inefficient, polluting trucks fueled by Big Oil – an industry that just happens to be a generous funder of her career. To get a clear-eyed view of which are the best vehicles to take us way forward, don’t ask a corporate-owned ideologue; ask the postal workers who drive them. Go to apwu.com. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>At about 12 years of age, I began working for my father, loading bundles into the two delivery trucks used in his small business. This required that, first, I back the trucks down an alley and into the loading bay. Thus, I learned to drive going backward, which probably says something fundamental about me. But even at 12, I didn’t get stuck in reverse, as today’s Republican Congress has. The GOP’s autocratic ideologues and corporate toadies are spurning hard-won, economic, social, environmental, and other progress made by generations of grassroots Americans. They are trying to drive our people back to Robber Baron rule and Jim Crow law. Indeed, no progressive advance today escapes the wrath of the GOP’s ideological swat squad. Consider the operatic political frenzy they’re now stirring up over Post Office trucks. Yes, that ubiquitous fleet of red, white, and blue mail delivery vehicles you see on every street and rural road in America. Those gas-powered workhorses, now 35 years old, are way overdue for replacement. Sensibly, the Postal Service is buying fuel-efficient, non-polluting, electric vehicles, which include such basics as airbags and air conditioning. But no, squealed extreme right-wingers like Sen. Joni Ernst of Iowa. She condemns the very idea of a battery-powered fleet as lefty “wokeness.” So she’s demanding that Congress literally defund the purchase of EVs, forcing the Postal Service to go backward to inefficient, polluting trucks fueled by Big Oil – an industry that just happens to be a generous funder of her career. To get a clear-eyed view of which are the best vehicles to take us way forward, don’t ask a corporate-owned ideologue; ask the postal workers who drive them. Go to apwu.com. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Gerrymandering Means Your Local Representative Isn’t Local… And Isn’t Yours]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>In a 2006 documentary, <a target="_blank" href="https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLVZDcVE4mtG6Sl_lmZCVhVmnB0gFCif7d&#38;si=ExZceUlqPuzlrWS7">I assailed Texas Republican lawmakers for ramming a brutish gerrymandering scheme into law</a>, doing my report from a street sign in central Austin.</p><p>That sign was the exact location the GOP had used as the pin point for slicing up the city’s one congressional district into four pieces like a pizza. Each slice radiated far out of town, merging into Republican suburbs in distant cities – thus suppressing Austin’s progressive voice in Congress.</p><p>Now here they come again, assaulting progressive voters throughout the state with a gerrymandering gang bang. At the command of Donald Trump, our so-called “representatives” are submissively shoving millions of Texans into jerry-rigged Trump enclaves, solely to serve his political desires.</p><p>Far from being just another corrupt hyper-partisan political manipulation, this GOP ploy is stripping away America’s fundamental principle of representative democracy. Instead of grassroots communities sorting out their differences and choosing their own governing representatives in local elections, political hacks in Washington and the state capital are cynically relocating people’s political “locality” (with no participation at all by the people).</p><p>Yes, instead of constituents choosing their members of Congress, gerrymandering lets members choose their constituents. So “your” representative doesn’t need to know you, much less serve you. Thus, the issues that Congress considers don’t percolate up from local communities, but are chosen by national and state political operatives and multimillion-dollar campaign donors. It’s the nationalization of local elections, ignoring the real needs of hometown people.</p><p>Why shouldn’t you have a representative who’s at least from your community, maybe even knows your name… and gives a damn about something more constructive than Trump’s anti-democratic, plutocratic agenda.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/gerrymandering-means-your-local-representative</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:171894361</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/171894361/6a2e4f8df1d6a57213b3e748dce8fd80.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/171894361/0752850fb0f71d5159ae917b13cee991.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>In a 2006 documentary, I assailed Texas Republican lawmakers for ramming a brutish gerrymandering scheme into law, doing my report from a street sign in central Austin. That sign was the exact location the GOP had used as the pin point for slicing up the city’s one congressional district into four pieces like a pizza. Each slice radiated far out of town, merging into Republican suburbs in distant cities – thus suppressing Austin’s progressive voice in Congress. Now here they come again, assaulting progressive voters throughout the state with a gerrymandering gang bang. At the command of Donald Trump, our so-called “representatives” are submissively shoving millions of Texans into jerry-rigged Trump enclaves, solely to serve his political desires. Far from being just another corrupt hyper-partisan political manipulation, this GOP ploy is stripping away America’s fundamental principle of representative democracy. Instead of grassroots communities sorting out their differences and choosing their own governing representatives in local elections, political hacks in Washington and the state capital are cynically relocating people’s political “locality” (with no participation at all by the people). Yes, instead of constituents choosing their members of Congress, gerrymandering lets members choose their constituents. So “your” representative doesn’t need to know you, much less serve you. Thus, the issues that Congress considers don’t percolate up from local communities, but are chosen by national and state political operatives and multimillion-dollar campaign donors. It’s the nationalization of local elections, ignoring the real needs of hometown people. Why shouldn’t you have a representative who’s at least from your community, maybe even knows your name… and gives a damn about something more constructive than Trump’s anti-democratic, plutocratic agenda. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>In a 2006 documentary, I assailed Texas Republican lawmakers for ramming a brutish gerrymandering scheme into law, doing my report from a street sign in central Austin. That sign was the exact location the GOP had used as the pin point for slicing up the city’s one congressional district into four pieces like a pizza. Each slice radiated far out of town, merging into Republican suburbs in distant cities – thus suppressing Austin’s progressive voice in Congress. Now here they come again, assaulting progressive voters throughout the state with a gerrymandering gang bang. At the command of Donald Trump, our so-called “representatives” are submissively shoving millions of Texans into jerry-rigged Trump enclaves, solely to serve his political desires. Far from being just another corrupt hyper-partisan political manipulation, this GOP ploy is stripping away America’s fundamental principle of representative democracy. Instead of grassroots communities sorting out their differences and choosing their own governing representatives in local elections, political hacks in Washington and the state capital are cynically relocating people’s political “locality” (with no participation at all by the people). Yes, instead of constituents choosing their members of Congress, gerrymandering lets members choose their constituents. So “your” representative doesn’t need to know you, much less serve you. Thus, the issues that Congress considers don’t percolate up from local communities, but are chosen by national and state political operatives and multimillion-dollar campaign donors. It’s the nationalization of local elections, ignoring the real needs of hometown people. Why shouldn’t you have a representative who’s at least from your community, maybe even knows your name… and gives a damn about something more constructive than Trump’s anti-democratic, plutocratic agenda. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Elon Musk’s $30-Billion Ride on the Corporate Merry-Go-Round]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Is Elon Musk OK?</p><p>Just a few months ago, the prancing right-winger was constantly in the news. Today, though – <em>poof!</em> – he has vanished from media coverage. But fret not -- Elon always finds money to take care of Number One. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.axios.com/2025/08/04/tesla-elon-musk-stock">Indeed, this month he was handed a </a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.axios.com/2025/08/04/tesla-elon-musk-stock"><em>$30 billion pay raise</em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.axios.com/2025/08/04/tesla-elon-musk-stock"> by his car company</a>. Yes, BILLION.</p><p>Odd, since his stewardship of Tesla in the past couple of years has been disastrous. Sales, profit, quality, and market share are in the ditch, along with his own reputation. Yet, in a gushing letter to shareholders, the corporation’s board of directors asserted that its $30 billion handout was a “critical” gesture to induce Elon to show up for work. Apparently, $29 billion would not have been enough.</p><p>Who are these board members who supposedly “govern” the corporation and its CEO? One is Kimbal Musk. Yes, Elon’s brother! Others are close pals and lackeys, each of whom is extravagantly paid. For example, the board member who “negotiated” that ridiculous giveaway to His Supremeness has pocketed <em>more than half a billion dollars in profits</em> from Tesla stock options she has been granted.</p><p>Well, declare apologists for Musk and his captive board, if $30 billion was excessive, the shareholders who technically own Tesla could’ve sued to stop payment. Uh… no, they couldn’t. <a target="_blank" href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/when-greedy-corporations-want-a-stupid">Last year, Musk moved Tesla’s official residence to Texas, where the corrupt governor dutifully passed a law dictating that only shareholders owning at least three percent of the stock can sue on matters of corporate governance</a>. Basically, that eliminates all shareholders except: Musk.</p><p>And that’s how the corporate merry-go-round is rigged to keep spinning around and around and around.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/elon-musks-30-billion-ride-on-the</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:171282783</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/171282783/4157e203d93681742444249a504b77b0.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/171282783/acb4434cad85af6b5eafba339c9a88fc.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Is Elon Musk OK? Just a few months ago, the prancing right-winger was constantly in the news. Today, though – poof! – he has vanished from media coverage. But fret not -- Elon always finds money to take care of Number One. Indeed, this month he was handed a $30 billion pay raise by his car company. Yes, BILLION. Odd, since his stewardship of Tesla in the past couple of years has been disastrous. Sales, profit, quality, and market share are in the ditch, along with his own reputation. Yet, in a gushing letter to shareholders, the corporation’s board of directors asserted that its $30 billion handout was a “critical” gesture to induce Elon to show up for work. Apparently, $29 billion would not have been enough. Who are these board members who supposedly “govern” the corporation and its CEO? One is Kimbal Musk. Yes, Elon’s brother! Others are close pals and lackeys, each of whom is extravagantly paid. For example, the board member who “negotiated” that ridiculous giveaway to His Supremeness has pocketed more than half a billion dollars in profits from Tesla stock options she has been granted. Well, declare apologists for Musk and his captive board, if $30 billion was excessive, the shareholders who technically own Tesla could’ve sued to stop payment. Uh… no, they couldn’t. Last year, Musk moved Tesla’s official residence to Texas, where the corrupt governor dutifully passed a law dictating that only shareholders owning at least three percent of the stock can sue on matters of corporate governance. Basically, that eliminates all shareholders except: Musk. And that’s how the corporate merry-go-round is rigged to keep spinning around and around and around. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Is Elon Musk OK? Just a few months ago, the prancing right-winger was constantly in the news. Today, though – poof! – he has vanished from media coverage. But fret not -- Elon always finds money to take care of Number One. Indeed, this month he was handed a $30 billion pay raise by his car company. Yes, BILLION. Odd, since his stewardship of Tesla in the past couple of years has been disastrous. Sales, profit, quality, and market share are in the ditch, along with his own reputation. Yet, in a gushing letter to shareholders, the corporation’s board of directors asserted that its $30 billion handout was a “critical” gesture to induce Elon to show up for work. Apparently, $29 billion would not have been enough. Who are these board members who supposedly “govern” the corporation and its CEO? One is Kimbal Musk. Yes, Elon’s brother! Others are close pals and lackeys, each of whom is extravagantly paid. For example, the board member who “negotiated” that ridiculous giveaway to His Supremeness has pocketed more than half a billion dollars in profits from Tesla stock options she has been granted. Well, declare apologists for Musk and his captive board, if $30 billion was excessive, the shareholders who technically own Tesla could’ve sued to stop payment. Uh… no, they couldn’t. Last year, Musk moved Tesla’s official residence to Texas, where the corrupt governor dutifully passed a law dictating that only shareholders owning at least three percent of the stock can sue on matters of corporate governance. Basically, that eliminates all shareholders except: Musk. And that’s how the corporate merry-go-round is rigged to keep spinning around and around and around. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Ag Secretary Brooke Rollins Brilliant… Or What?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>A gaggle of self-righteous multimillionaires are now in charge of America’s poverty agencies and policies, and they’ve been flaunting their deeply-held ignorance about poor families – almost none of whom they actually know.</p><p>Consider the national embarrassment of <strong>Brooke Rollins</strong>, a patrician ideologue, who is Trump’s plutocratic Secretary of Agriculture. Besides promoting a corporatized food and farm system, Rollins is advocating a program of back-to-the-future peonage for poor people. “We have way too many people that are taking government program that are able to work,” she snorts.</p><p>Bad grammar aside, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/understanding-the-intersection-of-medicaid-and-work-an-update/">she falsely asserts</a> that “34 million able-bodied adults” are freeloading on public health care. They’re taking Medicaid benefits that they ought to have to “earn” by hard labor, she recently decreed. Her Dickensian solution: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/09/trump-agriculture-medicaid-migrant-farm-workers">Put the moochers to work in the fields!</a></p><p>Noting that Trump’s militarized assault on immigrants has terrorized agricultural workers, thus creating a farm labor crisis, Rollins wants to hitch America’s poor families to the plow. Voilà – labor shortage solved, and the poor are forced to earn their medical care. What a brilliant leader!</p><p>Except for her rank ignorance. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/understanding-the-intersection-of-medicaid-and-work-an-update/">First, 64 percent of Medicaid recipients are </a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/understanding-the-intersection-of-medicaid-and-work-an-update/"><em>already working</em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/understanding-the-intersection-of-medicaid-and-work-an-update/"> and nearly all of the rest are retirees, unable to work, or struggling to find jobs.</a> Second, she’s obviously unaware that agriculture is <em>skilled</em> work – you can’t just bus city and suburban people out to the country and say “grow stuff.”</p><p>And third, it is beyond arrogant for a rich government autocrat – who takes $220,000 a year from taxpayers, plus platinum healthcare benefits and a fat pension – to be pontificating about forcing “undeserving” poor into hot fields to produce a nice leafy salad for her lunch.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/is-ag-secretary-brooke-rollins-brilliant</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:171279287</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/171279287/8b78f56bc230a9d0192826a862462436.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/171279287/1499ee67009db9554433468bcdfee02c.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>A gaggle of self-righteous multimillionaires are now in charge of America’s poverty agencies and policies, and they’ve been flaunting their deeply-held ignorance about poor families – almost none of whom they actually know. Consider the national embarrassment of Brooke Rollins, a patrician ideologue, who is Trump’s plutocratic Secretary of Agriculture. Besides promoting a corporatized food and farm system, Rollins is advocating a program of back-to-the-future peonage for poor people. “We have way too many people that are taking government program that are able to work,” she snorts. Bad grammar aside, she falsely asserts that “34 million able-bodied adults” are freeloading on public health care. They’re taking Medicaid benefits that they ought to have to “earn” by hard labor, she recently decreed. Her Dickensian solution: Put the moochers to work in the fields! Noting that Trump’s militarized assault on immigrants has terrorized agricultural workers, thus creating a farm labor crisis, Rollins wants to hitch America’s poor families to the plow. Voilà – labor shortage solved, and the poor are forced to earn their medical care. What a brilliant leader! Except for her rank ignorance. First, 64 percent of Medicaid recipients are already working and nearly all of the rest are retirees, unable to work, or struggling to find jobs. Second, she’s obviously unaware that agriculture is skilled work – you can’t just bus city and suburban people out to the country and say “grow stuff.” And third, it is beyond arrogant for a rich government autocrat – who takes $220,000 a year from taxpayers, plus platinum healthcare benefits and a fat pension – to be pontificating about forcing “undeserving” poor into hot fields to produce a nice leafy salad for her lunch. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>A gaggle of self-righteous multimillionaires are now in charge of America’s poverty agencies and policies, and they’ve been flaunting their deeply-held ignorance about poor families – almost none of whom they actually know. Consider the national embarrassment of Brooke Rollins, a patrician ideologue, who is Trump’s plutocratic Secretary of Agriculture. Besides promoting a corporatized food and farm system, Rollins is advocating a program of back-to-the-future peonage for poor people. “We have way too many people that are taking government program that are able to work,” she snorts. Bad grammar aside, she falsely asserts that “34 million able-bodied adults” are freeloading on public health care. They’re taking Medicaid benefits that they ought to have to “earn” by hard labor, she recently decreed. Her Dickensian solution: Put the moochers to work in the fields! Noting that Trump’s militarized assault on immigrants has terrorized agricultural workers, thus creating a farm labor crisis, Rollins wants to hitch America’s poor families to the plow. Voilà – labor shortage solved, and the poor are forced to earn their medical care. What a brilliant leader! Except for her rank ignorance. First, 64 percent of Medicaid recipients are already working and nearly all of the rest are retirees, unable to work, or struggling to find jobs. Second, she’s obviously unaware that agriculture is skilled work – you can’t just bus city and suburban people out to the country and say “grow stuff.” And third, it is beyond arrogant for a rich government autocrat – who takes $220,000 a year from taxpayers, plus platinum healthcare benefits and a fat pension – to be pontificating about forcing “undeserving” poor into hot fields to produce a nice leafy salad for her lunch. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Shouldn’t the Democratic Party Actually Be the Party of «d»emocrats?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Will Rogers joked that when thousands of rural Oklahomans fled the 1930s Dust Bowl and migrated to California: “It raised the intellectual level of both states.”</p><p>Following that line of thought, it occurred to me that America could benefit mightily if the Democratic Party’s overbearing corporate contingent were to migrate to their natural domain, the Republican Party. Seriously, as <a target="_blank" href="https://substack.com/profile/626319-robert-reich">Robert Reich</a> recently wrote: “Who in the world needs corporate Democrats?”</p><p>Thomas Jefferson warned of the democracy-crushing threat of America’s emerging “moneyed corporations.” And, sure enough, here they are today – literally owning the White House, Congress, Judiciary, most state governments… and suppressing democracy itself.</p><p>They’re entrenched not because they’re championed by the Republican Party, but because the once-proud party of America’s broad working class has also yoked itself to corporate money and embraced Republican policies of corporate supremacy. Where does that leave the great majority of working stiffs on election day? Staying home, feeling abandoned as both parties cater to the moneyed elite.</p><p>While many corporate Democrats insist they’re “social progressives,” it would be a profound public service for them to carry those social values directly into Republican primaries, softening that party’s raw minginess a bit. At the same time, their departure would free the Democratic Party from being financially shackled to the corporate agenda, letting it return to its roots as the unequivocating champion of working-class, little-d <em>democrats</em>.</p><p>By clarifying the core policy differences of both parties, elections could matter to most people again, presenting honest choices between a democratic or a plutocratic future. Pie-in-the-sky? Maybe, or even probably. But baking a pie starts by turning on the heat.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/shouldnt-the-democratic-party-actually</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:170705663</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 13:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/170705663/bc2106f39f161115de46be457026a2fc.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/170705663/9f368c941a848de5cf81536fbb072993.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Will Rogers joked that when thousands of rural Oklahomans fled the 1930s Dust Bowl and migrated to California: “It raised the intellectual level of both states.” Following that line of thought, it occurred to me that America could benefit mightily if the Democratic Party’s overbearing corporate contingent were to migrate to their natural domain, the Republican Party. Seriously, as Robert Reich recently wrote: “Who in the world needs corporate Democrats?” Thomas Jefferson warned of the democracy-crushing threat of America’s emerging “moneyed corporations.” And, sure enough, here they are today – literally owning the White House, Congress, Judiciary, most state governments… and suppressing democracy itself. They’re entrenched not because they’re championed by the Republican Party, but because the once-proud party of America’s broad working class has also yoked itself to corporate money and embraced Republican policies of corporate supremacy. Where does that leave the great majority of working stiffs on election day? Staying home, feeling abandoned as both parties cater to the moneyed elite. While many corporate Democrats insist they’re “social progressives,” it would be a profound public service for them to carry those social values directly into Republican primaries, softening that party’s raw minginess a bit. At the same time, their departure would free the Democratic Party from being financially shackled to the corporate agenda, letting it return to its roots as the unequivocating champion of working-class, little-d democrats. By clarifying the core policy differences of both parties, elections could matter to most people again, presenting honest choices between a democratic or a plutocratic future. Pie-in-the-sky? Maybe, or even probably. But baking a pie starts by turning on the heat. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Will Rogers joked that when thousands of rural Oklahomans fled the 1930s Dust Bowl and migrated to California: “It raised the intellectual level of both states.” Following that line of thought, it occurred to me that America could benefit mightily if the Democratic Party’s overbearing corporate contingent were to migrate to their natural domain, the Republican Party. Seriously, as Robert Reich recently wrote: “Who in the world needs corporate Democrats?” Thomas Jefferson warned of the democracy-crushing threat of America’s emerging “moneyed corporations.” And, sure enough, here they are today – literally owning the White House, Congress, Judiciary, most state governments… and suppressing democracy itself. They’re entrenched not because they’re championed by the Republican Party, but because the once-proud party of America’s broad working class has also yoked itself to corporate money and embraced Republican policies of corporate supremacy. Where does that leave the great majority of working stiffs on election day? Staying home, feeling abandoned as both parties cater to the moneyed elite. While many corporate Democrats insist they’re “social progressives,” it would be a profound public service for them to carry those social values directly into Republican primaries, softening that party’s raw minginess a bit. At the same time, their departure would free the Democratic Party from being financially shackled to the corporate agenda, letting it return to its roots as the unequivocating champion of working-class, little-d democrats. By clarifying the core policy differences of both parties, elections could matter to most people again, presenting honest choices between a democratic or a plutocratic future. Pie-in-the-sky? Maybe, or even probably. But baking a pie starts by turning on the heat. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Trump Is Not Only For Sale – You Can Also Lease Him]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Frenetic crowds are storming the White House like a Black Friday mob at Walmart!</p><p>Only these are not shoppers scrambling for family needs – these are CEOs, lobbyists, and billionaires out to “get theirs” in the huge Trump-a-Thon sell-off of Presidential favors. Common folks need not apply, since MAGA, Inc. (Trump’s political fundraising sack) charges a million bucks or more just to buy access to his golden throne.</p><p>Once there, everything is for sale. One cryptocurrency huckster, for example, delivered his million to get into a candlelight dinner at Mar-a-Lago, where he pitched a business deal to Trump himself. Then, for an extra $200,000, the crypto-guy was allowed to <a target="_blank" href="https://www.politico.com/news/2025/04/19/white-house-egg-roll-sponsors-00299714">“sponsor” the annual Easter Egg Roll </a>on the White House lawn. Yes – they’ve even financialized and corporatized an apolitical, publicly-funded event for children!</p><p>Not only is Trump being bought by Big Money, but he’s also available for short-term lease. For example, rich businesswoman Elizabeth Fago leased him in April for some heavy lifting on a household chore. Her son Paul had been found guilty last year of tax crimes and was headed to prison. But a million dollar check to MAGA Inc. put her in direct touch with Mister Fix-It. Sure enough, once her check was cashed, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/02/us/politics/donor-list-suggests-scale-of-trumps-pay-for-access-operation.html">the fortunate son was granted “a full and unconditional” presidential pardon</a> – no jail time, no payment of restitution to his victims.</p><p>When the <em>New York Times </em>asked about such corrupt selling of official favors, MAGA Inc. declared that Trump treats every American the same. So, there you have Trump’s million-dollar definition of “American.” If you’ve got the million, you’re in the club. If you don’t, you’re not.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/trump-is-not-only-for-sale-you-can</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:170702224</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/170702224/0309618844a8bc09e99d68c474cc1cff.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/170702224/203f7e755b111db8a14ca12eb202c21a.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Frenetic crowds are storming the White House like a Black Friday mob at Walmart! Only these are not shoppers scrambling for family needs – these are CEOs, lobbyists, and billionaires out to “get theirs” in the huge Trump-a-Thon sell-off of Presidential favors. Common folks need not apply, since MAGA, Inc. (Trump’s political fundraising sack) charges a million bucks or more just to buy access to his golden throne. Once there, everything is for sale. One cryptocurrency huckster, for example, delivered his million to get into a candlelight dinner at Mar-a-Lago, where he pitched a business deal to Trump himself. Then, for an extra $200,000, the crypto-guy was allowed to “sponsor” the annual Easter Egg Roll on the White House lawn. Yes – they’ve even financialized and corporatized an apolitical, publicly-funded event for children! Not only is Trump being bought by Big Money, but he’s also available for short-term lease. For example, rich businesswoman Elizabeth Fago leased him in April for some heavy lifting on a household chore. Her son Paul had been found guilty last year of tax crimes and was headed to prison. But a million dollar check to MAGA Inc. put her in direct touch with Mister Fix-It. Sure enough, once her check was cashed, the fortunate son was granted “a full and unconditional” presidential pardon – no jail time, no payment of restitution to his victims. When the New York Times asked about such corrupt selling of official favors, MAGA Inc. declared that Trump treats every American the same. So, there you have Trump’s million-dollar definition of “American.” If you’ve got the million, you’re in the club. If you don’t, you’re not. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Frenetic crowds are storming the White House like a Black Friday mob at Walmart! Only these are not shoppers scrambling for family needs – these are CEOs, lobbyists, and billionaires out to “get theirs” in the huge Trump-a-Thon sell-off of Presidential favors. Common folks need not apply, since MAGA, Inc. (Trump’s political fundraising sack) charges a million bucks or more just to buy access to his golden throne. Once there, everything is for sale. One cryptocurrency huckster, for example, delivered his million to get into a candlelight dinner at Mar-a-Lago, where he pitched a business deal to Trump himself. Then, for an extra $200,000, the crypto-guy was allowed to “sponsor” the annual Easter Egg Roll on the White House lawn. Yes – they’ve even financialized and corporatized an apolitical, publicly-funded event for children! Not only is Trump being bought by Big Money, but he’s also available for short-term lease. For example, rich businesswoman Elizabeth Fago leased him in April for some heavy lifting on a household chore. Her son Paul had been found guilty last year of tax crimes and was headed to prison. But a million dollar check to MAGA Inc. put her in direct touch with Mister Fix-It. Sure enough, once her check was cashed, the fortunate son was granted “a full and unconditional” presidential pardon – no jail time, no payment of restitution to his victims. When the New York Times asked about such corrupt selling of official favors, MAGA Inc. declared that Trump treats every American the same. So, there you have Trump’s million-dollar definition of “American.” If you’ve got the million, you’re in the club. If you don’t, you’re not. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Trumpsters Say America’s History Is What They Say It Is]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Has your family visited any of America’s phenomenal national parks or historical sites this summer? What treasures they are!</p><p>Also, visits to these jewels are enriched by the deeply-knowledgeable Park Service staff. And, of course, there’s the extra-special bonus that the Trump regime has added to our public parks this year: Political censorship.</p><p>With Trump issuing his dizzying blizzard of right-wing executive orders, you might’ve missed the one in March commanding the Park Service to scrutinize all of its public exhibits, signs, websites, videos, and other materials. Why? To flag and delete any scrap of information that Trump’s right-wing cultural cops consider to be “negative” historical content about America.</p><p>Sure enough, the Interior Department’s political overseers promptly compelled staffs at the Park Service’s 433 locations to go on a witch hunt for ideological impurity. In particular, any suggestion that racism, oppression, autocracy, and violence have been common features of the American experience have been decreed verboten. And, to assure a thorough cleansing of history, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.npca.org/articles/9321-new-park-signs-undermine-rangers-aim-to-erase-history">MAGA posses have been invited to go to historic sites and tag items they don’t like</a>. Trump operatives say that by mid-September, they will have removed, deleted, or – get this – physically <em>covered-up</em> the inconvenient truths of our people’s history.</p><p>They’re like one-year-olds who think if they cover their eyes, we can’t see them. Well, peek-a-boo! A rebellious coalition called “Save Our Signs,” is asking grassroots people to take photos and videos of Park Service exhibits before they’re hidden away. Then, SOS will display samples of the banned material online so We the People can see the inanity of Trump’s 1984ish Newspeak censorship. Link to SOS at <a target="_blank" href="https://sites.google.com/umn.edu/save-our-signs">jimhightower.com/SaveOurSigns</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/trumpsters-say-americas-history-is</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:170272225</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/170272225/a420c77efaffdf68d2e2db8ef9d8715c.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/170272225/5d054e36f34a8ab8564b513714dfd996.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Has your family visited any of America’s phenomenal national parks or historical sites this summer? What treasures they are! Also, visits to these jewels are enriched by the deeply-knowledgeable Park Service staff. And, of course, there’s the extra-special bonus that the Trump regime has added to our public parks this year: Political censorship. With Trump issuing his dizzying blizzard of right-wing executive orders, you might’ve missed the one in March commanding the Park Service to scrutinize all of its public exhibits, signs, websites, videos, and other materials. Why? To flag and delete any scrap of information that Trump’s right-wing cultural cops consider to be “negative” historical content about America. Sure enough, the Interior Department’s political overseers promptly compelled staffs at the Park Service’s 433 locations to go on a witch hunt for ideological impurity. In particular, any suggestion that racism, oppression, autocracy, and violence have been common features of the American experience have been decreed verboten. And, to assure a thorough cleansing of history, MAGA posses have been invited to go to historic sites and tag items they don’t like. Trump operatives say that by mid-September, they will have removed, deleted, or – get this – physically covered-up the inconvenient truths of our people’s history. They’re like one-year-olds who think if they cover their eyes, we can’t see them. Well, peek-a-boo! A rebellious coalition called “Save Our Signs,” is asking grassroots people to take photos and videos of Park Service exhibits before they’re hidden away. Then, SOS will display samples of the banned material online so We the People can see the inanity of Trump’s 1984ish Newspeak censorship. Link to SOS at jimhightower.com/SaveOurSigns. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Has your family visited any of America’s phenomenal national parks or historical sites this summer? What treasures they are! Also, visits to these jewels are enriched by the deeply-knowledgeable Park Service staff. And, of course, there’s the extra-special bonus that the Trump regime has added to our public parks this year: Political censorship. With Trump issuing his dizzying blizzard of right-wing executive orders, you might’ve missed the one in March commanding the Park Service to scrutinize all of its public exhibits, signs, websites, videos, and other materials. Why? To flag and delete any scrap of information that Trump’s right-wing cultural cops consider to be “negative” historical content about America. Sure enough, the Interior Department’s political overseers promptly compelled staffs at the Park Service’s 433 locations to go on a witch hunt for ideological impurity. In particular, any suggestion that racism, oppression, autocracy, and violence have been common features of the American experience have been decreed verboten. And, to assure a thorough cleansing of history, MAGA posses have been invited to go to historic sites and tag items they don’t like. Trump operatives say that by mid-September, they will have removed, deleted, or – get this – physically covered-up the inconvenient truths of our people’s history. They’re like one-year-olds who think if they cover their eyes, we can’t see them. Well, peek-a-boo! A rebellious coalition called “Save Our Signs,” is asking grassroots people to take photos and videos of Park Service exhibits before they’re hidden away. Then, SOS will display samples of the banned material online so We the People can see the inanity of Trump’s 1984ish Newspeak censorship. Link to SOS at jimhightower.com/SaveOurSigns. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can Feisty Journalists Rescue Their Newspaper from Corporate Greed… Again?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>In 2018 my newspaper died. Well, actually, the emaciated carcass of the Austin American Statesman still had a feeble pulse. But its journalistic voice and soul were gone, stripped out by the notorious financial predators of Gannett, the huge media conglomerate that had recently bought the paper.</p><p>Happily, though, the Statesman has made a near-miraculous recovery, thanks to a small-but-feisty band of actual journalists who believe in local newspapers. They fought Gannett bosses tenaciously, gaining a voice by forming a union, striking, and finally compelling the giant to sign a union contract. Victory!</p><p>Uh… not yet. Just months later, Gannett sold the newspaper to Hearst, another massive media conglomerate. This new relationship started well, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.instagram.com/p/DMilfIqJrHk/?img_index=3">but soon turned sour when Hearst honchos abruptly refused to honor the paper’s contract with the union</a>. Then they began firing employees and jacking around with the newsroom’s healthcare and retirement benefits. Adding pettiness to greed, Hearst honchos even refused to let Statesman journalists take a holiday that corporate managers get. What the hell?</p><p>Bear in mind that Hearst is a phenomenally profitable, $13-billion-a-year, multi-media behemoth. It’s CEO, Steven Swartz, pockets millions of dollars a year and lives in luxury. Also, Austin is a booming media market worth gazillions to Hearst! No need to be so pathetically mingy!</p><p>So, the hardy members of the Austin News Guild are back doing what working people have to do – organizing and mobilizing for a little more justice. “We’re no strangers to the petty tactics of corporate elites,” they say, so the guild is relaunching its grassroots campaign to battle the b******s, fight for fairness, and protect local news. To track progress, go to: <a target="_blank" href="http://AustinNewsGuild.org">AustinNewsGuild.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/can-feisty-journalists-rescue-their</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:170187987</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 16:28:23 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/170187987/c013f12b29da44608711d994dc2af41b.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/170187987/780005b6531561b4cb1bf2541692f378.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>In 2018 my newspaper died. Well, actually, the emaciated carcass of the Austin American Statesman still had a feeble pulse. But its journalistic voice and soul were gone, stripped out by the notorious financial predators of Gannett, the huge media conglomerate that had recently bought the paper. Happily, though, the Statesman has made a near-miraculous recovery, thanks to a small-but-feisty band of actual journalists who believe in local newspapers. They fought Gannett bosses tenaciously, gaining a voice by forming a union, striking, and finally compelling the giant to sign a union contract. Victory! Uh… not yet. Just months later, Gannett sold the newspaper to Hearst, another massive media conglomerate. This new relationship started well, but soon turned sour when Hearst honchos abruptly refused to honor the paper’s contract with the union. Then they began firing employees and jacking around with the newsroom’s healthcare and retirement benefits. Adding pettiness to greed, Hearst honchos even refused to let Statesman journalists take a holiday that corporate managers get. What the hell? Bear in mind that Hearst is a phenomenally profitable, $13-billion-a-year, multi-media behemoth. It’s CEO, Steven Swartz, pockets millions of dollars a year and lives in luxury. Also, Austin is a booming media market worth gazillions to Hearst! No need to be so pathetically mingy! So, the hardy members of the Austin News Guild are back doing what working people have to do – organizing and mobilizing for a little more justice. “We’re no strangers to the petty tactics of corporate elites,” they say, so the guild is relaunching its grassroots campaign to battle the b******s, fight for fairness, and protect local news. To track progress, go to: AustinNewsGuild.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>In 2018 my newspaper died. Well, actually, the emaciated carcass of the Austin American Statesman still had a feeble pulse. But its journalistic voice and soul were gone, stripped out by the notorious financial predators of Gannett, the huge media conglomerate that had recently bought the paper. Happily, though, the Statesman has made a near-miraculous recovery, thanks to a small-but-feisty band of actual journalists who believe in local newspapers. They fought Gannett bosses tenaciously, gaining a voice by forming a union, striking, and finally compelling the giant to sign a union contract. Victory! Uh… not yet. Just months later, Gannett sold the newspaper to Hearst, another massive media conglomerate. This new relationship started well, but soon turned sour when Hearst honchos abruptly refused to honor the paper’s contract with the union. Then they began firing employees and jacking around with the newsroom’s healthcare and retirement benefits. Adding pettiness to greed, Hearst honchos even refused to let Statesman journalists take a holiday that corporate managers get. What the hell? Bear in mind that Hearst is a phenomenally profitable, $13-billion-a-year, multi-media behemoth. It’s CEO, Steven Swartz, pockets millions of dollars a year and lives in luxury. Also, Austin is a booming media market worth gazillions to Hearst! No need to be so pathetically mingy! So, the hardy members of the Austin News Guild are back doing what working people have to do – organizing and mobilizing for a little more justice. “We’re no strangers to the petty tactics of corporate elites,” they say, so the guild is relaunching its grassroots campaign to battle the b******s, fight for fairness, and protect local news. To track progress, go to: AustinNewsGuild.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Are You Really A “Winner” If You Have to Rig the Rules to Win?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>If you want to learn how to play the game, boys and girls, forget all that old-fashioned stuff like “do your best,” “be a good sport,” and “respect the game.”</p><p>No, no, that’s loser talk. Today, the name of the game is <em>winning</em>. You’re Number One, or you’re nothing, so forget fair play and do whatever it takes to WIN! Of course, the gold medal champion of gaming the system is Trump, and to see the master in action, look at his current electoral manipulation in Texas.</p><p>With only a slim majority in the US House, and with his job-approval rating plummeting, Trump recently realized he’s in danger of losing his iron grip on Congress in next year’s mid-term elections. Gosh, what to do? Simple – rig the election! And no place is better at that than Texas.</p><p>So, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.lonestarleft.com/p/calls-to-action-stop-trump-texas">Lord Donald ordered Greg Abbott, the right-wing partisan hack who is governor of this once-proud Lone Star State, to convene a special legislative session to redraw our congressional districts</a>. Never mind that the districts had already been gerrymandered by Abbott only four years ago, Trump is demanding that voters be herded like cattle into even more convoluted districts. The goal is to oust five Texas Democrats from the House, thus stacking the Congressional deck with more Republicans so he can keep ruling the place. It’s political game-playing at its worst, disrespecting voters and the very idea of a House of Representatives.</p><p>Of course, there is an honorable way for the GOP to elect more of its own without engaging in political perversion: Stop trying to push far-right-wing nonsense that the great majority of voters don’t want. Instead, put up decent candidates who don’t need a Trump script to know what they stand for… and don’t need a Trump map to find the district that they supposedly “represent.”</p><p>Do something!</p><p>To stay on top of all-things-progressive in Texas, we can’t recommend <a target="_blank" href="https://substack.com/profile/14474375-michelle-h-davis">Michelle H. Davis</a>’ Substack enough: <a target="_blank" href="https://open.substack.com/pub/lonestarleft">Lone Star Left</a>. Here are a couple of her recent posts:</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/are-you-really-a-winner-if-you-have</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:169455342</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/169455342/10d1f62761e22e36e5732814ae2b2be7.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/169455342/f8eb4c90d2381084ca0b815daa813697.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>If you want to learn how to play the game, boys and girls, forget all that old-fashioned stuff like “do your best,” “be a good sport,” and “respect the game.” No, no, that’s loser talk. Today, the name of the game is winning. You’re Number One, or you’re nothing, so forget fair play and do whatever it takes to WIN! Of course, the gold medal champion of gaming the system is Trump, and to see the master in action, look at his current electoral manipulation in Texas. With only a slim majority in the US House, and with his job-approval rating plummeting, Trump recently realized he’s in danger of losing his iron grip on Congress in next year’s mid-term elections. Gosh, what to do? Simple – rig the election! And no place is better at that than Texas. So, Lord Donald ordered Greg Abbott, the right-wing partisan hack who is governor of this once-proud Lone Star State, to convene a special legislative session to redraw our congressional districts. Never mind that the districts had already been gerrymandered by Abbott only four years ago, Trump is demanding that voters be herded like cattle into even more convoluted districts. The goal is to oust five Texas Democrats from the House, thus stacking the Congressional deck with more Republicans so he can keep ruling the place. It’s political game-playing at its worst, disrespecting voters and the very idea of a House of Representatives. Of course, there is an honorable way for the GOP to elect more of its own without engaging in political perversion: Stop trying to push far-right-wing nonsense that the great majority of voters don’t want. Instead, put up decent candidates who don’t need a Trump script to know what they stand for… and don’t need a Trump map to find the district that they supposedly “represent.” Do something! To stay on top of all-things-progressive in Texas, we can’t recommend Michelle H. Davis’ Substack enough: Lone Star Left. Here are a couple of her recent posts: Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>If you want to learn how to play the game, boys and girls, forget all that old-fashioned stuff like “do your best,” “be a good sport,” and “respect the game.” No, no, that’s loser talk. Today, the name of the game is winning. You’re Number One, or you’re nothing, so forget fair play and do whatever it takes to WIN! Of course, the gold medal champion of gaming the system is Trump, and to see the master in action, look at his current electoral manipulation in Texas. With only a slim majority in the US House, and with his job-approval rating plummeting, Trump recently realized he’s in danger of losing his iron grip on Congress in next year’s mid-term elections. Gosh, what to do? Simple – rig the election! And no place is better at that than Texas. So, Lord Donald ordered Greg Abbott, the right-wing partisan hack who is governor of this once-proud Lone Star State, to convene a special legislative session to redraw our congressional districts. Never mind that the districts had already been gerrymandered by Abbott only four years ago, Trump is demanding that voters be herded like cattle into even more convoluted districts. The goal is to oust five Texas Democrats from the House, thus stacking the Congressional deck with more Republicans so he can keep ruling the place. It’s political game-playing at its worst, disrespecting voters and the very idea of a House of Representatives. Of course, there is an honorable way for the GOP to elect more of its own without engaging in political perversion: Stop trying to push far-right-wing nonsense that the great majority of voters don’t want. Instead, put up decent candidates who don’t need a Trump script to know what they stand for… and don’t need a Trump map to find the district that they supposedly “represent.” Do something! To stay on top of all-things-progressive in Texas, we can’t recommend Michelle H. Davis’ Substack enough: Lone Star Left. Here are a couple of her recent posts: Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Gaza Is a Moral Reckoning for Israel – And for You and Me]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Some outrages are so outrageous that I don’t even want to talk about them. But that’s when we <em>must </em>speak out.</p><p>Indeed, let’s rage against our government’s wholly-unprincipled embrace of (and direct participation in) the Israeli government’s ongoing massacre of the Palestinian people.</p><p>* Israel’s ruthless, 2-year invasion of Gaza <a target="_blank" href="https://www.npr.org/2025/07/23/nx-s1-5477365/israel-gaza-aid-casualties">has already killed 59,000 Palestinian civilians</a> – more than half of them women and children.</p><p>* That’s as many killings as our soldiers suffered during the entire Vietnam War.</p><p>* Israel’s military has forced nearly all of Gaza’s two million citizens to abandon their homes and towns, herding them into distant camps, many without food, water, toilets, etc.</p><p>* Excruciating death by starvation – especially among children – is now at epidemic levels in Gaza, creating a dystopian horror.</p><p>* When masses of desperate Palestinians rush to sporadic and inadequate deliveries of humanitarian aid, Israeli snipers and other forces have opened fire on them – just since May, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.npr.org/2025/07/23/nx-s1-5477365/israel-gaza-aid-casualties">more than a thousand unarmed Palestinians have been assassinated in such ambushes</a>.</p><p>Yes, fiendish Hamas terrorists, who literally operate underground in Gaza, are guilty of sadistic brutality against Israelis. But moral retribution requires going after Hamas, not mounting an inhumane onslaught to wipe the Palestinian people off the Earth.</p><p>A majority of Israelis are now <a target="_blank" href="https://www.bbc.com/news/videos/cgq7qpqz27qo">openly rebelling against their government’s barbaric abandonment of their people’s best values</a>. But what about us? Those sniper bullets and rockets have your and my names on them; those wasted children who’re dying in the agony of starvation belong to us; and it’s our politicians who’re propping up Israel’s corrupt prime minister and war machine. To stop this perversion of our own humanitarian values, go to International Rescue Committee: <a target="_blank" href="http://rescue.org">rescue.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/gaza-is-a-moral-reckoning-for-israel</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:169452956</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/169452956/2b25a07378256b4c5c75f6b83acb2ae8.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/169452956/50f43f36823f26d80633cc75f3b0131d.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Some outrages are so outrageous that I don’t even want to talk about them. But that’s when we must speak out. Indeed, let’s rage against our government’s wholly-unprincipled embrace of (and direct participation in) the Israeli government’s ongoing massacre of the Palestinian people. * Israel’s ruthless, 2-year invasion of Gaza has already killed 59,000 Palestinian civilians – more than half of them women and children. * That’s as many killings as our soldiers suffered during the entire Vietnam War. * Israel’s military has forced nearly all of Gaza’s two million citizens to abandon their homes and towns, herding them into distant camps, many without food, water, toilets, etc. * Excruciating death by starvation – especially among children – is now at epidemic levels in Gaza, creating a dystopian horror. * When masses of desperate Palestinians rush to sporadic and inadequate deliveries of humanitarian aid, Israeli snipers and other forces have opened fire on them – just since May, more than a thousand unarmed Palestinians have been assassinated in such ambushes. Yes, fiendish Hamas terrorists, who literally operate underground in Gaza, are guilty of sadistic brutality against Israelis. But moral retribution requires going after Hamas, not mounting an inhumane onslaught to wipe the Palestinian people off the Earth. A majority of Israelis are now openly rebelling against their government’s barbaric abandonment of their people’s best values. But what about us? Those sniper bullets and rockets have your and my names on them; those wasted children who’re dying in the agony of starvation belong to us; and it’s our politicians who’re propping up Israel’s corrupt prime minister and war machine. To stop this perversion of our own humanitarian values, go to International Rescue Committee: rescue.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Some outrages are so outrageous that I don’t even want to talk about them. But that’s when we must speak out. Indeed, let’s rage against our government’s wholly-unprincipled embrace of (and direct participation in) the Israeli government’s ongoing massacre of the Palestinian people. * Israel’s ruthless, 2-year invasion of Gaza has already killed 59,000 Palestinian civilians – more than half of them women and children. * That’s as many killings as our soldiers suffered during the entire Vietnam War. * Israel’s military has forced nearly all of Gaza’s two million citizens to abandon their homes and towns, herding them into distant camps, many without food, water, toilets, etc. * Excruciating death by starvation – especially among children – is now at epidemic levels in Gaza, creating a dystopian horror. * When masses of desperate Palestinians rush to sporadic and inadequate deliveries of humanitarian aid, Israeli snipers and other forces have opened fire on them – just since May, more than a thousand unarmed Palestinians have been assassinated in such ambushes. Yes, fiendish Hamas terrorists, who literally operate underground in Gaza, are guilty of sadistic brutality against Israelis. But moral retribution requires going after Hamas, not mounting an inhumane onslaught to wipe the Palestinian people off the Earth. A majority of Israelis are now openly rebelling against their government’s barbaric abandonment of their people’s best values. But what about us? Those sniper bullets and rockets have your and my names on them; those wasted children who’re dying in the agony of starvation belong to us; and it’s our politicians who’re propping up Israel’s corrupt prime minister and war machine. To stop this perversion of our own humanitarian values, go to International Rescue Committee: rescue.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Aren’t Million-Dollar Political “Donations” A Euphemism for Bribery?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>To paraphrase British historian Lord Acton: “[Money] tends to corrupt, and absolute [money] corrupts absolutely.”</p><p>During my time as a Texas elected official, I happened to witness an almost vaudevillian performance of Lord Acton’s axiom on the floor of our state senate. A multimillionaire named <strong>Bo Pilgrim</strong>, baron of a factory chicken empire called Pilgrim’s Pride, had come to the Capitol to speak against a bill requiring corporations like his to provide decent workers’ compensation benefits. Bo didn’t speak in words, however – he simply <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/1989/07/09/us/texas-businessman-hands-out-10000-checks-in-state-senate.html">walked onto the senate floor and brazenly handed out $10,000 checks to compliant senators</a>.</p><p>Today, corporate political money doesn’t just talk, it <em>screams</em> – drowning out the voices of all who oppose the special favors the corrupt “donors” buy. And these days, a $10,000 check is considered almost charming in its innocence.</p><p>Take Texas Governor <strong>Greg Abbott</strong>, a far-right-wing demagogic politico who prides himself on demonizing and directly harming poor and powerless people, while scooping up fantastic donations from the financial powers he serves. This year, after railroading a slew of corporate gimmies into law, Abbott cashed in. Last month alone, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.statesman.com/story/news/politics/state/2025/07/16/here-s-the-donor-behind-the-mysterious-trust-that-gave-greg-abbott-1m/85249390007/">he pocketed four million-dollar checks</a> – one each from a real estate titan, a ruthless pipeline autocrat, a Trump backing money manager, and one of <strong>Elon Musk</strong>’s corporate operatives.</p><p>Excuse me for speaking out, but this is a gross example of <em>kakistocracy</em> – government by and for the very worst people in society. If they didn’t shower him with cash, even Greg Abbott wouldn’t speak to them. It’s time to start calling this what the dictionary plainly says it is: Bribery.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/arent-million-dollar-political-donations</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:168955229</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/168955229/5e5008f0d17c348768aa67d909f54d9d.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/168955229/8dc3a1ba6461486ed76be90f51c4b2f2.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>To paraphrase British historian Lord Acton: “[Money] tends to corrupt, and absolute [money] corrupts absolutely.” During my time as a Texas elected official, I happened to witness an almost vaudevillian performance of Lord Acton’s axiom on the floor of our state senate. A multimillionaire named Bo Pilgrim, baron of a factory chicken empire called Pilgrim’s Pride, had come to the Capitol to speak against a bill requiring corporations like his to provide decent workers’ compensation benefits. Bo didn’t speak in words, however – he simply walked onto the senate floor and brazenly handed out $10,000 checks to compliant senators. Today, corporate political money doesn’t just talk, it screams – drowning out the voices of all who oppose the special favors the corrupt “donors” buy. And these days, a $10,000 check is considered almost charming in its innocence. Take Texas Governor Greg Abbott, a far-right-wing demagogic politico who prides himself on demonizing and directly harming poor and powerless people, while scooping up fantastic donations from the financial powers he serves. This year, after railroading a slew of corporate gimmies into law, Abbott cashed in. Last month alone, he pocketed four million-dollar checks – one each from a real estate titan, a ruthless pipeline autocrat, a Trump backing money manager, and one of Elon Musk’s corporate operatives. Excuse me for speaking out, but this is a gross example of kakistocracy – government by and for the very worst people in society. If they didn’t shower him with cash, even Greg Abbott wouldn’t speak to them. It’s time to start calling this what the dictionary plainly says it is: Bribery. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>To paraphrase British historian Lord Acton: “[Money] tends to corrupt, and absolute [money] corrupts absolutely.” During my time as a Texas elected official, I happened to witness an almost vaudevillian performance of Lord Acton’s axiom on the floor of our state senate. A multimillionaire named Bo Pilgrim, baron of a factory chicken empire called Pilgrim’s Pride, had come to the Capitol to speak against a bill requiring corporations like his to provide decent workers’ compensation benefits. Bo didn’t speak in words, however – he simply walked onto the senate floor and brazenly handed out $10,000 checks to compliant senators. Today, corporate political money doesn’t just talk, it screams – drowning out the voices of all who oppose the special favors the corrupt “donors” buy. And these days, a $10,000 check is considered almost charming in its innocence. Take Texas Governor Greg Abbott, a far-right-wing demagogic politico who prides himself on demonizing and directly harming poor and powerless people, while scooping up fantastic donations from the financial powers he serves. This year, after railroading a slew of corporate gimmies into law, Abbott cashed in. Last month alone, he pocketed four million-dollar checks – one each from a real estate titan, a ruthless pipeline autocrat, a Trump backing money manager, and one of Elon Musk’s corporate operatives. Excuse me for speaking out, but this is a gross example of kakistocracy – government by and for the very worst people in society. If they didn’t shower him with cash, even Greg Abbott wouldn’t speak to them. It’s time to start calling this what the dictionary plainly says it is: Bribery. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Disaster Warning: Profiteers Are Trying to Privatize America’s Public Weather Service]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>🚨🚨🚨 From the Lowdown’s “Early Political Warning System” comes this Code Red alert… 🚨🚨🚨 a fast-moving front of corporate corruption is sweeping westward from the White House… 🚨🚨🚨… Residents are urged to seek higher ethical ground immediately… 🚨🚨🚨</p><p>This is not a test, but a warning of an unnatural disaster: A plutocratic cabal of corporate elites is aiming to gut and eventually eliminate America’s National Weather Service! Yes, that’s the extensive network of scientific analysts, monitoring systems, researchers, emergency responders, and others trying to anticipate, prepare for, and protect us from the worst of storms, floods, wildfires, and other calamities.</p><p>In the name of “efficiency,” Republican politicos are now defunding and cancelling essential storm warning centers, hurricane monitoring staffs, flood rescue teams – and they’re even closing some forecast offices at night (as though bad weather checks out at sunset). Why?</p><p>Greed. Wall Street profiteers – including Trump appointees and political funders – have long lusted to <em>privatize</em> the weather service. While no one can control the weather, it is possible to control, commodify, and monopolize the collection, interpretation, and distribution of forecasting data. So, Trump Inc. intends to stop providing these functions as a public service for the benefit of all. Instead, weather data would become a corporate profit center, packaged and sold at premium prices to media conglomerates, insurance giants, private resorts, and others who can afford it.</p><p>These privatizing profiteers are shameful. They’re deliberately demonizing, destaffing, and dismantling a <em>public service</em>that is essential to America’s common good – just so they can steal it for their own profit. To rebel against their destructive greed, check out Union of Concerned Scientists: <a target="_blank" href="http://UCS.org">UCS.org</a></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/disaster-warning-profiteers-are-trying</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:168899015</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/168899015/ca2235734a6a8869b6e7084325787045.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/168899015/e1702d47f93345b4ad164d0c338d4e4d.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>&#128680;&#128680;&#128680; From the Lowdown’s “Early Political Warning System” comes this Code Red alert… &#128680;&#128680;&#128680; a fast-moving front of corporate corruption is sweeping westward from the White House… &#128680;&#128680;&#128680;… Residents are urged to seek higher ethical ground immediately… &#128680;&#128680;&#128680; This is not a test, but a warning of an unnatural disaster: A plutocratic cabal of corporate elites is aiming to gut and eventually eliminate America’s National Weather Service! Yes, that’s the extensive network of scientific analysts, monitoring systems, researchers, emergency responders, and others trying to anticipate, prepare for, and protect us from the worst of storms, floods, wildfires, and other calamities. In the name of “efficiency,” Republican politicos are now defunding and cancelling essential storm warning centers, hurricane monitoring staffs, flood rescue teams – and they’re even closing some forecast offices at night (as though bad weather checks out at sunset). Why? Greed. Wall Street profiteers – including Trump appointees and political funders – have long lusted to privatize the weather service. While no one can control the weather, it is possible to control, commodify, and monopolize the collection, interpretation, and distribution of forecasting data. So, Trump Inc. intends to stop providing these functions as a public service for the benefit of all. Instead, weather data would become a corporate profit center, packaged and sold at premium prices to media conglomerates, insurance giants, private resorts, and others who can afford it. These privatizing profiteers are shameful. They’re deliberately demonizing, destaffing, and dismantling a public servicethat is essential to America’s common good – just so they can steal it for their own profit. To rebel against their destructive greed, check out Union of Concerned Scientists: UCS.org Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>&#128680;&#128680;&#128680; From the Lowdown’s “Early Political Warning System” comes this Code Red alert… &#128680;&#128680;&#128680; a fast-moving front of corporate corruption is sweeping westward from the White House… &#128680;&#128680;&#128680;… Residents are urged to seek higher ethical ground immediately… &#128680;&#128680;&#128680; This is not a test, but a warning of an unnatural disaster: A plutocratic cabal of corporate elites is aiming to gut and eventually eliminate America’s National Weather Service! Yes, that’s the extensive network of scientific analysts, monitoring systems, researchers, emergency responders, and others trying to anticipate, prepare for, and protect us from the worst of storms, floods, wildfires, and other calamities. In the name of “efficiency,” Republican politicos are now defunding and cancelling essential storm warning centers, hurricane monitoring staffs, flood rescue teams – and they’re even closing some forecast offices at night (as though bad weather checks out at sunset). Why? Greed. Wall Street profiteers – including Trump appointees and political funders – have long lusted to privatize the weather service. While no one can control the weather, it is possible to control, commodify, and monopolize the collection, interpretation, and distribution of forecasting data. So, Trump Inc. intends to stop providing these functions as a public service for the benefit of all. Instead, weather data would become a corporate profit center, packaged and sold at premium prices to media conglomerates, insurance giants, private resorts, and others who can afford it. These privatizing profiteers are shameful. They’re deliberately demonizing, destaffing, and dismantling a public servicethat is essential to America’s common good – just so they can steal it for their own profit. To rebel against their destructive greed, check out Union of Concerned Scientists: UCS.org Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[GOP’s Budget Bill Is Political Pornography]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>In addition to protecting children from internet pornography—shouldn’t we protect them from seeing congress critters shamelessly sucking up to Trump and publicly prostituting themselves to billionaires?</p><p>Consider the raw obscenity of the GOP ramming its gross budget bill into law. Even many conservatives gagged at the depravity of forcibly taking food stamps and Medicaid from millions of everyday people, just so a few extremely rich elites can satisfy their insatiable lust for tax breaks.</p><p>The stench of greed in their law is so offensive that Republicans are now trying to perfume their minginess by branding all those who’re being denied access to food and health care as moochers. Get off welfare and go find a job! These shameless lawmakers even insist they’re helping the poor by “transitioning” them “from Medicaid to employer-provided health care.”</p><p>It's always instructive to hear $174,000-a-year, taxpayer-insured politicos scold hard-hit families for “taking” public aid. Apparently, it never dawns on these pecksniffs that dead-end jobs available to the poor don’t come with any health care. Well, sniff GOP leaders, that’s why we pushed through this “big, beautiful” tax cut for billionaires—it’s our anti-poverty program!</p><p>Huh? Yes, they explain, it’s simple: (1) cut spending on poor people; so (2) we can lower the taxes that rich people and corporations pay; thus (3) giving them billions to invest in good jobs for the poor.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… I was born at night, but it wasn’t last night. Notice that their Billionaire Boondoggle includes no requirement at all that recipients invest even one dollar in jobs. So, they won’t. This bill is not just ugly, it’s morally revolting.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/gops-budget-bill-is-political-pornography</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:168300394</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/168300394/2854140e31cf6ecb0a44f9e339e42d6d.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/168300394/d33e8d0cfe9c9adf481ffc1c982b7ed9.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>In addition to protecting children from internet pornography—shouldn’t we protect them from seeing congress critters shamelessly sucking up to Trump and publicly prostituting themselves to billionaires? Consider the raw obscenity of the GOP ramming its gross budget bill into law. Even many conservatives gagged at the depravity of forcibly taking food stamps and Medicaid from millions of everyday people, just so a few extremely rich elites can satisfy their insatiable lust for tax breaks. The stench of greed in their law is so offensive that Republicans are now trying to perfume their minginess by branding all those who’re being denied access to food and health care as moochers. Get off welfare and go find a job! These shameless lawmakers even insist they’re helping the poor by “transitioning” them “from Medicaid to employer-provided health care.” It's always instructive to hear $174,000-a-year, taxpayer-insured politicos scold hard-hit families for “taking” public aid. Apparently, it never dawns on these pecksniffs that dead-end jobs available to the poor don’t come with any health care. Well, sniff GOP leaders, that’s why we pushed through this “big, beautiful” tax cut for billionaires—it’s our anti-poverty program! Huh? Yes, they explain, it’s simple: (1) cut spending on poor people; so (2) we can lower the taxes that rich people and corporations pay; thus (3) giving them billions to invest in good jobs for the poor. This is Jim Hightower saying… I was born at night, but it wasn’t last night. Notice that their Billionaire Boondoggle includes no requirement at all that recipients invest even one dollar in jobs. So, they won’t. This bill is not just ugly, it’s morally revolting. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>In addition to protecting children from internet pornography—shouldn’t we protect them from seeing congress critters shamelessly sucking up to Trump and publicly prostituting themselves to billionaires? Consider the raw obscenity of the GOP ramming its gross budget bill into law. Even many conservatives gagged at the depravity of forcibly taking food stamps and Medicaid from millions of everyday people, just so a few extremely rich elites can satisfy their insatiable lust for tax breaks. The stench of greed in their law is so offensive that Republicans are now trying to perfume their minginess by branding all those who’re being denied access to food and health care as moochers. Get off welfare and go find a job! These shameless lawmakers even insist they’re helping the poor by “transitioning” them “from Medicaid to employer-provided health care.” It's always instructive to hear $174,000-a-year, taxpayer-insured politicos scold hard-hit families for “taking” public aid. Apparently, it never dawns on these pecksniffs that dead-end jobs available to the poor don’t come with any health care. Well, sniff GOP leaders, that’s why we pushed through this “big, beautiful” tax cut for billionaires—it’s our anti-poverty program! Huh? Yes, they explain, it’s simple: (1) cut spending on poor people; so (2) we can lower the taxes that rich people and corporations pay; thus (3) giving them billions to invest in good jobs for the poor. This is Jim Hightower saying… I was born at night, but it wasn’t last night. Notice that their Billionaire Boondoggle includes no requirement at all that recipients invest even one dollar in jobs. So, they won’t. This bill is not just ugly, it’s morally revolting. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can Trump’s Perfume Cloak the Stink of GOP Corruption?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Big news! The Trump4Sale shop next door to the Office of the President, has just issued an exciting new product: “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/01/style/trump-fragrances-victory-45-47.html">Trump Fragrance.”</a> Yes, it’s officially-certified Trump perfume, allowing you and your loved ones to reek of the essence of The Donald—only $249 for a 3-ounce bottle.</p><p>I wondered, with so much going on, why is he busy hawking perfume? But then I saw nearly every congressional Republican cravenly cave in to White House demands that they approve <a target="_blank" href="https://thecocklebur.substack.com/p/republicans-deliver-on-promises-to">Trump’s truly stinky budget plan</a>. Ah-ha! <em>They</em> are the perfume’s target market! Voting to slash food and health care funding for poor families, just so those dollars can be lavished on tax giveaways for millionaires and billionaires, is extremely unpopular. So Trump was offering them an odoriferous spritz.</p><p>Some will need gallons of it. Not only did they vote to harm to millions of people, but they rushed back to their districts, loudly demanding that the humanitarian disaster they created be fixed by state and local officials.</p><p>Then, there is Rep. Rob Bresnahan, a rich Pennsylvania Republican. He owned corporate stock in a big Medicaid provider named Centene, but as a legislative insider Rep. Bresnahan knew that Trump’s bill would gut Medicaid and crash Centene’s stock value. So,<a target="_blank" href="https://whyy.org/articles/congressional-stock-trading/"> he dumped that stock just one week before the House approved the budget</a>. And, yes, after protecting himself, Rob voted for the Medicaid gut job that caused the stock price to plummet.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… Even one of Bresnahan’s Republican colleagues, Brian Fitzpatrick, was appalled: “We need American leaders who are accountable, transparent, and wholly committed to serving the public—not their stock portfolio,” <a target="_blank" href="https://fitzpatrick.house.gov/2024/7/fitzpatrick-golden-lead-bipartisan-coalition-demanding-vote-on-congressional-stock-trading-ban">he said</a>, rightly adding that members of Congress “should be banned from trading individual stocks—period.”</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/can-trumps-perfume-cloak-the-stink</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:168297796</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/168297796/891186e55362040843738281f03ebd99.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/168297796/0de40f1ed182d3769d4144dd6b4d3dc5.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Big news! The Trump4Sale shop next door to the Office of the President, has just issued an exciting new product: “Trump Fragrance.” Yes, it’s officially-certified Trump perfume, allowing you and your loved ones to reek of the essence of The Donald—only $249 for a 3-ounce bottle. I wondered, with so much going on, why is he busy hawking perfume? But then I saw nearly every congressional Republican cravenly cave in to White House demands that they approve Trump’s truly stinky budget plan. Ah-ha! They are the perfume’s target market! Voting to slash food and health care funding for poor families, just so those dollars can be lavished on tax giveaways for millionaires and billionaires, is extremely unpopular. So Trump was offering them an odoriferous spritz. Some will need gallons of it. Not only did they vote to harm to millions of people, but they rushed back to their districts, loudly demanding that the humanitarian disaster they created be fixed by state and local officials. Then, there is Rep. Rob Bresnahan, a rich Pennsylvania Republican. He owned corporate stock in a big Medicaid provider named Centene, but as a legislative insider Rep. Bresnahan knew that Trump’s bill would gut Medicaid and crash Centene’s stock value. So, he dumped that stock just one week before the House approved the budget. And, yes, after protecting himself, Rob voted for the Medicaid gut job that caused the stock price to plummet. This is Jim Hightower saying… Even one of Bresnahan’s Republican colleagues, Brian Fitzpatrick, was appalled: “We need American leaders who are accountable, transparent, and wholly committed to serving the public—not their stock portfolio,” he said, rightly adding that members of Congress “should be banned from trading individual stocks—period.” Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Big news! The Trump4Sale shop next door to the Office of the President, has just issued an exciting new product: “Trump Fragrance.” Yes, it’s officially-certified Trump perfume, allowing you and your loved ones to reek of the essence of The Donald—only $249 for a 3-ounce bottle. I wondered, with so much going on, why is he busy hawking perfume? But then I saw nearly every congressional Republican cravenly cave in to White House demands that they approve Trump’s truly stinky budget plan. Ah-ha! They are the perfume’s target market! Voting to slash food and health care funding for poor families, just so those dollars can be lavished on tax giveaways for millionaires and billionaires, is extremely unpopular. So Trump was offering them an odoriferous spritz. Some will need gallons of it. Not only did they vote to harm to millions of people, but they rushed back to their districts, loudly demanding that the humanitarian disaster they created be fixed by state and local officials. Then, there is Rep. Rob Bresnahan, a rich Pennsylvania Republican. He owned corporate stock in a big Medicaid provider named Centene, but as a legislative insider Rep. Bresnahan knew that Trump’s bill would gut Medicaid and crash Centene’s stock value. So, he dumped that stock just one week before the House approved the budget. And, yes, after protecting himself, Rob voted for the Medicaid gut job that caused the stock price to plummet. This is Jim Hightower saying… Even one of Bresnahan’s Republican colleagues, Brian Fitzpatrick, was appalled: “We need American leaders who are accountable, transparent, and wholly committed to serving the public—not their stock portfolio,” he said, rightly adding that members of Congress “should be banned from trading individual stocks—period.” Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Idea: Let Big Oil Dump Its Fracking Into Our Lakes, Rivers, etc.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>A major political group says that to solve America’s environmental problems, we must let Big Oil Have more control over public policy. That group is Big Oil.</p><p>Indeed, such giants as Exxon and Shell Oil have long complained that environmentalists, consumers, and other busybodies, keep using legislation and lawsuits to interfere with their environmental “innovations.” But now, top state officials in (where else?) Texas have found a solution: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.texastribune.org/2025/05/19/texas-legislature-produced-water-legal-protections-oil-gas/">Just ban the public from meddling in oil industry business.</a></p><p>At issue is a scheme by oil barons to sell the wastewater they use in “fracking,” a notoriously destructive way of forcing oil out of the ground. It’s also terribly wasteful, requiring five barrels of water to get one barrel of oil. But, “Eureka!” cried industry profiteers – we can treat that “backwash” with some chemicals and market it as “produced water.” Letting us pump this fracking product right into the state’s lakes, rivers, aquifers, and other waterways, they say, will replenish the state’s dwindling water supply.</p><p>But is that safe? <a target="_blank" href="https://www.texastribune.org/2025/05/19/texas-legislature-produced-water-legal-protections-oil-gas/">Rather than answer, the corporate powers rushed to the governor and legislature – not seeking protections for the people, but to protect themselves and their profits </a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.texastribune.org/2025/05/19/texas-legislature-produced-water-legal-protections-oil-gas/"><em>from</em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.texastribune.org/2025/05/19/texas-legislature-produced-water-legal-protections-oil-gas/"> the people</a>. Sure enough, the state’s corporate corrupted politicos dutifully passed a law decreeing that companies producing, selling, or transporting recycled fracking water cannot be held liable for any “consequences” suffered by those using the product. Consequences? Yes, like poisoned crops, illnesses… and death!</p><p>When the Sierra Club demanded safety studies on the obvious dangers of spewing oil wastewater on and in everything, an industry functionary scoffed, declaring: “We’ve studied this problem to death.” Ooooo – bad choice of words!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/idea-let-big-oil-dump-its-fracking</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:167831198</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/167831198/08ab187c69cad31a305a8c34b7b31349.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/167831198/bf2df677c2827f263bb18e356cb12791.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>A major political group says that to solve America’s environmental problems, we must let Big Oil Have more control over public policy. That group is Big Oil. Indeed, such giants as Exxon and Shell Oil have long complained that environmentalists, consumers, and other busybodies, keep using legislation and lawsuits to interfere with their environmental “innovations.” But now, top state officials in (where else?) Texas have found a solution: Just ban the public from meddling in oil industry business. At issue is a scheme by oil barons to sell the wastewater they use in “fracking,” a notoriously destructive way of forcing oil out of the ground. It’s also terribly wasteful, requiring five barrels of water to get one barrel of oil. But, “Eureka!” cried industry profiteers – we can treat that “backwash” with some chemicals and market it as “produced water.” Letting us pump this fracking product right into the state’s lakes, rivers, aquifers, and other waterways, they say, will replenish the state’s dwindling water supply. But is that safe? Rather than answer, the corporate powers rushed to the governor and legislature – not seeking protections for the people, but to protect themselves and their profits from the people. Sure enough, the state’s corporate corrupted politicos dutifully passed a law decreeing that companies producing, selling, or transporting recycled fracking water cannot be held liable for any “consequences” suffered by those using the product. Consequences? Yes, like poisoned crops, illnesses… and death! When the Sierra Club demanded safety studies on the obvious dangers of spewing oil wastewater on and in everything, an industry functionary scoffed, declaring: “We’ve studied this problem to death.” Ooooo – bad choice of words! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>A major political group says that to solve America’s environmental problems, we must let Big Oil Have more control over public policy. That group is Big Oil. Indeed, such giants as Exxon and Shell Oil have long complained that environmentalists, consumers, and other busybodies, keep using legislation and lawsuits to interfere with their environmental “innovations.” But now, top state officials in (where else?) Texas have found a solution: Just ban the public from meddling in oil industry business. At issue is a scheme by oil barons to sell the wastewater they use in “fracking,” a notoriously destructive way of forcing oil out of the ground. It’s also terribly wasteful, requiring five barrels of water to get one barrel of oil. But, “Eureka!” cried industry profiteers – we can treat that “backwash” with some chemicals and market it as “produced water.” Letting us pump this fracking product right into the state’s lakes, rivers, aquifers, and other waterways, they say, will replenish the state’s dwindling water supply. But is that safe? Rather than answer, the corporate powers rushed to the governor and legislature – not seeking protections for the people, but to protect themselves and their profits from the people. Sure enough, the state’s corporate corrupted politicos dutifully passed a law decreeing that companies producing, selling, or transporting recycled fracking water cannot be held liable for any “consequences” suffered by those using the product. Consequences? Yes, like poisoned crops, illnesses… and death! When the Sierra Club demanded safety studies on the obvious dangers of spewing oil wastewater on and in everything, an industry functionary scoffed, declaring: “We’ve studied this problem to death.” Ooooo – bad choice of words! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can You Buy America for $5 Million? Ask JBS, Inc.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>News flash: One of the president’s media handlers has inadvertently issued a political statement that’s actually true!</p><p>She didn’t mean to. She was responding to the damning revelation that Trump has just given a huge government benefit to a global corporate criminal from Brazil – <em>after</em> – <a target="_blank" href="https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-senator-questions-brazilian-meatpacker-jbs-over-trump-inaugural-fund-2025-05-19/">that corporation donated a whopping $5 million to fund his extravagant inaugural party</a>. Trying to dismiss this obvious quid pro quo, the spokeswoman declared that Trump “is not bought by anyone.”</p><p>Right. Not by “anyone,” but by <em>many ones</em>. The most flagrantly corrupt president in US history, Trump’s Oval Office theme song is, “If you’ve got the money, I’ve got the time.” Remember, last year he bluntly instructed Big Oil to deliver a billion dollars to him, promising he would deliver many billions-worth of government favors to them. They did… and he is.</p><p>So, now, high-tech billionaires, foreign dictators, Wall Street elites, and other oligarchs are lined up at the White House, offering personal and political gimmies to entice him to rig the system for them. Take that $5 million pay-to-play money from Brazil. It came from JBS, the global factory farm monopolist infamous for price fixing, child labor abuse, vast environmental crimes, etc. Even our anything-goes stock exchange refused to sanction JBS’ immorality. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/12/climate/jbs-new-york-stock-exchange-listing.html">But then Trump took the money and enthroned JBS in the prestigious New York Stock Exchange</a>.</p><p>His sellout means the Brazillian bully can now raise billions in new capital through our stock market, jacking up its monopoly power over US farmers, consumers, businesses, and environment. Doing it all with a presidential seal of approval – bought for only $5 million.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/can-you-buy-america-for-5-million</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:167827855</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 17:06:39 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/167827855/1caf399c4e26b46a5adf192dadc31842.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/167827855/7bcf968cf65a45e1601f56d5dc513e68.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>News flash: One of the president’s media handlers has inadvertently issued a political statement that’s actually true! She didn’t mean to. She was responding to the damning revelation that Trump has just given a huge government benefit to a global corporate criminal from Brazil – after – that corporation donated a whopping $5 million to fund his extravagant inaugural party. Trying to dismiss this obvious quid pro quo, the spokeswoman declared that Trump “is not bought by anyone.” Right. Not by “anyone,” but by many ones. The most flagrantly corrupt president in US history, Trump’s Oval Office theme song is, “If you’ve got the money, I’ve got the time.” Remember, last year he bluntly instructed Big Oil to deliver a billion dollars to him, promising he would deliver many billions-worth of government favors to them. They did… and he is. So, now, high-tech billionaires, foreign dictators, Wall Street elites, and other oligarchs are lined up at the White House, offering personal and political gimmies to entice him to rig the system for them. Take that $5 million pay-to-play money from Brazil. It came from JBS, the global factory farm monopolist infamous for price fixing, child labor abuse, vast environmental crimes, etc. Even our anything-goes stock exchange refused to sanction JBS’ immorality. But then Trump took the money and enthroned JBS in the prestigious New York Stock Exchange. His sellout means the Brazillian bully can now raise billions in new capital through our stock market, jacking up its monopoly power over US farmers, consumers, businesses, and environment. Doing it all with a presidential seal of approval – bought for only $5 million. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>News flash: One of the president’s media handlers has inadvertently issued a political statement that’s actually true! She didn’t mean to. She was responding to the damning revelation that Trump has just given a huge government benefit to a global corporate criminal from Brazil – after – that corporation donated a whopping $5 million to fund his extravagant inaugural party. Trying to dismiss this obvious quid pro quo, the spokeswoman declared that Trump “is not bought by anyone.” Right. Not by “anyone,” but by many ones. The most flagrantly corrupt president in US history, Trump’s Oval Office theme song is, “If you’ve got the money, I’ve got the time.” Remember, last year he bluntly instructed Big Oil to deliver a billion dollars to him, promising he would deliver many billions-worth of government favors to them. They did… and he is. So, now, high-tech billionaires, foreign dictators, Wall Street elites, and other oligarchs are lined up at the White House, offering personal and political gimmies to entice him to rig the system for them. Take that $5 million pay-to-play money from Brazil. It came from JBS, the global factory farm monopolist infamous for price fixing, child labor abuse, vast environmental crimes, etc. Even our anything-goes stock exchange refused to sanction JBS’ immorality. But then Trump took the money and enthroned JBS in the prestigious New York Stock Exchange. His sellout means the Brazillian bully can now raise billions in new capital through our stock market, jacking up its monopoly power over US farmers, consumers, businesses, and environment. Doing it all with a presidential seal of approval – bought for only $5 million. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Even the Smallest Dog Can Lift Its Leg on the Tallest Building]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>In these days of domineering corporate rule, where can we commoners go to find even a little bit of justice?</p><p>Right where they’ve been found throughout human history: Within ourselves. Specifically, in our rebellious spirit, our willingness to confront the greedheads and boneheads who feel entitled to run roughshod over us.</p><p>For example, <em>The Formosa Four</em>.</p><p>You probably haven’t heard of them, since the mass media powers don’t cover something as consequential and uplifting as a nation of Davids challenging Goliath – such as “<a target="_blank" href="http://Formosa4.org">The Formosa Four.</a>” They are members of a tenacious and scrappy coalition that has dared to confront one of the most flagrant corporate criminals on the globe: Formosa Plastics. It’s a $6 billion-a-year profiteer that constantly and carelessly spews millions of tons of plastic contaminants into our environment and ourselves.</p><p>But last summer, the bully tried to play victim. When about 70 protestors defiantly converged on Formosa’s US headquarters in New Jersey, corporate executives had four of the leaders arrested and charged with criminal trespass – a power play to prevent free speech and scare off future protestors.</p><p>Yes, a global behemoth that’s a deadly polluter and serial human rights violator had our government arrest and prosecute grassroots critics for the “high crime” of <em>trespassing</em>. Such is the pettiness – but liberty-busting seriousness – of today’s arrogant forces of plutocracy.</p><p>Justice fighters, though, aren’t easily spooked by bullies, and the movement succeeded last week in having all charges dismissed. As one protester said, it takes “regular people putting their bodies on the line to make these things happen. One victory today, and many more in the future.” For more information, go to <a target="_blank" href="http://Formosa4.org">Formosa4.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/even-the-smallest-dog-can-lift-its</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:167182723</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/167182723/11b26ec44ec0f5bdd62c9edb33fe72f6.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/167182723/b992a6937e45186b3463f8bbb6a661ca.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>In these days of domineering corporate rule, where can we commoners go to find even a little bit of justice? Right where they’ve been found throughout human history: Within ourselves. Specifically, in our rebellious spirit, our willingness to confront the greedheads and boneheads who feel entitled to run roughshod over us. For example, The Formosa Four. You probably haven’t heard of them, since the mass media powers don’t cover something as consequential and uplifting as a nation of Davids challenging Goliath – such as “The Formosa Four.” They are members of a tenacious and scrappy coalition that has dared to confront one of the most flagrant corporate criminals on the globe: Formosa Plastics. It’s a $6 billion-a-year profiteer that constantly and carelessly spews millions of tons of plastic contaminants into our environment and ourselves. But last summer, the bully tried to play victim. When about 70 protestors defiantly converged on Formosa’s US headquarters in New Jersey, corporate executives had four of the leaders arrested and charged with criminal trespass – a power play to prevent free speech and scare off future protestors. Yes, a global behemoth that’s a deadly polluter and serial human rights violator had our government arrest and prosecute grassroots critics for the “high crime” of trespassing. Such is the pettiness – but liberty-busting seriousness – of today’s arrogant forces of plutocracy. Justice fighters, though, aren’t easily spooked by bullies, and the movement succeeded last week in having all charges dismissed. As one protester said, it takes “regular people putting their bodies on the line to make these things happen. One victory today, and many more in the future.” For more information, go to Formosa4.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>In these days of domineering corporate rule, where can we commoners go to find even a little bit of justice? Right where they’ve been found throughout human history: Within ourselves. Specifically, in our rebellious spirit, our willingness to confront the greedheads and boneheads who feel entitled to run roughshod over us. For example, The Formosa Four. You probably haven’t heard of them, since the mass media powers don’t cover something as consequential and uplifting as a nation of Davids challenging Goliath – such as “The Formosa Four.” They are members of a tenacious and scrappy coalition that has dared to confront one of the most flagrant corporate criminals on the globe: Formosa Plastics. It’s a $6 billion-a-year profiteer that constantly and carelessly spews millions of tons of plastic contaminants into our environment and ourselves. But last summer, the bully tried to play victim. When about 70 protestors defiantly converged on Formosa’s US headquarters in New Jersey, corporate executives had four of the leaders arrested and charged with criminal trespass – a power play to prevent free speech and scare off future protestors. Yes, a global behemoth that’s a deadly polluter and serial human rights violator had our government arrest and prosecute grassroots critics for the “high crime” of trespassing. Such is the pettiness – but liberty-busting seriousness – of today’s arrogant forces of plutocracy. Justice fighters, though, aren’t easily spooked by bullies, and the movement succeeded last week in having all charges dismissed. As one protester said, it takes “regular people putting their bodies on the line to make these things happen. One victory today, and many more in the future.” For more information, go to Formosa4.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bezos and Other Billionaires Defecate on Florida Town]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Don’t let it be said that the superrich care only about themselves, always taking from society and giving nothing back.</p><p>Consider the generous billionaires who live on an island in Florida’s Biscayne Bay. Amazon kingpin Jeff Bezos lives there, as do Ivanka Trump and her hubby, Jared Kushner. Actually, their so-called island is fake, built in the bay so a few dozen absurdly rich sparklies don’t have to mix with commoners living in the adjacent town of Surfside.</p><p>Snootiness aside, though, the billionaires have literally been giving “of themselves” to Surfside’s people. Specifically, their bodily waste has long been leaking from the septic systems of their mansions, polluting the town’s environment. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/13/us/indian-creek-surfside-billionaire-sewage.html">Yes, the rich are actually defecating on commoners</a>.</p><p>Facing public scorn, the Bezos-Trump-Kushner clan proposed piping their excrement into Surfside’s sewer system. Okay, but when the city asked for $10 million to help cover the pipe’s cost, the billionaires squealed like stuck hogs!</p><p>Come on! Ten million for them is like 10 dollars for you and me. Of course, moneyed elites didn’t get rich by playing fair, but by playing the system. So, they dispatched their lobbyists and lawyers to Gov. Ron DeSantis. Sure enough – BAM! – Republican officials suddenly and secretly approved a new state provision decreeing that local communities like Surfside cannot interfere with or even demand payment for such special-interest sewer projects as the Bezos-Trump-Kushner hookup. Then, again with no publicity, DeSantis signed the billionaires’ corrupt law – no doubt assured that they would reward his kindness later on.</p><p>Ironically, the word “defecate” is derived from a Latin verb meaning “to cleanse.” But there’s not enough soap in Florida to clean the hands of these dirty dealers.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/bezos-and-other-billionaires-defecate</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:167179422</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600845" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/167179422/7351072820e744262fadac262ffb92b0.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/167179422/c4325541487491642549c4bea5569623.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Don’t let it be said that the superrich care only about themselves, always taking from society and giving nothing back. Consider the generous billionaires who live on an island in Florida’s Biscayne Bay. Amazon kingpin Jeff Bezos lives there, as do Ivanka Trump and her hubby, Jared Kushner. Actually, their so-called island is fake, built in the bay so a few dozen absurdly rich sparklies don’t have to mix with commoners living in the adjacent town of Surfside. Snootiness aside, though, the billionaires have literally been giving “of themselves” to Surfside’s people. Specifically, their bodily waste has long been leaking from the septic systems of their mansions, polluting the town’s environment. Yes, the rich are actually defecating on commoners. Facing public scorn, the Bezos-Trump-Kushner clan proposed piping their excrement into Surfside’s sewer system. Okay, but when the city asked for $10 million to help cover the pipe’s cost, the billionaires squealed like stuck hogs! Come on! Ten million for them is like 10 dollars for you and me. Of course, moneyed elites didn’t get rich by playing fair, but by playing the system. So, they dispatched their lobbyists and lawyers to Gov. Ron DeSantis. Sure enough – BAM! – Republican officials suddenly and secretly approved a new state provision decreeing that local communities like Surfside cannot interfere with or even demand payment for such special-interest sewer projects as the Bezos-Trump-Kushner hookup. Then, again with no publicity, DeSantis signed the billionaires’ corrupt law – no doubt assured that they would reward his kindness later on. Ironically, the word “defecate” is derived from a Latin verb meaning “to cleanse.” But there’s not enough soap in Florida to clean the hands of these dirty dealers. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Don’t let it be said that the superrich care only about themselves, always taking from society and giving nothing back. Consider the generous billionaires who live on an island in Florida’s Biscayne Bay. Amazon kingpin Jeff Bezos lives there, as do Ivanka Trump and her hubby, Jared Kushner. Actually, their so-called island is fake, built in the bay so a few dozen absurdly rich sparklies don’t have to mix with commoners living in the adjacent town of Surfside. Snootiness aside, though, the billionaires have literally been giving “of themselves” to Surfside’s people. Specifically, their bodily waste has long been leaking from the septic systems of their mansions, polluting the town’s environment. Yes, the rich are actually defecating on commoners. Facing public scorn, the Bezos-Trump-Kushner clan proposed piping their excrement into Surfside’s sewer system. Okay, but when the city asked for $10 million to help cover the pipe’s cost, the billionaires squealed like stuck hogs! Come on! Ten million for them is like 10 dollars for you and me. Of course, moneyed elites didn’t get rich by playing fair, but by playing the system. So, they dispatched their lobbyists and lawyers to Gov. Ron DeSantis. Sure enough – BAM! – Republican officials suddenly and secretly approved a new state provision decreeing that local communities like Surfside cannot interfere with or even demand payment for such special-interest sewer projects as the Bezos-Trump-Kushner hookup. Then, again with no publicity, DeSantis signed the billionaires’ corrupt law – no doubt assured that they would reward his kindness later on. Ironically, the word “defecate” is derived from a Latin verb meaning “to cleanse.” But there’s not enough soap in Florida to clean the hands of these dirty dealers. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Sanitation Workers Should Be Paid More Than Cabinet Officials]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Surprisingly, top Republicans in Congress and the White House have recently been praising labor!</p><p>Oh, wait – they’re not hailing America’s laborers, but touting the existential virtue of “<em>laboring.</em>” “Work,” exclaim these politicos, provides “dignity” to all who labor.</p><p>Dignity? Obviously, they’ve never been inside a meatpacking plant, done roofing jobs for a wage-thieving developer, been paid a pittance to clean office buildings at midnight… or otherwise fully experienced the “dignity of labor.”</p><p>Years ago, Sen. Fred Harris was accosted at a political event by a rich businessman who demanded that Democrats reduce taxes by cutting the wages of government workers. The guy sputtered in disbelief that “mere garbagemen” were being paid $6 an hour. Fred stopped him right there, curtly asking: “Is that too much? What would it take to get you to do that job?”</p><p>Unfortunately, the guy’s crass classism is now official policy in Washington. In the name of “cutting waste” and lowering taxes on billionaires, a gaggle of narcissistic plutocrats – including Trump, “Chainsaw” Musk, cabinet appointees, and congressional extremists – have ganged up to fire valuable public service workers and slash essential assistance for poor families.</p><p>There is no sugar coating for the vulgarity and moral depravity of such elites whupping up on middle- and low-income families for their own gain. Moreover, their disdain for the value and creativity of those who do the daily work that makes America work is stupid … and socially suicidal.</p><p>Plus, their self-esteem is ludicrous. Indeed, if you pitted social value of a sanitation worker to any of Trump’s budget-slashing cabinet czars – guess which one the public would say is overpaid… and dispensable?</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-sanitation-workers-should-be</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:166906747</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 16:20:59 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/166906747/ef83011aff2691630b61f734cfd72fbd.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/166906747/e9208ff7934a760c9ac5e8464fec9c7e.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Surprisingly, top Republicans in Congress and the White House have recently been praising labor! Oh, wait – they’re not hailing America’s laborers, but touting the existential virtue of “laboring.” “Work,” exclaim these politicos, provides “dignity” to all who labor. Dignity? Obviously, they’ve never been inside a meatpacking plant, done roofing jobs for a wage-thieving developer, been paid a pittance to clean office buildings at midnight… or otherwise fully experienced the “dignity of labor.” Years ago, Sen. Fred Harris was accosted at a political event by a rich businessman who demanded that Democrats reduce taxes by cutting the wages of government workers. The guy sputtered in disbelief that “mere garbagemen” were being paid $6 an hour. Fred stopped him right there, curtly asking: “Is that too much? What would it take to get you to do that job?” Unfortunately, the guy’s crass classism is now official policy in Washington. In the name of “cutting waste” and lowering taxes on billionaires, a gaggle of narcissistic plutocrats – including Trump, “Chainsaw” Musk, cabinet appointees, and congressional extremists – have ganged up to fire valuable public service workers and slash essential assistance for poor families. There is no sugar coating for the vulgarity and moral depravity of such elites whupping up on middle- and low-income families for their own gain. Moreover, their disdain for the value and creativity of those who do the daily work that makes America work is stupid … and socially suicidal. Plus, their self-esteem is ludicrous. Indeed, if you pitted social value of a sanitation worker to any of Trump’s budget-slashing cabinet czars – guess which one the public would say is overpaid… and dispensable? Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Surprisingly, top Republicans in Congress and the White House have recently been praising labor! Oh, wait – they’re not hailing America’s laborers, but touting the existential virtue of “laboring.” “Work,” exclaim these politicos, provides “dignity” to all who labor. Dignity? Obviously, they’ve never been inside a meatpacking plant, done roofing jobs for a wage-thieving developer, been paid a pittance to clean office buildings at midnight… or otherwise fully experienced the “dignity of labor.” Years ago, Sen. Fred Harris was accosted at a political event by a rich businessman who demanded that Democrats reduce taxes by cutting the wages of government workers. The guy sputtered in disbelief that “mere garbagemen” were being paid $6 an hour. Fred stopped him right there, curtly asking: “Is that too much? What would it take to get you to do that job?” Unfortunately, the guy’s crass classism is now official policy in Washington. In the name of “cutting waste” and lowering taxes on billionaires, a gaggle of narcissistic plutocrats – including Trump, “Chainsaw” Musk, cabinet appointees, and congressional extremists – have ganged up to fire valuable public service workers and slash essential assistance for poor families. There is no sugar coating for the vulgarity and moral depravity of such elites whupping up on middle- and low-income families for their own gain. Moreover, their disdain for the value and creativity of those who do the daily work that makes America work is stupid … and socially suicidal. Plus, their self-esteem is ludicrous. Indeed, if you pitted social value of a sanitation worker to any of Trump’s budget-slashing cabinet czars – guess which one the public would say is overpaid… and dispensable? Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Soldiers Say It’s Hard to Eat a $45 Million Parade]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>How embarrassing. Our show-biz president’s glorious $45 million military parade – fssssst – fizzled. The gods rained on it, the thing dragged on, and Trump himself kept nodding off in his chair. Sad.</p><p>What his show needed was some of the reality-TV drama that defines this president. For example, he could’ve had a phalanx of food trucks rumbling down the street, being chased by hundreds of hungry US soldiers, waving empty plates and chanting, “Feed the Troops!”</p><p>Besides being entertaining, that spectacle would’ve brought long-overdue public attention to an outrage that really rankles rank-and-file soldiers – namely, hunger. Yes, the <em>trillion-dollar</em> Pentagon budget that overflows with waste and boondoggles for corporate contractors actually leaves military families struggling to have enough to eat, much less being well-fed.</p><p>Indeed, about 25 percent of service members are so poorly paid and poorly served on US Army bases that that they are officially “food insecure,” relying on food stamps and local food pantries for their bare bones nutritional needs. Last November, for example, it was reported that the base dining hall at Fort Carson, Colorado, was serving a miserly “meal” consisting of one slice of toast and spoonful lima beans. Some bases are only offering gas-station-style grab-and-go snacks.</p><p>More scandalous, soldiers have a $460 “food tax” automatically deducted from their meager paychecks each month to pay for food. But the Army brass quietly diverts two-thirds of the soldiers’ money to other purposes – which they won’t disclose.</p><p>Congress knows about this and does nothing. Trump doesn’t even want to know. And Pentagon honcho Hegseth is lost in the fog of his own incompetence. To help raise awareness and Hell, go to <a target="_blank" href="http://FeedingAmericaAction.org">FeedingAmericaAction.org</a>.</p><p>Do something</p><p>Want to support veterans and fight for justice with them? Here are two orgs we love:</p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://commondefense.us/">Common Defense</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://aboutfaceveterans.org/">About Face</a></p><p>Also, here are some graphics from <a target="_blank" href="https://posterproject.us/">The Poster Project</a> that you can share and use as talking points:</p><p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/soldiers-say-its-hard-to-eat-a-45</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:166733670</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/166733670/c04e90c6a4e48a2a6f7771c71573926d.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/166733670/ab5e34432fa30218852b6cb4a6077c7e.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>How embarrassing. Our show-biz president’s glorious $45 million military parade – fssssst – fizzled. The gods rained on it, the thing dragged on, and Trump himself kept nodding off in his chair. Sad. What his show needed was some of the reality-TV drama that defines this president. For example, he could’ve had a phalanx of food trucks rumbling down the street, being chased by hundreds of hungry US soldiers, waving empty plates and chanting, “Feed the Troops!” Besides being entertaining, that spectacle would’ve brought long-overdue public attention to an outrage that really rankles rank-and-file soldiers – namely, hunger. Yes, the trillion-dollar Pentagon budget that overflows with waste and boondoggles for corporate contractors actually leaves military families struggling to have enough to eat, much less being well-fed. Indeed, about 25 percent of service members are so poorly paid and poorly served on US Army bases that that they are officially “food insecure,” relying on food stamps and local food pantries for their bare bones nutritional needs. Last November, for example, it was reported that the base dining hall at Fort Carson, Colorado, was serving a miserly “meal” consisting of one slice of toast and spoonful lima beans. Some bases are only offering gas-station-style grab-and-go snacks. More scandalous, soldiers have a $460 “food tax” automatically deducted from their meager paychecks each month to pay for food. But the Army brass quietly diverts two-thirds of the soldiers’ money to other purposes – which they won’t disclose. Congress knows about this and does nothing. Trump doesn’t even want to know. And Pentagon honcho Hegseth is lost in the fog of his own incompetence. To help raise awareness and Hell, go to FeedingAmericaAction.org. Do something Want to support veterans and fight for justice with them? Here are two orgs we love: * Common Defense * About Face Also, here are some graphics from The Poster Project that you can share and use as talking points: Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>How embarrassing. Our show-biz president’s glorious $45 million military parade – fssssst – fizzled. The gods rained on it, the thing dragged on, and Trump himself kept nodding off in his chair. Sad. What his show needed was some of the reality-TV drama that defines this president. For example, he could’ve had a phalanx of food trucks rumbling down the street, being chased by hundreds of hungry US soldiers, waving empty plates and chanting, “Feed the Troops!” Besides being entertaining, that spectacle would’ve brought long-overdue public attention to an outrage that really rankles rank-and-file soldiers – namely, hunger. Yes, the trillion-dollar Pentagon budget that overflows with waste and boondoggles for corporate contractors actually leaves military families struggling to have enough to eat, much less being well-fed. Indeed, about 25 percent of service members are so poorly paid and poorly served on US Army bases that that they are officially “food insecure,” relying on food stamps and local food pantries for their bare bones nutritional needs. Last November, for example, it was reported that the base dining hall at Fort Carson, Colorado, was serving a miserly “meal” consisting of one slice of toast and spoonful lima beans. Some bases are only offering gas-station-style grab-and-go snacks. More scandalous, soldiers have a $460 “food tax” automatically deducted from their meager paychecks each month to pay for food. But the Army brass quietly diverts two-thirds of the soldiers’ money to other purposes – which they won’t disclose. Congress knows about this and does nothing. Trump doesn’t even want to know. And Pentagon honcho Hegseth is lost in the fog of his own incompetence. To help raise awareness and Hell, go to FeedingAmericaAction.org. Do something Want to support veterans and fight for justice with them? Here are two orgs we love: * Common Defense * About Face Also, here are some graphics from The Poster Project that you can share and use as talking points: Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Corporate Billionaires: From Greed to Sleaze]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Gosh, I miss the old days of CEO greed, when the pay gap between Boss Hog and everyday employees was merely gross.</p><p>Today, the guiding ethic for top executive enrichment is to have <em>no ethics</em>. Grab as much as you can as fast as you can, everyone else be damned. And never mind that as chief, you did absolutely nothing to “earn” that exorbitant stash of cash.</p><p>How exorbitant? Corporations try to hide the actual numbers, but under an insider accounting measure called “compensation actually paid” reveals the obscene truth. Last year, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/06/business/highest-paid-ceos.html">America’s 10 highest paid CEOs averaged more than a billion dollars each in pay</a>. One person, one year, one billion.</p><p>And the Number One highest-paid corporate honcho last year, Alex Karp, made off with nearly $7 billion! That’s <em>$560 million a month</em> in personal pay. With the exceptions of Jesus and Dolly Parton, no one is worth anywhere near that!</p><p>And what does Alex do? He’s the CEO of Palantir, <a target="_blank" href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/big-brother-is-real-and-on-the-move">a high-tech outfit now working for Donald Trump to collect and computerize all of your and my personal data, creating government dossiers so federal agents can monitor us</a>. Sleazy, but in today’s Corporate America, that’s a path to untold riches.</p><p>Still, for the insanely rich, too much is not enough. So, they, their lobbyists, and Republican congress critters are now furiously pushing for what Trump calls a “Big Beautiful Bill.” It would cut Medicaid, food stamps, and other basic human needs for America’s lowest-paid working families. Why? To give a billion-dollars more in annual tax cuts to hucksters like Karp… and Trump himself. This is worse than kleptocracy – it’s sleazocracry.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/corporate-billionaires-from-greed</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:166068580</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/166068580/a7658530545f7d966351aad0f769ede2.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/166068580/70bb89f327dbfced67c165f0f9720e9a.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Gosh, I miss the old days of CEO greed, when the pay gap between Boss Hog and everyday employees was merely gross. Today, the guiding ethic for top executive enrichment is to have no ethics. Grab as much as you can as fast as you can, everyone else be damned. And never mind that as chief, you did absolutely nothing to “earn” that exorbitant stash of cash. How exorbitant? Corporations try to hide the actual numbers, but under an insider accounting measure called “compensation actually paid” reveals the obscene truth. Last year, America’s 10 highest paid CEOs averaged more than a billion dollars each in pay. One person, one year, one billion. And the Number One highest-paid corporate honcho last year, Alex Karp, made off with nearly $7 billion! That’s $560 million a month in personal pay. With the exceptions of Jesus and Dolly Parton, no one is worth anywhere near that! And what does Alex do? He’s the CEO of Palantir, a high-tech outfit now working for Donald Trump to collect and computerize all of your and my personal data, creating government dossiers so federal agents can monitor us. Sleazy, but in today’s Corporate America, that’s a path to untold riches. Still, for the insanely rich, too much is not enough. So, they, their lobbyists, and Republican congress critters are now furiously pushing for what Trump calls a “Big Beautiful Bill.” It would cut Medicaid, food stamps, and other basic human needs for America’s lowest-paid working families. Why? To give a billion-dollars more in annual tax cuts to hucksters like Karp… and Trump himself. This is worse than kleptocracy – it’s sleazocracry. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Gosh, I miss the old days of CEO greed, when the pay gap between Boss Hog and everyday employees was merely gross. Today, the guiding ethic for top executive enrichment is to have no ethics. Grab as much as you can as fast as you can, everyone else be damned. And never mind that as chief, you did absolutely nothing to “earn” that exorbitant stash of cash. How exorbitant? Corporations try to hide the actual numbers, but under an insider accounting measure called “compensation actually paid” reveals the obscene truth. Last year, America’s 10 highest paid CEOs averaged more than a billion dollars each in pay. One person, one year, one billion. And the Number One highest-paid corporate honcho last year, Alex Karp, made off with nearly $7 billion! That’s $560 million a month in personal pay. With the exceptions of Jesus and Dolly Parton, no one is worth anywhere near that! And what does Alex do? He’s the CEO of Palantir, a high-tech outfit now working for Donald Trump to collect and computerize all of your and my personal data, creating government dossiers so federal agents can monitor us. Sleazy, but in today’s Corporate America, that’s a path to untold riches. Still, for the insanely rich, too much is not enough. So, they, their lobbyists, and Republican congress critters are now furiously pushing for what Trump calls a “Big Beautiful Bill.” It would cut Medicaid, food stamps, and other basic human needs for America’s lowest-paid working families. Why? To give a billion-dollars more in annual tax cuts to hucksters like Karp… and Trump himself. This is worse than kleptocracy – it’s sleazocracry. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Instead of Being Down About Trump, People Are Rising Up]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>If the barrage of MAGA nuttiness and raw meanness is getting you down, ponder this passage from the classic novel, <em>Don Quixote</em>: “It is not possible for the bad or the good to last forever… and since the bad has lasted so long, the good is close at hand.”</p><p>Of course, the good only comes when fed-up people openly rebel against the bad. And, sure enough, Trump’s awful tyranny is revving up a majority movement for the common good.</p><p>Soaking in self-delusion, tyrants start sipping their own bathwater, thinking it’s champagne. So, today’s Washington MAGA moguls, drunk on narcissism, are imperiously rigging the rules so their clique can grab more wealth and power from the rest of us. Maybe they thought we commoners wouldn’t notice… or care. But we did and do, so <a target="_blank" href="https://lakauffman.substack.com/p/when-peaceful-protests-are-everywhere">the rebellion is on and gaining steam with nationwide protests and a surge in grassroots populist defiance</a>.</p><p>Predictably, Trump & Co. is now resorting to the same losing tactic that panicky despots always fall back on – deploying police and military to subjugate the people. He has commanded the Army and Marines to shut down public protests. Then, posturing as a “strongman,” this 1960s draft dodger spent 45 million of our tax dollars to stage a made-for-TV, Stalin-style military parade on his birthday, letting him strut around as warrior-in-chief.</p><p>These are not shows of strength, but pathetic confessions of personal insecurity and presidential weakness. Sad. Don Quixote was right – the good is close at hand. So, to all of you in the growing democracy movement, keep pushing, push harder, push further! Thanks to you, we’re getting there. And we’ll get there sooner rather than later.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/instead-of-being-down-about-trump</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:166067904</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/166067904/6925d467f3799b8a02013b33bc20c262.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/166067904/9923e39a0f58c31441780374d9cde3e7.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>If the barrage of MAGA nuttiness and raw meanness is getting you down, ponder this passage from the classic novel, Don Quixote: “It is not possible for the bad or the good to last forever… and since the bad has lasted so long, the good is close at hand.” Of course, the good only comes when fed-up people openly rebel against the bad. And, sure enough, Trump’s awful tyranny is revving up a majority movement for the common good. Soaking in self-delusion, tyrants start sipping their own bathwater, thinking it’s champagne. So, today’s Washington MAGA moguls, drunk on narcissism, are imperiously rigging the rules so their clique can grab more wealth and power from the rest of us. Maybe they thought we commoners wouldn’t notice… or care. But we did and do, so the rebellion is on and gaining steam with nationwide protests and a surge in grassroots populist defiance. Predictably, Trump &amp; Co. is now resorting to the same losing tactic that panicky despots always fall back on – deploying police and military to subjugate the people. He has commanded the Army and Marines to shut down public protests. Then, posturing as a “strongman,” this 1960s draft dodger spent 45 million of our tax dollars to stage a made-for-TV, Stalin-style military parade on his birthday, letting him strut around as warrior-in-chief. These are not shows of strength, but pathetic confessions of personal insecurity and presidential weakness. Sad. Don Quixote was right – the good is close at hand. So, to all of you in the growing democracy movement, keep pushing, push harder, push further! Thanks to you, we’re getting there. And we’ll get there sooner rather than later. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>If the barrage of MAGA nuttiness and raw meanness is getting you down, ponder this passage from the classic novel, Don Quixote: “It is not possible for the bad or the good to last forever… and since the bad has lasted so long, the good is close at hand.” Of course, the good only comes when fed-up people openly rebel against the bad. And, sure enough, Trump’s awful tyranny is revving up a majority movement for the common good. Soaking in self-delusion, tyrants start sipping their own bathwater, thinking it’s champagne. So, today’s Washington MAGA moguls, drunk on narcissism, are imperiously rigging the rules so their clique can grab more wealth and power from the rest of us. Maybe they thought we commoners wouldn’t notice… or care. But we did and do, so the rebellion is on and gaining steam with nationwide protests and a surge in grassroots populist defiance. Predictably, Trump &amp; Co. is now resorting to the same losing tactic that panicky despots always fall back on – deploying police and military to subjugate the people. He has commanded the Army and Marines to shut down public protests. Then, posturing as a “strongman,” this 1960s draft dodger spent 45 million of our tax dollars to stage a made-for-TV, Stalin-style military parade on his birthday, letting him strut around as warrior-in-chief. These are not shows of strength, but pathetic confessions of personal insecurity and presidential weakness. Sad. Don Quixote was right – the good is close at hand. So, to all of you in the growing democracy movement, keep pushing, push harder, push further! Thanks to you, we’re getting there. And we’ll get there sooner rather than later. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Call Them What They Are: Corporate Mobsters]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>How sweet it is to be a corporate criminal these days!</p><p>I don’t mean common price gougers, polluters, and such, but full-fledged, executive-suite mobsters. They run huge corporate syndicates, treating fraud and even murder as necessary business tools. For example, Boeing Incorporated.</p><p>In 2018, a Boeing 737 MAX passenger jet suddenly nose-dived into the Java Sea, killing all 189 people on board. A freak accident, declared top bosses of the multibillion-dollar giant, disavowing any responsibility. Indeed, even though he knew that the MAX had a fatally flawed maneuvering system, the CEO rushed out to assure fliers that the jet was “as safe as any airplane that has ever flown the skies.”</p><p>But, oops – five months later, another MAX nosedived in Ethiopia, killing 157 more people. Whistleblowers and federal investigators later revealed that the bosses had long been shortchanging safety in order to jack up profits… and their own pay. Last summer – in a rare legal victory over business-as-usual coddling of corporate abuses – Boeing had to admit that it “knowingly” defrauded safety regulators and was, in fact, guilty of the criminal violations. So, justice! </p><p>Uh… not quite. Just a few weeks later, Trump happened, and he immediately turned the Justice Department into a full-service corporate whorehouse. So, after Boeing donated a cool million bucks in tribute to the new president, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/23/business/boeing-doj-737-max-crashes.html">Trump’s attorney generally obligingly decreed that the confessed corporate criminal could simply “withdraw” its guilty plea, pay a minimal fine for killing 346 people… and “move on.”</a></p><p>Politicians bark at us commoners: “Do the crime and you’ll do the time.” Unless, of course, you can buy a corporate Get-Out-Of-Jail-Free card from a corrupt president.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/call-them-what-they-are-corporate</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:165543960</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/165543960/b267354702c8679383f94eeb9cf029a8.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/165543960/18c11c34f6e7e93c0d2859adbe3b508a.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>How sweet it is to be a corporate criminal these days! I don’t mean common price gougers, polluters, and such, but full-fledged, executive-suite mobsters. They run huge corporate syndicates, treating fraud and even murder as necessary business tools. For example, Boeing Incorporated. In 2018, a Boeing 737 MAX passenger jet suddenly nose-dived into the Java Sea, killing all 189 people on board. A freak accident, declared top bosses of the multibillion-dollar giant, disavowing any responsibility. Indeed, even though he knew that the MAX had a fatally flawed maneuvering system, the CEO rushed out to assure fliers that the jet was “as safe as any airplane that has ever flown the skies.” But, oops – five months later, another MAX nosedived in Ethiopia, killing 157 more people. Whistleblowers and federal investigators later revealed that the bosses had long been shortchanging safety in order to jack up profits… and their own pay. Last summer – in a rare legal victory over business-as-usual coddling of corporate abuses – Boeing had to admit that it “knowingly” defrauded safety regulators and was, in fact, guilty of the criminal violations. So, justice! Uh… not quite. Just a few weeks later, Trump happened, and he immediately turned the Justice Department into a full-service corporate whorehouse. So, after Boeing donated a cool million bucks in tribute to the new president, Trump’s attorney generally obligingly decreed that the confessed corporate criminal could simply “withdraw” its guilty plea, pay a minimal fine for killing 346 people… and “move on.” Politicians bark at us commoners: “Do the crime and you’ll do the time.” Unless, of course, you can buy a corporate Get-Out-Of-Jail-Free card from a corrupt president. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>How sweet it is to be a corporate criminal these days! I don’t mean common price gougers, polluters, and such, but full-fledged, executive-suite mobsters. They run huge corporate syndicates, treating fraud and even murder as necessary business tools. For example, Boeing Incorporated. In 2018, a Boeing 737 MAX passenger jet suddenly nose-dived into the Java Sea, killing all 189 people on board. A freak accident, declared top bosses of the multibillion-dollar giant, disavowing any responsibility. Indeed, even though he knew that the MAX had a fatally flawed maneuvering system, the CEO rushed out to assure fliers that the jet was “as safe as any airplane that has ever flown the skies.” But, oops – five months later, another MAX nosedived in Ethiopia, killing 157 more people. Whistleblowers and federal investigators later revealed that the bosses had long been shortchanging safety in order to jack up profits… and their own pay. Last summer – in a rare legal victory over business-as-usual coddling of corporate abuses – Boeing had to admit that it “knowingly” defrauded safety regulators and was, in fact, guilty of the criminal violations. So, justice! Uh… not quite. Just a few weeks later, Trump happened, and he immediately turned the Justice Department into a full-service corporate whorehouse. So, after Boeing donated a cool million bucks in tribute to the new president, Trump’s attorney generally obligingly decreed that the confessed corporate criminal could simply “withdraw” its guilty plea, pay a minimal fine for killing 346 people… and “move on.” Politicians bark at us commoners: “Do the crime and you’ll do the time.” Unless, of course, you can buy a corporate Get-Out-Of-Jail-Free card from a corrupt president. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Big Brother Is Real… And On The Move]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Ok, let’s have a show of hands: How many of you voted to hand ALL of your most personal data to Trump’s intrusive government?</p><p>By “all,” I mean he is setting up one Silicon Valley “data aggregator” to collect, store, and control your Social Security number, bank codes, health records, tax filings, voting history, biometrics… and, well, the whole statistical YOU. This aggregator will vacuum up all these unconnected data points and reconstruct them into a full computerized profile of your life, behavior, and beliefs. </p><p>This mass surveillance infrastructure isn’t some <em>1984</em>ish fiction, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/30/technology/trump-palantir-data-americans.html">but a fast-moving reality spun from Trump’s Project 2025</a>. In an executive order quietly issued in March, he decreed that every federal agency must dump our personal data into a new centralized computer system, effectively creating government dossiers on each of us. Like every tyrant everywhere, Trump says his order is benign, merely “streamlining” data searches to increase government “efficiency.”</p><p>But this is no paper-shuffling decree, for Project 2025 operatives have already moved into the IRS, ICE, Social Security, the Pentagon, etc. – putting the technology in place to aggregate the master file.</p><p>Trump has – with no public input – already appointed a right-wing, high-tech data espionage outfit to be America’s surveillance overlord. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/30/technology/trump-palantir-data-americans.html">Named Palantir, it was created and financed by Peter Thiel, a Silicon Valley Republican billionaire, anti-democracy crusader, and self-absorbed plutocrat</a>. Palantir bluntly declares that its role in amassing and rummaging through our private information is “the finding of hidden things.”</p><p>You think you have “nothing to hide,” right? But tyrants can “find something” on everyone. <strong>To help stop Trump’s thugs from </strong><strong><em>weaponizing ourselves</em></strong><strong> against ourselves, go to Electronic Frontier Foundation: </strong><a target="_blank" href="http://eff.org"><strong>eff.org</strong></a></p><p><em>Extra, extra: For more on just how lousy (and dangerous) of a human Peter Thiel is, check out </em><a target="_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfXbyQ9KFdg"><em>the 4-part series that the podcast Behind the B******s produced on him in late 2024</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/big-brother-is-real-and-on-the-move</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:165542239</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/165542239/a5622079b3b586961e692d687314ad39.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/165542239/cf6a2fef8685b1e58b4ead04f7644c6a.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Ok, let’s have a show of hands: How many of you voted to hand ALL of your most personal data to Trump’s intrusive government? By “all,” I mean he is setting up one Silicon Valley “data aggregator” to collect, store, and control your Social Security number, bank codes, health records, tax filings, voting history, biometrics… and, well, the whole statistical YOU. This aggregator will vacuum up all these unconnected data points and reconstruct them into a full computerized profile of your life, behavior, and beliefs. This mass surveillance infrastructure isn’t some 1984ish fiction, but a fast-moving reality spun from Trump’s Project 2025. In an executive order quietly issued in March, he decreed that every federal agency must dump our personal data into a new centralized computer system, effectively creating government dossiers on each of us. Like every tyrant everywhere, Trump says his order is benign, merely “streamlining” data searches to increase government “efficiency.” But this is no paper-shuffling decree, for Project 2025 operatives have already moved into the IRS, ICE, Social Security, the Pentagon, etc. – putting the technology in place to aggregate the master file. Trump has – with no public input – already appointed a right-wing, high-tech data espionage outfit to be America’s surveillance overlord. Named Palantir, it was created and financed by Peter Thiel, a Silicon Valley Republican billionaire, anti-democracy crusader, and self-absorbed plutocrat. Palantir bluntly declares that its role in amassing and rummaging through our private information is “the finding of hidden things.” You think you have “nothing to hide,” right? But tyrants can “find something” on everyone. To help stop Trump’s thugs from weaponizing ourselves against ourselves, go to Electronic Frontier Foundation: eff.org Extra, extra: For more on just how lousy (and dangerous) of a human Peter Thiel is, check out the 4-part series that the podcast Behind the B******s produced on him in late 2024. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Ok, let’s have a show of hands: How many of you voted to hand ALL of your most personal data to Trump’s intrusive government? By “all,” I mean he is setting up one Silicon Valley “data aggregator” to collect, store, and control your Social Security number, bank codes, health records, tax filings, voting history, biometrics… and, well, the whole statistical YOU. This aggregator will vacuum up all these unconnected data points and reconstruct them into a full computerized profile of your life, behavior, and beliefs. This mass surveillance infrastructure isn’t some 1984ish fiction, but a fast-moving reality spun from Trump’s Project 2025. In an executive order quietly issued in March, he decreed that every federal agency must dump our personal data into a new centralized computer system, effectively creating government dossiers on each of us. Like every tyrant everywhere, Trump says his order is benign, merely “streamlining” data searches to increase government “efficiency.” But this is no paper-shuffling decree, for Project 2025 operatives have already moved into the IRS, ICE, Social Security, the Pentagon, etc. – putting the technology in place to aggregate the master file. Trump has – with no public input – already appointed a right-wing, high-tech data espionage outfit to be America’s surveillance overlord. Named Palantir, it was created and financed by Peter Thiel, a Silicon Valley Republican billionaire, anti-democracy crusader, and self-absorbed plutocrat. Palantir bluntly declares that its role in amassing and rummaging through our private information is “the finding of hidden things.” You think you have “nothing to hide,” right? But tyrants can “find something” on everyone. To help stop Trump’s thugs from weaponizing ourselves against ourselves, go to Electronic Frontier Foundation: eff.org Extra, extra: For more on just how lousy (and dangerous) of a human Peter Thiel is, check out the 4-part series that the podcast Behind the B******s produced on him in late 2024. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should The “Local Shrimp” You Buy Come From 8,000 Miles Away?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Let’s say you like shrimp. Whether you go for a chain restaurant’s happy hour shrimp boil or a pricey plate of “shrimp à la grandioso” at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort – a good question to ask is: Where do they get their shrimp?</p><p>Even if the restaurant has an ocean view and a shrimp boat out front, chances are its crustaceans come from industrial aquaculture farms thousands of miles away in India, Ecuador, Vietnam and Indonesia.<a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/30/dining/shrimp-fraud-gulf-coast-new-orleans.html"> Astonishingly, </a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/30/dining/shrimp-fraud-gulf-coast-new-orleans.html"><em>our country now imports 94 percent of the shrimp we eat</em></a>!</p><p>Astonishing, because our oceans have an abundance of top-quality shrimp, and we are blessed with highly-skilled shrimping families. Worse, those foreign industrial operations, financed by Wall Street and global profiteers, are infamous for using forced labor, banned antibiotics, and destructive environmental methods. Then they dump their grossly-cheap product into the US market, pushing out our superior-quality domestic product and devastating entire shrimping communities.</p><p>Yet, restaurant and supermarket prices for shrimp are at historic highs, with no disclosure to us consumers of where the product is from. The import industry effectively bribes lawmakers to avoid exposing, much less punishing, this multibillion-dollar swindle of American producers and eaters alike. The bait-and-switch conspiracy is now so pervasive that at last year’s National Shrimp Festival, four out of five vendors were – shhhh – quietly serving industrially-raised imported shrimp.</p><p>Of course, corporations have no conscience, but our tough-on-crime political leaders are so pusillanimous that they won’t even stand up for their own local shrimpers. A recent Louisiana law, for example, “boldly” requires restaurants to disclose if they’re peddling imported shrimp. But, the legislature meekly provided <em>no penalty</em> if violators ignore the law. So… they do.</p><p>For information on real reform, connect with <a target="_blank" href="http://SanAntonioBayWaterKeeper.org">SanAntonioBayWaterKeeper.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/should-the-local-shrimp-you-buy-come</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:165109068</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/165109068/7e0f60dfa901060f9e4f97ae6bffd80c.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/165109068/e0f75042fd863b2f72f4942d5cb6bcc2.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Let’s say you like shrimp. Whether you go for a chain restaurant’s happy hour shrimp boil or a pricey plate of “shrimp à la grandioso” at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort – a good question to ask is: Where do they get their shrimp? Even if the restaurant has an ocean view and a shrimp boat out front, chances are its crustaceans come from industrial aquaculture farms thousands of miles away in India, Ecuador, Vietnam and Indonesia. Astonishingly, our country now imports 94 percent of the shrimp we eat! Astonishing, because our oceans have an abundance of top-quality shrimp, and we are blessed with highly-skilled shrimping families. Worse, those foreign industrial operations, financed by Wall Street and global profiteers, are infamous for using forced labor, banned antibiotics, and destructive environmental methods. Then they dump their grossly-cheap product into the US market, pushing out our superior-quality domestic product and devastating entire shrimping communities. Yet, restaurant and supermarket prices for shrimp are at historic highs, with no disclosure to us consumers of where the product is from. The import industry effectively bribes lawmakers to avoid exposing, much less punishing, this multibillion-dollar swindle of American producers and eaters alike. The bait-and-switch conspiracy is now so pervasive that at last year’s National Shrimp Festival, four out of five vendors were – shhhh – quietly serving industrially-raised imported shrimp. Of course, corporations have no conscience, but our tough-on-crime political leaders are so pusillanimous that they won’t even stand up for their own local shrimpers. A recent Louisiana law, for example, “boldly” requires restaurants to disclose if they’re peddling imported shrimp. But, the legislature meekly provided no penalty if violators ignore the law. So… they do. For information on real reform, connect with SanAntonioBayWaterKeeper.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Let’s say you like shrimp. Whether you go for a chain restaurant’s happy hour shrimp boil or a pricey plate of “shrimp à la grandioso” at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort – a good question to ask is: Where do they get their shrimp? Even if the restaurant has an ocean view and a shrimp boat out front, chances are its crustaceans come from industrial aquaculture farms thousands of miles away in India, Ecuador, Vietnam and Indonesia. Astonishingly, our country now imports 94 percent of the shrimp we eat! Astonishing, because our oceans have an abundance of top-quality shrimp, and we are blessed with highly-skilled shrimping families. Worse, those foreign industrial operations, financed by Wall Street and global profiteers, are infamous for using forced labor, banned antibiotics, and destructive environmental methods. Then they dump their grossly-cheap product into the US market, pushing out our superior-quality domestic product and devastating entire shrimping communities. Yet, restaurant and supermarket prices for shrimp are at historic highs, with no disclosure to us consumers of where the product is from. The import industry effectively bribes lawmakers to avoid exposing, much less punishing, this multibillion-dollar swindle of American producers and eaters alike. The bait-and-switch conspiracy is now so pervasive that at last year’s National Shrimp Festival, four out of five vendors were – shhhh – quietly serving industrially-raised imported shrimp. Of course, corporations have no conscience, but our tough-on-crime political leaders are so pusillanimous that they won’t even stand up for their own local shrimpers. A recent Louisiana law, for example, “boldly” requires restaurants to disclose if they’re peddling imported shrimp. But, the legislature meekly provided no penalty if violators ignore the law. So… they do. For information on real reform, connect with SanAntonioBayWaterKeeper.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Right-Wingers To Women: Stay Home And Have Babies!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The right-wing routinely demonizes family-friendly policies of liberals as “social engineering.”</p><p>But look out! Here come those same politicians, putting on MAGA hardhats and firing up their political bulldozers to push one of the most arrogant and intrusive social schemes imaginable. They intend to re-engineer the American family! These “pronatalists” want families to conform to a Christian Nationalist family structure – specifically, a dominant man married to a subservient stay-at-home woman, having beaucoup children. Not a couple of kiddos but six, 12, or more!</p><p>For example, extremist MAGA senator Josh Hawley has become a cheerleader for a federal policy to entice women to quit work, stay home, and have more babies. He proposes a tax credit of $5,000 per child, gushing that this would cause working families to exclaim, “Oh, my gosh, we can actually raise our kids.”</p><p>Well, “gosh” right back at you, Josh! Just giving birth can cost more than $5,000 – and raising a child is multiples above that every year. So, you want to take away a mom’s job and her income, and add thousands in costs to the family budget – in exchange for a government tax credit? The slickest loan sharks aren’t that diabolical.</p><p>Oh, wait. Right-wing pronatalists have another government incentive to jack-up birth rates. Incredibly, Trump officials have proposed a “National Medal of Motherhood” for women who have six or more children! Wow, what should that medal look like, be made of, and say? And when and where should it be worn? Also, will un-medaled women socially ostracized?</p><p>If right-wingers actually wanted to help families, they’d be backing family-level wages, free child care, and Medicare for all. Everything else is political BS.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/right-wingers-to-women-stay-home</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:165096618</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/165096618/942da27b5219c172193a1c204a77a725.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/165096618/30f336e4f4e6b0f7cdb62b21879d3cfd.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>The right-wing routinely demonizes family-friendly policies of liberals as “social engineering.” But look out! Here come those same politicians, putting on MAGA hardhats and firing up their political bulldozers to push one of the most arrogant and intrusive social schemes imaginable. They intend to re-engineer the American family! These “pronatalists” want families to conform to a Christian Nationalist family structure – specifically, a dominant man married to a subservient stay-at-home woman, having beaucoup children. Not a couple of kiddos but six, 12, or more! For example, extremist MAGA senator Josh Hawley has become a cheerleader for a federal policy to entice women to quit work, stay home, and have more babies. He proposes a tax credit of $5,000 per child, gushing that this would cause working families to exclaim, “Oh, my gosh, we can actually raise our kids.” Well, “gosh” right back at you, Josh! Just giving birth can cost more than $5,000 – and raising a child is multiples above that every year. So, you want to take away a mom’s job and her income, and add thousands in costs to the family budget – in exchange for a government tax credit? The slickest loan sharks aren’t that diabolical. Oh, wait. Right-wing pronatalists have another government incentive to jack-up birth rates. Incredibly, Trump officials have proposed a “National Medal of Motherhood” for women who have six or more children! Wow, what should that medal look like, be made of, and say? And when and where should it be worn? Also, will un-medaled women socially ostracized? If right-wingers actually wanted to help families, they’d be backing family-level wages, free child care, and Medicare for all. Everything else is political BS. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>The right-wing routinely demonizes family-friendly policies of liberals as “social engineering.” But look out! Here come those same politicians, putting on MAGA hardhats and firing up their political bulldozers to push one of the most arrogant and intrusive social schemes imaginable. They intend to re-engineer the American family! These “pronatalists” want families to conform to a Christian Nationalist family structure – specifically, a dominant man married to a subservient stay-at-home woman, having beaucoup children. Not a couple of kiddos but six, 12, or more! For example, extremist MAGA senator Josh Hawley has become a cheerleader for a federal policy to entice women to quit work, stay home, and have more babies. He proposes a tax credit of $5,000 per child, gushing that this would cause working families to exclaim, “Oh, my gosh, we can actually raise our kids.” Well, “gosh” right back at you, Josh! Just giving birth can cost more than $5,000 – and raising a child is multiples above that every year. So, you want to take away a mom’s job and her income, and add thousands in costs to the family budget – in exchange for a government tax credit? The slickest loan sharks aren’t that diabolical. Oh, wait. Right-wing pronatalists have another government incentive to jack-up birth rates. Incredibly, Trump officials have proposed a “National Medal of Motherhood” for women who have six or more children! Wow, what should that medal look like, be made of, and say? And when and where should it be worn? Also, will un-medaled women socially ostracized? If right-wingers actually wanted to help families, they’d be backing family-level wages, free child care, and Medicare for all. Everything else is political BS. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Would Anyone Buy A Ticket To Hell From Elon Musk?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The most embarrassing thing about the ballyhooed war-on-government-waste, run by Elon “Chainsaw” Musk, is not even that it has generated more waste than it has cleaned up. More damning is that the clean-up crew quietly tiptoed around the biggest and stinkiest piles of waste – namely the billions of our tax dollars doled out annually to corporate welfare moochers. Such as – Hello – Elon Musk!</p><p>Son of a South African diamond dealer, Elon glided from a life of privilege all the way to being filthy rich, transported by extravagant taxpayer subsidies and government favors. And now he’s back at the trough, demanding a blank government check for his biggest boondoggle of all: Rocketing to Mars.</p><p>Not him (unfortunately), but you and me. A flaming megalomaniacal flimflammer, Musk says he’s a genius rocket scientist who will “save civilization” by relocating our human species to the Red Planet. Proclaiming that our Blue Marble is doomed to a hellish future, he is already using millions of earthly tax dollars to fund his fever dream.</p><p>Getting there, however, would be the cheap and easy part. Mars is already hellish, with killer levels of surface radiation, toxic dust, and so-called air that analysts say “will boil the saliva off your tongue before it asphyxiates you.”</p><p>The only real question is why the hell anyone is listening to this narcissistic flimflammer. He can’t run a government waste project, much less a planet. Speaking of waste, why is he so eager to throw away Earth? Our salvation lies not in the stars, Musk, or other techno-profiteers, but in our democratic values, connection to nature, and down-to-Earth creativity.</p><p>Let Musk go to hell – I’m sticking with the home team.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-would-anyone-buy-a-ticket-to</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:164485601</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/164485601/71c9d0ecea0ad86fa21dc1dc9cde597a.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/164485601/2701f8b938e8aaf2900aa99f77ef5dbc.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>The most embarrassing thing about the ballyhooed war-on-government-waste, run by Elon “Chainsaw” Musk, is not even that it has generated more waste than it has cleaned up. More damning is that the clean-up crew quietly tiptoed around the biggest and stinkiest piles of waste – namely the billions of our tax dollars doled out annually to corporate welfare moochers. Such as – Hello – Elon Musk! Son of a South African diamond dealer, Elon glided from a life of privilege all the way to being filthy rich, transported by extravagant taxpayer subsidies and government favors. And now he’s back at the trough, demanding a blank government check for his biggest boondoggle of all: Rocketing to Mars. Not him (unfortunately), but you and me. A flaming megalomaniacal flimflammer, Musk says he’s a genius rocket scientist who will “save civilization” by relocating our human species to the Red Planet. Proclaiming that our Blue Marble is doomed to a hellish future, he is already using millions of earthly tax dollars to fund his fever dream. Getting there, however, would be the cheap and easy part. Mars is already hellish, with killer levels of surface radiation, toxic dust, and so-called air that analysts say “will boil the saliva off your tongue before it asphyxiates you.” The only real question is why the hell anyone is listening to this narcissistic flimflammer. He can’t run a government waste project, much less a planet. Speaking of waste, why is he so eager to throw away Earth? Our salvation lies not in the stars, Musk, or other techno-profiteers, but in our democratic values, connection to nature, and down-to-Earth creativity. Let Musk go to hell – I’m sticking with the home team. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>The most embarrassing thing about the ballyhooed war-on-government-waste, run by Elon “Chainsaw” Musk, is not even that it has generated more waste than it has cleaned up. More damning is that the clean-up crew quietly tiptoed around the biggest and stinkiest piles of waste – namely the billions of our tax dollars doled out annually to corporate welfare moochers. Such as – Hello – Elon Musk! Son of a South African diamond dealer, Elon glided from a life of privilege all the way to being filthy rich, transported by extravagant taxpayer subsidies and government favors. And now he’s back at the trough, demanding a blank government check for his biggest boondoggle of all: Rocketing to Mars. Not him (unfortunately), but you and me. A flaming megalomaniacal flimflammer, Musk says he’s a genius rocket scientist who will “save civilization” by relocating our human species to the Red Planet. Proclaiming that our Blue Marble is doomed to a hellish future, he is already using millions of earthly tax dollars to fund his fever dream. Getting there, however, would be the cheap and easy part. Mars is already hellish, with killer levels of surface radiation, toxic dust, and so-called air that analysts say “will boil the saliva off your tongue before it asphyxiates you.” The only real question is why the hell anyone is listening to this narcissistic flimflammer. He can’t run a government waste project, much less a planet. Speaking of waste, why is he so eager to throw away Earth? Our salvation lies not in the stars, Musk, or other techno-profiteers, but in our democratic values, connection to nature, and down-to-Earth creativity. Let Musk go to hell – I’m sticking with the home team. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[What Starlings Could Teach Trump’s Mean Government]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>There is a species of birds named “superb starlings,” and I propose that we elect one of them to be our next president.</p><p>That’s because these wise creatures have figured out how to make egalitarianism central to their society, with a diversity of birds actively supporting each other. When bringing food back to their chicks, for example, adult starlings commonly share some with hatchlings of an unrelated flock. In turn, those birds repay the good deed in later breeding seasons.</p><p>Contrast this bird-nest ethic of the Common Good with the culture of right-wing minginess now being pushed furiously by Trump’s kakistocracy of billionaires and despotic ideologues.</p><p>Four of his overprivileged cabinet appointees, for example (Bobby Kennedy, Mehmet Oz, Brooke Rollins, and Scott Turner) recently ganged up on hard-hit poor families who receive modest public help for essential human needs, like food and health care. The four politicos piously wailed that welfare programs are an intolerable burden on wealthy taxpayers, so they intend to slash spending by <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/22/upshot/medicaid-republicans-work-requirement.html">forcing the poor to take jobs before getting any public help</a>.</p><p>But their claim that hordes of worthless sponges are living high on food stamps and Medicaid is the same BS such plutocrats always spread when trying to keep our society from being as smart, decent, and ethical as starlings. Their scolding dictate that “you must work” is pointless grandstanding. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/understanding-the-intersection-of-medicaid-and-work-an-update/">Nearly all Medicaid recipients, for example, </a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/understanding-the-intersection-of-medicaid-and-work-an-update/"><em>already have jobs</em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/understanding-the-intersection-of-medicaid-and-work-an-update/"> – or they are children, seniors, or disabled.</a></p><p>There’s a four-letter vulgarity that fits Kennedy, Oz, Rollins, and Turner: “Mean.” Okay, technically, “mean” is not an obscenity, but when powerful tax-paid elites like them are mean to poor people for political gain, they are, in fact, obscene… and disgusting.</p><p>Do something!</p><p>Medicaid cuts don’t just affect people on Medicaid— they hurt us all. For example, many hospitals, especially rural hospitals, rely on the revenue they receive from Medicaid reimbursements just to survive.</p><p>A number of people around the country are encouraging everyday folks to share the facts about Medicaid in their areas, and are <a target="_blank" href="https://posterproject.us/">creating infographics for you to use</a> to tell your stories. Calling your representatives is always good, but we’re also finding that local media coverage is having a huge impact (in part because your representatives deeply care about how they’re perceived in your local media).</p><p>Here’s where you can find all the <a target="_blank" href="https://posterproject.us/medicaid">Medicaid graphics for each state</a>; additionally, activist <a target="_blank" href="https://substack.com/profile/157605824-dani-cook">Dani Cook</a> has created a series of Medicaid graphics for states with <a target="_blank" href="https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1QUy5VlZ-j746YjFmGXGr2OvK5ECSncbc">large rural contingents here. </a></p><p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/what-starlings-could-teach-trumps</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:164484217</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/164484217/68c4c19e6695e04922232975b3fc26ee.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/164484217/a31b5ccc50fee8654da7ef1977e2ae68.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>There is a species of birds named “superb starlings,” and I propose that we elect one of them to be our next president. That’s because these wise creatures have figured out how to make egalitarianism central to their society, with a diversity of birds actively supporting each other. When bringing food back to their chicks, for example, adult starlings commonly share some with hatchlings of an unrelated flock. In turn, those birds repay the good deed in later breeding seasons. Contrast this bird-nest ethic of the Common Good with the culture of right-wing minginess now being pushed furiously by Trump’s kakistocracy of billionaires and despotic ideologues. Four of his overprivileged cabinet appointees, for example (Bobby Kennedy, Mehmet Oz, Brooke Rollins, and Scott Turner) recently ganged up on hard-hit poor families who receive modest public help for essential human needs, like food and health care. The four politicos piously wailed that welfare programs are an intolerable burden on wealthy taxpayers, so they intend to slash spending by forcing the poor to take jobs before getting any public help. But their claim that hordes of worthless sponges are living high on food stamps and Medicaid is the same BS such plutocrats always spread when trying to keep our society from being as smart, decent, and ethical as starlings. Their scolding dictate that “you must work” is pointless grandstanding. Nearly all Medicaid recipients, for example, already have jobs – or they are children, seniors, or disabled. There’s a four-letter vulgarity that fits Kennedy, Oz, Rollins, and Turner: “Mean.” Okay, technically, “mean” is not an obscenity, but when powerful tax-paid elites like them are mean to poor people for political gain, they are, in fact, obscene… and disgusting. Do something! Medicaid cuts don’t just affect people on Medicaid— they hurt us all. For example, many hospitals, especially rural hospitals, rely on the revenue they receive from Medicaid reimbursements just to survive. A number of people around the country are encouraging everyday folks to share the facts about Medicaid in their areas, and are creating infographics for you to use to tell your stories. Calling your representatives is always good, but we’re also finding that local media coverage is having a huge impact (in part because your representatives deeply care about how they’re perceived in your local media). Here’s where you can find all the Medicaid graphics for each state; additionally, activist Dani Cook has created a series of Medicaid graphics for states with large rural contingents here. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>There is a species of birds named “superb starlings,” and I propose that we elect one of them to be our next president. That’s because these wise creatures have figured out how to make egalitarianism central to their society, with a diversity of birds actively supporting each other. When bringing food back to their chicks, for example, adult starlings commonly share some with hatchlings of an unrelated flock. In turn, those birds repay the good deed in later breeding seasons. Contrast this bird-nest ethic of the Common Good with the culture of right-wing minginess now being pushed furiously by Trump’s kakistocracy of billionaires and despotic ideologues. Four of his overprivileged cabinet appointees, for example (Bobby Kennedy, Mehmet Oz, Brooke Rollins, and Scott Turner) recently ganged up on hard-hit poor families who receive modest public help for essential human needs, like food and health care. The four politicos piously wailed that welfare programs are an intolerable burden on wealthy taxpayers, so they intend to slash spending by forcing the poor to take jobs before getting any public help. But their claim that hordes of worthless sponges are living high on food stamps and Medicaid is the same BS such plutocrats always spread when trying to keep our society from being as smart, decent, and ethical as starlings. Their scolding dictate that “you must work” is pointless grandstanding. Nearly all Medicaid recipients, for example, already have jobs – or they are children, seniors, or disabled. There’s a four-letter vulgarity that fits Kennedy, Oz, Rollins, and Turner: “Mean.” Okay, technically, “mean” is not an obscenity, but when powerful tax-paid elites like them are mean to poor people for political gain, they are, in fact, obscene… and disgusting. Do something! Medicaid cuts don’t just affect people on Medicaid— they hurt us all. For example, many hospitals, especially rural hospitals, rely on the revenue they receive from Medicaid reimbursements just to survive. A number of people around the country are encouraging everyday folks to share the facts about Medicaid in their areas, and are creating infographics for you to use to tell your stories. Calling your representatives is always good, but we’re also finding that local media coverage is having a huge impact (in part because your representatives deeply care about how they’re perceived in your local media). Here’s where you can find all the Medicaid graphics for each state; additionally, activist Dani Cook has created a series of Medicaid graphics for states with large rural contingents here. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Moral Rights For AI Bots? What About Human Bots?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>You might be alarmed to learn that a little-known group in America is being treated inhumanely, denied even the most basic human rights.</p><p>I refer to our society’s callous treatment of AI bots.</p><p>Who? AI bots are not an ethnic group, but the rapidly-evolving species of advanced “artificial intelligence beings,” spawned in recent years by the high-tech demi-gods of Silicon Valley. Unbeknownst to most of us natural-born humans, profiteering corporations are already deploying millions of these “thinking machines” across our country, taking an ever-widening array of jobs that require a measure of cognitive, human-level abilities – from architects to therapists, lawyers to journalists.</p><p>However, rather than focusing on the deep ethical and pragmatic questions that this techno-corporate displacement poses for real-life people, the developers of AI’s Brave New World are trying to divert social concern to the bots. A recent headline urgently asks, “S<a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/24/technology/ai-welfare-anthropic-claude.html">hould AI Systems Have Rights?</a>” And a leading maker of those systems is proclaiming that society must be concerned about the “mental welfare” of bots. Meanwhile, corporate owners are urging that their machine creatures be given a moral status to assure that they are “ethically treated.”</p><p>Excuse me, but who are these greedmeisters to set ethical standards? The billionaires of tech have enriched themselves, not by any genius, but by ruthlessly exploiting workers, carelessly polluting our environment, arrogantly violating our laws, stealing from their competitors and consumers, and bribing government officials. They are sleaze.</p><p>Besides, corporate bots need to go the back of the line! Before we give rights to machines, let’s secure the rights that moneyed elites have denied to women, the poor, nature… and democracy itself.</p><p>Do something!</p><p>To learn more about AI, ethics, privacy and more, and to support sane advocacy around technology in general, check out the Electronic Frontier Foundation at <a target="_blank" href="https://www.eff.org/issues/ai">eff.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/moral-rights-for-ai-bots-what-about</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:163961259</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/163961259/82f50eecf80c03c84de217c803f4d580.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/163961259/a0767578a36dfcba82eebd018f9be60c.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>You might be alarmed to learn that a little-known group in America is being treated inhumanely, denied even the most basic human rights. I refer to our society’s callous treatment of AI bots. Who? AI bots are not an ethnic group, but the rapidly-evolving species of advanced “artificial intelligence beings,” spawned in recent years by the high-tech demi-gods of Silicon Valley. Unbeknownst to most of us natural-born humans, profiteering corporations are already deploying millions of these “thinking machines” across our country, taking an ever-widening array of jobs that require a measure of cognitive, human-level abilities – from architects to therapists, lawyers to journalists. However, rather than focusing on the deep ethical and pragmatic questions that this techno-corporate displacement poses for real-life people, the developers of AI’s Brave New World are trying to divert social concern to the bots. A recent headline urgently asks, “Should AI Systems Have Rights?” And a leading maker of those systems is proclaiming that society must be concerned about the “mental welfare” of bots. Meanwhile, corporate owners are urging that their machine creatures be given a moral status to assure that they are “ethically treated.” Excuse me, but who are these greedmeisters to set ethical standards? The billionaires of tech have enriched themselves, not by any genius, but by ruthlessly exploiting workers, carelessly polluting our environment, arrogantly violating our laws, stealing from their competitors and consumers, and bribing government officials. They are sleaze. Besides, corporate bots need to go the back of the line! Before we give rights to machines, let’s secure the rights that moneyed elites have denied to women, the poor, nature… and democracy itself. Do something! To learn more about AI, ethics, privacy and more, and to support sane advocacy around technology in general, check out the Electronic Frontier Foundation at eff.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>You might be alarmed to learn that a little-known group in America is being treated inhumanely, denied even the most basic human rights. I refer to our society’s callous treatment of AI bots. Who? AI bots are not an ethnic group, but the rapidly-evolving species of advanced “artificial intelligence beings,” spawned in recent years by the high-tech demi-gods of Silicon Valley. Unbeknownst to most of us natural-born humans, profiteering corporations are already deploying millions of these “thinking machines” across our country, taking an ever-widening array of jobs that require a measure of cognitive, human-level abilities – from architects to therapists, lawyers to journalists. However, rather than focusing on the deep ethical and pragmatic questions that this techno-corporate displacement poses for real-life people, the developers of AI’s Brave New World are trying to divert social concern to the bots. A recent headline urgently asks, “Should AI Systems Have Rights?” And a leading maker of those systems is proclaiming that society must be concerned about the “mental welfare” of bots. Meanwhile, corporate owners are urging that their machine creatures be given a moral status to assure that they are “ethically treated.” Excuse me, but who are these greedmeisters to set ethical standards? The billionaires of tech have enriched themselves, not by any genius, but by ruthlessly exploiting workers, carelessly polluting our environment, arrogantly violating our laws, stealing from their competitors and consumers, and bribing government officials. They are sleaze. Besides, corporate bots need to go the back of the line! Before we give rights to machines, let’s secure the rights that moneyed elites have denied to women, the poor, nature… and democracy itself. Do something! To learn more about AI, ethics, privacy and more, and to support sane advocacy around technology in general, check out the Electronic Frontier Foundation at eff.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Gutless, Greedy Lawyers Kowtowing to Trump]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I am a product of George Washington University Law School, so I feel I have an insider’s right to comment on the super-elite law firms that’ve suddenly been kowtowing to Trump.</p><p>Well… actually, I only lasted a week-and-a-half in law school. Still, you don’t need to be a legal scholar to see that these butt-kissing, billion-dollar firms are – to use a judicial term – scuzz.</p><p>It’s certainly true that Trump is a vindictive, petty president who routinely turns his office into a weapon of personal political revenge. And he especially despises lawyers who have defied his many blatantly-illegal power grabs, so he’s been deploying the crushing force of big government to punish such prominent Democratic firms as Paul Weiss. Trump stripped security clearances from Weiss lawyers, barred them from entering federal buildings, and threatened to cancel their clients’ government contracts.</p><p>No one said battling a despot would be easy. But, as Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor recently put it, “If you’re not used to fighting and losing battles, then don’t become a lawyer.”</p><p>Rather than fight, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/21/nyregion/what-is-paul-weiss.html">the Weiss firm pathetically tucked tail and ran whimpering to Trump</a>, begging forgiveness for challenging his unconstitutional acts. They even made a $40 million payoff to get in Lord Donald’s good graces!</p><p>Senior partners in the Weiss firm, each of whom are paid some <em>$20 million a year</em>, are not only gutless, but greedy as well. They sold their integrity to a mobster like Trump, so he would “let them” keep drawing that fat check. It shows that the opposite of courage is not merely cowardice, but conformity.</p><p>If lawyers will so meekly abandon their own democratic rights, why would any of us pay them to stand up for ours?</p><p>Do something!</p><p>To find and support lawyers who <em>actually support</em> The People, check out the National Lawyers Guild at <a target="_blank" href="http://nlg.org">nlg.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/gutless-greedy-lawyers-kowtowing</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:163960413</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/163960413/85e433465f1784478459818dfe9afd44.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/163960413/296eb8415ec309e9ba86e2b53dd9cf4f.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>I am a product of George Washington University Law School, so I feel I have an insider’s right to comment on the super-elite law firms that’ve suddenly been kowtowing to Trump. Well… actually, I only lasted a week-and-a-half in law school. Still, you don’t need to be a legal scholar to see that these butt-kissing, billion-dollar firms are – to use a judicial term – scuzz. It’s certainly true that Trump is a vindictive, petty president who routinely turns his office into a weapon of personal political revenge. And he especially despises lawyers who have defied his many blatantly-illegal power grabs, so he’s been deploying the crushing force of big government to punish such prominent Democratic firms as Paul Weiss. Trump stripped security clearances from Weiss lawyers, barred them from entering federal buildings, and threatened to cancel their clients’ government contracts. No one said battling a despot would be easy. But, as Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor recently put it, “If you’re not used to fighting and losing battles, then don’t become a lawyer.” Rather than fight, the Weiss firm pathetically tucked tail and ran whimpering to Trump, begging forgiveness for challenging his unconstitutional acts. They even made a $40 million payoff to get in Lord Donald’s good graces! Senior partners in the Weiss firm, each of whom are paid some $20 million a year, are not only gutless, but greedy as well. They sold their integrity to a mobster like Trump, so he would “let them” keep drawing that fat check. It shows that the opposite of courage is not merely cowardice, but conformity. If lawyers will so meekly abandon their own democratic rights, why would any of us pay them to stand up for ours? Do something! To find and support lawyers who actually support The People, check out the National Lawyers Guild at nlg.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>I am a product of George Washington University Law School, so I feel I have an insider’s right to comment on the super-elite law firms that’ve suddenly been kowtowing to Trump. Well… actually, I only lasted a week-and-a-half in law school. Still, you don’t need to be a legal scholar to see that these butt-kissing, billion-dollar firms are – to use a judicial term – scuzz. It’s certainly true that Trump is a vindictive, petty president who routinely turns his office into a weapon of personal political revenge. And he especially despises lawyers who have defied his many blatantly-illegal power grabs, so he’s been deploying the crushing force of big government to punish such prominent Democratic firms as Paul Weiss. Trump stripped security clearances from Weiss lawyers, barred them from entering federal buildings, and threatened to cancel their clients’ government contracts. No one said battling a despot would be easy. But, as Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor recently put it, “If you’re not used to fighting and losing battles, then don’t become a lawyer.” Rather than fight, the Weiss firm pathetically tucked tail and ran whimpering to Trump, begging forgiveness for challenging his unconstitutional acts. They even made a $40 million payoff to get in Lord Donald’s good graces! Senior partners in the Weiss firm, each of whom are paid some $20 million a year, are not only gutless, but greedy as well. They sold their integrity to a mobster like Trump, so he would “let them” keep drawing that fat check. It shows that the opposite of courage is not merely cowardice, but conformity. If lawyers will so meekly abandon their own democratic rights, why would any of us pay them to stand up for ours? Do something! To find and support lawyers who actually support The People, check out the National Lawyers Guild at nlg.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[MAGA Extremists: Even Too Nutty For Texas?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>In this dark age of Trumpian rule, is there any glimmer of hope?</p><p>Yes – lo and behold: <strong>Texas!</strong></p><p>I’ll bet you were not expecting that answer. Well, for sure, the Republican clique of arrogant billionaires and Christian supremacists who thought they owned Texas politics didn’t expect the comeuppance voters delivered to them in this month’s local elections.</p><p>In city and school board contests across the state, Texans bluntly said to right-wing operatives and officials: We’re sick of you – your constant attempts to divide and dictate, ban and bully, privatize and profiteer at the expense of the common good.</p><p>For example, in the flashing-red suburbs of Fort Worth, where GOP front groups have spent millions in dark-money to take over school boards, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.lonestarleft.com/p/magas-very-bad-night-in-texas">Democratic challengers won 11 of 11 races</a>! In Mansfield, the county’s third largest city, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.lonestarleft.com/p/magas-very-bad-night-in-texas">all five right-wing extremists running for mayor and school board lost.</a> “Mansfield has gone to Hell,” screeched one of the Christian Nationalist activists!</p><p>No, it’s being yanked back to its senses, rejecting hyper-partisan nutballism and church dictatorship in favor of, you know, <em>educating children</em>!</p><p>Also, voters in Katy, Fort Bend, Plano, Richardson, and other big suburbs – long written off as solid red bastions – <a target="_blank" href="https://www.lonestarleft.com/p/magas-very-bad-night-in-texas">produced sweeping progressive victories</a>.</p><p>This grassroots turnaround is no accident. It’s largely the product of a young generation of progressive activists revitalizing the tried-and-true practice of “little-d” democratic organizing – which means showing up in-person, day-in and day-out to connect with workaday people, focusing on their real problems.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… Of course, this doesn’t mean Texas is suddenly blue – but it’s on the right path, and that offers hope in other red and purple areas. Remember: The first rule of politics is to show up.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/maga-extremists-even-too-nutty-for</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:163485162</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/163485162/a84819350b4db4ea951097e350681374.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/163485162/384bccae430ec30699230e7a2e54be5d.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>In this dark age of Trumpian rule, is there any glimmer of hope? Yes – lo and behold: Texas! I’ll bet you were not expecting that answer. Well, for sure, the Republican clique of arrogant billionaires and Christian supremacists who thought they owned Texas politics didn’t expect the comeuppance voters delivered to them in this month’s local elections. In city and school board contests across the state, Texans bluntly said to right-wing operatives and officials: We’re sick of you – your constant attempts to divide and dictate, ban and bully, privatize and profiteer at the expense of the common good. For example, in the flashing-red suburbs of Fort Worth, where GOP front groups have spent millions in dark-money to take over school boards, Democratic challengers won 11 of 11 races! In Mansfield, the county’s third largest city, all five right-wing extremists running for mayor and school board lost. “Mansfield has gone to Hell,” screeched one of the Christian Nationalist activists! No, it’s being yanked back to its senses, rejecting hyper-partisan nutballism and church dictatorship in favor of, you know, educating children! Also, voters in Katy, Fort Bend, Plano, Richardson, and other big suburbs – long written off as solid red bastions – produced sweeping progressive victories. This grassroots turnaround is no accident. It’s largely the product of a young generation of progressive activists revitalizing the tried-and-true practice of “little-d” democratic organizing – which means showing up in-person, day-in and day-out to connect with workaday people, focusing on their real problems. This is Jim Hightower saying… Of course, this doesn’t mean Texas is suddenly blue – but it’s on the right path, and that offers hope in other red and purple areas. Remember: The first rule of politics is to show up. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>In this dark age of Trumpian rule, is there any glimmer of hope? Yes – lo and behold: Texas! I’ll bet you were not expecting that answer. Well, for sure, the Republican clique of arrogant billionaires and Christian supremacists who thought they owned Texas politics didn’t expect the comeuppance voters delivered to them in this month’s local elections. In city and school board contests across the state, Texans bluntly said to right-wing operatives and officials: We’re sick of you – your constant attempts to divide and dictate, ban and bully, privatize and profiteer at the expense of the common good. For example, in the flashing-red suburbs of Fort Worth, where GOP front groups have spent millions in dark-money to take over school boards, Democratic challengers won 11 of 11 races! In Mansfield, the county’s third largest city, all five right-wing extremists running for mayor and school board lost. “Mansfield has gone to Hell,” screeched one of the Christian Nationalist activists! No, it’s being yanked back to its senses, rejecting hyper-partisan nutballism and church dictatorship in favor of, you know, educating children! Also, voters in Katy, Fort Bend, Plano, Richardson, and other big suburbs – long written off as solid red bastions – produced sweeping progressive victories. This grassroots turnaround is no accident. It’s largely the product of a young generation of progressive activists revitalizing the tried-and-true practice of “little-d” democratic organizing – which means showing up in-person, day-in and day-out to connect with workaday people, focusing on their real problems. This is Jim Hightower saying… Of course, this doesn’t mean Texas is suddenly blue – but it’s on the right path, and that offers hope in other red and purple areas. Remember: The first rule of politics is to show up. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[My Church Is a Farmer’s Market… And Vice Versa]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Well, <em>habemus papam</em>—welcome, Pope Leo! Bless him… and us.</p><p>I hope no one thinks me blasphemous, but I go to a church nearly every Saturday that is not denominational, nor is it held in any sort of ornate cathedral, temple or mosque. It’s a plain wooden, open-air shed with a metal roof and a loose brick floor—but it’s filled with goodness, joy and a diversity of devotees who share in the bounty of nature. It’s the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.boggycreekfarm.com/">Boggy Creek Farmstand</a>, one of more than a dozen farmers’ markets flourishing in my hometown of Austin, Texas.</p><p>Indeed, thousands of these secular-but-soulful gathering places that nurture body and spirit have cropped up all across America. From big city neighborhoods, to rural towns, they provide a genuine grassroots alternative to factory food and monopoly megamarts.</p><p>The spread of this good food movement has been neither “miraculous” nor the product of some corporate conclave. Rather, it’s the organic result of hundreds of local coalitions—small farmers, consumer advocates, environmentalists, community officials, and others dedicated to real, lasting progress of, by and for workaday people.</p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://peopleshistoryintexas.substack.com/p/farmers-markets-in-texas">When organizing a Texas network of these cooperative ventures in my years as state agriculture commissioner</a>, we followed a path blazed by (shhhh, don’t tell anyone) New York City. There, a pragmatic visionary named <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/23/nyregion/barry-benepe-dead.html">Barry Benepe</a> and his can-do cohort were showing that small farmers could bypass the corporate system and profit by selling directly to consumers in the city.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… Our friend Barry passed away last month at 96, but what a legacy—45 Greenmarkets in New York City alone, and a national farm-to-table movement! To help extend its reach into your town, go to <a target="_blank" href="http://farmersmarketcoalition.org">farmersmarketcoalition.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/my-church-is-a-farmers-market-and</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:163484024</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/163484024/a34087401cef337fa3ace85637ae96d8.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/163484024/b1141c444d21b9587c95916d28171ae8.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Well, habemus papam—welcome, Pope Leo! Bless him… and us. I hope no one thinks me blasphemous, but I go to a church nearly every Saturday that is not denominational, nor is it held in any sort of ornate cathedral, temple or mosque. It’s a plain wooden, open-air shed with a metal roof and a loose brick floor—but it’s filled with goodness, joy and a diversity of devotees who share in the bounty of nature. It’s the Boggy Creek Farmstand, one of more than a dozen farmers’ markets flourishing in my hometown of Austin, Texas. Indeed, thousands of these secular-but-soulful gathering places that nurture body and spirit have cropped up all across America. From big city neighborhoods, to rural towns, they provide a genuine grassroots alternative to factory food and monopoly megamarts. The spread of this good food movement has been neither “miraculous” nor the product of some corporate conclave. Rather, it’s the organic result of hundreds of local coalitions—small farmers, consumer advocates, environmentalists, community officials, and others dedicated to real, lasting progress of, by and for workaday people. When organizing a Texas network of these cooperative ventures in my years as state agriculture commissioner, we followed a path blazed by (shhhh, don’t tell anyone) New York City. There, a pragmatic visionary named Barry Benepe and his can-do cohort were showing that small farmers could bypass the corporate system and profit by selling directly to consumers in the city. This is Jim Hightower saying… Our friend Barry passed away last month at 96, but what a legacy—45 Greenmarkets in New York City alone, and a national farm-to-table movement! To help extend its reach into your town, go to farmersmarketcoalition.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Well, habemus papam—welcome, Pope Leo! Bless him… and us. I hope no one thinks me blasphemous, but I go to a church nearly every Saturday that is not denominational, nor is it held in any sort of ornate cathedral, temple or mosque. It’s a plain wooden, open-air shed with a metal roof and a loose brick floor—but it’s filled with goodness, joy and a diversity of devotees who share in the bounty of nature. It’s the Boggy Creek Farmstand, one of more than a dozen farmers’ markets flourishing in my hometown of Austin, Texas. Indeed, thousands of these secular-but-soulful gathering places that nurture body and spirit have cropped up all across America. From big city neighborhoods, to rural towns, they provide a genuine grassroots alternative to factory food and monopoly megamarts. The spread of this good food movement has been neither “miraculous” nor the product of some corporate conclave. Rather, it’s the organic result of hundreds of local coalitions—small farmers, consumer advocates, environmentalists, community officials, and others dedicated to real, lasting progress of, by and for workaday people. When organizing a Texas network of these cooperative ventures in my years as state agriculture commissioner, we followed a path blazed by (shhhh, don’t tell anyone) New York City. There, a pragmatic visionary named Barry Benepe and his can-do cohort were showing that small farmers could bypass the corporate system and profit by selling directly to consumers in the city. This is Jim Hightower saying… Our friend Barry passed away last month at 96, but what a legacy—45 Greenmarkets in New York City alone, and a national farm-to-table movement! To help extend its reach into your town, go to farmersmarketcoalition.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Amazing Discovery: Some Washington Lobbyists and Lawmakers Have Sludge For Brains]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Like locusts swarming a wheat field, corporate lobbyists are all over our nation’s capital this spring, trying to get special favors, handouts, and insider deals from the White House huckster-in-chief.</p><p>It’s a corrupt-money sleazefest with lobbyists blatantly offering high-dollar political donations in exchange for presidential and congressional favoritism. Hundreds of these corporate requests are so selfish and unfair that it’s been hard to single out any one as exceptionally sleazy. Until now.</p><p>Meet the “Coalition of Recyclers of Residual Organics.” Well, recycle and coalition sound sorta positive, right? But what are “residual organics?” Uh… poop. Specifically, sewage sludge, including human waste. Piped from our homes, it goes through sewer systems to utility plants, which treat it and filter out the water, leaving a thick sludge of “biosolids.”</p><p>And what does “recycling” mean? Corporate giants like <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/06/climate/sludge-fertilizer-synagro-lobbying.html">Synagro (which is owned by Wall Street financier Goldman Sachs) buy it </a>and simply rebrand the stuff as “fertilizer.” They reap huge profits selling the sludge to unsuspecting farmers and ranchers, not mentioning that it can contain deadly levels of “forever chemicals.” Millions of acres across America have already been contaminated – along with water sources, livestock, and families.</p><p>So now, lobbyists for sludge peddlers are demanding that Trump’s government intervene. Not to help victimized families, but literally to take away the legal right of those families to sue the corporate profiteers that poisoned them.</p><p>Unsurprisingly, Republican lawmakers are siding with the poisoners. Meanwhile, Synagro continues to sell sludge as fertilizer, and Trump officials are even pushing EPA to stop designating “forever chemicals” as hazardous.</p><p>Has everyone gone crazy!? No. <strong>To find sanity in this mess, go to Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility: </strong><a target="_blank" href="http://peer.org"><strong>peer.org</strong></a></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/amazing-discovery-some-washington</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:163138713</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/163138713/279190b8950ad7f44c2ad79b85b6ae2f.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/163138713/8269a430f1ccf1997ec2715e35c82275.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Like locusts swarming a wheat field, corporate lobbyists are all over our nation’s capital this spring, trying to get special favors, handouts, and insider deals from the White House huckster-in-chief. It’s a corrupt-money sleazefest with lobbyists blatantly offering high-dollar political donations in exchange for presidential and congressional favoritism. Hundreds of these corporate requests are so selfish and unfair that it’s been hard to single out any one as exceptionally sleazy. Until now. Meet the “Coalition of Recyclers of Residual Organics.” Well, recycle and coalition sound sorta positive, right? But what are “residual organics?” Uh… poop. Specifically, sewage sludge, including human waste. Piped from our homes, it goes through sewer systems to utility plants, which treat it and filter out the water, leaving a thick sludge of “biosolids.” And what does “recycling” mean? Corporate giants like Synagro (which is owned by Wall Street financier Goldman Sachs) buy it and simply rebrand the stuff as “fertilizer.” They reap huge profits selling the sludge to unsuspecting farmers and ranchers, not mentioning that it can contain deadly levels of “forever chemicals.” Millions of acres across America have already been contaminated – along with water sources, livestock, and families. So now, lobbyists for sludge peddlers are demanding that Trump’s government intervene. Not to help victimized families, but literally to take away the legal right of those families to sue the corporate profiteers that poisoned them. Unsurprisingly, Republican lawmakers are siding with the poisoners. Meanwhile, Synagro continues to sell sludge as fertilizer, and Trump officials are even pushing EPA to stop designating “forever chemicals” as hazardous. Has everyone gone crazy!? No. To find sanity in this mess, go to Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility: peer.org Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Like locusts swarming a wheat field, corporate lobbyists are all over our nation’s capital this spring, trying to get special favors, handouts, and insider deals from the White House huckster-in-chief. It’s a corrupt-money sleazefest with lobbyists blatantly offering high-dollar political donations in exchange for presidential and congressional favoritism. Hundreds of these corporate requests are so selfish and unfair that it’s been hard to single out any one as exceptionally sleazy. Until now. Meet the “Coalition of Recyclers of Residual Organics.” Well, recycle and coalition sound sorta positive, right? But what are “residual organics?” Uh… poop. Specifically, sewage sludge, including human waste. Piped from our homes, it goes through sewer systems to utility plants, which treat it and filter out the water, leaving a thick sludge of “biosolids.” And what does “recycling” mean? Corporate giants like Synagro (which is owned by Wall Street financier Goldman Sachs) buy it and simply rebrand the stuff as “fertilizer.” They reap huge profits selling the sludge to unsuspecting farmers and ranchers, not mentioning that it can contain deadly levels of “forever chemicals.” Millions of acres across America have already been contaminated – along with water sources, livestock, and families. So now, lobbyists for sludge peddlers are demanding that Trump’s government intervene. Not to help victimized families, but literally to take away the legal right of those families to sue the corporate profiteers that poisoned them. Unsurprisingly, Republican lawmakers are siding with the poisoners. Meanwhile, Synagro continues to sell sludge as fertilizer, and Trump officials are even pushing EPA to stop designating “forever chemicals” as hazardous. Has everyone gone crazy!? No. To find sanity in this mess, go to Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility: peer.org Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Big Fool Says To Push On. Better Yet, Push Back Against Him.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Donnie Trump – what a joker, huh?</p><p>Remember his promise to end Russia’s war against Ukraine <em>on Day One </em>of his presidency? No joke, he bragged: “It’ll be done within 24 hours. You watch.”</p><p>Well, here we are at <em>Day One Hundred, </em>with the war still raging. So Trump either lied… or failed. But The Donald had a Joker up his sleeve – he now claims that, “when I said [Day One] it was in jest.”</p><p>Horsefeathers. First it was a core campaign promise, which he talked about at length in at least 53 of his widely publicized events (including two nationally-televised) debates. Second, he repeatedly assured his MAGA devotees that he was not joking, but literally would end Putin’s war in a day.</p><p>He <em>became</em> the joke, because he knows nothing about war and has surrounded himself with Fox News blowhards who know even less. I don’t mean that as an idle put-down, but as a screaming civil-defense warning of incoming danger. Unbeknownst to nearly all of us, Commander Trump and his menagerie of macho ne’er-do-wells are quietly-but-rapidly pulling America once again into the Big Muddy.</p><p>They’ve blundered into another “forever war,” dumping billions of our dollars into high-tech bombing raids against Houthi militia. Who? Houthis are tenacious guerilla fighters in the small impoverished nation of Yemen. Like the Viet Cong some 60 years ago, they are clever and resilient – and they’re confounding arrogant White House and Pentagon autocrats who keep thinking they can bomb their way to world domination.</p><p>As Pete Seeger put it in his Big Muddy song, “The big fool says to push on.” But we don’t have to obey. <strong>To push back, go to </strong><a target="_blank" href="http://PeoplesAction.org"><strong>PeoplesAction.org</strong></a><strong>.</strong></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-big-fool-says-to-push-on-better</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:162982514</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/162982514/a61989c857a743a582bebe971b005426.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/162982514/922c486b717a75b1fc8d6a9a8dd5b7f3.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Donnie Trump – what a joker, huh? Remember his promise to end Russia’s war against Ukraine on Day One of his presidency? No joke, he bragged: “It’ll be done within 24 hours. You watch.” Well, here we are at Day One Hundred, with the war still raging. So Trump either lied… or failed. But The Donald had a Joker up his sleeve – he now claims that, “when I said [Day One] it was in jest.” Horsefeathers. First it was a core campaign promise, which he talked about at length in at least 53 of his widely publicized events (including two nationally-televised) debates. Second, he repeatedly assured his MAGA devotees that he was not joking, but literally would end Putin’s war in a day. He became the joke, because he knows nothing about war and has surrounded himself with Fox News blowhards who know even less. I don’t mean that as an idle put-down, but as a screaming civil-defense warning of incoming danger. Unbeknownst to nearly all of us, Commander Trump and his menagerie of macho ne’er-do-wells are quietly-but-rapidly pulling America once again into the Big Muddy. They’ve blundered into another “forever war,” dumping billions of our dollars into high-tech bombing raids against Houthi militia. Who? Houthis are tenacious guerilla fighters in the small impoverished nation of Yemen. Like the Viet Cong some 60 years ago, they are clever and resilient – and they’re confounding arrogant White House and Pentagon autocrats who keep thinking they can bomb their way to world domination. As Pete Seeger put it in his Big Muddy song, “The big fool says to push on.” But we don’t have to obey. To push back, go to PeoplesAction.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Donnie Trump – what a joker, huh? Remember his promise to end Russia’s war against Ukraine on Day One of his presidency? No joke, he bragged: “It’ll be done within 24 hours. You watch.” Well, here we are at Day One Hundred, with the war still raging. So Trump either lied… or failed. But The Donald had a Joker up his sleeve – he now claims that, “when I said [Day One] it was in jest.” Horsefeathers. First it was a core campaign promise, which he talked about at length in at least 53 of his widely publicized events (including two nationally-televised) debates. Second, he repeatedly assured his MAGA devotees that he was not joking, but literally would end Putin’s war in a day. He became the joke, because he knows nothing about war and has surrounded himself with Fox News blowhards who know even less. I don’t mean that as an idle put-down, but as a screaming civil-defense warning of incoming danger. Unbeknownst to nearly all of us, Commander Trump and his menagerie of macho ne’er-do-wells are quietly-but-rapidly pulling America once again into the Big Muddy. They’ve blundered into another “forever war,” dumping billions of our dollars into high-tech bombing raids against Houthi militia. Who? Houthis are tenacious guerilla fighters in the small impoverished nation of Yemen. Like the Viet Cong some 60 years ago, they are clever and resilient – and they’re confounding arrogant White House and Pentagon autocrats who keep thinking they can bomb their way to world domination. As Pete Seeger put it in his Big Muddy song, “The big fool says to push on.” But we don’t have to obey. To push back, go to PeoplesAction.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Trump Backs Rip-Off Credit Card Fees. Making America Great Again?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Top officials of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau erupted in cheers this month.</p><p>How odd. The cheers were for a federal court that had just ruled in favor of letting big banks gouge us with exorbitant feeds when we’re late making a credit card payment. Bizarrely, agency officials joined jubilant bank executives in declaring, “This is a win for consumers.”</p><p>Huh? The court’s blatantly plutocratic ruling <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/16/business/credit-card-late-fee-limit-cfpb.html">lets financial giants slap us credit card customers with punitive fees of $32 or more for every late payment.</a> The court is legalizing their consumer robbery, allowing credit card lenders to pluck an extra <em>$10 billion a year</em> in excess fees from our pockets. Adding to their shame, the profiteering bankers will mainly squeeze this windfall from low-paid working families who’re living paycheck to paycheck, having to rely on credit to make ends meet.</p><p>So why in hell are the government’s consumer protectors cheering this? Because these officials are no longer “ours,” but corporate operatives been installed by Trump’s brigade of billionaires. The supreme goal of their autocratic government is to further empower the rich over the rest of us.</p><p>Indeed, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/who-benefits-trumps-move-shut-down-consumer-financial-protection-bureau">displacing consumer protectors with agents who’ll protect corporations from consumers was an explicit goal of Project 2025.</a> That extremist manifesto was co-authored by Russell Vought, a fanatical right-wing politico from the Christian Nationalist cult. What’s he doing now? Trump has put Vought in charge of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.</p><p>Thus, a national agency meant to help average consumers have a bit more of a fighting chance against financial greed has been perverted by Trump into just another tool helping moneyed elites rip off working families. How great does that make America?</p><p>Do something!</p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://action.consumerreports.org/cro-20250220-cfpb-cropetition">Consumer Reports</a> and the <a target="_blank" href="https://consumerfed.org/press_release/cfa-condemns-massive-cfpb-layoffs-by-trump-administration/">Consumer Federation of America</a> are both working to save the CFPB; additionally, a lawsuit has been filed by <a target="_blank" href="https://www.guptawessler.com/news-2/">Gupta Wessler</a>, a high-stakes litigation firm in D.C., on behalf of the National Treasury Employees Union, National Consumer Law Center, NAACP, Virginia Poverty Law Center, Pastor Eva Steege, and the CFPB Employee Association.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/trump-backs-rip-off-credit-card-fees</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:162340804</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/162340804/dfd9f34614626c5a0c2eb8bcde05849c.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/162340804/a4445812bbecaa69261fdd188ba80f29.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Top officials of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau erupted in cheers this month. How odd. The cheers were for a federal court that had just ruled in favor of letting big banks gouge us with exorbitant feeds when we’re late making a credit card payment. Bizarrely, agency officials joined jubilant bank executives in declaring, “This is a win for consumers.” Huh? The court’s blatantly plutocratic ruling lets financial giants slap us credit card customers with punitive fees of $32 or more for every late payment. The court is legalizing their consumer robbery, allowing credit card lenders to pluck an extra $10 billion a year in excess fees from our pockets. Adding to their shame, the profiteering bankers will mainly squeeze this windfall from low-paid working families who’re living paycheck to paycheck, having to rely on credit to make ends meet. So why in hell are the government’s consumer protectors cheering this? Because these officials are no longer “ours,” but corporate operatives been installed by Trump’s brigade of billionaires. The supreme goal of their autocratic government is to further empower the rich over the rest of us. Indeed, displacing consumer protectors with agents who’ll protect corporations from consumers was an explicit goal of Project 2025. That extremist manifesto was co-authored by Russell Vought, a fanatical right-wing politico from the Christian Nationalist cult. What’s he doing now? Trump has put Vought in charge of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Thus, a national agency meant to help average consumers have a bit more of a fighting chance against financial greed has been perverted by Trump into just another tool helping moneyed elites rip off working families. How great does that make America? Do something! Consumer Reports and the Consumer Federation of America are both working to save the CFPB; additionally, a lawsuit has been filed by Gupta Wessler, a high-stakes litigation firm in D.C., on behalf of the National Treasury Employees Union, National Consumer Law Center, NAACP, Virginia Poverty Law Center, Pastor Eva Steege, and the CFPB Employee Association. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Top officials of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau erupted in cheers this month. How odd. The cheers were for a federal court that had just ruled in favor of letting big banks gouge us with exorbitant feeds when we’re late making a credit card payment. Bizarrely, agency officials joined jubilant bank executives in declaring, “This is a win for consumers.” Huh? The court’s blatantly plutocratic ruling lets financial giants slap us credit card customers with punitive fees of $32 or more for every late payment. The court is legalizing their consumer robbery, allowing credit card lenders to pluck an extra $10 billion a year in excess fees from our pockets. Adding to their shame, the profiteering bankers will mainly squeeze this windfall from low-paid working families who’re living paycheck to paycheck, having to rely on credit to make ends meet. So why in hell are the government’s consumer protectors cheering this? Because these officials are no longer “ours,” but corporate operatives been installed by Trump’s brigade of billionaires. The supreme goal of their autocratic government is to further empower the rich over the rest of us. Indeed, displacing consumer protectors with agents who’ll protect corporations from consumers was an explicit goal of Project 2025. That extremist manifesto was co-authored by Russell Vought, a fanatical right-wing politico from the Christian Nationalist cult. What’s he doing now? Trump has put Vought in charge of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Thus, a national agency meant to help average consumers have a bit more of a fighting chance against financial greed has been perverted by Trump into just another tool helping moneyed elites rip off working families. How great does that make America? Do something! Consumer Reports and the Consumer Federation of America are both working to save the CFPB; additionally, a lawsuit has been filed by Gupta Wessler, a high-stakes litigation firm in D.C., on behalf of the National Treasury Employees Union, National Consumer Law Center, NAACP, Virginia Poverty Law Center, Pastor Eva Steege, and the CFPB Employee Association. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should America’s Farm Bill Serve Need… or Greed?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The federal budget is not only about money, but fundamentally about our country’s morality—our commitment to fairness, equality and unity.</p><p>Which brings me to, of all things, our nation’s Farm Bill. This sprawling piece of legislation, updated every five years, is intended to combine the interests of farmers with consumers, production with conservation, grassroots cultures with corporate systems… etc. It’s not easy. In fact, downright messy.</p><p>But now, with plutocratic ideologues and culture warriors dominating their caucus, Republican lawmakers have not even been able to produce an agreement among themselves, so the comprehensive farm bill America needs is a year overdue and no longer being pursued by the party in charge. Instead, the GOP’s ag committee chairman, Rep. Glenn Thompson, is <a target="_blank" href="https://barnraisingmedia.com/column/snap-cuts-gop-farm-bill/">jerry-rigging a stripped-down sham of a bill limited to the two spending priorities of MAGA Republicans</a>:</p><p><strong>One:</strong> Hand out many billions more of our taxpayers’ dollars to subsidize agribusiness giants and rich speculators who own the biggest farms, mainly because they’ll then keep funding and voting for Republicans.</p><p><strong>Two:</strong> Whack America’s poorest families. Thompson is banking on the minginess of extremist Republicans who oppose the Ag Department’s hunger programs. Those programs help 40 million poverty-stricken Americans (including 1 in 5 children) afford the groceries they need.</p><p>So, there we have the GOP’s farm bill ethics—cut the poor to give more to the rich in order to buy votes for more of the same. The word for this is “corrupt.” Also, “cruel.”</p><p>Indeed, it takes an exceptional level of political shamelessness to steal food from the hungry in order to fatten some of the richest people in our country. To fight their depravity, go to <a target="_blank" href="https://actionnetwork.org/forms/sign-up-for-ruralorganizing-updates">ruralorganizing.org</a>.</p><p><strong>Do something!</strong></p><p>The House GOP leadership has been making noises that they’re looking at the <strong>House Ag Committee’s meeting on May 8</strong> for the Farm Bill’s reconciliation markup. You can help put pressure on the committee itself by<a target="_blank" href="https://agriculture.house.gov/about/committee_members.htm"> contacting its members</a>, and demanding that your own representatives support small family famers and the programs our most vulnerable communities depend on.  </p><p>There’s also a great tool from <a target="_blank" href="https://thedemlabs.org/">The Democracy Labs</a> showing where kids will go hungry and farmers will be bankrupted: check out the <a target="_blank" href="https://thedemlabs.org/2025/03/11/starve-kids-and-bankrupt-farmers-to-fund-tax-cuts-for-billionaires-check-the-maga-hunger-map/">MAGA HUNGER MAP</a> and use it to call your representative.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/should-americas-farm-bill-serve-need</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:162339292</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/162339292/b786346ff12ac36c900e3ce4158c0f08.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/162339292/a2f03852a982048880af282aa51dc85b.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>The federal budget is not only about money, but fundamentally about our country’s morality—our commitment to fairness, equality and unity. Which brings me to, of all things, our nation’s Farm Bill. This sprawling piece of legislation, updated every five years, is intended to combine the interests of farmers with consumers, production with conservation, grassroots cultures with corporate systems… etc. It’s not easy. In fact, downright messy. But now, with plutocratic ideologues and culture warriors dominating their caucus, Republican lawmakers have not even been able to produce an agreement among themselves, so the comprehensive farm bill America needs is a year overdue and no longer being pursued by the party in charge. Instead, the GOP’s ag committee chairman, Rep. Glenn Thompson, is jerry-rigging a stripped-down sham of a bill limited to the two spending priorities of MAGA Republicans: One: Hand out many billions more of our taxpayers’ dollars to subsidize agribusiness giants and rich speculators who own the biggest farms, mainly because they’ll then keep funding and voting for Republicans. Two: Whack America’s poorest families. Thompson is banking on the minginess of extremist Republicans who oppose the Ag Department’s hunger programs. Those programs help 40 million poverty-stricken Americans (including 1 in 5 children) afford the groceries they need. So, there we have the GOP’s farm bill ethics—cut the poor to give more to the rich in order to buy votes for more of the same. The word for this is “corrupt.” Also, “cruel.” Indeed, it takes an exceptional level of political shamelessness to steal food from the hungry in order to fatten some of the richest people in our country. To fight their depravity, go to ruralorganizing.org. Do something! The House GOP leadership has been making noises that they’re looking at the House Ag Committee’s meeting on May 8 for the Farm Bill’s reconciliation markup. You can help put pressure on the committee itself by contacting its members, and demanding that your own representatives support small family famers and the programs our most vulnerable communities depend on. There’s also a great tool from The Democracy Labs showing where kids will go hungry and farmers will be bankrupted: check out the MAGA HUNGER MAP and use it to call your representative. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>The federal budget is not only about money, but fundamentally about our country’s morality—our commitment to fairness, equality and unity. Which brings me to, of all things, our nation’s Farm Bill. This sprawling piece of legislation, updated every five years, is intended to combine the interests of farmers with consumers, production with conservation, grassroots cultures with corporate systems… etc. It’s not easy. In fact, downright messy. But now, with plutocratic ideologues and culture warriors dominating their caucus, Republican lawmakers have not even been able to produce an agreement among themselves, so the comprehensive farm bill America needs is a year overdue and no longer being pursued by the party in charge. Instead, the GOP’s ag committee chairman, Rep. Glenn Thompson, is jerry-rigging a stripped-down sham of a bill limited to the two spending priorities of MAGA Republicans: One: Hand out many billions more of our taxpayers’ dollars to subsidize agribusiness giants and rich speculators who own the biggest farms, mainly because they’ll then keep funding and voting for Republicans. Two: Whack America’s poorest families. Thompson is banking on the minginess of extremist Republicans who oppose the Ag Department’s hunger programs. Those programs help 40 million poverty-stricken Americans (including 1 in 5 children) afford the groceries they need. So, there we have the GOP’s farm bill ethics—cut the poor to give more to the rich in order to buy votes for more of the same. The word for this is “corrupt.” Also, “cruel.” Indeed, it takes an exceptional level of political shamelessness to steal food from the hungry in order to fatten some of the richest people in our country. To fight their depravity, go to ruralorganizing.org. Do something! The House GOP leadership has been making noises that they’re looking at the House Ag Committee’s meeting on May 8 for the Farm Bill’s reconciliation markup. You can help put pressure on the committee itself by contacting its members, and demanding that your own representatives support small family famers and the programs our most vulnerable communities depend on. There’s also a great tool from The Democracy Labs showing where kids will go hungry and farmers will be bankrupted: check out the MAGA HUNGER MAP and use it to call your representative. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Don’t Let Elon Musk Eat Our Food Future!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Over the millennia, farmers everywhere have learned the wisdom of a commonsense practice in agriculture: Don’t Eat Your Seed Corn.</p><p>Raise the best crop you can—but be sure to store enough of the seed you produce this year to plant next year’s crop. Even with the razzle-dazzle computerization modern-day agriculture, seed savers are as essential as ever. Maybe more so, given climate change, mass pollution, species collapses, genetic loss, etc. Seeds are our future.</p><p>Luckily, a local, national, and global movement arose decades ago to say: “Let’s not be stupid.” Noting that new diseases, pests, blights, etc. continually break out around the globe, wiping out entire varieties of essential food crops, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/22/opinion/doge-elon-musk-usda-crops.html">pioneers of this movement set up a system of “gene banks”</a> for future needs.</p><p>Established in the Ag Department in 1898, these banks collect, store and keep alive vast reserves of seeds containing the genetic diversity of our entire food supply. They are literally a human survivalist resource. For example, if a devastating fungus infects a variety of wheat, scientists can search <em>62,000</em> other wheat varieties in the gene bank to find seed with a natural resistance to that fungus.</p><p>With a shoestring budget and a small staff of scientists, this network of 22 regional gene banks is government at its best, doing invaluable public work, efficiently.</p><p>But then, stupid showed up. Elon Musk, Trump’s thuggish whacker of the common good, has stormed into the seed saver community with his cartoonish chainsaw roaring. He summarily fired the network’s top plant scientists, slashed its meager budget—and is playing God with our food future.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… Just as rats should be kept out of America’s seed bins, so should Elon Musk.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/dont-let-elon-musk-eat-our-food-future</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:161808173</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/161808173/dc79bf807aeb1cd065ca83048379bb0b.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/161808173/d85096c42411dae10969d7889f95bf0c.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Over the millennia, farmers everywhere have learned the wisdom of a commonsense practice in agriculture: Don’t Eat Your Seed Corn. Raise the best crop you can—but be sure to store enough of the seed you produce this year to plant next year’s crop. Even with the razzle-dazzle computerization modern-day agriculture, seed savers are as essential as ever. Maybe more so, given climate change, mass pollution, species collapses, genetic loss, etc. Seeds are our future. Luckily, a local, national, and global movement arose decades ago to say: “Let’s not be stupid.” Noting that new diseases, pests, blights, etc. continually break out around the globe, wiping out entire varieties of essential food crops, pioneers of this movement set up a system of “gene banks” for future needs. Established in the Ag Department in 1898, these banks collect, store and keep alive vast reserves of seeds containing the genetic diversity of our entire food supply. They are literally a human survivalist resource. For example, if a devastating fungus infects a variety of wheat, scientists can search 62,000 other wheat varieties in the gene bank to find seed with a natural resistance to that fungus. With a shoestring budget and a small staff of scientists, this network of 22 regional gene banks is government at its best, doing invaluable public work, efficiently. But then, stupid showed up. Elon Musk, Trump’s thuggish whacker of the common good, has stormed into the seed saver community with his cartoonish chainsaw roaring. He summarily fired the network’s top plant scientists, slashed its meager budget—and is playing God with our food future. This is Jim Hightower saying… Just as rats should be kept out of America’s seed bins, so should Elon Musk. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Over the millennia, farmers everywhere have learned the wisdom of a commonsense practice in agriculture: Don’t Eat Your Seed Corn. Raise the best crop you can—but be sure to store enough of the seed you produce this year to plant next year’s crop. Even with the razzle-dazzle computerization modern-day agriculture, seed savers are as essential as ever. Maybe more so, given climate change, mass pollution, species collapses, genetic loss, etc. Seeds are our future. Luckily, a local, national, and global movement arose decades ago to say: “Let’s not be stupid.” Noting that new diseases, pests, blights, etc. continually break out around the globe, wiping out entire varieties of essential food crops, pioneers of this movement set up a system of “gene banks” for future needs. Established in the Ag Department in 1898, these banks collect, store and keep alive vast reserves of seeds containing the genetic diversity of our entire food supply. They are literally a human survivalist resource. For example, if a devastating fungus infects a variety of wheat, scientists can search 62,000 other wheat varieties in the gene bank to find seed with a natural resistance to that fungus. With a shoestring budget and a small staff of scientists, this network of 22 regional gene banks is government at its best, doing invaluable public work, efficiently. But then, stupid showed up. Elon Musk, Trump’s thuggish whacker of the common good, has stormed into the seed saver community with his cartoonish chainsaw roaring. He summarily fired the network’s top plant scientists, slashed its meager budget—and is playing God with our food future. This is Jim Hightower saying… Just as rats should be kept out of America’s seed bins, so should Elon Musk. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[What Is Behind Trump’s Lust for Greenland?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Donald Trump has never been able to comprehend the plain fact that when a person says no, that actually means “NO.” His view is that his every desire should be met with surrender—even if that requires applying force.</p><p>This explains a lot about his crude approach to Greenland, demanding that the Danish territory simply succumb to him. Even though proud Greenlanders have repeatedly said, “Go away!” to Trump’s uninvited advances, their emphatic rejections have only heightened his sadistic lust for dominance. Indeed, rebuffed again this month, he turned downright sinister, declaring, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/politics/trump-repeats-desire-acquire-greenland/6173334/">“One way or another, we’re going to get it.”</a></p><p>Why push so fiercely for a frozen Arctic island that has a population smaller than Greenville, South Carolina? First, because Donald is an overprivileged child with an insatiable need to assert power over others. The pragmatic reason though, is money. Beneath that thick covering of ice, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20250121-the-enormous-challenge-of-mining-greenland">Greenland has a trove</a> of oil, uranium, precious metals, etc., that Trump and his billionaire cohorts desperately want to plunder.</p><p>Initially, Trump & Co. tried macho American chauvinism to get their way: Leave dull old Denmark, they propositioned, and we’ll make you a sort of American sub-state. People snickered at that, so Trump tried his usual pay-off ploy—give in to us, he told the islanders, and “we will make you rich.” Rightly insulted, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/greenlanders-respond-to-trump-it-will-never-be-for-sale/">“We Are Not for Sale”</a> protests erupted across the land, and “Trump” became a curse word in the island’s Danish, Inuit and English languages.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… But “no” means “go” to him, so he has now <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/10/us/politics/trump-greenland-denmark.html">directed the National Security Council </a>to develop plans for subjugating Greenland’s resources, <em>even by force.</em> In a blunt order, he barked, “Let’s get it done.”</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/what-is-behind-trumps-lust-for-greenland</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:161806066</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/161806066/9f425b68b7c3aa02cd6bbff5d083293e.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/161806066/6d17b58daa85415c680e3a205e2dd29e.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Donald Trump has never been able to comprehend the plain fact that when a person says no, that actually means “NO.” His view is that his every desire should be met with surrender—even if that requires applying force. This explains a lot about his crude approach to Greenland, demanding that the Danish territory simply succumb to him. Even though proud Greenlanders have repeatedly said, “Go away!” to Trump’s uninvited advances, their emphatic rejections have only heightened his sadistic lust for dominance. Indeed, rebuffed again this month, he turned downright sinister, declaring, “One way or another, we’re going to get it.” Why push so fiercely for a frozen Arctic island that has a population smaller than Greenville, South Carolina? First, because Donald is an overprivileged child with an insatiable need to assert power over others. The pragmatic reason though, is money. Beneath that thick covering of ice, Greenland has a trove of oil, uranium, precious metals, etc., that Trump and his billionaire cohorts desperately want to plunder. Initially, Trump &amp; Co. tried macho American chauvinism to get their way: Leave dull old Denmark, they propositioned, and we’ll make you a sort of American sub-state. People snickered at that, so Trump tried his usual pay-off ploy—give in to us, he told the islanders, and “we will make you rich.” Rightly insulted, “We Are Not for Sale” protests erupted across the land, and “Trump” became a curse word in the island’s Danish, Inuit and English languages. This is Jim Hightower saying… But “no” means “go” to him, so he has now directed the National Security Council to develop plans for subjugating Greenland’s resources, even by force. In a blunt order, he barked, “Let’s get it done.” Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Donald Trump has never been able to comprehend the plain fact that when a person says no, that actually means “NO.” His view is that his every desire should be met with surrender—even if that requires applying force. This explains a lot about his crude approach to Greenland, demanding that the Danish territory simply succumb to him. Even though proud Greenlanders have repeatedly said, “Go away!” to Trump’s uninvited advances, their emphatic rejections have only heightened his sadistic lust for dominance. Indeed, rebuffed again this month, he turned downright sinister, declaring, “One way or another, we’re going to get it.” Why push so fiercely for a frozen Arctic island that has a population smaller than Greenville, South Carolina? First, because Donald is an overprivileged child with an insatiable need to assert power over others. The pragmatic reason though, is money. Beneath that thick covering of ice, Greenland has a trove of oil, uranium, precious metals, etc., that Trump and his billionaire cohorts desperately want to plunder. Initially, Trump &amp; Co. tried macho American chauvinism to get their way: Leave dull old Denmark, they propositioned, and we’ll make you a sort of American sub-state. People snickered at that, so Trump tried his usual pay-off ploy—give in to us, he told the islanders, and “we will make you rich.” Rightly insulted, “We Are Not for Sale” protests erupted across the land, and “Trump” became a curse word in the island’s Danish, Inuit and English languages. This is Jim Hightower saying… But “no” means “go” to him, so he has now directed the National Security Council to develop plans for subjugating Greenland’s resources, even by force. In a blunt order, he barked, “Let’s get it done.” Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yes, Trump Really Does Want to Kill Social Security]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>How ironic: The most inefficient bureaucracy in government turns out to be Trump’s “Department of Government Efficiency.”</p><p>That could be humorous, except that DOGE—a creature of the right-wing Project 2025—has been devastating to millions of people. And it’s about to get worse. Elon Musk—the flighty überrich autocrat put in charge of “efficiency” by his buddy Trump—is now going after the Social Security deposits of 73 million senior citizens.</p><p>But wait, hasn’t Trump himself promised (loudly and often) that he would not ax this essential retirement program? Yes… but Elon is his “gotcha.”</p><p>Rather than an honest kill, Musk is strangling the program with (believe it or not) bureaucratic red tape. Claiming to cutting waste, he’s eliminating 7,000 people who administer the program, shouting, “Bureaucratic excess!” Except, Social Security is actually a renowned model of government efficiency, spending <a target="_blank" href="https://www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/admin.html"><em>less than 1 percent </em></a>of its revenue on administration.</p><p>So by whacking the people who do the work, Musk is actually whacking the people who’re due to receive their earned benefits. For example, he’s decreed that the public <a target="_blank" href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/social-security-administration-number/">no longer apply for benefits or resolve questions by phone</a>, but now, must now travel in person to some distant Social Security office. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/08/us/social-security-trump.html">But the staff there has also been decimated</a>, so people who’ve come from afar are told to go back home and call for an appointment. Yes… a call that will not be answered.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… What’s at work here is a Musk-Trump ploy to wreck Social Security’s remarkable record of efficiency. Their intent is to make the service so bad that they can then let profiteering corporations can privatize your retirement.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/yes-trump-really-does-want-to-kill</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:161306628</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/161306628/8e9e175412b5198b5b431fd164874019.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/161306628/046d2d3674bf2b186a6cf5a6a7ce920e.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>How ironic: The most inefficient bureaucracy in government turns out to be Trump’s “Department of Government Efficiency.” That could be humorous, except that DOGE—a creature of the right-wing Project 2025—has been devastating to millions of people. And it’s about to get worse. Elon Musk—the flighty überrich autocrat put in charge of “efficiency” by his buddy Trump—is now going after the Social Security deposits of 73 million senior citizens. But wait, hasn’t Trump himself promised (loudly and often) that he would not ax this essential retirement program? Yes… but Elon is his “gotcha.” Rather than an honest kill, Musk is strangling the program with (believe it or not) bureaucratic red tape. Claiming to cutting waste, he’s eliminating 7,000 people who administer the program, shouting, “Bureaucratic excess!” Except, Social Security is actually a renowned model of government efficiency, spending less than 1 percent of its revenue on administration. So by whacking the people who do the work, Musk is actually whacking the people who’re due to receive their earned benefits. For example, he’s decreed that the public no longer apply for benefits or resolve questions by phone, but now, must now travel in person to some distant Social Security office. But the staff there has also been decimated, so people who’ve come from afar are told to go back home and call for an appointment. Yes… a call that will not be answered. This is Jim Hightower saying… What’s at work here is a Musk-Trump ploy to wreck Social Security’s remarkable record of efficiency. Their intent is to make the service so bad that they can then let profiteering corporations can privatize your retirement. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>How ironic: The most inefficient bureaucracy in government turns out to be Trump’s “Department of Government Efficiency.” That could be humorous, except that DOGE—a creature of the right-wing Project 2025—has been devastating to millions of people. And it’s about to get worse. Elon Musk—the flighty überrich autocrat put in charge of “efficiency” by his buddy Trump—is now going after the Social Security deposits of 73 million senior citizens. But wait, hasn’t Trump himself promised (loudly and often) that he would not ax this essential retirement program? Yes… but Elon is his “gotcha.” Rather than an honest kill, Musk is strangling the program with (believe it or not) bureaucratic red tape. Claiming to cutting waste, he’s eliminating 7,000 people who administer the program, shouting, “Bureaucratic excess!” Except, Social Security is actually a renowned model of government efficiency, spending less than 1 percent of its revenue on administration. So by whacking the people who do the work, Musk is actually whacking the people who’re due to receive their earned benefits. For example, he’s decreed that the public no longer apply for benefits or resolve questions by phone, but now, must now travel in person to some distant Social Security office. But the staff there has also been decimated, so people who’ve come from afar are told to go back home and call for an appointment. Yes… a call that will not be answered. This is Jim Hightower saying… What’s at work here is a Musk-Trump ploy to wreck Social Security’s remarkable record of efficiency. Their intent is to make the service so bad that they can then let profiteering corporations can privatize your retirement. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Trump and Musk Aren’t Reforming Our Government, They’re Sabotaging It]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>As Trump & Co. hurl horror after horror at us from the murky darkness of their extremely wasteful “war on government waste,” I think of Lily Tomlin, who said years ago: “No matter how cynical you get, it’s almost impossible to keep up.”</p><p>But no need to swat frantically at their every assault. Their blitzkrieg against everything at once is an intentional ploy to divide us into small, separate scrambles to save this and that, rather than rallying a unified, furious opposition to <em>them</em>. The evil is not in the budget cuts, but in the cutters.</p><p>Second, let’s be clear that their war-on-waste is NOT about eliminating useless taxpayer expenditures. Note that Elon Musk, Trump’s silly “efficiency czar,” ignores such walloping waste as Pentagon boondoggles and tax scams for überrich hucksters… like him.</p><p>But—by gollies!—those budget-whacking plutocrats are fearless when it comes to killing essential benefits for regular people. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/trump-admin-fires-staff-liheap-agency-utilities-assistance-program-rcna199177">A longstanding energy program, for example</a>, helps very-low-income families across America pay to heat their homes in bitter winters, and to cool homes in areas of brutal heat. It saves lives—efficiently!—being administered by a staff of only 25. But this month, Trump’s government reform thugs stormed in, fired all 25, and shut down the program. As Sen. Ed Markey said, “This isn’t reform. It’s sabotage.”</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… Exactly! Soft words like “efficiency” are their knives for castrating government of, by, and for The People, allowing a cabal of Trump, Musk, and allied financial elites to impose a moneyed monarchy over America. But remember our history—we democratic rebels won all-out wars in the 1770s and 1860s to defeat them. So, toughen up, here they come again.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/trump-and-musk-arent-reforming-our</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:161304445</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/161304445/9600399a1a585003576d253bdd85eb4a.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/161304445/ceb0ca5c566b7a8bb35a1050d7649156.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>As Trump &amp; Co. hurl horror after horror at us from the murky darkness of their extremely wasteful “war on government waste,” I think of Lily Tomlin, who said years ago: “No matter how cynical you get, it’s almost impossible to keep up.” But no need to swat frantically at their every assault. Their blitzkrieg against everything at once is an intentional ploy to divide us into small, separate scrambles to save this and that, rather than rallying a unified, furious opposition to them. The evil is not in the budget cuts, but in the cutters. Second, let’s be clear that their war-on-waste is NOT about eliminating useless taxpayer expenditures. Note that Elon Musk, Trump’s silly “efficiency czar,” ignores such walloping waste as Pentagon boondoggles and tax scams for überrich hucksters… like him. But—by gollies!—those budget-whacking plutocrats are fearless when it comes to killing essential benefits for regular people. A longstanding energy program, for example, helps very-low-income families across America pay to heat their homes in bitter winters, and to cool homes in areas of brutal heat. It saves lives—efficiently!—being administered by a staff of only 25. But this month, Trump’s government reform thugs stormed in, fired all 25, and shut down the program. As Sen. Ed Markey said, “This isn’t reform. It’s sabotage.” This is Jim Hightower saying… Exactly! Soft words like “efficiency” are their knives for castrating government of, by, and for The People, allowing a cabal of Trump, Musk, and allied financial elites to impose a moneyed monarchy over America. But remember our history—we democratic rebels won all-out wars in the 1770s and 1860s to defeat them. So, toughen up, here they come again. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>As Trump &amp; Co. hurl horror after horror at us from the murky darkness of their extremely wasteful “war on government waste,” I think of Lily Tomlin, who said years ago: “No matter how cynical you get, it’s almost impossible to keep up.” But no need to swat frantically at their every assault. Their blitzkrieg against everything at once is an intentional ploy to divide us into small, separate scrambles to save this and that, rather than rallying a unified, furious opposition to them. The evil is not in the budget cuts, but in the cutters. Second, let’s be clear that their war-on-waste is NOT about eliminating useless taxpayer expenditures. Note that Elon Musk, Trump’s silly “efficiency czar,” ignores such walloping waste as Pentagon boondoggles and tax scams for überrich hucksters… like him. But—by gollies!—those budget-whacking plutocrats are fearless when it comes to killing essential benefits for regular people. A longstanding energy program, for example, helps very-low-income families across America pay to heat their homes in bitter winters, and to cool homes in areas of brutal heat. It saves lives—efficiently!—being administered by a staff of only 25. But this month, Trump’s government reform thugs stormed in, fired all 25, and shut down the program. As Sen. Ed Markey said, “This isn’t reform. It’s sabotage.” This is Jim Hightower saying… Exactly! Soft words like “efficiency” are their knives for castrating government of, by, and for The People, allowing a cabal of Trump, Musk, and allied financial elites to impose a moneyed monarchy over America. But remember our history—we democratic rebels won all-out wars in the 1770s and 1860s to defeat them. So, toughen up, here they come again. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Congress Critter Proposes a Raw Deal to Replace Social Security]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Years ago, an iconic bar named “Another Raw Deal” was a regular hangout for us irreverent, free-spirited, political progressives in Austin, Texas. Even those push-button, hot-air hand dryers in its restrooms were political—printed on the big chrome button was this instruction: “Push here for a message from Sen. Phil Gramm.”</p><p>Mercifully, Gramm is gone, but political hot air is still gushing from the likes of Rep. Pat Fallon, an Elon-Musk-hugging, plutocratic congress critter from Texas. Lately, however, Pat has been learning the hard way that folks back home don’t share his fan-boy crush on the South African billionaire, who is gleefully chainsawing crucial public programs that even Republican families count on. So, Fallon’s own constituents are howling at him to do something!</p><p>He is: This aloof and clueless “public servant” has erupted in a mad dog attack on the locals! At a recent town hall event in his red district, voters were furious that <a target="_blank" href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/06/musk-doge-social-security">Musk is targeting the Social Security benefits </a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/06/musk-doge-social-security"><em>they’ve earned</em></a>. Fallon barked that “no one has said they’re cutting Social Security.” <a target="_blank" href="https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/3/19/2311414/-Rep-Pat-Fallon-R-TX4-to-Zennials-If-you-want-to-retire-work-two-jobs">But one of his voters shot back</a>: “Elon says it every day.” Indeed Musk is trying to kill it with lies, falsely attacking it as “the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time.”</p><p>Then, Fallon stumbled into the GOP’s briar patch of class bias, curtly proposing “a different deal” to replace Social Security. “If you want to retire,” he instructed, plan when you’re young and “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.lonestarlive.com/news/2025/03/texas-lawmaker-says-young-people-should-work-two-jobs-to-fix-social-security.html">work two jobs</a>.” Of course, millions already do—and the pay still doesn’t cover basic expenses, much less provide savings for retirement.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… Now that’s a raw deal! Did I mention that Fallon, a multimillionaire congressman, gets a lavish, paid-for-by-you-and-me public pension?</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/congress-critter-proposes-a-raw-deal</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:160868051</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/160868051/e6948afb2656863d2c95bef7410b34d7.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/160868051/ea6c81312297181e70ace63eced94f7d.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Years ago, an iconic bar named “Another Raw Deal” was a regular hangout for us irreverent, free-spirited, political progressives in Austin, Texas. Even those push-button, hot-air hand dryers in its restrooms were political—printed on the big chrome button was this instruction: “Push here for a message from Sen. Phil Gramm.” Mercifully, Gramm is gone, but political hot air is still gushing from the likes of Rep. Pat Fallon, an Elon-Musk-hugging, plutocratic congress critter from Texas. Lately, however, Pat has been learning the hard way that folks back home don’t share his fan-boy crush on the South African billionaire, who is gleefully chainsawing crucial public programs that even Republican families count on. So, Fallon’s own constituents are howling at him to do something! He is: This aloof and clueless “public servant” has erupted in a mad dog attack on the locals! At a recent town hall event in his red district, voters were furious that Musk is targeting the Social Security benefits they’ve earned. Fallon barked that “no one has said they’re cutting Social Security.” But one of his voters shot back: “Elon says it every day.” Indeed Musk is trying to kill it with lies, falsely attacking it as “the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time.” Then, Fallon stumbled into the GOP’s briar patch of class bias, curtly proposing “a different deal” to replace Social Security. “If you want to retire,” he instructed, plan when you’re young and “work two jobs.” Of course, millions already do—and the pay still doesn’t cover basic expenses, much less provide savings for retirement. This is Jim Hightower saying… Now that’s a raw deal! Did I mention that Fallon, a multimillionaire congressman, gets a lavish, paid-for-by-you-and-me public pension? Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Years ago, an iconic bar named “Another Raw Deal” was a regular hangout for us irreverent, free-spirited, political progressives in Austin, Texas. Even those push-button, hot-air hand dryers in its restrooms were political—printed on the big chrome button was this instruction: “Push here for a message from Sen. Phil Gramm.” Mercifully, Gramm is gone, but political hot air is still gushing from the likes of Rep. Pat Fallon, an Elon-Musk-hugging, plutocratic congress critter from Texas. Lately, however, Pat has been learning the hard way that folks back home don’t share his fan-boy crush on the South African billionaire, who is gleefully chainsawing crucial public programs that even Republican families count on. So, Fallon’s own constituents are howling at him to do something! He is: This aloof and clueless “public servant” has erupted in a mad dog attack on the locals! At a recent town hall event in his red district, voters were furious that Musk is targeting the Social Security benefits they’ve earned. Fallon barked that “no one has said they’re cutting Social Security.” But one of his voters shot back: “Elon says it every day.” Indeed Musk is trying to kill it with lies, falsely attacking it as “the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time.” Then, Fallon stumbled into the GOP’s briar patch of class bias, curtly proposing “a different deal” to replace Social Security. “If you want to retire,” he instructed, plan when you’re young and “work two jobs.” Of course, millions already do—and the pay still doesn’t cover basic expenses, much less provide savings for retirement. This is Jim Hightower saying… Now that’s a raw deal! Did I mention that Fallon, a multimillionaire congressman, gets a lavish, paid-for-by-you-and-me public pension? Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Billionaires and Right-Wing Hacks Now Run the USDA. E-I-E-I-O!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>America’s family farmers were astonished recently to get a jolly tweet from the President of the United States: “Have fun!” exclaimed The Donald.</p><p>Fun? The farm economy is in the ditch, with crop prices at depression levels and bankruptcies surging. Plus, Trump Inc. is now rigging the law to give agribusiness monopolies more power to run roughshod over farmers and rural communities.</p><p>Well, yes, say the billionaire “geniuses” and partisan hacks who’ve seized control of farm and food policies, but our phantasmagoric laissez-fairyland ideology will open up new agricultural markets here at home, so see? Fun!</p><p>Those ideologues, however, can’t make chicken salad out of chicken manure, and that’s what their promises are. While Brooke Rollins, Trump’s corporatized ag secretary, babbles about “new” markets—but <a target="_blank" href="https://barnraisingmedia.com/local-food-purchase-assistance-program-usda/">she actually </a><a target="_blank" href="https://barnraisingmedia.com/local-food-purchase-assistance-program-usda/"><em>shut down</em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://barnraisingmedia.com/local-food-purchase-assistance-program-usda/"> a nationwide market last month that provided a billion dollars a year to family farmers who produce for local schools, food pantries, etc.</a> In reality, Rollins’ goal is an industrialized, globalized food economy, so she coldly dismissed these local sales as “nonessential.” Of course, that says to all of the people involved that her government considers <em>them</em> nonessential.</p><p>Combining arrogance with ignorance, Trump’s aloof plutocrats carelessly wiped out this market right at spring planting time! <a target="_blank" href="https://barnraisingmedia.com/local-food-purchase-assistance-program-usda/">Each farm family has already taken out thousands of dollars in bank loans to buy seeds and other essential supplies to make this year’s crop</a>, but—WHAMMO!—Trump & Co. slammed the door on the family’s most reliable market, shoving them to the brink of broke… and beyond.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… This is what happens when clueless billionaires are brought in to make our public programs “efficient.” Corporate rule is never efficient—and it sure ain't fun.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/billionaires-and-right-wing-hacks</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:160799954</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/160799954/a62143f01621136e54b9a2fcc38b6384.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/160799954/0b9f14f09346741e4c1a84a9e49485c0.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>America’s family farmers were astonished recently to get a jolly tweet from the President of the United States: “Have fun!” exclaimed The Donald. Fun? The farm economy is in the ditch, with crop prices at depression levels and bankruptcies surging. Plus, Trump Inc. is now rigging the law to give agribusiness monopolies more power to run roughshod over farmers and rural communities. Well, yes, say the billionaire “geniuses” and partisan hacks who’ve seized control of farm and food policies, but our phantasmagoric laissez-fairyland ideology will open up new agricultural markets here at home, so see? Fun! Those ideologues, however, can’t make chicken salad out of chicken manure, and that’s what their promises are. While Brooke Rollins, Trump’s corporatized ag secretary, babbles about “new” markets—but she actually shut down a nationwide market last month that provided a billion dollars a year to family farmers who produce for local schools, food pantries, etc. In reality, Rollins’ goal is an industrialized, globalized food economy, so she coldly dismissed these local sales as “nonessential.” Of course, that says to all of the people involved that her government considers them nonessential. Combining arrogance with ignorance, Trump’s aloof plutocrats carelessly wiped out this market right at spring planting time! Each farm family has already taken out thousands of dollars in bank loans to buy seeds and other essential supplies to make this year’s crop, but—WHAMMO!—Trump &amp; Co. slammed the door on the family’s most reliable market, shoving them to the brink of broke… and beyond. This is Jim Hightower saying… This is what happens when clueless billionaires are brought in to make our public programs “efficient.” Corporate rule is never efficient—and it sure ain't fun. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>America’s family farmers were astonished recently to get a jolly tweet from the President of the United States: “Have fun!” exclaimed The Donald. Fun? The farm economy is in the ditch, with crop prices at depression levels and bankruptcies surging. Plus, Trump Inc. is now rigging the law to give agribusiness monopolies more power to run roughshod over farmers and rural communities. Well, yes, say the billionaire “geniuses” and partisan hacks who’ve seized control of farm and food policies, but our phantasmagoric laissez-fairyland ideology will open up new agricultural markets here at home, so see? Fun! Those ideologues, however, can’t make chicken salad out of chicken manure, and that’s what their promises are. While Brooke Rollins, Trump’s corporatized ag secretary, babbles about “new” markets—but she actually shut down a nationwide market last month that provided a billion dollars a year to family farmers who produce for local schools, food pantries, etc. In reality, Rollins’ goal is an industrialized, globalized food economy, so she coldly dismissed these local sales as “nonessential.” Of course, that says to all of the people involved that her government considers them nonessential. Combining arrogance with ignorance, Trump’s aloof plutocrats carelessly wiped out this market right at spring planting time! Each farm family has already taken out thousands of dollars in bank loans to buy seeds and other essential supplies to make this year’s crop, but—WHAMMO!—Trump &amp; Co. slammed the door on the family’s most reliable market, shoving them to the brink of broke… and beyond. This is Jim Hightower saying… This is what happens when clueless billionaires are brought in to make our public programs “efficient.” Corporate rule is never efficient—and it sure ain't fun. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Do We Have To Let Bright Lights Blind Us To Starry Nights?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Let us embrace the darkness.</p><p>Not the political dark ages being pushed on us by today’s regressive right-wing forces, but nature’s own pure darkness of night. Unfortunately, we Homo Sapiens have largely blacked out nature’s billions of beacons in the night sky, which have both dazzled and guided Earth’s creatures for eons.</p><p>Ironically, the tool used to wash out natural light… is light! In all cities and most towns, the glare of artificial lighting has pulled an impervious curtain across our sky. Especially garish (and entirely useless) is the lighting of corporate skyscrapers throughout the night with blinding spotlights that keep us from seeing the genuinely majestic view beyond.</p><p>I was lucky as a child to spend summer evenings on my Aunt Eula’s farm, entranced as darkness fell and the celestial show began. But today, most children don’t even know it’s there. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.1600377">Indeed, 80 percent of Americans never see the stream of the Milky Way galaxy that is our home</a> – much less seeing the spectacular cosmic beams shining from trillions of miles beyond.</p><p>This doesn’t mean we should just stumble around in the dark. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.cnn.com/science/light-pollution-dark-skies-c2e-spc/index.html">Of course we need light, but try a little common sense.</a> One, stop spotlighting buildings. Two, don’t point outdoor lighting up at the sky– shine it <em>down</em> on our streets, parking lots, stadiums, and porches where the illumination is actually needed. Three, remember that there’s an off switch. And even small steps can make a big difference. After all, all we’re giving up is bad lighting.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… We can have the light we need and still let nature’s sky be the star. The good news is that towns, cities, and even countries have begun adopting such sensible lighting policies. To help do this where you live, go to DarkSky International: <a target="_blank" href="http://darksky.org">darksky.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/do-we-have-to-let-bright-lights-blind</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:160262427</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/160262427/693133f31ad6e929faffebd4a2ea1ed7.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/160262427/5587baa37abe35c2e5b62ad662af843f.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Let us embrace the darkness. Not the political dark ages being pushed on us by today’s regressive right-wing forces, but nature’s own pure darkness of night. Unfortunately, we Homo Sapiens have largely blacked out nature’s billions of beacons in the night sky, which have both dazzled and guided Earth’s creatures for eons. Ironically, the tool used to wash out natural light… is light! In all cities and most towns, the glare of artificial lighting has pulled an impervious curtain across our sky. Especially garish (and entirely useless) is the lighting of corporate skyscrapers throughout the night with blinding spotlights that keep us from seeing the genuinely majestic view beyond. I was lucky as a child to spend summer evenings on my Aunt Eula’s farm, entranced as darkness fell and the celestial show began. But today, most children don’t even know it’s there. Indeed, 80 percent of Americans never see the stream of the Milky Way galaxy that is our home – much less seeing the spectacular cosmic beams shining from trillions of miles beyond. This doesn’t mean we should just stumble around in the dark. Of course we need light, but try a little common sense. One, stop spotlighting buildings. Two, don’t point outdoor lighting up at the sky– shine it down on our streets, parking lots, stadiums, and porches where the illumination is actually needed. Three, remember that there’s an off switch. And even small steps can make a big difference. After all, all we’re giving up is bad lighting. This is Jim Hightower saying… We can have the light we need and still let nature’s sky be the star. The good news is that towns, cities, and even countries have begun adopting such sensible lighting policies. To help do this where you live, go to DarkSky International: darksky.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Let us embrace the darkness. Not the political dark ages being pushed on us by today’s regressive right-wing forces, but nature’s own pure darkness of night. Unfortunately, we Homo Sapiens have largely blacked out nature’s billions of beacons in the night sky, which have both dazzled and guided Earth’s creatures for eons. Ironically, the tool used to wash out natural light… is light! In all cities and most towns, the glare of artificial lighting has pulled an impervious curtain across our sky. Especially garish (and entirely useless) is the lighting of corporate skyscrapers throughout the night with blinding spotlights that keep us from seeing the genuinely majestic view beyond. I was lucky as a child to spend summer evenings on my Aunt Eula’s farm, entranced as darkness fell and the celestial show began. But today, most children don’t even know it’s there. Indeed, 80 percent of Americans never see the stream of the Milky Way galaxy that is our home – much less seeing the spectacular cosmic beams shining from trillions of miles beyond. This doesn’t mean we should just stumble around in the dark. Of course we need light, but try a little common sense. One, stop spotlighting buildings. Two, don’t point outdoor lighting up at the sky– shine it down on our streets, parking lots, stadiums, and porches where the illumination is actually needed. Three, remember that there’s an off switch. And even small steps can make a big difference. After all, all we’re giving up is bad lighting. This is Jim Hightower saying… We can have the light we need and still let nature’s sky be the star. The good news is that towns, cities, and even countries have begun adopting such sensible lighting policies. To help do this where you live, go to DarkSky International: darksky.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[When Greedy Corporations Want a Stupid Law, They Come to Texas]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Texas: What the Hell?</p><p>Once again, my state’s GOP hierarchy is leading the nation in creative ways to increase corporate power over people’s rights. This time, lawmakers are rushing to protect corrupt executives from legal challenges by their own shareholders!</p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://archive.is/AjJxM">Their law would ban rank-and-file owners of corporate giants from suing their CEOs and other top officials for financial malfeasance</a>. In particular, it’s a heavy-handed attempt to prohibit shareholders from suing bosses who lavish shareholder funds on extravagant pay and luxury perks for themselves.</p><p>But leave it to Lone Star Republicans to make a bad law worse. Indeed, they say they only want to bar suits by “pesky” small investors—people who own less than three percent of a corporation’s stock. But that’s a flimflam, since almost no one owns more than three percent of any big corporation. And the few who do are huge Wall Street operators and multibillionaires—and they’re not about to sue a fellow-richie for being greedy.</p><p>So the Texas law would effectively institutionalize a corrupt, closed-loop protection racket, freeing self-serving executives from internal accountability.</p><p>Speaking of corrupt, who wrote this boondoggle? It’s sponsored by <a target="_blank" href="https://www.kut.org/politics/2025-01-15/meet-dustin-burrows-texas-new-house-speaker-and-one-of-the-most-powerful-people-in-the-state">Dustin Burrows</a>, the top official of the Texas House, but he doesn’t write bills—he totes bills written by big campaign donors, corporate lobbyists, and right-wing extremists. In this case, he’s <a target="_blank" href="https://www.opensecrets.org/officeholders/dustin-burrows/contributors?cycle=2024&#38;id=26783531">working for all three</a>.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… Burrows brags that his scam will be a boon for our state, because it’ll prompt CEOs everywhere to move their corporations here to take advantage of this law. Sure—corporations up to no good! Who needs ‘em? And if they set a precedent in Texas, I guarantee you they’ll be pushing it in your state next.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/when-greedy-corporations-want-a-stupid</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:160258420</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 17:05:22 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/160258420/6e1eb74dad08205dbc1c20fe4e75075e.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/160258420/e1c516fe4e3409345abb0c891846fb02.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Texas: What the Hell? Once again, my state’s GOP hierarchy is leading the nation in creative ways to increase corporate power over people’s rights. This time, lawmakers are rushing to protect corrupt executives from legal challenges by their own shareholders! Their law would ban rank-and-file owners of corporate giants from suing their CEOs and other top officials for financial malfeasance. In particular, it’s a heavy-handed attempt to prohibit shareholders from suing bosses who lavish shareholder funds on extravagant pay and luxury perks for themselves. But leave it to Lone Star Republicans to make a bad law worse. Indeed, they say they only want to bar suits by “pesky” small investors—people who own less than three percent of a corporation’s stock. But that’s a flimflam, since almost no one owns more than three percent of any big corporation. And the few who do are huge Wall Street operators and multibillionaires—and they’re not about to sue a fellow-richie for being greedy. So the Texas law would effectively institutionalize a corrupt, closed-loop protection racket, freeing self-serving executives from internal accountability. Speaking of corrupt, who wrote this boondoggle? It’s sponsored by Dustin Burrows, the top official of the Texas House, but he doesn’t write bills—he totes bills written by big campaign donors, corporate lobbyists, and right-wing extremists. In this case, he’s working for all three. This is Jim Hightower saying… Burrows brags that his scam will be a boon for our state, because it’ll prompt CEOs everywhere to move their corporations here to take advantage of this law. Sure—corporations up to no good! Who needs ‘em? And if they set a precedent in Texas, I guarantee you they’ll be pushing it in your state next. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Texas: What the Hell? Once again, my state’s GOP hierarchy is leading the nation in creative ways to increase corporate power over people’s rights. This time, lawmakers are rushing to protect corrupt executives from legal challenges by their own shareholders! Their law would ban rank-and-file owners of corporate giants from suing their CEOs and other top officials for financial malfeasance. In particular, it’s a heavy-handed attempt to prohibit shareholders from suing bosses who lavish shareholder funds on extravagant pay and luxury perks for themselves. But leave it to Lone Star Republicans to make a bad law worse. Indeed, they say they only want to bar suits by “pesky” small investors—people who own less than three percent of a corporation’s stock. But that’s a flimflam, since almost no one owns more than three percent of any big corporation. And the few who do are huge Wall Street operators and multibillionaires—and they’re not about to sue a fellow-richie for being greedy. So the Texas law would effectively institutionalize a corrupt, closed-loop protection racket, freeing self-serving executives from internal accountability. Speaking of corrupt, who wrote this boondoggle? It’s sponsored by Dustin Burrows, the top official of the Texas House, but he doesn’t write bills—he totes bills written by big campaign donors, corporate lobbyists, and right-wing extremists. In this case, he’s working for all three. This is Jim Hightower saying… Burrows brags that his scam will be a boon for our state, because it’ll prompt CEOs everywhere to move their corporations here to take advantage of this law. Sure—corporations up to no good! Who needs ‘em? And if they set a precedent in Texas, I guarantee you they’ll be pushing it in your state next. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Trump’s “War on Government Waste” Is a Class War]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>At last, Washington is going to eliminate government waste!</p><p>Trump & Company’s budget-whacking crew even brandished a big ol’ chainsaw to show us hoi polloi that they’re serious. So goodbye to those ridiculous, multibillion-dollar giveaways to politically connected corporate elites, right?</p><p>Uh… don’t get silly. The chainsawers-in-chief are Elon Musk, Trump and a mess of ultra-rich GOP cabinet appointees, and their fortunes are built on fat checks from the government, so they will NOT be targeting any of their boondoggles. Instead, they’re aiming at programs offering modest help to middle-class and poor families.</p><p>For example, the Agriculture Department regularly mails out billions of dollars in “farm subsidies,” but most real farmers don’t get a penny, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.motherjones.com/food/2024/02/farm-bill-racism-black-farmers-consolidation-crop-insurance/">while about 80 percent of the taxpayers’ money goes to the richest 10 percent of agribusiness owners</a>, including city-dwelling billionaires and corporate giants.</p><p>But rather than touching their giveaways, the Ag Department has just made a political show of<a target="_blank" href="https://www.politico.com/news/2025/03/10/usda-cancels-local-food-purchasing-for-schools-food-banks-00222796"> zeroing-out a very successful farm-to-market program that enables small producers to sell their fresh goods to local school districts and food banks</a>. This is government at its best—serving as a catalyst to “free up the enterprise” of small businesses by allowing them to bypass monopolistic middlemen and provide top-quality fresh foods to their communities.</p><p>Big Food, however, hates competition. Thus, Brooke Rollins (a corporate-hugging, far-right-wing lawyer who is Trump’s new Ag Secretary) summarily cancelled this enterprising local food initiative, announcing on Fox News that it was “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-senators-urge-usda-reinstate-canceled-local-food-programs-2025-03-13/">nonessential</a>” waste.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… So there you have their guiding ethic of these “waste warriors.” Programs helping regular Americans are just waste to be eliminated—but giveaways to the rich are “essential” waste to be protected.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/trumps-war-on-government-waste-is</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:159746651</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/159746651/590764ca0dd4b26351e4ac37705a1a21.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/159746651/aa23bdf2f877de5ea7edc39d120c1f96.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>At last, Washington is going to eliminate government waste! Trump &amp; Company’s budget-whacking crew even brandished a big ol’ chainsaw to show us hoi polloi that they’re serious. So goodbye to those ridiculous, multibillion-dollar giveaways to politically connected corporate elites, right? Uh… don’t get silly. The chainsawers-in-chief are Elon Musk, Trump and a mess of ultra-rich GOP cabinet appointees, and their fortunes are built on fat checks from the government, so they will NOT be targeting any of their boondoggles. Instead, they’re aiming at programs offering modest help to middle-class and poor families. For example, the Agriculture Department regularly mails out billions of dollars in “farm subsidies,” but most real farmers don’t get a penny, while about 80 percent of the taxpayers’ money goes to the richest 10 percent of agribusiness owners, including city-dwelling billionaires and corporate giants. But rather than touching their giveaways, the Ag Department has just made a political show of zeroing-out a very successful farm-to-market program that enables small producers to sell their fresh goods to local school districts and food banks. This is government at its best—serving as a catalyst to “free up the enterprise” of small businesses by allowing them to bypass monopolistic middlemen and provide top-quality fresh foods to their communities. Big Food, however, hates competition. Thus, Brooke Rollins (a corporate-hugging, far-right-wing lawyer who is Trump’s new Ag Secretary) summarily cancelled this enterprising local food initiative, announcing on Fox News that it was “nonessential” waste. This is Jim Hightower saying… So there you have their guiding ethic of these “waste warriors.” Programs helping regular Americans are just waste to be eliminated—but giveaways to the rich are “essential” waste to be protected. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>At last, Washington is going to eliminate government waste! Trump &amp; Company’s budget-whacking crew even brandished a big ol’ chainsaw to show us hoi polloi that they’re serious. So goodbye to those ridiculous, multibillion-dollar giveaways to politically connected corporate elites, right? Uh… don’t get silly. The chainsawers-in-chief are Elon Musk, Trump and a mess of ultra-rich GOP cabinet appointees, and their fortunes are built on fat checks from the government, so they will NOT be targeting any of their boondoggles. Instead, they’re aiming at programs offering modest help to middle-class and poor families. For example, the Agriculture Department regularly mails out billions of dollars in “farm subsidies,” but most real farmers don’t get a penny, while about 80 percent of the taxpayers’ money goes to the richest 10 percent of agribusiness owners, including city-dwelling billionaires and corporate giants. But rather than touching their giveaways, the Ag Department has just made a political show of zeroing-out a very successful farm-to-market program that enables small producers to sell their fresh goods to local school districts and food banks. This is government at its best—serving as a catalyst to “free up the enterprise” of small businesses by allowing them to bypass monopolistic middlemen and provide top-quality fresh foods to their communities. Big Food, however, hates competition. Thus, Brooke Rollins (a corporate-hugging, far-right-wing lawyer who is Trump’s new Ag Secretary) summarily cancelled this enterprising local food initiative, announcing on Fox News that it was “nonessential” waste. This is Jim Hightower saying… So there you have their guiding ethic of these “waste warriors.” Programs helping regular Americans are just waste to be eliminated—but giveaways to the rich are “essential” waste to be protected. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Trump, Musk, and “Little Buddy” v. The People]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Eeeeeek, there’s a mouse in the house! Oh wait—it’s just Little Mike Johnson. He’s harmless.</p><p>Mike is Speaker of the House of Representatives, which used to be a vital part of America’s national government. The Constitution empowers the House to oversee the federal budget, public policies, and the actions of presidents. But Johnson has meekly surrendered these core powers (and his own relevance) to Trump’s autocratic executive branch.</p><p>Mike even failed to be <em>Squeaker</em> of the House, for he issued no peep of protest as the authority of elected lawmakers was seized and pocketed by a corrupt chief executive claiming that he’s the law of the land. As Rep. Jamie Raskin put it, instead of standing against imperious one-man rule, Johnson applauded, reducing himself to Trump’s <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/29/pageoneplus/quote-of-the-day-the-speaker-asserts-his-dependence.html">“little buddy.”</a></p><p>Even more pathetic is seeing Johnson and the GOP’s entire congressional caucus kowtow to Elon Musk, sheepishly obeying the right-wing dictates of an over-privileged, South African finagler who’s never been elected by anybody to anything. Having bought his way into Trump’s golden orbit of billionaires in the last election, Musk is now prancing around as America’s acting president, while Johnson cheers.</p><p>But Trump, Musk, and Little Buddy have a problem that they don’t seem to grasp: “We the People” simply don’t support what they’re doing to us. It’s now obvious that they’re waging a billionaires-know-best, chainsawing rampage against public programs that benefit us commoners—especially any program that protects us from the unbounded greed of billionaires like… them.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… These corrupt, wannabe monarchs have been sipping their own bathwater, thinking it’s champagne. But the public is onto them… and on the move against them.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/trump-musk-and-little-buddy-v-the</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:159745296</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/159745296/de4df7203e646dab0fe309e1395fe8b7.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/159745296/2e98da42da4532d3cca2e0dba92217a9.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Eeeeeek, there’s a mouse in the house! Oh wait—it’s just Little Mike Johnson. He’s harmless. Mike is Speaker of the House of Representatives, which used to be a vital part of America’s national government. The Constitution empowers the House to oversee the federal budget, public policies, and the actions of presidents. But Johnson has meekly surrendered these core powers (and his own relevance) to Trump’s autocratic executive branch. Mike even failed to be Squeaker of the House, for he issued no peep of protest as the authority of elected lawmakers was seized and pocketed by a corrupt chief executive claiming that he’s the law of the land. As Rep. Jamie Raskin put it, instead of standing against imperious one-man rule, Johnson applauded, reducing himself to Trump’s “little buddy.” Even more pathetic is seeing Johnson and the GOP’s entire congressional caucus kowtow to Elon Musk, sheepishly obeying the right-wing dictates of an over-privileged, South African finagler who’s never been elected by anybody to anything. Having bought his way into Trump’s golden orbit of billionaires in the last election, Musk is now prancing around as America’s acting president, while Johnson cheers. But Trump, Musk, and Little Buddy have a problem that they don’t seem to grasp: “We the People” simply don’t support what they’re doing to us. It’s now obvious that they’re waging a billionaires-know-best, chainsawing rampage against public programs that benefit us commoners—especially any program that protects us from the unbounded greed of billionaires like… them. This is Jim Hightower saying… These corrupt, wannabe monarchs have been sipping their own bathwater, thinking it’s champagne. But the public is onto them… and on the move against them. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Eeeeeek, there’s a mouse in the house! Oh wait—it’s just Little Mike Johnson. He’s harmless. Mike is Speaker of the House of Representatives, which used to be a vital part of America’s national government. The Constitution empowers the House to oversee the federal budget, public policies, and the actions of presidents. But Johnson has meekly surrendered these core powers (and his own relevance) to Trump’s autocratic executive branch. Mike even failed to be Squeaker of the House, for he issued no peep of protest as the authority of elected lawmakers was seized and pocketed by a corrupt chief executive claiming that he’s the law of the land. As Rep. Jamie Raskin put it, instead of standing against imperious one-man rule, Johnson applauded, reducing himself to Trump’s “little buddy.” Even more pathetic is seeing Johnson and the GOP’s entire congressional caucus kowtow to Elon Musk, sheepishly obeying the right-wing dictates of an over-privileged, South African finagler who’s never been elected by anybody to anything. Having bought his way into Trump’s golden orbit of billionaires in the last election, Musk is now prancing around as America’s acting president, while Johnson cheers. But Trump, Musk, and Little Buddy have a problem that they don’t seem to grasp: “We the People” simply don’t support what they’re doing to us. It’s now obvious that they’re waging a billionaires-know-best, chainsawing rampage against public programs that benefit us commoners—especially any program that protects us from the unbounded greed of billionaires like… them. This is Jim Hightower saying… These corrupt, wannabe monarchs have been sipping their own bathwater, thinking it’s champagne. But the public is onto them… and on the move against them. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hey Musk—How About an Honest Reform of the Department of Agriculture?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Harry Truman once proclaimed: “No man should be president who doesn’t understand hogs.”</p><p>That might explain the calamitous mess that President Trump-Musk is making of our government today. Clearly, Don and Elon know nothing about four-legged farm animals, but they certainly know how to squeeze government to fatten their own two-legged breed of corporate swine. Thus, the billionaire hucksters are bulldozing agencies that serve people’s real needs, while preserving those that subsidize corporate greed.</p><p>For example, the U.S. Department of Agriculture. A once-proud agency created by Abraham Lincoln to serve tillers of the soil, but USDA today has become a bottomless feeding trough for agribusiness giants and other financial powers that “till” taxpayers.</p><p>Our country’s Farm Program, meant to be a safety net for hands-on dirt farmers, is now a $20-billion-a-year subsidy that pays <em>zero</em> to the vast majority of farm families. Instead, 75 percent of our money goes to the biggest and richest 10 percent of corporate fiefdoms, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.ewg.org/news-insights/news/2023/12/do-billionaires-get-farm-subsidies?">including billionaire speculators who never get any dirt under their fingernails</a>.</p><p>Actually, the Trump-Musk chainsaw crew is whacking some USDA programs—such as <a target="_blank" href="https://www.politico.com/newsletters/weekly-agriculture/2025/02/10/gop-plots-snips-to-snap-00203297">food stamps for poor families</a>, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.politico.com/news/2025/03/10/usda-cancels-local-food-purchasing-for-schools-food-banks-00222796">helping school districts buy from local farmers and ranchers</a>, and other efforts providing modest help to grassroots people and communities. But not a peep from the duo about the bales of taxpayer cash hauled every year to their own class of rich elites.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… A Department of Agriculture is as needed today as in Lincoln’s time. But an honest overhaul is necessary to return it to its democratic roots of serving the workaday people of rural America, freeing it from the corporate interests now running roughshod over those same people. For more information, go to Environmental Working Group at <a target="_blank" href="http://farm.ewg.org/">ewg.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/hey-muskhow-about-an-honest-reform</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:159255927</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2606882" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/159255927/a2d52345697b9a10177edbe9395e3cdf.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/159255927/9b78cfb6f758abd0d7a295da7e28143f.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Harry Truman once proclaimed: “No man should be president who doesn’t understand hogs.” That might explain the calamitous mess that President Trump-Musk is making of our government today. Clearly, Don and Elon know nothing about four-legged farm animals, but they certainly know how to squeeze government to fatten their own two-legged breed of corporate swine. Thus, the billionaire hucksters are bulldozing agencies that serve people’s real needs, while preserving those that subsidize corporate greed. For example, the U.S. Department of Agriculture. A once-proud agency created by Abraham Lincoln to serve tillers of the soil, but USDA today has become a bottomless feeding trough for agribusiness giants and other financial powers that “till” taxpayers. Our country’s Farm Program, meant to be a safety net for hands-on dirt farmers, is now a $20-billion-a-year subsidy that pays zero to the vast majority of farm families. Instead, 75 percent of our money goes to the biggest and richest 10 percent of corporate fiefdoms, including billionaire speculators who never get any dirt under their fingernails. Actually, the Trump-Musk chainsaw crew is whacking some USDA programs—such as food stamps for poor families, helping school districts buy from local farmers and ranchers, and other efforts providing modest help to grassroots people and communities. But not a peep from the duo about the bales of taxpayer cash hauled every year to their own class of rich elites. This is Jim Hightower saying… A Department of Agriculture is as needed today as in Lincoln’s time. But an honest overhaul is necessary to return it to its democratic roots of serving the workaday people of rural America, freeing it from the corporate interests now running roughshod over those same people. For more information, go to Environmental Working Group at ewg.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Harry Truman once proclaimed: “No man should be president who doesn’t understand hogs.” That might explain the calamitous mess that President Trump-Musk is making of our government today. Clearly, Don and Elon know nothing about four-legged farm animals, but they certainly know how to squeeze government to fatten their own two-legged breed of corporate swine. Thus, the billionaire hucksters are bulldozing agencies that serve people’s real needs, while preserving those that subsidize corporate greed. For example, the U.S. Department of Agriculture. A once-proud agency created by Abraham Lincoln to serve tillers of the soil, but USDA today has become a bottomless feeding trough for agribusiness giants and other financial powers that “till” taxpayers. Our country’s Farm Program, meant to be a safety net for hands-on dirt farmers, is now a $20-billion-a-year subsidy that pays zero to the vast majority of farm families. Instead, 75 percent of our money goes to the biggest and richest 10 percent of corporate fiefdoms, including billionaire speculators who never get any dirt under their fingernails. Actually, the Trump-Musk chainsaw crew is whacking some USDA programs—such as food stamps for poor families, helping school districts buy from local farmers and ranchers, and other efforts providing modest help to grassroots people and communities. But not a peep from the duo about the bales of taxpayer cash hauled every year to their own class of rich elites. This is Jim Hightower saying… A Department of Agriculture is as needed today as in Lincoln’s time. But an honest overhaul is necessary to return it to its democratic roots of serving the workaday people of rural America, freeing it from the corporate interests now running roughshod over those same people. For more information, go to Environmental Working Group at ewg.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Is Trump Such a Scaredy-Cat About Words?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>A classic a bumper sticker posed this alarming question: “Where are we going, and what am I doing in this handbasket?”</p><p>What we’re in today is an Orwellian basket to political hell, propelled by Trump himself. He has assembled a cohort of anti-democracy zealots, who are autocratically cutting off people’s fundamental freedoms—including speech, press, travel, and even thought.</p><p>The first Trump term unleashed a gaggle of right-wingers promoting mass ignorance by demonizing books, librarians, teachers, scientists, and our own people’s history. Next came a maniacal MAGA assault on America’s most essential, unifying democratic value: The reality that we <em>are</em> a proudly diverse bunch of people, striving to achieve the ideal of equality for all. “Heresy,” shouted Trump’s GOP, demanding that the pursuit of such goals literally be outlawed.</p><p>And now comes all-out, Kafkaesque crazy, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nbcnews.com/data-graphics/tracking-trumps-executive-orders-rcna189571">with Trump going on a binge of mass censorship and goofy executive dictates</a>. Consider just two of his recent commands. One bans government cafeterias <a target="_blank" href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/feb/10/trump-plastic-straws-executive-order">from using paper straws</a>! Another suspends a law that made it illegal <a target="_blank" href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/feb/10/trump-order-foreign-bribery-act">for US corporations to bribe foreign officials</a>. There’s the new morality: Paper straws, OUT; corporate bribery, IN.</p><p>More dangerous for our freedom, though, is the MAGA regime’s purging of words and ideas it doesn’t like, trying to force its government-approved Newspeak on America. Trump’s minions are now going through every agency’s documents and websites, <a target="_blank" href="https://newrepublic.com/article/192631/trump-speech-code-deleted-words">literally deleting hundreds of common word</a>s to be officially verboten—including: Equality, injustice, pollution, transgender, race, women… and, of course, Gulf of Mexico.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… These are not just words, but values and people. A president that starts by censoring our freedom of expression is a weakling, admitting that he’s afraid of free-thinking people.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-is-trump-such-a-scaredy-cat-about</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:159254170</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/159254170/0d7e52d322185f3a196ab441aa7a366c.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/159254170/5c8212b7c05f9af800ad2cdda0df3d78.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>A classic a bumper sticker posed this alarming question: “Where are we going, and what am I doing in this handbasket?” What we’re in today is an Orwellian basket to political hell, propelled by Trump himself. He has assembled a cohort of anti-democracy zealots, who are autocratically cutting off people’s fundamental freedoms—including speech, press, travel, and even thought. The first Trump term unleashed a gaggle of right-wingers promoting mass ignorance by demonizing books, librarians, teachers, scientists, and our own people’s history. Next came a maniacal MAGA assault on America’s most essential, unifying democratic value: The reality that we are a proudly diverse bunch of people, striving to achieve the ideal of equality for all. “Heresy,” shouted Trump’s GOP, demanding that the pursuit of such goals literally be outlawed. And now comes all-out, Kafkaesque crazy, with Trump going on a binge of mass censorship and goofy executive dictates. Consider just two of his recent commands. One bans government cafeterias from using paper straws! Another suspends a law that made it illegal for US corporations to bribe foreign officials. There’s the new morality: Paper straws, OUT; corporate bribery, IN. More dangerous for our freedom, though, is the MAGA regime’s purging of words and ideas it doesn’t like, trying to force its government-approved Newspeak on America. Trump’s minions are now going through every agency’s documents and websites, literally deleting hundreds of common words to be officially verboten—including: Equality, injustice, pollution, transgender, race, women… and, of course, Gulf of Mexico. This is Jim Hightower saying… These are not just words, but values and people. A president that starts by censoring our freedom of expression is a weakling, admitting that he’s afraid of free-thinking people. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>A classic a bumper sticker posed this alarming question: “Where are we going, and what am I doing in this handbasket?” What we’re in today is an Orwellian basket to political hell, propelled by Trump himself. He has assembled a cohort of anti-democracy zealots, who are autocratically cutting off people’s fundamental freedoms—including speech, press, travel, and even thought. The first Trump term unleashed a gaggle of right-wingers promoting mass ignorance by demonizing books, librarians, teachers, scientists, and our own people’s history. Next came a maniacal MAGA assault on America’s most essential, unifying democratic value: The reality that we are a proudly diverse bunch of people, striving to achieve the ideal of equality for all. “Heresy,” shouted Trump’s GOP, demanding that the pursuit of such goals literally be outlawed. And now comes all-out, Kafkaesque crazy, with Trump going on a binge of mass censorship and goofy executive dictates. Consider just two of his recent commands. One bans government cafeterias from using paper straws! Another suspends a law that made it illegal for US corporations to bribe foreign officials. There’s the new morality: Paper straws, OUT; corporate bribery, IN. More dangerous for our freedom, though, is the MAGA regime’s purging of words and ideas it doesn’t like, trying to force its government-approved Newspeak on America. Trump’s minions are now going through every agency’s documents and websites, literally deleting hundreds of common words to be officially verboten—including: Equality, injustice, pollution, transgender, race, women… and, of course, Gulf of Mexico. This is Jim Hightower saying… These are not just words, but values and people. A president that starts by censoring our freedom of expression is a weakling, admitting that he’s afraid of free-thinking people. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[“Corporate Morality” Is a Biblical Level Oxymoron]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>What a hoot to see so many once-cocky, Big Boss Men of corporate America completely surrender their policies, principles, and personal pride to grovel at the feet of Trump!</p><p>Even egomaniacal tech billionaires like Musk, Bezos, and Zuckerberg are publicly debasing themselves with a cringey eagerness to kiss-up to The Donald. Indeed, CEOs in practically every industry – from oil to food – have suddenly converted to MAGA nuttiness. And to prove their devotion, each is loudly pledging to sacrifice all of their corporate programs that advance such core American values as equal rights, workplace fairness, and environmental protection. Parroting Trump’s decree that DEI egalitarianism is “immoral,” the barons piously insist their reversals is a matter of ethics.</p><p>Hogwash. Their morality starts and ends with money, and as the Bible points out: “The love of money is the root of all evil.”</p><p>Consider the case of Paramount, the multibillion-dollar media giant. Although much of its wealth now comes from diversity programming on its MTV and BET networks, the top brass is bowing to TrumpSpeak, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/26/business/media/paramount-dei-policies.html">obediently killing Paramount’s diversity policies</a> – and even scrubbing the word “inclusion” from its corporate vocabulary!</p><p>Why? M-O-N-E-Y. Paramount is presently <a target="_blank" href="https://deadline.com/2025/02/paramount-skydance-merger-clears-sec-donald-trump-fcc-review-pending-1236288710/">pushing a multibillion-dollar merger with another entertainment giant</a> to extend its control over our media market, empowering it to gouge more cash from you and me. But the merger had to be okayed by a federal commission headed by an anti-diversity, Trump political hack – so top executives cravenly heaved Paramount’s principles overboard.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… That is now what passes for corporate ethics, with smug honchos abandoning all pretense that they’re guided by any higher morality than the love of money.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/corporate-morality-is-a-biblical</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:158783925</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/158783925/605cf4e354d872ce2af872fcffccb2c7.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/158783925/dd1e7829142d7675e5ec91a7872d358f.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>What a hoot to see so many once-cocky, Big Boss Men of corporate America completely surrender their policies, principles, and personal pride to grovel at the feet of Trump! Even egomaniacal tech billionaires like Musk, Bezos, and Zuckerberg are publicly debasing themselves with a cringey eagerness to kiss-up to The Donald. Indeed, CEOs in practically every industry – from oil to food – have suddenly converted to MAGA nuttiness. And to prove their devotion, each is loudly pledging to sacrifice all of their corporate programs that advance such core American values as equal rights, workplace fairness, and environmental protection. Parroting Trump’s decree that DEI egalitarianism is “immoral,” the barons piously insist their reversals is a matter of ethics. Hogwash. Their morality starts and ends with money, and as the Bible points out: “The love of money is the root of all evil.” Consider the case of Paramount, the multibillion-dollar media giant. Although much of its wealth now comes from diversity programming on its MTV and BET networks, the top brass is bowing to TrumpSpeak, obediently killing Paramount’s diversity policies – and even scrubbing the word “inclusion” from its corporate vocabulary! Why? M-O-N-E-Y. Paramount is presently pushing a multibillion-dollar merger with another entertainment giant to extend its control over our media market, empowering it to gouge more cash from you and me. But the merger had to be okayed by a federal commission headed by an anti-diversity, Trump political hack – so top executives cravenly heaved Paramount’s principles overboard. This is Jim Hightower saying… That is now what passes for corporate ethics, with smug honchos abandoning all pretense that they’re guided by any higher morality than the love of money. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>What a hoot to see so many once-cocky, Big Boss Men of corporate America completely surrender their policies, principles, and personal pride to grovel at the feet of Trump! Even egomaniacal tech billionaires like Musk, Bezos, and Zuckerberg are publicly debasing themselves with a cringey eagerness to kiss-up to The Donald. Indeed, CEOs in practically every industry – from oil to food – have suddenly converted to MAGA nuttiness. And to prove their devotion, each is loudly pledging to sacrifice all of their corporate programs that advance such core American values as equal rights, workplace fairness, and environmental protection. Parroting Trump’s decree that DEI egalitarianism is “immoral,” the barons piously insist their reversals is a matter of ethics. Hogwash. Their morality starts and ends with money, and as the Bible points out: “The love of money is the root of all evil.” Consider the case of Paramount, the multibillion-dollar media giant. Although much of its wealth now comes from diversity programming on its MTV and BET networks, the top brass is bowing to TrumpSpeak, obediently killing Paramount’s diversity policies – and even scrubbing the word “inclusion” from its corporate vocabulary! Why? M-O-N-E-Y. Paramount is presently pushing a multibillion-dollar merger with another entertainment giant to extend its control over our media market, empowering it to gouge more cash from you and me. But the merger had to be okayed by a federal commission headed by an anti-diversity, Trump political hack – so top executives cravenly heaved Paramount’s principles overboard. This is Jim Hightower saying… That is now what passes for corporate ethics, with smug honchos abandoning all pretense that they’re guided by any higher morality than the love of money. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hey, Democrats: To Defeat Trump’s Autocracy, Get Out of Washington]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Last week, the Democratic Party’s top congressional leaders finally took a bold stand against Trump’s assault on our democracy when he came to Congress to tout his autocratic agenda.</p><p>Traditionally, when a president arrives to address Congress, a bipartisan escort committee leads the dignitary to the podium. But, by gollies, Democratic leaders Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries showed their toughness by – get this – refusing to have Democrats join the escort committee.</p><p>Wow – imagine how that uplifted the millions of people being stomped on by Trump’s rampage!</p><p>Is this feeble response better than nothing? Believe it or not – “do nothing” is another “strategy” proposed by former Bill Clinton operative James Carville. He says the “smart” thing for Democrats to do is to <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/25/opinion/democrats-trump-congress.html"><em>roll over and play dead</em></a>. Seriously. Carville actually declares that fighting Trump is futile, so just “allow the Republicans to crumble beneath their own weight and make the American people miss us.”</p><p>Excuse me, but wasn’t that the party’s theory in 2016 and 2024 – let Trump rant, and he’ll defeat himself?</p><p>Instead, how about this? Literally get out of Washington. The party’s lawmakers should spend <em>most</em> of their congressional time away from the capital—out where masses of people are already agitating and organizing. Get with them, listen to them, roll up your sleeves, and serve them.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying, this is not just another legislative tiff we’re in, but a grassroots rumble, and the usual partisan name-calling and parliamentary nitpicking won’t win it. Inside Washington, the deck is stacked for Trump’s Autocratic America. Out here, though, the numbers and political dynamic favor democracy fighters. This is where the Democratic Party belongs.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/hey-democrats-to-defeat-trumps-autocracy</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:158781248</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/158781248/fa84863e642eef6940da4470e3a3b884.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/158781248/04997d913c7fd9e05bb3eb4fe269f452.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Last week, the Democratic Party’s top congressional leaders finally took a bold stand against Trump’s assault on our democracy when he came to Congress to tout his autocratic agenda. Traditionally, when a president arrives to address Congress, a bipartisan escort committee leads the dignitary to the podium. But, by gollies, Democratic leaders Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries showed their toughness by – get this – refusing to have Democrats join the escort committee. Wow – imagine how that uplifted the millions of people being stomped on by Trump’s rampage! Is this feeble response better than nothing? Believe it or not – “do nothing” is another “strategy” proposed by former Bill Clinton operative James Carville. He says the “smart” thing for Democrats to do is to roll over and play dead. Seriously. Carville actually declares that fighting Trump is futile, so just “allow the Republicans to crumble beneath their own weight and make the American people miss us.” Excuse me, but wasn’t that the party’s theory in 2016 and 2024 – let Trump rant, and he’ll defeat himself? Instead, how about this? Literally get out of Washington. The party’s lawmakers should spend most of their congressional time away from the capital—out where masses of people are already agitating and organizing. Get with them, listen to them, roll up your sleeves, and serve them. This is Jim Hightower saying, this is not just another legislative tiff we’re in, but a grassroots rumble, and the usual partisan name-calling and parliamentary nitpicking won’t win it. Inside Washington, the deck is stacked for Trump’s Autocratic America. Out here, though, the numbers and political dynamic favor democracy fighters. This is where the Democratic Party belongs. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Last week, the Democratic Party’s top congressional leaders finally took a bold stand against Trump’s assault on our democracy when he came to Congress to tout his autocratic agenda. Traditionally, when a president arrives to address Congress, a bipartisan escort committee leads the dignitary to the podium. But, by gollies, Democratic leaders Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries showed their toughness by – get this – refusing to have Democrats join the escort committee. Wow – imagine how that uplifted the millions of people being stomped on by Trump’s rampage! Is this feeble response better than nothing? Believe it or not – “do nothing” is another “strategy” proposed by former Bill Clinton operative James Carville. He says the “smart” thing for Democrats to do is to roll over and play dead. Seriously. Carville actually declares that fighting Trump is futile, so just “allow the Republicans to crumble beneath their own weight and make the American people miss us.” Excuse me, but wasn’t that the party’s theory in 2016 and 2024 – let Trump rant, and he’ll defeat himself? Instead, how about this? Literally get out of Washington. The party’s lawmakers should spend most of their congressional time away from the capital—out where masses of people are already agitating and organizing. Get with them, listen to them, roll up your sleeves, and serve them. This is Jim Hightower saying, this is not just another legislative tiff we’re in, but a grassroots rumble, and the usual partisan name-calling and parliamentary nitpicking won’t win it. Inside Washington, the deck is stacked for Trump’s Autocratic America. Out here, though, the numbers and political dynamic favor democracy fighters. This is where the Democratic Party belongs. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[To the Barricades: Trump Plans to “Fix” America’s Postal Service]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Uh-oh. Trump is hearing voices again.</p><p>And the voices are telling him to do something truly stupid. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/21/business/trump-postal-service-privatization/index.html">As he puts it</a>, “There is a lot of talk about the Postal Service being taken private,” adding that “It’s an idea that a lot of people have liked for a long time.”</p><p>Hmmm, I haven’t heard even one voice say our phenomenal <em>public</em> mail service should be privatized. Indeed, it is a widely popular government agency because it works for everyone – rich and poor, urban and rural.</p><p>When he claims that “a lot of people” like the idea of postal privatization how many? Six? Six million? And what kind of people? Working stiffs, poor people, rural residents… who? <a target="_blank" href="https://apwu.org/news/statement-apwu-president-mark-dimondstein-attacks-public-postal-service">He gives a coded answer to that when he refers to the Post Office being “taken” private.</a> Oh? Taken by whom? Of course – by the corrupt profiteering billionaires who funded Trump. Their business plan is to have him hand the agency to them in the name of instituting “corporate efficiency” – meaning the privateers will go to three-day mail delivery, cut-off service to unprofitable poor and rural communities, raise prices, and fire legions of experienced postal workers.</p><p>They’re out to steal an essential public treasure, but they’re also trying to censor opposition to their political control of government. The Postal Service was created in 1792 in part to prevent royalists and oligarchs from controlling communications. If you think that’s not a problem in modern America, reflect on the blunt media censorship being imposed right now by Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, and other petty potentates of corporate plutocracy.</p><p>To learn more, visit the American Postal Workers Union: <a target="_blank" href="http://apwu.org">apwu.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/to-the-barricades-trump-plans-to</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:158528483</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 17:18:37 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/158528483/9deb2e2d2f75fa2284e2e437bada5209.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/158528483/4b1eb6f362724ef391ea4d1cd452e2f8.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Uh-oh. Trump is hearing voices again. And the voices are telling him to do something truly stupid. As he puts it, “There is a lot of talk about the Postal Service being taken private,” adding that “It’s an idea that a lot of people have liked for a long time.” Hmmm, I haven’t heard even one voice say our phenomenal public mail service should be privatized. Indeed, it is a widely popular government agency because it works for everyone – rich and poor, urban and rural. When he claims that “a lot of people” like the idea of postal privatization how many? Six? Six million? And what kind of people? Working stiffs, poor people, rural residents… who? He gives a coded answer to that when he refers to the Post Office being “taken” private. Oh? Taken by whom? Of course – by the corrupt profiteering billionaires who funded Trump. Their business plan is to have him hand the agency to them in the name of instituting “corporate efficiency” – meaning the privateers will go to three-day mail delivery, cut-off service to unprofitable poor and rural communities, raise prices, and fire legions of experienced postal workers. They’re out to steal an essential public treasure, but they’re also trying to censor opposition to their political control of government. The Postal Service was created in 1792 in part to prevent royalists and oligarchs from controlling communications. If you think that’s not a problem in modern America, reflect on the blunt media censorship being imposed right now by Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, and other petty potentates of corporate plutocracy. To learn more, visit the American Postal Workers Union: apwu.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Uh-oh. Trump is hearing voices again. And the voices are telling him to do something truly stupid. As he puts it, “There is a lot of talk about the Postal Service being taken private,” adding that “It’s an idea that a lot of people have liked for a long time.” Hmmm, I haven’t heard even one voice say our phenomenal public mail service should be privatized. Indeed, it is a widely popular government agency because it works for everyone – rich and poor, urban and rural. When he claims that “a lot of people” like the idea of postal privatization how many? Six? Six million? And what kind of people? Working stiffs, poor people, rural residents… who? He gives a coded answer to that when he refers to the Post Office being “taken” private. Oh? Taken by whom? Of course – by the corrupt profiteering billionaires who funded Trump. Their business plan is to have him hand the agency to them in the name of instituting “corporate efficiency” – meaning the privateers will go to three-day mail delivery, cut-off service to unprofitable poor and rural communities, raise prices, and fire legions of experienced postal workers. They’re out to steal an essential public treasure, but they’re also trying to censor opposition to their political control of government. The Postal Service was created in 1792 in part to prevent royalists and oligarchs from controlling communications. If you think that’s not a problem in modern America, reflect on the blunt media censorship being imposed right now by Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, and other petty potentates of corporate plutocracy. To learn more, visit the American Postal Workers Union: apwu.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Now Is the Time to Push for a *Democratic* Democratic Party]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Once again, Sen. Bernie Sanders is showing that <a target="_blank" href="https://www.sevendaysvt.com/news/sanders-to-kick-off-round-two-of-his-fight-oligarchy-tour-42981368">he’s a leader who actually leads</a>.</p><p>While top Democratic Party lawmakers are hunkered down in their Washington bunker, immobilized by the Trump-Musk oligarchic coup on America’s democracy, the feisty “little-d” democrat from Vermont is out in grassroots America, rallying workaday people with his <a target="_blank" href="https://berniesanders.com/">National Tour to Fight Oligarchy</a>. His effort has even caused the lethargic Democratic establishment to speak out. Against Bernie!</p><p>The party’s clueless cadre of insider consultants mocked Sen. Sanders’ for focusing on Trump’s clique of profiteering oligarchs: “Americans don’t understand the word oligarchy,” <a target="_blank" href="https://x.com/matthewstoller/status/1893315642029117945">they clucked</a>.</p><p>Excuse me, smart ones, but once again, you’re wrong. The oligarchy has become quite well-known to us commoners, who’ve suffered from their healthcare outrages, voter suppression, anti-union greed, rampant price gouging, etc. To the shock of elites in both parties, Sanders has even taken his “Fight Oligarchy” campaign into <em>red</em> congressional districts, drawing thousands of mad-as-hellers in such Republican states as Iowa and Nebraska.</p><p>In a symbolic rejection of Bernie’s on-your-side populist rebellion, Hakeem Jeffries – the Democratic leader in the US House – <a target="_blank" href="https://www.politico.com/news/2025/02/07/hakeem-jeffries-silicon-valley-donors-00203076">rushed out to Silicon Valley to hug the billionaire oligarchs of high-tech</a>! Far from confronting the rise of monopoly power, Jeffries assured the Tech Bros that the “Party of the People” is there to serve them.</p><p>Meanwhile, Democratic congressional leaders <a target="_blank" href="https://www.axios.com/2025/02/12/democrats-jeffries-move-on-indivisible-trump">held an internal “gripe-fest”</a> last week. Not griping about Trump’s authoritarian assault – but about their own grassroots constituents inundating them with calls and emails demanding that they grow spines and start fighting the rising oligarchy.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/now-is-the-time-to-push-for-a-democratic</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:158295179</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 18:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/158295179/95efbc68620e0a7273601102aa770149.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/158295179/106c4358a2dd744762f4760ddea0b65a.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Once again, Sen. Bernie Sanders is showing that he’s a leader who actually leads. While top Democratic Party lawmakers are hunkered down in their Washington bunker, immobilized by the Trump-Musk oligarchic coup on America’s democracy, the feisty “little-d” democrat from Vermont is out in grassroots America, rallying workaday people with his National Tour to Fight Oligarchy. His effort has even caused the lethargic Democratic establishment to speak out. Against Bernie! The party’s clueless cadre of insider consultants mocked Sen. Sanders’ for focusing on Trump’s clique of profiteering oligarchs: “Americans don’t understand the word oligarchy,” they clucked. Excuse me, smart ones, but once again, you’re wrong. The oligarchy has become quite well-known to us commoners, who’ve suffered from their healthcare outrages, voter suppression, anti-union greed, rampant price gouging, etc. To the shock of elites in both parties, Sanders has even taken his “Fight Oligarchy” campaign into red congressional districts, drawing thousands of mad-as-hellers in such Republican states as Iowa and Nebraska. In a symbolic rejection of Bernie’s on-your-side populist rebellion, Hakeem Jeffries – the Democratic leader in the US House – rushed out to Silicon Valley to hug the billionaire oligarchs of high-tech! Far from confronting the rise of monopoly power, Jeffries assured the Tech Bros that the “Party of the People” is there to serve them. Meanwhile, Democratic congressional leaders held an internal “gripe-fest” last week. Not griping about Trump’s authoritarian assault – but about their own grassroots constituents inundating them with calls and emails demanding that they grow spines and start fighting the rising oligarchy. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Once again, Sen. Bernie Sanders is showing that he’s a leader who actually leads. While top Democratic Party lawmakers are hunkered down in their Washington bunker, immobilized by the Trump-Musk oligarchic coup on America’s democracy, the feisty “little-d” democrat from Vermont is out in grassroots America, rallying workaday people with his National Tour to Fight Oligarchy. His effort has even caused the lethargic Democratic establishment to speak out. Against Bernie! The party’s clueless cadre of insider consultants mocked Sen. Sanders’ for focusing on Trump’s clique of profiteering oligarchs: “Americans don’t understand the word oligarchy,” they clucked. Excuse me, smart ones, but once again, you’re wrong. The oligarchy has become quite well-known to us commoners, who’ve suffered from their healthcare outrages, voter suppression, anti-union greed, rampant price gouging, etc. To the shock of elites in both parties, Sanders has even taken his “Fight Oligarchy” campaign into red congressional districts, drawing thousands of mad-as-hellers in such Republican states as Iowa and Nebraska. In a symbolic rejection of Bernie’s on-your-side populist rebellion, Hakeem Jeffries – the Democratic leader in the US House – rushed out to Silicon Valley to hug the billionaire oligarchs of high-tech! Far from confronting the rise of monopoly power, Jeffries assured the Tech Bros that the “Party of the People” is there to serve them. Meanwhile, Democratic congressional leaders held an internal “gripe-fest” last week. Not griping about Trump’s authoritarian assault – but about their own grassroots constituents inundating them with calls and emails demanding that they grow spines and start fighting the rising oligarchy. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Guess What? Hurricanes and Wildfires Don’t Have Political Preferences]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>May I just say that the stupidest, most despicable, most self-defeating political “tactic” in our present hyper-partisan climate is the accusation that victims of today’s horrific wildfires, floods, and such are getting what they deserved because of their political views.</p><p>Start with this month’s catastrophic floods in Appalachia. If you’ve never had a river gushing into your home and town, you can’t imagine the destruction, muck, stench, injuries, death, and despair. Yet, <a target="_blank" href="https://appodlachia.substack.com/p/no-people-arent-getting-what-they">various numbskulls who profess to be progressive have posted taunts online</a>, chortling that these devastated victims are red-state, small-government Trump voters who don’t deserve government’s helping hand in their time of dire need.</p><p>Likewise, right-wing MAGA squads, including some GOP congress critters, routinely jeer at wildfire victims in blue states and cities, gloating that hellfire is righteous punishment for “ungodly” people who oppose Trump’s “divine mission.”</p><p>Hello—this is not politics, it’s disgraceful inhumanity. And those who engage in it are skuzz, insults to America’s democratic ideals of the Common Good.</p><p>Happily though (even as divisive and violent political rhetoric is being spewed by some of our highest officials), the ingrained ethic in practically every community is to rush to the aid of anyone and everyone in times of disaster. I saw this up close when Hurricane Harvey slammed Houston in 2017. Washington officials played politics for weeks as the city was drowning—but hundreds of working people showed up, even from far away states, bringing their small boats and power tools to organize ad hoc rescue teams, not asking anyone their party affiliation.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… That’s our truest selves—and it’s why it’s essential to swat down the malignant ethic of anyone who tries to pervert fundamental humanity into their red-blue morass.</p><p><em>This post from </em><a target="_blank" href="https://open.substack.com/pub/appodlachia"><em>No Elegy Needed</em></a><em> was part of the inspiration for this commentary, and they’ve shared resources where you can support the people affected by this latest round of climate disasters:</em></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/guess-what-hurricanes-and-wildfires</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:157817589</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598232" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/157817589/48ad68b4c5a49fc70b1ff9d80bb7e54a.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/157817589/5ce99bcbafce1ca2d772289cb68d71bb.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>May I just say that the stupidest, most despicable, most self-defeating political “tactic” in our present hyper-partisan climate is the accusation that victims of today’s horrific wildfires, floods, and such are getting what they deserved because of their political views. Start with this month’s catastrophic floods in Appalachia. If you’ve never had a river gushing into your home and town, you can’t imagine the destruction, muck, stench, injuries, death, and despair. Yet, various numbskulls who profess to be progressive have posted taunts online, chortling that these devastated victims are red-state, small-government Trump voters who don’t deserve government’s helping hand in their time of dire need. Likewise, right-wing MAGA squads, including some GOP congress critters, routinely jeer at wildfire victims in blue states and cities, gloating that hellfire is righteous punishment for “ungodly” people who oppose Trump’s “divine mission.” Hello—this is not politics, it’s disgraceful inhumanity. And those who engage in it are skuzz, insults to America’s democratic ideals of the Common Good. Happily though (even as divisive and violent political rhetoric is being spewed by some of our highest officials), the ingrained ethic in practically every community is to rush to the aid of anyone and everyone in times of disaster. I saw this up close when Hurricane Harvey slammed Houston in 2017. Washington officials played politics for weeks as the city was drowning—but hundreds of working people showed up, even from far away states, bringing their small boats and power tools to organize ad hoc rescue teams, not asking anyone their party affiliation. This is Jim Hightower saying… That’s our truest selves—and it’s why it’s essential to swat down the malignant ethic of anyone who tries to pervert fundamental humanity into their red-blue morass. This post from No Elegy Needed was part of the inspiration for this commentary, and they’ve shared resources where you can support the people affected by this latest round of climate disasters: Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>May I just say that the stupidest, most despicable, most self-defeating political “tactic” in our present hyper-partisan climate is the accusation that victims of today’s horrific wildfires, floods, and such are getting what they deserved because of their political views. Start with this month’s catastrophic floods in Appalachia. If you’ve never had a river gushing into your home and town, you can’t imagine the destruction, muck, stench, injuries, death, and despair. Yet, various numbskulls who profess to be progressive have posted taunts online, chortling that these devastated victims are red-state, small-government Trump voters who don’t deserve government’s helping hand in their time of dire need. Likewise, right-wing MAGA squads, including some GOP congress critters, routinely jeer at wildfire victims in blue states and cities, gloating that hellfire is righteous punishment for “ungodly” people who oppose Trump’s “divine mission.” Hello—this is not politics, it’s disgraceful inhumanity. And those who engage in it are skuzz, insults to America’s democratic ideals of the Common Good. Happily though (even as divisive and violent political rhetoric is being spewed by some of our highest officials), the ingrained ethic in practically every community is to rush to the aid of anyone and everyone in times of disaster. I saw this up close when Hurricane Harvey slammed Houston in 2017. Washington officials played politics for weeks as the city was drowning—but hundreds of working people showed up, even from far away states, bringing their small boats and power tools to organize ad hoc rescue teams, not asking anyone their party affiliation. This is Jim Hightower saying… That’s our truest selves—and it’s why it’s essential to swat down the malignant ethic of anyone who tries to pervert fundamental humanity into their red-blue morass. This post from No Elegy Needed was part of the inspiration for this commentary, and they’ve shared resources where you can support the people affected by this latest round of climate disasters: Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ironically, Trump’s Coup Attempt Is Uniting Americans to Fight for Their Common Good]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The Trump-Musk administration thought they could just stomp on us and our Constitution, replacing democracy with a MAGA monarchy. But they had not reckoned with one fearsome opponent: Sen. Chuck Schumer.</p><p>The Senate’s top Democrat says he’s getting “furious” about the GOP’s oligarchic coup attempt. Wow, he might even fire off one of his <em>strongly worded letters</em> to the White House! So far, though, the Democratic “leader” is meekly urging a horrified public to just weather the storm, predicting that, “Trump will screw up.”</p><p>Hello, Chuck—history clearly teaches that to fight totalitarianism, you actually have to… fight.</p><p>People are asking: Why the hell is the party’s top leadership AWOL? The good news is grassroots people themselves—the little-d democrats—have taken to the streets, leading the charge to STOP this plutocratic, autocratic power grab. So, “leaders” ought to at least follow! All Democratic national officials (including former presidents Clinton, Obama, and Biden) should literally come out and stand together, demonstrating solidarity with the majority of Americans fighting this far-right, un-American assault by rampaging billionaires.</p><p>Most encouraging is the fact that workaday people—in red states as well as blue—are erupting in spontaneous protests and unity actions. Ironically, Don & Elon’s self-serving plutocratic thuggery is rallying workers, veterans, schoolchildren, seniors, immigrants, the LGBTQ+ community, main street businesses… and, well, Americans—against them! The GOP assault on all of us reveals that we commoners really are in this together, and it will take all of us to defend the Common Good for one and all.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying, to get involved in some of the actions in your area, check out resources we’ve listed below.</p><p>There are loads of actions happening around the country, and it’s hard to collate them all! Here are just a few we’ve seen—leave us your recommendations in the comments, too.</p><p>* The newly-founded <strong>Federal Unionists Network</strong> (aka, “FUN,” we love it) had a day of action on February 19th. Follow along with their fight: </p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://www.federalunionists.net/">https://www.federalunionists.net/</a></p><p>* <strong>Stand Up for Science</strong> is back and hosting a day of rallies and action on March 7th. Get in on that here: </p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://standupforscience2025.org/">https://standupforscience2025.org/</a></p><p>* If you’re interested in defending veteran’s services of all kinds, check out <strong>Common Defense,</strong> who has a Project 2025 fight guide, too: <a target="_blank" href="https://commondefense.us/project-2025">https://commondefense.us/project-2025</a></p><p>* <strong>Indivisible</strong> has also lit up again—and we like that there are local groups you can join, not just national actions: <a target="_blank" href="https://indivisible.org/groups">https://indivisible.org/groups</a></p><p>* We also just found this Bluesky account that’s trying to track <strong>What Democrats Are Doing</strong>: <a target="_blank" href="https://bsky.app/profile/whatdemsaredoing.bsky.social">https://bsky.app/profile/whatdemsaredoing.bsky.social</a></p><p>Oh! And let’s have some fun too—<a target="_blank" href="https://www.mediaite.com/online/the-real-king-tvs-at-hud-headquarters-changed-to-display-ai-video-of-trump-kissing-elon-musks-feet/">someone hacked into the monitors</a> inside the Housing and Urban Development office yesterday:</p><p>And many more! We’ll do our best to keep track of what we’re seeing out there.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/ironically-trumps-coup-attempt-is</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:157745584</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600845" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/157745584/fd9cff7e1eb115896af428ab4abd9607.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/157745584/9c9b98f1cab8a632eb0077e579e54c3d.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>The Trump-Musk administration thought they could just stomp on us and our Constitution, replacing democracy with a MAGA monarchy. But they had not reckoned with one fearsome opponent: Sen. Chuck Schumer. The Senate’s top Democrat says he’s getting “furious” about the GOP’s oligarchic coup attempt. Wow, he might even fire off one of his strongly worded letters to the White House! So far, though, the Democratic “leader” is meekly urging a horrified public to just weather the storm, predicting that, “Trump will screw up.” Hello, Chuck—history clearly teaches that to fight totalitarianism, you actually have to… fight. People are asking: Why the hell is the party’s top leadership AWOL? The good news is grassroots people themselves—the little-d democrats—have taken to the streets, leading the charge to STOP this plutocratic, autocratic power grab. So, “leaders” ought to at least follow! All Democratic national officials (including former presidents Clinton, Obama, and Biden) should literally come out and stand together, demonstrating solidarity with the majority of Americans fighting this far-right, un-American assault by rampaging billionaires. Most encouraging is the fact that workaday people—in red states as well as blue—are erupting in spontaneous protests and unity actions. Ironically, Don &amp; Elon’s self-serving plutocratic thuggery is rallying workers, veterans, schoolchildren, seniors, immigrants, the LGBTQ+ community, main street businesses… and, well, Americans—against them! The GOP assault on all of us reveals that we commoners really are in this together, and it will take all of us to defend the Common Good for one and all. This is Jim Hightower saying, to get involved in some of the actions in your area, check out resources we’ve listed below. There are loads of actions happening around the country, and it’s hard to collate them all! Here are just a few we’ve seen—leave us your recommendations in the comments, too. * The newly-founded Federal Unionists Network (aka, “FUN,” we love it) had a day of action on February 19th. Follow along with their fight: https://www.federalunionists.net/ * Stand Up for Science is back and hosting a day of rallies and action on March 7th. Get in on that here: https://standupforscience2025.org/ * If you’re interested in defending veteran’s services of all kinds, check out Common Defense, who has a Project 2025 fight guide, too: https://commondefense.us/project-2025 * Indivisible has also lit up again—and we like that there are local groups you can join, not just national actions: https://indivisible.org/groups * We also just found this Bluesky account that’s trying to track What Democrats Are Doing: https://bsky.app/profile/whatdemsaredoing.bsky.social Oh! And let’s have some fun too—someone hacked into the monitors inside the Housing and Urban Development office yesterday: And many more! We’ll do our best to keep track of what we’re seeing out there. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>The Trump-Musk administration thought they could just stomp on us and our Constitution, replacing democracy with a MAGA monarchy. But they had not reckoned with one fearsome opponent: Sen. Chuck Schumer. The Senate’s top Democrat says he’s getting “furious” about the GOP’s oligarchic coup attempt. Wow, he might even fire off one of his strongly worded letters to the White House! So far, though, the Democratic “leader” is meekly urging a horrified public to just weather the storm, predicting that, “Trump will screw up.” Hello, Chuck—history clearly teaches that to fight totalitarianism, you actually have to… fight. People are asking: Why the hell is the party’s top leadership AWOL? The good news is grassroots people themselves—the little-d democrats—have taken to the streets, leading the charge to STOP this plutocratic, autocratic power grab. So, “leaders” ought to at least follow! All Democratic national officials (including former presidents Clinton, Obama, and Biden) should literally come out and stand together, demonstrating solidarity with the majority of Americans fighting this far-right, un-American assault by rampaging billionaires. Most encouraging is the fact that workaday people—in red states as well as blue—are erupting in spontaneous protests and unity actions. Ironically, Don &amp; Elon’s self-serving plutocratic thuggery is rallying workers, veterans, schoolchildren, seniors, immigrants, the LGBTQ+ community, main street businesses… and, well, Americans—against them! The GOP assault on all of us reveals that we commoners really are in this together, and it will take all of us to defend the Common Good for one and all. This is Jim Hightower saying, to get involved in some of the actions in your area, check out resources we’ve listed below. There are loads of actions happening around the country, and it’s hard to collate them all! Here are just a few we’ve seen—leave us your recommendations in the comments, too. * The newly-founded Federal Unionists Network (aka, “FUN,” we love it) had a day of action on February 19th. Follow along with their fight: https://www.federalunionists.net/ * Stand Up for Science is back and hosting a day of rallies and action on March 7th. Get in on that here: https://standupforscience2025.org/ * If you’re interested in defending veteran’s services of all kinds, check out Common Defense, who has a Project 2025 fight guide, too: https://commondefense.us/project-2025 * Indivisible has also lit up again—and we like that there are local groups you can join, not just national actions: https://indivisible.org/groups * We also just found this Bluesky account that’s trying to track What Democrats Are Doing: https://bsky.app/profile/whatdemsaredoing.bsky.social Oh! And let’s have some fun too—someone hacked into the monitors inside the Housing and Urban Development office yesterday: And many more! We’ll do our best to keep track of what we’re seeing out there. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[An AI Bot Won’t Take *Your* Job. Will It?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Corporate powers are telling us not to worry our little heads about the humanoid robotics they’re increasingly employing in America’s workplaces.</p><p>Yes, they concede, AI’s new generation of “thinking robots” will transform many jobs, but – like magic – they’ll also create better career opportunities for “the human element.” Really… like what? Well, like taking care of all those machines! But wait – can’t a robot do that, too?</p><p>What’s playing out here is corporate hide-and-seek from the public. Having poured hundreds of billions into developing the technology for their dream of a workerless workforce, CEOs and tech investors are now desperate to deflect workers’ fury over the joblessness that awaits them. Thus, moneyed elites have mounted a soothing PR campaign, asserting that the AI bots will only replace repetitive, drudge jobs, “liberating” those human employees to do higher-value work.</p><p>That bubble of lies, however, is already being popped by reality. Many renegade CEOs and profiteers brag that their advanced bots are taking over sophisticated thinking jobs and doing top-level creative tasks. For example, the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/02/business/klarna-ceo-ai.html"><em>New York Times</em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/02/business/klarna-ceo-ai.html"> reports</a> that Klarna, a multibillion-dollar company, says it’s replacing more than half of its 5,000 employees with new robotics. Its CEO is not coy about the future of work, declaring “AI can already do all of the jobs that we, as humans, do.”</p><p>The designers of this Brave New World bluntly say their AI creatures are fast-coming for a wide variety of our jobs – and big investors are betting billions on them. Yet, politicians and the media blithely accept the corporate deception that there is no need to talk about it – much less consider what to do about it.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/an-ai-bot-wont-take-your-job-will</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:157471964</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598232" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/157471964/5cf3fc6574bf4493e72b2454d7de9d4c.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/157471964/7fc280d5d548b41b59c73bbf8f608235.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Corporate powers are telling us not to worry our little heads about the humanoid robotics they’re increasingly employing in America’s workplaces. Yes, they concede, AI’s new generation of “thinking robots” will transform many jobs, but – like magic – they’ll also create better career opportunities for “the human element.” Really… like what? Well, like taking care of all those machines! But wait – can’t a robot do that, too? What’s playing out here is corporate hide-and-seek from the public. Having poured hundreds of billions into developing the technology for their dream of a workerless workforce, CEOs and tech investors are now desperate to deflect workers’ fury over the joblessness that awaits them. Thus, moneyed elites have mounted a soothing PR campaign, asserting that the AI bots will only replace repetitive, drudge jobs, “liberating” those human employees to do higher-value work. That bubble of lies, however, is already being popped by reality. Many renegade CEOs and profiteers brag that their advanced bots are taking over sophisticated thinking jobs and doing top-level creative tasks. For example, the New York Times reports that Klarna, a multibillion-dollar company, says it’s replacing more than half of its 5,000 employees with new robotics. Its CEO is not coy about the future of work, declaring “AI can already do all of the jobs that we, as humans, do.” The designers of this Brave New World bluntly say their AI creatures are fast-coming for a wide variety of our jobs – and big investors are betting billions on them. Yet, politicians and the media blithely accept the corporate deception that there is no need to talk about it – much less consider what to do about it. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Corporate powers are telling us not to worry our little heads about the humanoid robotics they’re increasingly employing in America’s workplaces. Yes, they concede, AI’s new generation of “thinking robots” will transform many jobs, but – like magic – they’ll also create better career opportunities for “the human element.” Really… like what? Well, like taking care of all those machines! But wait – can’t a robot do that, too? What’s playing out here is corporate hide-and-seek from the public. Having poured hundreds of billions into developing the technology for their dream of a workerless workforce, CEOs and tech investors are now desperate to deflect workers’ fury over the joblessness that awaits them. Thus, moneyed elites have mounted a soothing PR campaign, asserting that the AI bots will only replace repetitive, drudge jobs, “liberating” those human employees to do higher-value work. That bubble of lies, however, is already being popped by reality. Many renegade CEOs and profiteers brag that their advanced bots are taking over sophisticated thinking jobs and doing top-level creative tasks. For example, the New York Times reports that Klarna, a multibillion-dollar company, says it’s replacing more than half of its 5,000 employees with new robotics. Its CEO is not coy about the future of work, declaring “AI can already do all of the jobs that we, as humans, do.” The designers of this Brave New World bluntly say their AI creatures are fast-coming for a wide variety of our jobs – and big investors are betting billions on them. Yet, politicians and the media blithely accept the corporate deception that there is no need to talk about it – much less consider what to do about it. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Trump’s Thought Police Are Stomping On Freedom of Speech]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>In <em>Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland</em>, Humpty Dumpty autocratically declares that “When I use a word, it means what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.” But, says Alice: “The question is whether you can make words mean so many different things.” To which Humpty retorts: “The question is which is to be master – that’s all.”</p><p>Now comes Trumpty Dumpty, asserting that he and his government redefiners are our linguistic masters. For starters, they unilaterally exed out three hallowed words that have historically expressed our people’s proud democratic purpose – diversity, equity, and inclusion.</p><p>This month, <a target="_blank" href="https://popular.info/p/the-nsas-big-delete">investigative journalist Judd Legum uncovered dozens of words that partisan Trump functionaries are perverting and purging in a bizarre authoritarian frenzy</a>. Legum even found that NSA, a non-partisan security agency, has now banned its staff from using 27 common words, including “bias” and “injustice.” It’s as though Trump’s word police think censoring language will hide the ugly realities the words express.</p><p>In fact, the control of language is central to the entrenchment of totalitarian regimes, as George Orwell laid out in his bleak novel, <em>1984</em>. He wrote about “Newspeak,” “doublethink,” and other linguistic twists as mass propaganda tools that eliminated inconvenient ideas and provided new “truth” for the party faithful to spread. Such manipulation, Orwell says, creates “loyal willingness to say black is white.” Thus, we see the spectacle of Trump blindly signing an executive order titled “Restoring Freedom of Speech and Ending Federal Censorship” – even as he blatantly censors speech and stomps on our freedoms.</p><p>So come on – speak up against such thuggish Orwellian tyranny! For information, go to National Coalition Against Censorship: <a target="_blank" href="http://NCAC.org">NCAC.org</a></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/trumps-thought-police-are-stomping</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:157391469</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600845" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/157391469/5c2b096f2d0892c33c97b82aa7cc7a10.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/157391469/546dbc8649e4b6f25c6b5e30e1686997.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>In Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, Humpty Dumpty autocratically declares that “When I use a word, it means what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.” But, says Alice: “The question is whether you can make words mean so many different things.” To which Humpty retorts: “The question is which is to be master – that’s all.” Now comes Trumpty Dumpty, asserting that he and his government redefiners are our linguistic masters. For starters, they unilaterally exed out three hallowed words that have historically expressed our people’s proud democratic purpose – diversity, equity, and inclusion. This month, investigative journalist Judd Legum uncovered dozens of words that partisan Trump functionaries are perverting and purging in a bizarre authoritarian frenzy. Legum even found that NSA, a non-partisan security agency, has now banned its staff from using 27 common words, including “bias” and “injustice.” It’s as though Trump’s word police think censoring language will hide the ugly realities the words express. In fact, the control of language is central to the entrenchment of totalitarian regimes, as George Orwell laid out in his bleak novel, 1984. He wrote about “Newspeak,” “doublethink,” and other linguistic twists as mass propaganda tools that eliminated inconvenient ideas and provided new “truth” for the party faithful to spread. Such manipulation, Orwell says, creates “loyal willingness to say black is white.” Thus, we see the spectacle of Trump blindly signing an executive order titled “Restoring Freedom of Speech and Ending Federal Censorship” – even as he blatantly censors speech and stomps on our freedoms. So come on – speak up against such thuggish Orwellian tyranny! For information, go to National Coalition Against Censorship: NCAC.org Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>In Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, Humpty Dumpty autocratically declares that “When I use a word, it means what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.” But, says Alice: “The question is whether you can make words mean so many different things.” To which Humpty retorts: “The question is which is to be master – that’s all.” Now comes Trumpty Dumpty, asserting that he and his government redefiners are our linguistic masters. For starters, they unilaterally exed out three hallowed words that have historically expressed our people’s proud democratic purpose – diversity, equity, and inclusion. This month, investigative journalist Judd Legum uncovered dozens of words that partisan Trump functionaries are perverting and purging in a bizarre authoritarian frenzy. Legum even found that NSA, a non-partisan security agency, has now banned its staff from using 27 common words, including “bias” and “injustice.” It’s as though Trump’s word police think censoring language will hide the ugly realities the words express. In fact, the control of language is central to the entrenchment of totalitarian regimes, as George Orwell laid out in his bleak novel, 1984. He wrote about “Newspeak,” “doublethink,” and other linguistic twists as mass propaganda tools that eliminated inconvenient ideas and provided new “truth” for the party faithful to spread. Such manipulation, Orwell says, creates “loyal willingness to say black is white.” Thus, we see the spectacle of Trump blindly signing an executive order titled “Restoring Freedom of Speech and Ending Federal Censorship” – even as he blatantly censors speech and stomps on our freedoms. So come on – speak up against such thuggish Orwellian tyranny! For information, go to National Coalition Against Censorship: NCAC.org Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Hightower Endorsed Jesse Jackson for President in 1988]]></title><description><![CDATA[This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_7">jimhightower.substack.com</a><br/><br/><p>As the Trump administration attempts to erase Black history all over the country, we wanted to share this video from a 2022 interview with Hightower, where he talks about why he endorsed Jesse Jackson in 1988. At that time, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/watch-when-bernie-sanders-endorsed-jesse-jackson-for-president/">Hightower and a certain mayor of Burlington, VT that you might have heard of</a> were two of the only prominent white Democrats to, as …</p>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-hightower-endorsed-jesse-jackson</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:157145498</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower and Deanna Zandt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2025 19:40:23 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="1105231" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/157145498/2cd261c7985e85931c905bb03a6612fd.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower and Deanna Zandt</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>69</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/157145498/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com As the Trump administration attempts to erase Black history all over the country, we wanted to share this video from a 2022 interview with Hightower, where he talks about why he endorsed Jesse Jackson in 1988. At that time, Hightower and a certain mayor of Burlington, VT that you might have heard of were two of the only prominent white Democrats to, as …</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com As the Trump administration attempts to erase Black history all over the country, we wanted to share this video from a 2022 interview with Hightower, where he talks about why he endorsed Jesse Jackson in 1988. At that time, Hightower and a certain mayor of Burlington, VT that you might have heard of were two of the only prominent white Democrats to, as …</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Let’s Fight this 5-Alarm Monopoly Fire]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Here’s something I had never given any thought to: The price of fire trucks. Plus, a worrisome fire truck shortage!</p><p>Huh? What would cause any town or city to run short of this essential piece of its community infrastructure? Answer: old-fashioned greed, coming from a modern-day monopolistic construct called “private equity.”</p><p>Essentially, this is a fast-money Wall Street scheme, encouraging very wealthy investors to buy up established businesses and either plunder their assets or consolidate several of them into a monopoly. It has targeted everything from healthcare to newspapers… <a target="_blank" href="https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/did-a-private-equity-fire-truck-roll">and now, your local fire department.</a></p><p>Until recently, making and selling fire trucks was a competitive business, with family-owned manufacturers operating in every region of America. However (<a target="_blank" href="https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/did-a-private-equity-fire-truck-roll">as detailed by BIG, a unique newsletter investigating monopolies</a>) about a decade ago a private equity outfit began an industry “roll up,” consolidating independent truck companies into a national conglomerate named REV Group. It now controls nearly half of US fire truck sales.</p><p>What REV mainly revved up was its profits by doubling the sticker price for trucks to more than a million dollars each. Worse, REV increased delivery time for a local department’s order from about a year to as a long as four years, meaning old trucks break down and can’t respond to catastrophes. For example, the Los Angeles fire chief reports that in this month’s horrific wildfires, more than 100 of the city’s 183 fire trucks were out of service!</p><p>Fires are inevitable. Letting a handful of private equity speculators profit from fires <em>is not</em>. National and state antitrust laws already prohibit such greedheaded monopolization. So, here’s an idea: Enforce those laws! Learn more at the American Antitrust Institute: <a target="_blank" href="http://AntitrustInstitute.org">AntitrustInstitute.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/lets-fight-this-5-alarm-monopoly</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:156867364</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598232" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/156867364/bcfeabef116c5c2a38caec4967979d3f.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/156867364/a0a9c0c57d522c266aab370e83ce8b18.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Here’s something I had never given any thought to: The price of fire trucks. Plus, a worrisome fire truck shortage! Huh? What would cause any town or city to run short of this essential piece of its community infrastructure? Answer: old-fashioned greed, coming from a modern-day monopolistic construct called “private equity.” Essentially, this is a fast-money Wall Street scheme, encouraging very wealthy investors to buy up established businesses and either plunder their assets or consolidate several of them into a monopoly. It has targeted everything from healthcare to newspapers… and now, your local fire department. Until recently, making and selling fire trucks was a competitive business, with family-owned manufacturers operating in every region of America. However (as detailed by BIG, a unique newsletter investigating monopolies) about a decade ago a private equity outfit began an industry “roll up,” consolidating independent truck companies into a national conglomerate named REV Group. It now controls nearly half of US fire truck sales. What REV mainly revved up was its profits by doubling the sticker price for trucks to more than a million dollars each. Worse, REV increased delivery time for a local department’s order from about a year to as a long as four years, meaning old trucks break down and can’t respond to catastrophes. For example, the Los Angeles fire chief reports that in this month’s horrific wildfires, more than 100 of the city’s 183 fire trucks were out of service! Fires are inevitable. Letting a handful of private equity speculators profit from fires is not. National and state antitrust laws already prohibit such greedheaded monopolization. So, here’s an idea: Enforce those laws! Learn more at the American Antitrust Institute: AntitrustInstitute.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Here’s something I had never given any thought to: The price of fire trucks. Plus, a worrisome fire truck shortage! Huh? What would cause any town or city to run short of this essential piece of its community infrastructure? Answer: old-fashioned greed, coming from a modern-day monopolistic construct called “private equity.” Essentially, this is a fast-money Wall Street scheme, encouraging very wealthy investors to buy up established businesses and either plunder their assets or consolidate several of them into a monopoly. It has targeted everything from healthcare to newspapers… and now, your local fire department. Until recently, making and selling fire trucks was a competitive business, with family-owned manufacturers operating in every region of America. However (as detailed by BIG, a unique newsletter investigating monopolies) about a decade ago a private equity outfit began an industry “roll up,” consolidating independent truck companies into a national conglomerate named REV Group. It now controls nearly half of US fire truck sales. What REV mainly revved up was its profits by doubling the sticker price for trucks to more than a million dollars each. Worse, REV increased delivery time for a local department’s order from about a year to as a long as four years, meaning old trucks break down and can’t respond to catastrophes. For example, the Los Angeles fire chief reports that in this month’s horrific wildfires, more than 100 of the city’s 183 fire trucks were out of service! Fires are inevitable. Letting a handful of private equity speculators profit from fires is not. National and state antitrust laws already prohibit such greedheaded monopolization. So, here’s an idea: Enforce those laws! Learn more at the American Antitrust Institute: AntitrustInstitute.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Big News: Grassroots Democrats Pulling Party Back to the Grassroots]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Early in the Civil War, General George McClellan’s Union Army was poised for a decisive victory over Confederate forces. But, inexplicably, McClellan wouldn’t attack! For days, President Lincoln ordered and even begged the general to move. But nothing – so the Confederates slipped away. In firing McClellan, Lincoln wrote: “If you don’t want to use the army, I should like to borrow it for a while.”</p><p>That’s what today’s grassroots Democratic Party activists are saying to their aloof campaign generals, who stay ensconced in Washington, refusing to deploy their ground troops in the field of battle.</p><p>The great strength of the Democratic Party is its army of volunteer door-knockers across the country who have the local knowledge, connections, and lingo to relate to local voters. Yet, in the past 30 years, fat-cat donors and high-dollar consultants have taken over the “People’s Party” and abandoned <em>high-touch </em>organizing for<em> high-tech</em> “digital outreach.”</p><p>Thus, the Democrats’ passionate army of local campaigners is unused, only called on by emails to send more donations to fund Beltway consultants and negative political ads. As a friend of mine recently said in exasperation: “I wish the Democratic Party would stop asking for money and <em>start asking me for ACTION</em>.”</p><p>Well, change is coming, for the grassroots Democratic army has been taking charge in many areas and mobilizing itself! And in a huge advance, <a target="_blank" href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/good-news-from-the-democrats-for">the Party’s new National Chair and its new chair of State Democratic Committees </a>were both elected this month on a bold program to move the Party’s focus back to year-round, grassroots activism. After all, voters aren’t mere consumers of politics, they should be valued as the whole purpose of politics and its primary producers.</p><p><em>To get involved with this grassroots rebellion, and to hold the leadership accountable to their word, sign up with your local or state Democratic Party committees— </em><a target="_blank" href="https://democrats.org/who-we-are/state-parties/state-party-websites/"><em>a list of state parties’ websites can be found here</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/big-news-grassroots-democrats-pulling</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:156863665</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600845" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/156863665/0ec48ef4281c8fd9135597c0d65623b5.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/156863665/021e9f3ae8fa8985d9cce2dc9be5cb9b.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Early in the Civil War, General George McClellan’s Union Army was poised for a decisive victory over Confederate forces. But, inexplicably, McClellan wouldn’t attack! For days, President Lincoln ordered and even begged the general to move. But nothing – so the Confederates slipped away. In firing McClellan, Lincoln wrote: “If you don’t want to use the army, I should like to borrow it for a while.” That’s what today’s grassroots Democratic Party activists are saying to their aloof campaign generals, who stay ensconced in Washington, refusing to deploy their ground troops in the field of battle. The great strength of the Democratic Party is its army of volunteer door-knockers across the country who have the local knowledge, connections, and lingo to relate to local voters. Yet, in the past 30 years, fat-cat donors and high-dollar consultants have taken over the “People’s Party” and abandoned high-touch organizing for high-tech “digital outreach.” Thus, the Democrats’ passionate army of local campaigners is unused, only called on by emails to send more donations to fund Beltway consultants and negative political ads. As a friend of mine recently said in exasperation: “I wish the Democratic Party would stop asking for money and start asking me for ACTION.” Well, change is coming, for the grassroots Democratic army has been taking charge in many areas and mobilizing itself! And in a huge advance, the Party’s new National Chair and its new chair of State Democratic Committees were both elected this month on a bold program to move the Party’s focus back to year-round, grassroots activism. After all, voters aren’t mere consumers of politics, they should be valued as the whole purpose of politics and its primary producers. To get involved with this grassroots rebellion, and to hold the leadership accountable to their word, sign up with your local or state Democratic Party committees— a list of state parties’ websites can be found here. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Early in the Civil War, General George McClellan’s Union Army was poised for a decisive victory over Confederate forces. But, inexplicably, McClellan wouldn’t attack! For days, President Lincoln ordered and even begged the general to move. But nothing – so the Confederates slipped away. In firing McClellan, Lincoln wrote: “If you don’t want to use the army, I should like to borrow it for a while.” That’s what today’s grassroots Democratic Party activists are saying to their aloof campaign generals, who stay ensconced in Washington, refusing to deploy their ground troops in the field of battle. The great strength of the Democratic Party is its army of volunteer door-knockers across the country who have the local knowledge, connections, and lingo to relate to local voters. Yet, in the past 30 years, fat-cat donors and high-dollar consultants have taken over the “People’s Party” and abandoned high-touch organizing for high-tech “digital outreach.” Thus, the Democrats’ passionate army of local campaigners is unused, only called on by emails to send more donations to fund Beltway consultants and negative political ads. As a friend of mine recently said in exasperation: “I wish the Democratic Party would stop asking for money and start asking me for ACTION.” Well, change is coming, for the grassroots Democratic army has been taking charge in many areas and mobilizing itself! And in a huge advance, the Party’s new National Chair and its new chair of State Democratic Committees were both elected this month on a bold program to move the Party’s focus back to year-round, grassroots activism. After all, voters aren’t mere consumers of politics, they should be valued as the whole purpose of politics and its primary producers. To get involved with this grassroots rebellion, and to hold the leadership accountable to their word, sign up with your local or state Democratic Party committees— a list of state parties’ websites can be found here. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bizarre: Today’s Politicians Celebrate Jerks and Ignore Grassroots Genius]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Corporate chieftains are giants, even geniuses – right?</p><p>Years ago, laissez-faire ideologue Ayn Rand hailed them as society’s supermen, comparing them to Atlas, the mythological Greek god who “holds the world on his shoulders.”</p><p>But look, here comes one of her modern-day gods now – Timothy Wentworth! He stands astride Walgreens, the multibillion-dollar drug store conglomerate. Last month, Wentworth demonstrated his corporate prowess by offering a stunning insight. He noted that, with shoplifting on the rise, chains like his had reacted by moving much of their merchandise into locked display cases. But the ever-alert Big Boss has now deduced that this impacts sales, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/28/business/cvs-app-pharmacy-locked-cabinets.html">“because when you lock things up, for example, you don’t sell as many of them.”</a> Wow… pure genius!</p><p>Did I mention that Walgreens pays Timothy $13 million a year? Or, that his monopolistic chain is closing some 1,200 of its “less-profitable” stores, which will leave entire communities with no pharmacies to meet their crucial needs?</p><p>My point is not to disparage one silly corporate boss, but simply to say: Hey, why are the so-called “leaders” of both of our political parties kowtowing to the painful ignorance, arrogance, and avarice of the most self-serving group of egos in the world: Billionaires! Look at them – Elon Musk is a jabbering jerk, Mark Zuckerberg is a pathetic whiner, and Jeff Bezos cluelessly floats around on a garish yacht he financed by underpaying and mistreating his workers.</p><p>These are our giants? What about schoolteachers, family farmers, mechanics, cooks – and other everyday people who <em>really</em> make things work? America needs to start listening to them… and reinvesting in their genuine genius.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/bizarre-todays-politicians-celebrate</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:156392861</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598232" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/156392861/6f81581c024527dc15d096a191e4efd4.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/156392861/9e8588878cb0387f50080a3118d4701a.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Corporate chieftains are giants, even geniuses – right? Years ago, laissez-faire ideologue Ayn Rand hailed them as society’s supermen, comparing them to Atlas, the mythological Greek god who “holds the world on his shoulders.” But look, here comes one of her modern-day gods now – Timothy Wentworth! He stands astride Walgreens, the multibillion-dollar drug store conglomerate. Last month, Wentworth demonstrated his corporate prowess by offering a stunning insight. He noted that, with shoplifting on the rise, chains like his had reacted by moving much of their merchandise into locked display cases. But the ever-alert Big Boss has now deduced that this impacts sales, “because when you lock things up, for example, you don’t sell as many of them.” Wow… pure genius! Did I mention that Walgreens pays Timothy $13 million a year? Or, that his monopolistic chain is closing some 1,200 of its “less-profitable” stores, which will leave entire communities with no pharmacies to meet their crucial needs? My point is not to disparage one silly corporate boss, but simply to say: Hey, why are the so-called “leaders” of both of our political parties kowtowing to the painful ignorance, arrogance, and avarice of the most self-serving group of egos in the world: Billionaires! Look at them – Elon Musk is a jabbering jerk, Mark Zuckerberg is a pathetic whiner, and Jeff Bezos cluelessly floats around on a garish yacht he financed by underpaying and mistreating his workers. These are our giants? What about schoolteachers, family farmers, mechanics, cooks – and other everyday people who really make things work? America needs to start listening to them… and reinvesting in their genuine genius. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Corporate chieftains are giants, even geniuses – right? Years ago, laissez-faire ideologue Ayn Rand hailed them as society’s supermen, comparing them to Atlas, the mythological Greek god who “holds the world on his shoulders.” But look, here comes one of her modern-day gods now – Timothy Wentworth! He stands astride Walgreens, the multibillion-dollar drug store conglomerate. Last month, Wentworth demonstrated his corporate prowess by offering a stunning insight. He noted that, with shoplifting on the rise, chains like his had reacted by moving much of their merchandise into locked display cases. But the ever-alert Big Boss has now deduced that this impacts sales, “because when you lock things up, for example, you don’t sell as many of them.” Wow… pure genius! Did I mention that Walgreens pays Timothy $13 million a year? Or, that his monopolistic chain is closing some 1,200 of its “less-profitable” stores, which will leave entire communities with no pharmacies to meet their crucial needs? My point is not to disparage one silly corporate boss, but simply to say: Hey, why are the so-called “leaders” of both of our political parties kowtowing to the painful ignorance, arrogance, and avarice of the most self-serving group of egos in the world: Billionaires! Look at them – Elon Musk is a jabbering jerk, Mark Zuckerberg is a pathetic whiner, and Jeff Bezos cluelessly floats around on a garish yacht he financed by underpaying and mistreating his workers. These are our giants? What about schoolteachers, family farmers, mechanics, cooks – and other everyday people who really make things work? America needs to start listening to them… and reinvesting in their genuine genius. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Costco Shows Trump What a Real Mandate Is]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I guess I’ll just have throw myself on Donald Trump’s mercy, for I confess that I am a repeat violator of MAGA’s high crime of DEI-ism.</p><p><em>Diversity, Equity, Inclusion.</em> Guilty on all counts! But it’s not my fault. From childhood, I was fed a steady diet of that kind of all-in-this-together thinking by my parents, teachers, and ministers. So next thing you know, I was doing DEI on my own. Then, when I was elected to be Texas Agriculture Commissioner, I shamelessly promoted all three as agency goals (particularly for women and minorities who had long been excluded).</p><p>But I now see that such egalitarian concepts are out of step with the moral precepts of Trumpocracy. Thus, I’m an outlaw. You might be, too, for the MAGA minority now ruling in Washington is thuggishly expunging DEI values from our schools, corporations, libraries, churches, etc. You have two choices, they bark: Comply… or be forced to comply.</p><p>Sure enough, even corporate powerhouses like <a target="_blank" href="https://time.com/7209960/companies-rolling-back-dei/">Amazon, Disney, Facebook, Target, and Walmart are sucking up</a> to the new regime by cravenly surrendering DEI principles and promises without a fight. Well, they whine, we have no choice.</p><p>But wait—this is America! The choice has always been clear: Don’t just comply, defy! Even corporations can stand for the people’s democratic principles, as Costco recently did. The popular retailer was assailed by a right-wing group demanding that shareholders terminate its DEI efforts. <a target="_blank" href="https://apnews.com/article/costco-shareholder-proposal-diversity-dei-0330f448741b35f2f788a36948ff3f95">But Costco executives didn’t cower,</a> and guess what? <em>Ninety-eight percent </em>of Costco’s shareholders stood with them, emphatically endorsing diversity, equity, and inclusion as core American values.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… 98 percent! That, Mr. Trump, is a <em>real</em> mandate.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/costco-shows-trump-what-a-real-mandate</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:156390650</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600845" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/156390650/decb0194dea372e177ca7ae464438749.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/156390650/b0770797400743302cc3284e834d2172.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>I guess I’ll just have throw myself on Donald Trump’s mercy, for I confess that I am a repeat violator of MAGA’s high crime of DEI-ism. Diversity, Equity, Inclusion. Guilty on all counts! But it’s not my fault. From childhood, I was fed a steady diet of that kind of all-in-this-together thinking by my parents, teachers, and ministers. So next thing you know, I was doing DEI on my own. Then, when I was elected to be Texas Agriculture Commissioner, I shamelessly promoted all three as agency goals (particularly for women and minorities who had long been excluded). But I now see that such egalitarian concepts are out of step with the moral precepts of Trumpocracy. Thus, I’m an outlaw. You might be, too, for the MAGA minority now ruling in Washington is thuggishly expunging DEI values from our schools, corporations, libraries, churches, etc. You have two choices, they bark: Comply… or be forced to comply. Sure enough, even corporate powerhouses like Amazon, Disney, Facebook, Target, and Walmart are sucking up to the new regime by cravenly surrendering DEI principles and promises without a fight. Well, they whine, we have no choice. But wait—this is America! The choice has always been clear: Don’t just comply, defy! Even corporations can stand for the people’s democratic principles, as Costco recently did. The popular retailer was assailed by a right-wing group demanding that shareholders terminate its DEI efforts. But Costco executives didn’t cower, and guess what? Ninety-eight percent of Costco’s shareholders stood with them, emphatically endorsing diversity, equity, and inclusion as core American values. This is Jim Hightower saying… 98 percent! That, Mr. Trump, is a real mandate. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>I guess I’ll just have throw myself on Donald Trump’s mercy, for I confess that I am a repeat violator of MAGA’s high crime of DEI-ism. Diversity, Equity, Inclusion. Guilty on all counts! But it’s not my fault. From childhood, I was fed a steady diet of that kind of all-in-this-together thinking by my parents, teachers, and ministers. So next thing you know, I was doing DEI on my own. Then, when I was elected to be Texas Agriculture Commissioner, I shamelessly promoted all three as agency goals (particularly for women and minorities who had long been excluded). But I now see that such egalitarian concepts are out of step with the moral precepts of Trumpocracy. Thus, I’m an outlaw. You might be, too, for the MAGA minority now ruling in Washington is thuggishly expunging DEI values from our schools, corporations, libraries, churches, etc. You have two choices, they bark: Comply… or be forced to comply. Sure enough, even corporate powerhouses like Amazon, Disney, Facebook, Target, and Walmart are sucking up to the new regime by cravenly surrendering DEI principles and promises without a fight. Well, they whine, we have no choice. But wait—this is America! The choice has always been clear: Don’t just comply, defy! Even corporations can stand for the people’s democratic principles, as Costco recently did. The popular retailer was assailed by a right-wing group demanding that shareholders terminate its DEI efforts. But Costco executives didn’t cower, and guess what? Ninety-eight percent of Costco’s shareholders stood with them, emphatically endorsing diversity, equity, and inclusion as core American values. This is Jim Hightower saying… 98 percent! That, Mr. Trump, is a real mandate. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[What in the Name of Jesus Is This?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The far-right potentates of Christian nationalism not only say they speak to God, but they now claim to speak <em>for</em> God.</p><p>They might, however, want to ponder a cartoon I recently saw. It pictured one of these pious flimflammers demanding entry to heaven, bragging that he had been God’s personal messenger on Earth. “Really,” said God, “You don’t look at all like Dolly Parton.”</p><p>But now – GreatGodAlmighty! – here comes a gaggle of these lordly pretenders proclaiming that Yahweh has ordained their narrow religious sect to be America’s governmental rulers. This month, a flock of these “chosen ones” descended on the Texas state capitol, announcing that God has instructed them to transform our government into an authoritarian arm of their own fundamentalist churches. “We take charge and authority of [this] legislative session,” one of their leaders declared, informing the rest of us that his cult has “been given spiritual jurisdiction over the affairs of men.”</p><p>Unfortunately, this is not just another case of Crazy Texas. The extremist Christian nationalist show at the Texas Capitol was fully-embraced and coordinated by the extremist Republican governor, attorney general, legislative leaders, and state party hierarchy. More pointedly, it’s all part of a <a target="_blank" href="https://www.propublica.org/article/tim-dunn-farris-wilks-texas-christian-nationalism-dominionism-elections-voting">messianic crusade by two Bible-thumping, West Texas oil billionaires, Tim Dunn and Farris Wilks</a>. This plutocratic/theocratic duo is pumping unlimited sums of crude political cash into the GOP to “Christianize” elections and all public policies.</p><p>So don’t laugh – pay attention. This right-wing, religious, anti-democratic power play is unfolding all across America. Ludicrous as it seems, they’re out to crucify our freedoms and force their state-run theology on everyone– all in the name of Jesus.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/what-in-the-name-of-jesus-is-this</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:155935073</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598232" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/155935073/e64c06c44c5e12b60aba347517f88997.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/155935073/c731bd93f2ae7c976e5f96f20ea7a25b.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>The far-right potentates of Christian nationalism not only say they speak to God, but they now claim to speak for God. They might, however, want to ponder a cartoon I recently saw. It pictured one of these pious flimflammers demanding entry to heaven, bragging that he had been God’s personal messenger on Earth. “Really,” said God, “You don’t look at all like Dolly Parton.” But now – GreatGodAlmighty! – here comes a gaggle of these lordly pretenders proclaiming that Yahweh has ordained their narrow religious sect to be America’s governmental rulers. This month, a flock of these “chosen ones” descended on the Texas state capitol, announcing that God has instructed them to transform our government into an authoritarian arm of their own fundamentalist churches. “We take charge and authority of [this] legislative session,” one of their leaders declared, informing the rest of us that his cult has “been given spiritual jurisdiction over the affairs of men.” Unfortunately, this is not just another case of Crazy Texas. The extremist Christian nationalist show at the Texas Capitol was fully-embraced and coordinated by the extremist Republican governor, attorney general, legislative leaders, and state party hierarchy. More pointedly, it’s all part of a messianic crusade by two Bible-thumping, West Texas oil billionaires, Tim Dunn and Farris Wilks. This plutocratic/theocratic duo is pumping unlimited sums of crude political cash into the GOP to “Christianize” elections and all public policies. So don’t laugh – pay attention. This right-wing, religious, anti-democratic power play is unfolding all across America. Ludicrous as it seems, they’re out to crucify our freedoms and force their state-run theology on everyone– all in the name of Jesus. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>The far-right potentates of Christian nationalism not only say they speak to God, but they now claim to speak for God. They might, however, want to ponder a cartoon I recently saw. It pictured one of these pious flimflammers demanding entry to heaven, bragging that he had been God’s personal messenger on Earth. “Really,” said God, “You don’t look at all like Dolly Parton.” But now – GreatGodAlmighty! – here comes a gaggle of these lordly pretenders proclaiming that Yahweh has ordained their narrow religious sect to be America’s governmental rulers. This month, a flock of these “chosen ones” descended on the Texas state capitol, announcing that God has instructed them to transform our government into an authoritarian arm of their own fundamentalist churches. “We take charge and authority of [this] legislative session,” one of their leaders declared, informing the rest of us that his cult has “been given spiritual jurisdiction over the affairs of men.” Unfortunately, this is not just another case of Crazy Texas. The extremist Christian nationalist show at the Texas Capitol was fully-embraced and coordinated by the extremist Republican governor, attorney general, legislative leaders, and state party hierarchy. More pointedly, it’s all part of a messianic crusade by two Bible-thumping, West Texas oil billionaires, Tim Dunn and Farris Wilks. This plutocratic/theocratic duo is pumping unlimited sums of crude political cash into the GOP to “Christianize” elections and all public policies. So don’t laugh – pay attention. This right-wing, religious, anti-democratic power play is unfolding all across America. Ludicrous as it seems, they’re out to crucify our freedoms and force their state-run theology on everyone– all in the name of Jesus. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Royal Threat Behind Trump’s Petty Pomposity]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>In the 1787 Constitutional Convention, the framers were clear on what they were NOT creating: A monarchy. One delegate expressed the group’s absolute conviction that the founding document must exclude even the “fetus of monarchy.”</p><p>Yet, 238 years later, watching Trump’s inaugural week, it was both awful and comical to see the royal pretentions of King Donald. There were silly gestures, like him waving around a ceremonial sword (made more ludicrous by the fact he was a cowardly rich-boy draft dodger). Plus, the staged spectacle of him imperiously signing stacks of orders, proclamations, and pardons in a show of “Kingliness.”</p><p>Petty pomposity aside, though, he is an untethered megalomaniac whose inaugural speech re-asserted such monarchial concepts as “the divine right of kings” and “manifest destiny.” And let us not naively dismiss Trump’s flat-out claim that the Constitution gives him “the right to do whatever I want as president,” or that he previously suggested “termination” of the Constitution to return him to the White House.</p><p>Indeed, he now contends that he can unilaterally terminate a bedrock Constitutional right: The 14th Amendment provision guaranteeing citizenship to everyone born in the USA. He has royally and unconstitutionally decreed that children born here whose parents were undocumented immigrants are not citizens, but “aliens.”</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… Well, at least there’s the 22nd Amendment, which<em> makes clear</em> that he can’t be president again, right? Uh… maybe. Trump is already suggesting his royal court might find a way to keep him in power, just as they’re now contriving to void the clear citizenship protection of the 14th Amendment. Despots don’t obey Constitutions – they pervert them. And We the People must reject the perverters.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-royal-threat-behind-trumps-petty</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:155921539</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600845" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/155921539/fa9d61a633e0e74c1cf98eb9912c11bc.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/155921539/0f404f6a0f6bc2ed09f25474c5406dd3.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>In the 1787 Constitutional Convention, the framers were clear on what they were NOT creating: A monarchy. One delegate expressed the group’s absolute conviction that the founding document must exclude even the “fetus of monarchy.” Yet, 238 years later, watching Trump’s inaugural week, it was both awful and comical to see the royal pretentions of King Donald. There were silly gestures, like him waving around a ceremonial sword (made more ludicrous by the fact he was a cowardly rich-boy draft dodger). Plus, the staged spectacle of him imperiously signing stacks of orders, proclamations, and pardons in a show of “Kingliness.” Petty pomposity aside, though, he is an untethered megalomaniac whose inaugural speech re-asserted such monarchial concepts as “the divine right of kings” and “manifest destiny.” And let us not naively dismiss Trump’s flat-out claim that the Constitution gives him “the right to do whatever I want as president,” or that he previously suggested “termination” of the Constitution to return him to the White House. Indeed, he now contends that he can unilaterally terminate a bedrock Constitutional right: The 14th Amendment provision guaranteeing citizenship to everyone born in the USA. He has royally and unconstitutionally decreed that children born here whose parents were undocumented immigrants are not citizens, but “aliens.” This is Jim Hightower saying… Well, at least there’s the 22nd Amendment, which makes clear that he can’t be president again, right? Uh… maybe. Trump is already suggesting his royal court might find a way to keep him in power, just as they’re now contriving to void the clear citizenship protection of the 14th Amendment. Despots don’t obey Constitutions – they pervert them. And We the People must reject the perverters. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>In the 1787 Constitutional Convention, the framers were clear on what they were NOT creating: A monarchy. One delegate expressed the group’s absolute conviction that the founding document must exclude even the “fetus of monarchy.” Yet, 238 years later, watching Trump’s inaugural week, it was both awful and comical to see the royal pretentions of King Donald. There were silly gestures, like him waving around a ceremonial sword (made more ludicrous by the fact he was a cowardly rich-boy draft dodger). Plus, the staged spectacle of him imperiously signing stacks of orders, proclamations, and pardons in a show of “Kingliness.” Petty pomposity aside, though, he is an untethered megalomaniac whose inaugural speech re-asserted such monarchial concepts as “the divine right of kings” and “manifest destiny.” And let us not naively dismiss Trump’s flat-out claim that the Constitution gives him “the right to do whatever I want as president,” or that he previously suggested “termination” of the Constitution to return him to the White House. Indeed, he now contends that he can unilaterally terminate a bedrock Constitutional right: The 14th Amendment provision guaranteeing citizenship to everyone born in the USA. He has royally and unconstitutionally decreed that children born here whose parents were undocumented immigrants are not citizens, but “aliens.” This is Jim Hightower saying… Well, at least there’s the 22nd Amendment, which makes clear that he can’t be president again, right? Uh… maybe. Trump is already suggesting his royal court might find a way to keep him in power, just as they’re now contriving to void the clear citizenship protection of the 14th Amendment. Despots don’t obey Constitutions – they pervert them. And We the People must reject the perverters. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yes, You Can Fight the B******s… and Win!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>It’s been my honor to know a few <em>real</em> heroes – people who’ve selflessly dared to fight greed and oppression to advance the common good. Diane Wilson, for example.</p><p>For <em>forty </em>years, this fiery, fourth-generation fisherwoman from the Texas Gulf Coast has battled tenaciously for the rights and very survival of the area’s hardscrabble fishing families. She and her grassroots allies have taken on Formosa Plastics, a $250 billion, global corporate beast that has routinely dumped its chemical waste around Matagorda Bay, poisoning life and livelihoods.</p><p>But in 2019, in a lawsuit based on massive evidence collected by Wilson and her armada of volunteer kayakers, she won a stunning court victory, f<a target="_blank" href="https://insideclimatenews.org/news/24122024/texas-coast-formosa-plastics-landmark-settlement-funds-fishing-cooperative/">orcing the contaminator to pay $50 million for its malfeasance</a>.</p><p>Wilson’s fight was not just for her, and she did not get a penny from the Formosa settlement. But she won something richer than money – “It felt like justice,” she said of the court’s judgement.</p><p>Importantly, the court didn’t award the $50 million to some regulatory agency, but to a public trust administered by – guess who? – Wilson’s allies! So she has been working tenaciously ever since to make sure the money directly benefits the poor families Formosa ran over. Especially promising is the trust’s major grant to create the people’s own <a target="_blank" href="https://insideclimatenews.org/news/24122024/texas-coast-formosa-plastics-landmark-settlement-funds-fishing-cooperative/">Matagorda Bay Fishing Cooperative</a>. It will provide dock space, supply contracts, processing ability, local jobs… and the power for local people to forge their own future.</p><p>Why fight against overpowering odds for 40 years? Because of her strong principles… and sheer stubbornness. “It’s my home,” Wilson says of the bay and its working-class community, “and I completely refuse to give it to that company to ruin.”</p><p><em>Learn more about Diane and support her work:</em></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/yes-you-can-fight-the-bastards-and</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:155443939</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598232" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/155443939/5807120cd84575cb07a40f45d10b76c1.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/155443939/4d131b312eec4e0a40bc1dfecb344b7b.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>It’s been my honor to know a few real heroes – people who’ve selflessly dared to fight greed and oppression to advance the common good. Diane Wilson, for example. For forty years, this fiery, fourth-generation fisherwoman from the Texas Gulf Coast has battled tenaciously for the rights and very survival of the area’s hardscrabble fishing families. She and her grassroots allies have taken on Formosa Plastics, a $250 billion, global corporate beast that has routinely dumped its chemical waste around Matagorda Bay, poisoning life and livelihoods. But in 2019, in a lawsuit based on massive evidence collected by Wilson and her armada of volunteer kayakers, she won a stunning court victory, forcing the contaminator to pay $50 million for its malfeasance. Wilson’s fight was not just for her, and she did not get a penny from the Formosa settlement. But she won something richer than money – “It felt like justice,” she said of the court’s judgement. Importantly, the court didn’t award the $50 million to some regulatory agency, but to a public trust administered by – guess who? – Wilson’s allies! So she has been working tenaciously ever since to make sure the money directly benefits the poor families Formosa ran over. Especially promising is the trust’s major grant to create the people’s own Matagorda Bay Fishing Cooperative. It will provide dock space, supply contracts, processing ability, local jobs… and the power for local people to forge their own future. Why fight against overpowering odds for 40 years? Because of her strong principles… and sheer stubbornness. “It’s my home,” Wilson says of the bay and its working-class community, “and I completely refuse to give it to that company to ruin.” Learn more about Diane and support her work: Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>It’s been my honor to know a few real heroes – people who’ve selflessly dared to fight greed and oppression to advance the common good. Diane Wilson, for example. For forty years, this fiery, fourth-generation fisherwoman from the Texas Gulf Coast has battled tenaciously for the rights and very survival of the area’s hardscrabble fishing families. She and her grassroots allies have taken on Formosa Plastics, a $250 billion, global corporate beast that has routinely dumped its chemical waste around Matagorda Bay, poisoning life and livelihoods. But in 2019, in a lawsuit based on massive evidence collected by Wilson and her armada of volunteer kayakers, she won a stunning court victory, forcing the contaminator to pay $50 million for its malfeasance. Wilson’s fight was not just for her, and she did not get a penny from the Formosa settlement. But she won something richer than money – “It felt like justice,” she said of the court’s judgement. Importantly, the court didn’t award the $50 million to some regulatory agency, but to a public trust administered by – guess who? – Wilson’s allies! So she has been working tenaciously ever since to make sure the money directly benefits the poor families Formosa ran over. Especially promising is the trust’s major grant to create the people’s own Matagorda Bay Fishing Cooperative. It will provide dock space, supply contracts, processing ability, local jobs… and the power for local people to forge their own future. Why fight against overpowering odds for 40 years? Because of her strong principles… and sheer stubbornness. “It’s my home,” Wilson says of the bay and its working-class community, “and I completely refuse to give it to that company to ruin.” Learn more about Diane and support her work: Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Who Will Organize A Progressive Majority? Us!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>A lot of working-class voters, who live outside of blue voting areas are asking: Where the hell is the Democratic party?</p><p>Sad to say, the “Party of the People” is mired in Washington, controlled by a cadre of high-dollar consultants, corporate lobbyists, big donors, and meek political leaders who’ve decide that “red” and rural American voters are lost causes. But grassroots progressives who live in those areas say: Bovine excrement! After all, you damn sure can’t win if you don’t bother to show up.</p><p>So, party inertia aside, progressive advocates for working class values, policies, and people must become the ground-level organizers to build a “little-d” democratic majority. Not by writing position papers, but by “going there” in-person, online, or otherwise. Let’s tap grassroots savvy to find ways to reach and move millions of people (just a few at a time) who’re now not being reached or motivated.</p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://georgegoehl.substack.com/p/open-call-to-launch-new-working-class">Who will do this? Maybe you! Or someone you know:</a> People (young or old) with talent-skills-ideas that are now not being fully used should consider this chance to make a difference. <a target="_blank" href="https://substack.com/profile/20644791-george-goehl">George Goehl</a>, one of our nation’s best organizers of community organizers <a target="_blank" href="https://georgegoehl.substack.com/p/open-call-to-launch-new-working-class">recently issued an Open Call</a> for creative dedicated people to do new working-class organizing all across our country.</p><p>Don’t know how? It basically involves learning to listen to local people. Goehl, with his team of seasoned organizers, will train and provide essential support for people whose organizing ideas are accepted. Happily, project positions come with a full-time salary, benefits, and a start-up budget. The whole idea is to try new things, invest in what works… and win!</p><p>Want to throw you hat and ideas into the mix? No charge to apply. You can fill out an application at <a target="_blank" href="https://georgegoehl.substack.com/p/open-call-to-launch-new-working-class">georgegoehl.substack.com</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/who-will-organize-a-progressive-majority</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:155263548</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600845" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/155263548/c6e2135b431ec3d457add172339c0825.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/155263548/420a652ce2f4d5e4b918669b3e391b1f.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>A lot of working-class voters, who live outside of blue voting areas are asking: Where the hell is the Democratic party? Sad to say, the “Party of the People” is mired in Washington, controlled by a cadre of high-dollar consultants, corporate lobbyists, big donors, and meek political leaders who’ve decide that “red” and rural American voters are lost causes. But grassroots progressives who live in those areas say: Bovine excrement! After all, you damn sure can’t win if you don’t bother to show up. So, party inertia aside, progressive advocates for working class values, policies, and people must become the ground-level organizers to build a “little-d” democratic majority. Not by writing position papers, but by “going there” in-person, online, or otherwise. Let’s tap grassroots savvy to find ways to reach and move millions of people (just a few at a time) who’re now not being reached or motivated. Who will do this? Maybe you! Or someone you know: People (young or old) with talent-skills-ideas that are now not being fully used should consider this chance to make a difference. George Goehl, one of our nation’s best organizers of community organizers recently issued an Open Call for creative dedicated people to do new working-class organizing all across our country. Don’t know how? It basically involves learning to listen to local people. Goehl, with his team of seasoned organizers, will train and provide essential support for people whose organizing ideas are accepted. Happily, project positions come with a full-time salary, benefits, and a start-up budget. The whole idea is to try new things, invest in what works… and win! Want to throw you hat and ideas into the mix? No charge to apply. You can fill out an application at georgegoehl.substack.com. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>A lot of working-class voters, who live outside of blue voting areas are asking: Where the hell is the Democratic party? Sad to say, the “Party of the People” is mired in Washington, controlled by a cadre of high-dollar consultants, corporate lobbyists, big donors, and meek political leaders who’ve decide that “red” and rural American voters are lost causes. But grassroots progressives who live in those areas say: Bovine excrement! After all, you damn sure can’t win if you don’t bother to show up. So, party inertia aside, progressive advocates for working class values, policies, and people must become the ground-level organizers to build a “little-d” democratic majority. Not by writing position papers, but by “going there” in-person, online, or otherwise. Let’s tap grassroots savvy to find ways to reach and move millions of people (just a few at a time) who’re now not being reached or motivated. Who will do this? Maybe you! Or someone you know: People (young or old) with talent-skills-ideas that are now not being fully used should consider this chance to make a difference. George Goehl, one of our nation’s best organizers of community organizers recently issued an Open Call for creative dedicated people to do new working-class organizing all across our country. Don’t know how? It basically involves learning to listen to local people. Goehl, with his team of seasoned organizers, will train and provide essential support for people whose organizing ideas are accepted. Happily, project positions come with a full-time salary, benefits, and a start-up budget. The whole idea is to try new things, invest in what works… and win! Want to throw you hat and ideas into the mix? No charge to apply. You can fill out an application at georgegoehl.substack.com. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Billionaire Bros Do The Immigrant Worker Two-Step]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>One thing you can say about Trump is that he’s absolutely clear on his furious opposition to immigrants taking American jobs.</p><p>Except, of course, when the corporate honchos profiting from cheap immigrant labor are billionaire funders of Trump’s campaigns – or, hello, when Trump himself is doing the hiring!</p><p>A work-permit program called H-1B actually allows corporate giants to import foreigners to take US jobs. Trump loudly denounced this in his first term, but that was pre-Elon. When gabillionaire Elon Musk became Donald’s campaign Sugar Daddy last year, he turned out to be a mass abuser of the H-1B loophole – apparently even firing workers in his Tesla corporation and replacing them with cheaper foreign imports.</p><p>Yet, far from scolding his new Best Buddy, Trump did a full-body flip-flop. Now hailing H-1B as “a great program,” he admits that he, too, has long used it, even when he was denouncing it as a shameful rip-off of American workers.</p><p>Trump’s use of the foreign hire scheme is even chintzier than Musk’s for he uses a companion H-2 loophole to import hundreds of low-paid foreigners to take jobs as cooks, waiters, housekeepers, and farmworkers in his luxury resorts and hotels – including at Mar-a-Lago.</p><p>Amazing. These are lordly <em>billionaires</em> reducing themselves to sleaze by exploiting a corporate scheme to shortchange American and foreign workers alike. Moreover, whether trying to import engineers or waiters, the law requires these über-rich applicants to lie. They must swear that there are no American citizens available who can do these jobs.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… Welcome to Don and Elon’s phantasmagoric wonderland, where nothing is a lie if they say it’s true.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-billionaire-bros-do-the-immigrant</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:154895633</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598232" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/154895633/2580146b086f18e1884948d5f10aafc6.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/154895633/7f6f8a5a55c3a138de0b41c69347a92a.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>One thing you can say about Trump is that he’s absolutely clear on his furious opposition to immigrants taking American jobs. Except, of course, when the corporate honchos profiting from cheap immigrant labor are billionaire funders of Trump’s campaigns – or, hello, when Trump himself is doing the hiring! A work-permit program called H-1B actually allows corporate giants to import foreigners to take US jobs. Trump loudly denounced this in his first term, but that was pre-Elon. When gabillionaire Elon Musk became Donald’s campaign Sugar Daddy last year, he turned out to be a mass abuser of the H-1B loophole – apparently even firing workers in his Tesla corporation and replacing them with cheaper foreign imports. Yet, far from scolding his new Best Buddy, Trump did a full-body flip-flop. Now hailing H-1B as “a great program,” he admits that he, too, has long used it, even when he was denouncing it as a shameful rip-off of American workers. Trump’s use of the foreign hire scheme is even chintzier than Musk’s for he uses a companion H-2 loophole to import hundreds of low-paid foreigners to take jobs as cooks, waiters, housekeepers, and farmworkers in his luxury resorts and hotels – including at Mar-a-Lago. Amazing. These are lordly billionaires reducing themselves to sleaze by exploiting a corporate scheme to shortchange American and foreign workers alike. Moreover, whether trying to import engineers or waiters, the law requires these über-rich applicants to lie. They must swear that there are no American citizens available who can do these jobs. This is Jim Hightower saying… Welcome to Don and Elon’s phantasmagoric wonderland, where nothing is a lie if they say it’s true. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>One thing you can say about Trump is that he’s absolutely clear on his furious opposition to immigrants taking American jobs. Except, of course, when the corporate honchos profiting from cheap immigrant labor are billionaire funders of Trump’s campaigns – or, hello, when Trump himself is doing the hiring! A work-permit program called H-1B actually allows corporate giants to import foreigners to take US jobs. Trump loudly denounced this in his first term, but that was pre-Elon. When gabillionaire Elon Musk became Donald’s campaign Sugar Daddy last year, he turned out to be a mass abuser of the H-1B loophole – apparently even firing workers in his Tesla corporation and replacing them with cheaper foreign imports. Yet, far from scolding his new Best Buddy, Trump did a full-body flip-flop. Now hailing H-1B as “a great program,” he admits that he, too, has long used it, even when he was denouncing it as a shameful rip-off of American workers. Trump’s use of the foreign hire scheme is even chintzier than Musk’s for he uses a companion H-2 loophole to import hundreds of low-paid foreigners to take jobs as cooks, waiters, housekeepers, and farmworkers in his luxury resorts and hotels – including at Mar-a-Lago. Amazing. These are lordly billionaires reducing themselves to sleaze by exploiting a corporate scheme to shortchange American and foreign workers alike. Moreover, whether trying to import engineers or waiters, the law requires these über-rich applicants to lie. They must swear that there are no American citizens available who can do these jobs. This is Jim Hightower saying… Welcome to Don and Elon’s phantasmagoric wonderland, where nothing is a lie if they say it’s true. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[A Billionaire v. a Cartoonist. I’m Betting On the Cartoonist]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The sorry state of corporate journalism sagged to an even lower low this month when the <em>Washington Post</em> banned publication of a piece by its own Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist, <a target="_blank" href="https://substack.com/profile/13005553-ann-telnaes">Ann Telnaes</a>.</p><p>Why cancel her drawing? Because it lampooned Jeff Bezos, the multibillionaire boss of Amazon – who also happens to own The Post. <a target="_blank" href="https://anntelnaes.substack.com/p/why-im-quitting-the-washington-post">The cartoon depicts Bezos and other media titans (even Mickey Mouse!) groveling at the feet of Donald Trump</a> and offering sacks of cash. She was mocking Bezos and the others for recently sucking up to The Don by giving a million dollars each in celebration of his election.</p><p>Top <em>Post</em> executives not only abandoned the paper’s journalistic integrity by censoring its prized cartoonist, but they then tried to cover-up their suppression by calling it a technicality. “We had just published a column on the same topic as the cartoon,” weaseled a top manager, claiming he cut Telnaes’s drawing merely to avoid “repetition.”</p><p>But hello, read any paper, watch Fox News, listen to talk radio – and you’ll see that mass media <em>relies</em> on repetition. Moreover, cartoonists don’t merely repeat a story, they add journalistic impact by literally drawing a picture of it!</p><p>Ann Telnaes resigned on <em>principle</em> over this affront. Imagine Billionaire Bezos acting on any principle (besides advancing his financial principal). Yet, solely because he’s rich, he can compel a paper once renown for political courage to conform to the current plutocratic order. That’s how journalism dies. Democracy, too.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… Yet, genuine journalism and democracy itself remain resilient, specifically because scrappy champions like Ann Telnaes – armed with integrity and a sharp pen – don’t quit. She’s still cartooning. Find her at <a target="_blank" href="http://anntelnaes.substack.com">anntelnaes.substack.com</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/a-billionaire-v-a-cartoonist-im-betting</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:154833317</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2025 17:20:08 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600845" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/154833317/c973fddb23fa23148c511ad79a8efdf2.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/154833317/bc5263fee6f6fe4ff666d56f61898c82.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>The sorry state of corporate journalism sagged to an even lower low this month when the Washington Post banned publication of a piece by its own Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist, Ann Telnaes. Why cancel her drawing? Because it lampooned Jeff Bezos, the multibillionaire boss of Amazon – who also happens to own The Post. The cartoon depicts Bezos and other media titans (even Mickey Mouse!) groveling at the feet of Donald Trump and offering sacks of cash. She was mocking Bezos and the others for recently sucking up to The Don by giving a million dollars each in celebration of his election. Top Post executives not only abandoned the paper’s journalistic integrity by censoring its prized cartoonist, but they then tried to cover-up their suppression by calling it a technicality. “We had just published a column on the same topic as the cartoon,” weaseled a top manager, claiming he cut Telnaes’s drawing merely to avoid “repetition.” But hello, read any paper, watch Fox News, listen to talk radio – and you’ll see that mass media relies on repetition. Moreover, cartoonists don’t merely repeat a story, they add journalistic impact by literally drawing a picture of it! Ann Telnaes resigned on principle over this affront. Imagine Billionaire Bezos acting on any principle (besides advancing his financial principal). Yet, solely because he’s rich, he can compel a paper once renown for political courage to conform to the current plutocratic order. That’s how journalism dies. Democracy, too. This is Jim Hightower saying… Yet, genuine journalism and democracy itself remain resilient, specifically because scrappy champions like Ann Telnaes – armed with integrity and a sharp pen – don’t quit. She’s still cartooning. Find her at anntelnaes.substack.com. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>The sorry state of corporate journalism sagged to an even lower low this month when the Washington Post banned publication of a piece by its own Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist, Ann Telnaes. Why cancel her drawing? Because it lampooned Jeff Bezos, the multibillionaire boss of Amazon – who also happens to own The Post. The cartoon depicts Bezos and other media titans (even Mickey Mouse!) groveling at the feet of Donald Trump and offering sacks of cash. She was mocking Bezos and the others for recently sucking up to The Don by giving a million dollars each in celebration of his election. Top Post executives not only abandoned the paper’s journalistic integrity by censoring its prized cartoonist, but they then tried to cover-up their suppression by calling it a technicality. “We had just published a column on the same topic as the cartoon,” weaseled a top manager, claiming he cut Telnaes’s drawing merely to avoid “repetition.” But hello, read any paper, watch Fox News, listen to talk radio – and you’ll see that mass media relies on repetition. Moreover, cartoonists don’t merely repeat a story, they add journalistic impact by literally drawing a picture of it! Ann Telnaes resigned on principle over this affront. Imagine Billionaire Bezos acting on any principle (besides advancing his financial principal). Yet, solely because he’s rich, he can compel a paper once renown for political courage to conform to the current plutocratic order. That’s how journalism dies. Democracy, too. This is Jim Hightower saying… Yet, genuine journalism and democracy itself remain resilient, specifically because scrappy champions like Ann Telnaes – armed with integrity and a sharp pen – don’t quit. She’s still cartooning. Find her at anntelnaes.substack.com. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Making Work Work for Workers]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>As a writer, I get stuck every so often straining for the right words to tell my story. Over the years, though, I’ve learned when to quit tying myself into mental knots over sentence construction, instead stepping back and rethinking where my story is going.</p><p>This process is essentially what millions of American working families are going through this year as record numbers of them are shocking bosses, politicians, and economists by stepping back and declaring: “We quit!” Most of the quits are tied to very real abuses that have become ingrained in our workplaces over the past couple of decades – poverty paychecks, no health care, unpredictable schedules, no child care, understaffing, forced overtime, unsafe jobs, sexist and racist managers, tolerance of aggressively-rude customers, and so awful much more.</p><p>Specific grievances abound, but at the core of each is a deep, inherently-destructive executive-suite malignancy: Disrespect. The corporate system has cheapened employees from valuable human assets worthy of being nurtured and advanced to a bookkeeping expense that must be steadily eliminated. It’s not just about paychecks, it’s about feeling valued, feeling that the hierarchy gives a damn about the people doing the work.</p><p>Yet, corporate America is going out of its way to show that it doesn’t care – and, of course, workers notice. So, unionization is booming, millions who were laid off by the pandemic are refusing to rush back to the same old grind, and now millions who have jobs are quitting. This is much more than an unusual unemployment stat – it’s a sea change in people’s attitude about work itself… and life.</p><p><em>Bonus: one of our favorite memes from the last few years. More info </em><a target="_blank" href="https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/nobody-wants-to-work-anymore/"><em>from Snopes</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/making-work-work-for-workers</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:154402715</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598755" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/154402715/a239e7d460788d8c7a67fb547a8ad8fd.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/154402715/abbe087352e504f95c980db4bd8b2077.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>As a writer, I get stuck every so often straining for the right words to tell my story. Over the years, though, I’ve learned when to quit tying myself into mental knots over sentence construction, instead stepping back and rethinking where my story is going. This process is essentially what millions of American working families are going through this year as record numbers of them are shocking bosses, politicians, and economists by stepping back and declaring: “We quit!” Most of the quits are tied to very real abuses that have become ingrained in our workplaces over the past couple of decades – poverty paychecks, no health care, unpredictable schedules, no child care, understaffing, forced overtime, unsafe jobs, sexist and racist managers, tolerance of aggressively-rude customers, and so awful much more. Specific grievances abound, but at the core of each is a deep, inherently-destructive executive-suite malignancy: Disrespect. The corporate system has cheapened employees from valuable human assets worthy of being nurtured and advanced to a bookkeeping expense that must be steadily eliminated. It’s not just about paychecks, it’s about feeling valued, feeling that the hierarchy gives a damn about the people doing the work. Yet, corporate America is going out of its way to show that it doesn’t care – and, of course, workers notice. So, unionization is booming, millions who were laid off by the pandemic are refusing to rush back to the same old grind, and now millions who have jobs are quitting. This is much more than an unusual unemployment stat – it’s a sea change in people’s attitude about work itself… and life. Bonus: one of our favorite memes from the last few years. More info from Snopes. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>As a writer, I get stuck every so often straining for the right words to tell my story. Over the years, though, I’ve learned when to quit tying myself into mental knots over sentence construction, instead stepping back and rethinking where my story is going. This process is essentially what millions of American working families are going through this year as record numbers of them are shocking bosses, politicians, and economists by stepping back and declaring: “We quit!” Most of the quits are tied to very real abuses that have become ingrained in our workplaces over the past couple of decades – poverty paychecks, no health care, unpredictable schedules, no child care, understaffing, forced overtime, unsafe jobs, sexist and racist managers, tolerance of aggressively-rude customers, and so awful much more. Specific grievances abound, but at the core of each is a deep, inherently-destructive executive-suite malignancy: Disrespect. The corporate system has cheapened employees from valuable human assets worthy of being nurtured and advanced to a bookkeeping expense that must be steadily eliminated. It’s not just about paychecks, it’s about feeling valued, feeling that the hierarchy gives a damn about the people doing the work. Yet, corporate America is going out of its way to show that it doesn’t care – and, of course, workers notice. So, unionization is booming, millions who were laid off by the pandemic are refusing to rush back to the same old grind, and now millions who have jobs are quitting. This is much more than an unusual unemployment stat – it’s a sea change in people’s attitude about work itself… and life. Bonus: one of our favorite memes from the last few years. More info from Snopes. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Jimmy Carter’s Light Exposes Donald Trump’s Darkness]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>You’re not fooling me, Jimmy Carter. You did that on purpose! Dying when you did, I mean.</p><p>You chose last month to grab the global political spotlight once more to make a statement with the only Earthly move you had left: Checking out. What better way to make people ponder the state of political integrity in America than to reflect on Carter just the Trump Kakistocracy is moving its arrogant billionaires, corporate grifters, and ideological tyrants into our White House.</p><p>Sure enough, media coverage of Carter’s death highlighted his modest life in Plains, Georgia, plus the personal values of fairness and honesty that led him to a lifetime of roll-up-your-sleeves humanitarian efforts. What a damning contrast to the tawdry greedfest on display at Mar-a-Lago, with supposedly-respectable corporate executives flocking to “get theirs” in Trump’s sell-off of government favors and public offices.</p><p>And how amazed Carter must have been to see the gilded Trumpers flagrantly rejecting any pretense that theirs is to be a government of and for The People. He even saw Elon Musk – the prancing prince of plutocratic pomosity – practically move into Trump’s Florida mansion to shape the new government. To put a gloss of legitimacy on Elon’s self-serving role, Trump grandly named him head of an imaginary federal office he calls the “Department of Government Efficiency.” This DOGE should be pronounced “dodgy,” for it doesn’t actually exist and has no authority. But Musk is nonetheless flitting about officiously announcing that he will eliminate major programs that benefit people, while increasing government funding for – surprise! – corporations like his.</p><p>Even in death, the light of Jimmy Carter’s public integrity exposes the public corruption coming from Trump’s darkness.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/jimmy-carters-light-exposes-donald</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:154341284</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600845" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/154341284/5fa14a381dcff2b6e5c054eab63ffe81.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/154341284/2bc88b43be52d1958204a2a5b358ad57.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>You’re not fooling me, Jimmy Carter. You did that on purpose! Dying when you did, I mean. You chose last month to grab the global political spotlight once more to make a statement with the only Earthly move you had left: Checking out. What better way to make people ponder the state of political integrity in America than to reflect on Carter just the Trump Kakistocracy is moving its arrogant billionaires, corporate grifters, and ideological tyrants into our White House. Sure enough, media coverage of Carter’s death highlighted his modest life in Plains, Georgia, plus the personal values of fairness and honesty that led him to a lifetime of roll-up-your-sleeves humanitarian efforts. What a damning contrast to the tawdry greedfest on display at Mar-a-Lago, with supposedly-respectable corporate executives flocking to “get theirs” in Trump’s sell-off of government favors and public offices. And how amazed Carter must have been to see the gilded Trumpers flagrantly rejecting any pretense that theirs is to be a government of and for The People. He even saw Elon Musk – the prancing prince of plutocratic pomosity – practically move into Trump’s Florida mansion to shape the new government. To put a gloss of legitimacy on Elon’s self-serving role, Trump grandly named him head of an imaginary federal office he calls the “Department of Government Efficiency.” This DOGE should be pronounced “dodgy,” for it doesn’t actually exist and has no authority. But Musk is nonetheless flitting about officiously announcing that he will eliminate major programs that benefit people, while increasing government funding for – surprise! – corporations like his. Even in death, the light of Jimmy Carter’s public integrity exposes the public corruption coming from Trump’s darkness. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>You’re not fooling me, Jimmy Carter. You did that on purpose! Dying when you did, I mean. You chose last month to grab the global political spotlight once more to make a statement with the only Earthly move you had left: Checking out. What better way to make people ponder the state of political integrity in America than to reflect on Carter just the Trump Kakistocracy is moving its arrogant billionaires, corporate grifters, and ideological tyrants into our White House. Sure enough, media coverage of Carter’s death highlighted his modest life in Plains, Georgia, plus the personal values of fairness and honesty that led him to a lifetime of roll-up-your-sleeves humanitarian efforts. What a damning contrast to the tawdry greedfest on display at Mar-a-Lago, with supposedly-respectable corporate executives flocking to “get theirs” in Trump’s sell-off of government favors and public offices. And how amazed Carter must have been to see the gilded Trumpers flagrantly rejecting any pretense that theirs is to be a government of and for The People. He even saw Elon Musk – the prancing prince of plutocratic pomosity – practically move into Trump’s Florida mansion to shape the new government. To put a gloss of legitimacy on Elon’s self-serving role, Trump grandly named him head of an imaginary federal office he calls the “Department of Government Efficiency.” This DOGE should be pronounced “dodgy,” for it doesn’t actually exist and has no authority. But Musk is nonetheless flitting about officiously announcing that he will eliminate major programs that benefit people, while increasing government funding for – surprise! – corporations like his. Even in death, the light of Jimmy Carter’s public integrity exposes the public corruption coming from Trump’s darkness. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[My New Year’s Resolutions for Some Powerful People]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I made a few New Year’s resolutions this week – not for me, but as self-improvement ideas for some of the people running our country. No need for them to thank me – happy to help.</p><p>I drafted one for the GOP’s whole ultra-rightist gaggle of lawmakers who keep blocking passage of health coverage for poor people. “Resolved: We will forego the gold-plated socialized health care we now take from taxpayers, because it’s only right that we be in the same leaky boat as our constituents.”</p><p>Then there are America’s 735 narcissistic billionaires who obviously need to find a moral compass. They’re so self-absorbed they keep wasting their money and “genius” on phantasmagoric plutocratic schemes to separate their fortunes from the well-being of the rest of us. Then they wonder why they are not beloved. So, rich ones, let me help. Resolve in 2025 to demonstrate a little less hubris/a little more humanity, less strut/more sharing. Practice in front of a mirror – try seeing beyond you to the Common Good. It’s a beautiful and deeply rewarding place if you can find it.</p><p>And I didn’t overlook you Washington operatives and Big Money donors of the Democratic Party. Please resolve to camp out in grassroots America this year – where everyday little-d democrats want and need your attention and support. Not just in safe Blue districts, but especially in rural, purple, and even in red areas. You’ve abandoned them in recent years, but they still yearn to build a progressive governing majority for America’s future.</p><p>Of course, the problem with New Year’s resolutions is keeping them, and my honorees can’t be counted on. So, we have to keep pushing them to do what’s right.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/my-new-years-resolutions-for-some-af1</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:153983136</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2599751" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/153983136/4ba68e56529e77d0a992c3024e56ccdd.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/153983136/af54154415aa3bb81e82cd905e945fba.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>I made a few New Year’s resolutions this week – not for me, but as self-improvement ideas for some of the people running our country. No need for them to thank me – happy to help. I drafted one for the GOP’s whole ultra-rightist gaggle of lawmakers who keep blocking passage of health coverage for poor people. “Resolved: We will forego the gold-plated socialized health care we now take from taxpayers, because it’s only right that we be in the same leaky boat as our constituents.” Then there are America’s 735 narcissistic billionaires who obviously need to find a moral compass. They’re so self-absorbed they keep wasting their money and “genius” on phantasmagoric plutocratic schemes to separate their fortunes from the well-being of the rest of us. Then they wonder why they are not beloved. So, rich ones, let me help. Resolve in 2025 to demonstrate a little less hubris/a little more humanity, less strut/more sharing. Practice in front of a mirror – try seeing beyond you to the Common Good. It’s a beautiful and deeply rewarding place if you can find it. And I didn’t overlook you Washington operatives and Big Money donors of the Democratic Party. Please resolve to camp out in grassroots America this year – where everyday little-d democrats want and need your attention and support. Not just in safe Blue districts, but especially in rural, purple, and even in red areas. You’ve abandoned them in recent years, but they still yearn to build a progressive governing majority for America’s future. Of course, the problem with New Year’s resolutions is keeping them, and my honorees can’t be counted on. So, we have to keep pushing them to do what’s right. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>I made a few New Year’s resolutions this week – not for me, but as self-improvement ideas for some of the people running our country. No need for them to thank me – happy to help. I drafted one for the GOP’s whole ultra-rightist gaggle of lawmakers who keep blocking passage of health coverage for poor people. “Resolved: We will forego the gold-plated socialized health care we now take from taxpayers, because it’s only right that we be in the same leaky boat as our constituents.” Then there are America’s 735 narcissistic billionaires who obviously need to find a moral compass. They’re so self-absorbed they keep wasting their money and “genius” on phantasmagoric plutocratic schemes to separate their fortunes from the well-being of the rest of us. Then they wonder why they are not beloved. So, rich ones, let me help. Resolve in 2025 to demonstrate a little less hubris/a little more humanity, less strut/more sharing. Practice in front of a mirror – try seeing beyond you to the Common Good. It’s a beautiful and deeply rewarding place if you can find it. And I didn’t overlook you Washington operatives and Big Money donors of the Democratic Party. Please resolve to camp out in grassroots America this year – where everyday little-d democrats want and need your attention and support. Not just in safe Blue districts, but especially in rural, purple, and even in red areas. You’ve abandoned them in recent years, but they still yearn to build a progressive governing majority for America’s future. Of course, the problem with New Year’s resolutions is keeping them, and my honorees can’t be counted on. So, we have to keep pushing them to do what’s right. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[In 2025, Have Faith in the Power of Democratic Ideals]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>One of the most perverse political gambits this year has been pushed by foam-at-the-mouth, right-wing extremists. They’ve been trying to convince Americans to close their minds to all efforts promoting our society’s democratic goals of diversity, equity, and inclusion. “Don’t Be Woke,” they bark.</p><p>Hello, numbskulls! From 1776 forward, being wide awake to oppressors and exploiters is literally what made America… and continues to advance it. Our <em>diversity</em>, our national striving for <em>equity</em>, and our persistent struggle to <em>include</em> all in our historic democratic experiment are three core pillars that sustain the USA. My workaday father expressed this unifying reality to me in these profound words: “<a target="_blank" href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/daddys-philosophy">Everybody does better, when everybody does better.</a>”</p><p>But a group of self-proclaimed “Anti-Woke” crusaders has surged from the fringes of autocratic, xenophobic, racists politics, demanding that schools, corporations, churches, and families shut our eyes, ears, and minds to our own DEI values.</p><p>All this would be a depressing end to this political year, EXCEPT that people across the country are rebelling, openly scoffing at the “Don’t Be Woke” hokum. Even the petty autocrats governing states like Florida and Texas can’t stop local school officials from looping around official “bans” against teaching the obvious virtues of diversity, equity, and inclusion. Also, while a few corporations have bowed to the right-wing drumbeat, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2024/07/17/dei-workplace-trump-vance-impact/74432633007/">nearly all have continued their DEI programs this year</a>… or even increased them. Why? Because the programs make sense, their workers and shareholders support DEI values, and not all CEOs are suck-ups to right-wing goofiness.</p><p>So let us not head into 2025 with political fear, but with a recommitment to the persuasive power of democratic ideals.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/in-2025-have-faith-in-the-power-of</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:153875650</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2024 21:28:33 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600845" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/153875650/da050e8154bbadb791c7761cf21596dd.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/153875650/fc1d57167f2627439093a164813ba955.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>One of the most perverse political gambits this year has been pushed by foam-at-the-mouth, right-wing extremists. They’ve been trying to convince Americans to close their minds to all efforts promoting our society’s democratic goals of diversity, equity, and inclusion. “Don’t Be Woke,” they bark. Hello, numbskulls! From 1776 forward, being wide awake to oppressors and exploiters is literally what made America… and continues to advance it. Our diversity, our national striving for equity, and our persistent struggle to include all in our historic democratic experiment are three core pillars that sustain the USA. My workaday father expressed this unifying reality to me in these profound words: “Everybody does better, when everybody does better.” But a group of self-proclaimed “Anti-Woke” crusaders has surged from the fringes of autocratic, xenophobic, racists politics, demanding that schools, corporations, churches, and families shut our eyes, ears, and minds to our own DEI values. All this would be a depressing end to this political year, EXCEPT that people across the country are rebelling, openly scoffing at the “Don’t Be Woke” hokum. Even the petty autocrats governing states like Florida and Texas can’t stop local school officials from looping around official “bans” against teaching the obvious virtues of diversity, equity, and inclusion. Also, while a few corporations have bowed to the right-wing drumbeat, nearly all have continued their DEI programs this year… or even increased them. Why? Because the programs make sense, their workers and shareholders support DEI values, and not all CEOs are suck-ups to right-wing goofiness. So let us not head into 2025 with political fear, but with a recommitment to the persuasive power of democratic ideals. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>One of the most perverse political gambits this year has been pushed by foam-at-the-mouth, right-wing extremists. They’ve been trying to convince Americans to close their minds to all efforts promoting our society’s democratic goals of diversity, equity, and inclusion. “Don’t Be Woke,” they bark. Hello, numbskulls! From 1776 forward, being wide awake to oppressors and exploiters is literally what made America… and continues to advance it. Our diversity, our national striving for equity, and our persistent struggle to include all in our historic democratic experiment are three core pillars that sustain the USA. My workaday father expressed this unifying reality to me in these profound words: “Everybody does better, when everybody does better.” But a group of self-proclaimed “Anti-Woke” crusaders has surged from the fringes of autocratic, xenophobic, racists politics, demanding that schools, corporations, churches, and families shut our eyes, ears, and minds to our own DEI values. All this would be a depressing end to this political year, EXCEPT that people across the country are rebelling, openly scoffing at the “Don’t Be Woke” hokum. Even the petty autocrats governing states like Florida and Texas can’t stop local school officials from looping around official “bans” against teaching the obvious virtues of diversity, equity, and inclusion. Also, while a few corporations have bowed to the right-wing drumbeat, nearly all have continued their DEI programs this year… or even increased them. Why? Because the programs make sense, their workers and shareholders support DEI values, and not all CEOs are suck-ups to right-wing goofiness. So let us not head into 2025 with political fear, but with a recommitment to the persuasive power of democratic ideals. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Daddy's Philosophy]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>This holiday season got me to thinking about America's spirit of giving, and I don't mean this overdone business of Christmas, Hanukkah and other holiday gifts. I mean our true spirit of giving -- giving of ourselves.</p><p>Yes, we are a country of rugged individualists, yet there's also a deep, community-minded streak in each of us. We're a people who believe in the notion that we're all in this together, that we can make our individual lives better by contributing to the common good.</p><p>The establishment media pay little attention to grassroots generosity, focusing instead on the occasional showy donation by what it calls "philanthropists" -- big tycoons who give a little piece of their billions to some university or museum in exchange for getting a building named after them. But in my mind, the real philanthropists are the millions of you ordinary folks who have precious little money to give, but consistently give of themselves, and do it without demanding that their name be engraved on a granite wall.</p><p>My own Daddy, rest his soul, was a fine example of this. With half a dozen other guys in Denison, Texas, he started the Little League baseball program volunteering to build the park, sponsor and coach the teams, run the squawking P.A. system, etc. etc. Even after I graduated from Little League, Daddy stayed working at it, because his involvement was not merely for his kids . . . but for all. He felt the same way about being taxed to build a public library in town. I don't recall him ever going in that building, much less checking-out a book, but he wanted it to be there for the community and he was happy to pay his part. Not that he was a do-good liberal, for God's sake -- indeed, he called himself a conservative.</p><p>My Daddy didn't even know he had a political philosophy, but he did, and it's the best I've ever heard. He would often say to me, "Everybody does better when everybody does better." If only our leaders in Washington and on Wall Street would begin practicing this true American Philosophy.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/daddys-philosophy</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:153532030</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2024 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2597188" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/153532030/0521f5bd9ecb731c97477885b6bb599e.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/153532030/44d2cd3aff8cd92e429825a12aa1150a.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>This holiday season got me to thinking about America's spirit of giving, and I don't mean this overdone business of Christmas, Hanukkah and other holiday gifts. I mean our true spirit of giving -- giving of ourselves. Yes, we are a country of rugged individualists, yet there's also a deep, community-minded streak in each of us. We're a people who believe in the notion that we're all in this together, that we can make our individual lives better by contributing to the common good. The establishment media pay little attention to grassroots generosity, focusing instead on the occasional showy donation by what it calls "philanthropists" -- big tycoons who give a little piece of their billions to some university or museum in exchange for getting a building named after them. But in my mind, the real philanthropists are the millions of you ordinary folks who have precious little money to give, but consistently give of themselves, and do it without demanding that their name be engraved on a granite wall. My own Daddy, rest his soul, was a fine example of this. With half a dozen other guys in Denison, Texas, he started the Little League baseball program volunteering to build the park, sponsor and coach the teams, run the squawking P.A. system, etc. etc. Even after I graduated from Little League, Daddy stayed working at it, because his involvement was not merely for his kids . . . but for all. He felt the same way about being taxed to build a public library in town. I don't recall him ever going in that building, much less checking-out a book, but he wanted it to be there for the community and he was happy to pay his part. Not that he was a do-good liberal, for God's sake -- indeed, he called himself a conservative. My Daddy didn't even know he had a political philosophy, but he did, and it's the best I've ever heard. He would often say to me, "Everybody does better when everybody does better." If only our leaders in Washington and on Wall Street would begin practicing this true American Philosophy. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>This holiday season got me to thinking about America's spirit of giving, and I don't mean this overdone business of Christmas, Hanukkah and other holiday gifts. I mean our true spirit of giving -- giving of ourselves. Yes, we are a country of rugged individualists, yet there's also a deep, community-minded streak in each of us. We're a people who believe in the notion that we're all in this together, that we can make our individual lives better by contributing to the common good. The establishment media pay little attention to grassroots generosity, focusing instead on the occasional showy donation by what it calls "philanthropists" -- big tycoons who give a little piece of their billions to some university or museum in exchange for getting a building named after them. But in my mind, the real philanthropists are the millions of you ordinary folks who have precious little money to give, but consistently give of themselves, and do it without demanding that their name be engraved on a granite wall. My own Daddy, rest his soul, was a fine example of this. With half a dozen other guys in Denison, Texas, he started the Little League baseball program volunteering to build the park, sponsor and coach the teams, run the squawking P.A. system, etc. etc. Even after I graduated from Little League, Daddy stayed working at it, because his involvement was not merely for his kids . . . but for all. He felt the same way about being taxed to build a public library in town. I don't recall him ever going in that building, much less checking-out a book, but he wanted it to be there for the community and he was happy to pay his part. Not that he was a do-good liberal, for God's sake -- indeed, he called himself a conservative. My Daddy didn't even know he had a political philosophy, but he did, and it's the best I've ever heard. He would often say to me, "Everybody does better when everybody does better." If only our leaders in Washington and on Wall Street would begin practicing this true American Philosophy. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Coming of the Unholy Messiah of Corporate Rule]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>And lo, the Magi came from afar, guided by a heavenly star to worship the Messiah of Mar-a-Lago. Bearing precious gifts of flattery, cash, and bitcoin, the corporate Magi fell to their knees in awe when they beheld the Orange Aura in his gilded manger.</p><p>These starry-eyed worshippers are not religious seekers, but überrich CEOs of Wall Street banks and corporate giants. Abandoning any shred of principle and self-respect, they rushed to Florida this month on their private jets to suck-up to The Donald, crassly trying to cash-in on the plutocratic rule of his incoming Trump Taliban.</p><p>Especially embarrassing is the sight of avaricious high tech titans seeking favors. <a target="_blank" href="https://itep.org/corporate-tax-avoidance-trump-tax-cut-fdii/">These self-proclaimed paragons of “laissez-faire” economics are largely funded by us taxpayers,</a> and they’re now trying to get more government giveaways the old-fashioned way: Bribery. Such billionaire tech elites as Jeff Bezos of Amazon and Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-tech-ceos-meta-amazon-donate-millions-inauguration/">have greased their appeals by paying a million dollars each to Trump’s coronation committee</a> – just to get a meeting with him!</p><p>Interestingly, both Bezos and Zuckerberg had previously condemned Trump’s flagrant xenophobia, racism, and misogyny. But now, their repulsion has turned to adulation. After all, billionaires don’t let ethical principle get in the way of their <em>financial principal</em>.</p><p>Do you have a million dollars to buy a meeting with His Lordship? What are today’s young people to make of greedheaded creeps like Bezos and Zuckerberg, who insist that not only can they openly buy government favors… but mock our people’s democratic ideals? Young people are right: The system is corrupt. Trump aside, our Number One political goal must be to ban corporate money from politics.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-coming-of-the-unholy-messiah</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:153529758</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2024 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/153529758/992d8cfc5f95b1f14fc9f55ab2366650.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/153529758/d0e2c69ccd3d612afb41946fdd7ceac9.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>And lo, the Magi came from afar, guided by a heavenly star to worship the Messiah of Mar-a-Lago. Bearing precious gifts of flattery, cash, and bitcoin, the corporate Magi fell to their knees in awe when they beheld the Orange Aura in his gilded manger. These starry-eyed worshippers are not religious seekers, but überrich CEOs of Wall Street banks and corporate giants. Abandoning any shred of principle and self-respect, they rushed to Florida this month on their private jets to suck-up to The Donald, crassly trying to cash-in on the plutocratic rule of his incoming Trump Taliban. Especially embarrassing is the sight of avaricious high tech titans seeking favors. These self-proclaimed paragons of “laissez-faire” economics are largely funded by us taxpayers, and they’re now trying to get more government giveaways the old-fashioned way: Bribery. Such billionaire tech elites as Jeff Bezos of Amazon and Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, have greased their appeals by paying a million dollars each to Trump’s coronation committee – just to get a meeting with him! Interestingly, both Bezos and Zuckerberg had previously condemned Trump’s flagrant xenophobia, racism, and misogyny. But now, their repulsion has turned to adulation. After all, billionaires don’t let ethical principle get in the way of their financial principal. Do you have a million dollars to buy a meeting with His Lordship? What are today’s young people to make of greedheaded creeps like Bezos and Zuckerberg, who insist that not only can they openly buy government favors… but mock our people’s democratic ideals? Young people are right: The system is corrupt. Trump aside, our Number One political goal must be to ban corporate money from politics. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>And lo, the Magi came from afar, guided by a heavenly star to worship the Messiah of Mar-a-Lago. Bearing precious gifts of flattery, cash, and bitcoin, the corporate Magi fell to their knees in awe when they beheld the Orange Aura in his gilded manger. These starry-eyed worshippers are not religious seekers, but überrich CEOs of Wall Street banks and corporate giants. Abandoning any shred of principle and self-respect, they rushed to Florida this month on their private jets to suck-up to The Donald, crassly trying to cash-in on the plutocratic rule of his incoming Trump Taliban. Especially embarrassing is the sight of avaricious high tech titans seeking favors. These self-proclaimed paragons of “laissez-faire” economics are largely funded by us taxpayers, and they’re now trying to get more government giveaways the old-fashioned way: Bribery. Such billionaire tech elites as Jeff Bezos of Amazon and Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, have greased their appeals by paying a million dollars each to Trump’s coronation committee – just to get a meeting with him! Interestingly, both Bezos and Zuckerberg had previously condemned Trump’s flagrant xenophobia, racism, and misogyny. But now, their repulsion has turned to adulation. After all, billionaires don’t let ethical principle get in the way of their financial principal. Do you have a million dollars to buy a meeting with His Lordship? What are today’s young people to make of greedheaded creeps like Bezos and Zuckerberg, who insist that not only can they openly buy government favors… but mock our people’s democratic ideals? Young people are right: The system is corrupt. Trump aside, our Number One political goal must be to ban corporate money from politics. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Greed Is Immoral. Healthcare Greed Is Abominable.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>America has endured a long panorama of corporate greed – from the East India Trading Company to the Robber Barons, Gordon Gecko Wall Streeters to Elon Musk. But down at the bottom of raw greediness today, you’ll find the insatiable profiteers of the private nursing home industry.</p><p>Of course, many providers deliver honest, truly-caring service (especially non-profit and publicly-owned community centers). But as a whole, this essential service has <a target="_blank" href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/dispatch/when-private-equity-takes-over-a-nursing-home">fallen into the clutches of money-hustling corporate chains and Wall Street speculators</a>. Their goal is not to maximize grandma’s care, but to minimalize her cost to faraway rich shareholders.</p><p>Their most common profiteering ploy is to understaff their facilities, leaving vulnerable residents unattended… and often, dead. Federal law, though, lets corporate owners define “sufficient” staff levels, which is why so many are grossly-insufficient. One profit-padding tactic is called “tunneling” – the chain sets up a dummy staffing agency to provide employees for the chain’s nursing homes. That agency then charges greatly inflated to provide employees. But the chain doesn’t complain, since it owns the agency… and since unknowing customers end up paying the jacked-up tab.</p><p>President Biden has <a target="_blank" href="https://truthout.org/articles/nursing-home-industry-is-pushing-trump-to-rescind-bidens-safe-staffing-mandate/">proposed new rules</a> to stop the gouging and improve care, including a requirement that each “nursing” home actually keep at least one nurse on staff. One! But, oh the squeals by billionaire owners! “Cost prohibitive” they howl! So, instead of hiring nurses, <a target="_blank" href="https://truthout.org/articles/nursing-home-industry-is-pushing-trump-to-rescind-bidens-safe-staffing-mandate/">they’re hiring high-dollar lobbyists and lawyers to kill this little bit of health care fairness</a> for people who’re near the end of life.</p><p>These multimillionaire executives and billionaire investors are not only gouging families, but profiteering on the health of people’s loved ones. In case they care, that is why the public despises them.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/greed-is-immoral-healthcare-greed</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:153274436</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/153274436/2336df0a49ad8064fcc6c9378eb8904f.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/153274436/fb25f54ba5242a049af68a986b0f515e.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>America has endured a long panorama of corporate greed – from the East India Trading Company to the Robber Barons, Gordon Gecko Wall Streeters to Elon Musk. But down at the bottom of raw greediness today, you’ll find the insatiable profiteers of the private nursing home industry. Of course, many providers deliver honest, truly-caring service (especially non-profit and publicly-owned community centers). But as a whole, this essential service has fallen into the clutches of money-hustling corporate chains and Wall Street speculators. Their goal is not to maximize grandma’s care, but to minimalize her cost to faraway rich shareholders. Their most common profiteering ploy is to understaff their facilities, leaving vulnerable residents unattended… and often, dead. Federal law, though, lets corporate owners define “sufficient” staff levels, which is why so many are grossly-insufficient. One profit-padding tactic is called “tunneling” – the chain sets up a dummy staffing agency to provide employees for the chain’s nursing homes. That agency then charges greatly inflated to provide employees. But the chain doesn’t complain, since it owns the agency… and since unknowing customers end up paying the jacked-up tab. President Biden has proposed new rules to stop the gouging and improve care, including a requirement that each “nursing” home actually keep at least one nurse on staff. One! But, oh the squeals by billionaire owners! “Cost prohibitive” they howl! So, instead of hiring nurses, they’re hiring high-dollar lobbyists and lawyers to kill this little bit of health care fairness for people who’re near the end of life. These multimillionaire executives and billionaire investors are not only gouging families, but profiteering on the health of people’s loved ones. In case they care, that is why the public despises them. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>America has endured a long panorama of corporate greed – from the East India Trading Company to the Robber Barons, Gordon Gecko Wall Streeters to Elon Musk. But down at the bottom of raw greediness today, you’ll find the insatiable profiteers of the private nursing home industry. Of course, many providers deliver honest, truly-caring service (especially non-profit and publicly-owned community centers). But as a whole, this essential service has fallen into the clutches of money-hustling corporate chains and Wall Street speculators. Their goal is not to maximize grandma’s care, but to minimalize her cost to faraway rich shareholders. Their most common profiteering ploy is to understaff their facilities, leaving vulnerable residents unattended… and often, dead. Federal law, though, lets corporate owners define “sufficient” staff levels, which is why so many are grossly-insufficient. One profit-padding tactic is called “tunneling” – the chain sets up a dummy staffing agency to provide employees for the chain’s nursing homes. That agency then charges greatly inflated to provide employees. But the chain doesn’t complain, since it owns the agency… and since unknowing customers end up paying the jacked-up tab. President Biden has proposed new rules to stop the gouging and improve care, including a requirement that each “nursing” home actually keep at least one nurse on staff. One! But, oh the squeals by billionaire owners! “Cost prohibitive” they howl! So, instead of hiring nurses, they’re hiring high-dollar lobbyists and lawyers to kill this little bit of health care fairness for people who’re near the end of life. These multimillionaire executives and billionaire investors are not only gouging families, but profiteering on the health of people’s loved ones. In case they care, that is why the public despises them. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Should We Allow Food Monopolies? Let’s Bust the System!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>How are monopolistic corporations able to gain their economic dominance? By getting politicians to give it to them.</p><p>Consider the old robber barons. They weren’t brilliant investors or managers, but ruthless exploiters of government giveaways and bribers of officials who permitted their monopolistic thievery.</p><p>Likewise, today’s monopoly players have captured local, state, and national markets – not through honest competition, but by getting public officials to subsidize their expansion and to rig the rules against small competitors. Monopolizers buy this favoritism with the legalized bribes of campaign donations they lavish on compliant lawmakers.</p><p>Investigative digger Stacy Mitchell <a target="_blank" href="https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/12/food-deserts-robinson-patman/680765/">recently documented</a> how this corrupt political favoritism has allowed massive retail chains like Walmart, Kroger, and Dollar Store to crush thousands of local grocers. This has left millions of Americans living in “food deserts” – poor and rural communities with no food store.</p><p>What happened? As grocery chains spread from local to regional to national, they demanded that food manufacturers give them big discounts, giving them a dramatic monopoly pricing advantage over independent rivals. So, hometown grocers began hemorrhaging customers... and going broke.</p><p>This raw, anti-competitive, price discrimination was a flagrant violation of America’s anti-monopoly law – but here came Big Money to protect the monopolists. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/12/food-deserts-robinson-patman/680765/">In 1980, as Ronald Reagan was railing against “silly” consumer protection laws, supermarket lobbyists poured campaign cash into top officials of both parties</a>. What they bought was bipartisan agreement to simply stop enforcing the “fusty” old antitrust law that had protected a competitive grocery economy for nearly 50 years.</p><p>But good news! That useful, highly-effective law is still on the books, so let’s build a long-term grassroots campaign to rejuvenate it and re-outlaw monopolization, redlining, and price gouging by food giants. For more information, go to Institute for Local Self Reliance: <a target="_blank" href="http://ilsr.org">ilsr.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-should-we-allow-food-monopolies</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:153269594</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 17:16:17 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/153269594/847b754f1f28217a69c0e5e60f5a9c4a.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/153269594/89265dc82179d6e8551f6bb0090943c0.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>How are monopolistic corporations able to gain their economic dominance? By getting politicians to give it to them. Consider the old robber barons. They weren’t brilliant investors or managers, but ruthless exploiters of government giveaways and bribers of officials who permitted their monopolistic thievery. Likewise, today’s monopoly players have captured local, state, and national markets – not through honest competition, but by getting public officials to subsidize their expansion and to rig the rules against small competitors. Monopolizers buy this favoritism with the legalized bribes of campaign donations they lavish on compliant lawmakers. Investigative digger Stacy Mitchell recently documented how this corrupt political favoritism has allowed massive retail chains like Walmart, Kroger, and Dollar Store to crush thousands of local grocers. This has left millions of Americans living in “food deserts” – poor and rural communities with no food store. What happened? As grocery chains spread from local to regional to national, they demanded that food manufacturers give them big discounts, giving them a dramatic monopoly pricing advantage over independent rivals. So, hometown grocers began hemorrhaging customers... and going broke. This raw, anti-competitive, price discrimination was a flagrant violation of America’s anti-monopoly law – but here came Big Money to protect the monopolists. In 1980, as Ronald Reagan was railing against “silly” consumer protection laws, supermarket lobbyists poured campaign cash into top officials of both parties. What they bought was bipartisan agreement to simply stop enforcing the “fusty” old antitrust law that had protected a competitive grocery economy for nearly 50 years. But good news! That useful, highly-effective law is still on the books, so let’s build a long-term grassroots campaign to rejuvenate it and re-outlaw monopolization, redlining, and price gouging by food giants. For more information, go to Institute for Local Self Reliance: ilsr.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>How are monopolistic corporations able to gain their economic dominance? By getting politicians to give it to them. Consider the old robber barons. They weren’t brilliant investors or managers, but ruthless exploiters of government giveaways and bribers of officials who permitted their monopolistic thievery. Likewise, today’s monopoly players have captured local, state, and national markets – not through honest competition, but by getting public officials to subsidize their expansion and to rig the rules against small competitors. Monopolizers buy this favoritism with the legalized bribes of campaign donations they lavish on compliant lawmakers. Investigative digger Stacy Mitchell recently documented how this corrupt political favoritism has allowed massive retail chains like Walmart, Kroger, and Dollar Store to crush thousands of local grocers. This has left millions of Americans living in “food deserts” – poor and rural communities with no food store. What happened? As grocery chains spread from local to regional to national, they demanded that food manufacturers give them big discounts, giving them a dramatic monopoly pricing advantage over independent rivals. So, hometown grocers began hemorrhaging customers... and going broke. This raw, anti-competitive, price discrimination was a flagrant violation of America’s anti-monopoly law – but here came Big Money to protect the monopolists. In 1980, as Ronald Reagan was railing against “silly” consumer protection laws, supermarket lobbyists poured campaign cash into top officials of both parties. What they bought was bipartisan agreement to simply stop enforcing the “fusty” old antitrust law that had protected a competitive grocery economy for nearly 50 years. But good news! That useful, highly-effective law is still on the books, so let’s build a long-term grassroots campaign to rejuvenate it and re-outlaw monopolization, redlining, and price gouging by food giants. For more information, go to Institute for Local Self Reliance: ilsr.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Big Oil’s Slick Attempt to Greenwash Its Massive Plastic Pollution]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Let’s all sing the holiday classic: “All I want for Christmas… Is Something Not Made of Plastic.”</p><p>Easier sung than done. Plastic is now ubiquitous in toys, electronics, tools, air, water… and us. And don’t forget the plastic Baby Jesus in Christmas tableaus.</p><p>What is plastic, anyway? It’s a toxic synthetic material mostly manufactured from petroleum by such giants as ExxonMobil, the globe’s top purveyor. So much is produced by these profiteers that plastic trash is now a planetary disaster.</p><p>But not to worry, for Big Oil’s lobbyists assure us gabillions of plastic bags, bottles, and such are being recycled, keeping them out of our landfills, water, bodies, etc. Swell! Except… they’re lying.</p><p>After all, Exxon is the same for-profit contaminator that lied for years that fossil fuels were not causing climate change, even though top executives knew they were. Their ethic of deceit continues today – Big Oil knows that <a target="_blank" href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/big-oils-slick-attempt-to-greenwash#:~:text=Oil%20knows%20that-,94%20percent,-of%20US%20plastics"><em>94 percent</em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/big-oils-slick-attempt-to-greenwash#:~:text=Oil%20knows%20that-,94%20percent,-of%20US%20plastics"> of US plastics are not recycled</a>. Indeed, they can’t be.</p><p>Faced with growing public alarm about the ever-growing glut of plastic pollution, the industry has doubled down on deceit by offering a snappy new PR slogan: “Advanced Recycling.” They say it’s a magical process dubbed “pyrolysis.” <a target="_blank" href="https://www.treehugger.com/nrdc-report-trashes-chemical-recycling-5221820">Only… it doesn’t work, it’s inordinately expensive, and it increases climate change emissions</a>. Still, Exxon exclaims its AR will soon be processing half a million tons of plastic waste! But that’s not even a drop in the plastic bucket, for more than <em>400 million tons</em> of plastic waste is discarded each year –and the oil industry is planning to double plastic production by 2040.</p><p>The only real way to stop runaway plastic pollution of us and our planet is to use less plastic. To learn more and help, go to Beyond Plastics: <a target="_blank" href="http://BeyondPlastics.org">BeyondPlastics.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/big-oils-slick-attempt-to-greenwash-f64</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:152981287</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/152981287/60e2b6b06f71576793744089cc6dd95c.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/152981287/0af2d77cd489947a676c2622a14ddc4f.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Let’s all sing the holiday classic: “All I want for Christmas… Is Something Not Made of Plastic.” Easier sung than done. Plastic is now ubiquitous in toys, electronics, tools, air, water… and us. And don’t forget the plastic Baby Jesus in Christmas tableaus. What is plastic, anyway? It’s a toxic synthetic material mostly manufactured from petroleum by such giants as ExxonMobil, the globe’s top purveyor. So much is produced by these profiteers that plastic trash is now a planetary disaster. But not to worry, for Big Oil’s lobbyists assure us gabillions of plastic bags, bottles, and such are being recycled, keeping them out of our landfills, water, bodies, etc. Swell! Except… they’re lying. After all, Exxon is the same for-profit contaminator that lied for years that fossil fuels were not causing climate change, even though top executives knew they were. Their ethic of deceit continues today – Big Oil knows that 94 percent of US plastics are not recycled. Indeed, they can’t be. Faced with growing public alarm about the ever-growing glut of plastic pollution, the industry has doubled down on deceit by offering a snappy new PR slogan: “Advanced Recycling.” They say it’s a magical process dubbed “pyrolysis.” Only… it doesn’t work, it’s inordinately expensive, and it increases climate change emissions. Still, Exxon exclaims its AR will soon be processing half a million tons of plastic waste! But that’s not even a drop in the plastic bucket, for more than 400 million tons of plastic waste is discarded each year –and the oil industry is planning to double plastic production by 2040. The only real way to stop runaway plastic pollution of us and our planet is to use less plastic. To learn more and help, go to Beyond Plastics: BeyondPlastics.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Let’s all sing the holiday classic: “All I want for Christmas… Is Something Not Made of Plastic.” Easier sung than done. Plastic is now ubiquitous in toys, electronics, tools, air, water… and us. And don’t forget the plastic Baby Jesus in Christmas tableaus. What is plastic, anyway? It’s a toxic synthetic material mostly manufactured from petroleum by such giants as ExxonMobil, the globe’s top purveyor. So much is produced by these profiteers that plastic trash is now a planetary disaster. But not to worry, for Big Oil’s lobbyists assure us gabillions of plastic bags, bottles, and such are being recycled, keeping them out of our landfills, water, bodies, etc. Swell! Except… they’re lying. After all, Exxon is the same for-profit contaminator that lied for years that fossil fuels were not causing climate change, even though top executives knew they were. Their ethic of deceit continues today – Big Oil knows that 94 percent of US plastics are not recycled. Indeed, they can’t be. Faced with growing public alarm about the ever-growing glut of plastic pollution, the industry has doubled down on deceit by offering a snappy new PR slogan: “Advanced Recycling.” They say it’s a magical process dubbed “pyrolysis.” Only… it doesn’t work, it’s inordinately expensive, and it increases climate change emissions. Still, Exxon exclaims its AR will soon be processing half a million tons of plastic waste! But that’s not even a drop in the plastic bucket, for more than 400 million tons of plastic waste is discarded each year –and the oil industry is planning to double plastic production by 2040. The only real way to stop runaway plastic pollution of us and our planet is to use less plastic. To learn more and help, go to Beyond Plastics: BeyondPlastics.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Don’t Buy Coca-Cola’s Plastic Promise]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Former New Mexico governor Bruce King was renown for his frequent malapropisms and contorted logic.</p><p>For example, he once refused to back a bill pushed by loan-shark lobbyists – but, he pledged that it if the legislature passed the thing, he would sign it. Well, the bill did pass… but Bruce vetoed it! The lobbyists swarmed him, crying that he had given his <em>promise</em>. Yes, the governor conceded, but “we all know that a promise is not a commitment.”</p><p>Apparently, Coca-Cola executives have been studying Gov. King’s verbal backflip, for the multibillion-dollar corporate behemoth suddenly announced this month that it was adopting his “a-promise-is-not-a-commitment” ploy. The beverage barons are using King’s dictum to squirm out of the widely-ballyhooed promise they made just a few years ago to curtail the corporation’s contamination of our planet with plastic waste.</p><p>Coke has been the world’s #1 plastic polluter six years in a row, so its previous pledge to cut its plastic trash in half by 2030 would’ve had a major impact. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/04/business/coca-cola-sustainability-goals-change/index.html">But, oops, the honchos now say that was never a commitment</a> – just a “voluntary environmental goal.” That goal, they explain, has “evolved,” so now they’re focused on imposing “efficient resource allocation to deliver lasting positive impact.”</p><p>You don’t need a BS detector to translate that corporate gobbledygook. Coke’s “resource allocation” will defund its environmental efforts to further enrich its wealthiest shareholders, delivering a “lasting positive impact” for those few. And for the many who will continue absorbing the deadly petro-polymers that Coca-Cola carelessly discharges into our air, water, soil, food, and bodies – well, tough luck.</p><p>Don’t be fooled by <em>voluntary</em> anti-pollution requirements. I promise you, they are hoaxes.</p><p>Do something!</p><p>Sick of the plastic lies and pollution? Check out<a target="_blank" href="https://www.breakfreefromplastic.org/"> Break Free from Plastic</a>, who are working with more than 13,000 organizations and people worldwide to end the scourge once and for all. </p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/dont-buy-coca-colas-plastic-promise</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:152918473</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/152918473/64fa35d4fe5aba0f2aae401e687f9490.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/152918473/03dfeb9e1ea5188494b7b689947af1df.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Former New Mexico governor Bruce King was renown for his frequent malapropisms and contorted logic. For example, he once refused to back a bill pushed by loan-shark lobbyists – but, he pledged that it if the legislature passed the thing, he would sign it. Well, the bill did pass… but Bruce vetoed it! The lobbyists swarmed him, crying that he had given his promise. Yes, the governor conceded, but “we all know that a promise is not a commitment.” Apparently, Coca-Cola executives have been studying Gov. King’s verbal backflip, for the multibillion-dollar corporate behemoth suddenly announced this month that it was adopting his “a-promise-is-not-a-commitment” ploy. The beverage barons are using King’s dictum to squirm out of the widely-ballyhooed promise they made just a few years ago to curtail the corporation’s contamination of our planet with plastic waste. Coke has been the world’s #1 plastic polluter six years in a row, so its previous pledge to cut its plastic trash in half by 2030 would’ve had a major impact. But, oops, the honchos now say that was never a commitment – just a “voluntary environmental goal.” That goal, they explain, has “evolved,” so now they’re focused on imposing “efficient resource allocation to deliver lasting positive impact.” You don’t need a BS detector to translate that corporate gobbledygook. Coke’s “resource allocation” will defund its environmental efforts to further enrich its wealthiest shareholders, delivering a “lasting positive impact” for those few. And for the many who will continue absorbing the deadly petro-polymers that Coca-Cola carelessly discharges into our air, water, soil, food, and bodies – well, tough luck. Don’t be fooled by voluntary anti-pollution requirements. I promise you, they are hoaxes. Do something! Sick of the plastic lies and pollution? Check out Break Free from Plastic, who are working with more than 13,000 organizations and people worldwide to end the scourge once and for all. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Former New Mexico governor Bruce King was renown for his frequent malapropisms and contorted logic. For example, he once refused to back a bill pushed by loan-shark lobbyists – but, he pledged that it if the legislature passed the thing, he would sign it. Well, the bill did pass… but Bruce vetoed it! The lobbyists swarmed him, crying that he had given his promise. Yes, the governor conceded, but “we all know that a promise is not a commitment.” Apparently, Coca-Cola executives have been studying Gov. King’s verbal backflip, for the multibillion-dollar corporate behemoth suddenly announced this month that it was adopting his “a-promise-is-not-a-commitment” ploy. The beverage barons are using King’s dictum to squirm out of the widely-ballyhooed promise they made just a few years ago to curtail the corporation’s contamination of our planet with plastic waste. Coke has been the world’s #1 plastic polluter six years in a row, so its previous pledge to cut its plastic trash in half by 2030 would’ve had a major impact. But, oops, the honchos now say that was never a commitment – just a “voluntary environmental goal.” That goal, they explain, has “evolved,” so now they’re focused on imposing “efficient resource allocation to deliver lasting positive impact.” You don’t need a BS detector to translate that corporate gobbledygook. Coke’s “resource allocation” will defund its environmental efforts to further enrich its wealthiest shareholders, delivering a “lasting positive impact” for those few. And for the many who will continue absorbing the deadly petro-polymers that Coca-Cola carelessly discharges into our air, water, soil, food, and bodies – well, tough luck. Don’t be fooled by voluntary anti-pollution requirements. I promise you, they are hoaxes. Do something! Sick of the plastic lies and pollution? Check out Break Free from Plastic, who are working with more than 13,000 organizations and people worldwide to end the scourge once and for all. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can Corporate Profit and Morality Be Compatible?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Is “corporate ethics” an oxymoron? Do you have to be a jerk to be a successful CEO? Is exploitation the only path to profit?</p><p>The good news is that many companies, big and small, in the food economy are blazing a different path through Wall Street’s jungle of greed, demonstrating that money and morality can be compatible. <a target="_blank" href="https://newsroom.heb.com/community/">Texas supermarket chain HEB</a>, for example, has drawn an intensely loyal customer base by (1) investing in good wages and benefits for employees, (2) showing up in such emergencies as pandemics, hurricanes, freezes, etc. to give essential supplies and hands-on help, and (3) being an involved and supportive neighbor to the hundreds of unique communities it serves.</p><p>Also, <a target="_blank" href="https://mainegrains.com/">Maine Grains</a> is “relocalizing” the business of milling grain by working with local farmers who’d been abandoned by global grain marketers like Ardent and Gold Medal. They’re producing nutrient-rich flours from heritage grains, boosting the local economy in the process. Then there’s <a target="_blank" href="https://www.bobsredmill.com/">Bob’s Red Mill</a>, which also artfully mills its products from diverse, natural grains–and it’s <a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/bob-moore-bobs-red-mill-founder-employee-owned-company-2024-2">100% employee-owned.</a></p><p>These are part of a rising business alternative to the selfish, profiteering ethic of Fortune 500 titans. Called certified <a target="_blank" href="https://www.bcorporation.net/">B Corporations</a>, they definitely exist to make a profit, but they are equally focused on having a positive social impact, prioritizing fair wages, environmental protections, and healthy communities as core elements of their missions, even making those goals legal requirements of their corporate charter.</p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://www.benjerry.com/about-us/b-corp">Ben & Jerry’s</a>, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.amys.com/community/our-blog/were-now-officially-a-b-corp">Amy’s Kitchen</a>, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.kingarthurbaking.com/blog/2015/06/10/10-things-about-king-arthur-flour">King Arthur Baking</a>, and <a target="_blank" href="https://www.newbelgium.com/company/mission/b-corp/">New Belgium Brewery</a> are just a few more of some 3,800 other businesses now organized as B Corps. Though not pretending to be perfect, they’re at least striving to be more than money grubbers, instead trying to contribute to the Common Good. For more information on the products and practices of B Corps, go to <a target="_blank" href="https://www.bcorporation.net/">BCorporation.net</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/can-corporate-profit-and-morality</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:152622268</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 17:04:22 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2597188" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/152622268/80366a517f9468ad710b257b618e1928.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/152622268/84242c06d544c8544d12341761943bf4.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Is “corporate ethics” an oxymoron? Do you have to be a jerk to be a successful CEO? Is exploitation the only path to profit? The good news is that many companies, big and small, in the food economy are blazing a different path through Wall Street’s jungle of greed, demonstrating that money and morality can be compatible. Texas supermarket chain HEB, for example, has drawn an intensely loyal customer base by (1) investing in good wages and benefits for employees, (2) showing up in such emergencies as pandemics, hurricanes, freezes, etc. to give essential supplies and hands-on help, and (3) being an involved and supportive neighbor to the hundreds of unique communities it serves. Also, Maine Grains is “relocalizing” the business of milling grain by working with local farmers who’d been abandoned by global grain marketers like Ardent and Gold Medal. They’re producing nutrient-rich flours from heritage grains, boosting the local economy in the process. Then there’s Bob’s Red Mill, which also artfully mills its products from diverse, natural grains–and it’s 100% employee-owned. These are part of a rising business alternative to the selfish, profiteering ethic of Fortune 500 titans. Called certified B Corporations, they definitely exist to make a profit, but they are equally focused on having a positive social impact, prioritizing fair wages, environmental protections, and healthy communities as core elements of their missions, even making those goals legal requirements of their corporate charter. Ben &amp; Jerry’s, Amy’s Kitchen, King Arthur Baking, and New Belgium Brewery are just a few more of some 3,800 other businesses now organized as B Corps. Though not pretending to be perfect, they’re at least striving to be more than money grubbers, instead trying to contribute to the Common Good. For more information on the products and practices of B Corps, go to BCorporation.net. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Is “corporate ethics” an oxymoron? Do you have to be a jerk to be a successful CEO? Is exploitation the only path to profit? The good news is that many companies, big and small, in the food economy are blazing a different path through Wall Street’s jungle of greed, demonstrating that money and morality can be compatible. Texas supermarket chain HEB, for example, has drawn an intensely loyal customer base by (1) investing in good wages and benefits for employees, (2) showing up in such emergencies as pandemics, hurricanes, freezes, etc. to give essential supplies and hands-on help, and (3) being an involved and supportive neighbor to the hundreds of unique communities it serves. Also, Maine Grains is “relocalizing” the business of milling grain by working with local farmers who’d been abandoned by global grain marketers like Ardent and Gold Medal. They’re producing nutrient-rich flours from heritage grains, boosting the local economy in the process. Then there’s Bob’s Red Mill, which also artfully mills its products from diverse, natural grains–and it’s 100% employee-owned. These are part of a rising business alternative to the selfish, profiteering ethic of Fortune 500 titans. Called certified B Corporations, they definitely exist to make a profit, but they are equally focused on having a positive social impact, prioritizing fair wages, environmental protections, and healthy communities as core elements of their missions, even making those goals legal requirements of their corporate charter. Ben &amp; Jerry’s, Amy’s Kitchen, King Arthur Baking, and New Belgium Brewery are just a few more of some 3,800 other businesses now organized as B Corps. Though not pretending to be perfect, they’re at least striving to be more than money grubbers, instead trying to contribute to the Common Good. For more information on the products and practices of B Corps, go to BCorporation.net. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[A Kakistocracy Takes Over Immigration Policy]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Social media has been lighting up like fireworks, with a myriad of Trump voters exclaiming: “I didn’t know he meant me!” For example, many MAGA cheerleaders are now shocked to learn that his rallying cry to eliminate “Obamacare” means killing the popular Affordable Care Act that provides their health coverage!</p><p>Perhaps the most stunned, though, are many Trumpers who had cheered his anti-immigrant, send-em-back-where-they-came-from tirades. They assumed he only meant the murderers, rapists, and cat-eaters he frantically warned about – not their own son’s wonderful Honduran wife; not the beloved family running the popular Mexican café in town; and surely not their hardworking landscaping crew! Just the “bad” migrants, right?</p><p>Wrong. Trump says he’ll declare a national emergency, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/18/us/politics/trump-military-mass-deportation.html">ordering America’s military to conduct a mass round-up and deportation operation</a>, including police agencies making workplace raids and neighborhood sweeps. They even expect they’ll make “collateral arrests” of US citizens. Surely, you might think, such indiscriminate, unAmerican, mass incarceration can’t really happen here! But Trump is already putting thuggish right-wing enforcers in place to make it happen.</p><p>Moreover, a network of Trump’s big corporate funders is gleefully rushing to cash-in on this new capture-and-jail industry. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.cnbc.com/2024/11/11/private-prison-stocks-jump-on-trump-appointment-of-immigration-hardliner-tom-homan.html">Meet GEO Group</a>, for example, a multibillion-dollar private penitentiary conglomerate that has been a profiteering house of horrors for inmates and workers across the country. But its top executives were huge donors to Trump’s ascension, and they now tell Wall Street investors they expect to gain $400 million a year in new business incarcerating Trump’s immigration suspects.</p><p>There’s a name for a government based on xenophobia, demagoguery, and greed: “Kakistocracy” – government by the worst persons in society.</p><p>Do something!</p><p>Looking for organizations who are already working on the coming immigration fights? We love these, for starters:</p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://unitedwedream.org/">United We Dream</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://mijente.net/">Mijente</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.raicestexas.org/">RAICES</a></p><p>Also: look for local immigration organizing groups in your area—often these are the groups on the front lines of doing ICE raid defense, legal support and more. (For example, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.drumnyc.org/">DRUM</a> in NYC or <a target="_blank" href="https://vdlf.org/">Voces de la Frontera</a> in Wisconsin.)</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/a-kakistocracy-takes-over-immigration</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:152518714</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/152518714/8bc1ad52481d0ac8e8b40237e4b320c7.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/152518714/2b754d12148bb5e0347a97f8a98514f1.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Social media has been lighting up like fireworks, with a myriad of Trump voters exclaiming: “I didn’t know he meant me!” For example, many MAGA cheerleaders are now shocked to learn that his rallying cry to eliminate “Obamacare” means killing the popular Affordable Care Act that provides their health coverage! Perhaps the most stunned, though, are many Trumpers who had cheered his anti-immigrant, send-em-back-where-they-came-from tirades. They assumed he only meant the murderers, rapists, and cat-eaters he frantically warned about – not their own son’s wonderful Honduran wife; not the beloved family running the popular Mexican café in town; and surely not their hardworking landscaping crew! Just the “bad” migrants, right? Wrong. Trump says he’ll declare a national emergency, ordering America’s military to conduct a mass round-up and deportation operation, including police agencies making workplace raids and neighborhood sweeps. They even expect they’ll make “collateral arrests” of US citizens. Surely, you might think, such indiscriminate, unAmerican, mass incarceration can’t really happen here! But Trump is already putting thuggish right-wing enforcers in place to make it happen. Moreover, a network of Trump’s big corporate funders is gleefully rushing to cash-in on this new capture-and-jail industry. Meet GEO Group, for example, a multibillion-dollar private penitentiary conglomerate that has been a profiteering house of horrors for inmates and workers across the country. But its top executives were huge donors to Trump’s ascension, and they now tell Wall Street investors they expect to gain $400 million a year in new business incarcerating Trump’s immigration suspects. There’s a name for a government based on xenophobia, demagoguery, and greed: “Kakistocracy” – government by the worst persons in society. Do something! Looking for organizations who are already working on the coming immigration fights? We love these, for starters: * United We Dream * Mijente * RAICES Also: look for local immigration organizing groups in your area—often these are the groups on the front lines of doing ICE raid defense, legal support and more. (For example, DRUM in NYC or Voces de la Frontera in Wisconsin.) Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Social media has been lighting up like fireworks, with a myriad of Trump voters exclaiming: “I didn’t know he meant me!” For example, many MAGA cheerleaders are now shocked to learn that his rallying cry to eliminate “Obamacare” means killing the popular Affordable Care Act that provides their health coverage! Perhaps the most stunned, though, are many Trumpers who had cheered his anti-immigrant, send-em-back-where-they-came-from tirades. They assumed he only meant the murderers, rapists, and cat-eaters he frantically warned about – not their own son’s wonderful Honduran wife; not the beloved family running the popular Mexican café in town; and surely not their hardworking landscaping crew! Just the “bad” migrants, right? Wrong. Trump says he’ll declare a national emergency, ordering America’s military to conduct a mass round-up and deportation operation, including police agencies making workplace raids and neighborhood sweeps. They even expect they’ll make “collateral arrests” of US citizens. Surely, you might think, such indiscriminate, unAmerican, mass incarceration can’t really happen here! But Trump is already putting thuggish right-wing enforcers in place to make it happen. Moreover, a network of Trump’s big corporate funders is gleefully rushing to cash-in on this new capture-and-jail industry. Meet GEO Group, for example, a multibillion-dollar private penitentiary conglomerate that has been a profiteering house of horrors for inmates and workers across the country. But its top executives were huge donors to Trump’s ascension, and they now tell Wall Street investors they expect to gain $400 million a year in new business incarcerating Trump’s immigration suspects. There’s a name for a government based on xenophobia, demagoguery, and greed: “Kakistocracy” – government by the worst persons in society. Do something! Looking for organizations who are already working on the coming immigration fights? We love these, for starters: * United We Dream * Mijente * RAICES Also: look for local immigration organizing groups in your area—often these are the groups on the front lines of doing ICE raid defense, legal support and more. (For example, DRUM in NYC or Voces de la Frontera in Wisconsin.) Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[When and Where Was the First Thanksgiving Feast?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><em>Happy Thanksgiving, y’all! For the holiday, we’re sharing with you one of our favorite Thanksgiving origin stories from Hightower below. And as a bonus, while you’re cooking your food or relaxing after dinner, here’s our Dinner Democracy show from 2021, featuring friends </em><a target="_blank" href="https://rajpatel.org/"><em>Raj Patel</em></a><em> and </em><a target="_blank" href="https://www.tomphilpott.net/"><em>Tom Philpott</em></a><em>.</em> </p><p>Let’s talk Turkey!</p><p>No, not the Butterballs in Congress. I’m talking about the real thing, the big gobbler – 46 million of which we Americans will devour this Thanksgiving.</p><p>It was the Aztecs who first domesticated the <em>gallopavo</em>, but the invading Spanish conquerors “fouled-up” the bird’s origins. They declared it to be related to the peacock – Wrong! They also thought the peacock originated in Turkey – Wrong! And, they thought Turkey was located in Africa – well, you can see the Spanish were pretty confused.</p><p>Actually, even the origin of Thanksgiving Day in the US is confused. The popular assumption is that it was first celebrated by the Mayflower immigrants and the Wampanoag natives at Plymouth, Massachusetts, 1621. They feasted on venison, <em>furkees</em> (Wampanoag for gobblers), eels, mussels, corn, and beer. But wait, say Virginians, the first Thanksgiving Food-a-Palooza was not in Massachusetts – the feast originated down here in Jamestown colony, back in 1608.</p><p>Whoa there, pilgrims! Folks in El Paso, Texas, say it all began way out there in 1598, when Spanish settlers sat down with people of the Piro and Manso tribes, to give thanks, feasting on roasted duck, geese and fish.</p><p>“Ha!” says a Florida group, asserting the very, very first Thanksgiving happened in 1565 when the Spanish settlers of St. Augustine and friends from the Timucuan tribe chowed-down on “cocido” – a stew of salt pork, garbanzo beans and garlic – washing it all down with red wine.</p><p>Wherever it began, and whatever the purists claim is “official,” Thanksgiving today is as multicultural as America. So, let’s enjoy! Kick-back, give thanks we’re in a country with such ethnic richness, and dive into your turkey rellenos, moo-shu turkey, turkey falafel, barbecued turkey… and so on.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/when-and-where-was-the-first-thanksgiving-1a7</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:152199348</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="1558351" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/152199348/d99e911ad8c4328a64257413698feec7.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/152199348/c0ceeb60db1d836a99bc5f8d3558a4ce.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Happy Thanksgiving, y’all! For the holiday, we’re sharing with you one of our favorite Thanksgiving origin stories from Hightower below. And as a bonus, while you’re cooking your food or relaxing after dinner, here’s our Dinner Democracy show from 2021, featuring friends Raj Patel and Tom Philpott. Let’s talk Turkey! No, not the Butterballs in Congress. I’m talking about the real thing, the big gobbler – 46 million of which we Americans will devour this Thanksgiving. It was the Aztecs who first domesticated the gallopavo, but the invading Spanish conquerors “fouled-up” the bird’s origins. They declared it to be related to the peacock – Wrong! They also thought the peacock originated in Turkey – Wrong! And, they thought Turkey was located in Africa – well, you can see the Spanish were pretty confused. Actually, even the origin of Thanksgiving Day in the US is confused. The popular assumption is that it was first celebrated by the Mayflower immigrants and the Wampanoag natives at Plymouth, Massachusetts, 1621. They feasted on venison, furkees (Wampanoag for gobblers), eels, mussels, corn, and beer. But wait, say Virginians, the first Thanksgiving Food-a-Palooza was not in Massachusetts – the feast originated down here in Jamestown colony, back in 1608. Whoa there, pilgrims! Folks in El Paso, Texas, say it all began way out there in 1598, when Spanish settlers sat down with people of the Piro and Manso tribes, to give thanks, feasting on roasted duck, geese and fish. “Ha!” says a Florida group, asserting the very, very first Thanksgiving happened in 1565 when the Spanish settlers of St. Augustine and friends from the Timucuan tribe chowed-down on “cocido” – a stew of salt pork, garbanzo beans and garlic – washing it all down with red wine. Wherever it began, and whatever the purists claim is “official,” Thanksgiving today is as multicultural as America. So, let’s enjoy! Kick-back, give thanks we’re in a country with such ethnic richness, and dive into your turkey rellenos, moo-shu turkey, turkey falafel, barbecued turkey… and so on. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Happy Thanksgiving, y’all! For the holiday, we’re sharing with you one of our favorite Thanksgiving origin stories from Hightower below. And as a bonus, while you’re cooking your food or relaxing after dinner, here’s our Dinner Democracy show from 2021, featuring friends Raj Patel and Tom Philpott. Let’s talk Turkey! No, not the Butterballs in Congress. I’m talking about the real thing, the big gobbler – 46 million of which we Americans will devour this Thanksgiving. It was the Aztecs who first domesticated the gallopavo, but the invading Spanish conquerors “fouled-up” the bird’s origins. They declared it to be related to the peacock – Wrong! They also thought the peacock originated in Turkey – Wrong! And, they thought Turkey was located in Africa – well, you can see the Spanish were pretty confused. Actually, even the origin of Thanksgiving Day in the US is confused. The popular assumption is that it was first celebrated by the Mayflower immigrants and the Wampanoag natives at Plymouth, Massachusetts, 1621. They feasted on venison, furkees (Wampanoag for gobblers), eels, mussels, corn, and beer. But wait, say Virginians, the first Thanksgiving Food-a-Palooza was not in Massachusetts – the feast originated down here in Jamestown colony, back in 1608. Whoa there, pilgrims! Folks in El Paso, Texas, say it all began way out there in 1598, when Spanish settlers sat down with people of the Piro and Manso tribes, to give thanks, feasting on roasted duck, geese and fish. “Ha!” says a Florida group, asserting the very, very first Thanksgiving happened in 1565 when the Spanish settlers of St. Augustine and friends from the Timucuan tribe chowed-down on “cocido” – a stew of salt pork, garbanzo beans and garlic – washing it all down with red wine. Wherever it began, and whatever the purists claim is “official,” Thanksgiving today is as multicultural as America. So, let’s enjoy! Kick-back, give thanks we’re in a country with such ethnic richness, and dive into your turkey rellenos, moo-shu turkey, turkey falafel, barbecued turkey… and so on. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Trump’s Plan to Feed the Greed of Corporate Elites]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" href="https://www.npr.org/2024/11/19/nx-s1-5189643/commerce-treasury-secretary-howard-lutnick-trump-cantor-fitzgerald">Howard Lutnick</a> wants to have his cake and eat it, too. Then, he intends to eat <em>your</em> cake. Lutnick is another billionaire corporate huckster who was a campaign bagman for Trump, and now he’s to become the Commerce Secretary. But first, he’s been tasked with picking hordes of corporate loyalists to be placed in Trump’s government as friendly “regulators” of corporate hucksterism.</p><p>Convenient, huh? This is what Trump & Company mean by saying they’ll make government “efficient.” Instead of corporate powers having to lobby regulators to get special favors, corporate officials will <em>become</em> the regulators. That is so much smoother for Lutnick and his ilk, who look forward to four free-wheeling years of devouring our economy.</p><p>In choosing those who are to police corporate price gouging, workplace rules, bank rip-offs, and such, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/09/us/politics/howard-lutnick-transition-ethics.html">Lutnick has been calling Wall Streeters, Silicon Valley tech bosses, corporate giants, and billionaires</a>, telling them to send their best operatives to Trump’s regime. “Let’s get them into government,” he exults! Notice that he’s not calling any union leaders, consumer protectors, or other real public interest watchdogs.</p><p>By the way, Lutnick himself is in line to profit from the corporate feeding frenzy he’s now staffing. He is invested in everything from health care profiteers to cryptocurrency flimflams, and while he’s been doing Trump’s work, he’s simultaneously been pushing Congress to do favors for his personal holdings. But he insists that there is no conflict of interest in his efforts. After all, he says with a straight-face, he holds his government policy meetings in separate rooms from his own business pleadings.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… And that paper-thin wall of separation is Trump’s new ethical standard for protecting us from raw corporate greed.</p><p><em>PS—We know that our regular </em><strong><em>Do Something</em></strong><em> boxes, where we shout out activists and organizations that are working on the issues discussed in the post, are very popular, and will be especially critical for battling Trump. We’re working with a number of groups to get you the most effective actions out there, and we’ll be sharing as many as we find as they come in. Don’t hesitate to recommend your own to us in the comments, too!</em></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/trumps-plan-to-feed-the-greed-of</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:152193388</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/152193388/ca8344e015023b21e1a41e60d6512a24.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/152193388/fa843c0683ab8b125a969c0acd9cee40.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Howard Lutnick wants to have his cake and eat it, too. Then, he intends to eat your cake. Lutnick is another billionaire corporate huckster who was a campaign bagman for Trump, and now he’s to become the Commerce Secretary. But first, he’s been tasked with picking hordes of corporate loyalists to be placed in Trump’s government as friendly “regulators” of corporate hucksterism. Convenient, huh? This is what Trump &amp; Company mean by saying they’ll make government “efficient.” Instead of corporate powers having to lobby regulators to get special favors, corporate officials will become the regulators. That is so much smoother for Lutnick and his ilk, who look forward to four free-wheeling years of devouring our economy. In choosing those who are to police corporate price gouging, workplace rules, bank rip-offs, and such, Lutnick has been calling Wall Streeters, Silicon Valley tech bosses, corporate giants, and billionaires, telling them to send their best operatives to Trump’s regime. “Let’s get them into government,” he exults! Notice that he’s not calling any union leaders, consumer protectors, or other real public interest watchdogs. By the way, Lutnick himself is in line to profit from the corporate feeding frenzy he’s now staffing. He is invested in everything from health care profiteers to cryptocurrency flimflams, and while he’s been doing Trump’s work, he’s simultaneously been pushing Congress to do favors for his personal holdings. But he insists that there is no conflict of interest in his efforts. After all, he says with a straight-face, he holds his government policy meetings in separate rooms from his own business pleadings. This is Jim Hightower saying… And that paper-thin wall of separation is Trump’s new ethical standard for protecting us from raw corporate greed. PS—We know that our regular Do Something boxes, where we shout out activists and organizations that are working on the issues discussed in the post, are very popular, and will be especially critical for battling Trump. We’re working with a number of groups to get you the most effective actions out there, and we’ll be sharing as many as we find as they come in. Don’t hesitate to recommend your own to us in the comments, too! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Howard Lutnick wants to have his cake and eat it, too. Then, he intends to eat your cake. Lutnick is another billionaire corporate huckster who was a campaign bagman for Trump, and now he’s to become the Commerce Secretary. But first, he’s been tasked with picking hordes of corporate loyalists to be placed in Trump’s government as friendly “regulators” of corporate hucksterism. Convenient, huh? This is what Trump &amp; Company mean by saying they’ll make government “efficient.” Instead of corporate powers having to lobby regulators to get special favors, corporate officials will become the regulators. That is so much smoother for Lutnick and his ilk, who look forward to four free-wheeling years of devouring our economy. In choosing those who are to police corporate price gouging, workplace rules, bank rip-offs, and such, Lutnick has been calling Wall Streeters, Silicon Valley tech bosses, corporate giants, and billionaires, telling them to send their best operatives to Trump’s regime. “Let’s get them into government,” he exults! Notice that he’s not calling any union leaders, consumer protectors, or other real public interest watchdogs. By the way, Lutnick himself is in line to profit from the corporate feeding frenzy he’s now staffing. He is invested in everything from health care profiteers to cryptocurrency flimflams, and while he’s been doing Trump’s work, he’s simultaneously been pushing Congress to do favors for his personal holdings. But he insists that there is no conflict of interest in his efforts. After all, he says with a straight-face, he holds his government policy meetings in separate rooms from his own business pleadings. This is Jim Hightower saying… And that paper-thin wall of separation is Trump’s new ethical standard for protecting us from raw corporate greed. PS—We know that our regular Do Something boxes, where we shout out activists and organizations that are working on the issues discussed in the post, are very popular, and will be especially critical for battling Trump. We’re working with a number of groups to get you the most effective actions out there, and we’ll be sharing as many as we find as they come in. Don’t hesitate to recommend your own to us in the comments, too! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[How Trump’s Made-In-America Scheme Is a Still Made-in-China Scam]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Wow! Who says election promises don’t produce real change?</p><p>Candidate Trump had loudly proclaimed that he would force US corporations to move their Chinese manufacturing jobs back to America. How? By imposing a whopping new tariff on all of the made-in-China products they sell to us.</p><p>Even he must have been surprised, though, when one major American corporation promptly shouted “Yes, sir!” <em>Only one day after</em> Trump’s election, the Steve Madden shoe manufacturer <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/08/business/steve-madden-ceo-china.html">announced it would leave China</a>, where nearly all of its footwear is made. Amazing – a victory for Trump policy even before he takes office! And a morale boost for American workers.</p><p>So, where would Madden relocate? Maybe in the hard-hit industrial Midwest, or maybe such former shoe-making areas as New England and the Southeast. But no. In a less-pleasant surprise to Trump, Madden executives said they would not replant their factories in the USA – but in Vietnam, Cambodia, and Brazil.</p><p>Despite appearing to succumb to Trump’s anti-China tariff, Madden is making an end run around it, “leaving China” by taking China with it. The corporate trick here is the structural reality not only are US factories located in China, but so are the suppliers of materials manufacturers must buy to make their products. So, Madden can scoot down to Vietnam, thus escaping Trump’s China tariff. But the shoe’s components, from laces to soles, will still be Chinese-made. And contrary to Trump’s bragging, his policy will not create a single Made-in-America job.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… Let’s remember that corporations are the most aggressively-selfish elites in our society, and we should not be duped into thinking that running job-creation policy through them will benefit anyone but them.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/how-trumps-made-in-america-scheme</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:151783361</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/151783361/345ba621f95ec50210d57192f5a8c6aa.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/151783361/672ebb6553875304c865032069365cc2.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Wow! Who says election promises don’t produce real change? Candidate Trump had loudly proclaimed that he would force US corporations to move their Chinese manufacturing jobs back to America. How? By imposing a whopping new tariff on all of the made-in-China products they sell to us. Even he must have been surprised, though, when one major American corporation promptly shouted “Yes, sir!” Only one day after Trump’s election, the Steve Madden shoe manufacturer announced it would leave China, where nearly all of its footwear is made. Amazing – a victory for Trump policy even before he takes office! And a morale boost for American workers. So, where would Madden relocate? Maybe in the hard-hit industrial Midwest, or maybe such former shoe-making areas as New England and the Southeast. But no. In a less-pleasant surprise to Trump, Madden executives said they would not replant their factories in the USA – but in Vietnam, Cambodia, and Brazil. Despite appearing to succumb to Trump’s anti-China tariff, Madden is making an end run around it, “leaving China” by taking China with it. The corporate trick here is the structural reality not only are US factories located in China, but so are the suppliers of materials manufacturers must buy to make their products. So, Madden can scoot down to Vietnam, thus escaping Trump’s China tariff. But the shoe’s components, from laces to soles, will still be Chinese-made. And contrary to Trump’s bragging, his policy will not create a single Made-in-America job. This is Jim Hightower saying… Let’s remember that corporations are the most aggressively-selfish elites in our society, and we should not be duped into thinking that running job-creation policy through them will benefit anyone but them. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Wow! Who says election promises don’t produce real change? Candidate Trump had loudly proclaimed that he would force US corporations to move their Chinese manufacturing jobs back to America. How? By imposing a whopping new tariff on all of the made-in-China products they sell to us. Even he must have been surprised, though, when one major American corporation promptly shouted “Yes, sir!” Only one day after Trump’s election, the Steve Madden shoe manufacturer announced it would leave China, where nearly all of its footwear is made. Amazing – a victory for Trump policy even before he takes office! And a morale boost for American workers. So, where would Madden relocate? Maybe in the hard-hit industrial Midwest, or maybe such former shoe-making areas as New England and the Southeast. But no. In a less-pleasant surprise to Trump, Madden executives said they would not replant their factories in the USA – but in Vietnam, Cambodia, and Brazil. Despite appearing to succumb to Trump’s anti-China tariff, Madden is making an end run around it, “leaving China” by taking China with it. The corporate trick here is the structural reality not only are US factories located in China, but so are the suppliers of materials manufacturers must buy to make their products. So, Madden can scoot down to Vietnam, thus escaping Trump’s China tariff. But the shoe’s components, from laces to soles, will still be Chinese-made. And contrary to Trump’s bragging, his policy will not create a single Made-in-America job. This is Jim Hightower saying… Let’s remember that corporations are the most aggressively-selfish elites in our society, and we should not be duped into thinking that running job-creation policy through them will benefit anyone but them. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Democrats’ Rural Problem Is They’ve Forgotten How to Farm]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>As any farmer can tell you, if you want to harvest a crop, you’ve got to get out of the office and go to work in the field.</p><p>Why can’t the Democratic Party grasp this basic reality when it comes to producing votes? This year was going to be different. Pressed by progressive rural activists, national party leaders agreed to open a network of get-out-the-vote offices in rural areas of battleground states. SPOILER ALERT: Kamala Harris won <em>fewer</em> votes there than Biden harvested four years earlier.</p><p>What happened? Very little. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.notus.org/harris-2024/rural-leaders-say-the-harris-campaign-was-too-slow-to-reach-their-crucial-voters">And too late. </a>Opening a campaign office is hardly the same as being there for the long haul, building trust and nurturing local support. Harris was behind from the start, though, since Joe Biden’s Democratic Party operation had not bothered to hire any rural staffers or even prepare an agenda. Apparently, their idea of a good rural program was <em>Hee-Haw</em>.</p><p>The Harris campaign did put out a plan, but in September – just two months before the vote! Also, they had too many “rural strategists” and too few ground-level organizers at campaign headquarters. Those organizers did their best, but were mostly disregarded by campaign consultants. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.notus.org/harris-2024/rural-leaders-say-the-harris-campaign-was-too-slow-to-reach-their-crucial-voters">For example,</a> a good list of rural surrogates was recruited, but never used. Worse, Harris herself was absent – she was never scheduled to visit a farm, or even pay a culturally-symbolic visit to a state fair.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… The Democrats’ real problem is not any one campaign, but more than a decade of policy and political abandonment of rural communities. Do the “smart” political honchos in Washington think that people out here don’t notice the party’s absence and disregard for them? Again, any farmer knows you can’t harvest a crop if you don’t plant one and cultivate it.</p><p>Do something!</p><p>Want to get in on rural grassroots politics that are effective and meaningful? Go check out our friends at <a target="_blank" href="https://www.notus.org/harris-2024/rural-leaders-say-the-harris-campaign-was-too-slow-to-reach-their-crucial-voters">RuralOrganizing.org</a>!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-democrats-rural-problem-is-theyve</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:151782734</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/151782734/11082f55da41d8c8ae302f5d702f69bd.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/151782734/a5442657660dcc41ed9a9ffd1c5adaa8.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>As any farmer can tell you, if you want to harvest a crop, you’ve got to get out of the office and go to work in the field. Why can’t the Democratic Party grasp this basic reality when it comes to producing votes? This year was going to be different. Pressed by progressive rural activists, national party leaders agreed to open a network of get-out-the-vote offices in rural areas of battleground states. SPOILER ALERT: Kamala Harris won fewer votes there than Biden harvested four years earlier. What happened? Very little. And too late. Opening a campaign office is hardly the same as being there for the long haul, building trust and nurturing local support. Harris was behind from the start, though, since Joe Biden’s Democratic Party operation had not bothered to hire any rural staffers or even prepare an agenda. Apparently, their idea of a good rural program was Hee-Haw. The Harris campaign did put out a plan, but in September – just two months before the vote! Also, they had too many “rural strategists” and too few ground-level organizers at campaign headquarters. Those organizers did their best, but were mostly disregarded by campaign consultants. For example, a good list of rural surrogates was recruited, but never used. Worse, Harris herself was absent – she was never scheduled to visit a farm, or even pay a culturally-symbolic visit to a state fair. This is Jim Hightower saying… The Democrats’ real problem is not any one campaign, but more than a decade of policy and political abandonment of rural communities. Do the “smart” political honchos in Washington think that people out here don’t notice the party’s absence and disregard for them? Again, any farmer knows you can’t harvest a crop if you don’t plant one and cultivate it. Do something! Want to get in on rural grassroots politics that are effective and meaningful? Go check out our friends at RuralOrganizing.org! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>As any farmer can tell you, if you want to harvest a crop, you’ve got to get out of the office and go to work in the field. Why can’t the Democratic Party grasp this basic reality when it comes to producing votes? This year was going to be different. Pressed by progressive rural activists, national party leaders agreed to open a network of get-out-the-vote offices in rural areas of battleground states. SPOILER ALERT: Kamala Harris won fewer votes there than Biden harvested four years earlier. What happened? Very little. And too late. Opening a campaign office is hardly the same as being there for the long haul, building trust and nurturing local support. Harris was behind from the start, though, since Joe Biden’s Democratic Party operation had not bothered to hire any rural staffers or even prepare an agenda. Apparently, their idea of a good rural program was Hee-Haw. The Harris campaign did put out a plan, but in September – just two months before the vote! Also, they had too many “rural strategists” and too few ground-level organizers at campaign headquarters. Those organizers did their best, but were mostly disregarded by campaign consultants. For example, a good list of rural surrogates was recruited, but never used. Worse, Harris herself was absent – she was never scheduled to visit a farm, or even pay a culturally-symbolic visit to a state fair. This is Jim Hightower saying… The Democrats’ real problem is not any one campaign, but more than a decade of policy and political abandonment of rural communities. Do the “smart” political honchos in Washington think that people out here don’t notice the party’s absence and disregard for them? Again, any farmer knows you can’t harvest a crop if you don’t plant one and cultivate it. Do something! Want to get in on rural grassroots politics that are effective and meaningful? Go check out our friends at RuralOrganizing.org! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[ Look to Maine for Some Good News!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Even in a barrelful of rotten apples, you might think there’d still be a few good ones.</p><p>But don’t get your hopes up looking into barrels labeled “private equity investors.” These esoteric, multibillion-dollar Wall Street schemes rig the marketplace so “high-net-worth individuals” can grab fat profits and special tax breaks to buy up doctors’ offices, hometown newspapers, child care centers, etc.</p><p>Consider America’s humble-but-beneficial mobile home parks. Homeownership has become so pricey that these affordable manufactured units now make up 10 percent of all single-family home sales. But while the buyers own the houses, they must rent lots from mobile park owners. This has generally been a square deal, when park owners live among the renters, providing decent services at reasonable rates. One such is Linnhaven Center with some 300 mobile home residents in Brunswick, Maine.</p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-contemptible-thievery-of-gentrification#details">But what is home to millions of people has become a quick-buck target for Wall Street’s equity profiteers</a>. Waving cash at longtime trailer park owners, they’ve been snatching up thousands of these lots. Without warning, people’s home places are literally being bought out from under them. The absentee predators then raise rents to drive out residents, clearing the spaces for high-dollar renters or buyers.</p><p>But wait, good news for a change! <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nepm.org/2024-03-20/new-maine-law-will-allow-manufactured-homes-on-same-lots-as-single-family-homes">A new law in Maine</a> gives mobile home residents a chance to buy their park, and <a target="_blank" href="https://rocusa.org/">community cooperatives exist</a> to help arrange financing. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/10/realestate/brunswick-mobile-home-sale-maine.html">That’s what the modest-income people of Linnhaven have now done</a>. Such a big leap is not easy, but give people a fair chance, and they can make it work. As one Linnhaven woman put it, the community effort was much more than a property deal: “[It felt like] a chance to control your own destiny.”</p><p>Do something!</p><p>Interested in learning more about how mobile home owners can organize together? <a target="_blank" href="https://rocusa.org/">Check out Resident Owned Communities</a> at <a target="_blank" href="https://rocusa.org/">rocusa.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/look-to-maine-for-some-good-news</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:151556982</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/151556982/998eddcbb89eca85a929ca4d35f25132.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/151556982/49e98a7976d43a0a73a2a337d4e0015f.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Even in a barrelful of rotten apples, you might think there’d still be a few good ones. But don’t get your hopes up looking into barrels labeled “private equity investors.” These esoteric, multibillion-dollar Wall Street schemes rig the marketplace so “high-net-worth individuals” can grab fat profits and special tax breaks to buy up doctors’ offices, hometown newspapers, child care centers, etc. Consider America’s humble-but-beneficial mobile home parks. Homeownership has become so pricey that these affordable manufactured units now make up 10 percent of all single-family home sales. But while the buyers own the houses, they must rent lots from mobile park owners. This has generally been a square deal, when park owners live among the renters, providing decent services at reasonable rates. One such is Linnhaven Center with some 300 mobile home residents in Brunswick, Maine. But what is home to millions of people has become a quick-buck target for Wall Street’s equity profiteers. Waving cash at longtime trailer park owners, they’ve been snatching up thousands of these lots. Without warning, people’s home places are literally being bought out from under them. The absentee predators then raise rents to drive out residents, clearing the spaces for high-dollar renters or buyers. But wait, good news for a change! A new law in Maine gives mobile home residents a chance to buy their park, and community cooperatives exist to help arrange financing. That’s what the modest-income people of Linnhaven have now done. Such a big leap is not easy, but give people a fair chance, and they can make it work. As one Linnhaven woman put it, the community effort was much more than a property deal: “[It felt like] a chance to control your own destiny.” Do something! Interested in learning more about how mobile home owners can organize together? Check out Resident Owned Communities at rocusa.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Even in a barrelful of rotten apples, you might think there’d still be a few good ones. But don’t get your hopes up looking into barrels labeled “private equity investors.” These esoteric, multibillion-dollar Wall Street schemes rig the marketplace so “high-net-worth individuals” can grab fat profits and special tax breaks to buy up doctors’ offices, hometown newspapers, child care centers, etc. Consider America’s humble-but-beneficial mobile home parks. Homeownership has become so pricey that these affordable manufactured units now make up 10 percent of all single-family home sales. But while the buyers own the houses, they must rent lots from mobile park owners. This has generally been a square deal, when park owners live among the renters, providing decent services at reasonable rates. One such is Linnhaven Center with some 300 mobile home residents in Brunswick, Maine. But what is home to millions of people has become a quick-buck target for Wall Street’s equity profiteers. Waving cash at longtime trailer park owners, they’ve been snatching up thousands of these lots. Without warning, people’s home places are literally being bought out from under them. The absentee predators then raise rents to drive out residents, clearing the spaces for high-dollar renters or buyers. But wait, good news for a change! A new law in Maine gives mobile home residents a chance to buy their park, and community cooperatives exist to help arrange financing. That’s what the modest-income people of Linnhaven have now done. Such a big leap is not easy, but give people a fair chance, and they can make it work. As one Linnhaven woman put it, the community effort was much more than a property deal: “[It felt like] a chance to control your own destiny.” Do something! Interested in learning more about how mobile home owners can organize together? Check out Resident Owned Communities at rocusa.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Moderate, Milquetoast Democratic Party Loses Another Big One]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The morning after the election, a social media pundit expressed amazement that Democrat Kamala Harris had lost, noting that America is enjoying “an <em>objectively</em> strong economy.”</p><p>Indeed, the data shows impressive job growth, rising wages, slowing inflation, etc.  – all indicators of a solid economy. Nearly every pundit hailed this as meaning Harris’s campaign could glide on rising prosperity, while focusing her main message on what a dangerous bumbling buffoon Trump is.</p><p>The problem is that “objective economic data” often deceives. For example, consider economist John Kenneth Galbraith’s sad tale of the six-foot-tall statistician who drowned crossing a stream with an <em>average</em> depth of two feet.</p><p>Millions of Americans are drowning in today’s economy – even workaday people with college degrees – are struggling to make ends meet and feeling pessimistic about their future. Happy talk by economists, pundits, and politicians doesn’t pay the rising bills for rent, child care, groceries, insurance, medicines, etc. Everything is moving out of reach… <em>except</em> a protest vote. About half of Trump voters say high prices were “the largest factor” in their vote.</p><p>Democratic Party officials were dazzled by the soaring Dow Jones Average, ignoring the <em>Doug Jones Average</em>, which showed that Doug and Donna are struggling, anxious, angry… and even open to a bull goose demagog blustering that he’ll “fix” the rigged system on Day One.</p><p>Few of these hard-hit men and women actually believe in, agree with, trust, or like Trump – <em>nor are they stuck on supporting him</em>. But they will be, unless and until some progressive party decides to side with grassroots people in an unabashed fight for economic fairness and social justice. To help push in that direction, go to <a target="_blank" href="http://WorkingFamilies.org">WorkingFamilies.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-moderate-milquetoast-democratic</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:151553879</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/151553879/c14c460d07d0e56f235c34c78d8c5095.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/151553879/8399cab0af55d08bc3a9aca5607759a3.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>The morning after the election, a social media pundit expressed amazement that Democrat Kamala Harris had lost, noting that America is enjoying “an objectively strong economy.” Indeed, the data shows impressive job growth, rising wages, slowing inflation, etc.  – all indicators of a solid economy. Nearly every pundit hailed this as meaning Harris’s campaign could glide on rising prosperity, while focusing her main message on what a dangerous bumbling buffoon Trump is. The problem is that “objective economic data” often deceives. For example, consider economist John Kenneth Galbraith’s sad tale of the six-foot-tall statistician who drowned crossing a stream with an average depth of two feet. Millions of Americans are drowning in today’s economy – even workaday people with college degrees – are struggling to make ends meet and feeling pessimistic about their future. Happy talk by economists, pundits, and politicians doesn’t pay the rising bills for rent, child care, groceries, insurance, medicines, etc. Everything is moving out of reach… except a protest vote. About half of Trump voters say high prices were “the largest factor” in their vote. Democratic Party officials were dazzled by the soaring Dow Jones Average, ignoring the Doug Jones Average, which showed that Doug and Donna are struggling, anxious, angry… and even open to a bull goose demagog blustering that he’ll “fix” the rigged system on Day One. Few of these hard-hit men and women actually believe in, agree with, trust, or like Trump – nor are they stuck on supporting him. But they will be, unless and until some progressive party decides to side with grassroots people in an unabashed fight for economic fairness and social justice. To help push in that direction, go to WorkingFamilies.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>The morning after the election, a social media pundit expressed amazement that Democrat Kamala Harris had lost, noting that America is enjoying “an objectively strong economy.” Indeed, the data shows impressive job growth, rising wages, slowing inflation, etc.  – all indicators of a solid economy. Nearly every pundit hailed this as meaning Harris’s campaign could glide on rising prosperity, while focusing her main message on what a dangerous bumbling buffoon Trump is. The problem is that “objective economic data” often deceives. For example, consider economist John Kenneth Galbraith’s sad tale of the six-foot-tall statistician who drowned crossing a stream with an average depth of two feet. Millions of Americans are drowning in today’s economy – even workaday people with college degrees – are struggling to make ends meet and feeling pessimistic about their future. Happy talk by economists, pundits, and politicians doesn’t pay the rising bills for rent, child care, groceries, insurance, medicines, etc. Everything is moving out of reach… except a protest vote. About half of Trump voters say high prices were “the largest factor” in their vote. Democratic Party officials were dazzled by the soaring Dow Jones Average, ignoring the Doug Jones Average, which showed that Doug and Donna are struggling, anxious, angry… and even open to a bull goose demagog blustering that he’ll “fix” the rigged system on Day One. Few of these hard-hit men and women actually believe in, agree with, trust, or like Trump – nor are they stuck on supporting him. But they will be, unless and until some progressive party decides to side with grassroots people in an unabashed fight for economic fairness and social justice. To help push in that direction, go to WorkingFamilies.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[And the Fight Goes On]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Okay, the election was a gut punch. And all of us need a moment to catch our breath.</p><p>But no more than that, for this is a long-term battle, and we have enormous democratic strength to give us heart and hope for a progressive future. Yes, yesterday’s Trump surge is depressing and dangerous, but the message of that surge is not for progressives to sulk and surrender. Rather, a workaday majority is fairly shouting for the Democratic Party to get out of the corporate boardrooms and Washington salons, standing unequivocally, FDR-like, with that majority, focusing intently on the very volatile, central issues of power and powerlessness in our nation.</p><p>Election analysts hurl a blizzard of election statistics at us, but here’s one that I think tells the real story: Despite the intensity and importance of this year’s presidential election, some 20 million FEWER people voted than in 2020. Kamala Harris drew <em>14 million fewer votes</em> than Biden did back then. And, despite Trump’s grandiose claim of unprecedented popular support, he actually got 3 million fewer votes this year than in 2020.*</p><p>A big reason for Harris’ defeat, I think, in addition to the sexism and racism values that still raises its ugly head in our society, is that her campaign focused on how awful Trump is, rather than bringing a clear message of economic hope for hard pressed families. She bought into the establishment’s assertions that “objectively” the economy is doing great. While they exclaim that the Dow Jones Index is booming, most people say: But a boom for whom? Check the <em>Doug Jones</em> Index, and you’ll find Doug and Donna are struggling—and feeling some compatibility with Trump’s constant refrain that “the whole system is rigged .”</p><p>And when Harris did strike populist gold with her plan for Medicare to provide home health care  to help families who are struggling with the high costs of care for seniors, people with disabilities, and more, few people even knew she said that, because she didn’t hammer that popular message every day at every step.</p><p>Trump’s core message (magnified by X and a gaggle of other far-right media propagandists) is avowedly plutocratic, xenophobic, racist and sexist. <em>But I believe that America as a whole is better than that.</em></p><p>So our challenge is not to try appeasing MAGA extremists, but to buck-up and recommit to the hard, steady work of grassroots organizing, directly challenging what I call the <strong>6Bs</strong>: Bosses, Bankers, Billionaires, Big Shots, B******s, and Bullshitters who’re running roughshod over America’s workaday majority. </p><p>True progressivism has had to endure many downs, but it’s the ups that define us. So the fight continues, with renewed vigor. See you there. </p><p><em>* Number of votes is as of midday on November 6th, 2024. </em></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/and-the-fight-goes-on</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:151303447</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 02:16:24 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="3583729" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/151303447/56f8446a46aafeacd98d0fc62804f878.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>224</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/151303447/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Okay, the election was a gut punch. And all of us need a moment to catch our breath. But no more than that, for this is a long-term battle, and we have enormous democratic strength to give us heart and hope for a progressive future. Yes, yesterday’s Trump surge is depressing and dangerous, but the message of that surge is not for progressives to sulk and surrender. Rather, a workaday majority is fairly shouting for the Democratic Party to get out of the corporate boardrooms and Washington salons, standing unequivocally, FDR-like, with that majority, focusing intently on the very volatile, central issues of power and powerlessness in our nation. Election analysts hurl a blizzard of election statistics at us, but here’s one that I think tells the real story: Despite the intensity and importance of this year’s presidential election, some 20 million FEWER people voted than in 2020. Kamala Harris drew 14 million fewer votes than Biden did back then. And, despite Trump’s grandiose claim of unprecedented popular support, he actually got 3 million fewer votes this year than in 2020.* A big reason for Harris’ defeat, I think, in addition to the sexism and racism values that still raises its ugly head in our society, is that her campaign focused on how awful Trump is, rather than bringing a clear message of economic hope for hard pressed families. She bought into the establishment’s assertions that “objectively” the economy is doing great. While they exclaim that the Dow Jones Index is booming, most people say: But a boom for whom? Check the Doug Jones Index, and you’ll find Doug and Donna are struggling—and feeling some compatibility with Trump’s constant refrain that “the whole system is rigged .” And when Harris did strike populist gold with her plan for Medicare to provide home health care  to help families who are struggling with the high costs of care for seniors, people with disabilities, and more, few people even knew she said that, because she didn’t hammer that popular message every day at every step. Trump’s core message (magnified by X and a gaggle of other far-right media propagandists) is avowedly plutocratic, xenophobic, racist and sexist. But I believe that America as a whole is better than that. So our challenge is not to try appeasing MAGA extremists, but to buck-up and recommit to the hard, steady work of grassroots organizing, directly challenging what I call the 6Bs: Bosses, Bankers, Billionaires, Big Shots, B******s, and Bullshitters who’re running roughshod over America’s workaday majority.  True progressivism has had to endure many downs, but it’s the ups that define us. So the fight continues, with renewed vigor. See you there.  * Number of votes is as of midday on November 6th, 2024. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Okay, the election was a gut punch. And all of us need a moment to catch our breath. But no more than that, for this is a long-term battle, and we have enormous democratic strength to give us heart and hope for a progressive future. Yes, yesterday’s Trump surge is depressing and dangerous, but the message of that surge is not for progressives to sulk and surrender. Rather, a workaday majority is fairly shouting for the Democratic Party to get out of the corporate boardrooms and Washington salons, standing unequivocally, FDR-like, with that majority, focusing intently on the very volatile, central issues of power and powerlessness in our nation. Election analysts hurl a blizzard of election statistics at us, but here’s one that I think tells the real story: Despite the intensity and importance of this year’s presidential election, some 20 million FEWER people voted than in 2020. Kamala Harris drew 14 million fewer votes than Biden did back then. And, despite Trump’s grandiose claim of unprecedented popular support, he actually got 3 million fewer votes this year than in 2020.* A big reason for Harris’ defeat, I think, in addition to the sexism and racism values that still raises its ugly head in our society, is that her campaign focused on how awful Trump is, rather than bringing a clear message of economic hope for hard pressed families. She bought into the establishment’s assertions that “objectively” the economy is doing great. While they exclaim that the Dow Jones Index is booming, most people say: But a boom for whom? Check the Doug Jones Index, and you’ll find Doug and Donna are struggling—and feeling some compatibility with Trump’s constant refrain that “the whole system is rigged .” And when Harris did strike populist gold with her plan for Medicare to provide home health care  to help families who are struggling with the high costs of care for seniors, people with disabilities, and more, few people even knew she said that, because she didn’t hammer that popular message every day at every step. Trump’s core message (magnified by X and a gaggle of other far-right media propagandists) is avowedly plutocratic, xenophobic, racist and sexist. But I believe that America as a whole is better than that. So our challenge is not to try appeasing MAGA extremists, but to buck-up and recommit to the hard, steady work of grassroots organizing, directly challenging what I call the 6Bs: Bosses, Bankers, Billionaires, Big Shots, B******s, and Bullshitters who’re running roughshod over America’s workaday majority.  True progressivism has had to endure many downs, but it’s the ups that define us. So the fight continues, with renewed vigor. See you there.  * Number of votes is as of midday on November 6th, 2024. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bezos Bombs in His Role As Newspaper Owner]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>In bold type, nearly every newspaper urges readers to “VOTE! TAKE A STAND!”</p><p>But in this year’s truly momentous national election, we saw such giants of corporate media as the<em> Washington Post</em>, <em>LA Times</em>, and <em>USA Today </em>cower from taking their own stand on the presidency. Worse, the papers shamefully insisted that ducking their duty was itself a principled stand. Readers are smart enough to make their own decisions, they barked piously. Well, yes, but are you?</p><p>And who, exactly, are “you.” Take the <em>Washington Post</em>, a paper with a rich history of courageous journalism. But it wasn’t the paper’s knowledgeable reporters or editorial staffers who elected to be silent this year. Rather, one guy – Jeff Bezos – unilaterally chose to mute the paper’s voice.</p><p>Bezos, the gabillionaire founder of Amazon, bought the Post a decade ago, promising not to impose his financial self-interest over the staff’s journalistic integrity.</p><p>But that was then. Today, the notoriously weaselly Bezos is drawing some $13 billion from federal taxpayers, and he’s eager to get more. So, realizing that the next president can determine who gets those piles of money, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.npr.org/2024/10/28/nx-s1-5168416/washington-post-bezos-endorsement-president-cancellations-resignations">Bezos abruptly stopped his paper from endorsing Harris</a>, putting his financial principle above journalistic principles. The <em>Post</em> would’ve exploded, however, if he had dictated a Trump endorsement, so Boss Bezos tried the backdoor maneuver of no endorsement.</p><p>The <em>Post</em> exploded anyway. Star reporters either resigned or howled at the crass sell-out, while more than 250,000 readers cancelled their subscriptions. As one reader posted about the billionaire’s self-serving manipulation: “If you don’t have the guts to run a newspaper, don’t buy one.”</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/bezos-bombs-in-his-role-as-newspaper</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:151162053</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/151162053/5efa92243de02c51c2110a9506c17b59.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/151162053/e7fc9ff34effd2900f8c81058ca4cc7b.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>In bold type, nearly every newspaper urges readers to “VOTE! TAKE A STAND!” But in this year’s truly momentous national election, we saw such giants of corporate media as the Washington Post, LA Times, and USA Today cower from taking their own stand on the presidency. Worse, the papers shamefully insisted that ducking their duty was itself a principled stand. Readers are smart enough to make their own decisions, they barked piously. Well, yes, but are you? And who, exactly, are “you.” Take the Washington Post, a paper with a rich history of courageous journalism. But it wasn’t the paper’s knowledgeable reporters or editorial staffers who elected to be silent this year. Rather, one guy – Jeff Bezos – unilaterally chose to mute the paper’s voice. Bezos, the gabillionaire founder of Amazon, bought the Post a decade ago, promising not to impose his financial self-interest over the staff’s journalistic integrity. But that was then. Today, the notoriously weaselly Bezos is drawing some $13 billion from federal taxpayers, and he’s eager to get more. So, realizing that the next president can determine who gets those piles of money, Bezos abruptly stopped his paper from endorsing Harris, putting his financial principle above journalistic principles. The Post would’ve exploded, however, if he had dictated a Trump endorsement, so Boss Bezos tried the backdoor maneuver of no endorsement. The Post exploded anyway. Star reporters either resigned or howled at the crass sell-out, while more than 250,000 readers cancelled their subscriptions. As one reader posted about the billionaire’s self-serving manipulation: “If you don’t have the guts to run a newspaper, don’t buy one.” Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>In bold type, nearly every newspaper urges readers to “VOTE! TAKE A STAND!” But in this year’s truly momentous national election, we saw such giants of corporate media as the Washington Post, LA Times, and USA Today cower from taking their own stand on the presidency. Worse, the papers shamefully insisted that ducking their duty was itself a principled stand. Readers are smart enough to make their own decisions, they barked piously. Well, yes, but are you? And who, exactly, are “you.” Take the Washington Post, a paper with a rich history of courageous journalism. But it wasn’t the paper’s knowledgeable reporters or editorial staffers who elected to be silent this year. Rather, one guy – Jeff Bezos – unilaterally chose to mute the paper’s voice. Bezos, the gabillionaire founder of Amazon, bought the Post a decade ago, promising not to impose his financial self-interest over the staff’s journalistic integrity. But that was then. Today, the notoriously weaselly Bezos is drawing some $13 billion from federal taxpayers, and he’s eager to get more. So, realizing that the next president can determine who gets those piles of money, Bezos abruptly stopped his paper from endorsing Harris, putting his financial principle above journalistic principles. The Post would’ve exploded, however, if he had dictated a Trump endorsement, so Boss Bezos tried the backdoor maneuver of no endorsement. The Post exploded anyway. Star reporters either resigned or howled at the crass sell-out, while more than 250,000 readers cancelled their subscriptions. As one reader posted about the billionaire’s self-serving manipulation: “If you don’t have the guts to run a newspaper, don’t buy one.” Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can Our Elections Be Made Even More Vapid? Some Are Banking On It.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Many people feel that America’s political campaigns have become vapid PR hustles with little connection to the real-life concerns of workaday people. Luckily, Adam Swart says he has the fix for such voter malaise: Just add a more professional level of vapidity to the process, he says, and you can reduce the need for having actual voters involved in campaigning.</p><p>Swart is a for-hire politico who’s been hailed as a “visionary” and a “business rockstar” for launching an outfit he calls: <a target="_blank" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowds_on_Demand">Crowds on Demand</a>. His entrepreneurial concept is as simple as it is devious. Rather than the tedium of strategizing and organizing people into grassroots campaigns, just pay his COD team to stage a “movement” – you know, like Hollywood would do. Indeed, Swart’s operation is even headquartered in the center of Hollywood make believe, Beverly Hills.</p><p>But let him sell his own product. He says he can create and staff a turn-key political front group for clients. “We provide everything,” exclaims COD’s website, “including the people, the materials, and even the ideas… We can help you plan the strategy and execute it.”</p><p>How happy – if you’re a corporate schemer needing to win or defeat a proposal, but you don’t have any grassroots base of support, Crowds On Demand promises to fake it for you. “We can set up protests, rallies, demonstrations… and even create non-profit organizations to advance your agenda.” It’s basically an Astroturf campaign operation, but with even less turf and more plastic.</p><p>If there is one thing the American majority would agree on today, it is that the last thing our political system needs is more PR trickery, issue fakery, and political hustlers. How about we give a little more honesty a try?</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/can-our-elections-be-made-even-more</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:151164322</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 16:25:45 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/151164322/e85797d22547928b92213e34d1d4508c.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/151164322/ebe2e7ad074b3ca92ef8965e6d5c3fb9.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Many people feel that America’s political campaigns have become vapid PR hustles with little connection to the real-life concerns of workaday people. Luckily, Adam Swart says he has the fix for such voter malaise: Just add a more professional level of vapidity to the process, he says, and you can reduce the need for having actual voters involved in campaigning. Swart is a for-hire politico who’s been hailed as a “visionary” and a “business rockstar” for launching an outfit he calls: Crowds on Demand. His entrepreneurial concept is as simple as it is devious. Rather than the tedium of strategizing and organizing people into grassroots campaigns, just pay his COD team to stage a “movement” – you know, like Hollywood would do. Indeed, Swart’s operation is even headquartered in the center of Hollywood make believe, Beverly Hills. But let him sell his own product. He says he can create and staff a turn-key political front group for clients. “We provide everything,” exclaims COD’s website, “including the people, the materials, and even the ideas… We can help you plan the strategy and execute it.” How happy – if you’re a corporate schemer needing to win or defeat a proposal, but you don’t have any grassroots base of support, Crowds On Demand promises to fake it for you. “We can set up protests, rallies, demonstrations… and even create non-profit organizations to advance your agenda.” It’s basically an Astroturf campaign operation, but with even less turf and more plastic. If there is one thing the American majority would agree on today, it is that the last thing our political system needs is more PR trickery, issue fakery, and political hustlers. How about we give a little more honesty a try? Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Many people feel that America’s political campaigns have become vapid PR hustles with little connection to the real-life concerns of workaday people. Luckily, Adam Swart says he has the fix for such voter malaise: Just add a more professional level of vapidity to the process, he says, and you can reduce the need for having actual voters involved in campaigning. Swart is a for-hire politico who’s been hailed as a “visionary” and a “business rockstar” for launching an outfit he calls: Crowds on Demand. His entrepreneurial concept is as simple as it is devious. Rather than the tedium of strategizing and organizing people into grassroots campaigns, just pay his COD team to stage a “movement” – you know, like Hollywood would do. Indeed, Swart’s operation is even headquartered in the center of Hollywood make believe, Beverly Hills. But let him sell his own product. He says he can create and staff a turn-key political front group for clients. “We provide everything,” exclaims COD’s website, “including the people, the materials, and even the ideas… We can help you plan the strategy and execute it.” How happy – if you’re a corporate schemer needing to win or defeat a proposal, but you don’t have any grassroots base of support, Crowds On Demand promises to fake it for you. “We can set up protests, rallies, demonstrations… and even create non-profit organizations to advance your agenda.” It’s basically an Astroturf campaign operation, but with even less turf and more plastic. If there is one thing the American majority would agree on today, it is that the last thing our political system needs is more PR trickery, issue fakery, and political hustlers. How about we give a little more honesty a try? Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[CEOs Show Us How To Raise Everyone’s Pay]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Here’s a progressive idea I picked up from the unlikeliest of sources: Corporate CEOs!</p><p>For decades, these chieftains of our economic order have been steadily implementing a very visionary process for establishing corporate wage levels. The essence of it is this: <em>Let the workers set their own pay</em>! Since the 1970s, when the idea began taking hold in Corporate America, pay levels have zoomed up by more than 1,000 percent.</p><p>Well… not for you. This set-your-own pay movement has only been available to top corporate executives, whose median paychecks now top $16 million a year! But since it’s been a boon for this test group, I say it’s time to expand the no-hassle compensation concept to all employees. This would greatly boost grassroots purchasing power, economic growth, and fairness for all.</p><p>“Omigod no!” squawk corporate apologists, rushing to say that, technically, CEOs do not directly set their pay. Rather, the bosses have attached their earnings to their corporations’ ever-rising stock prices. Thus, astronomical rewards go to those who obsessively focus on jacking-up the price of their own stock, even though that’s a selfishly-narrow and false measure of a corporation’s performance.</p><p>Also, stock price is no indicator of a CEO’s worthiness. Even bosses who’re blockheads can still get a boost simply because they’ve rigged the system to hitch a free ride on inflated stock value.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… Still, if it’s good enough for them, why not an equal deal for working stiffs, who actually deliver the products and services that give a corporation some true value. I say, each worker should get the same percentage increase in pay that the top honcho takes. It’s a very simple process… and it’s only fair.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/ceos-show-us-how-to-raise-everyones</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:150843896</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/150843896/7d42cdb1578b5e6a4c9fd570018e9149.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/150843896/5072b7f80f0322771d1c83261d567d36.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Here’s a progressive idea I picked up from the unlikeliest of sources: Corporate CEOs! For decades, these chieftains of our economic order have been steadily implementing a very visionary process for establishing corporate wage levels. The essence of it is this: Let the workers set their own pay! Since the 1970s, when the idea began taking hold in Corporate America, pay levels have zoomed up by more than 1,000 percent. Well… not for you. This set-your-own pay movement has only been available to top corporate executives, whose median paychecks now top $16 million a year! But since it’s been a boon for this test group, I say it’s time to expand the no-hassle compensation concept to all employees. This would greatly boost grassroots purchasing power, economic growth, and fairness for all. “Omigod no!” squawk corporate apologists, rushing to say that, technically, CEOs do not directly set their pay. Rather, the bosses have attached their earnings to their corporations’ ever-rising stock prices. Thus, astronomical rewards go to those who obsessively focus on jacking-up the price of their own stock, even though that’s a selfishly-narrow and false measure of a corporation’s performance. Also, stock price is no indicator of a CEO’s worthiness. Even bosses who’re blockheads can still get a boost simply because they’ve rigged the system to hitch a free ride on inflated stock value. This is Jim Hightower saying… Still, if it’s good enough for them, why not an equal deal for working stiffs, who actually deliver the products and services that give a corporation some true value. I say, each worker should get the same percentage increase in pay that the top honcho takes. It’s a very simple process… and it’s only fair. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Here’s a progressive idea I picked up from the unlikeliest of sources: Corporate CEOs! For decades, these chieftains of our economic order have been steadily implementing a very visionary process for establishing corporate wage levels. The essence of it is this: Let the workers set their own pay! Since the 1970s, when the idea began taking hold in Corporate America, pay levels have zoomed up by more than 1,000 percent. Well… not for you. This set-your-own pay movement has only been available to top corporate executives, whose median paychecks now top $16 million a year! But since it’s been a boon for this test group, I say it’s time to expand the no-hassle compensation concept to all employees. This would greatly boost grassroots purchasing power, economic growth, and fairness for all. “Omigod no!” squawk corporate apologists, rushing to say that, technically, CEOs do not directly set their pay. Rather, the bosses have attached their earnings to their corporations’ ever-rising stock prices. Thus, astronomical rewards go to those who obsessively focus on jacking-up the price of their own stock, even though that’s a selfishly-narrow and false measure of a corporation’s performance. Also, stock price is no indicator of a CEO’s worthiness. Even bosses who’re blockheads can still get a boost simply because they’ve rigged the system to hitch a free ride on inflated stock value. This is Jim Hightower saying… Still, if it’s good enough for them, why not an equal deal for working stiffs, who actually deliver the products and services that give a corporation some true value. I say, each worker should get the same percentage increase in pay that the top honcho takes. It’s a very simple process… and it’s only fair. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[ The Shame of TD Bank’s Jolly Bankers]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Woody Guthrie satirized Depression-era bankers who routinely gouged farmers and poor people. “I’m a jolly banker, jolly banker am I,” Woody sang, about the joyful lenders who profiteered on people’s misery.</p><p>Woody’s song could be sung today by Bharat Masrani, CEO of the TD Bank empire. Investigative digger <a target="_blank" href="https://substack.com/profile/364398-judd-legum">Judd Legum</a> reports that Masrani <a target="_blank" href="https://popular.info/p/td-bank-executives-oversee-670-billion?">has long profited from a jolly scheme by his bank to launder $670 million in drug money from criminal networks</a>. Federal prosecutors found that top TD bankers knew they were engaged in illegal drug dealing, but—<em>shhhh</em>—they “chose profits over [legal] compliance.”</p><p>So – POW! – The Feds socked it to TD Bank with a $3 billion fine. That’ll teach ‘em… right?</p><p>No. Banks don’t commit crimes; bankers do. But pointedly, none of TD Bank’s top officials were charged with the crimes they committed or sanctioned. Masrani, who now admits his culpability, simply says, “I apologize.”</p><p>That’s it. He faces no consequences! He got $10 million in pay last year – and no one even says: Give it back. Also, he’s now retiring but expects to get a multimillion-dollar farewell package and become a paid consultant for the bank. How is this supposed to deter other bank honchos from turning criminal?</p><p>Meanwhile, even though the bank must shovel out three billion Big Ones for its executives’ illegalities, that’s no deterrent to executive criminality. Banks today reap such excessive profits that losing $3-billion is just written off as the cost of doing business – freeing executives to create new ways to rig the system for their own profit.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… The message to us commoners is plain: “Do the crime, and you’ll do the time – unless you’re a jolly banker.”</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-shame-of-td-banks-jolly-bankers</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:150841163</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/150841163/e5a789d8be17c7305f3063e933f2718c.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/150841163/2d239671f0adb2fd60b2fa421b6bfad4.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Woody Guthrie satirized Depression-era bankers who routinely gouged farmers and poor people. “I’m a jolly banker, jolly banker am I,” Woody sang, about the joyful lenders who profiteered on people’s misery. Woody’s song could be sung today by Bharat Masrani, CEO of the TD Bank empire. Investigative digger Judd Legum reports that Masrani has long profited from a jolly scheme by his bank to launder $670 million in drug money from criminal networks. Federal prosecutors found that top TD bankers knew they were engaged in illegal drug dealing, but—shhhh—they “chose profits over [legal] compliance.” So – POW! – The Feds socked it to TD Bank with a $3 billion fine. That’ll teach ‘em… right? No. Banks don’t commit crimes; bankers do. But pointedly, none of TD Bank’s top officials were charged with the crimes they committed or sanctioned. Masrani, who now admits his culpability, simply says, “I apologize.” That’s it. He faces no consequences! He got $10 million in pay last year – and no one even says: Give it back. Also, he’s now retiring but expects to get a multimillion-dollar farewell package and become a paid consultant for the bank. How is this supposed to deter other bank honchos from turning criminal? Meanwhile, even though the bank must shovel out three billion Big Ones for its executives’ illegalities, that’s no deterrent to executive criminality. Banks today reap such excessive profits that losing $3-billion is just written off as the cost of doing business – freeing executives to create new ways to rig the system for their own profit. This is Jim Hightower saying… The message to us commoners is plain: “Do the crime, and you’ll do the time – unless you’re a jolly banker.” Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Woody Guthrie satirized Depression-era bankers who routinely gouged farmers and poor people. “I’m a jolly banker, jolly banker am I,” Woody sang, about the joyful lenders who profiteered on people’s misery. Woody’s song could be sung today by Bharat Masrani, CEO of the TD Bank empire. Investigative digger Judd Legum reports that Masrani has long profited from a jolly scheme by his bank to launder $670 million in drug money from criminal networks. Federal prosecutors found that top TD bankers knew they were engaged in illegal drug dealing, but—shhhh—they “chose profits over [legal] compliance.” So – POW! – The Feds socked it to TD Bank with a $3 billion fine. That’ll teach ‘em… right? No. Banks don’t commit crimes; bankers do. But pointedly, none of TD Bank’s top officials were charged with the crimes they committed or sanctioned. Masrani, who now admits his culpability, simply says, “I apologize.” That’s it. He faces no consequences! He got $10 million in pay last year – and no one even says: Give it back. Also, he’s now retiring but expects to get a multimillion-dollar farewell package and become a paid consultant for the bank. How is this supposed to deter other bank honchos from turning criminal? Meanwhile, even though the bank must shovel out three billion Big Ones for its executives’ illegalities, that’s no deterrent to executive criminality. Banks today reap such excessive profits that losing $3-billion is just written off as the cost of doing business – freeing executives to create new ways to rig the system for their own profit. This is Jim Hightower saying… The message to us commoners is plain: “Do the crime, and you’ll do the time – unless you’re a jolly banker.” Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lilly Ledbetter Fought the B******s… and Won for All of Us]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Forget the cartoonish “Great Man” version of American history, nearly all social progress in our country has been spurred by unheralded “nobodies” who felt a sting of injustice – and resolved to right the wrong.</p><p>Lilly Ledbetter, who recently died at 86, was one such trailblazing rebel, and it’s worth remembering her gutsy stand for “paycheck fairness.” After 20 years as a supervisor at Goodyear Tire in Gadsden, Alabama, Ledbetter was stunned in 1998 to learn that she had routinely been paid about 40 percent less than men doing the same job – robbing her of some $200,000. She promptly sued Goodyear for backpay… and won. Justice!</p><p>But Goodyear unleashed a pack of lawyers to drag Lilly through spirit-sucking years of legal appeals, including to the Supreme Court. There, Sam Alito, the far-right judicial extremist absurdly decreed that she should have filed her claim of sex discrimination when it first started 20 years ago. Never mind that she had no way of knowing back then that she was being gouged, Alito is not one to let reality interfere with his political agenda. So, she lost.</p><p>But sometimes you win by losing. Stung by the injustice, Ledbetter became a modern day Mother Jones, launching a fiery national campaign for workplace fairness. Backed by women’s groups and labor, her tenacious organizing finally compelled Washington to enact the 2009 “Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act,” eliminating the sex discrimination loophole exploited by the likes of Alito and Goodyear.</p><p>Ledbetter never got a penny of the money the system cheated her out of, but with the passage of this law, she rightly said: “I have an even richer reward.” Yes… and so does America.  </p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/lilly-ledbetter-fought-the-bastards</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:150519168</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/150519168/60835dcee2cd6be8cf3723af96806292.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/150519168/1148f7ec3a371bf822ca1d7013912f83.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Forget the cartoonish “Great Man” version of American history, nearly all social progress in our country has been spurred by unheralded “nobodies” who felt a sting of injustice – and resolved to right the wrong. Lilly Ledbetter, who recently died at 86, was one such trailblazing rebel, and it’s worth remembering her gutsy stand for “paycheck fairness.” After 20 years as a supervisor at Goodyear Tire in Gadsden, Alabama, Ledbetter was stunned in 1998 to learn that she had routinely been paid about 40 percent less than men doing the same job – robbing her of some $200,000. She promptly sued Goodyear for backpay… and won. Justice! But Goodyear unleashed a pack of lawyers to drag Lilly through spirit-sucking years of legal appeals, including to the Supreme Court. There, Sam Alito, the far-right judicial extremist absurdly decreed that she should have filed her claim of sex discrimination when it first started 20 years ago. Never mind that she had no way of knowing back then that she was being gouged, Alito is not one to let reality interfere with his political agenda. So, she lost. But sometimes you win by losing. Stung by the injustice, Ledbetter became a modern day Mother Jones, launching a fiery national campaign for workplace fairness. Backed by women’s groups and labor, her tenacious organizing finally compelled Washington to enact the 2009 “Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act,” eliminating the sex discrimination loophole exploited by the likes of Alito and Goodyear. Ledbetter never got a penny of the money the system cheated her out of, but with the passage of this law, she rightly said: “I have an even richer reward.” Yes… and so does America.   Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Forget the cartoonish “Great Man” version of American history, nearly all social progress in our country has been spurred by unheralded “nobodies” who felt a sting of injustice – and resolved to right the wrong. Lilly Ledbetter, who recently died at 86, was one such trailblazing rebel, and it’s worth remembering her gutsy stand for “paycheck fairness.” After 20 years as a supervisor at Goodyear Tire in Gadsden, Alabama, Ledbetter was stunned in 1998 to learn that she had routinely been paid about 40 percent less than men doing the same job – robbing her of some $200,000. She promptly sued Goodyear for backpay… and won. Justice! But Goodyear unleashed a pack of lawyers to drag Lilly through spirit-sucking years of legal appeals, including to the Supreme Court. There, Sam Alito, the far-right judicial extremist absurdly decreed that she should have filed her claim of sex discrimination when it first started 20 years ago. Never mind that she had no way of knowing back then that she was being gouged, Alito is not one to let reality interfere with his political agenda. So, she lost. But sometimes you win by losing. Stung by the injustice, Ledbetter became a modern day Mother Jones, launching a fiery national campaign for workplace fairness. Backed by women’s groups and labor, her tenacious organizing finally compelled Washington to enact the 2009 “Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act,” eliminating the sex discrimination loophole exploited by the likes of Alito and Goodyear. Ledbetter never got a penny of the money the system cheated her out of, but with the passage of this law, she rightly said: “I have an even richer reward.” Yes… and so does America.   Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yes, the System Is Rigged Against the Working Class]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>A lot of working stiffs today say the system is rigged to keep them from getting ahead. One thing that might make them feel like that is this: The system <em>is</em> rigged against them!</p><p>Consider some very hard workers busting their butts going up and down our residential streets – Amazon’s army of delivery drivers, hauling tons of packages right to our doorsteps. Their exhausting, corporate-mandated hustle is a key source of Amazon’s enormous profits – making Amazon boss Jeff Bezos a cartoonishly-rich global playboy.</p><p>Yet Bezos – who’s entire career has been built on rigging the system against employees, competitors, and taxpayers – even refuses to acknowledge that those hundreds of thousands of drivers work for him. He disavows them because many are <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/10/business/economy/amazon-delivery-drivers-labor-nlrb.html">attempting to unionize</a> over the autocratic and abusive working conditions he imposes on them – including having such dehumanizing delivery schedules that drivers can’t even stop to pee. So, they commonly carry bottles so they can “go on the go.”</p><p>Not my problem, says Jeff, pointing to a perverse, corporate-written gotcha in American labor law. It rigs the system by letting Amazon contract with thousands of local front groups called DSPs – “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/10/business/economy/amazon-delivery-drivers-labor-nlrb.html">delivery service partners.</a>” They then hire drivers to deliver Amazon’s packages. This lets Bezos deny responsibility for how the workers are treated since, technically, he doesn’t employ them.</p><p>Cute, huh? Worse, his DSP ruse further rigs the system by proclaiming that unions cannot even try to organize Amazon itself. Instead, they must go place to place, trying to organize each of the 3,000 DSP fronts that provide Amazon’s workforce.</p><p>These legalistic manipulations disempower workers, enrich bosses, and enforce the Corporate Golden Rule: “Those who have the gold, rule.”</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/yes-the-system-is-rigged-against</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:150518547</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/150518547/617c4b3ef1cd792a03b661c5d2e082c6.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/150518547/aae49a74159b2a2771fc4ee8ad8699c8.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>A lot of working stiffs today say the system is rigged to keep them from getting ahead. One thing that might make them feel like that is this: The system is rigged against them! Consider some very hard workers busting their butts going up and down our residential streets – Amazon’s army of delivery drivers, hauling tons of packages right to our doorsteps. Their exhausting, corporate-mandated hustle is a key source of Amazon’s enormous profits – making Amazon boss Jeff Bezos a cartoonishly-rich global playboy. Yet Bezos – who’s entire career has been built on rigging the system against employees, competitors, and taxpayers – even refuses to acknowledge that those hundreds of thousands of drivers work for him. He disavows them because many are attempting to unionize over the autocratic and abusive working conditions he imposes on them – including having such dehumanizing delivery schedules that drivers can’t even stop to pee. So, they commonly carry bottles so they can “go on the go.” Not my problem, says Jeff, pointing to a perverse, corporate-written gotcha in American labor law. It rigs the system by letting Amazon contract with thousands of local front groups called DSPs – “delivery service partners.” They then hire drivers to deliver Amazon’s packages. This lets Bezos deny responsibility for how the workers are treated since, technically, he doesn’t employ them. Cute, huh? Worse, his DSP ruse further rigs the system by proclaiming that unions cannot even try to organize Amazon itself. Instead, they must go place to place, trying to organize each of the 3,000 DSP fronts that provide Amazon’s workforce. These legalistic manipulations disempower workers, enrich bosses, and enforce the Corporate Golden Rule: “Those who have the gold, rule.” Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>A lot of working stiffs today say the system is rigged to keep them from getting ahead. One thing that might make them feel like that is this: The system is rigged against them! Consider some very hard workers busting their butts going up and down our residential streets – Amazon’s army of delivery drivers, hauling tons of packages right to our doorsteps. Their exhausting, corporate-mandated hustle is a key source of Amazon’s enormous profits – making Amazon boss Jeff Bezos a cartoonishly-rich global playboy. Yet Bezos – who’s entire career has been built on rigging the system against employees, competitors, and taxpayers – even refuses to acknowledge that those hundreds of thousands of drivers work for him. He disavows them because many are attempting to unionize over the autocratic and abusive working conditions he imposes on them – including having such dehumanizing delivery schedules that drivers can’t even stop to pee. So, they commonly carry bottles so they can “go on the go.” Not my problem, says Jeff, pointing to a perverse, corporate-written gotcha in American labor law. It rigs the system by letting Amazon contract with thousands of local front groups called DSPs – “delivery service partners.” They then hire drivers to deliver Amazon’s packages. This lets Bezos deny responsibility for how the workers are treated since, technically, he doesn’t employ them. Cute, huh? Worse, his DSP ruse further rigs the system by proclaiming that unions cannot even try to organize Amazon itself. Instead, they must go place to place, trying to organize each of the 3,000 DSP fronts that provide Amazon’s workforce. These legalistic manipulations disempower workers, enrich bosses, and enforce the Corporate Golden Rule: “Those who have the gold, rule.” Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sordid Story: Corporate Executives Get Self-Gratification From M&As]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Sadism and masochism (abbreviated as S&M) are generally frowned on in polite society as perverse acts of sexual gratification. But what should we make of M&As?</p><p>This is Wall Street’s abbreviation of mergers and acquisitions, which are acts of self-gratification practiced by top corporate executives. Such financial couplings can also be judged as socially perverse, since they eliminate economic competition, slash jobs, raise consumer prices, shrivel markets for local suppliers, stifle innovation, and dramatically increase inequality. Despite all this, M&As are cheered by the moneyed establishment as wholesome corporate friskiness to be tolerated because they produce gushers of wealth.</p><p>Yes… but wealth for whom?</p><p>Consider <a target="_blank" href="https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/02/ftc-challenges-krogers-acquisition-albertsons">the brazen merger now being hotly pursued by Kroger and Albertsons</a> – two supermarket giants that themselves are spawns of multiple mergers, having consolidated dozens of previously independent competitors like Safeway, Ralphs, Vons, and Randalls. Thousands of employees were punted, hundreds of stores closed… and grocery prices soared. Yet, the two remaining giants now want anti-monopoly regulators to believe in a “magic math” theory that subtracting competitors <em>adds</em> competition.</p><p>Bear in mind that neither chain is on the skids – both are making billions in profits, their CEO pay is astronomical, and investors are reaping fat dividends. But, too much is not enough, and mergers are a profiteering freeway that paves its way to a bonanza of monopoly pricing. And that’s why these two are frantic to cozy up, having already paid nearly a billion dollars in fees to lawyers, bankers, lobbyists, and PR agents to consummate their merger.</p><p>Oh, there’s one more crude incentive that stimulates these corporate trysts: <em>Executives quietly pocket merger payments </em>if their deals go through. Albertsons’ CEO, for example, is set to receive $43 million for merging with Kroger.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/sordid-story-corporate-executives</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:150356602</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/150356602/b82275b241a7937accce829c3fb7ffed.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/150356602/b1f140f70a2a75487e6579096dcf3dba.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Sadism and masochism (abbreviated as S&amp;M) are generally frowned on in polite society as perverse acts of sexual gratification. But what should we make of M&amp;As? This is Wall Street’s abbreviation of mergers and acquisitions, which are acts of self-gratification practiced by top corporate executives. Such financial couplings can also be judged as socially perverse, since they eliminate economic competition, slash jobs, raise consumer prices, shrivel markets for local suppliers, stifle innovation, and dramatically increase inequality. Despite all this, M&amp;As are cheered by the moneyed establishment as wholesome corporate friskiness to be tolerated because they produce gushers of wealth. Yes… but wealth for whom? Consider the brazen merger now being hotly pursued by Kroger and Albertsons – two supermarket giants that themselves are spawns of multiple mergers, having consolidated dozens of previously independent competitors like Safeway, Ralphs, Vons, and Randalls. Thousands of employees were punted, hundreds of stores closed… and grocery prices soared. Yet, the two remaining giants now want anti-monopoly regulators to believe in a “magic math” theory that subtracting competitors adds competition. Bear in mind that neither chain is on the skids – both are making billions in profits, their CEO pay is astronomical, and investors are reaping fat dividends. But, too much is not enough, and mergers are a profiteering freeway that paves its way to a bonanza of monopoly pricing. And that’s why these two are frantic to cozy up, having already paid nearly a billion dollars in fees to lawyers, bankers, lobbyists, and PR agents to consummate their merger. Oh, there’s one more crude incentive that stimulates these corporate trysts: Executives quietly pocket merger payments if their deals go through. Albertsons’ CEO, for example, is set to receive $43 million for merging with Kroger. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Sadism and masochism (abbreviated as S&amp;M) are generally frowned on in polite society as perverse acts of sexual gratification. But what should we make of M&amp;As? This is Wall Street’s abbreviation of mergers and acquisitions, which are acts of self-gratification practiced by top corporate executives. Such financial couplings can also be judged as socially perverse, since they eliminate economic competition, slash jobs, raise consumer prices, shrivel markets for local suppliers, stifle innovation, and dramatically increase inequality. Despite all this, M&amp;As are cheered by the moneyed establishment as wholesome corporate friskiness to be tolerated because they produce gushers of wealth. Yes… but wealth for whom? Consider the brazen merger now being hotly pursued by Kroger and Albertsons – two supermarket giants that themselves are spawns of multiple mergers, having consolidated dozens of previously independent competitors like Safeway, Ralphs, Vons, and Randalls. Thousands of employees were punted, hundreds of stores closed… and grocery prices soared. Yet, the two remaining giants now want anti-monopoly regulators to believe in a “magic math” theory that subtracting competitors adds competition. Bear in mind that neither chain is on the skids – both are making billions in profits, their CEO pay is astronomical, and investors are reaping fat dividends. But, too much is not enough, and mergers are a profiteering freeway that paves its way to a bonanza of monopoly pricing. And that’s why these two are frantic to cozy up, having already paid nearly a billion dollars in fees to lawyers, bankers, lobbyists, and PR agents to consummate their merger. Oh, there’s one more crude incentive that stimulates these corporate trysts: Executives quietly pocket merger payments if their deals go through. Albertsons’ CEO, for example, is set to receive $43 million for merging with Kroger. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Holy Donald Trump! An Oklahoma Bible Story]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>As schoolkids learn in civics class, our government is made up of three separate branches. Your church is not one of them.</p><p>Unless you live in Oklahoma.</p><p>There, a fanatical Christian Nationalist named <a target="_blank" href="https://oklahomawatch.org/?s=ryan%20walters">Ryan Walters</a> is the appointed superintendent of schools. But he’s confused on the concept of “instruction,” viewing it not as teaching, but as a commandment to implement his own personal theology.</p><p>In June, he pompously instructed all public schools to put the Christian Bible in <em>every classroom</em> and to use them for teaching every subject. He’s also demanding millions of dollars from taxpayers to buy Bibles.</p><p>But not just any Bible. This month, Walters went from kooky to corrupt, issuing bid requirements that effectively narrowed the state’s purchase to one particular edition of Christianity’s Holy Word – the “<a target="_blank" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_Bless_the_U.S.A._Bible">God Bless the USA Bible.</a>” It’s a MAGA-approved compilation promoting the dogma that America is meant to be governed by Christians. Marketed by right-wing country musician Lee Greenwood, the volume is being hawked in commercials by presidential flimflammer Donald Trump, who is avidly supported by Walters.</p><p>Oh, coincidentally, it turns out that Trump gets a cut of every one of Greenwood’s sales. So, a chunk Oklahoma’s big Bible purchase would be pocketed by The Donald, enriching the most unholy president in history with manna from above.</p><p>The stench of this scam was even too much for Oklahoma’s aggressively partisan GOP leaders, who’ve now rewritten Walters’ purchase order to eliminate the Trump bid-rigging bias. Still, regular citizens are asking why the hell their state is trying to indoctrinate schoolkids, putting one religion above all others. To follow this Bible Story, connect with the nonprofit news group, Oklahoma Watch: <a target="_blank" href="http://OklahomaWatch.org">OklahomaWatch.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/holy-donald-trump-an-oklahoma-bible</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:150262523</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 16:04:29 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/150262523/07ad8cb19cc2c1f3dd92a7d0296fb2b0.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/150262523/253788f36542441d20093d54cd610e72.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>As schoolkids learn in civics class, our government is made up of three separate branches. Your church is not one of them. Unless you live in Oklahoma. There, a fanatical Christian Nationalist named Ryan Walters is the appointed superintendent of schools. But he’s confused on the concept of “instruction,” viewing it not as teaching, but as a commandment to implement his own personal theology. In June, he pompously instructed all public schools to put the Christian Bible in every classroom and to use them for teaching every subject. He’s also demanding millions of dollars from taxpayers to buy Bibles. But not just any Bible. This month, Walters went from kooky to corrupt, issuing bid requirements that effectively narrowed the state’s purchase to one particular edition of Christianity’s Holy Word – the “God Bless the USA Bible.” It’s a MAGA-approved compilation promoting the dogma that America is meant to be governed by Christians. Marketed by right-wing country musician Lee Greenwood, the volume is being hawked in commercials by presidential flimflammer Donald Trump, who is avidly supported by Walters. Oh, coincidentally, it turns out that Trump gets a cut of every one of Greenwood’s sales. So, a chunk Oklahoma’s big Bible purchase would be pocketed by The Donald, enriching the most unholy president in history with manna from above. The stench of this scam was even too much for Oklahoma’s aggressively partisan GOP leaders, who’ve now rewritten Walters’ purchase order to eliminate the Trump bid-rigging bias. Still, regular citizens are asking why the hell their state is trying to indoctrinate schoolkids, putting one religion above all others. To follow this Bible Story, connect with the nonprofit news group, Oklahoma Watch: OklahomaWatch.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>As schoolkids learn in civics class, our government is made up of three separate branches. Your church is not one of them. Unless you live in Oklahoma. There, a fanatical Christian Nationalist named Ryan Walters is the appointed superintendent of schools. But he’s confused on the concept of “instruction,” viewing it not as teaching, but as a commandment to implement his own personal theology. In June, he pompously instructed all public schools to put the Christian Bible in every classroom and to use them for teaching every subject. He’s also demanding millions of dollars from taxpayers to buy Bibles. But not just any Bible. This month, Walters went from kooky to corrupt, issuing bid requirements that effectively narrowed the state’s purchase to one particular edition of Christianity’s Holy Word – the “God Bless the USA Bible.” It’s a MAGA-approved compilation promoting the dogma that America is meant to be governed by Christians. Marketed by right-wing country musician Lee Greenwood, the volume is being hawked in commercials by presidential flimflammer Donald Trump, who is avidly supported by Walters. Oh, coincidentally, it turns out that Trump gets a cut of every one of Greenwood’s sales. So, a chunk Oklahoma’s big Bible purchase would be pocketed by The Donald, enriching the most unholy president in history with manna from above. The stench of this scam was even too much for Oklahoma’s aggressively partisan GOP leaders, who’ve now rewritten Walters’ purchase order to eliminate the Trump bid-rigging bias. Still, regular citizens are asking why the hell their state is trying to indoctrinate schoolkids, putting one religion above all others. To follow this Bible Story, connect with the nonprofit news group, Oklahoma Watch: OklahomaWatch.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[To Fight Right-Wing Book Bans, Read Banned Books!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>In high-school, my friend Charlie and I once poked into an abandoned Victorian house in our hometown. Up in the attic, we found a secret door to a space containing several boxes of books.</p><p>One held 50 copies of <em>The Age of Reason</em>, Thomas Paine’s 1794 treatise ridiculing the myths of Christian theology and the Bible. Hot, forbidden stuff! In Paine’s day, the book had been widely banned. Charlie and I each took a copy to read, found Paine’s thoughts mind-opening, and then did something that would be dangerous today: We gave the box of books to our town’s library for public distribution.</p><p>Amazingly, no one’s head exploded and no gaggle of fanatics demanded that our town’s librarian be fired. The library just quietly and gladly received the books.</p><p>Today, though, a few right-wing extremist groups roam our country trying to foment panic over books that critique everything from Christian Nationalism to the corporate order, as well as books written by or about women, people fighting racism, or the LGBTQ community. Such maniacal book bans nearly tripled in the last school year, taking some 10,000 titles off school bookshelves.</p><p>But these ideological pecksniffs now face blowback from a growing “freedom to read” movement, with gutsy local activists defying the screeching, self-appointed censors in communities across America. Especially impressive are young people themselves who’re attending local library and school board meetings, telling officials they will not obey political dictates on what not to read or believe. They’ve even launched a movement urging people to read  “Read Banned Books.”</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… To join the grassroots “freedom to read” rebellion, go to the American Library Association: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.ala.org/bbooks">ala.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/to-fight-right-wing-book-bans-read</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:150058490</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/150058490/66b89ca3862fdb06d2e3d197d710bd61.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/150058490/430ea3b6e42d793e84473309419044fd.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>In high-school, my friend Charlie and I once poked into an abandoned Victorian house in our hometown. Up in the attic, we found a secret door to a space containing several boxes of books. One held 50 copies of The Age of Reason, Thomas Paine’s 1794 treatise ridiculing the myths of Christian theology and the Bible. Hot, forbidden stuff! In Paine’s day, the book had been widely banned. Charlie and I each took a copy to read, found Paine’s thoughts mind-opening, and then did something that would be dangerous today: We gave the box of books to our town’s library for public distribution. Amazingly, no one’s head exploded and no gaggle of fanatics demanded that our town’s librarian be fired. The library just quietly and gladly received the books. Today, though, a few right-wing extremist groups roam our country trying to foment panic over books that critique everything from Christian Nationalism to the corporate order, as well as books written by or about women, people fighting racism, or the LGBTQ community. Such maniacal book bans nearly tripled in the last school year, taking some 10,000 titles off school bookshelves. But these ideological pecksniffs now face blowback from a growing “freedom to read” movement, with gutsy local activists defying the screeching, self-appointed censors in communities across America. Especially impressive are young people themselves who’re attending local library and school board meetings, telling officials they will not obey political dictates on what not to read or believe. They’ve even launched a movement urging people to read  “Read Banned Books.” This is Jim Hightower saying… To join the grassroots “freedom to read” rebellion, go to the American Library Association: ala.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>In high-school, my friend Charlie and I once poked into an abandoned Victorian house in our hometown. Up in the attic, we found a secret door to a space containing several boxes of books. One held 50 copies of The Age of Reason, Thomas Paine’s 1794 treatise ridiculing the myths of Christian theology and the Bible. Hot, forbidden stuff! In Paine’s day, the book had been widely banned. Charlie and I each took a copy to read, found Paine’s thoughts mind-opening, and then did something that would be dangerous today: We gave the box of books to our town’s library for public distribution. Amazingly, no one’s head exploded and no gaggle of fanatics demanded that our town’s librarian be fired. The library just quietly and gladly received the books. Today, though, a few right-wing extremist groups roam our country trying to foment panic over books that critique everything from Christian Nationalism to the corporate order, as well as books written by or about women, people fighting racism, or the LGBTQ community. Such maniacal book bans nearly tripled in the last school year, taking some 10,000 titles off school bookshelves. But these ideological pecksniffs now face blowback from a growing “freedom to read” movement, with gutsy local activists defying the screeching, self-appointed censors in communities across America. Especially impressive are young people themselves who’re attending local library and school board meetings, telling officials they will not obey political dictates on what not to read or believe. They’ve even launched a movement urging people to read  “Read Banned Books.” This is Jim Hightower saying… To join the grassroots “freedom to read” rebellion, go to the American Library Association: ala.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Isn’t It Odd That Public Officials Support Corporate Price Gouging?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Corporate lobbyists and politicians recently jumped all over Kamala Harris for her proposal to outlaw price gouging by food giants and grocery chains.</p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://washingtonmonthly.com/2024/09/09/stop-calling-kamala-harris-anti-price-gouging-proposal-price-controls/">The partisans piled on Harris</a>, sputtering like old Joe McCarthy that she was pushing “Soviet-style” government price-setting. Of course, these latter-day McCarthyites were either lying, ignorant, or both. Far from promoting price-setting, Harris was blasting price <em>gouging. </em>Big difference.</p><p>The ugly truth is that most public officials have quietly been pro-gouging for decades. By refusing to enforce anti-trust laws, they’ve helped conglomerated food giants steadily amass monopoly power over the production, processing, and marketing of food in nearly every American community. Big brand names then use that brute force to crush independent competitors, cheat customers, and consolidate even more power for themselves.</p><p>That is <em>illegal</em>. We have national laws, like the 1936 Robinson-Patman Act, that prohibit corporations from rigging the rules to control markets and rip off consumers. But, since unlimited corporate campaign donations have flooded into our elections, monopolists have essentially bought off officials in both parties who now ignore antitrust law, rebranding such market thuggery as “free enterprise” efficiency.</p><p>Thus, local and state governments routinely hand out millions of our tax dollars to subsidize big name supermarket chains, meatpacking factories, dollar stores, and other giants – all in the name of “consumers” and “competition.” No one mentions that these public giveaways provide the monopolistic market clout that allows the national outfits to clobber independent businesses, shrivel local competition and – voilà – gouge consumers.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… So, Harris is right to call out grocery gouging and to push stronger actions to stop it, but action number one is to enforce the anti-monopoly laws already on the books.</p><p>Do something</p><p>Want to fight monopolization and the centralization of markets? Here are a few places to start:</p><p>* The <a target="_blank" href="https://www.economicliberties.us/">American Economic Liberties Project </a>is part of a growing, cross-ideological movement to combat monopolistic corporations and the systems that entrench their power.</p><p>* The <a target="_blank" href="https://ilsr.org/fighting-monopoly-power/">Institute for Local Self-Reliance</a> has a thorough resource for starting in your town, from banking and broadband to pharmacy and food: <a target="_blank" href="https://ilsr.org/fighting-monopoly-power/">Fighting Monopoly Power: How States and Cities Can Beat Back Corporate Control and Build Thriving Communities</a></p><p>We also love our friend <a target="_blank" href="https://substack.com/profile/247442815-jd-scholten">J.D. Scholten</a>’s newsletter, <a target="_blank" href="https://open.substack.com/pub/screwed">You're Probably Getting Screwed</a>, and Zephyr Teachout’s “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/51176626-break-em-up">Break ‘em Up: Recovering Our Freedom from Big Ag, Big Tech and Big Money.</a>” Here’s our interview from 2021 with her:</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/isnt-it-odd-that-public-officials</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:149966248</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/149966248/5f01126b2a464df2edd9dd0aa0a89458.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/149966248/5a7593d856559babfd398a490c16e898.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Corporate lobbyists and politicians recently jumped all over Kamala Harris for her proposal to outlaw price gouging by food giants and grocery chains. The partisans piled on Harris, sputtering like old Joe McCarthy that she was pushing “Soviet-style” government price-setting. Of course, these latter-day McCarthyites were either lying, ignorant, or both. Far from promoting price-setting, Harris was blasting price gouging. Big difference. The ugly truth is that most public officials have quietly been pro-gouging for decades. By refusing to enforce anti-trust laws, they’ve helped conglomerated food giants steadily amass monopoly power over the production, processing, and marketing of food in nearly every American community. Big brand names then use that brute force to crush independent competitors, cheat customers, and consolidate even more power for themselves. That is illegal. We have national laws, like the 1936 Robinson-Patman Act, that prohibit corporations from rigging the rules to control markets and rip off consumers. But, since unlimited corporate campaign donations have flooded into our elections, monopolists have essentially bought off officials in both parties who now ignore antitrust law, rebranding such market thuggery as “free enterprise” efficiency. Thus, local and state governments routinely hand out millions of our tax dollars to subsidize big name supermarket chains, meatpacking factories, dollar stores, and other giants – all in the name of “consumers” and “competition.” No one mentions that these public giveaways provide the monopolistic market clout that allows the national outfits to clobber independent businesses, shrivel local competition and – voilà – gouge consumers. This is Jim Hightower saying… So, Harris is right to call out grocery gouging and to push stronger actions to stop it, but action number one is to enforce the anti-monopoly laws already on the books. Do something Want to fight monopolization and the centralization of markets? Here are a few places to start: * The American Economic Liberties Project is part of a growing, cross-ideological movement to combat monopolistic corporations and the systems that entrench their power. * The Institute for Local Self-Reliance has a thorough resource for starting in your town, from banking and broadband to pharmacy and food: Fighting Monopoly Power: How States and Cities Can Beat Back Corporate Control and Build Thriving Communities We also love our friend J.D. Scholten’s newsletter, You're Probably Getting Screwed, and Zephyr Teachout’s “Break ‘em Up: Recovering Our Freedom from Big Ag, Big Tech and Big Money.” Here’s our interview from 2021 with her: Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Corporate lobbyists and politicians recently jumped all over Kamala Harris for her proposal to outlaw price gouging by food giants and grocery chains. The partisans piled on Harris, sputtering like old Joe McCarthy that she was pushing “Soviet-style” government price-setting. Of course, these latter-day McCarthyites were either lying, ignorant, or both. Far from promoting price-setting, Harris was blasting price gouging. Big difference. The ugly truth is that most public officials have quietly been pro-gouging for decades. By refusing to enforce anti-trust laws, they’ve helped conglomerated food giants steadily amass monopoly power over the production, processing, and marketing of food in nearly every American community. Big brand names then use that brute force to crush independent competitors, cheat customers, and consolidate even more power for themselves. That is illegal. We have national laws, like the 1936 Robinson-Patman Act, that prohibit corporations from rigging the rules to control markets and rip off consumers. But, since unlimited corporate campaign donations have flooded into our elections, monopolists have essentially bought off officials in both parties who now ignore antitrust law, rebranding such market thuggery as “free enterprise” efficiency. Thus, local and state governments routinely hand out millions of our tax dollars to subsidize big name supermarket chains, meatpacking factories, dollar stores, and other giants – all in the name of “consumers” and “competition.” No one mentions that these public giveaways provide the monopolistic market clout that allows the national outfits to clobber independent businesses, shrivel local competition and – voilà – gouge consumers. This is Jim Hightower saying… So, Harris is right to call out grocery gouging and to push stronger actions to stop it, but action number one is to enforce the anti-monopoly laws already on the books. Do something Want to fight monopolization and the centralization of markets? Here are a few places to start: * The American Economic Liberties Project is part of a growing, cross-ideological movement to combat monopolistic corporations and the systems that entrench their power. * The Institute for Local Self-Reliance has a thorough resource for starting in your town, from banking and broadband to pharmacy and food: Fighting Monopoly Power: How States and Cities Can Beat Back Corporate Control and Build Thriving Communities We also love our friend J.D. Scholten’s newsletter, You're Probably Getting Screwed, and Zephyr Teachout’s “Break ‘em Up: Recovering Our Freedom from Big Ag, Big Tech and Big Money.” Here’s our interview from 2021 with her: Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Corporate Bosses Are Working-Class Heroes! And Other B.S.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Oh, swell – here it comes again.</p><p>It’s the “Great Man” theory of history, trotted out periodically by plutocrats, patricians, royalists, and assorted other proponents of an elitist social order. They insist that great progress does not come from political movements, unions, and other grassroots forces, but from the genius and benevolence of individual, derring-do, capitalist innovators.</p><p>In a <a target="_blank" href="https://archive.org/details/ford-hours">declaration this month</a>, for example, a group of laissez-fairyland hucksters asserted that it wasn’t labor’s long bloody struggle that advanced worker rights, but industrial America’s generous bosses! These befuddled revisionists of corporate history proclaimed that “unions did not create weekends, the 8-hour work day [or] a living wage.” No? Who then? “Henry Ford did [it] in 1926,” they say, adding emphatically that “CAPITALISM & COMPETITION creates higher wages and better working conditions.”</p><p>Excuse me, boss, but capitalism constantly tries to destroy any competitive market, and it thrives by holding down wages, repressing worker rights, and eliminating jobs.</p><p>Forget the right-wing’s cartoonish portrayal of Henry the Great as a working-class savior. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/henryford-antisemitism/">He was a Nazi-admiring, antisemitic, industrial magnate</a>. Contrary to the revisionists, unions did indeed create their own progress, having fought for wage and hour protections since the 1860s. They rallied popular support with this slogan: <a target="_blank" href="https://laborhistoryin2.podbean.com/e/october-24-eight-hours-for-work-eight-hours-for-rest-eight-hours-for-what-we-will/">“Eight hours for work, eight hours for rest, eight hours for what we will.”</a></p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… And here’s an inconvenient fact that causes the hair of today’s corporate myth makers to burst into flames: It was not some genius capitalist who first established the 8-hour day as our national standard – it was government! <a target="_blank" href="https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/proclamation-182-eight-hour-work-day-for-employees-the-government-the-united-states">President Ulysses Grant instituted it for all federal workers in 1869</a> – half a century before Ford finally trailed behind.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/corporate-bosses-are-working-class</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:149762072</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/149762072/8f553dee453a1fe7148d48fbb6cf7cf0.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/149762072/b13dd02ca1310dca5e69b395b4af1619.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Oh, swell – here it comes again. It’s the “Great Man” theory of history, trotted out periodically by plutocrats, patricians, royalists, and assorted other proponents of an elitist social order. They insist that great progress does not come from political movements, unions, and other grassroots forces, but from the genius and benevolence of individual, derring-do, capitalist innovators. In a declaration this month, for example, a group of laissez-fairyland hucksters asserted that it wasn’t labor’s long bloody struggle that advanced worker rights, but industrial America’s generous bosses! These befuddled revisionists of corporate history proclaimed that “unions did not create weekends, the 8-hour work day [or] a living wage.” No? Who then? “Henry Ford did [it] in 1926,” they say, adding emphatically that “CAPITALISM &amp; COMPETITION creates higher wages and better working conditions.” Excuse me, boss, but capitalism constantly tries to destroy any competitive market, and it thrives by holding down wages, repressing worker rights, and eliminating jobs. Forget the right-wing’s cartoonish portrayal of Henry the Great as a working-class savior. He was a Nazi-admiring, antisemitic, industrial magnate. Contrary to the revisionists, unions did indeed create their own progress, having fought for wage and hour protections since the 1860s. They rallied popular support with this slogan: “Eight hours for work, eight hours for rest, eight hours for what we will.” This is Jim Hightower saying… And here’s an inconvenient fact that causes the hair of today’s corporate myth makers to burst into flames: It was not some genius capitalist who first established the 8-hour day as our national standard – it was government! President Ulysses Grant instituted it for all federal workers in 1869 – half a century before Ford finally trailed behind. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Oh, swell – here it comes again. It’s the “Great Man” theory of history, trotted out periodically by plutocrats, patricians, royalists, and assorted other proponents of an elitist social order. They insist that great progress does not come from political movements, unions, and other grassroots forces, but from the genius and benevolence of individual, derring-do, capitalist innovators. In a declaration this month, for example, a group of laissez-fairyland hucksters asserted that it wasn’t labor’s long bloody struggle that advanced worker rights, but industrial America’s generous bosses! These befuddled revisionists of corporate history proclaimed that “unions did not create weekends, the 8-hour work day [or] a living wage.” No? Who then? “Henry Ford did [it] in 1926,” they say, adding emphatically that “CAPITALISM &amp; COMPETITION creates higher wages and better working conditions.” Excuse me, boss, but capitalism constantly tries to destroy any competitive market, and it thrives by holding down wages, repressing worker rights, and eliminating jobs. Forget the right-wing’s cartoonish portrayal of Henry the Great as a working-class savior. He was a Nazi-admiring, antisemitic, industrial magnate. Contrary to the revisionists, unions did indeed create their own progress, having fought for wage and hour protections since the 1860s. They rallied popular support with this slogan: “Eight hours for work, eight hours for rest, eight hours for what we will.” This is Jim Hightower saying… And here’s an inconvenient fact that causes the hair of today’s corporate myth makers to burst into flames: It was not some genius capitalist who first established the 8-hour day as our national standard – it was government! President Ulysses Grant instituted it for all federal workers in 1869 – half a century before Ford finally trailed behind. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[To Get Good Local News, Try Do-It-Yourself Journalism]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>NOTE: Hurricane Helene has wreaked horrific damage all across Appalachia and the Southeast. Some terrific rural organizers have put together </em></strong><a target="_blank" href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/14hx_zisRfU65zxNyDvdJkar_k11DIgOj-4X_F13WYPI/edit?fbclid=IwY2xjawFpAvxleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHZTo13YjVclCmyaErLgHpQ7qMARsMlCIq6qqn4vE9lmbiaOSJCMFoU9jfQ_aem_QQxtyffrLeoqFf5feyjQYw#heading=h.kfkkt8x805k5"><strong><em>this comprehensive document</em></strong></a><strong><em> of resources for people affected, as well as ways to help.</em></strong> </p><p>Perhaps you’ve noticed from the shrinkage (or total elimination) of your local newspaper that this source of hometown journalism has become monopolized, nationalized, and trivialized by conglomerate owners.</p><p>How uplifting then, to see a national consortium of saviors <a target="_blank" href="https://www.stagwellglobal.com/future-of-news/">rallying to reestablish a “thriving news media” for our democracy</a>. How? Well, say the saviors, by promoting “brand stability” for potential advertisers. Huh? Who are these “saviors?”</p><p>Unfortunately, they are predatory media giants such as the <em>USA Today</em> chain and other national news conglomerators and shrivelizers. Hello—they are the <em>cause</em> of the real instability in local news! These powers are using the people’s cry for media decentralization and localization as a ruse to goose up their own ad revenue, allowing them to further monopolize and trivialize print journalism.</p><p>But here’s a better idea: Advance true media democracy by creating your own local, non-corporate newspaper. Ha, scoff the barons of Big Media, that’s impossible! But as an activist friend of mine puts it: “Those who say it can’t be done should not interrupt those who’re doing it.”</p><p>Across the country, communities are taking charge. Here in Texas, <a target="_blank" href="https://ruraldemocracyinitiative.org/news/policy-victory-in-rural-texas-leads-to-statewide-shift/">the Caldwell/Hays Examiner was launched in 2022</a>, with a focus on rural issues up and down the I-35 corridor. In Western Iowa, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist <a target="_blank" href="https://www.westerniowajournalismfoundation.com/">Art Cullen has co-founded a nonprofit that supports local news efforts</a> through grants. And in Colorado, <a target="_blank" href="https://coloradosun.com/2021/05/03/colorado-sun-purchases-colorado-community-media-newspapers/">a group of folks mobilized to buy a local newspaper chain</a> before a hedge fund operation could sweep in and snatch it up.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… To learn more about how you can rebuild your local news outlets, visit the Institute for Nonprofit News at <a target="_blank" href="http://inn.org">inn.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/to-get-good-local-news-try-do-it</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:149670565</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 16:37:14 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/149670565/fc46bf4fd0009627bae76bd206a0b11e.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/149670565/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>NOTE: Hurricane Helene has wreaked horrific damage all across Appalachia and the Southeast. Some terrific rural organizers have put together this comprehensive document of resources for people affected, as well as ways to help. Perhaps you’ve noticed from the shrinkage (or total elimination) of your local newspaper that this source of hometown journalism has become monopolized, nationalized, and trivialized by conglomerate owners. How uplifting then, to see a national consortium of saviors rallying to reestablish a “thriving news media” for our democracy. How? Well, say the saviors, by promoting “brand stability” for potential advertisers. Huh? Who are these “saviors?” Unfortunately, they are predatory media giants such as the USA Today chain and other national news conglomerators and shrivelizers. Hello—they are the cause of the real instability in local news! These powers are using the people’s cry for media decentralization and localization as a ruse to goose up their own ad revenue, allowing them to further monopolize and trivialize print journalism. But here’s a better idea: Advance true media democracy by creating your own local, non-corporate newspaper. Ha, scoff the barons of Big Media, that’s impossible! But as an activist friend of mine puts it: “Those who say it can’t be done should not interrupt those who’re doing it.” Across the country, communities are taking charge. Here in Texas, the Caldwell/Hays Examiner was launched in 2022, with a focus on rural issues up and down the I-35 corridor. In Western Iowa, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Art Cullen has co-founded a nonprofit that supports local news efforts through grants. And in Colorado, a group of folks mobilized to buy a local newspaper chain before a hedge fund operation could sweep in and snatch it up. This is Jim Hightower saying… To learn more about how you can rebuild your local news outlets, visit the Institute for Nonprofit News at inn.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>NOTE: Hurricane Helene has wreaked horrific damage all across Appalachia and the Southeast. Some terrific rural organizers have put together this comprehensive document of resources for people affected, as well as ways to help. Perhaps you’ve noticed from the shrinkage (or total elimination) of your local newspaper that this source of hometown journalism has become monopolized, nationalized, and trivialized by conglomerate owners. How uplifting then, to see a national consortium of saviors rallying to reestablish a “thriving news media” for our democracy. How? Well, say the saviors, by promoting “brand stability” for potential advertisers. Huh? Who are these “saviors?” Unfortunately, they are predatory media giants such as the USA Today chain and other national news conglomerators and shrivelizers. Hello—they are the cause of the real instability in local news! These powers are using the people’s cry for media decentralization and localization as a ruse to goose up their own ad revenue, allowing them to further monopolize and trivialize print journalism. But here’s a better idea: Advance true media democracy by creating your own local, non-corporate newspaper. Ha, scoff the barons of Big Media, that’s impossible! But as an activist friend of mine puts it: “Those who say it can’t be done should not interrupt those who’re doing it.” Across the country, communities are taking charge. Here in Texas, the Caldwell/Hays Examiner was launched in 2022, with a focus on rural issues up and down the I-35 corridor. In Western Iowa, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Art Cullen has co-founded a nonprofit that supports local news efforts through grants. And in Colorado, a group of folks mobilized to buy a local newspaper chain before a hedge fund operation could sweep in and snatch it up. This is Jim Hightower saying… To learn more about how you can rebuild your local news outlets, visit the Institute for Nonprofit News at inn.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[What Should Politics Do? Ask Woody Guthrie]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Woody Guthrie’s prescription for inequality in America was straightforward: “Rich folks got your money with politics. You can get it back with politics.”</p><p>For Guthrie, “politics” meant more than voting, since both parties routinely cough-up candidates who meekly accept the business-as-usual system of letting bosses and bankers control America’s wealth and power. It’s useless, he said, to expect change to come from a “choice” between Tweedledumb and Tweedledumber. Instead, common folks must organize into a progressive movement with their own bold change agenda, become their own candidates, and create a politics worth voting for.</p><p>Pie in the sky? No! Periodic eruptions of progressive grassroots insurgencies have literally defined America, beginning with that big one in 1776. Indeed, we could take a lesson today from another transformative moment of democratic populism that surged more than a century ago, culminating in “The Omaha Platform of 1892.” This was in the depths of the Gilded Age, a sordid period much like ours, characterized by both ostentatious greed and widespread poverty, domination by monopolies, rising xenophobia, institutional racism – and government that ranged from aloof to insane.</p><p>But lo – from that darkness, a new People’s Party arose, created by the populist movement of farm and factory mad-as-hellers. They streamed into Omaha to hammer out the most progressive platform in US history, specifically rejecting corporate supremacy and demanding direct democracy.</p><p>That platform reshaped America’s political agenda, making the sweeping reforms of the Progressive Era and New Deal possible. As one senator said of the Omaha rebellion, it was the start of robber baron wealth flowing “to all the people, from whom it was originally taken.” And that’s what Woody Guthrie meant by “politics.”</p><p><em>Note: Due to Hightower’s travel schedule last week, this is a re-release of this commentary, if you’ve feel like you’ve heard it before.</em> 🤠</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/what-should-politics-do-ask-woody-6d6</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:149353803</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/149353803/ab28ae6f94fd3e85d6960c5d08488451.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/149353803/963e112848b8b1f072325e9b47951b2c.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Woody Guthrie’s prescription for inequality in America was straightforward: “Rich folks got your money with politics. You can get it back with politics.” For Guthrie, “politics” meant more than voting, since both parties routinely cough-up candidates who meekly accept the business-as-usual system of letting bosses and bankers control America’s wealth and power. It’s useless, he said, to expect change to come from a “choice” between Tweedledumb and Tweedledumber. Instead, common folks must organize into a progressive movement with their own bold change agenda, become their own candidates, and create a politics worth voting for. Pie in the sky? No! Periodic eruptions of progressive grassroots insurgencies have literally defined America, beginning with that big one in 1776. Indeed, we could take a lesson today from another transformative moment of democratic populism that surged more than a century ago, culminating in “The Omaha Platform of 1892.” This was in the depths of the Gilded Age, a sordid period much like ours, characterized by both ostentatious greed and widespread poverty, domination by monopolies, rising xenophobia, institutional racism – and government that ranged from aloof to insane. But lo – from that darkness, a new People’s Party arose, created by the populist movement of farm and factory mad-as-hellers. They streamed into Omaha to hammer out the most progressive platform in US history, specifically rejecting corporate supremacy and demanding direct democracy. That platform reshaped America’s political agenda, making the sweeping reforms of the Progressive Era and New Deal possible. As one senator said of the Omaha rebellion, it was the start of robber baron wealth flowing “to all the people, from whom it was originally taken.” And that’s what Woody Guthrie meant by “politics.” Note: Due to Hightower’s travel schedule last week, this is a re-release of this commentary, if you’ve feel like you’ve heard it before. &#129312; Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Woody Guthrie’s prescription for inequality in America was straightforward: “Rich folks got your money with politics. You can get it back with politics.” For Guthrie, “politics” meant more than voting, since both parties routinely cough-up candidates who meekly accept the business-as-usual system of letting bosses and bankers control America’s wealth and power. It’s useless, he said, to expect change to come from a “choice” between Tweedledumb and Tweedledumber. Instead, common folks must organize into a progressive movement with their own bold change agenda, become their own candidates, and create a politics worth voting for. Pie in the sky? No! Periodic eruptions of progressive grassroots insurgencies have literally defined America, beginning with that big one in 1776. Indeed, we could take a lesson today from another transformative moment of democratic populism that surged more than a century ago, culminating in “The Omaha Platform of 1892.” This was in the depths of the Gilded Age, a sordid period much like ours, characterized by both ostentatious greed and widespread poverty, domination by monopolies, rising xenophobia, institutional racism – and government that ranged from aloof to insane. But lo – from that darkness, a new People’s Party arose, created by the populist movement of farm and factory mad-as-hellers. They streamed into Omaha to hammer out the most progressive platform in US history, specifically rejecting corporate supremacy and demanding direct democracy. That platform reshaped America’s political agenda, making the sweeping reforms of the Progressive Era and New Deal possible. As one senator said of the Omaha rebellion, it was the start of robber baron wealth flowing “to all the people, from whom it was originally taken.” And that’s what Woody Guthrie meant by “politics.” Note: Due to Hightower’s travel schedule last week, this is a re-release of this commentary, if you’ve feel like you’ve heard it before. &#129312; Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[School Lunch, Christian Nationalism, and Jesus]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>An iconic Texas band, the <a target="_blank" href="https://austinloungelizards.com/">Austin Lounge Lizards</a>, has a song that nails the absurd self-righteousness of Christian supremacists: “Jesus loves me… but he can’t stand you.”</p><p>I think of this refrain when I behold today’s right-ring proselytizers wailing that the blessed rich should not be taxed to assure that everyone has the most basic human needs. Seems very un-Jesusy to me.</p><p>One bizarre focus of their religious wrath is a wholly sensible and Biblically sound national policy: Subsidizing school districts to assure that every child has healthy meals to fuel their daily learning. Yes, in the Christian Nationalists’ book of public abominations, government feeding of children is a holy no-no. <a target="_blank" href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/look-out-america-project-2025">Project 2025</a>, the Republican blueprint to impose theocratic rule over America, proclaims school meals a socialist/Marxist evil to be eradicated.</p><p>The extremist cry that if there is any free-lunch “giveaway,” it must be narrowly restricted to truly-destitute students. But wait – publicly singling out those children would stigmatize them. Plus, how odd to hear Republicans demanding an intrusive, absurdly-expensive, bureaucratic process empowering government to decide who’s eligible to eat!</p><p>In fact, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/13/dining/free-school-lunch-programs.html">the student lunch subsidy runs as low as 42 cents a meal</a>, so it’s far cheaper, fairer, and (dare I say it?) more Christian simply to offer it to all. Indeed, the program is akin to the Biblical story of Jesus providing fishes and loaves to the multitude. He imposed no income test – everyone got a fish.</p><p>Interestingly, the same lawmakers opposing 42-cent meals for kiddos today routinely and enthusiastically feed billions of our tax dollars to corporate ethically-challenged profiteers who love money above all. As I recall, Jesus couldn’t stand people like that.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/school-lunch-christian-nationalism</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:149353468</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/149353468/24f02b168953ee8af34a3cc114bb6dc3.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/149353468/342337541806a665ded1fc96c95424c8.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>An iconic Texas band, the Austin Lounge Lizards, has a song that nails the absurd self-righteousness of Christian supremacists: “Jesus loves me… but he can’t stand you.” I think of this refrain when I behold today’s right-ring proselytizers wailing that the blessed rich should not be taxed to assure that everyone has the most basic human needs. Seems very un-Jesusy to me. One bizarre focus of their religious wrath is a wholly sensible and Biblically sound national policy: Subsidizing school districts to assure that every child has healthy meals to fuel their daily learning. Yes, in the Christian Nationalists’ book of public abominations, government feeding of children is a holy no-no. Project 2025, the Republican blueprint to impose theocratic rule over America, proclaims school meals a socialist/Marxist evil to be eradicated. The extremist cry that if there is any free-lunch “giveaway,” it must be narrowly restricted to truly-destitute students. But wait – publicly singling out those children would stigmatize them. Plus, how odd to hear Republicans demanding an intrusive, absurdly-expensive, bureaucratic process empowering government to decide who’s eligible to eat! In fact, the student lunch subsidy runs as low as 42 cents a meal, so it’s far cheaper, fairer, and (dare I say it?) more Christian simply to offer it to all. Indeed, the program is akin to the Biblical story of Jesus providing fishes and loaves to the multitude. He imposed no income test – everyone got a fish. Interestingly, the same lawmakers opposing 42-cent meals for kiddos today routinely and enthusiastically feed billions of our tax dollars to corporate ethically-challenged profiteers who love money above all. As I recall, Jesus couldn’t stand people like that. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>An iconic Texas band, the Austin Lounge Lizards, has a song that nails the absurd self-righteousness of Christian supremacists: “Jesus loves me… but he can’t stand you.” I think of this refrain when I behold today’s right-ring proselytizers wailing that the blessed rich should not be taxed to assure that everyone has the most basic human needs. Seems very un-Jesusy to me. One bizarre focus of their religious wrath is a wholly sensible and Biblically sound national policy: Subsidizing school districts to assure that every child has healthy meals to fuel their daily learning. Yes, in the Christian Nationalists’ book of public abominations, government feeding of children is a holy no-no. Project 2025, the Republican blueprint to impose theocratic rule over America, proclaims school meals a socialist/Marxist evil to be eradicated. The extremist cry that if there is any free-lunch “giveaway,” it must be narrowly restricted to truly-destitute students. But wait – publicly singling out those children would stigmatize them. Plus, how odd to hear Republicans demanding an intrusive, absurdly-expensive, bureaucratic process empowering government to decide who’s eligible to eat! In fact, the student lunch subsidy runs as low as 42 cents a meal, so it’s far cheaper, fairer, and (dare I say it?) more Christian simply to offer it to all. Indeed, the program is akin to the Biblical story of Jesus providing fishes and loaves to the multitude. He imposed no income test – everyone got a fish. Interestingly, the same lawmakers opposing 42-cent meals for kiddos today routinely and enthusiastically feed billions of our tax dollars to corporate ethically-challenged profiteers who love money above all. As I recall, Jesus couldn’t stand people like that. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[How “Wonderful” Is POM, Fiji Water, and The Wonderful Company]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>If you name your $4-billion food conglomerate “The Wonderful Company,” you probably should strive extra hard not to let it become the horrible company.</p><p>This outfit spends a fortune painting itself as an environmentally sensitive purveyor of healthy products – like “POM,” its brand of pomegranate juice and its bottled “Fiji Water.” Moreover, its billionaire owners, Stewart and Lynda Resnick, have marketed themselves as generous philanthropists and powerhouse donors to the Democratic Party.</p><p>Wonderful.</p><p>But the corporation’s rap sheet includes false advertising, hogging of the public’s scarce water supplies, massive fossil fuel pollution, and – most abhorrent – exploitation of the low-paid farm workers who produce the crops that enrich the Resnicks.</p><p>Stewart, hailed as “the wealthiest farmer in the US,” has been spending lavishly on high-dollar lawyers and lobbyists, furiously fighting the United Farm Workers, who’re seeking fair wages, decent treatment, and simple respect from him. Worse, the politically-connected land baron is going all out to bust the entire union by pushing activist judges to outlaw California’s “card check” system. This is a democratic process enabling widely dispersed farm laborers to vote in unionization elections.</p><p>By trying to kill it, Stewart is engaged in a massive voter suppression effort to deny a smidgeon of justice to poorly-paid oppressed workers. It’s a raw power play by Stewart and his brotherhood of billionaire agribusiness barons, to further enrich themselves by taking away hard-won fair labor laws – and re-subjugating workers to the autocratic whims of owners.</p><p>What’s wrong with the Reznicks? They’re fabulously rich, and their company is enormously profitable. Yet they’re trying to nickel and dime one of the hardest working and poorly treated groups of workers in America. Nothing wonderful about that… or them.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/how-wonderful-is-pom-fiji-water-and</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:149058540</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/149058540/ab7741da8b3a8527d951073a940ced52.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/149058540/9575e184e547b4d864fd63706d85f341.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>If you name your $4-billion food conglomerate “The Wonderful Company,” you probably should strive extra hard not to let it become the horrible company. This outfit spends a fortune painting itself as an environmentally sensitive purveyor of healthy products – like “POM,” its brand of pomegranate juice and its bottled “Fiji Water.” Moreover, its billionaire owners, Stewart and Lynda Resnick, have marketed themselves as generous philanthropists and powerhouse donors to the Democratic Party. Wonderful. But the corporation’s rap sheet includes false advertising, hogging of the public’s scarce water supplies, massive fossil fuel pollution, and – most abhorrent – exploitation of the low-paid farm workers who produce the crops that enrich the Resnicks. Stewart, hailed as “the wealthiest farmer in the US,” has been spending lavishly on high-dollar lawyers and lobbyists, furiously fighting the United Farm Workers, who’re seeking fair wages, decent treatment, and simple respect from him. Worse, the politically-connected land baron is going all out to bust the entire union by pushing activist judges to outlaw California’s “card check” system. This is a democratic process enabling widely dispersed farm laborers to vote in unionization elections. By trying to kill it, Stewart is engaged in a massive voter suppression effort to deny a smidgeon of justice to poorly-paid oppressed workers. It’s a raw power play by Stewart and his brotherhood of billionaire agribusiness barons, to further enrich themselves by taking away hard-won fair labor laws – and re-subjugating workers to the autocratic whims of owners. What’s wrong with the Reznicks? They’re fabulously rich, and their company is enormously profitable. Yet they’re trying to nickel and dime one of the hardest working and poorly treated groups of workers in America. Nothing wonderful about that… or them. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>If you name your $4-billion food conglomerate “The Wonderful Company,” you probably should strive extra hard not to let it become the horrible company. This outfit spends a fortune painting itself as an environmentally sensitive purveyor of healthy products – like “POM,” its brand of pomegranate juice and its bottled “Fiji Water.” Moreover, its billionaire owners, Stewart and Lynda Resnick, have marketed themselves as generous philanthropists and powerhouse donors to the Democratic Party. Wonderful. But the corporation’s rap sheet includes false advertising, hogging of the public’s scarce water supplies, massive fossil fuel pollution, and – most abhorrent – exploitation of the low-paid farm workers who produce the crops that enrich the Resnicks. Stewart, hailed as “the wealthiest farmer in the US,” has been spending lavishly on high-dollar lawyers and lobbyists, furiously fighting the United Farm Workers, who’re seeking fair wages, decent treatment, and simple respect from him. Worse, the politically-connected land baron is going all out to bust the entire union by pushing activist judges to outlaw California’s “card check” system. This is a democratic process enabling widely dispersed farm laborers to vote in unionization elections. By trying to kill it, Stewart is engaged in a massive voter suppression effort to deny a smidgeon of justice to poorly-paid oppressed workers. It’s a raw power play by Stewart and his brotherhood of billionaire agribusiness barons, to further enrich themselves by taking away hard-won fair labor laws – and re-subjugating workers to the autocratic whims of owners. What’s wrong with the Reznicks? They’re fabulously rich, and their company is enormously profitable. Yet they’re trying to nickel and dime one of the hardest working and poorly treated groups of workers in America. Nothing wonderful about that… or them. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Battle of Baraboo – Privatizer Greed v. Seniors’ Health Care]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Baraboo, Wisconsin is known as home base for the Ringling Brothers Circus. But even that extravaganza of acrobats and clowns could not surpass the dazzling tent show playing out in Baraboo this month, starring the Sauk County Board of Supervisors. Only… you couldn’t have seen it, because the tent was zipped-tight to keep the public out.</p><p>The Baraboo spectacle is one of several now playing across the Badger State, produced by health care profiteers trying to privatize <em>county-owned</em> nursing homes. These locally-controlled public entities get 5-star ratings and are treasured by families in rural Wisconsin – so people overwhelmingly oppose privatization. Thus, to somersault over local democracy, corporate tricksters have joined with right-wing county officials to impose autocratic control.</p><p>Back in Baraboo, for example, people lined up at the tent to speak against any move by supervisors to sell the People’s senior nursing center. But terms of the sale had already been negotiated in secret, supervisors had decreed that the buyer would not be revealed until after the sale was approved, and the board’s discussion about the sale was held in closed session.</p><p>Adding to the mayhem, Wisconsin’s Republican nominee for US Senate astonished people by declaring that old people in nursing homes should not even be allowed to vote, since they “only have five, six months life expectancy.”</p><p>Crazy, yet the right-wing’s Baraboo sellout succeeded, right? Not so fast. One, any maneuver affecting the county budget requires a two-thirds vote of supervisors – not the bare majority this clown trick got. And, two, while devious supervisors arrogantly blocked the democratic will of the people, feisty locals are not surrendering to corporate greed and devious politicians. The Battle of Baraboo continues! Stay tuned!</p><p>Do something!</p><p>Interested in learning about how locals in Baraboo are fighting this fight? Our good friend <a target="_blank" href="https://substack.com/profile/20644791-george-goehl">George Goehl</a> is releasing a new season of his podcast, “To See Each Other,” next week. In it, you’ll find some heart-pounding moments of intrigue, along with what it takes to fight a good fight. You can subscribe <a target="_blank" href="https://substack.com/redirect/6aced836-2c6d-4a45-8bfb-d01b6cc1b972?j=eyJ1IjoiMThlb3gifQ.EJn6k-5hXTueqYFNDNQ3nq6BNFXCX3FfRCyl5tReqG8">here</a> (ITunes), <a target="_blank" href="https://substack.com/redirect/ca61e63d-0e4c-44a6-b4ce-92927dd473e7?j=eyJ1IjoiMThlb3gifQ.EJn6k-5hXTueqYFNDNQ3nq6BNFXCX3FfRCyl5tReqG8">here</a> (Spotify), or wherever you listen to podcasts.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-battle-of-baraboo-privatizer</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:149008828</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/149008828/8e8c64274d16cbda56afbb6bc7875287.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/149008828/90d721eda1a383d5e6812931fbeebb3b.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Baraboo, Wisconsin is known as home base for the Ringling Brothers Circus. But even that extravaganza of acrobats and clowns could not surpass the dazzling tent show playing out in Baraboo this month, starring the Sauk County Board of Supervisors. Only… you couldn’t have seen it, because the tent was zipped-tight to keep the public out. The Baraboo spectacle is one of several now playing across the Badger State, produced by health care profiteers trying to privatize county-owned nursing homes. These locally-controlled public entities get 5-star ratings and are treasured by families in rural Wisconsin – so people overwhelmingly oppose privatization. Thus, to somersault over local democracy, corporate tricksters have joined with right-wing county officials to impose autocratic control. Back in Baraboo, for example, people lined up at the tent to speak against any move by supervisors to sell the People’s senior nursing center. But terms of the sale had already been negotiated in secret, supervisors had decreed that the buyer would not be revealed until after the sale was approved, and the board’s discussion about the sale was held in closed session. Adding to the mayhem, Wisconsin’s Republican nominee for US Senate astonished people by declaring that old people in nursing homes should not even be allowed to vote, since they “only have five, six months life expectancy.” Crazy, yet the right-wing’s Baraboo sellout succeeded, right? Not so fast. One, any maneuver affecting the county budget requires a two-thirds vote of supervisors – not the bare majority this clown trick got. And, two, while devious supervisors arrogantly blocked the democratic will of the people, feisty locals are not surrendering to corporate greed and devious politicians. The Battle of Baraboo continues! Stay tuned! Do something! Interested in learning about how locals in Baraboo are fighting this fight? Our good friend George Goehl is releasing a new season of his podcast, “To See Each Other,” next week. In it, you’ll find some heart-pounding moments of intrigue, along with what it takes to fight a good fight. You can subscribe here (ITunes), here (Spotify), or wherever you listen to podcasts. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Baraboo, Wisconsin is known as home base for the Ringling Brothers Circus. But even that extravaganza of acrobats and clowns could not surpass the dazzling tent show playing out in Baraboo this month, starring the Sauk County Board of Supervisors. Only… you couldn’t have seen it, because the tent was zipped-tight to keep the public out. The Baraboo spectacle is one of several now playing across the Badger State, produced by health care profiteers trying to privatize county-owned nursing homes. These locally-controlled public entities get 5-star ratings and are treasured by families in rural Wisconsin – so people overwhelmingly oppose privatization. Thus, to somersault over local democracy, corporate tricksters have joined with right-wing county officials to impose autocratic control. Back in Baraboo, for example, people lined up at the tent to speak against any move by supervisors to sell the People’s senior nursing center. But terms of the sale had already been negotiated in secret, supervisors had decreed that the buyer would not be revealed until after the sale was approved, and the board’s discussion about the sale was held in closed session. Adding to the mayhem, Wisconsin’s Republican nominee for US Senate astonished people by declaring that old people in nursing homes should not even be allowed to vote, since they “only have five, six months life expectancy.” Crazy, yet the right-wing’s Baraboo sellout succeeded, right? Not so fast. One, any maneuver affecting the county budget requires a two-thirds vote of supervisors – not the bare majority this clown trick got. And, two, while devious supervisors arrogantly blocked the democratic will of the people, feisty locals are not surrendering to corporate greed and devious politicians. The Battle of Baraboo continues! Stay tuned! Do something! Interested in learning about how locals in Baraboo are fighting this fight? Our good friend George Goehl is releasing a new season of his podcast, “To See Each Other,” next week. In it, you’ll find some heart-pounding moments of intrigue, along with what it takes to fight a good fight. You can subscribe here (ITunes), here (Spotify), or wherever you listen to podcasts. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Are We Letting Corporate Profiteers Write America’s Farm and Food Policy?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>A farmer was asked what he’d do if he won a million-dollar lottery. “Well,” he said, “I guess I’d just keep farming ‘til the money runs out.”</p><p>Trying to make a living as a farmer is not for the fainthearted. You have to take out high-interest loans from cold-eyed bankers to put in a crop and buy supplies. Then you’re also at the mercy of everything from bugs to monopolistic middlemen. And here’s a cruel twist: If you defy the odds and produce a great crop,<em> you lose money</em>!`</p><p>This is happening right now. With unusually-good weather this year, corn and soybean harvests are expected to set records. But this abundance creates a market glut, allowing middlemen to knock down prices paid to farmers. A bushel of Illinois corn, for example, costs farmers $4.30 to produce, but they’re only getting $3.70 for it.</p><p>Meanwhile, the cost of such basics as seed, fertilizer, and tractors are skyrocketing. High costs coupled with low crop prices means that farmers’ income is expected to drop by 25 percent this year.</p><p>You might call this good crop-bad price phenomenon “ironic.” But it’s deliberate – an inevitable product of America’s perverse agricultural policy that pushes farmers to over produce in order to keep commodity prices low for giant processors and retailers. Little known fact: Our national “farm policy” is not written by farmers but by corporate lobbyists, lawyers, and economists – people who couldn’t run a watermelon stand if we gave them the melons and had the highway patrol flag down the customers for them.</p><p>That has got to change. To join an effort to demand a farm bill written by and for farmers, consumers, workers, and our environment, go to: <a target="_blank" href="http://FarmAid.org/Take-Action">FarmAid.org/Take-Action</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-are-we-letting-corporate-profiteers</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:148860122</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 18:39:52 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/148860122/55b9a6736835f9ea1b773f54551a3853.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/148860122/0eb90fd56c1697269b2fae5b78427dc5.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>A farmer was asked what he’d do if he won a million-dollar lottery. “Well,” he said, “I guess I’d just keep farming ‘til the money runs out.” Trying to make a living as a farmer is not for the fainthearted. You have to take out high-interest loans from cold-eyed bankers to put in a crop and buy supplies. Then you’re also at the mercy of everything from bugs to monopolistic middlemen. And here’s a cruel twist: If you defy the odds and produce a great crop, you lose money!` This is happening right now. With unusually-good weather this year, corn and soybean harvests are expected to set records. But this abundance creates a market glut, allowing middlemen to knock down prices paid to farmers. A bushel of Illinois corn, for example, costs farmers $4.30 to produce, but they’re only getting $3.70 for it. Meanwhile, the cost of such basics as seed, fertilizer, and tractors are skyrocketing. High costs coupled with low crop prices means that farmers’ income is expected to drop by 25 percent this year. You might call this good crop-bad price phenomenon “ironic.” But it’s deliberate – an inevitable product of America’s perverse agricultural policy that pushes farmers to over produce in order to keep commodity prices low for giant processors and retailers. Little known fact: Our national “farm policy” is not written by farmers but by corporate lobbyists, lawyers, and economists – people who couldn’t run a watermelon stand if we gave them the melons and had the highway patrol flag down the customers for them. That has got to change. To join an effort to demand a farm bill written by and for farmers, consumers, workers, and our environment, go to: FarmAid.org/Take-Action. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>A farmer was asked what he’d do if he won a million-dollar lottery. “Well,” he said, “I guess I’d just keep farming ‘til the money runs out.” Trying to make a living as a farmer is not for the fainthearted. You have to take out high-interest loans from cold-eyed bankers to put in a crop and buy supplies. Then you’re also at the mercy of everything from bugs to monopolistic middlemen. And here’s a cruel twist: If you defy the odds and produce a great crop, you lose money!` This is happening right now. With unusually-good weather this year, corn and soybean harvests are expected to set records. But this abundance creates a market glut, allowing middlemen to knock down prices paid to farmers. A bushel of Illinois corn, for example, costs farmers $4.30 to produce, but they’re only getting $3.70 for it. Meanwhile, the cost of such basics as seed, fertilizer, and tractors are skyrocketing. High costs coupled with low crop prices means that farmers’ income is expected to drop by 25 percent this year. You might call this good crop-bad price phenomenon “ironic.” But it’s deliberate – an inevitable product of America’s perverse agricultural policy that pushes farmers to over produce in order to keep commodity prices low for giant processors and retailers. Little known fact: Our national “farm policy” is not written by farmers but by corporate lobbyists, lawyers, and economists – people who couldn’t run a watermelon stand if we gave them the melons and had the highway patrol flag down the customers for them. That has got to change. To join an effort to demand a farm bill written by and for farmers, consumers, workers, and our environment, go to: FarmAid.org/Take-Action. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Is It That Big Shot Leaders Never Look Around to See If Anyone’s Following?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>It never ceases to amaze me that corporate, political, media, religious, and other power elites routinely speak and act in the name of the masses – without ever consulting us hoi polloi.</p><p>This disconnect is the source of a lot of the arrogance, stupidity, and inequality afflicting our society.</p><p>Consider the huge, very troubling takeover of US Steel by the Japanese conglomerate, Nippon. This buyout was being quietly hustled to conclusion by both giants. But – <em>boom!</em> – suddenly <a target="_blank" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/06/25/nippon-us-steel-union/">the deal hit a steel wall</a>, specifically the furious opposition of America’s United Steelworkers union. The corporate elites had smugly cut a backroom deal <em>without ever mentioning it to the union</em>! Thousands of workers had their livelihoods arrogantly treated as irrelevant. So, the union just said uh-uh, and the executive boneheads’ big buyout went from done to life support.</p><p>The stupidity gene has also imbedded itself in the brains of Christian authoritarians. They are hell-bent on forcing their holier-than-thou church dogma on all of us – without, of course, asking whether we want to be “saved” by them. So here comes one Ryan Walters, Oklahoma’s hyper-Christian superintendent of public schools. In a Burning Bush moment, Ryan felt God ordained him to decree that every classroom must henceforth display a Bible, and all teachers must alter their lesson plans to teach from it – even math teachers!</p><p>But a funny thing happened to this un-elected flaming theocrat: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.kgou.org/education/2024-09-03/a-personal-political-gimmick-oklahoma-superintendents-say-no-to-walters-bible-directive">Local school boards and teachers simply ignored him.</a> Ryan, brimming with ego, had not bothered to consult parents, school boards, teachers, or legislators – so no Bibles have been purchased and no curriculums have been changed.</p><p>However, his dictatorial theatrics did get the attention of one major group: Oklahoma’s GOP lawmakers are now investigating his “rogue behavior.”</p><p>Do something!</p><p>If you also feel queasy about the encroachment of Christian nationalism into our schools, check out the work from the <a target="_blank" href="https://ffrf.org/">Freedom from Religion Foundation</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-is-it-that-big-shot-leaders-never</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:148730179</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/148730179/aee8e05dfee24b3ea30cafa9410155c2.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/148730179/7eed0f57ebc07c5a9b9a374448e47dc0.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>It never ceases to amaze me that corporate, political, media, religious, and other power elites routinely speak and act in the name of the masses – without ever consulting us hoi polloi. This disconnect is the source of a lot of the arrogance, stupidity, and inequality afflicting our society. Consider the huge, very troubling takeover of US Steel by the Japanese conglomerate, Nippon. This buyout was being quietly hustled to conclusion by both giants. But – boom! – suddenly the deal hit a steel wall, specifically the furious opposition of America’s United Steelworkers union. The corporate elites had smugly cut a backroom deal without ever mentioning it to the union! Thousands of workers had their livelihoods arrogantly treated as irrelevant. So, the union just said uh-uh, and the executive boneheads’ big buyout went from done to life support. The stupidity gene has also imbedded itself in the brains of Christian authoritarians. They are hell-bent on forcing their holier-than-thou church dogma on all of us – without, of course, asking whether we want to be “saved” by them. So here comes one Ryan Walters, Oklahoma’s hyper-Christian superintendent of public schools. In a Burning Bush moment, Ryan felt God ordained him to decree that every classroom must henceforth display a Bible, and all teachers must alter their lesson plans to teach from it – even math teachers! But a funny thing happened to this un-elected flaming theocrat: Local school boards and teachers simply ignored him. Ryan, brimming with ego, had not bothered to consult parents, school boards, teachers, or legislators – so no Bibles have been purchased and no curriculums have been changed. However, his dictatorial theatrics did get the attention of one major group: Oklahoma’s GOP lawmakers are now investigating his “rogue behavior.” Do something! If you also feel queasy about the encroachment of Christian nationalism into our schools, check out the work from the Freedom from Religion Foundation. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>It never ceases to amaze me that corporate, political, media, religious, and other power elites routinely speak and act in the name of the masses – without ever consulting us hoi polloi. This disconnect is the source of a lot of the arrogance, stupidity, and inequality afflicting our society. Consider the huge, very troubling takeover of US Steel by the Japanese conglomerate, Nippon. This buyout was being quietly hustled to conclusion by both giants. But – boom! – suddenly the deal hit a steel wall, specifically the furious opposition of America’s United Steelworkers union. The corporate elites had smugly cut a backroom deal without ever mentioning it to the union! Thousands of workers had their livelihoods arrogantly treated as irrelevant. So, the union just said uh-uh, and the executive boneheads’ big buyout went from done to life support. The stupidity gene has also imbedded itself in the brains of Christian authoritarians. They are hell-bent on forcing their holier-than-thou church dogma on all of us – without, of course, asking whether we want to be “saved” by them. So here comes one Ryan Walters, Oklahoma’s hyper-Christian superintendent of public schools. In a Burning Bush moment, Ryan felt God ordained him to decree that every classroom must henceforth display a Bible, and all teachers must alter their lesson plans to teach from it – even math teachers! But a funny thing happened to this un-elected flaming theocrat: Local school boards and teachers simply ignored him. Ryan, brimming with ego, had not bothered to consult parents, school boards, teachers, or legislators – so no Bibles have been purchased and no curriculums have been changed. However, his dictatorial theatrics did get the attention of one major group: Oklahoma’s GOP lawmakers are now investigating his “rogue behavior.” Do something! If you also feel queasy about the encroachment of Christian nationalism into our schools, check out the work from the Freedom from Religion Foundation. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can Mass Media Promote Democracy Instead of Divisiveness? Here’s a Guy Who Did.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Every once in a great while, a major media celebrity comes along who puts his or her talent and – well, celebrity – to work for the Common Good.</p><p>Many generous artistic souls support good causes – and bless them for that! But there are a few who put the public interest at the center of their professional calling, and it’s been my joy to know a couple of them. We just lost a special one: <strong>Phil Donahue</strong>.</p><p>For 30 years, he brought a high-energy mix of unscripted fun, freewheeling grassroots democracy, serious issue exchanges, and public purpose to the unlikeliest of venues: Daytime TV talk shows. “Donahue” – the person and the show – defied studio bosses and conventional wisdom about what would appeal to “the great unwashed.” His crazy idea was to confront biases directly, with the audience as the stars. He put big issues in front of mainstream audiences before most TV bosses knew they were issues – abortion, medical price gouging, gender identity, atheism, NAFTA, Native Americans, AIDS, nuclear power, prison reform, family farmers, and so much more. And he did it daily, not talking to a pre-selected audience of like-minded people, but engaging disparate viewpoints directly in (often fiery) broadcasts.</p><p>Moreover, he brought genuine activists (not just sparklies) onto the show as guests. Even I made a couple of appearances. We were not invited to peacock and pontificate, but to provide a bit of insight and, most importantly, offer ways for viewers to fight back for fairness, justice, and a little more sanity in our world.</p><p>Phil Donahue is the model of what democratic media ought to be – an open exchange with regular people to promote the Common Good. See some Donahue for yourself at <a target="_blank" href="http://jimhightower.com/donahue">jimhightower.com/donahue</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/can-mass-media-promote-democracy</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:148448976</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/148448976/77c97ad18a30d61ad23f99065687a363.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/148448976/6c34c6d71e014b0a17174a749a7f97eb.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Every once in a great while, a major media celebrity comes along who puts his or her talent and – well, celebrity – to work for the Common Good. Many generous artistic souls support good causes – and bless them for that! But there are a few who put the public interest at the center of their professional calling, and it’s been my joy to know a couple of them. We just lost a special one: Phil Donahue. For 30 years, he brought a high-energy mix of unscripted fun, freewheeling grassroots democracy, serious issue exchanges, and public purpose to the unlikeliest of venues: Daytime TV talk shows. “Donahue” – the person and the show – defied studio bosses and conventional wisdom about what would appeal to “the great unwashed.” His crazy idea was to confront biases directly, with the audience as the stars. He put big issues in front of mainstream audiences before most TV bosses knew they were issues – abortion, medical price gouging, gender identity, atheism, NAFTA, Native Americans, AIDS, nuclear power, prison reform, family farmers, and so much more. And he did it daily, not talking to a pre-selected audience of like-minded people, but engaging disparate viewpoints directly in (often fiery) broadcasts. Moreover, he brought genuine activists (not just sparklies) onto the show as guests. Even I made a couple of appearances. We were not invited to peacock and pontificate, but to provide a bit of insight and, most importantly, offer ways for viewers to fight back for fairness, justice, and a little more sanity in our world. Phil Donahue is the model of what democratic media ought to be – an open exchange with regular people to promote the Common Good. See some Donahue for yourself at jimhightower.com/donahue. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Every once in a great while, a major media celebrity comes along who puts his or her talent and – well, celebrity – to work for the Common Good. Many generous artistic souls support good causes – and bless them for that! But there are a few who put the public interest at the center of their professional calling, and it’s been my joy to know a couple of them. We just lost a special one: Phil Donahue. For 30 years, he brought a high-energy mix of unscripted fun, freewheeling grassroots democracy, serious issue exchanges, and public purpose to the unlikeliest of venues: Daytime TV talk shows. “Donahue” – the person and the show – defied studio bosses and conventional wisdom about what would appeal to “the great unwashed.” His crazy idea was to confront biases directly, with the audience as the stars. He put big issues in front of mainstream audiences before most TV bosses knew they were issues – abortion, medical price gouging, gender identity, atheism, NAFTA, Native Americans, AIDS, nuclear power, prison reform, family farmers, and so much more. And he did it daily, not talking to a pre-selected audience of like-minded people, but engaging disparate viewpoints directly in (often fiery) broadcasts. Moreover, he brought genuine activists (not just sparklies) onto the show as guests. Even I made a couple of appearances. We were not invited to peacock and pontificate, but to provide a bit of insight and, most importantly, offer ways for viewers to fight back for fairness, justice, and a little more sanity in our world. Phil Donahue is the model of what democratic media ought to be – an open exchange with regular people to promote the Common Good. See some Donahue for yourself at jimhightower.com/donahue. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will Elon Betray Donald First, or Vice Versa?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Seeing two bloated egos like Elon Musk and Donald Trump hug-up recently in their marriage of political convenience, made me think: “Boy, there’s two who really do deserve each other!” The only question is which one will betray the other first.</p><p>My money is on Musk. Yes, Trump has built his entire career on the art of high-profile betrayals, from real estate scams to marriages. But Elon’s crass duplicity is even more naked (please excuse that image). He routinely shifts his core beliefs from one “rock-solid principle” to the opposite, coldly turning on trusting partners and allies, all for personal gain.</p><p>Take his 2022 denunciation of Joe Biden’s climate change proposal, which promised massive support for the electric vehicles sold by Musk. Just two years earlier, the Tesla CEO had proclaimed himself to be “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-super-fired-up-help-biden-fight-climate-change-2021-1">super fired up</a>” about Joe’s plan. But his ego got ruffled by some perceived slight by Biden, so he called for killing the entire climate initiative, smugly declaring Tesla didn’t need public money.</p><p>Ha! Far from being some bootstrap, up-from-nothing corporate genius, Musk is the fortunate son of a South African emerald dealer. He didn’t create Tesla, he bought it, then <a target="_blank" href="https://www.reuters.com/world/us/musk-embraces-trump-scorns-subsidies-tesla-still-lobbies-us-benefits-2024-08-12/">enriched himself by extracting giant subsidies from American taxpayers</a> and ruthlessly cheating workers and suppliers. Tesla’s first factory was built with half a billion federal dollars, he has been milking a public regulatory fund for $9 billion so far, each car he sells gets up to $7,500 in federal subsidies – and he continues to draw about a billion a year in tax breaks from that Biden law he condemned.</p><p>Musk says it’s all ethical, because the money is there for the taking. Yeah – and so is his integrity.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/will-elon-betray-donald-first-or</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:148447908</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/148447908/68b8f3d49a68d6975e3adb4af9502bee.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/148447908/9f8a3b7f44d916ac0df7000af244c5fd.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Seeing two bloated egos like Elon Musk and Donald Trump hug-up recently in their marriage of political convenience, made me think: “Boy, there’s two who really do deserve each other!” The only question is which one will betray the other first. My money is on Musk. Yes, Trump has built his entire career on the art of high-profile betrayals, from real estate scams to marriages. But Elon’s crass duplicity is even more naked (please excuse that image). He routinely shifts his core beliefs from one “rock-solid principle” to the opposite, coldly turning on trusting partners and allies, all for personal gain. Take his 2022 denunciation of Joe Biden’s climate change proposal, which promised massive support for the electric vehicles sold by Musk. Just two years earlier, the Tesla CEO had proclaimed himself to be “super fired up” about Joe’s plan. But his ego got ruffled by some perceived slight by Biden, so he called for killing the entire climate initiative, smugly declaring Tesla didn’t need public money. Ha! Far from being some bootstrap, up-from-nothing corporate genius, Musk is the fortunate son of a South African emerald dealer. He didn’t create Tesla, he bought it, then enriched himself by extracting giant subsidies from American taxpayers and ruthlessly cheating workers and suppliers. Tesla’s first factory was built with half a billion federal dollars, he has been milking a public regulatory fund for $9 billion so far, each car he sells gets up to $7,500 in federal subsidies – and he continues to draw about a billion a year in tax breaks from that Biden law he condemned. Musk says it’s all ethical, because the money is there for the taking. Yeah – and so is his integrity. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Seeing two bloated egos like Elon Musk and Donald Trump hug-up recently in their marriage of political convenience, made me think: “Boy, there’s two who really do deserve each other!” The only question is which one will betray the other first. My money is on Musk. Yes, Trump has built his entire career on the art of high-profile betrayals, from real estate scams to marriages. But Elon’s crass duplicity is even more naked (please excuse that image). He routinely shifts his core beliefs from one “rock-solid principle” to the opposite, coldly turning on trusting partners and allies, all for personal gain. Take his 2022 denunciation of Joe Biden’s climate change proposal, which promised massive support for the electric vehicles sold by Musk. Just two years earlier, the Tesla CEO had proclaimed himself to be “super fired up” about Joe’s plan. But his ego got ruffled by some perceived slight by Biden, so he called for killing the entire climate initiative, smugly declaring Tesla didn’t need public money. Ha! Far from being some bootstrap, up-from-nothing corporate genius, Musk is the fortunate son of a South African emerald dealer. He didn’t create Tesla, he bought it, then enriched himself by extracting giant subsidies from American taxpayers and ruthlessly cheating workers and suppliers. Tesla’s first factory was built with half a billion federal dollars, he has been milking a public regulatory fund for $9 billion so far, each car he sells gets up to $7,500 in federal subsidies – and he continues to draw about a billion a year in tax breaks from that Biden law he condemned. Musk says it’s all ethical, because the money is there for the taking. Yeah – and so is his integrity. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Right-wing Attack on Social Security Is Un-American]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Right-wing ideologues are mounting a three-pronged fraud trying to delegitimize Social Security, slash its benefits, then – zzzzzt – kill it.</p><p>First, they tried to demonize our public retirement program as a socialist horror. That hasn’t worked, since this pension literally works, allowing millions of workaday American families to escape old age poverty.</p><p>So, in Lie Number Two, they shriek: “Social Security is bankrupt – you future retirees will be left penniless in old age!” Uh… no. The bulk of retiree benefits are covered by payroll taxes, which continue to flow in, so the program is in no danger at all of folding.</p><p>Well, they exclaim in Lie Number Three, even to keep the program on life support requires gutting it by raising people’s retirement age to 70 or older and slashing monthly payments to retirees.</p><p>Uh… gosh, no again. Such a gut-job would be immoral – half of America’s workers get no retirement benefits except Social Security. Plus, such callousness is totally unnecessary, because there’s an obvious, easy, and fair fix: <em>Apply the Social Security tax to everyone!</em></p><p>While working stiffs pay this tax on every dollar they earn, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/02/millionaires-reach-limit-for-social-security-payroll-taxes-for-2024.html">millionaires and billionaires are taxed only on the first $170,000 of their astronomical pay</a>. Take Elon Musk, the richest man in America, who claimed a <em>$45 billion paycheck</em> last year. But under current law he only pays Social Security taxes on $170,000 of that – meaning 44 billion, 999 million, 830 thousand dollars of his income goes untaxed. Why shouldn’t he pay like everyone else?</p><p>Tax everyone equally – the rich as well as the working class – so everyone can have a secure, dignified retirement. That’s what the American concept of the Common Good means.</p><p><em>Photo by Timothy Krause on </em><a target="_blank" href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/timothykrause/7998205043"><em>Flickr</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-right-wing-attack-on-social-security</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:148282418</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 21:58:45 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/148282418/363a8471deaf5016921a336008c6b6c3.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/148282418/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Right-wing ideologues are mounting a three-pronged fraud trying to delegitimize Social Security, slash its benefits, then – zzzzzt – kill it. First, they tried to demonize our public retirement program as a socialist horror. That hasn’t worked, since this pension literally works, allowing millions of workaday American families to escape old age poverty. So, in Lie Number Two, they shriek: “Social Security is bankrupt – you future retirees will be left penniless in old age!” Uh… no. The bulk of retiree benefits are covered by payroll taxes, which continue to flow in, so the program is in no danger at all of folding. Well, they exclaim in Lie Number Three, even to keep the program on life support requires gutting it by raising people’s retirement age to 70 or older and slashing monthly payments to retirees. Uh… gosh, no again. Such a gut-job would be immoral – half of America’s workers get no retirement benefits except Social Security. Plus, such callousness is totally unnecessary, because there’s an obvious, easy, and fair fix: Apply the Social Security tax to everyone! While working stiffs pay this tax on every dollar they earn, millionaires and billionaires are taxed only on the first $170,000 of their astronomical pay. Take Elon Musk, the richest man in America, who claimed a $45 billion paycheck last year. But under current law he only pays Social Security taxes on $170,000 of that – meaning 44 billion, 999 million, 830 thousand dollars of his income goes untaxed. Why shouldn’t he pay like everyone else? Tax everyone equally – the rich as well as the working class – so everyone can have a secure, dignified retirement. That’s what the American concept of the Common Good means. Photo by Timothy Krause on Flickr. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Right-wing ideologues are mounting a three-pronged fraud trying to delegitimize Social Security, slash its benefits, then – zzzzzt – kill it. First, they tried to demonize our public retirement program as a socialist horror. That hasn’t worked, since this pension literally works, allowing millions of workaday American families to escape old age poverty. So, in Lie Number Two, they shriek: “Social Security is bankrupt – you future retirees will be left penniless in old age!” Uh… no. The bulk of retiree benefits are covered by payroll taxes, which continue to flow in, so the program is in no danger at all of folding. Well, they exclaim in Lie Number Three, even to keep the program on life support requires gutting it by raising people’s retirement age to 70 or older and slashing monthly payments to retirees. Uh… gosh, no again. Such a gut-job would be immoral – half of America’s workers get no retirement benefits except Social Security. Plus, such callousness is totally unnecessary, because there’s an obvious, easy, and fair fix: Apply the Social Security tax to everyone! While working stiffs pay this tax on every dollar they earn, millionaires and billionaires are taxed only on the first $170,000 of their astronomical pay. Take Elon Musk, the richest man in America, who claimed a $45 billion paycheck last year. But under current law he only pays Social Security taxes on $170,000 of that – meaning 44 billion, 999 million, 830 thousand dollars of his income goes untaxed. Why shouldn’t he pay like everyone else? Tax everyone equally – the rich as well as the working class – so everyone can have a secure, dignified retirement. That’s what the American concept of the Common Good means. Photo by Timothy Krause on Flickr. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Establishment Economists Attack Kamala Harris – For Being Right]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><em>“I’ve got those</em><em>Payday-Friday</em><em>Grocery store blues.”</em></p><p>That working-class-lament is from an old bluegrass song, but millions of working stiffs are singing it today. While many workers have finally seen an uptick in their paychecks, they’ve been dismayed to see the increase quickly gobbled up by jacked-up grocery prices. What the hell?</p><p>Kamala Harris has had the honesty to call it what it is: <a target="_blank" href="https://apnews.com/article/kamala-harris-price-gouging-ban-inflation-65dc8844bb41159d76886f752b6cab28">Gouging</a>. And, to put some bite in her bark, she’s proposing a long-overdue, national ban on rip-off pricing by food giants. Of course, this produced outraged squeals by corporate functionaries. But some of the most furious squealing is coming from a supposedly unbiased corner of America’s economic structure: Economists.</p><p>A little-known secret of this occult profession is that most economists are schooled by and working for the corporate order, generally hostile to consumers, workers and other competing interests. One absolute rule they learn is that NONE of the inequities and iniquities of America’s laissez-fairyland economy are to be blamed on corporate greed.</p><p>Thus, a whole pack of mainline economists raced to poo-pooh Harris’ price-gouging charge, asserting that grocery prices have naturally surged due to what they benignly call “<a target="_blank" href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/hear-corporate-americas-new-euphemisms">price pack architecture.</a>”</p><p>Bovine excrement! Price gouging cannot be perfumed by semantics – it is mass swindling, and people can detect it by its stench. So, let’s follow that stench to its anti-free enterprise source: <em>Monopoly</em>. For the past half century, economists in both Republican and Democratic administrations have looked the other way, <a target="_blank" href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-lowdown-the-free-market-hogtied">allowing food giants to consolidate and conglomerate, shut out competitors, monopolize every aspect of the food economy… and steal.</a></p><p>It’s that theft that Harris is daring to challenge, and Americans will cheer her on – no matter how furiously establishment economists squeal.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/establishment-economists-attack-kamala</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:148151877</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 18:43:57 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/148151877/594237c1de688df650979d648d5c6154.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/148151877/aae5d36a825433c29067605238f88695.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>“I’ve got thosePayday-FridayGrocery store blues.” That working-class-lament is from an old bluegrass song, but millions of working stiffs are singing it today. While many workers have finally seen an uptick in their paychecks, they’ve been dismayed to see the increase quickly gobbled up by jacked-up grocery prices. What the hell? Kamala Harris has had the honesty to call it what it is: Gouging. And, to put some bite in her bark, she’s proposing a long-overdue, national ban on rip-off pricing by food giants. Of course, this produced outraged squeals by corporate functionaries. But some of the most furious squealing is coming from a supposedly unbiased corner of America’s economic structure: Economists. A little-known secret of this occult profession is that most economists are schooled by and working for the corporate order, generally hostile to consumers, workers and other competing interests. One absolute rule they learn is that NONE of the inequities and iniquities of America’s laissez-fairyland economy are to be blamed on corporate greed. Thus, a whole pack of mainline economists raced to poo-pooh Harris’ price-gouging charge, asserting that grocery prices have naturally surged due to what they benignly call “price pack architecture.” Bovine excrement! Price gouging cannot be perfumed by semantics – it is mass swindling, and people can detect it by its stench. So, let’s follow that stench to its anti-free enterprise source: Monopoly. For the past half century, economists in both Republican and Democratic administrations have looked the other way, allowing food giants to consolidate and conglomerate, shut out competitors, monopolize every aspect of the food economy… and steal. It’s that theft that Harris is daring to challenge, and Americans will cheer her on – no matter how furiously establishment economists squeal. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>“I’ve got thosePayday-FridayGrocery store blues.” That working-class-lament is from an old bluegrass song, but millions of working stiffs are singing it today. While many workers have finally seen an uptick in their paychecks, they’ve been dismayed to see the increase quickly gobbled up by jacked-up grocery prices. What the hell? Kamala Harris has had the honesty to call it what it is: Gouging. And, to put some bite in her bark, she’s proposing a long-overdue, national ban on rip-off pricing by food giants. Of course, this produced outraged squeals by corporate functionaries. But some of the most furious squealing is coming from a supposedly unbiased corner of America’s economic structure: Economists. A little-known secret of this occult profession is that most economists are schooled by and working for the corporate order, generally hostile to consumers, workers and other competing interests. One absolute rule they learn is that NONE of the inequities and iniquities of America’s laissez-fairyland economy are to be blamed on corporate greed. Thus, a whole pack of mainline economists raced to poo-pooh Harris’ price-gouging charge, asserting that grocery prices have naturally surged due to what they benignly call “price pack architecture.” Bovine excrement! Price gouging cannot be perfumed by semantics – it is mass swindling, and people can detect it by its stench. So, let’s follow that stench to its anti-free enterprise source: Monopoly. For the past half century, economists in both Republican and Democratic administrations have looked the other way, allowing food giants to consolidate and conglomerate, shut out competitors, monopolize every aspect of the food economy… and steal. It’s that theft that Harris is daring to challenge, and Americans will cheer her on – no matter how furiously establishment economists squeal. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Changing Meaning Of “Work”—And the Idea of “Boss Man”]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>“Big Boss Man,” an old song by blues legend Jimmy Reed, still packs a potent political punch for today’s working class:</p><p>You got me workin’, boss man, working round the clockI wanna little drink of water, but you won’t let Jimmy stopBig boss man, can’t you hear me When I call?</p><p>But then, Reed urges workers to see how small the boss man really is:</p><p>Well, you ain’t so big, you just tall that’s all.Well, I’m gonna get me a boss man, one gonna treat me rightWork hard in the day time, rest easy at night.</p><p>That could be the anthem of millions of Americans today, who are rebelling against soulless corporate jobs and layers of bosses demanding longer hours doing tedious tasks. These workplace uprisngs are not about another dollar a day – rather <em>the idea of work itself is being confronted</em>.</p><p>People are realizing that their time, energy, and <em>their very lives</em> are being consumed a day at a time to profit faraway Big Boss Men. It’s also dawning on more and more workers that their jobs are BS – generating paperwork that no one sees, babysitting computer systems, making electronic downloads that are silly, etc.</p><p>Thus, large numbers of workers are saying: Who needs it? Is this my “life?” What’s the point? My “job” could – poof! – disappear tomorrow, and it wouldn’t matter. How am I to take any pride or find a smidgeon of personal fulfillment in surrendering the biggest chunks of my life to that?</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… Big Billionaire Bosses like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos bark that it’s time for employees to double down on the “work ethic” – yet there’s no ethical core to the work they demand. Bosses don’t get it, but what’s happening today is not merely a labor rebellion, but a revolution for humanity to be valued for itself… and for workers to become their own bosses.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-changing-meaning-of-workand-the</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:147883279</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/147883279/b844c14cf28ef2e628f684257ff52eaf.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/147883279/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>“Big Boss Man,” an old song by blues legend Jimmy Reed, still packs a potent political punch for today’s working class: You got me workin’, boss man, working round the clockI wanna little drink of water, but you won’t let Jimmy stopBig boss man, can’t you hear me When I call? But then, Reed urges workers to see how small the boss man really is: Well, you ain’t so big, you just tall that’s all.Well, I’m gonna get me a boss man, one gonna treat me rightWork hard in the day time, rest easy at night. That could be the anthem of millions of Americans today, who are rebelling against soulless corporate jobs and layers of bosses demanding longer hours doing tedious tasks. These workplace uprisngs are not about another dollar a day – rather the idea of work itself is being confronted. People are realizing that their time, energy, and their very lives are being consumed a day at a time to profit faraway Big Boss Men. It’s also dawning on more and more workers that their jobs are BS – generating paperwork that no one sees, babysitting computer systems, making electronic downloads that are silly, etc. Thus, large numbers of workers are saying: Who needs it? Is this my “life?” What’s the point? My “job” could – poof! – disappear tomorrow, and it wouldn’t matter. How am I to take any pride or find a smidgeon of personal fulfillment in surrendering the biggest chunks of my life to that? This is Jim Hightower saying… Big Billionaire Bosses like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos bark that it’s time for employees to double down on the “work ethic” – yet there’s no ethical core to the work they demand. Bosses don’t get it, but what’s happening today is not merely a labor rebellion, but a revolution for humanity to be valued for itself… and for workers to become their own bosses. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>“Big Boss Man,” an old song by blues legend Jimmy Reed, still packs a potent political punch for today’s working class: You got me workin’, boss man, working round the clockI wanna little drink of water, but you won’t let Jimmy stopBig boss man, can’t you hear me When I call? But then, Reed urges workers to see how small the boss man really is: Well, you ain’t so big, you just tall that’s all.Well, I’m gonna get me a boss man, one gonna treat me rightWork hard in the day time, rest easy at night. That could be the anthem of millions of Americans today, who are rebelling against soulless corporate jobs and layers of bosses demanding longer hours doing tedious tasks. These workplace uprisngs are not about another dollar a day – rather the idea of work itself is being confronted. People are realizing that their time, energy, and their very lives are being consumed a day at a time to profit faraway Big Boss Men. It’s also dawning on more and more workers that their jobs are BS – generating paperwork that no one sees, babysitting computer systems, making electronic downloads that are silly, etc. Thus, large numbers of workers are saying: Who needs it? Is this my “life?” What’s the point? My “job” could – poof! – disappear tomorrow, and it wouldn’t matter. How am I to take any pride or find a smidgeon of personal fulfillment in surrendering the biggest chunks of my life to that? This is Jim Hightower saying… Big Billionaire Bosses like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos bark that it’s time for employees to double down on the “work ethic” – yet there’s no ethical core to the work they demand. Bosses don’t get it, but what’s happening today is not merely a labor rebellion, but a revolution for humanity to be valued for itself… and for workers to become their own bosses. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Republicans Discover a Big Flaw in Tim Walz: He’s Not Rich!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Here’s a hard-right political twist I wasn’t expecting, and Tim Walz is probably surprised, too.</p><p>Within the confines of Trump’s MAGAworld, some are <em>appalled</em> by Walz’s wealth. Wealth? They’re claiming this former high school teacher is rich? No… and that bothers them.</p><p>Walz gets a gubernatorial paycheck and a modest public pension. That’s it. No portfolio of Wall Street stocks, no deferred payouts on corporate bonuses, and he doesn’t even own a house, much less a vacation home. While this pegs him as a regular middle-class American, it seems to put off a covey of moneyed Trumpsters who see his lack of riches as a personal weakness.</p><p><em>The Wall Street Journal</em> recently featured one such partisan, who says he prefers “a high net worth” politician, like JD Vance. Being rich, explained the partisan, means a candidate “has financial acumen, business and investment savvy….” Righto! For example, Vance was savvy enough to kiss-up to right-wing Silicon Valley billionaire Peter Thiel, who has pumped millions into the fictional “hillbilly,” turning Vance into a pretentious “Hillwilliam.” And please stop pretending that rich candidates are less corrupt since they aren’t dependent on special-interest funding. Trump himself put the lie to that, when he recently begged a BigOil group. to give a billion dollars to his campaign – in exchange for his promise to slash their taxes.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… Most bizarre is the assertion by Walz critics that his failure to be invested in Wall Street stocks means he’s out of touch with the financial concerns of “the average American.” Hello, nearly all stocks are owned by the superrich, like Trump and Vance. In fact, the average American family owns <em>zero</em> stocks – just like Walz.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/republicans-discover-a-big-flaw-in</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:147882186</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/147882186/e1c6cb09bbae358799c92e80b20a369c.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/147882186/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Here’s a hard-right political twist I wasn’t expecting, and Tim Walz is probably surprised, too. Within the confines of Trump’s MAGAworld, some are appalled by Walz’s wealth. Wealth? They’re claiming this former high school teacher is rich? No… and that bothers them. Walz gets a gubernatorial paycheck and a modest public pension. That’s it. No portfolio of Wall Street stocks, no deferred payouts on corporate bonuses, and he doesn’t even own a house, much less a vacation home. While this pegs him as a regular middle-class American, it seems to put off a covey of moneyed Trumpsters who see his lack of riches as a personal weakness. The Wall Street Journal recently featured one such partisan, who says he prefers “a high net worth” politician, like JD Vance. Being rich, explained the partisan, means a candidate “has financial acumen, business and investment savvy….” Righto! For example, Vance was savvy enough to kiss-up to right-wing Silicon Valley billionaire Peter Thiel, who has pumped millions into the fictional “hillbilly,” turning Vance into a pretentious “Hillwilliam.” And please stop pretending that rich candidates are less corrupt since they aren’t dependent on special-interest funding. Trump himself put the lie to that, when he recently begged a BigOil group. to give a billion dollars to his campaign – in exchange for his promise to slash their taxes. This is Jim Hightower saying… Most bizarre is the assertion by Walz critics that his failure to be invested in Wall Street stocks means he’s out of touch with the financial concerns of “the average American.” Hello, nearly all stocks are owned by the superrich, like Trump and Vance. In fact, the average American family owns zero stocks – just like Walz. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Here’s a hard-right political twist I wasn’t expecting, and Tim Walz is probably surprised, too. Within the confines of Trump’s MAGAworld, some are appalled by Walz’s wealth. Wealth? They’re claiming this former high school teacher is rich? No… and that bothers them. Walz gets a gubernatorial paycheck and a modest public pension. That’s it. No portfolio of Wall Street stocks, no deferred payouts on corporate bonuses, and he doesn’t even own a house, much less a vacation home. While this pegs him as a regular middle-class American, it seems to put off a covey of moneyed Trumpsters who see his lack of riches as a personal weakness. The Wall Street Journal recently featured one such partisan, who says he prefers “a high net worth” politician, like JD Vance. Being rich, explained the partisan, means a candidate “has financial acumen, business and investment savvy….” Righto! For example, Vance was savvy enough to kiss-up to right-wing Silicon Valley billionaire Peter Thiel, who has pumped millions into the fictional “hillbilly,” turning Vance into a pretentious “Hillwilliam.” And please stop pretending that rich candidates are less corrupt since they aren’t dependent on special-interest funding. Trump himself put the lie to that, when he recently begged a BigOil group. to give a billion dollars to his campaign – in exchange for his promise to slash their taxes. This is Jim Hightower saying… Most bizarre is the assertion by Walz critics that his failure to be invested in Wall Street stocks means he’s out of touch with the financial concerns of “the average American.” Hello, nearly all stocks are owned by the superrich, like Trump and Vance. In fact, the average American family owns zero stocks – just like Walz. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Want to Cool Earth? Just Block the Sun. Simple.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Challenging conventional wisdom can advance society’s understanding of truth. Good. Arrogantly challenging the complex balance of nature, however, can go kablooie! Very bad.</p><p>In recent times, there’s been an unfortunate tendency for some scientific hot shots to send society off on techno-tangents to “remake” nature, promising miracles. About 70 years ago, for example, a so-called ag-science genius promised that dumping synthetic pesticides on monoculture crops across the globe would end hunger. Chemical giants and governments rushed to do the dump, but the “fix” ultimately resulted in the ongoing poisoning of Earth’s land, water, food, and people – while enriching agricultural monopolists and allowing hunger to rage.</p><p>Unfortunately, insistence by technologists and profiteers that they can outsmart and overwhelm nature is now being pushed with cosmic vengeance. A covey of arrogant academics and billionaire backers are saying: “Trust us, we can handle that little global warming issue.”</p><p>One is named <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/01/climate/david-keith-solar-geoengineering.html">David Keith</a>, running a $100 million “stratospheric solar geoengineering” scheme named SCoPEx. Keith proposes to solve global warming by – get this – dispensing volumes of sulfur dioxide into the Earth’s stratosphere to “regulate” the amount and location of sunlight around the globe.</p><p>Gosh, what could go wrong with that? Never mind the unknown consequences of tampering with basic nature, argues Keith, for his bold techno-fix to global warming bypasses the political difficulty of ending our fossil fuel addiction – so we should just do it.</p><p>Keith does admit he can be “inappropriately forceful – I’m intense,” he says. Well then, let’s all chip in a for some therapy sessions to help him overcome his megalomania before he makes an irreversible mess of the only planet we have that sustains life.</p><p>Do something</p><p>Looking for <em>real</em> environmental change? <a target="_blank" href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/want-environmental-progress-follow">Look no further than the youth!</a> I wrote about them in <a target="_blank" href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/want-environmental-progress-follow">this post</a>, but we recommend teaming up with and supporting the following groups:</p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://genzforchange.org/">Gen-Z for Change</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://thisiszerohour.org/">Zero Hour</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://blackgirlenvironmentalist.org/">Black Girl Environmentalist</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.ourchildrenstrust.org/">Our Children’s Trust</a></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/want-to-cool-earth-just-block-the</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:147785119</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2024 15:16:52 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/147785119/6162ce5ac70f89ef8317bc518c82ef25.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/147785119/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Challenging conventional wisdom can advance society’s understanding of truth. Good. Arrogantly challenging the complex balance of nature, however, can go kablooie! Very bad. In recent times, there’s been an unfortunate tendency for some scientific hot shots to send society off on techno-tangents to “remake” nature, promising miracles. About 70 years ago, for example, a so-called ag-science genius promised that dumping synthetic pesticides on monoculture crops across the globe would end hunger. Chemical giants and governments rushed to do the dump, but the “fix” ultimately resulted in the ongoing poisoning of Earth’s land, water, food, and people – while enriching agricultural monopolists and allowing hunger to rage. Unfortunately, insistence by technologists and profiteers that they can outsmart and overwhelm nature is now being pushed with cosmic vengeance. A covey of arrogant academics and billionaire backers are saying: “Trust us, we can handle that little global warming issue.” One is named David Keith, running a $100 million “stratospheric solar geoengineering” scheme named SCoPEx. Keith proposes to solve global warming by – get this – dispensing volumes of sulfur dioxide into the Earth’s stratosphere to “regulate” the amount and location of sunlight around the globe. Gosh, what could go wrong with that? Never mind the unknown consequences of tampering with basic nature, argues Keith, for his bold techno-fix to global warming bypasses the political difficulty of ending our fossil fuel addiction – so we should just do it. Keith does admit he can be “inappropriately forceful – I’m intense,” he says. Well then, let’s all chip in a for some therapy sessions to help him overcome his megalomania before he makes an irreversible mess of the only planet we have that sustains life. Do something Looking for real environmental change? Look no further than the youth! I wrote about them in this post, but we recommend teaming up with and supporting the following groups: * Gen-Z for Change * Zero Hour * Black Girl Environmentalist * Our Children’s Trust Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Challenging conventional wisdom can advance society’s understanding of truth. Good. Arrogantly challenging the complex balance of nature, however, can go kablooie! Very bad. In recent times, there’s been an unfortunate tendency for some scientific hot shots to send society off on techno-tangents to “remake” nature, promising miracles. About 70 years ago, for example, a so-called ag-science genius promised that dumping synthetic pesticides on monoculture crops across the globe would end hunger. Chemical giants and governments rushed to do the dump, but the “fix” ultimately resulted in the ongoing poisoning of Earth’s land, water, food, and people – while enriching agricultural monopolists and allowing hunger to rage. Unfortunately, insistence by technologists and profiteers that they can outsmart and overwhelm nature is now being pushed with cosmic vengeance. A covey of arrogant academics and billionaire backers are saying: “Trust us, we can handle that little global warming issue.” One is named David Keith, running a $100 million “stratospheric solar geoengineering” scheme named SCoPEx. Keith proposes to solve global warming by – get this – dispensing volumes of sulfur dioxide into the Earth’s stratosphere to “regulate” the amount and location of sunlight around the globe. Gosh, what could go wrong with that? Never mind the unknown consequences of tampering with basic nature, argues Keith, for his bold techno-fix to global warming bypasses the political difficulty of ending our fossil fuel addiction – so we should just do it. Keith does admit he can be “inappropriately forceful – I’m intense,” he says. Well then, let’s all chip in a for some therapy sessions to help him overcome his megalomania before he makes an irreversible mess of the only planet we have that sustains life. Do something Looking for real environmental change? Look no further than the youth! I wrote about them in this post, but we recommend teaming up with and supporting the following groups: * Gen-Z for Change * Zero Hour * Black Girl Environmentalist * Our Children’s Trust Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[A Flock of Rich Plutocratic Democrats Want Lina Khan’s Head. Why?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>We’ve recently learned about <a target="_blank" href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/look-out-america-project-2025">Project 2025</a>, the GOP’s scheme to let corporate agents take over our government. But what about the less-visible effort to make Democrats install corporate-subservient officials who’ll expand their monopoly power?</p><p>High-finance finaglers of Wall Street and Silicon Valley are quietly demanding that Kamala Harris commit to appointing their designated toadies to oversee America’s so-called “free-enterprise” structure. Their primary target is the Federal Trade Commission, a little-known agency meant to protect and extend economic competition.</p><p>The FTC is now headed by <a target="_blank" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lina_Khan">Lina Khan</a>, a tenacious opponent of anti-consumer, anti-worker mergers and takeovers. She rightly recognizes that the “free” in free enterprise is not an adjective, but a verb, requiring aggressive public action to <em>free-up the enterprise</em> of people who’re now routinely shut out of the market by monopolistic giants. So, says Khan, if we really want free markets, let’s free them.</p><p>Oh, how the money vultures screeched! “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/03/business/dealbook/saying-the-quiet-part-out-loud.html">She’s a dope,</a>” raged takeover bully Barry Diller in a dopey fury. And, since many of the monopolistic titans who’re offended by Khan’s otherwise very popular progressive populism are from the Democratic Party’s high-dollar donor class, they have undue clout. Thus, they are bluntly demanding her head as their price for financially backing Harris’s presidential run. Commissioner Khan, they exclaim, simply does not understand “the way the Washington game is played.</p><p>Oh, yes, she does – and she’s flat out rejecting it! She’s the first real anti-trust champion America has had in years – but will the party’s higher-ups have the guts and integrity to defend her? Or will the business-as-usual powers be ushered back in? The answer to that will be an early measure of Harris’s commitment to economic democracy.</p><p>Do something</p><p>Want to fight monopolization and the centralization of markets? Here are a few places to start:</p><p>* The <a target="_blank" href="https://www.economicliberties.us/">American Economic Liberties Project </a>is part of a growing, cross- ideological movement to combat monopolistic corporations and the systems that entrench their power.</p><p>* The <a target="_blank" href="https://ilsr.org/fighting-monopoly-power/">Institute for Local Self-Reliance</a> has a thorough resource for starting in your town, from banking and broadband to pharmacy and food: <a target="_blank" href="https://ilsr.org/fighting-monopoly-power/">Fighting Monopoly Power: How States and Cities Can Beat Back Corporate Control and Build Thriving Communities</a></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/a-flock-of-rich-plutocratic-democrats</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:147664598</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/147664598/dff3a08f5ad654e1cde5230d5cf70c0d.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/147664598/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>We’ve recently learned about Project 2025, the GOP’s scheme to let corporate agents take over our government. But what about the less-visible effort to make Democrats install corporate-subservient officials who’ll expand their monopoly power? High-finance finaglers of Wall Street and Silicon Valley are quietly demanding that Kamala Harris commit to appointing their designated toadies to oversee America’s so-called “free-enterprise” structure. Their primary target is the Federal Trade Commission, a little-known agency meant to protect and extend economic competition. The FTC is now headed by Lina Khan, a tenacious opponent of anti-consumer, anti-worker mergers and takeovers. She rightly recognizes that the “free” in free enterprise is not an adjective, but a verb, requiring aggressive public action to free-up the enterprise of people who’re now routinely shut out of the market by monopolistic giants. So, says Khan, if we really want free markets, let’s free them. Oh, how the money vultures screeched! “She’s a dope,” raged takeover bully Barry Diller in a dopey fury. And, since many of the monopolistic titans who’re offended by Khan’s otherwise very popular progressive populism are from the Democratic Party’s high-dollar donor class, they have undue clout. Thus, they are bluntly demanding her head as their price for financially backing Harris’s presidential run. Commissioner Khan, they exclaim, simply does not understand “the way the Washington game is played. Oh, yes, she does – and she’s flat out rejecting it! She’s the first real anti-trust champion America has had in years – but will the party’s higher-ups have the guts and integrity to defend her? Or will the business-as-usual powers be ushered back in? The answer to that will be an early measure of Harris’s commitment to economic democracy. Do something Want to fight monopolization and the centralization of markets? Here are a few places to start: * The American Economic Liberties Project is part of a growing, cross- ideological movement to combat monopolistic corporations and the systems that entrench their power. * The Institute for Local Self-Reliance has a thorough resource for starting in your town, from banking and broadband to pharmacy and food: Fighting Monopoly Power: How States and Cities Can Beat Back Corporate Control and Build Thriving Communities Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>We’ve recently learned about Project 2025, the GOP’s scheme to let corporate agents take over our government. But what about the less-visible effort to make Democrats install corporate-subservient officials who’ll expand their monopoly power? High-finance finaglers of Wall Street and Silicon Valley are quietly demanding that Kamala Harris commit to appointing their designated toadies to oversee America’s so-called “free-enterprise” structure. Their primary target is the Federal Trade Commission, a little-known agency meant to protect and extend economic competition. The FTC is now headed by Lina Khan, a tenacious opponent of anti-consumer, anti-worker mergers and takeovers. She rightly recognizes that the “free” in free enterprise is not an adjective, but a verb, requiring aggressive public action to free-up the enterprise of people who’re now routinely shut out of the market by monopolistic giants. So, says Khan, if we really want free markets, let’s free them. Oh, how the money vultures screeched! “She’s a dope,” raged takeover bully Barry Diller in a dopey fury. And, since many of the monopolistic titans who’re offended by Khan’s otherwise very popular progressive populism are from the Democratic Party’s high-dollar donor class, they have undue clout. Thus, they are bluntly demanding her head as their price for financially backing Harris’s presidential run. Commissioner Khan, they exclaim, simply does not understand “the way the Washington game is played. Oh, yes, she does – and she’s flat out rejecting it! She’s the first real anti-trust champion America has had in years – but will the party’s higher-ups have the guts and integrity to defend her? Or will the business-as-usual powers be ushered back in? The answer to that will be an early measure of Harris’s commitment to economic democracy. Do something Want to fight monopolization and the centralization of markets? Here are a few places to start: * The American Economic Liberties Project is part of a growing, cross- ideological movement to combat monopolistic corporations and the systems that entrench their power. * The Institute for Local Self-Reliance has a thorough resource for starting in your town, from banking and broadband to pharmacy and food: Fighting Monopoly Power: How States and Cities Can Beat Back Corporate Control and Build Thriving Communities Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[J.D. Vance: Silicon Valley’s Fake Hillbilly]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Who is JD Vance, you might ask?</p><p>Well, which JD? He keeps flipping his bio, politics, and persona, trying to advance his fortunes. A decade ago, he was posing as a Kentucky hillbilly spokesman – only, he’s not from Kentucky and expresses disdain for actual hillbillies.</p><p>Still, he did go from a hardscrabble childhood to an Ivy League  law school, later boasting that he’s a self-made success, with no rich daddy pulling strings for him. Well unless you count his Sugar Daddy. From those Ivy League days forward, “just plain JD” has been a protégé of a Silicon Valley multibillionaire right-winger, Peter Thiel, who put Vance in cushy, high-tech jobs, then arranged $120 million in funding to make him a rich vulture capitalist.</p><p>Suddenly, the “hillbilly” was a “Hillwilliam” – a full-fledged, rich man’s Republican. But he was not yet a right-wing nut, even denouncing Donald Trump in 2016 as “America’s Hitler.” Then, JD decided he should be a US Senator, and Daddy Thiel promptly put up $10 million to buy the seat. But oops – Trump owned the Ohio GOP, so Vance grew a MAGA-macho beard, and squirmed down to Mar-a-Lago to beg The Donald’s forgiveness for that Hitler faux pas, obsequiously pledging to be a Forever Trumper.</p><p>So now, Vance is Trump’s VP nominee… but with a wandering eye, looking to establish himself as the anti-democracy, Christian nationalist champion of the authoritarian Project 2025. Kookier yet, Vance embraces a new McCarthyism cult supporting a violent purge of progressives from our society, saying that such Americans are “Unhumans,” who must be treated as prey.</p><p>Absurd? Yes! But there he stands, the new public face of extremist, right-wing nuttiness that surpasses even Trump’s monarchial fantasies.</p><p><em>Having a hard time keeping up with Vance’s chameleon forms? We are, too! Thank goodness Ohio activist </em><a target="_blank" href="https://linktr.ee/RachelCoyleOhio"><em>Rachel Coyle</em></a><em> is keeping track. Check out her work at </em><a target="_blank" href="http://shillbilly.info"><em>shillbilly.info</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/jd-vance-silicon-valleys-fake-hillbilly</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:147379598</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/147379598/a2f87747a14c39264ac5c45afb2d5cc1.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/147379598/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Who is JD Vance, you might ask? Well, which JD? He keeps flipping his bio, politics, and persona, trying to advance his fortunes. A decade ago, he was posing as a Kentucky hillbilly spokesman – only, he’s not from Kentucky and expresses disdain for actual hillbillies. Still, he did go from a hardscrabble childhood to an Ivy League  law school, later boasting that he’s a self-made success, with no rich daddy pulling strings for him. Well unless you count his Sugar Daddy. From those Ivy League days forward, “just plain JD” has been a protégé of a Silicon Valley multibillionaire right-winger, Peter Thiel, who put Vance in cushy, high-tech jobs, then arranged $120 million in funding to make him a rich vulture capitalist. Suddenly, the “hillbilly” was a “Hillwilliam” – a full-fledged, rich man’s Republican. But he was not yet a right-wing nut, even denouncing Donald Trump in 2016 as “America’s Hitler.” Then, JD decided he should be a US Senator, and Daddy Thiel promptly put up $10 million to buy the seat. But oops – Trump owned the Ohio GOP, so Vance grew a MAGA-macho beard, and squirmed down to Mar-a-Lago to beg The Donald’s forgiveness for that Hitler faux pas, obsequiously pledging to be a Forever Trumper. So now, Vance is Trump’s VP nominee… but with a wandering eye, looking to establish himself as the anti-democracy, Christian nationalist champion of the authoritarian Project 2025. Kookier yet, Vance embraces a new McCarthyism cult supporting a violent purge of progressives from our society, saying that such Americans are “Unhumans,” who must be treated as prey. Absurd? Yes! But there he stands, the new public face of extremist, right-wing nuttiness that surpasses even Trump’s monarchial fantasies. Having a hard time keeping up with Vance’s chameleon forms? We are, too! Thank goodness Ohio activist Rachel Coyle is keeping track. Check out her work at shillbilly.info. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Who is JD Vance, you might ask? Well, which JD? He keeps flipping his bio, politics, and persona, trying to advance his fortunes. A decade ago, he was posing as a Kentucky hillbilly spokesman – only, he’s not from Kentucky and expresses disdain for actual hillbillies. Still, he did go from a hardscrabble childhood to an Ivy League  law school, later boasting that he’s a self-made success, with no rich daddy pulling strings for him. Well unless you count his Sugar Daddy. From those Ivy League days forward, “just plain JD” has been a protégé of a Silicon Valley multibillionaire right-winger, Peter Thiel, who put Vance in cushy, high-tech jobs, then arranged $120 million in funding to make him a rich vulture capitalist. Suddenly, the “hillbilly” was a “Hillwilliam” – a full-fledged, rich man’s Republican. But he was not yet a right-wing nut, even denouncing Donald Trump in 2016 as “America’s Hitler.” Then, JD decided he should be a US Senator, and Daddy Thiel promptly put up $10 million to buy the seat. But oops – Trump owned the Ohio GOP, so Vance grew a MAGA-macho beard, and squirmed down to Mar-a-Lago to beg The Donald’s forgiveness for that Hitler faux pas, obsequiously pledging to be a Forever Trumper. So now, Vance is Trump’s VP nominee… but with a wandering eye, looking to establish himself as the anti-democracy, Christian nationalist champion of the authoritarian Project 2025. Kookier yet, Vance embraces a new McCarthyism cult supporting a violent purge of progressives from our society, saying that such Americans are “Unhumans,” who must be treated as prey. Absurd? Yes! But there he stands, the new public face of extremist, right-wing nuttiness that surpasses even Trump’s monarchial fantasies. Having a hard time keeping up with Vance’s chameleon forms? We are, too! Thank goodness Ohio activist Rachel Coyle is keeping track. Check out her work at shillbilly.info. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[“Laffin’ Kamala” versus “Grumpin’ Trump”]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>You know that American politics is turning into a sad joke when a supposedly-serious presidential campaign tries to demonize laughter.</p><p>Yet, bizarrely, Donald Trump’s humorless gaggle of strategists decided that their first point of attack on Kamala Harris would be: Her laugh. No, seriously! Donald himself launched the offensive – “I call her Laffin’ Kamala,” he snorted. “You ever watch her laugh?” he implored listeners, declaring, “She’s crazy. She’s nuts.”</p><p>Uh… no. Like normal people, she laughs – often, naturally, and joyously. So do I. Maybe you do, too. But, one GOP outfit sniffed that this is “inappropriate” for a woman running for president. And a Republican senatorial doofus from Louisiana even barked that Harris should act more like Margaret Thatcher, Britain’s former right-wing prime minister, pointing out that she “didn’t giggle.” The sour old senator then mansplained that Harris’ laughter made people think she’s “a ding-dong” – even though the dinging seems to be coming from his own head.</p><p>Interestingly, though, Trump’s orchestrated snark attack on Harris’ laughter is working. For Harris! By repeatedly pointing out that she has unscripted moments of laughter, Republicans actually make people feel positive toward her. I can attest from my own time politicking in a supposedly conservative state that laughter unites people – I quickly learned that humor is a key that can unlock the mind.</p><p>Moreover, the GOP’s churlish demonization of laughter only highlights the fact that, in contrast to Kamala, Trump is a grump! Note that<em> we never see him laugh</em>. He smirks, gloats, and often puts on a smarmy grin – but he never has a joyous belly laugh or shows any genuine sense of fun. Sad for him… but sadder for us if we let his dour demeanor define our America.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/laffin-kamala-versus-grumpin-trump</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:147379292</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/147379292/79c26fce0e5d5e992809f9edd1adee0d.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/147379292/39a6f947b24a8fcb2d390c4d7b47ac97.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>You know that American politics is turning into a sad joke when a supposedly-serious presidential campaign tries to demonize laughter. Yet, bizarrely, Donald Trump’s humorless gaggle of strategists decided that their first point of attack on Kamala Harris would be: Her laugh. No, seriously! Donald himself launched the offensive – “I call her Laffin’ Kamala,” he snorted. “You ever watch her laugh?” he implored listeners, declaring, “She’s crazy. She’s nuts.” Uh… no. Like normal people, she laughs – often, naturally, and joyously. So do I. Maybe you do, too. But, one GOP outfit sniffed that this is “inappropriate” for a woman running for president. And a Republican senatorial doofus from Louisiana even barked that Harris should act more like Margaret Thatcher, Britain’s former right-wing prime minister, pointing out that she “didn’t giggle.” The sour old senator then mansplained that Harris’ laughter made people think she’s “a ding-dong” – even though the dinging seems to be coming from his own head. Interestingly, though, Trump’s orchestrated snark attack on Harris’ laughter is working. For Harris! By repeatedly pointing out that she has unscripted moments of laughter, Republicans actually make people feel positive toward her. I can attest from my own time politicking in a supposedly conservative state that laughter unites people – I quickly learned that humor is a key that can unlock the mind. Moreover, the GOP’s churlish demonization of laughter only highlights the fact that, in contrast to Kamala, Trump is a grump! Note that we never see him laugh. He smirks, gloats, and often puts on a smarmy grin – but he never has a joyous belly laugh or shows any genuine sense of fun. Sad for him… but sadder for us if we let his dour demeanor define our America. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>You know that American politics is turning into a sad joke when a supposedly-serious presidential campaign tries to demonize laughter. Yet, bizarrely, Donald Trump’s humorless gaggle of strategists decided that their first point of attack on Kamala Harris would be: Her laugh. No, seriously! Donald himself launched the offensive – “I call her Laffin’ Kamala,” he snorted. “You ever watch her laugh?” he implored listeners, declaring, “She’s crazy. She’s nuts.” Uh… no. Like normal people, she laughs – often, naturally, and joyously. So do I. Maybe you do, too. But, one GOP outfit sniffed that this is “inappropriate” for a woman running for president. And a Republican senatorial doofus from Louisiana even barked that Harris should act more like Margaret Thatcher, Britain’s former right-wing prime minister, pointing out that she “didn’t giggle.” The sour old senator then mansplained that Harris’ laughter made people think she’s “a ding-dong” – even though the dinging seems to be coming from his own head. Interestingly, though, Trump’s orchestrated snark attack on Harris’ laughter is working. For Harris! By repeatedly pointing out that she has unscripted moments of laughter, Republicans actually make people feel positive toward her. I can attest from my own time politicking in a supposedly conservative state that laughter unites people – I quickly learned that humor is a key that can unlock the mind. Moreover, the GOP’s churlish demonization of laughter only highlights the fact that, in contrast to Kamala, Trump is a grump! Note that we never see him laugh. He smirks, gloats, and often puts on a smarmy grin – but he never has a joyous belly laugh or shows any genuine sense of fun. Sad for him… but sadder for us if we let his dour demeanor define our America. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[A quick housekeeping note for podcast listeners]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Hightower was under the weather and unable to record new commentaries for this week, so we wanted just to quickly let our podcast listeners know that you can check out new written content being posted to our Substack all week, at <a target="_blank" href="http://jimhightower.substack.com">jimhightower.substack.com</a>.</p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/a-quick-housekeeping-note-for-podcast</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:146928313</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower and Deanna Zandt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="332629" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/146928313/d470dcbb239822b4df626e1916f5d135.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower and Deanna Zandt</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>27</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/146928313/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Hightower was under the weather and unable to record new commentaries for this week, so we wanted just to quickly let our podcast listeners know that you can check out new written content being posted to our Substack all week, at jimhightower.substack.com. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Hightower was under the weather and unable to record new commentaries for this week, so we wanted just to quickly let our podcast listeners know that you can check out new written content being posted to our Substack all week, at jimhightower.substack.com. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Singing the Chick-fil-A Child Labor Blues]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>“Summertime, and the living is easy, fish are jumping, and”… wait a minute, what the hell is this?</p><p>A summer camp for kids – but with a disturbing corporate twist. Some outlets of Chick-fil-A, the fast food chicken chain, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.salon.com/2024/06/12/for-just-35-you-can-send-your-child-to-chick-fil-as-eyebrow-raising-summer-camp-in-louisiana/">are promoting a summer camp where children as young as 5 can learn “how to be a Chick-fil-A worker.”</a></p><p>Isn’t this fun? The corporation says that while the chickadees won’t actually be doing the work of regular employees, they will learn how to “take orders, deliver orders, make drinks, and be a hostess.”</p><p>Of course, the little campers don’t get paid – indeed their families must pay to let the company give them an early dose of the good ol’ American work ethic and a “behind-the-scenes look” inside the hierarchal corporate order. You can’t start ‘em too young on these life lessons! The kiddos do get compensated, sort of, with their very own Chick-fil-A nametag and t-shirt.</p><p>Okay, this is not the Dickensian dystopia of 19th century England – but is that our modern standard? There is nothing wrong with young kids working… but 5-year-olds? And – as was the case in the pre-teen tasks I had in my father’s small business and on my Aunt Eula’s farm – the objective ought not be indoctrination into the corporate culture of low-wage franchises. Rather, I was learning to help the family and how to contribute to the larger community. My reward was not merely a token stipend, but a recognition that <em>I belonged</em> – that I had a role and was valued as part of that community.  People didn’t need a corporate name tag to know who I was.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… There’s so much more that an $11 billion nationwide giant like Chick-fil-A could do for the communities that provide its profits. Can’t they think of anything less selfish than promoting a fast-food future for children.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/singing-the-chick-fil-a-child-labor</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:146672054</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/146672054/262565a76a32efc9a717e8df347c2d04.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/146672054/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>“Summertime, and the living is easy, fish are jumping, and”… wait a minute, what the hell is this? A summer camp for kids – but with a disturbing corporate twist. Some outlets of Chick-fil-A, the fast food chicken chain, are promoting a summer camp where children as young as 5 can learn “how to be a Chick-fil-A worker.” Isn’t this fun? The corporation says that while the chickadees won’t actually be doing the work of regular employees, they will learn how to “take orders, deliver orders, make drinks, and be a hostess.” Of course, the little campers don’t get paid – indeed their families must pay to let the company give them an early dose of the good ol’ American work ethic and a “behind-the-scenes look” inside the hierarchal corporate order. You can’t start ‘em too young on these life lessons! The kiddos do get compensated, sort of, with their very own Chick-fil-A nametag and t-shirt. Okay, this is not the Dickensian dystopia of 19th century England – but is that our modern standard? There is nothing wrong with young kids working… but 5-year-olds? And – as was the case in the pre-teen tasks I had in my father’s small business and on my Aunt Eula’s farm – the objective ought not be indoctrination into the corporate culture of low-wage franchises. Rather, I was learning to help the family and how to contribute to the larger community. My reward was not merely a token stipend, but a recognition that I belonged – that I had a role and was valued as part of that community.  People didn’t need a corporate name tag to know who I was. This is Jim Hightower saying… There’s so much more that an $11 billion nationwide giant like Chick-fil-A could do for the communities that provide its profits. Can’t they think of anything less selfish than promoting a fast-food future for children. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>“Summertime, and the living is easy, fish are jumping, and”… wait a minute, what the hell is this? A summer camp for kids – but with a disturbing corporate twist. Some outlets of Chick-fil-A, the fast food chicken chain, are promoting a summer camp where children as young as 5 can learn “how to be a Chick-fil-A worker.” Isn’t this fun? The corporation says that while the chickadees won’t actually be doing the work of regular employees, they will learn how to “take orders, deliver orders, make drinks, and be a hostess.” Of course, the little campers don’t get paid – indeed their families must pay to let the company give them an early dose of the good ol’ American work ethic and a “behind-the-scenes look” inside the hierarchal corporate order. You can’t start ‘em too young on these life lessons! The kiddos do get compensated, sort of, with their very own Chick-fil-A nametag and t-shirt. Okay, this is not the Dickensian dystopia of 19th century England – but is that our modern standard? There is nothing wrong with young kids working… but 5-year-olds? And – as was the case in the pre-teen tasks I had in my father’s small business and on my Aunt Eula’s farm – the objective ought not be indoctrination into the corporate culture of low-wage franchises. Rather, I was learning to help the family and how to contribute to the larger community. My reward was not merely a token stipend, but a recognition that I belonged – that I had a role and was valued as part of that community.  People didn’t need a corporate name tag to know who I was. This is Jim Hightower saying… There’s so much more that an $11 billion nationwide giant like Chick-fil-A could do for the communities that provide its profits. Can’t they think of anything less selfish than promoting a fast-food future for children. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[What If a Homeless Person Served on the Supreme Court?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>What’s wrong with Neil Gorsuch? His soul, I mean.</p><p>As one of the domineering right-wing extremists on the Supreme Court, Gorsuch routinely supports enthroning plutocracy, autocracy, and his own brand of Christian theocracy over people’s democratic rights. But he also uses his unelected, unchecked judicial position to take power and justice away from America’s least powerful, most vulnerable people – including the homeless.</p><p>For example,<a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/28/us/politics/supreme-court-homelessness.html"> he ruled last month that an Oregon city’s ban on homeless residents sleeping outdoors was NOT cruel and unusual punishment</a>. Never mind that the city provided nowhere else for homeless individuals and families to bed down, Gorsuch saw no problem with penalizing people who have to sleep or camp out in parks, on the street, etc. After all, he blithely explained, it was not a ban on homelessness, but merely on sleeping outdoors.</p><p>“It makes no difference,” exclaimed His Supremeness, whether the violator is homeless… or “a backpacker on vacation.” Or, I suppose he’d say, a Supreme Court justice sleeping under a bridge. To punctuate his cluelessness, Gorsuch actually asserted that the law <em>applied equally to everyone</em>. Except, of course, that the homeless can’t just go home after being kicked out from under the bridge.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… It’s rank injustice for Gorsuch – a child of a politically-powerful and rich family, product of Ivy League schools and high-dollar law firms, possessor of enormous personal wealth and multiple homes – to dictate “let-them-eat-cake” rules for homeless people he’ll never know or understand. Yes, homelessness is a complex social scourge, but cavalierly criminalizing its victims is itself a <em>judicial</em> crime that solves nothing. Neil is not morally fit to judge poor people – so how about replacing him with a homeless person who actually knows something about real life.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/what-if-a-homeless-person-served</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:146670935</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/146670935/06056c3ed5795f88bb044df8a1058580.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/146670935/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>What’s wrong with Neil Gorsuch? His soul, I mean. As one of the domineering right-wing extremists on the Supreme Court, Gorsuch routinely supports enthroning plutocracy, autocracy, and his own brand of Christian theocracy over people’s democratic rights. But he also uses his unelected, unchecked judicial position to take power and justice away from America’s least powerful, most vulnerable people – including the homeless. For example, he ruled last month that an Oregon city’s ban on homeless residents sleeping outdoors was NOT cruel and unusual punishment. Never mind that the city provided nowhere else for homeless individuals and families to bed down, Gorsuch saw no problem with penalizing people who have to sleep or camp out in parks, on the street, etc. After all, he blithely explained, it was not a ban on homelessness, but merely on sleeping outdoors. “It makes no difference,” exclaimed His Supremeness, whether the violator is homeless… or “a backpacker on vacation.” Or, I suppose he’d say, a Supreme Court justice sleeping under a bridge. To punctuate his cluelessness, Gorsuch actually asserted that the law applied equally to everyone. Except, of course, that the homeless can’t just go home after being kicked out from under the bridge. This is Jim Hightower saying… It’s rank injustice for Gorsuch – a child of a politically-powerful and rich family, product of Ivy League schools and high-dollar law firms, possessor of enormous personal wealth and multiple homes – to dictate “let-them-eat-cake” rules for homeless people he’ll never know or understand. Yes, homelessness is a complex social scourge, but cavalierly criminalizing its victims is itself a judicial crime that solves nothing. Neil is not morally fit to judge poor people – so how about replacing him with a homeless person who actually knows something about real life. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>What’s wrong with Neil Gorsuch? His soul, I mean. As one of the domineering right-wing extremists on the Supreme Court, Gorsuch routinely supports enthroning plutocracy, autocracy, and his own brand of Christian theocracy over people’s democratic rights. But he also uses his unelected, unchecked judicial position to take power and justice away from America’s least powerful, most vulnerable people – including the homeless. For example, he ruled last month that an Oregon city’s ban on homeless residents sleeping outdoors was NOT cruel and unusual punishment. Never mind that the city provided nowhere else for homeless individuals and families to bed down, Gorsuch saw no problem with penalizing people who have to sleep or camp out in parks, on the street, etc. After all, he blithely explained, it was not a ban on homelessness, but merely on sleeping outdoors. “It makes no difference,” exclaimed His Supremeness, whether the violator is homeless… or “a backpacker on vacation.” Or, I suppose he’d say, a Supreme Court justice sleeping under a bridge. To punctuate his cluelessness, Gorsuch actually asserted that the law applied equally to everyone. Except, of course, that the homeless can’t just go home after being kicked out from under the bridge. This is Jim Hightower saying… It’s rank injustice for Gorsuch – a child of a politically-powerful and rich family, product of Ivy League schools and high-dollar law firms, possessor of enormous personal wealth and multiple homes – to dictate “let-them-eat-cake” rules for homeless people he’ll never know or understand. Yes, homelessness is a complex social scourge, but cavalierly criminalizing its victims is itself a judicial crime that solves nothing. Neil is not morally fit to judge poor people – so how about replacing him with a homeless person who actually knows something about real life. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should Corrupt Judges Be the Ones Redefining Official Corruption?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>If the six right-wing dogmatists who now literally rule the Supreme Court wonder why 70 percent of the American people consider them somewhere between politically corrupt and grotesque, they might re-read their Kafkasesque decision last month perverting the meaning of bribery.</p><p>Appropriately enough, the case involved garbage trucks. A smalltown mayor had funneled a million-dollar contract for new garbage trucks to a local seller, which then made a $13,000 payoff to the mayor. Obvious graft. But no, the six supremes decreed that the payoff was not illegal, because it was given to the mayor <em>after</em> the garbage truck contract was issued. Taking money before would be a bribe, they babbled, but money given afterwards is an innocent “gratuity” – like tipping a waiter for good service.</p><p>The court’s distortion of kindergarten-level ethics was written by Brett Kavanaugh, infamous for his own frat-boy moral contortions. In his formal opinion, Brett rhetorically asked if such after-the-fact kickbacks should be considered bribes. “The answer.” he proclaimed,” is no.”</p><p>Of course, as any reasonable person would tell the black-robed fabricator, the obvious answer is: “Hell yes!”</p><p>Kavanaugh even tried to trivialize such official bribery, calling it no more sinister than parents sending a gift basket to thank their child’s teacher for a job well done. Hello, Mr. Clueless, this was a $13,000 gift basket!! The truck dealer was obviously rewarding the mayor for handing out a million taxpayer dollars to it!</p><p>Do something!</p><p>We’re collaborating with friends to build out fresh actions you can take, and in the meantime, check these out:</p><p>* <strong>Share the Justice Can’t Wait updated</strong><a target="_blank" href="https://justicecantwait.org/"> website</a>.</p><p>* <strong>Share Stand Up America’s Supreme Court Voter</strong><a target="_blank" href="https://www.courtvoter.com/"><strong> website</strong></a><strong>,</strong> which aims to educate and mobilize voters on the impact the next president will have on the future of the U.S. Supreme Court.</p><p>* <strong>Join United for Democracy in</strong><a target="_blank" href="https://unitedfordemocracy.us/get-involved/"><strong> calling</strong></a><strong> on Congress</strong> to rein in the out-of-control Supreme Court.</p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://demandjustice.org/">Demand Justice</a> has been advocating for the Judiciary Act, which would expand the court by four seats. They’re asking people to <a target="_blank" href="https://demandjustice.org/action-center/">call their representatives</a>, and to join their <a target="_blank" href="https://demandjustice.org/action-center/">rapid response team</a>. </p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/should-corrupt-judges-be-the-ones</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:146375979</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/146375979/d5f0922f66501e68bd97d6adb376e4db.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/146375979/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>If the six right-wing dogmatists who now literally rule the Supreme Court wonder why 70 percent of the American people consider them somewhere between politically corrupt and grotesque, they might re-read their Kafkasesque decision last month perverting the meaning of bribery. Appropriately enough, the case involved garbage trucks. A smalltown mayor had funneled a million-dollar contract for new garbage trucks to a local seller, which then made a $13,000 payoff to the mayor. Obvious graft. But no, the six supremes decreed that the payoff was not illegal, because it was given to the mayor after the garbage truck contract was issued. Taking money before would be a bribe, they babbled, but money given afterwards is an innocent “gratuity” – like tipping a waiter for good service. The court’s distortion of kindergarten-level ethics was written by Brett Kavanaugh, infamous for his own frat-boy moral contortions. In his formal opinion, Brett rhetorically asked if such after-the-fact kickbacks should be considered bribes. “The answer.” he proclaimed,” is no.” Of course, as any reasonable person would tell the black-robed fabricator, the obvious answer is: “Hell yes!” Kavanaugh even tried to trivialize such official bribery, calling it no more sinister than parents sending a gift basket to thank their child’s teacher for a job well done. Hello, Mr. Clueless, this was a $13,000 gift basket!! The truck dealer was obviously rewarding the mayor for handing out a million taxpayer dollars to it! Do something! We’re collaborating with friends to build out fresh actions you can take, and in the meantime, check these out: * Share the Justice Can’t Wait updated website. * Share Stand Up America’s Supreme Court Voter website, which aims to educate and mobilize voters on the impact the next president will have on the future of the U.S. Supreme Court. * Join United for Democracy in calling on Congress to rein in the out-of-control Supreme Court. * Demand Justice has been advocating for the Judiciary Act, which would expand the court by four seats. They’re asking people to call their representatives, and to join their rapid response team.  Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>If the six right-wing dogmatists who now literally rule the Supreme Court wonder why 70 percent of the American people consider them somewhere between politically corrupt and grotesque, they might re-read their Kafkasesque decision last month perverting the meaning of bribery. Appropriately enough, the case involved garbage trucks. A smalltown mayor had funneled a million-dollar contract for new garbage trucks to a local seller, which then made a $13,000 payoff to the mayor. Obvious graft. But no, the six supremes decreed that the payoff was not illegal, because it was given to the mayor after the garbage truck contract was issued. Taking money before would be a bribe, they babbled, but money given afterwards is an innocent “gratuity” – like tipping a waiter for good service. The court’s distortion of kindergarten-level ethics was written by Brett Kavanaugh, infamous for his own frat-boy moral contortions. In his formal opinion, Brett rhetorically asked if such after-the-fact kickbacks should be considered bribes. “The answer.” he proclaimed,” is no.” Of course, as any reasonable person would tell the black-robed fabricator, the obvious answer is: “Hell yes!” Kavanaugh even tried to trivialize such official bribery, calling it no more sinister than parents sending a gift basket to thank their child’s teacher for a job well done. Hello, Mr. Clueless, this was a $13,000 gift basket!! The truck dealer was obviously rewarding the mayor for handing out a million taxpayer dollars to it! Do something! We’re collaborating with friends to build out fresh actions you can take, and in the meantime, check these out: * Share the Justice Can’t Wait updated website. * Share Stand Up America’s Supreme Court Voter website, which aims to educate and mobilize voters on the impact the next president will have on the future of the U.S. Supreme Court. * Join United for Democracy in calling on Congress to rein in the out-of-control Supreme Court. * Demand Justice has been advocating for the Judiciary Act, which would expand the court by four seats. They’re asking people to call their representatives, and to join their rapid response team.  Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[SCOTUS Is Meant to Be a Court, Not Our Supreme Ruler]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>What is a SCOTUS? Sounds like a prehistoric critter scuttling along some seabed. But, no, it is the acronym for our Supreme Court of the United States.</p><p>SCOTUS is meant to be the impartial arbiter of legal disputes over what our laws mean. Yet, who are these arbiters, how are they elected, why don’t we even know their names, and if they go rogue, imposing their personal autocratic beliefs on our nation’s democratic ideals… what then?</p><p>Well, structurally, SCOTUS is <em>un</em>democratic, a relic of monarchial rule. Unlike the 535 members of the legislative branch, who are elected from diverse districts across America, there are <em>only nine</em> supremes, and <em>none</em> of the current bunch have ever faced the people, even in an election for dogcatcher. They are hand-picked by political and moneyed elites, and most blatantly lie to win approval for their <em>lifetime appointments</em>. Once enthroned, they have <em>no accountability </em>to us commoners, who are expected to blindly obey their edicts.</p><p>Today, out of 330 million Americans, six right-wing SCOTUS members have seized control of the court… and our government. They claim supremacy over the People, the President, and the Congress – arbitrarily dictating what is “legal” for elected officials and the public to do. Indeed, they are now <em>making up laws</em> on abortion, presidential power, voting rights, environmental protection, and much more to suit their personal political and religious biases. Moreover, they operate behind closed doors, with no disclosure of their conflicts of interest.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… Call this what it is: A right-wing extremist power grab. And it is fast supplanting our people’s historic democratic progress with a kleptocracy of autocratic, plutocratic, theocratic rule. The only remedy is a head-on people’s rebellion to democratize this totally unAmerican court.</p><p>Do something!</p><p>We’re collaborating with friends to build out fresh actions you can take, and in the meantime, check these out:</p><p>* <strong>Share the Justice Can’t Wait updated</strong><a target="_blank" href="https://justicecantwait.org/"> website</a>.</p><p>* <strong>Share Stand Up America’s Supreme Court Voter</strong><a target="_blank" href="https://www.courtvoter.com/"><strong> website</strong></a><strong>,</strong> which aims to educate and mobilize voters on the impact the next president will have on the future of the U.S. Supreme Court.</p><p>* <strong>Join United for Democracy in</strong><a target="_blank" href="https://unitedfordemocracy.us/get-involved/"><strong> calling</strong></a><strong> on Congress</strong> to rein in the out-of-control Supreme Court.</p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://demandjustice.org/">Demand Justice</a> has been advocating for the Judiciary Act, which would expand the court by four seats. They’re asking people to <a target="_blank" href="https://demandjustice.org/action-center/">call their representatives</a>, and to join their <a target="_blank" href="https://demandjustice.org/action-center/">rapid response team</a>. </p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/scotus-is-meant-to-be-a-court-not</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:146446763</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 20:16:40 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/146446763/83cf65e5755dc5be90b476df5c83aaf8.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/146446763/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>What is a SCOTUS? Sounds like a prehistoric critter scuttling along some seabed. But, no, it is the acronym for our Supreme Court of the United States. SCOTUS is meant to be the impartial arbiter of legal disputes over what our laws mean. Yet, who are these arbiters, how are they elected, why don’t we even know their names, and if they go rogue, imposing their personal autocratic beliefs on our nation’s democratic ideals… what then? Well, structurally, SCOTUS is undemocratic, a relic of monarchial rule. Unlike the 535 members of the legislative branch, who are elected from diverse districts across America, there are only nine supremes, and none of the current bunch have ever faced the people, even in an election for dogcatcher. They are hand-picked by political and moneyed elites, and most blatantly lie to win approval for their lifetime appointments. Once enthroned, they have no accountability to us commoners, who are expected to blindly obey their edicts. Today, out of 330 million Americans, six right-wing SCOTUS members have seized control of the court… and our government. They claim supremacy over the People, the President, and the Congress – arbitrarily dictating what is “legal” for elected officials and the public to do. Indeed, they are now making up laws on abortion, presidential power, voting rights, environmental protection, and much more to suit their personal political and religious biases. Moreover, they operate behind closed doors, with no disclosure of their conflicts of interest. This is Jim Hightower saying… Call this what it is: A right-wing extremist power grab. And it is fast supplanting our people’s historic democratic progress with a kleptocracy of autocratic, plutocratic, theocratic rule. The only remedy is a head-on people’s rebellion to democratize this totally unAmerican court. Do something! We’re collaborating with friends to build out fresh actions you can take, and in the meantime, check these out: * Share the Justice Can’t Wait updated website. * Share Stand Up America’s Supreme Court Voter website, which aims to educate and mobilize voters on the impact the next president will have on the future of the U.S. Supreme Court. * Join United for Democracy in calling on Congress to rein in the out-of-control Supreme Court. * Demand Justice has been advocating for the Judiciary Act, which would expand the court by four seats. They’re asking people to call their representatives, and to join their rapid response team.  Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>What is a SCOTUS? Sounds like a prehistoric critter scuttling along some seabed. But, no, it is the acronym for our Supreme Court of the United States. SCOTUS is meant to be the impartial arbiter of legal disputes over what our laws mean. Yet, who are these arbiters, how are they elected, why don’t we even know their names, and if they go rogue, imposing their personal autocratic beliefs on our nation’s democratic ideals… what then? Well, structurally, SCOTUS is undemocratic, a relic of monarchial rule. Unlike the 535 members of the legislative branch, who are elected from diverse districts across America, there are only nine supremes, and none of the current bunch have ever faced the people, even in an election for dogcatcher. They are hand-picked by political and moneyed elites, and most blatantly lie to win approval for their lifetime appointments. Once enthroned, they have no accountability to us commoners, who are expected to blindly obey their edicts. Today, out of 330 million Americans, six right-wing SCOTUS members have seized control of the court… and our government. They claim supremacy over the People, the President, and the Congress – arbitrarily dictating what is “legal” for elected officials and the public to do. Indeed, they are now making up laws on abortion, presidential power, voting rights, environmental protection, and much more to suit their personal political and religious biases. Moreover, they operate behind closed doors, with no disclosure of their conflicts of interest. This is Jim Hightower saying… Call this what it is: A right-wing extremist power grab. And it is fast supplanting our people’s historic democratic progress with a kleptocracy of autocratic, plutocratic, theocratic rule. The only remedy is a head-on people’s rebellion to democratize this totally unAmerican court. Do something! We’re collaborating with friends to build out fresh actions you can take, and in the meantime, check these out: * Share the Justice Can’t Wait updated website. * Share Stand Up America’s Supreme Court Voter website, which aims to educate and mobilize voters on the impact the next president will have on the future of the U.S. Supreme Court. * Join United for Democracy in calling on Congress to rein in the out-of-control Supreme Court. * Demand Justice has been advocating for the Judiciary Act, which would expand the court by four seats. They’re asking people to call their representatives, and to join their rapid response team.  Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Top Corporate Executives Should Have to Feel the Summer Heat]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Being a lifelong Texan, I’m used to hot summers. But what the hell – 99 degrees in June! Last year, we had 80 days of 100-plus temperatures, and we’re looking at 90 days this year. I can’t moan in self-pity, though, for the globally-warming furnace is now searing the whole country, even in northern climes where people are used to having days in August when they need “summer sweaters.”</p><p>As we crank up our air-conditioners, however, let’s pause for a moment to consider some <em>50 million workers</em> in your and my communities who are exposed throughout the day to the full intensity of the sun’s power. They are roofers and landscapers, warehouse workers and farm laborers, street pavers and letter carriers. These have always been hot jobs, but now they’re deadly—<a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/25/climate/extreme-heat-biden-workplace.html">heat kills more Americans today than hurricanes, floods, and tornadoes combined.</a></p><p>So surely there are basic workplace rules assuring that these exposed people get water, shade breaks, etc. No…. and when such humanitarian codes are proposed, industry bosses coldly reject them. For example, after several Texas cities began enacting worker protections, corporate lobbyists rushed to their hireling, Gov. Greg Abbott, who obediently snuck a state pre-emption into law,<a target="_blank" href="https://www.texastribune.org/2023/06/16/texas-heat-wave-water-break-construction-workers/"> </a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.texastribune.org/2023/06/16/texas-heat-wave-water-break-construction-workers/"><em>banning</em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.texastribune.org/2023/06/16/texas-heat-wave-water-break-construction-workers/"> local officials from setting their own heat standards</a>. That year, a record 450 people died of heat exposure in Texas, but Abbott just snarled that his preemption “increases economic liberty.”</p><p>Mercifully, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.huffpost.com/entry/biden-administration-heat-safety-rule-osha_n_6684248ce4b05d5a5eb38b26">President Biden is pushing national heat rules</a>. Of course, industry lobbyists are out to kill his anti-killing reforms, calling them “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/25/climate/extreme-heat-biden-workplace.html">unreasonably complicated.</a>” Really? Providing water and shade is too perplexing for our corporate geniuses? Why don’t we put them on roofing jobs in August – and let them think about it?</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/top-corporate-executives-should-have</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:146308339</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/146308339/603ee9be0c4b36ec6b241ff59530abc4.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/146308339/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Being a lifelong Texan, I’m used to hot summers. But what the hell – 99 degrees in June! Last year, we had 80 days of 100-plus temperatures, and we’re looking at 90 days this year. I can’t moan in self-pity, though, for the globally-warming furnace is now searing the whole country, even in northern climes where people are used to having days in August when they need “summer sweaters.” As we crank up our air-conditioners, however, let’s pause for a moment to consider some 50 million workers in your and my communities who are exposed throughout the day to the full intensity of the sun’s power. They are roofers and landscapers, warehouse workers and farm laborers, street pavers and letter carriers. These have always been hot jobs, but now they’re deadly—heat kills more Americans today than hurricanes, floods, and tornadoes combined. So surely there are basic workplace rules assuring that these exposed people get water, shade breaks, etc. No…. and when such humanitarian codes are proposed, industry bosses coldly reject them. For example, after several Texas cities began enacting worker protections, corporate lobbyists rushed to their hireling, Gov. Greg Abbott, who obediently snuck a state pre-emption into law, banning local officials from setting their own heat standards. That year, a record 450 people died of heat exposure in Texas, but Abbott just snarled that his preemption “increases economic liberty.” Mercifully, President Biden is pushing national heat rules. Of course, industry lobbyists are out to kill his anti-killing reforms, calling them “unreasonably complicated.” Really? Providing water and shade is too perplexing for our corporate geniuses? Why don’t we put them on roofing jobs in August – and let them think about it? Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Being a lifelong Texan, I’m used to hot summers. But what the hell – 99 degrees in June! Last year, we had 80 days of 100-plus temperatures, and we’re looking at 90 days this year. I can’t moan in self-pity, though, for the globally-warming furnace is now searing the whole country, even in northern climes where people are used to having days in August when they need “summer sweaters.” As we crank up our air-conditioners, however, let’s pause for a moment to consider some 50 million workers in your and my communities who are exposed throughout the day to the full intensity of the sun’s power. They are roofers and landscapers, warehouse workers and farm laborers, street pavers and letter carriers. These have always been hot jobs, but now they’re deadly—heat kills more Americans today than hurricanes, floods, and tornadoes combined. So surely there are basic workplace rules assuring that these exposed people get water, shade breaks, etc. No…. and when such humanitarian codes are proposed, industry bosses coldly reject them. For example, after several Texas cities began enacting worker protections, corporate lobbyists rushed to their hireling, Gov. Greg Abbott, who obediently snuck a state pre-emption into law, banning local officials from setting their own heat standards. That year, a record 450 people died of heat exposure in Texas, but Abbott just snarled that his preemption “increases economic liberty.” Mercifully, President Biden is pushing national heat rules. Of course, industry lobbyists are out to kill his anti-killing reforms, calling them “unreasonably complicated.” Really? Providing water and shade is too perplexing for our corporate geniuses? Why don’t we put them on roofing jobs in August – and let them think about it? Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Louisiana’s Kids Won’t Listen to Their Pious Governor]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>For us Texans, there’s nothing new about Bible-thumping politicians bedevilling us with the foolishness of their dogmatic Christian piety. A century ago, for example, a proposal was made to offer bilingual education to Spanish-speaking school kids. But it was quashed by the governor, who solemnly declared: “<a target="_blank" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miriam_A._Ferguson">If English was good enough for Jesus Christ, it ought to be good enough for the children of Texas.</a>”</p><p>But suddenly, Louisiana’s demagogic Christian officials have surged past Texas on the far right. The Pelican State’s governor, an Elmer Gantry wannabe, has decreed that every single public school classroom must henceforth prominently display the Ten Commandments to indoctrinate the tykes in his religion. That way, babbled a legislative backer of the state edict, students can “look up and see what God says is right and what he says is wrong.”</p><p>Actually, the Christian bible itself is a little wobbly on that, offering three different versions of holy commandments, including this: “Thou shalt not seethe a kid in it is mother’s milk.”</p><p>Wobbliest of all, though, is the moral authority of depraved politicians hypocritically preaching to school kids about such sins of adultery, stealing, and (hello MAGA zealots!) worshiping false gods. Plus, their piousness doesn’t work. Young people are not so dull and docile that they’ll mindlessly obey what some self-serving, immoral politicos put on a poster.</p><p>Louisiana could have consulted Texas on this. For some 60 years, a 6-foot-tall granite slab engraved with the Ten Commandments has stood outside our State Capitol building. Yet, those <em>inside</em>, the Capitol – including our governor – routinely violate those engraved moral sentiments.</p><p>If so-called “leaders” don’t give a damn about honoring the values they put on classrooms posters, why should students?</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-louisianas-kids-wont-listen-to</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:146255445</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 19:54:55 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/146255445/5f695051417eecf7119cffc9e9cd9a16.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/146255445/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>For us Texans, there’s nothing new about Bible-thumping politicians bedevilling us with the foolishness of their dogmatic Christian piety. A century ago, for example, a proposal was made to offer bilingual education to Spanish-speaking school kids. But it was quashed by the governor, who solemnly declared: “If English was good enough for Jesus Christ, it ought to be good enough for the children of Texas.” But suddenly, Louisiana’s demagogic Christian officials have surged past Texas on the far right. The Pelican State’s governor, an Elmer Gantry wannabe, has decreed that every single public school classroom must henceforth prominently display the Ten Commandments to indoctrinate the tykes in his religion. That way, babbled a legislative backer of the state edict, students can “look up and see what God says is right and what he says is wrong.” Actually, the Christian bible itself is a little wobbly on that, offering three different versions of holy commandments, including this: “Thou shalt not seethe a kid in it is mother’s milk.” Wobbliest of all, though, is the moral authority of depraved politicians hypocritically preaching to school kids about such sins of adultery, stealing, and (hello MAGA zealots!) worshiping false gods. Plus, their piousness doesn’t work. Young people are not so dull and docile that they’ll mindlessly obey what some self-serving, immoral politicos put on a poster. Louisiana could have consulted Texas on this. For some 60 years, a 6-foot-tall granite slab engraved with the Ten Commandments has stood outside our State Capitol building. Yet, those inside, the Capitol – including our governor – routinely violate those engraved moral sentiments. If so-called “leaders” don’t give a damn about honoring the values they put on classrooms posters, why should students? Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>For us Texans, there’s nothing new about Bible-thumping politicians bedevilling us with the foolishness of their dogmatic Christian piety. A century ago, for example, a proposal was made to offer bilingual education to Spanish-speaking school kids. But it was quashed by the governor, who solemnly declared: “If English was good enough for Jesus Christ, it ought to be good enough for the children of Texas.” But suddenly, Louisiana’s demagogic Christian officials have surged past Texas on the far right. The Pelican State’s governor, an Elmer Gantry wannabe, has decreed that every single public school classroom must henceforth prominently display the Ten Commandments to indoctrinate the tykes in his religion. That way, babbled a legislative backer of the state edict, students can “look up and see what God says is right and what he says is wrong.” Actually, the Christian bible itself is a little wobbly on that, offering three different versions of holy commandments, including this: “Thou shalt not seethe a kid in it is mother’s milk.” Wobbliest of all, though, is the moral authority of depraved politicians hypocritically preaching to school kids about such sins of adultery, stealing, and (hello MAGA zealots!) worshiping false gods. Plus, their piousness doesn’t work. Young people are not so dull and docile that they’ll mindlessly obey what some self-serving, immoral politicos put on a poster. Louisiana could have consulted Texas on this. For some 60 years, a 6-foot-tall granite slab engraved with the Ten Commandments has stood outside our State Capitol building. Yet, those inside, the Capitol – including our governor – routinely violate those engraved moral sentiments. If so-called “leaders” don’t give a damn about honoring the values they put on classrooms posters, why should students? Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Right-Wing Turns Anti-Corporate! Sorta… Not Really.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Wow: Big political news, folks!</p><p>In an astonishing twist, some far-right-wing Republican groups and politicians are demanding that their longtime corporate allies – such as Walmart, the Koch brothers, GE, and Wall Street banks – stick to their business and stop interfering in the people’s political decisions. One group, the National Center for Public Policy Research, bluntly declares that it now prefers “corporate behavior without partisan influences.” It’s even urging corporate shareholders to pass resolutions requiring top executives to halt their overbearing political intrusion. What an unbelievable breakthrough for progressive reform!</p><p>Well, it would be… if true. But it’s a fraud. NCPPR only wants corporate powers to stop politicking against <em>right-wing </em>issues. Specifically, the tricksters demand that corporations cease all efforts to advance diversity, equality, and inclusiveness in American society. Also, they oppose any corporate embrace of Pride events, or corporate acknowledgement of America’s history of institutional racism. And, they say, corporations should stop all efforts to combat climate change, since right-wing orthodoxy says global warming is a hoax. Forget head-in-the-sand politics, NCPPRers want to bury political reality itself in the sand.</p><p>Now for the Good News: They’re buffoons. Even profiteering investors aren’t buying their hokum. Their “anti-WOKE” resolutions are being rejected by <em>98 percent </em>of shareholders’ votes! Even in the rigged system of corporate voting, that’s a stunning rejection. Meanwhile, shareholder proposals to support progressive ideals and policies have been gaining ground, now winning a fourth to a third of the vote. That’s three times better than the support that such proposals got 20 years ago.</p><p>This is further proof that the fundamental political barrier to right-wing extremism is that the vast majority of Americans actually believe in economic fairness, social justice… and reality.</p><p><em>Photo via </em><a target="_blank" href="https://dissentpins.com/products/no-one-is-treading-on-you-sweetie-sticker-1"><em>Dissent Pins</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-right-wing-turns-anti-corporate</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:145951848</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/145951848/e0f962619fdce2629d4cd34355ac0f33.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/145951848/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Wow: Big political news, folks! In an astonishing twist, some far-right-wing Republican groups and politicians are demanding that their longtime corporate allies – such as Walmart, the Koch brothers, GE, and Wall Street banks – stick to their business and stop interfering in the people’s political decisions. One group, the National Center for Public Policy Research, bluntly declares that it now prefers “corporate behavior without partisan influences.” It’s even urging corporate shareholders to pass resolutions requiring top executives to halt their overbearing political intrusion. What an unbelievable breakthrough for progressive reform! Well, it would be… if true. But it’s a fraud. NCPPR only wants corporate powers to stop politicking against right-wing issues. Specifically, the tricksters demand that corporations cease all efforts to advance diversity, equality, and inclusiveness in American society. Also, they oppose any corporate embrace of Pride events, or corporate acknowledgement of America’s history of institutional racism. And, they say, corporations should stop all efforts to combat climate change, since right-wing orthodoxy says global warming is a hoax. Forget head-in-the-sand politics, NCPPRers want to bury political reality itself in the sand. Now for the Good News: They’re buffoons. Even profiteering investors aren’t buying their hokum. Their “anti-WOKE” resolutions are being rejected by 98 percent of shareholders’ votes! Even in the rigged system of corporate voting, that’s a stunning rejection. Meanwhile, shareholder proposals to support progressive ideals and policies have been gaining ground, now winning a fourth to a third of the vote. That’s three times better than the support that such proposals got 20 years ago. This is further proof that the fundamental political barrier to right-wing extremism is that the vast majority of Americans actually believe in economic fairness, social justice… and reality. Photo via Dissent Pins. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Wow: Big political news, folks! In an astonishing twist, some far-right-wing Republican groups and politicians are demanding that their longtime corporate allies – such as Walmart, the Koch brothers, GE, and Wall Street banks – stick to their business and stop interfering in the people’s political decisions. One group, the National Center for Public Policy Research, bluntly declares that it now prefers “corporate behavior without partisan influences.” It’s even urging corporate shareholders to pass resolutions requiring top executives to halt their overbearing political intrusion. What an unbelievable breakthrough for progressive reform! Well, it would be… if true. But it’s a fraud. NCPPR only wants corporate powers to stop politicking against right-wing issues. Specifically, the tricksters demand that corporations cease all efforts to advance diversity, equality, and inclusiveness in American society. Also, they oppose any corporate embrace of Pride events, or corporate acknowledgement of America’s history of institutional racism. And, they say, corporations should stop all efforts to combat climate change, since right-wing orthodoxy says global warming is a hoax. Forget head-in-the-sand politics, NCPPRers want to bury political reality itself in the sand. Now for the Good News: They’re buffoons. Even profiteering investors aren’t buying their hokum. Their “anti-WOKE” resolutions are being rejected by 98 percent of shareholders’ votes! Even in the rigged system of corporate voting, that’s a stunning rejection. Meanwhile, shareholder proposals to support progressive ideals and policies have been gaining ground, now winning a fourth to a third of the vote. That’s three times better than the support that such proposals got 20 years ago. This is further proof that the fundamental political barrier to right-wing extremism is that the vast majority of Americans actually believe in economic fairness, social justice… and reality. Photo via Dissent Pins. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should Congress Honor Donald Trump with a Medal, a Statue… or What?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Here’s a member of Congress with too much time on his hands… and way too little of anything on his mind.</p><p>Greg Steube of Florida, is a run-of-the-mill, extremist Republican specializing in such partisan slapstick as trying to nullify Joe Biden’s election and install GOP loser, Donald Trump, as president.</p><p>But Steube went full-tilt ridiculous when <a target="_blank" href="https://www.newsweek.com/republican-mocked-plan-name-waterways-after-trump-cult-1912719">he excitedly announced that</a>, “Tomorrow I will introduce legislation to rename our coastal waters after… Donald Trump!” This would brand all the seas round America’s entire coastline with “TRUMP” logos – like trapping all of America in a big fat Trump bear hug.</p><p>But – isn’t it rather blah to “honor” an ex-president with obscure boundary waters? It’s like a town council voting to put the ex-mayor’s name on a drainage ditch. Still, Stuebe hoped that this would charm the MAGA demi-god, prompting him to smile on Greg’s future election ambitions. Believe it or not, this is what is considered serious congressional business by the GOP!</p><p>Republican congress critters are in a frenzy to kiss up to their convict-in-chief, proposing multiple government gifts for him. Arizona’s Paul Gosar, for example, is demanding that the US treasury <a target="_blank" href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/06/18/trump-on-a-500-bill-republicans-cant-stop-honoring-ex-president/74134378007/">print $500 bills bearing a portrait of the Donald</a>. And Florida’s Anna Paulina Luna proposes to tarnish the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/05/14/congress/congressional-medal-for-trump-house-gop-00157932">Congressional Gold Medal by bestowing it on the political mad dog</a> who launched the January 6 mob attack on – yes, Congress! How cynical – especially since Steube and other Donald worshippers had opposed giving the congressional medal to police officers who had risked their lives to protect them from Trump’s rampaging mob.</p><p>Meanwhile, how about a more fitting honor for the huckster: Name a federal prison “Trump Tower.” Put it in big gold letters!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/should-congress-honor-donald-trump</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:145951805</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/145951805/bca2ffb6dfa6b054aa1454705a5e61a6.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/145951805/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Here’s a member of Congress with too much time on his hands… and way too little of anything on his mind. Greg Steube of Florida, is a run-of-the-mill, extremist Republican specializing in such partisan slapstick as trying to nullify Joe Biden’s election and install GOP loser, Donald Trump, as president. But Steube went full-tilt ridiculous when he excitedly announced that, “Tomorrow I will introduce legislation to rename our coastal waters after… Donald Trump!” This would brand all the seas round America’s entire coastline with “TRUMP” logos – like trapping all of America in a big fat Trump bear hug. But – isn’t it rather blah to “honor” an ex-president with obscure boundary waters? It’s like a town council voting to put the ex-mayor’s name on a drainage ditch. Still, Stuebe hoped that this would charm the MAGA demi-god, prompting him to smile on Greg’s future election ambitions. Believe it or not, this is what is considered serious congressional business by the GOP! Republican congress critters are in a frenzy to kiss up to their convict-in-chief, proposing multiple government gifts for him. Arizona’s Paul Gosar, for example, is demanding that the US treasury print $500 bills bearing a portrait of the Donald. And Florida’s Anna Paulina Luna proposes to tarnish the Congressional Gold Medal by bestowing it on the political mad dog who launched the January 6 mob attack on – yes, Congress! How cynical – especially since Steube and other Donald worshippers had opposed giving the congressional medal to police officers who had risked their lives to protect them from Trump’s rampaging mob. Meanwhile, how about a more fitting honor for the huckster: Name a federal prison “Trump Tower.” Put it in big gold letters! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Here’s a member of Congress with too much time on his hands… and way too little of anything on his mind. Greg Steube of Florida, is a run-of-the-mill, extremist Republican specializing in such partisan slapstick as trying to nullify Joe Biden’s election and install GOP loser, Donald Trump, as president. But Steube went full-tilt ridiculous when he excitedly announced that, “Tomorrow I will introduce legislation to rename our coastal waters after… Donald Trump!” This would brand all the seas round America’s entire coastline with “TRUMP” logos – like trapping all of America in a big fat Trump bear hug. But – isn’t it rather blah to “honor” an ex-president with obscure boundary waters? It’s like a town council voting to put the ex-mayor’s name on a drainage ditch. Still, Stuebe hoped that this would charm the MAGA demi-god, prompting him to smile on Greg’s future election ambitions. Believe it or not, this is what is considered serious congressional business by the GOP! Republican congress critters are in a frenzy to kiss up to their convict-in-chief, proposing multiple government gifts for him. Arizona’s Paul Gosar, for example, is demanding that the US treasury print $500 bills bearing a portrait of the Donald. And Florida’s Anna Paulina Luna proposes to tarnish the Congressional Gold Medal by bestowing it on the political mad dog who launched the January 6 mob attack on – yes, Congress! How cynical – especially since Steube and other Donald worshippers had opposed giving the congressional medal to police officers who had risked their lives to protect them from Trump’s rampaging mob. Meanwhile, how about a more fitting honor for the huckster: Name a federal prison “Trump Tower.” Put it in big gold letters! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Let’s Put Labor Day to Work for Workers… and Democracy]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>What if Labor Day was not about giving working families one measly Monday off to sleep in, rush to the beach, do some 12-oz elbow bends – then report back first thing Tuesday to start another 364 days of pulling the corporate plow?</p><p>Instead, imagine if working stiffs themselves took hold of this day, putting it to work rallying and reinvigorating a rebellious labor movement to achieve economic fairness and social justice for all in America. This was, after all, the purpose of the original Labor Day, held in 1882. Thousands of bricklayers, machinists, piano makers, longshoremen, and other unionized workers in the New York City area defied corporate bosses to declare their own day off. They were not taking a vacation, but making “a public show of organized strength,” energizing labor’s demand for an end to the tyranny of 12-hour days, 6-day weeks, and $2 a day in pay.</p><p>In an audacious affront to the plutocracy, a miles-long parade of common workers marched six abreast, accompanied by union floats, and boisterous bands. They pointedly traversed right in front of the gilded mansions of robber barons living along Fifth Avenue, the most ostentatious corridor of wealth and power in America. The day culminated in a sprawling picnic and festival, with 25,000 union celebrants enjoying food, beer, dancing, each other… and a shared sense that the working class was on the move.</p><p>Why not again? Auto workers, flight attendants, fast-food workers, and others are clearly on the move, so why not make a new “public show of organized strength,” directly confronting the corporate greedheads and political boneheads who’re stealing our democracy. Ralph Nader called for this two years ago – to see his ideas for “A Workers Action Day,” go to: <a target="_blank" href="https://nader.org/2022/08/17/to-democrats-make-labor-day-a-workers-action-day/">nader.org</a>.</p><p>Do something!</p><p>In addition to Nader’s article, here are more resources for staying up to date on labor’s resurgence in the US:</p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://labornotes.org/">Labor Notes</a>, a media and organizing project that has been the voice of union activists who want to put the movement back in the labor movement since 1979</p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://striketracker.ilr.cornell.edu/">Cornell ILR School’s Labor Action Tracker</a></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/lets-put-labor-day-to-work-for-workers</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:145727284</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/145727284/e5202075d6928dc3fbc56f87de3cea56.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/145727284/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>What if Labor Day was not about giving working families one measly Monday off to sleep in, rush to the beach, do some 12-oz elbow bends – then report back first thing Tuesday to start another 364 days of pulling the corporate plow? Instead, imagine if working stiffs themselves took hold of this day, putting it to work rallying and reinvigorating a rebellious labor movement to achieve economic fairness and social justice for all in America. This was, after all, the purpose of the original Labor Day, held in 1882. Thousands of bricklayers, machinists, piano makers, longshoremen, and other unionized workers in the New York City area defied corporate bosses to declare their own day off. They were not taking a vacation, but making “a public show of organized strength,” energizing labor’s demand for an end to the tyranny of 12-hour days, 6-day weeks, and $2 a day in pay. In an audacious affront to the plutocracy, a miles-long parade of common workers marched six abreast, accompanied by union floats, and boisterous bands. They pointedly traversed right in front of the gilded mansions of robber barons living along Fifth Avenue, the most ostentatious corridor of wealth and power in America. The day culminated in a sprawling picnic and festival, with 25,000 union celebrants enjoying food, beer, dancing, each other… and a shared sense that the working class was on the move. Why not again? Auto workers, flight attendants, fast-food workers, and others are clearly on the move, so why not make a new “public show of organized strength,” directly confronting the corporate greedheads and political boneheads who’re stealing our democracy. Ralph Nader called for this two years ago – to see his ideas for “A Workers Action Day,” go to: nader.org. Do something! In addition to Nader’s article, here are more resources for staying up to date on labor’s resurgence in the US: * Labor Notes, a media and organizing project that has been the voice of union activists who want to put the movement back in the labor movement since 1979 * Cornell ILR School’s Labor Action Tracker Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>What if Labor Day was not about giving working families one measly Monday off to sleep in, rush to the beach, do some 12-oz elbow bends – then report back first thing Tuesday to start another 364 days of pulling the corporate plow? Instead, imagine if working stiffs themselves took hold of this day, putting it to work rallying and reinvigorating a rebellious labor movement to achieve economic fairness and social justice for all in America. This was, after all, the purpose of the original Labor Day, held in 1882. Thousands of bricklayers, machinists, piano makers, longshoremen, and other unionized workers in the New York City area defied corporate bosses to declare their own day off. They were not taking a vacation, but making “a public show of organized strength,” energizing labor’s demand for an end to the tyranny of 12-hour days, 6-day weeks, and $2 a day in pay. In an audacious affront to the plutocracy, a miles-long parade of common workers marched six abreast, accompanied by union floats, and boisterous bands. They pointedly traversed right in front of the gilded mansions of robber barons living along Fifth Avenue, the most ostentatious corridor of wealth and power in America. The day culminated in a sprawling picnic and festival, with 25,000 union celebrants enjoying food, beer, dancing, each other… and a shared sense that the working class was on the move. Why not again? Auto workers, flight attendants, fast-food workers, and others are clearly on the move, so why not make a new “public show of organized strength,” directly confronting the corporate greedheads and political boneheads who’re stealing our democracy. Ralph Nader called for this two years ago – to see his ideas for “A Workers Action Day,” go to: nader.org. Do something! In addition to Nader’s article, here are more resources for staying up to date on labor’s resurgence in the US: * Labor Notes, a media and organizing project that has been the voice of union activists who want to put the movement back in the labor movement since 1979 * Cornell ILR School’s Labor Action Tracker Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The GOP’s New Plan to Enrich the Super-rich… Again]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Excellent news, people: Republican officials are mounting an all-out political push for a massive cut in our taxes next year!</p><p>Well… by “our taxes,” they don’t mean yours. Rather, here they come with another absurd sob story about giant corporations and the super-wealthy suffering unbearably from excessive taxation. Claiming to feel the pain of these multibillionaires, the GOP is riding to their rescue, promising to extend the trillion-dollar tax boondoggle Donald Trump handed to the rich in 2017, and vowing to add an extra trillion-dollars-worth of new breaks for them.</p><p>Ludicrously, the lawmakers, lobbyists, and corporate front groups pushing this garish plutocratic giveaway loudly insist that the real beneficiaries are not the privileged few, but [cue the patriotic music] America! Lowering taxes on the corporate rich, they exclaim, will let those elites invest more in new jobs and enterprises, expanding the economy for all.</p><p> Of course, that’s the same ball of dung they keep rolling up Capitol Hill again and again, and it gets stinkier every time, especially now that monopolies control everything from high tech and health care to oil and food prices. Why reward them? Far from creating jobs, they’re frantically automating them, and rather than increasing competitiveness, monopolies buy up or squeeze out competitors. Plus, if they get another tax windfall, the oligarchs will just use it to jack-up their stock prices, artificially making them richer and more dominant over us.</p><p>Another “gotcha” in the GOP’s giveaway would gut the IRS’ ability to investigate and prosecute these filthy rich scofflaws who annually cheat us out of billions of dollars they owe for the upkeep of America. For information and action on this massive ripoff, go to <a target="_blank" href="http://AmericansForTaxFairness.org">AmericansForTaxFairness.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-gops-new-plan-to-enrich-the-super</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:145727816</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/145727816/c9eeb8e5151c6670ed76f2f4812be702.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/145727816/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Excellent news, people: Republican officials are mounting an all-out political push for a massive cut in our taxes next year! Well… by “our taxes,” they don’t mean yours. Rather, here they come with another absurd sob story about giant corporations and the super-wealthy suffering unbearably from excessive taxation. Claiming to feel the pain of these multibillionaires, the GOP is riding to their rescue, promising to extend the trillion-dollar tax boondoggle Donald Trump handed to the rich in 2017, and vowing to add an extra trillion-dollars-worth of new breaks for them. Ludicrously, the lawmakers, lobbyists, and corporate front groups pushing this garish plutocratic giveaway loudly insist that the real beneficiaries are not the privileged few, but [cue the patriotic music] America! Lowering taxes on the corporate rich, they exclaim, will let those elites invest more in new jobs and enterprises, expanding the economy for all.  Of course, that’s the same ball of dung they keep rolling up Capitol Hill again and again, and it gets stinkier every time, especially now that monopolies control everything from high tech and health care to oil and food prices. Why reward them? Far from creating jobs, they’re frantically automating them, and rather than increasing competitiveness, monopolies buy up or squeeze out competitors. Plus, if they get another tax windfall, the oligarchs will just use it to jack-up their stock prices, artificially making them richer and more dominant over us. Another “gotcha” in the GOP’s giveaway would gut the IRS’ ability to investigate and prosecute these filthy rich scofflaws who annually cheat us out of billions of dollars they owe for the upkeep of America. For information and action on this massive ripoff, go to AmericansForTaxFairness.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Excellent news, people: Republican officials are mounting an all-out political push for a massive cut in our taxes next year! Well… by “our taxes,” they don’t mean yours. Rather, here they come with another absurd sob story about giant corporations and the super-wealthy suffering unbearably from excessive taxation. Claiming to feel the pain of these multibillionaires, the GOP is riding to their rescue, promising to extend the trillion-dollar tax boondoggle Donald Trump handed to the rich in 2017, and vowing to add an extra trillion-dollars-worth of new breaks for them. Ludicrously, the lawmakers, lobbyists, and corporate front groups pushing this garish plutocratic giveaway loudly insist that the real beneficiaries are not the privileged few, but [cue the patriotic music] America! Lowering taxes on the corporate rich, they exclaim, will let those elites invest more in new jobs and enterprises, expanding the economy for all.  Of course, that’s the same ball of dung they keep rolling up Capitol Hill again and again, and it gets stinkier every time, especially now that monopolies control everything from high tech and health care to oil and food prices. Why reward them? Far from creating jobs, they’re frantically automating them, and rather than increasing competitiveness, monopolies buy up or squeeze out competitors. Plus, if they get another tax windfall, the oligarchs will just use it to jack-up their stock prices, artificially making them richer and more dominant over us. Another “gotcha” in the GOP’s giveaway would gut the IRS’ ability to investigate and prosecute these filthy rich scofflaws who annually cheat us out of billions of dollars they owe for the upkeep of America. For information and action on this massive ripoff, go to AmericansForTaxFairness.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hear Corporate America’s New Euphemisms for Gouging You]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>We should pay attention to corporate America’s fluctuating wordplay, for their frequent contortions of language disguise ploys to dupe, confuse, and rip off us hoi polloi – i.e., their customers.</p><p>For example, here’s a mouthful that’s been gaining popularity among manufacturers of food products: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/31/business/what-is-price-pack-architecture.html"><em>Price Pack Architecture</em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/31/business/what-is-price-pack-architecture.html">.</a> It’s a bit of gobbledygook meant to obscure the profiteering practice of – shhhh – ever so quietly shrinking the size and contents of their packages – without lowering prices. Economists dubbed this “shrinkflation,” but that too clearly implied gouging. Thus, corporate image-makers invented the incomprehensible nonsense phrase of PPA to cloak their anti-consumer trickery.</p><p>This convoluted codeword also allows the tricksters to brag openly about their cleverness to their Wall Street investors. Here’s Coca-Cola’s CEO, for example, doing corporate-speak to <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/31/business/what-is-price-pack-architecture.html">bankers in February</a>: “We are leveraging our revenue growth management capabilities to tailor our offerings <em>and price pack architecture</em> to meet consumers’ evolving needs.”</p><p>English translation: Consumers will need to pay us more for less Coke. You could almost hear the bankers weep for joy over Coke’s sneaky scheme to stiff its customers.</p><p>Perhaps you’ve wondered what big-time corporate CEOs actually do to rake in their exorbitant salaries, now averaging more than $8,000 an hour! Well, there it is: The CEO’s main job is to keep workers’ pay low, monopolize markets, and constantly invent slick ways to squeeze another dime from each consumer’s pocket.</p><p>It’s not honest work, but it does pay well. Coca-Cola’s CEO James Quincey, for example, hauled in $25 million in pay last year. That’s 1,800 times more than the annual income of the typical Coca-Cola worker, who’ll now pay more for a sip of Coke, thanks to Quincey’s “price pack architecture.”</p><p><em>Photo courtesy </em><a target="_blank" href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/alleyofashes/9741124424"><em>Alley of Ashes on Flickr</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/hear-corporate-americas-new-euphemisms</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:145480563</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/145480563/25cf93e9c48ce798679cb45147734b84.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/145480563/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>We should pay attention to corporate America’s fluctuating wordplay, for their frequent contortions of language disguise ploys to dupe, confuse, and rip off us hoi polloi – i.e., their customers. For example, here’s a mouthful that’s been gaining popularity among manufacturers of food products: Price Pack Architecture. It’s a bit of gobbledygook meant to obscure the profiteering practice of – shhhh – ever so quietly shrinking the size and contents of their packages – without lowering prices. Economists dubbed this “shrinkflation,” but that too clearly implied gouging. Thus, corporate image-makers invented the incomprehensible nonsense phrase of PPA to cloak their anti-consumer trickery. This convoluted codeword also allows the tricksters to brag openly about their cleverness to their Wall Street investors. Here’s Coca-Cola’s CEO, for example, doing corporate-speak to bankers in February: “We are leveraging our revenue growth management capabilities to tailor our offerings and price pack architecture to meet consumers’ evolving needs.” English translation: Consumers will need to pay us more for less Coke. You could almost hear the bankers weep for joy over Coke’s sneaky scheme to stiff its customers. Perhaps you’ve wondered what big-time corporate CEOs actually do to rake in their exorbitant salaries, now averaging more than $8,000 an hour! Well, there it is: The CEO’s main job is to keep workers’ pay low, monopolize markets, and constantly invent slick ways to squeeze another dime from each consumer’s pocket. It’s not honest work, but it does pay well. Coca-Cola’s CEO James Quincey, for example, hauled in $25 million in pay last year. That’s 1,800 times more than the annual income of the typical Coca-Cola worker, who’ll now pay more for a sip of Coke, thanks to Quincey’s “price pack architecture.” Photo courtesy Alley of Ashes on Flickr. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>We should pay attention to corporate America’s fluctuating wordplay, for their frequent contortions of language disguise ploys to dupe, confuse, and rip off us hoi polloi – i.e., their customers. For example, here’s a mouthful that’s been gaining popularity among manufacturers of food products: Price Pack Architecture. It’s a bit of gobbledygook meant to obscure the profiteering practice of – shhhh – ever so quietly shrinking the size and contents of their packages – without lowering prices. Economists dubbed this “shrinkflation,” but that too clearly implied gouging. Thus, corporate image-makers invented the incomprehensible nonsense phrase of PPA to cloak their anti-consumer trickery. This convoluted codeword also allows the tricksters to brag openly about their cleverness to their Wall Street investors. Here’s Coca-Cola’s CEO, for example, doing corporate-speak to bankers in February: “We are leveraging our revenue growth management capabilities to tailor our offerings and price pack architecture to meet consumers’ evolving needs.” English translation: Consumers will need to pay us more for less Coke. You could almost hear the bankers weep for joy over Coke’s sneaky scheme to stiff its customers. Perhaps you’ve wondered what big-time corporate CEOs actually do to rake in their exorbitant salaries, now averaging more than $8,000 an hour! Well, there it is: The CEO’s main job is to keep workers’ pay low, monopolize markets, and constantly invent slick ways to squeeze another dime from each consumer’s pocket. It’s not honest work, but it does pay well. Coca-Cola’s CEO James Quincey, for example, hauled in $25 million in pay last year. That’s 1,800 times more than the annual income of the typical Coca-Cola worker, who’ll now pay more for a sip of Coke, thanks to Quincey’s “price pack architecture.” Photo courtesy Alley of Ashes on Flickr. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[There’s the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly… and Then Sam Alito]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Sam Alito is so ugly that he can’t even see his ugliness.</p><p>I don’t mean looks, but the deep inner ugliness of character that keeps oozing from this so-called “supreme” judge. Start with the unabashed lies he told senators to win his lifetime appointment to America’s powerfully-undemocratic judicial branch. Lie Number One was his promise not to mess with women’s constitutional right to reproductive freedom. But, once he put on his authoritarian black robe, he <em>wrote</em> the Court’s edict ripping that right from every woman.</p><p>Later, Alito got caught secretly accepting a freebie trip to a luxury fishing lodge, paid for by a billionaire vulture capitalist. Far from embarrassed, he haughtily asserted that as a Supreme he has no ethical duty even to report such gifts of “personal hospitality.” Indeed, he’s led the Supreme Court’s corrupt refusal to adopt an enforceable code of ethics (which every other public office must do).</p><p>Which brings us to Alito’s current flag flap, revealing a clownish show of tone-deaf arrogance. Abandoning any pretense of judicial impartiality, he’s had flags flying at both his home and beach house, ostentatiously trumpeting his embrace of MAGA extremism and his opposition to President Biden. How, then, can he be a fair judge of upcoming cases concerning Trump’s anti-democratic power grabs?</p><p>No problem, said Alito, imperiously waving off proper demands that he remove himself from ruling on these cases. Trying to deflect a tsunami of criticism, the black-robed scoundrel resorted to the classic “gentleman’s dodge”: <em>He blamed his wife</em>. “My wife is fond of flying flags,” he said, insisting that the never even noticed them flapping in front of his houses for the world to see.</p><p>That’s not just ugly, it’s supremely stupid.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/theres-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:145479745</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/145479745/e377c65f2a897180d6222b7436bc65ea.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/145479745/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Sam Alito is so ugly that he can’t even see his ugliness. I don’t mean looks, but the deep inner ugliness of character that keeps oozing from this so-called “supreme” judge. Start with the unabashed lies he told senators to win his lifetime appointment to America’s powerfully-undemocratic judicial branch. Lie Number One was his promise not to mess with women’s constitutional right to reproductive freedom. But, once he put on his authoritarian black robe, he wrote the Court’s edict ripping that right from every woman. Later, Alito got caught secretly accepting a freebie trip to a luxury fishing lodge, paid for by a billionaire vulture capitalist. Far from embarrassed, he haughtily asserted that as a Supreme he has no ethical duty even to report such gifts of “personal hospitality.” Indeed, he’s led the Supreme Court’s corrupt refusal to adopt an enforceable code of ethics (which every other public office must do). Which brings us to Alito’s current flag flap, revealing a clownish show of tone-deaf arrogance. Abandoning any pretense of judicial impartiality, he’s had flags flying at both his home and beach house, ostentatiously trumpeting his embrace of MAGA extremism and his opposition to President Biden. How, then, can he be a fair judge of upcoming cases concerning Trump’s anti-democratic power grabs? No problem, said Alito, imperiously waving off proper demands that he remove himself from ruling on these cases. Trying to deflect a tsunami of criticism, the black-robed scoundrel resorted to the classic “gentleman’s dodge”: He blamed his wife. “My wife is fond of flying flags,” he said, insisting that the never even noticed them flapping in front of his houses for the world to see. That’s not just ugly, it’s supremely stupid. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Sam Alito is so ugly that he can’t even see his ugliness. I don’t mean looks, but the deep inner ugliness of character that keeps oozing from this so-called “supreme” judge. Start with the unabashed lies he told senators to win his lifetime appointment to America’s powerfully-undemocratic judicial branch. Lie Number One was his promise not to mess with women’s constitutional right to reproductive freedom. But, once he put on his authoritarian black robe, he wrote the Court’s edict ripping that right from every woman. Later, Alito got caught secretly accepting a freebie trip to a luxury fishing lodge, paid for by a billionaire vulture capitalist. Far from embarrassed, he haughtily asserted that as a Supreme he has no ethical duty even to report such gifts of “personal hospitality.” Indeed, he’s led the Supreme Court’s corrupt refusal to adopt an enforceable code of ethics (which every other public office must do). Which brings us to Alito’s current flag flap, revealing a clownish show of tone-deaf arrogance. Abandoning any pretense of judicial impartiality, he’s had flags flying at both his home and beach house, ostentatiously trumpeting his embrace of MAGA extremism and his opposition to President Biden. How, then, can he be a fair judge of upcoming cases concerning Trump’s anti-democratic power grabs? No problem, said Alito, imperiously waving off proper demands that he remove himself from ruling on these cases. Trying to deflect a tsunami of criticism, the black-robed scoundrel resorted to the classic “gentleman’s dodge”: He blamed his wife. “My wife is fond of flying flags,” he said, insisting that the never even noticed them flapping in front of his houses for the world to see. That’s not just ugly, it’s supremely stupid. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Return of the Swamp Drainer: Making a Mockery of Democracy]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Remember Donald Trump, the “swamp drainer”?</p><p>In 2016, candidate Trump promised to end the grubby money corruption of American politics. “The special interests, lobbyists, donors,” he rightly and righteously noted “make large contributions to politicians and they have total control of those politicians.” Asserting that he knows the political rot better than anyone, he said he’d “fix that system, because that system is wrong.”</p><p>Eight years later, here comes the Donald again – but the swamp is bigger and suckier than ever. And instead of bold talk about draining it, Trump is auctioning off the swamp, flagrantly offering direct presidential benefits to Big Oil, Wall Street hucksters, high-tech tycoons, and all other moneyed interests that “make large contributions” to him.</p><p>How large? The <em>Washington Post</em> reports that one businessman asked to have lunch with Trump, promising a million-dollar check. “I’m not having lunch,” Trump retorted. “You’ve got to make it $25 million.” H<a target="_blank" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/05/09/trump-oil-industry-campaign-money/">e has also demanded </a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/05/09/trump-oil-industry-campaign-money/"><em>a cool billion bucks</em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/05/09/trump-oil-industry-campaign-money/"> from a covey of Big Oil executives.</a> Promising to cut their corporate taxes and deliver an array of other special benefits, the presidential wannabe punctuated his itemization of political goodies with an unsubtle monetary nudge, saying, “be generous, please.”</p><p>Since a Supreme Court majority of extreme partisans opened the floodgates 14 years ago, corrupt corporate cash has gone from merely polluting American democracy to now swamping it. Trump is not the only bribe huckster, but he is the most blatant, shamelessly nuclearizing the going rate for buying public policy, mocking the ideal of a citizens’ government. Trump himself is fond of telling fatcat donors that he doesn’t spend 10 minutes with anyone who can’t give $10 million. Hello – where does that leave you and me? And our country?</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/return-of-the-swamp-drainer-making</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:145233712</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/145233712/d1f704e7e119e2b847ca995866c3695f.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/145233712/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Remember Donald Trump, the “swamp drainer”? In 2016, candidate Trump promised to end the grubby money corruption of American politics. “The special interests, lobbyists, donors,” he rightly and righteously noted “make large contributions to politicians and they have total control of those politicians.” Asserting that he knows the political rot better than anyone, he said he’d “fix that system, because that system is wrong.” Eight years later, here comes the Donald again – but the swamp is bigger and suckier than ever. And instead of bold talk about draining it, Trump is auctioning off the swamp, flagrantly offering direct presidential benefits to Big Oil, Wall Street hucksters, high-tech tycoons, and all other moneyed interests that “make large contributions” to him. How large? The Washington Post reports that one businessman asked to have lunch with Trump, promising a million-dollar check. “I’m not having lunch,” Trump retorted. “You’ve got to make it $25 million.” He has also demanded a cool billion bucks from a covey of Big Oil executives. Promising to cut their corporate taxes and deliver an array of other special benefits, the presidential wannabe punctuated his itemization of political goodies with an unsubtle monetary nudge, saying, “be generous, please.” Since a Supreme Court majority of extreme partisans opened the floodgates 14 years ago, corrupt corporate cash has gone from merely polluting American democracy to now swamping it. Trump is not the only bribe huckster, but he is the most blatant, shamelessly nuclearizing the going rate for buying public policy, mocking the ideal of a citizens’ government. Trump himself is fond of telling fatcat donors that he doesn’t spend 10 minutes with anyone who can’t give $10 million. Hello – where does that leave you and me? And our country? Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Remember Donald Trump, the “swamp drainer”? In 2016, candidate Trump promised to end the grubby money corruption of American politics. “The special interests, lobbyists, donors,” he rightly and righteously noted “make large contributions to politicians and they have total control of those politicians.” Asserting that he knows the political rot better than anyone, he said he’d “fix that system, because that system is wrong.” Eight years later, here comes the Donald again – but the swamp is bigger and suckier than ever. And instead of bold talk about draining it, Trump is auctioning off the swamp, flagrantly offering direct presidential benefits to Big Oil, Wall Street hucksters, high-tech tycoons, and all other moneyed interests that “make large contributions” to him. How large? The Washington Post reports that one businessman asked to have lunch with Trump, promising a million-dollar check. “I’m not having lunch,” Trump retorted. “You’ve got to make it $25 million.” He has also demanded a cool billion bucks from a covey of Big Oil executives. Promising to cut their corporate taxes and deliver an array of other special benefits, the presidential wannabe punctuated his itemization of political goodies with an unsubtle monetary nudge, saying, “be generous, please.” Since a Supreme Court majority of extreme partisans opened the floodgates 14 years ago, corrupt corporate cash has gone from merely polluting American democracy to now swamping it. Trump is not the only bribe huckster, but he is the most blatant, shamelessly nuclearizing the going rate for buying public policy, mocking the ideal of a citizens’ government. Trump himself is fond of telling fatcat donors that he doesn’t spend 10 minutes with anyone who can’t give $10 million. Hello – where does that leave you and me? And our country? Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Going from Democracy… to Plutocracy… and Now to Kleptocracy]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>One group of oppressed Americans has become especially outspoken this election year, contending that top government officials (Democrats in particular) are ignoring their community’s basic needs and stifling their pursuit of economic advancement.</p><p>I speak, of course, about the tragic plight of our nation’s downtrodden multi-billionaire class. While it’s true that Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, and these other Silicon Valley sad sackers and weepy Wall Streeters have vastly increased their wealth under Joe Biden’s presidency, they wail that he has not properly courted and coddled them. Indeed, Biden set their hair on fire this March by calling out their outrageous tax-dodging ploys, demanding they start providing their fair share of support for America by paying a “billionaire tax.”</p><p>Thus, these poor, put-upon moneyed elites have been jetting around to Hollywood, Palm Beach, and other posh enclaves, holding secret strategy sessions and rallying the über-rich class to defeat Biden this fall. Of course, since self-centered, plutocratic billionaires are less popular than bed bugs, they can’t win with their ideas and votes, but only by buying elections – and these gilded conspirators intend to do just that, amassing billions to bury Biden.</p><p>But, oops, one money confab in April exploded into public view when some 20 poobahs of such oil giants as Chevron, Exxon, and Occidental conferred with Trump himself. In a straight-out bribery offer, he pledged to repeal environmental protections the industry dislikes –<a target="_blank" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/05/09/trump-oil-industry-campaign-money/"><em>if </em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/05/09/trump-oil-industry-campaign-money/">they pony up one billion dollars for his presidential campaign.</a></p><p>This sordid palace intrigue is the product of the right-wing Supreme Court’s 2010 edict letting selfish wealthy interests secretly dump unlimited sums of corporate money into our elections. They’re turning our democratic ideals into a kleptocracy.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/going-from-democracy-to-plutocracy</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:145233284</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2024 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/145233284/86f80b8a7a7b240afc9a10106b47b6bc.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/145233284/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>One group of oppressed Americans has become especially outspoken this election year, contending that top government officials (Democrats in particular) are ignoring their community’s basic needs and stifling their pursuit of economic advancement. I speak, of course, about the tragic plight of our nation’s downtrodden multi-billionaire class. While it’s true that Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, and these other Silicon Valley sad sackers and weepy Wall Streeters have vastly increased their wealth under Joe Biden’s presidency, they wail that he has not properly courted and coddled them. Indeed, Biden set their hair on fire this March by calling out their outrageous tax-dodging ploys, demanding they start providing their fair share of support for America by paying a “billionaire tax.” Thus, these poor, put-upon moneyed elites have been jetting around to Hollywood, Palm Beach, and other posh enclaves, holding secret strategy sessions and rallying the über-rich class to defeat Biden this fall. Of course, since self-centered, plutocratic billionaires are less popular than bed bugs, they can’t win with their ideas and votes, but only by buying elections – and these gilded conspirators intend to do just that, amassing billions to bury Biden. But, oops, one money confab in April exploded into public view when some 20 poobahs of such oil giants as Chevron, Exxon, and Occidental conferred with Trump himself. In a straight-out bribery offer, he pledged to repeal environmental protections the industry dislikes –if they pony up one billion dollars for his presidential campaign. This sordid palace intrigue is the product of the right-wing Supreme Court’s 2010 edict letting selfish wealthy interests secretly dump unlimited sums of corporate money into our elections. They’re turning our democratic ideals into a kleptocracy. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>One group of oppressed Americans has become especially outspoken this election year, contending that top government officials (Democrats in particular) are ignoring their community’s basic needs and stifling their pursuit of economic advancement. I speak, of course, about the tragic plight of our nation’s downtrodden multi-billionaire class. While it’s true that Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, and these other Silicon Valley sad sackers and weepy Wall Streeters have vastly increased their wealth under Joe Biden’s presidency, they wail that he has not properly courted and coddled them. Indeed, Biden set their hair on fire this March by calling out their outrageous tax-dodging ploys, demanding they start providing their fair share of support for America by paying a “billionaire tax.” Thus, these poor, put-upon moneyed elites have been jetting around to Hollywood, Palm Beach, and other posh enclaves, holding secret strategy sessions and rallying the über-rich class to defeat Biden this fall. Of course, since self-centered, plutocratic billionaires are less popular than bed bugs, they can’t win with their ideas and votes, but only by buying elections – and these gilded conspirators intend to do just that, amassing billions to bury Biden. But, oops, one money confab in April exploded into public view when some 20 poobahs of such oil giants as Chevron, Exxon, and Occidental conferred with Trump himself. In a straight-out bribery offer, he pledged to repeal environmental protections the industry dislikes –if they pony up one billion dollars for his presidential campaign. This sordid palace intrigue is the product of the right-wing Supreme Court’s 2010 edict letting selfish wealthy interests secretly dump unlimited sums of corporate money into our elections. They’re turning our democratic ideals into a kleptocracy. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[How Silly Can Right-Wing Culture Warriors Get?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>If you’re wondering whatever happened to Ron DeSantis, he’s now re-ensconced in Florida… goofier than ever.</p><p>Last year, backed by a covey of billionaires, Governor Ron was all set to be our next president until national voters discovered he has the personality of a dirt clod and the political sensibility of a tin-pot totalitarian.</p><p>Even in the GOP primaries, most voters gagged at his ruthless anti-abortion absolutism, his <em>Fahrenheit 451</em> book bans, his vigilante rampages against local librarians, his dictate that textbooks whitewash American history, his cruel toying with desperate asylum seekers, and so awful much more.</p><p>Thus, the Potentate of Tallahassee limped back home. But far from chastened, Ron has doubled down on political goofiness, frittering away his remaining prestige and gubernatorial credibility on right-wing hokum. For example, he has<a target="_blank" href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/food/2024/05/05/florida-lab-grown-meat-ban/73569976007/"> banned the sale of alternative meat products in Florida</a>. Also, in a bizarre commandment he calls “Freedom Summer,” he has decreed that <a target="_blank" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2024/05/21/florida-bridges-rainbow-lights-pride/">Florida’s bridges can only be lit up in hues of red, white, and blue – no “liberal” colors like green or purple</a>.</p><p>His latest tilt-at-windmills stunt is to repeal state efforts to fight climate change! He’s reversing state policies encouraging agencies to switch to electric vehicles, prohibiting several wind and solar-powered projects, and eliminating state incentives for energy efficient homes. As sea levels rise all around Florida – flooding its coastal cities – <a target="_blank" href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/may/16/desantis-climate-change-energy-bill">DeSantis rants against “the agenda of radical green zealots,” maniacally declaring: “We’re restoring sanity” to energy policy.</a></p><p>If Republican Party strategists wonder why voters think the GOP has gone nuts, look no further than Florida’s authoritarian governor, who’s busy dictating people’s meat choices – and the color of bridges – while his state sinks into the sea.</p><p>Do Something!</p><p>There’s a lot happening in progressive Florida politics these days—no, really! Check out <a target="_blank" href="https://floridarising.org/">FloridaRising.org</a> to get involved.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/how-silly-can-right-wing-culture</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:145026166</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/145026166/1f4629dcbaa3f922fbb9d3bac57be76a.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/145026166/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>If you’re wondering whatever happened to Ron DeSantis, he’s now re-ensconced in Florida… goofier than ever. Last year, backed by a covey of billionaires, Governor Ron was all set to be our next president until national voters discovered he has the personality of a dirt clod and the political sensibility of a tin-pot totalitarian. Even in the GOP primaries, most voters gagged at his ruthless anti-abortion absolutism, his Fahrenheit 451 book bans, his vigilante rampages against local librarians, his dictate that textbooks whitewash American history, his cruel toying with desperate asylum seekers, and so awful much more. Thus, the Potentate of Tallahassee limped back home. But far from chastened, Ron has doubled down on political goofiness, frittering away his remaining prestige and gubernatorial credibility on right-wing hokum. For example, he has banned the sale of alternative meat products in Florida. Also, in a bizarre commandment he calls “Freedom Summer,” he has decreed that Florida’s bridges can only be lit up in hues of red, white, and blue – no “liberal” colors like green or purple. His latest tilt-at-windmills stunt is to repeal state efforts to fight climate change! He’s reversing state policies encouraging agencies to switch to electric vehicles, prohibiting several wind and solar-powered projects, and eliminating state incentives for energy efficient homes. As sea levels rise all around Florida – flooding its coastal cities – DeSantis rants against “the agenda of radical green zealots,” maniacally declaring: “We’re restoring sanity” to energy policy. If Republican Party strategists wonder why voters think the GOP has gone nuts, look no further than Florida’s authoritarian governor, who’s busy dictating people’s meat choices – and the color of bridges – while his state sinks into the sea. Do Something! There’s a lot happening in progressive Florida politics these days—no, really! Check out FloridaRising.org to get involved. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>If you’re wondering whatever happened to Ron DeSantis, he’s now re-ensconced in Florida… goofier than ever. Last year, backed by a covey of billionaires, Governor Ron was all set to be our next president until national voters discovered he has the personality of a dirt clod and the political sensibility of a tin-pot totalitarian. Even in the GOP primaries, most voters gagged at his ruthless anti-abortion absolutism, his Fahrenheit 451 book bans, his vigilante rampages against local librarians, his dictate that textbooks whitewash American history, his cruel toying with desperate asylum seekers, and so awful much more. Thus, the Potentate of Tallahassee limped back home. But far from chastened, Ron has doubled down on political goofiness, frittering away his remaining prestige and gubernatorial credibility on right-wing hokum. For example, he has banned the sale of alternative meat products in Florida. Also, in a bizarre commandment he calls “Freedom Summer,” he has decreed that Florida’s bridges can only be lit up in hues of red, white, and blue – no “liberal” colors like green or purple. His latest tilt-at-windmills stunt is to repeal state efforts to fight climate change! He’s reversing state policies encouraging agencies to switch to electric vehicles, prohibiting several wind and solar-powered projects, and eliminating state incentives for energy efficient homes. As sea levels rise all around Florida – flooding its coastal cities – DeSantis rants against “the agenda of radical green zealots,” maniacally declaring: “We’re restoring sanity” to energy policy. If Republican Party strategists wonder why voters think the GOP has gone nuts, look no further than Florida’s authoritarian governor, who’s busy dictating people’s meat choices – and the color of bridges – while his state sinks into the sea. Do Something! There’s a lot happening in progressive Florida politics these days—no, really! Check out FloridaRising.org to get involved. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cruising Along with Ted Cruz]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>A Republican senator once tried excusing the egomaniacal right-wing nastiness of his colleague, Ted Cruz declaring, “sometimes Ted is his own worst enemy.” I said to myself: “Not while I’m alive he’s not.”</p><p>But now, I’m reassessing, because Cruz keeps descending deeper into self-pity and self-destruction. For example, he’s recently been trying to gut a consumer-friendly rule requiring airlines to make automatic, hassle-free refunds to passengers when their flights are unduly delayed or cancelled. However, kissing up to his airline political donors, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/ted-cruz-airlines-automatic-refunds-faa-reauthorization-1235012248/">Ted’s amendment would put the hassle back in refunds</a>, requiring abused passengers to file written requests to the various impenetrable corporate bureaucracies of airlines to get their money back – maybe… someday.</p><p>In fairness, though, Cruz has been working hard to make air travel much easier for one class of travelers: US senators and House members, plus their staffs and families! He wants to make us common taxpayers fund “<a target="_blank" href="https://thehill.com/policy/transportation/4628183-cruz-amendmentfaa-reauthorization-special-security/">airport security escorts</a>” for him and other privileged ones, moving them ahead of everyone and zipping them through the screening and boarding process. This, Ted explained, will help in “keeping the flying public safe.”</p><p>He really means keeping the public from seeing or interacting at airports with public officials like him. You might recall that, while hundreds of Texans were literally dying during the state’s power grid’s failure in 2021’s calamitous deep freeze, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/feb/18/ted-cruz-cancun-flight-texas-storms-holiday-senator-reports">Ted was photographed</a> in tropical attire at Houston’s airport, waiting to board a flight to Cancun, fleeing the cold and his constituents. By getting special airport escorts, though, so-called public servants like Cruz won’t be exposed to public view.</p><p>Hello – of all the public needs crying out today for taxpayer funding – where would you rank providing an airport escort for Ted Cruz?</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/cruising-along-with-ted-cruz</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:145026029</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/145026029/2c03629de1f7176e4c77b35e9536cd38.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/145026029/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>A Republican senator once tried excusing the egomaniacal right-wing nastiness of his colleague, Ted Cruz declaring, “sometimes Ted is his own worst enemy.” I said to myself: “Not while I’m alive he’s not.” But now, I’m reassessing, because Cruz keeps descending deeper into self-pity and self-destruction. For example, he’s recently been trying to gut a consumer-friendly rule requiring airlines to make automatic, hassle-free refunds to passengers when their flights are unduly delayed or cancelled. However, kissing up to his airline political donors, Ted’s amendment would put the hassle back in refunds, requiring abused passengers to file written requests to the various impenetrable corporate bureaucracies of airlines to get their money back – maybe… someday. In fairness, though, Cruz has been working hard to make air travel much easier for one class of travelers: US senators and House members, plus their staffs and families! He wants to make us common taxpayers fund “airport security escorts” for him and other privileged ones, moving them ahead of everyone and zipping them through the screening and boarding process. This, Ted explained, will help in “keeping the flying public safe.” He really means keeping the public from seeing or interacting at airports with public officials like him. You might recall that, while hundreds of Texans were literally dying during the state’s power grid’s failure in 2021’s calamitous deep freeze, Ted was photographed in tropical attire at Houston’s airport, waiting to board a flight to Cancun, fleeing the cold and his constituents. By getting special airport escorts, though, so-called public servants like Cruz won’t be exposed to public view. Hello – of all the public needs crying out today for taxpayer funding – where would you rank providing an airport escort for Ted Cruz? Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>A Republican senator once tried excusing the egomaniacal right-wing nastiness of his colleague, Ted Cruz declaring, “sometimes Ted is his own worst enemy.” I said to myself: “Not while I’m alive he’s not.” But now, I’m reassessing, because Cruz keeps descending deeper into self-pity and self-destruction. For example, he’s recently been trying to gut a consumer-friendly rule requiring airlines to make automatic, hassle-free refunds to passengers when their flights are unduly delayed or cancelled. However, kissing up to his airline political donors, Ted’s amendment would put the hassle back in refunds, requiring abused passengers to file written requests to the various impenetrable corporate bureaucracies of airlines to get their money back – maybe… someday. In fairness, though, Cruz has been working hard to make air travel much easier for one class of travelers: US senators and House members, plus their staffs and families! He wants to make us common taxpayers fund “airport security escorts” for him and other privileged ones, moving them ahead of everyone and zipping them through the screening and boarding process. This, Ted explained, will help in “keeping the flying public safe.” He really means keeping the public from seeing or interacting at airports with public officials like him. You might recall that, while hundreds of Texans were literally dying during the state’s power grid’s failure in 2021’s calamitous deep freeze, Ted was photographed in tropical attire at Houston’s airport, waiting to board a flight to Cancun, fleeing the cold and his constituents. By getting special airport escorts, though, so-called public servants like Cruz won’t be exposed to public view. Hello – of all the public needs crying out today for taxpayer funding – where would you rank providing an airport escort for Ted Cruz? Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[An Anti-Abortion Creep: Worse than a Snake in the Grass]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Let me be clear that I mean no disrespect to reptiles when I note that Jonathan Mitchell is a snake.</p><p>An extremist right-wing Texas lawyer, Mitchell is actually creepier and all-together more diabolical that your average serpent could think of being. Jonathan slithers around the country as a self-appointed anti-abortion vigilante, terrorizing women’s advocates, health clinics, and doctors. And now (turning truly creepy), he’s singling-out <em>individual women</em>with his bullying legalistic theatrics.</p><p>By perverting an obscure judicial procedure, called Rule 202, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.texastribune.org/2024/05/10/texas-courts-abortion-jonathan-mitchell/">Mitchell threatens to publicly expose and sue women who make an entirely-legal, out-of-state trip to terminate a pregnancy</a>. Moreover, he threatens to sue any of her family, friends, and others who aid or encourage her pursuit of reproductive freedom. <em>Moreover</em>, even without actually suing them, Mitchell proclaims that he can use the coercive power of government to compel each of them to be interrogated.</p><p>This gross assertion of theocratic power, wielded by a religious partisan with zero public authority, goes beyond mere tyranny. He is resurrecting the hysterical demagoguery and satanic extremism of Cotton Mather and the Puritan fanatics who fomented the Salem witch trials and executions of the 1690s. Mitchell and his theocratic clique are trying to weaponize Rule 202 so any woman who suffers a miscarriage or is accused by a scorned lover of having an abortion can be subjected to a hostile court-ordered grilling. Mitchell’s witchcrafters don’t need to win or even actually file such frivolous and venomous legal actions, for their goal is raw intimidation. Simply accusing vulnerable women of being abortion witches would force them to hire lawyers and endure public inquisition – or surrender their liberty without due process.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… Vipers are not this vicious! To help reject Mitchell’s misogynistic scheme, go to Abortion Access Front: <a target="_blank" href="http://AAFront.org">AAFront.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/an-anti-abortion-creep-worse-than</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:144810474</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/144810474/8cc618e8b7f021a6192c9fe330315ada.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/144810474/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Let me be clear that I mean no disrespect to reptiles when I note that Jonathan Mitchell is a snake. An extremist right-wing Texas lawyer, Mitchell is actually creepier and all-together more diabolical that your average serpent could think of being. Jonathan slithers around the country as a self-appointed anti-abortion vigilante, terrorizing women’s advocates, health clinics, and doctors. And now (turning truly creepy), he’s singling-out individual womenwith his bullying legalistic theatrics. By perverting an obscure judicial procedure, called Rule 202, Mitchell threatens to publicly expose and sue women who make an entirely-legal, out-of-state trip to terminate a pregnancy. Moreover, he threatens to sue any of her family, friends, and others who aid or encourage her pursuit of reproductive freedom. Moreover, even without actually suing them, Mitchell proclaims that he can use the coercive power of government to compel each of them to be interrogated. This gross assertion of theocratic power, wielded by a religious partisan with zero public authority, goes beyond mere tyranny. He is resurrecting the hysterical demagoguery and satanic extremism of Cotton Mather and the Puritan fanatics who fomented the Salem witch trials and executions of the 1690s. Mitchell and his theocratic clique are trying to weaponize Rule 202 so any woman who suffers a miscarriage or is accused by a scorned lover of having an abortion can be subjected to a hostile court-ordered grilling. Mitchell’s witchcrafters don’t need to win or even actually file such frivolous and venomous legal actions, for their goal is raw intimidation. Simply accusing vulnerable women of being abortion witches would force them to hire lawyers and endure public inquisition – or surrender their liberty without due process. This is Jim Hightower saying… Vipers are not this vicious! To help reject Mitchell’s misogynistic scheme, go to Abortion Access Front: AAFront.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Let me be clear that I mean no disrespect to reptiles when I note that Jonathan Mitchell is a snake. An extremist right-wing Texas lawyer, Mitchell is actually creepier and all-together more diabolical that your average serpent could think of being. Jonathan slithers around the country as a self-appointed anti-abortion vigilante, terrorizing women’s advocates, health clinics, and doctors. And now (turning truly creepy), he’s singling-out individual womenwith his bullying legalistic theatrics. By perverting an obscure judicial procedure, called Rule 202, Mitchell threatens to publicly expose and sue women who make an entirely-legal, out-of-state trip to terminate a pregnancy. Moreover, he threatens to sue any of her family, friends, and others who aid or encourage her pursuit of reproductive freedom. Moreover, even without actually suing them, Mitchell proclaims that he can use the coercive power of government to compel each of them to be interrogated. This gross assertion of theocratic power, wielded by a religious partisan with zero public authority, goes beyond mere tyranny. He is resurrecting the hysterical demagoguery and satanic extremism of Cotton Mather and the Puritan fanatics who fomented the Salem witch trials and executions of the 1690s. Mitchell and his theocratic clique are trying to weaponize Rule 202 so any woman who suffers a miscarriage or is accused by a scorned lover of having an abortion can be subjected to a hostile court-ordered grilling. Mitchell’s witchcrafters don’t need to win or even actually file such frivolous and venomous legal actions, for their goal is raw intimidation. Simply accusing vulnerable women of being abortion witches would force them to hire lawyers and endure public inquisition – or surrender their liberty without due process. This is Jim Hightower saying… Vipers are not this vicious! To help reject Mitchell’s misogynistic scheme, go to Abortion Access Front: AAFront.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[God Bless Nurses. And Please Hurry!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Every religion prioritizes care for the needy. Christianity’s Benedictine Rule, for example, puts care of the sick atop the moral order, “above and before every other duty.”</p><p>Really – even above the holy Wall Street mandate that medical and insurance conglomerates must squeeze every last penny of profits out of America’s corporate-care system? Well, gosh, they say, let’s not go crazy with this religious stuff! There’s morality… and then there’s business.</p><p>Consider how today’s monopolized and financialized hospital networks treat nurses – the high-touch frontline people who do the most to put care in “healthcare.” Paid a pittance, thousands of nurses across America are now organizing and unionizing against the inequities of this system. The nurses core grievance, however, is not their pay, but the gross understaffing imposed on them and their patients by profiteering hospital chains.</p><p>In a national survey, more than half of nurses feel “used up” and “emotionally drained.” Why? Primarily because executives keep goosing up profits by eliminating care providers, making it impossible for the remaining, stretched-out staff to meet their own high moral standard of care. That’s demoralizing for nurses… and deadly for patients.</p><p>Yet, corporate-care lobbyists loudly squawk that hospital chains can’t afford to pay fair wages and fully staff-up. Ironically, one of the loudest squawkers is the hospital mega-chain, Ascension, a Catholic church offshoot proclaiming to be “rooted in the loving ministry of Jesus as healer.” Some healer. In a devilish partnership with a Wall Street huckster, Ascension has been slashing nursing staffs while <a target="_blank" href="https://www.austinchronicle.com/news/2023-06-23/ascension-to-lock-nurses-out-for-days-after-one-day-strike/">paying its CEO $13 million a year, hoarding $18 billion in cash, and allotting a pitiful two percent of its budget</a> for charitable care of the poor.</p><p>What the hell! To help battle health care greed, go to <a target="_blank" href="http://NationalNursesUnited.org">NationalNursesUnited.org</a>.</p><p><em>Photo courtesy National Nurses— Austin nurses </em><a target="_blank" href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/nationalnursesunited/53008169827/"><em>locked out after a strike</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/god-bless-nurses-and-please-hurry</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:144656871</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/144656871/d0d144be657c9a6f02458588ee885087.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/144656871/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Every religion prioritizes care for the needy. Christianity’s Benedictine Rule, for example, puts care of the sick atop the moral order, “above and before every other duty.” Really – even above the holy Wall Street mandate that medical and insurance conglomerates must squeeze every last penny of profits out of America’s corporate-care system? Well, gosh, they say, let’s not go crazy with this religious stuff! There’s morality… and then there’s business. Consider how today’s monopolized and financialized hospital networks treat nurses – the high-touch frontline people who do the most to put care in “healthcare.” Paid a pittance, thousands of nurses across America are now organizing and unionizing against the inequities of this system. The nurses core grievance, however, is not their pay, but the gross understaffing imposed on them and their patients by profiteering hospital chains. In a national survey, more than half of nurses feel “used up” and “emotionally drained.” Why? Primarily because executives keep goosing up profits by eliminating care providers, making it impossible for the remaining, stretched-out staff to meet their own high moral standard of care. That’s demoralizing for nurses… and deadly for patients. Yet, corporate-care lobbyists loudly squawk that hospital chains can’t afford to pay fair wages and fully staff-up. Ironically, one of the loudest squawkers is the hospital mega-chain, Ascension, a Catholic church offshoot proclaiming to be “rooted in the loving ministry of Jesus as healer.” Some healer. In a devilish partnership with a Wall Street huckster, Ascension has been slashing nursing staffs while paying its CEO $13 million a year, hoarding $18 billion in cash, and allotting a pitiful two percent of its budget for charitable care of the poor. What the hell! To help battle health care greed, go to NationalNursesUnited.org. Photo courtesy National Nurses— Austin nurses locked out after a strike. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Every religion prioritizes care for the needy. Christianity’s Benedictine Rule, for example, puts care of the sick atop the moral order, “above and before every other duty.” Really – even above the holy Wall Street mandate that medical and insurance conglomerates must squeeze every last penny of profits out of America’s corporate-care system? Well, gosh, they say, let’s not go crazy with this religious stuff! There’s morality… and then there’s business. Consider how today’s monopolized and financialized hospital networks treat nurses – the high-touch frontline people who do the most to put care in “healthcare.” Paid a pittance, thousands of nurses across America are now organizing and unionizing against the inequities of this system. The nurses core grievance, however, is not their pay, but the gross understaffing imposed on them and their patients by profiteering hospital chains. In a national survey, more than half of nurses feel “used up” and “emotionally drained.” Why? Primarily because executives keep goosing up profits by eliminating care providers, making it impossible for the remaining, stretched-out staff to meet their own high moral standard of care. That’s demoralizing for nurses… and deadly for patients. Yet, corporate-care lobbyists loudly squawk that hospital chains can’t afford to pay fair wages and fully staff-up. Ironically, one of the loudest squawkers is the hospital mega-chain, Ascension, a Catholic church offshoot proclaiming to be “rooted in the loving ministry of Jesus as healer.” Some healer. In a devilish partnership with a Wall Street huckster, Ascension has been slashing nursing staffs while paying its CEO $13 million a year, hoarding $18 billion in cash, and allotting a pitiful two percent of its budget for charitable care of the poor. What the hell! To help battle health care greed, go to NationalNursesUnited.org. Photo courtesy National Nurses— Austin nurses locked out after a strike. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[That Stench of Corruption You Smell is Coming from the Supreme Court]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>We Texans are long-accustomed to enduring stormy outbursts of corruption among our top state legislators. The spectacle of lawmakers taking corporate bribes to provide legislative favors, tax breaks, government contracts, and such is as common as Spring tornadoes – and even more destructive to the public good.</p><p>The state’s prevailing ethical standard was articulated several years ago when a powerful legislator (nicknamed “Bull of Brazos”) was caught personally profiting from a bill he was pushing: “I’d just make a little bit of money,” he explained dismissively. “I wouldn’t make a whole lot.”</p><p>Before rolling your eyes at Crazy Texas, though, consider the sneak attack that Corporate America is now making to <em>legalize</em> the wholesale bribery of every public official in America. Their ploy is a cynical effort to redefine bribery. Paying officials to do corporate favors, they insist, should only be considered a bribe if the payoff is arranged before the favor is done. Yes, with a straight face, these finaglers claim that if the payment comes <em>after </em>an official delivers the goods, it’s not a bribe, but simply a “gratuity.” Like tipping a waiter for good service.</p><p>Even the flimflammers Congress would balk at voting for such a blatant perversion of language and public integrity. So, the corporate connivers have slinked over to the corrupt plutocratic partisans on the Supreme Court, beseeching them to – Hocus Pocus! – autocratically decree that wrong is right. And they probably will, since a majority of the Supremes have themselves accepted corrupt freebies from corporate patrons. Take Clarence Thomas, <em>please</em>! He’s been given millions in corporate bribes (excuse me, “gratuities”), so he’s hardly an unbiased judge of official corruption.</p><p>To fight the stench of this legal freak show, go to Campaign Legal Center: <a target="_blank" href="http://campaignlegal.org">campaignlegal.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/that-stench-of-corruption-you-smell</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:144590962</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/144590962/03d2f8902e8dafac76d14dbc21f04f4e.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/144590962/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>We Texans are long-accustomed to enduring stormy outbursts of corruption among our top state legislators. The spectacle of lawmakers taking corporate bribes to provide legislative favors, tax breaks, government contracts, and such is as common as Spring tornadoes – and even more destructive to the public good. The state’s prevailing ethical standard was articulated several years ago when a powerful legislator (nicknamed “Bull of Brazos”) was caught personally profiting from a bill he was pushing: “I’d just make a little bit of money,” he explained dismissively. “I wouldn’t make a whole lot.” Before rolling your eyes at Crazy Texas, though, consider the sneak attack that Corporate America is now making to legalize the wholesale bribery of every public official in America. Their ploy is a cynical effort to redefine bribery. Paying officials to do corporate favors, they insist, should only be considered a bribe if the payoff is arranged before the favor is done. Yes, with a straight face, these finaglers claim that if the payment comes after an official delivers the goods, it’s not a bribe, but simply a “gratuity.” Like tipping a waiter for good service. Even the flimflammers Congress would balk at voting for such a blatant perversion of language and public integrity. So, the corporate connivers have slinked over to the corrupt plutocratic partisans on the Supreme Court, beseeching them to – Hocus Pocus! – autocratically decree that wrong is right. And they probably will, since a majority of the Supremes have themselves accepted corrupt freebies from corporate patrons. Take Clarence Thomas, please! He’s been given millions in corporate bribes (excuse me, “gratuities”), so he’s hardly an unbiased judge of official corruption. To fight the stench of this legal freak show, go to Campaign Legal Center: campaignlegal.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>We Texans are long-accustomed to enduring stormy outbursts of corruption among our top state legislators. The spectacle of lawmakers taking corporate bribes to provide legislative favors, tax breaks, government contracts, and such is as common as Spring tornadoes – and even more destructive to the public good. The state’s prevailing ethical standard was articulated several years ago when a powerful legislator (nicknamed “Bull of Brazos”) was caught personally profiting from a bill he was pushing: “I’d just make a little bit of money,” he explained dismissively. “I wouldn’t make a whole lot.” Before rolling your eyes at Crazy Texas, though, consider the sneak attack that Corporate America is now making to legalize the wholesale bribery of every public official in America. Their ploy is a cynical effort to redefine bribery. Paying officials to do corporate favors, they insist, should only be considered a bribe if the payoff is arranged before the favor is done. Yes, with a straight face, these finaglers claim that if the payment comes after an official delivers the goods, it’s not a bribe, but simply a “gratuity.” Like tipping a waiter for good service. Even the flimflammers Congress would balk at voting for such a blatant perversion of language and public integrity. So, the corporate connivers have slinked over to the corrupt plutocratic partisans on the Supreme Court, beseeching them to – Hocus Pocus! – autocratically decree that wrong is right. And they probably will, since a majority of the Supremes have themselves accepted corrupt freebies from corporate patrons. Take Clarence Thomas, please! He’s been given millions in corporate bribes (excuse me, “gratuities”), so he’s hardly an unbiased judge of official corruption. To fight the stench of this legal freak show, go to Campaign Legal Center: campaignlegal.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Culture War Stupidity Plunges Into Absurdity]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Right-wing culture warriors have been relentlessly attacking people’s personal liberties – running hellish crusades to deny our freedom to vote, to read what we want, to form labor unions, to make our own reproductive decisions… etc.</p><p>Now, apparently having run out of freedoms to ban, here they come with a twisted attempt to politicize another of our inalienable rights: <em>The pursuit of happiness</em>! They’ve launched a campaign of psycho-babble, preaching that those who embrace progressive ideas and causes are doomed to a life of perpetual unhappiness. “Don’t go there!” they squawk.</p><p>This babbaloney is even being advanced by such self-proclaimed “serious” conservatives as New York Times pundit, Ross Douthat. He recently <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/27/opinion/left-right-happiness.html">opined</a> that “The left-wing temperament is, by nature, unhappier than the moderate and conservative alternatives.” Yes, Douthat insists that we progressives are hampered by “a refusal of contentment,” unlike the joyful serenity enjoyed by right-wingers.</p><p>Golly, Ross, how could we have missed the conservative blissfulness inherent in Donald Trump’s perpetual glower and nastiness? And that snarling, right-wing gaggle of quacks, prima donnas, and haters in Congress sure offers a fine public example of intrinsic conservative conviviality.</p><p>But Douthat plunges deeper into his dark rabbit hole, theorizing that “youth unhappiness” increases “the further left you go.” Not sure how many progressive youngsters he’s actually met, but I’ve been lucky to meet and work regularly with young champions of environmental justice, union organizing, women’s rights, etc. They have continuously lifted my spirits with their optimism, sense of fun, and jubilant camaraderie.</p><p>And, by the way, young progressives don’t need me – much less an aloof, dour conservative – speaking for them. They have their own voice and are on the way up – laughing at the likes of Douthat.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/culture-war-stupidity-plunges-into</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:144367695</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/144367695/ebc631f762651413ffb584f4a3127ca0.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/144367695/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Right-wing culture warriors have been relentlessly attacking people’s personal liberties – running hellish crusades to deny our freedom to vote, to read what we want, to form labor unions, to make our own reproductive decisions… etc. Now, apparently having run out of freedoms to ban, here they come with a twisted attempt to politicize another of our inalienable rights: The pursuit of happiness! They’ve launched a campaign of psycho-babble, preaching that those who embrace progressive ideas and causes are doomed to a life of perpetual unhappiness. “Don’t go there!” they squawk. This babbaloney is even being advanced by such self-proclaimed “serious” conservatives as New York Times pundit, Ross Douthat. He recently opined that “The left-wing temperament is, by nature, unhappier than the moderate and conservative alternatives.” Yes, Douthat insists that we progressives are hampered by “a refusal of contentment,” unlike the joyful serenity enjoyed by right-wingers. Golly, Ross, how could we have missed the conservative blissfulness inherent in Donald Trump’s perpetual glower and nastiness? And that snarling, right-wing gaggle of quacks, prima donnas, and haters in Congress sure offers a fine public example of intrinsic conservative conviviality. But Douthat plunges deeper into his dark rabbit hole, theorizing that “youth unhappiness” increases “the further left you go.” Not sure how many progressive youngsters he’s actually met, but I’ve been lucky to meet and work regularly with young champions of environmental justice, union organizing, women’s rights, etc. They have continuously lifted my spirits with their optimism, sense of fun, and jubilant camaraderie. And, by the way, young progressives don’t need me – much less an aloof, dour conservative – speaking for them. They have their own voice and are on the way up – laughing at the likes of Douthat. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Right-wing culture warriors have been relentlessly attacking people’s personal liberties – running hellish crusades to deny our freedom to vote, to read what we want, to form labor unions, to make our own reproductive decisions… etc. Now, apparently having run out of freedoms to ban, here they come with a twisted attempt to politicize another of our inalienable rights: The pursuit of happiness! They’ve launched a campaign of psycho-babble, preaching that those who embrace progressive ideas and causes are doomed to a life of perpetual unhappiness. “Don’t go there!” they squawk. This babbaloney is even being advanced by such self-proclaimed “serious” conservatives as New York Times pundit, Ross Douthat. He recently opined that “The left-wing temperament is, by nature, unhappier than the moderate and conservative alternatives.” Yes, Douthat insists that we progressives are hampered by “a refusal of contentment,” unlike the joyful serenity enjoyed by right-wingers. Golly, Ross, how could we have missed the conservative blissfulness inherent in Donald Trump’s perpetual glower and nastiness? And that snarling, right-wing gaggle of quacks, prima donnas, and haters in Congress sure offers a fine public example of intrinsic conservative conviviality. But Douthat plunges deeper into his dark rabbit hole, theorizing that “youth unhappiness” increases “the further left you go.” Not sure how many progressive youngsters he’s actually met, but I’ve been lucky to meet and work regularly with young champions of environmental justice, union organizing, women’s rights, etc. They have continuously lifted my spirits with their optimism, sense of fun, and jubilant camaraderie. And, by the way, young progressives don’t need me – much less an aloof, dour conservative – speaking for them. They have their own voice and are on the way up – laughing at the likes of Douthat. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Gutting Our Public Post Offices: Oh What Joy!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Hoo boy… DeJoy!</p><p>Woe is us (the American people) for having our jewel of a national Postal Service saddled with a corporate-minded Postmaster General, Louis DeJoy. Formerly CEO of a private shipping contractor, DeJoy’s chief qualification for running this invaluable public service is that he’s been a major donor to Republican politicians – including Donald Trump, who appointed him to the post.</p><p>In 2020, the new honcho put forth a 10-year scheme to “save” the people’s post office by imposing boilerplate corporate tactics – downsize staff, cut service, and raise prices. He gave his plan a zippy PR slogan: “Delivering for America.” But <em>delivering less for more</em> is a hard sell, and people soon started rebelling against absurdly late delivery, closure of local branches, long lines at understaffed postal counters, and relentless price hikes, including another 8-percent increase this year.</p><p>Excuse my bad play on words, but there is no joy in seeing an essential public service needlessly gutted. Millions of us rely on timely mail delivered by the amazing network of public postal workers. Their linking of any one zip code to all others is a pillar of our democracy, not only servicing the well-off and corporate elites, but crucial to small businesses, rural communities, people getting medicines by mail – as well as to millions of us wanting to vote by mail this November.</p><p>Four years of DeJoy’s corporate gimmicks to “improve” our postal service by shriveling it have proven disastrous – and the harm is spreading. Enough! This is a time when your voice can matter, for a bipartisan outcry is demanding that Congress and/or the postal board of governors step in <em>pronto</em> to terminate DeJoy’s political meddling. For information and ACTION go to: <a target="_blank" href="http://TakeOnWallSt.com">TakeOnWallSt.com</a>.</p><p><em>Photo: </em><a target="_blank" href="https://www.norwoodnews.org/bronxites-rally-to-save-jerome-station-post-office/"><em>Rachel Bradshaw and Norwood News</em></a></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/gutting-our-public-post-offices-oh</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:144367393</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/144367393/dfd7ec71ddb3956ce1e3739282e0f9f4.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/144367393/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Hoo boy… DeJoy! Woe is us (the American people) for having our jewel of a national Postal Service saddled with a corporate-minded Postmaster General, Louis DeJoy. Formerly CEO of a private shipping contractor, DeJoy’s chief qualification for running this invaluable public service is that he’s been a major donor to Republican politicians – including Donald Trump, who appointed him to the post. In 2020, the new honcho put forth a 10-year scheme to “save” the people’s post office by imposing boilerplate corporate tactics – downsize staff, cut service, and raise prices. He gave his plan a zippy PR slogan: “Delivering for America.” But delivering less for more is a hard sell, and people soon started rebelling against absurdly late delivery, closure of local branches, long lines at understaffed postal counters, and relentless price hikes, including another 8-percent increase this year. Excuse my bad play on words, but there is no joy in seeing an essential public service needlessly gutted. Millions of us rely on timely mail delivered by the amazing network of public postal workers. Their linking of any one zip code to all others is a pillar of our democracy, not only servicing the well-off and corporate elites, but crucial to small businesses, rural communities, people getting medicines by mail – as well as to millions of us wanting to vote by mail this November. Four years of DeJoy’s corporate gimmicks to “improve” our postal service by shriveling it have proven disastrous – and the harm is spreading. Enough! This is a time when your voice can matter, for a bipartisan outcry is demanding that Congress and/or the postal board of governors step in pronto to terminate DeJoy’s political meddling. For information and ACTION go to: TakeOnWallSt.com. Photo: Rachel Bradshaw and Norwood News Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Hoo boy… DeJoy! Woe is us (the American people) for having our jewel of a national Postal Service saddled with a corporate-minded Postmaster General, Louis DeJoy. Formerly CEO of a private shipping contractor, DeJoy’s chief qualification for running this invaluable public service is that he’s been a major donor to Republican politicians – including Donald Trump, who appointed him to the post. In 2020, the new honcho put forth a 10-year scheme to “save” the people’s post office by imposing boilerplate corporate tactics – downsize staff, cut service, and raise prices. He gave his plan a zippy PR slogan: “Delivering for America.” But delivering less for more is a hard sell, and people soon started rebelling against absurdly late delivery, closure of local branches, long lines at understaffed postal counters, and relentless price hikes, including another 8-percent increase this year. Excuse my bad play on words, but there is no joy in seeing an essential public service needlessly gutted. Millions of us rely on timely mail delivered by the amazing network of public postal workers. Their linking of any one zip code to all others is a pillar of our democracy, not only servicing the well-off and corporate elites, but crucial to small businesses, rural communities, people getting medicines by mail – as well as to millions of us wanting to vote by mail this November. Four years of DeJoy’s corporate gimmicks to “improve” our postal service by shriveling it have proven disastrous – and the harm is spreading. Enough! This is a time when your voice can matter, for a bipartisan outcry is demanding that Congress and/or the postal board of governors step in pronto to terminate DeJoy’s political meddling. For information and ACTION go to: TakeOnWallSt.com. Photo: Rachel Bradshaw and Norwood News Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hey Democrats: Find the Party’s Future in Its Populist Past]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>A farmer friend of mine once bemoaned the fact that the Democrat we’d both supported for president, Bill Clinton, was hugging up Wall Street and stiffing family farmers. “I don’t mind losing when we lose,” my friend said, “but I hate losing when we win.”</p><p>Agreed. Yet, losing in politics is sometimes a prelude to winning, calling not for despair, but a doubling down on principle and organizing. Take the revolutionary presidential platform put forth by the upstart, unabashedly progressive People’s Party in 1892. It was stunning in its little-d democratic boldness, directly challenging corporate power. The populists became the first to support an 8-hour day and minimum wage for labor, women’s suffrage, graduated income taxes, government farm loans to bypass bank monopolies, veterans’ pensions, direct lawmaking by citizen initiatives… etc.</p><p>Wall Street and the two-party duopoly soon conspired to crush the People’s Party. But they could not stop its ideas, which grew in popular support and were largely enacted by state and national governments. This democratic reformation occurred because (1) the populists were unabashedly bold, (2) their ideas were solid, benefitting the Common Good, and (3) their political heirs were organized and persistent.</p><p>That same rebellious spirit remains at the heart and soul of today’s people’s politics. For example, while 2011’s Occupy Wall Street uprising was autocratically crushed, resurgent labor progressives are now carrying its ideals forward… and winning! Likewise, America’s scrappy democratic soul is being expressed every day by grassroots groups of rural poor people battling corporate polluters, child care workers struggling for decent pay, local people standing up to Silicon Valley arrogance and Wall Street greed… etc.</p><p>Americans are on the move against plutocratic and autocratic rule. They need a party to move with them.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/hey-democrats-find-the-partys-future</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:144242012</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/144242012/a8f6cd39a72b1b569aad12e78993c9d7.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/144242012/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>A farmer friend of mine once bemoaned the fact that the Democrat we’d both supported for president, Bill Clinton, was hugging up Wall Street and stiffing family farmers. “I don’t mind losing when we lose,” my friend said, “but I hate losing when we win.” Agreed. Yet, losing in politics is sometimes a prelude to winning, calling not for despair, but a doubling down on principle and organizing. Take the revolutionary presidential platform put forth by the upstart, unabashedly progressive People’s Party in 1892. It was stunning in its little-d democratic boldness, directly challenging corporate power. The populists became the first to support an 8-hour day and minimum wage for labor, women’s suffrage, graduated income taxes, government farm loans to bypass bank monopolies, veterans’ pensions, direct lawmaking by citizen initiatives… etc. Wall Street and the two-party duopoly soon conspired to crush the People’s Party. But they could not stop its ideas, which grew in popular support and were largely enacted by state and national governments. This democratic reformation occurred because (1) the populists were unabashedly bold, (2) their ideas were solid, benefitting the Common Good, and (3) their political heirs were organized and persistent. That same rebellious spirit remains at the heart and soul of today’s people’s politics. For example, while 2011’s Occupy Wall Street uprising was autocratically crushed, resurgent labor progressives are now carrying its ideals forward… and winning! Likewise, America’s scrappy democratic soul is being expressed every day by grassroots groups of rural poor people battling corporate polluters, child care workers struggling for decent pay, local people standing up to Silicon Valley arrogance and Wall Street greed… etc. Americans are on the move against plutocratic and autocratic rule. They need a party to move with them. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>A farmer friend of mine once bemoaned the fact that the Democrat we’d both supported for president, Bill Clinton, was hugging up Wall Street and stiffing family farmers. “I don’t mind losing when we lose,” my friend said, “but I hate losing when we win.” Agreed. Yet, losing in politics is sometimes a prelude to winning, calling not for despair, but a doubling down on principle and organizing. Take the revolutionary presidential platform put forth by the upstart, unabashedly progressive People’s Party in 1892. It was stunning in its little-d democratic boldness, directly challenging corporate power. The populists became the first to support an 8-hour day and minimum wage for labor, women’s suffrage, graduated income taxes, government farm loans to bypass bank monopolies, veterans’ pensions, direct lawmaking by citizen initiatives… etc. Wall Street and the two-party duopoly soon conspired to crush the People’s Party. But they could not stop its ideas, which grew in popular support and were largely enacted by state and national governments. This democratic reformation occurred because (1) the populists were unabashedly bold, (2) their ideas were solid, benefitting the Common Good, and (3) their political heirs were organized and persistent. That same rebellious spirit remains at the heart and soul of today’s people’s politics. For example, while 2011’s Occupy Wall Street uprising was autocratically crushed, resurgent labor progressives are now carrying its ideals forward… and winning! Likewise, America’s scrappy democratic soul is being expressed every day by grassroots groups of rural poor people battling corporate polluters, child care workers struggling for decent pay, local people standing up to Silicon Valley arrogance and Wall Street greed… etc. Americans are on the move against plutocratic and autocratic rule. They need a party to move with them. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[What Should Politics Do? Ask Woody Guthrie]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Woody Guthrie’s prescription for inequality in America was straightforward: “Rich folks got your money with politics. You can get it back with politics.”</p><p>For Guthrie, “politics” meant more than voting, since both parties routinely cough-up candidates who meekly accept the business-as-usual system of letting bosses and bankers control America’s wealth and power. It’s useless, he said, to expect change to come from a “choice” between Tweedledumb and Tweedledumber. Instead, common folks must organize into a progressive movement with their own bold change agenda, become their own candidates, and create a politics worth voting for.</p><p>Pie in the sky? No! Periodic eruptions of progressive grassroots insurgencies have literally defined America, beginning with that big one in 1776. Indeed, we could take a lesson today from another transformative moment of democratic populism that surged more than a century ago, culminating in “The Omaha Platform of 1892.” This was in the depths of the Gilded Age, a sordid period much like ours, characterized by both ostentatious greed and widespread poverty, domination by monopolies, rising xenophobia, institutional racism – and government that ranged from aloof to insane.</p><p>But lo – from that darkness, a new People’s Party arose, created by the populist movement of farm and factory mad-as-hellers. They streamed into Omaha to hammer out the most progressive platform in US history, specifically rejecting corporate supremacy and demanding direct democracy.</p><p>That platform reshaped America’s political agenda, making the sweeping reforms of the Progressive Era and New Deal possible. As one senator said of the Omaha rebellion, it was the start of robber baron wealth flowing “to all the people, from whom it was originally taken.” And that’s what Woody Guthrie meant by “politics.”</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/what-should-politics-do-ask-woody</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:144181917</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 20:53:09 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/144181917/26324d58ea5dd883fbfd53c52ad49a2f.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/144181917/f105aa303c17072de05777dc6c2fd613.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Woody Guthrie’s prescription for inequality in America was straightforward: “Rich folks got your money with politics. You can get it back with politics.” For Guthrie, “politics” meant more than voting, since both parties routinely cough-up candidates who meekly accept the business-as-usual system of letting bosses and bankers control America’s wealth and power. It’s useless, he said, to expect change to come from a “choice” between Tweedledumb and Tweedledumber. Instead, common folks must organize into a progressive movement with their own bold change agenda, become their own candidates, and create a politics worth voting for. Pie in the sky? No! Periodic eruptions of progressive grassroots insurgencies have literally defined America, beginning with that big one in 1776. Indeed, we could take a lesson today from another transformative moment of democratic populism that surged more than a century ago, culminating in “The Omaha Platform of 1892.” This was in the depths of the Gilded Age, a sordid period much like ours, characterized by both ostentatious greed and widespread poverty, domination by monopolies, rising xenophobia, institutional racism – and government that ranged from aloof to insane. But lo – from that darkness, a new People’s Party arose, created by the populist movement of farm and factory mad-as-hellers. They streamed into Omaha to hammer out the most progressive platform in US history, specifically rejecting corporate supremacy and demanding direct democracy. That platform reshaped America’s political agenda, making the sweeping reforms of the Progressive Era and New Deal possible. As one senator said of the Omaha rebellion, it was the start of robber baron wealth flowing “to all the people, from whom it was originally taken.” And that’s what Woody Guthrie meant by “politics.” Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Woody Guthrie’s prescription for inequality in America was straightforward: “Rich folks got your money with politics. You can get it back with politics.” For Guthrie, “politics” meant more than voting, since both parties routinely cough-up candidates who meekly accept the business-as-usual system of letting bosses and bankers control America’s wealth and power. It’s useless, he said, to expect change to come from a “choice” between Tweedledumb and Tweedledumber. Instead, common folks must organize into a progressive movement with their own bold change agenda, become their own candidates, and create a politics worth voting for. Pie in the sky? No! Periodic eruptions of progressive grassroots insurgencies have literally defined America, beginning with that big one in 1776. Indeed, we could take a lesson today from another transformative moment of democratic populism that surged more than a century ago, culminating in “The Omaha Platform of 1892.” This was in the depths of the Gilded Age, a sordid period much like ours, characterized by both ostentatious greed and widespread poverty, domination by monopolies, rising xenophobia, institutional racism – and government that ranged from aloof to insane. But lo – from that darkness, a new People’s Party arose, created by the populist movement of farm and factory mad-as-hellers. They streamed into Omaha to hammer out the most progressive platform in US history, specifically rejecting corporate supremacy and demanding direct democracy. That platform reshaped America’s political agenda, making the sweeping reforms of the Progressive Era and New Deal possible. As one senator said of the Omaha rebellion, it was the start of robber baron wealth flowing “to all the people, from whom it was originally taken.” And that’s what Woody Guthrie meant by “politics.” Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The True Story About Coca-Cola’s Plastic Fairy Tale]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Years ago, Coca-Cola excitedly debuted a new formula for its soda, dubbing it “New Coke.” Consumers hated it, and sales plummeted – a marketing fiasco.</p><p>But here comes Coke again, pushing an even worse product: “A Better Plastic Bottle,” trumpeting it as “100% Recycled.” Coke really needs an environmental PR goose-up, because today’s consumers know and care a lot about the massive plastic contamination of our planet – and Coke has been ranked as the globe’s <em>number one plastic polluter</em> for six years in a row!</p><p>Problem is, the corporation’s recycling hype is a fraud, for plastic is a fossil fuel polymer that essentially is forever. Even though most of us dutifully put throw-away containers in recycling bins, the industry’s dirty secret is that 95 percent of plastics can’t be recycled, so they’re simply burned, dumped in landfills, or tossed “away.” In a February report, The Center for Climate Integrity reveals that the plastics-industrial-complex has been like Big Tobacco and Big Oil – intentionally fabricating, promoting, and profiting from a mass-market scam for decades. As the Climate Center commented, “The only thing the plastics industry has actually recycled is their lies, over and over again.”</p><p>But, taking another lesson from tobacco and oil, Big Plastic figures that if one lie stops working, tell a bigger one. So, Coca-Cola is presently gushing about “better” plastic bottles, while plastic manufacturers are so desperate to keep peddling environmental contamination that their new media blitz frantically insists, “Recycling is Real!”</p><p>Of course, their “new” claims are nothing but re-fabricated prevarications. Meanwhile, the industry is planning to dump <em>300 percent more plastic</em> on us in the next few years. Hello, let’s get real – the only way to stop planet-choking plastic contamination is to stop making the stuff.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-true-story-about-coca-colas-plastic</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:143960877</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/143960877/1f4a54dd9f6702b68844ec49613e1ca1.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/143960877/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Years ago, Coca-Cola excitedly debuted a new formula for its soda, dubbing it “New Coke.” Consumers hated it, and sales plummeted – a marketing fiasco. But here comes Coke again, pushing an even worse product: “A Better Plastic Bottle,” trumpeting it as “100% Recycled.” Coke really needs an environmental PR goose-up, because today’s consumers know and care a lot about the massive plastic contamination of our planet – and Coke has been ranked as the globe’s number one plastic polluter for six years in a row! Problem is, the corporation’s recycling hype is a fraud, for plastic is a fossil fuel polymer that essentially is forever. Even though most of us dutifully put throw-away containers in recycling bins, the industry’s dirty secret is that 95 percent of plastics can’t be recycled, so they’re simply burned, dumped in landfills, or tossed “away.” In a February report, The Center for Climate Integrity reveals that the plastics-industrial-complex has been like Big Tobacco and Big Oil – intentionally fabricating, promoting, and profiting from a mass-market scam for decades. As the Climate Center commented, “The only thing the plastics industry has actually recycled is their lies, over and over again.” But, taking another lesson from tobacco and oil, Big Plastic figures that if one lie stops working, tell a bigger one. So, Coca-Cola is presently gushing about “better” plastic bottles, while plastic manufacturers are so desperate to keep peddling environmental contamination that their new media blitz frantically insists, “Recycling is Real!” Of course, their “new” claims are nothing but re-fabricated prevarications. Meanwhile, the industry is planning to dump 300 percent more plastic on us in the next few years. Hello, let’s get real – the only way to stop planet-choking plastic contamination is to stop making the stuff. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Years ago, Coca-Cola excitedly debuted a new formula for its soda, dubbing it “New Coke.” Consumers hated it, and sales plummeted – a marketing fiasco. But here comes Coke again, pushing an even worse product: “A Better Plastic Bottle,” trumpeting it as “100% Recycled.” Coke really needs an environmental PR goose-up, because today’s consumers know and care a lot about the massive plastic contamination of our planet – and Coke has been ranked as the globe’s number one plastic polluter for six years in a row! Problem is, the corporation’s recycling hype is a fraud, for plastic is a fossil fuel polymer that essentially is forever. Even though most of us dutifully put throw-away containers in recycling bins, the industry’s dirty secret is that 95 percent of plastics can’t be recycled, so they’re simply burned, dumped in landfills, or tossed “away.” In a February report, The Center for Climate Integrity reveals that the plastics-industrial-complex has been like Big Tobacco and Big Oil – intentionally fabricating, promoting, and profiting from a mass-market scam for decades. As the Climate Center commented, “The only thing the plastics industry has actually recycled is their lies, over and over again.” But, taking another lesson from tobacco and oil, Big Plastic figures that if one lie stops working, tell a bigger one. So, Coca-Cola is presently gushing about “better” plastic bottles, while plastic manufacturers are so desperate to keep peddling environmental contamination that their new media blitz frantically insists, “Recycling is Real!” Of course, their “new” claims are nothing but re-fabricated prevarications. Meanwhile, the industry is planning to dump 300 percent more plastic on us in the next few years. Hello, let’s get real – the only way to stop planet-choking plastic contamination is to stop making the stuff. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Big Apple’s Mayor Takes a Big Bite Out of Democracy]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>And now: A special report from the <em>Department of Really Bad Ideas</em>. And this one is a doozie.</p><p>It comes from Hizzoner Eric Adams, the present mayor of New York City. Like mayors everywhere, Adams is routinely expected to respond to city council members, state reps, members of Congress, and other elected officials who ask for help on city issues and problems affecting the people they represent. After all, that’s how it’s supposed to work – local folks have an issue needing city attention, so they go to officials in their local community who can carry this issue to the top level. Most of these matters are resolved by – hello – relevant officials simply having a phone call, a quick meeting, or even an email exchange.</p><p>But no – the Big Apple’s mayor has decreed that elected officials needing to discuss concerns of their constituents may NOT speak directly to him. Nor may they simply speak with his staff, meet with, or engage with agency heads, or other mayoral personnel who could help the people. Rather, Adams has decreed that supplicants wanting to approach the city’s public servants <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/11/nyregion/adams-city-council-permission.html">must submit a seven-page, online “engagement request.”</a> The mayor’s intergovernmental office will review each one, then decide whether to grant or deny any official engagement.</p><p>An Adams gatekeeper hailed this bureaucratic intake process as a <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/11/nyregion/adams-city-council-permission.html">“new and exciting tool” to “impose operational efficiency and streamline requests.”</a> Golly – even George Orwell couldn’t have conjured up a statement as soul-sucking as that!</p><p>Streamlined efficiency is the ultimate virtue for automatons and authoritarian regimes – NOT for public officials in a democratic society. Democracy is necessarily slower-paced, deliberative, and inclusive. And it does not require – or accept – filling out a seven-page form to “engage” with your mayor.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-big-apples-mayor-takes-a-big</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:143898262</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 18:03:42 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/143898262/c25067423937523933f452396143e066.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/143898262/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>And now: A special report from the Department of Really Bad Ideas. And this one is a doozie. It comes from Hizzoner Eric Adams, the present mayor of New York City. Like mayors everywhere, Adams is routinely expected to respond to city council members, state reps, members of Congress, and other elected officials who ask for help on city issues and problems affecting the people they represent. After all, that’s how it’s supposed to work – local folks have an issue needing city attention, so they go to officials in their local community who can carry this issue to the top level. Most of these matters are resolved by – hello – relevant officials simply having a phone call, a quick meeting, or even an email exchange. But no – the Big Apple’s mayor has decreed that elected officials needing to discuss concerns of their constituents may NOT speak directly to him. Nor may they simply speak with his staff, meet with, or engage with agency heads, or other mayoral personnel who could help the people. Rather, Adams has decreed that supplicants wanting to approach the city’s public servants must submit a seven-page, online “engagement request.” The mayor’s intergovernmental office will review each one, then decide whether to grant or deny any official engagement. An Adams gatekeeper hailed this bureaucratic intake process as a “new and exciting tool” to “impose operational efficiency and streamline requests.” Golly – even George Orwell couldn’t have conjured up a statement as soul-sucking as that! Streamlined efficiency is the ultimate virtue for automatons and authoritarian regimes – NOT for public officials in a democratic society. Democracy is necessarily slower-paced, deliberative, and inclusive. And it does not require – or accept – filling out a seven-page form to “engage” with your mayor. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>And now: A special report from the Department of Really Bad Ideas. And this one is a doozie. It comes from Hizzoner Eric Adams, the present mayor of New York City. Like mayors everywhere, Adams is routinely expected to respond to city council members, state reps, members of Congress, and other elected officials who ask for help on city issues and problems affecting the people they represent. After all, that’s how it’s supposed to work – local folks have an issue needing city attention, so they go to officials in their local community who can carry this issue to the top level. Most of these matters are resolved by – hello – relevant officials simply having a phone call, a quick meeting, or even an email exchange. But no – the Big Apple’s mayor has decreed that elected officials needing to discuss concerns of their constituents may NOT speak directly to him. Nor may they simply speak with his staff, meet with, or engage with agency heads, or other mayoral personnel who could help the people. Rather, Adams has decreed that supplicants wanting to approach the city’s public servants must submit a seven-page, online “engagement request.” The mayor’s intergovernmental office will review each one, then decide whether to grant or deny any official engagement. An Adams gatekeeper hailed this bureaucratic intake process as a “new and exciting tool” to “impose operational efficiency and streamline requests.” Golly – even George Orwell couldn’t have conjured up a statement as soul-sucking as that! Streamlined efficiency is the ultimate virtue for automatons and authoritarian regimes – NOT for public officials in a democratic society. Democracy is necessarily slower-paced, deliberative, and inclusive. And it does not require – or accept – filling out a seven-page form to “engage” with your mayor. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Where’s George Orwell Today? Texas!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>If you think the GOP’s Congress of Clowns represents the fringiest, freakiest, pack of politicos that MAGA-world can hurl at us – you haven’t been to Texas.</p><p>It’s widely known, of course, that Ted Cruz, Greg Abbott, and most other top Republican officials here are obsequious Trump acolytes. Thus, Texas is infamously racing against Florida to be declared the stupidest, meanest, most-repressive state government in America, constantly making demonic attacks on women’s freedom, immigrants, voting rights, public schools, poor people, and so on. But I’m confident Texas will win this race to the bottom for one big reason: GOP crazy runs extraordinarily deep here.</p><p>We have a county-level layer of ultra-MAGA cultists constantly pressing the state’s far-right officials to march all the way to the farthest edge of extremism – then leap into absurdity. Therefore, the party officially supports abolishment of labor unions, elimination of the minimum wage, privatization of social security, legalization of machine guns, and… well, you get the drift. Now, though, local mad-dog Trumpistas are pushing their party straight into the abyss of autocracy by <a target="_blank" href="https://www.sacurrent.com/news/texas-gop-officials-condemn-charles-butt-chair-of-san-antonios-h-e-b-34158264">declaring war on H-E-B</a>.</p><p>What’s that? H-E-B is a Texas chain of supermarkets <a target="_blank" href="https://www.kxan.com/news/h-e-b-bags-top-spot-in-national-grocery-store-ranking/">beloved in communities throughout the state</a>. “Beloved,” because the stores fully embrace the rich diversity of all people in our state, has affordable prices, values employees, and supports community needs.</p><p>Nonetheless, county Republican zealots screech that H-E-B <a target="_blank" href="https://www.sacurrent.com/news/texas-gop-officials-condemn-charles-butt-chair-of-san-antonios-h-e-b-34158264">violates their party ideology</a> by accepting food stamps, opposing privatization of schools, and (horrors!) sponsoring some LBGTQ pride events. So, they’re demanding official condemnation of the grocery chain for – GET THIS – “advocating for policies contrary to the Republican Party of Texas platform.”</p><p>Yes, violating the party platform is to be criminalized. It’s the reincarnation of Orwell’s <em>Nineteen Eighty-Four</em>: Be MAGA… or else.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/wheres-george-orwell-today-texas</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:143655189</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/143655189/6012d913e151ee0f58fbb97c2b43f973.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/143655189/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>If you think the GOP’s Congress of Clowns represents the fringiest, freakiest, pack of politicos that MAGA-world can hurl at us – you haven’t been to Texas. It’s widely known, of course, that Ted Cruz, Greg Abbott, and most other top Republican officials here are obsequious Trump acolytes. Thus, Texas is infamously racing against Florida to be declared the stupidest, meanest, most-repressive state government in America, constantly making demonic attacks on women’s freedom, immigrants, voting rights, public schools, poor people, and so on. But I’m confident Texas will win this race to the bottom for one big reason: GOP crazy runs extraordinarily deep here. We have a county-level layer of ultra-MAGA cultists constantly pressing the state’s far-right officials to march all the way to the farthest edge of extremism – then leap into absurdity. Therefore, the party officially supports abolishment of labor unions, elimination of the minimum wage, privatization of social security, legalization of machine guns, and… well, you get the drift. Now, though, local mad-dog Trumpistas are pushing their party straight into the abyss of autocracy by declaring war on H-E-B. What’s that? H-E-B is a Texas chain of supermarkets beloved in communities throughout the state. “Beloved,” because the stores fully embrace the rich diversity of all people in our state, has affordable prices, values employees, and supports community needs. Nonetheless, county Republican zealots screech that H-E-B violates their party ideology by accepting food stamps, opposing privatization of schools, and (horrors!) sponsoring some LBGTQ pride events. So, they’re demanding official condemnation of the grocery chain for – GET THIS – “advocating for policies contrary to the Republican Party of Texas platform.” Yes, violating the party platform is to be criminalized. It’s the reincarnation of Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four: Be MAGA… or else. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>If you think the GOP’s Congress of Clowns represents the fringiest, freakiest, pack of politicos that MAGA-world can hurl at us – you haven’t been to Texas. It’s widely known, of course, that Ted Cruz, Greg Abbott, and most other top Republican officials here are obsequious Trump acolytes. Thus, Texas is infamously racing against Florida to be declared the stupidest, meanest, most-repressive state government in America, constantly making demonic attacks on women’s freedom, immigrants, voting rights, public schools, poor people, and so on. But I’m confident Texas will win this race to the bottom for one big reason: GOP crazy runs extraordinarily deep here. We have a county-level layer of ultra-MAGA cultists constantly pressing the state’s far-right officials to march all the way to the farthest edge of extremism – then leap into absurdity. Therefore, the party officially supports abolishment of labor unions, elimination of the minimum wage, privatization of social security, legalization of machine guns, and… well, you get the drift. Now, though, local mad-dog Trumpistas are pushing their party straight into the abyss of autocracy by declaring war on H-E-B. What’s that? H-E-B is a Texas chain of supermarkets beloved in communities throughout the state. “Beloved,” because the stores fully embrace the rich diversity of all people in our state, has affordable prices, values employees, and supports community needs. Nonetheless, county Republican zealots screech that H-E-B violates their party ideology by accepting food stamps, opposing privatization of schools, and (horrors!) sponsoring some LBGTQ pride events. So, they’re demanding official condemnation of the grocery chain for – GET THIS – “advocating for policies contrary to the Republican Party of Texas platform.” Yes, violating the party platform is to be criminalized. It’s the reincarnation of Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four: Be MAGA… or else. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can’t Oil Barons Ever Be Honest? (Hint: No)]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Former New Mexico Gov. Bruce King once opposed a bill because, he said, he feared it would “open a whole box of Pandoras.”</p><p>An odd rhetorical twist, but it would be helpful if today’s ego-bloated, high-tech billionaires and corporate profiteers had a bit of self-restraint, rather than thinking their money equals genius. For example, such doofuses are presently pushing convoluted schemes to “solve” our globe’s technology-caused climate crisis with – what else? – technology.</p><p>Their latest box of Pandoras includes <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/31/climate/climate-change-carbon-capture-ccs.html">a grandiose plan to “geoengineer” carbon dioxide</a>, the destructive gas spewed into our air by the production and use of fossil fuels. The geniuses say they have the techno-knowhow to suck-up that bad gas and pump it a mile deep into the Earth. See, problem gone! All they need, they say, is for taxpayers to put up trillions of dollars.</p><p>Who’s behind this hustle? Oil giants. Yes, the same prevaricating snake oil salesmen who cause most of the suffocating CO2 pollution that’s rapidly cooking our planet! Such petro-peddlers as Occidental Petroleum are now trying to re-brand themselves as “carbon management” experts, asking us to trust them to re-engineer our atmosphere. But they’re frauds – their magical “Vacuum Cleaner in the Sky” won’t remove even one-percent of the new carbon emissions released every year.</p><p>Worse, Occidental says it intends to keep much of the CO2 it vacuums up, using the gas to force more oil out of the ground – thus <em>creating more global warming</em>! As Occidental’s CEO gleefully puts it, geoengineering “gives our industry a license to continue to operate for… 60, 70, 80 years.”</p><p>Razzle-dazzle technology is not a climate solution. It’s a business-as-usual lie told by profiteers desperate to keep burning fossil fuels – and our globe.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/cant-oil-barons-ever-be-honest-hint</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:143643168</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2600846" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/143643168/b35d671625f6498990152f9635615d9f.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/143643168/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Former New Mexico Gov. Bruce King once opposed a bill because, he said, he feared it would “open a whole box of Pandoras.” An odd rhetorical twist, but it would be helpful if today’s ego-bloated, high-tech billionaires and corporate profiteers had a bit of self-restraint, rather than thinking their money equals genius. For example, such doofuses are presently pushing convoluted schemes to “solve” our globe’s technology-caused climate crisis with – what else? – technology. Their latest box of Pandoras includes a grandiose plan to “geoengineer” carbon dioxide, the destructive gas spewed into our air by the production and use of fossil fuels. The geniuses say they have the techno-knowhow to suck-up that bad gas and pump it a mile deep into the Earth. See, problem gone! All they need, they say, is for taxpayers to put up trillions of dollars. Who’s behind this hustle? Oil giants. Yes, the same prevaricating snake oil salesmen who cause most of the suffocating CO2 pollution that’s rapidly cooking our planet! Such petro-peddlers as Occidental Petroleum are now trying to re-brand themselves as “carbon management” experts, asking us to trust them to re-engineer our atmosphere. But they’re frauds – their magical “Vacuum Cleaner in the Sky” won’t remove even one-percent of the new carbon emissions released every year. Worse, Occidental says it intends to keep much of the CO2 it vacuums up, using the gas to force more oil out of the ground – thus creating more global warming! As Occidental’s CEO gleefully puts it, geoengineering “gives our industry a license to continue to operate for… 60, 70, 80 years.” Razzle-dazzle technology is not a climate solution. It’s a business-as-usual lie told by profiteers desperate to keep burning fossil fuels – and our globe. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Former New Mexico Gov. Bruce King once opposed a bill because, he said, he feared it would “open a whole box of Pandoras.” An odd rhetorical twist, but it would be helpful if today’s ego-bloated, high-tech billionaires and corporate profiteers had a bit of self-restraint, rather than thinking their money equals genius. For example, such doofuses are presently pushing convoluted schemes to “solve” our globe’s technology-caused climate crisis with – what else? – technology. Their latest box of Pandoras includes a grandiose plan to “geoengineer” carbon dioxide, the destructive gas spewed into our air by the production and use of fossil fuels. The geniuses say they have the techno-knowhow to suck-up that bad gas and pump it a mile deep into the Earth. See, problem gone! All they need, they say, is for taxpayers to put up trillions of dollars. Who’s behind this hustle? Oil giants. Yes, the same prevaricating snake oil salesmen who cause most of the suffocating CO2 pollution that’s rapidly cooking our planet! Such petro-peddlers as Occidental Petroleum are now trying to re-brand themselves as “carbon management” experts, asking us to trust them to re-engineer our atmosphere. But they’re frauds – their magical “Vacuum Cleaner in the Sky” won’t remove even one-percent of the new carbon emissions released every year. Worse, Occidental says it intends to keep much of the CO2 it vacuums up, using the gas to force more oil out of the ground – thus creating more global warming! As Occidental’s CEO gleefully puts it, geoengineering “gives our industry a license to continue to operate for… 60, 70, 80 years.” Razzle-dazzle technology is not a climate solution. It’s a business-as-usual lie told by profiteers desperate to keep burning fossil fuels – and our globe. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Happy Hour with Hightower: April Ask Me Anything Video]]></title><description><![CDATA[This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_7">jimhightower.substack.com</a><br/><br/><p>Hello Lowdowners! DZ here. Apologies for the delay getting the recording of last week’s Happy Hour out to you all— there was a problem with the audio which took a minute to find a fix. You’ll hear that Hightower still sounds a little distorted here and there, and I apologize for that! I figured out what went wrong when we recorded, so, fingers crossed, it shouldn’t happen again.</p><p>We covered a LOT of ground in this session: breaking the two-party duopoly, poor people’s food, Netanyahu versus Gaza, how Texas turned red, who’s doing good grassroots organizing, <a target="_blank" href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/tom-paine-what-a-guy">Thomas Paine</a>, and much more. Plus a lot of laughs (and a few extra tech snafus) along the way! Below you’ll find the links we put into the live chat, as well as a full transcript of the video. Enjoy, and we’ll see you at the next one!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/happy-hour-with-hightower-april-ask</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:143623084</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Deanna Zandt and Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2024 02:02:48 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="1420992" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/143623084/c769800cc20918dd3ace15aecb88f3d1.mp3"/><itunes:author>Deanna Zandt and Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>118</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/143623084/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com Hello Lowdowners! DZ here. Apologies for the delay getting the recording of last week’s Happy Hour out to you all— there was a problem with the audio which took a minute to find a fix. You’ll hear that Hightower still sounds a little distorted here and there, and I apologize for that! I figured out what went wrong when we recorded, so, fingers crossed, it shouldn’t happen again. We covered a LOT of ground in this session: breaking the two-party duopoly, poor people’s food, Netanyahu versus Gaza, how Texas turned red, who’s doing good grassroots organizing, Thomas Paine, and much more. Plus a lot of laughs (and a few extra tech snafus) along the way! Below you’ll find the links we put into the live chat, as well as a full transcript of the video. Enjoy, and we’ll see you at the next one! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com Hello Lowdowners! DZ here. Apologies for the delay getting the recording of last week’s Happy Hour out to you all— there was a problem with the audio which took a minute to find a fix. You’ll hear that Hightower still sounds a little distorted here and there, and I apologize for that! I figured out what went wrong when we recorded, so, fingers crossed, it shouldn’t happen again. We covered a LOT of ground in this session: breaking the two-party duopoly, poor people’s food, Netanyahu versus Gaza, how Texas turned red, who’s doing good grassroots organizing, Thomas Paine, and much more. Plus a lot of laughs (and a few extra tech snafus) along the way! Below you’ll find the links we put into the live chat, as well as a full transcript of the video. Enjoy, and we’ll see you at the next one! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Are We Letting Greedheads and Ideologues Kill Our Post Office?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Before there was a USA – before our Constitution was adopted, and even before our 1776 Declaration of Independence – one of America’s best democratic institutions was <a target="_blank" href="https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smithsonian-institution/brief-history-united-states-postal-service-180975627/">already delivering</a> for the people: The Post Office.</p><p>But it’s important to realize that, for 250 years, this invaluable public service has delivered more than mail. It was – <em>and is</em>– a core element of our national unity. Its network of local employees go door-to-door, coast-to-coast, six days a week in every zip code, physically linking America’s widely dispersed, wildly diverse people into one country. It is a universally-popular and essential government service that works!</p><p>Yet – as we’ve seen with such other valued public assets as our schools and parks – no flower is so beneficial to the Common Good that selfish corporate opportunists won’t try to pluck it for their private gain. So for years, <a target="_blank" href="https://hightowerlowdown.org/article/the-post-office-is-not-broke-and-it-hasnt-taken-any-of-our-tax-money-since-1971/">corporate profiteers and laissez-faire ideologues have been plucking apart the budget</a>, staff, branches, and historic mission of the Post Office.</p><p>Their scheme is to shrivel service, foment public dissatisfaction with the agency, demand evermore cuts in staff and branches – then push for a corporate takeover and downsizing of this universal, nationwide delivery network. It’s not just a piece of government they’re trying to eliminate, it’s the core idea of America itself, namely our people’s can-do democratic spirit and commitment to the Common Good.</p><p>Rather than meekly accepting this corporate retreat from our egalitarian ideals, let’s reassert our rebellious spirit. For starters, we can help the feisty American Postal Workers Union push a “<a target="_blank" href="https://agrandalliance.org/">People’s Postal Agenda.</a>” It outlines ways to reinvent and <em>expand</em> the public services that this grassroots network of employees and local branches is uniquely able to provide. For info and action go to <a target="_blank" href="https://apwu.org/what-we-stand-for">apwu.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-are-we-letting-greedheads-and</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:143490078</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2024 17:21:56 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/143490078/b68ae45532c06a136ae507461a4bef03.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/143490078/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Before there was a USA – before our Constitution was adopted, and even before our 1776 Declaration of Independence – one of America’s best democratic institutions was already delivering for the people: The Post Office. But it’s important to realize that, for 250 years, this invaluable public service has delivered more than mail. It was – and is– a core element of our national unity. Its network of local employees go door-to-door, coast-to-coast, six days a week in every zip code, physically linking America’s widely dispersed, wildly diverse people into one country. It is a universally-popular and essential government service that works! Yet – as we’ve seen with such other valued public assets as our schools and parks – no flower is so beneficial to the Common Good that selfish corporate opportunists won’t try to pluck it for their private gain. So for years, corporate profiteers and laissez-faire ideologues have been plucking apart the budget, staff, branches, and historic mission of the Post Office. Their scheme is to shrivel service, foment public dissatisfaction with the agency, demand evermore cuts in staff and branches – then push for a corporate takeover and downsizing of this universal, nationwide delivery network. It’s not just a piece of government they’re trying to eliminate, it’s the core idea of America itself, namely our people’s can-do democratic spirit and commitment to the Common Good. Rather than meekly accepting this corporate retreat from our egalitarian ideals, let’s reassert our rebellious spirit. For starters, we can help the feisty American Postal Workers Union push a “People’s Postal Agenda.” It outlines ways to reinvent and expand the public services that this grassroots network of employees and local branches is uniquely able to provide. For info and action go to apwu.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Before there was a USA – before our Constitution was adopted, and even before our 1776 Declaration of Independence – one of America’s best democratic institutions was already delivering for the people: The Post Office. But it’s important to realize that, for 250 years, this invaluable public service has delivered more than mail. It was – and is– a core element of our national unity. Its network of local employees go door-to-door, coast-to-coast, six days a week in every zip code, physically linking America’s widely dispersed, wildly diverse people into one country. It is a universally-popular and essential government service that works! Yet – as we’ve seen with such other valued public assets as our schools and parks – no flower is so beneficial to the Common Good that selfish corporate opportunists won’t try to pluck it for their private gain. So for years, corporate profiteers and laissez-faire ideologues have been plucking apart the budget, staff, branches, and historic mission of the Post Office. Their scheme is to shrivel service, foment public dissatisfaction with the agency, demand evermore cuts in staff and branches – then push for a corporate takeover and downsizing of this universal, nationwide delivery network. It’s not just a piece of government they’re trying to eliminate, it’s the core idea of America itself, namely our people’s can-do democratic spirit and commitment to the Common Good. Rather than meekly accepting this corporate retreat from our egalitarian ideals, let’s reassert our rebellious spirit. For starters, we can help the feisty American Postal Workers Union push a “People’s Postal Agenda.” It outlines ways to reinvent and expand the public services that this grassroots network of employees and local branches is uniquely able to provide. For info and action go to apwu.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[What Nation Besides Israel Is Killing Gaza’s Innocent Palestinians?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>“Somebody better investigate soon.”</p><p>That’s a lyric in Bob Dylan’s “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sb4PsXncNV8">Oxford Town</a>,” a 1962 song deploring the relentless murdering of Black people and civil rights activists in the Deep South. The line mocks the refusal of racist officials to punish the White murderers, instead cynically covering up atrocities by promising do-nothing “investigations.”</p><p>Six decades later, the depraved ethic of Oxford Town is allowing Israel’s indiscriminate carpet-bombing of Gaza, wreaking horror at a genocidal pace on the Palestinian people. So far, some 33,000 Palestinians have been slaughtered, with another 75,000 horribly injured – and two-thirds of these victims are children and women. Hundreds of thousands more face imminent starvation because their homes, cities, and entire economy have been blown to smithereens. Adding to the depravity, Israel’s fanatical ruler, Benjamin Netanyahu, restricts humanitarian aid from reaching the Palestinian people.</p><p>Yet our government is Netanyahu’s biggest international apologist and enabler! Oh, for sure our officials condemn each of his atrocities, loudly demanding “a full investigation.” But even when investigations happen, they produce no punishment… and no change in our shameful open-ended policy of annually supplying the billions of US dollars and mega-weapons he’s now using to exterminate the innocent men, women, and children of Gaza. Thus, the horrendous 2,000-pound bombs he’s dropping on Palestinians bear our US flag.</p><p>President Biden said last week that he’s heartbroken by the relentless killing of innocent Palestinians, calling it “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/04/04/biden-warns-netanyahu-situation-gaza-is-unacceptable/">unacceptable.</a>” Then he accepted it! Even as he expressed anguish, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/02/us/politics/biden-israel-weapons-deal.html">Biden authorized a shipment </a>of another $18 billion-worth of US bombs and jets to Netanyahu.</p><p>Washington keeps sending killer weapons to – then, when they’re fired at innocents, we piously demand useless investigations and request (pretty please) that Netanyahu “bomb responsibly.” Gosh, why isn’t that working?</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/what-nation-besides-israel-is-killing</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:143421202</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2024 16:30:30 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/143421202/41cc04175342d55463ace67ef4315199.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/143421202/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>“Somebody better investigate soon.” That’s a lyric in Bob Dylan’s “Oxford Town,” a 1962 song deploring the relentless murdering of Black people and civil rights activists in the Deep South. The line mocks the refusal of racist officials to punish the White murderers, instead cynically covering up atrocities by promising do-nothing “investigations.” Six decades later, the depraved ethic of Oxford Town is allowing Israel’s indiscriminate carpet-bombing of Gaza, wreaking horror at a genocidal pace on the Palestinian people. So far, some 33,000 Palestinians have been slaughtered, with another 75,000 horribly injured – and two-thirds of these victims are children and women. Hundreds of thousands more face imminent starvation because their homes, cities, and entire economy have been blown to smithereens. Adding to the depravity, Israel’s fanatical ruler, Benjamin Netanyahu, restricts humanitarian aid from reaching the Palestinian people. Yet our government is Netanyahu’s biggest international apologist and enabler! Oh, for sure our officials condemn each of his atrocities, loudly demanding “a full investigation.” But even when investigations happen, they produce no punishment… and no change in our shameful open-ended policy of annually supplying the billions of US dollars and mega-weapons he’s now using to exterminate the innocent men, women, and children of Gaza. Thus, the horrendous 2,000-pound bombs he’s dropping on Palestinians bear our US flag. President Biden said last week that he’s heartbroken by the relentless killing of innocent Palestinians, calling it “unacceptable.” Then he accepted it! Even as he expressed anguish, Biden authorized a shipment of another $18 billion-worth of US bombs and jets to Netanyahu. Washington keeps sending killer weapons to – then, when they’re fired at innocents, we piously demand useless investigations and request (pretty please) that Netanyahu “bomb responsibly.” Gosh, why isn’t that working? Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>“Somebody better investigate soon.” That’s a lyric in Bob Dylan’s “Oxford Town,” a 1962 song deploring the relentless murdering of Black people and civil rights activists in the Deep South. The line mocks the refusal of racist officials to punish the White murderers, instead cynically covering up atrocities by promising do-nothing “investigations.” Six decades later, the depraved ethic of Oxford Town is allowing Israel’s indiscriminate carpet-bombing of Gaza, wreaking horror at a genocidal pace on the Palestinian people. So far, some 33,000 Palestinians have been slaughtered, with another 75,000 horribly injured – and two-thirds of these victims are children and women. Hundreds of thousands more face imminent starvation because their homes, cities, and entire economy have been blown to smithereens. Adding to the depravity, Israel’s fanatical ruler, Benjamin Netanyahu, restricts humanitarian aid from reaching the Palestinian people. Yet our government is Netanyahu’s biggest international apologist and enabler! Oh, for sure our officials condemn each of his atrocities, loudly demanding “a full investigation.” But even when investigations happen, they produce no punishment… and no change in our shameful open-ended policy of annually supplying the billions of US dollars and mega-weapons he’s now using to exterminate the innocent men, women, and children of Gaza. Thus, the horrendous 2,000-pound bombs he’s dropping on Palestinians bear our US flag. President Biden said last week that he’s heartbroken by the relentless killing of innocent Palestinians, calling it “unacceptable.” Then he accepted it! Even as he expressed anguish, Biden authorized a shipment of another $18 billion-worth of US bombs and jets to Netanyahu. Washington keeps sending killer weapons to – then, when they’re fired at innocents, we piously demand useless investigations and request (pretty please) that Netanyahu “bomb responsibly.” Gosh, why isn’t that working? Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[How Many Dead Firefighters Does It Take to Ban Asbestos?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>If your home or business is suddenly being engulfed in flames, you count on a quick response from the fire department. But who rushes to aid firefighters when so many of the burning buildings they enter are contaminated with chrysotile asbestos – a cancer-causing product so deadly that it’s banned in over 50 countries? So far, no one.</p><p>This nasty toxic (widely used in construction materials, car parts, and even water systems), infiltrates lungs and kills some 40,000 Americans a year, especially firefighters. For the last 30 years, victims, health advocates, and others have been pushing to stop using the deadly stuff – but chemical profiteers and the politicians they pay kept defeating these efforts.</p><p>In 2016, though, Congress finally empowered the EPA to ban it.</p><p>Great! But that same year, Trump happened. With his usual deep analysis, concern for workers, and respect for science, he mindlessly proclaimed asbestos “100 percent safe,” even declaring that the movement to ban it was “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.motherjones.com/2020-elections/2020/06/the-trump-files-asbestos-mob-conspiracy/">led by the mob.</a>” Thus, his EPA did nothing… and deaths continued.</p><p>Then came Joe Biden, and – Hallelujah! – EPA has now announced that it is “finally slamming the door on manufacturing, importing, and using chrysotile asbestos.” When? <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/18/climate/biden-administration-bans-asbestos.html"><em>Twelve years from </em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/18/climate/biden-administration-bans-asbestos.html">now.</a> What? Yes, that’s a very sloooow-motion slamming. Biden wanted the ban to take effect in two years, but industry lobbyists screeched. So, our government chose not to “rush” to aid firefighters and others who’ll be killed by this policy of putting corporate profits over their lives.</p><p>Remember this whenever political hucksters demand that you vote to eliminate “regulatory burdens.” Burdens for whom – asbestos peddlers or firefighters? And beware: Here comes Trump again, promising to eliminate public regulations if he’s elected. Really? Who will benefit from that?</p><p>Do something!</p><p>To learn more about fighting toxic chemicals and to advocate for sound policy, check out the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.ewg.org/take-action/support-key-legislation">Environmental Working Group</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/how-many-dead-firefighters-does-it</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:143192635</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/143192635/49e680ad13601efe35524a5008f023bd.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/143192635/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>If your home or business is suddenly being engulfed in flames, you count on a quick response from the fire department. But who rushes to aid firefighters when so many of the burning buildings they enter are contaminated with chrysotile asbestos – a cancer-causing product so deadly that it’s banned in over 50 countries? So far, no one. This nasty toxic (widely used in construction materials, car parts, and even water systems), infiltrates lungs and kills some 40,000 Americans a year, especially firefighters. For the last 30 years, victims, health advocates, and others have been pushing to stop using the deadly stuff – but chemical profiteers and the politicians they pay kept defeating these efforts. In 2016, though, Congress finally empowered the EPA to ban it. Great! But that same year, Trump happened. With his usual deep analysis, concern for workers, and respect for science, he mindlessly proclaimed asbestos “100 percent safe,” even declaring that the movement to ban it was “led by the mob.” Thus, his EPA did nothing… and deaths continued. Then came Joe Biden, and – Hallelujah! – EPA has now announced that it is “finally slamming the door on manufacturing, importing, and using chrysotile asbestos.” When? Twelve years from now. What? Yes, that’s a very sloooow-motion slamming. Biden wanted the ban to take effect in two years, but industry lobbyists screeched. So, our government chose not to “rush” to aid firefighters and others who’ll be killed by this policy of putting corporate profits over their lives. Remember this whenever political hucksters demand that you vote to eliminate “regulatory burdens.” Burdens for whom – asbestos peddlers or firefighters? And beware: Here comes Trump again, promising to eliminate public regulations if he’s elected. Really? Who will benefit from that? Do something! To learn more about fighting toxic chemicals and to advocate for sound policy, check out the Environmental Working Group. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>If your home or business is suddenly being engulfed in flames, you count on a quick response from the fire department. But who rushes to aid firefighters when so many of the burning buildings they enter are contaminated with chrysotile asbestos – a cancer-causing product so deadly that it’s banned in over 50 countries? So far, no one. This nasty toxic (widely used in construction materials, car parts, and even water systems), infiltrates lungs and kills some 40,000 Americans a year, especially firefighters. For the last 30 years, victims, health advocates, and others have been pushing to stop using the deadly stuff – but chemical profiteers and the politicians they pay kept defeating these efforts. In 2016, though, Congress finally empowered the EPA to ban it. Great! But that same year, Trump happened. With his usual deep analysis, concern for workers, and respect for science, he mindlessly proclaimed asbestos “100 percent safe,” even declaring that the movement to ban it was “led by the mob.” Thus, his EPA did nothing… and deaths continued. Then came Joe Biden, and – Hallelujah! – EPA has now announced that it is “finally slamming the door on manufacturing, importing, and using chrysotile asbestos.” When? Twelve years from now. What? Yes, that’s a very sloooow-motion slamming. Biden wanted the ban to take effect in two years, but industry lobbyists screeched. So, our government chose not to “rush” to aid firefighters and others who’ll be killed by this policy of putting corporate profits over their lives. Remember this whenever political hucksters demand that you vote to eliminate “regulatory burdens.” Burdens for whom – asbestos peddlers or firefighters? And beware: Here comes Trump again, promising to eliminate public regulations if he’s elected. Really? Who will benefit from that? Do something! To learn more about fighting toxic chemicals and to advocate for sound policy, check out the Environmental Working Group. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Big Corporations Get Special Tax Breaks and You Don’t]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Free Market ideologues fabricate some of the most preposterous yarns trying to justify their assertion of corporate greed over public need.</p><p>Consider their far-fetched of Laissez-fairyland tale that by allowing corporate giants to dodge the billions of tax dollars they owe to our country, the top executives of those corporations will plow that money into new jobs, products, and services for the Common Good. The ideologues assure us innocents that this is the “magic of the marketplace.”</p><p>But remember: Magicians don’t perform magic – they perform illusions. In this case, since the law does not <em>require</em> that such tax windfalls be invested for the public good, they aren’t. Instead, the corporate barons simply pocket the money.</p><p>A diligent watchdog group, Institute for Policy Studies, <a target="_blank" href="https://ips-dc.org/report-corporations-that-pay-their-executives-more-than-uncle-sam/">recently documented this by analyzing financial data of 35 enormously profitable giants</a>, including Tesla, T-Mobile, and Duke Energy. Over a four-year period, these 35 lavished pay of <em>$9.5 billion</em> on their honchos. Even for giants, that’s an extravagant payout. Where’d the money come from? Tax dodging. Combined, these outfits paid zero in federal taxes, and even extracted nearly $2 billion in refunds.</p><p>To rationalize this handout, free market ideologues clam that corporations are just like ordinary taxpayers, merely taking a few legal deductions to lower their tax bill. But wait – tax laws aren’t handed down on stone tablets, applying equally to everyone. When’s the last time Congress asked you to help write one law? Instead, America’s tax code is an arcane work of gobbledygook literally written in back rooms by corporate lobbyists – which is why powerful corporations get special breaks to evade taxes… and you don’t.</p><p>To see through such corporate scams and help end this corruption, connect with Institute for Policy Studies: <a target="_blank" href="http://ips-dc.org">ips-dc.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-big-corporations-get-special</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:143192069</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/143192069/6fd2b99dec33a2757fbfdde5d10635c8.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/143192069/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Free Market ideologues fabricate some of the most preposterous yarns trying to justify their assertion of corporate greed over public need. Consider their far-fetched of Laissez-fairyland tale that by allowing corporate giants to dodge the billions of tax dollars they owe to our country, the top executives of those corporations will plow that money into new jobs, products, and services for the Common Good. The ideologues assure us innocents that this is the “magic of the marketplace.” But remember: Magicians don’t perform magic – they perform illusions. In this case, since the law does not require that such tax windfalls be invested for the public good, they aren’t. Instead, the corporate barons simply pocket the money. A diligent watchdog group, Institute for Policy Studies, recently documented this by analyzing financial data of 35 enormously profitable giants, including Tesla, T-Mobile, and Duke Energy. Over a four-year period, these 35 lavished pay of $9.5 billion on their honchos. Even for giants, that’s an extravagant payout. Where’d the money come from? Tax dodging. Combined, these outfits paid zero in federal taxes, and even extracted nearly $2 billion in refunds. To rationalize this handout, free market ideologues clam that corporations are just like ordinary taxpayers, merely taking a few legal deductions to lower their tax bill. But wait – tax laws aren’t handed down on stone tablets, applying equally to everyone. When’s the last time Congress asked you to help write one law? Instead, America’s tax code is an arcane work of gobbledygook literally written in back rooms by corporate lobbyists – which is why powerful corporations get special breaks to evade taxes… and you don’t. To see through such corporate scams and help end this corruption, connect with Institute for Policy Studies: ips-dc.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Free Market ideologues fabricate some of the most preposterous yarns trying to justify their assertion of corporate greed over public need. Consider their far-fetched of Laissez-fairyland tale that by allowing corporate giants to dodge the billions of tax dollars they owe to our country, the top executives of those corporations will plow that money into new jobs, products, and services for the Common Good. The ideologues assure us innocents that this is the “magic of the marketplace.” But remember: Magicians don’t perform magic – they perform illusions. In this case, since the law does not require that such tax windfalls be invested for the public good, they aren’t. Instead, the corporate barons simply pocket the money. A diligent watchdog group, Institute for Policy Studies, recently documented this by analyzing financial data of 35 enormously profitable giants, including Tesla, T-Mobile, and Duke Energy. Over a four-year period, these 35 lavished pay of $9.5 billion on their honchos. Even for giants, that’s an extravagant payout. Where’d the money come from? Tax dodging. Combined, these outfits paid zero in federal taxes, and even extracted nearly $2 billion in refunds. To rationalize this handout, free market ideologues clam that corporations are just like ordinary taxpayers, merely taking a few legal deductions to lower their tax bill. But wait – tax laws aren’t handed down on stone tablets, applying equally to everyone. When’s the last time Congress asked you to help write one law? Instead, America’s tax code is an arcane work of gobbledygook literally written in back rooms by corporate lobbyists – which is why powerful corporations get special breaks to evade taxes… and you don’t. To see through such corporate scams and help end this corruption, connect with Institute for Policy Studies: ips-dc.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[How Oily Is Big Oil’s Latest PR Campaign?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>If you’re concerned about fossil fuels and climate change, consider an energy source that, according to its backers, will make everyday living “comfortable and healthier.”</p><p>What is this miraculous substance? <em>Oil</em>.</p><p>Huh? Yes, that filthy scourge of our planet and health, is being ballyhooed as our globe’s energy and environmental salvation! By whom? Of course: The <a target="_blank" href="https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/American_Petroleum_Institute">American Petroleum Institute</a>, the powerhouse lobbying front for ExxonMobil and other petro-profiteers. API recently bragged that it will pour tens of millions of dollars into a PR Blitz during this year’s presidential election to demonize clean energy sources and demand that government promote more fossil fuel production.</p><p>API’s campaign slogan is “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/jan/10/oil-ads-lights-on-energy">Lights On Energy</a>” – but the luminosity of its media message is mighty dim. Start with the fact that Big Oil has zero public credibility, having routinely gouged us on prices for years and knowingly lied to us for decades about not causing climate change.</p><p>Second, the demand by oil barons that government “quit intruding into the free market” by encouraging alternative energy is a whiney embarrassment. Hello – for more than a century, oil corporations have gorged on billions and billions of dollars in taxpayer handouts – and they are in line to keep getting $2.5 billion a year in corporate welfare for the next decade! (Didn’t their mommas ever teach them not to talk with their mouths full?)</p><p>Also pathetic is their partisan wail that President Biden is restricting their production and profits. Hello again: US oil production reached a record high last year, Big Oil’s profits are soaring, and they’re now jacking up our gas prices again. Meanwhile, 2023 was the hottest year our globe ever recorded.</p><p>Let’s reflect the heat back on these greedheads. For facts and action items, go to <a target="_blank" href="http://fossilfree4health.org">fossilfree4health.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/how-oily-is-big-oils-latest-pr-campaign</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:143045633</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:51:15 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/143045633/8e75e321074a2215ba5f15dd16430513.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/143045633/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>If you’re concerned about fossil fuels and climate change, consider an energy source that, according to its backers, will make everyday living “comfortable and healthier.” What is this miraculous substance? Oil. Huh? Yes, that filthy scourge of our planet and health, is being ballyhooed as our globe’s energy and environmental salvation! By whom? Of course: The American Petroleum Institute, the powerhouse lobbying front for ExxonMobil and other petro-profiteers. API recently bragged that it will pour tens of millions of dollars into a PR Blitz during this year’s presidential election to demonize clean energy sources and demand that government promote more fossil fuel production. API’s campaign slogan is “Lights On Energy” – but the luminosity of its media message is mighty dim. Start with the fact that Big Oil has zero public credibility, having routinely gouged us on prices for years and knowingly lied to us for decades about not causing climate change. Second, the demand by oil barons that government “quit intruding into the free market” by encouraging alternative energy is a whiney embarrassment. Hello – for more than a century, oil corporations have gorged on billions and billions of dollars in taxpayer handouts – and they are in line to keep getting $2.5 billion a year in corporate welfare for the next decade! (Didn’t their mommas ever teach them not to talk with their mouths full?) Also pathetic is their partisan wail that President Biden is restricting their production and profits. Hello again: US oil production reached a record high last year, Big Oil’s profits are soaring, and they’re now jacking up our gas prices again. Meanwhile, 2023 was the hottest year our globe ever recorded. Let’s reflect the heat back on these greedheads. For facts and action items, go to fossilfree4health.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>If you’re concerned about fossil fuels and climate change, consider an energy source that, according to its backers, will make everyday living “comfortable and healthier.” What is this miraculous substance? Oil. Huh? Yes, that filthy scourge of our planet and health, is being ballyhooed as our globe’s energy and environmental salvation! By whom? Of course: The American Petroleum Institute, the powerhouse lobbying front for ExxonMobil and other petro-profiteers. API recently bragged that it will pour tens of millions of dollars into a PR Blitz during this year’s presidential election to demonize clean energy sources and demand that government promote more fossil fuel production. API’s campaign slogan is “Lights On Energy” – but the luminosity of its media message is mighty dim. Start with the fact that Big Oil has zero public credibility, having routinely gouged us on prices for years and knowingly lied to us for decades about not causing climate change. Second, the demand by oil barons that government “quit intruding into the free market” by encouraging alternative energy is a whiney embarrassment. Hello – for more than a century, oil corporations have gorged on billions and billions of dollars in taxpayer handouts – and they are in line to keep getting $2.5 billion a year in corporate welfare for the next decade! (Didn’t their mommas ever teach them not to talk with their mouths full?) Also pathetic is their partisan wail that President Biden is restricting their production and profits. Hello again: US oil production reached a record high last year, Big Oil’s profits are soaring, and they’re now jacking up our gas prices again. Meanwhile, 2023 was the hottest year our globe ever recorded. Let’s reflect the heat back on these greedheads. For facts and action items, go to fossilfree4health.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should We Be Polite as the GOP Stomps on Our Democratic Rights?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>When a fox attacks a hen house, is it uncivil for the hens to raise a ruckus?</p><p>Two Supreme Court justices say it is. Elevating collegiality above social justice, right-wing extremist Amy Coney Barrett and progressive jurist Sonia Sotomayor have jointly been hailing America’s top Court as a model of genteel political discourse, claiming that the six Republicans and three Democrats disagree agreeably. “We do not interrupt one another, and we never raise our voices,” <a target="_blank" href="https://www.axios.com/2024/03/14/supreme-court-civility-amy-coney-barrett-sonia-sotomayor">Barrett primly lectured to a recent conference of civics teachers.</a> Sotomayor chimed in that Court decorum frowns on any internal comments that “could be viewed [by other justices] as hurtful.”</p><p>How sweet that the Supremes are so judiciously cordial inside their marble sanctuary. But how bitter that the Court’s lockstep Republican ideologues are so crudely slapping down women’s rights, running roughshod over our environmental protections, stomping on voting rights, enthroning plutocracy, imposing theocracy… and so awful much more. Yet, when any of the three progressive justices do publicly assail these blatantly partisan, anti-democratic edicts, Barrett decorously decries their “stridency,” demurely chiding that “the Court should turn the national temperature down, not up.”</p><p>Yoo-hoo, Madame Supreme, can you even hear yourself? Your very elevation to the High Court was a strident affront to our democracy and to the very idea of justice, rammed through in a flagrantly partisan power play by a lame-duck president and a corrupt Republican senator. Please, spare us your phony lectures on judicial propriety!</p><p>America would still be an English colony if the rebels of 1776 had not “stridently” risen up and impolitely confronted the kind of elitist governmental authoritarianism that Barrett & Company wants to re-impose on us. Come on, progressives – get rude! Democracy demands that we be confrontational… not courtly.</p><p>Do something!</p><p>We love to recommend <a target="_blank" href="https://fixthecourt.com/">FixTheCourt.com</a> for ideas and resources on overhauling the Supreme Court. If you’ve got more organizations or people to recommend, leave them for us in the comments!</p><p><em>Photo by </em><a target="_blank" href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/msvg/5544222319"><em>Michael on Flickr</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/should-we-be-polite-as-the-gop-stomps</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:142945351</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2024 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/142945351/b6f93955f6efde517ec4391430aa639c.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/142945351/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>When a fox attacks a hen house, is it uncivil for the hens to raise a ruckus? Two Supreme Court justices say it is. Elevating collegiality above social justice, right-wing extremist Amy Coney Barrett and progressive jurist Sonia Sotomayor have jointly been hailing America’s top Court as a model of genteel political discourse, claiming that the six Republicans and three Democrats disagree agreeably. “We do not interrupt one another, and we never raise our voices,” Barrett primly lectured to a recent conference of civics teachers. Sotomayor chimed in that Court decorum frowns on any internal comments that “could be viewed [by other justices] as hurtful.” How sweet that the Supremes are so judiciously cordial inside their marble sanctuary. But how bitter that the Court’s lockstep Republican ideologues are so crudely slapping down women’s rights, running roughshod over our environmental protections, stomping on voting rights, enthroning plutocracy, imposing theocracy… and so awful much more. Yet, when any of the three progressive justices do publicly assail these blatantly partisan, anti-democratic edicts, Barrett decorously decries their “stridency,” demurely chiding that “the Court should turn the national temperature down, not up.” Yoo-hoo, Madame Supreme, can you even hear yourself? Your very elevation to the High Court was a strident affront to our democracy and to the very idea of justice, rammed through in a flagrantly partisan power play by a lame-duck president and a corrupt Republican senator. Please, spare us your phony lectures on judicial propriety! America would still be an English colony if the rebels of 1776 had not “stridently” risen up and impolitely confronted the kind of elitist governmental authoritarianism that Barrett &amp; Company wants to re-impose on us. Come on, progressives – get rude! Democracy demands that we be confrontational… not courtly. Do something! We love to recommend FixTheCourt.com for ideas and resources on overhauling the Supreme Court. If you’ve got more organizations or people to recommend, leave them for us in the comments! Photo by Michael on Flickr. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>When a fox attacks a hen house, is it uncivil for the hens to raise a ruckus? Two Supreme Court justices say it is. Elevating collegiality above social justice, right-wing extremist Amy Coney Barrett and progressive jurist Sonia Sotomayor have jointly been hailing America’s top Court as a model of genteel political discourse, claiming that the six Republicans and three Democrats disagree agreeably. “We do not interrupt one another, and we never raise our voices,” Barrett primly lectured to a recent conference of civics teachers. Sotomayor chimed in that Court decorum frowns on any internal comments that “could be viewed [by other justices] as hurtful.” How sweet that the Supremes are so judiciously cordial inside their marble sanctuary. But how bitter that the Court’s lockstep Republican ideologues are so crudely slapping down women’s rights, running roughshod over our environmental protections, stomping on voting rights, enthroning plutocracy, imposing theocracy… and so awful much more. Yet, when any of the three progressive justices do publicly assail these blatantly partisan, anti-democratic edicts, Barrett decorously decries their “stridency,” demurely chiding that “the Court should turn the national temperature down, not up.” Yoo-hoo, Madame Supreme, can you even hear yourself? Your very elevation to the High Court was a strident affront to our democracy and to the very idea of justice, rammed through in a flagrantly partisan power play by a lame-duck president and a corrupt Republican senator. Please, spare us your phony lectures on judicial propriety! America would still be an English colony if the rebels of 1776 had not “stridently” risen up and impolitely confronted the kind of elitist governmental authoritarianism that Barrett &amp; Company wants to re-impose on us. Come on, progressives – get rude! Democracy demands that we be confrontational… not courtly. Do something! We love to recommend FixTheCourt.com for ideas and resources on overhauling the Supreme Court. If you’ve got more organizations or people to recommend, leave them for us in the comments! Photo by Michael on Flickr. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Are We Letting Financial Hucksters Dictate Our Local News?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Too many American newspapers have shut down or shriveled to irrelevance, but, luckily, we still have such bastions of local journalism as the Chicago Chronicle and New York News Daily.</p><p>But wait… those aren’t real newspapers, aren’t local, and aren’t even American. T<a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/07/business/media/russia-us-news-sites.html">hey are </a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/07/business/media/russia-us-news-sites.html"><em>Russian</em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/07/business/media/russia-us-news-sites.html"> fake-news outlets</a>, created in recent weeks by Putin’s propagandists to interfere in our presidential election. They are web publications with names and designs that mimic real US news sites, but have no reporters or local newsrooms. Rather, they exist solely to fabricate “news reports” that appear legitimate, getting picked up and re-reported as fact in under-staffed, chain-owned newspapers, then promoted on right-wing social media sites.</p><p>This is what happens to people and democracy when local journalism is stripped away or hollowed out – no one is on regular watch, allowing charlatans, profiteers, and propagandists to dupe unsuspecting residents. Not only have hundreds of papers been eliminated, but <em>half</em> of the remaining dailies are now owned by Wall Street predators like SoftBank, the Japanese hedge fund that controls the huge USA Today/Gannett chain. Their interest is not in your town or quality journalism, but in slashing news coverage to jack up their profits. Such absentee owners have eliminated nearly <em>60 percent</em> of America’s reporters and other newsroom staff in just 20 years.</p><p>Let’s be clear: Real journalism is labor-driven. No reporters on the ground, no local news. Hello – “news” is the lifeblood of democracy, so why hold it hostage to a handful of corporate profit-seekers? Are we such unimaginative clods that we can’t figure out how to finance honest, non-plutocratic news for our democracy?</p><p>For ideas on how to revive local news in your town, contact <a target="_blank" href="http://rebuildlocalnews.org">rebuildlocalnews.org</a> – and give news democracy a boost.</p><p>Do something!</p><p>In addition to <a target="_blank" href="https://www.rebuildlocalnews.org">Rebuild Local News</a>, check out these groups working to save local news and newsrooms:</p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nationaltrustforlocalnews.org">National Trust for Local News</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://cherryroad-media.com">Cherry Road Media</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://irjci.blogspot.com">Institute for Rural Journalism</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://newsguild.org">The News Guild</a></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-are-we-letting-financial-hucksters</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:142726306</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/142726306/bdcd0cb515d2bc84c8f6ff0be0c9616b.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/142726306/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Too many American newspapers have shut down or shriveled to irrelevance, but, luckily, we still have such bastions of local journalism as the Chicago Chronicle and New York News Daily. But wait… those aren’t real newspapers, aren’t local, and aren’t even American. They are Russian fake-news outlets, created in recent weeks by Putin’s propagandists to interfere in our presidential election. They are web publications with names and designs that mimic real US news sites, but have no reporters or local newsrooms. Rather, they exist solely to fabricate “news reports” that appear legitimate, getting picked up and re-reported as fact in under-staffed, chain-owned newspapers, then promoted on right-wing social media sites. This is what happens to people and democracy when local journalism is stripped away or hollowed out – no one is on regular watch, allowing charlatans, profiteers, and propagandists to dupe unsuspecting residents. Not only have hundreds of papers been eliminated, but half of the remaining dailies are now owned by Wall Street predators like SoftBank, the Japanese hedge fund that controls the huge USA Today/Gannett chain. Their interest is not in your town or quality journalism, but in slashing news coverage to jack up their profits. Such absentee owners have eliminated nearly 60 percent of America’s reporters and other newsroom staff in just 20 years. Let’s be clear: Real journalism is labor-driven. No reporters on the ground, no local news. Hello – “news” is the lifeblood of democracy, so why hold it hostage to a handful of corporate profit-seekers? Are we such unimaginative clods that we can’t figure out how to finance honest, non-plutocratic news for our democracy? For ideas on how to revive local news in your town, contact rebuildlocalnews.org – and give news democracy a boost. Do something! In addition to Rebuild Local News, check out these groups working to save local news and newsrooms: * National Trust for Local News * Cherry Road Media * Institute for Rural Journalism * The News Guild Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Too many American newspapers have shut down or shriveled to irrelevance, but, luckily, we still have such bastions of local journalism as the Chicago Chronicle and New York News Daily. But wait… those aren’t real newspapers, aren’t local, and aren’t even American. They are Russian fake-news outlets, created in recent weeks by Putin’s propagandists to interfere in our presidential election. They are web publications with names and designs that mimic real US news sites, but have no reporters or local newsrooms. Rather, they exist solely to fabricate “news reports” that appear legitimate, getting picked up and re-reported as fact in under-staffed, chain-owned newspapers, then promoted on right-wing social media sites. This is what happens to people and democracy when local journalism is stripped away or hollowed out – no one is on regular watch, allowing charlatans, profiteers, and propagandists to dupe unsuspecting residents. Not only have hundreds of papers been eliminated, but half of the remaining dailies are now owned by Wall Street predators like SoftBank, the Japanese hedge fund that controls the huge USA Today/Gannett chain. Their interest is not in your town or quality journalism, but in slashing news coverage to jack up their profits. Such absentee owners have eliminated nearly 60 percent of America’s reporters and other newsroom staff in just 20 years. Let’s be clear: Real journalism is labor-driven. No reporters on the ground, no local news. Hello – “news” is the lifeblood of democracy, so why hold it hostage to a handful of corporate profit-seekers? Are we such unimaginative clods that we can’t figure out how to finance honest, non-plutocratic news for our democracy? For ideas on how to revive local news in your town, contact rebuildlocalnews.org – and give news democracy a boost. Do something! In addition to Rebuild Local News, check out these groups working to save local news and newsrooms: * National Trust for Local News * Cherry Road Media * Institute for Rural Journalism * The News Guild Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sen. Katie Britt Plays a Cruel Political Game to Exploit a Mexican Rape Victim]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Poor Katie Britt, the Republican senator from Alabama. She was set up by her party’s operatives to do the GOP’s televised response to Joe Biden’s State-of-the-Union speech.</p><p>Sadly, her moment in the national limelight was widely panned, even by Republicans, for her presentation was overwrought and – well, cringey. But the visuals pale to insignificance when you consider that her partisan presentation was based on an intentional, abject lie – exacerbated by her shameful exploitation of a woman who had been brutally raped.</p><p>Britt told about a 12-year-old Mexican girl who was the victim of multiple rapes, implying the girl’s horror was caused by “Biden’s border crisis.” Unfortunately for the senator, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/03/09/fact-check-katie-britt-sex-trafficking/">an alert investigative reporter blew the whistle on her political lie</a>. Yes, the grotesque rapes happened – but 20 years ago, not on Biden’s watch. Indeed, Republican George W. Bush was president! Also, her nightmare occurred in Central Mexico, far from the US border, and it had nothing to do with migrants.</p><p>Britt knew she was lying as she dramatically concluded that Biden’s Latino “invasion” (as Republicans demagogically brand desperate refugees) is “almost entirely preventable.” Yes, but guess who helped negotiate a bipartisan bill to end the border crush – then cynically voted to kill the bill because Donald Trump told her to? Katie Britt.</p><p>And what about that Mexican woman whose trauma Britt cruelly exploited? She’s now working in Mexico for a non-profit trying to stop human trafficking. Yet, Britt and the GOP didn’t even have the grace to tell her they were going to pervert her story for partisan politics. “I thought it was very strange,” <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/09/us/politics/katie-britt-republican-response-sotu-border.html">she said when later informed of Britt’s crude re-exploitation of her</a> – adding pointedly that, “The work I do is not a game.”</p><p>Do something!</p><p>To get involved in the fight against <em>actual</em> human trafficking, and to support survivors, check out organizations like <a target="_blank" href="https://www.gems-girls.org/">GEMS</a> and the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.unitedway.org/our-impact/featured-programs/human-trafficking/united-to-end-human-trafficking/">United Way</a>.</p><p>Be <em>extremely careful</em> when getting involved with organizations claiming to work on human trafficking; many are fronts for right-wing conspiracy theorists and <a target="_blank" href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/former-marine-brings-more-creepy-claims-against-operation-underground-railroad-founder-tim-ballard">exploit their communities themselves</a>. </p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/sen-katie-britt-plays-a-cruel-political</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:142725122</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/142725122/689e78b4484a1aaadfc86e54554e654c.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/142725122/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Poor Katie Britt, the Republican senator from Alabama. She was set up by her party’s operatives to do the GOP’s televised response to Joe Biden’s State-of-the-Union speech. Sadly, her moment in the national limelight was widely panned, even by Republicans, for her presentation was overwrought and – well, cringey. But the visuals pale to insignificance when you consider that her partisan presentation was based on an intentional, abject lie – exacerbated by her shameful exploitation of a woman who had been brutally raped. Britt told about a 12-year-old Mexican girl who was the victim of multiple rapes, implying the girl’s horror was caused by “Biden’s border crisis.” Unfortunately for the senator, an alert investigative reporter blew the whistle on her political lie. Yes, the grotesque rapes happened – but 20 years ago, not on Biden’s watch. Indeed, Republican George W. Bush was president! Also, her nightmare occurred in Central Mexico, far from the US border, and it had nothing to do with migrants. Britt knew she was lying as she dramatically concluded that Biden’s Latino “invasion” (as Republicans demagogically brand desperate refugees) is “almost entirely preventable.” Yes, but guess who helped negotiate a bipartisan bill to end the border crush – then cynically voted to kill the bill because Donald Trump told her to? Katie Britt. And what about that Mexican woman whose trauma Britt cruelly exploited? She’s now working in Mexico for a non-profit trying to stop human trafficking. Yet, Britt and the GOP didn’t even have the grace to tell her they were going to pervert her story for partisan politics. “I thought it was very strange,” she said when later informed of Britt’s crude re-exploitation of her – adding pointedly that, “The work I do is not a game.” Do something! To get involved in the fight against actual human trafficking, and to support survivors, check out organizations like GEMS and the United Way. Be extremely careful when getting involved with organizations claiming to work on human trafficking; many are fronts for right-wing conspiracy theorists and exploit their communities themselves. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Poor Katie Britt, the Republican senator from Alabama. She was set up by her party’s operatives to do the GOP’s televised response to Joe Biden’s State-of-the-Union speech. Sadly, her moment in the national limelight was widely panned, even by Republicans, for her presentation was overwrought and – well, cringey. But the visuals pale to insignificance when you consider that her partisan presentation was based on an intentional, abject lie – exacerbated by her shameful exploitation of a woman who had been brutally raped. Britt told about a 12-year-old Mexican girl who was the victim of multiple rapes, implying the girl’s horror was caused by “Biden’s border crisis.” Unfortunately for the senator, an alert investigative reporter blew the whistle on her political lie. Yes, the grotesque rapes happened – but 20 years ago, not on Biden’s watch. Indeed, Republican George W. Bush was president! Also, her nightmare occurred in Central Mexico, far from the US border, and it had nothing to do with migrants. Britt knew she was lying as she dramatically concluded that Biden’s Latino “invasion” (as Republicans demagogically brand desperate refugees) is “almost entirely preventable.” Yes, but guess who helped negotiate a bipartisan bill to end the border crush – then cynically voted to kill the bill because Donald Trump told her to? Katie Britt. And what about that Mexican woman whose trauma Britt cruelly exploited? She’s now working in Mexico for a non-profit trying to stop human trafficking. Yet, Britt and the GOP didn’t even have the grace to tell her they were going to pervert her story for partisan politics. “I thought it was very strange,” she said when later informed of Britt’s crude re-exploitation of her – adding pointedly that, “The work I do is not a game.” Do something! To get involved in the fight against actual human trafficking, and to support survivors, check out organizations like GEMS and the United Way. Be extremely careful when getting involved with organizations claiming to work on human trafficking; many are fronts for right-wing conspiracy theorists and exploit their communities themselves. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tom Paine: What a Guy!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>In my view, the greatest of America’s “Founding Fathers” was not Washington or Jefferson – nor, technically, he wasn’t even an American. Rather, he was a British immigrant and itinerate agitator for real democracy, enlightenment, and universal human rights.</p><p>He was Thomas Paine, a prolific, profound, persuasive, and widely popular pamphleteer in the movement for American Independence. With plain language and genuine passion for the cause, Paine’s 47-page pamphlet, <em>Common Sense</em>, was so compelling in its support of the Revolution that it was passed around from person to person – and even read aloud in taverns! But Paine wasn’t content with democratic rhetoric – he actually believed in an egalitarian society, and his post-revolution writings (including <em>Age of Reason</em>, and <em>Agrarian Justice</em>) unabashedly demanded that the new hierarchy of US leaders fulfill the promise of democracy.</p><p>Even before the War for Independence, Paine called for slaves to be freed and slavery prohibited. After the war, he terrified most of the gentlemen of means who’d signed the Declaration of Independence by insisting that non-landowners be eligible to vote and hold office (John Adams was so appalled by this that he decried <em>Common Sense</em> as a “crapulous mess”).  But Paine just kept pushing, calling for women’s suffrage, progressive taxation, state-funded childcare, a guaranteed minimum income, universal public education, strict separation of church and state, and adoption of some of the democratic principles of the Iroquois Nation.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… Don’t tell small-minded, right-wing demagogues like Ron DeSantis and Greg Abbott – but Thomas Paine was WOKE! Some 250 years before their push to impose autocracy, plutocracy, and theocracy over us, this revolutionary founder championed social justice and economic fairness. As one historian noted, “we are today all Paine’s children,” for he imbued America’s destiny with democratic impulse and aspiration.</p><p><em>PS, from the staff— Hightower was recently given the </em><a target="_blank" href="https://floridaveteransforcommonsense.org/event/2024-thomas-paine-party/?instance_id=237"><em>Thomas Paine award by the Florida Veterans for Common Sense</em></a><em>, where he learned a ton about Paine that he never knew. Hence the inspiration for this commentary! Thanks FLVCS!</em></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/tom-paine-what-a-guy</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:142553309</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/142553309/37478cd5760d28a3b6bde81b0ba7143a.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/142553309/ac17316648a99c75a81ac6da049b6833.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>In my view, the greatest of America’s “Founding Fathers” was not Washington or Jefferson – nor, technically, he wasn’t even an American. Rather, he was a British immigrant and itinerate agitator for real democracy, enlightenment, and universal human rights. He was Thomas Paine, a prolific, profound, persuasive, and widely popular pamphleteer in the movement for American Independence. With plain language and genuine passion for the cause, Paine’s 47-page pamphlet, Common Sense, was so compelling in its support of the Revolution that it was passed around from person to person – and even read aloud in taverns! But Paine wasn’t content with democratic rhetoric – he actually believed in an egalitarian society, and his post-revolution writings (including Age of Reason, and Agrarian Justice) unabashedly demanded that the new hierarchy of US leaders fulfill the promise of democracy. Even before the War for Independence, Paine called for slaves to be freed and slavery prohibited. After the war, he terrified most of the gentlemen of means who’d signed the Declaration of Independence by insisting that non-landowners be eligible to vote and hold office (John Adams was so appalled by this that he decried Common Sense as a “crapulous mess”).  But Paine just kept pushing, calling for women’s suffrage, progressive taxation, state-funded childcare, a guaranteed minimum income, universal public education, strict separation of church and state, and adoption of some of the democratic principles of the Iroquois Nation. This is Jim Hightower saying… Don’t tell small-minded, right-wing demagogues like Ron DeSantis and Greg Abbott – but Thomas Paine was WOKE! Some 250 years before their push to impose autocracy, plutocracy, and theocracy over us, this revolutionary founder championed social justice and economic fairness. As one historian noted, “we are today all Paine’s children,” for he imbued America’s destiny with democratic impulse and aspiration. PS, from the staff— Hightower was recently given the Thomas Paine award by the Florida Veterans for Common Sense, where he learned a ton about Paine that he never knew. Hence the inspiration for this commentary! Thanks FLVCS! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>In my view, the greatest of America’s “Founding Fathers” was not Washington or Jefferson – nor, technically, he wasn’t even an American. Rather, he was a British immigrant and itinerate agitator for real democracy, enlightenment, and universal human rights. He was Thomas Paine, a prolific, profound, persuasive, and widely popular pamphleteer in the movement for American Independence. With plain language and genuine passion for the cause, Paine’s 47-page pamphlet, Common Sense, was so compelling in its support of the Revolution that it was passed around from person to person – and even read aloud in taverns! But Paine wasn’t content with democratic rhetoric – he actually believed in an egalitarian society, and his post-revolution writings (including Age of Reason, and Agrarian Justice) unabashedly demanded that the new hierarchy of US leaders fulfill the promise of democracy. Even before the War for Independence, Paine called for slaves to be freed and slavery prohibited. After the war, he terrified most of the gentlemen of means who’d signed the Declaration of Independence by insisting that non-landowners be eligible to vote and hold office (John Adams was so appalled by this that he decried Common Sense as a “crapulous mess”).  But Paine just kept pushing, calling for women’s suffrage, progressive taxation, state-funded childcare, a guaranteed minimum income, universal public education, strict separation of church and state, and adoption of some of the democratic principles of the Iroquois Nation. This is Jim Hightower saying… Don’t tell small-minded, right-wing demagogues like Ron DeSantis and Greg Abbott – but Thomas Paine was WOKE! Some 250 years before their push to impose autocracy, plutocracy, and theocracy over us, this revolutionary founder championed social justice and economic fairness. As one historian noted, “we are today all Paine’s children,” for he imbued America’s destiny with democratic impulse and aspiration. PS, from the staff— Hightower was recently given the Thomas Paine award by the Florida Veterans for Common Sense, where he learned a ton about Paine that he never knew. Hence the inspiration for this commentary! Thanks FLVCS! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Guess What? Americans Want to Be WOKE!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Well, well, well – look who’s waking up and raring to go: Mr. and Ms. WOKE!</p><p>We so-called “woke” people have been the target of far-right politicos and front groups that are frantically trying to ban us and our ideas from America’s political discourse. In the past few years, such thuggish gubernatorial demagogues as Ron DeSantis have perverted the power of Big Government to attack teachers, librarians, public agencies, and even <a target="_blank" href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/florida-ron-desantis-bud-light-dylan-mulvaney-anheuser-busch/">beer</a>. <em>Beer!</em></p><p>Why? Because such people and organizations make educational efforts to reduce bigotry, hatred, and exclusiveness in our society. “That’s woke,” screech the ultra-rightists, demanding that any talk about racism, sexism, gender discrimination, or other ugly realities in America must be suppressed.</p><p>Like the witch hunters of old, today’s pious puritans of ideological conformity have demonized such basic values as diversity and equity, calling them “toxic.” DeSantis <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/02/us/university-florida-dei.html">outlawed any teaching of them in Florida universities</a>, and then <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/24/us/florida-universities-sociology.html">he cut sociology from the core curriculum of the state’s educational system</a> – essentially cutting out “us,” the study of humanity.</p><p>If ignorance is bliss, the DeSantis clique must be ecstatic, for they are eliminating crucial lessons in the art of tolerance, community, sharing, collaboration… and getting along together. You can have a society that works for the benefit of all – or a DeSantisWorld, where the few rule, and everyone else is forced to conform to their biases.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… But wait – the great majority of Americans are rebelling and saying: “We <em>are </em>woke!” Even Republicans flatly rejected DeSantis’ presidential campaign that promised to “Floridize” America with anti-WOKE nonsense. And far from wanting to reverse efforts to increase diversity and inclusiveness, a recent poll found that <em>70 percent</em> of Americans (including half of Republicans) say our country “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/data-download/americans-want-societal-change-are-divided-specifics-rcna82135">needs to do more to increase social justice.</a>”</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/guess-what-americans-want-to-be-woke</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:142529721</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 16:01:07 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/142529721/3e82f5a6353ea206ba56124a9148e9f5.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/142529721/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Well, well, well – look who’s waking up and raring to go: Mr. and Ms. WOKE! We so-called “woke” people have been the target of far-right politicos and front groups that are frantically trying to ban us and our ideas from America’s political discourse. In the past few years, such thuggish gubernatorial demagogues as Ron DeSantis have perverted the power of Big Government to attack teachers, librarians, public agencies, and even beer. Beer! Why? Because such people and organizations make educational efforts to reduce bigotry, hatred, and exclusiveness in our society. “That’s woke,” screech the ultra-rightists, demanding that any talk about racism, sexism, gender discrimination, or other ugly realities in America must be suppressed. Like the witch hunters of old, today’s pious puritans of ideological conformity have demonized such basic values as diversity and equity, calling them “toxic.” DeSantis outlawed any teaching of them in Florida universities, and then he cut sociology from the core curriculum of the state’s educational system – essentially cutting out “us,” the study of humanity. If ignorance is bliss, the DeSantis clique must be ecstatic, for they are eliminating crucial lessons in the art of tolerance, community, sharing, collaboration… and getting along together. You can have a society that works for the benefit of all – or a DeSantisWorld, where the few rule, and everyone else is forced to conform to their biases. This is Jim Hightower saying… But wait – the great majority of Americans are rebelling and saying: “We are woke!” Even Republicans flatly rejected DeSantis’ presidential campaign that promised to “Floridize” America with anti-WOKE nonsense. And far from wanting to reverse efforts to increase diversity and inclusiveness, a recent poll found that 70 percent of Americans (including half of Republicans) say our country “needs to do more to increase social justice.” Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Well, well, well – look who’s waking up and raring to go: Mr. and Ms. WOKE! We so-called “woke” people have been the target of far-right politicos and front groups that are frantically trying to ban us and our ideas from America’s political discourse. In the past few years, such thuggish gubernatorial demagogues as Ron DeSantis have perverted the power of Big Government to attack teachers, librarians, public agencies, and even beer. Beer! Why? Because such people and organizations make educational efforts to reduce bigotry, hatred, and exclusiveness in our society. “That’s woke,” screech the ultra-rightists, demanding that any talk about racism, sexism, gender discrimination, or other ugly realities in America must be suppressed. Like the witch hunters of old, today’s pious puritans of ideological conformity have demonized such basic values as diversity and equity, calling them “toxic.” DeSantis outlawed any teaching of them in Florida universities, and then he cut sociology from the core curriculum of the state’s educational system – essentially cutting out “us,” the study of humanity. If ignorance is bliss, the DeSantis clique must be ecstatic, for they are eliminating crucial lessons in the art of tolerance, community, sharing, collaboration… and getting along together. You can have a society that works for the benefit of all – or a DeSantisWorld, where the few rule, and everyone else is forced to conform to their biases. This is Jim Hightower saying… But wait – the great majority of Americans are rebelling and saying: “We are woke!” Even Republicans flatly rejected DeSantis’ presidential campaign that promised to “Floridize” America with anti-WOKE nonsense. And far from wanting to reverse efforts to increase diversity and inclusiveness, a recent poll found that 70 percent of Americans (including half of Republicans) say our country “needs to do more to increase social justice.” Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is “Icarus” the Solution to Climate Change?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Although the sun is an essential life force, we need to protect ourselves from its relentless glare.</p><p>Sunglasses? Check. Beach umbrella? Check. Tinted car windows? Check. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/02/climate/sun-shade-climate-geoengineering.html">A huge, multi-trillion-dollar parasol floating in outer space to reduce global warming</a>? Uh… huh?</p><p>Ready or not, here come the corporate hucksters and techno-fantasists with a dazzling scheme to prevent climate-change without requiring any actual change in human behavior. Amazing! It’s easy, they exclaim: Simply put a massive SpaceBrella, between us and El Sol, and – voila! – it will block enough of those bad ol’ sunrays to lower the planet’s temp enough for us to keep trucking.</p><p>This is indeed simple – as in “simpleton”. It reminds me of the 1950’s atomic bomb drills we had in elementary school, when we tykes were instructed to protect ourselves by crouching under our desks.</p><p>Today’s SpaceBrella hawkers offer the same sort of approach: Since political and corporate powers aren’t doing near enough to prevent cataclysmic climate disaster, they cheerfully say we can hide under their phantasmagoric space shield. That way, we won’t have to bother Big Oil, Big Coal, and other money powers with our demands to convert from an exploitative fossil-fuel economy to climate-friendly fuels and sustainable systems.</p><p>It’s embarrassing that this clique of profiteers, politicians, and so-called scientists should be so frivolous as to propose that humanity dodge reality and fritter away our future on such a gimmick. The real solution is right here on Earth, basically requiring that we STOP THE STUPIDITY!</p><p>These techno-money schemes are like Icarus, the mythological Greek character who created wings of wax and feathers so he could fly – but he flew too close to the sun, and his wings melted, so he plunged to his death in the sea.</p><p>Do something</p><p>Here on Earth, there are loads of environmental justice organizations taking serious action on climate change—and many of them are led by young people, to boot. Here are a few of our favorites:</p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://genzforchange.org/">Gen-Z for Change</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://thisiszerohour.org/">Zero Hour</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://blackgirlenvironmentalist.org/">Black Girl Environmentalist</a></p><p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/is-icarus-the-solution-to-climate</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:142295153</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 18:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/142295153/79e6dee79d96f8025a2d9acb795366b8.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/142295153/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Although the sun is an essential life force, we need to protect ourselves from its relentless glare. Sunglasses? Check. Beach umbrella? Check. Tinted car windows? Check. A huge, multi-trillion-dollar parasol floating in outer space to reduce global warming? Uh… huh? Ready or not, here come the corporate hucksters and techno-fantasists with a dazzling scheme to prevent climate-change without requiring any actual change in human behavior. Amazing! It’s easy, they exclaim: Simply put a massive SpaceBrella, between us and El Sol, and – voila! – it will block enough of those bad ol’ sunrays to lower the planet’s temp enough for us to keep trucking. This is indeed simple – as in “simpleton”. It reminds me of the 1950’s atomic bomb drills we had in elementary school, when we tykes were instructed to protect ourselves by crouching under our desks. Today’s SpaceBrella hawkers offer the same sort of approach: Since political and corporate powers aren’t doing near enough to prevent cataclysmic climate disaster, they cheerfully say we can hide under their phantasmagoric space shield. That way, we won’t have to bother Big Oil, Big Coal, and other money powers with our demands to convert from an exploitative fossil-fuel economy to climate-friendly fuels and sustainable systems. It’s embarrassing that this clique of profiteers, politicians, and so-called scientists should be so frivolous as to propose that humanity dodge reality and fritter away our future on such a gimmick. The real solution is right here on Earth, basically requiring that we STOP THE STUPIDITY! These techno-money schemes are like Icarus, the mythological Greek character who created wings of wax and feathers so he could fly – but he flew too close to the sun, and his wings melted, so he plunged to his death in the sea. Do something Here on Earth, there are loads of environmental justice organizations taking serious action on climate change—and many of them are led by young people, to boot. Here are a few of our favorites: * Gen-Z for Change * Zero Hour * Black Girl Environmentalist Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Although the sun is an essential life force, we need to protect ourselves from its relentless glare. Sunglasses? Check. Beach umbrella? Check. Tinted car windows? Check. A huge, multi-trillion-dollar parasol floating in outer space to reduce global warming? Uh… huh? Ready or not, here come the corporate hucksters and techno-fantasists with a dazzling scheme to prevent climate-change without requiring any actual change in human behavior. Amazing! It’s easy, they exclaim: Simply put a massive SpaceBrella, between us and El Sol, and – voila! – it will block enough of those bad ol’ sunrays to lower the planet’s temp enough for us to keep trucking. This is indeed simple – as in “simpleton”. It reminds me of the 1950’s atomic bomb drills we had in elementary school, when we tykes were instructed to protect ourselves by crouching under our desks. Today’s SpaceBrella hawkers offer the same sort of approach: Since political and corporate powers aren’t doing near enough to prevent cataclysmic climate disaster, they cheerfully say we can hide under their phantasmagoric space shield. That way, we won’t have to bother Big Oil, Big Coal, and other money powers with our demands to convert from an exploitative fossil-fuel economy to climate-friendly fuels and sustainable systems. It’s embarrassing that this clique of profiteers, politicians, and so-called scientists should be so frivolous as to propose that humanity dodge reality and fritter away our future on such a gimmick. The real solution is right here on Earth, basically requiring that we STOP THE STUPIDITY! These techno-money schemes are like Icarus, the mythological Greek character who created wings of wax and feathers so he could fly – but he flew too close to the sun, and his wings melted, so he plunged to his death in the sea. Do something Here on Earth, there are loads of environmental justice organizations taking serious action on climate change—and many of them are led by young people, to boot. Here are a few of our favorites: * Gen-Z for Change * Zero Hour * Black Girl Environmentalist Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[What If There Was a Natural Substitute for Plastic? There Is!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>In 1863, humorist Artemus Ward wrote a satire on hucksterism, making up a tale of Abe Lincoln being asked to endorse a piece of quackery about spiritualism. Not wanting to offend, the Lincoln character slyly offers non-committal praise: “Well for people who like that kind of thing, I think that is just about the kind of thing they’d like.”</p><p>But sometimes a product really needs no hype – like this new one I’ve learned about that’s damn-near magical! It’s a non-polluting, affordable, natural, job-creating, alternative to plastic stuff. No, seriously – come back here – this is real!</p><p>The only fib in my pitch is the word “new.” Actually, this product is ancient. It’s <em>cork</em>, used for thousands of years by Persians, Egyptians, Greeks, and others to make shoers, fishing gear, etc. But now, it’s a sustainable, regenerative material that all sorts of enterprising outfits are using for home construction, clothing, electric cars, spacecraft… and more.</p><p>Maybe like me, you’ve pulled many a wine cork without thinking where does this thing come from? Trees! In particular, the bark of evergreen, Mediterranean cork tress that live for some 200 years. But how sad to cut them down for wine stoppers! No, no – the bark is carefully harvested by skilled workers… then it grows back over about nine years and can be harvested again… and again, creating steady income for small farms. The tree is climate friendly, drought-tolerant, and fire resistant, and the cork itself is renewable, reusable, and biodegradable. Even cork dust is used to produce energy.</p><p>Before we let corporate profiteers turn Earth (and us) into a throwaway plastic dump, let’s recognize that nature is the greatest technologist ever. So maybe cooperating with her can be more beneficial than constantly trying to overpower and trash her.</p><p>Do something!</p><p>To get involved with recycling cork, check out the work of <a target="_blank" href="https://recork.com/us/locations">Recork.com</a>.</p><p><p>Thank you for reading Jim Hightower's Lowdown. This post is public so feel free to share it.</p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/what-if-there-was-a-natural-substitute</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:142294613</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 18:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/142294613/c8963ffa718523615b58b621de46dc90.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/142294613/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>In 1863, humorist Artemus Ward wrote a satire on hucksterism, making up a tale of Abe Lincoln being asked to endorse a piece of quackery about spiritualism. Not wanting to offend, the Lincoln character slyly offers non-committal praise: “Well for people who like that kind of thing, I think that is just about the kind of thing they’d like.” But sometimes a product really needs no hype – like this new one I’ve learned about that’s damn-near magical! It’s a non-polluting, affordable, natural, job-creating, alternative to plastic stuff. No, seriously – come back here – this is real! The only fib in my pitch is the word “new.” Actually, this product is ancient. It’s cork, used for thousands of years by Persians, Egyptians, Greeks, and others to make shoers, fishing gear, etc. But now, it’s a sustainable, regenerative material that all sorts of enterprising outfits are using for home construction, clothing, electric cars, spacecraft… and more. Maybe like me, you’ve pulled many a wine cork without thinking where does this thing come from? Trees! In particular, the bark of evergreen, Mediterranean cork tress that live for some 200 years. But how sad to cut them down for wine stoppers! No, no – the bark is carefully harvested by skilled workers… then it grows back over about nine years and can be harvested again… and again, creating steady income for small farms. The tree is climate friendly, drought-tolerant, and fire resistant, and the cork itself is renewable, reusable, and biodegradable. Even cork dust is used to produce energy. Before we let corporate profiteers turn Earth (and us) into a throwaway plastic dump, let’s recognize that nature is the greatest technologist ever. So maybe cooperating with her can be more beneficial than constantly trying to overpower and trash her. Do something! To get involved with recycling cork, check out the work of Recork.com. Thank you for reading Jim Hightower's Lowdown. This post is public so feel free to share it. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>In 1863, humorist Artemus Ward wrote a satire on hucksterism, making up a tale of Abe Lincoln being asked to endorse a piece of quackery about spiritualism. Not wanting to offend, the Lincoln character slyly offers non-committal praise: “Well for people who like that kind of thing, I think that is just about the kind of thing they’d like.” But sometimes a product really needs no hype – like this new one I’ve learned about that’s damn-near magical! It’s a non-polluting, affordable, natural, job-creating, alternative to plastic stuff. No, seriously – come back here – this is real! The only fib in my pitch is the word “new.” Actually, this product is ancient. It’s cork, used for thousands of years by Persians, Egyptians, Greeks, and others to make shoers, fishing gear, etc. But now, it’s a sustainable, regenerative material that all sorts of enterprising outfits are using for home construction, clothing, electric cars, spacecraft… and more. Maybe like me, you’ve pulled many a wine cork without thinking where does this thing come from? Trees! In particular, the bark of evergreen, Mediterranean cork tress that live for some 200 years. But how sad to cut them down for wine stoppers! No, no – the bark is carefully harvested by skilled workers… then it grows back over about nine years and can be harvested again… and again, creating steady income for small farms. The tree is climate friendly, drought-tolerant, and fire resistant, and the cork itself is renewable, reusable, and biodegradable. Even cork dust is used to produce energy. Before we let corporate profiteers turn Earth (and us) into a throwaway plastic dump, let’s recognize that nature is the greatest technologist ever. So maybe cooperating with her can be more beneficial than constantly trying to overpower and trash her. Do something! To get involved with recycling cork, check out the work of Recork.com. Thank you for reading Jim Hightower's Lowdown. This post is public so feel free to share it. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[How Corporate Lobbyists Can Engineer a Train Wreck]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>“Corporate crises consultants” (yes, there are such creatures) have patented a formula allowing their wrongdoing clients to champion reform while simultaneously <em>killing </em>it.</p><p>A classic case is now unfolding around last year’s derailment of a 2-mile-long Norfolk Southern freight train in East Palestine, Ohio. The community’s air, soil, water, and people suffered a massive spill of toxic chemicals.</p><p>So, following the corporate crisis script, <strong>Step One</strong> was for the CEO to offer “thoughts and prayers” for victims. <strong>Step Two</strong>: Reject corporate blame, but promise a “thorough investigation.” <strong>Three</strong>: Magnanimously pledge to work with lawmakers to prevent future disasters. And <strong>Four</strong>: Quietly unleash your pack of lobbyists to gut any effective change in the law.</p><p>Norfolk honchos are now pushing hard on Point Four. CEO Alan Shaw recently reiterated the corporation’s promise of reform, but – shhhh—he quietly orchestrated <a target="_blank" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/02/03/east-palestine-derailment-safety-lobbying/">a $17 million increase in the rail industry’s Congressional lobbying</a> to kill or drastically weaken safety proposals that Norfolk had publicly embraced after the wreck. But he keeps talking reform, slyly assuring locals that Norfolk would be “continuing our engagement” with lawmakers.</p><p>“Engagement” is a euphemism for payments. Rail executives have poured beaucoup bucks into such compliant congress critters as Troy Nehls, the Republican chair of a rail safety subcommittee. He recently wailed that Congress must not impose “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/02/03/east-palestine-derailment-safety-lobbying/">more burdensome regulations and all this other stuff</a>” on the poor multibillion-dollar giants. Also, Sen. John Thune, an industry-financed asset who formerly was <em>a lobbyist for railroads (!)</em>, has tried to derail even modest safety proposals following last year’s derailment, callously calling them a “stalking horse for onerous regulatory mandates and union giveaways.”</p><p>May I just say the obvious? These people are disgusting excuses for human beings.</p><p><em>Photo by Paula R. Lively on </em><a target="_blank" href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/29621494@N02/52666060615/"><em>Flickr</em></a></p><p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!  </p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/how-corporate-lobbyists-can-engineer</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:142069875</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 18:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598755" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/142069875/f3727e9342d4940f67b0843b172347dc.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/142069875/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>“Corporate crises consultants” (yes, there are such creatures) have patented a formula allowing their wrongdoing clients to champion reform while simultaneously killing it. A classic case is now unfolding around last year’s derailment of a 2-mile-long Norfolk Southern freight train in East Palestine, Ohio. The community’s air, soil, water, and people suffered a massive spill of toxic chemicals. So, following the corporate crisis script, Step One was for the CEO to offer “thoughts and prayers” for victims. Step Two: Reject corporate blame, but promise a “thorough investigation.” Three: Magnanimously pledge to work with lawmakers to prevent future disasters. And Four: Quietly unleash your pack of lobbyists to gut any effective change in the law. Norfolk honchos are now pushing hard on Point Four. CEO Alan Shaw recently reiterated the corporation’s promise of reform, but – shhhh—he quietly orchestrated a $17 million increase in the rail industry’s Congressional lobbying to kill or drastically weaken safety proposals that Norfolk had publicly embraced after the wreck. But he keeps talking reform, slyly assuring locals that Norfolk would be “continuing our engagement” with lawmakers. “Engagement” is a euphemism for payments. Rail executives have poured beaucoup bucks into such compliant congress critters as Troy Nehls, the Republican chair of a rail safety subcommittee. He recently wailed that Congress must not impose “more burdensome regulations and all this other stuff” on the poor multibillion-dollar giants. Also, Sen. John Thune, an industry-financed asset who formerly was a lobbyist for railroads (!), has tried to derail even modest safety proposals following last year’s derailment, callously calling them a “stalking horse for onerous regulatory mandates and union giveaways.” May I just say the obvious? These people are disgusting excuses for human beings. Photo by Paula R. Lively on Flickr Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>“Corporate crises consultants” (yes, there are such creatures) have patented a formula allowing their wrongdoing clients to champion reform while simultaneously killing it. A classic case is now unfolding around last year’s derailment of a 2-mile-long Norfolk Southern freight train in East Palestine, Ohio. The community’s air, soil, water, and people suffered a massive spill of toxic chemicals. So, following the corporate crisis script, Step One was for the CEO to offer “thoughts and prayers” for victims. Step Two: Reject corporate blame, but promise a “thorough investigation.” Three: Magnanimously pledge to work with lawmakers to prevent future disasters. And Four: Quietly unleash your pack of lobbyists to gut any effective change in the law. Norfolk honchos are now pushing hard on Point Four. CEO Alan Shaw recently reiterated the corporation’s promise of reform, but – shhhh—he quietly orchestrated a $17 million increase in the rail industry’s Congressional lobbying to kill or drastically weaken safety proposals that Norfolk had publicly embraced after the wreck. But he keeps talking reform, slyly assuring locals that Norfolk would be “continuing our engagement” with lawmakers. “Engagement” is a euphemism for payments. Rail executives have poured beaucoup bucks into such compliant congress critters as Troy Nehls, the Republican chair of a rail safety subcommittee. He recently wailed that Congress must not impose “more burdensome regulations and all this other stuff” on the poor multibillion-dollar giants. Also, Sen. John Thune, an industry-financed asset who formerly was a lobbyist for railroads (!), has tried to derail even modest safety proposals following last year’s derailment, callously calling them a “stalking horse for onerous regulatory mandates and union giveaways.” May I just say the obvious? These people are disgusting excuses for human beings. Photo by Paula R. Lively on Flickr Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[What Happened to the “Miracle of Meatless Meat”?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>“Step right up, folks, and bite into the wondrous future of meat!”</p><p>Cheap meat! Ethical meat! Animal meat you love – beef, chicken, pork, fish, etc. – all <em>produced without animals</em>! It’s the miracle of “meatless meat” – a viscous mass derived from “fetal bovine serum,” then grown not on ranches, but in huge vats in corporate factories. Science marches on!</p><p>Until it meets reality. Just three years ago, lab-meat hucksters had bedazzled high-tech investors, and gullible media commentators into believing the food future was now. Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Peter Thiel, and other tech billionaires had jumped in with big bucks, as did Tyson Foods and global hedge funds. A New York Times editorialist <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/24/opinion/climate-change-meatless-meat.html">exulted</a>, “This isn’t just science fiction,” demanding that President Biden “supercharge this industry” by putting our government’s “money and muscle” into “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/24/opinion/climate-change-meatless-meat.html">a moonshot for meatless meat.</a>”</p><p>So… years later, where’s the beef?</p><p>Still on the hoof. The wondrous claim that food futurists could “grow” millions of tons of meat in only 15 days from a single drop of cells was <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/09/opinion/eat-just-upside-foods-cultivated-meat.html">just another pile of bovine excrement</a>. They were raising money rather than doing science, so their billions of dollars and industrial vats of “cell slurry” have only produced a few sad strands of cultured protein. That’s not a hamburger… much less a future.</p><p>Even if these monetized technocratic “geniuses” could eliminate animals from animal agriculture, that’s not real change, for it leaves the monopolistic industrial structure and the profiteering anti-democratic ethic of today’s food system in place. Moreover, agriculture is not a technology, it is a rich blend of culture, history, family, and community. Change will not come from the hubris and dull imaginations of plutocratic tech billionaires, but from long term cultivation of these organic, grassroots sources of progressive policies.</p><p><em>Photo by Ivan Radic on </em><a target="_blank" href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/26344495@N05/52609372756/in/photostream/"><em>Flickr</em></a></p><p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/what-happened-to-the-miracle-of-meatless</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:142069293</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 18:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598755" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/142069293/b632e40484b7e627bbd6d7e45009fa12.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/142069293/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>“Step right up, folks, and bite into the wondrous future of meat!” Cheap meat! Ethical meat! Animal meat you love – beef, chicken, pork, fish, etc. – all produced without animals! It’s the miracle of “meatless meat” – a viscous mass derived from “fetal bovine serum,” then grown not on ranches, but in huge vats in corporate factories. Science marches on! Until it meets reality. Just three years ago, lab-meat hucksters had bedazzled high-tech investors, and gullible media commentators into believing the food future was now. Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Peter Thiel, and other tech billionaires had jumped in with big bucks, as did Tyson Foods and global hedge funds. A New York Times editorialist exulted, “This isn’t just science fiction,” demanding that President Biden “supercharge this industry” by putting our government’s “money and muscle” into “a moonshot for meatless meat.” So… years later, where’s the beef? Still on the hoof. The wondrous claim that food futurists could “grow” millions of tons of meat in only 15 days from a single drop of cells was just another pile of bovine excrement. They were raising money rather than doing science, so their billions of dollars and industrial vats of “cell slurry” have only produced a few sad strands of cultured protein. That’s not a hamburger… much less a future. Even if these monetized technocratic “geniuses” could eliminate animals from animal agriculture, that’s not real change, for it leaves the monopolistic industrial structure and the profiteering anti-democratic ethic of today’s food system in place. Moreover, agriculture is not a technology, it is a rich blend of culture, history, family, and community. Change will not come from the hubris and dull imaginations of plutocratic tech billionaires, but from long term cultivation of these organic, grassroots sources of progressive policies. Photo by Ivan Radic on Flickr Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>“Step right up, folks, and bite into the wondrous future of meat!” Cheap meat! Ethical meat! Animal meat you love – beef, chicken, pork, fish, etc. – all produced without animals! It’s the miracle of “meatless meat” – a viscous mass derived from “fetal bovine serum,” then grown not on ranches, but in huge vats in corporate factories. Science marches on! Until it meets reality. Just three years ago, lab-meat hucksters had bedazzled high-tech investors, and gullible media commentators into believing the food future was now. Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Peter Thiel, and other tech billionaires had jumped in with big bucks, as did Tyson Foods and global hedge funds. A New York Times editorialist exulted, “This isn’t just science fiction,” demanding that President Biden “supercharge this industry” by putting our government’s “money and muscle” into “a moonshot for meatless meat.” So… years later, where’s the beef? Still on the hoof. The wondrous claim that food futurists could “grow” millions of tons of meat in only 15 days from a single drop of cells was just another pile of bovine excrement. They were raising money rather than doing science, so their billions of dollars and industrial vats of “cell slurry” have only produced a few sad strands of cultured protein. That’s not a hamburger… much less a future. Even if these monetized technocratic “geniuses” could eliminate animals from animal agriculture, that’s not real change, for it leaves the monopolistic industrial structure and the profiteering anti-democratic ethic of today’s food system in place. Moreover, agriculture is not a technology, it is a rich blend of culture, history, family, and community. Change will not come from the hubris and dull imaginations of plutocratic tech billionaires, but from long term cultivation of these organic, grassroots sources of progressive policies. Photo by Ivan Radic on Flickr Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Abortion-Ban Extremists Are Using a Slave Law to Repress Women]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Here’s our Big Word of the day: <em>Extraterritoriality</em>.</p><p>It expresses a sketchy legal theory asserting that rulers in one state have a right to enforce their laws in another state. The most prominent use of it was in the infamous <a target="_blank" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugitive_Slave_Act_of_1850">Fugitive Slave Act of 1850</a>, requiring officials in Northern anti-slave states to capture and return escaped slaves to their plantation “owners” in the South, thus applying Southern slave laws in Northern jurisdictions. This abomination was finally repealed in 1864.</p><p>But, 160 years later, here comes another faction of right-wing zealots trying to revive the slave-law concept of extraterritoriality – this time applying it to any and all American women who dare to make their own reproductive health decisions. I’m ashamed to say that this repressive use of the doctrine is being led by my state’s misogynistic governor, Greg Abbott, and our corrupt attorney general, Ken Paxton – two tyrannical men who’ve already saddled Texas women with the most draconian abortion ban in the country, including piously forbidding abortion in cases of rape and incest.</p><p>Thus, for women to obtain their inherent right to control their own bodies, they’re forced to travel to nearby states. Uh-uh, bark brutish Texas’ political extremists, we’ll ban that, too! Thus, they’ve pushed a flagrantly-unconstitutional scheme <em>to </em><a target="_blank" href="https://www.texastribune.org/2024/02/09/texas-abortion-transgender-care-outside-state-borders/"><em>outlaw the use of public roads </em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.texastribune.org/2024/02/09/texas-abortion-transgender-care-outside-state-borders/">to drive out-of-state for care</a>, and they’ve even sanctioned right-wing vigilantes to follow suspected medical travelers to doctors beyond our borders. And, going full-tilt totalitarian, the Abbott-Paxton posse has demanded that out-of-state-care groups <a target="_blank" href="https://www.texastribune.org/2024/01/26/texas-attorney-general-trans-documents-georgia-ken-paxton/">hand over the names and addresses</a> of Texas women they’ve helped to get out-of-state care.</p><p>Talk about government overreach! Big Brother isn’t just watching… he’s <em>stalking</em> you. To oppose this brutish repression – and to keep it from coming to your state – visit <a target="_blank" href="http://RewireNewsGroup.com/abortion">RewireNewsGroup.com/abortion</a>.</p><p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/abortion-ban-extremists-are-using</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:141930807</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 17:25:46 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598755" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/141930807/4bbb96737af515f8006b90760cfbbb75.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/141930807/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Here’s our Big Word of the day: Extraterritoriality. It expresses a sketchy legal theory asserting that rulers in one state have a right to enforce their laws in another state. The most prominent use of it was in the infamous Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, requiring officials in Northern anti-slave states to capture and return escaped slaves to their plantation “owners” in the South, thus applying Southern slave laws in Northern jurisdictions. This abomination was finally repealed in 1864. But, 160 years later, here comes another faction of right-wing zealots trying to revive the slave-law concept of extraterritoriality – this time applying it to any and all American women who dare to make their own reproductive health decisions. I’m ashamed to say that this repressive use of the doctrine is being led by my state’s misogynistic governor, Greg Abbott, and our corrupt attorney general, Ken Paxton – two tyrannical men who’ve already saddled Texas women with the most draconian abortion ban in the country, including piously forbidding abortion in cases of rape and incest. Thus, for women to obtain their inherent right to control their own bodies, they’re forced to travel to nearby states. Uh-uh, bark brutish Texas’ political extremists, we’ll ban that, too! Thus, they’ve pushed a flagrantly-unconstitutional scheme to outlaw the use of public roads to drive out-of-state for care, and they’ve even sanctioned right-wing vigilantes to follow suspected medical travelers to doctors beyond our borders. And, going full-tilt totalitarian, the Abbott-Paxton posse has demanded that out-of-state-care groups hand over the names and addresses of Texas women they’ve helped to get out-of-state care. Talk about government overreach! Big Brother isn’t just watching… he’s stalking you. To oppose this brutish repression – and to keep it from coming to your state – visit RewireNewsGroup.com/abortion. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Here’s our Big Word of the day: Extraterritoriality. It expresses a sketchy legal theory asserting that rulers in one state have a right to enforce their laws in another state. The most prominent use of it was in the infamous Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, requiring officials in Northern anti-slave states to capture and return escaped slaves to their plantation “owners” in the South, thus applying Southern slave laws in Northern jurisdictions. This abomination was finally repealed in 1864. But, 160 years later, here comes another faction of right-wing zealots trying to revive the slave-law concept of extraterritoriality – this time applying it to any and all American women who dare to make their own reproductive health decisions. I’m ashamed to say that this repressive use of the doctrine is being led by my state’s misogynistic governor, Greg Abbott, and our corrupt attorney general, Ken Paxton – two tyrannical men who’ve already saddled Texas women with the most draconian abortion ban in the country, including piously forbidding abortion in cases of rape and incest. Thus, for women to obtain their inherent right to control their own bodies, they’re forced to travel to nearby states. Uh-uh, bark brutish Texas’ political extremists, we’ll ban that, too! Thus, they’ve pushed a flagrantly-unconstitutional scheme to outlaw the use of public roads to drive out-of-state for care, and they’ve even sanctioned right-wing vigilantes to follow suspected medical travelers to doctors beyond our borders. And, going full-tilt totalitarian, the Abbott-Paxton posse has demanded that out-of-state-care groups hand over the names and addresses of Texas women they’ve helped to get out-of-state care. Talk about government overreach! Big Brother isn’t just watching… he’s stalking you. To oppose this brutish repression – and to keep it from coming to your state – visit RewireNewsGroup.com/abortion. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Where Did Our Local Newspapers Go?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I no longer receive my local newspaper, the <em>Austin-American Statesman</em>.</p><p>Oh, the <em>paper</em> still comes, but it’s just paper, minus the news part – news that our community once counted on to keep up with local government doings, corporate shenanigans, citizen actions, and other critical features of our city’s democratic life. What happened? Wall Street profiteers swept in a few years ago to conglomeratize, homogenize, and financialize, the <em>Statesman</em>.</p><p>It’s now a money cog in the Gannett/USA Today chain of some 200 major dailies that the syndicate seized. Indeed, Gannett itself is wholly owned by SoftBank, a Japanese hedge fund. Those distant bankers are not interested in local news, but in slashing news staffs to fatten their profits. In Austin alone, Softbank has cut two-thirds of the paper’s journalists since taking over – and coverage of local stories has also plunged by two-thirds.</p><p>Interestingly, the Statesman recently ran a front-page piece about a local union protest by flight attendants demanding fair wages. On that same day, the paper also reported that Uber and Lyft drivers were striking in Austin. But wait – at the same time, the Statesman journalists were <a target="_blank" href="https://www.instagram.com/p/C3Dkmpsp3F2/">picketing right in front of the paper’s office</a>, protesting the greed of SoftBank/Gannett and the demise of local news. Curiously, <em>Statesman</em> editors did not consider this local news about our newspaper to be news, so they cravenly kept this important information from the people.</p><p>Austin was not alone in this news blackout by the chain’s managers. Journalists at a dozen other Gannett papers – from Akron to South Bend – were picketing, yet, none of those papers ran a peep about their journalists’ defense of local news. Nor did Gannett’s flagship paper,<em> USA Today</em>, mention this nationwide union rebellion by its own journalists.</p><p>To support journalists and real journalism, go to <a target="_blank" href="http://newsguild.org">newsguild.org.</a></p><p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/where-did-our-local-newspapers-go</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:141865740</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 17:21:58 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598755" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/141865740/40a75650344ded6fbe2d27529f6749a1.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/141865740/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>I no longer receive my local newspaper, the Austin-American Statesman. Oh, the paper still comes, but it’s just paper, minus the news part – news that our community once counted on to keep up with local government doings, corporate shenanigans, citizen actions, and other critical features of our city’s democratic life. What happened? Wall Street profiteers swept in a few years ago to conglomeratize, homogenize, and financialize, the Statesman. It’s now a money cog in the Gannett/USA Today chain of some 200 major dailies that the syndicate seized. Indeed, Gannett itself is wholly owned by SoftBank, a Japanese hedge fund. Those distant bankers are not interested in local news, but in slashing news staffs to fatten their profits. In Austin alone, Softbank has cut two-thirds of the paper’s journalists since taking over – and coverage of local stories has also plunged by two-thirds. Interestingly, the Statesman recently ran a front-page piece about a local union protest by flight attendants demanding fair wages. On that same day, the paper also reported that Uber and Lyft drivers were striking in Austin. But wait – at the same time, the Statesman journalists were picketing right in front of the paper’s office, protesting the greed of SoftBank/Gannett and the demise of local news. Curiously, Statesman editors did not consider this local news about our newspaper to be news, so they cravenly kept this important information from the people. Austin was not alone in this news blackout by the chain’s managers. Journalists at a dozen other Gannett papers – from Akron to South Bend – were picketing, yet, none of those papers ran a peep about their journalists’ defense of local news. Nor did Gannett’s flagship paper, USA Today, mention this nationwide union rebellion by its own journalists. To support journalists and real journalism, go to newsguild.org. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>I no longer receive my local newspaper, the Austin-American Statesman. Oh, the paper still comes, but it’s just paper, minus the news part – news that our community once counted on to keep up with local government doings, corporate shenanigans, citizen actions, and other critical features of our city’s democratic life. What happened? Wall Street profiteers swept in a few years ago to conglomeratize, homogenize, and financialize, the Statesman. It’s now a money cog in the Gannett/USA Today chain of some 200 major dailies that the syndicate seized. Indeed, Gannett itself is wholly owned by SoftBank, a Japanese hedge fund. Those distant bankers are not interested in local news, but in slashing news staffs to fatten their profits. In Austin alone, Softbank has cut two-thirds of the paper’s journalists since taking over – and coverage of local stories has also plunged by two-thirds. Interestingly, the Statesman recently ran a front-page piece about a local union protest by flight attendants demanding fair wages. On that same day, the paper also reported that Uber and Lyft drivers were striking in Austin. But wait – at the same time, the Statesman journalists were picketing right in front of the paper’s office, protesting the greed of SoftBank/Gannett and the demise of local news. Curiously, Statesman editors did not consider this local news about our newspaper to be news, so they cravenly kept this important information from the people. Austin was not alone in this news blackout by the chain’s managers. Journalists at a dozen other Gannett papers – from Akron to South Bend – were picketing, yet, none of those papers ran a peep about their journalists’ defense of local news. Nor did Gannett’s flagship paper, USA Today, mention this nationwide union rebellion by its own journalists. To support journalists and real journalism, go to newsguild.org. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[What Is a Banker’s Promise Worth?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Bruce King, former governor of New Mexico, often baffled people with his convoluted use of words. Like the time he vetoed a loan shark bill he’d previously agreed to sign. “But, Governor,” squealed the lenders’ lobbyists, “we had your commitment!” Unfazed, King said, “Now boys, we all know that a commitment is not a promise.”</p><p>In this case, King’s linguistic backflip was virtuous, for it killed a bad bill. But now come banking giants themselves doing a shameful backflip on their widely publicized scout’s honor <em>promise</em> to do the right thing for humanity on a true life-and-death issue: Climate change.</p><p>It was only two years ago that Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, and other Wall Street behemoths loudly proclaimed their conversion to environmental responsibility. In ads, interviews, and speeches, they solemnly vowed they would no longer finance new coal, oil, and other fossil fuel projects which are the major cause of global warming. The bankers promised to protect the “fragile ecosystem and the rights of Indigenous Peoples.” Hooray!</p><p>But that was so yesterday – way back in 2022. Today, the prevailing political winds are coming from howling right-wingers denouncing environmental values and “woke capitalism.” So, the pusillanimous bankers are now saying that a promise is not forever (or even two years) – as <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/03/climate/bank-of-america-esg.html">they default on their enviro responsibility</a>. Instead, they’re refocusing on a messy mix of fossil fuels, and – <em>maybe</em> – they’ll toss in a few clean energy projects. Or not.</p><p>Chase Bank weaseled out of its latest climate action commitment with corporate claptrap, declaring that reducing fossil fuel investments “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/03/climate/bank-of-america-esg.html">will not successfully achieve the necessary transition of the global energy system</a>.” Yeah, so why bother? Forget what we promised way back when.</p><p>Then Wall Streeters wonder why people distrust and despise them!</p><p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p></p><p><em>Photo: </em><a target="_blank" href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/bobbosphere/28454630522/"><em>Bob Simpson on Flickr</em></a></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/what-is-a-bankers-promise-worth</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:141713753</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2024 00:12:09 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598755" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/141713753/1d9c604fd5e6e84d94b3887eddac8755.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/141713753/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Bruce King, former governor of New Mexico, often baffled people with his convoluted use of words. Like the time he vetoed a loan shark bill he’d previously agreed to sign. “But, Governor,” squealed the lenders’ lobbyists, “we had your commitment!” Unfazed, King said, “Now boys, we all know that a commitment is not a promise.” In this case, King’s linguistic backflip was virtuous, for it killed a bad bill. But now come banking giants themselves doing a shameful backflip on their widely publicized scout’s honor promise to do the right thing for humanity on a true life-and-death issue: Climate change. It was only two years ago that Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, and other Wall Street behemoths loudly proclaimed their conversion to environmental responsibility. In ads, interviews, and speeches, they solemnly vowed they would no longer finance new coal, oil, and other fossil fuel projects which are the major cause of global warming. The bankers promised to protect the “fragile ecosystem and the rights of Indigenous Peoples.” Hooray! But that was so yesterday – way back in 2022. Today, the prevailing political winds are coming from howling right-wingers denouncing environmental values and “woke capitalism.” So, the pusillanimous bankers are now saying that a promise is not forever (or even two years) – as they default on their enviro responsibility. Instead, they’re refocusing on a messy mix of fossil fuels, and – maybe – they’ll toss in a few clean energy projects. Or not. Chase Bank weaseled out of its latest climate action commitment with corporate claptrap, declaring that reducing fossil fuel investments “will not successfully achieve the necessary transition of the global energy system.” Yeah, so why bother? Forget what we promised way back when. Then Wall Streeters wonder why people distrust and despise them! Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Photo: Bob Simpson on Flickr Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Bruce King, former governor of New Mexico, often baffled people with his convoluted use of words. Like the time he vetoed a loan shark bill he’d previously agreed to sign. “But, Governor,” squealed the lenders’ lobbyists, “we had your commitment!” Unfazed, King said, “Now boys, we all know that a commitment is not a promise.” In this case, King’s linguistic backflip was virtuous, for it killed a bad bill. But now come banking giants themselves doing a shameful backflip on their widely publicized scout’s honor promise to do the right thing for humanity on a true life-and-death issue: Climate change. It was only two years ago that Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, and other Wall Street behemoths loudly proclaimed their conversion to environmental responsibility. In ads, interviews, and speeches, they solemnly vowed they would no longer finance new coal, oil, and other fossil fuel projects which are the major cause of global warming. The bankers promised to protect the “fragile ecosystem and the rights of Indigenous Peoples.” Hooray! But that was so yesterday – way back in 2022. Today, the prevailing political winds are coming from howling right-wingers denouncing environmental values and “woke capitalism.” So, the pusillanimous bankers are now saying that a promise is not forever (or even two years) – as they default on their enviro responsibility. Instead, they’re refocusing on a messy mix of fossil fuels, and – maybe – they’ll toss in a few clean energy projects. Or not. Chase Bank weaseled out of its latest climate action commitment with corporate claptrap, declaring that reducing fossil fuel investments “will not successfully achieve the necessary transition of the global energy system.” Yeah, so why bother? Forget what we promised way back when. Then Wall Streeters wonder why people distrust and despise them! Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Photo: Bob Simpson on Flickr Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Love to You from Valentine, Texas]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Please be my Valentine!</p><p>That is not only a warm, sweet, sometimes romantic sentiment people express in mid-February on a frilly, red card. It’s also the name of a third-century saint who literally lost his head, a ninth-century pope whose reign lasted only 40 days, three Roman emperors, a very good Mexican hot sauce… and a tiny town in Texas.</p><p>That town has a genuinely sweet story to tell and a unique role to play in the sending of thousands of Valentine’s Day sentiments to people around the world. Valentine, Texas, population 217, was founded by the Southern Pacific Railroad in the 1880s and reportedly was named for one of the corporation’s big shareholders. Nothing romantic about that.</p><p>But in recent years, would-be cupids have turned the town’s name and – believe it or not – its one-room post office into a center of affectionate expression. What happened is that romantics from distant places began to batch-up their pre-addressed, stamped Valentines and zip them to this postal outpost way out on the Texas-Mexico border. Why? Because, to give their sentimental missives extra oomph, they wanted them to bear the special touch of being mailed from an actual place named Valentine.</p><p>The greatest thing about our public postal workers is that they literally deliver, and the Valentine branch goes the extra mile to provide this loving gesture – at no extra charge. Ismelda Ornelas, Postmaster of the 79854 office, handstamps each envelope herself. Indeed, the Valentine post office is now officially designated the “Love Station.” <a target="_blank" href="https://about.usps.com/newsroom/local-releases/tx/2023/0201-valentine-tx-po-announces-postmark.htm">Moreover, the local school district holds an annual art contest among students to design each year’s Valentine postmark, which is then stamped on each envelope.</a></p><p>See, while the media tells us our world is going to hell, here’s another grassroots example of loving, creative people going the other way. Happy Valentine’s Day!</p><p><p>Thank you for reading Jim Hightower's Lowdown. This post is public so feel free to share it.</p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p><em>Originally published February 14, 2023.</em></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/love-to-you-from-valentine-texas-7aa</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:141675702</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 18:55:42 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593008" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/141675702/787b1a4cd77135df3ac35da5361733db.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/141675702/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Please be my Valentine! That is not only a warm, sweet, sometimes romantic sentiment people express in mid-February on a frilly, red card. It’s also the name of a third-century saint who literally lost his head, a ninth-century pope whose reign lasted only 40 days, three Roman emperors, a very good Mexican hot sauce… and a tiny town in Texas. That town has a genuinely sweet story to tell and a unique role to play in the sending of thousands of Valentine’s Day sentiments to people around the world. Valentine, Texas, population 217, was founded by the Southern Pacific Railroad in the 1880s and reportedly was named for one of the corporation’s big shareholders. Nothing romantic about that. But in recent years, would-be cupids have turned the town’s name and – believe it or not – its one-room post office into a center of affectionate expression. What happened is that romantics from distant places began to batch-up their pre-addressed, stamped Valentines and zip them to this postal outpost way out on the Texas-Mexico border. Why? Because, to give their sentimental missives extra oomph, they wanted them to bear the special touch of being mailed from an actual place named Valentine. The greatest thing about our public postal workers is that they literally deliver, and the Valentine branch goes the extra mile to provide this loving gesture – at no extra charge. Ismelda Ornelas, Postmaster of the 79854 office, handstamps each envelope herself. Indeed, the Valentine post office is now officially designated the “Love Station.” Moreover, the local school district holds an annual art contest among students to design each year’s Valentine postmark, which is then stamped on each envelope. See, while the media tells us our world is going to hell, here’s another grassroots example of loving, creative people going the other way. Happy Valentine’s Day! Thank you for reading Jim Hightower's Lowdown. This post is public so feel free to share it. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Originally published February 14, 2023. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Please be my Valentine! That is not only a warm, sweet, sometimes romantic sentiment people express in mid-February on a frilly, red card. It’s also the name of a third-century saint who literally lost his head, a ninth-century pope whose reign lasted only 40 days, three Roman emperors, a very good Mexican hot sauce… and a tiny town in Texas. That town has a genuinely sweet story to tell and a unique role to play in the sending of thousands of Valentine’s Day sentiments to people around the world. Valentine, Texas, population 217, was founded by the Southern Pacific Railroad in the 1880s and reportedly was named for one of the corporation’s big shareholders. Nothing romantic about that. But in recent years, would-be cupids have turned the town’s name and – believe it or not – its one-room post office into a center of affectionate expression. What happened is that romantics from distant places began to batch-up their pre-addressed, stamped Valentines and zip them to this postal outpost way out on the Texas-Mexico border. Why? Because, to give their sentimental missives extra oomph, they wanted them to bear the special touch of being mailed from an actual place named Valentine. The greatest thing about our public postal workers is that they literally deliver, and the Valentine branch goes the extra mile to provide this loving gesture – at no extra charge. Ismelda Ornelas, Postmaster of the 79854 office, handstamps each envelope herself. Indeed, the Valentine post office is now officially designated the “Love Station.” Moreover, the local school district holds an annual art contest among students to design each year’s Valentine postmark, which is then stamped on each envelope. See, while the media tells us our world is going to hell, here’s another grassroots example of loving, creative people going the other way. Happy Valentine’s Day! Thank you for reading Jim Hightower's Lowdown. This post is public so feel free to share it. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Originally published February 14, 2023. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Debacle of “God’s Army” at Eagle Pass]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps you heard about the recent surge of invasive foreigners into Eagle Pass, Texas – the Rio Grande border town that finds itself at the hot center of the US-Mexico immigration crisis.</p><p>Only, this “invasion” (as Donald Trump’s MAGA crowd likes to call it) was not by Latin Americans, but by Anglos descending on Eagle Pass from the North! Indeed, it was <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/03/us/texas-convoy-border-eagle-pass.html">an invasion by Trumpista partisans claiming to be “God’s Army.”</a> Organized as a Christian Nationalist crusade, they boasted that a mighty convoy of 700,000 trucks from all across the US would be streaming toward Eagle Pass to “Take Our Border Back.”</p><p>What a show of strength! But just when you think the whole country has gone full-tilt bonkers, reality shows up. “God’s Army” actually consisted of about 20 trucks, a babbling rant by Sarah Palin, and a forlorn crowd of… <em>maybe 200 people</em>. Seriously. That was it. The greased pig contest for children at a small county fair in Texas draws more than that.</p><p>And, very significantly, many of the Trump “patriots” who came from afar were stunned to find that his frantic claims of hordes of rampaging criminals flooding into the US didn’t exist. “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.newsweek.com/texas-border-convoy-member-crossings-not-bad-1866686">That’s kind of eye-opening,</a>” said one who’d made the long trek to repel the “invaders.” And a 29-year-old local resident expressed the rude truth about the loudly ballyhooed caravan: “What is all of this for? For show,” he exclaimed!</p><p>Adding to the sleazy spectacle, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott had convened a dozen other immigrant-bashing GOP governors in Eagle Pass to take advantage of the caravan’s political glow. Imagine their chagrin that their number of high-powered governors, political staffers, and media entourages outnumbered the crowd.</p><p>For an honest depiction of God’s Army, go to Vote Common Good: <a target="_blank" href="http://votecommongood.com">votecommongood.com</a>.</p><p><em>Photo: </em><a target="_blank" href="https://truthout.org/articles/locals-say-eagle-pass-is-being-invaded-by-christian-nationalists-not-migrants/"><em>Truthout</em></a></p><p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-debacle-of-gods-army-at-eagle</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:141643314</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 18:42:12 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598755" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/141643314/be899432821ee89364d79f2489bcac92.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/141643314/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Perhaps you heard about the recent surge of invasive foreigners into Eagle Pass, Texas – the Rio Grande border town that finds itself at the hot center of the US-Mexico immigration crisis. Only, this “invasion” (as Donald Trump’s MAGA crowd likes to call it) was not by Latin Americans, but by Anglos descending on Eagle Pass from the North! Indeed, it was an invasion by Trumpista partisans claiming to be “God’s Army.” Organized as a Christian Nationalist crusade, they boasted that a mighty convoy of 700,000 trucks from all across the US would be streaming toward Eagle Pass to “Take Our Border Back.” What a show of strength! But just when you think the whole country has gone full-tilt bonkers, reality shows up. “God’s Army” actually consisted of about 20 trucks, a babbling rant by Sarah Palin, and a forlorn crowd of… maybe 200 people. Seriously. That was it. The greased pig contest for children at a small county fair in Texas draws more than that. And, very significantly, many of the Trump “patriots” who came from afar were stunned to find that his frantic claims of hordes of rampaging criminals flooding into the US didn’t exist. “That’s kind of eye-opening,” said one who’d made the long trek to repel the “invaders.” And a 29-year-old local resident expressed the rude truth about the loudly ballyhooed caravan: “What is all of this for? For show,” he exclaimed! Adding to the sleazy spectacle, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott had convened a dozen other immigrant-bashing GOP governors in Eagle Pass to take advantage of the caravan’s political glow. Imagine their chagrin that their number of high-powered governors, political staffers, and media entourages outnumbered the crowd. For an honest depiction of God’s Army, go to Vote Common Good: votecommongood.com. Photo: Truthout Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Perhaps you heard about the recent surge of invasive foreigners into Eagle Pass, Texas – the Rio Grande border town that finds itself at the hot center of the US-Mexico immigration crisis. Only, this “invasion” (as Donald Trump’s MAGA crowd likes to call it) was not by Latin Americans, but by Anglos descending on Eagle Pass from the North! Indeed, it was an invasion by Trumpista partisans claiming to be “God’s Army.” Organized as a Christian Nationalist crusade, they boasted that a mighty convoy of 700,000 trucks from all across the US would be streaming toward Eagle Pass to “Take Our Border Back.” What a show of strength! But just when you think the whole country has gone full-tilt bonkers, reality shows up. “God’s Army” actually consisted of about 20 trucks, a babbling rant by Sarah Palin, and a forlorn crowd of… maybe 200 people. Seriously. That was it. The greased pig contest for children at a small county fair in Texas draws more than that. And, very significantly, many of the Trump “patriots” who came from afar were stunned to find that his frantic claims of hordes of rampaging criminals flooding into the US didn’t exist. “That’s kind of eye-opening,” said one who’d made the long trek to repel the “invaders.” And a 29-year-old local resident expressed the rude truth about the loudly ballyhooed caravan: “What is all of this for? For show,” he exclaimed! Adding to the sleazy spectacle, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott had convened a dozen other immigrant-bashing GOP governors in Eagle Pass to take advantage of the caravan’s political glow. Imagine their chagrin that their number of high-powered governors, political staffers, and media entourages outnumbered the crowd. For an honest depiction of God’s Army, go to Vote Common Good: votecommongood.com. Photo: Truthout Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Right-Wing’s Program to Solve Childhood Obesity]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>This plot line could have come from one of Charles Dickens’ novels about upper-class depravity: “Miserly governors refuse to provide gruel for poverty-stricken ragamuffins.”</p><p>Unfortunately, this is not a novel, but modern-day reality taking place in 15 states, where <a target="_blank" href="https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2024/01/16/republican-governors-opt-out-food-assistance-program-kids/7741705419289">rightwing officeholders have scorned a federal program to provide food this summer for millions of children mired in poverty.</a></p><p><em>No!</em> bark these political ideologues. Seeking to <em>punish</em> poverty, they piously demonize public aid… even for hungry children! This program hardly lavishes luxury dining on anyone, offering only $40 per child in groceries. Not for one meal or even a week, but <a target="_blank" href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/usda-grocery-ebt-21-million-children-summer-2024-what-to-know/">$40 a </a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/usda-grocery-ebt-21-million-children-summer-2024-what-to-know/"><em>month</em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/usda-grocery-ebt-21-million-children-summer-2024-what-to-know/"> – about a buck-thirty a day</a>. Feast on that!</p><p>Yet, the politicos in such deeply impoverished states as Mississippi and Louisiana have arrogantly shunned this minimal assistance their people so desperately need. Worse, so have the mingy governors of super-rich states like Florida and Texas, where millions of children need this food. Also, note that these elitist governors are personally wealthy, yet they have no ethical qualms about taxpayers picking up the tab for their pricey meals.</p><p>Then there’s the pathetic duplicity of Iowa governor, Kim Reynolds. She rejected the grocery benefit for her state’s children, asserting that it “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/iowa-guv-kim-reynolds-rejects-federal-funds-slated-for-food-insecure-kids">does nothing to promote nutrition</a>” and could contribute to childhood obesity. Well, gosh, Gov, providing food has actually proven to be nutritionally beneficial for children. On the other hand, she’s right that denying food to children definitely can cause them to lose weight! Thanks, Kim.</p><p>Turning down food assistance for poor children is shockingly callous, just plain mean… and politically stupid, even for right-wing puritanical ideologues. The good news is that 35 states, five US territories, and four Native American tribes have welcomed the summer program. Learn more at <a target="_blank" href="http://FeedingAmerica.org">FeedingAmerica.org</a>.</p><p>Do something!</p><p>Fed up with childhood hunger? Take action and learn more with these great organizations:</p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://frac.org/">Food Research and Action Center</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.cbpp.org/research/topics/food-assistance">Center on Budget and Policy Priorites’ Food Assistance work</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://healthyeatingresearch.org/">Healthy Eating Research</a></p><p></p><p><p>Thank you for reading Jim Hightower's Lowdown. This post is public so feel free to share it.</p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-right-wings-program-to-solve</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:141496932</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2024 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598755" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/141496932/a43219093de10bc28b072bff335cd067.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/141496932/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>This plot line could have come from one of Charles Dickens’ novels about upper-class depravity: “Miserly governors refuse to provide gruel for poverty-stricken ragamuffins.” Unfortunately, this is not a novel, but modern-day reality taking place in 15 states, where rightwing officeholders have scorned a federal program to provide food this summer for millions of children mired in poverty. No! bark these political ideologues. Seeking to punish poverty, they piously demonize public aid… even for hungry children! This program hardly lavishes luxury dining on anyone, offering only $40 per child in groceries. Not for one meal or even a week, but $40 a month – about a buck-thirty a day. Feast on that! Yet, the politicos in such deeply impoverished states as Mississippi and Louisiana have arrogantly shunned this minimal assistance their people so desperately need. Worse, so have the mingy governors of super-rich states like Florida and Texas, where millions of children need this food. Also, note that these elitist governors are personally wealthy, yet they have no ethical qualms about taxpayers picking up the tab for their pricey meals. Then there’s the pathetic duplicity of Iowa governor, Kim Reynolds. She rejected the grocery benefit for her state’s children, asserting that it “does nothing to promote nutrition” and could contribute to childhood obesity. Well, gosh, Gov, providing food has actually proven to be nutritionally beneficial for children. On the other hand, she’s right that denying food to children definitely can cause them to lose weight! Thanks, Kim. Turning down food assistance for poor children is shockingly callous, just plain mean… and politically stupid, even for right-wing puritanical ideologues. The good news is that 35 states, five US territories, and four Native American tribes have welcomed the summer program. Learn more at FeedingAmerica.org. Do something! Fed up with childhood hunger? Take action and learn more with these great organizations: * Food Research and Action Center * Center on Budget and Policy Priorites’ Food Assistance work * Healthy Eating Research Thank you for reading Jim Hightower's Lowdown. This post is public so feel free to share it. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>This plot line could have come from one of Charles Dickens’ novels about upper-class depravity: “Miserly governors refuse to provide gruel for poverty-stricken ragamuffins.” Unfortunately, this is not a novel, but modern-day reality taking place in 15 states, where rightwing officeholders have scorned a federal program to provide food this summer for millions of children mired in poverty. No! bark these political ideologues. Seeking to punish poverty, they piously demonize public aid… even for hungry children! This program hardly lavishes luxury dining on anyone, offering only $40 per child in groceries. Not for one meal or even a week, but $40 a month – about a buck-thirty a day. Feast on that! Yet, the politicos in such deeply impoverished states as Mississippi and Louisiana have arrogantly shunned this minimal assistance their people so desperately need. Worse, so have the mingy governors of super-rich states like Florida and Texas, where millions of children need this food. Also, note that these elitist governors are personally wealthy, yet they have no ethical qualms about taxpayers picking up the tab for their pricey meals. Then there’s the pathetic duplicity of Iowa governor, Kim Reynolds. She rejected the grocery benefit for her state’s children, asserting that it “does nothing to promote nutrition” and could contribute to childhood obesity. Well, gosh, Gov, providing food has actually proven to be nutritionally beneficial for children. On the other hand, she’s right that denying food to children definitely can cause them to lose weight! Thanks, Kim. Turning down food assistance for poor children is shockingly callous, just plain mean… and politically stupid, even for right-wing puritanical ideologues. The good news is that 35 states, five US territories, and four Native American tribes have welcomed the summer program. Learn more at FeedingAmerica.org. Do something! Fed up with childhood hunger? Take action and learn more with these great organizations: * Food Research and Action Center * Center on Budget and Policy Priorites’ Food Assistance work * Healthy Eating Research Thank you for reading Jim Hightower's Lowdown. This post is public so feel free to share it. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Supreme Court’s Six Corporate Supremacists Ride Again]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Heeere they come again: The wrecking crew of Alito, Barrett, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Roberts & Thomas – the six plutocratic judicial supremacists determined to force their personal political biases on all of us.</p><p>The latest ploy of this right-wing cabal is to gut the ability of public agencies to issue regulations protecting people from health care rip-offs, consumer price gougers, labor abusers, toxic polluters, and other corporate profiteers. The six-person Republican majority controlling the court is about to decree that when reigning in corporate abuses, public agencies can only take specific regulatory actions that Congress puts into law.</p><p>Sounds good in theory, but in real life, Congress has no ability to itemize the ever-changing list of actions needed to stop the abuses. Thus Congress (and “We the People”) rely on the diligence and expertise of agencies to make the law work. So, the court’s sneaky maneuver is just judicial smoke and mirrors, benefitting… well, who?</p><p>“Overregulated small businesses,” wailed the court’s six laissez-faire ideologues. Indeed, to make their legal ruling, the six had handpicked a case involving a couple of small fishing companies complaining about federal rules to prevent the overfishing of herring. But wait – look who’s steering those little fishermen’s legal boat: Charles Koch, the ultra-billionaire, anti-regulation extremist! His secretive political operation recruited the herring fishermen to be his corporate pawns and is orchestrating this judicial flimflam.</p><p>Moreover, Koch’s surreptitious network also funded and orchestrated the political placement of today’s corporate majority on the Supreme Court.</p><p>Yet, America’s corporate media establishment papers over this judicial coup. A recent AP headline, for example, meekly reports that “Conservative Interests Take Aim at Regulations.” No – Koch forces are not conservative, they’re corporate supremacists. And they’re not aiming at “regulations” – but at you and me.</p><p>Do something!</p><p>We love to recommend <a target="_blank" href="https://fixthecourt.com/">FixTheCourt.com</a> for ideas and resources on overhauling the Supreme Court. If you’ve got more organizations or people to recommend, leave them for us in the comments!</p><p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-supreme-courts-six-corporate</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:141437399</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2024 18:37:09 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598755" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/141437399/7781d4f825cf23420c296d76df0188f0.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/141437399/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Heeere they come again: The wrecking crew of Alito, Barrett, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Roberts &amp; Thomas – the six plutocratic judicial supremacists determined to force their personal political biases on all of us. The latest ploy of this right-wing cabal is to gut the ability of public agencies to issue regulations protecting people from health care rip-offs, consumer price gougers, labor abusers, toxic polluters, and other corporate profiteers. The six-person Republican majority controlling the court is about to decree that when reigning in corporate abuses, public agencies can only take specific regulatory actions that Congress puts into law. Sounds good in theory, but in real life, Congress has no ability to itemize the ever-changing list of actions needed to stop the abuses. Thus Congress (and “We the People”) rely on the diligence and expertise of agencies to make the law work. So, the court’s sneaky maneuver is just judicial smoke and mirrors, benefitting… well, who? “Overregulated small businesses,” wailed the court’s six laissez-faire ideologues. Indeed, to make their legal ruling, the six had handpicked a case involving a couple of small fishing companies complaining about federal rules to prevent the overfishing of herring. But wait – look who’s steering those little fishermen’s legal boat: Charles Koch, the ultra-billionaire, anti-regulation extremist! His secretive political operation recruited the herring fishermen to be his corporate pawns and is orchestrating this judicial flimflam. Moreover, Koch’s surreptitious network also funded and orchestrated the political placement of today’s corporate majority on the Supreme Court. Yet, America’s corporate media establishment papers over this judicial coup. A recent AP headline, for example, meekly reports that “Conservative Interests Take Aim at Regulations.” No – Koch forces are not conservative, they’re corporate supremacists. And they’re not aiming at “regulations” – but at you and me. Do something! We love to recommend FixTheCourt.com for ideas and resources on overhauling the Supreme Court. If you’ve got more organizations or people to recommend, leave them for us in the comments! Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Heeere they come again: The wrecking crew of Alito, Barrett, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Roberts &amp; Thomas – the six plutocratic judicial supremacists determined to force their personal political biases on all of us. The latest ploy of this right-wing cabal is to gut the ability of public agencies to issue regulations protecting people from health care rip-offs, consumer price gougers, labor abusers, toxic polluters, and other corporate profiteers. The six-person Republican majority controlling the court is about to decree that when reigning in corporate abuses, public agencies can only take specific regulatory actions that Congress puts into law. Sounds good in theory, but in real life, Congress has no ability to itemize the ever-changing list of actions needed to stop the abuses. Thus Congress (and “We the People”) rely on the diligence and expertise of agencies to make the law work. So, the court’s sneaky maneuver is just judicial smoke and mirrors, benefitting… well, who? “Overregulated small businesses,” wailed the court’s six laissez-faire ideologues. Indeed, to make their legal ruling, the six had handpicked a case involving a couple of small fishing companies complaining about federal rules to prevent the overfishing of herring. But wait – look who’s steering those little fishermen’s legal boat: Charles Koch, the ultra-billionaire, anti-regulation extremist! His secretive political operation recruited the herring fishermen to be his corporate pawns and is orchestrating this judicial flimflam. Moreover, Koch’s surreptitious network also funded and orchestrated the political placement of today’s corporate majority on the Supreme Court. Yet, America’s corporate media establishment papers over this judicial coup. A recent AP headline, for example, meekly reports that “Conservative Interests Take Aim at Regulations.” No – Koch forces are not conservative, they’re corporate supremacists. And they’re not aiming at “regulations” – but at you and me. Do something! We love to recommend FixTheCourt.com for ideas and resources on overhauling the Supreme Court. If you’ve got more organizations or people to recommend, leave them for us in the comments! Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Shameful Greed of the Solano County Gold Rush]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Farming can be a deeply satisfying life – you’re connecting directly to nature, you are your own boss, and you do work that’s real, benefitting humanity.</p><p>But then there are the pests – such as invasive bugs, monopolistic profiteers… and a new, exceptionally destructive plague: Billionaires. Yes, flocks of predatory ultra-billionaires, wanting not just to gouge farmers, but to take away their farms.</p><p>The crassest example of this land grab is happening now in Solano County, California, a bucolic agricultural area just north of San Francisco. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/19/business/economy/flannery-california-forever-solano.html">A gaggle of narcissistic Silicon Valley tech titans with maximum bank accounts</a> and minimal ethics has arrogantly (and surreptitiously) been spending nearly a billion dollars in an investment hustle to buy out and pave over <em>every</em> farm in the county.</p><p>Led by a former Wall Street huckster literally known as “Golden Boy,” the titans pose as altruistic futurists intending to turn this rural county into a magical technetronic haven of urban affluence and sophistication. Agriculture, they say, is the low-yield economy of yesterday, wasting valuable real estate on farming. So, farmers must sell out and get out of the way, allowing so these capitalist visionaries to grow a new “Mega-City of the Future.”</p><p>But not everyone in Solano was charmed, with many refusing to sell to Golden Boy. So, flush with self-entitlement, the Silicon Valley Money Lords are trying to muscle the uppity rural holdouts by suing them for – Get This – refusing to sell their farms! The lawsuit is BS, of course, but it’s meant to crush the farmers with legal fees.</p><p>Altruistic visionaries? In a note soliciting others to invest in this thuggish thievery, one of the billionaires bluntly touted the syndicate’s real motivation, gushing that the Solano land grab can be <em>spectacularly profitable</em> for investors.</p><p>Do something!</p><p>A coalition of community and environmental groups has formed <a target="_blank" href="https://www.solanotogether.org/">Solano Together</a>— visit their website to stay up-to-date on the fight and support their efforts.</p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Solano_County_Fair_Rooster_in_front_of_livestock_building.jpg"><em>Photo</em></a><em> by Kiddo27 on Wikimedia Commons</em></p><p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-shameful-greed-of-the-solano</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:141277922</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598755" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/141277922/114d398985185d848757f731458b294c.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/141277922/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Farming can be a deeply satisfying life – you’re connecting directly to nature, you are your own boss, and you do work that’s real, benefitting humanity. But then there are the pests – such as invasive bugs, monopolistic profiteers… and a new, exceptionally destructive plague: Billionaires. Yes, flocks of predatory ultra-billionaires, wanting not just to gouge farmers, but to take away their farms. The crassest example of this land grab is happening now in Solano County, California, a bucolic agricultural area just north of San Francisco. A gaggle of narcissistic Silicon Valley tech titans with maximum bank accounts and minimal ethics has arrogantly (and surreptitiously) been spending nearly a billion dollars in an investment hustle to buy out and pave over every farm in the county. Led by a former Wall Street huckster literally known as “Golden Boy,” the titans pose as altruistic futurists intending to turn this rural county into a magical technetronic haven of urban affluence and sophistication. Agriculture, they say, is the low-yield economy of yesterday, wasting valuable real estate on farming. So, farmers must sell out and get out of the way, allowing so these capitalist visionaries to grow a new “Mega-City of the Future.” But not everyone in Solano was charmed, with many refusing to sell to Golden Boy. So, flush with self-entitlement, the Silicon Valley Money Lords are trying to muscle the uppity rural holdouts by suing them for – Get This – refusing to sell their farms! The lawsuit is BS, of course, but it’s meant to crush the farmers with legal fees. Altruistic visionaries? In a note soliciting others to invest in this thuggish thievery, one of the billionaires bluntly touted the syndicate’s real motivation, gushing that the Solano land grab can be spectacularly profitable for investors. Do something! A coalition of community and environmental groups has formed Solano Together— visit their website to stay up-to-date on the fight and support their efforts. Photo by Kiddo27 on Wikimedia Commons Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Farming can be a deeply satisfying life – you’re connecting directly to nature, you are your own boss, and you do work that’s real, benefitting humanity. But then there are the pests – such as invasive bugs, monopolistic profiteers… and a new, exceptionally destructive plague: Billionaires. Yes, flocks of predatory ultra-billionaires, wanting not just to gouge farmers, but to take away their farms. The crassest example of this land grab is happening now in Solano County, California, a bucolic agricultural area just north of San Francisco. A gaggle of narcissistic Silicon Valley tech titans with maximum bank accounts and minimal ethics has arrogantly (and surreptitiously) been spending nearly a billion dollars in an investment hustle to buy out and pave over every farm in the county. Led by a former Wall Street huckster literally known as “Golden Boy,” the titans pose as altruistic futurists intending to turn this rural county into a magical technetronic haven of urban affluence and sophistication. Agriculture, they say, is the low-yield economy of yesterday, wasting valuable real estate on farming. So, farmers must sell out and get out of the way, allowing so these capitalist visionaries to grow a new “Mega-City of the Future.” But not everyone in Solano was charmed, with many refusing to sell to Golden Boy. So, flush with self-entitlement, the Silicon Valley Money Lords are trying to muscle the uppity rural holdouts by suing them for – Get This – refusing to sell their farms! The lawsuit is BS, of course, but it’s meant to crush the farmers with legal fees. Altruistic visionaries? In a note soliciting others to invest in this thuggish thievery, one of the billionaires bluntly touted the syndicate’s real motivation, gushing that the Solano land grab can be spectacularly profitable for investors. Do something! A coalition of community and environmental groups has formed Solano Together— visit their website to stay up-to-date on the fight and support their efforts. Photo by Kiddo27 on Wikimedia Commons Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Just What We Need – Another Border Wall!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>In the 1980s, many Texans were alarmed that hordes of immigrants were fleeing Rust Belt states and pouring across the Red River to take our jobs. So, my friend <a target="_blank" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Fromholz">Steve Fromholz</a> recommended a big beautiful wall across our northern border to keep them out.</p><p>But Fromholz – a popular singer-songwriter and renown political sprite – was ahead of his time in the political sport of wallbuilding. Instead of steel barriers and miles of nasty of razor wire, Steve proposed preventing Yankee refugees from entering the Lone Star State by planting a 10-foot high, 10-foot thick wall of jalapeño peppers along the length of the Red River. Eat your way through… and you’d be accepted as a naturalized Texan.</p><p>I thought of Steve’s impishness when I read that Nikki Haley, Ron DeSantis, and other Republicans were concocting a whole new xenophobic bugaboo to goose up their anti-immigrant demagoguery. We can’t just fear the “invasion” coming across our Southern border, they cry! Indeed, Haley wailed: “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/22/us/politics/nikki-haley-border-canada.html">It’s the northern border, too</a>” – adding ominously that we must “do whatever it takes to keep people out.” And then DeSantis piled on, saying we should wall off America’s Canadian border.</p><p>Meanwhile, nearly all residents living along that 5,500-mile boundary fear the political wall-mongers more than the imaginary threat of foreigners surging across illegally. “People have always been coming through Canada,” says a clerk at a general store in far-north New Hampshire. Scoffing at the silly political hype, she says: “I don’t think the residents are really worried.”</p><p>But Chicken-Little politicos won’t be shooed off by reality. After all, they still have the east, west, and gulf coasts to shut off – so expect them to propose razor wire for the entire US shoreline. Their ridiculousness makes Fromholz’s satire seem rational!</p><p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/just-what-we-need-another-border</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:141203747</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598755" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/141203747/e4c36dff6f2543bf57c173d80f02bb41.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/141203747/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>In the 1980s, many Texans were alarmed that hordes of immigrants were fleeing Rust Belt states and pouring across the Red River to take our jobs. So, my friend Steve Fromholz recommended a big beautiful wall across our northern border to keep them out. But Fromholz – a popular singer-songwriter and renown political sprite – was ahead of his time in the political sport of wallbuilding. Instead of steel barriers and miles of nasty of razor wire, Steve proposed preventing Yankee refugees from entering the Lone Star State by planting a 10-foot high, 10-foot thick wall of jalapeño peppers along the length of the Red River. Eat your way through… and you’d be accepted as a naturalized Texan. I thought of Steve’s impishness when I read that Nikki Haley, Ron DeSantis, and other Republicans were concocting a whole new xenophobic bugaboo to goose up their anti-immigrant demagoguery. We can’t just fear the “invasion” coming across our Southern border, they cry! Indeed, Haley wailed: “It’s the northern border, too” – adding ominously that we must “do whatever it takes to keep people out.” And then DeSantis piled on, saying we should wall off America’s Canadian border. Meanwhile, nearly all residents living along that 5,500-mile boundary fear the political wall-mongers more than the imaginary threat of foreigners surging across illegally. “People have always been coming through Canada,” says a clerk at a general store in far-north New Hampshire. Scoffing at the silly political hype, she says: “I don’t think the residents are really worried.” But Chicken-Little politicos won’t be shooed off by reality. After all, they still have the east, west, and gulf coasts to shut off – so expect them to propose razor wire for the entire US shoreline. Their ridiculousness makes Fromholz’s satire seem rational! Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>In the 1980s, many Texans were alarmed that hordes of immigrants were fleeing Rust Belt states and pouring across the Red River to take our jobs. So, my friend Steve Fromholz recommended a big beautiful wall across our northern border to keep them out. But Fromholz – a popular singer-songwriter and renown political sprite – was ahead of his time in the political sport of wallbuilding. Instead of steel barriers and miles of nasty of razor wire, Steve proposed preventing Yankee refugees from entering the Lone Star State by planting a 10-foot high, 10-foot thick wall of jalapeño peppers along the length of the Red River. Eat your way through… and you’d be accepted as a naturalized Texan. I thought of Steve’s impishness when I read that Nikki Haley, Ron DeSantis, and other Republicans were concocting a whole new xenophobic bugaboo to goose up their anti-immigrant demagoguery. We can’t just fear the “invasion” coming across our Southern border, they cry! Indeed, Haley wailed: “It’s the northern border, too” – adding ominously that we must “do whatever it takes to keep people out.” And then DeSantis piled on, saying we should wall off America’s Canadian border. Meanwhile, nearly all residents living along that 5,500-mile boundary fear the political wall-mongers more than the imaginary threat of foreigners surging across illegally. “People have always been coming through Canada,” says a clerk at a general store in far-north New Hampshire. Scoffing at the silly political hype, she says: “I don’t think the residents are really worried.” But Chicken-Little politicos won’t be shooed off by reality. After all, they still have the east, west, and gulf coasts to shut off – so expect them to propose razor wire for the entire US shoreline. Their ridiculousness makes Fromholz’s satire seem rational! Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rebranding CAFOs as PFOs Is Corporate BS]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>A decade ago, Oklahoma’s countryside was literally infested with 626 massively-polluting CAFOs – “Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations.” These are nightmarish creatures of industrial agribusiness, each one caging thousands of chickens, hogs, or cattle in huge concrete and steel buildings, and producing rivers of excrement. Imagine living next to one!</p><p>But – <em>hallelujah!</em> – responding to the outrage of rural neighbors, environmentalists, and animal rights advocates, Oklahoma’s political honchos have since stepped in with regulations to eliminate 90 percent of those CAFOs. Wow! How’d they do that?</p><p>The old-fashioned way: Political fraud. At the behest of chicken lobbyists for factory farm giants like Tyson Foods, state lawmakers – Hocus-Pocus! – let CAFOs rebrand themselves as PFOs, “Poultry Feeding Operations.” It’s the same old stink by a new name – only worse. The state’s PFO designation let’s corporate profiteers get away with providing <em>fewer protections</em> for Oklahoma communities they subject to the overwhelming stench, contamination, flies, disease, and other nasties inherent in caging more than 300,000 birds at a time in one spot.</p><p>For example, merely switching a factory’s registration from a federal CAFO to a state PFO lets these industrial polluters locate right across the road from family homes, bringing such constant odor, debris, and disease that people can’t open their windows or play in their yard. The PFO scheme also eliminates a requirement that neighbors have to be notified when a chicken factory proposes to locate next door, and state officials even outlawed legal protests against their rubber stamping of water permits for these polluters.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… Here’s a solution: Require that a PFO chicken factory be installed next door to the Capitol building—share the stink!</p><p>Do something</p><p>* Our friends at <strong>Farm Aid</strong> are working on reforming and restructuring industrial agriculture in a number of different ways— <a target="_blank" href="https://www.farmaid.org/category/issues/industrial-agriculture/">check out their full archive of actions, resources and news.</a></p><p>* Need local inspiration? The people of <a target="_blank" href="https://gro-ww.org/pierce-county-cafos/">Pierce County in western Wisconsin are currently fighting a CAFO expansion</a>— and winning, so far. Learn from their work <a target="_blank" href="https://gro-ww.org/pierce-county-cafos/">here</a>, and <a target="_blank" href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/friday-signpost-grassroots-groups">check out the Friday Signpost we wrote about them</a>.</p><p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/rebranding-cafos-as-pfos-is-corporate</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:141043750</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2024 17:05:32 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598755" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/141043750/b8b09def036423de52a4e92ea2868174.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/141043750/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>A decade ago, Oklahoma’s countryside was literally infested with 626 massively-polluting CAFOs – “Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations.” These are nightmarish creatures of industrial agribusiness, each one caging thousands of chickens, hogs, or cattle in huge concrete and steel buildings, and producing rivers of excrement. Imagine living next to one! But – hallelujah! – responding to the outrage of rural neighbors, environmentalists, and animal rights advocates, Oklahoma’s political honchos have since stepped in with regulations to eliminate 90 percent of those CAFOs. Wow! How’d they do that? The old-fashioned way: Political fraud. At the behest of chicken lobbyists for factory farm giants like Tyson Foods, state lawmakers – Hocus-Pocus! – let CAFOs rebrand themselves as PFOs, “Poultry Feeding Operations.” It’s the same old stink by a new name – only worse. The state’s PFO designation let’s corporate profiteers get away with providing fewer protections for Oklahoma communities they subject to the overwhelming stench, contamination, flies, disease, and other nasties inherent in caging more than 300,000 birds at a time in one spot. For example, merely switching a factory’s registration from a federal CAFO to a state PFO lets these industrial polluters locate right across the road from family homes, bringing such constant odor, debris, and disease that people can’t open their windows or play in their yard. The PFO scheme also eliminates a requirement that neighbors have to be notified when a chicken factory proposes to locate next door, and state officials even outlawed legal protests against their rubber stamping of water permits for these polluters. This is Jim Hightower saying… Here’s a solution: Require that a PFO chicken factory be installed next door to the Capitol building—share the stink! Do something * Our friends at Farm Aid are working on reforming and restructuring industrial agriculture in a number of different ways— check out their full archive of actions, resources and news. * Need local inspiration? The people of Pierce County in western Wisconsin are currently fighting a CAFO expansion— and winning, so far. Learn from their work here, and check out the Friday Signpost we wrote about them. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>A decade ago, Oklahoma’s countryside was literally infested with 626 massively-polluting CAFOs – “Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations.” These are nightmarish creatures of industrial agribusiness, each one caging thousands of chickens, hogs, or cattle in huge concrete and steel buildings, and producing rivers of excrement. Imagine living next to one! But – hallelujah! – responding to the outrage of rural neighbors, environmentalists, and animal rights advocates, Oklahoma’s political honchos have since stepped in with regulations to eliminate 90 percent of those CAFOs. Wow! How’d they do that? The old-fashioned way: Political fraud. At the behest of chicken lobbyists for factory farm giants like Tyson Foods, state lawmakers – Hocus-Pocus! – let CAFOs rebrand themselves as PFOs, “Poultry Feeding Operations.” It’s the same old stink by a new name – only worse. The state’s PFO designation let’s corporate profiteers get away with providing fewer protections for Oklahoma communities they subject to the overwhelming stench, contamination, flies, disease, and other nasties inherent in caging more than 300,000 birds at a time in one spot. For example, merely switching a factory’s registration from a federal CAFO to a state PFO lets these industrial polluters locate right across the road from family homes, bringing such constant odor, debris, and disease that people can’t open their windows or play in their yard. The PFO scheme also eliminates a requirement that neighbors have to be notified when a chicken factory proposes to locate next door, and state officials even outlawed legal protests against their rubber stamping of water permits for these polluters. This is Jim Hightower saying… Here’s a solution: Require that a PFO chicken factory be installed next door to the Capitol building—share the stink! Do something * Our friends at Farm Aid are working on reforming and restructuring industrial agriculture in a number of different ways— check out their full archive of actions, resources and news. * Need local inspiration? The people of Pierce County in western Wisconsin are currently fighting a CAFO expansion— and winning, so far. Learn from their work here, and check out the Friday Signpost we wrote about them. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why You Were Not Invited to Davos]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Once again, my invitation to the big shindig in Davos never arrived. Davos is the posh resort village in the Swiss Alps where some 3,000 global power elites gather every January for a weeklong, corporate-funded Schmooze-and-Booze-Fest to solve the world’s problems.</p><p>You and I are never invited to this confab, grandiosely titled “World Economic Forum.” That’s because (1) we’re not corporate or governmental VIPs, and (2) we might raise rude questions like, “Who the hell elected you plutocratic know-nothings and screw-ups to solve world problems – which <em>you</em> largely created?” See? We the People can’t be trusted to be polite.</p><p>Indeed, the theme of this year’s forum is, “How Can We Rebuild Trust?” By “we,” they mean the Davos clique itself – the Wall Street bankers, Silicon Valley speculators, various oligarchs, industrial barons, billionaire campaign donors, labor abusers, war mongers, mass polluters, high-tech futurists, and other architects of… well, the mess we’re in.</p><p>In our country, only about 10 percent say democracy is working for most Americans today, with the Powers That Be not even trying to serve what the majority believes in, wants, and needs. Economic fairness, social justice, and equal opportunity – our society’s fundamental, unifying values – are being trampled by the greed of moneyed elites and the fear and hatred of small-minded ideological extremists. They squabble over even keeping our government operating and fritter away their time and credibility on crap that undermines public trust.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… So, no, Davos crowd,<em> you</em> cannot “rebuild trust,” for no one can trust you. You could gain a real measure of credibility if your elite forum would do something truly significant for democracy, like taking corporate money out of our politics. That would make Davos historic. Otherwise, you’re just partying… and stroking your egos.</p><p><em>Photo by </em><a target="_blank" href="https://unsplash.com/@evangelineshaw?utm_content=creditCopyText&#38;utm_medium=referral&#38;utm_source=unsplash"><em>Evangeline Shaw</em></a><em> on </em><a target="_blank" href="https://unsplash.com/photos/world-economic-forum-MXJ9oRlevtw?utm_content=creditCopyText&#38;utm_medium=referral&#38;utm_source=unsplash"><em>Unsplash</em></a></p><p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-you-were-not-invited-to-davos</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:140969290</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2024 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598755" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/140969290/ce010fda57db386b854b455d6bf53591.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/140969290/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Once again, my invitation to the big shindig in Davos never arrived. Davos is the posh resort village in the Swiss Alps where some 3,000 global power elites gather every January for a weeklong, corporate-funded Schmooze-and-Booze-Fest to solve the world’s problems. You and I are never invited to this confab, grandiosely titled “World Economic Forum.” That’s because (1) we’re not corporate or governmental VIPs, and (2) we might raise rude questions like, “Who the hell elected you plutocratic know-nothings and screw-ups to solve world problems – which you largely created?” See? We the People can’t be trusted to be polite. Indeed, the theme of this year’s forum is, “How Can We Rebuild Trust?” By “we,” they mean the Davos clique itself – the Wall Street bankers, Silicon Valley speculators, various oligarchs, industrial barons, billionaire campaign donors, labor abusers, war mongers, mass polluters, high-tech futurists, and other architects of… well, the mess we’re in. In our country, only about 10 percent say democracy is working for most Americans today, with the Powers That Be not even trying to serve what the majority believes in, wants, and needs. Economic fairness, social justice, and equal opportunity – our society’s fundamental, unifying values – are being trampled by the greed of moneyed elites and the fear and hatred of small-minded ideological extremists. They squabble over even keeping our government operating and fritter away their time and credibility on crap that undermines public trust. This is Jim Hightower saying… So, no, Davos crowd, you cannot “rebuild trust,” for no one can trust you. You could gain a real measure of credibility if your elite forum would do something truly significant for democracy, like taking corporate money out of our politics. That would make Davos historic. Otherwise, you’re just partying… and stroking your egos. Photo by Evangeline Shaw on Unsplash Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Once again, my invitation to the big shindig in Davos never arrived. Davos is the posh resort village in the Swiss Alps where some 3,000 global power elites gather every January for a weeklong, corporate-funded Schmooze-and-Booze-Fest to solve the world’s problems. You and I are never invited to this confab, grandiosely titled “World Economic Forum.” That’s because (1) we’re not corporate or governmental VIPs, and (2) we might raise rude questions like, “Who the hell elected you plutocratic know-nothings and screw-ups to solve world problems – which you largely created?” See? We the People can’t be trusted to be polite. Indeed, the theme of this year’s forum is, “How Can We Rebuild Trust?” By “we,” they mean the Davos clique itself – the Wall Street bankers, Silicon Valley speculators, various oligarchs, industrial barons, billionaire campaign donors, labor abusers, war mongers, mass polluters, high-tech futurists, and other architects of… well, the mess we’re in. In our country, only about 10 percent say democracy is working for most Americans today, with the Powers That Be not even trying to serve what the majority believes in, wants, and needs. Economic fairness, social justice, and equal opportunity – our society’s fundamental, unifying values – are being trampled by the greed of moneyed elites and the fear and hatred of small-minded ideological extremists. They squabble over even keeping our government operating and fritter away their time and credibility on crap that undermines public trust. This is Jim Hightower saying… So, no, Davos crowd, you cannot “rebuild trust,” for no one can trust you. You could gain a real measure of credibility if your elite forum would do something truly significant for democracy, like taking corporate money out of our politics. That would make Davos historic. Otherwise, you’re just partying… and stroking your egos. Photo by Evangeline Shaw on Unsplash Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mini-Documentary: Black Farmers in Texas]]></title><description><![CDATA[This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_7">jimhightower.substack.com</a><br/><br/><p>The systemic denial of support and general exploitation that Black farmers in America have endured remains a relatively unexplored topic when it comes to progressive social justice stories. The <em>New York Times</em>’ <strong>1619 Project</strong> exposed the evolution of Black land ownership with a <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/04/podcasts/1619-slavery-sugar-farm-land.html">two-part episode</a> tracing both its roots from the end of slavery (<a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/04/podcasts/1619-slavery-sugar-farm-land.html">part 1</a>) as well as modern-day injustices like loan discrimination from the USDA (<a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/04/podcasts/1619-slavery-sugar-farm-land.html">part 2</a>). When Hightower became Agriculture Commissioner, he aimed to create structures supportive of marginalized farmers, especially Black farmers, as corporate agribusiness threatened the livelihoods of farmers across the state. This short documentary from <a target="_blank" href="https://substack.com/profile/125386888-peoples-history-in-texas">People's History in Texas</a> explores the collaborative, mutual process that the Texas Department of Agriculture (TDA) deployed to make gains for people who had traditionally been left—or pushed—behind.</p><p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/mini-documentary-black-farmers-in</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:140843187</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower, People's History in Texas, and Deanna Zandt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2024 17:11:41 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="481282" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/140843187/f946f60a33dd0547794cfb217f89fc66.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower, People's History in Texas, and Deanna Zandt</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>30</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/140843187/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com The systemic denial of support and general exploitation that Black farmers in America have endured remains a relatively unexplored topic when it comes to progressive social justice stories. The New York Times’ 1619 Project exposed the evolution of Black land ownership with a two-part episode tracing both its roots from the end of slavery (part 1) as well as modern-day injustices like loan discrimination from the USDA (part 2). When Hightower became Agriculture Commissioner, he aimed to create structures supportive of marginalized farmers, especially Black farmers, as corporate agribusiness threatened the livelihoods of farmers across the state. This short documentary from People's History in Texas explores the collaborative, mutual process that the Texas Department of Agriculture (TDA) deployed to make gains for people who had traditionally been left—or pushed—behind. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com The systemic denial of support and general exploitation that Black farmers in America have endured remains a relatively unexplored topic when it comes to progressive social justice stories. The New York Times’ 1619 Project exposed the evolution of Black land ownership with a two-part episode tracing both its roots from the end of slavery (part 1) as well as modern-day injustices like loan discrimination from the USDA (part 2). When Hightower became Agriculture Commissioner, he aimed to create structures supportive of marginalized farmers, especially Black farmers, as corporate agribusiness threatened the livelihoods of farmers across the state. This short documentary from People's History in Texas explores the collaborative, mutual process that the Texas Department of Agriculture (TDA) deployed to make gains for people who had traditionally been left—or pushed—behind. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[When Private Enterprise Fails, Public Enterprise Must Step Up]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>In cities all across America, an infiltration of wealthy investors, developers, and bankers is driving poor and middle-class families out of their own towns.</p><p>What’s at work here is the relentless financial shove of high-dollar gentrification. House by house, block by block, moneyed interests suddenly (and often secretly) buy up properties, bulldozing modest family homes to erect sprawling edifices for the rich. It’s a profiteering money grab that intentionally prices out regular homebuyers. Worse, it also artificially skyrockets property taxes for the area’s longtime homeowners, forcing them to sell out and leave town.</p><p>This financial whirligig is enormously destructive to a community’s crucial sense of fairness and… well, <em>community</em>. For one glaring example, look at who likely does NOT live in your city: School teachers, fire fighters, police, nurses, utility crews, and others who’re essential to making any city work.</p><p>If the so-called “free-market” can’t (or won’t) provide affordable spaces so these families can “come home,” where they belong, then the community itself must step up to meet the need with creative <em>public</em> initiatives.</p><p>The good news is that many cities are doing just that, including where I live. Fed up with losing teachers who endure spirit-sucking hour-long commutes from distant suburbs, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.mysanantonio.com/news/local/article/austin-isd-teacher-housing-18524841.php">Austin’s school board recently created its own affordable housing arm</a>. It’s starting to build hundreds of rental homes affordable to teachers, cafeteria workers, bus drivers, and other school employees. In addition, the district has formed a “public facility corporation” that partners with local developers and groups like <a target="_blank" href="https://www.habitat.org/">Habitat for Humanity</a> to build and sell family homes at prices within reach of the city’s school employees.</p><p>Housing is not only a basic human need, but also a community <em>essential</em> that can’t be left to the whims and greed of developers.</p><p>Do something</p><p>Fighting gentrification requires collaboration across many sectors and issues— here are a few organizations that are working strategically to make things happen:</p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.populardemocracy.org/">The Center for Popular Democracy</a> has affiliates in over 30 states working on a variety of community issues— <a target="_blank" href="https://www.populardemocracy.org/our-affiliates">find one in your state here</a>.</p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.righttothecity.org/">Right to the City’s</a> national alliance encompasses over 90 community-based racial, economic, gender, and environmental justice organizations.</p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.renters-rising.org/">Renters Rising</a> is a national alliance of renters working to shift the balance of power between renters and corporate landlords to guarantee that renters are able to live with dignity. </p><p>* Learn more: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.americanprogress.org/article/localized-anti-displacement-policies/">This report from the Center for American Progress</a> on localized anti-displacement policies gives background as well as suggested effective policies in the fight to keep communities intact.</p><p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/when-private-enterprise-fails-public</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:140808356</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 16:55:01 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598755" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/140808356/d9aa42823feb4f7fdd0a3015403adfc5.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/140808356/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>In cities all across America, an infiltration of wealthy investors, developers, and bankers is driving poor and middle-class families out of their own towns. What’s at work here is the relentless financial shove of high-dollar gentrification. House by house, block by block, moneyed interests suddenly (and often secretly) buy up properties, bulldozing modest family homes to erect sprawling edifices for the rich. It’s a profiteering money grab that intentionally prices out regular homebuyers. Worse, it also artificially skyrockets property taxes for the area’s longtime homeowners, forcing them to sell out and leave town. This financial whirligig is enormously destructive to a community’s crucial sense of fairness and… well, community. For one glaring example, look at who likely does NOT live in your city: School teachers, fire fighters, police, nurses, utility crews, and others who’re essential to making any city work. If the so-called “free-market” can’t (or won’t) provide affordable spaces so these families can “come home,” where they belong, then the community itself must step up to meet the need with creative public initiatives. The good news is that many cities are doing just that, including where I live. Fed up with losing teachers who endure spirit-sucking hour-long commutes from distant suburbs, Austin’s school board recently created its own affordable housing arm. It’s starting to build hundreds of rental homes affordable to teachers, cafeteria workers, bus drivers, and other school employees. In addition, the district has formed a “public facility corporation” that partners with local developers and groups like Habitat for Humanity to build and sell family homes at prices within reach of the city’s school employees. Housing is not only a basic human need, but also a community essential that can’t be left to the whims and greed of developers. Do something Fighting gentrification requires collaboration across many sectors and issues— here are a few organizations that are working strategically to make things happen: * The Center for Popular Democracy has affiliates in over 30 states working on a variety of community issues— find one in your state here. * Right to the City’s national alliance encompasses over 90 community-based racial, economic, gender, and environmental justice organizations. * Renters Rising is a national alliance of renters working to shift the balance of power between renters and corporate landlords to guarantee that renters are able to live with dignity. * Learn more: This report from the Center for American Progress on localized anti-displacement policies gives background as well as suggested effective policies in the fight to keep communities intact. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>In cities all across America, an infiltration of wealthy investors, developers, and bankers is driving poor and middle-class families out of their own towns. What’s at work here is the relentless financial shove of high-dollar gentrification. House by house, block by block, moneyed interests suddenly (and often secretly) buy up properties, bulldozing modest family homes to erect sprawling edifices for the rich. It’s a profiteering money grab that intentionally prices out regular homebuyers. Worse, it also artificially skyrockets property taxes for the area’s longtime homeowners, forcing them to sell out and leave town. This financial whirligig is enormously destructive to a community’s crucial sense of fairness and… well, community. For one glaring example, look at who likely does NOT live in your city: School teachers, fire fighters, police, nurses, utility crews, and others who’re essential to making any city work. If the so-called “free-market” can’t (or won’t) provide affordable spaces so these families can “come home,” where they belong, then the community itself must step up to meet the need with creative public initiatives. The good news is that many cities are doing just that, including where I live. Fed up with losing teachers who endure spirit-sucking hour-long commutes from distant suburbs, Austin’s school board recently created its own affordable housing arm. It’s starting to build hundreds of rental homes affordable to teachers, cafeteria workers, bus drivers, and other school employees. In addition, the district has formed a “public facility corporation” that partners with local developers and groups like Habitat for Humanity to build and sell family homes at prices within reach of the city’s school employees. Housing is not only a basic human need, but also a community essential that can’t be left to the whims and greed of developers. Do something Fighting gentrification requires collaboration across many sectors and issues— here are a few organizations that are working strategically to make things happen: * The Center for Popular Democracy has affiliates in over 30 states working on a variety of community issues— find one in your state here. * Right to the City’s national alliance encompasses over 90 community-based racial, economic, gender, and environmental justice organizations. * Renters Rising is a national alliance of renters working to shift the balance of power between renters and corporate landlords to guarantee that renters are able to live with dignity. * Learn more: This report from the Center for American Progress on localized anti-displacement policies gives background as well as suggested effective policies in the fight to keep communities intact. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Martin Luther King Didn’t Just Dream… He Organized!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>It’s time once again for America’s annual sing-along of “We Shall Overcome,” in celebration of Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday. As even school children know, he famously had a dream. His dream was that over the long arc of history, America will someday achieve racial harmony – <em>if</em> Black people will stop being pushy about racial injustice.</p><p>Oh, wait – that’s the right-wing’s current whitewashed version of King’s dream, scrubbing out his condemnation of brutally-racist White leaders and institutions (which still repress Black progress and foment racial hatred). And far from meekly waiting on “the arc of history,” King rallied people to take immediate action, calling it “<a target="_blank" href="https://inside.sfuhs.org/dept/history/US_History_reader/Chapter14/MLKriverside.htm">the fierce urgency of now.</a>”</p><p>He sought “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2018/04/the-pace-of-change/">a grand alliance of Negro and White [to] eradicate social evils [that] oppress both White and Negro.</a>” At the time of his assassination, he was actively forging that populist coalition to battle plutocratic wealth.</p><p>Indeed, King knew the history he sought to revive. The post-Civil War Populist Movement, he said, “<a target="_blank" href="https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/our-god-marching">began awakening the poor White masses and the former Negro slaves to the fact that [both] were being fleeced by [Southern aristocrat interests].</a>” That movement, he noted, intended to write a Black-White voting block “to build a great society of justice where none would prey upon the weakness of others; a society of plenty where greed and poverty would be done away.…”</p><p>But the unifying, democratic promise of Populism, King rightly explained, so terrified the aristocracy of wealth that its leaders made it “<a target="_blank" href="https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/our-god-marching">a crime for Negroes and Whites to come together as equals at any level.</a>” Thus moneyed elites effectively killed the people’s Populist party in the 1890s – but not the people’s Populist spirit.</p><p>So rather than merely celebrating a birthday, let’s recommit to King’s <em>real</em> dream of a multi-racial, democratic Populism.  </p><p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/martin-luther-king-didnt-just-dream</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:140704936</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2024 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598755" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/140704936/f04d4e40c29df97ed9c3b72ea44a1788.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/140704936/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>It’s time once again for America’s annual sing-along of “We Shall Overcome,” in celebration of Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday. As even school children know, he famously had a dream. His dream was that over the long arc of history, America will someday achieve racial harmony – if Black people will stop being pushy about racial injustice. Oh, wait – that’s the right-wing’s current whitewashed version of King’s dream, scrubbing out his condemnation of brutally-racist White leaders and institutions (which still repress Black progress and foment racial hatred). And far from meekly waiting on “the arc of history,” King rallied people to take immediate action, calling it “the fierce urgency of now.” He sought “a grand alliance of Negro and White [to] eradicate social evils [that] oppress both White and Negro.” At the time of his assassination, he was actively forging that populist coalition to battle plutocratic wealth. Indeed, King knew the history he sought to revive. The post-Civil War Populist Movement, he said, “began awakening the poor White masses and the former Negro slaves to the fact that [both] were being fleeced by [Southern aristocrat interests].” That movement, he noted, intended to write a Black-White voting block “to build a great society of justice where none would prey upon the weakness of others; a society of plenty where greed and poverty would be done away.…” But the unifying, democratic promise of Populism, King rightly explained, so terrified the aristocracy of wealth that its leaders made it “a crime for Negroes and Whites to come together as equals at any level.” Thus moneyed elites effectively killed the people’s Populist party in the 1890s – but not the people’s Populist spirit. So rather than merely celebrating a birthday, let’s recommit to King’s real dream of a multi-racial, democratic Populism.   Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>It’s time once again for America’s annual sing-along of “We Shall Overcome,” in celebration of Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday. As even school children know, he famously had a dream. His dream was that over the long arc of history, America will someday achieve racial harmony – if Black people will stop being pushy about racial injustice. Oh, wait – that’s the right-wing’s current whitewashed version of King’s dream, scrubbing out his condemnation of brutally-racist White leaders and institutions (which still repress Black progress and foment racial hatred). And far from meekly waiting on “the arc of history,” King rallied people to take immediate action, calling it “the fierce urgency of now.” He sought “a grand alliance of Negro and White [to] eradicate social evils [that] oppress both White and Negro.” At the time of his assassination, he was actively forging that populist coalition to battle plutocratic wealth. Indeed, King knew the history he sought to revive. The post-Civil War Populist Movement, he said, “began awakening the poor White masses and the former Negro slaves to the fact that [both] were being fleeced by [Southern aristocrat interests].” That movement, he noted, intended to write a Black-White voting block “to build a great society of justice where none would prey upon the weakness of others; a society of plenty where greed and poverty would be done away.…” But the unifying, democratic promise of Populism, King rightly explained, so terrified the aristocracy of wealth that its leaders made it “a crime for Negroes and Whites to come together as equals at any level.” Thus moneyed elites effectively killed the people’s Populist party in the 1890s – but not the people’s Populist spirit. So rather than merely celebrating a birthday, let’s recommit to King’s real dream of a multi-racial, democratic Populism.   Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Happy Birthday, Hightower! Featuring Beto O'Rourke, Heather Ball, Rep. Ro Khanna, Some Real Cute Kids, and a Singing (!) Ralph Nader ]]></title><description><![CDATA[This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_7">jimhightower.substack.com</a><br/><br/><p>Hightower isn’t too enthusiastic about celebrating birthdays, but when he turned 80 last year, Laura and Deanna decided to risk it all and get a bunch of his friends and co-conspirators to send him birthday messages. We were blown away by all the wonderful memories and love folks that from different parts of his life shared! Hightower noted in his thank you video (below) that what struck him the most is that folks weren’t just referencing a person, but the efforts to build a real movement over the course of these many decades together.</p><p>Our friends gave us permission to share their videos with you, so for your Friday enjoyment, we’ve got them all here for you. </p>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/happy-birthday-hightower-featuring</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:140627048</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Skrovan, Ro Khanna, People's History in Texas, Ralph Nader, and Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 22:09:01 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2196522" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/140627048/ee643c85b7f4babbc3cdf3e5a6b9eebf.mp3"/><itunes:author>Steve Skrovan, Ro Khanna, People's History in Texas, Ralph Nader, and Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>137</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/140627048/aa8a020c5680bd5187a3f87d60174457.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com Hightower isn’t too enthusiastic about celebrating birthdays, but when he turned 80 last year, Laura and Deanna decided to risk it all and get a bunch of his friends and co-conspirators to send him birthday messages. We were blown away by all the wonderful memories and love folks that from different parts of his life shared! Hightower noted in his thank you video (below) that what struck him the most is that folks weren’t just referencing a person, but the efforts to build a real movement over the course of these many decades together. Our friends gave us permission to share their videos with you, so for your Friday enjoyment, we’ve got them all here for you.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com Hightower isn’t too enthusiastic about celebrating birthdays, but when he turned 80 last year, Laura and Deanna decided to risk it all and get a bunch of his friends and co-conspirators to send him birthday messages. We were blown away by all the wonderful memories and love folks that from different parts of his life shared! Hightower noted in his thank you video (below) that what struck him the most is that folks weren’t just referencing a person, but the efforts to build a real movement over the course of these many decades together. Our friends gave us permission to share their videos with you, so for your Friday enjoyment, we’ve got them all here for you.</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Let’s Send All Billionaires to Mars!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, in the short time we homo sapiens have existed on this 4.5 billion-year-old Planet Earth, we have trashed the place. Climate change, deforestation, desertification, plastics in everything… etc.</p><p>Fortunately, though, we large-brained hominids have evolved an almost-magical resource that promises to be our salvation: <em>Billionaires!</em></p><p>One of the priceless benefits of amassing a multibillion-dollar, self-regenerating pile of wealth is that it automatically establishes you as “A Genius.” Never mind that you’ve most likely acquired your stash through some combination of inheritance, grift, rank exploitation, tax dodging, and such – you’re suddenly treated as a savant whose most fanciful nonsense is now taken seriously by the establishment.</p><p>Thus, we presently have two overstuffed money hogs, Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos, preaching that Earth is a lost cause. But, no problem, for they are designing space technologies that will let a cadre of select humans escape doom by colonizing the Moon and Mars. Using <a target="_blank" href="https://inequality.org/research/jeff-bezos-owes-american-taxpayers-for-space-ride/">untold billions of our tax dollars</a>, the two are in a PR race to land their spaceships first. But – Hey Bozos! – what then? You think our blue-green planet is hell, try living with no air, water, soil, little gravity, and zero protection from the incessant bombardment of cosmic radiation.</p><p>Well, postulate the billionaire space cadets, “we” (actually meaning us taxpayers) will just geoengineer Mars and the Moon, terraforming them into an Earthlike oasis. But wait – as astrophysicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson <a target="_blank" href="https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/oct/30/neil-dregrasse-tyson-astrophysics-mars-exploration#:~:text=If%20you%20had%20the%20power,another%20planet%20doesn&#39;t%20work.">pointed out a decade ago</a>, “If you had the power to terraform Mars into Earth, then you have the power to turn Earth back to Earth.”</p><p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/lets-send-all-billionaires-to-mars</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:140519861</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598755" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/140519861/b10a5d438aa14c58aea318bcb868e412.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/140519861/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Unfortunately, in the short time we homo sapiens have existed on this 4.5 billion-year-old Planet Earth, we have trashed the place. Climate change, deforestation, desertification, plastics in everything… etc. Fortunately, though, we large-brained hominids have evolved an almost-magical resource that promises to be our salvation: Billionaires! One of the priceless benefits of amassing a multibillion-dollar, self-regenerating pile of wealth is that it automatically establishes you as “A Genius.” Never mind that you’ve most likely acquired your stash through some combination of inheritance, grift, rank exploitation, tax dodging, and such – you’re suddenly treated as a savant whose most fanciful nonsense is now taken seriously by the establishment. Thus, we presently have two overstuffed money hogs, Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos, preaching that Earth is a lost cause. But, no problem, for they are designing space technologies that will let a cadre of select humans escape doom by colonizing the Moon and Mars. Using untold billions of our tax dollars, the two are in a PR race to land their spaceships first. But – Hey Bozos! – what then? You think our blue-green planet is hell, try living with no air, water, soil, little gravity, and zero protection from the incessant bombardment of cosmic radiation. Well, postulate the billionaire space cadets, “we” (actually meaning us taxpayers) will just geoengineer Mars and the Moon, terraforming them into an Earthlike oasis. But wait – as astrophysicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson pointed out a decade ago, “If you had the power to terraform Mars into Earth, then you have the power to turn Earth back to Earth.” Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Unfortunately, in the short time we homo sapiens have existed on this 4.5 billion-year-old Planet Earth, we have trashed the place. Climate change, deforestation, desertification, plastics in everything… etc. Fortunately, though, we large-brained hominids have evolved an almost-magical resource that promises to be our salvation: Billionaires! One of the priceless benefits of amassing a multibillion-dollar, self-regenerating pile of wealth is that it automatically establishes you as “A Genius.” Never mind that you’ve most likely acquired your stash through some combination of inheritance, grift, rank exploitation, tax dodging, and such – you’re suddenly treated as a savant whose most fanciful nonsense is now taken seriously by the establishment. Thus, we presently have two overstuffed money hogs, Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos, preaching that Earth is a lost cause. But, no problem, for they are designing space technologies that will let a cadre of select humans escape doom by colonizing the Moon and Mars. Using untold billions of our tax dollars, the two are in a PR race to land their spaceships first. But – Hey Bozos! – what then? You think our blue-green planet is hell, try living with no air, water, soil, little gravity, and zero protection from the incessant bombardment of cosmic radiation. Well, postulate the billionaire space cadets, “we” (actually meaning us taxpayers) will just geoengineer Mars and the Moon, terraforming them into an Earthlike oasis. But wait – as astrophysicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson pointed out a decade ago, “If you had the power to terraform Mars into Earth, then you have the power to turn Earth back to Earth.” Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Forget Millionaires. A Few Billionaires Are Now Stealing Our Country]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>In the serious business of politics, a little humor can be your best friend.</p><p>I saw its impact 30 years ago in Austin when a group of young, irreverent democracy activists decided to try limiting corporations that were drowning our local elections in their special-interest campaign cash. The upstart group named their grassroots effort a name that was a bit whimsical, yet pointed: “Austinites For A Little Less Corruption.”</p><p>It caught on. Even though the entire corporate, political, and media establishment united in furious opposition to the reform, 70 percent of voters rather joyously shouted, “YES!”</p><p>Now, more than ever, we need to rally grassroots Americans in a high-spirited, openly-rebellious campaign to save our people’s historic democratic values. An autocratic coterie of plutocratic supremists with unlimited corporate funding already dominates our elections, public policy, agenda, and our highest courts. It’s not a secret conspiracy – they’re quite open about it!</p><p>But forget the days of million-dollar donors – the arsenal of the systemic corruptors has now been nuclearized. For example, Charles Koch has just injected <a target="_blank" href="https://popular.info/p/charles-kochs-5-billion-tax-loophole">$5 </a><a target="_blank" href="https://popular.info/p/charles-kochs-5-billion-tax-loophole"><em>billion</em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://popular.info/p/charles-kochs-5-billion-tax-loophole"> in his 2024 political operation</a>. Tim Dunn, an ultra-right-wing Texas oil baron and extremist GOP sugar daddy has<a target="_blank" href="https://www.texastribune.org/2023/12/11/tim-dunn-occidental-petroleum-sale/"> just sold his fracking empire for $12 </a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.texastribune.org/2023/12/11/tim-dunn-occidental-petroleum-sale/"><em>billion</em></a>, gaining a new gusher of cash to weaponize his intention to impose laissez-faire rule over America.</p><p>It’s hard to visualize how much more anti-democratic firepower one gets by spending billions instead of mere millions. Think of the difference not in terms of dollars, but time. If you have a million seconds, that’s 11 days. But a billion seconds – that’s more than 31 years!</p><p>We can have no progress – no democracy – without getting corporate money out of America’s political system. For info and action, go to <a target="_blank" href="http://citizen.org">citizen.org</a>.</p><p>Do something</p><p>To fight the influence of big money in politics, in addition to <a target="_blank" href="https://www.citizen.org/topic/protecting-democracy/money-in-politics/">Public Citizen</a>, check out these organizations’ work:</p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.commoncause.org/our-work/money-influence/">Common Cause</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.brennancenter.org/issues/reform-money-politics">Brennan Center</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="http://movetoamend.org">Move to Amend</a></p><p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/forget-millionaires-a-few-billionaires</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:140519359</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 16:58:02 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598755" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/140519359/1ef6198ec88eac0e790d63f731102736.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/140519359/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>In the serious business of politics, a little humor can be your best friend. I saw its impact 30 years ago in Austin when a group of young, irreverent democracy activists decided to try limiting corporations that were drowning our local elections in their special-interest campaign cash. The upstart group named their grassroots effort a name that was a bit whimsical, yet pointed: “Austinites For A Little Less Corruption.” It caught on. Even though the entire corporate, political, and media establishment united in furious opposition to the reform, 70 percent of voters rather joyously shouted, “YES!” Now, more than ever, we need to rally grassroots Americans in a high-spirited, openly-rebellious campaign to save our people’s historic democratic values. An autocratic coterie of plutocratic supremists with unlimited corporate funding already dominates our elections, public policy, agenda, and our highest courts. It’s not a secret conspiracy – they’re quite open about it! But forget the days of million-dollar donors – the arsenal of the systemic corruptors has now been nuclearized. For example, Charles Koch has just injected $5 billion in his 2024 political operation. Tim Dunn, an ultra-right-wing Texas oil baron and extremist GOP sugar daddy has just sold his fracking empire for $12 billion, gaining a new gusher of cash to weaponize his intention to impose laissez-faire rule over America. It’s hard to visualize how much more anti-democratic firepower one gets by spending billions instead of mere millions. Think of the difference not in terms of dollars, but time. If you have a million seconds, that’s 11 days. But a billion seconds – that’s more than 31 years! We can have no progress – no democracy – without getting corporate money out of America’s political system. For info and action, go to citizen.org. Do something To fight the influence of big money in politics, in addition to Public Citizen, check out these organizations’ work: * Common Cause * Brennan Center * Move to Amend Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>In the serious business of politics, a little humor can be your best friend. I saw its impact 30 years ago in Austin when a group of young, irreverent democracy activists decided to try limiting corporations that were drowning our local elections in their special-interest campaign cash. The upstart group named their grassroots effort a name that was a bit whimsical, yet pointed: “Austinites For A Little Less Corruption.” It caught on. Even though the entire corporate, political, and media establishment united in furious opposition to the reform, 70 percent of voters rather joyously shouted, “YES!” Now, more than ever, we need to rally grassroots Americans in a high-spirited, openly-rebellious campaign to save our people’s historic democratic values. An autocratic coterie of plutocratic supremists with unlimited corporate funding already dominates our elections, public policy, agenda, and our highest courts. It’s not a secret conspiracy – they’re quite open about it! But forget the days of million-dollar donors – the arsenal of the systemic corruptors has now been nuclearized. For example, Charles Koch has just injected $5 billion in his 2024 political operation. Tim Dunn, an ultra-right-wing Texas oil baron and extremist GOP sugar daddy has just sold his fracking empire for $12 billion, gaining a new gusher of cash to weaponize his intention to impose laissez-faire rule over America. It’s hard to visualize how much more anti-democratic firepower one gets by spending billions instead of mere millions. Think of the difference not in terms of dollars, but time. If you have a million seconds, that’s 11 days. But a billion seconds – that’s more than 31 years! We can have no progress – no democracy – without getting corporate money out of America’s political system. For info and action, go to citizen.org. Do something To fight the influence of big money in politics, in addition to Public Citizen, check out these organizations’ work: * Common Cause * Brennan Center * Move to Amend Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[A New Road to Farm - Food - Climate Progress]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>“<a target="_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOlVN8VKsAY">Arkansas Traveler</a>” is an old-time song of folk humor that tells of a well-heeled dandy who gets lost while travelling across the Ozark Mountains. He comes upon a backwoods farmer and shouts out: “Hey farmer, where does this road go?” Not missing a beat, the farmer says: “I’ve lived here all my life, stranger, and it ain’t gone nowhere, yet.”</p><p>A corny joke, yet the current US Congress has traveled that same nowhere road all year long in a fruitless attempt to reach agreement on a rewrite of America’s basic Farm Bill. This failure is a very big deal and wholly irresponsible. The bill is a five-year, $700 billion package that not only doles out federal crop subsidies (which have largely gone to huge agribusiness operations), but it also provides food stamps for millions of poor families, money for vital ag conservation programs, and economic development work in thousands of rural counties.</p><p>So why the dead end? It’s caused by the same plutocratic/theocratic nuttiness of Republican lawmakers who put their extremist right-wing ideology and corporate servitude above all the other needs of regular people and our country. Because of their internal chaos and political grandstanding, the old status quo Farm Bill had to be extended for another year. Yet, that’s not all bad news, for a whole new constituency has begun rallying to write a truly innovative, forward-looking farm-food-labor climate bill that fosters the Common Good above the exploitative greed of today’s monopolistic, narrow-minded agribusiness complex.</p><p>Let’s turn the dead-end year into a positive opportunity to build public support in 2024 for fundamental <em>democratic </em>change in America’s food direction. The way to get there is not through more back-room Washington deals, but by going straight to the people, mobilizing family farmers, food workers, consumers, climate activists, and others behind a revitalized system that works for us.</p><p><em>Photo by </em><a target="_blank" href="https://unsplash.com/@auroraborealisme?utm_content=creditCopyText&#38;utm_medium=referral&#38;utm_source=unsplash"><em>Aurora Borealis</em></a><em> on </em><a target="_blank" href="https://unsplash.com/photos/green-grass-field-under-blue-sky-during-daytime-W0pdzJmTXyE?utm_content=creditCopyText&#38;utm_medium=referral&#38;utm_source=unsplash"><em>Unsplash</em></a></p><p>Do something</p><p>To learn more about the Farm Bill, we recommend <a target="_blank" href="https://www.farmaid.org/issues/farm-policy/farm-bill-101/">Farm Aid’s Farm Bill 101 guide</a>, and their regular <a target="_blank" href="https://www.farmaid.org/issues/farm-policy/the-latest-updates-on-the-2023-farm-bill/">updates</a>. (They’ll also give you actions to take when it’s time!)</p><p>We’re also fans of <a target="_blank" href="https://ruralorganizing.org/">RuralOrganizing.org</a> for getting involved in rural support all over the country— after all, the Farm Bill is not just a food bill, it’s a rural infrastructure bill. </p><p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/a-new-road-to-farm-food-climate-progress</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:140291190</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2024 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/140291190/375461096b366bdb492636d638c53171.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/140291190/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>“Arkansas Traveler” is an old-time song of folk humor that tells of a well-heeled dandy who gets lost while travelling across the Ozark Mountains. He comes upon a backwoods farmer and shouts out: “Hey farmer, where does this road go?” Not missing a beat, the farmer says: “I’ve lived here all my life, stranger, and it ain’t gone nowhere, yet.” A corny joke, yet the current US Congress has traveled that same nowhere road all year long in a fruitless attempt to reach agreement on a rewrite of America’s basic Farm Bill. This failure is a very big deal and wholly irresponsible. The bill is a five-year, $700 billion package that not only doles out federal crop subsidies (which have largely gone to huge agribusiness operations), but it also provides food stamps for millions of poor families, money for vital ag conservation programs, and economic development work in thousands of rural counties. So why the dead end? It’s caused by the same plutocratic/theocratic nuttiness of Republican lawmakers who put their extremist right-wing ideology and corporate servitude above all the other needs of regular people and our country. Because of their internal chaos and political grandstanding, the old status quo Farm Bill had to be extended for another year. Yet, that’s not all bad news, for a whole new constituency has begun rallying to write a truly innovative, forward-looking farm-food-labor climate bill that fosters the Common Good above the exploitative greed of today’s monopolistic, narrow-minded agribusiness complex. Let’s turn the dead-end year into a positive opportunity to build public support in 2024 for fundamental democratic change in America’s food direction. The way to get there is not through more back-room Washington deals, but by going straight to the people, mobilizing family farmers, food workers, consumers, climate activists, and others behind a revitalized system that works for us. Photo by Aurora Borealis on Unsplash Do something To learn more about the Farm Bill, we recommend Farm Aid’s Farm Bill 101 guide, and their regular updates. (They’ll also give you actions to take when it’s time!) We’re also fans of RuralOrganizing.org for getting involved in rural support all over the country— after all, the Farm Bill is not just a food bill, it’s a rural infrastructure bill. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>“Arkansas Traveler” is an old-time song of folk humor that tells of a well-heeled dandy who gets lost while travelling across the Ozark Mountains. He comes upon a backwoods farmer and shouts out: “Hey farmer, where does this road go?” Not missing a beat, the farmer says: “I’ve lived here all my life, stranger, and it ain’t gone nowhere, yet.” A corny joke, yet the current US Congress has traveled that same nowhere road all year long in a fruitless attempt to reach agreement on a rewrite of America’s basic Farm Bill. This failure is a very big deal and wholly irresponsible. The bill is a five-year, $700 billion package that not only doles out federal crop subsidies (which have largely gone to huge agribusiness operations), but it also provides food stamps for millions of poor families, money for vital ag conservation programs, and economic development work in thousands of rural counties. So why the dead end? It’s caused by the same plutocratic/theocratic nuttiness of Republican lawmakers who put their extremist right-wing ideology and corporate servitude above all the other needs of regular people and our country. Because of their internal chaos and political grandstanding, the old status quo Farm Bill had to be extended for another year. Yet, that’s not all bad news, for a whole new constituency has begun rallying to write a truly innovative, forward-looking farm-food-labor climate bill that fosters the Common Good above the exploitative greed of today’s monopolistic, narrow-minded agribusiness complex. Let’s turn the dead-end year into a positive opportunity to build public support in 2024 for fundamental democratic change in America’s food direction. The way to get there is not through more back-room Washington deals, but by going straight to the people, mobilizing family farmers, food workers, consumers, climate activists, and others behind a revitalized system that works for us. Photo by Aurora Borealis on Unsplash Do something To learn more about the Farm Bill, we recommend Farm Aid’s Farm Bill 101 guide, and their regular updates. (They’ll also give you actions to take when it’s time!) We’re also fans of RuralOrganizing.org for getting involved in rural support all over the country— after all, the Farm Bill is not just a food bill, it’s a rural infrastructure bill. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[My New Year’s Resolutions for Some Powerful People]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I made a few New Year’s resolutions this week – not for me, but as self-improvement ideas for some of the people running our country. No need for them to thank me – happy to help.</p><p>I drafted one for the GOP’s whole ultra-rightist gaggle of lawmakers who keep blocking passage of health coverage for poor people. “Resolved: We will forego the gold-plated socialized health care we now take from taxpayers, because it’s only right that we be in the same leaky boat as our constituents.”</p><p>Then there are America’s 735 narcissistic billionaires who obviously need to find a moral compass. They’re so self-absorbed they keep wasting their money and “genius” on phantasmagoric plutocratic schemes to separate their fortunes from the well-being of the rest of us. Then they wonder why they are not beloved. So, rich ones, let me help. Resolve in 2024 to demonstrate a little less hubris/a little more humanity, less strut/more sharing. Practice in front of a mirror – try seeing beyond you to the Common Good. It’s a beautiful and deeply rewarding place if you can find it.</p><p>And I didn’t overlook you Washington operatives and Big Money donors of the Democratic Party. Please resolve to camp out in grassroots America this year – where everyday little-d democrats want and need your attention and support. Not just in safe Blue districts, but especially in rural, purple, and even in red areas. You’ve abandoned them in recent years, but they still yearn to build a progressive governing majority for America’s future.</p><p>Of course, the problem with New Year’s resolutions is keeping them, and my honorees can’t be counted on. So, we have to keep pushing them to do what’s right.</p><p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/my-new-years-resolutions-for-some</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:140289460</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2024 17:18:36 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/140289460/fdab3003daa08d0c35ed26aa53307dd8.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/140289460/ac29e9742ad3d3245c0309f6cb0329c8.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>I made a few New Year’s resolutions this week – not for me, but as self-improvement ideas for some of the people running our country. No need for them to thank me – happy to help. I drafted one for the GOP’s whole ultra-rightist gaggle of lawmakers who keep blocking passage of health coverage for poor people. “Resolved: We will forego the gold-plated socialized health care we now take from taxpayers, because it’s only right that we be in the same leaky boat as our constituents.” Then there are America’s 735 narcissistic billionaires who obviously need to find a moral compass. They’re so self-absorbed they keep wasting their money and “genius” on phantasmagoric plutocratic schemes to separate their fortunes from the well-being of the rest of us. Then they wonder why they are not beloved. So, rich ones, let me help. Resolve in 2024 to demonstrate a little less hubris/a little more humanity, less strut/more sharing. Practice in front of a mirror – try seeing beyond you to the Common Good. It’s a beautiful and deeply rewarding place if you can find it. And I didn’t overlook you Washington operatives and Big Money donors of the Democratic Party. Please resolve to camp out in grassroots America this year – where everyday little-d democrats want and need your attention and support. Not just in safe Blue districts, but especially in rural, purple, and even in red areas. You’ve abandoned them in recent years, but they still yearn to build a progressive governing majority for America’s future. Of course, the problem with New Year’s resolutions is keeping them, and my honorees can’t be counted on. So, we have to keep pushing them to do what’s right. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>I made a few New Year’s resolutions this week – not for me, but as self-improvement ideas for some of the people running our country. No need for them to thank me – happy to help. I drafted one for the GOP’s whole ultra-rightist gaggle of lawmakers who keep blocking passage of health coverage for poor people. “Resolved: We will forego the gold-plated socialized health care we now take from taxpayers, because it’s only right that we be in the same leaky boat as our constituents.” Then there are America’s 735 narcissistic billionaires who obviously need to find a moral compass. They’re so self-absorbed they keep wasting their money and “genius” on phantasmagoric plutocratic schemes to separate their fortunes from the well-being of the rest of us. Then they wonder why they are not beloved. So, rich ones, let me help. Resolve in 2024 to demonstrate a little less hubris/a little more humanity, less strut/more sharing. Practice in front of a mirror – try seeing beyond you to the Common Good. It’s a beautiful and deeply rewarding place if you can find it. And I didn’t overlook you Washington operatives and Big Money donors of the Democratic Party. Please resolve to camp out in grassroots America this year – where everyday little-d democrats want and need your attention and support. Not just in safe Blue districts, but especially in rural, purple, and even in red areas. You’ve abandoned them in recent years, but they still yearn to build a progressive governing majority for America’s future. Of course, the problem with New Year’s resolutions is keeping them, and my honorees can’t be counted on. So, we have to keep pushing them to do what’s right. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Rattiest Right-Wing Congress Critter ]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Vangunu, one of the Solomon Islands, is home to a giant species of rodent called Vika. Astonishingly, this rare and very large rat has jaws so powerful it can bite through a coconut shell!</p><p>That made me think of Rep. Jim Jordan, the GOP’s rattiest, far-right-wing congress critter. There is no documented proof that this extremist partisan was raised on Vangunu, but he sure keeps gnawing on Joe and Hunter Biden, desperately trying to crack open a scandal that simply doesn’t exist. Vikas are powerful, but they’ve not been accused of being smart.</p><p>Jordan, the former coach of a boy’s wrestling team, now has his team of House Republicans in a choke hold, draining national media attention to his goofy obsession with impeaching Joe. Impeach him for what? Well, says Jordan, we’re looking for a reason.</p><p>He has it bassackwards – real impeachment proceedings start with specific charges of an official’s “high crimes and misdemeanors.” But Coach Jordan is perverting that Constitutional requirement by first accusing Biden of high crimes, <em>then</em> holding hearings in hopes of finding one. But poor Jim – it turns out to be easier for him to bite through a coconut than to fabricate a Biden crime.</p><p>But Jordan keeps gnawing, wasting Congress’ time, staff, and credibility (plus millions of taxpayer’s dollars) scuttling down trails that go nowhere. Meanwhile, as he and the GOP House prioritize their clownish political agenda, they can’t perform the basics of government, which is simply to keep essential public services funded and functioning.</p><p>Unable to govern, Republican leaders abruptly stopped working in the House in early December, saying they’ll get serious next year. But, uh-oh, the vika congressman has just announced he’ll hold more impeachment hearings next year so he can keep gnawing at the Biden coconut.</p><p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-rattiest-right-wing-congress</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:140147216</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2023 17:28:12 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/140147216/97b83489291474965e434fac2c5ba562.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/140147216/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Vangunu, one of the Solomon Islands, is home to a giant species of rodent called Vika. Astonishingly, this rare and very large rat has jaws so powerful it can bite through a coconut shell! That made me think of Rep. Jim Jordan, the GOP’s rattiest, far-right-wing congress critter. There is no documented proof that this extremist partisan was raised on Vangunu, but he sure keeps gnawing on Joe and Hunter Biden, desperately trying to crack open a scandal that simply doesn’t exist. Vikas are powerful, but they’ve not been accused of being smart. Jordan, the former coach of a boy’s wrestling team, now has his team of House Republicans in a choke hold, draining national media attention to his goofy obsession with impeaching Joe. Impeach him for what? Well, says Jordan, we’re looking for a reason. He has it bassackwards – real impeachment proceedings start with specific charges of an official’s “high crimes and misdemeanors.” But Coach Jordan is perverting that Constitutional requirement by first accusing Biden of high crimes, then holding hearings in hopes of finding one. But poor Jim – it turns out to be easier for him to bite through a coconut than to fabricate a Biden crime. But Jordan keeps gnawing, wasting Congress’ time, staff, and credibility (plus millions of taxpayer’s dollars) scuttling down trails that go nowhere. Meanwhile, as he and the GOP House prioritize their clownish political agenda, they can’t perform the basics of government, which is simply to keep essential public services funded and functioning. Unable to govern, Republican leaders abruptly stopped working in the House in early December, saying they’ll get serious next year. But, uh-oh, the vika congressman has just announced he’ll hold more impeachment hearings next year so he can keep gnawing at the Biden coconut. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Vangunu, one of the Solomon Islands, is home to a giant species of rodent called Vika. Astonishingly, this rare and very large rat has jaws so powerful it can bite through a coconut shell! That made me think of Rep. Jim Jordan, the GOP’s rattiest, far-right-wing congress critter. There is no documented proof that this extremist partisan was raised on Vangunu, but he sure keeps gnawing on Joe and Hunter Biden, desperately trying to crack open a scandal that simply doesn’t exist. Vikas are powerful, but they’ve not been accused of being smart. Jordan, the former coach of a boy’s wrestling team, now has his team of House Republicans in a choke hold, draining national media attention to his goofy obsession with impeaching Joe. Impeach him for what? Well, says Jordan, we’re looking for a reason. He has it bassackwards – real impeachment proceedings start with specific charges of an official’s “high crimes and misdemeanors.” But Coach Jordan is perverting that Constitutional requirement by first accusing Biden of high crimes, then holding hearings in hopes of finding one. But poor Jim – it turns out to be easier for him to bite through a coconut than to fabricate a Biden crime. But Jordan keeps gnawing, wasting Congress’ time, staff, and credibility (plus millions of taxpayer’s dollars) scuttling down trails that go nowhere. Meanwhile, as he and the GOP House prioritize their clownish political agenda, they can’t perform the basics of government, which is simply to keep essential public services funded and functioning. Unable to govern, Republican leaders abruptly stopped working in the House in early December, saying they’ll get serious next year. But, uh-oh, the vika congressman has just announced he’ll hold more impeachment hearings next year so he can keep gnawing at the Biden coconut. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Want Environmental Progress? Follow The Kids. ]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>“OK, Boomer.” That’s a snarky phrase currently some use to mock 60-and-70-year-olds they consider to be cluelessly out-of-touch.</p><p>Recently, however, teenagers and 20-somethings have turned that snide sentiment into a positive challenge directed at doomsayers of all ages who claim nothing can be done to stop runaway global warming: “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/22/climate/climate-change-ok-doomer.html">OK, Doomer,</a>” these young climate activists respond. It’s their shorthand way of saying to do-nothing fatalists. Give up if you want, but please step aside while we organize and mobilize for climate sanity.</p><p>Our globes’s fast-warming, catastrophe-creating climate is more than just another issue – it has become a generational cause for young people. Indeed, 62 percent of young voters support totally phasing out fossil fuels, and they’re channeling their anger about official inaction toward both political parties. Such feisty grassroots groups as <a target="_blank" href="https://genzforchange.org/">Gen-Z for Change</a>, <a target="_blank" href="https://thisiszerohour.org/">Zero Hour</a>, <a target="_blank" href="https://blackgirlenvironmentalist.org/">Black Girl Environmentalist</a>, and <a target="_blank" href="https://www.ourchildrenstrust.org/">Our Children’s Trust</a> are on the front lines – in the face of power, and on the move.</p><p>As in all progressive struggles – from civil rights to labor to environmental justice – progress comes from sticking with principle, building incrementally on local victories, and persevering against moneyed reactionaries. Already, one breakthrough by these young climate activists was made this year in deep-red, rural Montana. In a case filed by <a target="_blank" href="https://www.ourchildrenstrust.org/montana">Our Children’s Trust</a>, 16 children, ages 2-18, charged that a state law took away their right to challenge energy projects that increase global warming. Noting that Montana’s constitution establishes a right to “a clean and healthful environment,” <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/14/us/montana-youth-climate-ruling.html">state Judge Kathy Seeley ruled for the children</a>… and for a clean, healthy climate future.</p><p>Progress is not made by spectators and cynics, but by activists. And those who say that activism can’t produce change should not interrupt those who’re doing it.</p><p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/want-environmental-progress-follow</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:140092298</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2023 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/140092298/e8928634d2c0678a1ea5093e14c24a79.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/140092298/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>“OK, Boomer.” That’s a snarky phrase currently some use to mock 60-and-70-year-olds they consider to be cluelessly out-of-touch. Recently, however, teenagers and 20-somethings have turned that snide sentiment into a positive challenge directed at doomsayers of all ages who claim nothing can be done to stop runaway global warming: “OK, Doomer,” these young climate activists respond. It’s their shorthand way of saying to do-nothing fatalists. Give up if you want, but please step aside while we organize and mobilize for climate sanity. Our globes’s fast-warming, catastrophe-creating climate is more than just another issue – it has become a generational cause for young people. Indeed, 62 percent of young voters support totally phasing out fossil fuels, and they’re channeling their anger about official inaction toward both political parties. Such feisty grassroots groups as Gen-Z for Change, Zero Hour, Black Girl Environmentalist, and Our Children’s Trust are on the front lines – in the face of power, and on the move. As in all progressive struggles – from civil rights to labor to environmental justice – progress comes from sticking with principle, building incrementally on local victories, and persevering against moneyed reactionaries. Already, one breakthrough by these young climate activists was made this year in deep-red, rural Montana. In a case filed by Our Children’s Trust, 16 children, ages 2-18, charged that a state law took away their right to challenge energy projects that increase global warming. Noting that Montana’s constitution establishes a right to “a clean and healthful environment,” state Judge Kathy Seeley ruled for the children… and for a clean, healthy climate future. Progress is not made by spectators and cynics, but by activists. And those who say that activism can’t produce change should not interrupt those who’re doing it. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>“OK, Boomer.” That’s a snarky phrase currently some use to mock 60-and-70-year-olds they consider to be cluelessly out-of-touch. Recently, however, teenagers and 20-somethings have turned that snide sentiment into a positive challenge directed at doomsayers of all ages who claim nothing can be done to stop runaway global warming: “OK, Doomer,” these young climate activists respond. It’s their shorthand way of saying to do-nothing fatalists. Give up if you want, but please step aside while we organize and mobilize for climate sanity. Our globes’s fast-warming, catastrophe-creating climate is more than just another issue – it has become a generational cause for young people. Indeed, 62 percent of young voters support totally phasing out fossil fuels, and they’re channeling their anger about official inaction toward both political parties. Such feisty grassroots groups as Gen-Z for Change, Zero Hour, Black Girl Environmentalist, and Our Children’s Trust are on the front lines – in the face of power, and on the move. As in all progressive struggles – from civil rights to labor to environmental justice – progress comes from sticking with principle, building incrementally on local victories, and persevering against moneyed reactionaries. Already, one breakthrough by these young climate activists was made this year in deep-red, rural Montana. In a case filed by Our Children’s Trust, 16 children, ages 2-18, charged that a state law took away their right to challenge energy projects that increase global warming. Noting that Montana’s constitution establishes a right to “a clean and healthful environment,” state Judge Kathy Seeley ruled for the children… and for a clean, healthy climate future. Progress is not made by spectators and cynics, but by activists. And those who say that activism can’t produce change should not interrupt those who’re doing it. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Big Oil’s Slick Attempt to Greenwash Its Massive Plastic Pollution]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Let’s all sing the holiday classic: “All I want for Christmas… Is Something Not Made of Plastic.”</p><p>Easier sung than done. Plastic is now ubiquitous in toys, electronics, tools, air, water… and us. And don’t forget the plastic Baby Jesus in Christmas tableaus.</p><p>What is plastic, anyway? It’s a toxic synthetic material mostly manufactured from petroleum by such giants as ExxonMobil, the globe’s top purveyor. So much is produced by these profiteers that plastic trash is now a planetary disaster.</p><p>But not to worry, for Big Oil’s lobbyists assure us gabillions of plastic bags, bottles, and such are being recycled, keeping them out of our landfills, water, bodies, etc. Swell! Except… they’re lying.</p><p>After all, Exxon is the same for-profit contaminator that lied for years that fossil fuels were not causing climate change, even though top executives knew they were. Their ethic of deceit continues today – Big Oil knows that<a target="_blank" href="https://www.beyondplastics.org/plastics-recycling-rates"> </a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.beyondplastics.org/plastics-recycling-rates"><em>94 percent</em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.beyondplastics.org/plastics-recycling-rates"> of US plastics are not recycled</a>. Indeed, they can’t be.</p><p>Faced with growing public alarm about the ever-growing glut of plastic pollution, the industry has doubled down on deceit by offering a snappy new PR slogan: “Advanced Recycling.” They say it’s a magical process dubbed “pyrolysis.” <a target="_blank" href="https://www.treehugger.com/nrdc-report-trashes-chemical-recycling-5221820">Only… it doesn’t work, it’s inordinately expensive, and it increases climate change emissions</a>. Still, Exxon exclaims its AR will soon be processing half a million tons of plastic waste!  But that’s not even a drop in the plastic bucket, for more than <em>400 million tons</em> of plastic waste is discarded each year –and the oil industry is planning to double plastic production by 2040.</p><p>The only real way to stop runaway plastic pollution of us and our planet is to use less plastic. To learn more and help, go to Beyond Plastics: <a target="_blank" href="http://BeyondPlastics.org">BeyondPlastics.org</a>.</p><p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/big-oils-slick-attempt-to-greenwash</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:139966246</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/139966246/e9a4a6b52c7a204834bf38e6c48dc074.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/139966246/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Let’s all sing the holiday classic: “All I want for Christmas… Is Something Not Made of Plastic.” Easier sung than done. Plastic is now ubiquitous in toys, electronics, tools, air, water… and us. And don’t forget the plastic Baby Jesus in Christmas tableaus. What is plastic, anyway? It’s a toxic synthetic material mostly manufactured from petroleum by such giants as ExxonMobil, the globe’s top purveyor. So much is produced by these profiteers that plastic trash is now a planetary disaster. But not to worry, for Big Oil’s lobbyists assure us gabillions of plastic bags, bottles, and such are being recycled, keeping them out of our landfills, water, bodies, etc. Swell! Except… they’re lying. After all, Exxon is the same for-profit contaminator that lied for years that fossil fuels were not causing climate change, even though top executives knew they were. Their ethic of deceit continues today – Big Oil knows that 94 percent of US plastics are not recycled. Indeed, they can’t be. Faced with growing public alarm about the ever-growing glut of plastic pollution, the industry has doubled down on deceit by offering a snappy new PR slogan: “Advanced Recycling.” They say it’s a magical process dubbed “pyrolysis.” Only… it doesn’t work, it’s inordinately expensive, and it increases climate change emissions. Still, Exxon exclaims its AR will soon be processing half a million tons of plastic waste!  But that’s not even a drop in the plastic bucket, for more than 400 million tons of plastic waste is discarded each year –and the oil industry is planning to double plastic production by 2040. The only real way to stop runaway plastic pollution of us and our planet is to use less plastic. To learn more and help, go to Beyond Plastics: BeyondPlastics.org. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Let’s all sing the holiday classic: “All I want for Christmas… Is Something Not Made of Plastic.” Easier sung than done. Plastic is now ubiquitous in toys, electronics, tools, air, water… and us. And don’t forget the plastic Baby Jesus in Christmas tableaus. What is plastic, anyway? It’s a toxic synthetic material mostly manufactured from petroleum by such giants as ExxonMobil, the globe’s top purveyor. So much is produced by these profiteers that plastic trash is now a planetary disaster. But not to worry, for Big Oil’s lobbyists assure us gabillions of plastic bags, bottles, and such are being recycled, keeping them out of our landfills, water, bodies, etc. Swell! Except… they’re lying. After all, Exxon is the same for-profit contaminator that lied for years that fossil fuels were not causing climate change, even though top executives knew they were. Their ethic of deceit continues today – Big Oil knows that 94 percent of US plastics are not recycled. Indeed, they can’t be. Faced with growing public alarm about the ever-growing glut of plastic pollution, the industry has doubled down on deceit by offering a snappy new PR slogan: “Advanced Recycling.” They say it’s a magical process dubbed “pyrolysis.” Only… it doesn’t work, it’s inordinately expensive, and it increases climate change emissions. Still, Exxon exclaims its AR will soon be processing half a million tons of plastic waste!  But that’s not even a drop in the plastic bucket, for more than 400 million tons of plastic waste is discarded each year –and the oil industry is planning to double plastic production by 2040. The only real way to stop runaway plastic pollution of us and our planet is to use less plastic. To learn more and help, go to Beyond Plastics: BeyondPlastics.org. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mike Says That God Says He’s Our New Moses]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Mike Johnson, bless his heart, says he doesn’t “wanna get too spooky on you,” but it was God who made him the new Speaker of the US House.</p><p>He’s not asserting the fairly common belief, held by many Christians, that the Almighty plays a direct role in shaping people’s lives. No, no – Mike’s claim of divine selection is more singular, grandiose… and spooky. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/mike-johnson-moses-christian-nationalist-gala-1234918565/">In a recent speech to a sect of Christian Nationalists</a>, he confided that just prior to being chosen Speaker, God Hizownself had been awakening him every night for three weeks “to speak to me” about campaign strategy. Johnson says that while 13 other Republicans vied for the office, “the Lord kept telling me to wait, wait, wait.” Then God finally said, “Now step forward” and claim the gavel of power.</p><p>Why him, you might ask? Well, explains the ultra-right-winger, American culture has become “so dark and depraved it almost seems irredeemable.” So, says Mike, God needed a Christian purist to be “a new Moses” willing to lead America from the wickedness of abortion, gay marriage, and what the religious nationalists call “the ungodly effort to undermine our culture by Leftists.”</p><p>Mike went further, explaining that “[God] had been speaking to me about this, and the Lord told me very clearly to prepare and be ready.” But, says Mike, he was told not merely to take the nation’s third highest political office, but ready to guide the nation, Moses-like, through “a Red Sea moment.” So, all of us should get ready, for we now have a Trump-supporting, holy-rolling congress critter who actually believes he’s been chosen by God to part the perilous waters and take us from a diverse democracy to his theocratic Christian wonderland.</p><p>God help us – and please hurry!</p><p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/mike-says-that-god-says-hes-our-new</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:139901781</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2023 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/139901781/d6d3d5c92c3dfdb56b96000f8813a07b.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/139901781/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Mike Johnson, bless his heart, says he doesn’t “wanna get too spooky on you,” but it was God who made him the new Speaker of the US House. He’s not asserting the fairly common belief, held by many Christians, that the Almighty plays a direct role in shaping people’s lives. No, no – Mike’s claim of divine selection is more singular, grandiose… and spooky. In a recent speech to a sect of Christian Nationalists, he confided that just prior to being chosen Speaker, God Hizownself had been awakening him every night for three weeks “to speak to me” about campaign strategy. Johnson says that while 13 other Republicans vied for the office, “the Lord kept telling me to wait, wait, wait.” Then God finally said, “Now step forward” and claim the gavel of power. Why him, you might ask? Well, explains the ultra-right-winger, American culture has become “so dark and depraved it almost seems irredeemable.” So, says Mike, God needed a Christian purist to be “a new Moses” willing to lead America from the wickedness of abortion, gay marriage, and what the religious nationalists call “the ungodly effort to undermine our culture by Leftists.” Mike went further, explaining that “[God] had been speaking to me about this, and the Lord told me very clearly to prepare and be ready.” But, says Mike, he was told not merely to take the nation’s third highest political office, but ready to guide the nation, Moses-like, through “a Red Sea moment.” So, all of us should get ready, for we now have a Trump-supporting, holy-rolling congress critter who actually believes he’s been chosen by God to part the perilous waters and take us from a diverse democracy to his theocratic Christian wonderland. God help us – and please hurry! Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Mike Johnson, bless his heart, says he doesn’t “wanna get too spooky on you,” but it was God who made him the new Speaker of the US House. He’s not asserting the fairly common belief, held by many Christians, that the Almighty plays a direct role in shaping people’s lives. No, no – Mike’s claim of divine selection is more singular, grandiose… and spooky. In a recent speech to a sect of Christian Nationalists, he confided that just prior to being chosen Speaker, God Hizownself had been awakening him every night for three weeks “to speak to me” about campaign strategy. Johnson says that while 13 other Republicans vied for the office, “the Lord kept telling me to wait, wait, wait.” Then God finally said, “Now step forward” and claim the gavel of power. Why him, you might ask? Well, explains the ultra-right-winger, American culture has become “so dark and depraved it almost seems irredeemable.” So, says Mike, God needed a Christian purist to be “a new Moses” willing to lead America from the wickedness of abortion, gay marriage, and what the religious nationalists call “the ungodly effort to undermine our culture by Leftists.” Mike went further, explaining that “[God] had been speaking to me about this, and the Lord told me very clearly to prepare and be ready.” But, says Mike, he was told not merely to take the nation’s third highest political office, but ready to guide the nation, Moses-like, through “a Red Sea moment.” So, all of us should get ready, for we now have a Trump-supporting, holy-rolling congress critter who actually believes he’s been chosen by God to part the perilous waters and take us from a diverse democracy to his theocratic Christian wonderland. God help us – and please hurry! Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Is My Doctor Unionizing?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>You wait a month to get a doctor appointment, then you sit in the waiting room an hour because Dr. Incorporated is perpetually overbooked, then you’re finally rushed in for your 10-minutes with the doc… tick, tick, tick… and then you’re scooted out, uncertain whether you’re supposed to take pills or make funeral arrangements.</p><p>Welcome to corporatized, consolidized, and bureaucratized “healthcare” – a rigid system in which nurses, pharmacists, and even doctors are no longer independent health professionals driven by a moral mandate to provide their best care to patients. Instead, all are treated as cogs in a monopolistic structure driven by an imperative to provide maximum profit to Wall Street owners of the corporate-care chains. This financial hierarchy demands factory-like cost-cutting – including cutting the numbers of nurses, pharmacists, and physicians who actually provide the care.</p><p>The cutbacks leave remaining caregivers stressed to the breaking point, and “care” is regimented to such time-motion metrics as limiting doctors to only 10 minutes per patient. Next!</p><p>Even when professionals complain that corporate cutbacks are endangering patients, the hierarchy responds with irrelevant financial statistics. For example, when Walgreens’ pharmacists recently revolted against constant staff cuts, the chain’s corporate bosses coldly retorted that they were investing $400 million in new pharmacists. Sounds like a big number, but really? Walgreens is pocketing <em>$27 billion this year in profit</em>! So, investing under 2% of one year’s profit will not make a blip in service to patients. Instead, the bulk of the billions that consumers pay goes to enrich top executives and Wall Street investors.</p><p>This enrichment of the rich few at our expense is why health care providers are unionizing – not for themselves, but for us patients. For information and action, go to <a target="_blank" href="http://doctorscouncil.org">doctorscouncil.org</a>.</p><p><em>Photo: </em><a target="_blank" href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/109799466@N06/33237094186/in/album-72157681094000195/"><em>Joe Piette on Flickr</em></a></p><p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-is-my-doctor-unionizing</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:139785505</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2023 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/139785505/4b9da92bff7194518862b0a7e3fa9295.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/139785505/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>You wait a month to get a doctor appointment, then you sit in the waiting room an hour because Dr. Incorporated is perpetually overbooked, then you’re finally rushed in for your 10-minutes with the doc… tick, tick, tick… and then you’re scooted out, uncertain whether you’re supposed to take pills or make funeral arrangements. Welcome to corporatized, consolidized, and bureaucratized “healthcare” – a rigid system in which nurses, pharmacists, and even doctors are no longer independent health professionals driven by a moral mandate to provide their best care to patients. Instead, all are treated as cogs in a monopolistic structure driven by an imperative to provide maximum profit to Wall Street owners of the corporate-care chains. This financial hierarchy demands factory-like cost-cutting – including cutting the numbers of nurses, pharmacists, and physicians who actually provide the care. The cutbacks leave remaining caregivers stressed to the breaking point, and “care” is regimented to such time-motion metrics as limiting doctors to only 10 minutes per patient. Next! Even when professionals complain that corporate cutbacks are endangering patients, the hierarchy responds with irrelevant financial statistics. For example, when Walgreens’ pharmacists recently revolted against constant staff cuts, the chain’s corporate bosses coldly retorted that they were investing $400 million in new pharmacists. Sounds like a big number, but really? Walgreens is pocketing $27 billion this year in profit! So, investing under 2% of one year’s profit will not make a blip in service to patients. Instead, the bulk of the billions that consumers pay goes to enrich top executives and Wall Street investors. This enrichment of the rich few at our expense is why health care providers are unionizing – not for themselves, but for us patients. For information and action, go to doctorscouncil.org. Photo: Joe Piette on Flickr Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>You wait a month to get a doctor appointment, then you sit in the waiting room an hour because Dr. Incorporated is perpetually overbooked, then you’re finally rushed in for your 10-minutes with the doc… tick, tick, tick… and then you’re scooted out, uncertain whether you’re supposed to take pills or make funeral arrangements. Welcome to corporatized, consolidized, and bureaucratized “healthcare” – a rigid system in which nurses, pharmacists, and even doctors are no longer independent health professionals driven by a moral mandate to provide their best care to patients. Instead, all are treated as cogs in a monopolistic structure driven by an imperative to provide maximum profit to Wall Street owners of the corporate-care chains. This financial hierarchy demands factory-like cost-cutting – including cutting the numbers of nurses, pharmacists, and physicians who actually provide the care. The cutbacks leave remaining caregivers stressed to the breaking point, and “care” is regimented to such time-motion metrics as limiting doctors to only 10 minutes per patient. Next! Even when professionals complain that corporate cutbacks are endangering patients, the hierarchy responds with irrelevant financial statistics. For example, when Walgreens’ pharmacists recently revolted against constant staff cuts, the chain’s corporate bosses coldly retorted that they were investing $400 million in new pharmacists. Sounds like a big number, but really? Walgreens is pocketing $27 billion this year in profit! So, investing under 2% of one year’s profit will not make a blip in service to patients. Instead, the bulk of the billions that consumers pay goes to enrich top executives and Wall Street investors. This enrichment of the rich few at our expense is why health care providers are unionizing – not for themselves, but for us patients. For information and action, go to doctorscouncil.org. Photo: Joe Piette on Flickr Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Interview with Hightower: Democrats need to ‘stop talking b******t and do something’]]></title><description><![CDATA[This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_7">jimhightower.substack.com</a><br/><br/><p><em>Recently, our friends over at </em><a target="_blank" href="https://therealnews.com/the-marc-steiner-show"><em>The Marc Steiner Show</em></a><em> on </em><a target="_blank" href="https://therealnews.com/"><em>The Real News Network</em></a><em> stopped by Hightower’s house in Austin for a long chat about Texas politics and the history of progressive populism. Enjoy! And if you like what you hear, make sure you visit </em><a target="_blank" href="https://therealnews.com/"><em>The Real News</em></a><em> and consider making a </em><a target="_blank" href="https://therealnews.com/?form=FUNGWBAWASM"><em>donation</em></a><em> to them.</em></p><p>People write off states like Texas as dyed-in-the-wool Republican strongholds, but it wasn’t always that way. Legendary author, organizer, commentator, and former State Agricultural Commissioner Jim Hightower is living proof that there is a strong progressive tradition in Texas that stretches back to the 19th century. Hightower has fought the far right for decades, but he has also seen how Democrats have abandoned grassroots organizing and how the Democratic Party has been hijacked by corporate money and self-serving elites. In this special episode of <em>The Marc Steiner Show</em>, recorded at Hightower’s home in Austin, Texas, we talk to Hightower about House Bill 2127 (aka “The Death Star Bill”), how corporate power and far-right nuts took over Texas politics, and how to rebuild the progressive movement in the Lone Star State.</p><p>Pre-Production: Kayla Rivara, Maximillian Alvarez, Marc Steiner, David Griscom, Alexander KofflerStudio Production: Alexander KofflerPost-Production: David Hebden</p>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/interview-with-hightower-democrats</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:139757275</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:38:41 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="5326897" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/139757275/59e99976e14effbbfc56ec9139978582.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>260</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/139757275/fa7b3be56685b7b53cce954379250d4d.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com Recently, our friends over at The Marc Steiner Show on The Real News Network stopped by Hightower’s house in Austin for a long chat about Texas politics and the history of progressive populism. Enjoy! And if you like what you hear, make sure you visit The Real News and consider making a donation to them. People write off states like Texas as dyed-in-the-wool Republican strongholds, but it wasn’t always that way. Legendary author, organizer, commentator, and former State Agricultural Commissioner Jim Hightower is living proof that there is a strong progressive tradition in Texas that stretches back to the 19th century. Hightower has fought the far right for decades, but he has also seen how Democrats have abandoned grassroots organizing and how the Democratic Party has been hijacked by corporate money and self-serving elites. In this special episode of The Marc Steiner Show, recorded at Hightower’s home in Austin, Texas, we talk to Hightower about House Bill 2127 (aka “The Death Star Bill”), how corporate power and far-right nuts took over Texas politics, and how to rebuild the progressive movement in the Lone Star State. Pre-Production: Kayla Rivara, Maximillian Alvarez, Marc Steiner, David Griscom, Alexander KofflerStudio Production: Alexander KofflerPost-Production: David Hebden</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com Recently, our friends over at The Marc Steiner Show on The Real News Network stopped by Hightower’s house in Austin for a long chat about Texas politics and the history of progressive populism. Enjoy! And if you like what you hear, make sure you visit The Real News and consider making a donation to them. People write off states like Texas as dyed-in-the-wool Republican strongholds, but it wasn’t always that way. Legendary author, organizer, commentator, and former State Agricultural Commissioner Jim Hightower is living proof that there is a strong progressive tradition in Texas that stretches back to the 19th century. Hightower has fought the far right for decades, but he has also seen how Democrats have abandoned grassroots organizing and how the Democratic Party has been hijacked by corporate money and self-serving elites. In this special episode of The Marc Steiner Show, recorded at Hightower’s home in Austin, Texas, we talk to Hightower about House Bill 2127 (aka “The Death Star Bill”), how corporate power and far-right nuts took over Texas politics, and how to rebuild the progressive movement in the Lone Star State. Pre-Production: Kayla Rivara, Maximillian Alvarez, Marc Steiner, David Griscom, Alexander KofflerStudio Production: Alexander KofflerPost-Production: David Hebden</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Air Travel Is So Expensive and Unpleasant]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>In a song about outlaws, Woody Guthrie noted that, “Some’ll rob with a 6-gun/Some with a fountain pen.”</p><p>Indeed, the big money thievery in our society today is being perpetrated by the Fountain Pen Gang of corporate monopolists, Wall Street financiers, and Washington lobbyists. They’re trying to pull off another multibillion-dollar heist right now in the airline industry. It’s a merger caper that would gouge consumers, shortchange airline workers, and cut service to communities by further shrinking competition in an already-monopolistic market. Just four giants – American, United, Delta, and Southwest – now control <em>two-thirds</em> of all air travel in the entire US. The only competitive force left is a handful of smaller lines, such as Jet Blue, Spirit, Alaska, and Hawaiian. Currently, though, Alaska and Jet Blue are trying to take over the other two, perversely arguing that <em>cutting</em> the number of competitors will miraculously <em>increase </em>competition and magically <em>reduce</em> prices for consumers.</p><p>This is what I call “Santa Clause Economics” – you have to be six years old to believe it. Here, boys and girls, is the reason that less competition is not more: All of these airlines are owned and controlled by the same tiny group of über-rich, Wall Street financial profiteers. For example, Vanguard Group (a $7-trillion global investment powerhouse) is the largest institutional shareholder in American, United, Delta, Southwest, and Alaska, plus the second largest in Jet Blue. So, far from fighting the Big Four, the two monopolistic wannabes would join them to rig prices even higher and make airline “service” more of an oxymoron than it is now.</p><p>The word “free” in free enterprise is not an adjective, it’s a verb. We have to free-up the enterprising competitors that corporate monopolists are locking out, <em>decentralizing</em> market power, not increasing consolidation.</p><p>Do something </p><p>Want to fight monopolization and the centralization of markets? Here are a few places to start:</p><p>* The <a target="_blank" href="https://www.economicliberties.us/">American Economic Liberties Project </a>is part of a growing, cross- ideological movement to combat monopolistic corporations and the systems that entrench their power.</p><p>* The <a target="_blank" href="https://ilsr.org/fighting-monopoly-power/">Institute for Local Self-Reliance</a> has a thorough resource for starting in your town, from banking and broadband to pharmacy and food: <a target="_blank" href="https://ilsr.org/fighting-monopoly-power/">Fighting Monopoly Power: How States and Cities Can Beat Back Corporate Control and Build Thriving Communities</a></p><p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-air-travel-is-so-expensive-and</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:139693819</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2023 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/139693819/72d249c22c046e6fee10835ba323da53.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/139693819/29e00e7399887a48aa7c16b70008f39f.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>In a song about outlaws, Woody Guthrie noted that, “Some’ll rob with a 6-gun/Some with a fountain pen.” Indeed, the big money thievery in our society today is being perpetrated by the Fountain Pen Gang of corporate monopolists, Wall Street financiers, and Washington lobbyists. They’re trying to pull off another multibillion-dollar heist right now in the airline industry. It’s a merger caper that would gouge consumers, shortchange airline workers, and cut service to communities by further shrinking competition in an already-monopolistic market. Just four giants – American, United, Delta, and Southwest – now control two-thirds of all air travel in the entire US. The only competitive force left is a handful of smaller lines, such as Jet Blue, Spirit, Alaska, and Hawaiian. Currently, though, Alaska and Jet Blue are trying to take over the other two, perversely arguing that cutting the number of competitors will miraculously increase competition and magically reduce prices for consumers. This is what I call “Santa Clause Economics” – you have to be six years old to believe it. Here, boys and girls, is the reason that less competition is not more: All of these airlines are owned and controlled by the same tiny group of über-rich, Wall Street financial profiteers. For example, Vanguard Group (a $7-trillion global investment powerhouse) is the largest institutional shareholder in American, United, Delta, Southwest, and Alaska, plus the second largest in Jet Blue. So, far from fighting the Big Four, the two monopolistic wannabes would join them to rig prices even higher and make airline “service” more of an oxymoron than it is now. The word “free” in free enterprise is not an adjective, it’s a verb. We have to free-up the enterprising competitors that corporate monopolists are locking out, decentralizing market power, not increasing consolidation. Do something Want to fight monopolization and the centralization of markets? Here are a few places to start: * The American Economic Liberties Project is part of a growing, cross- ideological movement to combat monopolistic corporations and the systems that entrench their power. * The Institute for Local Self-Reliance has a thorough resource for starting in your town, from banking and broadband to pharmacy and food: Fighting Monopoly Power: How States and Cities Can Beat Back Corporate Control and Build Thriving Communities Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>In a song about outlaws, Woody Guthrie noted that, “Some’ll rob with a 6-gun/Some with a fountain pen.” Indeed, the big money thievery in our society today is being perpetrated by the Fountain Pen Gang of corporate monopolists, Wall Street financiers, and Washington lobbyists. They’re trying to pull off another multibillion-dollar heist right now in the airline industry. It’s a merger caper that would gouge consumers, shortchange airline workers, and cut service to communities by further shrinking competition in an already-monopolistic market. Just four giants – American, United, Delta, and Southwest – now control two-thirds of all air travel in the entire US. The only competitive force left is a handful of smaller lines, such as Jet Blue, Spirit, Alaska, and Hawaiian. Currently, though, Alaska and Jet Blue are trying to take over the other two, perversely arguing that cutting the number of competitors will miraculously increase competition and magically reduce prices for consumers. This is what I call “Santa Clause Economics” – you have to be six years old to believe it. Here, boys and girls, is the reason that less competition is not more: All of these airlines are owned and controlled by the same tiny group of über-rich, Wall Street financial profiteers. For example, Vanguard Group (a $7-trillion global investment powerhouse) is the largest institutional shareholder in American, United, Delta, Southwest, and Alaska, plus the second largest in Jet Blue. So, far from fighting the Big Four, the two monopolistic wannabes would join them to rig prices even higher and make airline “service” more of an oxymoron than it is now. The word “free” in free enterprise is not an adjective, it’s a verb. We have to free-up the enterprising competitors that corporate monopolists are locking out, decentralizing market power, not increasing consolidation. Do something Want to fight monopolization and the centralization of markets? Here are a few places to start: * The American Economic Liberties Project is part of a growing, cross- ideological movement to combat monopolistic corporations and the systems that entrench their power. * The Institute for Local Self-Reliance has a thorough resource for starting in your town, from banking and broadband to pharmacy and food: Fighting Monopoly Power: How States and Cities Can Beat Back Corporate Control and Build Thriving Communities Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Woody Guthrie’s Anthem Mocking Right-Wing Republicanism]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>What it is about today’s vituperative, foam-at-the-mouth Republican party?</p><p>No longer disguising their desire to repress women, workers, immigrants, the poor, and all others who differ with (or are different from) their own partisan clan, the party has turned to a politics of hatred and division, openly seeking to <em>punish</em> opponents they now brand as “enemies” and “vermin.” What’s motivating this plunge into such undiluted political sourness?</p><p>My simple observation is that they’ve succumbed to a base impulse expressed in one straightforward word: <strong>MEANNESS</strong>. After all, their current agenda amounts to hurting people they don’t like, trying to keep America’s diverse majority from getting such basic human needs and rights as health care, the vote, fair wages, reproductive liberty, and public education free of church dictates. That’s not “conservative,” it’s just mean.</p><p>This malicious strain of selfish Republicanism has flared up periodically in our history, with the few striving to repress the many. Woody Guthrie even wrote an anthem in the 1940s mocking those crusading for such a morally-depraved politics:</p><p>“I’m the meanest man that ever had a brain…</p><p>I hate everybody don’t think like me…And I’m readin’ all the books I canTo learn how to hurt…Keep you without no vote,Keep you without no union.…</p><p>Well, if I can get the the fat to hatin’ the lean,That’d tickle me more than anything I’ve seen,Then get the colors fightin’ one another,And friend against friend, and brother and sister against brother……</p><p>I love to hate and I hate to love!I’m mean, I’m just mean.”</p><p>This song is dedicated to Ron DeSantis, Marjorie Taylor Green, Jim Jordan, Mike Johnson, Greg Abbott, and… well, you know who you are.</p><p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/woody-guthries-anthem-mocking-right</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:139441619</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2023 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/139441619/b8fa7726c8e7442cdc3b2b4a999a9db0.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/139441619/c2dfc5d6e8411be859e7ac80b1bf8690.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>What it is about today’s vituperative, foam-at-the-mouth Republican party? No longer disguising their desire to repress women, workers, immigrants, the poor, and all others who differ with (or are different from) their own partisan clan, the party has turned to a politics of hatred and division, openly seeking to punish opponents they now brand as “enemies” and “vermin.” What’s motivating this plunge into such undiluted political sourness? My simple observation is that they’ve succumbed to a base impulse expressed in one straightforward word: MEANNESS. After all, their current agenda amounts to hurting people they don’t like, trying to keep America’s diverse majority from getting such basic human needs and rights as health care, the vote, fair wages, reproductive liberty, and public education free of church dictates. That’s not “conservative,” it’s just mean. This malicious strain of selfish Republicanism has flared up periodically in our history, with the few striving to repress the many. Woody Guthrie even wrote an anthem in the 1940s mocking those crusading for such a morally-depraved politics: “I’m the meanest man that ever had a brain… I hate everybody don’t think like me…And I’m readin’ all the books I canTo learn how to hurt…Keep you without no vote,Keep you without no union.… Well, if I can get the the fat to hatin’ the lean,That’d tickle me more than anything I’ve seen,Then get the colors fightin’ one another,And friend against friend, and brother and sister against brother…… I love to hate and I hate to love!I’m mean, I’m just mean.” This song is dedicated to Ron DeSantis, Marjorie Taylor Green, Jim Jordan, Mike Johnson, Greg Abbott, and… well, you know who you are. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>What it is about today’s vituperative, foam-at-the-mouth Republican party? No longer disguising their desire to repress women, workers, immigrants, the poor, and all others who differ with (or are different from) their own partisan clan, the party has turned to a politics of hatred and division, openly seeking to punish opponents they now brand as “enemies” and “vermin.” What’s motivating this plunge into such undiluted political sourness? My simple observation is that they’ve succumbed to a base impulse expressed in one straightforward word: MEANNESS. After all, their current agenda amounts to hurting people they don’t like, trying to keep America’s diverse majority from getting such basic human needs and rights as health care, the vote, fair wages, reproductive liberty, and public education free of church dictates. That’s not “conservative,” it’s just mean. This malicious strain of selfish Republicanism has flared up periodically in our history, with the few striving to repress the many. Woody Guthrie even wrote an anthem in the 1940s mocking those crusading for such a morally-depraved politics: “I’m the meanest man that ever had a brain… I hate everybody don’t think like me…And I’m readin’ all the books I canTo learn how to hurt…Keep you without no vote,Keep you without no union.… Well, if I can get the the fat to hatin’ the lean,That’d tickle me more than anything I’ve seen,Then get the colors fightin’ one another,And friend against friend, and brother and sister against brother…… I love to hate and I hate to love!I’m mean, I’m just mean.” This song is dedicated to Ron DeSantis, Marjorie Taylor Green, Jim Jordan, Mike Johnson, Greg Abbott, and… well, you know who you are. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Corporate Giants Say You Don’t Mind Their Price Gouging. Do You?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>According to an old saying, “You can’t squeeze blood from a turnip.” True. But that raises this question: Who would even try squeezing blood from a turnip?</p><p>Well, metaphorically speaking, if “blood” means profit, and “turnips” are customers, airlines are eager to apply the squeeze. As are banks, credit card outfits, cable TV and Internet hucksters, car rental companies, concert promoters… and can anyone decipher their insurance policies!?</p><p>I’m not talking about fair profit, but junk fees, hidden charges, undisclosed add-ons, and other “gotchas” that brand-name giants sneak into the fine print of their price tags. It’s pure corporate larceny, adding up to a stunning level of unearned profit for the perpetrators – airlines picked our pockets for nearly <a target="_blank" href="https://www.cnbc.com/2023/05/07/how-us-airlines-make-7-billion-a-year-from-checked-bags.html">$7 billion last year in baggage fees alone</a>; credit card dealers <a target="_blank" href="https://www.fool.com/the-ascent/credit-cards/articles/us-consumers-were-charged-145-billion-in-credit-card-late-fees-in-2022-heres-how-you-can-avoid-them/">plucked $14 billion from us in punitive late-fees</a>; and the overall corporate haul from this secretive squeeze on consumers now tops <a target="_blank" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2023/11/19/companies-lobbyists-fight-junk-fees/">$64 billion a year</a>!</p><p>Shouldn’t companies have to tell you – in plain language – what they’re actually charging you… and for what? “Yes!” says Joe Biden, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2023/11/19/companies-lobbyists-fight-junk-fees/">who’s pressuring the gougers to come clean</a>. “Hooray!” exult consumers who’re tired of being played for suckers.</p><p>Of course, as another saying notes, “Where there’s a will, there’s a thousand won’ts.” So a flock of corporate lobbyists are now swarming the Capitol crying: “Save junk fees!” Their arguments are hilariously absurd: They assert that price disclosure will “confuse consumers;” that government should not “interfere” in the free market; that it’s “technically infeasible” to tell consumers the real price – and a group who actually quibbled, “What exactly is a fee?”</p><p>To help raise common sense and plain fairness to high places, check out the work Public Interest Research Group at <a target="_blank" href="https://pirg.org/articles/companies-want-junk-fees-to-protect-profits-vote-yes-or-no/">www.pirg.org</a>.</p><p>Do something!</p><p>In addition to PIRG, we found these groups who are working on junk fees— support them with your action and donations if you can.</p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://consumerfed.org/press_release/federal-agencies-continue-the-fight-against-junk-fees/">Consumer Federation of America </a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.economicliberties.us/our-work/how-states-can-take-on-junk-fees/">American Economic Liberties Project </a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://ourfinancialsecurity.org/">Americans for Financial Reform Education Fund </a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.responsiblelending.org/">Center for Responsible Lending Consumer Action</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://advocacy.consumerreports.org/press_release/consumer-reports-praises-white-house-efforts-to-protect-consumers-from-excessive-junk-fees/">Consumer Reports</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://fightcorporatemonopolies.org/">Fight Corporate Monopolies</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.freepress.net/policy-library/consumer-advocacy-groups-urge-ftc-crack-down-junk-fees">Free Press</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.consumeradvocates.org/for-consumers/">National Association of Consumer Advocates </a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://nclnet.org/">National Consumers League</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.travelersunited.org/">Travelers United</a></p><p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/corporate-giants-say-you-dont-mind</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:139431576</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2023 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/139431576/19179f8e854ddb6d31930cbdf7b12ac2.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/139431576/e48ebedbbb68840e2bb0a3d6949baa79.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>According to an old saying, “You can’t squeeze blood from a turnip.” True. But that raises this question: Who would even try squeezing blood from a turnip? Well, metaphorically speaking, if “blood” means profit, and “turnips” are customers, airlines are eager to apply the squeeze. As are banks, credit card outfits, cable TV and Internet hucksters, car rental companies, concert promoters… and can anyone decipher their insurance policies!? I’m not talking about fair profit, but junk fees, hidden charges, undisclosed add-ons, and other “gotchas” that brand-name giants sneak into the fine print of their price tags. It’s pure corporate larceny, adding up to a stunning level of unearned profit for the perpetrators – airlines picked our pockets for nearly $7 billion last year in baggage fees alone; credit card dealers plucked $14 billion from us in punitive late-fees; and the overall corporate haul from this secretive squeeze on consumers now tops $64 billion a year! Shouldn’t companies have to tell you – in plain language – what they’re actually charging you… and for what? “Yes!” says Joe Biden, who’s pressuring the gougers to come clean. “Hooray!” exult consumers who’re tired of being played for suckers. Of course, as another saying notes, “Where there’s a will, there’s a thousand won’ts.” So a flock of corporate lobbyists are now swarming the Capitol crying: “Save junk fees!” Their arguments are hilariously absurd: They assert that price disclosure will “confuse consumers;” that government should not “interfere” in the free market; that it’s “technically infeasible” to tell consumers the real price – and a group who actually quibbled, “What exactly is a fee?” To help raise common sense and plain fairness to high places, check out the work Public Interest Research Group at www.pirg.org. Do something! In addition to PIRG, we found these groups who are working on junk fees— support them with your action and donations if you can. * Consumer Federation of America * American Economic Liberties Project * Americans for Financial Reform Education Fund * Center for Responsible Lending Consumer Action * Consumer Reports * Fight Corporate Monopolies * Free Press * National Association of Consumer Advocates * National Consumers League * Travelers United Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>According to an old saying, “You can’t squeeze blood from a turnip.” True. But that raises this question: Who would even try squeezing blood from a turnip? Well, metaphorically speaking, if “blood” means profit, and “turnips” are customers, airlines are eager to apply the squeeze. As are banks, credit card outfits, cable TV and Internet hucksters, car rental companies, concert promoters… and can anyone decipher their insurance policies!? I’m not talking about fair profit, but junk fees, hidden charges, undisclosed add-ons, and other “gotchas” that brand-name giants sneak into the fine print of their price tags. It’s pure corporate larceny, adding up to a stunning level of unearned profit for the perpetrators – airlines picked our pockets for nearly $7 billion last year in baggage fees alone; credit card dealers plucked $14 billion from us in punitive late-fees; and the overall corporate haul from this secretive squeeze on consumers now tops $64 billion a year! Shouldn’t companies have to tell you – in plain language – what they’re actually charging you… and for what? “Yes!” says Joe Biden, who’s pressuring the gougers to come clean. “Hooray!” exult consumers who’re tired of being played for suckers. Of course, as another saying notes, “Where there’s a will, there’s a thousand won’ts.” So a flock of corporate lobbyists are now swarming the Capitol crying: “Save junk fees!” Their arguments are hilariously absurd: They assert that price disclosure will “confuse consumers;” that government should not “interfere” in the free market; that it’s “technically infeasible” to tell consumers the real price – and a group who actually quibbled, “What exactly is a fee?” To help raise common sense and plain fairness to high places, check out the work Public Interest Research Group at www.pirg.org. Do something! In addition to PIRG, we found these groups who are working on junk fees— support them with your action and donations if you can. * Consumer Federation of America * American Economic Liberties Project * Americans for Financial Reform Education Fund * Center for Responsible Lending Consumer Action * Consumer Reports * Fight Corporate Monopolies * Free Press * National Association of Consumer Advocates * National Consumers League * Travelers United Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Here’s a Wild Idea That’s Taking Root!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Growing up, I absorbed a lot of values from my Ol’ Texas Daddy – a strong commitment to the Common Good, a healthy work ethic, and a lively sense of humor. But one thing about him I’ve rejected: His determination to have a perfect yard of thick, verdant, St. Augustine grass. Lord, how he worked at it – laying sod, (watering), fertilizing, (watering), weeding, (watering), spreading pesticides, (watering), mowing… (more watering). But it was too hot, too dry, too infested with blight, bugs, slugs, and such. He was up against Texas nature, and he just couldn’t win.</p><p>So, I’ve gone in the opposite direction – slowly nurturing a natural yard of native trees, drought-tolerant plants, and a general live-with-nature ethic in my little landscape. I’m hardly alone in this rejection of the uniform “green grass imperative.” A spontaneous yard rebellion is taking hold across our country as more and more households, neighborhoods, businesses, etc. shift to a nature-friendly approach. A particularly encouraging push for change is coming from school kids – elementary level through college – who’re appalled by the poisoning of our globe and organizing locally to do something that both makes a difference and makes a statement. One exemplary channel for their activism is a student movement called <a target="_blank" href="https://campus.rewild.org/">Re:wild Your Campus</a>.</p><p>Of course, some people consider wild yards to be scruffy, ugly… unruly. That’s their choice, but some also insist that tidy grass lawns must be everyone’s choice. So they proclaim themselves to be the yard police, demanding that cities and homeowner associations make green-grass uniformity the law, filing busybody lawsuits and running right-wing social media campaigns targeting people and groups that disobey.</p><p>These attacks are silly because… well, they are silly, and also because they’re attacking the future, which is nearly always a loser strategy. To work for yard sanity and choice, go to <a target="_blank" href="http://rewild.org/">Rewild.org</a>.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/heres-a-wild-idea-thats-taking-root-7e4</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:139305039</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 17:40:38 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/139305039/9d8930abca865fbd8795e8dd9e68e186.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/139305039/1e3da07cecc08be7624a9a4129b34faa.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Growing up, I absorbed a lot of values from my Ol’ Texas Daddy – a strong commitment to the Common Good, a healthy work ethic, and a lively sense of humor. But one thing about him I’ve rejected: His determination to have a perfect yard of thick, verdant, St. Augustine grass. Lord, how he worked at it – laying sod, (watering), fertilizing, (watering), weeding, (watering), spreading pesticides, (watering), mowing… (more watering). But it was too hot, too dry, too infested with blight, bugs, slugs, and such. He was up against Texas nature, and he just couldn’t win. So, I’ve gone in the opposite direction – slowly nurturing a natural yard of native trees, drought-tolerant plants, and a general live-with-nature ethic in my little landscape. I’m hardly alone in this rejection of the uniform “green grass imperative.” A spontaneous yard rebellion is taking hold across our country as more and more households, neighborhoods, businesses, etc. shift to a nature-friendly approach. A particularly encouraging push for change is coming from school kids – elementary level through college – who’re appalled by the poisoning of our globe and organizing locally to do something that both makes a difference and makes a statement. One exemplary channel for their activism is a student movement called Re:wild Your Campus. Of course, some people consider wild yards to be scruffy, ugly… unruly. That’s their choice, but some also insist that tidy grass lawns must be everyone’s choice. So they proclaim themselves to be the yard police, demanding that cities and homeowner associations make green-grass uniformity the law, filing busybody lawsuits and running right-wing social media campaigns targeting people and groups that disobey. These attacks are silly because… well, they are silly, and also because they’re attacking the future, which is nearly always a loser strategy. To work for yard sanity and choice, go to Rewild.org. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Growing up, I absorbed a lot of values from my Ol’ Texas Daddy – a strong commitment to the Common Good, a healthy work ethic, and a lively sense of humor. But one thing about him I’ve rejected: His determination to have a perfect yard of thick, verdant, St. Augustine grass. Lord, how he worked at it – laying sod, (watering), fertilizing, (watering), weeding, (watering), spreading pesticides, (watering), mowing… (more watering). But it was too hot, too dry, too infested with blight, bugs, slugs, and such. He was up against Texas nature, and he just couldn’t win. So, I’ve gone in the opposite direction – slowly nurturing a natural yard of native trees, drought-tolerant plants, and a general live-with-nature ethic in my little landscape. I’m hardly alone in this rejection of the uniform “green grass imperative.” A spontaneous yard rebellion is taking hold across our country as more and more households, neighborhoods, businesses, etc. shift to a nature-friendly approach. A particularly encouraging push for change is coming from school kids – elementary level through college – who’re appalled by the poisoning of our globe and organizing locally to do something that both makes a difference and makes a statement. One exemplary channel for their activism is a student movement called Re:wild Your Campus. Of course, some people consider wild yards to be scruffy, ugly… unruly. That’s their choice, but some also insist that tidy grass lawns must be everyone’s choice. So they proclaim themselves to be the yard police, demanding that cities and homeowner associations make green-grass uniformity the law, filing busybody lawsuits and running right-wing social media campaigns targeting people and groups that disobey. These attacks are silly because… well, they are silly, and also because they’re attacking the future, which is nearly always a loser strategy. To work for yard sanity and choice, go to Rewild.org. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Voters Reject the Illiberal Bigotry of Moms 4 Liberty]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>In one of their satirical songs, the Austin Lounge Lizards lampooned the ridiculous bigotry of some Christian factions, singing: “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lg8B767itf0">Jesus loves me. But he can’t stand you.</a>”</p><p>That could be the bellicose anthem of a quasi-religious Republican front group with a very sweet-sounding name: “Moms for Liberty.” Far from sweet, however, these moms are funded by rich Republicans to be ground troops in the party’s culture wars – essentially an anti-liberty campaign against people, books, teachers, and ideas they don’t like. In the last few years, squads of these moms have turned into political hate groups, persecuting small town school board members by baselessly accusing them of conspiring to indoctrinate children with pornography, hatred of white people, and “liberal” thinking.</p><p>Having stirred up dust devils of division and fear, the momsters ran candidates in local board elections this fall, hoping to take over public schools. But they miscalculated on an essential political reality: Most Americans are not right-wingers, bigots, or Christian Nationalists. The group had counted on surprising voters in what are usually low visibility/low-turnout races, but the extremists were the ones <a target="_blank" href="https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2023/11/parents-rights-moms-for-liberty-lost-big-in-elections-last-night/">surprised by an aggressive voter pushback against their scheme</a>.</p><p>Indeed, various surveys show that the GOP’s mom-wing lost about 80 percent of its races across the country, even in major swing states like Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. For example, in the very conservative school district of Pennridge, Pennsylvania, where a far-right majority of the board was attempting to impose a national model of a politically-driven educational system, five Republican incumbents were up for re-election. All five were swept out, turning the Pennridge school board blue for the first time in years!</p><p>To help push back against right-wing politicizers of your school district, contact Campaign for Our Shared Future: <a target="_blank" href="http://CampaignSharedFuture.org">CampaignSharedFuture.org</a>.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/voters-reject-the-illiberal-bigotry</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:139215253</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2023 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/139215253/bcad04046686970ebba9781501046d4f.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/139215253/0c5090599158c5f479c405abaf0d1279.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>In one of their satirical songs, the Austin Lounge Lizards lampooned the ridiculous bigotry of some Christian factions, singing: “Jesus loves me. But he can’t stand you.” That could be the bellicose anthem of a quasi-religious Republican front group with a very sweet-sounding name: “Moms for Liberty.” Far from sweet, however, these moms are funded by rich Republicans to be ground troops in the party’s culture wars – essentially an anti-liberty campaign against people, books, teachers, and ideas they don’t like. In the last few years, squads of these moms have turned into political hate groups, persecuting small town school board members by baselessly accusing them of conspiring to indoctrinate children with pornography, hatred of white people, and “liberal” thinking. Having stirred up dust devils of division and fear, the momsters ran candidates in local board elections this fall, hoping to take over public schools. But they miscalculated on an essential political reality: Most Americans are not right-wingers, bigots, or Christian Nationalists. The group had counted on surprising voters in what are usually low visibility/low-turnout races, but the extremists were the ones surprised by an aggressive voter pushback against their scheme. Indeed, various surveys show that the GOP’s mom-wing lost about 80 percent of its races across the country, even in major swing states like Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. For example, in the very conservative school district of Pennridge, Pennsylvania, where a far-right majority of the board was attempting to impose a national model of a politically-driven educational system, five Republican incumbents were up for re-election. All five were swept out, turning the Pennridge school board blue for the first time in years! To help push back against right-wing politicizers of your school district, contact Campaign for Our Shared Future: CampaignSharedFuture.org. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>In one of their satirical songs, the Austin Lounge Lizards lampooned the ridiculous bigotry of some Christian factions, singing: “Jesus loves me. But he can’t stand you.” That could be the bellicose anthem of a quasi-religious Republican front group with a very sweet-sounding name: “Moms for Liberty.” Far from sweet, however, these moms are funded by rich Republicans to be ground troops in the party’s culture wars – essentially an anti-liberty campaign against people, books, teachers, and ideas they don’t like. In the last few years, squads of these moms have turned into political hate groups, persecuting small town school board members by baselessly accusing them of conspiring to indoctrinate children with pornography, hatred of white people, and “liberal” thinking. Having stirred up dust devils of division and fear, the momsters ran candidates in local board elections this fall, hoping to take over public schools. But they miscalculated on an essential political reality: Most Americans are not right-wingers, bigots, or Christian Nationalists. The group had counted on surprising voters in what are usually low visibility/low-turnout races, but the extremists were the ones surprised by an aggressive voter pushback against their scheme. Indeed, various surveys show that the GOP’s mom-wing lost about 80 percent of its races across the country, even in major swing states like Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. For example, in the very conservative school district of Pennridge, Pennsylvania, where a far-right majority of the board was attempting to impose a national model of a politically-driven educational system, five Republican incumbents were up for re-election. All five were swept out, turning the Pennridge school board blue for the first time in years! To help push back against right-wing politicizers of your school district, contact Campaign for Our Shared Future: CampaignSharedFuture.org. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[When and Where Was the First Thanksgiving Feast?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Let’s talk Turkey!</p><p>No, not the Butterballs in Congress. I’m talking about the real thing, the big gobbler – 46 million of which we Americans will devour this Thanksgiving.</p><p>It was the Aztecs who first domesticated the <em>gallopavo</em>, but the invading Spanish conquerors “fouled-up” the bird’s origins. They declared it to be related to the peacock – Wrong! They also thought the peacock originated in Turkey – Wrong! And, they thought Turkey was located in Africa – well, you can see the Spanish were pretty confused.</p><p>Actually, even the origin of Thanksgiving Day in the US is confused. The popular assumption is that it was first celebrated by the Mayflower immigrants and the Wampanoag natives at Plymouth, Massachusetts, 1621. They feasted on venison, furkees (Wampanoag for gobblers), eels, mussels, corn, and beer. But wait, say Virginians, the first Thanksgiving Food-a-Palooza was not in Massachusetts – the feast originated down here in Jamestown colony, back in 1608.</p><p>Whoa there, pilgrims! Folks in El Paso, Texas, say it all began way out there in 1598, when Spanish settlers sat down with people of the Piro and Manso tribes, to give thanks, feasting on roasted duck, geese and fish.</p><p>“Ha!” says a Florida group, asserting the very, very first Thanksgiving happened in 1565 when the Spanish settlers of St. Augustine and friends from the Timucuan tribe chowed-down on “cocido” – a stew of salt pork, garbanzo beans and garlic – washing it all down with red wine.</p><p>Wherever it began, and whatever the purists claim is “official,” Thanksgiving today is as multicultural as America. So, let’s enjoy! Kick-back, give thanks we’re in a country with such ethnic richness, and dive into your turkey rellenos, moo-shu turkey, turkey falafel, barbecued turkey… and so on.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/when-and-where-was-the-first-thanksgiving</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:139106000</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2023 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/139106000/7dda5405a72a67481464fb9bb03f6b6d.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/139106000/a8f99eed36963d75ed94453255ade13d.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Let’s talk Turkey! No, not the Butterballs in Congress. I’m talking about the real thing, the big gobbler – 46 million of which we Americans will devour this Thanksgiving. It was the Aztecs who first domesticated the gallopavo, but the invading Spanish conquerors “fouled-up” the bird’s origins. They declared it to be related to the peacock – Wrong! They also thought the peacock originated in Turkey – Wrong! And, they thought Turkey was located in Africa – well, you can see the Spanish were pretty confused. Actually, even the origin of Thanksgiving Day in the US is confused. The popular assumption is that it was first celebrated by the Mayflower immigrants and the Wampanoag natives at Plymouth, Massachusetts, 1621. They feasted on venison, furkees (Wampanoag for gobblers), eels, mussels, corn, and beer. But wait, say Virginians, the first Thanksgiving Food-a-Palooza was not in Massachusetts – the feast originated down here in Jamestown colony, back in 1608. Whoa there, pilgrims! Folks in El Paso, Texas, say it all began way out there in 1598, when Spanish settlers sat down with people of the Piro and Manso tribes, to give thanks, feasting on roasted duck, geese and fish. “Ha!” says a Florida group, asserting the very, very first Thanksgiving happened in 1565 when the Spanish settlers of St. Augustine and friends from the Timucuan tribe chowed-down on “cocido” – a stew of salt pork, garbanzo beans and garlic – washing it all down with red wine. Wherever it began, and whatever the purists claim is “official,” Thanksgiving today is as multicultural as America. So, let’s enjoy! Kick-back, give thanks we’re in a country with such ethnic richness, and dive into your turkey rellenos, moo-shu turkey, turkey falafel, barbecued turkey… and so on. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Let’s talk Turkey! No, not the Butterballs in Congress. I’m talking about the real thing, the big gobbler – 46 million of which we Americans will devour this Thanksgiving. It was the Aztecs who first domesticated the gallopavo, but the invading Spanish conquerors “fouled-up” the bird’s origins. They declared it to be related to the peacock – Wrong! They also thought the peacock originated in Turkey – Wrong! And, they thought Turkey was located in Africa – well, you can see the Spanish were pretty confused. Actually, even the origin of Thanksgiving Day in the US is confused. The popular assumption is that it was first celebrated by the Mayflower immigrants and the Wampanoag natives at Plymouth, Massachusetts, 1621. They feasted on venison, furkees (Wampanoag for gobblers), eels, mussels, corn, and beer. But wait, say Virginians, the first Thanksgiving Food-a-Palooza was not in Massachusetts – the feast originated down here in Jamestown colony, back in 1608. Whoa there, pilgrims! Folks in El Paso, Texas, say it all began way out there in 1598, when Spanish settlers sat down with people of the Piro and Manso tribes, to give thanks, feasting on roasted duck, geese and fish. “Ha!” says a Florida group, asserting the very, very first Thanksgiving happened in 1565 when the Spanish settlers of St. Augustine and friends from the Timucuan tribe chowed-down on “cocido” – a stew of salt pork, garbanzo beans and garlic – washing it all down with red wine. Wherever it began, and whatever the purists claim is “official,” Thanksgiving today is as multicultural as America. So, let’s enjoy! Kick-back, give thanks we’re in a country with such ethnic richness, and dive into your turkey rellenos, moo-shu turkey, turkey falafel, barbecued turkey… and so on. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why “Supreme Court Ethics” is an Oxymoron]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Let me be blunt: The problem with today’s Supreme Court is that it consists of too many 5-watt bulbs sitting in 100-watt sockets.</p><p>While most of the nine members are assumed to be brilliant, “smart” is as smart does, and this court’s right-wing majority wallows in stupid, consistently pushing plutocracy, autocracy, and theocracy over the democratic will of the people. Compounding this stupidity, many of the judges have flagrantly accepted “gifts” of cash, luxury vacations, and other freebies from the corporate and right-wing interests that have benefitted from the Court’s rulings. Yet, caught red-handed, the narcissistic jurists assert that We the People should just trust their integrity.</p><p>These nine legal powerbrokers, who pose as America’s arbiters of justice, have even exempted themselves from having an ethics code, allowing each one to make up their own, unwritten ethical rules. Thus, corruption flourishes; so the public, Congress, and the media have finally demanded that, at the very least, the eminences be subjected to basic ethics. “Okay, OK,” the nine finally grumped, “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/14/us/politics/supreme-court-ethics-code-clarence-thomas-sotomayor.html">We’ll sign onto a code.</a>”</p><p>BUT… their acquiescence included a killer gotcha: <em>They</em> would write their own rules of behavior! Sure enough, their 14-page code is a toothless watchdog with no bark, much less bite. It starts by snarling that the great unwashed simply fail to understand that the entire court is, as the Chief Justice had earlier proclaimed, “jurists of exceptional integrity.” So, the new “code” promises boilerplate ethical behavior, but provides <em>no enforcement mechanism</em> beyond claiming the judges will police each other.</p><p>If these brilliant lawyers can’t (or won’t) write a straightforward code of judicial ethics, why would we trust them to render “justice” for us? We have to democratize this omnipotent Third Branch of our government. To get involved, go to <a target="_blank" href="http://FixTheCourt.com">FixTheCourt.com</a>.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-supreme-court-ethics-is-an-oxymoron</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:139019369</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/139019369/ca9a2bf84db17a2ceb02f95877b6afc3.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/139019369/8321261edb05efa6a9bf88da7c21dcfc.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Let me be blunt: The problem with today’s Supreme Court is that it consists of too many 5-watt bulbs sitting in 100-watt sockets. While most of the nine members are assumed to be brilliant, “smart” is as smart does, and this court’s right-wing majority wallows in stupid, consistently pushing plutocracy, autocracy, and theocracy over the democratic will of the people. Compounding this stupidity, many of the judges have flagrantly accepted “gifts” of cash, luxury vacations, and other freebies from the corporate and right-wing interests that have benefitted from the Court’s rulings. Yet, caught red-handed, the narcissistic jurists assert that We the People should just trust their integrity. These nine legal powerbrokers, who pose as America’s arbiters of justice, have even exempted themselves from having an ethics code, allowing each one to make up their own, unwritten ethical rules. Thus, corruption flourishes; so the public, Congress, and the media have finally demanded that, at the very least, the eminences be subjected to basic ethics. “Okay, OK,” the nine finally grumped, “We’ll sign onto a code.” BUT… their acquiescence included a killer gotcha: They would write their own rules of behavior! Sure enough, their 14-page code is a toothless watchdog with no bark, much less bite. It starts by snarling that the great unwashed simply fail to understand that the entire court is, as the Chief Justice had earlier proclaimed, “jurists of exceptional integrity.” So, the new “code” promises boilerplate ethical behavior, but provides no enforcement mechanism beyond claiming the judges will police each other. If these brilliant lawyers can’t (or won’t) write a straightforward code of judicial ethics, why would we trust them to render “justice” for us? We have to democratize this omnipotent Third Branch of our government. To get involved, go to FixTheCourt.com. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Let me be blunt: The problem with today’s Supreme Court is that it consists of too many 5-watt bulbs sitting in 100-watt sockets. While most of the nine members are assumed to be brilliant, “smart” is as smart does, and this court’s right-wing majority wallows in stupid, consistently pushing plutocracy, autocracy, and theocracy over the democratic will of the people. Compounding this stupidity, many of the judges have flagrantly accepted “gifts” of cash, luxury vacations, and other freebies from the corporate and right-wing interests that have benefitted from the Court’s rulings. Yet, caught red-handed, the narcissistic jurists assert that We the People should just trust their integrity. These nine legal powerbrokers, who pose as America’s arbiters of justice, have even exempted themselves from having an ethics code, allowing each one to make up their own, unwritten ethical rules. Thus, corruption flourishes; so the public, Congress, and the media have finally demanded that, at the very least, the eminences be subjected to basic ethics. “Okay, OK,” the nine finally grumped, “We’ll sign onto a code.” BUT… their acquiescence included a killer gotcha: They would write their own rules of behavior! Sure enough, their 14-page code is a toothless watchdog with no bark, much less bite. It starts by snarling that the great unwashed simply fail to understand that the entire court is, as the Chief Justice had earlier proclaimed, “jurists of exceptional integrity.” So, the new “code” promises boilerplate ethical behavior, but provides no enforcement mechanism beyond claiming the judges will police each other. If these brilliant lawyers can’t (or won’t) write a straightforward code of judicial ethics, why would we trust them to render “justice” for us? We have to democratize this omnipotent Third Branch of our government. To get involved, go to FixTheCourt.com. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[How Things Work: Congress’s Revolving Door ]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Hear it? What’s that sound? “Whoop-whoop-whoop.” Oooo, it’s Washington’s revolving door, allowing corporate interests to come directly inside Congress to pervert public policy.</p><p>That door is now spinning fast, because there’s a new boss operator in Congress.  He’s Mike Johnson, who was recently unanimously chosen by Republicans to be their Speaker of the House. He’s a corporate wet dream – an affable ultra-conservative from Shreveport, who consistently backs the plutocratic agenda of Big Business over workers, the poor, consumers and most other Americans. Moreover, Johnson maintains it was God (!) who elevated him to his new position of authority, and that the Bible will guide his policy views.</p><p>Well, selected parts of the Bible – don’t expect much mercy, justice, and peacemaking from this hard-core laissez-faire ideologue. For example, guess who he’s chosen to be his director of policy? Big Pharma’s top Washington lobbyist! Dan Ziegler has been the chief influence peddler for a dozen multibillion-dollar drug giants, including Eli Lilly, Merck, and Pfizer. Ziegler has furiously opposed every legislative effort to stop the rampant price gouging by profiteering drug makers – even though <em>90 percent</em> of Americans are clamoring for Congress to clamp down on their rip-offs. But we 90-percenters don’t control the revolving door… Mike does.</p><p>Johnson piously cloaks himself in both the Christian gospel and libertarian myth of “free markets,” yet he has consistently pushed government action to restrict competition and protect drug monopolies. Now, in his first substantive action as speaker, he is literally bringing Big Pharma inside to sit beside him in the seat of legislative power.  </p><p>Drug pricing reform will soon come up for a vote in Congress. Before Mike’s lobbyist buddy tells him what to do, let’s demand that he re-read the Sermon on the Mount.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/how-things-work-congresss-revolving</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:138733113</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 17:38:03 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/138733113/2ad3ee470f0e78067aaad078941bdaf4.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/138733113/748691c68321841d5bb366e7d2ba4ee9.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Hear it? What’s that sound? “Whoop-whoop-whoop.” Oooo, it’s Washington’s revolving door, allowing corporate interests to come directly inside Congress to pervert public policy. That door is now spinning fast, because there’s a new boss operator in Congress.  He’s Mike Johnson, who was recently unanimously chosen by Republicans to be their Speaker of the House. He’s a corporate wet dream – an affable ultra-conservative from Shreveport, who consistently backs the plutocratic agenda of Big Business over workers, the poor, consumers and most other Americans. Moreover, Johnson maintains it was God (!) who elevated him to his new position of authority, and that the Bible will guide his policy views. Well, selected parts of the Bible – don’t expect much mercy, justice, and peacemaking from this hard-core laissez-faire ideologue. For example, guess who he’s chosen to be his director of policy? Big Pharma’s top Washington lobbyist! Dan Ziegler has been the chief influence peddler for a dozen multibillion-dollar drug giants, including Eli Lilly, Merck, and Pfizer. Ziegler has furiously opposed every legislative effort to stop the rampant price gouging by profiteering drug makers – even though 90 percent of Americans are clamoring for Congress to clamp down on their rip-offs. But we 90-percenters don’t control the revolving door… Mike does. Johnson piously cloaks himself in both the Christian gospel and libertarian myth of “free markets,” yet he has consistently pushed government action to restrict competition and protect drug monopolies. Now, in his first substantive action as speaker, he is literally bringing Big Pharma inside to sit beside him in the seat of legislative power.   Drug pricing reform will soon come up for a vote in Congress. Before Mike’s lobbyist buddy tells him what to do, let’s demand that he re-read the Sermon on the Mount. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Hear it? What’s that sound? “Whoop-whoop-whoop.” Oooo, it’s Washington’s revolving door, allowing corporate interests to come directly inside Congress to pervert public policy. That door is now spinning fast, because there’s a new boss operator in Congress.  He’s Mike Johnson, who was recently unanimously chosen by Republicans to be their Speaker of the House. He’s a corporate wet dream – an affable ultra-conservative from Shreveport, who consistently backs the plutocratic agenda of Big Business over workers, the poor, consumers and most other Americans. Moreover, Johnson maintains it was God (!) who elevated him to his new position of authority, and that the Bible will guide his policy views. Well, selected parts of the Bible – don’t expect much mercy, justice, and peacemaking from this hard-core laissez-faire ideologue. For example, guess who he’s chosen to be his director of policy? Big Pharma’s top Washington lobbyist! Dan Ziegler has been the chief influence peddler for a dozen multibillion-dollar drug giants, including Eli Lilly, Merck, and Pfizer. Ziegler has furiously opposed every legislative effort to stop the rampant price gouging by profiteering drug makers – even though 90 percent of Americans are clamoring for Congress to clamp down on their rip-offs. But we 90-percenters don’t control the revolving door… Mike does. Johnson piously cloaks himself in both the Christian gospel and libertarian myth of “free markets,” yet he has consistently pushed government action to restrict competition and protect drug monopolies. Now, in his first substantive action as speaker, he is literally bringing Big Pharma inside to sit beside him in the seat of legislative power.   Drug pricing reform will soon come up for a vote in Congress. Before Mike’s lobbyist buddy tells him what to do, let’s demand that he re-read the Sermon on the Mount. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Billionaires Behind School Privatization]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>If you’re trying to enact an extremist right-wing policy, but the public keeps rejecting it – what do you do?</p><p>You could try blatant deception, giving the same old policy a new coat of paint, a euphemistic name, and a multimillion-dollar political shove. That’s the dark path now being taken by the clique of plutocrats and theocrats who’re determined to privatize America’s public schools.</p><p>Take Texas Governor Greg Abbott – please! Joking aside, he’s been pushing to make taxpayers fund private schools. But his own right-wing legislature has consistently rejected his power play. After all, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.the74million.org/article/gop-bid-to-bring-vouchers-to-texas-fails-halting-school-choice-wave-for-now/">even red-state Republicans don’t want for-profit chains and religious zealots grabbing tax dollars to indoctrinate school children.</a></p><p>So this year, Abbott & Company rebranded their scheme as “school choice” and “parental empowerment.” Who could be against that? The People, it turns out. While some families might want exclusive private schools, their claim that they have no choice is a fraud. As one GOP legislator put it, his rural county has “private schools, a parochial school, a charter school, and a large home school community. “<em>That is choice</em>,” he rightly notes..</p><p>Who are the privatizers? National billionaires like the Koch brothers – and in Texas, we have <a target="_blank" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Dunn_(businessman)">Tim Dunn</a> and <a target="_blank" href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/05/texas-fracking-billionaire-brothers-prageru-daily-wire">Farris Wilks</a>, two messianic oil billionaires from West Texas who double as proselytizers of a toxic theology of Christian nationalism. They are the Money Gods of school privatization – indeed, the governor, more than half of Texas House members, and <em>every Republican state senato</em>r are financially hooked on their Oil money.</p><p>Do something</p><p>A lot of work around school privatization is very locally-focused, but for a great set of toolkits, actions, explainers and more, check out the <a target="_blank" href="https://networkforpubliceducation.org/">Network for Public Education</a>.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-billionaires-behind-school-privatization</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:138667552</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2023 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/138667552/31a71ae7537fe5dd6c2e614900f55fc2.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/138667552/9079449c7bf03b95b46ab0c81b353c1b.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>If you’re trying to enact an extremist right-wing policy, but the public keeps rejecting it – what do you do? You could try blatant deception, giving the same old policy a new coat of paint, a euphemistic name, and a multimillion-dollar political shove. That’s the dark path now being taken by the clique of plutocrats and theocrats who’re determined to privatize America’s public schools. Take Texas Governor Greg Abbott – please! Joking aside, he’s been pushing to make taxpayers fund private schools. But his own right-wing legislature has consistently rejected his power play. After all, even red-state Republicans don’t want for-profit chains and religious zealots grabbing tax dollars to indoctrinate school children. So this year, Abbott &amp; Company rebranded their scheme as “school choice” and “parental empowerment.” Who could be against that? The People, it turns out. While some families might want exclusive private schools, their claim that they have no choice is a fraud. As one GOP legislator put it, his rural county has “private schools, a parochial school, a charter school, and a large home school community. “That is choice,” he rightly notes.. Who are the privatizers? National billionaires like the Koch brothers – and in Texas, we have Tim Dunn and Farris Wilks, two messianic oil billionaires from West Texas who double as proselytizers of a toxic theology of Christian nationalism. They are the Money Gods of school privatization – indeed, the governor, more than half of Texas House members, and every Republican state senator are financially hooked on their Oil money. Do something A lot of work around school privatization is very locally-focused, but for a great set of toolkits, actions, explainers and more, check out the Network for Public Education. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>If you’re trying to enact an extremist right-wing policy, but the public keeps rejecting it – what do you do? You could try blatant deception, giving the same old policy a new coat of paint, a euphemistic name, and a multimillion-dollar political shove. That’s the dark path now being taken by the clique of plutocrats and theocrats who’re determined to privatize America’s public schools. Take Texas Governor Greg Abbott – please! Joking aside, he’s been pushing to make taxpayers fund private schools. But his own right-wing legislature has consistently rejected his power play. After all, even red-state Republicans don’t want for-profit chains and religious zealots grabbing tax dollars to indoctrinate school children. So this year, Abbott &amp; Company rebranded their scheme as “school choice” and “parental empowerment.” Who could be against that? The People, it turns out. While some families might want exclusive private schools, their claim that they have no choice is a fraud. As one GOP legislator put it, his rural county has “private schools, a parochial school, a charter school, and a large home school community. “That is choice,” he rightly notes.. Who are the privatizers? National billionaires like the Koch brothers – and in Texas, we have Tim Dunn and Farris Wilks, two messianic oil billionaires from West Texas who double as proselytizers of a toxic theology of Christian nationalism. They are the Money Gods of school privatization – indeed, the governor, more than half of Texas House members, and every Republican state senator are financially hooked on their Oil money. Do something A lot of work around school privatization is very locally-focused, but for a great set of toolkits, actions, explainers and more, check out the Network for Public Education. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Instead of Utility Greed – How About Some Energy Sanity?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Which is the “greenest” state in America?</p><p>You might think California, or maybe Oregon. But go 3,000 miles east, and you’ll come upon the physical beauty and ecological vitality of the Green Mountain State: Vermont. Indeed, its very name is derived from the French term for green mountains: <em>Verts Monts</em>.</p><p>And now, Vermont’s green ethic is being advanced in a very innovative way by perhaps the least likely source: The state’s biggest electric utility! These outfits are usually rank profiteers, with their only green concern being the extraction of more dollar bills from consumers.</p><p>But, says Mari McClure, CEO of Green Mountain Power, “call us the un-utility.” She is flipping the industry model – instead of having thousands of customers hooked on a system of massive, centralized, increasingly-expensive and unreliable power plants – GMP is <em>decentralizing</em>. Not just symbolically, but by <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/09/business/energy-environment/green-mountain-home-batteries.html">literally putting its power source in customers’ homes, businesses, schools, etc.</a></p><p>Specifically, Green Mountain will install television-size storage batteries statewide in homes and buildings, each one soaking up wind and solar energy when the weather is right, releasing stored power when needed. This turns out to be far cheaper than building central power plants, having to constantly replace miles of electric lines downed by storms, and paying for widespread power outages.</p><p>Plus, it delivers priceless customer goodwill by doing away with infuriating outages that shut down people’s lights, refrigerators, medical equipment, etc. “We don’t want the power to be off for our customers ever,” says McClure.</p><p>Do something</p><p>We’ve been actively looking for organizations and people who are helping people make this switch, but we’re having a hard time! If you know some we can recommend, leave them in the comments.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/instead-of-utility-greed-how-about</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:138425647</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/138425647/de5f96b117d6503e55ce209778fc0c16.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/138425647/53c4b030ade70a2b8a6cb2c37b6ab3d9.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Which is the “greenest” state in America? You might think California, or maybe Oregon. But go 3,000 miles east, and you’ll come upon the physical beauty and ecological vitality of the Green Mountain State: Vermont. Indeed, its very name is derived from the French term for green mountains: Verts Monts. And now, Vermont’s green ethic is being advanced in a very innovative way by perhaps the least likely source: The state’s biggest electric utility! These outfits are usually rank profiteers, with their only green concern being the extraction of more dollar bills from consumers. But, says Mari McClure, CEO of Green Mountain Power, “call us the un-utility.” She is flipping the industry model – instead of having thousands of customers hooked on a system of massive, centralized, increasingly-expensive and unreliable power plants – GMP is decentralizing. Not just symbolically, but by literally putting its power source in customers’ homes, businesses, schools, etc. Specifically, Green Mountain will install television-size storage batteries statewide in homes and buildings, each one soaking up wind and solar energy when the weather is right, releasing stored power when needed. This turns out to be far cheaper than building central power plants, having to constantly replace miles of electric lines downed by storms, and paying for widespread power outages. Plus, it delivers priceless customer goodwill by doing away with infuriating outages that shut down people’s lights, refrigerators, medical equipment, etc. “We don’t want the power to be off for our customers ever,” says McClure. Do something We’ve been actively looking for organizations and people who are helping people make this switch, but we’re having a hard time! If you know some we can recommend, leave them in the comments. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Which is the “greenest” state in America? You might think California, or maybe Oregon. But go 3,000 miles east, and you’ll come upon the physical beauty and ecological vitality of the Green Mountain State: Vermont. Indeed, its very name is derived from the French term for green mountains: Verts Monts. And now, Vermont’s green ethic is being advanced in a very innovative way by perhaps the least likely source: The state’s biggest electric utility! These outfits are usually rank profiteers, with their only green concern being the extraction of more dollar bills from consumers. But, says Mari McClure, CEO of Green Mountain Power, “call us the un-utility.” She is flipping the industry model – instead of having thousands of customers hooked on a system of massive, centralized, increasingly-expensive and unreliable power plants – GMP is decentralizing. Not just symbolically, but by literally putting its power source in customers’ homes, businesses, schools, etc. Specifically, Green Mountain will install television-size storage batteries statewide in homes and buildings, each one soaking up wind and solar energy when the weather is right, releasing stored power when needed. This turns out to be far cheaper than building central power plants, having to constantly replace miles of electric lines downed by storms, and paying for widespread power outages. Plus, it delivers priceless customer goodwill by doing away with infuriating outages that shut down people’s lights, refrigerators, medical equipment, etc. “We don’t want the power to be off for our customers ever,” says McClure. Do something We’ve been actively looking for organizations and people who are helping people make this switch, but we’re having a hard time! If you know some we can recommend, leave them in the comments. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[A Supreme Court of Ethical Weasels]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Wow! A couple of Supreme Court justices say they’re now starting to think that maybe the Court should sorta start thinking about possibly, perhaps, someday adopting some sort of anti-corruption reforms.</p><p>This nine-member group of unelected, supremely powerful judges is allowed to make up its own rules of ethical behavior. So – Surprise! – they’ve chosen to have no code of conduct like all other top officials are expected to obey. Unsurprisingly, then, the justices feel free to accept financial payments (excuse me: “Bribes”) from moneyed interests seeking favorable legal rulings from the supposedly-impartial Court.</p><p>But – oops – the general public has begun to notice the corruption, and public belief in the court’s integrity has plummeted. Thus, one of the far-right Supremes, Amy Coney Barrett, is now supporting a vague veil of an ethics code for her colleagues, even as she attests that all “are very committed to the highest standards of ethical conduct.”</p><p>Seriously? Including the notorious money sleaze, Clarence Thomas?</p><p>But wait, even a progressive justice, Elena Kagan, joins in the charade that an ethical code might produce… well, ethics. Or, at least, political cover for the lack thereof. A code, she surmises, would “go far in persuading other people that we were adhering to the highest standards of conduct.”</p><p>Hello – would you be persuaded? Yet, these “Supremes” won’t even take the minimal step of adopting a simple code to measure basic integrity. “It would be a good idea for us to do it,” Barrett meekly says. “It would be a good thing for the court to do that,” Kagan echoes.</p><p>Stop it! Stop the pitiful posturing. There’s only nine of you – you’re in charge! Convene a Happy Hour, confront reality, and do the right thing! Just do it – I’ll buy the beer.</p><p>Do something</p><p>We love to recommend <a target="_blank" href="https://fixthecourt.com/">FixTheCourt.com</a> for ideas and resources on overhauling the Supreme Court. If you’ve got more organizations or people to recommend, leave them for us in the comments!</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/a-supreme-court-of-ethical-weasels</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:138425081</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/138425081/fdf2c7ac4e1da4d7993c81978ec7b707.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/138425081/55826116ef78f244db50757c52f74a67.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Wow! A couple of Supreme Court justices say they’re now starting to think that maybe the Court should sorta start thinking about possibly, perhaps, someday adopting some sort of anti-corruption reforms. This nine-member group of unelected, supremely powerful judges is allowed to make up its own rules of ethical behavior. So – Surprise! – they’ve chosen to have no code of conduct like all other top officials are expected to obey. Unsurprisingly, then, the justices feel free to accept financial payments (excuse me: “Bribes”) from moneyed interests seeking favorable legal rulings from the supposedly-impartial Court. But – oops – the general public has begun to notice the corruption, and public belief in the court’s integrity has plummeted. Thus, one of the far-right Supremes, Amy Coney Barrett, is now supporting a vague veil of an ethics code for her colleagues, even as she attests that all “are very committed to the highest standards of ethical conduct.” Seriously? Including the notorious money sleaze, Clarence Thomas? But wait, even a progressive justice, Elena Kagan, joins in the charade that an ethical code might produce… well, ethics. Or, at least, political cover for the lack thereof. A code, she surmises, would “go far in persuading other people that we were adhering to the highest standards of conduct.” Hello – would you be persuaded? Yet, these “Supremes” won’t even take the minimal step of adopting a simple code to measure basic integrity. “It would be a good idea for us to do it,” Barrett meekly says. “It would be a good thing for the court to do that,” Kagan echoes. Stop it! Stop the pitiful posturing. There’s only nine of you – you’re in charge! Convene a Happy Hour, confront reality, and do the right thing! Just do it – I’ll buy the beer. Do something We love to recommend FixTheCourt.com for ideas and resources on overhauling the Supreme Court. If you’ve got more organizations or people to recommend, leave them for us in the comments! Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Wow! A couple of Supreme Court justices say they’re now starting to think that maybe the Court should sorta start thinking about possibly, perhaps, someday adopting some sort of anti-corruption reforms. This nine-member group of unelected, supremely powerful judges is allowed to make up its own rules of ethical behavior. So – Surprise! – they’ve chosen to have no code of conduct like all other top officials are expected to obey. Unsurprisingly, then, the justices feel free to accept financial payments (excuse me: “Bribes”) from moneyed interests seeking favorable legal rulings from the supposedly-impartial Court. But – oops – the general public has begun to notice the corruption, and public belief in the court’s integrity has plummeted. Thus, one of the far-right Supremes, Amy Coney Barrett, is now supporting a vague veil of an ethics code for her colleagues, even as she attests that all “are very committed to the highest standards of ethical conduct.” Seriously? Including the notorious money sleaze, Clarence Thomas? But wait, even a progressive justice, Elena Kagan, joins in the charade that an ethical code might produce… well, ethics. Or, at least, political cover for the lack thereof. A code, she surmises, would “go far in persuading other people that we were adhering to the highest standards of conduct.” Hello – would you be persuaded? Yet, these “Supremes” won’t even take the minimal step of adopting a simple code to measure basic integrity. “It would be a good idea for us to do it,” Barrett meekly says. “It would be a good thing for the court to do that,” Kagan echoes. Stop it! Stop the pitiful posturing. There’s only nine of you – you’re in charge! Convene a Happy Hour, confront reality, and do the right thing! Just do it – I’ll buy the beer. Do something We love to recommend FixTheCourt.com for ideas and resources on overhauling the Supreme Court. If you’ve got more organizations or people to recommend, leave them for us in the comments! Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chap Ambrose Vs. Elon Musk: I’m Betting on Chap]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>There is nothing quite as pitiful as whiny billionaires. And the whiniest of all is the richest – Elon Musk. This self-entitled bully runs over anyone in his way, then whines when they protest.</p><p>Elon’s latest high-pitched screech was prompted by public demands that his profiteering schemes obey clean-water and safety regulations. He owns a corporation named (believe it or not) the Boring Company – an underground tunnelling venture based in Bastrop, Texas, digging out tons of soil, chemicals, and contaminated groundwater. But where to put all the waste? I’ll just dump the stuff in the nearby Colorado River, said Lord Musk. Lots of stuff – 140,000 gallons of wastewater <em>per day</em>!</p><p>But that river is our main water source, said local people – you’ll need to comply with water treatment and disposal rules. Outrageous, whined Elon, maniacally squealing that “Construction is becoming practically illegal” in America. So, he proceeded to dump his waste without a permit.</p><p>Then he encountered Chap Ambrose, a Boring neighbor and former Musk admirer. Chap began asking questions and getting nothing but evasions, lies, and disrespect. Musk was messing with Texas, so Ambrose rallied local opposition through a website he named “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.keepbastropboring.com/">Keep Bastrop Boring,</a>” promoting it on a local billboard. With a drone, he videoed Musk’s expanding industrial mess, broadcasting the videos throughout the area. He filed actions with county, state, and national regulatory authorities, and got his state senator to hold a hearing, attended by hundreds of residents in this rural county.</p><p>Musk can bamboozle powerful officials, but not feisty people like Chap, who recently ridiculed the pouty billionaire. “I’m sorry, neighbor,” Ambrose told him, “development remains legal in Bastrop, but what is illegal is polluting Texas water… You’re making this way harder than it has to be.”</p><p>The fight goes on – and I’m betting on Chap.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/chap-ambrose-vs-elon-musk-im-betting</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:138226364</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/138226364/bcd382799922ed589c421479c23aa31f.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/138226364/c2ff84031d2891a94e942d7124e5c750.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>There is nothing quite as pitiful as whiny billionaires. And the whiniest of all is the richest – Elon Musk. This self-entitled bully runs over anyone in his way, then whines when they protest. Elon’s latest high-pitched screech was prompted by public demands that his profiteering schemes obey clean-water and safety regulations. He owns a corporation named (believe it or not) the Boring Company – an underground tunnelling venture based in Bastrop, Texas, digging out tons of soil, chemicals, and contaminated groundwater. But where to put all the waste? I’ll just dump the stuff in the nearby Colorado River, said Lord Musk. Lots of stuff – 140,000 gallons of wastewater per day! But that river is our main water source, said local people – you’ll need to comply with water treatment and disposal rules. Outrageous, whined Elon, maniacally squealing that “Construction is becoming practically illegal” in America. So, he proceeded to dump his waste without a permit. Then he encountered Chap Ambrose, a Boring neighbor and former Musk admirer. Chap began asking questions and getting nothing but evasions, lies, and disrespect. Musk was messing with Texas, so Ambrose rallied local opposition through a website he named “Keep Bastrop Boring,” promoting it on a local billboard. With a drone, he videoed Musk’s expanding industrial mess, broadcasting the videos throughout the area. He filed actions with county, state, and national regulatory authorities, and got his state senator to hold a hearing, attended by hundreds of residents in this rural county. Musk can bamboozle powerful officials, but not feisty people like Chap, who recently ridiculed the pouty billionaire. “I’m sorry, neighbor,” Ambrose told him, “development remains legal in Bastrop, but what is illegal is polluting Texas water… You’re making this way harder than it has to be.” The fight goes on – and I’m betting on Chap. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>There is nothing quite as pitiful as whiny billionaires. And the whiniest of all is the richest – Elon Musk. This self-entitled bully runs over anyone in his way, then whines when they protest. Elon’s latest high-pitched screech was prompted by public demands that his profiteering schemes obey clean-water and safety regulations. He owns a corporation named (believe it or not) the Boring Company – an underground tunnelling venture based in Bastrop, Texas, digging out tons of soil, chemicals, and contaminated groundwater. But where to put all the waste? I’ll just dump the stuff in the nearby Colorado River, said Lord Musk. Lots of stuff – 140,000 gallons of wastewater per day! But that river is our main water source, said local people – you’ll need to comply with water treatment and disposal rules. Outrageous, whined Elon, maniacally squealing that “Construction is becoming practically illegal” in America. So, he proceeded to dump his waste without a permit. Then he encountered Chap Ambrose, a Boring neighbor and former Musk admirer. Chap began asking questions and getting nothing but evasions, lies, and disrespect. Musk was messing with Texas, so Ambrose rallied local opposition through a website he named “Keep Bastrop Boring,” promoting it on a local billboard. With a drone, he videoed Musk’s expanding industrial mess, broadcasting the videos throughout the area. He filed actions with county, state, and national regulatory authorities, and got his state senator to hold a hearing, attended by hundreds of residents in this rural county. Musk can bamboozle powerful officials, but not feisty people like Chap, who recently ridiculed the pouty billionaire. “I’m sorry, neighbor,” Ambrose told him, “development remains legal in Bastrop, but what is illegal is polluting Texas water… You’re making this way harder than it has to be.” The fight goes on – and I’m betting on Chap. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Blast from the past: Bill Moyers & Jim Hightower]]></title><description><![CDATA[This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_7">jimhightower.substack.com</a><br/><br/><p><em>Editors’ note: Back in 2010, Hightower appeared on Bill Moyers’ much-beloved (and much missed!) PBS show. They covered so much ground together that applies to today’s politics that we thought our subscribers would enjoy revisiting this moment in time with us.</em></p>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/blast-from-the-past-bill-moyers-and</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:138278871</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2023 16:01:13 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="1572690" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/138278871/2a2ce82db41b67aa5f97b13344f86df3.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>122</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/138278871/da4a03f17719f24abb222a9064c9ff6c.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com Editors’ note: Back in 2010, Hightower appeared on Bill Moyers’ much-beloved (and much missed!) PBS show. They covered so much ground together that applies to today’s politics that we thought our subscribers would enjoy revisiting this moment in time with us.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com Editors’ note: Back in 2010, Hightower appeared on Bill Moyers’ much-beloved (and much missed!) PBS show. They covered so much ground together that applies to today’s politics that we thought our subscribers would enjoy revisiting this moment in time with us.</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Secretive Presidential Primary That Excludes You]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Are you excited by – or do you dread – the upcoming presidential election season? Either way, buckle up, for it’s only 12 weeks ‘til the Iowa caucuses, and then (Zoom!) there’s non-stop voting across America for the rest of 2024. Democracy at work!</p><p>Well… unless you don’t notice the <em>Plutocratic Primary</em>, where – shhhh – presidential voting is already taking place. However, this balloting is only open to a teensy number of very exclusive voters: Billionaires.</p><p>These privileged ones don’t have to go to public campaign events – candidates come to them for closed-door tête à têtes, making undisclosed promises in exchange for millions of dollars in campaign funds. This secretive primary lets moneyed elites initiate or eliminate policies that candidates obediently support. Moreover, by granting or withholding large donations, billionaires can determine which candidates are considered “viable,” letting the superrich have a heavy hand in “choosing the choices” that we commoners will have next year.</p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/14/us/politics/desantis-haley-donor-gatherings.html">The </a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/14/us/politics/desantis-haley-donor-gatherings.html"><em>New York Times</em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/14/us/politics/desantis-haley-donor-gatherings.html"> reports</a> that this flexing of the money muscle was recently exercised at a closed meeting of GOP sugar daddies in Utah. Ron DeSantis, Nikki Haley, Chris Christie, and other presidential wannabes were on display, pleading with the donors to choose them as the party’s alternative to Donald Trump – and to shoo the other Republican contenders out of the race.</p><p>Haley bluntly appealed to the rich clique’s plutocratic ego: “I think it’s up to the donors to decide which candidates should get off the stage.” Christie went a step further toward plutocratic rule, asking the elite attendees to decide who would be “the best president.”</p><p>No one in the room bothered asking the obvious question: <em>Best for whom</em>? Everyone knew he meant best for the rich. No need for messy elections – let the billionaires choose!</p><p>Do something!</p><p>To fight the influence of big money in politics, check out these organizations’ work:</p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.citizen.org/topic/protecting-democracy/money-in-politics/">Public Citizen</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.commoncause.org/our-work/money-influence/">Common Cause</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.brennancenter.org/issues/reform-money-politics">Brennan Center</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="http://movetoamend.org">Move to Amend</a></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-secretive-presidential-primary</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:138224299</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2598756" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/138224299/f5ec3d9dc7d2ae71df982be47ac06776.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/138224299/632bb904931285634af1851f6f422d4e.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Are you excited by – or do you dread – the upcoming presidential election season? Either way, buckle up, for it’s only 12 weeks ‘til the Iowa caucuses, and then (Zoom!) there’s non-stop voting across America for the rest of 2024. Democracy at work! Well… unless you don’t notice the Plutocratic Primary, where – shhhh – presidential voting is already taking place. However, this balloting is only open to a teensy number of very exclusive voters: Billionaires. These privileged ones don’t have to go to public campaign events – candidates come to them for closed-door tête à têtes, making undisclosed promises in exchange for millions of dollars in campaign funds. This secretive primary lets moneyed elites initiate or eliminate policies that candidates obediently support. Moreover, by granting or withholding large donations, billionaires can determine which candidates are considered “viable,” letting the superrich have a heavy hand in “choosing the choices” that we commoners will have next year. The New York Times reports that this flexing of the money muscle was recently exercised at a closed meeting of GOP sugar daddies in Utah. Ron DeSantis, Nikki Haley, Chris Christie, and other presidential wannabes were on display, pleading with the donors to choose them as the party’s alternative to Donald Trump – and to shoo the other Republican contenders out of the race. Haley bluntly appealed to the rich clique’s plutocratic ego: “I think it’s up to the donors to decide which candidates should get off the stage.” Christie went a step further toward plutocratic rule, asking the elite attendees to decide who would be “the best president.” No one in the room bothered asking the obvious question: Best for whom? Everyone knew he meant best for the rich. No need for messy elections – let the billionaires choose! Do something! To fight the influence of big money in politics, check out these organizations’ work: * Public Citizen * Common Cause * Brennan Center * Move to Amend Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Are you excited by – or do you dread – the upcoming presidential election season? Either way, buckle up, for it’s only 12 weeks ‘til the Iowa caucuses, and then (Zoom!) there’s non-stop voting across America for the rest of 2024. Democracy at work! Well… unless you don’t notice the Plutocratic Primary, where – shhhh – presidential voting is already taking place. However, this balloting is only open to a teensy number of very exclusive voters: Billionaires. These privileged ones don’t have to go to public campaign events – candidates come to them for closed-door tête à têtes, making undisclosed promises in exchange for millions of dollars in campaign funds. This secretive primary lets moneyed elites initiate or eliminate policies that candidates obediently support. Moreover, by granting or withholding large donations, billionaires can determine which candidates are considered “viable,” letting the superrich have a heavy hand in “choosing the choices” that we commoners will have next year. The New York Times reports that this flexing of the money muscle was recently exercised at a closed meeting of GOP sugar daddies in Utah. Ron DeSantis, Nikki Haley, Chris Christie, and other presidential wannabes were on display, pleading with the donors to choose them as the party’s alternative to Donald Trump – and to shoo the other Republican contenders out of the race. Haley bluntly appealed to the rich clique’s plutocratic ego: “I think it’s up to the donors to decide which candidates should get off the stage.” Christie went a step further toward plutocratic rule, asking the elite attendees to decide who would be “the best president.” No one in the room bothered asking the obvious question: Best for whom? Everyone knew he meant best for the rich. No need for messy elections – let the billionaires choose! Do something! To fight the influence of big money in politics, check out these organizations’ work: * Public Citizen * Common Cause * Brennan Center * Move to Amend Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Trucking Industry Wails About Its Labor Shortage. Here’s a Solution.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Seemingly intractable problems sometimes have an obvious solution standing right in front of them. Our nation’s dire shortage of long-haul truck drivers, for example.</p><p>Wrangling big rigs across the country is difficult and dangerous work, and the corporate giants that dominate the industry have long been wailing that they can’t find people willing to do the job. Their lobbyists have even pleaded with regulators to lower the age requirement so they can hire teenagers to drive these 18-wheel behemoths! What could go wrong with that?</p><p>Is there no better solution than child labor? How about us, asks the non-profit group, Real Women in Trucking?</p><p>Little known fact: Less than five percent of America’s long-haul drivers are women. Lesser known fact: Thousands of women are eager to do the job, are fully qualified, and hold commercial licenses to drive the rigs – but are constantly rejected when they apply for openings at trucking companies.</p><p>This is because most of the industry imposes a discriminatory gotcha to reject qualified female applicants. The gimmick is an unwritten, <em>unlawful</em> corporate rule, mandating that female job candidates can only be trained by female driving instructors. Obviously, since there are so few women drivers, very few female trainers are available, so – Gotcha! – women can’t get hired.</p><p>This is toothachingly stupid. Major corporations are loudly crying “labor shortage,” while the answer to the shortage is literally knocking on their doors. Also, these are good paying jobs, one of the few available to people without college degrees – so trucking corporations are literally slamming the door to the middle class in the face of enterprising women.</p><p>My words to the industry:  Stop crying, answer the knock, and HIRE THE WOMEN! </p><p>Do something:</p><p>To learn more about this story go to: <a target="_blank" href="http://RealWomenInTrucking.org">RealWomenInTrucking.org</a>.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/trucking-industry-wails-about-its</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:138013796</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/138013796/b9e04454e47f2db0c15b6d04c358bca0.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/138013796/807db3ced880faec673dd8fb861afbd5.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Seemingly intractable problems sometimes have an obvious solution standing right in front of them. Our nation’s dire shortage of long-haul truck drivers, for example. Wrangling big rigs across the country is difficult and dangerous work, and the corporate giants that dominate the industry have long been wailing that they can’t find people willing to do the job. Their lobbyists have even pleaded with regulators to lower the age requirement so they can hire teenagers to drive these 18-wheel behemoths! What could go wrong with that? Is there no better solution than child labor? How about us, asks the non-profit group, Real Women in Trucking? Little known fact: Less than five percent of America’s long-haul drivers are women. Lesser known fact: Thousands of women are eager to do the job, are fully qualified, and hold commercial licenses to drive the rigs – but are constantly rejected when they apply for openings at trucking companies. This is because most of the industry imposes a discriminatory gotcha to reject qualified female applicants. The gimmick is an unwritten, unlawful corporate rule, mandating that female job candidates can only be trained by female driving instructors. Obviously, since there are so few women drivers, very few female trainers are available, so – Gotcha! – women can’t get hired. This is toothachingly stupid. Major corporations are loudly crying “labor shortage,” while the answer to the shortage is literally knocking on their doors. Also, these are good paying jobs, one of the few available to people without college degrees – so trucking corporations are literally slamming the door to the middle class in the face of enterprising women. My words to the industry:  Stop crying, answer the knock, and HIRE THE WOMEN! Do something: To learn more about this story go to: RealWomenInTrucking.org. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Seemingly intractable problems sometimes have an obvious solution standing right in front of them. Our nation’s dire shortage of long-haul truck drivers, for example. Wrangling big rigs across the country is difficult and dangerous work, and the corporate giants that dominate the industry have long been wailing that they can’t find people willing to do the job. Their lobbyists have even pleaded with regulators to lower the age requirement so they can hire teenagers to drive these 18-wheel behemoths! What could go wrong with that? Is there no better solution than child labor? How about us, asks the non-profit group, Real Women in Trucking? Little known fact: Less than five percent of America’s long-haul drivers are women. Lesser known fact: Thousands of women are eager to do the job, are fully qualified, and hold commercial licenses to drive the rigs – but are constantly rejected when they apply for openings at trucking companies. This is because most of the industry imposes a discriminatory gotcha to reject qualified female applicants. The gimmick is an unwritten, unlawful corporate rule, mandating that female job candidates can only be trained by female driving instructors. Obviously, since there are so few women drivers, very few female trainers are available, so – Gotcha! – women can’t get hired. This is toothachingly stupid. Major corporations are loudly crying “labor shortage,” while the answer to the shortage is literally knocking on their doors. Also, these are good paying jobs, one of the few available to people without college degrees – so trucking corporations are literally slamming the door to the middle class in the face of enterprising women. My words to the industry:  Stop crying, answer the knock, and HIRE THE WOMEN! Do something: To learn more about this story go to: RealWomenInTrucking.org. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Did You Vote for Six Judicial Elites to Rule Over You?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>If the Democratic Party wants a big, hot issue that would force the GOP to admit its disdain for democracy – how about those Supremes?</p><p>The Supreme Court, intended to be an apolitical, neutral arbiter of legal cases brought before it, has been elevated to a supreme <em>legislative</em> body by today’s 6-person majority of extreme right-wing partisans controlling this Third Branch of our government.</p><p>I’m hardly a legal scholar (unless you count my week-and-a-half in law school!), but you don’t have to be in Who’s Who to know What’s What. From my lifetime in politics, I can attest that what these Republican judges are doing is pure politics, using their black robes as cover for flagrant political activism. Coordinating surreptitiously with right-wing ideologues and corporate money powers that shower favors on them, they intentionally bring up case after case designed to rewrite America’s laws. These six aloof judges are effectively enacting a new political order of plutocratic, autocratic, and theocratic power over the beliefs and democratic will of America’s pluralistic majority.</p><p>Posing as “conservative” jurists, they’ve steadily concentrated arbitrary lawmaking power in their own hands. Reaching way beyond the Court’s Constitutional role of deciding cases, today’s Supremes now effectively create law by choosing cases to bring up, favoring those fabricated by such right-wing political allies as the Koch brothers and the Federalist Society. Moreover, the six partisans cherry-pick isolated parts of a case to advance their collective agenda, even ruling on legal questions the case doesn’t raise, simply making up their own questions.</p><p>With no legal, ethical, or electoral checks on this secretive, anti-democratic government, the Court now routinely rules against workers, women, civil rights, the environment, personal liberties, and… well, against America! Shouldn’t we have at least one political party calling them out and reining in their arrogance?</p><p>Do something:</p><p>To join the fight to overhaul the Supreme Court, check out <a target="_blank" href="https://fixthecourt.com/">FixTheCourt.com</a>.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/did-you-vote-for-six-judicial-elites</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:138013000</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593530" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/138013000/243a7537a3e0d2ec1850bc76782dbdaf.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/138013000/d574d34d090de59723de4e47b4ffc0cf.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>If the Democratic Party wants a big, hot issue that would force the GOP to admit its disdain for democracy – how about those Supremes? The Supreme Court, intended to be an apolitical, neutral arbiter of legal cases brought before it, has been elevated to a supreme legislative body by today’s 6-person majority of extreme right-wing partisans controlling this Third Branch of our government. I’m hardly a legal scholar (unless you count my week-and-a-half in law school!), but you don’t have to be in Who’s Who to know What’s What. From my lifetime in politics, I can attest that what these Republican judges are doing is pure politics, using their black robes as cover for flagrant political activism. Coordinating surreptitiously with right-wing ideologues and corporate money powers that shower favors on them, they intentionally bring up case after case designed to rewrite America’s laws. These six aloof judges are effectively enacting a new political order of plutocratic, autocratic, and theocratic power over the beliefs and democratic will of America’s pluralistic majority. Posing as “conservative” jurists, they’ve steadily concentrated arbitrary lawmaking power in their own hands. Reaching way beyond the Court’s Constitutional role of deciding cases, today’s Supremes now effectively create law by choosing cases to bring up, favoring those fabricated by such right-wing political allies as the Koch brothers and the Federalist Society. Moreover, the six partisans cherry-pick isolated parts of a case to advance their collective agenda, even ruling on legal questions the case doesn’t raise, simply making up their own questions. With no legal, ethical, or electoral checks on this secretive, anti-democratic government, the Court now routinely rules against workers, women, civil rights, the environment, personal liberties, and… well, against America! Shouldn’t we have at least one political party calling them out and reining in their arrogance? Do something: To join the fight to overhaul the Supreme Court, check out FixTheCourt.com. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>If the Democratic Party wants a big, hot issue that would force the GOP to admit its disdain for democracy – how about those Supremes? The Supreme Court, intended to be an apolitical, neutral arbiter of legal cases brought before it, has been elevated to a supreme legislative body by today’s 6-person majority of extreme right-wing partisans controlling this Third Branch of our government. I’m hardly a legal scholar (unless you count my week-and-a-half in law school!), but you don’t have to be in Who’s Who to know What’s What. From my lifetime in politics, I can attest that what these Republican judges are doing is pure politics, using their black robes as cover for flagrant political activism. Coordinating surreptitiously with right-wing ideologues and corporate money powers that shower favors on them, they intentionally bring up case after case designed to rewrite America’s laws. These six aloof judges are effectively enacting a new political order of plutocratic, autocratic, and theocratic power over the beliefs and democratic will of America’s pluralistic majority. Posing as “conservative” jurists, they’ve steadily concentrated arbitrary lawmaking power in their own hands. Reaching way beyond the Court’s Constitutional role of deciding cases, today’s Supremes now effectively create law by choosing cases to bring up, favoring those fabricated by such right-wing political allies as the Koch brothers and the Federalist Society. Moreover, the six partisans cherry-pick isolated parts of a case to advance their collective agenda, even ruling on legal questions the case doesn’t raise, simply making up their own questions. With no legal, ethical, or electoral checks on this secretive, anti-democratic government, the Court now routinely rules against workers, women, civil rights, the environment, personal liberties, and… well, against America! Shouldn’t we have at least one political party calling them out and reining in their arrogance? Do something: To join the fight to overhaul the Supreme Court, check out FixTheCourt.com. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Contemptible Thievery of Gentrification]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Over time, words with beautiful meanings occasionally get degraded into ugliness. “Gentle,” for example.</p><p>Originally meaning good natured and kindly, it was twisted into “gentry” in the Middle Ages by very un-gentle land barons seeking a patina of refinement. Then it became a pretentious verb – to “gentrify” – meaning to make something common appear upscale. And now the word has devolved to “gentrification,” describing the greed of developers and speculators who oust middle-and-low-income families from their communities to create trendy enclaves for the rich.</p><p>The latest move by these profiteers is their meanest yet, targeting families with the most tenuous hold on affordable shelter: <a target="_blank" href="https://apnews.com/article/mobile-home-parks-rent-investors-8dbadf3f9a33faddb06abc980b046176">People living in mobile home parks</a>. Some 20 million Americans – especially vulnerable senior citizens, veterans, the disabled, and immigrant workers – make their homes in these inexpensive parks.</p><p>Well, “inexpensive” until the vultures sweep in, including multi-billion-dollar Wall Street powerhouses like Blackstone Group, Apollo Global Management, and Carlyle Group that’re buying up hundreds of trailer parks across the country. These are easy for unprincipled speculators to grab – while tenants might own their mobile home, they rent the lots, and the first sign that a huckster has taken over a neighborhood park is an unwarranted spike in everyone’s rent. Residents are captive tenants, for these homes are not really mobile, and even if one can be moved, the cost can top $10,000. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/03/15/what-happens-when-investment-firms-acquire-trailer-parks"><em>New Yorker</em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/03/15/what-happens-when-investment-firms-acquire-trailer-parks"> magazine notes</a> that today’s typical mobile-home park has been called “a Waffle House where customers are chained to their booths.”</p><p>Corporate predators can collect ever-rising rents and fees, while cutting amenities, steadily driving out lower-income families. Then the business model can switch to gentrification, remaking the parks to attract upscale owners of million-dollar mobile homes.</p><p>And where do former tenants go? Away. Out of sight, out of mind.</p><p><em>To fight this predatory spending spree, some folks living in mobile homes are forming coops to buy the parks themselves. </em><a target="_blank" href="https://apnews.com/article/mobile-homes-resident-cooperatives-affordable-housing-e17bbf20c49f79e181e0856fa69e59ba"><em>Check out this group in Oregon</em></a><em>, for example.</em></p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-contemptible-thievery-of-gentrification</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:137880884</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 16:00:42 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/137880884/5642605bf89691ca7adb71ec18ede22a.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/137880884/87649dee9d09f169fd7228f9c3aca3de.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Over time, words with beautiful meanings occasionally get degraded into ugliness. “Gentle,” for example. Originally meaning good natured and kindly, it was twisted into “gentry” in the Middle Ages by very un-gentle land barons seeking a patina of refinement. Then it became a pretentious verb – to “gentrify” – meaning to make something common appear upscale. And now the word has devolved to “gentrification,” describing the greed of developers and speculators who oust middle-and-low-income families from their communities to create trendy enclaves for the rich. The latest move by these profiteers is their meanest yet, targeting families with the most tenuous hold on affordable shelter: People living in mobile home parks. Some 20 million Americans – especially vulnerable senior citizens, veterans, the disabled, and immigrant workers – make their homes in these inexpensive parks. Well, “inexpensive” until the vultures sweep in, including multi-billion-dollar Wall Street powerhouses like Blackstone Group, Apollo Global Management, and Carlyle Group that’re buying up hundreds of trailer parks across the country. These are easy for unprincipled speculators to grab – while tenants might own their mobile home, they rent the lots, and the first sign that a huckster has taken over a neighborhood park is an unwarranted spike in everyone’s rent. Residents are captive tenants, for these homes are not really mobile, and even if one can be moved, the cost can top $10,000. New Yorker magazine notes that today’s typical mobile-home park has been called “a Waffle House where customers are chained to their booths.” Corporate predators can collect ever-rising rents and fees, while cutting amenities, steadily driving out lower-income families. Then the business model can switch to gentrification, remaking the parks to attract upscale owners of million-dollar mobile homes. And where do former tenants go? Away. Out of sight, out of mind. To fight this predatory spending spree, some folks living in mobile homes are forming coops to buy the parks themselves. Check out this group in Oregon, for example. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Over time, words with beautiful meanings occasionally get degraded into ugliness. “Gentle,” for example. Originally meaning good natured and kindly, it was twisted into “gentry” in the Middle Ages by very un-gentle land barons seeking a patina of refinement. Then it became a pretentious verb – to “gentrify” – meaning to make something common appear upscale. And now the word has devolved to “gentrification,” describing the greed of developers and speculators who oust middle-and-low-income families from their communities to create trendy enclaves for the rich. The latest move by these profiteers is their meanest yet, targeting families with the most tenuous hold on affordable shelter: People living in mobile home parks. Some 20 million Americans – especially vulnerable senior citizens, veterans, the disabled, and immigrant workers – make their homes in these inexpensive parks. Well, “inexpensive” until the vultures sweep in, including multi-billion-dollar Wall Street powerhouses like Blackstone Group, Apollo Global Management, and Carlyle Group that’re buying up hundreds of trailer parks across the country. These are easy for unprincipled speculators to grab – while tenants might own their mobile home, they rent the lots, and the first sign that a huckster has taken over a neighborhood park is an unwarranted spike in everyone’s rent. Residents are captive tenants, for these homes are not really mobile, and even if one can be moved, the cost can top $10,000. New Yorker magazine notes that today’s typical mobile-home park has been called “a Waffle House where customers are chained to their booths.” Corporate predators can collect ever-rising rents and fees, while cutting amenities, steadily driving out lower-income families. Then the business model can switch to gentrification, remaking the parks to attract upscale owners of million-dollar mobile homes. And where do former tenants go? Away. Out of sight, out of mind. To fight this predatory spending spree, some folks living in mobile homes are forming coops to buy the parks themselves. Check out this group in Oregon, for example. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Let’s Send Hearing Aids to All Right-Wing Officials]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Here’s my suggestion for stopping the ultra-right-wing loopiness coming out of the mouths of Republican officials: Hearing aids.</p><p>I’m convinced that the wacko blatherings of Matt Gaetz, the ravings of the Q-anon cult, Trump’s tantrums, and so many others are the result of a tragic neurological disconnect. This affliction lets their tongues wag impulsively, but their ears don’t pick up the noise, so they’re unaware that they are prattling nonsense.</p><p>The current chaos in Congress’ Republican caucus is one embarrassing example of this eardrum contagion, but it has also spread throughout the country, even to local right-wing officials. In Shasta County, California, for example, the Republican-controlled board of supervisors recently lurched into full-tilt screwballism, frenetically warning that Japanese forces are <a target="_blank" href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/28/california-shasta-county-far-right-mosquito-vaccine">weaponizing mosquitos to be “flying syringes”</a> to mass-inject Americans. See – no way they would’ve said that if they could hear themselves.</p><p>Which brings us to the fount of present-day right-wing goofiness: Texas state officials. Their latest tone-deaf ploy is by Gov. Greg Abbott, who wants to divert our people’s tax dollars from public schools to <a target="_blank" href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/28/california-shasta-county-far-right-mosquito-vaccine">exclusive private academies</a>, subsidizing the rich class he serves. He’s tried to do this before, but he fails – since even <a target="_blank" href="https://www.the74million.org/article/gop-bid-to-bring-vouchers-to-texas-fails-halting-school-choice-wave-for-now/">conservative Republicans in rural counties don’t want their public education turned over to profiteering corporate chains</a>. So, this time Greg is hyping privatization as a “religious freedom” issue, piously preaching that “God created us to have family units – not state bureaucrats – make decisions for families.”</p><p>Sheesh, does Abbott even have ears? Or maybe he’s hoping that we don’t have memories, for we have heard him howling constantly that the state – not families – must make every woman’s personal reproductive decisions. Let’s buy a hearing aid for him, and set it on a constant replay loop.</p><p>To support public education in Texas, check out the Texas AFT’s latest on the issue: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.texasaft.org/topics/policy/funding/">https://www.texasaft.org/topics/policy/funding/</a></p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Thank you for reading Jim Hightower's Lowdown. This post is public so feel free to share it.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/lets-send-hearing-aids-to-all-right</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:137823410</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593009" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/137823410/576e67a32e9812b2b554aecb444a065b.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/137823410/2e42e2fe273e2253ede7e954e08af19b.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Here’s my suggestion for stopping the ultra-right-wing loopiness coming out of the mouths of Republican officials: Hearing aids. I’m convinced that the wacko blatherings of Matt Gaetz, the ravings of the Q-anon cult, Trump’s tantrums, and so many others are the result of a tragic neurological disconnect. This affliction lets their tongues wag impulsively, but their ears don’t pick up the noise, so they’re unaware that they are prattling nonsense. The current chaos in Congress’ Republican caucus is one embarrassing example of this eardrum contagion, but it has also spread throughout the country, even to local right-wing officials. In Shasta County, California, for example, the Republican-controlled board of supervisors recently lurched into full-tilt screwballism, frenetically warning that Japanese forces are weaponizing mosquitos to be “flying syringes” to mass-inject Americans. See – no way they would’ve said that if they could hear themselves. Which brings us to the fount of present-day right-wing goofiness: Texas state officials. Their latest tone-deaf ploy is by Gov. Greg Abbott, who wants to divert our people’s tax dollars from public schools to exclusive private academies, subsidizing the rich class he serves. He’s tried to do this before, but he fails – since even conservative Republicans in rural counties don’t want their public education turned over to profiteering corporate chains. So, this time Greg is hyping privatization as a “religious freedom” issue, piously preaching that “God created us to have family units – not state bureaucrats – make decisions for families.” Sheesh, does Abbott even have ears? Or maybe he’s hoping that we don’t have memories, for we have heard him howling constantly that the state – not families – must make every woman’s personal reproductive decisions. Let’s buy a hearing aid for him, and set it on a constant replay loop. To support public education in Texas, check out the Texas AFT’s latest on the issue: https://www.texasaft.org/topics/policy/funding/ Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Thank you for reading Jim Hightower's Lowdown. This post is public so feel free to share it. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Here’s my suggestion for stopping the ultra-right-wing loopiness coming out of the mouths of Republican officials: Hearing aids. I’m convinced that the wacko blatherings of Matt Gaetz, the ravings of the Q-anon cult, Trump’s tantrums, and so many others are the result of a tragic neurological disconnect. This affliction lets their tongues wag impulsively, but their ears don’t pick up the noise, so they’re unaware that they are prattling nonsense. The current chaos in Congress’ Republican caucus is one embarrassing example of this eardrum contagion, but it has also spread throughout the country, even to local right-wing officials. In Shasta County, California, for example, the Republican-controlled board of supervisors recently lurched into full-tilt screwballism, frenetically warning that Japanese forces are weaponizing mosquitos to be “flying syringes” to mass-inject Americans. See – no way they would’ve said that if they could hear themselves. Which brings us to the fount of present-day right-wing goofiness: Texas state officials. Their latest tone-deaf ploy is by Gov. Greg Abbott, who wants to divert our people’s tax dollars from public schools to exclusive private academies, subsidizing the rich class he serves. He’s tried to do this before, but he fails – since even conservative Republicans in rural counties don’t want their public education turned over to profiteering corporate chains. So, this time Greg is hyping privatization as a “religious freedom” issue, piously preaching that “God created us to have family units – not state bureaucrats – make decisions for families.” Sheesh, does Abbott even have ears? Or maybe he’s hoping that we don’t have memories, for we have heard him howling constantly that the state – not families – must make every woman’s personal reproductive decisions. Let’s buy a hearing aid for him, and set it on a constant replay loop. To support public education in Texas, check out the Texas AFT’s latest on the issue: https://www.texasaft.org/topics/policy/funding/ Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Thank you for reading Jim Hightower's Lowdown. This post is public so feel free to share it. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Look Who’s Behind the Know-Nothing “No Labels” Party]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>In the mid-1800s, a new political party flared up in American politics, posing as an alternative to both the Democratic and Republican parties.</p><p>Xenophobic and nativist, it was extremely secretive with outsiders about its specific structure, motive, and agenda.  Indeed, members were instructed to say “I know nothing” when asked about details – thus it was quickly dubbed the <em>Know-Nothing Party</em>. In 1856, it nominated Millard Filmore as its presidential nominee, but he was reticent to talk about the party, even refraining from running as an avowed party member. He lost, and the Know-Nothings soon withered.</p><p>Yet, here comes another oddly-secretive party. Labeling themselves “No Labels,” this reincarnation ought to be named the <em>Nothing Party</em>, for it offers nothing of substance to voters. Its so-called “Common Sense Agenda” is fluffier than cotton candy, yet, it’s trying to run a third party candidate in next year’s presidential race.</p><p>Why? Follow the money! That’s not easy to do, though, for this gaggle of conservative corporatists slyly incorporated as a nonprofit “social welfare” outfit – a deceit that lets it hide the names of its political funders from the public. <a target="_blank" href="https://newrepublic.com/article/172059/no-labels-took-100000-clarence-thomas-buddy-harlan-crow"><em>The New Republic,</em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://newrepublic.com/article/172059/no-labels-took-100000-clarence-thomas-buddy-harlan-crow"> however, got records revealing that No Labels is a fat cat front</a>, with Texas billionaire Republican Harlan Crow leading the way.</p><p>Who? Crow is the political patron who has secretly been lavishing luxury gifts and cash on Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, who in turn has embraced Crow’s plutocratic positions in court cases.</p><p>That same plutocratic agenda appears to be fueling No Labels third-party presidential push, for these rich politicos know that a milquetoast spoiler candidate would mostly draw independent moderates from Joe Biden, giving Crow & Company another GOP corporate presidency. It’s a cynical game… but that’s how they play it.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/look-whos-behind-the-know-nothing</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:137630447</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/137630447/48f13842b4ae3e11efcae0e68e1207e7.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/137630447/c33582f807fd6171191f7680953f2daa.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>In the mid-1800s, a new political party flared up in American politics, posing as an alternative to both the Democratic and Republican parties. Xenophobic and nativist, it was extremely secretive with outsiders about its specific structure, motive, and agenda.  Indeed, members were instructed to say “I know nothing” when asked about details – thus it was quickly dubbed the Know-Nothing Party. In 1856, it nominated Millard Filmore as its presidential nominee, but he was reticent to talk about the party, even refraining from running as an avowed party member. He lost, and the Know-Nothings soon withered. Yet, here comes another oddly-secretive party. Labeling themselves “No Labels,” this reincarnation ought to be named the Nothing Party, for it offers nothing of substance to voters. Its so-called “Common Sense Agenda” is fluffier than cotton candy, yet, it’s trying to run a third party candidate in next year’s presidential race. Why? Follow the money! That’s not easy to do, though, for this gaggle of conservative corporatists slyly incorporated as a nonprofit “social welfare” outfit – a deceit that lets it hide the names of its political funders from the public. The New Republic, however, got records revealing that No Labels is a fat cat front, with Texas billionaire Republican Harlan Crow leading the way. Who? Crow is the political patron who has secretly been lavishing luxury gifts and cash on Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, who in turn has embraced Crow’s plutocratic positions in court cases. That same plutocratic agenda appears to be fueling No Labels third-party presidential push, for these rich politicos know that a milquetoast spoiler candidate would mostly draw independent moderates from Joe Biden, giving Crow &amp; Company another GOP corporate presidency. It’s a cynical game… but that’s how they play it. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>In the mid-1800s, a new political party flared up in American politics, posing as an alternative to both the Democratic and Republican parties. Xenophobic and nativist, it was extremely secretive with outsiders about its specific structure, motive, and agenda.  Indeed, members were instructed to say “I know nothing” when asked about details – thus it was quickly dubbed the Know-Nothing Party. In 1856, it nominated Millard Filmore as its presidential nominee, but he was reticent to talk about the party, even refraining from running as an avowed party member. He lost, and the Know-Nothings soon withered. Yet, here comes another oddly-secretive party. Labeling themselves “No Labels,” this reincarnation ought to be named the Nothing Party, for it offers nothing of substance to voters. Its so-called “Common Sense Agenda” is fluffier than cotton candy, yet, it’s trying to run a third party candidate in next year’s presidential race. Why? Follow the money! That’s not easy to do, though, for this gaggle of conservative corporatists slyly incorporated as a nonprofit “social welfare” outfit – a deceit that lets it hide the names of its political funders from the public. The New Republic, however, got records revealing that No Labels is a fat cat front, with Texas billionaire Republican Harlan Crow leading the way. Who? Crow is the political patron who has secretly been lavishing luxury gifts and cash on Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, who in turn has embraced Crow’s plutocratic positions in court cases. That same plutocratic agenda appears to be fueling No Labels third-party presidential push, for these rich politicos know that a milquetoast spoiler candidate would mostly draw independent moderates from Joe Biden, giving Crow &amp; Company another GOP corporate presidency. It’s a cynical game… but that’s how they play it. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bribery, Bad. Campaign Donations, Good?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>What amazes me about outbreaks of bribery among high government officials is not just the level of greed involved, but that the take is often so cheesy.</p><p>For example, there seems to be no end to the ongoing saga of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas peddling his position and prestige to right-wing corporate titans for… what? Free rides on their jets, golf outings, and assorted baubles. He’s supposed to be an impartial justice, but he consistently supports rich interests who’re picking up his tabs. We taxpayers provide $274,000 a year in salary to Thomas – why wouldn’t he buy his own baubles and protect a smidgeon of his judicial integrity?</p><p>Now comes New Jersey’s Sen. Robert Menendez, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, who has been oddly insistent on giving US weaponry and financial aid to Egypt’s repressive military dictatorship. Why? Because Menendez has sunk butt-deep into influence peddling, using his position to advance Egyptian interests.</p><p>In exchange, Egyptian agents have blessed him with huge wads of cash, gold bullion, a Mercedes-Benz convertible, and a no-show “job” for his wife. Oh… they also delivered an air purifier for his home.</p><p>Seriously. An air purifier. That’s a mighty cheap sell-out! Yet, what a priceless symbol of the whole stinky deal.</p><p>Meanwhile, Menendez says that the donations are unrelated to his honest concerns about our Mid-East foreign policy. He proudly asserts that his senatorial assistance is just “the normal work of a congressional office.”</p><p>Sadly, he’s right! Most Senate offices today routinely do official favors for moneyed interests in exchange for millions of dollars in bribes. But that’s such an ugly word – so they call the Big Money payments “campaign contributions.” Then they get indignant when we call the system corrupt. But that’s what it is.</p><p>To fight the influence of big money in politics, check out these organizations’ work:</p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.citizen.org/topic/protecting-democracy/money-in-politics/">Public Citizen</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.commoncause.org/our-work/money-influence/">Common Cause</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.brennancenter.org/issues/reform-money-politics">Brennan Center</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="http://movetoamend.org">Move to Amend</a></p><p>* Tell us about other people doing this work in the comments!</p><p></p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/bribery-bad-campaign-donations-good</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:137627116</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 16:25:12 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/137627116/f7bdded9491693ae3e36a48e986cdfc9.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/137627116/6dff13c547ca4c9ad40a726313b144a2.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>What amazes me about outbreaks of bribery among high government officials is not just the level of greed involved, but that the take is often so cheesy. For example, there seems to be no end to the ongoing saga of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas peddling his position and prestige to right-wing corporate titans for… what? Free rides on their jets, golf outings, and assorted baubles. He’s supposed to be an impartial justice, but he consistently supports rich interests who’re picking up his tabs. We taxpayers provide $274,000 a year in salary to Thomas – why wouldn’t he buy his own baubles and protect a smidgeon of his judicial integrity? Now comes New Jersey’s Sen. Robert Menendez, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, who has been oddly insistent on giving US weaponry and financial aid to Egypt’s repressive military dictatorship. Why? Because Menendez has sunk butt-deep into influence peddling, using his position to advance Egyptian interests. In exchange, Egyptian agents have blessed him with huge wads of cash, gold bullion, a Mercedes-Benz convertible, and a no-show “job” for his wife. Oh… they also delivered an air purifier for his home. Seriously. An air purifier. That’s a mighty cheap sell-out! Yet, what a priceless symbol of the whole stinky deal. Meanwhile, Menendez says that the donations are unrelated to his honest concerns about our Mid-East foreign policy. He proudly asserts that his senatorial assistance is just “the normal work of a congressional office.” Sadly, he’s right! Most Senate offices today routinely do official favors for moneyed interests in exchange for millions of dollars in bribes. But that’s such an ugly word – so they call the Big Money payments “campaign contributions.” Then they get indignant when we call the system corrupt. But that’s what it is. To fight the influence of big money in politics, check out these organizations’ work: * Public Citizen * Common Cause * Brennan Center * Move to Amend * Tell us about other people doing this work in the comments! Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>What amazes me about outbreaks of bribery among high government officials is not just the level of greed involved, but that the take is often so cheesy. For example, there seems to be no end to the ongoing saga of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas peddling his position and prestige to right-wing corporate titans for… what? Free rides on their jets, golf outings, and assorted baubles. He’s supposed to be an impartial justice, but he consistently supports rich interests who’re picking up his tabs. We taxpayers provide $274,000 a year in salary to Thomas – why wouldn’t he buy his own baubles and protect a smidgeon of his judicial integrity? Now comes New Jersey’s Sen. Robert Menendez, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, who has been oddly insistent on giving US weaponry and financial aid to Egypt’s repressive military dictatorship. Why? Because Menendez has sunk butt-deep into influence peddling, using his position to advance Egyptian interests. In exchange, Egyptian agents have blessed him with huge wads of cash, gold bullion, a Mercedes-Benz convertible, and a no-show “job” for his wife. Oh… they also delivered an air purifier for his home. Seriously. An air purifier. That’s a mighty cheap sell-out! Yet, what a priceless symbol of the whole stinky deal. Meanwhile, Menendez says that the donations are unrelated to his honest concerns about our Mid-East foreign policy. He proudly asserts that his senatorial assistance is just “the normal work of a congressional office.” Sadly, he’s right! Most Senate offices today routinely do official favors for moneyed interests in exchange for millions of dollars in bribes. But that’s such an ugly word – so they call the Big Money payments “campaign contributions.” Then they get indignant when we call the system corrupt. But that’s what it is. To fight the influence of big money in politics, check out these organizations’ work: * Public Citizen * Common Cause * Brennan Center * Move to Amend * Tell us about other people doing this work in the comments! Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Let’s Get Real: Billionaires Are Nuts!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>When megalomanic, multi-billionaire barons of industry suddenly announce that they are boundless geniuses who must remake society, government, and nature – perk up and pay attention! Their grand schemes of social engineering almost always go badly for us non-billionaires.</p><p>Having spent their careers in the top-down, self-aggrandizing, exploitative, corporate culture, they invariably turn to techno-solutions and AI computer models, ignoring such bothersome factors as human dynamics.</p><p>So look out, for here comes a gaggle of high-tech gabillionaires from Silicon Valley, planning to “fix” America’s cities <a target="_blank" href="https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2023-08-31/residents-politicians-learn-land-grab-solano-county-tech-billionaires">by building an urban utopia from scratch</a>. They’ve chosen Solano County, northeast of San Francisco, for their start-up city, promoting it as a hybrid of technotopia and European urbanity, free from the gritty realities of – you know – real cities.</p><p>Their plan, however, did not include informing the people currently living there about their scheme. Instead, they dispatched secret armies of lawyers and developers to snap up the area’s rich farmland, preparing to surprise the locals by converting their land, community, and culture into the gabillionaires’ experiment in new urbanism. One of the moneyed schemers <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/17/opinion/solano-county-flannery-associates-billionaires-build-cities.html">declared</a> that: “The idea is simple: Found new cities, free from old bureaucratic and legal structures, and explore bold new visions of how government should work.”</p><p>But that’s not simple… it’s <em>simplistic</em>. Also, wholly anti-democratic and unAmerican. But it’s in keeping with the egomaniacal ejaculations of such other self-indulgent richies as Peter Thiel, who wants cities to float on oceans; Jeff Bezos, who proposes that cities orbit in space; and Elon Musk who wants cities built on Mars.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… They should all be sent to those places now! Meanwhile, what if more of our billionaires invested their money and political influence in funding real solutions to real problems in the real cities America already has?</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/lets-get-real-billionaires-are-nuts</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:137486522</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2023 16:16:03 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/137486522/23209053a3381b68a4c7bdc3de1dc7cb.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/137486522/adfaf5351a0a5e7ce1c3650cac3c2720.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>When megalomanic, multi-billionaire barons of industry suddenly announce that they are boundless geniuses who must remake society, government, and nature – perk up and pay attention! Their grand schemes of social engineering almost always go badly for us non-billionaires. Having spent their careers in the top-down, self-aggrandizing, exploitative, corporate culture, they invariably turn to techno-solutions and AI computer models, ignoring such bothersome factors as human dynamics. So look out, for here comes a gaggle of high-tech gabillionaires from Silicon Valley, planning to “fix” America’s cities by building an urban utopia from scratch. They’ve chosen Solano County, northeast of San Francisco, for their start-up city, promoting it as a hybrid of technotopia and European urbanity, free from the gritty realities of – you know – real cities. Their plan, however, did not include informing the people currently living there about their scheme. Instead, they dispatched secret armies of lawyers and developers to snap up the area’s rich farmland, preparing to surprise the locals by converting their land, community, and culture into the gabillionaires’ experiment in new urbanism. One of the moneyed schemers declared that: “The idea is simple: Found new cities, free from old bureaucratic and legal structures, and explore bold new visions of how government should work.” But that’s not simple… it’s simplistic. Also, wholly anti-democratic and unAmerican. But it’s in keeping with the egomaniacal ejaculations of such other self-indulgent richies as Peter Thiel, who wants cities to float on oceans; Jeff Bezos, who proposes that cities orbit in space; and Elon Musk who wants cities built on Mars. This is Jim Hightower saying… They should all be sent to those places now! Meanwhile, what if more of our billionaires invested their money and political influence in funding real solutions to real problems in the real cities America already has? Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>When megalomanic, multi-billionaire barons of industry suddenly announce that they are boundless geniuses who must remake society, government, and nature – perk up and pay attention! Their grand schemes of social engineering almost always go badly for us non-billionaires. Having spent their careers in the top-down, self-aggrandizing, exploitative, corporate culture, they invariably turn to techno-solutions and AI computer models, ignoring such bothersome factors as human dynamics. So look out, for here comes a gaggle of high-tech gabillionaires from Silicon Valley, planning to “fix” America’s cities by building an urban utopia from scratch. They’ve chosen Solano County, northeast of San Francisco, for their start-up city, promoting it as a hybrid of technotopia and European urbanity, free from the gritty realities of – you know – real cities. Their plan, however, did not include informing the people currently living there about their scheme. Instead, they dispatched secret armies of lawyers and developers to snap up the area’s rich farmland, preparing to surprise the locals by converting their land, community, and culture into the gabillionaires’ experiment in new urbanism. One of the moneyed schemers declared that: “The idea is simple: Found new cities, free from old bureaucratic and legal structures, and explore bold new visions of how government should work.” But that’s not simple… it’s simplistic. Also, wholly anti-democratic and unAmerican. But it’s in keeping with the egomaniacal ejaculations of such other self-indulgent richies as Peter Thiel, who wants cities to float on oceans; Jeff Bezos, who proposes that cities orbit in space; and Elon Musk who wants cities built on Mars. This is Jim Hightower saying… They should all be sent to those places now! Meanwhile, what if more of our billionaires invested their money and political influence in funding real solutions to real problems in the real cities America already has? Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[A Thundering Herd of Bankers Robbing Oklahoma City Taxpayers]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Oklahoma troubadour Woodie Guthrie wrote a song about outlaws that was right on target:</p><p>“As through this world I’ve traveledI’ve seen lots of funny menSome’ll rob you with a six gunSome with a fountain pen.”</p><p>That could apply today to Clayton Bennett, a multimillionaire Oklahoma City banker who has regularly wielded his fountain pen to loot public funds for his private gain. Bennett is a Hall of Infamy player in the elite club of big league owners of pro-basketball teams, specializing in picking taxpayers’ pockets to finance his operations. In 2006, he and a few high-rolling partners bought the Seattle SuperSonics team, promptly demanding that locals pony up $500 million to build a new arena for them.</p><p>No, said Seattle. So Bennett & Gang scampered off to Oklahoma City with the team (renaming it the Thunder), using their fountain pens to filch a $100-million subsidy from taxpayers there. Soon, Bennett and the Gang struck again, demanding that local officials hand over another $115-million subsidy.</p><p>Gratitude? Robbers don’t say thank you. They refill their fountain pens. As <a target="_blank" href="https://popular.info/p/the-oklahoma-city-boondoggle">Judd Legum reports in his excellent Substack report Popular Information</a>, Bennett is now demanding $850 million from OKC taxpayers to build a glittery new basketball palace for him. Legum notes that this is about “$3,200 for every Oklahoma City household,” and that Bennett’s take will deplete the budget of about a dozen essential community projects.</p><p>He also has an inside accomplice: The Mayor. Having taken Bennett cash to get elected, Mayor David Holt is now warning taxpayers to hand over millions to his rich banker buddy – or the Thunder will leave town.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… So go! The thieving won’t stop until the people stop the thieves. Boom-Boom-Boom – ship the whole herd of thundering thieves out of town, including Bennett and that pusillanimous mayor.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/a-thundering-herd-of-bankers-robbing</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:137420503</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2023 16:14:33 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/137420503/66d6085d985f8028b8996f4b1d4a64a5.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/137420503/aa9f9e91e4d6638ec034a5cf5bbef089.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Oklahoma troubadour Woodie Guthrie wrote a song about outlaws that was right on target: “As through this world I’ve traveledI’ve seen lots of funny menSome’ll rob you with a six gunSome with a fountain pen.” That could apply today to Clayton Bennett, a multimillionaire Oklahoma City banker who has regularly wielded his fountain pen to loot public funds for his private gain. Bennett is a Hall of Infamy player in the elite club of big league owners of pro-basketball teams, specializing in picking taxpayers’ pockets to finance his operations. In 2006, he and a few high-rolling partners bought the Seattle SuperSonics team, promptly demanding that locals pony up $500 million to build a new arena for them. No, said Seattle. So Bennett &amp; Gang scampered off to Oklahoma City with the team (renaming it the Thunder), using their fountain pens to filch a $100-million subsidy from taxpayers there. Soon, Bennett and the Gang struck again, demanding that local officials hand over another $115-million subsidy. Gratitude? Robbers don’t say thank you. They refill their fountain pens. As Judd Legum reports in his excellent Substack report Popular Information, Bennett is now demanding $850 million from OKC taxpayers to build a glittery new basketball palace for him. Legum notes that this is about “$3,200 for every Oklahoma City household,” and that Bennett’s take will deplete the budget of about a dozen essential community projects. He also has an inside accomplice: The Mayor. Having taken Bennett cash to get elected, Mayor David Holt is now warning taxpayers to hand over millions to his rich banker buddy – or the Thunder will leave town. This is Jim Hightower saying… So go! The thieving won’t stop until the people stop the thieves. Boom-Boom-Boom – ship the whole herd of thundering thieves out of town, including Bennett and that pusillanimous mayor. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Oklahoma troubadour Woodie Guthrie wrote a song about outlaws that was right on target: “As through this world I’ve traveledI’ve seen lots of funny menSome’ll rob you with a six gunSome with a fountain pen.” That could apply today to Clayton Bennett, a multimillionaire Oklahoma City banker who has regularly wielded his fountain pen to loot public funds for his private gain. Bennett is a Hall of Infamy player in the elite club of big league owners of pro-basketball teams, specializing in picking taxpayers’ pockets to finance his operations. In 2006, he and a few high-rolling partners bought the Seattle SuperSonics team, promptly demanding that locals pony up $500 million to build a new arena for them. No, said Seattle. So Bennett &amp; Gang scampered off to Oklahoma City with the team (renaming it the Thunder), using their fountain pens to filch a $100-million subsidy from taxpayers there. Soon, Bennett and the Gang struck again, demanding that local officials hand over another $115-million subsidy. Gratitude? Robbers don’t say thank you. They refill their fountain pens. As Judd Legum reports in his excellent Substack report Popular Information, Bennett is now demanding $850 million from OKC taxpayers to build a glittery new basketball palace for him. Legum notes that this is about “$3,200 for every Oklahoma City household,” and that Bennett’s take will deplete the budget of about a dozen essential community projects. He also has an inside accomplice: The Mayor. Having taken Bennett cash to get elected, Mayor David Holt is now warning taxpayers to hand over millions to his rich banker buddy – or the Thunder will leave town. This is Jim Hightower saying… So go! The thieving won’t stop until the people stop the thieves. Boom-Boom-Boom – ship the whole herd of thundering thieves out of town, including Bennett and that pusillanimous mayor. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Is Ted Cruz Weaker Than Near Beer?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Oh, thank God for Ted Cruz! Once again, the far-right-wing US Senator is saving you and me from a political horror that doesn’t exist.</p><p>This is Ted’s specialty, for he seems unable to deal with the real economic and social problems that workaday people actually have. Thus, he constantly tries to divert attention from his senatorial incompetence by staging embarrassing political stunts, such as his furious fulminations against Big Bird, Mickey Mouse, and other fictional characters. Unable to triumph over them, however, Cruz is now conjuring up entirely fictional conflicts to let him (a Harvard educated elitist) pose as a hero of working-class commoners.</p><p>Beer drinkers, for example. The Cruzer recently swooped onto a Republican TV show, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.newsweek.com/ted-cruz-rails-against-beer-limit-guideline-that-doesnt-exist-1823576">squawking like Chicken Little</a> that Joe Biden intended to restrict us Americans to only <em>two beers a week</em>! Oh, the horror. “What is it with liberals that want to control every damn aspect of your life?” squealed the senator (who, by the way, does want government to control every woman’s reproductive rights, people’s voting rights, the rights of labor, what books people can read, etc., etc.).</p><p>But Ted’s in a tizzy over Biden’s two-beer limit. Only… <a target="_blank" href="https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2023/sep/01/ted-cruz/is-joe-biden-trying-to-limit-how-much-beer-you-can/">there’s no such thing</a>. Actually, Biden has said nothing about beer – zero, zilch. Joe’s kinda busy – you know, Ukraine, global warming, health care… real problems – so unlike the little senator from Texas, he doesn’t have time to play political pickle ball.</p><p>Embarrassingly, such other GOP officials as Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst have joined Cruz’s screwball crusade to stop Bidens non-existent Beer Bust. It’s like they all went to clown school to learn to be “senatorial.” As for Ted, his non-stop series of nutty PR antics reveals that he is to a real senator what near beer is to beer—only not nearly as close.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-is-ted-cruz-weaker-than-near</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:137261370</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/137261370/0dc178d3db1fade94d72d77664de30fe.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/137261370/fecdb8364352db58221f77fb051f92bc.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Oh, thank God for Ted Cruz! Once again, the far-right-wing US Senator is saving you and me from a political horror that doesn’t exist. This is Ted’s specialty, for he seems unable to deal with the real economic and social problems that workaday people actually have. Thus, he constantly tries to divert attention from his senatorial incompetence by staging embarrassing political stunts, such as his furious fulminations against Big Bird, Mickey Mouse, and other fictional characters. Unable to triumph over them, however, Cruz is now conjuring up entirely fictional conflicts to let him (a Harvard educated elitist) pose as a hero of working-class commoners. Beer drinkers, for example. The Cruzer recently swooped onto a Republican TV show, squawking like Chicken Little that Joe Biden intended to restrict us Americans to only two beers a week! Oh, the horror. “What is it with liberals that want to control every damn aspect of your life?” squealed the senator (who, by the way, does want government to control every woman’s reproductive rights, people’s voting rights, the rights of labor, what books people can read, etc., etc.). But Ted’s in a tizzy over Biden’s two-beer limit. Only… there’s no such thing. Actually, Biden has said nothing about beer – zero, zilch. Joe’s kinda busy – you know, Ukraine, global warming, health care… real problems – so unlike the little senator from Texas, he doesn’t have time to play political pickle ball. Embarrassingly, such other GOP officials as Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst have joined Cruz’s screwball crusade to stop Bidens non-existent Beer Bust. It’s like they all went to clown school to learn to be “senatorial.” As for Ted, his non-stop series of nutty PR antics reveals that he is to a real senator what near beer is to beer—only not nearly as close. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Oh, thank God for Ted Cruz! Once again, the far-right-wing US Senator is saving you and me from a political horror that doesn’t exist. This is Ted’s specialty, for he seems unable to deal with the real economic and social problems that workaday people actually have. Thus, he constantly tries to divert attention from his senatorial incompetence by staging embarrassing political stunts, such as his furious fulminations against Big Bird, Mickey Mouse, and other fictional characters. Unable to triumph over them, however, Cruz is now conjuring up entirely fictional conflicts to let him (a Harvard educated elitist) pose as a hero of working-class commoners. Beer drinkers, for example. The Cruzer recently swooped onto a Republican TV show, squawking like Chicken Little that Joe Biden intended to restrict us Americans to only two beers a week! Oh, the horror. “What is it with liberals that want to control every damn aspect of your life?” squealed the senator (who, by the way, does want government to control every woman’s reproductive rights, people’s voting rights, the rights of labor, what books people can read, etc., etc.). But Ted’s in a tizzy over Biden’s two-beer limit. Only… there’s no such thing. Actually, Biden has said nothing about beer – zero, zilch. Joe’s kinda busy – you know, Ukraine, global warming, health care… real problems – so unlike the little senator from Texas, he doesn’t have time to play political pickle ball. Embarrassingly, such other GOP officials as Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst have joined Cruz’s screwball crusade to stop Bidens non-existent Beer Bust. It’s like they all went to clown school to learn to be “senatorial.” As for Ted, his non-stop series of nutty PR antics reveals that he is to a real senator what near beer is to beer—only not nearly as close. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[How Things Work: Big Pharma Price Gouging]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Corporate and governmental hucksters intentionally cloak their schemes in convoluted obfuscations… so we commoners can’t really know what they’re saying… or doing to us.</p><p>That’s why our Hightower Lowdown team takes pride in regularly trying to deconstruct their arcane jargon, translating it into plain language. Recently, for example, <a target="_blank" href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/yes-we-can-stop-drug-price-gouging">I pointed out the slick deceit in Big Pharma’s assertion that its outrageously-high drug prices are just a factor of “core cost recovery.”</a> Huh? That’s supposed to mean that it costs a lot to do basic research for discovering new medicines, so they must recover those costs.</p><p>But wait, I hollered: Basic drug research is not paid for by brand-name corporate monopolists. Rather, this essential humane work is done by such <em>public</em> entities as the National Institutes of Health – paid for by us taxpayers. And it’s a huge tax-paid subsidy to these private profiteers. In 2020, a <a target="_blank" href="https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/blog/us-tax-dollars-funded-every-new-pharmaceutical-in-the-last-decade">study</a> by the Institute for New Economic Thinking laid out the scam in stark terms: “Taxpayers have been footing the bill for every new drug approved between 2010 and 2019.” Hello – <em>every new drug!</em></p><p>The Institute’s study traced the funding of 356 new drugs approved in that period, finding that a whopping $230 billion in public financed research paid for the basic science that created the medicines. In what the researchers called “a robust pipeline” to industry, monopolistic patents were then obtained on those ingredients by Big Pharma to market drugs made possible by the “scientific capital” <em>we taxpayers </em>invested.</p><p>For drug profiteers, this is manna from heaven. The system hands new drug products to them, letting them arbitrarily fix prices that enrich their investors with nearly double the profit levels of the other corporate powers. If you suspect the system is rigged to gouge you – there it is!</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/how-things-work-big-pharma-price</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:137223005</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/137223005/26780f1a5fab168a4d2d9c729e918ae2.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/137223005/502ad5537e9c66a086e8cbb7dd135eb8.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Corporate and governmental hucksters intentionally cloak their schemes in convoluted obfuscations… so we commoners can’t really know what they’re saying… or doing to us. That’s why our Hightower Lowdown team takes pride in regularly trying to deconstruct their arcane jargon, translating it into plain language. Recently, for example, I pointed out the slick deceit in Big Pharma’s assertion that its outrageously-high drug prices are just a factor of “core cost recovery.” Huh? That’s supposed to mean that it costs a lot to do basic research for discovering new medicines, so they must recover those costs. But wait, I hollered: Basic drug research is not paid for by brand-name corporate monopolists. Rather, this essential humane work is done by such public entities as the National Institutes of Health – paid for by us taxpayers. And it’s a huge tax-paid subsidy to these private profiteers. In 2020, a study by the Institute for New Economic Thinking laid out the scam in stark terms: “Taxpayers have been footing the bill for every new drug approved between 2010 and 2019.” Hello – every new drug! The Institute’s study traced the funding of 356 new drugs approved in that period, finding that a whopping $230 billion in public financed research paid for the basic science that created the medicines. In what the researchers called “a robust pipeline” to industry, monopolistic patents were then obtained on those ingredients by Big Pharma to market drugs made possible by the “scientific capital” we taxpayers invested. For drug profiteers, this is manna from heaven. The system hands new drug products to them, letting them arbitrarily fix prices that enrich their investors with nearly double the profit levels of the other corporate powers. If you suspect the system is rigged to gouge you – there it is! Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Corporate and governmental hucksters intentionally cloak their schemes in convoluted obfuscations… so we commoners can’t really know what they’re saying… or doing to us. That’s why our Hightower Lowdown team takes pride in regularly trying to deconstruct their arcane jargon, translating it into plain language. Recently, for example, I pointed out the slick deceit in Big Pharma’s assertion that its outrageously-high drug prices are just a factor of “core cost recovery.” Huh? That’s supposed to mean that it costs a lot to do basic research for discovering new medicines, so they must recover those costs. But wait, I hollered: Basic drug research is not paid for by brand-name corporate monopolists. Rather, this essential humane work is done by such public entities as the National Institutes of Health – paid for by us taxpayers. And it’s a huge tax-paid subsidy to these private profiteers. In 2020, a study by the Institute for New Economic Thinking laid out the scam in stark terms: “Taxpayers have been footing the bill for every new drug approved between 2010 and 2019.” Hello – every new drug! The Institute’s study traced the funding of 356 new drugs approved in that period, finding that a whopping $230 billion in public financed research paid for the basic science that created the medicines. In what the researchers called “a robust pipeline” to industry, monopolistic patents were then obtained on those ingredients by Big Pharma to market drugs made possible by the “scientific capital” we taxpayers invested. For drug profiteers, this is manna from heaven. The system hands new drug products to them, letting them arbitrarily fix prices that enrich their investors with nearly double the profit levels of the other corporate powers. If you suspect the system is rigged to gouge you – there it is! Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[How the Right-Wing is Trying to Turn Public Education Into Corporate Obedience Schools]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Back to school! Bright-eyed youngsters are now back in our public classrooms, filled with questions about the world around them. Questions like: What happened to our school library, and where did our librarians go?</p><p>Sadly, these wholly beneficial, caring educators are being dumped in school trash bins by loopy right-wing ideologues who’re out to impose their bigotry and ignorance on America. They’ve been on a rampage of banning books and demonizing teachers, but now the extremists are saying: “<a target="_blank" href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/chat-and-chew-beyond-book-banning#details">That’s not stupid enough – let’s also launch a witch hunt against librarians!</a>”</p><p>This authoritarian assault, funded by a clique of far-right billionaires and coordinated by <a target="_blank" href="https://www.mediamatters.org/critical-race-theory/unmasking-moms-liberty">their front groups</a>, has been <a target="_blank" href="https://inthesetimes.com/article/republicans-defund-library-book-banning-gop">popping off</a> across the country. But leave it to Texas Governor Greg Abbott to push it from extreme to totalitarianism.</p><p>He has unilaterally seized control of Houston’s school district (the largest, most diverse in Texas), installing his own whip-cracking, dictatorial overseer. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.texastribune.org/2023/06/21/mike-miles-houston-isd-dallas-tea-takeover/">Mike Miles</a>, a former Army Ranger and CEO of a corporate school chain, promptly decreed that to improve reading scores in the district, he would <em>first</em>, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.houstonpublicmedia.org/articles/news/education-news/hisd/2023/07/26/457933/city-leaders-criticize-houston-isd-superintendent-mike-miles-over-plans-for-school-libraries/">eliminate librarians from 28 schools in Black and Latino neighborhoods</a>, and <em>second,</em> <a target="_blank" href="https://www.houstonpublicmedia.org/articles/news/education-news/hisd/2023/07/26/457933/city-leaders-criticize-houston-isd-superintendent-mike-miles-over-plans-for-school-libraries/">turn their libraries into centers where students who misbehave will be disciplined</a>.</p><p>Also, Abbott’s education czar demands that all teachers there must reapply for their jobs, agree to follow a centrally-scripted curriculum, and be monitored by classroom cameras. All this, says Miles with a twisted smile, is meant to give a message of “hope” to teachers and parents. Of course, elimination of independent educational resources and regimentation of instruction will reduce schools to state institutions for obedience training.</p><p>And that’s the point. The GOP’s push to remake education is a billionaire’s wet dream of a compliant, subservient workforce: Don’t ask questions—just keep pulling that plow.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/how-the-right-wing-is-trying-to-turn</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:137041080</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 15:35:34 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/137041080/ed847f48b2572c89294196f6edddf059.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/137041080/f71e0cff2230bae0e8255e42863e9b4a.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Back to school! Bright-eyed youngsters are now back in our public classrooms, filled with questions about the world around them. Questions like: What happened to our school library, and where did our librarians go? Sadly, these wholly beneficial, caring educators are being dumped in school trash bins by loopy right-wing ideologues who’re out to impose their bigotry and ignorance on America. They’ve been on a rampage of banning books and demonizing teachers, but now the extremists are saying: “That’s not stupid enough – let’s also launch a witch hunt against librarians!” This authoritarian assault, funded by a clique of far-right billionaires and coordinated by their front groups, has been popping off across the country. But leave it to Texas Governor Greg Abbott to push it from extreme to totalitarianism. He has unilaterally seized control of Houston’s school district (the largest, most diverse in Texas), installing his own whip-cracking, dictatorial overseer. Mike Miles, a former Army Ranger and CEO of a corporate school chain, promptly decreed that to improve reading scores in the district, he would first, eliminate librarians from 28 schools in Black and Latino neighborhoods, and second, turn their libraries into centers where students who misbehave will be disciplined. Also, Abbott’s education czar demands that all teachers there must reapply for their jobs, agree to follow a centrally-scripted curriculum, and be monitored by classroom cameras. All this, says Miles with a twisted smile, is meant to give a message of “hope” to teachers and parents. Of course, elimination of independent educational resources and regimentation of instruction will reduce schools to state institutions for obedience training. And that’s the point. The GOP’s push to remake education is a billionaire’s wet dream of a compliant, subservient workforce: Don’t ask questions—just keep pulling that plow. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Back to school! Bright-eyed youngsters are now back in our public classrooms, filled with questions about the world around them. Questions like: What happened to our school library, and where did our librarians go? Sadly, these wholly beneficial, caring educators are being dumped in school trash bins by loopy right-wing ideologues who’re out to impose their bigotry and ignorance on America. They’ve been on a rampage of banning books and demonizing teachers, but now the extremists are saying: “That’s not stupid enough – let’s also launch a witch hunt against librarians!” This authoritarian assault, funded by a clique of far-right billionaires and coordinated by their front groups, has been popping off across the country. But leave it to Texas Governor Greg Abbott to push it from extreme to totalitarianism. He has unilaterally seized control of Houston’s school district (the largest, most diverse in Texas), installing his own whip-cracking, dictatorial overseer. Mike Miles, a former Army Ranger and CEO of a corporate school chain, promptly decreed that to improve reading scores in the district, he would first, eliminate librarians from 28 schools in Black and Latino neighborhoods, and second, turn their libraries into centers where students who misbehave will be disciplined. Also, Abbott’s education czar demands that all teachers there must reapply for their jobs, agree to follow a centrally-scripted curriculum, and be monitored by classroom cameras. All this, says Miles with a twisted smile, is meant to give a message of “hope” to teachers and parents. Of course, elimination of independent educational resources and regimentation of instruction will reduce schools to state institutions for obedience training. And that’s the point. The GOP’s push to remake education is a billionaire’s wet dream of a compliant, subservient workforce: Don’t ask questions—just keep pulling that plow. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yes, We Can Stop Drug Price Gouging! Here’s How!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>We human beings sometimes do some terrible things in pursuit of the almighty dollar. But to our credit, one moral line we humans don’t cross is to profiteer by gouging sick people on the price of medicines their lives depend on.</p><p>Unless, of course, you count executives of giant pharmaceutical corporations as human beings. Gouging patients is their preferred business model.</p><p>It’s a scream then to watch Big Pharma fall into a sky-is-falling fit over our government’s long-overdue move to give us patients some bargaining power over this monopolistic industry. Under President Joe Biden’s anti-inflation policy passed early this year, our Medicare program can now negotiate drug prices on our behalf.</p><p>This will drastically lower what you and I are now forced to pay to the profiteers. For decades, Congress has coddled the corporate gougers (who maintain by far the biggest lobbying army in Washington), allowing them to manipulate the patent laws and rig the system. Thus, we Americans pay two-to-three times more than people in other countries for the exact same medicines.</p><p>Oh, wail drug executives, bloated profits give us the incentive to keep developing innovative new cures. Hold it right there, Slick – most basic drug development is done by tax-funded medical researchers, not brand-name market hucksters. Mega-drug outfits like Johnson & Johnson, Merck, and Bristol Myers spend more on advertising, exorbitant executive salaries, lobbying, and big stockholder payouts than on research. Still, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/23/us/politics/medicare-drug-price-negotiations-lawsuits.html">these same greedhounds are suing Biden</a>, howling that making them negotiate is an unconstitutional “taking” of their income. But, hello, these scoundrels have been taking our income, health, and lives for years.</p><p>I’m with Biden on this – as is 80 percent of the public (including 77 percent of Republicans) who favor making the gougers negotiate. You go, Joe! To stay informed and involved, connect with Public Citizen at <a target="_blank" href="https://www.citizen.org/topic/safe-affordable-drugs-devices/">citzen.org</a>.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/yes-we-can-stop-drug-price-gouging</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:136821744</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2023 16:00:35 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/136821744/216e762ea80875dbedac91d7aa4d35e1.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/136821744/2578b130aceca68f4ecc68e1f685e074.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>We human beings sometimes do some terrible things in pursuit of the almighty dollar. But to our credit, one moral line we humans don’t cross is to profiteer by gouging sick people on the price of medicines their lives depend on. Unless, of course, you count executives of giant pharmaceutical corporations as human beings. Gouging patients is their preferred business model. It’s a scream then to watch Big Pharma fall into a sky-is-falling fit over our government’s long-overdue move to give us patients some bargaining power over this monopolistic industry. Under President Joe Biden’s anti-inflation policy passed early this year, our Medicare program can now negotiate drug prices on our behalf. This will drastically lower what you and I are now forced to pay to the profiteers. For decades, Congress has coddled the corporate gougers (who maintain by far the biggest lobbying army in Washington), allowing them to manipulate the patent laws and rig the system. Thus, we Americans pay two-to-three times more than people in other countries for the exact same medicines. Oh, wail drug executives, bloated profits give us the incentive to keep developing innovative new cures. Hold it right there, Slick – most basic drug development is done by tax-funded medical researchers, not brand-name market hucksters. Mega-drug outfits like Johnson &amp; Johnson, Merck, and Bristol Myers spend more on advertising, exorbitant executive salaries, lobbying, and big stockholder payouts than on research. Still, these same greedhounds are suing Biden, howling that making them negotiate is an unconstitutional “taking” of their income. But, hello, these scoundrels have been taking our income, health, and lives for years. I’m with Biden on this – as is 80 percent of the public (including 77 percent of Republicans) who favor making the gougers negotiate. You go, Joe! To stay informed and involved, connect with Public Citizen at citzen.org. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>We human beings sometimes do some terrible things in pursuit of the almighty dollar. But to our credit, one moral line we humans don’t cross is to profiteer by gouging sick people on the price of medicines their lives depend on. Unless, of course, you count executives of giant pharmaceutical corporations as human beings. Gouging patients is their preferred business model. It’s a scream then to watch Big Pharma fall into a sky-is-falling fit over our government’s long-overdue move to give us patients some bargaining power over this monopolistic industry. Under President Joe Biden’s anti-inflation policy passed early this year, our Medicare program can now negotiate drug prices on our behalf. This will drastically lower what you and I are now forced to pay to the profiteers. For decades, Congress has coddled the corporate gougers (who maintain by far the biggest lobbying army in Washington), allowing them to manipulate the patent laws and rig the system. Thus, we Americans pay two-to-three times more than people in other countries for the exact same medicines. Oh, wail drug executives, bloated profits give us the incentive to keep developing innovative new cures. Hold it right there, Slick – most basic drug development is done by tax-funded medical researchers, not brand-name market hucksters. Mega-drug outfits like Johnson &amp; Johnson, Merck, and Bristol Myers spend more on advertising, exorbitant executive salaries, lobbying, and big stockholder payouts than on research. Still, these same greedhounds are suing Biden, howling that making them negotiate is an unconstitutional “taking” of their income. But, hello, these scoundrels have been taking our income, health, and lives for years. I’m with Biden on this – as is 80 percent of the public (including 77 percent of Republicans) who favor making the gougers negotiate. You go, Joe! To stay informed and involved, connect with Public Citizen at citzen.org. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Are Far-Right-Wing Extremists Worshiping John C. Calhoun?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>A few days ago, the city of Savannah, Georgia took an important symbolic step toward racial inclusiveness, naming one of Savannah’s 23 historic public squares for a Black woman.</p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susie_King_Taylor">Susie King Taylor,</a> born in 1848 to enslaved parents, became a renowned educator, setting up schools for emancipated children and adults – a laudable role model in America’s ongoing struggle to extend equal opportunity to all. Before adding Taylor’s name, though, the name that had been plastered on that square 170 years ago – <a target="_blank" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_C._Calhoun">John C. Calhoun</a> – had to be subtracted. Council members did that last year, finding the South Carolina senator and two-time vice president unworthy of any public honor. Why?</p><p>Well, why would Georgians of 1853 create a monument to a lawmaker from another state? Answer: <a target="_blank" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_C._Calhoun#Slavery">Slavery</a>. No politician in our history has been a more vehement apologist and promoter of human enslavement than Calhoun. Thus, racist Southern leaders revered him. A rich son of plantation privilege, Calhoun owned dozens of slaves. More shamefully, he built his political career by fabricating a hokey economic theory asserting that slavery was such a “positive good” that even white workers in Northern factories should be converted to slave laborers.</p><p>Worst of all, Calhoun opposed the democratic ideal of majority rule, crying that it allowed the many to “interfere” with the freedom of the elite propertied class (his own) to do what they wish with their “properties” – including slaves. He even favored outright plutocracy, proposing that the rich should be given a special right to overturn laws they don’t like.</p><p>While Savannah is doing the right thing by saying no to this autocrat… <strong>beware</strong>, for the Koch brothers’ network of today’s plutocratic billionaires is now <a target="_blank" href="https://newrepublic.com/article/169563/patriot-academy-right-wing-constitutional-defense-training-camp">exalting Calhoun</a>, furtively organizing to impose his plutocratic order over us. To learn more about and fight against the Kochs, go to: <a target="_blank" href="http://TrueNorthResearch.org">TrueNorthResearch.org</a>.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-are-far-right-wing-extremists</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:136760400</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 17:35:25 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/136760400/db519ed57ca694fe158c667ec4f13b9d.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/136760400/e535b2292d3f6e5a168e050b31614854.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>A few days ago, the city of Savannah, Georgia took an important symbolic step toward racial inclusiveness, naming one of Savannah’s 23 historic public squares for a Black woman. Susie King Taylor, born in 1848 to enslaved parents, became a renowned educator, setting up schools for emancipated children and adults – a laudable role model in America’s ongoing struggle to extend equal opportunity to all. Before adding Taylor’s name, though, the name that had been plastered on that square 170 years ago – John C. Calhoun – had to be subtracted. Council members did that last year, finding the South Carolina senator and two-time vice president unworthy of any public honor. Why? Well, why would Georgians of 1853 create a monument to a lawmaker from another state? Answer: Slavery. No politician in our history has been a more vehement apologist and promoter of human enslavement than Calhoun. Thus, racist Southern leaders revered him. A rich son of plantation privilege, Calhoun owned dozens of slaves. More shamefully, he built his political career by fabricating a hokey economic theory asserting that slavery was such a “positive good” that even white workers in Northern factories should be converted to slave laborers. Worst of all, Calhoun opposed the democratic ideal of majority rule, crying that it allowed the many to “interfere” with the freedom of the elite propertied class (his own) to do what they wish with their “properties” – including slaves. He even favored outright plutocracy, proposing that the rich should be given a special right to overturn laws they don’t like. While Savannah is doing the right thing by saying no to this autocrat… beware, for the Koch brothers’ network of today’s plutocratic billionaires is now exalting Calhoun, furtively organizing to impose his plutocratic order over us. To learn more about and fight against the Kochs, go to: TrueNorthResearch.org. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>A few days ago, the city of Savannah, Georgia took an important symbolic step toward racial inclusiveness, naming one of Savannah’s 23 historic public squares for a Black woman. Susie King Taylor, born in 1848 to enslaved parents, became a renowned educator, setting up schools for emancipated children and adults – a laudable role model in America’s ongoing struggle to extend equal opportunity to all. Before adding Taylor’s name, though, the name that had been plastered on that square 170 years ago – John C. Calhoun – had to be subtracted. Council members did that last year, finding the South Carolina senator and two-time vice president unworthy of any public honor. Why? Well, why would Georgians of 1853 create a monument to a lawmaker from another state? Answer: Slavery. No politician in our history has been a more vehement apologist and promoter of human enslavement than Calhoun. Thus, racist Southern leaders revered him. A rich son of plantation privilege, Calhoun owned dozens of slaves. More shamefully, he built his political career by fabricating a hokey economic theory asserting that slavery was such a “positive good” that even white workers in Northern factories should be converted to slave laborers. Worst of all, Calhoun opposed the democratic ideal of majority rule, crying that it allowed the many to “interfere” with the freedom of the elite propertied class (his own) to do what they wish with their “properties” – including slaves. He even favored outright plutocracy, proposing that the rich should be given a special right to overturn laws they don’t like. While Savannah is doing the right thing by saying no to this autocrat… beware, for the Koch brothers’ network of today’s plutocratic billionaires is now exalting Calhoun, furtively organizing to impose his plutocratic order over us. To learn more about and fight against the Kochs, go to: TrueNorthResearch.org. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Day the Planet Started to Win]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The people are revolting (in the very best meaning of that word)!</p><p>An inspiring example of people rising up against a trifecta of economic, cultural, and political oppression has just come to us from a community of seemingly-powerless people living in a very of isolated place. Long exploited, lied to, disrespected, and robbed, they revolted, daring to take on the biggest, richest, most-politically-connected industrial power on the globe: BigOil. Astonishingly – after a decade of protesting, organizing, coalition building, suing, petitioning, and otherwise resolutely rebelling against injustice – these tenacious people just won an inspiring grassroots victory over BigOil profiteering.</p><p>One reason you probably haven’t heard about it is that it didn’t happen in any of the usual centers of media focus – <a target="_blank" href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/aug/21/ecuador-votes-to-halt-oil-drilling-in-amazonian-biodiversity-hotspot">but in the Amazonian rainforest of Ecuador</a>. Also, this revolt was not led by some brand-name environmental group or charismatic political honcho, but by the Tagaeri and Taromenani tribes and other indigenous Waorani people living in the rich biodiversity of Ecuador’s Yasuní National Park.</p><p>Directly challenging the exigent crisis of climate change, the Waorani rallied the region’s young people into a potent political force. They successfully organized behind a national referendum to (1) ban oil drilling in the region, (2) compel the profiteers to remove their wells and pipelines, and (3) pay for remediation and reforestation. Significantly, they specifically called for leaving oil in the ground so it would not add to climate destruction. Moreover, the proposed ban was binding, unable to be overturned by future lobbyists and officials.</p><p>A resounding 58 percent of Ecuadorians voted “Yes!” As a Waorani leader noted this is “the day the planet started to win.”</p><p>The victory also says to environmental leaders everywhere, “Be Bolder! Trust the people – grassroots organizing wins. Go for it!”</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-day-the-planet-started-to-win</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:136592785</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/136592785/5d160f3de515e866f1c2f0b6e2529e83.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/136592785/34e840d7843bdee600c984e6a0dfc10d.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>The people are revolting (in the very best meaning of that word)! An inspiring example of people rising up against a trifecta of economic, cultural, and political oppression has just come to us from a community of seemingly-powerless people living in a very of isolated place. Long exploited, lied to, disrespected, and robbed, they revolted, daring to take on the biggest, richest, most-politically-connected industrial power on the globe: BigOil. Astonishingly – after a decade of protesting, organizing, coalition building, suing, petitioning, and otherwise resolutely rebelling against injustice – these tenacious people just won an inspiring grassroots victory over BigOil profiteering. One reason you probably haven’t heard about it is that it didn’t happen in any of the usual centers of media focus – but in the Amazonian rainforest of Ecuador. Also, this revolt was not led by some brand-name environmental group or charismatic political honcho, but by the Tagaeri and Taromenani tribes and other indigenous Waorani people living in the rich biodiversity of Ecuador’s Yasuní National Park. Directly challenging the exigent crisis of climate change, the Waorani rallied the region’s young people into a potent political force. They successfully organized behind a national referendum to (1) ban oil drilling in the region, (2) compel the profiteers to remove their wells and pipelines, and (3) pay for remediation and reforestation. Significantly, they specifically called for leaving oil in the ground so it would not add to climate destruction. Moreover, the proposed ban was binding, unable to be overturned by future lobbyists and officials. A resounding 58 percent of Ecuadorians voted “Yes!” As a Waorani leader noted this is “the day the planet started to win.” The victory also says to environmental leaders everywhere, “Be Bolder! Trust the people – grassroots organizing wins. Go for it!” Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>The people are revolting (in the very best meaning of that word)! An inspiring example of people rising up against a trifecta of economic, cultural, and political oppression has just come to us from a community of seemingly-powerless people living in a very of isolated place. Long exploited, lied to, disrespected, and robbed, they revolted, daring to take on the biggest, richest, most-politically-connected industrial power on the globe: BigOil. Astonishingly – after a decade of protesting, organizing, coalition building, suing, petitioning, and otherwise resolutely rebelling against injustice – these tenacious people just won an inspiring grassroots victory over BigOil profiteering. One reason you probably haven’t heard about it is that it didn’t happen in any of the usual centers of media focus – but in the Amazonian rainforest of Ecuador. Also, this revolt was not led by some brand-name environmental group or charismatic political honcho, but by the Tagaeri and Taromenani tribes and other indigenous Waorani people living in the rich biodiversity of Ecuador’s Yasuní National Park. Directly challenging the exigent crisis of climate change, the Waorani rallied the region’s young people into a potent political force. They successfully organized behind a national referendum to (1) ban oil drilling in the region, (2) compel the profiteers to remove their wells and pipelines, and (3) pay for remediation and reforestation. Significantly, they specifically called for leaving oil in the ground so it would not add to climate destruction. Moreover, the proposed ban was binding, unable to be overturned by future lobbyists and officials. A resounding 58 percent of Ecuadorians voted “Yes!” As a Waorani leader noted this is “the day the planet started to win.” The victory also says to environmental leaders everywhere, “Be Bolder! Trust the people – grassroots organizing wins. Go for it!” Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Vapid GOP “Debate” Reveals Why Big Money Politics Sucks]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Peggy Lee struck a mournful chord with her hit song, “Is That All There Is?”</p><p>It was about the vapidity of life, and I found myself subconsciously singing along last week as I pondered the GOP presidential debate. Of course, these made-for-TV spectacles are more akin to mud-wrestling than actual policy debates. Still, I dared hope for some tiny element of civic seriousness. After all, the eight aspirants were auditioning to be (“Oh, say can you see…”) the next President of the United States!</p><p>Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, for example, stands out as a textbook example of the vapidity of modern American politics – a rampaging ego with no core democratic principles, no authentic persona, no speaking from the heart… and no possibility of being elected except that special interest powers have pumped him up with a couple hundred million dollars to be their boy.</p><p>Indeed, a strategy memo from DeSantis’ own funders and consultants surfaced publicly just before last week’s debate, confirming his vacuity – as a candidate and a person. The detailed memo instructed him to avoid talking about policy solutions, to “sledgehammer” an opponent, to appear both for and against Trump, and maybe show a little human emotion by talking about his kids. In short, he needs advisors to tell him how to be “himself.”</p><p>DeSantis is hardly the first who-am-I candidate for the White House. Hillary Clinton’s managers reintroduced her as the new “real” Hillary every couple of months in 2016, and Rick Perry’s handlers tried to make him look smart by wearing horn-rimmed glasses.</p><p>This lack of authenticity is now the norm, for it allows Big Money to shape candidates in its image. And that’s why today’s public policies are overwhelmingly based on what money wants, not on public need and honest principle.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/vapid-gop-debate-reveals-why-big</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:136531232</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2023 18:57:26 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/136531232/95056fcd5dbc0332d3307b4c74d02a88.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/136531232/ebc0b073e746a60c081c25ce7228c3bf.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Peggy Lee struck a mournful chord with her hit song, “Is That All There Is?” It was about the vapidity of life, and I found myself subconsciously singing along last week as I pondered the GOP presidential debate. Of course, these made-for-TV spectacles are more akin to mud-wrestling than actual policy debates. Still, I dared hope for some tiny element of civic seriousness. After all, the eight aspirants were auditioning to be (“Oh, say can you see…”) the next President of the United States! Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, for example, stands out as a textbook example of the vapidity of modern American politics – a rampaging ego with no core democratic principles, no authentic persona, no speaking from the heart… and no possibility of being elected except that special interest powers have pumped him up with a couple hundred million dollars to be their boy. Indeed, a strategy memo from DeSantis’ own funders and consultants surfaced publicly just before last week’s debate, confirming his vacuity – as a candidate and a person. The detailed memo instructed him to avoid talking about policy solutions, to “sledgehammer” an opponent, to appear both for and against Trump, and maybe show a little human emotion by talking about his kids. In short, he needs advisors to tell him how to be “himself.” DeSantis is hardly the first who-am-I candidate for the White House. Hillary Clinton’s managers reintroduced her as the new “real” Hillary every couple of months in 2016, and Rick Perry’s handlers tried to make him look smart by wearing horn-rimmed glasses. This lack of authenticity is now the norm, for it allows Big Money to shape candidates in its image. And that’s why today’s public policies are overwhelmingly based on what money wants, not on public need and honest principle. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Peggy Lee struck a mournful chord with her hit song, “Is That All There Is?” It was about the vapidity of life, and I found myself subconsciously singing along last week as I pondered the GOP presidential debate. Of course, these made-for-TV spectacles are more akin to mud-wrestling than actual policy debates. Still, I dared hope for some tiny element of civic seriousness. After all, the eight aspirants were auditioning to be (“Oh, say can you see…”) the next President of the United States! Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, for example, stands out as a textbook example of the vapidity of modern American politics – a rampaging ego with no core democratic principles, no authentic persona, no speaking from the heart… and no possibility of being elected except that special interest powers have pumped him up with a couple hundred million dollars to be their boy. Indeed, a strategy memo from DeSantis’ own funders and consultants surfaced publicly just before last week’s debate, confirming his vacuity – as a candidate and a person. The detailed memo instructed him to avoid talking about policy solutions, to “sledgehammer” an opponent, to appear both for and against Trump, and maybe show a little human emotion by talking about his kids. In short, he needs advisors to tell him how to be “himself.” DeSantis is hardly the first who-am-I candidate for the White House. Hillary Clinton’s managers reintroduced her as the new “real” Hillary every couple of months in 2016, and Rick Perry’s handlers tried to make him look smart by wearing horn-rimmed glasses. This lack of authenticity is now the norm, for it allows Big Money to shape candidates in its image. And that’s why today’s public policies are overwhelmingly based on what money wants, not on public need and honest principle. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer Alert: Your Phone Company Wants Into Your Bank Account!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Last week, T-Mobile (my cell phone provider) pinged me with a rude message: Henceforth we will screw you out of an extra $5 a month.</p><p><strong>WHAT?!</strong> Had I done something wrong? No. Would I be getting some added benefit for my five bucks? No. It seems that T-Mobile bean counters have just arbitrarily decided that we customers who use credit cards to pay our phone bills online must pay an extra fiver each month as a payment processing fee. Yes, we’re to pay them to take our money. Bonnie and Clyde were not that brazen!</p><p>You can avoid the add-on IF you <em>give your bank account number to T-Mobile</em>, allowing it (and who knows who else?) to have direct access to your personal stash of cash. Uh… NO! Tut-tut say the T-Mobilers, your private info is perfectly secure with us. Do they think we have suckerwrappers around our heads? Just eight months ago, their “security system” let thieves swipe the personal data of 37 million customers, including names, account numbers, addresses, phone numbers, and birthdates.</p><p>Well, sniff “free-market” ideologues, just switch to a competitor. But AT&T, Verizon, etc. have all adopted the exact same thieving “give-us-your-bank-account” scheme. Phone service today is a shared monopoly, not a free market, and it’s now copycatting airlines, banks, and other monopolistic profiteers that constantly fabricate add-ons and pricing gimmicks to gouge consumers.</p><p>T-Mobile rose to telecom prominence a decade ago by attacking its rivals for overcharging and abusing consumers. It ran ads publicly demanding that AT&T and others stop their greedy practices “because it’s the right thing to do.” But now that it’s a monopolistic giant, T-Mobile’s new line is that might makes right, so it has joined the industry’s consumer-abuse greed game.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/consumer-alert-your-phone-company</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:136370370</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2023 14:42:19 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/136370370/7d311300150301d1971118a9be30e7cf.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/136370370/3d145383d9f179dc78e73fb55000a7df.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Last week, T-Mobile (my cell phone provider) pinged me with a rude message: Henceforth we will screw you out of an extra $5 a month. WHAT?! Had I done something wrong? No. Would I be getting some added benefit for my five bucks? No. It seems that T-Mobile bean counters have just arbitrarily decided that we customers who use credit cards to pay our phone bills online must pay an extra fiver each month as a payment processing fee. Yes, we’re to pay them to take our money. Bonnie and Clyde were not that brazen! You can avoid the add-on IF you give your bank account number to T-Mobile, allowing it (and who knows who else?) to have direct access to your personal stash of cash. Uh… NO! Tut-tut say the T-Mobilers, your private info is perfectly secure with us. Do they think we have suckerwrappers around our heads? Just eight months ago, their “security system” let thieves swipe the personal data of 37 million customers, including names, account numbers, addresses, phone numbers, and birthdates. Well, sniff “free-market” ideologues, just switch to a competitor. But AT&amp;T, Verizon, etc. have all adopted the exact same thieving “give-us-your-bank-account” scheme. Phone service today is a shared monopoly, not a free market, and it’s now copycatting airlines, banks, and other monopolistic profiteers that constantly fabricate add-ons and pricing gimmicks to gouge consumers. T-Mobile rose to telecom prominence a decade ago by attacking its rivals for overcharging and abusing consumers. It ran ads publicly demanding that AT&amp;T and others stop their greedy practices “because it’s the right thing to do.” But now that it’s a monopolistic giant, T-Mobile’s new line is that might makes right, so it has joined the industry’s consumer-abuse greed game. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Last week, T-Mobile (my cell phone provider) pinged me with a rude message: Henceforth we will screw you out of an extra $5 a month. WHAT?! Had I done something wrong? No. Would I be getting some added benefit for my five bucks? No. It seems that T-Mobile bean counters have just arbitrarily decided that we customers who use credit cards to pay our phone bills online must pay an extra fiver each month as a payment processing fee. Yes, we’re to pay them to take our money. Bonnie and Clyde were not that brazen! You can avoid the add-on IF you give your bank account number to T-Mobile, allowing it (and who knows who else?) to have direct access to your personal stash of cash. Uh… NO! Tut-tut say the T-Mobilers, your private info is perfectly secure with us. Do they think we have suckerwrappers around our heads? Just eight months ago, their “security system” let thieves swipe the personal data of 37 million customers, including names, account numbers, addresses, phone numbers, and birthdates. Well, sniff “free-market” ideologues, just switch to a competitor. But AT&amp;T, Verizon, etc. have all adopted the exact same thieving “give-us-your-bank-account” scheme. Phone service today is a shared monopoly, not a free market, and it’s now copycatting airlines, banks, and other monopolistic profiteers that constantly fabricate add-ons and pricing gimmicks to gouge consumers. T-Mobile rose to telecom prominence a decade ago by attacking its rivals for overcharging and abusing consumers. It ran ads publicly demanding that AT&amp;T and others stop their greedy practices “because it’s the right thing to do.” But now that it’s a monopolistic giant, T-Mobile’s new line is that might makes right, so it has joined the industry’s consumer-abuse greed game. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Jesse James Now Wears Guccis]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Today’s train robbers don’t need masks or guns, for they are railroad executives wearing $3,000 suits and robbing us by railroading the political system.</p><p>With their gangs of lobbyists and hopper cars of campaign cash, they get Congress to do their dirty work, gutting public safety protections and muting railway unions. Thus, rich investors get richer, while regular people are hit by an astonishing level of derailments, injuries, destruction… and death. <a target="_blank" href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/publish/posts/detail/106038773?referrer=%2Fpublish%2Fposts">Witness the horrific wreck of Norfolk Southern’s nearly two-mile long toxic freight train this year in East Palestine, Ohio.</a></p><p>This was a product of the industry’s prevailing ethic of profit over public safety, and the American people were outraged by the greed, demanding fundamental reform. <a target="_blank" href="https://apnews.com/article/rail-accidents-transportation-pete-buttigieg-ohio-pennsylvania-f1cd9d79cdd66b1f45d1dcdf1e53ff58">US Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg weighed in</a>, correctly noting that calls to protect the public have too often “given way to industry pushback and inaction. That must not happen this time,” he emphatically declared.</p><p>You go, Pete! But it <em>is</em> happening.</p><p>A key reform he pushed was to allow rail employees to report safety dangers without fear of retribution from the corporate hierarchy. Such a “close call” reporting program has existed for years – but participation was <em>voluntary.</em> Hello – out of some 800 American railroad corporations, just 27 chose to volunteer, and all of the Big Eight freight giants (including Norfolk Southern) refused to join.</p><p>In the media glare of the East Palestine catastrophe, however, nearly all pledged to support the employee reporting reform. But that was then. Today, the media focus on East Palestine is gone, and <a target="_blank" href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/profiles-in-pusillanimousity-the">the railroad lobbyists and their hopper cars of corporate cash have rolled back into Washington</a>, watering down Buttigieg’s safety agreement to nothing.</p><p>And that’s why America’s train system won’t run right until we fix the crooked political money system that derails progress.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/jesse-james-now-wears-guccis</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:136305519</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/136305519/a9402e1efab6ae1695b0192c240c69ec.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/136305519/8fd73245e9b1ed4d736078d57c6fcb48.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Today’s train robbers don’t need masks or guns, for they are railroad executives wearing $3,000 suits and robbing us by railroading the political system. With their gangs of lobbyists and hopper cars of campaign cash, they get Congress to do their dirty work, gutting public safety protections and muting railway unions. Thus, rich investors get richer, while regular people are hit by an astonishing level of derailments, injuries, destruction… and death. Witness the horrific wreck of Norfolk Southern’s nearly two-mile long toxic freight train this year in East Palestine, Ohio. This was a product of the industry’s prevailing ethic of profit over public safety, and the American people were outraged by the greed, demanding fundamental reform. US Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg weighed in, correctly noting that calls to protect the public have too often “given way to industry pushback and inaction. That must not happen this time,” he emphatically declared. You go, Pete! But it is happening. A key reform he pushed was to allow rail employees to report safety dangers without fear of retribution from the corporate hierarchy. Such a “close call” reporting program has existed for years – but participation was voluntary. Hello – out of some 800 American railroad corporations, just 27 chose to volunteer, and all of the Big Eight freight giants (including Norfolk Southern) refused to join. In the media glare of the East Palestine catastrophe, however, nearly all pledged to support the employee reporting reform. But that was then. Today, the media focus on East Palestine is gone, and the railroad lobbyists and their hopper cars of corporate cash have rolled back into Washington, watering down Buttigieg’s safety agreement to nothing. And that’s why America’s train system won’t run right until we fix the crooked political money system that derails progress. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Today’s train robbers don’t need masks or guns, for they are railroad executives wearing $3,000 suits and robbing us by railroading the political system. With their gangs of lobbyists and hopper cars of campaign cash, they get Congress to do their dirty work, gutting public safety protections and muting railway unions. Thus, rich investors get richer, while regular people are hit by an astonishing level of derailments, injuries, destruction… and death. Witness the horrific wreck of Norfolk Southern’s nearly two-mile long toxic freight train this year in East Palestine, Ohio. This was a product of the industry’s prevailing ethic of profit over public safety, and the American people were outraged by the greed, demanding fundamental reform. US Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg weighed in, correctly noting that calls to protect the public have too often “given way to industry pushback and inaction. That must not happen this time,” he emphatically declared. You go, Pete! But it is happening. A key reform he pushed was to allow rail employees to report safety dangers without fear of retribution from the corporate hierarchy. Such a “close call” reporting program has existed for years – but participation was voluntary. Hello – out of some 800 American railroad corporations, just 27 chose to volunteer, and all of the Big Eight freight giants (including Norfolk Southern) refused to join. In the media glare of the East Palestine catastrophe, however, nearly all pledged to support the employee reporting reform. But that was then. Today, the media focus on East Palestine is gone, and the railroad lobbyists and their hopper cars of corporate cash have rolled back into Washington, watering down Buttigieg’s safety agreement to nothing. And that’s why America’s train system won’t run right until we fix the crooked political money system that derails progress. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Democrats Should Help Republicans Publicize “Project 2025”]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>When your political opponents push extremist public policies that would be disastrous for America, should you wring your hands in dread… or applaud?</p><p>Consider “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jul/27/project-2025-dismantle-us-climate-policy-next-republican-president">Project 2025,</a>” put together by former Trump officials and the Koch brothers’ network of billionaire plutocrats. Their strategy is to win the presidency next year by demonizing all environmental protections and promising to halt all national efforts to cope with the obvious crises of climate change. Their proposals include <em>repealing</em> regulations that curb fossil fuel pollution, <em>terminating</em> our nation’s transition to renewable energy, <em>shutting down</em> all environmental protection agencies, <em>encouraging</em> more oil and gas drilling and use, and <em>promoting</em> the deadly delusion that global warming is not a real problem.</p><p>Moreover, they intend to implement Project 2025 in the first 180 days of a right-wing Republican’s presidential term – obviously anticipating that Donald Trump will be that president. “We are not tinkering at the edges,” brags a far-out right-wing group that instigated the scheme, “We are writing a battle plan and we are marshalling our forces.” They’ve already drawn up a list of agencies and policies they’ll begin eliminating on Day One, and they’ve readied a list of some 20,000 right-wing henchmen to put on the federal payroll immediately to enforce their plan.</p><p>If this sounds ludicrous, it is. But it’s actually happening, for the Republican Party has decided to be ludicrous. As the director of Project 2025 <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/17/us/politics/trump-plans-2025.html">told the </a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/17/us/politics/trump-plans-2025.html"><em>New York Times</em></a>, “[This is] where the conservative movement sits at this time.”</p><p>Maybe, but it damn sure won’t sit well with the American people, who’re presently suffering the hellish ravages of our rapidly overheating climate. Indeed, here’s a great chance for Democrats to demonstrate their bipartisan spirit by doing all they can to publicize the Republicans’ let-it-burn global warming policy.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-democrats-should-help-republicans</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:136068731</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/136068731/b4b83f1d5439361e4ee4bee58aa1c05b.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/136068731/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>When your political opponents push extremist public policies that would be disastrous for America, should you wring your hands in dread… or applaud? Consider “Project 2025,” put together by former Trump officials and the Koch brothers’ network of billionaire plutocrats. Their strategy is to win the presidency next year by demonizing all environmental protections and promising to halt all national efforts to cope with the obvious crises of climate change. Their proposals include repealing regulations that curb fossil fuel pollution, terminating our nation’s transition to renewable energy, shutting down all environmental protection agencies, encouraging more oil and gas drilling and use, and promoting the deadly delusion that global warming is not a real problem. Moreover, they intend to implement Project 2025 in the first 180 days of a right-wing Republican’s presidential term – obviously anticipating that Donald Trump will be that president. “We are not tinkering at the edges,” brags a far-out right-wing group that instigated the scheme, “We are writing a battle plan and we are marshalling our forces.” They’ve already drawn up a list of agencies and policies they’ll begin eliminating on Day One, and they’ve readied a list of some 20,000 right-wing henchmen to put on the federal payroll immediately to enforce their plan. If this sounds ludicrous, it is. But it’s actually happening, for the Republican Party has decided to be ludicrous. As the director of Project 2025 told the New York Times, “[This is] where the conservative movement sits at this time.” Maybe, but it damn sure won’t sit well with the American people, who’re presently suffering the hellish ravages of our rapidly overheating climate. Indeed, here’s a great chance for Democrats to demonstrate their bipartisan spirit by doing all they can to publicize the Republicans’ let-it-burn global warming policy. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>When your political opponents push extremist public policies that would be disastrous for America, should you wring your hands in dread… or applaud? Consider “Project 2025,” put together by former Trump officials and the Koch brothers’ network of billionaire plutocrats. Their strategy is to win the presidency next year by demonizing all environmental protections and promising to halt all national efforts to cope with the obvious crises of climate change. Their proposals include repealing regulations that curb fossil fuel pollution, terminating our nation’s transition to renewable energy, shutting down all environmental protection agencies, encouraging more oil and gas drilling and use, and promoting the deadly delusion that global warming is not a real problem. Moreover, they intend to implement Project 2025 in the first 180 days of a right-wing Republican’s presidential term – obviously anticipating that Donald Trump will be that president. “We are not tinkering at the edges,” brags a far-out right-wing group that instigated the scheme, “We are writing a battle plan and we are marshalling our forces.” They’ve already drawn up a list of agencies and policies they’ll begin eliminating on Day One, and they’ve readied a list of some 20,000 right-wing henchmen to put on the federal payroll immediately to enforce their plan. If this sounds ludicrous, it is. But it’s actually happening, for the Republican Party has decided to be ludicrous. As the director of Project 2025 told the New York Times, “[This is] where the conservative movement sits at this time.” Maybe, but it damn sure won’t sit well with the American people, who’re presently suffering the hellish ravages of our rapidly overheating climate. Indeed, here’s a great chance for Democrats to demonstrate their bipartisan spirit by doing all they can to publicize the Republicans’ let-it-burn global warming policy. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why the GOP Is Becoming a Clique of Rabid Political Veterinarians]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><p><strong>Quick announcement: Drop Your Lawsuits, Drop Your Prices!</strong></p><p>Hightower is joining <a target="_blank" href="https://www.citizen.org/tags/texas/">Public Citizen Texas</a>, the <a target="_blank" href="https://organizetexas.org/">Texas Organizing Project,</a> <a target="_blank" href="https://familiesusa.org/">Families USA </a>and many more organizations <strong>on Wednesday, August 16th</strong> at the Federal Courthouse in Austin to demonstrate against Big Pharma’s greed.  The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association sued to prevent the Inflation Reduction Act from taking effect; many cities around the country are holding a series of actions calling on pharmaceutical corporations, PhRMA, the U.S. Chamber and other chambers of commerce to drop their lawsuits and instead negotiate lower drug prices.</p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://www.eventbrite.com/e/drop-your-lawsuits-drop-your-prices-reject-big-pharmas-greed-tickets-696113142147?fbclid=IwAR1W3-ajgrlrbF7ibnvIctG36IvxV_rV2ib3-0BdbeVewS_UNGbTbiybS_c">Join up with and support this fight here!</a></p></p><p>Ohio voters scored a big election victory for women’s rights last week! It was a tricky vote, too – deceptively couched as a statewide referendum to approve a little technical change in the procedure for approving statewide referendums. How boring.</p><p>But Ohioans figured out that it really was a BIG vote on an underhanded ploy by right-wing Republicans to block the right of women to make their own reproductive decisions. Not boring. So, in a huge turnout, a whopping 57 precent of voters said “yes” to women and “NO!” to the tricksters.</p><p>Yet the referendum actually did encompass a procedural issue that’s an even bigger political story than the election results – namely the GOP’s ongoing attempts to rig election rules so it’s extremist minority can “win” without getting a majority of the votes. Background: A state constitutional amendment guaranteeing the right to abortion is already set to be voted on this November in Ohio. Right-wing Republican leaders fear that more than half of Ohioans will support that amendment. Thus, last week’s referendum was their desperate attempt to win by losing, specifically by decreeing that – Hocus Pocus! – constitutional initiatives must get <em>60-percent approval</em> to become law. Yes, a 40-percent minority of voters could nullify the majority will of the people.</p><p>This gaming of the system by devious Republican officials and far-right extremists has become their core political strategy across the country. It’s actually a deeply embarrassing admission by them – they are conceding that they are now captives of ideological extremism and outright nutballism, making their party so completely out of touch with the American majority that they can’t win honestly.  So they’ve become the Anti-Democracy Party, acting as rabid political veterinarians out to “fix” democracy by neutering the power of the people.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-the-gop-is-becoming-a-clique</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:136064399</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/136064399/828c2e878d2b88881bf3b92e8990048d.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/136064399/740e4dce64c00c314983877979c7ef60.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Quick announcement: Drop Your Lawsuits, Drop Your Prices! Hightower is joining Public Citizen Texas, the Texas Organizing Project, Families USA and many more organizations on Wednesday, August 16th at the Federal Courthouse in Austin to demonstrate against Big Pharma’s greed.  The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association sued to prevent the Inflation Reduction Act from taking effect; many cities around the country are holding a series of actions calling on pharmaceutical corporations, PhRMA, the U.S. Chamber and other chambers of commerce to drop their lawsuits and instead negotiate lower drug prices. Join up with and support this fight here! Ohio voters scored a big election victory for women’s rights last week! It was a tricky vote, too – deceptively couched as a statewide referendum to approve a little technical change in the procedure for approving statewide referendums. How boring. But Ohioans figured out that it really was a BIG vote on an underhanded ploy by right-wing Republicans to block the right of women to make their own reproductive decisions. Not boring. So, in a huge turnout, a whopping 57 precent of voters said “yes” to women and “NO!” to the tricksters. Yet the referendum actually did encompass a procedural issue that’s an even bigger political story than the election results – namely the GOP’s ongoing attempts to rig election rules so it’s extremist minority can “win” without getting a majority of the votes. Background: A state constitutional amendment guaranteeing the right to abortion is already set to be voted on this November in Ohio. Right-wing Republican leaders fear that more than half of Ohioans will support that amendment. Thus, last week’s referendum was their desperate attempt to win by losing, specifically by decreeing that – Hocus Pocus! – constitutional initiatives must get 60-percent approval to become law. Yes, a 40-percent minority of voters could nullify the majority will of the people. This gaming of the system by devious Republican officials and far-right extremists has become their core political strategy across the country. It’s actually a deeply embarrassing admission by them – they are conceding that they are now captives of ideological extremism and outright nutballism, making their party so completely out of touch with the American majority that they can’t win honestly.  So they’ve become the Anti-Democracy Party, acting as rabid political veterinarians out to “fix” democracy by neutering the power of the people. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Quick announcement: Drop Your Lawsuits, Drop Your Prices! Hightower is joining Public Citizen Texas, the Texas Organizing Project, Families USA and many more organizations on Wednesday, August 16th at the Federal Courthouse in Austin to demonstrate against Big Pharma’s greed.  The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association sued to prevent the Inflation Reduction Act from taking effect; many cities around the country are holding a series of actions calling on pharmaceutical corporations, PhRMA, the U.S. Chamber and other chambers of commerce to drop their lawsuits and instead negotiate lower drug prices. Join up with and support this fight here! Ohio voters scored a big election victory for women’s rights last week! It was a tricky vote, too – deceptively couched as a statewide referendum to approve a little technical change in the procedure for approving statewide referendums. How boring. But Ohioans figured out that it really was a BIG vote on an underhanded ploy by right-wing Republicans to block the right of women to make their own reproductive decisions. Not boring. So, in a huge turnout, a whopping 57 precent of voters said “yes” to women and “NO!” to the tricksters. Yet the referendum actually did encompass a procedural issue that’s an even bigger political story than the election results – namely the GOP’s ongoing attempts to rig election rules so it’s extremist minority can “win” without getting a majority of the votes. Background: A state constitutional amendment guaranteeing the right to abortion is already set to be voted on this November in Ohio. Right-wing Republican leaders fear that more than half of Ohioans will support that amendment. Thus, last week’s referendum was their desperate attempt to win by losing, specifically by decreeing that – Hocus Pocus! – constitutional initiatives must get 60-percent approval to become law. Yes, a 40-percent minority of voters could nullify the majority will of the people. This gaming of the system by devious Republican officials and far-right extremists has become their core political strategy across the country. It’s actually a deeply embarrassing admission by them – they are conceding that they are now captives of ideological extremism and outright nutballism, making their party so completely out of touch with the American majority that they can’t win honestly.  So they’ve become the Anti-Democracy Party, acting as rabid political veterinarians out to “fix” democracy by neutering the power of the people. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Breaking News: New Life for Local Newspapers]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>How about a little bit of <em>good</em> news for a change? Specifically, good news about news.</p><p>The demise of local newspapers has been a very depressing story in the last few years, with several thousand of them gobbled up by Wall Street profiteers. Those money powers loot the publications’ assets, then callously shut down each community’s paper, or reduces them to empty news shells. So that’s that – local print journalism is passé, right?</p><p>Wrong! High-spirited, community-minded subscribers in places like Glen Rose (Texas), Hamburg (Iowa), Portland (Maine), and International Falls (Minnesota) are humming an upbeat tune of regeneration that could be titled “Not Dead Yet!” In Maine, for example, five of the state’s six daily papers and 17 weeklies were sinking under the ownership of an investment group. But all were recently bought by the <a target="_blank" href="http://nationaltrustforlocalnews.org">National Trust for Local News</a>, a non-profit started two years ago. The Trust is turning each publication over to local non-profit owners and helping them find ways to become sustainable.</p><p></p><p>Another new effort, called <a target="_blank" href="https://cherryroad-media.com/">Cherry Road Media</a>, has bought 77 rural papers in 17 states, most from the predatory Gannett conglomerate that wanted to dump them. Cherry Road’s business plan is simple, old-time genius – return editorial decision-making to local people and journalists who know the town, be an active presence and participant in community affairs, make the locals responsible for sustaining their town’s paper – and most important, reinvest profits in real local journalism that advances democracy.</p><p>In both of these new initiatives, the foremost mission is to serve the common good of the communities, not to pad the wealth of a few distant financiers. To learn more about these models (and how you might implement something similar in your town), contact Institute for Rural Journalism and Community Issues: <a target="_blank" href="http://RuralJournalism.org">RuralJournalism.org</a>.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p></p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/breaking-news-new-life-for-local</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:135893131</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/135893131/fe76ef9f091ca059d14bfc3931670daf.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/135893131/76f3a80212f6836d20d69b2036193aba.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>How about a little bit of good news for a change? Specifically, good news about news. The demise of local newspapers has been a very depressing story in the last few years, with several thousand of them gobbled up by Wall Street profiteers. Those money powers loot the publications’ assets, then callously shut down each community’s paper, or reduces them to empty news shells. So that’s that – local print journalism is passé, right? Wrong! High-spirited, community-minded subscribers in places like Glen Rose (Texas), Hamburg (Iowa), Portland (Maine), and International Falls (Minnesota) are humming an upbeat tune of regeneration that could be titled “Not Dead Yet!” In Maine, for example, five of the state’s six daily papers and 17 weeklies were sinking under the ownership of an investment group. But all were recently bought by the National Trust for Local News, a non-profit started two years ago. The Trust is turning each publication over to local non-profit owners and helping them find ways to become sustainable. Another new effort, called Cherry Road Media, has bought 77 rural papers in 17 states, most from the predatory Gannett conglomerate that wanted to dump them. Cherry Road’s business plan is simple, old-time genius – return editorial decision-making to local people and journalists who know the town, be an active presence and participant in community affairs, make the locals responsible for sustaining their town’s paper – and most important, reinvest profits in real local journalism that advances democracy. In both of these new initiatives, the foremost mission is to serve the common good of the communities, not to pad the wealth of a few distant financiers. To learn more about these models (and how you might implement something similar in your town), contact Institute for Rural Journalism and Community Issues: RuralJournalism.org. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>How about a little bit of good news for a change? Specifically, good news about news. The demise of local newspapers has been a very depressing story in the last few years, with several thousand of them gobbled up by Wall Street profiteers. Those money powers loot the publications’ assets, then callously shut down each community’s paper, or reduces them to empty news shells. So that’s that – local print journalism is passé, right? Wrong! High-spirited, community-minded subscribers in places like Glen Rose (Texas), Hamburg (Iowa), Portland (Maine), and International Falls (Minnesota) are humming an upbeat tune of regeneration that could be titled “Not Dead Yet!” In Maine, for example, five of the state’s six daily papers and 17 weeklies were sinking under the ownership of an investment group. But all were recently bought by the National Trust for Local News, a non-profit started two years ago. The Trust is turning each publication over to local non-profit owners and helping them find ways to become sustainable. Another new effort, called Cherry Road Media, has bought 77 rural papers in 17 states, most from the predatory Gannett conglomerate that wanted to dump them. Cherry Road’s business plan is simple, old-time genius – return editorial decision-making to local people and journalists who know the town, be an active presence and participant in community affairs, make the locals responsible for sustaining their town’s paper – and most important, reinvest profits in real local journalism that advances democracy. In both of these new initiatives, the foremost mission is to serve the common good of the communities, not to pad the wealth of a few distant financiers. To learn more about these models (and how you might implement something similar in your town), contact Institute for Rural Journalism and Community Issues: RuralJournalism.org. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[It’s HOT… and Joe Biden Has a Website for That!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Weather forecasters across the Southwest are having a hard time this summer coming up with descriptive taglines for each day’s ever-rising heat. If 105° is “hot”—what to call 110°… and up? Some have quit trying, simply labeling each day: “Again.”</p><p>Luckily Joe Biden has issued bold new steps to counter the relentless climate change that’s causing this extreme, killer heat. For example, workers will get “hazard alerts” telling them it’s hot. Also, a new website will urge everyone to stay hydrated. His aides say this shows that Joe is treating climate change with “the urgency it deserves.”</p><p>Excuse me while I have a political heat stroke. Urgency? The same day Biden launched his pathetic global warming “policy,” the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2023/07/supreme-court-rules-in-favor-of-mountain-valley-pipeline/">Republican Supreme Court rubber stamped his disastrous push for the massively-polluting Mountain Valley Pipeline</a>. This 300-mile environmental scar across two states will be like adding <a target="_blank" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/06/02/mountain-valley-pipeline-debt-deal/">26 more coal-fired power plants to our climate change crisis</a>. Then there’s his<a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/12/climate/biden-willow-arctic-drilling-restrictions.html"> unconscionable approval this year of Willow, an oil-drilling project in the Arctic</a> that will release hundreds of millions of tons of additional greenhouse gas emissions. Plus approving and subsidizing dozens of other fossil fuel boondoggles.</p><p>Worse, Biden has meekly refused to take the genuinely bold step of declaring a climate emergency, even as he’s pushed new laws to remove the people’s right to challenge corporate profiteering at the expense of climate sanity.</p><p>Yes, the Republicans are worse, but pointing that out is neither a policy nor good politics. Climate change is not a future problem, it is NOW… and people are literally feeling it. If Biden wonders why his approval rating is a woeful 39 percent (and even among Democrats, only 20 percent express enthusiasm for him)—there it is. People want and need presidential boldness, not a hot weather website.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/its-hot-and-joe-biden-has-a-website</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:135832416</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/135832416/b9003d0a805d30876f3b8b8adfb57e88.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/135832416/c2f0b64c5c37050773730825562c1232.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Weather forecasters across the Southwest are having a hard time this summer coming up with descriptive taglines for each day’s ever-rising heat. If 105° is “hot”—what to call 110°… and up? Some have quit trying, simply labeling each day: “Again.” Luckily Joe Biden has issued bold new steps to counter the relentless climate change that’s causing this extreme, killer heat. For example, workers will get “hazard alerts” telling them it’s hot. Also, a new website will urge everyone to stay hydrated. His aides say this shows that Joe is treating climate change with “the urgency it deserves.” Excuse me while I have a political heat stroke. Urgency? The same day Biden launched his pathetic global warming “policy,” the Republican Supreme Court rubber stamped his disastrous push for the massively-polluting Mountain Valley Pipeline. This 300-mile environmental scar across two states will be like adding 26 more coal-fired power plants to our climate change crisis. Then there’s his unconscionable approval this year of Willow, an oil-drilling project in the Arctic that will release hundreds of millions of tons of additional greenhouse gas emissions. Plus approving and subsidizing dozens of other fossil fuel boondoggles. Worse, Biden has meekly refused to take the genuinely bold step of declaring a climate emergency, even as he’s pushed new laws to remove the people’s right to challenge corporate profiteering at the expense of climate sanity. Yes, the Republicans are worse, but pointing that out is neither a policy nor good politics. Climate change is not a future problem, it is NOW… and people are literally feeling it. If Biden wonders why his approval rating is a woeful 39 percent (and even among Democrats, only 20 percent express enthusiasm for him)—there it is. People want and need presidential boldness, not a hot weather website. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Weather forecasters across the Southwest are having a hard time this summer coming up with descriptive taglines for each day’s ever-rising heat. If 105° is “hot”—what to call 110°… and up? Some have quit trying, simply labeling each day: “Again.” Luckily Joe Biden has issued bold new steps to counter the relentless climate change that’s causing this extreme, killer heat. For example, workers will get “hazard alerts” telling them it’s hot. Also, a new website will urge everyone to stay hydrated. His aides say this shows that Joe is treating climate change with “the urgency it deserves.” Excuse me while I have a political heat stroke. Urgency? The same day Biden launched his pathetic global warming “policy,” the Republican Supreme Court rubber stamped his disastrous push for the massively-polluting Mountain Valley Pipeline. This 300-mile environmental scar across two states will be like adding 26 more coal-fired power plants to our climate change crisis. Then there’s his unconscionable approval this year of Willow, an oil-drilling project in the Arctic that will release hundreds of millions of tons of additional greenhouse gas emissions. Plus approving and subsidizing dozens of other fossil fuel boondoggles. Worse, Biden has meekly refused to take the genuinely bold step of declaring a climate emergency, even as he’s pushed new laws to remove the people’s right to challenge corporate profiteering at the expense of climate sanity. Yes, the Republicans are worse, but pointing that out is neither a policy nor good politics. Climate change is not a future problem, it is NOW… and people are literally feeling it. If Biden wonders why his approval rating is a woeful 39 percent (and even among Democrats, only 20 percent express enthusiasm for him)—there it is. People want and need presidential boldness, not a hot weather website. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Texas, What the Hell? A Murderous Governor ]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Little-known fact: A leading cause of death in Texas is Gov. Greg Abbott.</p><p>Yes, by intentional actions and deliberate inactions, Abbott has used his gubernatorial policies to kill thousands of Texans, including: his calculated refusal to extend Medicaid to millions of poor Texans (including nearly a million children)… his intentional denial of water breaks for outdoor workers broiling under this year’s 100-plus-degree heat dome… his lethal deregulation of utilities causing the state power grid to collapse for days in the deep freeze of 2021 with hundreds dying for lack of heat and water… his shameful prioritizing of gun extremism over the lives of school children... and his despicable grandstanding stunts at the Mexican border, killing untold hundreds of migrant families by design.</p><p>These people are not dying accidentally, but are victims of Abbot’s premeditated policies and political ambition. Consider his silly scheme of throwing <em>$9.5 BILLION</em> of Texas taxpayers’ money into the ditch of his highly-ballyhooed border-security PR show. Grandiosely branded “Operation Lone Star,” it has posed Generalissimo Abbott as a right-wing border hero.</p><p>Some hero. He has stretched miles of razor wire <em>underwater</em> in the Rio Grande, slashing the flesh of migrant families and trapping babies and pregnant women in the coils. And Abbott’s state troopers have been commanded to shove exhausted and injured refugees back into the river toward Mexico. As one appalled trooper says: “We have stepped over a line into the inhumane.”</p><p>This willful cruelty is immoral, but it’s made ridiculous by the fact that Abbott’s militaristic power play has totally failed to deter migration. After all, these families are fleeing for their lives and future, so he can wrap all of Texas in razor wire, and they will still come… and find a way in.</p><p>Abbott can kill lots of them, but he can’t kill the human spirit.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/texas-what-the-hell-a-murderous-governor</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:135686005</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/135686005/62d0e846ad98553e0da8c1872d6d2de3.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/135686005/ea2d6e10b9d0ad4648ea081054385fdb.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Little-known fact: A leading cause of death in Texas is Gov. Greg Abbott. Yes, by intentional actions and deliberate inactions, Abbott has used his gubernatorial policies to kill thousands of Texans, including: his calculated refusal to extend Medicaid to millions of poor Texans (including nearly a million children)… his intentional denial of water breaks for outdoor workers broiling under this year’s 100-plus-degree heat dome… his lethal deregulation of utilities causing the state power grid to collapse for days in the deep freeze of 2021 with hundreds dying for lack of heat and water… his shameful prioritizing of gun extremism over the lives of school children... and his despicable grandstanding stunts at the Mexican border, killing untold hundreds of migrant families by design. These people are not dying accidentally, but are victims of Abbot’s premeditated policies and political ambition. Consider his silly scheme of throwing $9.5 BILLION of Texas taxpayers’ money into the ditch of his highly-ballyhooed border-security PR show. Grandiosely branded “Operation Lone Star,” it has posed Generalissimo Abbott as a right-wing border hero. Some hero. He has stretched miles of razor wire underwater in the Rio Grande, slashing the flesh of migrant families and trapping babies and pregnant women in the coils. And Abbott’s state troopers have been commanded to shove exhausted and injured refugees back into the river toward Mexico. As one appalled trooper says: “We have stepped over a line into the inhumane.” This willful cruelty is immoral, but it’s made ridiculous by the fact that Abbott’s militaristic power play has totally failed to deter migration. After all, these families are fleeing for their lives and future, so he can wrap all of Texas in razor wire, and they will still come… and find a way in. Abbott can kill lots of them, but he can’t kill the human spirit. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Little-known fact: A leading cause of death in Texas is Gov. Greg Abbott. Yes, by intentional actions and deliberate inactions, Abbott has used his gubernatorial policies to kill thousands of Texans, including: his calculated refusal to extend Medicaid to millions of poor Texans (including nearly a million children)… his intentional denial of water breaks for outdoor workers broiling under this year’s 100-plus-degree heat dome… his lethal deregulation of utilities causing the state power grid to collapse for days in the deep freeze of 2021 with hundreds dying for lack of heat and water… his shameful prioritizing of gun extremism over the lives of school children... and his despicable grandstanding stunts at the Mexican border, killing untold hundreds of migrant families by design. These people are not dying accidentally, but are victims of Abbot’s premeditated policies and political ambition. Consider his silly scheme of throwing $9.5 BILLION of Texas taxpayers’ money into the ditch of his highly-ballyhooed border-security PR show. Grandiosely branded “Operation Lone Star,” it has posed Generalissimo Abbott as a right-wing border hero. Some hero. He has stretched miles of razor wire underwater in the Rio Grande, slashing the flesh of migrant families and trapping babies and pregnant women in the coils. And Abbott’s state troopers have been commanded to shove exhausted and injured refugees back into the river toward Mexico. As one appalled trooper says: “We have stepped over a line into the inhumane.” This willful cruelty is immoral, but it’s made ridiculous by the fact that Abbott’s militaristic power play has totally failed to deter migration. After all, these families are fleeing for their lives and future, so he can wrap all of Texas in razor wire, and they will still come… and find a way in. Abbott can kill lots of them, but he can’t kill the human spirit. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Would Someone Please Wake Up Sen. Tom Cotton?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Tom Cotton, a far-out, right-winger, is to good public policy what a boll weevil is to a good cotton crop: totally destructive.</p><p>But he is politically candid – rather than disguising his racial bigotry, for example, Tom flaunts it, as he did last month in an open letter to the retail giant, Target. While the senator is usually a devoted corporate-hugging Republican, he lashed out at Target for business policies that he furiously condemns as racially discriminatory… <em>against white people!</em></p><p>What popped Tom’s cork was the chain’s pledge to increase the number of Black people it hires by 20 percent. Holy Dixieland, wailed Cotton, hiring more of them means fewer jobs for us white people! He insisted that Caucasians have the right to take any and all of Target’s jobs.</p><p>Interestingly, Target’s gesture to racial equality was made three years ago, with no peep or protest from the now-infuriated Cotton. What changed? The GOP’s dog-whistling tune. The new politically correct line of anti-Black racists (even parroted by today’s Republican Supreme Court) is that all efforts to provide racial fairness and balance are – get this – illegal racism against the white majority!</p><p>So Cotton is just scurrying aboard his party’s latest anti-black bandwagon, proclaiming that whites must be protected from racial progress. Not only are Tom and his ilk threatening teachers, librarians, and local governments for promoting equality, but also brand name corporations that they claim to be “woke” – that is, not solely focused on profits, but also promoting a little attention to America’s need for social justice.</p><p>Ironically, Tom’s clique piously claims to be devout Christians. But guess who was supremely woke? Jesus! Tom Cotton needs to review the Sermon on the Mount, where Jesus declared that those who hunger and thirst for justice are blessed.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/would-someone-please-wake-up-sen</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:135627733</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/135627733/609d1aa49493657cf5de979aff405a27.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/135627733/991d9437ea92e3e1e98ebc5cc0f53919.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Sen. Tom Cotton, a far-out, right-winger, is to good public policy what a boll weevil is to a good cotton crop: totally destructive. But he is politically candid – rather than disguising his racial bigotry, for example, Tom flaunts it, as he did last month in an open letter to the retail giant, Target. While the senator is usually a devoted corporate-hugging Republican, he lashed out at Target for business policies that he furiously condemns as racially discriminatory… against white people! What popped Tom’s cork was the chain’s pledge to increase the number of Black people it hires by 20 percent. Holy Dixieland, wailed Cotton, hiring more of them means fewer jobs for us white people! He insisted that Caucasians have the right to take any and all of Target’s jobs. Interestingly, Target’s gesture to racial equality was made three years ago, with no peep or protest from the now-infuriated Cotton. What changed? The GOP’s dog-whistling tune. The new politically correct line of anti-Black racists (even parroted by today’s Republican Supreme Court) is that all efforts to provide racial fairness and balance are – get this – illegal racism against the white majority! So Cotton is just scurrying aboard his party’s latest anti-black bandwagon, proclaiming that whites must be protected from racial progress. Not only are Tom and his ilk threatening teachers, librarians, and local governments for promoting equality, but also brand name corporations that they claim to be “woke” – that is, not solely focused on profits, but also promoting a little attention to America’s need for social justice. Ironically, Tom’s clique piously claims to be devout Christians. But guess who was supremely woke? Jesus! Tom Cotton needs to review the Sermon on the Mount, where Jesus declared that those who hunger and thirst for justice are blessed. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Sen. Tom Cotton, a far-out, right-winger, is to good public policy what a boll weevil is to a good cotton crop: totally destructive. But he is politically candid – rather than disguising his racial bigotry, for example, Tom flaunts it, as he did last month in an open letter to the retail giant, Target. While the senator is usually a devoted corporate-hugging Republican, he lashed out at Target for business policies that he furiously condemns as racially discriminatory… against white people! What popped Tom’s cork was the chain’s pledge to increase the number of Black people it hires by 20 percent. Holy Dixieland, wailed Cotton, hiring more of them means fewer jobs for us white people! He insisted that Caucasians have the right to take any and all of Target’s jobs. Interestingly, Target’s gesture to racial equality was made three years ago, with no peep or protest from the now-infuriated Cotton. What changed? The GOP’s dog-whistling tune. The new politically correct line of anti-Black racists (even parroted by today’s Republican Supreme Court) is that all efforts to provide racial fairness and balance are – get this – illegal racism against the white majority! So Cotton is just scurrying aboard his party’s latest anti-black bandwagon, proclaiming that whites must be protected from racial progress. Not only are Tom and his ilk threatening teachers, librarians, and local governments for promoting equality, but also brand name corporations that they claim to be “woke” – that is, not solely focused on profits, but also promoting a little attention to America’s need for social justice. Ironically, Tom’s clique piously claims to be devout Christians. But guess who was supremely woke? Jesus! Tom Cotton needs to review the Sermon on the Mount, where Jesus declared that those who hunger and thirst for justice are blessed. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[A “New” Political Party That’s the Same Old Business-As-Usual]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>As John Mellencamp sings: “If you don’t stand for something, you’ll fall for anything.” True. And here’s and equally true twist on that aphorism: “If you stand for everything, you won’t amount to anything.”</p><p>In a remarkable, achievement, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2023/07/no-labels-is-setting-up-state-parties-2024/">a newly formed political party calling itself “No Labels” </a>has managed to fall into both traps, standing up for everything and nothing all. The fledgling entity is using every synonym in the book to assure everyone that it is a middle-of-the-road, bipartisan, centrist, both-sides party, offering hybrid liberal-conservative solutions that won’t offend anyone.</p><p>But wait – they’ve chosen a multimillionaire coal baron and multimillionaire son of global plastics polluter to be their standard bearers. As a presidential ticket, Democrat Joe Manchin and Republican Jon Huntsman probably would unite voters of both parties ­­– <em>against them</em>!</p><p>While they don’t stand for much, there is one huge, overriding issue that the No Labels hucksters strongly agree on: Corporate money contaminating American politics. These “reformers” are in favor of it! Indeed, secret fat cat donations are the No Labelers’ financial lifeline, having already hauled in hundreds of thousands of dollars from right-wing corporate interests. Such as? No-no, say the founders, we can’t tell you who’s buying the No Labels label, for the funders don’t want the public to know their names or their special interests.</p><p>Of course, secret-funding of elections equals secret government – of, by, and for the funders. By standing against the people’s right to know, the group has put a flaming neon FRAUD label on their hokey “reform” party. Huntsman even admits it, saying financial disclosure would be the right thing to do, but “that’s not the way you play the game.”</p><p> “The game?” Just what we need – another gang of corporate politicos who think governing America is a game to be won by hook or crook.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/a-new-political-party-thats-the-same</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:135441304</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/135441304/78298a5f4c9d141ebb04fc51a5ab4178.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/135441304/deb16e658130f7fa29da38b03890b164.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>As John Mellencamp sings: “If you don’t stand for something, you’ll fall for anything.” True. And here’s and equally true twist on that aphorism: “If you stand for everything, you won’t amount to anything.” In a remarkable, achievement, a newly formed political party calling itself “No Labels” has managed to fall into both traps, standing up for everything and nothing all. The fledgling entity is using every synonym in the book to assure everyone that it is a middle-of-the-road, bipartisan, centrist, both-sides party, offering hybrid liberal-conservative solutions that won’t offend anyone. But wait – they’ve chosen a multimillionaire coal baron and multimillionaire son of global plastics polluter to be their standard bearers. As a presidential ticket, Democrat Joe Manchin and Republican Jon Huntsman probably would unite voters of both parties ­­– against them! While they don’t stand for much, there is one huge, overriding issue that the No Labels hucksters strongly agree on: Corporate money contaminating American politics. These “reformers” are in favor of it! Indeed, secret fat cat donations are the No Labelers’ financial lifeline, having already hauled in hundreds of thousands of dollars from right-wing corporate interests. Such as? No-no, say the founders, we can’t tell you who’s buying the No Labels label, for the funders don’t want the public to know their names or their special interests. Of course, secret-funding of elections equals secret government – of, by, and for the funders. By standing against the people’s right to know, the group has put a flaming neon FRAUD label on their hokey “reform” party. Huntsman even admits it, saying financial disclosure would be the right thing to do, but “that’s not the way you play the game.”  “The game?” Just what we need – another gang of corporate politicos who think governing America is a game to be won by hook or crook. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>As John Mellencamp sings: “If you don’t stand for something, you’ll fall for anything.” True. And here’s and equally true twist on that aphorism: “If you stand for everything, you won’t amount to anything.” In a remarkable, achievement, a newly formed political party calling itself “No Labels” has managed to fall into both traps, standing up for everything and nothing all. The fledgling entity is using every synonym in the book to assure everyone that it is a middle-of-the-road, bipartisan, centrist, both-sides party, offering hybrid liberal-conservative solutions that won’t offend anyone. But wait – they’ve chosen a multimillionaire coal baron and multimillionaire son of global plastics polluter to be their standard bearers. As a presidential ticket, Democrat Joe Manchin and Republican Jon Huntsman probably would unite voters of both parties ­­– against them! While they don’t stand for much, there is one huge, overriding issue that the No Labels hucksters strongly agree on: Corporate money contaminating American politics. These “reformers” are in favor of it! Indeed, secret fat cat donations are the No Labelers’ financial lifeline, having already hauled in hundreds of thousands of dollars from right-wing corporate interests. Such as? No-no, say the founders, we can’t tell you who’s buying the No Labels label, for the funders don’t want the public to know their names or their special interests. Of course, secret-funding of elections equals secret government – of, by, and for the funders. By standing against the people’s right to know, the group has put a flaming neon FRAUD label on their hokey “reform” party. Huntsman even admits it, saying financial disclosure would be the right thing to do, but “that’s not the way you play the game.”  “The game?” Just what we need – another gang of corporate politicos who think governing America is a game to be won by hook or crook. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[How the System Works: Joe Manchin’s Pipe Dream]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Rube Goldberg would marvel at Sen. Joe Manchin’s wacky, convoluted machinations to rig the system so fossil fuel polluters can run roughshod over nature, local people, and democracy.</p><p>Goldberg was a master of satirical cartoons, drawing hilarious schematics of convoluted contraptions to do silly tasks. His “Self-Operating Napkin,” for example, involved a spoon, cracker, toucan, skyrocket, sickle, and a pendulum attached to a napkin – all operating sequentially to automatically wipe the chin of a soup eater.</p><p>So here comes Joe with his own sequential machinations to (Zip! Ping! Sproing!) push his pet corporate boondoggle into law. Manchin’s Mountain Valley Pipeline would ram a 300-mile polluting pipe through the pristine mountains of West Virginia, into Virginia and ultimately into North Carolina, ripping through farms, communities, national parks, and 1,000 streams and waterlands. The people hated it – and, amazingly, environmental regulators and multiple courts sided with the people again and again!</p><p>Time for Joe’s Rube Goldberg act. Late last year – <em>Ping!­­</em> – Manchin switched from a “No” on a climate change bill to a “yes,” in exchange for President Biden supporting the pipeline. But congressional progressives rebelled, so their dirty deal failed. Then – <em>Sproing! </em>– Biden snuck Manchin’s boondoggle into this year’s must-pass debt ceiling bill, so – <em>Whoosh!</em> – locals and environmentalists were blown away. Wait though, the federal court that had been siding with people still had a say. But – <em>Zzzzzt! </em>– Manchin and Biden teamed up with congressional Republicans to – <em>Whammo!</em> ­– shift jurisdiction over the pipeline from that court to one with corporate-friendly judges. But – <em>Screech!</em> – the abandoned court says, “Hold it” -- Congress is unconstitutionally interfering in the Judicial Branch’s power.</p><p>So, do Manchin and Biden get to stiff the people? Undecided – but they’ve already revealed to the people how corrupt their Rube Goldberg system is.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/how-the-system-works-joe-manchins</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:135441146</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/135441146/2514d499573fa9d87b503a66fb7a46ee.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/135441146/c95675be81996ed3695e1dd8880bbc46.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Rube Goldberg would marvel at Sen. Joe Manchin’s wacky, convoluted machinations to rig the system so fossil fuel polluters can run roughshod over nature, local people, and democracy. Goldberg was a master of satirical cartoons, drawing hilarious schematics of convoluted contraptions to do silly tasks. His “Self-Operating Napkin,” for example, involved a spoon, cracker, toucan, skyrocket, sickle, and a pendulum attached to a napkin – all operating sequentially to automatically wipe the chin of a soup eater. So here comes Joe with his own sequential machinations to (Zip! Ping! Sproing!) push his pet corporate boondoggle into law. Manchin’s Mountain Valley Pipeline would ram a 300-mile polluting pipe through the pristine mountains of West Virginia, into Virginia and ultimately into North Carolina, ripping through farms, communities, national parks, and 1,000 streams and waterlands. The people hated it – and, amazingly, environmental regulators and multiple courts sided with the people again and again! Time for Joe’s Rube Goldberg act. Late last year – Ping!­­ – Manchin switched from a “No” on a climate change bill to a “yes,” in exchange for President Biden supporting the pipeline. But congressional progressives rebelled, so their dirty deal failed. Then – Sproing! – Biden snuck Manchin’s boondoggle into this year’s must-pass debt ceiling bill, so – Whoosh! – locals and environmentalists were blown away. Wait though, the federal court that had been siding with people still had a say. But – Zzzzzt! – Manchin and Biden teamed up with congressional Republicans to – Whammo! ­– shift jurisdiction over the pipeline from that court to one with corporate-friendly judges. But – Screech! – the abandoned court says, “Hold it” -- Congress is unconstitutionally interfering in the Judicial Branch’s power. So, do Manchin and Biden get to stiff the people? Undecided – but they’ve already revealed to the people how corrupt their Rube Goldberg system is. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Rube Goldberg would marvel at Sen. Joe Manchin’s wacky, convoluted machinations to rig the system so fossil fuel polluters can run roughshod over nature, local people, and democracy. Goldberg was a master of satirical cartoons, drawing hilarious schematics of convoluted contraptions to do silly tasks. His “Self-Operating Napkin,” for example, involved a spoon, cracker, toucan, skyrocket, sickle, and a pendulum attached to a napkin – all operating sequentially to automatically wipe the chin of a soup eater. So here comes Joe with his own sequential machinations to (Zip! Ping! Sproing!) push his pet corporate boondoggle into law. Manchin’s Mountain Valley Pipeline would ram a 300-mile polluting pipe through the pristine mountains of West Virginia, into Virginia and ultimately into North Carolina, ripping through farms, communities, national parks, and 1,000 streams and waterlands. The people hated it – and, amazingly, environmental regulators and multiple courts sided with the people again and again! Time for Joe’s Rube Goldberg act. Late last year – Ping!­­ – Manchin switched from a “No” on a climate change bill to a “yes,” in exchange for President Biden supporting the pipeline. But congressional progressives rebelled, so their dirty deal failed. Then – Sproing! – Biden snuck Manchin’s boondoggle into this year’s must-pass debt ceiling bill, so – Whoosh! – locals and environmentalists were blown away. Wait though, the federal court that had been siding with people still had a say. But – Zzzzzt! – Manchin and Biden teamed up with congressional Republicans to – Whammo! ­– shift jurisdiction over the pipeline from that court to one with corporate-friendly judges. But – Screech! – the abandoned court says, “Hold it” -- Congress is unconstitutionally interfering in the Judicial Branch’s power. So, do Manchin and Biden get to stiff the people? Undecided – but they’ve already revealed to the people how corrupt their Rube Goldberg system is. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why You Can’t Believe a Word Anti-Abortion Politicos Say]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, it’s 1984 again in America.</p><p> Not the year. The book. George Orwell’s classic novel tells of a far-right totalitarian clique that uses “newspeak” and “doublethink” to impose their rigid, anti-democratic doctrine on society. Their regime held power through mind control – they had T a “Ministry of Truth” for perverting language and manipulating facts, while their “Thought Police” enforced ideological purity and suppressed dissent.</p><p>Thirty-nine years later, here comes a clique of theocratic extremists in our country using Orwellian manipulation in its crusade to take control over every woman’s personal reproductive rights. Having seized the Supreme Court and practically the entire Republican Party, these present-day autocrats are now demanding that state and national lawmakers enforce the group’s ultimate dictate: <em>A total ban on abortions</em>, even in cases of rape and incest.</p><p>To their amazement, however, the great majority of Americans (even Republicans) think abortion ought to be generally available, with each woman deciding what’s best for her. Moreover, the idea of Big Brother imposing a federal ban is massively unpopular.</p><p>No problem, say today’s Orwellian newspeakers, <a target="_blank" href="https://jessica.substack.com/p/the-anti-abortion-movements-language">we’ll just ban the word “ban” from or PR campaigns</a>. Thus, their harsh abortion ban has magically morphed linguistically into a “pro-life plan.” There – feel better?</p><p>Doubling down on their propaganda ploy, the abortion truth twisters are also plotting to ban reporters from using what one called “the big ban word.” Anti-abortion agents are now barraging news outlets with warnings that any use of that verb will be considered proof of political bias. Sure enough, rather than risk right-wing fury, some scaredy-cat reporters are already caving in, meekly describing bans as “restrictions on procedures.” How nice – a kinder, gentler tyranny!</p><p>To keep up with the 2023 version of Orwell’s Thought Police, connect with <a target="_blank" href="https://substack.com/profile/535611-jessica-valenti">Jessica Valenti</a>‘s diligent tracking of anti-abortion trickery at <a target="_blank" href="http://jessica.substack.com">jessica.substack.com</a>.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-you-cant-believe-a-word-anti</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:135125657</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/135125657/d6b1aa5caf9f86b9297af57083464cff.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/135125657/fd6dad3c759492366f9fcecde38abcb2.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Unfortunately, it’s 1984 again in America.  Not the year. The book. George Orwell’s classic novel tells of a far-right totalitarian clique that uses “newspeak” and “doublethink” to impose their rigid, anti-democratic doctrine on society. Their regime held power through mind control – they had T a “Ministry of Truth” for perverting language and manipulating facts, while their “Thought Police” enforced ideological purity and suppressed dissent. Thirty-nine years later, here comes a clique of theocratic extremists in our country using Orwellian manipulation in its crusade to take control over every woman’s personal reproductive rights. Having seized the Supreme Court and practically the entire Republican Party, these present-day autocrats are now demanding that state and national lawmakers enforce the group’s ultimate dictate: A total ban on abortions, even in cases of rape and incest. To their amazement, however, the great majority of Americans (even Republicans) think abortion ought to be generally available, with each woman deciding what’s best for her. Moreover, the idea of Big Brother imposing a federal ban is massively unpopular. No problem, say today’s Orwellian newspeakers, we’ll just ban the word “ban” from or PR campaigns. Thus, their harsh abortion ban has magically morphed linguistically into a “pro-life plan.” There – feel better? Doubling down on their propaganda ploy, the abortion truth twisters are also plotting to ban reporters from using what one called “the big ban word.” Anti-abortion agents are now barraging news outlets with warnings that any use of that verb will be considered proof of political bias. Sure enough, rather than risk right-wing fury, some scaredy-cat reporters are already caving in, meekly describing bans as “restrictions on procedures.” How nice – a kinder, gentler tyranny! To keep up with the 2023 version of Orwell’s Thought Police, connect with Jessica Valenti‘s diligent tracking of anti-abortion trickery at jessica.substack.com. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Unfortunately, it’s 1984 again in America.  Not the year. The book. George Orwell’s classic novel tells of a far-right totalitarian clique that uses “newspeak” and “doublethink” to impose their rigid, anti-democratic doctrine on society. Their regime held power through mind control – they had T a “Ministry of Truth” for perverting language and manipulating facts, while their “Thought Police” enforced ideological purity and suppressed dissent. Thirty-nine years later, here comes a clique of theocratic extremists in our country using Orwellian manipulation in its crusade to take control over every woman’s personal reproductive rights. Having seized the Supreme Court and practically the entire Republican Party, these present-day autocrats are now demanding that state and national lawmakers enforce the group’s ultimate dictate: A total ban on abortions, even in cases of rape and incest. To their amazement, however, the great majority of Americans (even Republicans) think abortion ought to be generally available, with each woman deciding what’s best for her. Moreover, the idea of Big Brother imposing a federal ban is massively unpopular. No problem, say today’s Orwellian newspeakers, we’ll just ban the word “ban” from or PR campaigns. Thus, their harsh abortion ban has magically morphed linguistically into a “pro-life plan.” There – feel better? Doubling down on their propaganda ploy, the abortion truth twisters are also plotting to ban reporters from using what one called “the big ban word.” Anti-abortion agents are now barraging news outlets with warnings that any use of that verb will be considered proof of political bias. Sure enough, rather than risk right-wing fury, some scaredy-cat reporters are already caving in, meekly describing bans as “restrictions on procedures.” How nice – a kinder, gentler tyranny! To keep up with the 2023 version of Orwell’s Thought Police, connect with Jessica Valenti‘s diligent tracking of anti-abortion trickery at jessica.substack.com. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[What If George Washington or Sam Adams Ran for President?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>All those firecrackers on July 4 got me thinking about the headline revolutionaries who signed the 1776 Declaration, fought the Brits for independence, hammered out the Constitution and installed our Bill of Rights. Old Ben, Monticello Tom, General George, Alex, “Pamphleteer Tommy” Paine, Jimmie and Dolly, Tea Party Sam, and others got America’s democratic experiment started, and they’re rightly saluted today, from school rooms to political gatherings of both major parties, as true patriots.</p><p>Reflecting on that generation’s remarkable impact reveals the historic potential of our people’s democratic spirit. But it also raises the unavoidable contrast with our present crop of leading political characters. This is worth noting now, because the Fourth has become the opening bell for America’s quadrennial presidential run (yes, ready or not, the first “debates” are only a month away, and Iowa’s Republican caucuses are set for January 15).</p><p>So here’s my question: Given the current state of our two major parties, would any of the Patriots of ’76 have a snowball’s chance in hell of being nominated for president of the country they founded? Consider George Washington. The GOP’s MAGA crowd would boo him off the stage, Trump would mock the general as “Toothless George,” and the party of Q-Anon, anti-woke nonsense, and Marjorie Taylor Green would place him behind überrich ego trippers like Vivek Ramaswamy and Doug Burgum.</p><p>Democrats? While today’s grassroots Dems would rally enthusiastically to the little-d democratic principles and firebrand activism of Thomas Paine or Samuel Adams, the party’s pusillanimous corporate-hugging establishment would bury both in a muddy deluge of money and lies.</p><p>This political reality check is not meant to depress us, but to provoke us into demanding and doing better. Okay, maybe greatness is now beyond us, but shouldn’t we strive for more than mediocrity and outright goofiness?</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/what-if-george-washington-or-sam</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:135124595</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/135124595/9d37bb1474dca099ba0695b2f4ae6ff2.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/135124595/8aa2e67ac129351ccda197ab2b6e63c3.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>All those firecrackers on July 4 got me thinking about the headline revolutionaries who signed the 1776 Declaration, fought the Brits for independence, hammered out the Constitution and installed our Bill of Rights. Old Ben, Monticello Tom, General George, Alex, “Pamphleteer Tommy” Paine, Jimmie and Dolly, Tea Party Sam, and others got America’s democratic experiment started, and they’re rightly saluted today, from school rooms to political gatherings of both major parties, as true patriots. Reflecting on that generation’s remarkable impact reveals the historic potential of our people’s democratic spirit. But it also raises the unavoidable contrast with our present crop of leading political characters. This is worth noting now, because the Fourth has become the opening bell for America’s quadrennial presidential run (yes, ready or not, the first “debates” are only a month away, and Iowa’s Republican caucuses are set for January 15). So here’s my question: Given the current state of our two major parties, would any of the Patriots of ’76 have a snowball’s chance in hell of being nominated for president of the country they founded? Consider George Washington. The GOP’s MAGA crowd would boo him off the stage, Trump would mock the general as “Toothless George,” and the party of Q-Anon, anti-woke nonsense, and Marjorie Taylor Green would place him behind überrich ego trippers like Vivek Ramaswamy and Doug Burgum. Democrats? While today’s grassroots Dems would rally enthusiastically to the little-d democratic principles and firebrand activism of Thomas Paine or Samuel Adams, the party’s pusillanimous corporate-hugging establishment would bury both in a muddy deluge of money and lies. This political reality check is not meant to depress us, but to provoke us into demanding and doing better. Okay, maybe greatness is now beyond us, but shouldn’t we strive for more than mediocrity and outright goofiness? Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>All those firecrackers on July 4 got me thinking about the headline revolutionaries who signed the 1776 Declaration, fought the Brits for independence, hammered out the Constitution and installed our Bill of Rights. Old Ben, Monticello Tom, General George, Alex, “Pamphleteer Tommy” Paine, Jimmie and Dolly, Tea Party Sam, and others got America’s democratic experiment started, and they’re rightly saluted today, from school rooms to political gatherings of both major parties, as true patriots. Reflecting on that generation’s remarkable impact reveals the historic potential of our people’s democratic spirit. But it also raises the unavoidable contrast with our present crop of leading political characters. This is worth noting now, because the Fourth has become the opening bell for America’s quadrennial presidential run (yes, ready or not, the first “debates” are only a month away, and Iowa’s Republican caucuses are set for January 15). So here’s my question: Given the current state of our two major parties, would any of the Patriots of ’76 have a snowball’s chance in hell of being nominated for president of the country they founded? Consider George Washington. The GOP’s MAGA crowd would boo him off the stage, Trump would mock the general as “Toothless George,” and the party of Q-Anon, anti-woke nonsense, and Marjorie Taylor Green would place him behind überrich ego trippers like Vivek Ramaswamy and Doug Burgum. Democrats? While today’s grassroots Dems would rally enthusiastically to the little-d democratic principles and firebrand activism of Thomas Paine or Samuel Adams, the party’s pusillanimous corporate-hugging establishment would bury both in a muddy deluge of money and lies. This political reality check is not meant to depress us, but to provoke us into demanding and doing better. Okay, maybe greatness is now beyond us, but shouldn’t we strive for more than mediocrity and outright goofiness? Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Supreme Court: A Nest of Clueless Overprivileged Elites]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Here’s an embarrassing turn of events: The six right-wing ideologues now controlling the Supreme Court recently decreed that helping some students get into college through affirmative action programs is henceforth unconstitutional.</p><p>This is somewhere between clueless and cynical, since at least five of these six aloof Supremes got into colleges and law schools through higher education’s most-entrenched channel of affirmative action: Family affluence and elite connections.</p><p>America’s higher ed establishment has long promoted a self-serving conceit that entrance to its campuses is based on meritocracy. Blatant racial and gender discrimination, however, put the lie to that, so schools adopted affirmative action policies to help rebalance the mix. The six supreme partisans killed this effort, replacing it with… nothing.</p><p>Meanwhile, our college system is becoming even more exclusive because of a deeply ingrained institutional bias that deliberately shuts out millions of the best and brightest, no matter their race, gender, or religion. That bias is <em>economic class</em>. From prestigious private schools to most big-name state universities, recruitment and admission procedures overwhelmingly favor those families privileged to have money and social standing. No matter how smart or promising working class and poor students are, they’re largely left out. <em>New York Times</em> columnist David Leonhardt reports that <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/05/briefing/affirmative-action.html?searchResultPosition=3">this class divide is sharp</a>, with some colleges enrolling more undergraduates from the wealthiest one percent of families that from all the families in the bottom 60 percent!</p><p>These far-right political justices, blind to the special privileges they’ve been given in life, are imperiously negating our people’s hard-won progress toward… well, toward justice for all. Moreover, their elitist monkeywrenching of college enrollment eliminates a ladder of unimpeded opportunity that is essential for the well-being of our country as a whole.</p><p>All six need to be replaced, not merely with better judges, but with better human beings.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-supreme-court-a-nest-of-clueless</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:134341398</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/134341398/bb0461646f9a09b32c4d6e2d42a858fb.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/134341398/66b563143a953d30c3cd555e9e9b9449.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Here’s an embarrassing turn of events: The six right-wing ideologues now controlling the Supreme Court recently decreed that helping some students get into college through affirmative action programs is henceforth unconstitutional. This is somewhere between clueless and cynical, since at least five of these six aloof Supremes got into colleges and law schools through higher education’s most-entrenched channel of affirmative action: Family affluence and elite connections. America’s higher ed establishment has long promoted a self-serving conceit that entrance to its campuses is based on meritocracy. Blatant racial and gender discrimination, however, put the lie to that, so schools adopted affirmative action policies to help rebalance the mix. The six supreme partisans killed this effort, replacing it with… nothing. Meanwhile, our college system is becoming even more exclusive because of a deeply ingrained institutional bias that deliberately shuts out millions of the best and brightest, no matter their race, gender, or religion. That bias is economic class. From prestigious private schools to most big-name state universities, recruitment and admission procedures overwhelmingly favor those families privileged to have money and social standing. No matter how smart or promising working class and poor students are, they’re largely left out. New York Times columnist David Leonhardt reports that this class divide is sharp, with some colleges enrolling more undergraduates from the wealthiest one percent of families that from all the families in the bottom 60 percent! These far-right political justices, blind to the special privileges they’ve been given in life, are imperiously negating our people’s hard-won progress toward… well, toward justice for all. Moreover, their elitist monkeywrenching of college enrollment eliminates a ladder of unimpeded opportunity that is essential for the well-being of our country as a whole. All six need to be replaced, not merely with better judges, but with better human beings. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Here’s an embarrassing turn of events: The six right-wing ideologues now controlling the Supreme Court recently decreed that helping some students get into college through affirmative action programs is henceforth unconstitutional. This is somewhere between clueless and cynical, since at least five of these six aloof Supremes got into colleges and law schools through higher education’s most-entrenched channel of affirmative action: Family affluence and elite connections. America’s higher ed establishment has long promoted a self-serving conceit that entrance to its campuses is based on meritocracy. Blatant racial and gender discrimination, however, put the lie to that, so schools adopted affirmative action policies to help rebalance the mix. The six supreme partisans killed this effort, replacing it with… nothing. Meanwhile, our college system is becoming even more exclusive because of a deeply ingrained institutional bias that deliberately shuts out millions of the best and brightest, no matter their race, gender, or religion. That bias is economic class. From prestigious private schools to most big-name state universities, recruitment and admission procedures overwhelmingly favor those families privileged to have money and social standing. No matter how smart or promising working class and poor students are, they’re largely left out. New York Times columnist David Leonhardt reports that this class divide is sharp, with some colleges enrolling more undergraduates from the wealthiest one percent of families that from all the families in the bottom 60 percent! These far-right political justices, blind to the special privileges they’ve been given in life, are imperiously negating our people’s hard-won progress toward… well, toward justice for all. Moreover, their elitist monkeywrenching of college enrollment eliminates a ladder of unimpeded opportunity that is essential for the well-being of our country as a whole. All six need to be replaced, not merely with better judges, but with better human beings. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Texas: What the Hell? Stay Hydrated, They Say. Unless You’re a Construction Worker]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>About 150 years ago, Gen. Philip Sheridan was sweltering in the relentless heat of a Texas summer. He was not happy: “If I owned Texas and all Hell,” he groused, “I would rent out Texas and live in Hell.”</p><p>Summer has always been hot here, but 2023 has been something else, thanks to a hellish “heat dome” that has been baking us since late spring, sending daily temps up to 116 degrees. But worse, a more punishing heat has hit us from an even stranger <em>unnatural</em> dome: The Texas State Capitol. That’s where our malicious governor Greg Abbott and his GOP majority of extremist right-wing lawmakers rig the rules to make life easier and richer for corporate elites – and much harder for working people.</p><p>In this year’s legislative session they rammed a nasty piece of plutocratic meanness into law that critics dubbed “Death Star.”  It annihilates the basic right of local officials and voters to govern their own cities and counties. In particular, it empowers autocratic state officials -- <em>and even corporate executives!</em> – to nullify decisions by localities to protect workers and others from corporate abuse.</p><p>In a cruel case of bad timing, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.texastribune.org/2023/06/16/texas-heat-wave-water-break-construction-workers/">the first local law targeted for nullification by the Texas GOP is a humane requirement in Dallas and other cities that developers provide 10-minute water breaks for construction workers</a>. This in a state with America’s <a target="_blank" href="https://www.texastribune.org/2023/01/26/texas-heat-deaths-migrants-climate-change/">highest rate of heat-related deaths</a> and presently suffering biblical-level heat. Triple-digit temperatures kill, yet Abbott, his air-conditioned legislative cronies, and his corporate campaign donors whined that a required water break was an “oppressive burden” on the extraordinarily-rich construction industry.</p><p>Here’s a new rule I’d like to see: No lawmaker or lobbyist is allowed to oppose heat protections for workers unless they spend July and August with no air conditioning for themselves.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/texas-what-the-hell-stay-hydrated</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:134338365</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/134338365/a8508378431e94e1e7ec0ff105d10bad.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/134338365/992b9e60c557fe4d755b15763e0e2e19.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>About 150 years ago, Gen. Philip Sheridan was sweltering in the relentless heat of a Texas summer. He was not happy: “If I owned Texas and all Hell,” he groused, “I would rent out Texas and live in Hell.” Summer has always been hot here, but 2023 has been something else, thanks to a hellish “heat dome” that has been baking us since late spring, sending daily temps up to 116 degrees. But worse, a more punishing heat has hit us from an even stranger unnatural dome: The Texas State Capitol. That’s where our malicious governor Greg Abbott and his GOP majority of extremist right-wing lawmakers rig the rules to make life easier and richer for corporate elites – and much harder for working people. In this year’s legislative session they rammed a nasty piece of plutocratic meanness into law that critics dubbed “Death Star.”  It annihilates the basic right of local officials and voters to govern their own cities and counties. In particular, it empowers autocratic state officials -- and even corporate executives! – to nullify decisions by localities to protect workers and others from corporate abuse. In a cruel case of bad timing, the first local law targeted for nullification by the Texas GOP is a humane requirement in Dallas and other cities that developers provide 10-minute water breaks for construction workers. This in a state with America’s highest rate of heat-related deaths and presently suffering biblical-level heat. Triple-digit temperatures kill, yet Abbott, his air-conditioned legislative cronies, and his corporate campaign donors whined that a required water break was an “oppressive burden” on the extraordinarily-rich construction industry. Here’s a new rule I’d like to see: No lawmaker or lobbyist is allowed to oppose heat protections for workers unless they spend July and August with no air conditioning for themselves. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>About 150 years ago, Gen. Philip Sheridan was sweltering in the relentless heat of a Texas summer. He was not happy: “If I owned Texas and all Hell,” he groused, “I would rent out Texas and live in Hell.” Summer has always been hot here, but 2023 has been something else, thanks to a hellish “heat dome” that has been baking us since late spring, sending daily temps up to 116 degrees. But worse, a more punishing heat has hit us from an even stranger unnatural dome: The Texas State Capitol. That’s where our malicious governor Greg Abbott and his GOP majority of extremist right-wing lawmakers rig the rules to make life easier and richer for corporate elites – and much harder for working people. In this year’s legislative session they rammed a nasty piece of plutocratic meanness into law that critics dubbed “Death Star.”  It annihilates the basic right of local officials and voters to govern their own cities and counties. In particular, it empowers autocratic state officials -- and even corporate executives! – to nullify decisions by localities to protect workers and others from corporate abuse. In a cruel case of bad timing, the first local law targeted for nullification by the Texas GOP is a humane requirement in Dallas and other cities that developers provide 10-minute water breaks for construction workers. This in a state with America’s highest rate of heat-related deaths and presently suffering biblical-level heat. Triple-digit temperatures kill, yet Abbott, his air-conditioned legislative cronies, and his corporate campaign donors whined that a required water break was an “oppressive burden” on the extraordinarily-rich construction industry. Here’s a new rule I’d like to see: No lawmaker or lobbyist is allowed to oppose heat protections for workers unless they spend July and August with no air conditioning for themselves. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Grassroots Action Is Shoving States Into Action on Child Care]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Two pieces of good advice: (1) “Never sign nothin’ by neon,” and (2) “Never negotiate with snakes.”</p><p>But Joe Biden violated both rules this year, getting out-negotiated by Senate Republicans (and their tag-along Democrat, Joe Manchin). As a result, Biden completely surrendered an urgently-needed program for America: Universal child care.</p><p>The US child care system is broken at every level—availability is scarce, and even if parents can find an opening, the price is forbidding. Yet care providers and teachers are grossly underpaid.</p><p>So we’re doomed by corporate greed and Washington’s indifference, right? Wrong! Grassroots people across the country are demanding and getting real change at the state level.</p><p>Last year, for example, voters in <a target="_blank" href="https://earlylearningnation.com/2022/11/how-grassroots-activists-got-early-childhood-education-aid-on-the-ballot-in-new-mexico/"><strong>New Mexico</strong></a><a target="_blank" href="https://earlylearningnation.com/2022/11/how-grassroots-activists-got-early-childhood-education-aid-on-the-ballot-in-new-mexico/"> rallied a decade-long care rebellion</a> to put a landmark initiative on the ballot to guarantee that all children ages zero to five have a constitutional right to quality early childhood education. Moreover, Amendment 1 allocates a steady stream of money from New Mexico’s Land Grant Permanent Fund to make this promise real. The vote initiative passed with 70 percent of the vote.</p><p><strong>Vermont</strong>, led by such persistent grassroots groups as <a target="_blank" href="https://letsgrowkids.org/">Let’s Grow Kids</a>, is providing $130 million a year to establish a solid base for <a target="_blank" href="https://earlylearningnation.com/2023/06/with-125-million-hanging-in-the-air-vermont-sets-the-stage-for-national-child-care/">universal child care</a>. Last month, the Republican governor vetoed the funding provision—but a bipartisan legislative majority, prodded by public demand, has now voted to <a target="_blank" href="https://earlylearningnation.com/2023/06/vermont-makes-child-care-history-with-a-bipartisan-veto-override/">override this veto</a>.</p><p>Also, the red state legislature in <strong>Tennessee</strong> is <a target="_blank" href="https://earlylearningnation.com/2023/06/tennessee-on-track-to-become-first-in-nation-to-offer-diaper-benefit-to-medicaid-families/">providing a new and essential child care benefit</a> to low-income parents of infants and toddlers: Diapers. And even some in the US Congress are beginning to get the child care message, having formed the first-ever <a target="_blank" href="https://twitter.com/DadsCaucus"><strong>Congressional Dads Caucus</strong></a> to push family-friendly policies.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… This is democracy in action—when leaders won’t lead, shove them!</p><p>Do Something</p><p>To see what’s happening in your state, and find the groups that are making change happen, <a target="_blank" href="https://earlylearningnation.com/early-learning-in-the-states/">check out Early Learning Nation’s 50-state map</a>.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/grassroots-action-is-shoving-states</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:133462894</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/133462894/b3eba122fd2df1d861347cfc6ab14bde.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/133462894/6c3e41f6f3144dd765b3bfe1c05eb592.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Two pieces of good advice: (1) “Never sign nothin’ by neon,” and (2) “Never negotiate with snakes.” But Joe Biden violated both rules this year, getting out-negotiated by Senate Republicans (and their tag-along Democrat, Joe Manchin). As a result, Biden completely surrendered an urgently-needed program for America: Universal child care. The US child care system is broken at every level—availability is scarce, and even if parents can find an opening, the price is forbidding. Yet care providers and teachers are grossly underpaid. So we’re doomed by corporate greed and Washington’s indifference, right? Wrong! Grassroots people across the country are demanding and getting real change at the state level. Last year, for example, voters in New Mexico rallied a decade-long care rebellion to put a landmark initiative on the ballot to guarantee that all children ages zero to five have a constitutional right to quality early childhood education. Moreover, Amendment 1 allocates a steady stream of money from New Mexico’s Land Grant Permanent Fund to make this promise real. The vote initiative passed with 70 percent of the vote. Vermont, led by such persistent grassroots groups as Let’s Grow Kids, is providing $130 million a year to establish a solid base for universal child care. Last month, the Republican governor vetoed the funding provision—but a bipartisan legislative majority, prodded by public demand, has now voted to override this veto. Also, the red state legislature in Tennessee is providing a new and essential child care benefit to low-income parents of infants and toddlers: Diapers. And even some in the US Congress are beginning to get the child care message, having formed the first-ever Congressional Dads Caucus to push family-friendly policies. This is Jim Hightower saying… This is democracy in action—when leaders won’t lead, shove them! Do Something To see what’s happening in your state, and find the groups that are making change happen, check out Early Learning Nation’s 50-state map. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Two pieces of good advice: (1) “Never sign nothin’ by neon,” and (2) “Never negotiate with snakes.” But Joe Biden violated both rules this year, getting out-negotiated by Senate Republicans (and their tag-along Democrat, Joe Manchin). As a result, Biden completely surrendered an urgently-needed program for America: Universal child care. The US child care system is broken at every level—availability is scarce, and even if parents can find an opening, the price is forbidding. Yet care providers and teachers are grossly underpaid. So we’re doomed by corporate greed and Washington’s indifference, right? Wrong! Grassroots people across the country are demanding and getting real change at the state level. Last year, for example, voters in New Mexico rallied a decade-long care rebellion to put a landmark initiative on the ballot to guarantee that all children ages zero to five have a constitutional right to quality early childhood education. Moreover, Amendment 1 allocates a steady stream of money from New Mexico’s Land Grant Permanent Fund to make this promise real. The vote initiative passed with 70 percent of the vote. Vermont, led by such persistent grassroots groups as Let’s Grow Kids, is providing $130 million a year to establish a solid base for universal child care. Last month, the Republican governor vetoed the funding provision—but a bipartisan legislative majority, prodded by public demand, has now voted to override this veto. Also, the red state legislature in Tennessee is providing a new and essential child care benefit to low-income parents of infants and toddlers: Diapers. And even some in the US Congress are beginning to get the child care message, having formed the first-ever Congressional Dads Caucus to push family-friendly policies. This is Jim Hightower saying… This is democracy in action—when leaders won’t lead, shove them! Do Something To see what’s happening in your state, and find the groups that are making change happen, check out Early Learning Nation’s 50-state map. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Political Perverts: Pro-Lifers Who’re Anti-Child Care]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The political extremists demanding that government control every woman’s personal reproductive decisions claim that they are “pro-life.” But that’s a rhetorical fraud.</p><p>Look at their overall policy agenda and you’ll see that they are merely <em>pro-birth</em>. After that, <em>adios</em>, baby… good luck. They consistently join Republican lawmakers to kill public programs that deliver essential real-life needs to babies <em>after </em>they’re born.</p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://earlylearningnation.com/category/child-care-crisis/">Consider child care, a fundamental need in any society</a>. Yet the “leaders” of our rich, sophisticated nation that supposedly treasures family, work, and children have created a mingy system that literally is a crying shame, revealing that our society deliberately does NOT care for children.</p><p>Here’s reality for you: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.aecf.org/blog/how-the-high-cost-of-child-care-hurts-families-workers-economy#:~:text=While%20the%20cost%20of%20care,and%20customer%20service%20(%2418.">98% of American workers are better paid</a> than those we entrust to care for our children. Working at a nail salon, loading boxes at an Amazon warehouse, flipping burgers at McDonald’s are jobs given more pay and respect than most child care jobs!</p><p>This is not just a “poor people’s problem,” for the lack of child care availability, affordability, and quality is a <a target="_blank" href="https://earlylearningnation.com/category/child-care-crisis/">looming crisis</a> for a majority of American families. Nonetheless, Republicans, enabled by corporate Democrat Joe Manchin, recently killed funding of a program to both raise worker pay and lower the prices families are charged. Such care is “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/21/upshot/child-care-daycare-disruptions.html">too expensive</a>,” squawked the same lawmakers who routinely dole out billions in welfare to corporate profiteers.</p><p>But wait—the GOP has come up with a genius, low-cost solution: Relax safety and educational requirements for child care centers (as <a target="_blank" href="https://iowacapitaldispatch.com/briefs/bill-would-allow-16-year-olds-to-provide-child-care-without-supervision/">Iowa</a> and <a target="_blank" href="https://iowacapitaldispatch.com/briefs/bill-would-allow-16-year-olds-to-provide-child-care-without-supervision/">Montana</a> have already done), allowing 16-year-olds to provide “care” for up to 15 children each! Also, why not automate the system… and do the little nippers really need that orange juice and daily snack?</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… To support life, not just birth, join up with the <a target="_blank" href="http://ffyf.org">First Five Years Fund at ffyf.org</a>.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/political-perverts-pro-lifers-whore</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:133233301</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/133233301/9397c45ed85a6abb45dd8805c35b3110.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/133233301/b78ed8324989e442310f834def829d6e.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>The political extremists demanding that government control every woman’s personal reproductive decisions claim that they are “pro-life.” But that’s a rhetorical fraud. Look at their overall policy agenda and you’ll see that they are merely pro-birth. After that, adios, baby… good luck. They consistently join Republican lawmakers to kill public programs that deliver essential real-life needs to babies after they’re born. Consider child care, a fundamental need in any society. Yet the “leaders” of our rich, sophisticated nation that supposedly treasures family, work, and children have created a mingy system that literally is a crying shame, revealing that our society deliberately does NOT care for children. Here’s reality for you: 98% of American workers are better paid than those we entrust to care for our children. Working at a nail salon, loading boxes at an Amazon warehouse, flipping burgers at McDonald’s are jobs given more pay and respect than most child care jobs! This is not just a “poor people’s problem,” for the lack of child care availability, affordability, and quality is a looming crisis for a majority of American families. Nonetheless, Republicans, enabled by corporate Democrat Joe Manchin, recently killed funding of a program to both raise worker pay and lower the prices families are charged. Such care is “too expensive,” squawked the same lawmakers who routinely dole out billions in welfare to corporate profiteers. But wait—the GOP has come up with a genius, low-cost solution: Relax safety and educational requirements for child care centers (as Iowa and Montana have already done), allowing 16-year-olds to provide “care” for up to 15 children each! Also, why not automate the system… and do the little nippers really need that orange juice and daily snack? This is Jim Hightower saying… To support life, not just birth, join up with the First Five Years Fund at ffyf.org. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>The political extremists demanding that government control every woman’s personal reproductive decisions claim that they are “pro-life.” But that’s a rhetorical fraud. Look at their overall policy agenda and you’ll see that they are merely pro-birth. After that, adios, baby… good luck. They consistently join Republican lawmakers to kill public programs that deliver essential real-life needs to babies after they’re born. Consider child care, a fundamental need in any society. Yet the “leaders” of our rich, sophisticated nation that supposedly treasures family, work, and children have created a mingy system that literally is a crying shame, revealing that our society deliberately does NOT care for children. Here’s reality for you: 98% of American workers are better paid than those we entrust to care for our children. Working at a nail salon, loading boxes at an Amazon warehouse, flipping burgers at McDonald’s are jobs given more pay and respect than most child care jobs! This is not just a “poor people’s problem,” for the lack of child care availability, affordability, and quality is a looming crisis for a majority of American families. Nonetheless, Republicans, enabled by corporate Democrat Joe Manchin, recently killed funding of a program to both raise worker pay and lower the prices families are charged. Such care is “too expensive,” squawked the same lawmakers who routinely dole out billions in welfare to corporate profiteers. But wait—the GOP has come up with a genius, low-cost solution: Relax safety and educational requirements for child care centers (as Iowa and Montana have already done), allowing 16-year-olds to provide “care” for up to 15 children each! Also, why not automate the system… and do the little nippers really need that orange juice and daily snack? This is Jim Hightower saying… To support life, not just birth, join up with the First Five Years Fund at ffyf.org. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Most Influential Musician You Never Heard Of]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>When you think of Americans whose music has made a lasting difference, you might think of Scott Joplin, Woody Guthrie, Maybelle Carter, Harry Belafonte… or Roger Payne.</p><p>Who? I came across Payne in a June obituary, reporting that he’d died at age 88 (yes, I occasionally scan the obits, not out of morbid curiosity, but because these little death notices encompass our people’s history, reconnecting us to common lives that had some small or surprisingly large impact).</p><p>Payne’s impact is still reverberating around the globe, even though few know his name. A biologist who studied moths, in the 1960s he chanced upon a technical military recording of undersea sounds that incidentally included a cacophony of baying, shrieking, mooing, squealing and caterwauling. They were the voices of humpback whales. What others had considered noise “blew my mind,” Payne said, describing them as a musical chorus of "exuberant, uninterrupted rivers of sound.” His life’s work shifted from moths to whales… to the interdependence of all species.</p><p>At the time, whales were treated by industry and governments as dull, lumbering nuisances. But Payne’s musical instincts came into play, sensing that the “singing” of these magnificent mammals might reach the primordial soul of humans. So he collected their rhythmic, haunting melodies into a momentous 1970 recording titled “Songs of the Humpback Whale.” It became a huge best-seller, altered public perception, and spawned a global “Save the Whales” campaign—one of the most successful conservation movements ever.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… So without writing or performing a single musical note, this scientist produced a truly powerful serenade from nature that continues to make a difference. To connect with Roger Payne’s work and help extend his deep understanding that all of us beings are related, contact the global advocacy group he founded, Ocean Alliance, at <a target="_blank" href="http://whale.org">whale.org</a>.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-most-influential-musician-you</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:131936677</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2023 16:58:41 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/131936677/f7c21cface12b7846be4797408ef15e2.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/131936677/3fa67e9b7bed83f69a41097a3baefbc7.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>When you think of Americans whose music has made a lasting difference, you might think of Scott Joplin, Woody Guthrie, Maybelle Carter, Harry Belafonte… or Roger Payne. Who? I came across Payne in a June obituary, reporting that he’d died at age 88 (yes, I occasionally scan the obits, not out of morbid curiosity, but because these little death notices encompass our people’s history, reconnecting us to common lives that had some small or surprisingly large impact). Payne’s impact is still reverberating around the globe, even though few know his name. A biologist who studied moths, in the 1960s he chanced upon a technical military recording of undersea sounds that incidentally included a cacophony of baying, shrieking, mooing, squealing and caterwauling. They were the voices of humpback whales. What others had considered noise “blew my mind,” Payne said, describing them as a musical chorus of "exuberant, uninterrupted rivers of sound.” His life’s work shifted from moths to whales… to the interdependence of all species. At the time, whales were treated by industry and governments as dull, lumbering nuisances. But Payne’s musical instincts came into play, sensing that the “singing” of these magnificent mammals might reach the primordial soul of humans. So he collected their rhythmic, haunting melodies into a momentous 1970 recording titled “Songs of the Humpback Whale.” It became a huge best-seller, altered public perception, and spawned a global “Save the Whales” campaign—one of the most successful conservation movements ever. This is Jim Hightower saying… So without writing or performing a single musical note, this scientist produced a truly powerful serenade from nature that continues to make a difference. To connect with Roger Payne’s work and help extend his deep understanding that all of us beings are related, contact the global advocacy group he founded, Ocean Alliance, at whale.org. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>When you think of Americans whose music has made a lasting difference, you might think of Scott Joplin, Woody Guthrie, Maybelle Carter, Harry Belafonte… or Roger Payne. Who? I came across Payne in a June obituary, reporting that he’d died at age 88 (yes, I occasionally scan the obits, not out of morbid curiosity, but because these little death notices encompass our people’s history, reconnecting us to common lives that had some small or surprisingly large impact). Payne’s impact is still reverberating around the globe, even though few know his name. A biologist who studied moths, in the 1960s he chanced upon a technical military recording of undersea sounds that incidentally included a cacophony of baying, shrieking, mooing, squealing and caterwauling. They were the voices of humpback whales. What others had considered noise “blew my mind,” Payne said, describing them as a musical chorus of "exuberant, uninterrupted rivers of sound.” His life’s work shifted from moths to whales… to the interdependence of all species. At the time, whales were treated by industry and governments as dull, lumbering nuisances. But Payne’s musical instincts came into play, sensing that the “singing” of these magnificent mammals might reach the primordial soul of humans. So he collected their rhythmic, haunting melodies into a momentous 1970 recording titled “Songs of the Humpback Whale.” It became a huge best-seller, altered public perception, and spawned a global “Save the Whales” campaign—one of the most successful conservation movements ever. This is Jim Hightower saying… So without writing or performing a single musical note, this scientist produced a truly powerful serenade from nature that continues to make a difference. To connect with Roger Payne’s work and help extend his deep understanding that all of us beings are related, contact the global advocacy group he founded, Ocean Alliance, at whale.org. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Secret History of “Wokeness”]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>In <em>Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland</em>, Humpty Dumpty scornfully declares that, “When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean.”</p><p>So what does “woke” mean? It’s become the pet political aspersion that today’s kooky right-wing hucksters hurl at liberals, but the hurlers would be whopperjawed to learn that it’s was actually coined by and for <em>progressives</em>! Indeed, it admonishes people to be awake to the dangers posed by hate-filled bigots and reactionaries like… well, like today’s right-wing extremists.</p><p><strong>SURPRISING HISTORICAL TIDBIT:</strong> The first person reported to have used the word was Huddie Ledbetter, the legendary Black blues artist known as Lead Belly. Among his many classic songs was “Scottsboro Boys,” about nine Black teenagers falsely accused in 1931 of raping two Alabama white women. As a Black musician who traveled the backroads of the Jim Crow South, Lead Belly warned others to pay attention when in a viciously racist state: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.vox.com/culture/21437879/stay-woke-wokeness-history-origin-evolution-controversy">“Best stay woke,” he cautioned.</a></p><p>But—out of blind ignorance, blind arrogance, or both—today’s adaptors of the Jim Crow mentality have perverted common-sense wokeness into a verbal whip to lash African-Americans, immigrants, Democrats, women, LGBTQ+ people and all others they don’t like (pretty much everyone who looks, thinks, prays and acts different from them). How kooky? They’ve declared librarians, science, Mickey Mouse, and Bud Light to be their evil enemies. “Don’t be woke,” they bark, demanding autocratic, plutocratic, and theocratic laws to coerce compliance with their own retrogressive bigotries.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… Bear in mind that this is no longer a fringe cult, but the mainstream of the Republican Party, including its top congressional leaders, presidential wannabes, and state officials. Actually, you can easily comprehend what these Humpty-Dumpties really mean by their “Don’t Be Woke” war cry. Just substitute the word “sane” for “woke.”</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-secret-history-of-wokeness</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:131433033</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/131433033/f52e592fa27f9642e5735b32cded8022.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/131433033/3f9716cc61a53c8ce9357e9bf70fbf6f.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>In Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, Humpty Dumpty scornfully declares that, “When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean.” So what does “woke” mean? It’s become the pet political aspersion that today’s kooky right-wing hucksters hurl at liberals, but the hurlers would be whopperjawed to learn that it’s was actually coined by and for progressives! Indeed, it admonishes people to be awake to the dangers posed by hate-filled bigots and reactionaries like… well, like today’s right-wing extremists. SURPRISING HISTORICAL TIDBIT: The first person reported to have used the word was Huddie Ledbetter, the legendary Black blues artist known as Lead Belly. Among his many classic songs was “Scottsboro Boys,” about nine Black teenagers falsely accused in 1931 of raping two Alabama white women. As a Black musician who traveled the backroads of the Jim Crow South, Lead Belly warned others to pay attention when in a viciously racist state: “Best stay woke,” he cautioned. But—out of blind ignorance, blind arrogance, or both—today’s adaptors of the Jim Crow mentality have perverted common-sense wokeness into a verbal whip to lash African-Americans, immigrants, Democrats, women, LGBTQ+ people and all others they don’t like (pretty much everyone who looks, thinks, prays and acts different from them). How kooky? They’ve declared librarians, science, Mickey Mouse, and Bud Light to be their evil enemies. “Don’t be woke,” they bark, demanding autocratic, plutocratic, and theocratic laws to coerce compliance with their own retrogressive bigotries. This is Jim Hightower saying… Bear in mind that this is no longer a fringe cult, but the mainstream of the Republican Party, including its top congressional leaders, presidential wannabes, and state officials. Actually, you can easily comprehend what these Humpty-Dumpties really mean by their “Don’t Be Woke” war cry. Just substitute the word “sane” for “woke.” Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>In Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, Humpty Dumpty scornfully declares that, “When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean.” So what does “woke” mean? It’s become the pet political aspersion that today’s kooky right-wing hucksters hurl at liberals, but the hurlers would be whopperjawed to learn that it’s was actually coined by and for progressives! Indeed, it admonishes people to be awake to the dangers posed by hate-filled bigots and reactionaries like… well, like today’s right-wing extremists. SURPRISING HISTORICAL TIDBIT: The first person reported to have used the word was Huddie Ledbetter, the legendary Black blues artist known as Lead Belly. Among his many classic songs was “Scottsboro Boys,” about nine Black teenagers falsely accused in 1931 of raping two Alabama white women. As a Black musician who traveled the backroads of the Jim Crow South, Lead Belly warned others to pay attention when in a viciously racist state: “Best stay woke,” he cautioned. But—out of blind ignorance, blind arrogance, or both—today’s adaptors of the Jim Crow mentality have perverted common-sense wokeness into a verbal whip to lash African-Americans, immigrants, Democrats, women, LGBTQ+ people and all others they don’t like (pretty much everyone who looks, thinks, prays and acts different from them). How kooky? They’ve declared librarians, science, Mickey Mouse, and Bud Light to be their evil enemies. “Don’t be woke,” they bark, demanding autocratic, plutocratic, and theocratic laws to coerce compliance with their own retrogressive bigotries. This is Jim Hightower saying… Bear in mind that this is no longer a fringe cult, but the mainstream of the Republican Party, including its top congressional leaders, presidential wannabes, and state officials. Actually, you can easily comprehend what these Humpty-Dumpties really mean by their “Don’t Be Woke” war cry. Just substitute the word “sane” for “woke.” Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Do You Suspect the System Is Rigged? Here’s Proof]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Years ago, a Texas lawmaker got caught using his official position to enrich himself by taking money from special interests, in exchange for voting their way. The culprit did not deem this as corrupt, but just the normal ethic of an enterprising business transaction: “I seen my chances,” he explained, “and I took ‘em.”</p><p>This is the Clarence Thomas code-of-ethics. As has been widely reported, this Supreme Court judge (who reliably rules for corporate supremacy over the people’s interests) has secretly been on the take for years from a billionaire corporate right-winger. Real estate tycoon Harlan Crow, an extremist activist for plutocratic government, has been lavishing millions of dollars’ worth of luxury vacations, private jet travel, family housing and educational payments, and other gratuities on Thomas.</p><p>Yet, this supposedly-supreme lawyer says he detected no whiff of bribery, nor did he see any need to inform us commoners of it. He simply <em>seen his chances and took ’em.</em></p><p>But Thomas knew damn well that it was improper, corrupting, and disgusting. After all, during the last three decades, he has consistently voted for court rulings to make such obvious graft legal. For example, he has voted again and again to drain common sense from our anti-corruption laws, declaring that it is legal for a corporation to keep a public official on private retainer, that it’s okay for political officials to sell access to their offices, that the “appearance of corruption” is not corrupt – and, directly relevant to Harlan Crow, Thomas voted that it is technically not bribery to try influencing public officials by bestowing a series of gifts to them over time.</p><p>If it seems to you like the system is rigged to favor the powerful, there you have it. Thomas is both the rigger and the beneficiary of the system.</p><p></p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/do-you-suspect-the-system-is-rigged</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:130230595</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2023 15:46:44 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/130230595/3b9d739bb6160c2b3fe495a4871b8d41.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/130230595/6cbfe19c3f29c8166d07bf299dafa2e7.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Years ago, a Texas lawmaker got caught using his official position to enrich himself by taking money from special interests, in exchange for voting their way. The culprit did not deem this as corrupt, but just the normal ethic of an enterprising business transaction: “I seen my chances,” he explained, “and I took ‘em.” This is the Clarence Thomas code-of-ethics. As has been widely reported, this Supreme Court judge (who reliably rules for corporate supremacy over the people’s interests) has secretly been on the take for years from a billionaire corporate right-winger. Real estate tycoon Harlan Crow, an extremist activist for plutocratic government, has been lavishing millions of dollars’ worth of luxury vacations, private jet travel, family housing and educational payments, and other gratuities on Thomas. Yet, this supposedly-supreme lawyer says he detected no whiff of bribery, nor did he see any need to inform us commoners of it. He simply seen his chances and took ’em. But Thomas knew damn well that it was improper, corrupting, and disgusting. After all, during the last three decades, he has consistently voted for court rulings to make such obvious graft legal. For example, he has voted again and again to drain common sense from our anti-corruption laws, declaring that it is legal for a corporation to keep a public official on private retainer, that it’s okay for political officials to sell access to their offices, that the “appearance of corruption” is not corrupt – and, directly relevant to Harlan Crow, Thomas voted that it is technically not bribery to try influencing public officials by bestowing a series of gifts to them over time. If it seems to you like the system is rigged to favor the powerful, there you have it. Thomas is both the rigger and the beneficiary of the system. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Years ago, a Texas lawmaker got caught using his official position to enrich himself by taking money from special interests, in exchange for voting their way. The culprit did not deem this as corrupt, but just the normal ethic of an enterprising business transaction: “I seen my chances,” he explained, “and I took ‘em.” This is the Clarence Thomas code-of-ethics. As has been widely reported, this Supreme Court judge (who reliably rules for corporate supremacy over the people’s interests) has secretly been on the take for years from a billionaire corporate right-winger. Real estate tycoon Harlan Crow, an extremist activist for plutocratic government, has been lavishing millions of dollars’ worth of luxury vacations, private jet travel, family housing and educational payments, and other gratuities on Thomas. Yet, this supposedly-supreme lawyer says he detected no whiff of bribery, nor did he see any need to inform us commoners of it. He simply seen his chances and took ’em. But Thomas knew damn well that it was improper, corrupting, and disgusting. After all, during the last three decades, he has consistently voted for court rulings to make such obvious graft legal. For example, he has voted again and again to drain common sense from our anti-corruption laws, declaring that it is legal for a corporation to keep a public official on private retainer, that it’s okay for political officials to sell access to their offices, that the “appearance of corruption” is not corrupt – and, directly relevant to Harlan Crow, Thomas voted that it is technically not bribery to try influencing public officials by bestowing a series of gifts to them over time. If it seems to you like the system is rigged to favor the powerful, there you have it. Thomas is both the rigger and the beneficiary of the system. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Motown Supremes, Chicken Supreme… But the "Supreme" Court?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The six-person majority of far-right “Supremes” who presently dominate America’s judicial system seems intent on demonstrating that having a seat on our Supreme Court does not mean there is anything Supreme about them.</p><p>Consider one bottom-line measure of character that is central to the Court’s integrity: financial ethics. This simply requires the judges to file annual reports to reveal any sources of outside income and gifts, thus providing some minimal assurance to regular folks that the eminences are not taking personal payments from moneyed interests seeking favorable Court rulings.</p><p>But unlike all other top government officials, Supreme Court justices have a loosey-goosey system for reporting financial conflicts of interest. It’s called: “Trust us.”</p><p>Thus, for years, Clarence Thomas has been taking millions of dollars’ worth of gimmes from a right-wing corporate billionaire, while voting to impose this benefactor’s plutocratic agenda as the Law of the Land. Yet, in two decades of financial “reports to the people,” there is not a whisper from His Supremeness that he has regularly pocketed a wealth of gratuities from this special “friend.”</p><p>Or take John Roberts, the Chief Justice, who poses as a paragon of judicial independence while aggressively pressing an agenda of corporate supremacy over the Common Good. While he’s not known to take payments from corporate interests – his wife does. She’s been paid millions of dollars in commissions to recruit lawyers for firms that have business before Justice Roberts. Yet, until this special interest enrichment of his family was recently uncovered, Roberts never mentioned it in his annual reports.</p><p>Meanwhile, every federal official must agree to abide by a code of ethical behavior – with the exception of nine officials who have exempted themselves, saying “Trust us.” Yes, the Supremes.</p><p>Since the Court refuses to fix itself, the people must. To help, go to <a target="_blank" href="http://fixthecourt.com">fixthecourt.com</a>.</p><p></p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-motown-supremes-chicken-supreme</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:129976718</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/129976718/77743190cd3bce42d9aa66cd7d30e703.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/129976718/97bfcb5970a863e09fb85396c643be72.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>The six-person majority of far-right “Supremes” who presently dominate America’s judicial system seems intent on demonstrating that having a seat on our Supreme Court does not mean there is anything Supreme about them. Consider one bottom-line measure of character that is central to the Court’s integrity: financial ethics. This simply requires the judges to file annual reports to reveal any sources of outside income and gifts, thus providing some minimal assurance to regular folks that the eminences are not taking personal payments from moneyed interests seeking favorable Court rulings. But unlike all other top government officials, Supreme Court justices have a loosey-goosey system for reporting financial conflicts of interest. It’s called: “Trust us.” Thus, for years, Clarence Thomas has been taking millions of dollars’ worth of gimmes from a right-wing corporate billionaire, while voting to impose this benefactor’s plutocratic agenda as the Law of the Land. Yet, in two decades of financial “reports to the people,” there is not a whisper from His Supremeness that he has regularly pocketed a wealth of gratuities from this special “friend.” Or take John Roberts, the Chief Justice, who poses as a paragon of judicial independence while aggressively pressing an agenda of corporate supremacy over the Common Good. While he’s not known to take payments from corporate interests – his wife does. She’s been paid millions of dollars in commissions to recruit lawyers for firms that have business before Justice Roberts. Yet, until this special interest enrichment of his family was recently uncovered, Roberts never mentioned it in his annual reports. Meanwhile, every federal official must agree to abide by a code of ethical behavior – with the exception of nine officials who have exempted themselves, saying “Trust us.” Yes, the Supremes. Since the Court refuses to fix itself, the people must. To help, go to fixthecourt.com. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>The six-person majority of far-right “Supremes” who presently dominate America’s judicial system seems intent on demonstrating that having a seat on our Supreme Court does not mean there is anything Supreme about them. Consider one bottom-line measure of character that is central to the Court’s integrity: financial ethics. This simply requires the judges to file annual reports to reveal any sources of outside income and gifts, thus providing some minimal assurance to regular folks that the eminences are not taking personal payments from moneyed interests seeking favorable Court rulings. But unlike all other top government officials, Supreme Court justices have a loosey-goosey system for reporting financial conflicts of interest. It’s called: “Trust us.” Thus, for years, Clarence Thomas has been taking millions of dollars’ worth of gimmes from a right-wing corporate billionaire, while voting to impose this benefactor’s plutocratic agenda as the Law of the Land. Yet, in two decades of financial “reports to the people,” there is not a whisper from His Supremeness that he has regularly pocketed a wealth of gratuities from this special “friend.” Or take John Roberts, the Chief Justice, who poses as a paragon of judicial independence while aggressively pressing an agenda of corporate supremacy over the Common Good. While he’s not known to take payments from corporate interests – his wife does. She’s been paid millions of dollars in commissions to recruit lawyers for firms that have business before Justice Roberts. Yet, until this special interest enrichment of his family was recently uncovered, Roberts never mentioned it in his annual reports. Meanwhile, every federal official must agree to abide by a code of ethical behavior – with the exception of nine officials who have exempted themselves, saying “Trust us.” Yes, the Supremes. Since the Court refuses to fix itself, the people must. To help, go to fixthecourt.com. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[True “Wokeism” Is a Core American Value – Stand Up for It! ]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>As Scottish literary giant Robert Burns wrote, “The best-laid schemes of mice and men/Go oft awry.”</p><p>His 1785 poem, titled “To A Mouse,” could be directed today at the right-wing sloganeers who’ve been scheming so furiously to turn their hokey “woke” snobbery into a winning political stratagem. “Your local librarian is woke!” they screech.  “So is Disney, Inc.! Some of your churches, too, plus all Democrats, and – OMG – even Bud Light!!!” Creeping Wokeism is the new Red Scare, Welfare Queen, and Willy Horton political bugaboos rolled into one, forming the main “issue” of Republicans now running for President, Congress, and dogcatcher.</p><p>But rather than getting defensive, insisting you are NOT woke, consider firing back by saying, “Of course I’m woke!”  For the great majority of Americans, being woke is a very positive characteristic, meaning you’re awake, attentive to what’s going on. Indeed, in Black communities, “stay woke” has long meant staying alert to racial and social injustices. But even some Republicans must consider it bizarrely self-defeating for their party’s top candidates to be urging voters to go to sleep.</p><p>GOP leaders explain that anti-woke means crusading against D.E.I (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusiveness). But wait – that means they’re opposing America itself, for we are a nation united under the essential principle of <em>e pluribus unum</em>. As affirmed by the egalitarian principles of the Declaration of Independence, the 14th Amendment, the Statue of Liberty – and our kindergarten teachings of sharing and fairness – ours is a country rooted in constant <em>diversification</em>, expanding <em>equality</em>, and the democratic idea that every voice ought to <em>be included</em>. Our country needs more of all three!</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… America is way short of achieving these historic ideals, but shame on those revisionist political elites now demanding we abandon even striving for them. Confront the charlatans!</p><p><em>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</em></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/true-wokeism-is-a-core-american-value</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:128553165</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 16:30:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/128553165/ef58b016ebb2c6d1f9e8555f0d9532d9.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/128553165/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>As Scottish literary giant Robert Burns wrote, “The best-laid schemes of mice and men/Go oft awry.” His 1785 poem, titled “To A Mouse,” could be directed today at the right-wing sloganeers who’ve been scheming so furiously to turn their hokey “woke” snobbery into a winning political stratagem. “Your local librarian is woke!” they screech.  “So is Disney, Inc.! Some of your churches, too, plus all Democrats, and – OMG – even Bud Light!!!” Creeping Wokeism is the new Red Scare, Welfare Queen, and Willy Horton political bugaboos rolled into one, forming the main “issue” of Republicans now running for President, Congress, and dogcatcher. But rather than getting defensive, insisting you are NOT woke, consider firing back by saying, “Of course I’m woke!”  For the great majority of Americans, being woke is a very positive characteristic, meaning you’re awake, attentive to what’s going on. Indeed, in Black communities, “stay woke” has long meant staying alert to racial and social injustices. But even some Republicans must consider it bizarrely self-defeating for their party’s top candidates to be urging voters to go to sleep. GOP leaders explain that anti-woke means crusading against D.E.I (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusiveness). But wait – that means they’re opposing America itself, for we are a nation united under the essential principle of e pluribus unum. As affirmed by the egalitarian principles of the Declaration of Independence, the 14th Amendment, the Statue of Liberty – and our kindergarten teachings of sharing and fairness – ours is a country rooted in constant diversification, expanding equality, and the democratic idea that every voice ought to be included. Our country needs more of all three! This is Jim Hightower saying… America is way short of achieving these historic ideals, but shame on those revisionist political elites now demanding we abandon even striving for them. Confront the charlatans! Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>As Scottish literary giant Robert Burns wrote, “The best-laid schemes of mice and men/Go oft awry.” His 1785 poem, titled “To A Mouse,” could be directed today at the right-wing sloganeers who’ve been scheming so furiously to turn their hokey “woke” snobbery into a winning political stratagem. “Your local librarian is woke!” they screech.  “So is Disney, Inc.! Some of your churches, too, plus all Democrats, and – OMG – even Bud Light!!!” Creeping Wokeism is the new Red Scare, Welfare Queen, and Willy Horton political bugaboos rolled into one, forming the main “issue” of Republicans now running for President, Congress, and dogcatcher. But rather than getting defensive, insisting you are NOT woke, consider firing back by saying, “Of course I’m woke!”  For the great majority of Americans, being woke is a very positive characteristic, meaning you’re awake, attentive to what’s going on. Indeed, in Black communities, “stay woke” has long meant staying alert to racial and social injustices. But even some Republicans must consider it bizarrely self-defeating for their party’s top candidates to be urging voters to go to sleep. GOP leaders explain that anti-woke means crusading against D.E.I (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusiveness). But wait – that means they’re opposing America itself, for we are a nation united under the essential principle of e pluribus unum. As affirmed by the egalitarian principles of the Declaration of Independence, the 14th Amendment, the Statue of Liberty – and our kindergarten teachings of sharing and fairness – ours is a country rooted in constant diversification, expanding equality, and the democratic idea that every voice ought to be included. Our country needs more of all three! This is Jim Hightower saying… America is way short of achieving these historic ideals, but shame on those revisionist political elites now demanding we abandon even striving for them. Confront the charlatans! Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title>🥞<![CDATA[ SHORT STACK: Who the Hell is Mike Reed?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>When <a target="_blank" href="https://newsguild.org/heres-how-you-can-support-striking-guild-members/">The NewsGuild-CWA </a>launched its recent wave of walk-outs by journalists at dozens of newspapers owned by the massive Gannett chain, it put a spotlight on an obscure powerplayer in American media: Mike Reed.</p><p>He’s not a journalist, but a moneyman – CEO of the evolving global corporate entities that have controlled Gannett since 2005. </p><p>He is the financial “genius” who got an avaricious hedge fund group to make a disastrous $1.8 billion high-interest loan so Gannett could amass what is now America’s largest newspaper chain. To get the money needed to pay back those lenders, Mike has been hollowing out most of the once-proud newspapers Gannett took over – slashing salaries, gutting staffs, eliminating local coverage, plundering physical assets, and shutting down entire papers. For example, in the past decade:</p><p>* Gannett has cut half of its workforce, including eliminating 79% of its newsroom employees in Austin, 78% in Providence, 82% in Sarasota, 74% in South Bend, and 87% in Utica.</p><p>* Three of the chain’s dailies in Ohio are “ghost papers” meaning they have no reporters, editors, photographers, or other staff.</p><p>* Having decimated newsrooms, Gannett has replaced local news with cut & paste syndicated copy and corporate press releases. For example, since 2013, the number of local news reports have fallen 76% in Austin, 76 percent in Jacksonville, and 85% in Rochester.</p><p>* In the past year, Mike has responded to the demoralization and overwork of the chain’s remaining staff by cutting another 20% of journalism jobs, instituting unpaid furloughs, and suspending corporate payments to employee pension plans.</p><p>Meanwhile, Gannett’s stock price has plummeted by 70 percent since 2019, and it still owes $1.2 billion to those hedge fund slicks. Oh – and Mike’s own paycheck was $7.7 million in 2022, plus $3.4 million last year.</p><p>If you’re asked why News Guild members are protesting, there it is: All of the above.</p><p><em>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</em></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/short-stack-who-the-hell-is-mike</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:128034513</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2023 15:38:22 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="1553650" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/128034513/d9d737cdb21bf49c695085aeb6fdf31e.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>129</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/128034513/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>When The NewsGuild-CWA launched its recent wave of walk-outs by journalists at dozens of newspapers owned by the massive Gannett chain, it put a spotlight on an obscure powerplayer in American media: Mike Reed. He’s not a journalist, but a moneyman – CEO of the evolving global corporate entities that have controlled Gannett since 2005. He is the financial “genius” who got an avaricious hedge fund group to make a disastrous $1.8 billion high-interest loan so Gannett could amass what is now America’s largest newspaper chain. To get the money needed to pay back those lenders, Mike has been hollowing out most of the once-proud newspapers Gannett took over – slashing salaries, gutting staffs, eliminating local coverage, plundering physical assets, and shutting down entire papers. For example, in the past decade: * Gannett has cut half of its workforce, including eliminating 79% of its newsroom employees in Austin, 78% in Providence, 82% in Sarasota, 74% in South Bend, and 87% in Utica. * Three of the chain’s dailies in Ohio are “ghost papers” meaning they have no reporters, editors, photographers, or other staff. * Having decimated newsrooms, Gannett has replaced local news with cut &amp; paste syndicated copy and corporate press releases. For example, since 2013, the number of local news reports have fallen 76% in Austin, 76 percent in Jacksonville, and 85% in Rochester. * In the past year, Mike has responded to the demoralization and overwork of the chain’s remaining staff by cutting another 20% of journalism jobs, instituting unpaid furloughs, and suspending corporate payments to employee pension plans. Meanwhile, Gannett’s stock price has plummeted by 70 percent since 2019, and it still owes $1.2 billion to those hedge fund slicks. Oh – and Mike’s own paycheck was $7.7 million in 2022, plus $3.4 million last year. If you’re asked why News Guild members are protesting, there it is: All of the above. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>When The NewsGuild-CWA launched its recent wave of walk-outs by journalists at dozens of newspapers owned by the massive Gannett chain, it put a spotlight on an obscure powerplayer in American media: Mike Reed. He’s not a journalist, but a moneyman – CEO of the evolving global corporate entities that have controlled Gannett since 2005. He is the financial “genius” who got an avaricious hedge fund group to make a disastrous $1.8 billion high-interest loan so Gannett could amass what is now America’s largest newspaper chain. To get the money needed to pay back those lenders, Mike has been hollowing out most of the once-proud newspapers Gannett took over – slashing salaries, gutting staffs, eliminating local coverage, plundering physical assets, and shutting down entire papers. For example, in the past decade: * Gannett has cut half of its workforce, including eliminating 79% of its newsroom employees in Austin, 78% in Providence, 82% in Sarasota, 74% in South Bend, and 87% in Utica. * Three of the chain’s dailies in Ohio are “ghost papers” meaning they have no reporters, editors, photographers, or other staff. * Having decimated newsrooms, Gannett has replaced local news with cut &amp; paste syndicated copy and corporate press releases. For example, since 2013, the number of local news reports have fallen 76% in Austin, 76 percent in Jacksonville, and 85% in Rochester. * In the past year, Mike has responded to the demoralization and overwork of the chain’s remaining staff by cutting another 20% of journalism jobs, instituting unpaid furloughs, and suspending corporate payments to employee pension plans. Meanwhile, Gannett’s stock price has plummeted by 70 percent since 2019, and it still owes $1.2 billion to those hedge fund slicks. Oh – and Mike’s own paycheck was $7.7 million in 2022, plus $3.4 million last year. If you’re asked why News Guild members are protesting, there it is: All of the above. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Unreported News About Your “Newspaper”]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Why would your local newspaper not even mention an important local news story? Perhaps because it’s a damning story about the conglomerate owner of the paper.</p><p>This month, hundreds of journalists working for major dailies in some two dozen cities across America joined in an extraordinary mass walkout from their jobs. They were protesting the rank greed, gross mismanagement, and abandonment of democratic duty by the owner of their papers. That owner is Gannett, a massive financial conglomerate that has grabbled control of more than 200 dailies in 43 states. This is a huge, multidimensional news story about news itself – but where was the coverage?</p><p><strong>Big Story Number One</strong>: Unbeknownst to most people in these communities, <a target="_blank" href="https://hightowerlowdown.org/article/when-local-papers-die-the-ghouls-rush-in/">they no longer have a local daily paper</a> – control over everything from news content to price now belongs to beancounting strangers at Gannett headquarters hundreds of miles away.</p><p><strong>Big Story Number Two</strong>: More fundamentally, control has moved <a target="_blank" href="https://hightowerlowdown.org/article/how-we-can-save-local-news/">from journalists to bankers</a>. Gannett is owned by SoftBank, a Japanese hedge fund that has rapaciously looted American newsrooms to grab extravagant fees, salaries, and profits for its rich financial hucksters.</p><p><strong>Big Story Number Three</strong>: The workaday hometown reporters, photographers, and others who actually produce Gannett’s papers <a target="_blank" href="https://newsguild.org/heres-how-you-can-support-striking-guild-members/">are making a gutsy stand against the profiteer</a>, not just for themselves, but for the essential ideals of journalistic integrity and grassroots democracy.</p><p><strong>Biggest Story of All</strong>: Gannett’s 200+ papers cravenly joined in a concerted blanket cover-up of this momentous story, stiffing the public they’re supposed to serve and disrespecting the ethical stand of their own employees. Even Gannett’s flagship paper <em>USA Today </em>– which regularly reports on other labor actions – took a dive on covering the journalistic malfeasance of its own overseer.</p><p>To fight hedge fund corporatization of journalism, local news, and democracy go to <a target="_blank" href="http://newsguild.org">newsguild.org</a>.</p><p>DO SOMETHING</p><p>Here are some more resources for you if you want to support local journalism and learn more:</p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.rebuildlocalnews.org/">Rebuild Local News</a></p><p>* The Democracy Fund’s <a target="_blank" href="https://democracyfund.org/what-we-do/public-square/">Public Square</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.theajp.org/">The American Journalism Project</a></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-unreported-news-about-your-newspaper</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:127785012</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2023 22:18:08 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/127785012/f4ad6124f9547b3a39b7bc056b2d6b24.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/127785012/d53a033399bb0d74d1f538fb48da1a9c.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Why would your local newspaper not even mention an important local news story? Perhaps because it’s a damning story about the conglomerate owner of the paper. This month, hundreds of journalists working for major dailies in some two dozen cities across America joined in an extraordinary mass walkout from their jobs. They were protesting the rank greed, gross mismanagement, and abandonment of democratic duty by the owner of their papers. That owner is Gannett, a massive financial conglomerate that has grabbled control of more than 200 dailies in 43 states. This is a huge, multidimensional news story about news itself – but where was the coverage? Big Story Number One: Unbeknownst to most people in these communities, they no longer have a local daily paper – control over everything from news content to price now belongs to beancounting strangers at Gannett headquarters hundreds of miles away. Big Story Number Two: More fundamentally, control has moved from journalists to bankers. Gannett is owned by SoftBank, a Japanese hedge fund that has rapaciously looted American newsrooms to grab extravagant fees, salaries, and profits for its rich financial hucksters. Big Story Number Three: The workaday hometown reporters, photographers, and others who actually produce Gannett’s papers are making a gutsy stand against the profiteer, not just for themselves, but for the essential ideals of journalistic integrity and grassroots democracy. Biggest Story of All: Gannett’s 200+ papers cravenly joined in a concerted blanket cover-up of this momentous story, stiffing the public they’re supposed to serve and disrespecting the ethical stand of their own employees. Even Gannett’s flagship paper USA Today – which regularly reports on other labor actions – took a dive on covering the journalistic malfeasance of its own overseer. To fight hedge fund corporatization of journalism, local news, and democracy go to newsguild.org. DO SOMETHING Here are some more resources for you if you want to support local journalism and learn more: * Rebuild Local News * The Democracy Fund’s Public Square * The American Journalism Project This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Why would your local newspaper not even mention an important local news story? Perhaps because it’s a damning story about the conglomerate owner of the paper. This month, hundreds of journalists working for major dailies in some two dozen cities across America joined in an extraordinary mass walkout from their jobs. They were protesting the rank greed, gross mismanagement, and abandonment of democratic duty by the owner of their papers. That owner is Gannett, a massive financial conglomerate that has grabbled control of more than 200 dailies in 43 states. This is a huge, multidimensional news story about news itself – but where was the coverage? Big Story Number One: Unbeknownst to most people in these communities, they no longer have a local daily paper – control over everything from news content to price now belongs to beancounting strangers at Gannett headquarters hundreds of miles away. Big Story Number Two: More fundamentally, control has moved from journalists to bankers. Gannett is owned by SoftBank, a Japanese hedge fund that has rapaciously looted American newsrooms to grab extravagant fees, salaries, and profits for its rich financial hucksters. Big Story Number Three: The workaday hometown reporters, photographers, and others who actually produce Gannett’s papers are making a gutsy stand against the profiteer, not just for themselves, but for the essential ideals of journalistic integrity and grassroots democracy. Biggest Story of All: Gannett’s 200+ papers cravenly joined in a concerted blanket cover-up of this momentous story, stiffing the public they’re supposed to serve and disrespecting the ethical stand of their own employees. Even Gannett’s flagship paper USA Today – which regularly reports on other labor actions – took a dive on covering the journalistic malfeasance of its own overseer. To fight hedge fund corporatization of journalism, local news, and democracy go to newsguild.org. DO SOMETHING Here are some more resources for you if you want to support local journalism and learn more: * Rebuild Local News * The Democracy Fund’s Public Square * The American Journalism Project This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[How It’s Done: Setting Low the Ethical Bar in Politics]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The beauty of impeaching a public official is that it recalibrates the standard for political morality, letting other politicos gauge just how low they can go. Consider two recent Texas examples.</p><p>First came Rep. Bryan Slaton, a howling right-wing culture warrior who specialized in demonizing LGBTQ people as “perverted.” But the 45-year-old Republican – a former Southern Baptist youth pastor who was elected on a “family values” platform – got caught getting a 19-year-old intern drunk, having sex with her, then warning her to keep quiet. But she outed the pervert, so his pious <a target="_blank" href="https://www.texastribune.org/2023/05/09/bryan-slaton-expel-house-vote/">GOP colleagues defenestrated Bryan</a> to preserve “the legislature’s integrity” (excuse that oxymoron). Thus, the moral bar was lowered to “<em>do not get caught</em> drugging underage staffers to have sex.” Good to know.</p><p>Then came the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/texas-attorney-general-ken-paxtons-impeachment-explainer-rcna86833">impeachment of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton</a>, a notorious political grifter who has turned the state’s top law enforcement office into a personal criminal enterprise. He’s facing multiple indictments and investigations for securities fraud, bribery, abuse of power, obstruction of justice – and even such tawdry embarrassments as having a donor with legal problems renovate his kitchen and hire his mistress.</p><p>Paxton is a scuzz, but he’s received a get-out-of-jail-free political pass for years by being the partisan scuzz for the GOP’s militant MAGA clique. But – uh-oh – in February, he arrogantly went too low, demanding over $3 million from the legislature to settle a whistleblower case against him. Suddenly, even fellow Republicans were spooked into probing the misdeeds. The lead investigator, who’d never before expressed concern about the AG’s flagrant violations of the public trust, declared that spending state money for Paxton’s criminality was just too much to swallow. “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/details-of-texas-attorney-general-ken-paxtons-scandal-shocks-house-panels-conscience">It curls my mustache,</a>” he exclaimed, as he made the motion to impeach the scoundrel.</p><p>Thus, a new standard was set: Corruption is still fine… but settle on your own dime.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/how-its-done-setting-low-the-ethical</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:126194403</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/126194403/d2563a66e118c464222c864a00b5eaef.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/126194403/f122a5f748b7e8d87ea4c5f47dbec8c4.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>The beauty of impeaching a public official is that it recalibrates the standard for political morality, letting other politicos gauge just how low they can go. Consider two recent Texas examples. First came Rep. Bryan Slaton, a howling right-wing culture warrior who specialized in demonizing LGBTQ people as “perverted.” But the 45-year-old Republican – a former Southern Baptist youth pastor who was elected on a “family values” platform – got caught getting a 19-year-old intern drunk, having sex with her, then warning her to keep quiet. But she outed the pervert, so his pious GOP colleagues defenestrated Bryan to preserve “the legislature’s integrity” (excuse that oxymoron). Thus, the moral bar was lowered to “do not get caught drugging underage staffers to have sex.” Good to know. Then came the impeachment of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a notorious political grifter who has turned the state’s top law enforcement office into a personal criminal enterprise. He’s facing multiple indictments and investigations for securities fraud, bribery, abuse of power, obstruction of justice – and even such tawdry embarrassments as having a donor with legal problems renovate his kitchen and hire his mistress. Paxton is a scuzz, but he’s received a get-out-of-jail-free political pass for years by being the partisan scuzz for the GOP’s militant MAGA clique. But – uh-oh – in February, he arrogantly went too low, demanding over $3 million from the legislature to settle a whistleblower case against him. Suddenly, even fellow Republicans were spooked into probing the misdeeds. The lead investigator, who’d never before expressed concern about the AG’s flagrant violations of the public trust, declared that spending state money for Paxton’s criminality was just too much to swallow. “It curls my mustache,” he exclaimed, as he made the motion to impeach the scoundrel. Thus, a new standard was set: Corruption is still fine… but settle on your own dime. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>The beauty of impeaching a public official is that it recalibrates the standard for political morality, letting other politicos gauge just how low they can go. Consider two recent Texas examples. First came Rep. Bryan Slaton, a howling right-wing culture warrior who specialized in demonizing LGBTQ people as “perverted.” But the 45-year-old Republican – a former Southern Baptist youth pastor who was elected on a “family values” platform – got caught getting a 19-year-old intern drunk, having sex with her, then warning her to keep quiet. But she outed the pervert, so his pious GOP colleagues defenestrated Bryan to preserve “the legislature’s integrity” (excuse that oxymoron). Thus, the moral bar was lowered to “do not get caught drugging underage staffers to have sex.” Good to know. Then came the impeachment of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a notorious political grifter who has turned the state’s top law enforcement office into a personal criminal enterprise. He’s facing multiple indictments and investigations for securities fraud, bribery, abuse of power, obstruction of justice – and even such tawdry embarrassments as having a donor with legal problems renovate his kitchen and hire his mistress. Paxton is a scuzz, but he’s received a get-out-of-jail-free political pass for years by being the partisan scuzz for the GOP’s militant MAGA clique. But – uh-oh – in February, he arrogantly went too low, demanding over $3 million from the legislature to settle a whistleblower case against him. Suddenly, even fellow Republicans were spooked into probing the misdeeds. The lead investigator, who’d never before expressed concern about the AG’s flagrant violations of the public trust, declared that spending state money for Paxton’s criminality was just too much to swallow. “It curls my mustache,” he exclaimed, as he made the motion to impeach the scoundrel. Thus, a new standard was set: Corruption is still fine… but settle on your own dime. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Biden, the GOP and You: Who Won the Debt-Ceiling Fight?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>During the big Washington showdown over the government’s debt ceiling, it looked possible for a brief moment that Joe Biden might bully GOP leader Kevin McCarthy into hurting one of America’s most vulnerable minorities: The überrich.</p><p>Republicans were pushing hard to “fix” the government’s financing crunch by imposing vindictive new work requirements that would cut off benefits for older, low-income Americans who need Medicaid and food stamps to get by. Democrats had denounced the cruelty and rank unfairness of punishing the poor, while requiring nothing from millionaires and billionaires. Biden twitted McCarthy with the threat of putting some of the burden on the privileged – before backing away from democratic principle, jovially assuring Kevin that he was just pulling his leg.</p><p>And a good thing he backtracked, too. Are you aware that the richest among us are suffering? CEO pay hikes have slowed to a trickle, with honchos of major corporations getting their incomes increased last year by an average of only about $15 million each. How can Washington expect such hard-hit families to help with the national debt?</p><p>Besides, many top executives are already making painful sacrifices to keep corporate profits soaring. Not sacrificing personally, of course, but sacrificing employees. Google’s top boss, for example, punted tens of thousands of workers last year, just before rewarding himself with a $226-million paycheck for doing the dirty deed. (By the way, it would take several <em>lifetimes</em> for a regular Google worker to amass the fortune the chief pocketed in that one year).</p><p>But hey, that’s how the system works, right? And it’ll keep working like that as long as corporate-financed political operatives like Biden and McCarthy are the ones making the “compromises.” After all, it’s not really a compromise when two foxes and a chicken vote on what’s for dinner.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/biden-the-gop-and-you-who-won-the</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:126190982</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/126190982/c69f80cdc3125cf895cbeaf9b29e8a3e.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/126190982/9284c3943555c4e2078bbfe7fedf3333.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>During the big Washington showdown over the government’s debt ceiling, it looked possible for a brief moment that Joe Biden might bully GOP leader Kevin McCarthy into hurting one of America’s most vulnerable minorities: The überrich. Republicans were pushing hard to “fix” the government’s financing crunch by imposing vindictive new work requirements that would cut off benefits for older, low-income Americans who need Medicaid and food stamps to get by. Democrats had denounced the cruelty and rank unfairness of punishing the poor, while requiring nothing from millionaires and billionaires. Biden twitted McCarthy with the threat of putting some of the burden on the privileged – before backing away from democratic principle, jovially assuring Kevin that he was just pulling his leg. And a good thing he backtracked, too. Are you aware that the richest among us are suffering? CEO pay hikes have slowed to a trickle, with honchos of major corporations getting their incomes increased last year by an average of only about $15 million each. How can Washington expect such hard-hit families to help with the national debt? Besides, many top executives are already making painful sacrifices to keep corporate profits soaring. Not sacrificing personally, of course, but sacrificing employees. Google’s top boss, for example, punted tens of thousands of workers last year, just before rewarding himself with a $226-million paycheck for doing the dirty deed. (By the way, it would take several lifetimes for a regular Google worker to amass the fortune the chief pocketed in that one year). But hey, that’s how the system works, right? And it’ll keep working like that as long as corporate-financed political operatives like Biden and McCarthy are the ones making the “compromises.” After all, it’s not really a compromise when two foxes and a chicken vote on what’s for dinner. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>During the big Washington showdown over the government’s debt ceiling, it looked possible for a brief moment that Joe Biden might bully GOP leader Kevin McCarthy into hurting one of America’s most vulnerable minorities: The überrich. Republicans were pushing hard to “fix” the government’s financing crunch by imposing vindictive new work requirements that would cut off benefits for older, low-income Americans who need Medicaid and food stamps to get by. Democrats had denounced the cruelty and rank unfairness of punishing the poor, while requiring nothing from millionaires and billionaires. Biden twitted McCarthy with the threat of putting some of the burden on the privileged – before backing away from democratic principle, jovially assuring Kevin that he was just pulling his leg. And a good thing he backtracked, too. Are you aware that the richest among us are suffering? CEO pay hikes have slowed to a trickle, with honchos of major corporations getting their incomes increased last year by an average of only about $15 million each. How can Washington expect such hard-hit families to help with the national debt? Besides, many top executives are already making painful sacrifices to keep corporate profits soaring. Not sacrificing personally, of course, but sacrificing employees. Google’s top boss, for example, punted tens of thousands of workers last year, just before rewarding himself with a $226-million paycheck for doing the dirty deed. (By the way, it would take several lifetimes for a regular Google worker to amass the fortune the chief pocketed in that one year). But hey, that’s how the system works, right? And it’ll keep working like that as long as corporate-financed political operatives like Biden and McCarthy are the ones making the “compromises.” After all, it’s not really a compromise when two foxes and a chicken vote on what’s for dinner. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[What Pan Would You Take To A Public Protest?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Do mass protests matter anymore? Even when large numbers turn out with a high level of outrage directed at abusive corporate or governmental elites, the Powers That Be usually just  hunker down and wait for the fury to pass.</p><p>But the one form of protest that really gets to even the most aloof elite is <em>cultural caricature</em>. In recent decades, the creative deployment of giant puppets, satirical songs, pop-up parodies, and other forms of social mockery has pierced the ego shields of haughty corporate chieftains and puffed-up politicos. They ignore angry speeches, but public ridicule stings the them personally, energizing the larger community.</p><p>Consider how common household utensils can rally the people’s discontent, rattle the establishment, and deliver a message of revolutionary protest. In recent years, mass rebellions, armed with nothing but kitchenware, have noisily made their points in such disparate places as Chile and Iceland.</p><p>And today, the people of France are bedeviling their country’s aristocratic wannabe, President Emmanuel Macron, with a ceaseless, mass clanging of skillets, saucepans, spoons and other plebian cookware brought from their French kitchens into the streets of every region. They are protesting the president’s imperious, decision to undercut their pensions, as well as his tone-deaf refusal even to hear their complaints. So their “voice” has become the incessant banging of pots. Now, Macron can’t go anywhere without being greeted – and often drowned out – by the cacophony of “cassarolades” (the saucepan movement).</p><p>The protest is driving Macron crazy, which seems to be a very short ride for him. Clearly irritated by the commoner’s cleverness, his government is now using antiterrorism laws to ban “the use of portable sound devices” in protests.</p><p>Of course, the crazier he gets about pots and pans, the more effective their “voice” becomes – and the louder people laugh at their “leader.”</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/what-pan-would-you-take-to-a-public</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:125079237</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/125079237/ba521d02d1debbfa66625aa2bb939f6d.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/125079237/c9ff6da9e5e8e59896236a1942639056.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Do mass protests matter anymore? Even when large numbers turn out with a high level of outrage directed at abusive corporate or governmental elites, the Powers That Be usually just  hunker down and wait for the fury to pass. But the one form of protest that really gets to even the most aloof elite is cultural caricature. In recent decades, the creative deployment of giant puppets, satirical songs, pop-up parodies, and other forms of social mockery has pierced the ego shields of haughty corporate chieftains and puffed-up politicos. They ignore angry speeches, but public ridicule stings the them personally, energizing the larger community. Consider how common household utensils can rally the people’s discontent, rattle the establishment, and deliver a message of revolutionary protest. In recent years, mass rebellions, armed with nothing but kitchenware, have noisily made their points in such disparate places as Chile and Iceland. And today, the people of France are bedeviling their country’s aristocratic wannabe, President Emmanuel Macron, with a ceaseless, mass clanging of skillets, saucepans, spoons and other plebian cookware brought from their French kitchens into the streets of every region. They are protesting the president’s imperious, decision to undercut their pensions, as well as his tone-deaf refusal even to hear their complaints. So their “voice” has become the incessant banging of pots. Now, Macron can’t go anywhere without being greeted – and often drowned out – by the cacophony of “cassarolades” (the saucepan movement). The protest is driving Macron crazy, which seems to be a very short ride for him. Clearly irritated by the commoner’s cleverness, his government is now using antiterrorism laws to ban “the use of portable sound devices” in protests. Of course, the crazier he gets about pots and pans, the more effective their “voice” becomes – and the louder people laugh at their “leader.” Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Do mass protests matter anymore? Even when large numbers turn out with a high level of outrage directed at abusive corporate or governmental elites, the Powers That Be usually just  hunker down and wait for the fury to pass. But the one form of protest that really gets to even the most aloof elite is cultural caricature. In recent decades, the creative deployment of giant puppets, satirical songs, pop-up parodies, and other forms of social mockery has pierced the ego shields of haughty corporate chieftains and puffed-up politicos. They ignore angry speeches, but public ridicule stings the them personally, energizing the larger community. Consider how common household utensils can rally the people’s discontent, rattle the establishment, and deliver a message of revolutionary protest. In recent years, mass rebellions, armed with nothing but kitchenware, have noisily made their points in such disparate places as Chile and Iceland. And today, the people of France are bedeviling their country’s aristocratic wannabe, President Emmanuel Macron, with a ceaseless, mass clanging of skillets, saucepans, spoons and other plebian cookware brought from their French kitchens into the streets of every region. They are protesting the president’s imperious, decision to undercut their pensions, as well as his tone-deaf refusal even to hear their complaints. So their “voice” has become the incessant banging of pots. Now, Macron can’t go anywhere without being greeted – and often drowned out – by the cacophony of “cassarolades” (the saucepan movement). The protest is driving Macron crazy, which seems to be a very short ride for him. Clearly irritated by the commoner’s cleverness, his government is now using antiterrorism laws to ban “the use of portable sound devices” in protests. Of course, the crazier he gets about pots and pans, the more effective their “voice” becomes – and the louder people laugh at their “leader.” Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[A Labor Strike in Hollywood? Why Should You Care?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Hollywood! Glamour! Riches!</p><p>Yet, people who make a living writing movies, TV shows, and streaming programs are on strike! Most people find it hard to relate to complaints about working on projects with multimillion-dollar budgets, A-list stars, and famous studio moguls. So what’s wrong with this picture?</p><p>It’s a faded picture taken in the long ago golden age of Hollywood when creative writing was prized by industry’s barons and writers got respect and decent paychecks. In today’s reality, projects are rich, but writers are poor, for Hollywood has shifted to the same model of plutocratic inequality that has swamped banking, high-tech and other monopolistic sectors.</p><p>Wall Street now rules. While we consumers still pay top-dollar for tickets and monthly fees, practically all of the money flows upstream to financiers and corporate poohbahs. This has sunk the real creators (writers, directors, actors, tech crews, and craftpeople) into the quicksand of low-wage, temporary jobs. Legacy production giants like Disney, Paramount, and Universal, (along with überrich new players like Amazon, Apple, Comcast, and Netflix), kowtow to Wall Street, stiffing the people who actually have talent, squeezing corporate profits from their labor.</p><p>This is the blue-collar reality of Hollywood you don’t hear about, and battling the same old rank greed of elite bosses is what this strike is about. Instead of making art, today’s industry is focused on slashing labor costs to artificially jack up corporate stock prices.</p><p>The pay increase sought by the 10,000 members of the Writers Guild of America is easily affordable by studio powers. Indeed, just one big boss, David Zaslav at Warner Brothers, gets $250 million a year – <em>enough to pay every WGA writer </em>the minimal annual income asked for in this strike.</p><p>To help stop the financialization and gigification of yet another workplace go to <a target="_blank" href="http://wga.org">wga.org</a>.</p><p>DO SOMETHING</p><p>Want to support the strikers? The WGA Strike Hub has all the actions: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.wgacontract2023.org/strike-hub">https://www.wgacontract2023.org/strike-hub</a></p><p>Daily updates on picketing and other actions can be found on this Google document: <a target="_blank" href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G0KN43AkhLQXlz1n6FoWi8wQKq09NsZJS_TEgzz1DqM/edit">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G0KN43AkhLQXlz1n6FoWi8wQKq09NsZJS_TEgzz1DqM/edit</a></p><p>To learn more about fighting the gig economy state-by-state, check out this in-depth article from the Economic Policy Institute: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.epi.org/publication/state-misclassification-of-workers/">https://www.epi.org/publication/state-misclassification-of-workers/</a></p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/a-labor-strike-in-hollywood-why-should</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:125066246</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2023 15:22:28 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/125066246/516e5f59f64914dbada759547e3b5fdb.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/125066246/41cb043214d6be81f1bae45443508f0e.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Hollywood! Glamour! Riches! Yet, people who make a living writing movies, TV shows, and streaming programs are on strike! Most people find it hard to relate to complaints about working on projects with multimillion-dollar budgets, A-list stars, and famous studio moguls. So what’s wrong with this picture? It’s a faded picture taken in the long ago golden age of Hollywood when creative writing was prized by industry’s barons and writers got respect and decent paychecks. In today’s reality, projects are rich, but writers are poor, for Hollywood has shifted to the same model of plutocratic inequality that has swamped banking, high-tech and other monopolistic sectors. Wall Street now rules. While we consumers still pay top-dollar for tickets and monthly fees, practically all of the money flows upstream to financiers and corporate poohbahs. This has sunk the real creators (writers, directors, actors, tech crews, and craftpeople) into the quicksand of low-wage, temporary jobs. Legacy production giants like Disney, Paramount, and Universal, (along with überrich new players like Amazon, Apple, Comcast, and Netflix), kowtow to Wall Street, stiffing the people who actually have talent, squeezing corporate profits from their labor. This is the blue-collar reality of Hollywood you don’t hear about, and battling the same old rank greed of elite bosses is what this strike is about. Instead of making art, today’s industry is focused on slashing labor costs to artificially jack up corporate stock prices. The pay increase sought by the 10,000 members of the Writers Guild of America is easily affordable by studio powers. Indeed, just one big boss, David Zaslav at Warner Brothers, gets $250 million a year – enough to pay every WGA writer the minimal annual income asked for in this strike. To help stop the financialization and gigification of yet another workplace go to wga.org. DO SOMETHING Want to support the strikers? The WGA Strike Hub has all the actions: https://www.wgacontract2023.org/strike-hub Daily updates on picketing and other actions can be found on this Google document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G0KN43AkhLQXlz1n6FoWi8wQKq09NsZJS_TEgzz1DqM/edit To learn more about fighting the gig economy state-by-state, check out this in-depth article from the Economic Policy Institute: https://www.epi.org/publication/state-misclassification-of-workers/ Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Hollywood! Glamour! Riches! Yet, people who make a living writing movies, TV shows, and streaming programs are on strike! Most people find it hard to relate to complaints about working on projects with multimillion-dollar budgets, A-list stars, and famous studio moguls. So what’s wrong with this picture? It’s a faded picture taken in the long ago golden age of Hollywood when creative writing was prized by industry’s barons and writers got respect and decent paychecks. In today’s reality, projects are rich, but writers are poor, for Hollywood has shifted to the same model of plutocratic inequality that has swamped banking, high-tech and other monopolistic sectors. Wall Street now rules. While we consumers still pay top-dollar for tickets and monthly fees, practically all of the money flows upstream to financiers and corporate poohbahs. This has sunk the real creators (writers, directors, actors, tech crews, and craftpeople) into the quicksand of low-wage, temporary jobs. Legacy production giants like Disney, Paramount, and Universal, (along with überrich new players like Amazon, Apple, Comcast, and Netflix), kowtow to Wall Street, stiffing the people who actually have talent, squeezing corporate profits from their labor. This is the blue-collar reality of Hollywood you don’t hear about, and battling the same old rank greed of elite bosses is what this strike is about. Instead of making art, today’s industry is focused on slashing labor costs to artificially jack up corporate stock prices. The pay increase sought by the 10,000 members of the Writers Guild of America is easily affordable by studio powers. Indeed, just one big boss, David Zaslav at Warner Brothers, gets $250 million a year – enough to pay every WGA writer the minimal annual income asked for in this strike. To help stop the financialization and gigification of yet another workplace go to wga.org. DO SOMETHING Want to support the strikers? The WGA Strike Hub has all the actions: https://www.wgacontract2023.org/strike-hub Daily updates on picketing and other actions can be found on this Google document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G0KN43AkhLQXlz1n6FoWi8wQKq09NsZJS_TEgzz1DqM/edit To learn more about fighting the gig economy state-by-state, check out this in-depth article from the Economic Policy Institute: https://www.epi.org/publication/state-misclassification-of-workers/ Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Two Joe Bros Versus the People of Appalachia]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>If poohbahs of the national Democratic Party wonder why working-class families, which once formed the party’s solid base of political support, have gone astray – they might ponder the awful message they’re sending by constantly smooching Sen. Joe Manchin’s flabby tail.</p><p>The multimillionaire, West Virginia coal baron and anti-democratic “Democrat” is demanding that a massively-polluting pipeline, named Mountain Valley, be rammed through rivers, watersheds, national parks, towns, farmlands, homesteads – and down the throats of the people of West Virginia, Virginia, and North Carolina. Why? Money. The senator’s fossil fuel funders, who own the project, want the federal government to <em>mandate</em> construction of their corporate boondoggle.</p><p>For a decade, gutsy grassroots groups have rebelled and defeated these Wall Street profiteers, and the people of this Appalachian region are still adamantly opposed. But here comes Biden to rescue Manchin and his fossil fuelers with a dirty backroom deal overruling the will of the people. Proclaiming that he wants to advance America’s conversion from fossil fuels to renewable energy, Biden is pushing a bill to make it easier and faster to get federal approval for new energy projects. Fine. But his bill specifically greases the skids for <em>more fossil fuel projects</em>. And guess which one is first in line for quick approval? Yes, Brother Joe Manchin’s Mountain Valley Pipeline.</p><p>Continually pumping fracked gas across three states would produce a mess of leaks and spills, but the project would also emit some 40 million metric tons of planet warming gas a year – equivalent to the annual pollution of 10 coal plants. As the Natural Resources Defense Council puts it, “We won’t build the clean energy economy of the future by doubling down on the dirty fuels of the past.”</p><p>For information and action on this raw deal by the two Joes, connect with Appalachian Mountain Advocates: <a target="_blank" href="http://appvoices.org">appvoices.org</a>.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/two-joe-bros-versus-the-people-of</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:123766034</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 16:39:43 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/123766034/09b92d305b082c84f5932ca9ef8fda1b.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/123766034/277c7e0cdbd9e12ce82cdf0de0bd64fb.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>If poohbahs of the national Democratic Party wonder why working-class families, which once formed the party’s solid base of political support, have gone astray – they might ponder the awful message they’re sending by constantly smooching Sen. Joe Manchin’s flabby tail. The multimillionaire, West Virginia coal baron and anti-democratic “Democrat” is demanding that a massively-polluting pipeline, named Mountain Valley, be rammed through rivers, watersheds, national parks, towns, farmlands, homesteads – and down the throats of the people of West Virginia, Virginia, and North Carolina. Why? Money. The senator’s fossil fuel funders, who own the project, want the federal government to mandate construction of their corporate boondoggle. For a decade, gutsy grassroots groups have rebelled and defeated these Wall Street profiteers, and the people of this Appalachian region are still adamantly opposed. But here comes Biden to rescue Manchin and his fossil fuelers with a dirty backroom deal overruling the will of the people. Proclaiming that he wants to advance America’s conversion from fossil fuels to renewable energy, Biden is pushing a bill to make it easier and faster to get federal approval for new energy projects. Fine. But his bill specifically greases the skids for more fossil fuel projects. And guess which one is first in line for quick approval? Yes, Brother Joe Manchin’s Mountain Valley Pipeline. Continually pumping fracked gas across three states would produce a mess of leaks and spills, but the project would also emit some 40 million metric tons of planet warming gas a year – equivalent to the annual pollution of 10 coal plants. As the Natural Resources Defense Council puts it, “We won’t build the clean energy economy of the future by doubling down on the dirty fuels of the past.” For information and action on this raw deal by the two Joes, connect with Appalachian Mountain Advocates: appvoices.org. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>If poohbahs of the national Democratic Party wonder why working-class families, which once formed the party’s solid base of political support, have gone astray – they might ponder the awful message they’re sending by constantly smooching Sen. Joe Manchin’s flabby tail. The multimillionaire, West Virginia coal baron and anti-democratic “Democrat” is demanding that a massively-polluting pipeline, named Mountain Valley, be rammed through rivers, watersheds, national parks, towns, farmlands, homesteads – and down the throats of the people of West Virginia, Virginia, and North Carolina. Why? Money. The senator’s fossil fuel funders, who own the project, want the federal government to mandate construction of their corporate boondoggle. For a decade, gutsy grassroots groups have rebelled and defeated these Wall Street profiteers, and the people of this Appalachian region are still adamantly opposed. But here comes Biden to rescue Manchin and his fossil fuelers with a dirty backroom deal overruling the will of the people. Proclaiming that he wants to advance America’s conversion from fossil fuels to renewable energy, Biden is pushing a bill to make it easier and faster to get federal approval for new energy projects. Fine. But his bill specifically greases the skids for more fossil fuel projects. And guess which one is first in line for quick approval? Yes, Brother Joe Manchin’s Mountain Valley Pipeline. Continually pumping fracked gas across three states would produce a mess of leaks and spills, but the project would also emit some 40 million metric tons of planet warming gas a year – equivalent to the annual pollution of 10 coal plants. As the Natural Resources Defense Council puts it, “We won’t build the clean energy economy of the future by doubling down on the dirty fuels of the past.” For information and action on this raw deal by the two Joes, connect with Appalachian Mountain Advocates: appvoices.org. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Pigs Win a Big One Over Corporate Hoggishness]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>It’s an odd marketing strategy for an industry to assail its own consumers.</p><p>Yet, that’s what the monopolistic meatpacking industry (led by such huge conglomerates as Tyson, Smithfield, JBS, and Hormel that control nearly 70 percent of America’s pork market) is doing. “Just shut up and eat your bacon,” the industry shrieks! The target of their corporate tantrum is the growing grassroots movement of consumers, animal rights advocates, farmers, chefs, retailers, and others who are dismayed and disgusted by Big Pork’s profiteering on animal cruelty.</p><p>“None of your business!” shout the executives, lobbyists, lawyers, and for-rent politicians who run the tortuous system.</p><p>But gutsy groups like the Humane Society, made their way inside the industry’s animal factories, videoing such mass horrors as thousands of pregnant sows locked for 16 weeks at a time in gestation crates so small the animals can’t even turn around. In 2018, such <em>exposé</em>s prompted 60 percent of California voters to approve a ballot initiative outlawing the use of the inhumane crates.</p><p>Adding plutocratic stupidity to their greed, the pork barons then sued the people for overreaching their power! Yes, the pork profiteers actually asserted that democracy (ie, people power) must not interfere with “sound business practices.”</p><p>Never mind that few of us uncorporatized commoners consider animal suffering to be a sound practice. Even the corporate-coddling Supreme Court gagged at the industry’s claim that it has the sovereign power to dictate what type of pork chops are available to the public. This month, in an odd-fellow 5-4 decision rendered by two progressive judges and three corporatists, the Court ruled that “policy choices like these usually belong to the people.” Well, yes, and to the animals!</p><p>This is an example of how grassroots activism matters in important ways. To stay involved in this issue, go to <a target="_blank" href="https://www.humanesociety.org/animals/pigs">humanesociety.org/animals/pigs</a>.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/pigs-win-a-big-one-over-corporate</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:123306297</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2023 15:01:36 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/123306297/f7982bf3077c441f4ad5cdc08226095d.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/123306297/ae8a748073ca1390b99e07b7fa83c555.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>It’s an odd marketing strategy for an industry to assail its own consumers. Yet, that’s what the monopolistic meatpacking industry (led by such huge conglomerates as Tyson, Smithfield, JBS, and Hormel that control nearly 70 percent of America’s pork market) is doing. “Just shut up and eat your bacon,” the industry shrieks! The target of their corporate tantrum is the growing grassroots movement of consumers, animal rights advocates, farmers, chefs, retailers, and others who are dismayed and disgusted by Big Pork’s profiteering on animal cruelty. “None of your business!” shout the executives, lobbyists, lawyers, and for-rent politicians who run the tortuous system. But gutsy groups like the Humane Society, made their way inside the industry’s animal factories, videoing such mass horrors as thousands of pregnant sows locked for 16 weeks at a time in gestation crates so small the animals can’t even turn around. In 2018, such exposés prompted 60 percent of California voters to approve a ballot initiative outlawing the use of the inhumane crates. Adding plutocratic stupidity to their greed, the pork barons then sued the people for overreaching their power! Yes, the pork profiteers actually asserted that democracy (ie, people power) must not interfere with “sound business practices.” Never mind that few of us uncorporatized commoners consider animal suffering to be a sound practice. Even the corporate-coddling Supreme Court gagged at the industry’s claim that it has the sovereign power to dictate what type of pork chops are available to the public. This month, in an odd-fellow 5-4 decision rendered by two progressive judges and three corporatists, the Court ruled that “policy choices like these usually belong to the people.” Well, yes, and to the animals! This is an example of how grassroots activism matters in important ways. To stay involved in this issue, go to humanesociety.org/animals/pigs. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>It’s an odd marketing strategy for an industry to assail its own consumers. Yet, that’s what the monopolistic meatpacking industry (led by such huge conglomerates as Tyson, Smithfield, JBS, and Hormel that control nearly 70 percent of America’s pork market) is doing. “Just shut up and eat your bacon,” the industry shrieks! The target of their corporate tantrum is the growing grassroots movement of consumers, animal rights advocates, farmers, chefs, retailers, and others who are dismayed and disgusted by Big Pork’s profiteering on animal cruelty. “None of your business!” shout the executives, lobbyists, lawyers, and for-rent politicians who run the tortuous system. But gutsy groups like the Humane Society, made their way inside the industry’s animal factories, videoing such mass horrors as thousands of pregnant sows locked for 16 weeks at a time in gestation crates so small the animals can’t even turn around. In 2018, such exposés prompted 60 percent of California voters to approve a ballot initiative outlawing the use of the inhumane crates. Adding plutocratic stupidity to their greed, the pork barons then sued the people for overreaching their power! Yes, the pork profiteers actually asserted that democracy (ie, people power) must not interfere with “sound business practices.” Never mind that few of us uncorporatized commoners consider animal suffering to be a sound practice. Even the corporate-coddling Supreme Court gagged at the industry’s claim that it has the sovereign power to dictate what type of pork chops are available to the public. This month, in an odd-fellow 5-4 decision rendered by two progressive judges and three corporatists, the Court ruled that “policy choices like these usually belong to the people.” Well, yes, and to the animals! This is an example of how grassroots activism matters in important ways. To stay involved in this issue, go to humanesociety.org/animals/pigs. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Checking the Price You Pay for Corporate Food]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Oftentimes, when you suspect you’re being gouged by corporate price fixers – you are.</p><p>Take the rat-a-tat-tat of today’s price jumps at supermarkets and chain restaurants. They make you want to race to the cash register before they raise prices again!</p><p>No, no cry the CEOs of food giants, it’s not us, it’s “supply chain disruptions;” then corporate politicians and economists chime in with old platitudes about the invisible hand of “supply and demand;” and media know-nothings also pile on, blathering about “ne’er-do-wells” causing a labor shortage.</p><p>But, hogwash – your suspicions are right: It’s plain ol’ price fixing by avaricious food monopolies. Top executives even brag about it when talking to their bankers and stockholders. McDonald’s for example, recently told investors that “strategic menu price increases” <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/28/business/food-inflation-prices.html">in the past three months had boosted profits by 63 percent</a>. Big Mac’s CEO exulted: “I’m really proud of how our system has executed pricing.” Never mind that it’s their customers being executed.</p><p>Well, say free-market proselytizers, just buy from a competitor. But in nearly all segments of today’s food economy, a handful of giants control the market, with each one in on the fix. For example, Chipotle, a McDonald’s rival, also jacked up prices in the same three-month period, manufacturing an 84 percent profit increase. It’s CEO then gloated to Wall Streeters: “I think we’ve demonstrated we do have pricing power.”</p><p>By the way, these same giants are also fattening their profits by ripping off their workers. The federal poverty level is now $25,000 a year, with fast-food workers typically getting only $3,000 a year more than that bare minimum for a 40-hour week. But there’s the “gotcha” – the profiteering executives hold each worker to about 26 hours a week, creating a sub-poverty labor force for this multi-billion-dollar industry.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/checking-the-price-you-pay-for-corporate</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:121794994</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2023 15:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/121794994/48f34cca3e1baed5822729b4eab52f70.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/121794994/92b262b6a13071af148ebe28ae29472d.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Oftentimes, when you suspect you’re being gouged by corporate price fixers – you are. Take the rat-a-tat-tat of today’s price jumps at supermarkets and chain restaurants. They make you want to race to the cash register before they raise prices again! No, no cry the CEOs of food giants, it’s not us, it’s “supply chain disruptions;” then corporate politicians and economists chime in with old platitudes about the invisible hand of “supply and demand;” and media know-nothings also pile on, blathering about “ne’er-do-wells” causing a labor shortage. But, hogwash – your suspicions are right: It’s plain ol’ price fixing by avaricious food monopolies. Top executives even brag about it when talking to their bankers and stockholders. McDonald’s for example, recently told investors that “strategic menu price increases” in the past three months had boosted profits by 63 percent. Big Mac’s CEO exulted: “I’m really proud of how our system has executed pricing.” Never mind that it’s their customers being executed. Well, say free-market proselytizers, just buy from a competitor. But in nearly all segments of today’s food economy, a handful of giants control the market, with each one in on the fix. For example, Chipotle, a McDonald’s rival, also jacked up prices in the same three-month period, manufacturing an 84 percent profit increase. It’s CEO then gloated to Wall Streeters: “I think we’ve demonstrated we do have pricing power.” By the way, these same giants are also fattening their profits by ripping off their workers. The federal poverty level is now $25,000 a year, with fast-food workers typically getting only $3,000 a year more than that bare minimum for a 40-hour week. But there’s the “gotcha” – the profiteering executives hold each worker to about 26 hours a week, creating a sub-poverty labor force for this multi-billion-dollar industry. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Oftentimes, when you suspect you’re being gouged by corporate price fixers – you are. Take the rat-a-tat-tat of today’s price jumps at supermarkets and chain restaurants. They make you want to race to the cash register before they raise prices again! No, no cry the CEOs of food giants, it’s not us, it’s “supply chain disruptions;” then corporate politicians and economists chime in with old platitudes about the invisible hand of “supply and demand;” and media know-nothings also pile on, blathering about “ne’er-do-wells” causing a labor shortage. But, hogwash – your suspicions are right: It’s plain ol’ price fixing by avaricious food monopolies. Top executives even brag about it when talking to their bankers and stockholders. McDonald’s for example, recently told investors that “strategic menu price increases” in the past three months had boosted profits by 63 percent. Big Mac’s CEO exulted: “I’m really proud of how our system has executed pricing.” Never mind that it’s their customers being executed. Well, say free-market proselytizers, just buy from a competitor. But in nearly all segments of today’s food economy, a handful of giants control the market, with each one in on the fix. For example, Chipotle, a McDonald’s rival, also jacked up prices in the same three-month period, manufacturing an 84 percent profit increase. It’s CEO then gloated to Wall Streeters: “I think we’ve demonstrated we do have pricing power.” By the way, these same giants are also fattening their profits by ripping off their workers. The federal poverty level is now $25,000 a year, with fast-food workers typically getting only $3,000 a year more than that bare minimum for a 40-hour week. But there’s the “gotcha” – the profiteering executives hold each worker to about 26 hours a week, creating a sub-poverty labor force for this multi-billion-dollar industry. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[What? Progress in Mississippi? Seriously?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>There’s a common political refrain among Texas Progressives: “Thank God for Mississippi.”</p><p>Our own state government, run by corporate lobbyists and right-wing nutballs, is a notorious hellhole for efforts to provide even a little more fairness for the poor, the working class, and the environment. So, Lone Star progressives need some straw to grasp to keep from tumbling into the ditch of total despair. Mississippi has been that straw – no matter how mingy our state officials are, Texans can count on the Magnolia State to be one digit worse.</p><p>But – <em>Have Mercy!</em> – Texans are suddenly in danger of losing our reputational buffer, for Mississippi is close to making a momentous upgrade this election year. An unabashed working-class Democrat with a program of For-The-People reforms and an anti-plutocrat campaign for governor has already pulled even with the right-wing incumbent!</p><p>Brandon Presley is the upstart’s name. A “little-d” democratic populist elected at 23-years-old to be mayor of his small hometown (where he still lives), he’s now in his fourth term as a highly effective, widely popular member of the state utility commission. There, he has successfully battled the electric power giants and telecom profiteers on behalf of everyday ratepayers, workers, and the environment.</p><p>Presley (who actually is an Elvis cousin!) is not a pure liberal – he’s pro-gun and anti-choice. But this <em>is </em>Mississippi, and while it’s essential to strive for the pure light of liberalism, a multi-racial, majority of workaday Mississippians see Presley as a pure champion of basics they’ve long been denied – from health care to voting rights. So, they’re rallying for change – after all, even a dog knows the difference between being stumbled over and being kicked!</p><p>The people of Mississippi know they’re being kicked by the moneyed powers, and Brandon Presley is saying, “Let’s kick back.” To learn more, go to <a target="_blank" href="http://brandonpresley.com">brandonpresley.com</a>.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/what-progress-in-mississippi-seriously-18b</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:121794795</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2023 15:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/121794795/5c6397ed8e12253dbe3d541c2df126b3.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/121794795/159124a333cb0cbb47d44c90be97274f.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>There’s a common political refrain among Texas Progressives: “Thank God for Mississippi.” Our own state government, run by corporate lobbyists and right-wing nutballs, is a notorious hellhole for efforts to provide even a little more fairness for the poor, the working class, and the environment. So, Lone Star progressives need some straw to grasp to keep from tumbling into the ditch of total despair. Mississippi has been that straw – no matter how mingy our state officials are, Texans can count on the Magnolia State to be one digit worse. But – Have Mercy! – Texans are suddenly in danger of losing our reputational buffer, for Mississippi is close to making a momentous upgrade this election year. An unabashed working-class Democrat with a program of For-The-People reforms and an anti-plutocrat campaign for governor has already pulled even with the right-wing incumbent! Brandon Presley is the upstart’s name. A “little-d” democratic populist elected at 23-years-old to be mayor of his small hometown (where he still lives), he’s now in his fourth term as a highly effective, widely popular member of the state utility commission. There, he has successfully battled the electric power giants and telecom profiteers on behalf of everyday ratepayers, workers, and the environment. Presley (who actually is an Elvis cousin!) is not a pure liberal – he’s pro-gun and anti-choice. But this is Mississippi, and while it’s essential to strive for the pure light of liberalism, a multi-racial, majority of workaday Mississippians see Presley as a pure champion of basics they’ve long been denied – from health care to voting rights. So, they’re rallying for change – after all, even a dog knows the difference between being stumbled over and being kicked! The people of Mississippi know they’re being kicked by the moneyed powers, and Brandon Presley is saying, “Let’s kick back.” To learn more, go to brandonpresley.com. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>There’s a common political refrain among Texas Progressives: “Thank God for Mississippi.” Our own state government, run by corporate lobbyists and right-wing nutballs, is a notorious hellhole for efforts to provide even a little more fairness for the poor, the working class, and the environment. So, Lone Star progressives need some straw to grasp to keep from tumbling into the ditch of total despair. Mississippi has been that straw – no matter how mingy our state officials are, Texans can count on the Magnolia State to be one digit worse. But – Have Mercy! – Texans are suddenly in danger of losing our reputational buffer, for Mississippi is close to making a momentous upgrade this election year. An unabashed working-class Democrat with a program of For-The-People reforms and an anti-plutocrat campaign for governor has already pulled even with the right-wing incumbent! Brandon Presley is the upstart’s name. A “little-d” democratic populist elected at 23-years-old to be mayor of his small hometown (where he still lives), he’s now in his fourth term as a highly effective, widely popular member of the state utility commission. There, he has successfully battled the electric power giants and telecom profiteers on behalf of everyday ratepayers, workers, and the environment. Presley (who actually is an Elvis cousin!) is not a pure liberal – he’s pro-gun and anti-choice. But this is Mississippi, and while it’s essential to strive for the pure light of liberalism, a multi-racial, majority of workaday Mississippians see Presley as a pure champion of basics they’ve long been denied – from health care to voting rights. So, they’re rallying for change – after all, even a dog knows the difference between being stumbled over and being kicked! The people of Mississippi know they’re being kicked by the moneyed powers, and Brandon Presley is saying, “Let’s kick back.” To learn more, go to brandonpresley.com. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[How Perverse is the GOP’s Book Banning Crusade?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Tiptoeing around the democratic process, Indiana’s Republican legislature has become the latest of that ilk to slap its local school librarians with an idiotic book ban.</p><p>Snuck into law behind closed doors, the partisan Hoosier law requires librarians to pull books that the learned lawmakers consider “harmful to minors.” Just to juice up the ignorance and arrogance of their ban, the law <em>criminalizes</em> failure to comply by punishing librarians with up to two-and-a-half years in prison and a $10,000 fine! What constitutes “harmful to minors”? Indiana’s priggish politicos declare nudity, sexual references, and “offensive content to community standards” to be violations.</p><p>Obviously then, books commanding that rape victims marry their rapists, as well as celebrating daughters who seduce their father to bear his children, plus endorsement of bestiality, copulation in church, women boiling their children for food – and so God awful much more – have to be ripped from the shelves and burned! Only all of this is enshrined in <em>The Bible</em>, which is urged on Indiana’s youngsters in Sunday Schools, conveniently placed in the bedstands of every chain hotel… and cited by pious lawmakers as their moral compass.</p><p>The so-called “Good Book” is replete with the gross and explicit sexual material that Republican book censors call “harmful.” Indeed a feisty civil libertarian organization named <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ffrf.org">Freedom From Religion Foundation</a> gives away book labels you can stick in Bibles, warning that “literal belief in this book may endanger your health and life.”</p><p>The books that right-wing autocrats want to ban are not pornographic, they just explore ideas that those politicians don’t like – ideas that young people are already grappling with. And, by the way, why not require these pious lawmakers to disclose what licentious material they’ve been reading – before they dictate what we can read?</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/how-perverse-is-the-gops-book-banning</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:120098105</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 14:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/120098105/eeb9cd01f662dd39fd09db937da47830.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/120098105/551bc7a69553f58a2dc7abf807d059e2.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Tiptoeing around the democratic process, Indiana’s Republican legislature has become the latest of that ilk to slap its local school librarians with an idiotic book ban. Snuck into law behind closed doors, the partisan Hoosier law requires librarians to pull books that the learned lawmakers consider “harmful to minors.” Just to juice up the ignorance and arrogance of their ban, the law criminalizes failure to comply by punishing librarians with up to two-and-a-half years in prison and a $10,000 fine! What constitutes “harmful to minors”? Indiana’s priggish politicos declare nudity, sexual references, and “offensive content to community standards” to be violations. Obviously then, books commanding that rape victims marry their rapists, as well as celebrating daughters who seduce their father to bear his children, plus endorsement of bestiality, copulation in church, women boiling their children for food – and so God awful much more – have to be ripped from the shelves and burned! Only all of this is enshrined in The Bible, which is urged on Indiana’s youngsters in Sunday Schools, conveniently placed in the bedstands of every chain hotel… and cited by pious lawmakers as their moral compass. The so-called “Good Book” is replete with the gross and explicit sexual material that Republican book censors call “harmful.” Indeed a feisty civil libertarian organization named Freedom From Religion Foundation gives away book labels you can stick in Bibles, warning that “literal belief in this book may endanger your health and life.” The books that right-wing autocrats want to ban are not pornographic, they just explore ideas that those politicians don’t like – ideas that young people are already grappling with. And, by the way, why not require these pious lawmakers to disclose what licentious material they’ve been reading – before they dictate what we can read? Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Tiptoeing around the democratic process, Indiana’s Republican legislature has become the latest of that ilk to slap its local school librarians with an idiotic book ban. Snuck into law behind closed doors, the partisan Hoosier law requires librarians to pull books that the learned lawmakers consider “harmful to minors.” Just to juice up the ignorance and arrogance of their ban, the law criminalizes failure to comply by punishing librarians with up to two-and-a-half years in prison and a $10,000 fine! What constitutes “harmful to minors”? Indiana’s priggish politicos declare nudity, sexual references, and “offensive content to community standards” to be violations. Obviously then, books commanding that rape victims marry their rapists, as well as celebrating daughters who seduce their father to bear his children, plus endorsement of bestiality, copulation in church, women boiling their children for food – and so God awful much more – have to be ripped from the shelves and burned! Only all of this is enshrined in The Bible, which is urged on Indiana’s youngsters in Sunday Schools, conveniently placed in the bedstands of every chain hotel… and cited by pious lawmakers as their moral compass. The so-called “Good Book” is replete with the gross and explicit sexual material that Republican book censors call “harmful.” Indeed a feisty civil libertarian organization named Freedom From Religion Foundation gives away book labels you can stick in Bibles, warning that “literal belief in this book may endanger your health and life.” The books that right-wing autocrats want to ban are not pornographic, they just explore ideas that those politicians don’t like – ideas that young people are already grappling with. And, by the way, why not require these pious lawmakers to disclose what licentious material they’ve been reading – before they dictate what we can read? Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chicken Little Attacks America’s Teachers]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I’m a child of privilege. Not the privilege of money (I come from a family of small-town working people). But it was my privilege to grow up in the public schools of Denison, Texas.</p><p>There I received the rich blessings of dedicated classroom teachers, a diverse student body, playground socialization, librarians, coaches, cafeteria and custodial workers, student politics, vocational training… and a deep appreciation for the unifying value of community and the Common Good.</p><p>That’s why I’m flabbergasted by today’s clique of corporate profiteers, theocratic zealots, and laissez-faire knuckleheads who’re lobbying furiously across the country to demonize, defund, and dismantle this invaluable social benefit. If ignorance is bliss, they must be ecstatic!</p><p>Public schools do have some real problems: Politicians constantly slashing education budgets, professional burnout created by understaffing and low pay, the devastating strain of a killer pandemic, and a new-normal of assault-rifle murders. But the profiteers, theocrats, and knuckleheads aren’t interested in those, instead focusing on what they say is the fatal flaw in public education: <em>Teachers</em>.</p><p>Yes, the claim is that diabolical educators are perverting innocent minds by teaching America’s actual history, showing students that the full diversity of humankind enriches our society, and presenting our Earth as something to be protected, not plundered. And worse – OMIGOSH – many classroom teachers are <em>union members</em>! So, teachers suddenly find themselves political pawns in the GOP’s culture war. “Our schools are a cesspool of Marxist indoctrination,” squawked Sen. Marco Rubio, and Donald Trump squealed that schools are run by “radical left maniacs” and “pink-haired communists.”</p><p>These right-wing Chicken Littles are demonizing America’s invaluable educators because they need someone for people to hate, providing cover for their unpopular plot to privatize education. But hate can easily backfire on hatemongers – and local teachers are a whole lot more popular than conniving politicos and profiteers.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/chicken-little-attacks-americas-teachers</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:120087026</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2023 14:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/120087026/a0617849103bc081f75648560c8d6256.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/120087026/c2fd9a8682fbae8e109e8f572edebc51.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>I’m a child of privilege. Not the privilege of money (I come from a family of small-town working people). But it was my privilege to grow up in the public schools of Denison, Texas. There I received the rich blessings of dedicated classroom teachers, a diverse student body, playground socialization, librarians, coaches, cafeteria and custodial workers, student politics, vocational training… and a deep appreciation for the unifying value of community and the Common Good. That’s why I’m flabbergasted by today’s clique of corporate profiteers, theocratic zealots, and laissez-faire knuckleheads who’re lobbying furiously across the country to demonize, defund, and dismantle this invaluable social benefit. If ignorance is bliss, they must be ecstatic! Public schools do have some real problems: Politicians constantly slashing education budgets, professional burnout created by understaffing and low pay, the devastating strain of a killer pandemic, and a new-normal of assault-rifle murders. But the profiteers, theocrats, and knuckleheads aren’t interested in those, instead focusing on what they say is the fatal flaw in public education: Teachers. Yes, the claim is that diabolical educators are perverting innocent minds by teaching America’s actual history, showing students that the full diversity of humankind enriches our society, and presenting our Earth as something to be protected, not plundered. And worse – OMIGOSH – many classroom teachers are union members! So, teachers suddenly find themselves political pawns in the GOP’s culture war. “Our schools are a cesspool of Marxist indoctrination,” squawked Sen. Marco Rubio, and Donald Trump squealed that schools are run by “radical left maniacs” and “pink-haired communists.” These right-wing Chicken Littles are demonizing America’s invaluable educators because they need someone for people to hate, providing cover for their unpopular plot to privatize education. But hate can easily backfire on hatemongers – and local teachers are a whole lot more popular than conniving politicos and profiteers. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>I’m a child of privilege. Not the privilege of money (I come from a family of small-town working people). But it was my privilege to grow up in the public schools of Denison, Texas. There I received the rich blessings of dedicated classroom teachers, a diverse student body, playground socialization, librarians, coaches, cafeteria and custodial workers, student politics, vocational training… and a deep appreciation for the unifying value of community and the Common Good. That’s why I’m flabbergasted by today’s clique of corporate profiteers, theocratic zealots, and laissez-faire knuckleheads who’re lobbying furiously across the country to demonize, defund, and dismantle this invaluable social benefit. If ignorance is bliss, they must be ecstatic! Public schools do have some real problems: Politicians constantly slashing education budgets, professional burnout created by understaffing and low pay, the devastating strain of a killer pandemic, and a new-normal of assault-rifle murders. But the profiteers, theocrats, and knuckleheads aren’t interested in those, instead focusing on what they say is the fatal flaw in public education: Teachers. Yes, the claim is that diabolical educators are perverting innocent minds by teaching America’s actual history, showing students that the full diversity of humankind enriches our society, and presenting our Earth as something to be protected, not plundered. And worse – OMIGOSH – many classroom teachers are union members! So, teachers suddenly find themselves political pawns in the GOP’s culture war. “Our schools are a cesspool of Marxist indoctrination,” squawked Sen. Marco Rubio, and Donald Trump squealed that schools are run by “radical left maniacs” and “pink-haired communists.” These right-wing Chicken Littles are demonizing America’s invaluable educators because they need someone for people to hate, providing cover for their unpopular plot to privatize education. But hate can easily backfire on hatemongers – and local teachers are a whole lot more popular than conniving politicos and profiteers. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[A Republican Death Star is Targeting Your Liberty]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>While the Powers That Be constantly warn us about foreign threats to our democracy from Russian trolls, TikTok, etc. – there is scant coverage of an actual assault on our people’s democratic liberties by forces on our own soil.</p><p>It’s coming from extremist, right-wing Republican lawmakers who have autocratic control over more than a score of America’s state governments. Their obscure anti-democracy weapon is called “preemption” – the dangerous power of state officials to nullify laws passed by local people.</p><p>It’s supposed to be used rarely, carefully, and only in emergency situations, but today’s radical Big Government Republicans have weaponized it, routinely overturning local actions that the GOP’s corporate funders don’t like. Local decisions to protect worker safety, outlaw loan sharking, shut down puppy mills, prevent workplace discrimination, stop pollution, control political corruption… and so many more popular democratic reforms are being abolished by Republican autocrats in service to plutocrats. Some 500 more of those usurpations are moving through state legislatures across the country now – with practically no public notice.</p><p>Embarrassingly, GOP leaders in my state of Texas have been leading this charge against the people’s democratic will, and they’re now enacting a nuclearized escalation of their attack. Their new weapon has been dubbed “Death Star” – <a target="_blank" href="https://www.exposedbycmd.org/2023/04/11/texas-death-star-bill-on-track-to-decimate-local-worker-and-consumer-protections/#:~:text=Brad%20Johnson%2FTwitter-,Texas%20%E2%80%9CDeath%20Star%E2%80%9D%20Bill%20on%20Track%20to%20Decimate,Local%20Worker%20and%20Consumer%20Protections&#38;text=An%20omnibus%20regulatory%20preemption%20bill,%2C%20consumers%2C%20and%20the%20environment.">a state law that will </a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.exposedbycmd.org/2023/04/11/texas-death-star-bill-on-track-to-decimate-local-worker-and-consumer-protections/#:~:text=Brad%20Johnson%2FTwitter-,Texas%20%E2%80%9CDeath%20Star%E2%80%9D%20Bill%20on%20Track%20to%20Decimate,Local%20Worker%20and%20Consumer%20Protections&#38;text=An%20omnibus%20regulatory%20preemption%20bill,%2C%20consumers%2C%20and%20the%20environment."><em>preemptively</em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.exposedbycmd.org/2023/04/11/texas-death-star-bill-on-track-to-decimate-local-worker-and-consumer-protections/#:~:text=Brad%20Johnson%2FTwitter-,Texas%20%E2%80%9CDeath%20Star%E2%80%9D%20Bill%20on%20Track%20to%20Decimate,Local%20Worker%20and%20Consumer%20Protections&#38;text=An%20omnibus%20regulatory%20preemption%20bill,%2C%20consumers%2C%20and%20the%20environment."> ban cities and counties from passing corporate regulations stronger than state regulation</a> (which is infamously feeble). The ban – gleefully pushed by a horde of lobbyist for brand-name corporate elites – includes letting corporations overturn <em>existing</em> local protections for workers, consumers, small business, the environment, and others. “We hate cities and counties,” grumped the sponsor of the Death Star law.</p><p>This is a wholesale usurpation of your and my liberty to govern ourselves. In exchange for political funding, GOP officials are literally outsourcing the people’s democratic authority to private profiteers. Learn more at <a target="_blank" href="http://www.supportdemocracy.org">www.supportdemocracy.org</a>.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/a-republican-death-star-is-targeting</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:119053956</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2023 14:43:52 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593009" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/119053956/706ace1e385deb3091130dc4184e39b2.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/119053956/b09b759016226c7aa4f9ffa8e9fce80e.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>While the Powers That Be constantly warn us about foreign threats to our democracy from Russian trolls, TikTok, etc. – there is scant coverage of an actual assault on our people’s democratic liberties by forces on our own soil. It’s coming from extremist, right-wing Republican lawmakers who have autocratic control over more than a score of America’s state governments. Their obscure anti-democracy weapon is called “preemption” – the dangerous power of state officials to nullify laws passed by local people. It’s supposed to be used rarely, carefully, and only in emergency situations, but today’s radical Big Government Republicans have weaponized it, routinely overturning local actions that the GOP’s corporate funders don’t like. Local decisions to protect worker safety, outlaw loan sharking, shut down puppy mills, prevent workplace discrimination, stop pollution, control political corruption… and so many more popular democratic reforms are being abolished by Republican autocrats in service to plutocrats. Some 500 more of those usurpations are moving through state legislatures across the country now – with practically no public notice. Embarrassingly, GOP leaders in my state of Texas have been leading this charge against the people’s democratic will, and they’re now enacting a nuclearized escalation of their attack. Their new weapon has been dubbed “Death Star” – a state law that will preemptively ban cities and counties from passing corporate regulations stronger than state regulation (which is infamously feeble). The ban – gleefully pushed by a horde of lobbyist for brand-name corporate elites – includes letting corporations overturn existing local protections for workers, consumers, small business, the environment, and others. “We hate cities and counties,” grumped the sponsor of the Death Star law. This is a wholesale usurpation of your and my liberty to govern ourselves. In exchange for political funding, GOP officials are literally outsourcing the people’s democratic authority to private profiteers. Learn more at www.supportdemocracy.org. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>While the Powers That Be constantly warn us about foreign threats to our democracy from Russian trolls, TikTok, etc. – there is scant coverage of an actual assault on our people’s democratic liberties by forces on our own soil. It’s coming from extremist, right-wing Republican lawmakers who have autocratic control over more than a score of America’s state governments. Their obscure anti-democracy weapon is called “preemption” – the dangerous power of state officials to nullify laws passed by local people. It’s supposed to be used rarely, carefully, and only in emergency situations, but today’s radical Big Government Republicans have weaponized it, routinely overturning local actions that the GOP’s corporate funders don’t like. Local decisions to protect worker safety, outlaw loan sharking, shut down puppy mills, prevent workplace discrimination, stop pollution, control political corruption… and so many more popular democratic reforms are being abolished by Republican autocrats in service to plutocrats. Some 500 more of those usurpations are moving through state legislatures across the country now – with practically no public notice. Embarrassingly, GOP leaders in my state of Texas have been leading this charge against the people’s democratic will, and they’re now enacting a nuclearized escalation of their attack. Their new weapon has been dubbed “Death Star” – a state law that will preemptively ban cities and counties from passing corporate regulations stronger than state regulation (which is infamously feeble). The ban – gleefully pushed by a horde of lobbyist for brand-name corporate elites – includes letting corporations overturn existing local protections for workers, consumers, small business, the environment, and others. “We hate cities and counties,” grumped the sponsor of the Death Star law. This is a wholesale usurpation of your and my liberty to govern ourselves. In exchange for political funding, GOP officials are literally outsourcing the people’s democratic authority to private profiteers. Learn more at www.supportdemocracy.org. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Let’s Admit It: The Supreme Court is Corrupt. Let’s Fix It.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>When public officials get themselves mired in the muck of corruption, they can always count on Sen. Ted Cruz to issue a moral judgement: If the offender is a Democrat, he pronounces the corruption inexcusably grotesque; if it’s a Republican, he wails that the offender is the victim.</p><p>For example, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was recently caught (yet again) butt-deep in judicial immorality, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.propublica.org/article/clarence-thomas-harlan-crow-real-estate-scotus">taking hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of freebies from a Texas real estate baron</a> who has both a partisan and corporate interest in Thomas’ court rulings. So, Cruz to the rescue! No judicial impropriety here, he squawks, for this is nothing but a diabolical plot by Democrats to “<a target="_blank" href="https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/3980799-ted-cruz-decries-political-smear-job-against-clarence-thomas-for-ethics-questions/">smear</a>” poor Clarence.</p><p>But Thomas is busy <em>smearing himself</em>, so Dems can just take the advice of Woodrow Wilson: “Never attempt to murder a man who’s committing suicide.” From the start of his court tenure, Thomas has been a shameless seeker of personal gain, tucking untold sums from untold sources in the inner pockets of his judicial robes. He learned to <a target="_blank" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2023/04/06/clarence-thomas-gifts-disclosure-court/">hide his corruption in 2004</a>, when he actually reported taking pricey gifts from a special interest, which got him widely condemned. So, he “reformed” – no he didn’t quit taking gimmes, he just quit disclosing them!</p><p>Thomas is a supreme grifter, but sadly he’s not alone. Many recent justices have fallen from the pedestal of judicial integrity, cozying up to the moneyed interests. Gifts aside, we now have a hyper-partisan, right-wing Republican majority taking their judicial opinions from those same interests, turning America’s unelected Third Branch of government into an autocratic, plutocratic political agency. Then they wonder why their public approval rating – and legitimacy – are in the ditch!</p><p>Since they won’t reform themselves, We the People must do it for them. To help, go to <a target="_blank" href="http://fixthecourt.com">fixthecourt.com</a>.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/lets-admit-it-the-supreme-court-is-b2c</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:119050339</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2023 15:11:54 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2589352" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/119050339/cfb8e15ba18de58e16657bca231d86ce.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>129</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/119050339/600a8af98cc191d7603b811a21f91bc8.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>When public officials get themselves mired in the muck of corruption, they can always count on Sen. Ted Cruz to issue a moral judgement: If the offender is a Democrat, he pronounces the corruption inexcusably grotesque; if it’s a Republican, he wails that the offender is the victim. For example, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was recently caught (yet again) butt-deep in judicial immorality, taking hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of freebies from a Texas real estate baron who has both a partisan and corporate interest in Thomas’ court rulings. So, Cruz to the rescue! No judicial impropriety here, he squawks, for this is nothing but a diabolical plot by Democrats to “smear” poor Clarence. But Thomas is busy smearing himself, so Dems can just take the advice of Woodrow Wilson: “Never attempt to murder a man who’s committing suicide.” From the start of his court tenure, Thomas has been a shameless seeker of personal gain, tucking untold sums from untold sources in the inner pockets of his judicial robes. He learned to hide his corruption in 2004, when he actually reported taking pricey gifts from a special interest, which got him widely condemned. So, he “reformed” – no he didn’t quit taking gimmes, he just quit disclosing them! Thomas is a supreme grifter, but sadly he’s not alone. Many recent justices have fallen from the pedestal of judicial integrity, cozying up to the moneyed interests. Gifts aside, we now have a hyper-partisan, right-wing Republican majority taking their judicial opinions from those same interests, turning America’s unelected Third Branch of government into an autocratic, plutocratic political agency. Then they wonder why their public approval rating – and legitimacy – are in the ditch! Since they won’t reform themselves, We the People must do it for them. To help, go to fixthecourt.com. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>When public officials get themselves mired in the muck of corruption, they can always count on Sen. Ted Cruz to issue a moral judgement: If the offender is a Democrat, he pronounces the corruption inexcusably grotesque; if it’s a Republican, he wails that the offender is the victim. For example, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was recently caught (yet again) butt-deep in judicial immorality, taking hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of freebies from a Texas real estate baron who has both a partisan and corporate interest in Thomas’ court rulings. So, Cruz to the rescue! No judicial impropriety here, he squawks, for this is nothing but a diabolical plot by Democrats to “smear” poor Clarence. But Thomas is busy smearing himself, so Dems can just take the advice of Woodrow Wilson: “Never attempt to murder a man who’s committing suicide.” From the start of his court tenure, Thomas has been a shameless seeker of personal gain, tucking untold sums from untold sources in the inner pockets of his judicial robes. He learned to hide his corruption in 2004, when he actually reported taking pricey gifts from a special interest, which got him widely condemned. So, he “reformed” – no he didn’t quit taking gimmes, he just quit disclosing them! Thomas is a supreme grifter, but sadly he’s not alone. Many recent justices have fallen from the pedestal of judicial integrity, cozying up to the moneyed interests. Gifts aside, we now have a hyper-partisan, right-wing Republican majority taking their judicial opinions from those same interests, turning America’s unelected Third Branch of government into an autocratic, plutocratic political agency. Then they wonder why their public approval rating – and legitimacy – are in the ditch! Since they won’t reform themselves, We the People must do it for them. To help, go to fixthecourt.com. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Here’s Something Good About Texas!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Given the rabid rightwingism of most Republican officeholders in my state of Texas, you might assume that the climate here is only fit for rattlesnakes, scorpions, and venomous critters of pious political extremism.</p><p>Yet, the true Texas political character (historically and currently) is vehemently anti-corporate and deeply rooted in the uniting ethic of the Common Good. For an historic example, look to the state’s first constitution – it <em>outlawed</em> banks and required a two-thirds vote of the legislature to form a corporation!</p><p>And today, grassroots Texans in the rural town of Llano have just demonstrated the power of progressive community values that are common in this supposedly-conservative state. The issue was book-banning – a batch of political extremists had decided to purge the public library of 17 books. Porno! they shrieked. Yet, <em>none</em> are pornographic. They are simply about ideas and realities that Republican culture-war zealots don’t like – namely books documenting the history of institutional racism in America and the normality of America’s LGBTQ community.</p><p>Common sense Llano locals rebelled, suing the county government for autocratically trying to control the people’s freedom to read and learn. And, a federal judge has now ruled that the book banning was flagrantly unconstitutional, ordering the targeted titles back on the shelves.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/heres-something-good-about-texas</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:117144907</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2023 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/117144907/c9a3c4f9de9d38ebd6380d07d90415d9.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/117144907/afa9190a7481210e802589c2ed758337.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Given the rabid rightwingism of most Republican officeholders in my state of Texas, you might assume that the climate here is only fit for rattlesnakes, scorpions, and venomous critters of pious political extremism. Yet, the true Texas political character (historically and currently) is vehemently anti-corporate and deeply rooted in the uniting ethic of the Common Good. For an historic example, look to the state’s first constitution – it outlawed banks and required a two-thirds vote of the legislature to form a corporation! And today, grassroots Texans in the rural town of Llano have just demonstrated the power of progressive community values that are common in this supposedly-conservative state. The issue was book-banning – a batch of political extremists had decided to purge the public library of 17 books. Porno! they shrieked. Yet, none are pornographic. They are simply about ideas and realities that Republican culture-war zealots don’t like – namely books documenting the history of institutional racism in America and the normality of America’s LGBTQ community. Common sense Llano locals rebelled, suing the county government for autocratically trying to control the people’s freedom to read and learn. And, a federal judge has now ruled that the book banning was flagrantly unconstitutional, ordering the targeted titles back on the shelves. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Given the rabid rightwingism of most Republican officeholders in my state of Texas, you might assume that the climate here is only fit for rattlesnakes, scorpions, and venomous critters of pious political extremism. Yet, the true Texas political character (historically and currently) is vehemently anti-corporate and deeply rooted in the uniting ethic of the Common Good. For an historic example, look to the state’s first constitution – it outlawed banks and required a two-thirds vote of the legislature to form a corporation! And today, grassroots Texans in the rural town of Llano have just demonstrated the power of progressive community values that are common in this supposedly-conservative state. The issue was book-banning – a batch of political extremists had decided to purge the public library of 17 books. Porno! they shrieked. Yet, none are pornographic. They are simply about ideas and realities that Republican culture-war zealots don’t like – namely books documenting the history of institutional racism in America and the normality of America’s LGBTQ community. Common sense Llano locals rebelled, suing the county government for autocratically trying to control the people’s freedom to read and learn. And, a federal judge has now ruled that the book banning was flagrantly unconstitutional, ordering the targeted titles back on the shelves. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Steve Rattner Explains Your Life’s Purpose For You]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Do you find it as charming as I do when some leisure-class corporate chieftain whines that America’s working stiffs are a bunch of slackers?</p><p>We’re hearing that now from Wall Street plutocrats, grumping that employees no longer have that old nose-to-the-grindstone, “yes-boss” work ethic of old-school capitalism that has created such fabulous wealth. Of course, “wealth for whom” and “work for what?” are at the root of today’s questioning of the old culture and structure of work. But the grumpers don’t want to hear that, so they simply carp that America has “gone soft.”</p><p>The latest high-flying scolder is Steven Rattner, the Wall Street huckster who was fined $6 million in 2010 for running a kickback scheme and banned from investment banking for two years. But now he’s back in the financial hustle, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/22/opinion/remote-work-salesforce-meta-working-from-home.html">feeling free to chastise you for what he sees as your lack of hustle on the job</a>.</p><p>In particular, Steve is peeved at you work-from-home people, asserting with no actual evidence you’re not really working. He claims it will inevitably lead to “a lower standard of living” – a standard he measures strictly in money, not quality of life. Indeed, he says that your life should <em>be</em> work – pointing with envy to China’s “996” system, a grinding ethic of expecting people to work from 9am to 9pm 6 days a week. Then Rattner offers a grand solution to dissuade work-from-home arrangements: Housing. Why, he asks, have a big majority of European workers already returned to their offices? Simple, he says – most people there live in small apartments and houses, making stay-at-home work less comfortable. Voila! Put America’s workers in tiny houses and office space will fill up.</p><p>See – life is simple if you view it from the heights of Wall Street. Thank you, Steve. Now go away.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/steve-rattner-explains-your-lifes</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:117138891</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/117138891/e3f5ca1559056682d0b887f3c26bd932.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/117138891/b30a4c5e4d2aec1d3d5a17307a995b98.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Do you find it as charming as I do when some leisure-class corporate chieftain whines that America’s working stiffs are a bunch of slackers? We’re hearing that now from Wall Street plutocrats, grumping that employees no longer have that old nose-to-the-grindstone, “yes-boss” work ethic of old-school capitalism that has created such fabulous wealth. Of course, “wealth for whom” and “work for what?” are at the root of today’s questioning of the old culture and structure of work. But the grumpers don’t want to hear that, so they simply carp that America has “gone soft.” The latest high-flying scolder is Steven Rattner, the Wall Street huckster who was fined $6 million in 2010 for running a kickback scheme and banned from investment banking for two years. But now he’s back in the financial hustle, feeling free to chastise you for what he sees as your lack of hustle on the job. In particular, Steve is peeved at you work-from-home people, asserting with no actual evidence you’re not really working. He claims it will inevitably lead to “a lower standard of living” – a standard he measures strictly in money, not quality of life. Indeed, he says that your life should be work – pointing with envy to China’s “996” system, a grinding ethic of expecting people to work from 9am to 9pm 6 days a week. Then Rattner offers a grand solution to dissuade work-from-home arrangements: Housing. Why, he asks, have a big majority of European workers already returned to their offices? Simple, he says – most people there live in small apartments and houses, making stay-at-home work less comfortable. Voila! Put America’s workers in tiny houses and office space will fill up. See – life is simple if you view it from the heights of Wall Street. Thank you, Steve. Now go away. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Do you find it as charming as I do when some leisure-class corporate chieftain whines that America’s working stiffs are a bunch of slackers? We’re hearing that now from Wall Street plutocrats, grumping that employees no longer have that old nose-to-the-grindstone, “yes-boss” work ethic of old-school capitalism that has created such fabulous wealth. Of course, “wealth for whom” and “work for what?” are at the root of today’s questioning of the old culture and structure of work. But the grumpers don’t want to hear that, so they simply carp that America has “gone soft.” The latest high-flying scolder is Steven Rattner, the Wall Street huckster who was fined $6 million in 2010 for running a kickback scheme and banned from investment banking for two years. But now he’s back in the financial hustle, feeling free to chastise you for what he sees as your lack of hustle on the job. In particular, Steve is peeved at you work-from-home people, asserting with no actual evidence you’re not really working. He claims it will inevitably lead to “a lower standard of living” – a standard he measures strictly in money, not quality of life. Indeed, he says that your life should be work – pointing with envy to China’s “996” system, a grinding ethic of expecting people to work from 9am to 9pm 6 days a week. Then Rattner offers a grand solution to dissuade work-from-home arrangements: Housing. Why, he asks, have a big majority of European workers already returned to their offices? Simple, he says – most people there live in small apartments and houses, making stay-at-home work less comfortable. Voila! Put America’s workers in tiny houses and office space will fill up. See – life is simple if you view it from the heights of Wall Street. Thank you, Steve. Now go away. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chat & Chew! Beyond Book Banning: the Movement to Control America]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>You’ve probably heard the news out of Texas, Missouri, Michigan, Idaho and more— sudden and inexplicable protests against books and demands that they be removed from libraries. And you’ve also probably noticed that the books getting banned seem to have things in common with one another, like the prominence of LGBTQ+ characters, or themes that explore racial justice—or the lack thereof—in America. Could this seemingly “spontaneous” movement represent something more?</p><p>Hightower welcomes <strong>Emily Drabinski</strong>, incoming president of the <strong>American Library Association,</strong> and <strong>Nadine Farid Johnson</strong>, managing director of <strong>PEN America</strong> Washington and and Free Expression Programs, to discuss… and talk about actions you can take to protect your local library.</p><p>Links we discussed:</p><p>* Unite Against Book Bans: <a target="_blank" href="https://uniteagainstbookbans.org/">https://uniteagainstbookbans.org/</a></p><p>* American Library Association: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.ala.org/advocacy/bbooks">https://www.ala.org/advocacy/bbooks</a></p><p>* PEN America’s Banned Books resources: <a target="_blank" href="https://pen.org/issue/book-bans/">https://pen.org/issue/book-bans/</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.route-fifty.com/management/2022/09/library-consumed-controversy-began-over-book-it-didnt-even-have/376668/">Boundary County, Idaho’s ban of books it didn’t own</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.tpr.org/news/2023-04-13/llano-county-library-will-remain-open-despite-effort-to-shut-it-down-over-book-ban">People of Llano County, Texas, supporting their library</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.queernorthshore.org/">Queer Northshore</a> in St Tammany Parish, LA</p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://truthout.org/articles/progressive-library-boards-can-block-right-wing-censorship-heres-how/">More on running for your local library board from Emily</a></p><p>* <em>The Hips on the Drag Queen Go Swish, Swish, Swish</em></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://ffrf.org/component/k2/item/23733-an-x-rated-book-sex-obscenity-in-the-bible">Freedom from Religion Foundation’s full list of sexual references in the Bible</a></p><p>* <a target="_blank" href="https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/lilkalish/black-queer-author-mom-blasts-book-ban">Author George M Johnson’s mother testifies before a local board on their behalf</a></p><p>We’re working on a full transcript of the show! We’ll update the show page when we have it ready.</p><p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/chat-and-chew-beyond-book-banning</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:117029860</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2023 21:26:31 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="33862917" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/117029860/87c66994c8240d7e806be90a4aa2f6b5.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>2822</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/117029860/c8c3224736b2d5f00f0fec4a48afe37d.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>You’ve probably heard the news out of Texas, Missouri, Michigan, Idaho and more— sudden and inexplicable protests against books and demands that they be removed from libraries. And you’ve also probably noticed that the books getting banned seem to have things in common with one another, like the prominence of LGBTQ+ characters, or themes that explore racial justice—or the lack thereof—in America. Could this seemingly “spontaneous” movement represent something more? Hightower welcomes Emily Drabinski, incoming president of the American Library Association, and Nadine Farid Johnson, managing director of PEN America Washington and and Free Expression Programs, to discuss… and talk about actions you can take to protect your local library. Links we discussed: * Unite Against Book Bans: https://uniteagainstbookbans.org/ * American Library Association: https://www.ala.org/advocacy/bbooks * PEN America’s Banned Books resources: https://pen.org/issue/book-bans/ * Boundary County, Idaho’s ban of books it didn’t own * People of Llano County, Texas, supporting their library * Queer Northshore in St Tammany Parish, LA * More on running for your local library board from Emily * The Hips on the Drag Queen Go Swish, Swish, Swish * Freedom from Religion Foundation’s full list of sexual references in the Bible * Author George M Johnson’s mother testifies before a local board on their behalf We’re working on a full transcript of the show! We’ll update the show page when we have it ready. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>You’ve probably heard the news out of Texas, Missouri, Michigan, Idaho and more— sudden and inexplicable protests against books and demands that they be removed from libraries. And you’ve also probably noticed that the books getting banned seem to have things in common with one another, like the prominence of LGBTQ+ characters, or themes that explore racial justice—or the lack thereof—in America. Could this seemingly “spontaneous” movement represent something more? Hightower welcomes Emily Drabinski, incoming president of the American Library Association, and Nadine Farid Johnson, managing director of PEN America Washington and and Free Expression Programs, to discuss… and talk about actions you can take to protect your local library. Links we discussed: * Unite Against Book Bans: https://uniteagainstbookbans.org/ * American Library Association: https://www.ala.org/advocacy/bbooks * PEN America’s Banned Books resources: https://pen.org/issue/book-bans/ * Boundary County, Idaho’s ban of books it didn’t own * People of Llano County, Texas, supporting their library * Queer Northshore in St Tammany Parish, LA * More on running for your local library board from Emily * The Hips on the Drag Queen Go Swish, Swish, Swish * Freedom from Religion Foundation’s full list of sexual references in the Bible * Author George M Johnson’s mother testifies before a local board on their behalf We’re working on a full transcript of the show! We’ll update the show page when we have it ready. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[How Many Words Does It Take to Say “Class War”?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>These days, America’s top economic officials tend to speak in unintelligible bureaucratic gobbledygook. But, once upon a time, there was a <em>plainspoken</em> White House economist, and he even had a sense of humor. He didn’t last.</p><p>Alfred Kahn was chastised by the White House in 1978 for speaking clearly and honestly about the looming possibility of a depression: “Too blunt… use softer words!” So Kahn started calling the downturn a looming “banana.” When banana industry lobbyists complained, he switched to “kumquat.”</p><p>In that spirit, let me warn you about an unemployment “taco” that the autocratic Federal Reserve system is cooking up for working families. The Fed (as it is called by jolly bankers who run it) says it is imposing “the restoration between supply and demand in the labor market.” They soothingly add that “there will very likely be some softening in labor market conditions.”</p><p>You can almost hear them humming Rock-a-bye Baby, but don’t nod off. As Bryce Covert, the insightful economic digger and truthteller <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/31/opinion/federal-reserve-inflation-jerome-powell.html">recently explained</a>, there’s nothing soft about the Fed’s arbitrary policy – it means “fewer raises and more people out of work… which means about 1.5 million people will lose their jobs.” She documents that, historically, such a jolt of unemployment will probably (get ready for scary words) “trigger a recession.” Or a “taco” if that makes you feel better.</p><p>The mumbo-jumbo of economists aside, what we have here is the same old power play of moneyed elites putting the jobs and wages of working families on the chopping block to jack up the exorbitant profits of monopolistic corporations. When the Fed bankers say they’re “restoring balance,” they mean restoring the power of corporate bosses to rule unilaterally over America’s workaday majority.</p><p>In plain language, this is blatant class war by the privileged few against the many.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/how-many-words-does-it-take-to-say</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:115875273</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2023 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/115875273/a2ec890e1d57d2906ec2db3fcb639b44.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/115875273/8263ec8540f6e74335f9f211e51d7414.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>These days, America’s top economic officials tend to speak in unintelligible bureaucratic gobbledygook. But, once upon a time, there was a plainspoken White House economist, and he even had a sense of humor. He didn’t last. Alfred Kahn was chastised by the White House in 1978 for speaking clearly and honestly about the looming possibility of a depression: “Too blunt… use softer words!” So Kahn started calling the downturn a looming “banana.” When banana industry lobbyists complained, he switched to “kumquat.” In that spirit, let me warn you about an unemployment “taco” that the autocratic Federal Reserve system is cooking up for working families. The Fed (as it is called by jolly bankers who run it) says it is imposing “the restoration between supply and demand in the labor market.” They soothingly add that “there will very likely be some softening in labor market conditions.” You can almost hear them humming Rock-a-bye Baby, but don’t nod off. As Bryce Covert, the insightful economic digger and truthteller recently explained, there’s nothing soft about the Fed’s arbitrary policy – it means “fewer raises and more people out of work… which means about 1.5 million people will lose their jobs.” She documents that, historically, such a jolt of unemployment will probably (get ready for scary words) “trigger a recession.” Or a “taco” if that makes you feel better. The mumbo-jumbo of economists aside, what we have here is the same old power play of moneyed elites putting the jobs and wages of working families on the chopping block to jack up the exorbitant profits of monopolistic corporations. When the Fed bankers say they’re “restoring balance,” they mean restoring the power of corporate bosses to rule unilaterally over America’s workaday majority. In plain language, this is blatant class war by the privileged few against the many. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>These days, America’s top economic officials tend to speak in unintelligible bureaucratic gobbledygook. But, once upon a time, there was a plainspoken White House economist, and he even had a sense of humor. He didn’t last. Alfred Kahn was chastised by the White House in 1978 for speaking clearly and honestly about the looming possibility of a depression: “Too blunt… use softer words!” So Kahn started calling the downturn a looming “banana.” When banana industry lobbyists complained, he switched to “kumquat.” In that spirit, let me warn you about an unemployment “taco” that the autocratic Federal Reserve system is cooking up for working families. The Fed (as it is called by jolly bankers who run it) says it is imposing “the restoration between supply and demand in the labor market.” They soothingly add that “there will very likely be some softening in labor market conditions.” You can almost hear them humming Rock-a-bye Baby, but don’t nod off. As Bryce Covert, the insightful economic digger and truthteller recently explained, there’s nothing soft about the Fed’s arbitrary policy – it means “fewer raises and more people out of work… which means about 1.5 million people will lose their jobs.” She documents that, historically, such a jolt of unemployment will probably (get ready for scary words) “trigger a recession.” Or a “taco” if that makes you feel better. The mumbo-jumbo of economists aside, what we have here is the same old power play of moneyed elites putting the jobs and wages of working families on the chopping block to jack up the exorbitant profits of monopolistic corporations. When the Fed bankers say they’re “restoring balance,” they mean restoring the power of corporate bosses to rule unilaterally over America’s workaday majority. In plain language, this is blatant class war by the privileged few against the many. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[What If Democrats Decided to Campaign as Real Democrats?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Way to go, Wisconsin!</p><p>In a momentous progressive win, voters there elected County Judge Janet Protasiewicz to their state supreme court. She thumped a mega-MAGA-Republican by 11 points in a pivotal race, ending a dark decade of unbridled right-wing partisan extremism by that court’s GOP majority.</p><p>But the vote has profound implications reaching far beyond the Badger State. Its deeper meaning was brought home to me on election eve when the Republican candidate – a Trump-hugging, gerrymandering, antichoice lawyer – complained that, “Doing a statewide campaign… is kind of hard.”  Well, yes, but to paraphrase a song by a band called the Austin Lounge Lizards, “Campaigning is hard/But it’s harder when you’re stupid.”</p><p>Not that the lawyer lacked intellect, but smart is as smart does. What the swing state of Wisconsin showed is that this right-wing candidate and other arrogant GOP fanatics are stupid if they think people won’t care that (1) Republicans are shutting people out of the voting booth, and (2) they’re running as ideological autocrats promising to use state power to outlaw the inherent right of a woman to make her own, deeply-personal decision about abortion.</p><p>Moreover, Judge Janet’s big win sends a gut-check message to meek Democratic Party officials and donors who continually admonish candidates and local activists to be middle-of-the-roaders, compromising the people’s “little-d” democratic principles in hopes of winning some Republican votes. Protasiewicz was straight with voters, proudly campaigning to be a pro-choice, pro-worker, pro-democracy justice.</p><p>Because of both the integrity and clarity of her message, she generated a record turnout, greatly increased participation by women and young voters, and – especially noteworthy – made significant inroads in rural and working-class counties that had been considered Trump country. She showed that if Democrats stand up for the people – hello – people will stand up for Democrats.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/what-if-democrats-decided-to-campaign</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:115656032</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 17:00:20 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/115656032/31290f7499121d32bb0241591b4a2c66.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/115656032/3623f8c0b62941bfffb203f8ba50ce93.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Way to go, Wisconsin! In a momentous progressive win, voters there elected County Judge Janet Protasiewicz to their state supreme court. She thumped a mega-MAGA-Republican by 11 points in a pivotal race, ending a dark decade of unbridled right-wing partisan extremism by that court’s GOP majority. But the vote has profound implications reaching far beyond the Badger State. Its deeper meaning was brought home to me on election eve when the Republican candidate – a Trump-hugging, gerrymandering, antichoice lawyer – complained that, “Doing a statewide campaign… is kind of hard.”  Well, yes, but to paraphrase a song by a band called the Austin Lounge Lizards, “Campaigning is hard/But it’s harder when you’re stupid.” Not that the lawyer lacked intellect, but smart is as smart does. What the swing state of Wisconsin showed is that this right-wing candidate and other arrogant GOP fanatics are stupid if they think people won’t care that (1) Republicans are shutting people out of the voting booth, and (2) they’re running as ideological autocrats promising to use state power to outlaw the inherent right of a woman to make her own, deeply-personal decision about abortion. Moreover, Judge Janet’s big win sends a gut-check message to meek Democratic Party officials and donors who continually admonish candidates and local activists to be middle-of-the-roaders, compromising the people’s “little-d” democratic principles in hopes of winning some Republican votes. Protasiewicz was straight with voters, proudly campaigning to be a pro-choice, pro-worker, pro-democracy justice. Because of both the integrity and clarity of her message, she generated a record turnout, greatly increased participation by women and young voters, and – especially noteworthy – made significant inroads in rural and working-class counties that had been considered Trump country. She showed that if Democrats stand up for the people – hello – people will stand up for Democrats. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Way to go, Wisconsin! In a momentous progressive win, voters there elected County Judge Janet Protasiewicz to their state supreme court. She thumped a mega-MAGA-Republican by 11 points in a pivotal race, ending a dark decade of unbridled right-wing partisan extremism by that court’s GOP majority. But the vote has profound implications reaching far beyond the Badger State. Its deeper meaning was brought home to me on election eve when the Republican candidate – a Trump-hugging, gerrymandering, antichoice lawyer – complained that, “Doing a statewide campaign… is kind of hard.”  Well, yes, but to paraphrase a song by a band called the Austin Lounge Lizards, “Campaigning is hard/But it’s harder when you’re stupid.” Not that the lawyer lacked intellect, but smart is as smart does. What the swing state of Wisconsin showed is that this right-wing candidate and other arrogant GOP fanatics are stupid if they think people won’t care that (1) Republicans are shutting people out of the voting booth, and (2) they’re running as ideological autocrats promising to use state power to outlaw the inherent right of a woman to make her own, deeply-personal decision about abortion. Moreover, Judge Janet’s big win sends a gut-check message to meek Democratic Party officials and donors who continually admonish candidates and local activists to be middle-of-the-roaders, compromising the people’s “little-d” democratic principles in hopes of winning some Republican votes. Protasiewicz was straight with voters, proudly campaigning to be a pro-choice, pro-worker, pro-democracy justice. Because of both the integrity and clarity of her message, she generated a record turnout, greatly increased participation by women and young voters, and – especially noteworthy – made significant inroads in rural and working-class counties that had been considered Trump country. She showed that if Democrats stand up for the people – hello – people will stand up for Democrats. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Isn’t the Death of Local News National News? ]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>My city’s daily newspaper has gotten so emaciated it should be in hospice care.</p><p>Its  front “section” is down to six pages, half of which are cheap ads, and nearly all of its articles are out-of-date, cut-and-paste pieces bought from out-of-state “content providers.” This embarrassment, put out by the Gannett chain of over 1,100 cadaverous papers, pretends to be the “news” source for Austin, a vibrant city of a million people and the capitol of the second-largest state in America! Gannett, owned by a multibillion-dollar Japanese hedge fund, profits by buying up local papers, firing most of the news staff, raising prices, selling off the papers’ assets, then killing the paper.</p><p>If your town’s publication is a now a Gannett property, look to Salinas, California for its future. The 152-year-old Salinas <em>Californian</em> was this important region’s main news artery until its hedge-funders started hacking. The paper was down to one reporter last December, but that lone journalist quit – <a target="_blank" href="https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2023-03-27/as-the-salinas-californian-withers-a-city-yearns-to-know-its-stories">and the </a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2023-03-27/as-the-salinas-californian-withers-a-city-yearns-to-know-its-stories"><em>Californian</em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2023-03-27/as-the-salinas-californian-withers-a-city-yearns-to-know-its-stories"> is now a “newspaper” without reporters </a>– meaning no coverage of elections, city hall, sports, police, workplace issues… etc.</p><p>The Salinas paper is technically alive, overseen until recently by another Gannett paper – located 300 miles away! Now, says the chain’s comically-named “Center for Community Journalism,” Salinas residents can get their news by reading Gannett’s national paper, USA Today.</p><p>In fairness, Gannett’s bosses <em>are</em> making major investments. In themselves. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.niemanlab.org/reading/in-2021-gannett-paid-its-ceo-mike-reed-7-74-million-while-cutting-its-overall-headcount-by-24/">CEO Mike Reed’s salary this year</a> is $8 million for helping gut local news. And while the global chain’s owners won’t pay for a reporter in Salinas, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.yahoo.com/now/gannett-launches-share-buyback-100m-175330913.html?guccounter=1&#38;guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&#38;guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAIWPkLFEBVEBO3FaSUxNHV-oU6vlhWIEzRe9qlnKd5PVvOn7AMyAcLBhRYmsr8JJ9ge3us4z_ys2VxTYYBqMiSAYfUIVpUhiYHtlqwqC9t-iU8YPyK17V6PCR_8LQ8VuWOdkITW3_V8y6Tlvawyz-N4Ctyq4SOmv9tZHhDDsrMp-">they will spend $100 million for a stock buyback scheme</a> that will artificially jack up their own wealth. This is a blockbuster story of real news affecting real people and democracy itself. So how man Gannett “news” papers do you guess are covering it?</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-isnt-the-death-of-local-news</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:114132113</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/114132113/383fa5779a96572447ab9dc7b94a1c6e.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/114132113/24433f8d87e508de5c436c501420a238.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>My city’s daily newspaper has gotten so emaciated it should be in hospice care. Its  front “section” is down to six pages, half of which are cheap ads, and nearly all of its articles are out-of-date, cut-and-paste pieces bought from out-of-state “content providers.” This embarrassment, put out by the Gannett chain of over 1,100 cadaverous papers, pretends to be the “news” source for Austin, a vibrant city of a million people and the capitol of the second-largest state in America! Gannett, owned by a multibillion-dollar Japanese hedge fund, profits by buying up local papers, firing most of the news staff, raising prices, selling off the papers’ assets, then killing the paper. If your town’s publication is a now a Gannett property, look to Salinas, California for its future. The 152-year-old Salinas Californian was this important region’s main news artery until its hedge-funders started hacking. The paper was down to one reporter last December, but that lone journalist quit – and the Californian is now a “newspaper” without reporters – meaning no coverage of elections, city hall, sports, police, workplace issues… etc. The Salinas paper is technically alive, overseen until recently by another Gannett paper – located 300 miles away! Now, says the chain’s comically-named “Center for Community Journalism,” Salinas residents can get their news by reading Gannett’s national paper, USA Today. In fairness, Gannett’s bosses are making major investments. In themselves. CEO Mike Reed’s salary this year is $8 million for helping gut local news. And while the global chain’s owners won’t pay for a reporter in Salinas, they will spend $100 million for a stock buyback scheme that will artificially jack up their own wealth. This is a blockbuster story of real news affecting real people and democracy itself. So how man Gannett “news” papers do you guess are covering it? Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>My city’s daily newspaper has gotten so emaciated it should be in hospice care. Its  front “section” is down to six pages, half of which are cheap ads, and nearly all of its articles are out-of-date, cut-and-paste pieces bought from out-of-state “content providers.” This embarrassment, put out by the Gannett chain of over 1,100 cadaverous papers, pretends to be the “news” source for Austin, a vibrant city of a million people and the capitol of the second-largest state in America! Gannett, owned by a multibillion-dollar Japanese hedge fund, profits by buying up local papers, firing most of the news staff, raising prices, selling off the papers’ assets, then killing the paper. If your town’s publication is a now a Gannett property, look to Salinas, California for its future. The 152-year-old Salinas Californian was this important region’s main news artery until its hedge-funders started hacking. The paper was down to one reporter last December, but that lone journalist quit – and the Californian is now a “newspaper” without reporters – meaning no coverage of elections, city hall, sports, police, workplace issues… etc. The Salinas paper is technically alive, overseen until recently by another Gannett paper – located 300 miles away! Now, says the chain’s comically-named “Center for Community Journalism,” Salinas residents can get their news by reading Gannett’s national paper, USA Today. In fairness, Gannett’s bosses are making major investments. In themselves. CEO Mike Reed’s salary this year is $8 million for helping gut local news. And while the global chain’s owners won’t pay for a reporter in Salinas, they will spend $100 million for a stock buyback scheme that will artificially jack up their own wealth. This is a blockbuster story of real news affecting real people and democracy itself. So how man Gannett “news” papers do you guess are covering it? Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[GOP “Preemption” Is a Euphemism for Creeping Autocracy]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>It’s always instructive to hear powerful political officials declare that in the name of democracy, they must usurp the people’s democratic authority.</p><p>This has become all too common, as even so-called democratic regimes in France and Israel have infuriated their people by trying to ram vastly unpopular, anti-democratic schemes into law by executive fiat. Luckily, though, our US of A remains committed to The People’s rule right? Moreover, our leaders agree that local government is best, for it is closest to the people, right?</p><p>Uh… no… and no. Since the once-conservative Republican Party has turned extremist and downright goofy during the past decade, its governors and lawmakers have become knee-jerk autocrats, imposing their unpopular policies through a crude power play called “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.newamerica.org/political-reform/reports/punching-down/part-one-state-preemption-unleashed/">Preemption</a>.”</p><p>This is the despotic use of arbitrary state power to cancel any town, city, or county policies that Republican politicians don’t like. Preemption is an extreme governing tool meant to be rarely used in emergency situations, but GOP-controlled statehouses in Florida, Texas, Ohio, and elsewhere now use it routinely as an ideological sledgehammer, crushing the right of local people to govern themselves.</p><p>This has let extremist Republican officials force some of their racist, homophobic, and xenophobic nastiness on communities that vehemently oppose them. But most Republican preemptions are issued in service to corporate elites. For example, when local communities try to raise the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.epi.org/preemption-map/">minimum wage for working families</a>, stop Big Oil <a target="_blank" href="https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/all-politics-not-local">fracking abuses</a>, or <a target="_blank" href="https://www.supportdemocracy.org/preemption">prevent corporate money from corrupting local politics</a> – corporate-serving governors rush to outlaw the people’s will and preserve the abusive power of rank profiteers.</p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://thehill.com/policy/equilibrium-sustainability/3912877-texas-preemption-bills-escalate-war-between-liberal-cities-conservative-legislature/">Texas lawmakers are even trying to supersize and privatize preemption with a blanket decree</a> that all local ordinances restricting corporations are overruled by state law – even proposing that corporate executives themselves can overturn local actions. To fight these autocrats, go to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.supportdemocracy.org">www.supportdemocracy.org</a>.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/gop-preemption-is-a-euphemism-for</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:114130491</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 16:51:36 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/114130491/a54d4dc24fbed7e73805215d11f78122.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/114130491/39c83c56cd63f80984e6155165d8377b.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>It’s always instructive to hear powerful political officials declare that in the name of democracy, they must usurp the people’s democratic authority. This has become all too common, as even so-called democratic regimes in France and Israel have infuriated their people by trying to ram vastly unpopular, anti-democratic schemes into law by executive fiat. Luckily, though, our US of A remains committed to The People’s rule right? Moreover, our leaders agree that local government is best, for it is closest to the people, right? Uh… no… and no. Since the once-conservative Republican Party has turned extremist and downright goofy during the past decade, its governors and lawmakers have become knee-jerk autocrats, imposing their unpopular policies through a crude power play called “Preemption.” This is the despotic use of arbitrary state power to cancel any town, city, or county policies that Republican politicians don’t like. Preemption is an extreme governing tool meant to be rarely used in emergency situations, but GOP-controlled statehouses in Florida, Texas, Ohio, and elsewhere now use it routinely as an ideological sledgehammer, crushing the right of local people to govern themselves. This has let extremist Republican officials force some of their racist, homophobic, and xenophobic nastiness on communities that vehemently oppose them. But most Republican preemptions are issued in service to corporate elites. For example, when local communities try to raise the minimum wage for working families, stop Big Oil fracking abuses, or prevent corporate money from corrupting local politics – corporate-serving governors rush to outlaw the people’s will and preserve the abusive power of rank profiteers. Texas lawmakers are even trying to supersize and privatize preemption with a blanket decree that all local ordinances restricting corporations are overruled by state law – even proposing that corporate executives themselves can overturn local actions. To fight these autocrats, go to www.supportdemocracy.org. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>It’s always instructive to hear powerful political officials declare that in the name of democracy, they must usurp the people’s democratic authority. This has become all too common, as even so-called democratic regimes in France and Israel have infuriated their people by trying to ram vastly unpopular, anti-democratic schemes into law by executive fiat. Luckily, though, our US of A remains committed to The People’s rule right? Moreover, our leaders agree that local government is best, for it is closest to the people, right? Uh… no… and no. Since the once-conservative Republican Party has turned extremist and downright goofy during the past decade, its governors and lawmakers have become knee-jerk autocrats, imposing their unpopular policies through a crude power play called “Preemption.” This is the despotic use of arbitrary state power to cancel any town, city, or county policies that Republican politicians don’t like. Preemption is an extreme governing tool meant to be rarely used in emergency situations, but GOP-controlled statehouses in Florida, Texas, Ohio, and elsewhere now use it routinely as an ideological sledgehammer, crushing the right of local people to govern themselves. This has let extremist Republican officials force some of their racist, homophobic, and xenophobic nastiness on communities that vehemently oppose them. But most Republican preemptions are issued in service to corporate elites. For example, when local communities try to raise the minimum wage for working families, stop Big Oil fracking abuses, or prevent corporate money from corrupting local politics – corporate-serving governors rush to outlaw the people’s will and preserve the abusive power of rank profiteers. Texas lawmakers are even trying to supersize and privatize preemption with a blanket decree that all local ordinances restricting corporations are overruled by state law – even proposing that corporate executives themselves can overturn local actions. To fight these autocrats, go to www.supportdemocracy.org. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Big News! Republicans Do Have An Idea: Bring Back Child Labor!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I have to concede one point: Today’s far-right Republican party does not discriminate against women. In fact, the GOP is giving its female political buffoons a higher profile than its male bozos.</p><p>Consider Sarah Huckabee Sanders, governor of Arkansas, who became a star in the new Republican Crusade to bring back child labor abuse. Pushed by their corporate backers, GOP governors and lawmakers exclaim that the answer to America’s so-called “labor shortage” is not to make jobs more attractive, but to fill them with cheap, compliant children.</p><p>Huckabee Sanders rushed to the aid of these corporate powers, eliminating a bothersome Arkansas law that required Tyson, Walmart, and other big employers to get a special state permit to put any child under 16 to work. “The meddling hand of big government creeping down from Washington, DC,” she bellowed, “will be stopped cold… We will get the overregulating, micromanaging, bureaucratic tyrants off your backs.”</p><p>So she is using the meddling hand of big <em>state</em> government to creep into the lives of vulnerable children. She is not alone. Ohio’s Republican controlled state government is moving to extend the number of hours bosses can make children work; Iowa wants to let 14-year-olds work in industrial freezers and laundries; and Republicans in Congress have shrunk the number of investigators and lawyers policing child labor abuse, so abusive corporate managers know there is little chance they’ll be caught.</p><p>Most damning, these corporate politicians value children so little that they’ve set the maximum fine for violating the workplace safety of minors at $15,138 per child. For multimillion-dollar conglomerates, that devaluation makes it much cheaper to endanger children than protect them.</p><p>America should not even be talking about child safety rules in dangerous workplaces – it’s shameful to have any children working there.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/big-news-republicans-do-have-an-idea</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:112924552</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2023 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/112924552/bd4c6987fd091c79fe33a49d567ce4b8.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/112924552/3bd7a500a35e8ee8bafa305fb1152496.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>I have to concede one point: Today’s far-right Republican party does not discriminate against women. In fact, the GOP is giving its female political buffoons a higher profile than its male bozos. Consider Sarah Huckabee Sanders, governor of Arkansas, who became a star in the new Republican Crusade to bring back child labor abuse. Pushed by their corporate backers, GOP governors and lawmakers exclaim that the answer to America’s so-called “labor shortage” is not to make jobs more attractive, but to fill them with cheap, compliant children. Huckabee Sanders rushed to the aid of these corporate powers, eliminating a bothersome Arkansas law that required Tyson, Walmart, and other big employers to get a special state permit to put any child under 16 to work. “The meddling hand of big government creeping down from Washington, DC,” she bellowed, “will be stopped cold… We will get the overregulating, micromanaging, bureaucratic tyrants off your backs.” So she is using the meddling hand of big state government to creep into the lives of vulnerable children. She is not alone. Ohio’s Republican controlled state government is moving to extend the number of hours bosses can make children work; Iowa wants to let 14-year-olds work in industrial freezers and laundries; and Republicans in Congress have shrunk the number of investigators and lawyers policing child labor abuse, so abusive corporate managers know there is little chance they’ll be caught. Most damning, these corporate politicians value children so little that they’ve set the maximum fine for violating the workplace safety of minors at $15,138 per child. For multimillion-dollar conglomerates, that devaluation makes it much cheaper to endanger children than protect them. America should not even be talking about child safety rules in dangerous workplaces – it’s shameful to have any children working there. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>I have to concede one point: Today’s far-right Republican party does not discriminate against women. In fact, the GOP is giving its female political buffoons a higher profile than its male bozos. Consider Sarah Huckabee Sanders, governor of Arkansas, who became a star in the new Republican Crusade to bring back child labor abuse. Pushed by their corporate backers, GOP governors and lawmakers exclaim that the answer to America’s so-called “labor shortage” is not to make jobs more attractive, but to fill them with cheap, compliant children. Huckabee Sanders rushed to the aid of these corporate powers, eliminating a bothersome Arkansas law that required Tyson, Walmart, and other big employers to get a special state permit to put any child under 16 to work. “The meddling hand of big government creeping down from Washington, DC,” she bellowed, “will be stopped cold… We will get the overregulating, micromanaging, bureaucratic tyrants off your backs.” So she is using the meddling hand of big state government to creep into the lives of vulnerable children. She is not alone. Ohio’s Republican controlled state government is moving to extend the number of hours bosses can make children work; Iowa wants to let 14-year-olds work in industrial freezers and laundries; and Republicans in Congress have shrunk the number of investigators and lawyers policing child labor abuse, so abusive corporate managers know there is little chance they’ll be caught. Most damning, these corporate politicians value children so little that they’ve set the maximum fine for violating the workplace safety of minors at $15,138 per child. For multimillion-dollar conglomerates, that devaluation makes it much cheaper to endanger children than protect them. America should not even be talking about child safety rules in dangerous workplaces – it’s shameful to have any children working there. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[One Idea for Actually Stopping Child Labor Abuse]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>With new outrages erupting every day, I find some comfort in knowing that We the People have at least eliminated certain particularly-ugly plutocratic abuses. Child labor, for example – outlawed in 1938, right?</p><p>Well, outlawed, yes; stopped, no. Recent reports reveal that thousands of children, ages 12 to 17, are toiling illegally at dangerous jobs, in manufacturing, construction, food processing, etc. To be clear, there’s nothing wrong with teenagers working – they help their families, gain experience, or just earn a few bucks. Indeed, I worked part-time throughout my high school and college years, and while I did gripe some, overall it was positive.</p><p>So, this is not about children working – it’s about <em>corporate child abuse</em>, plain and simple. For example, last year Packers Sanitation Services was caught “employing oppressive child labor” in meatpacking plants to clean saws, head splitters, and other butchering machines. In a typical incident, one 13-year-old was badly burned by the caustic cleaning chemicals they used during long night shifts – which ran from 11pm to at least 5am!</p><p>Once caught, top executives of Packers Sanitation tried to sanitize their reputation by proclaiming they have “zero tolerance for any violation” of child labor laws. Oh? Ask that 13-year-old. These executives would be comical, except they’re completely disgusting and morally repugnant. Yet, our worker protection laws are so weak that Packers’ multiple violations, involving 102 children in this one case, resulted in a fine of… $1.5 million.</p><p>That’s not even peanuts for this nationwide giant, which is owned by Blackstone, a trillion-dollar Wall Street hucksters run by with well-manicured executives who pretend they know <em>nothing</em> about the children they endanger for profit.</p><p>How about we make a few of the teenage children and grandchildren of Blackstone profiteers work some midnight shifts cleaning meatcutting machinery? I’m guessing they would stop the abuse overnight.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/one-idea-for-actually-stopping-child</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:112919739</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2023 20:10:34 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/112919739/b53f44caf7e734d91c3b6302b1d8da41.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/112919739/34240edef72c3b18e0e50d5d6def1ba8.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>With new outrages erupting every day, I find some comfort in knowing that We the People have at least eliminated certain particularly-ugly plutocratic abuses. Child labor, for example – outlawed in 1938, right? Well, outlawed, yes; stopped, no. Recent reports reveal that thousands of children, ages 12 to 17, are toiling illegally at dangerous jobs, in manufacturing, construction, food processing, etc. To be clear, there’s nothing wrong with teenagers working – they help their families, gain experience, or just earn a few bucks. Indeed, I worked part-time throughout my high school and college years, and while I did gripe some, overall it was positive. So, this is not about children working – it’s about corporate child abuse, plain and simple. For example, last year Packers Sanitation Services was caught “employing oppressive child labor” in meatpacking plants to clean saws, head splitters, and other butchering machines. In a typical incident, one 13-year-old was badly burned by the caustic cleaning chemicals they used during long night shifts – which ran from 11pm to at least 5am! Once caught, top executives of Packers Sanitation tried to sanitize their reputation by proclaiming they have “zero tolerance for any violation” of child labor laws. Oh? Ask that 13-year-old. These executives would be comical, except they’re completely disgusting and morally repugnant. Yet, our worker protection laws are so weak that Packers’ multiple violations, involving 102 children in this one case, resulted in a fine of… $1.5 million. That’s not even peanuts for this nationwide giant, which is owned by Blackstone, a trillion-dollar Wall Street hucksters run by with well-manicured executives who pretend they know nothing about the children they endanger for profit. How about we make a few of the teenage children and grandchildren of Blackstone profiteers work some midnight shifts cleaning meatcutting machinery? I’m guessing they would stop the abuse overnight. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>With new outrages erupting every day, I find some comfort in knowing that We the People have at least eliminated certain particularly-ugly plutocratic abuses. Child labor, for example – outlawed in 1938, right? Well, outlawed, yes; stopped, no. Recent reports reveal that thousands of children, ages 12 to 17, are toiling illegally at dangerous jobs, in manufacturing, construction, food processing, etc. To be clear, there’s nothing wrong with teenagers working – they help their families, gain experience, or just earn a few bucks. Indeed, I worked part-time throughout my high school and college years, and while I did gripe some, overall it was positive. So, this is not about children working – it’s about corporate child abuse, plain and simple. For example, last year Packers Sanitation Services was caught “employing oppressive child labor” in meatpacking plants to clean saws, head splitters, and other butchering machines. In a typical incident, one 13-year-old was badly burned by the caustic cleaning chemicals they used during long night shifts – which ran from 11pm to at least 5am! Once caught, top executives of Packers Sanitation tried to sanitize their reputation by proclaiming they have “zero tolerance for any violation” of child labor laws. Oh? Ask that 13-year-old. These executives would be comical, except they’re completely disgusting and morally repugnant. Yet, our worker protection laws are so weak that Packers’ multiple violations, involving 102 children in this one case, resulted in a fine of… $1.5 million. That’s not even peanuts for this nationwide giant, which is owned by Blackstone, a trillion-dollar Wall Street hucksters run by with well-manicured executives who pretend they know nothing about the children they endanger for profit. How about we make a few of the teenage children and grandchildren of Blackstone profiteers work some midnight shifts cleaning meatcutting machinery? I’m guessing they would stop the abuse overnight. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Shhhh! Anti-WOKE Right-Wingers Want to Put You to Sleep]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>It’s always useful in a moment of national urgency to have level-headed experts explain what’s happening. Experts like extremist right-wing politicos.</p><p>For example, when two high-flying banks crashed this month, these screechers flocked to blame it all on their latest ideological bugaboo: “Wokeness.” Their loopy contention is that everything bad in our country is happening because such institutions as schools, libraries, corporations, and even banks are responding to America’s long history of systemic inequality by pursuing “politically-correct” policies promoting liberal values like fairness, equality, and diversity.</p><p>Hello – oppression of the many by the few is in fact a reality in America. Two, pursuit of those liberal values is what makes America historically important. And… banks? You’re actually asserting that high-finance is now motivated by a liberal, share-the-wealth mentality?</p><p>Yes indeed, squawk these self-proclaimed knowledgeable ones, singling out the recently-failed Silicon Valley Bank. “They were one of the most woke banks,” moaned a GOP lawmaker who specializes in conspiracy theories. Gov. Ron DeSantis piled on, barking that “this bank, they’re so concerned with [diversity]… and all kinds of stuff.” Then Donald Trump offered his usual deep assessment, lecturing that the collapse “is what happens when you push leftist/woke ideology.”</p><p>Bovine Excrement! As has now been documented, these bankers were not woke, but greedy, incompetent, and reckless. Worse, our bank regulators had been intentionally <em>put to sleep</em> by a 2018 law that specifically let such banks escape careful public supervision. Guess whightower hat? Trump was the one who initiated this disastrous regulatory exemption, Ron DeSantis cheered and voted for it, and the CEO of Silicon Valley Bank led a lobbying campaign to ram it into law.</p><p>Stay alert folks – these politicos and profiteers are the ones who crashed the bank – and now they’re trying to put us to sleep with their hokey “anti-woke” PR stunt.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/shhhh-anti-woke-right-wingers-want</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:111687647</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2023 17:52:03 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/111687647/36b2b65e7bcc6807b458bb7dbc3fb8ef.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/111687647/248f1abca9bec763d5a3739b14264136.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>It’s always useful in a moment of national urgency to have level-headed experts explain what’s happening. Experts like extremist right-wing politicos. For example, when two high-flying banks crashed this month, these screechers flocked to blame it all on their latest ideological bugaboo: “Wokeness.” Their loopy contention is that everything bad in our country is happening because such institutions as schools, libraries, corporations, and even banks are responding to America’s long history of systemic inequality by pursuing “politically-correct” policies promoting liberal values like fairness, equality, and diversity. Hello – oppression of the many by the few is in fact a reality in America. Two, pursuit of those liberal values is what makes America historically important. And… banks? You’re actually asserting that high-finance is now motivated by a liberal, share-the-wealth mentality? Yes indeed, squawk these self-proclaimed knowledgeable ones, singling out the recently-failed Silicon Valley Bank. “They were one of the most woke banks,” moaned a GOP lawmaker who specializes in conspiracy theories. Gov. Ron DeSantis piled on, barking that “this bank, they’re so concerned with [diversity]… and all kinds of stuff.” Then Donald Trump offered his usual deep assessment, lecturing that the collapse “is what happens when you push leftist/woke ideology.” Bovine Excrement! As has now been documented, these bankers were not woke, but greedy, incompetent, and reckless. Worse, our bank regulators had been intentionally put to sleep by a 2018 law that specifically let such banks escape careful public supervision. Guess whightower hat? Trump was the one who initiated this disastrous regulatory exemption, Ron DeSantis cheered and voted for it, and the CEO of Silicon Valley Bank led a lobbying campaign to ram it into law. Stay alert folks – these politicos and profiteers are the ones who crashed the bank – and now they’re trying to put us to sleep with their hokey “anti-woke” PR stunt. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>It’s always useful in a moment of national urgency to have level-headed experts explain what’s happening. Experts like extremist right-wing politicos. For example, when two high-flying banks crashed this month, these screechers flocked to blame it all on their latest ideological bugaboo: “Wokeness.” Their loopy contention is that everything bad in our country is happening because such institutions as schools, libraries, corporations, and even banks are responding to America’s long history of systemic inequality by pursuing “politically-correct” policies promoting liberal values like fairness, equality, and diversity. Hello – oppression of the many by the few is in fact a reality in America. Two, pursuit of those liberal values is what makes America historically important. And… banks? You’re actually asserting that high-finance is now motivated by a liberal, share-the-wealth mentality? Yes indeed, squawk these self-proclaimed knowledgeable ones, singling out the recently-failed Silicon Valley Bank. “They were one of the most woke banks,” moaned a GOP lawmaker who specializes in conspiracy theories. Gov. Ron DeSantis piled on, barking that “this bank, they’re so concerned with [diversity]… and all kinds of stuff.” Then Donald Trump offered his usual deep assessment, lecturing that the collapse “is what happens when you push leftist/woke ideology.” Bovine Excrement! As has now been documented, these bankers were not woke, but greedy, incompetent, and reckless. Worse, our bank regulators had been intentionally put to sleep by a 2018 law that specifically let such banks escape careful public supervision. Guess whightower hat? Trump was the one who initiated this disastrous regulatory exemption, Ron DeSantis cheered and voted for it, and the CEO of Silicon Valley Bank led a lobbying campaign to ram it into law. Stay alert folks – these politicos and profiteers are the ones who crashed the bank – and now they’re trying to put us to sleep with their hokey “anti-woke” PR stunt. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hey Kids, Let’s Go to DeSantis World!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Until recently, kids were thrilled when their parents said: “We’re going to Disney World!” But that was in the beforetimes, before Florida’s autocratic governor put Disney World under the control of his state’s thought police, turning it into “DeSantis World.”</p><p>Having made kid-friendly Disney kowtow to his own magic kingdom of right-wing ideological conformity, Governor Ron is now demanding that the entire Sunshine State convert to the darkness of DeSantis World. A major tactic in his push is to rewrite the state’s school books to “protect” young ones from having to learn that such historical unpleasantness as racism and sexism have shaped their society… and are still doing so.</p><p>To advance RonThink, he has rammed his “Stop WOKE Act” into law, requiring teachers to – shhh – soften or just eliminate references to America’s racial problems. Pretend it never happened, is Professor DeSantis’ instruction.</p><p>Indeed, one educational publisher obediently followed his dictate rewriting the uplifting 1955 story of Rosa Parks confronting the flagrant, institutional racism of Montgomery, Alabama’s public bus service. Before DeSantis, the publisher told the story straight. “In her city, the law said African Americans had to give up their seats… if a White person wanted to sit down. [Parks] would not give up her seat. The police came and took her to jail.”</p><p>Now, after DeSantification, here’s the publisher’s re-write: “One day, [Parks] rode the bus. She was told to move to a different seat. She did not. She did what she believed was right.” Hmmm. No reference to her even being African-American or to the law requiring her to bow to any White person’s demand for her seat. And no mention of police hauling her to jail because of the color of her skin.</p><p>DeSantis World is where people’s dream of social justice goes to die.</p><p><em>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</em></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/hey-kids-lets-go-to-desantis-world</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:111247886</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 15:31:04 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/111247886/2f9982b8f54608f374bcd6091125df86.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/111247886/bc276ccb858e5a3e3f050818966a0bf4.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Until recently, kids were thrilled when their parents said: “We’re going to Disney World!” But that was in the beforetimes, before Florida’s autocratic governor put Disney World under the control of his state’s thought police, turning it into “DeSantis World.” Having made kid-friendly Disney kowtow to his own magic kingdom of right-wing ideological conformity, Governor Ron is now demanding that the entire Sunshine State convert to the darkness of DeSantis World. A major tactic in his push is to rewrite the state’s school books to “protect” young ones from having to learn that such historical unpleasantness as racism and sexism have shaped their society… and are still doing so. To advance RonThink, he has rammed his “Stop WOKE Act” into law, requiring teachers to – shhh – soften or just eliminate references to America’s racial problems. Pretend it never happened, is Professor DeSantis’ instruction. Indeed, one educational publisher obediently followed his dictate rewriting the uplifting 1955 story of Rosa Parks confronting the flagrant, institutional racism of Montgomery, Alabama’s public bus service. Before DeSantis, the publisher told the story straight. “In her city, the law said African Americans had to give up their seats… if a White person wanted to sit down. [Parks] would not give up her seat. The police came and took her to jail.” Now, after DeSantification, here’s the publisher’s re-write: “One day, [Parks] rode the bus. She was told to move to a different seat. She did not. She did what she believed was right.” Hmmm. No reference to her even being African-American or to the law requiring her to bow to any White person’s demand for her seat. And no mention of police hauling her to jail because of the color of her skin. DeSantis World is where people’s dream of social justice goes to die. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Until recently, kids were thrilled when their parents said: “We’re going to Disney World!” But that was in the beforetimes, before Florida’s autocratic governor put Disney World under the control of his state’s thought police, turning it into “DeSantis World.” Having made kid-friendly Disney kowtow to his own magic kingdom of right-wing ideological conformity, Governor Ron is now demanding that the entire Sunshine State convert to the darkness of DeSantis World. A major tactic in his push is to rewrite the state’s school books to “protect” young ones from having to learn that such historical unpleasantness as racism and sexism have shaped their society… and are still doing so. To advance RonThink, he has rammed his “Stop WOKE Act” into law, requiring teachers to – shhh – soften or just eliminate references to America’s racial problems. Pretend it never happened, is Professor DeSantis’ instruction. Indeed, one educational publisher obediently followed his dictate rewriting the uplifting 1955 story of Rosa Parks confronting the flagrant, institutional racism of Montgomery, Alabama’s public bus service. Before DeSantis, the publisher told the story straight. “In her city, the law said African Americans had to give up their seats… if a White person wanted to sit down. [Parks] would not give up her seat. The police came and took her to jail.” Now, after DeSantification, here’s the publisher’s re-write: “One day, [Parks] rode the bus. She was told to move to a different seat. She did not. She did what she believed was right.” Hmmm. No reference to her even being African-American or to the law requiring her to bow to any White person’s demand for her seat. And no mention of police hauling her to jail because of the color of her skin. DeSantis World is where people’s dream of social justice goes to die. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Can’t Ill Seniors Get Even a Scrap of Dignity from Congress?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><p>What’s wrong with us? Our nation’s moral compass, I mean.</p><p>I don’t like being a downer, just focusing on wrongs, but some wrongs stand out as morally abominable, such as this one. It’s about hundreds of thousands of our low-income elders who, toward the end of life (when frail and most vulnerable) find themselves cast into a part of the Medicaid system that has been deliberately structured by Congress to subject them to needless deprivations and daily indignities.</p><p>These are our loved ones with serious health problems who need long term care in nursing homes, and two-thirds of them rely on Medicaid to cover their costs. To get this benefit, they surrender all of their income, which goes to defray their nursing home expenses. Of course, for a decent existence beyond mere survival, we all rely on a few little things that are basic to our humanity. So, Medicare authorizes each state to set a monthly “personal needs allowance,” so their elderly patients can cover their hygiene and grooming products, a book or CD, a small gift for grandchildren, a chocolate bar, etc.</p><p>Good! But then Mr. Mingy walked in. In 1987, Congress set the minimum for this allowance at a meager $30 a month – under $8 a week! Congress has not raised it in the 36 years since, and most states still provide only a pittance, despite inflation and monopoly price gouging on practically everything. So, our state and national “leaders” (who freely dole out massive corporate subsidies and tax giveaways to billionaires) are leaving ill seniors with so little spending money that they must ration their toothpaste and scrimp pennies to buy a rare treat from the vending machine.</p><p>I know this is small in the global scale of human indignities, but that makes it an even bigger moral failure for our society. It would take so little to do so much for so many.</p><p><em>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</em></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-cant-ill-seniors-get-even-a-scrap</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:109623255</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/109623255/a8cfb234d25296891c4933bf32183c2a.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/109623255/6683be29657e3ac7f111e7fabfaa43f9.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>What’s wrong with us? Our nation’s moral compass, I mean. I don’t like being a downer, just focusing on wrongs, but some wrongs stand out as morally abominable, such as this one. It’s about hundreds of thousands of our low-income elders who, toward the end of life (when frail and most vulnerable) find themselves cast into a part of the Medicaid system that has been deliberately structured by Congress to subject them to needless deprivations and daily indignities. These are our loved ones with serious health problems who need long term care in nursing homes, and two-thirds of them rely on Medicaid to cover their costs. To get this benefit, they surrender all of their income, which goes to defray their nursing home expenses. Of course, for a decent existence beyond mere survival, we all rely on a few little things that are basic to our humanity. So, Medicare authorizes each state to set a monthly “personal needs allowance,” so their elderly patients can cover their hygiene and grooming products, a book or CD, a small gift for grandchildren, a chocolate bar, etc. Good! But then Mr. Mingy walked in. In 1987, Congress set the minimum for this allowance at a meager $30 a month – under $8 a week! Congress has not raised it in the 36 years since, and most states still provide only a pittance, despite inflation and monopoly price gouging on practically everything. So, our state and national “leaders” (who freely dole out massive corporate subsidies and tax giveaways to billionaires) are leaving ill seniors with so little spending money that they must ration their toothpaste and scrimp pennies to buy a rare treat from the vending machine. I know this is small in the global scale of human indignities, but that makes it an even bigger moral failure for our society. It would take so little to do so much for so many. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>What’s wrong with us? Our nation’s moral compass, I mean. I don’t like being a downer, just focusing on wrongs, but some wrongs stand out as morally abominable, such as this one. It’s about hundreds of thousands of our low-income elders who, toward the end of life (when frail and most vulnerable) find themselves cast into a part of the Medicaid system that has been deliberately structured by Congress to subject them to needless deprivations and daily indignities. These are our loved ones with serious health problems who need long term care in nursing homes, and two-thirds of them rely on Medicaid to cover their costs. To get this benefit, they surrender all of their income, which goes to defray their nursing home expenses. Of course, for a decent existence beyond mere survival, we all rely on a few little things that are basic to our humanity. So, Medicare authorizes each state to set a monthly “personal needs allowance,” so their elderly patients can cover their hygiene and grooming products, a book or CD, a small gift for grandchildren, a chocolate bar, etc. Good! But then Mr. Mingy walked in. In 1987, Congress set the minimum for this allowance at a meager $30 a month – under $8 a week! Congress has not raised it in the 36 years since, and most states still provide only a pittance, despite inflation and monopoly price gouging on practically everything. So, our state and national “leaders” (who freely dole out massive corporate subsidies and tax giveaways to billionaires) are leaving ill seniors with so little spending money that they must ration their toothpaste and scrimp pennies to buy a rare treat from the vending machine. I know this is small in the global scale of human indignities, but that makes it an even bigger moral failure for our society. It would take so little to do so much for so many. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Take a Whiff of Elon Musk’s Ecological Paradise]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Exciting News, people: Utopia is on the rise! </p><p>Space Commander Elon Musk has announced that His Magnificence (ie, him) intends to <a target="_blank" href="https://www.austinchronicle.com/daily/news/2023-03-09/billionaire-wants-his-own-town-go-figure/">construct his very own private town</a> on 3,500 acres of farmland near his new Tesla plant southeast of Austin, Texas. More than a town, Musk explains that he will create <em>utopia</em> in Texas, promising an “ecological paradise” where his Tesla workers can live and do fun things like swimming, pickleball... and paying rent to him.</p><p>The gabillionaire is certainly rich enough to erect his own Muskopolis. But, alas, the “utopia” name is already taken. Indeed, I’ve been to Utopia, Texas, a small town west of San Antonio that was founded in 1855 by (cover your ears, Elon!) Swiss Socialists. Of course, history shows that a company town is ruled by the company, not by residents (much less socialists). And Musk has made clear at Tesla, Twitter, etc. that his personal whims rule over workers, consumers, our environment… and even truth.</p><p>Which brings us to that ecological worker’s paradise he’s promising. Even as one arm of his empire was extolling his vision of a Garden-of-Eden situated along the beauty of the Colorado River, another arm was scheming to pollute it! Musk is asking Texas’ corporate-controlled regulators to let him use the site to dump <a target="_blank" href="https://www.kvue.com/article/money/economy/boomtown-2040/gapped-bass-elon-musk-wastewater/269-7077cbb9-3cdc-47bb-b6a8-09305b326d8a">140,000 gallons </a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.kvue.com/article/money/economy/boomtown-2040/gapped-bass-elon-musk-wastewater/269-7077cbb9-3cdc-47bb-b6a8-09305b326d8a"><em>a day</em></a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.kvue.com/article/money/economy/boomtown-2040/gapped-bass-elon-musk-wastewater/269-7077cbb9-3cdc-47bb-b6a8-09305b326d8a"> of his industrial wastewater into the Colorado.</a></p><p>Excuse me, but that turns Elon’s ecological paradise into a fraud. Worse, it adds up to Musk pouring 50 million gallons a year of his waste into the river, fouling the main water source for dozens of towns and hundreds of farms downstream.</p><p>Musk seeks to extend the long sordid history in our country of company town hucksters, and his latest Texas scam is proof that we should never trust a billionaire promising us paradise.</p><p><em>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</em></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/take-a-whiff-of-elon-musks-ecological</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:109618817</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/109618817/36a22f750f3daf10b47c0db3c4f831fa.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/109618817/e6665402f6611eba0dc4aa321c4ac946.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Exciting News, people: Utopia is on the rise!  Space Commander Elon Musk has announced that His Magnificence (ie, him) intends to construct his very own private town on 3,500 acres of farmland near his new Tesla plant southeast of Austin, Texas. More than a town, Musk explains that he will create utopia in Texas, promising an “ecological paradise” where his Tesla workers can live and do fun things like swimming, pickleball... and paying rent to him. The gabillionaire is certainly rich enough to erect his own Muskopolis. But, alas, the “utopia” name is already taken. Indeed, I’ve been to Utopia, Texas, a small town west of San Antonio that was founded in 1855 by (cover your ears, Elon!) Swiss Socialists. Of course, history shows that a company town is ruled by the company, not by residents (much less socialists). And Musk has made clear at Tesla, Twitter, etc. that his personal whims rule over workers, consumers, our environment… and even truth. Which brings us to that ecological worker’s paradise he’s promising. Even as one arm of his empire was extolling his vision of a Garden-of-Eden situated along the beauty of the Colorado River, another arm was scheming to pollute it! Musk is asking Texas’ corporate-controlled regulators to let him use the site to dump 140,000 gallons a day of his industrial wastewater into the Colorado. Excuse me, but that turns Elon’s ecological paradise into a fraud. Worse, it adds up to Musk pouring 50 million gallons a year of his waste into the river, fouling the main water source for dozens of towns and hundreds of farms downstream. Musk seeks to extend the long sordid history in our country of company town hucksters, and his latest Texas scam is proof that we should never trust a billionaire promising us paradise. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Exciting News, people: Utopia is on the rise!  Space Commander Elon Musk has announced that His Magnificence (ie, him) intends to construct his very own private town on 3,500 acres of farmland near his new Tesla plant southeast of Austin, Texas. More than a town, Musk explains that he will create utopia in Texas, promising an “ecological paradise” where his Tesla workers can live and do fun things like swimming, pickleball... and paying rent to him. The gabillionaire is certainly rich enough to erect his own Muskopolis. But, alas, the “utopia” name is already taken. Indeed, I’ve been to Utopia, Texas, a small town west of San Antonio that was founded in 1855 by (cover your ears, Elon!) Swiss Socialists. Of course, history shows that a company town is ruled by the company, not by residents (much less socialists). And Musk has made clear at Tesla, Twitter, etc. that his personal whims rule over workers, consumers, our environment… and even truth. Which brings us to that ecological worker’s paradise he’s promising. Even as one arm of his empire was extolling his vision of a Garden-of-Eden situated along the beauty of the Colorado River, another arm was scheming to pollute it! Musk is asking Texas’ corporate-controlled regulators to let him use the site to dump 140,000 gallons a day of his industrial wastewater into the Colorado. Excuse me, but that turns Elon’s ecological paradise into a fraud. Worse, it adds up to Musk pouring 50 million gallons a year of his waste into the river, fouling the main water source for dozens of towns and hundreds of farms downstream. Musk seeks to extend the long sordid history in our country of company town hucksters, and his latest Texas scam is proof that we should never trust a billionaire promising us paradise. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[How Despicable Are Big Pharmacies Insulin Price Gougers?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Profiteering is always bad, but there are degrees of profiteer. Level 1 includes your everyday price gougers, like banks and airlines. At Level 2, you’ll find the more demonic outfits like loan sharks and for-profit college hucksters. Then top of the heap at Level 3, you’ll find Eli Lilly.</p><p>This $288 billion drug making colossus is America’s primary peddler of insulin, the diabetes drug that some seven million Americans must constantly take literally to stay alive. By having both monopoly power over the market and such a huge base of captive customers, Lilly has gleefully jacked up its prices again and again over three decades, with it now costing each sufferer as much as $1,000 a month! Finally, under intense political pressure to stop it’s extreme, life-threatening gouging, the giant recently announced it would soon cut its insulin price by a whopping 70 percent! In full-page ads, Lilly hailed its corporate generosity, magnanimously declaring that “everyone deserves affordable options.”</p><p>But – <em>hello!</em> – it has intentionally charged <em>unaffordable</em> rip off prices for 30 years, wallowing in monopoly profits. And – Hello again – if Lilly says it can keep profiting on its insulin product despite slashing the price by 70 percent, that means it has been overcharging patients by 70 percent all this time! Yet, its rich executives want us to thank them? No thank you.</p><p>Even with the price cut, they’re still charging $66 for a single vial of insulin. Guess what? It costs Lilly less than $7 to produce that vial, and it could be sold profitably for under $9.</p><p>Meanwhile, note that the ballyhooed price cut is voluntary, meaning Lilly can raise the price again at any time. Indeed, David Ricks (who personally pockets $19 million a year from the profiteer) has refused to pledge that he’ll keep the medicine affordable.</p><p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/how-despicable-are-big-pharmacies</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:108245569</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2023 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/108245569/5a89647cf9b257bfb68a9898785d05a7.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/108245569/65fd8c5c6386dec6a840a8f22563b32e.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Profiteering is always bad, but there are degrees of profiteer. Level 1 includes your everyday price gougers, like banks and airlines. At Level 2, you’ll find the more demonic outfits like loan sharks and for-profit college hucksters. Then top of the heap at Level 3, you’ll find Eli Lilly. This $288 billion drug making colossus is America’s primary peddler of insulin, the diabetes drug that some seven million Americans must constantly take literally to stay alive. By having both monopoly power over the market and such a huge base of captive customers, Lilly has gleefully jacked up its prices again and again over three decades, with it now costing each sufferer as much as $1,000 a month! Finally, under intense political pressure to stop it’s extreme, life-threatening gouging, the giant recently announced it would soon cut its insulin price by a whopping 70 percent! In full-page ads, Lilly hailed its corporate generosity, magnanimously declaring that “everyone deserves affordable options.” But – hello! – it has intentionally charged unaffordable rip off prices for 30 years, wallowing in monopoly profits. And – Hello again – if Lilly says it can keep profiting on its insulin product despite slashing the price by 70 percent, that means it has been overcharging patients by 70 percent all this time! Yet, its rich executives want us to thank them? No thank you. Even with the price cut, they’re still charging $66 for a single vial of insulin. Guess what? It costs Lilly less than $7 to produce that vial, and it could be sold profitably for under $9. Meanwhile, note that the ballyhooed price cut is voluntary, meaning Lilly can raise the price again at any time. Indeed, David Ricks (who personally pockets $19 million a year from the profiteer) has refused to pledge that he’ll keep the medicine affordable. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Profiteering is always bad, but there are degrees of profiteer. Level 1 includes your everyday price gougers, like banks and airlines. At Level 2, you’ll find the more demonic outfits like loan sharks and for-profit college hucksters. Then top of the heap at Level 3, you’ll find Eli Lilly. This $288 billion drug making colossus is America’s primary peddler of insulin, the diabetes drug that some seven million Americans must constantly take literally to stay alive. By having both monopoly power over the market and such a huge base of captive customers, Lilly has gleefully jacked up its prices again and again over three decades, with it now costing each sufferer as much as $1,000 a month! Finally, under intense political pressure to stop it’s extreme, life-threatening gouging, the giant recently announced it would soon cut its insulin price by a whopping 70 percent! In full-page ads, Lilly hailed its corporate generosity, magnanimously declaring that “everyone deserves affordable options.” But – hello! – it has intentionally charged unaffordable rip off prices for 30 years, wallowing in monopoly profits. And – Hello again – if Lilly says it can keep profiting on its insulin product despite slashing the price by 70 percent, that means it has been overcharging patients by 70 percent all this time! Yet, its rich executives want us to thank them? No thank you. Even with the price cut, they’re still charging $66 for a single vial of insulin. Guess what? It costs Lilly less than $7 to produce that vial, and it could be sold profitably for under $9. Meanwhile, note that the ballyhooed price cut is voluntary, meaning Lilly can raise the price again at any time. Indeed, David Ricks (who personally pockets $19 million a year from the profiteer) has refused to pledge that he’ll keep the medicine affordable. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Texas: What the Hell? Get Ready for Roving Bands of Book-Banners Coming to Your Town]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Not so long ago, book burnings were considered a festive group activity by assorted right-wing zealots. Today, though, burning seems so old-fashioned, and well… crude.</p><p>Yet, the concept is burning hotter than ever among a gaggle of testosterone-driven Republican leaders eager to show voters that they will go to extremes to incinerate progressive ideas and people’s personal liberties. Rather than lighting bonfires, though, the new fad for GOP politicians is simply to use government power to <em>ban</em> the offending books (thus saving the expense of matches and lighter fluid).</p><p>It might not surprise you to learn that our Lone Star State’s extremist political operatives are leading today’s book-banning frenzy. One Jonathan Mitchell, for example, is going from town to town pushing Texas Republican officeholders to pass local ordinances he labels “Safe Library Patron Protection.” Yes, patrons, censoring what you can read is necessary to “protect” you. The GOP ban prohibits libraries from having books, videos, etc. that contain “immoral content,” which he defines as depictions of nudity, sexual behavior, mentions of masturbation, LGBTQ life, etc. It’s also autocratically homophobic, making it illegal for librarians to display LGBTQ flags or even mentioning “LGBTQ Pride Month.”</p><p>This repressive monomania stabs even deeper into our freedom of expression by concocting a “right” of right-wing vigilantes to enforce the ordinances. Yes, self-<a target="_blank" href="https://www.axios.com/2023/02/16/texas-abortion-ban-libraries-books">appointed bands of bounty hunters would be authorized to roam the countryside suing local libraries (</a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.axios.com/2023/02/16/texas-abortion-ban-libraries-books"><em>and individual librarians</em></a>) for having “banned” books on the shelves. To spur this political malice, Wallace’s scheme provides a $10,000 reward for every violation a vigilante finds (or fabricates).</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… Well, you say, thank God I don’t live in Texas! But – Hello – repression doesn’t recognize state borders, so the pernicious idea of paid library marauders is spreading across the country. To help defend your freedom from them, go to the American Library Association: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.ala.org/advocacy/fight-censorship">ala.org</a>.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/texas-what-the-hell-get-ready-for</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:108242010</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/108242010/68ee80ddb8c75fa6c659a50d138cfd36.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/108242010/c59925a3a3c53649d97fdec12530ad21.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Not so long ago, book burnings were considered a festive group activity by assorted right-wing zealots. Today, though, burning seems so old-fashioned, and well… crude. Yet, the concept is burning hotter than ever among a gaggle of testosterone-driven Republican leaders eager to show voters that they will go to extremes to incinerate progressive ideas and people’s personal liberties. Rather than lighting bonfires, though, the new fad for GOP politicians is simply to use government power to ban the offending books (thus saving the expense of matches and lighter fluid). It might not surprise you to learn that our Lone Star State’s extremist political operatives are leading today’s book-banning frenzy. One Jonathan Mitchell, for example, is going from town to town pushing Texas Republican officeholders to pass local ordinances he labels “Safe Library Patron Protection.” Yes, patrons, censoring what you can read is necessary to “protect” you. The GOP ban prohibits libraries from having books, videos, etc. that contain “immoral content,” which he defines as depictions of nudity, sexual behavior, mentions of masturbation, LGBTQ life, etc. It’s also autocratically homophobic, making it illegal for librarians to display LGBTQ flags or even mentioning “LGBTQ Pride Month.” This repressive monomania stabs even deeper into our freedom of expression by concocting a “right” of right-wing vigilantes to enforce the ordinances. Yes, self-appointed bands of bounty hunters would be authorized to roam the countryside suing local libraries (and individual librarians) for having “banned” books on the shelves. To spur this political malice, Wallace’s scheme provides a $10,000 reward for every violation a vigilante finds (or fabricates). This is Jim Hightower saying… Well, you say, thank God I don’t live in Texas! But – Hello – repression doesn’t recognize state borders, so the pernicious idea of paid library marauders is spreading across the country. To help defend your freedom from them, go to the American Library Association: ala.org. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Not so long ago, book burnings were considered a festive group activity by assorted right-wing zealots. Today, though, burning seems so old-fashioned, and well… crude. Yet, the concept is burning hotter than ever among a gaggle of testosterone-driven Republican leaders eager to show voters that they will go to extremes to incinerate progressive ideas and people’s personal liberties. Rather than lighting bonfires, though, the new fad for GOP politicians is simply to use government power to ban the offending books (thus saving the expense of matches and lighter fluid). It might not surprise you to learn that our Lone Star State’s extremist political operatives are leading today’s book-banning frenzy. One Jonathan Mitchell, for example, is going from town to town pushing Texas Republican officeholders to pass local ordinances he labels “Safe Library Patron Protection.” Yes, patrons, censoring what you can read is necessary to “protect” you. The GOP ban prohibits libraries from having books, videos, etc. that contain “immoral content,” which he defines as depictions of nudity, sexual behavior, mentions of masturbation, LGBTQ life, etc. It’s also autocratically homophobic, making it illegal for librarians to display LGBTQ flags or even mentioning “LGBTQ Pride Month.” This repressive monomania stabs even deeper into our freedom of expression by concocting a “right” of right-wing vigilantes to enforce the ordinances. Yes, self-appointed bands of bounty hunters would be authorized to roam the countryside suing local libraries (and individual librarians) for having “banned” books on the shelves. To spur this political malice, Wallace’s scheme provides a $10,000 reward for every violation a vigilante finds (or fabricates). This is Jim Hightower saying… Well, you say, thank God I don’t live in Texas! But – Hello – repression doesn’t recognize state borders, so the pernicious idea of paid library marauders is spreading across the country. To help defend your freedom from them, go to the American Library Association: ala.org. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why the GOP Should Undergo Remedial Diversity Training]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Obviously, the main social problem in America is that Black people run everything and us white folks as a group just can’t get a fair break, right? So says Texas Gov. Greg Abbott.</p><p>As a lifelong white Texan, I can’t tell you how “amazing” it is to see our governor, come out unapologetically for a return to old-time institutional bigotry. Absolutely *Freaking* Amazing! Apparently, Abbott fantasizes that hordes of Black people are seizing control of our government, universities, banks, media… and other power centers, shoving aside more qualified and entitled whites. Going from fantasy to hallucination, he concludes that this takeover is caused by corporate and government hiring policies that bolster diversity and inclusiveness in our society. Even attempting to implement this democratic goal, he barks, is illegal because – get this – it violates federal law against discrimination.</p><p>Yes, in GregWorld, fighting discrimination against minorities discriminates against the white majority. So his excellency has actually issued an edict directing state agencies and universities to shut down all hiring programs that include diversity goals! His official injunction declares that deliberately trying to stop excluding minorities from full access to employment opportunities leads to the “alienation of individuals from the workplace.” He means, of course that some white people are alienated that non-white people are getting job opportunities – never mind that minorities routinely suffer extreme “alienation from the workplace” – ie, exclusion. By the way, Abbott’s attack on diversity not only opens the door to even more job discrimination against Black Americans, but also against women, people with disabilities, LGBTQ people, all people of color, and veterans. Give him credit: He’s an equal opportunity abuser!</p><p>Abbott and his right-wing ilk should realize that the price of creating an exclusive society with no diversity is that they would then be stuck living with people like themselves.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-the-gop-should-undergo-remedial</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:106256751</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2023 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/106256751/8d18b9faf5b4354250b3a26df3e28afc.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/106256751/d87bc89f44cc72e4bc7ab48ce89f1774.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Obviously, the main social problem in America is that Black people run everything and us white folks as a group just can’t get a fair break, right? So says Texas Gov. Greg Abbott. As a lifelong white Texan, I can’t tell you how “amazing” it is to see our governor, come out unapologetically for a return to old-time institutional bigotry. Absolutely *Freaking* Amazing! Apparently, Abbott fantasizes that hordes of Black people are seizing control of our government, universities, banks, media… and other power centers, shoving aside more qualified and entitled whites. Going from fantasy to hallucination, he concludes that this takeover is caused by corporate and government hiring policies that bolster diversity and inclusiveness in our society. Even attempting to implement this democratic goal, he barks, is illegal because – get this – it violates federal law against discrimination. Yes, in GregWorld, fighting discrimination against minorities discriminates against the white majority. So his excellency has actually issued an edict directing state agencies and universities to shut down all hiring programs that include diversity goals! His official injunction declares that deliberately trying to stop excluding minorities from full access to employment opportunities leads to the “alienation of individuals from the workplace.” He means, of course that some white people are alienated that non-white people are getting job opportunities – never mind that minorities routinely suffer extreme “alienation from the workplace” – ie, exclusion. By the way, Abbott’s attack on diversity not only opens the door to even more job discrimination against Black Americans, but also against women, people with disabilities, LGBTQ people, all people of color, and veterans. Give him credit: He’s an equal opportunity abuser! Abbott and his right-wing ilk should realize that the price of creating an exclusive society with no diversity is that they would then be stuck living with people like themselves. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Obviously, the main social problem in America is that Black people run everything and us white folks as a group just can’t get a fair break, right? So says Texas Gov. Greg Abbott. As a lifelong white Texan, I can’t tell you how “amazing” it is to see our governor, come out unapologetically for a return to old-time institutional bigotry. Absolutely *Freaking* Amazing! Apparently, Abbott fantasizes that hordes of Black people are seizing control of our government, universities, banks, media… and other power centers, shoving aside more qualified and entitled whites. Going from fantasy to hallucination, he concludes that this takeover is caused by corporate and government hiring policies that bolster diversity and inclusiveness in our society. Even attempting to implement this democratic goal, he barks, is illegal because – get this – it violates federal law against discrimination. Yes, in GregWorld, fighting discrimination against minorities discriminates against the white majority. So his excellency has actually issued an edict directing state agencies and universities to shut down all hiring programs that include diversity goals! His official injunction declares that deliberately trying to stop excluding minorities from full access to employment opportunities leads to the “alienation of individuals from the workplace.” He means, of course that some white people are alienated that non-white people are getting job opportunities – never mind that minorities routinely suffer extreme “alienation from the workplace” – ie, exclusion. By the way, Abbott’s attack on diversity not only opens the door to even more job discrimination against Black Americans, but also against women, people with disabilities, LGBTQ people, all people of color, and veterans. Give him credit: He’s an equal opportunity abuser! Abbott and his right-wing ilk should realize that the price of creating an exclusive society with no diversity is that they would then be stuck living with people like themselves. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Are the Women in Your State Legislature Properly Attired?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Many of today’s right-wing governors and state legislators have a problem. By constantly pushing an extremist ideological agenda of nonsense about nutty conspiracy theories – while imposing autocratic laws to ban everything from voting to library books – they’ve become widely ridiculed as some combo of kooky, clownish, and embarrassingly corrupt.</p><p>That’s why it’s significant that Missouri’s GOP lawmakers have not only recognized their image problem, but have actually made an effort to demonstrate that they are serious-minded public officials concerned about their professionalism. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/15/us/missouri-dress-code-women.html">Namely, the state house of representatives has adopted a dress code</a>. Seriously.</p><p>Specifically, the “attire mandate” addresses the pressing state issue of female lawmakers who come to work dressed normally – but without jackets. Disapproving legislative leaders clucked that this fashion faux pas was undermining the public’s respect for them. But now, says GOP Rep. Ann Kelley, sponsor of the new code, “It has been fixed.” Henceforth, all women legislators in the “Show Me” state must wear blazers or cardigans in order to, as Kelley explained, “always maintain a formal and professional atmosphere” in the House.</p><p>Professional? Excuse me, but these far-right state legislatures totter between being goofy policy forums and carnival sideshows. The only proper attire for many of these so-called legislative “leaders” would be straitjackets. Indeed, trying to rationalize the Missouri legislature’s expenditure of state time, money, and credibility on dictating women’s attire, Kelley’s GOP colleague Brenda Shields declared it was about protecting freedom! The clothing mandate, she explained, eliminates the possibility that the state will “be the clothing police.”</p><p>I don’t know about you, but I’m thinking of moving to Missouri! It must be wonderful to live in a state where the government has already fixed all the big problems people really care about, letting the legislative body focus on properly clothing its women members.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/are-the-women-in-your-state-legislature</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:106253784</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2023 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593531" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/106253784/f27f844cf1df87243e0a86838145fbdd.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/106253784/185f4f44cee311577c2f4587e3e9727b.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Many of today’s right-wing governors and state legislators have a problem. By constantly pushing an extremist ideological agenda of nonsense about nutty conspiracy theories – while imposing autocratic laws to ban everything from voting to library books – they’ve become widely ridiculed as some combo of kooky, clownish, and embarrassingly corrupt. That’s why it’s significant that Missouri’s GOP lawmakers have not only recognized their image problem, but have actually made an effort to demonstrate that they are serious-minded public officials concerned about their professionalism. Namely, the state house of representatives has adopted a dress code. Seriously. Specifically, the “attire mandate” addresses the pressing state issue of female lawmakers who come to work dressed normally – but without jackets. Disapproving legislative leaders clucked that this fashion faux pas was undermining the public’s respect for them. But now, says GOP Rep. Ann Kelley, sponsor of the new code, “It has been fixed.” Henceforth, all women legislators in the “Show Me” state must wear blazers or cardigans in order to, as Kelley explained, “always maintain a formal and professional atmosphere” in the House. Professional? Excuse me, but these far-right state legislatures totter between being goofy policy forums and carnival sideshows. The only proper attire for many of these so-called legislative “leaders” would be straitjackets. Indeed, trying to rationalize the Missouri legislature’s expenditure of state time, money, and credibility on dictating women’s attire, Kelley’s GOP colleague Brenda Shields declared it was about protecting freedom! The clothing mandate, she explained, eliminates the possibility that the state will “be the clothing police.” I don’t know about you, but I’m thinking of moving to Missouri! It must be wonderful to live in a state where the government has already fixed all the big problems people really care about, letting the legislative body focus on properly clothing its women members. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Many of today’s right-wing governors and state legislators have a problem. By constantly pushing an extremist ideological agenda of nonsense about nutty conspiracy theories – while imposing autocratic laws to ban everything from voting to library books – they’ve become widely ridiculed as some combo of kooky, clownish, and embarrassingly corrupt. That’s why it’s significant that Missouri’s GOP lawmakers have not only recognized their image problem, but have actually made an effort to demonstrate that they are serious-minded public officials concerned about their professionalism. Namely, the state house of representatives has adopted a dress code. Seriously. Specifically, the “attire mandate” addresses the pressing state issue of female lawmakers who come to work dressed normally – but without jackets. Disapproving legislative leaders clucked that this fashion faux pas was undermining the public’s respect for them. But now, says GOP Rep. Ann Kelley, sponsor of the new code, “It has been fixed.” Henceforth, all women legislators in the “Show Me” state must wear blazers or cardigans in order to, as Kelley explained, “always maintain a formal and professional atmosphere” in the House. Professional? Excuse me, but these far-right state legislatures totter between being goofy policy forums and carnival sideshows. The only proper attire for many of these so-called legislative “leaders” would be straitjackets. Indeed, trying to rationalize the Missouri legislature’s expenditure of state time, money, and credibility on dictating women’s attire, Kelley’s GOP colleague Brenda Shields declared it was about protecting freedom! The clothing mandate, she explained, eliminates the possibility that the state will “be the clothing police.” I don’t know about you, but I’m thinking of moving to Missouri! It must be wonderful to live in a state where the government has already fixed all the big problems people really care about, letting the legislative body focus on properly clothing its women members. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tracking Norfolk Southern’s Derailment]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>“The Wreck of the Old Ninety-Seven” is a classic bluegrass song recounting a spectacular train crash in 1903, caused by the company’s demand that the engineer speed down a dangerous track to deliver cargo on time.</p><p>One hundred twenty years later we have the “Wreck of the Norfolk Southern” – a devastating crash caused by the corporate demand that it be allowed to run an ill-equipped, understaffed, largely-unregulated, 1.7 mile train carrying flammable, cancer-causing toxics through communities, putting profit over people and public safety.</p><p>This rolling bomb of a train was hardly unique, for the handful of multibillion-dollar railroad giants that control the industry also control lawmakers and regulators who’re supposed to protect the public from public-be-damned profiteers.  A measure of their arrogance came just two years ago, when an Ohio legislative committee dared to consider a modest proposal for just a bit more rail safety. Norfolk Southern executives squawked like Chicken Little, asserting a plutocratic doctrine of corporate supremacy on such decisions. They even imperiously proclaimed that state lawmakers have no right to <em>interfere</em> in safety matters.</p><p>Ohio’s Chamber of Commerce dutifully echoed Norfolk’s concern for profit over people, testifying that “Ohio’s business climate would be negatively impacted” by the bill. Never mind that Ohio’s public safety climate can literally be “negatively impacted” by train wrecks! Plunging deeper down the autocratic rabbit hole, the Chamber insisted that corporate control over workers is sacrosanct. It postulated that a crew-safety provision in the Ohio bill is illegal because it “would interfere with the employment relationship between employers and their employees.” Yes, that’s a corporate claim that executives have an inalienable right to endanger workers.</p><p>Sure enough, bowing to the corporate powers, Ohio lawmakers rejected the 2021 safety bill. And that, boys and girls, is why train catastrophes keep happening.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/tracking-norfolk-southerns-derailment</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:106061560</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2023 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2594053" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/106061560/098250e432f2daa833e076a461de4277.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/106061560/4e46c5fb194c3f11e7dd9507712f1e5b.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>“The Wreck of the Old Ninety-Seven” is a classic bluegrass song recounting a spectacular train crash in 1903, caused by the company’s demand that the engineer speed down a dangerous track to deliver cargo on time. One hundred twenty years later we have the “Wreck of the Norfolk Southern” – a devastating crash caused by the corporate demand that it be allowed to run an ill-equipped, understaffed, largely-unregulated, 1.7 mile train carrying flammable, cancer-causing toxics through communities, putting profit over people and public safety. This rolling bomb of a train was hardly unique, for the handful of multibillion-dollar railroad giants that control the industry also control lawmakers and regulators who’re supposed to protect the public from public-be-damned profiteers.  A measure of their arrogance came just two years ago, when an Ohio legislative committee dared to consider a modest proposal for just a bit more rail safety. Norfolk Southern executives squawked like Chicken Little, asserting a plutocratic doctrine of corporate supremacy on such decisions. They even imperiously proclaimed that state lawmakers have no right to interfere in safety matters. Ohio’s Chamber of Commerce dutifully echoed Norfolk’s concern for profit over people, testifying that “Ohio’s business climate would be negatively impacted” by the bill. Never mind that Ohio’s public safety climate can literally be “negatively impacted” by train wrecks! Plunging deeper down the autocratic rabbit hole, the Chamber insisted that corporate control over workers is sacrosanct. It postulated that a crew-safety provision in the Ohio bill is illegal because it “would interfere with the employment relationship between employers and their employees.” Yes, that’s a corporate claim that executives have an inalienable right to endanger workers. Sure enough, bowing to the corporate powers, Ohio lawmakers rejected the 2021 safety bill. And that, boys and girls, is why train catastrophes keep happening. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>“The Wreck of the Old Ninety-Seven” is a classic bluegrass song recounting a spectacular train crash in 1903, caused by the company’s demand that the engineer speed down a dangerous track to deliver cargo on time. One hundred twenty years later we have the “Wreck of the Norfolk Southern” – a devastating crash caused by the corporate demand that it be allowed to run an ill-equipped, understaffed, largely-unregulated, 1.7 mile train carrying flammable, cancer-causing toxics through communities, putting profit over people and public safety. This rolling bomb of a train was hardly unique, for the handful of multibillion-dollar railroad giants that control the industry also control lawmakers and regulators who’re supposed to protect the public from public-be-damned profiteers.  A measure of their arrogance came just two years ago, when an Ohio legislative committee dared to consider a modest proposal for just a bit more rail safety. Norfolk Southern executives squawked like Chicken Little, asserting a plutocratic doctrine of corporate supremacy on such decisions. They even imperiously proclaimed that state lawmakers have no right to interfere in safety matters. Ohio’s Chamber of Commerce dutifully echoed Norfolk’s concern for profit over people, testifying that “Ohio’s business climate would be negatively impacted” by the bill. Never mind that Ohio’s public safety climate can literally be “negatively impacted” by train wrecks! Plunging deeper down the autocratic rabbit hole, the Chamber insisted that corporate control over workers is sacrosanct. It postulated that a crew-safety provision in the Ohio bill is illegal because it “would interfere with the employment relationship between employers and their employees.” Yes, that’s a corporate claim that executives have an inalienable right to endanger workers. Sure enough, bowing to the corporate powers, Ohio lawmakers rejected the 2021 safety bill. And that, boys and girls, is why train catastrophes keep happening. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[How to Guarantee a Train Wreck]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Stuff happens, right?</p><p>I mean, who could’ve thought that in these modern times of digital monitoring of everything, something as massive as a freight train could become a toxic fireball rolling undetected and unslowed into an Ohio town? But a Norfolk Southern train did just that, derailing in East Palestine and contaminating the air, water, land, and families with tons of cancer-causing chemicals. Gosh exclaimed Norfolk Southern’s CEO; gosh exclaimed the Ohio Governor; gosh exclaimed the US transportation chief; gosh exclaimed the GOP chair of the rail transportation committee – this is a terrible, unexpected accident, and we’re all appalled by it!</p><p>Only… all of these officials knew full-well that this disaster would happen (though they didn’t know exactly where). Indeed, far from unexpected, there are more than 1,000 preventable train derailments in the US every year (Norfolk Southern had another only days after the one in Ohio). And these things don’t just happen – they are <em>caused</em>by the profiteering greed of the monopolistic industry’s top executives and rich investors.</p><p>While Norfolk’s boardroom elites have been pocketing record profits in recent years, they’ve used armies of lobbyists and multimillion-dollar political donations to kill safety protections that would prevent such a disastrous record. To cut costs and jack-up profits, railroad bosses have rigged the rules to run trains that are absurdly long, go too fast, carry ever-heavier loads of undisclosed toxics in weak tanker cars, have no fire detectors, use outmoded braking systems – and have as few as one crew member on board. One!</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… Norfolk’s derailed train was made to derail. It pulled 149 cars, stretching nearly two miles down the track, and it was unequipped to detect fires and other problems. This disaster was not an “accident” – it (and those that will come next) was mandated by the corporate and government officials now professing outrage.</p><p>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/how-to-guarantee-a-train-wreck</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:106038773</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2023 18:41:43 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593530" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/106038773/0fac94214c9f28ceb703a9792b7bb638.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/106038773/ef3a21756ec0eba128f7e18d161cfa94.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Stuff happens, right? I mean, who could’ve thought that in these modern times of digital monitoring of everything, something as massive as a freight train could become a toxic fireball rolling undetected and unslowed into an Ohio town? But a Norfolk Southern train did just that, derailing in East Palestine and contaminating the air, water, land, and families with tons of cancer-causing chemicals. Gosh exclaimed Norfolk Southern’s CEO; gosh exclaimed the Ohio Governor; gosh exclaimed the US transportation chief; gosh exclaimed the GOP chair of the rail transportation committee – this is a terrible, unexpected accident, and we’re all appalled by it! Only… all of these officials knew full-well that this disaster would happen (though they didn’t know exactly where). Indeed, far from unexpected, there are more than 1,000 preventable train derailments in the US every year (Norfolk Southern had another only days after the one in Ohio). And these things don’t just happen – they are causedby the profiteering greed of the monopolistic industry’s top executives and rich investors. While Norfolk’s boardroom elites have been pocketing record profits in recent years, they’ve used armies of lobbyists and multimillion-dollar political donations to kill safety protections that would prevent such a disastrous record. To cut costs and jack-up profits, railroad bosses have rigged the rules to run trains that are absurdly long, go too fast, carry ever-heavier loads of undisclosed toxics in weak tanker cars, have no fire detectors, use outmoded braking systems – and have as few as one crew member on board. One! This is Jim Hightower saying… Norfolk’s derailed train was made to derail. It pulled 149 cars, stretching nearly two miles down the track, and it was unequipped to detect fires and other problems. This disaster was not an “accident” – it (and those that will come next) was mandated by the corporate and government officials now professing outrage. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Stuff happens, right? I mean, who could’ve thought that in these modern times of digital monitoring of everything, something as massive as a freight train could become a toxic fireball rolling undetected and unslowed into an Ohio town? But a Norfolk Southern train did just that, derailing in East Palestine and contaminating the air, water, land, and families with tons of cancer-causing chemicals. Gosh exclaimed Norfolk Southern’s CEO; gosh exclaimed the Ohio Governor; gosh exclaimed the US transportation chief; gosh exclaimed the GOP chair of the rail transportation committee – this is a terrible, unexpected accident, and we’re all appalled by it! Only… all of these officials knew full-well that this disaster would happen (though they didn’t know exactly where). Indeed, far from unexpected, there are more than 1,000 preventable train derailments in the US every year (Norfolk Southern had another only days after the one in Ohio). And these things don’t just happen – they are causedby the profiteering greed of the monopolistic industry’s top executives and rich investors. While Norfolk’s boardroom elites have been pocketing record profits in recent years, they’ve used armies of lobbyists and multimillion-dollar political donations to kill safety protections that would prevent such a disastrous record. To cut costs and jack-up profits, railroad bosses have rigged the rules to run trains that are absurdly long, go too fast, carry ever-heavier loads of undisclosed toxics in weak tanker cars, have no fire detectors, use outmoded braking systems – and have as few as one crew member on board. One! This is Jim Hightower saying… Norfolk’s derailed train was made to derail. It pulled 149 cars, stretching nearly two miles down the track, and it was unequipped to detect fires and other problems. This disaster was not an “accident” – it (and those that will come next) was mandated by the corporate and government officials now professing outrage. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sick? Injured? Dying? Call Wall Street!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Your doctor is out and unable to see you now. Not out for lunch or out on vacation -- but out of medical practice.</p><p>America’s perverse health care system, which sublimates care to the profiteering demands of Wall Street speculators who essentially own today’s system, has been driving out hordes of nurses, pharmacists… and now doctors. These practitioners take their Hippocratic Oath seriously: “First, do no harm.” Yet, again and again they see corporate managers of hospital chains, physician clinics, etc. doing severe harm, routinely slashing staffing levels, eliminating services, rejecting low-income patients… and raising prices. All to prop-up the profits of rich, absentee investors.</p><p>A prominent physician recently wrote that in 2021 alone four times more doctors quit the profession than joined. He says his colleagues are demoralized by “<a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/05/opinion/doctors-universal-health-care.html">the diseased systems for which we work.</a>” The disease is money. The primary measure of “care” is now how much profit the system generates for its uncaring corporate owners, so one’s health is largely dependent on one’s wealth. The morally abominable result is that hundreds of thousands of preventable deaths are occurring each year. Yes, profit-based health care <em>is a killer</em>.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… It’s time to be blunt: For-profit health care is the creation of profiteers and the politicians they buy. It’s insane to let their greed dictate the allocation and quality of this essential human need. Luckily, a better way is right in front of us: Medicare. This enormously-popular public program of universal coverage for each and every American over 65 has proven to be an effective and fair system that is far cheaper and much, much more caring than Wall Street’s privatized scheme. So, let’s eliminate the profiteers by extending Medicare to all of us – every woman, man, and child in our society. To help go to: <a target="_blank" href="https://ourrevolution.com/2021/06/05/m4a/">ourrevolution.com/issues</a>.</p><p><em>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</em></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/sick-injured-dying-call-wall-street</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:103711979</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2023 13:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2597187" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/103711979/9985ee477fe67e4068a7f85c49240340.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/103711979/5f64d5dc2cb481dc898caa1ef0566b2b.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Your doctor is out and unable to see you now. Not out for lunch or out on vacation -- but out of medical practice. America’s perverse health care system, which sublimates care to the profiteering demands of Wall Street speculators who essentially own today’s system, has been driving out hordes of nurses, pharmacists… and now doctors. These practitioners take their Hippocratic Oath seriously: “First, do no harm.” Yet, again and again they see corporate managers of hospital chains, physician clinics, etc. doing severe harm, routinely slashing staffing levels, eliminating services, rejecting low-income patients… and raising prices. All to prop-up the profits of rich, absentee investors. A prominent physician recently wrote that in 2021 alone four times more doctors quit the profession than joined. He says his colleagues are demoralized by “the diseased systems for which we work.” The disease is money. The primary measure of “care” is now how much profit the system generates for its uncaring corporate owners, so one’s health is largely dependent on one’s wealth. The morally abominable result is that hundreds of thousands of preventable deaths are occurring each year. Yes, profit-based health care is a killer. This is Jim Hightower saying… It’s time to be blunt: For-profit health care is the creation of profiteers and the politicians they buy. It’s insane to let their greed dictate the allocation and quality of this essential human need. Luckily, a better way is right in front of us: Medicare. This enormously-popular public program of universal coverage for each and every American over 65 has proven to be an effective and fair system that is far cheaper and much, much more caring than Wall Street’s privatized scheme. So, let’s eliminate the profiteers by extending Medicare to all of us – every woman, man, and child in our society. To help go to: ourrevolution.com/issues. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Your doctor is out and unable to see you now. Not out for lunch or out on vacation -- but out of medical practice. America’s perverse health care system, which sublimates care to the profiteering demands of Wall Street speculators who essentially own today’s system, has been driving out hordes of nurses, pharmacists… and now doctors. These practitioners take their Hippocratic Oath seriously: “First, do no harm.” Yet, again and again they see corporate managers of hospital chains, physician clinics, etc. doing severe harm, routinely slashing staffing levels, eliminating services, rejecting low-income patients… and raising prices. All to prop-up the profits of rich, absentee investors. A prominent physician recently wrote that in 2021 alone four times more doctors quit the profession than joined. He says his colleagues are demoralized by “the diseased systems for which we work.” The disease is money. The primary measure of “care” is now how much profit the system generates for its uncaring corporate owners, so one’s health is largely dependent on one’s wealth. The morally abominable result is that hundreds of thousands of preventable deaths are occurring each year. Yes, profit-based health care is a killer. This is Jim Hightower saying… It’s time to be blunt: For-profit health care is the creation of profiteers and the politicians they buy. It’s insane to let their greed dictate the allocation and quality of this essential human need. Luckily, a better way is right in front of us: Medicare. This enormously-popular public program of universal coverage for each and every American over 65 has proven to be an effective and fair system that is far cheaper and much, much more caring than Wall Street’s privatized scheme. So, let’s eliminate the profiteers by extending Medicare to all of us – every woman, man, and child in our society. To help go to: ourrevolution.com/issues. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Are We Letting For-Profit Health Care Kill Us?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>No one needs another outrage to worry about, but here’s one that could literally be your last worry. Our hospitals are killing us.</p><p>Not that the staffers are going room to room snuffing our patients, of course, but hospital owners and top executives are nonetheless killing thousands of ill Americans entrusted to their care. They are doing by deliberately short-staffing their facilities and shortchanging sick and injured people they’re richly paid to serve.</p><p>At the core of this outrage is a fatal structural flaw in our healthcare system, namely that these are no longer “our” hospitals. Instead of being public or non-profit entities for the Common Good, focused squarely on patients, hospitals today tend to be private operations controlled by corporate profiteers. Pitting patients against profits is no way to run a hospital, for it means money will ultimately rule over health (and over life itself). Ask a nurse.</p><p>These dedicated professionals are the solid pillars of American health. More than doctors and way more than administrators, nurses make a hospital function, providing the primary care and constant, on-site monitoring that are the essence of an ethical, healthy system. Yet, thousands have already fled the work they love, another third plan to leave this year – and thousands more are going on strike.</p><p>Why? Because the profit system demands massive staff cuts, leaving way too few nurses to meet the basic needs of patients, causing burnout among nurses… and unnecessary deaths of the people they care for. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/18/opinion/nurses-strike-pay-staffing-ratios.html">A damning 2021 study revealed that forcing fewer nurses to tend to an ever-larger caseload effectively killed more than 4,000 New York hospital patients in the previous two years alone.</a></p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying… Yet, the corporate powers insist on treating nurses just as a cost to be cut, arguing that hospitals must have “staffing flexibility.” In other words: Cut nurses/Raise profits.</p><p><em>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</em></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-are-we-letting-for-profit-health</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:103711551</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2023 13:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593008" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/103711551/93f77de88c61edf693b21860aab068ec.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/103711551/7ad6797e427874eb058b0c8150b20917.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>No one needs another outrage to worry about, but here’s one that could literally be your last worry. Our hospitals are killing us. Not that the staffers are going room to room snuffing our patients, of course, but hospital owners and top executives are nonetheless killing thousands of ill Americans entrusted to their care. They are doing by deliberately short-staffing their facilities and shortchanging sick and injured people they’re richly paid to serve. At the core of this outrage is a fatal structural flaw in our healthcare system, namely that these are no longer “our” hospitals. Instead of being public or non-profit entities for the Common Good, focused squarely on patients, hospitals today tend to be private operations controlled by corporate profiteers. Pitting patients against profits is no way to run a hospital, for it means money will ultimately rule over health (and over life itself). Ask a nurse. These dedicated professionals are the solid pillars of American health. More than doctors and way more than administrators, nurses make a hospital function, providing the primary care and constant, on-site monitoring that are the essence of an ethical, healthy system. Yet, thousands have already fled the work they love, another third plan to leave this year – and thousands more are going on strike. Why? Because the profit system demands massive staff cuts, leaving way too few nurses to meet the basic needs of patients, causing burnout among nurses… and unnecessary deaths of the people they care for. A damning 2021 study revealed that forcing fewer nurses to tend to an ever-larger caseload effectively killed more than 4,000 New York hospital patients in the previous two years alone. This is Jim Hightower saying… Yet, the corporate powers insist on treating nurses just as a cost to be cut, arguing that hospitals must have “staffing flexibility.” In other words: Cut nurses/Raise profits. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>No one needs another outrage to worry about, but here’s one that could literally be your last worry. Our hospitals are killing us. Not that the staffers are going room to room snuffing our patients, of course, but hospital owners and top executives are nonetheless killing thousands of ill Americans entrusted to their care. They are doing by deliberately short-staffing their facilities and shortchanging sick and injured people they’re richly paid to serve. At the core of this outrage is a fatal structural flaw in our healthcare system, namely that these are no longer “our” hospitals. Instead of being public or non-profit entities for the Common Good, focused squarely on patients, hospitals today tend to be private operations controlled by corporate profiteers. Pitting patients against profits is no way to run a hospital, for it means money will ultimately rule over health (and over life itself). Ask a nurse. These dedicated professionals are the solid pillars of American health. More than doctors and way more than administrators, nurses make a hospital function, providing the primary care and constant, on-site monitoring that are the essence of an ethical, healthy system. Yet, thousands have already fled the work they love, another third plan to leave this year – and thousands more are going on strike. Why? Because the profit system demands massive staff cuts, leaving way too few nurses to meet the basic needs of patients, causing burnout among nurses… and unnecessary deaths of the people they care for. A damning 2021 study revealed that forcing fewer nurses to tend to an ever-larger caseload effectively killed more than 4,000 New York hospital patients in the previous two years alone. This is Jim Hightower saying… Yet, the corporate powers insist on treating nurses just as a cost to be cut, arguing that hospitals must have “staffing flexibility.” In other words: Cut nurses/Raise profits. Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Would Wall Street Kill Your Granny for A Little More Profit? ]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>There are industries that occasionally do something rotten. And there are industries like Big Oil, Big Pharma, and Big Tobacco – that persistently do rotten things.</p><p>Then there is the nursing home industry – where rottenness has become a core business principle. The end-of-life “experience” can be rotten enough on its own, with an assortment of natural indignities bedeviling us, and good nursing homes help gentle this time. In the past couple of decades, though, an entirely <em>unnatural</em> force has come to dominate the delivery of aged care: Profiteering corporate chains and Wall Street speculators.</p><p>The very fact that this essential and sensitive social function, which ought to be the domain of health professionals and charitable enterprises, is now called an “industry” reflects a total perversion of its purpose. Some 70 percent of nursing homes are now corporate operations run by absentee executives who have no experience in nursing homes and who’re guided by the market imperative of maximizing investor profits. They constantly demand “efficiencies” from their facilities, which invariably means reducing the number of nurses, which invariably reduces care, which means more injuries, illness… and deaths. As one nursing expert rightly says, “It’s criminal.”</p><p>But it’s not against the law, since the industry’s lobbying front – a major donor to congressional campaigns – effectively writes the laws, which allows corporate hustlers to provide only one nurse on duty, no matter how many patients are in the facility. When a humane nurse-staffing requirement was proposed last year, the lobby group furiously opposed it… and congress dutifully bowed to industry profits over grandma’s decent end-time. After all, granny doesn’t make campaign donations.</p><p>So, as a health policy analyst bluntly puts it, “The only kind of groups that seem to be interested in investing in nursing homes are bad actors.” To help push for better, contact <a target="_blank" href="http://TheConsumerVoice.org">TheConsumerVoice.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/would-wall-street-kill-your-granny</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:102721444</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2597187" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/102721444/6670c6e8992e7bbb72743b4807760cfe.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/102721444/185a97bb1a8d40ebdfbb5b3602ea4dda.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>There are industries that occasionally do something rotten. And there are industries like Big Oil, Big Pharma, and Big Tobacco – that persistently do rotten things. Then there is the nursing home industry – where rottenness has become a core business principle. The end-of-life “experience” can be rotten enough on its own, with an assortment of natural indignities bedeviling us, and good nursing homes help gentle this time. In the past couple of decades, though, an entirely unnatural force has come to dominate the delivery of aged care: Profiteering corporate chains and Wall Street speculators. The very fact that this essential and sensitive social function, which ought to be the domain of health professionals and charitable enterprises, is now called an “industry” reflects a total perversion of its purpose. Some 70 percent of nursing homes are now corporate operations run by absentee executives who have no experience in nursing homes and who’re guided by the market imperative of maximizing investor profits. They constantly demand “efficiencies” from their facilities, which invariably means reducing the number of nurses, which invariably reduces care, which means more injuries, illness… and deaths. As one nursing expert rightly says, “It’s criminal.” But it’s not against the law, since the industry’s lobbying front – a major donor to congressional campaigns – effectively writes the laws, which allows corporate hustlers to provide only one nurse on duty, no matter how many patients are in the facility. When a humane nurse-staffing requirement was proposed last year, the lobby group furiously opposed it… and congress dutifully bowed to industry profits over grandma’s decent end-time. After all, granny doesn’t make campaign donations. So, as a health policy analyst bluntly puts it, “The only kind of groups that seem to be interested in investing in nursing homes are bad actors.” To help push for better, contact TheConsumerVoice.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>There are industries that occasionally do something rotten. And there are industries like Big Oil, Big Pharma, and Big Tobacco – that persistently do rotten things. Then there is the nursing home industry – where rottenness has become a core business principle. The end-of-life “experience” can be rotten enough on its own, with an assortment of natural indignities bedeviling us, and good nursing homes help gentle this time. In the past couple of decades, though, an entirely unnatural force has come to dominate the delivery of aged care: Profiteering corporate chains and Wall Street speculators. The very fact that this essential and sensitive social function, which ought to be the domain of health professionals and charitable enterprises, is now called an “industry” reflects a total perversion of its purpose. Some 70 percent of nursing homes are now corporate operations run by absentee executives who have no experience in nursing homes and who’re guided by the market imperative of maximizing investor profits. They constantly demand “efficiencies” from their facilities, which invariably means reducing the number of nurses, which invariably reduces care, which means more injuries, illness… and deaths. As one nursing expert rightly says, “It’s criminal.” But it’s not against the law, since the industry’s lobbying front – a major donor to congressional campaigns – effectively writes the laws, which allows corporate hustlers to provide only one nurse on duty, no matter how many patients are in the facility. When a humane nurse-staffing requirement was proposed last year, the lobby group furiously opposed it… and congress dutifully bowed to industry profits over grandma’s decent end-time. After all, granny doesn’t make campaign donations. So, as a health policy analyst bluntly puts it, “The only kind of groups that seem to be interested in investing in nursing homes are bad actors.” To help push for better, contact TheConsumerVoice.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Love to You from Valentine, Texas]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Please be my Valentine!</p><p>That is not only a warm, sweet, sometimes romantic sentiment people express in mid-February on a frilly, red card. It’s also the name of a third-century saint who literally lost his head, a ninth-century pope whose reign lasted only 40 days, three Roman emperors, a very good Mexican hot sauce… and a tiny town in Texas.</p><p>That town has a genuinely sweet story to tell and a unique role to play in the sending of thousands of Valentine’s Day sentiments to people around the world. Valentine, Texas, population 217, was founded by the Southern Pacific Railroad in the 1880s and reportedly was named for one of the corporation’s big shareholders. Nothing romantic about that.</p><p>But in recent years, would-be cupids have turned the town’s name and – believe it or not – its one-room post office into a center of affectionate expression. What happened is that romantics from distant places began to batch-up their pre-addressed, stamped Valentines and zip them to this postal outpost way out on the Texas-Mexico border. Why? Because, to give their sentimental missives extra oomph, they wanted them to bear the special touch of being mailed from an actual place named Valentine.</p><p>The greatest thing about our public postal workers is that they literally deliver, and the Valentine branch goes the extra mile to provide this loving gesture – at no extra charge. Ismelda Ornelas, Postmaster of the 79854 office, handstamps each envelope herself. Indeed, the Valentine post office is now officially designated the “Love Station.” <a target="_blank" href="https://about.usps.com/newsroom/local-releases/tx/2023/0201-valentine-tx-po-announces-postmark.htm">Moreover, the local school district holds an annual art contest among students to design each year’s Valentine postmark, which is then stamped on each envelope.</a></p><p>See, while the media tells us our world is going to hell, here’s another grassroots example of loving, creative people going the other way. Happy Valentine’s Day!</p><p><em>Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media!</em></p><p></p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/love-to-you-from-valentine-texas</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:102717226</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593008" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/102717226/53c4f4873eefda1f19f3a813aef3158e.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/102717226/bf589456b8ece6478692bc375680335d.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Please be my Valentine! That is not only a warm, sweet, sometimes romantic sentiment people express in mid-February on a frilly, red card. It’s also the name of a third-century saint who literally lost his head, a ninth-century pope whose reign lasted only 40 days, three Roman emperors, a very good Mexican hot sauce… and a tiny town in Texas. That town has a genuinely sweet story to tell and a unique role to play in the sending of thousands of Valentine’s Day sentiments to people around the world. Valentine, Texas, population 217, was founded by the Southern Pacific Railroad in the 1880s and reportedly was named for one of the corporation’s big shareholders. Nothing romantic about that. But in recent years, would-be cupids have turned the town’s name and – believe it or not – its one-room post office into a center of affectionate expression. What happened is that romantics from distant places began to batch-up their pre-addressed, stamped Valentines and zip them to this postal outpost way out on the Texas-Mexico border. Why? Because, to give their sentimental missives extra oomph, they wanted them to bear the special touch of being mailed from an actual place named Valentine. The greatest thing about our public postal workers is that they literally deliver, and the Valentine branch goes the extra mile to provide this loving gesture – at no extra charge. Ismelda Ornelas, Postmaster of the 79854 office, handstamps each envelope herself. Indeed, the Valentine post office is now officially designated the “Love Station.” Moreover, the local school district holds an annual art contest among students to design each year’s Valentine postmark, which is then stamped on each envelope. See, while the media tells us our world is going to hell, here’s another grassroots example of loving, creative people going the other way. Happy Valentine’s Day! Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Please be my Valentine! That is not only a warm, sweet, sometimes romantic sentiment people express in mid-February on a frilly, red card. It’s also the name of a third-century saint who literally lost his head, a ninth-century pope whose reign lasted only 40 days, three Roman emperors, a very good Mexican hot sauce… and a tiny town in Texas. That town has a genuinely sweet story to tell and a unique role to play in the sending of thousands of Valentine’s Day sentiments to people around the world. Valentine, Texas, population 217, was founded by the Southern Pacific Railroad in the 1880s and reportedly was named for one of the corporation’s big shareholders. Nothing romantic about that. But in recent years, would-be cupids have turned the town’s name and – believe it or not – its one-room post office into a center of affectionate expression. What happened is that romantics from distant places began to batch-up their pre-addressed, stamped Valentines and zip them to this postal outpost way out on the Texas-Mexico border. Why? Because, to give their sentimental missives extra oomph, they wanted them to bear the special touch of being mailed from an actual place named Valentine. The greatest thing about our public postal workers is that they literally deliver, and the Valentine branch goes the extra mile to provide this loving gesture – at no extra charge. Ismelda Ornelas, Postmaster of the 79854 office, handstamps each envelope herself. Indeed, the Valentine post office is now officially designated the “Love Station.” Moreover, the local school district holds an annual art contest among students to design each year’s Valentine postmark, which is then stamped on each envelope. See, while the media tells us our world is going to hell, here’s another grassroots example of loving, creative people going the other way. Happy Valentine’s Day! Enjoyed this post? Please consider sharing with friends and on social media! Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Prevaricating for Profit]]></title><description><![CDATA[This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_7">jimhightower.substack.com</a><br/><br/><p>Why would anyone believe anything that a big corporation tells us?</p><p>Corporate powers use lies as a core element of their business strategy. I’m not even counting the tsunami of polished, poll-tested lies they call “advertising.” Rather, I mean their secret perversions of facts to hide the deadly harms they and their products cause, all pushed by top execu…</p>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/prevaricating-for-profit</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:101318996</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2023 12:00:37 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="829764" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/101318996/102923da9b6db8e1460a9a4aa4875ad3.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>41</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/101318996/77efc26ae6f9d3a0dae56122ce5ec8c6.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com Why would anyone believe anything that a big corporation tells us? Corporate powers use lies as a core element of their business strategy. I’m not even counting the tsunami of polished, poll-tested lies they call “advertising.” Rather, I mean their secret perversions of facts to hide the deadly harms they and their products cause, all pushed by top execu…</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com Why would anyone believe anything that a big corporation tells us? Corporate powers use lies as a core element of their business strategy. I’m not even counting the tsunami of polished, poll-tested lies they call “advertising.” Rather, I mean their secret perversions of facts to hide the deadly harms they and their products cause, all pushed by top execu…</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Who Taught George Santos to Be Such a Self-Serving Fraud?]]></title><description><![CDATA[This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_7">jimhightower.substack.com</a><br/><br/><p>People are baffled by the surreal saga of George Santos, the bizarre Republican congress critter who is a bottomless sink hole of lies. How could he think that he, a highly visible public figure, could get away with such blatant fabrications?</p><p>Perhaps he thought he was a corporation.</p><p>After all, these multibillion-dollar brand-name outfits routinely lie abo…</p>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/who-taught-george-santos-to-be-such</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:101314505</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2023 12:01:57 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="761323" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/101314505/b04c8b697d7899924d2bcc6336267b00.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>38</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/101314505/d7019d3dfa458b646129168ab24d42b2.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com People are baffled by the surreal saga of George Santos, the bizarre Republican congress critter who is a bottomless sink hole of lies. How could he think that he, a highly visible public figure, could get away with such blatant fabrications? Perhaps he thought he was a corporation. After all, these multibillion-dollar brand-name outfits routinely lie abo…</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com People are baffled by the surreal saga of George Santos, the bizarre Republican congress critter who is a bottomless sink hole of lies. How could he think that he, a highly visible public figure, could get away with such blatant fabrications? Perhaps he thought he was a corporation. After all, these multibillion-dollar brand-name outfits routinely lie abo…</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Welcome to the US House of Crazies]]></title><description><![CDATA[This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_7">jimhightower.substack.com</a><br/><br/><p>An old political saying notes that the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing. However, given the proliferation of today’s goofball culture wars and fanatical right-wing phobias, that truism should be updated to say: Evil swarms when power-hungry leaders unleash the crazies.</p><p>Which brings us to the US House of Repres…</p>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/welcome-to-the-us-house-of-crazies</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:99864302</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2023 12:01:12 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="813045" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/99864302/844c13bd316cd0db4e15ea191ab7c909.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>41</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/99864302/4d4eaf86440f3c2fc0ac537a07744257.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com An old political saying notes that the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing. However, given the proliferation of today’s goofball culture wars and fanatical right-wing phobias, that truism should be updated to say: Evil swarms when power-hungry leaders unleash the crazies. Which brings us to the US House of Repres…</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com An old political saying notes that the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing. However, given the proliferation of today’s goofball culture wars and fanatical right-wing phobias, that truism should be updated to say: Evil swarms when power-hungry leaders unleash the crazies. Which brings us to the US House of Repres…</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Santos Is Pathetic. McCarthy Is Disgusting. Both Should Go Away.]]></title><description><![CDATA[This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_7">jimhightower.substack.com</a><br/><br/><p>Big news from Congressional Republicans: After years of failing to unearth any proof that America’s elections are corrupted by flagrant cases of voter fraud, the GOP has now found a whopper!</p><p>Unfortunately for the Party’s voter integrity police, though, what they’ve uncovered is not some nefarious Democratic plot, but a scheme of mass deception by one of …</p>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/santos-is-pathetic-mccarthy-is-disgusting</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:99828366</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 12:01:28 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="888278" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/99828366/5edd13530222e15c117b404a436a5142.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>44</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/99828366/8a48be082777b60ce8e79d26c868e12d.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com Big news from Congressional Republicans: After years of failing to unearth any proof that America’s elections are corrupted by flagrant cases of voter fraud, the GOP has now found a whopper! Unfortunately for the Party’s voter integrity police, though, what they’ve uncovered is not some nefarious Democratic plot, but a scheme of mass deception by one of …</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com Big news from Congressional Republicans: After years of failing to unearth any proof that America’s elections are corrupted by flagrant cases of voter fraud, the GOP has now found a whopper! Unfortunately for the Party’s voter integrity police, though, what they’ve uncovered is not some nefarious Democratic plot, but a scheme of mass deception by one of …</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[How Inequality Happens]]></title><description><![CDATA[This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_7">jimhightower.substack.com</a><br/><br/><p>High-dollar corporate executives and Wall Street bankers keep telling us that it’s lonely at the top. Well, they should try toiling at the bottom of America’s pay scale.</p><p>The radical rise of inequality in our society is a function of the vast political inequality separating the working class from the power structure. The elite rich have many friends in hi…</p>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/how-inequality-happens</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:98697119</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2023 12:01:11 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="775951" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/98697119/d398d605122eac0895e99be7c743fcc3.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>39</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/98697119/b3b7520bbda789a236d82ad74ad12197.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com High-dollar corporate executives and Wall Street bankers keep telling us that it’s lonely at the top. Well, they should try toiling at the bottom of America’s pay scale. The radical rise of inequality in our society is a function of the vast political inequality separating the working class from the power structure. The elite rich have many friends in hi…</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com High-dollar corporate executives and Wall Street bankers keep telling us that it’s lonely at the top. Well, they should try toiling at the bottom of America’s pay scale. The radical rise of inequality in our society is a function of the vast political inequality separating the working class from the power structure. The elite rich have many friends in hi…</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Singing The Hard-Hit Wall Street Worker Blues]]></title><description><![CDATA[This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_7">jimhightower.substack.com</a><br/><br/><p>I don’t usually cover sob stories, but this one is so touching it might make you cry. Or throw up.</p><p>It’s about some workers who toiled all last year in the caverns of New York City, only to find at year’s end that their pay was being cut by up to 50 percent. Actually, it’s not their salaries that were cut – but their bonuses. You see, these are Wall Stree…</p>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/singing-the-hard-hit-wall-street</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:98692527</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2023 16:09:33 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="1050759" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/98692527/a7f99b2895c37ac861f3280846d9a31d.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>53</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/98692527/96da556287fcf8015ebc87da4409c3b3.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com I don’t usually cover sob stories, but this one is so touching it might make you cry. Or throw up. It’s about some workers who toiled all last year in the caverns of New York City, only to find at year’s end that their pay was being cut by up to 50 percent. Actually, it’s not their salaries that were cut – but their bonuses. You see, these are Wall Stree…</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com I don’t usually cover sob stories, but this one is so touching it might make you cry. Or throw up. It’s about some workers who toiled all last year in the caverns of New York City, only to find at year’s end that their pay was being cut by up to 50 percent. Actually, it’s not their salaries that were cut – but their bonuses. You see, these are Wall Stree…</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Here’s A Wild Idea That’s Taking Root]]></title><description><![CDATA[This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_7">jimhightower.substack.com</a><br/><br/><p>Growing up, I absorbed a lot of values from my Ol’ Texas Daddy – a strong commitment to the Common Good, a healthy work ethic, and a lively sense of humor. But one thing about him I’ve rejected: His determination to have a perfect yard of thick, verdant, St. Augustine grass.</p><p>Lord, how he worked at it – laying sod, (watering), fertilizing, (watering), weeding, (watering), spreading pesticides, (watering), mowing… (more watering). But it was too hot, too dry, too infested with blight, bugs, slugs, and such. He was up against Texas nature, and he just couldn’t win.</p>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/heres-a-wild-idea-thats-taking-root</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:97300671</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 12:01:14 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="766547" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/97300671/63e3f8e355c6d74bef02126ff21fa09d.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>38</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/97300671/c5ba0b40ba8213fd42389b0e9c207225.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com Growing up, I absorbed a lot of values from my Ol’ Texas Daddy – a strong commitment to the Common Good, a healthy work ethic, and a lively sense of humor. But one thing about him I’ve rejected: His determination to have a perfect yard of thick, verdant, St. Augustine grass. Lord, how he worked at it – laying sod, (watering), fertilizing, (watering), weeding, (watering), spreading pesticides, (watering), mowing… (more watering). But it was too hot, too dry, too infested with blight, bugs, slugs, and such. He was up against Texas nature, and he just couldn’t win.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com Growing up, I absorbed a lot of values from my Ol’ Texas Daddy – a strong commitment to the Common Good, a healthy work ethic, and a lively sense of humor. But one thing about him I’ve rejected: His determination to have a perfect yard of thick, verdant, St. Augustine grass. Lord, how he worked at it – laying sod, (watering), fertilizing, (watering), weeding, (watering), spreading pesticides, (watering), mowing… (more watering). But it was too hot, too dry, too infested with blight, bugs, slugs, and such. He was up against Texas nature, and he just couldn’t win.</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Your Lush, Green Lawn Killing Mother Nature?]]></title><description><![CDATA[This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_7">jimhightower.substack.com</a><br/><br/><p>Sometimes, little things can be a big deal. For example, in considering ways to help protect Mother Earth from global environmental rampages by us humans, look out your window.</p><p>In many cities and most suburbs, chances are you’re looking at a lawn – a grass-carpeted yard that looks almost the same as the one next door, the one next to it, etc. Some see a lush expanse of green grass as the ultimate in landscaping beauty, and some even consider a well-manicured lawn to be a measure of one’s moral character.</p><p>Beauty and piety aside, though, the spread and intensification of “lawn culture” has become an environmental extravagance that is already unsustainable in whole sections of our country, and it adds up to a steadily-increasing burden on Earth’s essential resources. Grass itself is natural, but keeping it alive across thousands of square miles is not, for it requires a deluge of chemicals and endless rivers of water applied again and again, yard after yard, trying to keep these plots green. And – O, the irony! – their “green” includes eliminating bees, butterflies… and, well, nature. One statistic tells the tale: Americans use more than 10 times more poison per acre than all of America’s farmers use on their crops.</p><p>Just glance around you, and you’ll see the grass lawn imperative at work throughout your community – it surrounds local schools, “greens-up” corporate complexes, spreads across college campuses, forms miles of golf courses, etc.</p><p>This is not a diatribe against grassy plots, which can be natural joys. But let’s get real, get creative, and get in touch with the full balance and beauty of nature. You can promote ground cover sanity right where you live with native plants, xeriscaping, organic methods, rain gardens, and “re-wilding” your yard with things like prairie grass. For help, go to <a target="_blank" href="http://Rewild.org/Rewild-Your-Life">Rewild.org/Rewild-Your-Life</a>.</p>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/is-your-lush-green-lawn-killing-mother</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:97299859</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2023 17:19:51 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="1086808" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/97299859/3ecec6d412a85d50a2b209517068f354.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>54</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/97299859/965c457c53a6849155093abe1c726f5c.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com Sometimes, little things can be a big deal. For example, in considering ways to help protect Mother Earth from global environmental rampages by us humans, look out your window. In many cities and most suburbs, chances are you’re looking at a lawn – a grass-carpeted yard that looks almost the same as the one next door, the one next to it, etc. Some see a lush expanse of green grass as the ultimate in landscaping beauty, and some even consider a well-manicured lawn to be a measure of one’s moral character. Beauty and piety aside, though, the spread and intensification of “lawn culture” has become an environmental extravagance that is already unsustainable in whole sections of our country, and it adds up to a steadily-increasing burden on Earth’s essential resources. Grass itself is natural, but keeping it alive across thousands of square miles is not, for it requires a deluge of chemicals and endless rivers of water applied again and again, yard after yard, trying to keep these plots green. And – O, the irony! – their “green” includes eliminating bees, butterflies… and, well, nature. One statistic tells the tale: Americans use more than 10 times more poison per acre than all of America’s farmers use on their crops. Just glance around you, and you’ll see the grass lawn imperative at work throughout your community – it surrounds local schools, “greens-up” corporate complexes, spreads across college campuses, forms miles of golf courses, etc. This is not a diatribe against grassy plots, which can be natural joys. But let’s get real, get creative, and get in touch with the full balance and beauty of nature. You can promote ground cover sanity right where you live with native plants, xeriscaping, organic methods, rain gardens, and “re-wilding” your yard with things like prairie grass. For help, go to Rewild.org/Rewild-Your-Life.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit jimhightower.substack.com Sometimes, little things can be a big deal. For example, in considering ways to help protect Mother Earth from global environmental rampages by us humans, look out your window. In many cities and most suburbs, chances are you’re looking at a lawn – a grass-carpeted yard that looks almost the same as the one next door, the one next to it, etc. Some see a lush expanse of green grass as the ultimate in landscaping beauty, and some even consider a well-manicured lawn to be a measure of one’s moral character. Beauty and piety aside, though, the spread and intensification of “lawn culture” has become an environmental extravagance that is already unsustainable in whole sections of our country, and it adds up to a steadily-increasing burden on Earth’s essential resources. Grass itself is natural, but keeping it alive across thousands of square miles is not, for it requires a deluge of chemicals and endless rivers of water applied again and again, yard after yard, trying to keep these plots green. And – O, the irony! – their “green” includes eliminating bees, butterflies… and, well, nature. One statistic tells the tale: Americans use more than 10 times more poison per acre than all of America’s farmers use on their crops. Just glance around you, and you’ll see the grass lawn imperative at work throughout your community – it surrounds local schools, “greens-up” corporate complexes, spreads across college campuses, forms miles of golf courses, etc. This is not a diatribe against grassy plots, which can be natural joys. But let’s get real, get creative, and get in touch with the full balance and beauty of nature. You can promote ground cover sanity right where you live with native plants, xeriscaping, organic methods, rain gardens, and “re-wilding” your yard with things like prairie grass. For help, go to Rewild.org/Rewild-Your-Life.</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Stop Right-Wing Censorship of Library Books]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes, stupid political ideas beget even stupider political tactics.</p><p>For example, a faction of right-wing Republicans want to stop public discussion and actions involving two ideas they hate: (1) racism always has been and still is a systemic problem in American society; and (2) LGBTQ people are a normal and welcome part of... well, of us – America’s richly diverse society.</p><p>Aside from the raw ignorance behind the GOP’s denial of these realities, consider the boneheadedness of their current campaign to impose their bigotry on America: Book banning. </p><p>At least 50 extremist groups are roaming from city to city, funded by deep pocket right-wingers like the Koch brothers’ political network, to demand that books they don’t like be removed from schools and libraries. Worse, their open assault on knowledge and our freedom to read includes the nasty tactic of demonizing and threatening librarians who resist their dictates. Librarians! As a group, these truly helpful people are a national treasure, serving the common good – yet they’re getting physical threats and being fired by these little right-wing mobs.</p><p>The good news is that their surreptitious attacks are being exposed, and local folks are rising up against the book banners and partisan thugs spreading their ignorance and usurping people’s freedom to learn. For example, when two high school girls in Leander, Texas, asked to check out a few books from their library, they were stunned to learn that the school district had banned all the titles they requested. Students had not been informed of this censorship much less consulted. Rather than whine, the two feisty girls organized the Banned Book Club in their school, reading “prohibited” titles as a group, then meeting twice a month to discuss the books, including the ban.</p><p>This is Jim Hightower saying... To get more information and to fight this right-wing repression, contact American Library Association: <a target="_blank" href="http://ala.org/">ala.org</a>.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a subscriber.</p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/stop-right-wing-censorship-of-library</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:94474933</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2023 12:01:19 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593008" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/94474933/e806c4e4c19693df925937231864eb20.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/94474933/6045f8fbf22d1ff26342d430af8e929a.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Sometimes, stupid political ideas beget even stupider political tactics. For example, a faction of right-wing Republicans want to stop public discussion and actions involving two ideas they hate: (1) racism always has been and still is a systemic problem in American society; and (2) LGBTQ people are a normal and welcome part of... well, of us – America’s richly diverse society. Aside from the raw ignorance behind the GOP’s denial of these realities, consider the boneheadedness of their current campaign to impose their bigotry on America: Book banning. At least 50 extremist groups are roaming from city to city, funded by deep pocket right-wingers like the Koch brothers’ political network, to demand that books they don’t like be removed from schools and libraries. Worse, their open assault on knowledge and our freedom to read includes the nasty tactic of demonizing and threatening librarians who resist their dictates. Librarians! As a group, these truly helpful people are a national treasure, serving the common good – yet they’re getting physical threats and being fired by these little right-wing mobs. The good news is that their surreptitious attacks are being exposed, and local folks are rising up against the book banners and partisan thugs spreading their ignorance and usurping people’s freedom to learn. For example, when two high school girls in Leander, Texas, asked to check out a few books from their library, they were stunned to learn that the school district had banned all the titles they requested. Students had not been informed of this censorship much less consulted. Rather than whine, the two feisty girls organized the Banned Book Club in their school, reading “prohibited” titles as a group, then meeting twice a month to discuss the books, including the ban. This is Jim Hightower saying... To get more information and to fight this right-wing repression, contact American Library Association: ala.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Sometimes, stupid political ideas beget even stupider political tactics. For example, a faction of right-wing Republicans want to stop public discussion and actions involving two ideas they hate: (1) racism always has been and still is a systemic problem in American society; and (2) LGBTQ people are a normal and welcome part of... well, of us – America’s richly diverse society. Aside from the raw ignorance behind the GOP’s denial of these realities, consider the boneheadedness of their current campaign to impose their bigotry on America: Book banning. At least 50 extremist groups are roaming from city to city, funded by deep pocket right-wingers like the Koch brothers’ political network, to demand that books they don’t like be removed from schools and libraries. Worse, their open assault on knowledge and our freedom to read includes the nasty tactic of demonizing and threatening librarians who resist their dictates. Librarians! As a group, these truly helpful people are a national treasure, serving the common good – yet they’re getting physical threats and being fired by these little right-wing mobs. The good news is that their surreptitious attacks are being exposed, and local folks are rising up against the book banners and partisan thugs spreading their ignorance and usurping people’s freedom to learn. For example, when two high school girls in Leander, Texas, asked to check out a few books from their library, they were stunned to learn that the school district had banned all the titles they requested. Students had not been informed of this censorship much less consulted. Rather than whine, the two feisty girls organized the Banned Book Club in their school, reading “prohibited” titles as a group, then meeting twice a month to discuss the books, including the ban. This is Jim Hightower saying... To get more information and to fight this right-wing repression, contact American Library Association: ala.org. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Perverse Vulgarity of Book Banning]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me for using explicit language here, but it seems to me that today’s most vulgar expression of right-wing extremist dogma is its unhealthy obsession with banning books. It’s a political perversion that, ironically, its participants usually rationalize by claiming they are “battling vulgarity.”</p><p>And, boy, are they hot to trot! There’s a surge of them these days, because stripping books out of schools and public libraries has become a favorite way for autocratic right-wingers to stimulate their supporters’ political passion for engaging in culture wars against their neighbors... and common sense.</p><p>Until recently, there were only a couple of hundred isolated book challenges a year in our entire country, and local school boards and city councils generally handled them properly – without starting an uncivil war. But now, attempted book bans are erupting everywhere, orchestrated by a few extremist political groups and a flock of opportunistic Republican politicians. PEN, a nonprofit watchdog that monitors these attacks on our freedom of expression, has documented 2,532 copycat campaigns across America in the past year to ban more than 1,600 works from our schools. They’ve even targeted the Bible!</p><p>They uniformly assert that they are defending “parental rights” and protecting children from “sensitive materials” that raise topics like slavery and sexual identities. Bovine excrement. First, their naked censorship is just a power play to impose their hang-ups on you and your children. In a recent poll, 71 percent of Americans oppose these partisan efforts to ban library books in the name of “protecting” young people. Second, have these political nannies not heard of the Internet? I can assure them that most of their own children already know about the truths these so-called adults are trying to censor.</p><p>Nothing is so foolish – or wrong – as trying to put blinders on young people’s natural curiosity.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-perverse-vulgarity-of-book-banning</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:94474704</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2023 17:31:33 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2593008" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/94474704/030176edfff468ef3c4faabf2f353be6.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/94474704/f964860d407a7af1589744d2790e3cac.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Excuse me for using explicit language here, but it seems to me that today’s most vulgar expression of right-wing extremist dogma is its unhealthy obsession with banning books. It’s a political perversion that, ironically, its participants usually rationalize by claiming they are “battling vulgarity.” And, boy, are they hot to trot! There’s a surge of them these days, because stripping books out of schools and public libraries has become a favorite way for autocratic right-wingers to stimulate their supporters’ political passion for engaging in culture wars against their neighbors... and common sense. Until recently, there were only a couple of hundred isolated book challenges a year in our entire country, and local school boards and city councils generally handled them properly – without starting an uncivil war. But now, attempted book bans are erupting everywhere, orchestrated by a few extremist political groups and a flock of opportunistic Republican politicians. PEN, a nonprofit watchdog that monitors these attacks on our freedom of expression, has documented 2,532 copycat campaigns across America in the past year to ban more than 1,600 works from our schools. They’ve even targeted the Bible! They uniformly assert that they are defending “parental rights” and protecting children from “sensitive materials” that raise topics like slavery and sexual identities. Bovine excrement. First, their naked censorship is just a power play to impose their hang-ups on you and your children. In a recent poll, 71 percent of Americans oppose these partisan efforts to ban library books in the name of “protecting” young people. Second, have these political nannies not heard of the Internet? I can assure them that most of their own children already know about the truths these so-called adults are trying to censor. Nothing is so foolish – or wrong – as trying to put blinders on young people’s natural curiosity. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Excuse me for using explicit language here, but it seems to me that today’s most vulgar expression of right-wing extremist dogma is its unhealthy obsession with banning books. It’s a political perversion that, ironically, its participants usually rationalize by claiming they are “battling vulgarity.” And, boy, are they hot to trot! There’s a surge of them these days, because stripping books out of schools and public libraries has become a favorite way for autocratic right-wingers to stimulate their supporters’ political passion for engaging in culture wars against their neighbors... and common sense. Until recently, there were only a couple of hundred isolated book challenges a year in our entire country, and local school boards and city councils generally handled them properly – without starting an uncivil war. But now, attempted book bans are erupting everywhere, orchestrated by a few extremist political groups and a flock of opportunistic Republican politicians. PEN, a nonprofit watchdog that monitors these attacks on our freedom of expression, has documented 2,532 copycat campaigns across America in the past year to ban more than 1,600 works from our schools. They’ve even targeted the Bible! They uniformly assert that they are defending “parental rights” and protecting children from “sensitive materials” that raise topics like slavery and sexual identities. Bovine excrement. First, their naked censorship is just a power play to impose their hang-ups on you and your children. In a recent poll, 71 percent of Americans oppose these partisan efforts to ban library books in the name of “protecting” young people. Second, have these political nannies not heard of the Internet? I can assure them that most of their own children already know about the truths these so-called adults are trying to censor. Nothing is so foolish – or wrong – as trying to put blinders on young people’s natural curiosity. Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[How Detestable Can Corporate Bosses Be?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>There’s a new “ism” creeping into America’s vocabulary… and into our social order: <em>Bossism</em>.</p><p>Being a boss can merely mean you’re in charge – but in this age of glaring inequality and autocratic corporate rule, bossing implies being overbearing, tyrannical… a jerk. Amazingly, then, it’s precisely those detestable qualities that are drawing a group of uber-rich, Silicon Valley executives and financiers into an emerging cult of bossism. These high-tech elites are united in a belief that America’s workers have become too powerful, too uppity, and too “woke,” so the geniuses at the top of the corporate totem pole are unifying to impose a new era of harsh labor policies that’ll “show em who’s boss.”</p><p>It’s the Revolt of Pampered Plutocrats against the democratic activism of people who do the creative and physical work that make the bosses ridiculously rich. Bossism’s top-down arrogance is incredibly narcissistic, managerially disastrous, and stupid. A measure of the tech execs’ stupidity is that they’ve embraced the most thuggish boss in the land as their idol and movement symbol: Elon Musk. Yes, the petty and petulant crybaby billionaire who botched his takeover of Twitter, then ham-handedly devastated its workforce by impetuously firing half of them and driving away hundreds more with his spoiled brat, anti-worker antics. He’s made himself such a symbol of brutish bossism that he now gets booed in public!</p><p>Yet, Silicon Valley’s little Elon Wannabes have chosen him as their poster boy, hoping he will lead America back to a robber baron ethic of iron-fisted honchos who fire at will, dictate rules, and tolerate no dissent from those down below.</p><p>Their problem, though, is you – the workaday majority who refuse to bow down to the bossism of old. As the defiant blues song puts it, “Big Boss Man, You ain’t so big, You’re just tall, that’s all.”</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a subscriber.</p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/how-detestable-can-corporate-bosses</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:93404380</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2022 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="2597188" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/93404380/5ef70ea07454fc5ccc4a0c172d9335a3.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/93404380/cd2aada5eb577d98fce145e095d97d42.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>There’s a new “ism” creeping into America’s vocabulary… and into our social order: Bossism. Being a boss can merely mean you’re in charge – but in this age of glaring inequality and autocratic corporate rule, bossing implies being overbearing, tyrannical… a jerk. Amazingly, then, it’s precisely those detestable qualities that are drawing a group of uber-rich, Silicon Valley executives and financiers into an emerging cult of bossism. These high-tech elites are united in a belief that America’s workers have become too powerful, too uppity, and too “woke,” so the geniuses at the top of the corporate totem pole are unifying to impose a new era of harsh labor policies that’ll “show em who’s boss.” It’s the Revolt of Pampered Plutocrats against the democratic activism of people who do the creative and physical work that make the bosses ridiculously rich. Bossism’s top-down arrogance is incredibly narcissistic, managerially disastrous, and stupid. A measure of the tech execs’ stupidity is that they’ve embraced the most thuggish boss in the land as their idol and movement symbol: Elon Musk. Yes, the petty and petulant crybaby billionaire who botched his takeover of Twitter, then ham-handedly devastated its workforce by impetuously firing half of them and driving away hundreds more with his spoiled brat, anti-worker antics. He’s made himself such a symbol of brutish bossism that he now gets booed in public! Yet, Silicon Valley’s little Elon Wannabes have chosen him as their poster boy, hoping he will lead America back to a robber baron ethic of iron-fisted honchos who fire at will, dictate rules, and tolerate no dissent from those down below. Their problem, though, is you – the workaday majority who refuse to bow down to the bossism of old. As the defiant blues song puts it, “Big Boss Man, You ain’t so big, You’re just tall, that’s all.” Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>There’s a new “ism” creeping into America’s vocabulary… and into our social order: Bossism. Being a boss can merely mean you’re in charge – but in this age of glaring inequality and autocratic corporate rule, bossing implies being overbearing, tyrannical… a jerk. Amazingly, then, it’s precisely those detestable qualities that are drawing a group of uber-rich, Silicon Valley executives and financiers into an emerging cult of bossism. These high-tech elites are united in a belief that America’s workers have become too powerful, too uppity, and too “woke,” so the geniuses at the top of the corporate totem pole are unifying to impose a new era of harsh labor policies that’ll “show em who’s boss.” It’s the Revolt of Pampered Plutocrats against the democratic activism of people who do the creative and physical work that make the bosses ridiculously rich. Bossism’s top-down arrogance is incredibly narcissistic, managerially disastrous, and stupid. A measure of the tech execs’ stupidity is that they’ve embraced the most thuggish boss in the land as their idol and movement symbol: Elon Musk. Yes, the petty and petulant crybaby billionaire who botched his takeover of Twitter, then ham-handedly devastated its workforce by impetuously firing half of them and driving away hundreds more with his spoiled brat, anti-worker antics. He’s made himself such a symbol of brutish bossism that he now gets booed in public! Yet, Silicon Valley’s little Elon Wannabes have chosen him as their poster boy, hoping he will lead America back to a robber baron ethic of iron-fisted honchos who fire at will, dictate rules, and tolerate no dissent from those down below. Their problem, though, is you – the workaday majority who refuse to bow down to the bossism of old. As the defiant blues song puts it, “Big Boss Man, You ain’t so big, You’re just tall, that’s all.” Jim Hightower's Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Assorted nuts]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Let me say one word to you: Nuts.</p><p>Now, let me say one name to you: Ted Cruz.</p><p>They’ve become synonymous, with the Texas lawmaker perennially topping national lists of goofy, right-wing political goobers. Only, Ted can’t rightly be called a lawmaker, for he’s not a serious participant in that process, instead devoting his senatorship to political stunts and picking silly PR fights with a growing list of enemies.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Hightower Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p>Running out of people to attack, Ted has found another species for his vitriol: Fictional icons. He’s been padding his right-wing credentials by going after Mr. Potato Head, Mickey and Pluto, and, believe it or not, Muppets. This US senator has dedicated the power and public resources of his office to demonize popular creatures on “Sesame Street,” specifically Big Bird and loveable little Elmo. Ted rants he has proof that Muppets are covert tools of “government propaganda.” So, this ridiculous excuse of a senator is saving America from… Muppets.</p><p>But for a whole bag of assorted nuttiness, you can’t beat Sen. Rick Scott’s 11-point plan to “Rescue America.” A disgraced former healthcare mogul, this mega-millionaire reinvented himself as a wingnut Florida senator, and he now chairs a policy arm of the Republican Party.</p><p>In February, he set forth a stunning agenda of far-out right-wing extremism that he says his party will push if they re-take the senate this November, including:</p><p>* Implementing new federal taxes on <em>the poorest half of Americans</em>. So – as Scott puts it – they’ll “have skin in the game.”</p><p>* “Stopping socialism” by terminating Social Security and Medicare.</p><p>* Spending unlimited billions to build Donald Trump’s folly of a border wall (and, ironically, naming the scam after The Donald).</p><p>Fiddle-faddlers like Cruz and Scott have turned the once-proud US Senate into The Little Nut Shoppe on the Hill.</p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/assorted-nuts</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:75117312</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2022 16:34:17 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="3111591" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/75117312/c2e67d45432bd9bc533683b60de78e26.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/75117312/65367cb90a758f0365788abaf51b30f0.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Let me say one word to you: Nuts. Now, let me say one name to you: Ted Cruz. They’ve become synonymous, with the Texas lawmaker perennially topping national lists of goofy, right-wing political goobers. Only, Ted can’t rightly be called a lawmaker, for he’s not a serious participant in that process, instead devoting his senatorship to political stunts and picking silly PR fights with a growing list of enemies. Jim Hightower's Hightower Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Running out of people to attack, Ted has found another species for his vitriol: Fictional icons. He’s been padding his right-wing credentials by going after Mr. Potato Head, Mickey and Pluto, and, believe it or not, Muppets. This US senator has dedicated the power and public resources of his office to demonize popular creatures on “Sesame Street,” specifically Big Bird and loveable little Elmo. Ted rants he has proof that Muppets are covert tools of “government propaganda.” So, this ridiculous excuse of a senator is saving America from… Muppets. But for a whole bag of assorted nuttiness, you can’t beat Sen. Rick Scott’s 11-point plan to “Rescue America.” A disgraced former healthcare mogul, this mega-millionaire reinvented himself as a wingnut Florida senator, and he now chairs a policy arm of the Republican Party. In February, he set forth a stunning agenda of far-out right-wing extremism that he says his party will push if they re-take the senate this November, including: * Implementing new federal taxes on the poorest half of Americans. So – as Scott puts it – they’ll “have skin in the game.” * “Stopping socialism” by terminating Social Security and Medicare. * Spending unlimited billions to build Donald Trump’s folly of a border wall (and, ironically, naming the scam after The Donald). Fiddle-faddlers like Cruz and Scott have turned the once-proud US Senate into The Little Nut Shoppe on the Hill. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Let me say one word to you: Nuts. Now, let me say one name to you: Ted Cruz. They’ve become synonymous, with the Texas lawmaker perennially topping national lists of goofy, right-wing political goobers. Only, Ted can’t rightly be called a lawmaker, for he’s not a serious participant in that process, instead devoting his senatorship to political stunts and picking silly PR fights with a growing list of enemies. Jim Hightower's Hightower Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Running out of people to attack, Ted has found another species for his vitriol: Fictional icons. He’s been padding his right-wing credentials by going after Mr. Potato Head, Mickey and Pluto, and, believe it or not, Muppets. This US senator has dedicated the power and public resources of his office to demonize popular creatures on “Sesame Street,” specifically Big Bird and loveable little Elmo. Ted rants he has proof that Muppets are covert tools of “government propaganda.” So, this ridiculous excuse of a senator is saving America from… Muppets. But for a whole bag of assorted nuttiness, you can’t beat Sen. Rick Scott’s 11-point plan to “Rescue America.” A disgraced former healthcare mogul, this mega-millionaire reinvented himself as a wingnut Florida senator, and he now chairs a policy arm of the Republican Party. In February, he set forth a stunning agenda of far-out right-wing extremism that he says his party will push if they re-take the senate this November, including: * Implementing new federal taxes on the poorest half of Americans. So – as Scott puts it – they’ll “have skin in the game.” * “Stopping socialism” by terminating Social Security and Medicare. * Spending unlimited billions to build Donald Trump’s folly of a border wall (and, ironically, naming the scam after The Donald). Fiddle-faddlers like Cruz and Scott have turned the once-proud US Senate into The Little Nut Shoppe on the Hill. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Embarrassment of Modern Corporate Managers ]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>What makes a newspaper great? Many say it’s having street-savvy reporters and editors with the integrity to shine the light of investigative journalism on the power structure’s abuses.</p><p>But, no, says Fred Ryan, top executive of the <em>Washington Post</em> – the secret is attendance. Ryan, a corporate manager and former Ronald Reagan staffer, was handpicked to be CEO of the legendary paper by Jeff Bezos in 2014, when the Amazon billionaire bought the Post. But on Ryan’s watch, readership is in decline, which he blames on newsroom sluggards who don’t spend enough time in the office. So, he’s become the hall monitor, measuring reporters’ productivity by their office attendance.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Hightower Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p>Fred seems unaware that a good reporter’s real work is out on the beat, not sitting in front of a computer. No doubt he would’ve fired Woodward and Bernstein for being out of the office so often to meet with Deep Throat to uncover Nixon’s Watergate scandal. In Fairness, though, he apparently has a 2-part plan to boost team spirit: (1) Eliminate 100 reporters, and (2) judge the output of those remaining by counting the number of video conferences they attend each week.</p><p>But that’s hardly the totality of Ryan’s innovations. The big news is that he’s hired not one, but two, high-dollar PR firms to create a cutting edge “branding strategy” for the Post. Already they’ve come up with a spiffy new corporate slogan: “We don’t just break news. We break ground.” Wow – how great is that? (Never mind that some wags have changed the second line to, “We break wind”).</p><p>When overpaid incompetents like Ryan substitute slogans and computer metrics for real solutions, they’re admitting that <em>they</em> are the problem – that they simply don’t know how to motivate and manage a creative workforce. They should resign in embarrassment.</p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-embarrassment-of-modern-corporate</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:73962755</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="3116606" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/73962755/f72577634a16659842b6ce7b5a4ea9f1.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/73962755/d3438f5a27faa9418c9b0350bc199d6f.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>What makes a newspaper great? Many say it’s having street-savvy reporters and editors with the integrity to shine the light of investigative journalism on the power structure’s abuses. But, no, says Fred Ryan, top executive of the Washington Post – the secret is attendance. Ryan, a corporate manager and former Ronald Reagan staffer, was handpicked to be CEO of the legendary paper by Jeff Bezos in 2014, when the Amazon billionaire bought the Post. But on Ryan’s watch, readership is in decline, which he blames on newsroom sluggards who don’t spend enough time in the office. So, he’s become the hall monitor, measuring reporters’ productivity by their office attendance. Jim Hightower's Hightower Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Fred seems unaware that a good reporter’s real work is out on the beat, not sitting in front of a computer. No doubt he would’ve fired Woodward and Bernstein for being out of the office so often to meet with Deep Throat to uncover Nixon’s Watergate scandal. In Fairness, though, he apparently has a 2-part plan to boost team spirit: (1) Eliminate 100 reporters, and (2) judge the output of those remaining by counting the number of video conferences they attend each week. But that’s hardly the totality of Ryan’s innovations. The big news is that he’s hired not one, but two, high-dollar PR firms to create a cutting edge “branding strategy” for the Post. Already they’ve come up with a spiffy new corporate slogan: “We don’t just break news. We break ground.” Wow – how great is that? (Never mind that some wags have changed the second line to, “We break wind”). When overpaid incompetents like Ryan substitute slogans and computer metrics for real solutions, they’re admitting that they are the problem – that they simply don’t know how to motivate and manage a creative workforce. They should resign in embarrassment. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>What makes a newspaper great? Many say it’s having street-savvy reporters and editors with the integrity to shine the light of investigative journalism on the power structure’s abuses. But, no, says Fred Ryan, top executive of the Washington Post – the secret is attendance. Ryan, a corporate manager and former Ronald Reagan staffer, was handpicked to be CEO of the legendary paper by Jeff Bezos in 2014, when the Amazon billionaire bought the Post. But on Ryan’s watch, readership is in decline, which he blames on newsroom sluggards who don’t spend enough time in the office. So, he’s become the hall monitor, measuring reporters’ productivity by their office attendance. Jim Hightower's Hightower Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Fred seems unaware that a good reporter’s real work is out on the beat, not sitting in front of a computer. No doubt he would’ve fired Woodward and Bernstein for being out of the office so often to meet with Deep Throat to uncover Nixon’s Watergate scandal. In Fairness, though, he apparently has a 2-part plan to boost team spirit: (1) Eliminate 100 reporters, and (2) judge the output of those remaining by counting the number of video conferences they attend each week. But that’s hardly the totality of Ryan’s innovations. The big news is that he’s hired not one, but two, high-dollar PR firms to create a cutting edge “branding strategy” for the Post. Already they’ve come up with a spiffy new corporate slogan: “We don’t just break news. We break ground.” Wow – how great is that? (Never mind that some wags have changed the second line to, “We break wind”). When overpaid incompetents like Ryan substitute slogans and computer metrics for real solutions, they’re admitting that they are the problem – that they simply don’t know how to motivate and manage a creative workforce. They should resign in embarrassment. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Welcome To Our Future of “Digital Productivity Monitoring”]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>For generations, workers have been punished by corporate bosses for watching the clock. But now, the corporate clock is watching workers!</p><p>Called “digital productivity monitoring,” this surveillance is done by an integrated computer system including a real-time clock, camera, keyboard tracker, and algorithms to provide a second-by-second record of what each employee is doing. Jeff Bezos, boss of Amazon, pioneered use of this ticking electronic eye in his monstrous warehouses, forcing hapless, low-paid “pickers” to sprint down cavernous stacks of consumer stuff to fill online orders, <em>pronto</em> – beat the clock, or be fired.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Hightower Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p>Terrific policy! exclaimed taskmasters at hospital chains, banks, tech giants, newspapers, colleges, and other outfits employing millions of mid-level professionals. So, they’ve been installing these unblinking digital snoops to watch their employees, even timing their bathroom breaks and constantly eying each one’s pace of work. They’ve plugged in new software with such Orwellian names as WorkSmart and Time Doctor to count worker’s keystrokes and to snap pictures every 10 minutes of workers’ faces and screens, recording all on digital scoreboards. You are paid only for the minutes the computers “see” you in action. Bosses hail the electronic minders as “Fitbits” of productivity, spurring workers to keep noses to the grindstone, and also to instill workplace honesty.</p><p>Only… the whole scheme is dishonest. No employee’s worthiness can be measured in keystrokes and 10-minute snapshots! What about thinking, conferring with colleagues, listening to customers, etc.? No – zero “productivity points” are awarded for that work. For example, the <em>New York Times</em> reports that the multibillion-dollar United Health Group marks its drug-addiction therapists “idle” if they are conversing off-line with patients, leaving their keyboards inactive.</p><p>Employees call this digital management “demoralizing,” “toxic,” and “just wrong.” But corporate investors are pouring billions into it. Which group do you trust to shape America’s workplace?</p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/welcome-to-our-future-of-digital</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:73962506</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2022 12:50:38 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="3111591" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/73962506/0448a6b35b07d71fb4d79a436b529350.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/73962506/5fe6b83020809ddc2f211a7cced25a8f.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>For generations, workers have been punished by corporate bosses for watching the clock. But now, the corporate clock is watching workers! Called “digital productivity monitoring,” this surveillance is done by an integrated computer system including a real-time clock, camera, keyboard tracker, and algorithms to provide a second-by-second record of what each employee is doing. Jeff Bezos, boss of Amazon, pioneered use of this ticking electronic eye in his monstrous warehouses, forcing hapless, low-paid “pickers” to sprint down cavernous stacks of consumer stuff to fill online orders, pronto – beat the clock, or be fired. Jim Hightower's Hightower Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Terrific policy! exclaimed taskmasters at hospital chains, banks, tech giants, newspapers, colleges, and other outfits employing millions of mid-level professionals. So, they’ve been installing these unblinking digital snoops to watch their employees, even timing their bathroom breaks and constantly eying each one’s pace of work. They’ve plugged in new software with such Orwellian names as WorkSmart and Time Doctor to count worker’s keystrokes and to snap pictures every 10 minutes of workers’ faces and screens, recording all on digital scoreboards. You are paid only for the minutes the computers “see” you in action. Bosses hail the electronic minders as “Fitbits” of productivity, spurring workers to keep noses to the grindstone, and also to instill workplace honesty. Only… the whole scheme is dishonest. No employee’s worthiness can be measured in keystrokes and 10-minute snapshots! What about thinking, conferring with colleagues, listening to customers, etc.? No – zero “productivity points” are awarded for that work. For example, the New York Times reports that the multibillion-dollar United Health Group marks its drug-addiction therapists “idle” if they are conversing off-line with patients, leaving their keyboards inactive. Employees call this digital management “demoralizing,” “toxic,” and “just wrong.” But corporate investors are pouring billions into it. Which group do you trust to shape America’s workplace? This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>For generations, workers have been punished by corporate bosses for watching the clock. But now, the corporate clock is watching workers! Called “digital productivity monitoring,” this surveillance is done by an integrated computer system including a real-time clock, camera, keyboard tracker, and algorithms to provide a second-by-second record of what each employee is doing. Jeff Bezos, boss of Amazon, pioneered use of this ticking electronic eye in his monstrous warehouses, forcing hapless, low-paid “pickers” to sprint down cavernous stacks of consumer stuff to fill online orders, pronto – beat the clock, or be fired. Jim Hightower's Hightower Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Terrific policy! exclaimed taskmasters at hospital chains, banks, tech giants, newspapers, colleges, and other outfits employing millions of mid-level professionals. So, they’ve been installing these unblinking digital snoops to watch their employees, even timing their bathroom breaks and constantly eying each one’s pace of work. They’ve plugged in new software with such Orwellian names as WorkSmart and Time Doctor to count worker’s keystrokes and to snap pictures every 10 minutes of workers’ faces and screens, recording all on digital scoreboards. You are paid only for the minutes the computers “see” you in action. Bosses hail the electronic minders as “Fitbits” of productivity, spurring workers to keep noses to the grindstone, and also to instill workplace honesty. Only… the whole scheme is dishonest. No employee’s worthiness can be measured in keystrokes and 10-minute snapshots! What about thinking, conferring with colleagues, listening to customers, etc.? No – zero “productivity points” are awarded for that work. For example, the New York Times reports that the multibillion-dollar United Health Group marks its drug-addiction therapists “idle” if they are conversing off-line with patients, leaving their keyboards inactive. Employees call this digital management “demoralizing,” “toxic,” and “just wrong.” But corporate investors are pouring billions into it. Which group do you trust to shape America’s workplace? This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[What Do Truckers and Librarians Have In Common?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>In the world of work, what two occupations might seem to have the very least in common? How about long-haul truck drivers… and school librarians? Yes, an odd pairing, but solidarity forever!</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Hightower Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p>Start with truckers, The job is literally a grueling haul. You’re wrangling massive 18-wheelers some 500 miles a day for 2-3 weeks straight, putting up with traffic jams, storms, bad roads, lunatic drivers, helter-skelter scheduling, truck stop food, sleeping in the truck – and battling fatigue, aches, your bladder, and loneliness.</p><p>Trucking used to be a good union job, with decent pay and conditions – until the deregulation craze four decades ago brought in Wall Street profiteers and fast buck hustlers who turned the industry into anti-union exploiters. As a result, the yearly quit-rate for drivers is almost 100 percent! But rather than retaining drivers by upping pay and stopping their torturous treatment, the corporate bosses have rushed to Washington demanding access to an even cheaper pool of low-wage workers: Teenagers. Yes – put an 18-year-old in that 18-wheeler… and keep them profits rolling!</p><p>And here’s another good job suddenly turned ugly: School librarian. Yes, while student enrollments rise and the need for these nurturers of our society’s literacy is greater than ever, their quit-rate is soaring. Not because of pay or long hours, but because of raw right-wing politics. These dedicated, invaluable educators are literally being abused by demagogic GOP politicians and their extremist partisans who’ve launched an anti-librarian crusade, including book banning and witch hunting. Come on – how twisted are you to pick on librarians? Yet, they are under attack by political hacks, condemned by reprobate preachers, and physically threatened by frenzied parents… and being fired by wimpy school boards.</p><p>Forget the “law” of supply and demand, today’s job market is being ruled by greedmeisters and political lunatics.</p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/what-do-truckers-and-librarians-have</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:72082220</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="3116606" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/72082220/2aa958a4cc22afad384edeb8c0c6ae27.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/72082220/4d344b9b28304d07658b64219caa5828.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>In the world of work, what two occupations might seem to have the very least in common? How about long-haul truck drivers… and school librarians? Yes, an odd pairing, but solidarity forever! Jim Hightower's Hightower Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Start with truckers, The job is literally a grueling haul. You’re wrangling massive 18-wheelers some 500 miles a day for 2-3 weeks straight, putting up with traffic jams, storms, bad roads, lunatic drivers, helter-skelter scheduling, truck stop food, sleeping in the truck – and battling fatigue, aches, your bladder, and loneliness. Trucking used to be a good union job, with decent pay and conditions – until the deregulation craze four decades ago brought in Wall Street profiteers and fast buck hustlers who turned the industry into anti-union exploiters. As a result, the yearly quit-rate for drivers is almost 100 percent! But rather than retaining drivers by upping pay and stopping their torturous treatment, the corporate bosses have rushed to Washington demanding access to an even cheaper pool of low-wage workers: Teenagers. Yes – put an 18-year-old in that 18-wheeler… and keep them profits rolling! And here’s another good job suddenly turned ugly: School librarian. Yes, while student enrollments rise and the need for these nurturers of our society’s literacy is greater than ever, their quit-rate is soaring. Not because of pay or long hours, but because of raw right-wing politics. These dedicated, invaluable educators are literally being abused by demagogic GOP politicians and their extremist partisans who’ve launched an anti-librarian crusade, including book banning and witch hunting. Come on – how twisted are you to pick on librarians? Yet, they are under attack by political hacks, condemned by reprobate preachers, and physically threatened by frenzied parents… and being fired by wimpy school boards. Forget the “law” of supply and demand, today’s job market is being ruled by greedmeisters and political lunatics. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>In the world of work, what two occupations might seem to have the very least in common? How about long-haul truck drivers… and school librarians? Yes, an odd pairing, but solidarity forever! Jim Hightower's Hightower Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Start with truckers, The job is literally a grueling haul. You’re wrangling massive 18-wheelers some 500 miles a day for 2-3 weeks straight, putting up with traffic jams, storms, bad roads, lunatic drivers, helter-skelter scheduling, truck stop food, sleeping in the truck – and battling fatigue, aches, your bladder, and loneliness. Trucking used to be a good union job, with decent pay and conditions – until the deregulation craze four decades ago brought in Wall Street profiteers and fast buck hustlers who turned the industry into anti-union exploiters. As a result, the yearly quit-rate for drivers is almost 100 percent! But rather than retaining drivers by upping pay and stopping their torturous treatment, the corporate bosses have rushed to Washington demanding access to an even cheaper pool of low-wage workers: Teenagers. Yes – put an 18-year-old in that 18-wheeler… and keep them profits rolling! And here’s another good job suddenly turned ugly: School librarian. Yes, while student enrollments rise and the need for these nurturers of our society’s literacy is greater than ever, their quit-rate is soaring. Not because of pay or long hours, but because of raw right-wing politics. These dedicated, invaluable educators are literally being abused by demagogic GOP politicians and their extremist partisans who’ve launched an anti-librarian crusade, including book banning and witch hunting. Come on – how twisted are you to pick on librarians? Yet, they are under attack by political hacks, condemned by reprobate preachers, and physically threatened by frenzied parents… and being fired by wimpy school boards. Forget the “law” of supply and demand, today’s job market is being ruled by greedmeisters and political lunatics. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Clueless CEOs Confused By Workers Quitting]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>For more than a year, America’s corporate chieftains have been moaning about “The Great Resignation” – the recent phenomena of workers just up and quitting their jobs. And now comes “Quiet Quitting,” workers who don’t leave their jobs, but only do what they were hired to do, quietly rejecting the endless extra (unpaid) tasks and weekend assignments that bosses try to pile on. What’s at work in the heads of all these workers?</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Hightower Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p>Simple, barked one taskmaster way back in 1894, “nobody wants to work.” And here’s an anti-New Deal baron in 1940, snorting that “trouble is everybody is on relief or a pension – nobody wants to work.” Then in ’52, came the same refrain, everybody is “too damned lazy and nobody wants to work anymore.” Year after year, the exact same wail is repeated from on high, including this group gripe expressed in a corporate survey this year: “1 in 5 executive leaders agree [that] ‘No one wants to work.’”</p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/nobody-wants-to-work-anymore/">Given the historic continuum of executive-suite disdain for working stiffs</a>, it’s no surprise that the top dogs are blaming “sluggish” workers for today’s rampant job dissatisfaction. But it’s both hilarious and pathetic that high-dollar bosses are so inept at employee relations that they can’t keep the rank and file on the job, much less happy. Their response has been to put a silly band-aid on this serious problem. They’ve created new executive positions like “Chief people officer” and hired consulting firms with such names as “Woohoo” and “Happy Ltd” to come up with treats, trinkets, and gimmicks, trying to make the workplace a playscape: Beer tastings! Ping Pong games! Meditation periods! A Lizzo concert! Office slides! Company water bottles! Wine Wednesdays!</p><p>Seriously? Memo to CEOs: Try decent pay and benefits, rational scheduling, meaningful goals, real teamwork, and personal respect. In a word: Dignity.</p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/clueless-ceos-confused-by-workers</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:72081817</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2022 11:34:56 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="3111591" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/72081817/518b17f3eddd7b62ef891f372d1172cb.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/72081817/eb61b5f0e4dc050017bea54e69b27a0a.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>For more than a year, America’s corporate chieftains have been moaning about “The Great Resignation” – the recent phenomena of workers just up and quitting their jobs. And now comes “Quiet Quitting,” workers who don’t leave their jobs, but only do what they were hired to do, quietly rejecting the endless extra (unpaid) tasks and weekend assignments that bosses try to pile on. What’s at work in the heads of all these workers? Jim Hightower's Hightower Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Simple, barked one taskmaster way back in 1894, “nobody wants to work.” And here’s an anti-New Deal baron in 1940, snorting that “trouble is everybody is on relief or a pension – nobody wants to work.” Then in ’52, came the same refrain, everybody is “too damned lazy and nobody wants to work anymore.” Year after year, the exact same wail is repeated from on high, including this group gripe expressed in a corporate survey this year: “1 in 5 executive leaders agree [that] ‘No one wants to work.’” Given the historic continuum of executive-suite disdain for working stiffs, it’s no surprise that the top dogs are blaming “sluggish” workers for today’s rampant job dissatisfaction. But it’s both hilarious and pathetic that high-dollar bosses are so inept at employee relations that they can’t keep the rank and file on the job, much less happy. Their response has been to put a silly band-aid on this serious problem. They’ve created new executive positions like “Chief people officer” and hired consulting firms with such names as “Woohoo” and “Happy Ltd” to come up with treats, trinkets, and gimmicks, trying to make the workplace a playscape: Beer tastings! Ping Pong games! Meditation periods! A Lizzo concert! Office slides! Company water bottles! Wine Wednesdays! Seriously? Memo to CEOs: Try decent pay and benefits, rational scheduling, meaningful goals, real teamwork, and personal respect. In a word: Dignity. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>For more than a year, America’s corporate chieftains have been moaning about “The Great Resignation” – the recent phenomena of workers just up and quitting their jobs. And now comes “Quiet Quitting,” workers who don’t leave their jobs, but only do what they were hired to do, quietly rejecting the endless extra (unpaid) tasks and weekend assignments that bosses try to pile on. What’s at work in the heads of all these workers? Jim Hightower's Hightower Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Simple, barked one taskmaster way back in 1894, “nobody wants to work.” And here’s an anti-New Deal baron in 1940, snorting that “trouble is everybody is on relief or a pension – nobody wants to work.” Then in ’52, came the same refrain, everybody is “too damned lazy and nobody wants to work anymore.” Year after year, the exact same wail is repeated from on high, including this group gripe expressed in a corporate survey this year: “1 in 5 executive leaders agree [that] ‘No one wants to work.’” Given the historic continuum of executive-suite disdain for working stiffs, it’s no surprise that the top dogs are blaming “sluggish” workers for today’s rampant job dissatisfaction. But it’s both hilarious and pathetic that high-dollar bosses are so inept at employee relations that they can’t keep the rank and file on the job, much less happy. Their response has been to put a silly band-aid on this serious problem. They’ve created new executive positions like “Chief people officer” and hired consulting firms with such names as “Woohoo” and “Happy Ltd” to come up with treats, trinkets, and gimmicks, trying to make the workplace a playscape: Beer tastings! Ping Pong games! Meditation periods! A Lizzo concert! Office slides! Company water bottles! Wine Wednesdays! Seriously? Memo to CEOs: Try decent pay and benefits, rational scheduling, meaningful goals, real teamwork, and personal respect. In a word: Dignity. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Billionaires Playing Cowboys… At Our Expense]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Let’s all gather ‘round the campfire, Buckaroos and let Ol’ Cactus Jim here tell you about some of today’s hardy, hard-working cowboys. Yes, those manly men who live free-spirited, yippy-ti-yi-yo, cowboy lives out in the rustic ranch country of the Rocky Mountain West.<br/><br/>Oh, wait – that was a century ago. The “cowboys” who’re now humming “Home On The Range” across Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming are multimillionaire and billionaire corporate titan and celebrities like Rupert Murdoch, Bill Gates, and Bruce Willis. They don’t really live there nor mix with locals, no do they actually “ranch” their spectacular 300,000-acre spreads, since they don’t know how.<br/><br/>So they hire real ranching outfits to bring in some cattle, sheep, and other ranching accruements, then they fly in on private jets occasionally and strut around like John Wayne. They are in a word, pathetic.<br/><br/>But they surely are land barons, spending up to $200 million each for their vast spreads. Indeed, these dilettantes rule the availability of ranchland and scenic wilderness, pricing out people who really want to ranch and locking out families who want to experience some of nature’s most majestic rivers and mountains. Fifteen years ago, the biggest private landowners held 27 million acres; now they’ve grabbed 42 million acres for themselves.<br/><br/>Well, say apologists for wealth concentration, they bought the land with their money, so it’s fair and square. But hold on slick. They don’t come just for the views, hunting, and exclusivity – their ranches get generous land subsidies, plus, states like Wyoming provide no-tax hideaways for their wealth.<br/><br/>This is Jim Hightower saying… So, even though you and I are shut out of these gated land baronies, at least we can take pride in knowing that it’s our tax dollars that help the rich buy them… and lock the gates.</p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/billionaires-playing-cowboys-at-our</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:70024555</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="3116606" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/70024555/7e5d425c069b41c43c3c8ef1be575a90.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/70024555/d5bd592eac03f91e3bd4c9af794ffa79.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Let’s all gather ‘round the campfire, Buckaroos and let Ol’ Cactus Jim here tell you about some of today’s hardy, hard-working cowboys. Yes, those manly men who live free-spirited, yippy-ti-yi-yo, cowboy lives out in the rustic ranch country of the Rocky Mountain West. Oh, wait – that was a century ago. The “cowboys” who’re now humming “Home On The Range” across Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming are multimillionaire and billionaire corporate titan and celebrities like Rupert Murdoch, Bill Gates, and Bruce Willis. They don’t really live there nor mix with locals, no do they actually “ranch” their spectacular 300,000-acre spreads, since they don’t know how. So they hire real ranching outfits to bring in some cattle, sheep, and other ranching accruements, then they fly in on private jets occasionally and strut around like John Wayne. They are in a word, pathetic. But they surely are land barons, spending up to $200 million each for their vast spreads. Indeed, these dilettantes rule the availability of ranchland and scenic wilderness, pricing out people who really want to ranch and locking out families who want to experience some of nature’s most majestic rivers and mountains. Fifteen years ago, the biggest private landowners held 27 million acres; now they’ve grabbed 42 million acres for themselves. Well, say apologists for wealth concentration, they bought the land with their money, so it’s fair and square. But hold on slick. They don’t come just for the views, hunting, and exclusivity – their ranches get generous land subsidies, plus, states like Wyoming provide no-tax hideaways for their wealth. This is Jim Hightower saying… So, even though you and I are shut out of these gated land baronies, at least we can take pride in knowing that it’s our tax dollars that help the rich buy them… and lock the gates. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Let’s all gather ‘round the campfire, Buckaroos and let Ol’ Cactus Jim here tell you about some of today’s hardy, hard-working cowboys. Yes, those manly men who live free-spirited, yippy-ti-yi-yo, cowboy lives out in the rustic ranch country of the Rocky Mountain West. Oh, wait – that was a century ago. The “cowboys” who’re now humming “Home On The Range” across Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming are multimillionaire and billionaire corporate titan and celebrities like Rupert Murdoch, Bill Gates, and Bruce Willis. They don’t really live there nor mix with locals, no do they actually “ranch” their spectacular 300,000-acre spreads, since they don’t know how. So they hire real ranching outfits to bring in some cattle, sheep, and other ranching accruements, then they fly in on private jets occasionally and strut around like John Wayne. They are in a word, pathetic. But they surely are land barons, spending up to $200 million each for their vast spreads. Indeed, these dilettantes rule the availability of ranchland and scenic wilderness, pricing out people who really want to ranch and locking out families who want to experience some of nature’s most majestic rivers and mountains. Fifteen years ago, the biggest private landowners held 27 million acres; now they’ve grabbed 42 million acres for themselves. Well, say apologists for wealth concentration, they bought the land with their money, so it’s fair and square. But hold on slick. They don’t come just for the views, hunting, and exclusivity – their ranches get generous land subsidies, plus, states like Wyoming provide no-tax hideaways for their wealth. This is Jim Hightower saying… So, even though you and I are shut out of these gated land baronies, at least we can take pride in knowing that it’s our tax dollars that help the rich buy them… and lock the gates. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[A Tear-Jerker About the Housing Saga of Some Rich Jerks]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The “old homeplace” is a classic theme of Americana, expressed in everything from Norman Rockwell paintings to Woody Guthrie’s powerful folk lament, “I Ain’t Got No Home In This World Anymore.”<br/><br/>But for a heart-rending, modern-day version of the emotional pull of home, you can’t beat the poignant wail of a new song entitled: “The Low-down Down-home Atherton Rich Man Blues.” Warning: You might need a box of tissues to get through this sad saga.<br/><br/>Atherton, California, is a very small town of some 7,500 souls who face a dreadful housing crisis. Unlike most situations, though, they are alarmed by a looming threat of <em>too much</em> housing! It seems that a recent California law requires cities to provide some affordable, multi-family houses to help cope with a growing statewide shortage of homes, meaning Atherton needs to put in about 350 townhouse units as its share.<br/><br/>“Townhouses!” shrieked the locals. “This can’t be! Un-rich people live in townhouses!”<br/><br/>You see, Atherton is a precious enclave in the heart of the Silicon Valley, where only tech gabillionaires are allowed. The price of their mansions averages about $8 million, with each one secluded on at least an acre of land. So… townhouse people? No way. As one affordable housing advocate put it, “Atherton talks about multifamily housing as if it was a Martian invasion.” In a letter to the city council, the multi-billionaire Andreessen family, wailed that allowing more than one residence per acre “will MASSIVELY decrease our home values [and] quality of life of life.” I’m sure you weep for them, so grab a tissue.<br/><br/>Yet, some Athertonians are at least trying to find solutions. One denizen suggests that all of the residents’ swimming pool cabanas should count toward the town’s affordable housing requirements.<br/><br/>If that won’t make you cry, nothing will.</p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/a-tear-jerker-about-the-housing-saga</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:70024480</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2022 18:29:38 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="3111591" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/70024480/88f9083e21d1bf6417d159ed0759b776.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/70024480/05685912bac7dcb9a9c54faedde3f40d.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>The “old homeplace” is a classic theme of Americana, expressed in everything from Norman Rockwell paintings to Woody Guthrie’s powerful folk lament, “I Ain’t Got No Home In This World Anymore.” But for a heart-rending, modern-day version of the emotional pull of home, you can’t beat the poignant wail of a new song entitled: “The Low-down Down-home Atherton Rich Man Blues.” Warning: You might need a box of tissues to get through this sad saga. Atherton, California, is a very small town of some 7,500 souls who face a dreadful housing crisis. Unlike most situations, though, they are alarmed by a looming threat of too much housing! It seems that a recent California law requires cities to provide some affordable, multi-family houses to help cope with a growing statewide shortage of homes, meaning Atherton needs to put in about 350 townhouse units as its share. “Townhouses!” shrieked the locals. “This can’t be! Un-rich people live in townhouses!” You see, Atherton is a precious enclave in the heart of the Silicon Valley, where only tech gabillionaires are allowed. The price of their mansions averages about $8 million, with each one secluded on at least an acre of land. So… townhouse people? No way. As one affordable housing advocate put it, “Atherton talks about multifamily housing as if it was a Martian invasion.” In a letter to the city council, the multi-billionaire Andreessen family, wailed that allowing more than one residence per acre “will MASSIVELY decrease our home values [and] quality of life of life.” I’m sure you weep for them, so grab a tissue. Yet, some Athertonians are at least trying to find solutions. One denizen suggests that all of the residents’ swimming pool cabanas should count toward the town’s affordable housing requirements. If that won’t make you cry, nothing will. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>The “old homeplace” is a classic theme of Americana, expressed in everything from Norman Rockwell paintings to Woody Guthrie’s powerful folk lament, “I Ain’t Got No Home In This World Anymore.” But for a heart-rending, modern-day version of the emotional pull of home, you can’t beat the poignant wail of a new song entitled: “The Low-down Down-home Atherton Rich Man Blues.” Warning: You might need a box of tissues to get through this sad saga. Atherton, California, is a very small town of some 7,500 souls who face a dreadful housing crisis. Unlike most situations, though, they are alarmed by a looming threat of too much housing! It seems that a recent California law requires cities to provide some affordable, multi-family houses to help cope with a growing statewide shortage of homes, meaning Atherton needs to put in about 350 townhouse units as its share. “Townhouses!” shrieked the locals. “This can’t be! Un-rich people live in townhouses!” You see, Atherton is a precious enclave in the heart of the Silicon Valley, where only tech gabillionaires are allowed. The price of their mansions averages about $8 million, with each one secluded on at least an acre of land. So… townhouse people? No way. As one affordable housing advocate put it, “Atherton talks about multifamily housing as if it was a Martian invasion.” In a letter to the city council, the multi-billionaire Andreessen family, wailed that allowing more than one residence per acre “will MASSIVELY decrease our home values [and] quality of life of life.” I’m sure you weep for them, so grab a tissue. Yet, some Athertonians are at least trying to find solutions. One denizen suggests that all of the residents’ swimming pool cabanas should count toward the town’s affordable housing requirements. If that won’t make you cry, nothing will. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bringing Democracy to the Democratic Party]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><p>Jim Hightower's Hightower Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p>Sen. Joe Manchin – a one-man political steamroller in Washington – is a Democrat. Except when he’s not, which is most of the time. A multimillionaire, West Virginia coal executive, he’s the darling of fossil fuel and pipeline lobbyists, as well as Republican opponents of progressive Democratic policies. Indeed, he’s funded by Republican billionaires.</p><p>But Washington lobbyists and billionaires are not the only source of personal political power that allows him to hold office and block “little-d” democratic policies that the American majority wants and needs. Back home, Joe has maintained a tight, authoritarian grip on West Virginia’s Democratic Party structure, rigging the rules to put Little Joes in each and every party position. In turn, this has long given Boss Manchin control over who gets to run as Democrats for down-ballot elected offices in the Mountain State.</p><p>Until June 18, that is. That’s when a statewide democratic rebellion that had been organizing for six years elected its slate of over 50 candidates to oust the Manchinites on the Party executive committee, replacing all but one of the top Party officers with grassroots activists. It truly was a diverse, people-run victory. Selina Vickers, a social worker, was chief strategist, and Mike Pushkin, a cab driver, is now the Party Chair. Danielle Walker (now vice-chair of the committee and the first person of color in state history to sit on the Party’s governing body) summed up the significance of this turnaround: “There’s a new beacon of light shining down on the government with people energized and ready to strategize with a return to the democratic process.”</p><p>For guidance on bringing this kind of progressive reform to your local/state Dem Party hierarchy, go to Our Revolution, the one national group that is prioritizing work on this fundamental democratic change to the Democratic Party. (<a target="_blank" href="http://ourrevolution.com/">OurRevolution.com</a>).</p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/bringing-democracy-to-the-democratic</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:69146899</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2022 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="3116606" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/69146899/e39f71bc8a464b1943f0e5a151ded3a3.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/69146899/532e5fea59646a6d72279fb6ff730258.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Jim Hightower's Hightower Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Sen. Joe Manchin – a one-man political steamroller in Washington – is a Democrat. Except when he’s not, which is most of the time. A multimillionaire, West Virginia coal executive, he’s the darling of fossil fuel and pipeline lobbyists, as well as Republican opponents of progressive Democratic policies. Indeed, he’s funded by Republican billionaires. But Washington lobbyists and billionaires are not the only source of personal political power that allows him to hold office and block “little-d” democratic policies that the American majority wants and needs. Back home, Joe has maintained a tight, authoritarian grip on West Virginia’s Democratic Party structure, rigging the rules to put Little Joes in each and every party position. In turn, this has long given Boss Manchin control over who gets to run as Democrats for down-ballot elected offices in the Mountain State. Until June 18, that is. That’s when a statewide democratic rebellion that had been organizing for six years elected its slate of over 50 candidates to oust the Manchinites on the Party executive committee, replacing all but one of the top Party officers with grassroots activists. It truly was a diverse, people-run victory. Selina Vickers, a social worker, was chief strategist, and Mike Pushkin, a cab driver, is now the Party Chair. Danielle Walker (now vice-chair of the committee and the first person of color in state history to sit on the Party’s governing body) summed up the significance of this turnaround: “There’s a new beacon of light shining down on the government with people energized and ready to strategize with a return to the democratic process.” For guidance on bringing this kind of progressive reform to your local/state Dem Party hierarchy, go to Our Revolution, the one national group that is prioritizing work on this fundamental democratic change to the Democratic Party. (OurRevolution.com). This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Jim Hightower's Hightower Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Sen. Joe Manchin – a one-man political steamroller in Washington – is a Democrat. Except when he’s not, which is most of the time. A multimillionaire, West Virginia coal executive, he’s the darling of fossil fuel and pipeline lobbyists, as well as Republican opponents of progressive Democratic policies. Indeed, he’s funded by Republican billionaires. But Washington lobbyists and billionaires are not the only source of personal political power that allows him to hold office and block “little-d” democratic policies that the American majority wants and needs. Back home, Joe has maintained a tight, authoritarian grip on West Virginia’s Democratic Party structure, rigging the rules to put Little Joes in each and every party position. In turn, this has long given Boss Manchin control over who gets to run as Democrats for down-ballot elected offices in the Mountain State. Until June 18, that is. That’s when a statewide democratic rebellion that had been organizing for six years elected its slate of over 50 candidates to oust the Manchinites on the Party executive committee, replacing all but one of the top Party officers with grassroots activists. It truly was a diverse, people-run victory. Selina Vickers, a social worker, was chief strategist, and Mike Pushkin, a cab driver, is now the Party Chair. Danielle Walker (now vice-chair of the committee and the first person of color in state history to sit on the Party’s governing body) summed up the significance of this turnaround: “There’s a new beacon of light shining down on the government with people energized and ready to strategize with a return to the democratic process.” For guidance on bringing this kind of progressive reform to your local/state Dem Party hierarchy, go to Our Revolution, the one national group that is prioritizing work on this fundamental democratic change to the Democratic Party. (OurRevolution.com). This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Good News: Small Groups Can Defeat Corporate Giants]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>From corporate polluters to political bosses, power elites try to create a myth of inevitability, trying to make workaday people feel helpless, too small to change the injustices of the system. Don’t bother is their message.</p><p><p>Jim Hightower's Hightower Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></p><p>But the feisty residents of Boxtown, Tennessee, definitely did bother when they learned that a couple of profiteering fossil fuel giants were targeting them. Boxtown, a historic Black neighborhood of Memphis settled by former slaves 160 years ago, was considered by Valero Energy and Plains All-American Pipeline to be politically powerless, so when these multibillion-dollar petro powers decided to ram a dirty and dangerous pipeline through the Memphis area, Boxtown was their chosen route. The rich Texas oil barons even sneeringly called the lower-income community, “The point of least resistance.”</p><p>Boy did they get that wrong! Those “small” people of Boxtown resisted fiercely and smartly. Most flat-out refused to sell their family land at the thieving price offered by the oil slicks. They forged a unified grassroots coalition (Memphis Community Against the Pipeline), reached out to other neighborhoods, and educated locals about the terrible safety records of the two corporate plunderers. They also enlisted environmental groups to help beat back the strong-arm attempt by Valero and Plains All-American to seize the people’s property through eminent-domain. It’s a long story, with many ups and downs, but the inspiring essence of it is that local “nobodies” defeated the big money and raw racist arrogance of a powerhouse duo of absentee corporate elites that disrespected – and misjudged – them.</p><p>It gets little national media attention, but regular grassroots communities and coalitions are mounting – and winning – such gutsy fights against corporate exploiters all across America. We’re <em>not</em> helpless or too small – remember this: Even the smallest dog can lift its leg on the tallest building! To learn more, contact <a target="_blank" href="http://memphiscap.org/">MemphisCAP.org</a></p><p>.</p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/good-news-small-groups-can-defeat-f31</link><guid isPermaLink="false">substack:post:69142800</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2022 22:23:32 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="3111591" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/69142800/98678c2dee9a7bf5b74bf298222d19dc.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/69142800/074f93cba8c0a8312457630104c2a7a1.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>From corporate polluters to political bosses, power elites try to create a myth of inevitability, trying to make workaday people feel helpless, too small to change the injustices of the system. Don’t bother is their message. Jim Hightower's Hightower Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. But the feisty residents of Boxtown, Tennessee, definitely did bother when they learned that a couple of profiteering fossil fuel giants were targeting them. Boxtown, a historic Black neighborhood of Memphis settled by former slaves 160 years ago, was considered by Valero Energy and Plains All-American Pipeline to be politically powerless, so when these multibillion-dollar petro powers decided to ram a dirty and dangerous pipeline through the Memphis area, Boxtown was their chosen route. The rich Texas oil barons even sneeringly called the lower-income community, “The point of least resistance.” Boy did they get that wrong! Those “small” people of Boxtown resisted fiercely and smartly. Most flat-out refused to sell their family land at the thieving price offered by the oil slicks. They forged a unified grassroots coalition (Memphis Community Against the Pipeline), reached out to other neighborhoods, and educated locals about the terrible safety records of the two corporate plunderers. They also enlisted environmental groups to help beat back the strong-arm attempt by Valero and Plains All-American to seize the people’s property through eminent-domain. It’s a long story, with many ups and downs, but the inspiring essence of it is that local “nobodies” defeated the big money and raw racist arrogance of a powerhouse duo of absentee corporate elites that disrespected – and misjudged – them. It gets little national media attention, but regular grassroots communities and coalitions are mounting – and winning – such gutsy fights against corporate exploiters all across America. We’re not helpless or too small – remember this: Even the smallest dog can lift its leg on the tallest building! To learn more, contact MemphisCAP.org . This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>From corporate polluters to political bosses, power elites try to create a myth of inevitability, trying to make workaday people feel helpless, too small to change the injustices of the system. Don’t bother is their message. Jim Hightower's Hightower Lowdown is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. But the feisty residents of Boxtown, Tennessee, definitely did bother when they learned that a couple of profiteering fossil fuel giants were targeting them. Boxtown, a historic Black neighborhood of Memphis settled by former slaves 160 years ago, was considered by Valero Energy and Plains All-American Pipeline to be politically powerless, so when these multibillion-dollar petro powers decided to ram a dirty and dangerous pipeline through the Memphis area, Boxtown was their chosen route. The rich Texas oil barons even sneeringly called the lower-income community, “The point of least resistance.” Boy did they get that wrong! Those “small” people of Boxtown resisted fiercely and smartly. Most flat-out refused to sell their family land at the thieving price offered by the oil slicks. They forged a unified grassroots coalition (Memphis Community Against the Pipeline), reached out to other neighborhoods, and educated locals about the terrible safety records of the two corporate plunderers. They also enlisted environmental groups to help beat back the strong-arm attempt by Valero and Plains All-American to seize the people’s property through eminent-domain. It’s a long story, with many ups and downs, but the inspiring essence of it is that local “nobodies” defeated the big money and raw racist arrogance of a powerhouse duo of absentee corporate elites that disrespected – and misjudged – them. It gets little national media attention, but regular grassroots communities and coalitions are mounting – and winning – such gutsy fights against corporate exploiters all across America. We’re not helpless or too small – remember this: Even the smallest dog can lift its leg on the tallest building! To learn more, contact MemphisCAP.org . This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should “Sudden Death” Be A Part of Professional Golf?]]></title><description><![CDATA[Is it a good deal to sell out your personal integrity for cash from notorious scoundrels?<br/><br/>Depends on your sell-out price, chortle some 48 ethically-stunted professional golfers who’ve peddled both their honor and honesty to the murderous moneyed monarchs who rule Saudi Arabia. The golfers, who are already millionaires, rushed to grab money thrown at their feet by the royal kingdom, which oddly thinks it can launder its public image by sponsoring a money-soaked global golf tour. Of course, a golf tournament needs golfers, but the Saudis had none, so they simply bought some. First, former stars Phil Mickelson and Greg Norman signed away their integrity to join, taking at least $200 million apiece. Then Dustin Johnson and Bryson DeChambeau took $150 million each from Team Saudi, and the likes of Brooks Koepka and Sergio Garcia quicky scrambled to get theirs.<br/><br/>Worse than the golfers’ unsightly money grubbing, however, is their insufferable dishonesty, trying to whitewash their taking of what is literally blood money. Mickelson faked moral outrage at the Kingdom’s rulers, calling them “less than savory individuals” and piously proclaiming that he did not condone “human rights violations.” But he certainly has condoned (and cashed) the checks written to him by the violators.<br/><br/>But Greg Norman, the former pro who led recruitment of golfer talent for the Saudis, offered the most pathetic moral excuse for selling out. Asked how he could link arms with a potentate so barbarous as to have had a critic of the regime murdered and chopped into pieces, Norman said: “look, we’ve all made mistakes.”<br/><br/>There’s a word that describes what these golfing multimillionaires are doing: “Disgusting.” The good news is that most pros – including bigger-name stars like Tiger Woods, Rory McIlroy, and Justin Thomas – have some values that they refuse to trade for dollars. <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/should-sudden-death-be-a-part-of-bdb</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://hightowerlowdown.org/?post_type=podcast&amp;p=17308</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 16:44:17 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="33333333" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/67734067/e08eab6e74ae6ae13ec4c4a96e5bb95b.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Is it a good deal to sell out your personal integrity for cash from notorious scoundrels?

Depends on your sell-out price, chortle some 48 ethically-stunted professional golfers who’ve peddled both their honor and honesty to the murderous moneyed monar</itunes:subtitle><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/67734067/f86b4285fd844e349be47a74fc39fcc0.jpg"/><itunes:summary>Is it a good deal to sell out your personal integrity for cash from notorious scoundrels? Depends on your sell-out price, chortle some 48 ethically-stunted professional golfers who’ve peddled both their honor and honesty to the murderous moneyed monarchs who rule Saudi Arabia. The golfers, who are already millionaires, rushed to grab money thrown at their feet by the royal kingdom, which oddly thinks it can launder its public image by sponsoring a money-soaked global golf tour. Of course, a golf tournament needs golfers, but the Saudis had none, so they simply bought some. First, former stars Phil Mickelson and Greg Norman signed away their integrity to join, taking at least $200 million apiece. Then Dustin Johnson and Bryson DeChambeau took $150 million each from Team Saudi, and the likes of Brooks Koepka and Sergio Garcia quicky scrambled to get theirs. Worse than the golfers’ unsightly money grubbing, however, is their insufferable dishonesty, trying to whitewash their taking of what is literally blood money. Mickelson faked moral outrage at the Kingdom’s rulers, calling them “less than savory individuals” and piously proclaiming that he did not condone “human rights violations.” But he certainly has condoned (and cashed) the checks written to him by the violators. But Greg Norman, the former pro who led recruitment of golfer talent for the Saudis, offered the most pathetic moral excuse for selling out. Asked how he could link arms with a potentate so barbarous as to have had a critic of the regime murdered and chopped into pieces, Norman said: “look, we’ve all made mistakes.” There’s a word that describes what these golfing multimillionaires are doing: “Disgusting.” The good news is that most pros – including bigger-name stars like Tiger Woods, Rory McIlroy, and Justin Thomas – have some values that they refuse to trade for dollars. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Whip Inflation Now!]]></title><description><![CDATA[Republican politicos are all over Joe Biden for failing to stop inflation. Perhaps you wonder, though, what these squawkers would do if they were in charge?<br/><br/>No need to wonder – just look back to 1974, when Americans were being pummeled by price spikes that topped 12%, nearly double what we’re enduring today. But by Gollies, President Gerald Ford and his Republican contingent in Congress met the challenge head-on with a new magical program of economic uplift they called WIN – Whip Inflation Now! But it was nothing – just a political slogan with no magic and no action behind it. Price controls? Antitrust action? No, no, GOP Inc. didn’t want to offend, much less punish, corporate titans for a little profiteering, so they shifted the blame for inflation to consumers, demanding that families just say no to price gouging.<br/><br/>Ford himself went on national TV, urging fellow citizens to join him in buying “only those products and services priced at or below present levels.” The core of the Republican “program,” then, was telling hard-hit wage earners to battle the monopolistic behemoths of Big Oil, Big Pharma, Big Food, et al on their own by simply refusing to pay inflated prices for the gasoline, medicines, groceries, and such that–hellllooooo–they had to have.<br/><br/>As a reward, everyone who signed a form promising be an “Inflation Fighter” was sent a nifty WIN button, indicating their patriotic participation. Sure enough, Americans responded enthusiastically – with an avalanche of ridicule. Even Ford’s own top economic advisor, Alan Greenspan, was whopper jawed by the GOP’s idea that the substance of their policy was a political button: “It was surreal. …I said to myself. ‘This is unbelievable stupidity.’”<br/><br/>Yet, this time, Republican leaders are more surreal, not even pretending to have solution… and we don’t even get a button. <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/whip-inflation-nowwhip-inflation-233</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://hightowerlowdown.org/?post_type=podcast&amp;p=17285</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 04:01:30 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="33333333" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/67734068/4c09580271a3c1299e05d81f1ca56014.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Republican politicos are all over Joe Biden for failing to stop inflation. Perhaps you wonder, though, what these squawkers would do if they were in charge?

No need to wonder – just look back to 1974, when Americans were being pummeled by price spikes</itunes:subtitle><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/67734068/db6be4a82874e3519670840ca66cf4a2.jpg"/><itunes:summary>Republican politicos are all over Joe Biden for failing to stop inflation. Perhaps you wonder, though, what these squawkers would do if they were in charge? No need to wonder – just look back to 1974, when Americans were being pummeled by price spikes that topped 12%, nearly double what we’re enduring today. But by Gollies, President Gerald Ford and his Republican contingent in Congress met the challenge head-on with a new magical program of economic uplift they called WIN – Whip Inflation Now! But it was nothing – just a political slogan with no magic and no action behind it. Price controls? Antitrust action? No, no, GOP Inc. didn’t want to offend, much less punish, corporate titans for a little profiteering, so they shifted the blame for inflation to consumers, demanding that families just say no to price gouging. Ford himself went on national TV, urging fellow citizens to join him in buying “only those products and services priced at or below present levels.” The core of the Republican “program,” then, was telling hard-hit wage earners to battle the monopolistic behemoths of Big Oil, Big Pharma, Big Food, et al on their own by simply refusing to pay inflated prices for the gasoline, medicines, groceries, and such that–hellllooooo–they had to have. As a reward, everyone who signed a form promising be an “Inflation Fighter” was sent a nifty WIN button, indicating their patriotic participation. Sure enough, Americans responded enthusiastically – with an avalanche of ridicule. Even Ford’s own top economic advisor, Alan Greenspan, was whopper jawed by the GOP’s idea that the substance of their policy was a political button: “It was surreal. …I said to myself. ‘This is unbelievable stupidity.’” Yet, this time, Republican leaders are more surreal, not even pretending to have solution… and we don’t even get a button. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Shhh, The Governor Is Listening]]></title><description><![CDATA[Although we haven’t even gotten through this year’s midterm congressional elections, it’s still not too early to start examining some of the characters who hope you’ll make them president in 2024.<br/><br/>I know, you don’t want to… but we must. That’s because corporate elites have already chosen their favorites, and they intend to use massive sums of money, lies, more money, PR slickum, and even more money to slide their toady into the Oval Office, hoping you don’t discover until it’s too late that their chosen one really is a toad.<br/><br/>Take Ron DeSantis. The GOP’s far-right, power hungry, narcissistic Florida governor promises to be the next Donald Trump – only more effective and not as nice. For example, his favorite gubernatorial hobby is the Orwellian practice of monitoring and censoring people’s speech and thoughts, culling out ideas he deems objectionable.<br/><br/>“Don’t Say Gay,” is his most infamous dictate to the state’s teachers, but he has also outlawed any teachings that might “denigrate the Founding Fathers.” Nor will he tolerate the study of institutional racism in America. Indeed, he has even mandated that social studies textbooks (Get this!) must not include concepts of social justice. Ron adamantly opposes what right-wingers call a “woke” society – he wants one that’s asleep.<br/><br/>Sound asleep. He recently rallied his right-wing cadre to ban some math textbooks. Yes, Math! They screech that some real-life topics like wage disparities are being used to make math problems relevant to today’s students – so it was Fahrenheit 451 for those books. Thus far, DeSantis’ censorship binge has nixed 42 math books for “incorporat[ing] prohibited topics.”<br/><br/>Imagine what he could ban as president! Did I mention that DeSantis is also forming his own gubernatorial military force – a state army he can deploy in “emergencies”? What’s an emergency? He says he’ll decide. <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/shhh-the-governor-is-listeningshhh-34a</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://hightowerlowdown.org/?post_type=podcast&amp;p=17261</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2022 04:01:56 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="33333333" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/67734069/8df649c3c8b4619a5b82a82f3cc0ecd7.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Although we haven’t even gotten through this year’s midterm congressional elections, it’s still not too early to start examining some of the characters who hope you’ll make them president in 2024.

I know, you don’t want to… but we must. That’s because</itunes:subtitle><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/67734069/8fc14710f1ca4affa6cdf0b974bee2d8.jpg"/><itunes:summary>Although we haven’t even gotten through this year’s midterm congressional elections, it’s still not too early to start examining some of the characters who hope you’ll make them president in 2024. I know, you don’t want to… but we must. That’s because corporate elites have already chosen their favorites, and they intend to use massive sums of money, lies, more money, PR slickum, and even more money to slide their toady into the Oval Office, hoping you don’t discover until it’s too late that their chosen one really is a toad. Take Ron DeSantis. The GOP’s far-right, power hungry, narcissistic Florida governor promises to be the next Donald Trump – only more effective and not as nice. For example, his favorite gubernatorial hobby is the Orwellian practice of monitoring and censoring people’s speech and thoughts, culling out ideas he deems objectionable. “Don’t Say Gay,” is his most infamous dictate to the state’s teachers, but he has also outlawed any teachings that might “denigrate the Founding Fathers.” Nor will he tolerate the study of institutional racism in America. Indeed, he has even mandated that social studies textbooks (Get this!) must not include concepts of social justice. Ron adamantly opposes what right-wingers call a “woke” society – he wants one that’s asleep. Sound asleep. He recently rallied his right-wing cadre to ban some math textbooks. Yes, Math! They screech that some real-life topics like wage disparities are being used to make math problems relevant to today’s students – so it was Fahrenheit 451 for those books. Thus far, DeSantis’ censorship binge has nixed 42 math books for “incorporat[ing] prohibited topics.” Imagine what he could ban as president! Did I mention that DeSantis is also forming his own gubernatorial military force – a state army he can deploy in “emergencies”? What’s an emergency? He says he’ll decide. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Sunshine State’s Dark Bully]]></title><description><![CDATA[How about Ron DeSantis? The Florida governor is the new darling of the right-wing media, funders, and other establishment powers who’re pushing him to be your next president.<br/><br/>“Ron DeSantis is the new Republican Party,” gushed one arch-conservative media maven. That’s odd, since what characterizes Ron’s tenure (and is causing a collective swoon for him within the rightist hierarchy) is his Big Government authoritarianism. Just yesterday, these same so-called conservatives said such use of government power was evil. But here comes DeSantis, who puts the bull in bully – bellowing “culture war” hooey, demonizing immigrants, fabricating claims of voter fraud, promoting Covid lies, and so forth. Then he imperiously asserts government power to bully local communities, workers, the poor, Florida’s environment, truth, fairness, honesty, and democracy.<br/><br/>Consider one of his recent maneuvers to overturn the people’s democratic will. Like most other Republican-run states, DeSantis’s Florida keeps trying to block African-Americans from the polls. In 2018, however, Floridians themselves rebuked the suppressors by approving a ballot measure to expand the electorate. A whopping 65% said YES to eliminating a vindictive lifelong ban on voting by ex-felons – people who had served their time. This long overdue measure of simple justice (approved, in fact, by a much bigger margin of voters than DeSantis got that year) re-enfranchised about 1.4 million former felons.<br/><br/>But wait – DeSantis had old Jim Crow up his sleeve! In 2019, he rammed a technical gotcha into state law, preventing former felons from voting until they pay in full all court fines (many arbitrarily and unfairly assessed years ago for things like marijuana possession). The fines can run thousands of dollars, so DeSantis’ new law created a partisan poll tax to price a big percentage of these newly eligible voters out of democratic participation.<br/><br/>Remember, he’s the “new” Republican Party. <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-sunshine-states-dark-bullythe-34b</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://hightowerlowdown.org/?post_type=podcast&amp;p=17258</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2022 04:01:18 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="33333333" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/67734070/658cf7abac3a4aae7f85d9ccacc29b66.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>How about Ron DeSantis? The Florida governor is the new darling of the right-wing media, funders, and other establishment powers who’re pushing him to be your next president.

“Ron DeSantis is the new Republican Party,” gushed one arch-conservative med</itunes:subtitle><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/67734070/b8e470c27b2145d98b7d733e12f32f82.jpg"/><itunes:summary>How about Ron DeSantis? The Florida governor is the new darling of the right-wing media, funders, and other establishment powers who’re pushing him to be your next president. “Ron DeSantis is the new Republican Party,” gushed one arch-conservative media maven. That’s odd, since what characterizes Ron’s tenure (and is causing a collective swoon for him within the rightist hierarchy) is his Big Government authoritarianism. Just yesterday, these same so-called conservatives said such use of government power was evil. But here comes DeSantis, who puts the bull in bully – bellowing “culture war” hooey, demonizing immigrants, fabricating claims of voter fraud, promoting Covid lies, and so forth. Then he imperiously asserts government power to bully local communities, workers, the poor, Florida’s environment, truth, fairness, honesty, and democracy. Consider one of his recent maneuvers to overturn the people’s democratic will. Like most other Republican-run states, DeSantis’s Florida keeps trying to block African-Americans from the polls. In 2018, however, Floridians themselves rebuked the suppressors by approving a ballot measure to expand the electorate. A whopping 65% said YES to eliminating a vindictive lifelong ban on voting by ex-felons – people who had served their time. This long overdue measure of simple justice (approved, in fact, by a much bigger margin of voters than DeSantis got that year) re-enfranchised about 1.4 million former felons. But wait – DeSantis had old Jim Crow up his sleeve! In 2019, he rammed a technical gotcha into state law, preventing former felons from voting until they pay in full all court fines (many arbitrarily and unfairly assessed years ago for things like marijuana possession). The fines can run thousands of dollars, so DeSantis’ new law created a partisan poll tax to price a big percentage of these newly eligible voters out of democratic participation. Remember, he’s the “new” Republican Party. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[How Can Democrats Save the Party… From Their Own Leaders?]]></title><description><![CDATA[“It’s over.” “Biden’s numbers are in the ditch.” “Democrats are doomed.” “Call the priest.”<br/><br/>These are Democrats talking! Even before November’s congressional elections are run, many conventional-thinking Democratic operatives are surrendering to a presumed Republican sweep. You don’t need a political science degree to know that if you start out announcing that you’ll lose, chances are you will – after all, who wants to vote for a party that shows no fighting spirit, no confidence in the appeal of its own ideas?<br/><br/>What’s happening here is that the Party’s top leaders have decided their candidates can’t win in rural areas and smaller factory cities – so they’ve quit trying. Worse, they blame the voters, claiming that Trumpism, Fox News BS, and culture war nonsense have poisoned the minds of people “out there.” Thus, Party leaders have retreated from the countryside to focus entirely on big urban areas. Democratic Congressional leaders even killed their rural outreach programs, and the Party’s chairman in 2018 meekly declared: “You can’t door-knock in rural America.”<br/><br/>Actually, sir, you can. And if you choose to abandon this whole working-class constituency – surprise! – it will abandon you. Worse, than failing to campaign along America’s dirt roads and factory streets, national Democrats have actively been pushing corporate policies that have ravaged families living there – including trade scams that sucking out union jobs; shamefully bailing out Wall Street bankers who crashed our real economy (while ignoring millions of devastated workaday people); and doing nothing about the corporate-caused farm depression still ripping across our land. Washington Democrats have largely betrayed this vital, FDRish constituency of millions that they now blithely dismiss as irredeemable.<br/><br/>Did Party poohbahs think voters wouldn’t notice or care how they’re being treated? If we want them back on our side, then let’s go to them… and get back on their side! <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/how-can-democrats-save-the-party-efb</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://hightowerlowdown.org/?post_type=podcast&amp;p=17163</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 04:01:28 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="33333333" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/67734071/59ae48318002f96c8260a9ff9b8c40bc.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>“It’s over.” “Biden’s numbers are in the ditch.” “Democrats are doomed.” “Call the priest.”

These are Democrats talking! Even before November’s congressional elections are run, many conventional-thinking Democratic operatives are surrendering to a pre</itunes:subtitle><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/67734071/a4b3bb8d00e98c88eee6ebf9f8171c70.jpg"/><itunes:summary>“It’s over.” “Biden’s numbers are in the ditch.” “Democrats are doomed.” “Call the priest.” These are Democrats talking! Even before November’s congressional elections are run, many conventional-thinking Democratic operatives are surrendering to a presumed Republican sweep. You don’t need a political science degree to know that if you start out announcing that you’ll lose, chances are you will – after all, who wants to vote for a party that shows no fighting spirit, no confidence in the appeal of its own ideas? What’s happening here is that the Party’s top leaders have decided their candidates can’t win in rural areas and smaller factory cities – so they’ve quit trying. Worse, they blame the voters, claiming that Trumpism, Fox News BS, and culture war nonsense have poisoned the minds of people “out there.” Thus, Party leaders have retreated from the countryside to focus entirely on big urban areas. Democratic Congressional leaders even killed their rural outreach programs, and the Party’s chairman in 2018 meekly declared: “You can’t door-knock in rural America.” Actually, sir, you can. And if you choose to abandon this whole working-class constituency – surprise! – it will abandon you. Worse, than failing to campaign along America’s dirt roads and factory streets, national Democrats have actively been pushing corporate policies that have ravaged families living there – including trade scams that sucking out union jobs; shamefully bailing out Wall Street bankers who crashed our real economy (while ignoring millions of devastated workaday people); and doing nothing about the corporate-caused farm depression still ripping across our land. Washington Democrats have largely betrayed this vital, FDRish constituency of millions that they now blithely dismiss as irredeemable. Did Party poohbahs think voters wouldn’t notice or care how they’re being treated? If we want them back on our side, then let’s go to them… and get back on their side! This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Come On, Biden, Be A Real President!]]></title><description><![CDATA[President Biden recently flew off to Taiwan to assure allies there that he will fight for them. And next he’s headed over to Saudi Arabia to “repair ties” with those oil monarchs.<br/><br/>This flurry of foreign travel might be strategically important for international realpolitik, but – Hello – another strategically important piece of real politics is looming right here at home: The November congressional elections! Taiwan and Saudi Arabia don’t get a vote, but Texas and South Carolina do. So how about spending a bit more time flying or even whistle stopping to such places, where many hard-hit working-class families would like to see President Joe fight for and repair ties with them.<br/><br/>In fairness, much of Biden’s progressive agenda has been deliberately gummed up by such congressional blobs of do-nothingism as Mitch McConnell and Joe Manchin. But blaming them isn’t winning any points for him – nor does it help the families now struggling with baby formula shortages, $5 gasoline, a farm and factory depression, etc.<br/><br/>Instead of blame or surrender, more of Harry Truman’s feisty, can-do spirit is called for – get out of the Beltway Bubble and go straight to the people with an urgent program of Big Actions that they want and need. To hell with placating McConnell and Manchin –you’re the president Joe, not them, and you’re not powerless. For example, Rep. Ro Khanna points out that you should use the government’s emergency authority to do “preemptive buying” on the open market to stop runaway food and fuel prices. The authority to do this is already on the books, so no need to kiss McConnell’s butt – just take direct presidential action for ordinary Americans.<br/><br/>This is the difference between giving speeches telling voters you’re on their side… and actually being there, so they can see it for themselves. It’s honest politics. <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/come-on-biden-be-a-real-presidentcome-860</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://hightowerlowdown.org/?post_type=podcast&amp;p=17165</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2022 16:29:58 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="33333333" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/67734072/b825dd486ac71ba30352c77f91d2601e.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>President Biden recently flew off to Taiwan to assure allies there that he will fight for them. And next he’s headed over to Saudi Arabia to “repair ties” with those oil monarchs.

This flurry of foreign travel might be strategically important for inte</itunes:subtitle><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/67734072/92d6fa248b6f2d1596720064af9dcf83.jpg"/><itunes:summary>President Biden recently flew off to Taiwan to assure allies there that he will fight for them. And next he’s headed over to Saudi Arabia to “repair ties” with those oil monarchs. This flurry of foreign travel might be strategically important for international realpolitik, but – Hello – another strategically important piece of real politics is looming right here at home: The November congressional elections! Taiwan and Saudi Arabia don’t get a vote, but Texas and South Carolina do. So how about spending a bit more time flying or even whistle stopping to such places, where many hard-hit working-class families would like to see President Joe fight for and repair ties with them. In fairness, much of Biden’s progressive agenda has been deliberately gummed up by such congressional blobs of do-nothingism as Mitch McConnell and Joe Manchin. But blaming them isn’t winning any points for him – nor does it help the families now struggling with baby formula shortages, $5 gasoline, a farm and factory depression, etc. Instead of blame or surrender, more of Harry Truman’s feisty, can-do spirit is called for – get out of the Beltway Bubble and go straight to the people with an urgent program of Big Actions that they want and need. To hell with placating McConnell and Manchin –you’re the president Joe, not them, and you’re not powerless. For example, Rep. Ro Khanna points out that you should use the government’s emergency authority to do “preemptive buying” on the open market to stop runaway food and fuel prices. The authority to do this is already on the books, so no need to kiss McConnell’s butt – just take direct presidential action for ordinary Americans. This is the difference between giving speeches telling voters you’re on their side… and actually being there, so they can see it for themselves. It’s honest politics. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Enthroning Corporate Power Over America]]></title><description><![CDATA[“Equal Justice Under Law.” That’s the noble principle carved into the marble façade of the temple-like Supreme Court building.<br/><br/>Today, though, six right-wing, corporate-dominated activist judges control the present Court, and they’re implementing an elitist creed mocking that ideal. By putting the interests and power of the wealthy over the rest of us. They’re turning “justice” into an antidemocratic concept of “just us.” In ruling after ruling, today’s supremes are political operatives taking power from the many to further-empower and enrich the few.<br/><br/>One huge change occurred in 2010, when the five Republican judges decreed that corporations be given a Constitutional right to spend unlimited sums of their cash to dominate our elections – and to pack our courts with judges who serve them. Sure enough, a majority of Supremes are now in harness to the corporate agenda.<br/><br/>Consider their constant push to rig the rules against workers. While the federal judiciary has aided corporate bosses for decades by chipping away at hard-won legal protections for working families, the chisel has become a jackhammer in the last few years. The Supreme Court’s Republican majority routinely pounds precedents, logic, truth, and the Constitution itself to demolish the structural pillars of labor rights and organizing.<br/><br/>In a 2018 case, for example, the GOP judges undermined the funding of unions by arbitrarily striking down their process for collecting dues–a practice the court itself had authorized 41 years earlier. As Justice Elena Kagan bluntly put it in her dissenting opinion, there was no reason for the court to barge into this matter of long-settled law … except that the Republican majority simply didn’t like the previous decision and overruled it “because it wanted to.”<br/><br/>This is not justice, it’s raw politics – yet another open-and-shut case of black-robed partisans supplanting America’s hallowed rule of law with their own anti-labor whim. <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/enthroning-corporate-power-over-americaenthronin-cf3</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://hightowerlowdown.org/?post_type=podcast&amp;p=17128</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2022 04:01:33 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="33333333" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/67734073/7d87774c6a3da2d769f9d7ccdf10d974.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>“Equal Justice Under Law.” That’s the noble principle carved into the marble façade of the temple-like Supreme Court building.

Today, though, six right-wing, corporate-dominated activist judges control the present Court, and they’re implementing an el</itunes:subtitle><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/67734073/e67edcc70a76a0e2753954d22ad513ac.jpg"/><itunes:summary>“Equal Justice Under Law.” That’s the noble principle carved into the marble façade of the temple-like Supreme Court building. Today, though, six right-wing, corporate-dominated activist judges control the present Court, and they’re implementing an elitist creed mocking that ideal. By putting the interests and power of the wealthy over the rest of us. They’re turning “justice” into an antidemocratic concept of “just us.” In ruling after ruling, today’s supremes are political operatives taking power from the many to further-empower and enrich the few. One huge change occurred in 2010, when the five Republican judges decreed that corporations be given a Constitutional right to spend unlimited sums of their cash to dominate our elections – and to pack our courts with judges who serve them. Sure enough, a majority of Supremes are now in harness to the corporate agenda. Consider their constant push to rig the rules against workers. While the federal judiciary has aided corporate bosses for decades by chipping away at hard-won legal protections for working families, the chisel has become a jackhammer in the last few years. The Supreme Court’s Republican majority routinely pounds precedents, logic, truth, and the Constitution itself to demolish the structural pillars of labor rights and organizing. In a 2018 case, for example, the GOP judges undermined the funding of unions by arbitrarily striking down their process for collecting dues–a practice the court itself had authorized 41 years earlier. As Justice Elena Kagan bluntly put it in her dissenting opinion, there was no reason for the court to barge into this matter of long-settled law … except that the Republican majority simply didn’t like the previous decision and overruled it “because it wanted to.” This is not justice, it’s raw politics – yet another open-and-shut case of black-robed partisans supplanting America’s hallowed rule of law with their own anti-labor whim. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Corporate Conspiracy on The Court]]></title><description><![CDATA[Usurping the fundamental rights of women to control their own bodies.<br/><br/>Authorizing corporate giants to buy our elections.<br/><br/>Nullifying the right of organizers to talk to workers about unionizing.<br/><br/>Who is rigging America’s legal system against workaday people? The Supreme Court’s right-wing extremists, that’s who. Just a handful of aloof, unelected judges have been turning what’s supposed to be a citadel of justice into an unrestrained political instrument for instituting autocratic, plutocratic, theocratic power over us. If that sounds like a coup, it is! A slow-motion power grab has quietly been underway for years, with a core group of corporate billionaires and far-right political operatives working (with practically no media exposure) to stack federal and state courts with partisan activists.<br/><br/>There’s even a smoking gun revealing this plot: A confidential memo to the Chamber of Commerce, written in 1971 by Lewis Powell – a corporate lawyer and consigliere for Big Tobacco. Powell lamented that such upstanding corporate citizens as tobacco giants were not getting the respect they deserved, nor did they have enough power over the nation’s political system.<br/><br/>That was absurd, of course, but Powell was dead-set on returning America to pre-New Deal days when corporate barons were the supreme, domineering force over America’s government, economy, and society. To get there, Powell’s memo noted that “with an activist-minded Supreme Court, the judiciary may be the most important instrument for social, economic, and political change” – by which he meant structural changes that empower moneyed interests over workers, consumers, et al. Just two months after Powell sent his memo, President Nixon awarded him a seat on the Supreme Court!<br/><br/>After decades of political maneuvering by a consortium of laissez-faire ideologues, dark-money billionaire funders, secretive front groups, and top GOP politicos, we now have the Supreme Court corporations want. Powell’s memo has literally come to life. <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/the-corporate-conspiracy-on-the-courtthe-998</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://hightowerlowdown.org/?post_type=podcast&amp;p=17126</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2022 16:07:17 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="33333333" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/67734074/e7ab584d0ab2fec924b8848dd53f39aa.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Usurping the fundamental rights of women to control their own bodies.

Authorizing corporate giants to buy our elections.

Nullifying the right of organizers to talk to workers about unionizing.

Who is rigging America’s legal system against workad</itunes:subtitle><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/67734074/3181d9b349f382c708cd4a4d682688b5.jpg"/><itunes:summary>Usurping the fundamental rights of women to control their own bodies. Authorizing corporate giants to buy our elections. Nullifying the right of organizers to talk to workers about unionizing. Who is rigging America’s legal system against workaday people? The Supreme Court’s right-wing extremists, that’s who. Just a handful of aloof, unelected judges have been turning what’s supposed to be a citadel of justice into an unrestrained political instrument for instituting autocratic, plutocratic, theocratic power over us. If that sounds like a coup, it is! A slow-motion power grab has quietly been underway for years, with a core group of corporate billionaires and far-right political operatives working (with practically no media exposure) to stack federal and state courts with partisan activists. There’s even a smoking gun revealing this plot: A confidential memo to the Chamber of Commerce, written in 1971 by Lewis Powell – a corporate lawyer and consigliere for Big Tobacco. Powell lamented that such upstanding corporate citizens as tobacco giants were not getting the respect they deserved, nor did they have enough power over the nation’s political system. That was absurd, of course, but Powell was dead-set on returning America to pre-New Deal days when corporate barons were the supreme, domineering force over America’s government, economy, and society. To get there, Powell’s memo noted that “with an activist-minded Supreme Court, the judiciary may be the most important instrument for social, economic, and political change” – by which he meant structural changes that empower moneyed interests over workers, consumers, et al. Just two months after Powell sent his memo, President Nixon awarded him a seat on the Supreme Court! After decades of political maneuvering by a consortium of laissez-faire ideologues, dark-money billionaire funders, secretive front groups, and top GOP politicos, we now have the Supreme Court corporations want. Powell’s memo has literally come to life. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Secrecy: Who Needs it?]]></title><description><![CDATA[When Supreme Court member Sam Alito’s secret plan for canceling the constitutional right of women to end their pregnancies leaked out to the public – Republican politicos went ballistic! Over the leak, that is.<br/><br/>The Court’s Republican Chief Justice, John Roberts, called the unauthorized disclosure an “affront” to the majesty of the Supremes. Likewise, Republican congressional leaders have furiously demanded to know who dunnit and why! Way beyond their political screeching and posturing, however, a Pennsylvania woman quietly wrote a letter to the New York Times that calmly posed a couple of honest, more-fundamental questions: “Why are Supreme Court votes and processes so hidden in the first place?” And “How did this grip on secrecy become so sacrosanct?”<br/><br/>After all, as important and enormously-powerful as this tiny body is, it’s still a governmental agency doing public business that affects every American. So the legal work that the nine members of this ultimate judicial authority do – including their internal machinations to reach such awesome decisions as nullifying fundamental human rights – ought to be transparent to all who will be affected.<br/><br/>The ugly truth is that today’s Third Branch of government has needlessly, dangerously, and rather ludicrously become a black-robed autocracy. Bear in mind that these nine individuals are enrobed for life, choose the cases they consider, make up their own rules of ethical conduct, operate almost entirely behind closed doors, can conspire to issue decrees – and the bare majority of only five of them can arbitrarily overrule president’s, congresses, states, other courts, voters… and your own personal life-decisions.<br/><br/>And now comes a six-person GOP majority of supreme justices determined to entrench corporate plutocracy, right-wing theocracy, and Republican sovereignty over all of us. That’s why we must finally lift the medieval level of secrecy the partisan judges are using to shroud their actions. <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/supreme-court-secrecy-who-needs-itsupreme-379</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://hightowerlowdown.org/?post_type=podcast&amp;p=17029</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 04:01:42 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="33333333" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/67734075/c1370104de15b929cab17b372c25f980.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>When Supreme Court member Sam Alito’s secret plan for canceling the constitutional right of women to end their pregnancies leaked out to the public – Republican politicos went ballistic! Over the leak, that is.

The Court’s Republican Chief Justice, Jo</itunes:subtitle><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/67734075/3de201bd791ec38f60ddcf1146601c9e.jpg"/><itunes:summary>When Supreme Court member Sam Alito’s secret plan for canceling the constitutional right of women to end their pregnancies leaked out to the public – Republican politicos went ballistic! Over the leak, that is. The Court’s Republican Chief Justice, John Roberts, called the unauthorized disclosure an “affront” to the majesty of the Supremes. Likewise, Republican congressional leaders have furiously demanded to know who dunnit and why! Way beyond their political screeching and posturing, however, a Pennsylvania woman quietly wrote a letter to the New York Times that calmly posed a couple of honest, more-fundamental questions: “Why are Supreme Court votes and processes so hidden in the first place?” And “How did this grip on secrecy become so sacrosanct?” After all, as important and enormously-powerful as this tiny body is, it’s still a governmental agency doing public business that affects every American. So the legal work that the nine members of this ultimate judicial authority do – including their internal machinations to reach such awesome decisions as nullifying fundamental human rights – ought to be transparent to all who will be affected. The ugly truth is that today’s Third Branch of government has needlessly, dangerously, and rather ludicrously become a black-robed autocracy. Bear in mind that these nine individuals are enrobed for life, choose the cases they consider, make up their own rules of ethical conduct, operate almost entirely behind closed doors, can conspire to issue decrees – and the bare majority of only five of them can arbitrarily overrule president’s, congresses, states, other courts, voters… and your own personal life-decisions. And now comes a six-person GOP majority of supreme justices determined to entrench corporate plutocracy, right-wing theocracy, and Republican sovereignty over all of us. That’s why we must finally lift the medieval level of secrecy the partisan judges are using to shroud their actions. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Should We the People Respect a Court That Disrespects the People?]]></title><description><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell, the perpetually sour old goose who heads the Senate Republican Caucus, had a hissy fit when the news leaked out that American women are about to have their most fundamental constitutional right taken from them by a cabal of Supreme Court judges.<br/><br/>What made Mitch twitch, of course, was not the bad news for women… but the leak. He huffed that revealing the right-wing Court’s scheme to the public was a “stunning breach,” spewing that it’s “an attack on the independence of the Supreme Court.” Uh, Mitch… the so-called Supremes have been meeting behind closed doors specifically to plot an all-out attack on the independence of some 170 million women to control their own bodies. Why aren’t you opposing the secrecy, rather than supporting the Court’s subversion of women’s liberty?<br/><br/>Perversely, the entire Republican leadership is outraged by the leak, rather than the attack on women. Right-wing blowhard Ted Cruz, for example, yapped that informing the public “will do lasting damage to the integrity of the Court.” Uh, Ted… you and your ideological ilk annihilated the Court’s integrity – and its legitimacy – when you stacked it with a covey of corporate-coddling partisan hacks like Alito, Barrett, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Thomas.<br/><br/>Then came Sen. Mike Lee of Utah, a Trump acolyte, ludicrously blathering that the leak of the judicial plan is “despicable.” Why? Well, he explained to us commoners, the Court “is not a political body.” If ignorance is bliss, Mike must be ecstatic! The GOP majority on this court is so immersed in its own partisan biases that it is routinely ruling against workers, the environment, women, voting rights, local communities… and democracy itself.<br/><br/>No surprise then that public trust in the integrity of these “arbiters of justice” is crashing. If the Court won’t respect our democratic ideals, the people won't respect the Court. <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</a>]]></description><link>https://jimhightower.substack.com/p/why-should-we-the-people-respect-cd2</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://hightowerlowdown.org/?post_type=podcast&amp;p=17027</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hightower]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2022 19:37:15 GMT</pubDate><enclosure length="33333333" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/67734076/3bec2013ed3161dad83f21963e5224fd.mp3"/><itunes:author>Jim Hightower</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Mitch McConnell, the perpetually sour old goose who heads the Senate Republican Caucus, had a hissy fit when the news leaked out that American women are about to have their most fundamental constitutional right taken from them by a cabal of Supreme Court</itunes:subtitle><itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>130</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://substackcdn.com/feed/podcast/782570/post/67734076/f89e218c0c6f6a201b7fc40ce4d1e10d.jpg"/><itunes:summary>Mitch McConnell, the perpetually sour old goose who heads the Senate Republican Caucus, had a hissy fit when the news leaked out that American women are about to have their most fundamental constitutional right taken from them by a cabal of Supreme Court judges. What made Mitch twitch, of course, was not the bad news for women… but the leak. He huffed that revealing the right-wing Court’s scheme to the public was a “stunning breach,” spewing that it’s “an attack on the independence of the Supreme Court.” Uh, Mitch… the so-called Supremes have been meeting behind closed doors specifically to plot an all-out attack on the independence of some 170 million women to control their own bodies. Why aren’t you opposing the secrecy, rather than supporting the Court’s subversion of women’s liberty? Perversely, the entire Republican leadership is outraged by the leak, rather than the attack on women. Right-wing blowhard Ted Cruz, for example, yapped that informing the public “will do lasting damage to the integrity of the Court.” Uh, Ted… you and your ideological ilk annihilated the Court’s integrity – and its legitimacy – when you stacked it with a covey of corporate-coddling partisan hacks like Alito, Barrett, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Thomas. Then came Sen. Mike Lee of Utah, a Trump acolyte, ludicrously blathering that the leak of the judicial plan is “despicable.” Why? Well, he explained to us commoners, the Court “is not a political body.” If ignorance is bliss, Mike must be ecstatic! The GOP majority on this court is so immersed in its own partisan biases that it is routinely ruling against workers, the environment, women, voting rights, local communities… and democracy itself. No surprise then that public trust in the integrity of these “arbiters of justice” is crashing. If the Court won’t respect our democratic ideals, the people won't respect the Court. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jimhightower.substack.com/subscribe</itunes:summary></item></channel></rss>