<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:blogger='http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6631405922607116203</id><updated>2026-04-18T11:09:17.151+01:00</updated><category term="latest issue"/><category term="books for review"/><category term="editorial"/><category term="copyright"/><category term="United States"/><category term="patents"/><category term="trade marks"/><category term="Community trade mark"/><category term="authors&#39; take"/><category term="guest editorial"/><category term="ECJ reference"/><category term="table of contents"/><category term="trade mark infringement"/><category term="Germany"/><category term="Miscellany"/><category term="special issue"/><category term="European Union"/><category term="copyright infringement"/><category term="Australia"/><category term="Authors&#39; Take series"/><category term="CJEU"/><category term="New Editorial Board member"/><category term="passing off"/><category term="Canada"/><category term="JIPLP&#39;s 10th Anniversary Conference"/><category term="book review"/><category term="articles in search of an author"/><category term="current issue"/><category term="opposition"/><category term="England and Wales"/><category term="JIPLP LinkedIn Group"/><category term="JIPLP-GRUR Int. partnership"/><category term="The Authors&#39; Take"/><category term="United Kingdom"/><category term="patent infringement"/><category term="style"/><category term="Current Intelligence notes"/><category term="JIPLP"/><category term="JIPLP competition"/><category term="JIPLP-GRUR London event 2014"/><category term="JIPLP-GRUR London event 2015"/><category term="blocking of internet access"/><category term="call for articles"/><category term="image rights"/><category term="Eleonora Rosati"/><category term="France"/><category term="India"/><category term="Secondary Protection of Innovations"/><category term="communication to the public"/><category term="counterfeiting"/><category term="current issue online"/><category term="seminar"/><category term="validity"/><category term="Brexit"/><category term="JIPLP Special Image Rights Issue"/><category term="Netherlands"/><category term="Registered Community design"/><category term="Trade secrets"/><category term="author profiles"/><category term="exhaustion of rights"/><category term="fundamental rights"/><category term="in person"/><category term="infringement"/><category term="invalidity"/><category term="jurisdiction"/><category term="liability of ISPs"/><category term="moral rights"/><category term="news"/><category term="trade mark registrability"/><category term="ACTA"/><category term="AI"/><category term="Artificial Intelligence"/><category term="Belgium"/><category term="CJEU reference"/><category term="CJEU references"/><category term="COPE"/><category term="Carina Gommers"/><category term="China"/><category term="Community design"/><category term="Community trade marks"/><category term="Competition"/><category term="DNA sequence patents"/><category term="GIs"/><category term="Geographical indications and trade marks"/><category term="Good writing"/><category term="IJLIT"/><category term="INTA 2014"/><category term="ISPs"/><category term="Italy"/><category term="JIPLP housekeeping"/><category term="JIPLP in print"/><category term="Reviews"/><category term="SPCs"/><category term="Turkey"/><category term="abuse of process"/><category term="assessment of damages"/><category term="claim construction"/><category term="detention of suspected infringements"/><category term="editorial board"/><category term="fair use"/><category term="fashion"/><category term="genuine use"/><category term="injunctions"/><category term="intermediaries"/><category term="internet"/><category term="patent eligibility"/><category term="patent law"/><category term="patent validity"/><category term="patent-eligibility"/><category term="peer reviewers"/><category term="registrability"/><category term="shape marks"/><category term="special edition"/><category term="sustainability"/><category term="trade mark law"/><category term="videogames"/><category term="&quot;Fakes in Transit&quot; seminar"/><category term="2016"/><category term="AG Szpunar"/><category term="Africa"/><category term="April 2019"/><category term="Community designs"/><category term="Community plant varieties"/><category term="Contributory trade mark infringement"/><category term="DSM Directive"/><category term="Danny Friedmann"/><category term="Darren Smyth"/><category term="Digital Markets Act"/><category term="ECJ"/><category term="EPO"/><category term="EU copyright"/><category term="EU trade mark law"/><category term="February issue 2019"/><category term="Finland"/><category term="Funke Medien"/><category term="Google Settlement"/><category term="Greece"/><category term="Heidi Härkönen"/><category term="INTA 2020"/><category term="IP"/><category term="IP Publishers&#39; and Editors&#39; Lunch"/><category term="IP enforcement"/><category term="IP licences"/><category term="In conversation with"/><category term="Intellectual Property Enforcement Directive"/><category term="Irene Calboli"/><category term="JIPLP-GRUR Munich event 2014"/><category term="JIPLP-GRUR Munich event 2015"/><category term="June 2019"/><category term="Kelsey Farish"/><category term="Keri Johnston"/><category term="Levola Hengelo"/><category term="Luxury goods"/><category term="May 2019"/><category term="May 2020"/><category term="Myriad"/><category term="November 2013 JIPLP"/><category term="OHIM"/><category term="Portugal"/><category term="Rubik&#39;s cube"/><category term="Spain"/><category term="Stephen Barratt"/><category term="Supplementary protection certificates"/><category term="Suppmentary protection certificates"/><category term="UK"/><category term="Yin Harn Lee"/><category term="added matter"/><category term="adwords"/><category term="assessing patent strength"/><category term="authorship and ownership"/><category term="book for review"/><category term="books and other materials for review"/><category term="colour marks"/><category term="colour trade marks"/><category term="competition law"/><category term="copyright reform"/><category term="cross-linking"/><category term="damages"/><category term="database right"/><category term="deepfakes"/><category term="defences"/><category term="design law"/><category term="design rights"/><category term="distinctive character"/><category term="domain names"/><category term="e-books"/><category term="enforcement"/><category term="evidence"/><category term="fair dealing"/><category term="fashion law"/><category term="fashion law special issue"/><category term="films for review"/><category term="free movement of goods"/><category term="freedom of expression"/><category term="functionality"/><category term="house style"/><category term="individual character"/><category term="informed user"/><category term="initial interest confusion"/><category term="injunction"/><category term="interim injunction"/><category term="inventive step"/><category term="invitation to submit articles"/><category term="jeremy phillips"/><category term="likelihood of confusion"/><category term="likeness"/><category term="linking"/><category term="meaning of &#39;Greek Yoghurt&#39;"/><category term="mobile-optimised website"/><category term="models"/><category term="new issue"/><category term="new journal"/><category term="novelty"/><category term="obviousness"/><category term="online infringement"/><category term="originality"/><category term="own name"/><category term="ownership of IP rights"/><category term="parallel trade"/><category term="parody"/><category term="patent litigation"/><category term="patent term extension"/><category term="pharmaceutical patents"/><category term="racemates"/><category term="right to repair"/><category term="safe harbours"/><category term="saisie-contrefaçon"/><category term="scope of protection"/><category term="sensory copyright"/><category term="sponsorship"/><category term="standards"/><category term="three dimensional marks"/><category term="trade mark"/><category term="trade mark validity"/><category term="unfair competition"/><category term="&#39;Three Strikes&#39;"/><category term="2014 cover colour"/><category term="24 November 2017); Samuel Wee; Authors&#39; Take; counterfeits; goods in transit; freight forwarders"/><category term="3 dimensional mark"/><category term="3D marks"/><category term="ALAI report and opinion"/><category term="Abbreviation"/><category term="Adrián Crespo"/><category term="Advance access"/><category term="Advance publication online"/><category term="Advocate General&#39;s Opinion"/><category term="Afghanistan Papers"/><category term="African IP practitioners&#39; association"/><category term="Akanksha Jumde; Nishant Kumar; GIs"/><category term="Alexandra Allen-Franks"/><category term="Alina Trapova"/><category term="America Invents Act"/><category term="Amy Thomas"/><category term="Anastasiia Chuvaeva"/><category term="Andrea Rossi"/><category term="Andy Warhol"/><category term="Art. 14 Directive 2019/790"/><category term="Article 101 TFEU"/><category term="Article 102 TFEU"/><category term="Article 9(7) Enforcement Directive"/><category term="August 2017 editorial"/><category term="August 2017 issue"/><category term="August 2019 Editorial"/><category term="August 2019 issue"/><category term="August 2020 Editorial"/><category term="Australian Mandatory Bargaining Code"/><category term="Author&#39;s Take; plant variety rights"/><category term="Authors"/><category term="Authors&#39; Take; Tito Rendas; copyright exceptions; user rights; CDSM Directive"/><category term="Authors&#39;s Take series"/><category term="Belize"/><category term="Berdien van der Donk"/><category term="Bernd Justin Jütte"/><category term="Bluebook"/><category term="Bob Marley"/><category term="Border measures"/><category term="Brompton Bicycle C-833/18; copyright; authors&#39; take; functional shapes; Ilanah Fhima"/><category term="Business methods patents"/><category term="C-18/18"/><category term="C-265/16; Authors&#39; Take; private copying"/><category term="C-466/20"/><category term="C-688/17"/><category term="CJEU or ECJ"/><category term="COVID"/><category term="COVID-19"/><category term="California"/><category term="Call for Article"/><category term="Canada. copyright"/><category term="Caroline Le Goffic"/><category term="Case C-516/17 Spiegel Online"/><category term="Caterina Sganga"/><category term="Charles R. Macedo"/><category term="Christmas"/><category term="Christmas special"/><category term="Christopher Stothers"/><category term="Citation in Court of Appeal"/><category term="Citation of JIPLP article in legal proceedings"/><category term="Climate change and IP"/><category term="Coexistence agreements"/><category term="Colombia"/><category term="Confidentiality"/><category term="Congratulations to a contributor"/><category term="Copyright in public sculptures"/><category term="Copyright policy"/><category term="Coty Germany GmbH v Parfumerie Akzente GmbH C-230/16"/><category term="Coty Germany GmbH v Parfümerie Akzente GmbH C‑230/16"/><category term="Counterfeiting in the 21st century"/><category term="Court of Justice"/><category term="Cristiana Sappa"/><category term="Current Intelligence template"/><category term="Current issues"/><category term="Damier Azur"/><category term="Dan Bereskin; Authors&#39; Take; trademarks; likelihood of confusion"/><category term="Daniël Jongsma"/><category term="Darren Meale"/><category term="Data Governance Act"/><category term="David Goldring award"/><category term="December 2018 issue"/><category term="Denmark"/><category term="Design protection for copyright works"/><category term="Developing countries initiative"/><category term="Digital Millennium Copyright Act"/><category term="Digital Services Act"/><category term="Directive 2016/943"/><category term="Dolly the Sheep"/><category term="Donald Prutzman"/><category term="Double jeopardy"/><category term="ECHR"/><category term="ECJ citation"/><category term="ECLI citations"/><category term="ECtHR"/><category term="EU copyright consultations"/><category term="EU copyright reform"/><category term="EU law"/><category term="EU policy"/><category term="EU-Central American Association Agreement"/><category term="EU-Central Association Agreement"/><category term="Easter eggs"/><category term="Eddy Ventose"/><category term="Editorial Board members in the news"/><category term="Edward Cronan"/><category term="Elena Izyumenko"/><category term="Elizabeth Ng Siew Kuan"/><category term="Emma Perot"/><category term="Environment"/><category term="Estonia"/><category term="Eugene C Lim"/><category term="Euro-defences"/><category term="European Case Law Identifier"/><category term="European Patent Office"/><category term="European trade mark reform"/><category term="Eva De Pauw"/><category term="Event announcement: A Distinctive Mess? Current Trade Mark Law and Practice in the EU and UK"/><category term="Ewa De Pauw"/><category term="Expert privilege"/><category term="FRAND"/><category term="FRAND licences"/><category term="FTAs"/><category term="Falabella bag"/><category term="Farewell"/><category term="Farewell Editorial"/><category term="February 2020"/><category term="February issue 2018"/><category term="Festive Feature"/><category term="Filmspeler"/><category term="Finland. copyright reform"/><category term="First to file"/><category term="Frederick Mostert"/><category term="Free Trade Agreements"/><category term="French copyright"/><category term="GMO"/><category term="GRUR Presidency"/><category term="GRUR annual meeting 2017"/><category term="Gill Grassie"/><category term="Glyn v Weston Feature Film Company"/><category term="Gold Bears"/><category term="Google"/><category term="Google Library Project"/><category term="Google taz"/><category term="Haifeng Huang"/><category term="Harry and Meghan"/><category term="How to find GRUR Int. cotent in JIPLP"/><category term="Hungary"/><category term="INTA 2012"/><category term="INTA 2013"/><category term="INTA 2015"/><category term="INTA Meeting 2010"/><category term="INTA Meeting 2012"/><category term="INTA special"/><category term="IP and Africa"/><category term="IP and morality"/><category term="IP defence in antitrust law"/><category term="IP enforcement online"/><category term="IP golden age"/><category term="IP panellists"/><category term="IP round-ups 2019; webinars; JIPLP"/><category term="IP teaching"/><category term="IP theory"/><category term="IP tsar"/><category term="ISP liability"/><category term="Index"/><category term="Influencers; Riyadh Al-Balushi; Fashion Law; UAE; Authors&#39; Take"/><category term="Intellectual Property eZine"/><category term="Interflora"/><category term="Internet search engines"/><category term="Ireland"/><category term="Isaac Rutenberg"/><category term="Issue 1"/><category term="Issue 5"/><category term="JECLAP"/><category term="JECLP"/><category term="JILP/GRUR Partnership"/><category term="JILP/GRUR Partnership Page"/><category term="JIPLP Special Fashion Law Issue"/><category term="JIPLP at INTA"/><category term="JIPLP citation"/><category term="JIPLP copyright conference"/><category term="JIPLP editor&#39;s position"/><category term="JIPLP editors"/><category term="JIPLP readers and writers group"/><category term="JIPLP-GRUR Joint Conference 2019"/><category term="JIPLP-GRUR joint seminar 2016"/><category term="JIPLP-GRUR seminar 2015"/><category term="JLB"/><category term="Jane C. Ginsburg"/><category term="January 2018"/><category term="January 2019"/><category term="Japan"/><category term="Jingwen Liu"/><category term="Joshua Marshall"/><category term="Journal of Cybersecurity"/><category term="Journal of Law and the Biosciences"/><category term="June 2020"/><category term="June issue"/><category term="Jyh-An Lee"/><category term="Karsten Königer"/><category term="Kenya"/><category term="Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot"/><category term="Knut"/><category term="LGBT"/><category term="Lacoste"/><category term="Lauri Rechardt"/><category term="Legal formalism in decision-making"/><category term="Library subscriptions"/><category term="Living with uncertainty"/><category term="London"/><category term="London Olympics 2012"/><category term="Louboutin C-163/16"/><category term="Louis Louembé"/><category term="LouisVuitton Malletier v. Megastar Shipping Pte Ltd [2017] SGHC 305 (High Court of Singapore"/><category term="Love"/><category term="Luxmi Rajanayagam"/><category term="Léon Dijkman"/><category term="Léon Edward Dijkman"/><category term="MARQUES"/><category term="Manuscript Central"/><category term="March 2015 issue"/><category term="Marius Schneider"/><category term="Matal v Tam"/><category term="Matthias Leistner"/><category term="May 2018"/><category term="Message from the Editor"/><category term="Message from the Editors"/><category term="Message to authors"/><category term="Michal Bohaczewski"/><category term="Mira T Sundara Rajan"/><category term="Mythili Thaya"/><category term="Nedim Malovic"/><category term="Neil Wilkof"/><category term="Nigeria"/><category term="November 2018"/><category term="OHIM citation"/><category term="OUP"/><category term="OUP licences"/><category term="OUP summer sale"/><category term="Open Access"/><category term="Originality in EU Copyright Law"/><category term="Oxford University Press"/><category term="PDO/PGI"/><category term="Passion"/><category term="Pat Treacy"/><category term="Patentability inventive step and common knowledge"/><category term="Patentability of gene sequences"/><category term="Paul Joseph"/><category term="Paul Maier"/><category term="Paul Stevens"/><category term="Pennsylvania"/><category term="Penny Gilbert"/><category term="Personal data"/><category term="Peter A. Jabaly"/><category term="Peter Groves"/><category term="Peter Mézei"/><category term="Phillip Johnson"/><category term="Photoshop"/><category term="Pierre Fabre"/><category term="Pierre Massot"/><category term="Pierre Massot. Author&#39;s Take"/><category term="Pirate Party"/><category term="Plant Varieties"/><category term="Poland"/><category term="Pride"/><category term="Prince"/><category term="Privy Council"/><category term="Production editor"/><category term="Professor Taina Pihlajarinne and Post-Doctoral Researcher Juha Vesala; press publisher&#39;s right; Authors&#39; Take"/><category term="QR Code"/><category term="Revenge Porn"/><category term="Rihanna"/><category term="Rothy"/><category term="SEP"/><category term="SSO"/><category term="Sabesh Asokan"/><category term="Safe harbour"/><category term="Sara Cavagnero"/><category term="Sarah Blair"/><category term="Sarah Harris"/><category term="Saville"/><category term="Scotland"/><category term="Secret Sanra"/><category term="Section 512 Study"/><category term="September issue"/><category term="Simone Schroff"/><category term="Singapore"/><category term="Singapore Design Law Reform Conference"/><category term="Sir Richard Arnold"/><category term="South Africa"/><category term="Spiegel Online"/><category term="Sri Lanka"/><category term="Stefano Barazza"/><category term="Stella McCartney"/><category term="Subscription news"/><category term="Subscription rates 2010"/><category term="Svennson case"/><category term="Swiss claims"/><category term="T-480/12"/><category term="TRIPs"/><category term="Taiwan"/><category term="Technology transfer"/><category term="Three Weeks"/><category term="Tilman Müller-Stoy"/><category term="Tito Rendas"/><category term="Toby Bond"/><category term="Topic in search of an author"/><category term="Topics in search of an author"/><category term="Trade mark licences"/><category term="Twitter"/><category term="UDRP"/><category term="UK copyright"/><category term="UPC"/><category term="UPOV"/><category term="URL footnotes"/><category term="US Copyright Office"/><category term="US copyright"/><category term="US patent validity"/><category term="United States law"/><category term="VCAST"/><category term="Vladimir Kharitonov v. Russia"/><category term="Vuitton"/><category term="Warner Music v TuneIn Inc"/><category term="Warner-Lambert v Actavis"/><category term="Willem Leppink"/><category term="Word polishing service"/><category term="World Intellectual Property Women"/><category term="Yann Basire"/><category term="abstracts"/><category term="acquiescence"/><category term="action by licensee"/><category term="admissibility of evidence"/><category term="alleged infringement"/><category term="ambush marketing"/><category term="andrew mcwhirter"/><category term="animal marks"/><category term="anti-counterfeiting"/><category term="anti-suit injunction"/><category term="anticipatory disclosure"/><category term="anticompetitive practices"/><category term="app for review"/><category term="appeals"/><category term="application for central amendment"/><category term="appstore"/><category term="archives"/><category term="art"/><category term="article"/><category term="assistance for IP litigants"/><category term="attorneys&#39; fees"/><category term="attribution of authorship"/><category term="authentication"/><category term="author involvement"/><category term="author self-interest"/><category term="authorship"/><category term="automatic copyright reversion"/><category term="bad faith"/><category term="biosafety"/><category term="biotech licensing"/><category term="book notice"/><category term="book offer"/><category term="book reviews"/><category term="brands and motherhood"/><category term="breach of confidence"/><category term="burden of proof"/><category term="cancellation proceedings"/><category term="celebrities"/><category term="celebrity names and images"/><category term="certificate of contested validity"/><category term="character merchandising"/><category term="cheese"/><category term="circular economy"/><category term="cloud-based video recording; EU copyright; CJEU; Article 5(2)(b) InfoSoc Directive; communication to the public; Article 3 InfoSoc Directive"/><category term="coat-tails"/><category term="collective rights management"/><category term="combination patent"/><category term="commoditization"/><category term="comparative advertising"/><category term="comparison of marks"/><category term="composite marks containing acronyms"/><category term="composite trade marks"/><category term="compulsory licence"/><category term="compulsory patent licence"/><category term="computer-implemented inventions"/><category term="confidential information"/><category term="consent"/><category term="consent to marketing"/><category term="constitutionality"/><category term="contracts"/><category term="contractual restrictions relating to unprotected data"/><category term="contributory patent infringement"/><category term="copying of substantial part"/><category term="copyright and censorship"/><category term="copyright and chaos theory"/><category term="copyright enforcement"/><category term="copyright in databases"/><category term="copyright law"/><category term="copyright licensing"/><category term="copyright limitations"/><category term="copyright ownership"/><category term="copyright subject matter"/><category term="copyright-protected work"/><category term="counterfeits"/><category term="criminal copyright liability"/><category term="criminal enforcement"/><category term="cross-undertaking in damages"/><category term="cultural heritage"/><category term="customs"/><category term="damages inquiry"/><category term="data file formats"/><category term="data protection"/><category term="data theft"/><category term="deception"/><category term="declaratory judgment"/><category term="deep fakes"/><category term="defences to patent infringement"/><category term="degree of similarity"/><category term="denominations of origin"/><category term="description of invention"/><category term="descriptiveness"/><category term="design"/><category term="design freedom"/><category term="design infringement"/><category term="designs"/><category term="digital rights management"/><category term="digital single market"/><category term="disclosure of source code"/><category term="distinctiveness"/><category term="doctrine of claim differentiation"/><category term="domain names as property"/><category term="download"/><category term="downloading of undisplayed material"/><category term="downloads"/><category term="duty to consider decisions in other jurisdictions"/><category term="duty to monitor content"/><category term="e-Commerce Directive"/><category term="eBrochure"/><category term="eSports"/><category term="econometrics of IP"/><category term="effect of deeming provision in bilateral treaty"/><category term="emails as property"/><category term="embellishments"/><category term="employee inventions"/><category term="employer-employee confidentiality"/><category term="enantiomers"/><category term="entitlement"/><category term="essential facilities doctrine"/><category term="estoppel"/><category term="evidence of prior art"/><category term="evidence of use"/><category term="exclusive jurisdiction"/><category term="exhaustion"/><category term="expert evidence"/><category term="fair compensation"/><category term="fashion copies"/><category term="file extensions"/><category term="first sale doctrine"/><category term="first to invent"/><category term="first use"/><category term="five-stripe motif"/><category term="fixation"/><category term="football match broadcasts"/><category term="foreign goodwill"/><category term="foreign trade marks"/><category term="free content"/><category term="furniture"/><category term="future issues"/><category term="gaming"/><category term="gatekeepers"/><category term="general monitoring"/><category term="genetic subject matter"/><category term="geographic indications"/><category term="geographical indications"/><category term="good faith"/><category term="good guys and bad guys"/><category term="goodwill"/><category term="goodwill within the jurisdiction"/><category term="grace period"/><category term="green economy and IP"/><category term="greenwashing"/><category term="grey goods"/><category term="handicrafts"/><category term="hate speech"/><category term="higher education"/><category term="hong kong"/><category term="human rights"/><category term="hyperlinking"/><category term="hyperlinks"/><category term="image"/><category term="implied licence"/><category term="indigenous intangible rights"/><category term="industrial applicability"/><category term="inequitable conduct"/><category term="inherent distinctiveness"/><category term="innovative drugs"/><category term="inquiry into damages"/><category term="insufficiency"/><category term="intention to target"/><category term="interactive entertainment"/><category term="internet sales"/><category term="internet streaming"/><category term="interoperability"/><category term="interpretation of claims"/><category term="interview"/><category term="invalidity proceedings"/><category term="invalidity. earlier Community trade mark"/><category term="inventions"/><category term="issue"/><category term="joint authorship"/><category term="joint liability"/><category term="joint seminar"/><category term="judicial review"/><category term="jury trial"/><category term="keywords"/><category term="law of nature"/><category term="lectures"/><category term="levies"/><category term="levies for blank recording media"/><category term="liability"/><category term="licence fee"/><category term="list of licences"/><category term="lyrica"/><category term="making available right"/><category term="manifest error of assessment"/><category term="market survey evidence"/><category term="marks with a reputation"/><category term="methods of medical treatment"/><category term="military reports"/><category term="misappropriation doctrine"/><category term="misuse of database"/><category term="mod chips"/><category term="morality"/><category term="multi-factor test for actionability of links"/><category term="multimedia players"/><category term="names of foreign origin"/><category term="national emblems"/><category term="nature of goods"/><category term="networking"/><category term="new public"/><category term="new publication"/><category term="new technologies"/><category term="non-agricultural GIs"/><category term="non-intrusive IP"/><category term="non-obviousness"/><category term="non-use"/><category term="notice of compliance"/><category term="offensive marks"/><category term="online aggregators"/><category term="online delivery"/><category term="online marketplaces"/><category term="online platforms and intermediaries"/><category term="online storage services"/><category term="online subscription"/><category term="online survey"/><category term="open innovation"/><category term="orphan works"/><category term="outsourcing of national IP office functions"/><category term="own name defence"/><category term="parallel imports"/><category term="passing off and unfair competition"/><category term="patent application"/><category term="patent claims"/><category term="patent interpretation"/><category term="patent priority"/><category term="patent reissue procedure"/><category term="patent thickets"/><category term="patentability"/><category term="patterns"/><category term="peer-to-patent"/><category term="permissions"/><category term="petitions for review"/><category term="pharma licensing"/><category term="pharmaceutical products"/><category term="plant protection products"/><category term="platforms"/><category term="plausibility"/><category term="policy"/><category term="poll"/><category term="polymorphs"/><category term="post-sale liability"/><category term="pre-filing disclosure"/><category term="preclusion"/><category term="predatory publishers"/><category term="pregabalin"/><category term="preliminary injunctions"/><category term="press publishers’ right"/><category term="printed version"/><category term="prior art"/><category term="priority certificates"/><category term="private copying"/><category term="private copying law"/><category term="problem and solution approach"/><category term="procedure"/><category term="product design"/><category term="product-by-process claims"/><category term="production"/><category term="programming languages"/><category term="proof of use"/><category term="proof reading"/><category term="proportionality"/><category term="prospective authors"/><category term="public domain"/><category term="public funded research"/><category term="public health"/><category term="public lending right"/><category term="public sentiment"/><category term="publicity rights"/><category term="publicly funded research"/><category term="publishing ethics"/><category term="rainbow flag"/><category term="ratification of international treaties"/><category term="reason for non-use"/><category term="recapture rule"/><category term="red sole"/><category term="refusal to deal"/><category term="relevance"/><category term="religiously offensive terminology"/><category term="responding to peer reviews"/><category term="retention of title"/><category term="retrospective entitlement to copyright"/><category term="reverse engineering"/><category term="revocation"/><category term="right of association"/><category term="right of communication"/><category term="right of first refusal"/><category term="right of publicity"/><category term="right to digitise library collections"/><category term="right to object to download of version of film in another language"/><category term="rights in forenames"/><category term="rivastigmine"/><category term="robots"/><category term="round-ups"/><category term="royal branding"/><category term="royalty rates"/><category term="safeners"/><category term="scientific discoveries"/><category term="secondary passing off"/><category term="section 9(3) CDPA"/><category term="seminar report"/><category term="shapes"/><category term="sidebar poll"/><category term="similarity"/><category term="similarity of marks"/><category term="smell"/><category term="social media"/><category term="source indicators"/><category term="sports rights"/><category term="springboard injunctions"/><category term="substantial value"/><category term="sufficiency"/><category term="sui generis copyright"/><category term="summary judgment"/><category term="survey"/><category term="swiss form claims"/><category term="taste"/><category term="tea"/><category term="technical drawings"/><category term="technical effect"/><category term="technical function"/><category term="temporary copies"/><category term="terrorism"/><category term="text and data mining"/><category term="third party liability for information"/><category term="time-limits"/><category term="timing"/><category term="tobacco labelling"/><category term="tolerance"/><category term="trade dress"/><category term="trade mark practice"/><category term="trade mark tacking"/><category term="trade mark use"/><category term="trade marks registrability"/><category term="transformativeness"/><category term="unincorporated sport association"/><category term="unitary patent"/><category term="unregistered design right"/><category term="use"/><category term="use in a single country"/><category term="user-generated content"/><category term="users"/><category term="utility models"/><category term="vacancy"/><category term="valuing innovation"/><category term="vicarious liability"/><category term="webinar"/><category term="webinars"/><category term="website blocking"/><category term="well-known trade marks"/><category term="winding up of infringing company"/><category term="winnetou"/><category term="works of art"/><category term="wrongful belief in invalidity of another&#39;s patent"/><category term="wrongful enforcement"/><title type='text'>JIPLP</title><subtitle type='html'>The blog of the &lt;i&gt;Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice&lt;/i&gt;. Here&#39;s where editorial panellists, readers and contributors can come together and share their views on all aspects of IP law and practice. Join us!</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6631405922607116203/posts/default?max-results=10'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6631405922607116203/posts/default?start-index=11&amp;max-results=10'/><author><name>Unknown</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>831</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>10</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6631405922607116203.post-5242832314286081880</id><published>2024-07-26T06:32:00.005+01:00</published><updated>2024-07-26T07:07:34.658+01:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="call for articles"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="fashion"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="IP"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="special issue"/><title type='text'> Announcing new JIPLP Special Issue on Fashion and IP!</title><content type='html'>&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhYTaPVNlujhI8STAyBX-IN2iSFXb8zyFwg9BB25msY4qCBPhII2NrMTmJlnapwIX9kjOSi2ruvdQAAPRpmsz9rKZVyfOzddJ2BPjfKwnlx1DWSa2jYrR25iRNZeR1vRdvC5Nn51I5IPbiSOpXkOCZLM0MXSmOZ7nyU5pKJnAZppfw48HLb7HlvTveFoAVn/s2664/spring%202024%20fashion%20trends.webp&quot; style=&quot;clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;&quot;&gt;&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; data-original-height=&quot;1998&quot; data-original-width=&quot;2664&quot; height=&quot;240&quot; src=&quot;https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhYTaPVNlujhI8STAyBX-IN2iSFXb8zyFwg9BB25msY4qCBPhII2NrMTmJlnapwIX9kjOSi2ruvdQAAPRpmsz9rKZVyfOzddJ2BPjfKwnlx1DWSa2jYrR25iRNZeR1vRdvC5Nn51I5IPbiSOpXkOCZLM0MXSmOZ7nyU5pKJnAZppfw48HLb7HlvTveFoAVn/s320/spring%202024%20fashion%20trends.webp&quot; width=&quot;320&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;Back in 2018, the &lt;i&gt;Journal of Intellectual Property Law &amp;amp; Practice&lt;/i&gt; (JIPLP) was among the very first academic journals to dedicate &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://academic.oup.com/jiplp/issue/13/11&quot;&gt;a special issue&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/b&gt;entirely to the interplay between fashion and intellectual property (IP) law.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;The relevant call for articles attracted dozens of submissions and the issue was a great success.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Since then, a lot has happened at the crossroads of IP and fashion: courses have multiplied and so have conferences, fashion law research has become more common and imaginative, and several professionals nowadays refer to themselves as fashion lawyers.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Now, JIPLP wants to investigate what’s new in the world of fashion and IP, by launching a new call for articles and special issue on fashion law, which will be released in late 2024 / early 2025!&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;If you are thinking of and/or researching a new issue, topic, line of case law, policy and legislative developments relevant to the fashion sector and wish to write on it, we want to hear from you!&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Interested authors are invited to submit articles in the range of &lt;b&gt;4,000-7,000 words&lt;/b&gt; on a topic of their choice within this theme for consideration for publication in JIPLP.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Relevant articles must be submitted through &lt;a href=&quot;https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/jiplap&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;the online portal&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, be in accordance with &lt;a href=&quot;https://academic.oup.com/jiplp/pages/General_Instructions&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;JIPLP house style&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, be previously unpublished, and carry the indication that they are for consideration for the special fashion law issue. Further to a desk review, all potentially suitable submissions will undergo peer review.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;The deadline for submissions is &lt;b&gt;Monday, 30 September 2024&lt;/b&gt;. No late submissions will be considered for this special issue.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;For authors interested in discussing informally the topic of a possible contribution, please email the Editor of this special issue, &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:eleonorarosati@gmail.com&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Prof Dr Eleonora Rosati&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, and/or JIPLP Managing Editor, &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:sarah.harris@oup.com&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Ms Sarah Harris&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;The Editor is also considering the possible organization of an online conference/meeting with the authors of the special issue after the special issue has been published.&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/feeds/5242832314286081880/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/2024/07/announcing-new-jiplp-special-issue-on.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6631405922607116203/posts/default/5242832314286081880'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6631405922607116203/posts/default/5242832314286081880'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/2024/07/announcing-new-jiplp-special-issue-on.html' title=' Announcing new JIPLP Special Issue on Fashion and IP!'/><author><name>Eleonora Rosati</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05629420303968805446</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhCUpQjwM9OYRlVc2rORgikTrHt_fw-Q7NJBJdhp-x5yMbuDflVo0oaVreCWTlFLmzcQ_QabhNwyWOhZjDzDhlNAQ2xEQ3fw561uTmDda0-YWSjiTNhgBrzuF82gegMNg/s113/E+Rosati.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhYTaPVNlujhI8STAyBX-IN2iSFXb8zyFwg9BB25msY4qCBPhII2NrMTmJlnapwIX9kjOSi2ruvdQAAPRpmsz9rKZVyfOzddJ2BPjfKwnlx1DWSa2jYrR25iRNZeR1vRdvC5Nn51I5IPbiSOpXkOCZLM0MXSmOZ7nyU5pKJnAZppfw48HLb7HlvTveFoAVn/s72-c/spring%202024%20fashion%20trends.webp" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6631405922607116203.post-8456072177828112326</id><published>2024-02-23T06:52:00.001+00:00</published><updated>2024-02-23T06:52:32.687+00:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="call for articles"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Christopher Stothers"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="patents"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Penny Gilbert"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="special issue"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Stefano Barazza"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Tilman Müller-Stoy"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="UPC"/><title type='text'>JIPLP special issue to celebrate the first anniversary of the UPC</title><content type='html'>&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;The &lt;a href=&quot;https://academic.oup.com/jiplp&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Journal of Intellectual Property Law &amp;amp; Practice&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (JIPLP) is delighted to announce a special issue to celebrate the first anniversary of the Unified Patent Court (UPC). The special issue, which will be published later this year, will be jointly edited by (in alphabetical order) &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.linkedin.com/in/stefbar/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Stefano Barazza&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (JIPLP editor), &lt;a href=&quot;https://powellgilbert.com/people/penny-gilbert/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Penny Gilbert&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (Powell Gilbert), &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bardehle.com/de/team/mueller-stoy-tilman&quot;&gt;Tilman Müller-Stoy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/b&gt;(Bardehle Pagenberg), and &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.freshfields.com/en-gb/contacts/find-a-lawyer/s/stothers-christopher/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Christopher Stothers&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhUlP9Fit3pR1-iiClOs3Kf8cVqjSx8cTRKSEbuoXwgSAj3xVri-Hcb5LxMvDucYXuKT2vR0AJcZFLl2CPJ-N8-JldzmsvRLW5gjUWMs2NEjlcmDwm87ONfRGqSgs9hi2z_fJwwRsS0cmRN0XF2tpbcHexjq4CXMPey8MsGzULP1DReGefUuPNmJwuTn-eo/s1284/Screenshot%202024-02-23%20at%2007.50.45.png&quot; imageanchor=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;&quot;&gt;&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; data-original-height=&quot;236&quot; data-original-width=&quot;1284&quot; height=&quot;74&quot; src=&quot;https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhUlP9Fit3pR1-iiClOs3Kf8cVqjSx8cTRKSEbuoXwgSAj3xVri-Hcb5LxMvDucYXuKT2vR0AJcZFLl2CPJ-N8-JldzmsvRLW5gjUWMs2NEjlcmDwm87ONfRGqSgs9hi2z_fJwwRsS0cmRN0XF2tpbcHexjq4CXMPey8MsGzULP1DReGefUuPNmJwuTn-eo/w400-h74/Screenshot%202024-02-23%20at%2007.50.45.png&quot; width=&quot;400&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Interested authors are invited to submit articles that focus on the lessons learnt during the first year of operation of the UPC. We are particularly interested in articles analysing &lt;b&gt;substantive or procedural matters in light of the emerging case law of the UPC&lt;/b&gt; (e.g. transparency and public access to documents, provisional measures, service of documents, claim construction, bifurcation, language of proceedings, expert evidence, internal coherence/consistency, etc.). We also encourage contributions that, &lt;b&gt;on the basis of the UPC experience so far&lt;/b&gt;, focus on &lt;b&gt;broader aspects&lt;/b&gt;, such as litigation strategy, the role of the UPC in the global patent system, the relationship between the UPC and other courts/jurisdictions, preliminary evaluations of its effectiveness and overall functioning, or suggestions for improvements to the UPC system. While empirical and statistical studies are welcome, please note that these must be accompanied by a substantive legal analysis.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Articles should have a length comprised &lt;b&gt;between 3,000 and 8,000 words (footnotes included)&lt;/b&gt; and comply with&lt;b&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;https://academic.oup.com/jiplp/pages/General_Instructions&quot;&gt;JIPLP author guidelines&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;. Please note that JIPLP uses &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/oscola&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;OSCOLA&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; as its citation style.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;The deadline for submissions, which can be only made through the &lt;a href=&quot;https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/jiplap&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;JIPLP submission site&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, falls on the first UPC anniversary, &lt;b&gt;1 June 2024&lt;/b&gt;. No late submissions can be considered for this special issue.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;JIPLP is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal, so all the articles received will undergo a review process. In this sense, submission of an article will not automatically entail its acceptance for publication.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;For any questions and/or to inquire about the suitability of a certain topic/angle, please contact JIPLP’s Managing Editor, Sarah Harris, by &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:sarah.harris.contractor@oup.com?subject=JIPLP%20UPC%20Special%20Issue&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;email&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;We look forward to receiving your contributions!&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/feeds/8456072177828112326/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/2024/02/jiplp-special-issue-to-celebrate-first.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6631405922607116203/posts/default/8456072177828112326'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6631405922607116203/posts/default/8456072177828112326'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/2024/02/jiplp-special-issue-to-celebrate-first.html' title='JIPLP special issue to celebrate the first anniversary of the UPC'/><author><name>Eleonora Rosati</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05629420303968805446</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhCUpQjwM9OYRlVc2rORgikTrHt_fw-Q7NJBJdhp-x5yMbuDflVo0oaVreCWTlFLmzcQ_QabhNwyWOhZjDzDhlNAQ2xEQ3fw561uTmDda0-YWSjiTNhgBrzuF82gegMNg/s113/E+Rosati.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhUlP9Fit3pR1-iiClOs3Kf8cVqjSx8cTRKSEbuoXwgSAj3xVri-Hcb5LxMvDucYXuKT2vR0AJcZFLl2CPJ-N8-JldzmsvRLW5gjUWMs2NEjlcmDwm87ONfRGqSgs9hi2z_fJwwRsS0cmRN0XF2tpbcHexjq4CXMPey8MsGzULP1DReGefUuPNmJwuTn-eo/s72-w400-h74-c/Screenshot%202024-02-23%20at%2007.50.45.png" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6631405922607116203.post-1424425950902481962</id><published>2022-09-12T11:37:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2022-09-12T11:37:03.936+01:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="circular economy"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="green economy and IP"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="special issue"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="sustainability"/><title type='text'>Announcing the JIPLP Special Issue on IP and the Green Economy: Call for Articles</title><content type='html'>&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;The &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://academic.oup.com/jiplp&quot;&gt;Journal of Intellectual Property Law &amp;amp; Practice (JIPLP)&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/b&gt;is delighted to announce that, in the first half of 2023, it will publish a special issue entirely devoted to the relationship between intellectual property (IP) and the Green Economy, in particular the Circular Economy.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;This special issue will be jointly edited by (in alphabetical order) &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.swansea.ac.uk/staff/stefano.barazza/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Stefano Barazza&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;https://law.tamu.edu/faculty-staff/find-people/faculty-profiles/irene-calboli&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Irene Calboli&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.linkedin.com/in/sarah-harris-babb4a1/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Sarah Harris&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ip.mpg.de/en/persons/kur-annette.html&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Annette Kur&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.su.se/english/profiles/elro0365-1.442578&quot;&gt;Eleonora Rosati&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;We invite interested authors to submit articles addressing Green Economy issues from an IP perspective. Potential topics include – &lt;u&gt;but are not limited to!&lt;/u&gt; – the following:&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Sustainability and IP;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Right to repair;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Greenwashing and IP;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Green trade marks;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Craft and industrial GIs;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Exhaustion / first sale doctrine as applied to the Green / Circular Economy (e.g., upcycling);&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Green patents.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Articles should have a length comprised &lt;b&gt;between 2,000 and 5,000 words (footnotes included)&lt;/b&gt; and comply with &lt;a href=&quot;https://academic.oup.com/jiplp/pages/General_Instructions&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;JIPLP author guidelines&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;The deadline for submissions, which can be only made through the &lt;a href=&quot;https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/jiplap&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;JIPLP submission site&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, is &lt;b&gt;23 January 2023&lt;/b&gt;. No late submissions can be considered for this special issue.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;JIPLP is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal so all articles that are received will undergo a review process. In this sense, submission of an article will not automatically entail its acceptance for publication.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;For any questions and/or to inquire about the suitability of a certain topic/angle, please &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:sarah.harris.contractor@oup.com%20?subject=JIPLP%20Special%20Issue%20on%20IP%20and%20the%20Green%20Economy&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;contact JIPLP Managing Editor, Sarah Harris, by email&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;We look forward to receiving your contributions!&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/feeds/1424425950902481962/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/2022/09/announcing-jiplp-special-issue-on-ip.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6631405922607116203/posts/default/1424425950902481962'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6631405922607116203/posts/default/1424425950902481962'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/2022/09/announcing-jiplp-special-issue-on-ip.html' title='Announcing the JIPLP Special Issue on IP and the Green Economy: Call for Articles'/><author><name>Eleonora Rosati</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05629420303968805446</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhCUpQjwM9OYRlVc2rORgikTrHt_fw-Q7NJBJdhp-x5yMbuDflVo0oaVreCWTlFLmzcQ_QabhNwyWOhZjDzDhlNAQ2xEQ3fw561uTmDda0-YWSjiTNhgBrzuF82gegMNg/s113/E+Rosati.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6631405922607116203.post-8817700374113172568</id><published>2022-07-29T16:19:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2022-07-29T16:19:27.775+01:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Art. 14 Directive 2019/790"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Authors&#39; Take series"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="copyright"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Cristiana Sappa"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="cultural heritage"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="public domain"/><title type='text'>The Authors&#39; Take - Hosting public domain into a minefield: the resistance to art. 14 of the DSM Directive and to the related rules that transpose it into national law</title><content type='html'>&lt;h2 style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Hosting public domain into a minefield: the resistance to art. 14 of the DSM Directive and to the related rules that transpose it into national law&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;by &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot;&gt;Cristiana Sappa&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Art. 14 of the &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/790/oj&quot;&gt;DSM Directive&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; plays a role for both economic and non-economic exploitations of works of visual art’s reproductions. The rule helps provide access to information on cultural heritage and therefore facilitates the educational mission of bodies managing cultural heritage. Besides this, this provision also introduces some additional freedom for exploiting some visual art-related material and elaborating derivative works. These initiatives can be taken by both market operators and public sector bodies managing cultural heritage. Basically, art. 14 confirms the policy initiatives according to which what is in the public domain shall remain into the public domain.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;However, art. 14 is only a prima facie manifesto for public domain, and it merely refers to works of visual art. Its aim is under threat from different perspectives, i.e. copyright and neighbouring rights, let alone unfair practices, contractual provisions and national rules on cultural heritage alone.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;First, this threat depends on the low requirements needed to enjoy copyright protection. The threshold of originality is so low that many reproductions of works of visual art can easily access copyright protection, including 3D reproductions that are currently more and more used, also for elaborating a growing number of derivative works, such as augmented or virtual reality experiences.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Secondly, several neighbouring rights can interfere with art. 14 and limit its impact on public domain. The reference goes not only to the (obvious) protection on non-creative photographs, but also to critical editions, editions principes, that some countries introduced. It also points out to the sui generis protection of databases, even though the latter is somehow limited by the&amp;nbsp;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019L1024&quot;&gt;Directive on Open Data&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Overall, to accomplish art. 14’s political goal as initially thought, courts shall interpret it in a consistent fashion with modern approaches favouring wide circulation and re-use of cultural heritage’s information.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;[This is an Authors&#39; Take post, which provides readers with an insight into current IP scholarship, featuring preliminary comments and thoughts from authors of articles accepted for publication in forthcoming issues of the Journal of Intellectual Property Law &amp;amp; Practice (OUP). The full text of this contribution will be made available on&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/6631405922607116203/790259247869875209#&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Advance Access&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;soon]&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/feeds/8817700374113172568/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/2022/07/the-authors-take-hosting-public-domain.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6631405922607116203/posts/default/8817700374113172568'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6631405922607116203/posts/default/8817700374113172568'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/2022/07/the-authors-take-hosting-public-domain.html' title='The Authors&#39; Take - Hosting public domain into a minefield: the resistance to art. 14 of the DSM Directive and to the related rules that transpose it into national law'/><author><name>Eleonora Rosati</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05629420303968805446</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhCUpQjwM9OYRlVc2rORgikTrHt_fw-Q7NJBJdhp-x5yMbuDflVo0oaVreCWTlFLmzcQ_QabhNwyWOhZjDzDhlNAQ2xEQ3fw561uTmDda0-YWSjiTNhgBrzuF82gegMNg/s113/E+Rosati.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6631405922607116203.post-7780531443514269751</id><published>2022-07-19T14:26:00.007+01:00</published><updated>2022-07-19T14:26:43.132+01:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Authors&#39; Take series"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Haifeng Huang"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Jingwen Liu"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Jyh-An Lee"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Trade secrets"/><title type='text'>The Authors&#39; Take - Uncovering Trade Secrets in China: An Empirical Study of Civil Litigation 2010–2020</title><content type='html'>&lt;h2 style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Uncovering Trade Secrets in China: An Empirical Study of Civil Litigation 2010–2020&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;h4 style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;by &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.law.cuhk.edu.hk/app/people/prof-jyh-an-lee/&quot;&gt;Jyh-An Lee&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.law.cuhk.edu.hk/app/people/jingwen-liu/&quot;&gt;Jingwen Liu&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.jonesday.com/en/lawyers/h/haifeng-huang&quot;&gt;Haifeng Huang&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Trading partners of and foreign investors in China have claimed that trade-secret protection in the country is far from adequate. This intuition is rooted in China’s lack of a stand-alone trade-secret act, deficiencies in China’s civil enforcement mechanisms, the unsatisfactory win rate for plaintiffs and damages awarded, and the excessive burden-of-proof requirements imposed on trade-secret owners. Although these issues have been controversial for more than two decades, relevant debates have often lacked even the barest empirical support.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Against this backdrop, and as a byproduct of the US-China trade disputes in 2018 and 2019, China amended the Anti-Unfair Competition Law (AUCL), being the primary legislation that reflects trade secrets, in 2019 to further strengthen its trade-secret protection. The 2019 Amendment of the AUCL had, among others, substantially reformed the damages and evidence rules so as to lift the damages cap and partially reverse the burden of proof in cases concerning trade secret misappropriation. While these reforms have come under the spotlight, their actual impact has yet to be elucidated.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;In this article, we investigate all published civil-litigation cases pertaining to trade-secret misappropriation in China from 2010 through 2020. Our empirical findings, which cover various aspects of trade-secret law enforcement in the country, paint a realistic picture of (1) the number and the spatio-temporal distribution of trade secret litigation, (2) the win rates of trade-secret holders and their available remedies, (3) the percentage of cases involving departing employees, and (4) foreign parties’ participation in the private enforcement of trade secrets. By presenting the empirical data with contextual analyses, this article provides a rigorous reflection of the features and patterns of private trade-secret enforcement in China during the studied period.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;[This is an Authors&#39; Take post, which provides readers with an insight into current IP scholarship, featuring preliminary comments and thoughts from authors of articles accepted for publication in forthcoming issues of the Journal of Intellectual Property Law &amp;amp; Practice (OUP). The full text of this contribution will be made available on &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/6631405922607116203/790259247869875209#&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Advance Access&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; soon]&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/feeds/7780531443514269751/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/2022/07/the-authors-take-uncovering-trade.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6631405922607116203/posts/default/7780531443514269751'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6631405922607116203/posts/default/7780531443514269751'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/2022/07/the-authors-take-uncovering-trade.html' title='The Authors&#39; Take - Uncovering Trade Secrets in China: An Empirical Study of Civil Litigation 2010–2020'/><author><name>Eleonora Rosati</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05629420303968805446</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhCUpQjwM9OYRlVc2rORgikTrHt_fw-Q7NJBJdhp-x5yMbuDflVo0oaVreCWTlFLmzcQ_QabhNwyWOhZjDzDhlNAQ2xEQ3fw561uTmDda0-YWSjiTNhgBrzuF82gegMNg/s113/E+Rosati.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6631405922607116203.post-989350500805988609</id><published>2022-04-29T10:19:00.004+01:00</published><updated>2022-04-29T11:28:40.016+01:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="DSM Directive"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="special issue"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="webinar"/><title type='text'>The national transpositions of the DSM Directive: JIPLP Special DSM Issue and live webinar</title><content type='html'>&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;In late 2021, we launched a call for articles for a special issue entirely devoted to the national transpositions of the DSM Directive 2019/790.&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;We are now delighted to inform our readers that the ‘DSM Special Issue’ is just about to be released and that, on 8 June 2022, &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-national-transpositions-of-the-dsm-directive-jiplp-special-dsm-issue-tickets-330452039947&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;we will be hosting a webinar&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt;during which the Authors of accepted articles will present and discuss the various national approaches to the implementation of some of the Directive’s most important provisions.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Join us for an afternoon of DSM-focused discussions!&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;h3 style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Speakers&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Bernardo Calabrese, author of &lt;a href=&quot;https://academic.oup.com/jiplp/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/jiplp/jpac026/6566075?redirectedFrom=fulltext&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Scientific TDM exception and communication to the public: did Italians do it better … or at least not worse?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Ana Lazarova, author of &lt;a href=&quot;https://academic.oup.com/jiplp/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/jiplp/jpac029/6566788?redirectedFrom=fulltext&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bulgaria falls into all the traps set by Article 5 of the CDSM Directive&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Zyad Loutfi, author of &lt;a href=&quot;https://academic.oup.com/jiplp/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/jiplp/jpac027/6565798?redirectedFrom=fulltext&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Press publishers’ right in France: a tale of Odyssean gods&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Caterina Sganga and Magali Contardi, authors of &lt;a href=&quot;https://academic.oup.com/jiplp/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/jiplp/jpac028/6565568?redirectedFrom=fulltext&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;The new Italian press publishers’ right: creative, fairness-oriented… and invalid?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Michalina Kowala, author of &lt;a href=&quot;https://academic.oup.com/jiplp/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/jiplp/jpac037/6575485?redirectedFrom=fulltext&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;The Polish transposition of the press publishers’ right: waiting for the miracle?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Samuli Melart, author of &lt;a href=&quot;https://academic.oup.com/jiplp/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jiplp/jpac030/6565569?searchresult=1&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;The Finnish transposition of Article 17 of Directive 2019/790: progress or regress?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Simona Lavagnini, author of &lt;a href=&quot;https://academic.oup.com/jiplp/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jiplp/jpac032/6574553?searchresult=1&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;The Italian implementation of Article 17 of Directive 2019/790: complaints, appeals and the new powers of AGCOM&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Miquel Peguera, author of &lt;a href=&quot;https://academic.oup.com/jiplp/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/jiplp/jpac034/6572327?redirectedFrom=fulltext&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Spanish transposition of Arts. 15 and 17 of the DSM Directive: overview of selected issues&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Ludovico Bossi and Jacopo Ciani Sciolla, authors of &lt;a href=&quot;https://academic.oup.com/jiplp/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/jiplp/jpac033/6572326?redirectedFrom=fulltext&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;The transposition of the transparency obligation pursuant to Article 19 Directive (EU) 790/2019: an Italian perspective&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Jelizaveta Juřičková, author of &lt;a href=&quot;https://academic.oup.com/jiplp/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/jiplp/jpac031/6566076?redirectedFrom=fulltext&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Something old, something new: Czech transposition of disputes under the DSM Directive&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;h3 style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Chair&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Eleonora Rosati, &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://academic.oup.com/jiplp/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jiplp/jpac035/6574933&quot;&gt;Editor of the DSM Special Issue&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;h3 style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;For further information and to register, just &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-national-transpositions-of-the-dsm-directive-jiplp-special-dsm-issue-tickets-330452039947&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt; </content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/feeds/989350500805988609/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/2022/04/the-national-transpositions-of-dsm.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6631405922607116203/posts/default/989350500805988609'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6631405922607116203/posts/default/989350500805988609'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/2022/04/the-national-transpositions-of-dsm.html' title='The national transpositions of the DSM Directive: JIPLP Special DSM Issue and live webinar'/><author><name>Eleonora Rosati</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05629420303968805446</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhCUpQjwM9OYRlVc2rORgikTrHt_fw-Q7NJBJdhp-x5yMbuDflVo0oaVreCWTlFLmzcQ_QabhNwyWOhZjDzDhlNAQ2xEQ3fw561uTmDda0-YWSjiTNhgBrzuF82gegMNg/s113/E+Rosati.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6631405922607116203.post-7862438106115951960</id><published>2021-12-06T11:48:00.000+00:00</published><updated>2021-12-06T11:48:27.963+00:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="DSM Directive"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="special issue"/><title type='text'>Announcing the JIPLP Special Issue on the national transpositions of the DSM Directive: Call for Articles!</title><content type='html'>&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;The &lt;i&gt;Journal of Intellectual Property Law &amp;amp; Practice &lt;/i&gt;(JIPLP) is delighted to announce a Call for Articles for its forthcoming special issue on the &lt;i&gt;national&lt;/i&gt; transpositions of the DSM Directive 2019/790, which will be published in 2022.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Interested authors are invited to submit articles in the range of 3,500-6,000 words on a topic of their choice within this theme for consideration for publication in JIPLP. The issue will focus on the national approaches to the interpretation and transpositions of the Directive&#39;s provisions. Both actual transposition measures and draft provisions can be the topic of articles. No articles focusing exclusively on the text of the Directive may be considered for this issue.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Relevant articles must be submitted through the &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/6631405922607116203/5627957928662846389#&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;online portal&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, be in accordance with &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/6631405922607116203/5627957928662846389#&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;JIPLP house style&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, and carry the indication that they are for consideration for the special issue on the DSM Directive&#39;s national transpositions.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;The deadline for submissions is &lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;Friday, 18 March 2022&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;. No late submissions will be considered for this special issue.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;For authors interested in discussing informally the topic of a possible contribution, please email the Editor of this special issue, &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.linkedin.com/in/eleonorarosati/?originalSubdomain=uk&quot;&gt;Eleonora Rosati&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;, and/or Managing Editor &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.linkedin.com/in/sarah-harris-babb4a1/&quot;&gt;Sarah Harris&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;The special issue will be available in complimentary open access for a limited period of time after publication. The Editor is also considering the possible organization of an online conference/meeting with the authors of the special issue after the special issue has been published.&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/feeds/7862438106115951960/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/2021/12/announcing-jiplp-special-issue-on.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6631405922607116203/posts/default/7862438106115951960'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6631405922607116203/posts/default/7862438106115951960'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/2021/12/announcing-jiplp-special-issue-on.html' title='Announcing the JIPLP Special Issue on the national transpositions of the DSM Directive: Call for Articles!'/><author><name>Eleonora Rosati</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05629420303968805446</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhCUpQjwM9OYRlVc2rORgikTrHt_fw-Q7NJBJdhp-x5yMbuDflVo0oaVreCWTlFLmzcQ_QabhNwyWOhZjDzDhlNAQ2xEQ3fw561uTmDda0-YWSjiTNhgBrzuF82gegMNg/s113/E+Rosati.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6631405922607116203.post-790259247869875209</id><published>2021-11-20T18:39:00.003+00:00</published><updated>2021-11-20T18:39:38.438+00:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Authors&#39; Take; Tito Rendas; copyright exceptions; user rights; CDSM Directive"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="copyright limitations"/><title type='text'>The Authors&#39; Take - Are copyright-permitted uses “exceptions”, “limitations” or “user rights”? The special case of Article 17 CDSM Directive</title><content type='html'>&lt;h2 style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Are copyright-permitted uses “exceptions”, “limitations” or “user rights”? The special case of Article 17 CDSM Directive&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;h4 style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;h4 style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;by &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.clsbe.lisboa.ucp.pt/person/tito-rendas&quot;&gt;Tito Rendas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;In law, terminology matters a great deal. In the specific case of copyright, it matters because the words we use to refer to permitted uses of protected works – uses like private copying, quotation or parody – may have important practical consequences. With this forthcoming article, I hope to clarify the legal nature of permitted uses in copyright law. For that purpose, I shall tackle two sources of terminological disagreement.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;The first relates to the nature of the rules that lay down permitted uses, specifically whether they should be considered “exceptions” or “limitations”. According to conventional wisdom, this terminological choice may affect the way we interpret these provisions: it is said that “exceptions” must be interpreted in a strict manner, whereas “limitations” tolerate broad readings. After concluding that the rules setting forth permitted uses are better described as “exceptions”, I make clear that this qualification should not be taken as carrying a preference for their narrow interpretation or as admitting their hierarchically inferior status in relation to exclusive rights. Despite being exceptions, nothing prevents these rules from being construed extensively.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;I then move on to examining the nature of the entitlements conferred by copyright exceptions. I submit that, in general, these entitlements are not rights properly-so-called, since they are not paired with a correlative duty. Instead, we should refer to them as “privileges” or “freedoms”.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;In some cases, however, the prerogatives enjoyed by users may be appropriately qualified as “rights”. I argue that the safeguards contained in Article 17 CDSM Directive create one such case. Whereas Article 17(7) puts online content-sharing service providers under a duty not to prevent uses that are covered by exceptions, Article 17(9) gives the beneficiaries of exceptions access to truly offensive means of reaction, instead of mere means of defense. Read together, these safeguards confer actual rights upon users.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;[This is an Authors&#39; Take post, which provides readers with an insight into current IP scholarship, featuring preliminary comments and thoughts from authors of articles accepted for publication in forthcoming issues of the Journal of Intellectual Property Law &amp;amp; Practice (OUP). The full text of this contribution will be made available on &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/6631405922607116203/6671955243229340652#&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Advance Access&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; soon]&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/feeds/790259247869875209/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/2021/11/the-authors-take-are-copyright.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6631405922607116203/posts/default/790259247869875209'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6631405922607116203/posts/default/790259247869875209'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/2021/11/the-authors-take-are-copyright.html' title='The Authors&#39; Take - Are copyright-permitted uses “exceptions”, “limitations” or “user rights”? The special case of Article 17 CDSM Directive'/><author><name>Eleonora Rosati</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05629420303968805446</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhCUpQjwM9OYRlVc2rORgikTrHt_fw-Q7NJBJdhp-x5yMbuDflVo0oaVreCWTlFLmzcQ_QabhNwyWOhZjDzDhlNAQ2xEQ3fw561uTmDda0-YWSjiTNhgBrzuF82gegMNg/s113/E+Rosati.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6631405922607116203.post-6671955243229340652</id><published>2021-09-30T15:48:00.001+01:00</published><updated>2021-11-20T18:36:52.600+00:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Article 102 TFEU"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Australian Mandatory Bargaining Code"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="competition law"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Digital Markets Act"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Google"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="online aggregators"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="press publishers’ right"/><title type='text'>The Authors&#39; Take - Fighting the tech giants – news edition: Competition law’s (un)suitability to safeguard the press publishers’ right and the quest for a regulatory approach</title><content type='html'>&lt;h2 style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Fighting the tech giants – news edition: Competition law’s (un)suitability to safeguard the press publishers’ right and the quest for a regulatory approach&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;h3 style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;by &lt;a href=&quot;https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/en/persons/tone-knapstad&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Tone Knapstad&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;As part of the ongoing debate on value-sharing for creators and users of online content, press publishers were granted a neighbouring right under EU copyright. This entailed an opportunity to obtain remuneration through licences for the use of online journalistic content by online aggregation services.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;However, the right’s lack of efficiency became visible when press publishers in France, the first country to implement the right, attempted to enforce remuneration for Google’s use of snippets. Google demanded zero-remuneration licences or would abstain from using snippets from news webpages, which has proven to lead to decline in webpage traffic. Accordingly, the press publishers were still not seeing the promised remuneration. Since the strong market position of Google appeared to enable the ultimatum, the publishers claimed the behaviour infringed competition law, constituting an abuse of dominance.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;This article argues that EU competition law cannot be relied on to ensure remuneration under the press publishers’ right. This argument is, firstly, based on an analysis concluding that practices similar to that of Google – forcing zero remuneration licences - do not constitute an abuse of dominance under Article 102 of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union. Secondly, the argument is founded on the conclusion that competition law, de lege ferenda, should not be applied for such purposes, as the goal of competition law does not warrant securing remuneration. Moreover, it is suggested that the fairness standard, which some argue is becoming a benchmark in EU competition law, is not a steering principle in itself, but rather that fairness is the result of correct competition law enforcement.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Lastly, the article maps the alternative regulatory approaches initiated in the EU (Digital Markets Act), Australia (Mandatory Bargaining Code) and the US. This is done to assess whether these solve the problem of press publisher remuneration and to explore the implications of regulation for competition law.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;[This is an Authors&#39; Take post, which provides readers with an insight into current IP scholarship, featuring preliminary comments and thoughts from authors of articles accepted for publication in forthcoming issues of the Journal of Intellectual Property Law &amp;amp; Practice (OUP). The full text of this contribution will be made available on &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/6631405922607116203/5060176479396779385#&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Advance Access&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; soon]&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/feeds/6671955243229340652/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/2021/09/the-authors-take-fighting-tech-giants.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6631405922607116203/posts/default/6671955243229340652'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6631405922607116203/posts/default/6671955243229340652'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/2021/09/the-authors-take-fighting-tech-giants.html' title='The Authors&#39; Take - Fighting the tech giants – news edition: Competition law’s (un)suitability to safeguard the press publishers’ right and the quest for a regulatory approach'/><author><name>Eleonora Rosati</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05629420303968805446</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhCUpQjwM9OYRlVc2rORgikTrHt_fw-Q7NJBJdhp-x5yMbuDflVo0oaVreCWTlFLmzcQ_QabhNwyWOhZjDzDhlNAQ2xEQ3fw561uTmDda0-YWSjiTNhgBrzuF82gegMNg/s113/E+Rosati.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6631405922607116203.post-7961983274992273564</id><published>2021-08-23T10:20:00.002+01:00</published><updated>2021-09-30T15:45:15.645+01:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Authors&#39;s Take series"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="copyright"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="EU policy"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="policy"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Simone Schroff"/><title type='text'>The Authors&#39; Take -  The purpose of copyright</title><content type='html'>&lt;h2 style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;The purpose of copyright&amp;nbsp;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3 style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;by &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.plymouth.ac.uk/staff/simone-schroff&quot;&gt;Simone Schroff&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Digital technology has redefined how copyright works are created, distributed and consumed, changing the expectations of creators, commercial intermediaries and users alike. In this environment, clarity about what copyright aims to achieve is crucial to strike a viable bargain between the different groups.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;The purpose of copyright has come under intense and sustained scrutiny over the last two decades. Copyright law is traditionally seen as a tool to protect the author, reward creators and investors and ensure societal benefit. While the debates about the right balance are wide-ranging and sometimes highly contentious, any consensus has proven elusive. Stakeholder dissatisfaction and claims of policy failure are increasingly common.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;This article argues that the stagnating debates show that the traditional copyright theories do not provide sufficient guidance. Instead, reforms need to be reassessed based on what policy makers actually try to achieve. Using conventional discourse analysis on empirical EU policy evidence, the cross- institutional minimum consensus on what copyright aims to achieve is explored.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;The results show how EU copyright policy differs from the theoretical and member state level debates. In particular, all aspects of EU copyright are shaped by the Single European Market: technological change brings economic benefits and copyright is a tool to harness them. As a result, copyright is considered a property right and all interference with it needs be kept to a minimum while competition law provides the safety net. The findings also show that while the narrative of harm to creators mobilises public opinion, reform proposals are more likely to succeed if they treat technological innovation as an economic opportunity rather than a threat.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;[This is an Authors&#39; Take post, which provides readers with an insight into current IP scholarship, featuring preliminary comments and thoughts from authors of articles accepted for publication in forthcoming issues of the Journal of Intellectual Property Law &amp;amp; Practice (OUP). The full text of this contribution will be made available on&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/6631405922607116203/1545251762052837963#&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Advance Access&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;soon]&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/feeds/7961983274992273564/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/2021/08/the-authors-take-purpose-of-copyright.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6631405922607116203/posts/default/7961983274992273564'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6631405922607116203/posts/default/7961983274992273564'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://jiplp.blogspot.com/2021/08/the-authors-take-purpose-of-copyright.html' title='The Authors&#39; Take -  The purpose of copyright'/><author><name>Eleonora Rosati</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05629420303968805446</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhCUpQjwM9OYRlVc2rORgikTrHt_fw-Q7NJBJdhp-x5yMbuDflVo0oaVreCWTlFLmzcQ_QabhNwyWOhZjDzDhlNAQ2xEQ3fw561uTmDda0-YWSjiTNhgBrzuF82gegMNg/s113/E+Rosati.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>