Picture Perfect

Not exactly straight out the camera

noreply@blogger.com (John Curley) — Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:48:00 +0000

A very cool inside look at the sometimes mind-numbing detail work and hundreds of interpretive decisions that go into making an image that looks beautiful ... and natural.

Manhattanhenge stops traffic in NYC

noreply@blogger.com (John Curley) — Thu, 30 May 2013 04:47:00 +0000

It's nice to see New Yorkers go crazy for a sunset.

via NBC

Beauty out of sadness

noreply@blogger.com (John Curley) — Mon, 06 May 2013 05:28:00 +0000

From the Daily Mail

On Exhibit

noreply@blogger.com (John Curley) — Fri, 26 Apr 2013 19:21:00 +0000

Two of my cameraphone pics, including this one taken at the beach near Fort Funston, are included in a curated group show at SF's Gallery 472, opening May 3 and running through July 4. Huzzah!

Which Phone Has the Best Camera? Gizmodo Takes a Look

noreply@blogger.com (John Curley) — Thu, 25 Apr 2013 05:25:00 +0000

With the arrival of the Samsung Galaxy S4, Gizmodo decided it was time to take another look at which phones has the best camera. Their verdict? It's not The S4, and it's not the iPhone 5.

Here's what they have to say

"Because breaking your camera is only half as stupid as using Instagram..."

noreply@blogger.com (John Curley) — Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:06:00 +0000

Here's a funny video that tweaks all the Instagram users (and of course I'm one of them):

I don't think using Instgram means that you're not a "real" photographer, and I don't think "real" photographers don't use Instagram (what a silly thought).

But here's a thought: what if, in 5 or 10 years, the barriers between vision and execution are even lower? by that I mean, if you're able to see it, you'll be able to capture it? if you're able to imagine it, you'll be able to do it? ... I'm sure there will always be craft associated with photography, and it will always be valued. but I think the separation between "real" photography and ... whatever else we're talking about, will continue to narrow.

In case you're worried about the Facebook / Instagram news ...

noreply@blogger.com (John Curley) — Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:17:00 +0000

Gizmodo has posted a helpful piece about exporting all your Instagram photos.

http://gizmodo.com/5900380/how-to-export-your-instagram-photos-before-facebook-ruins-everything

Expert tips for taking pictures at Burning Man

noreply@blogger.com (John Curley) — Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:30:00 +0000

: The panel: Curious Josh, Ryan, Liana, Kevissimo and Paynie

A group of super-talented LA photographers got together in a downtown loft the other night to talk about taking pictures at Burning Man, and there was a ton of helpful information you want to know about, whether you're planning to bring a high-end DSLR, a disposable camera from the supermarket, or anything in between.

Here's who was there and where to see their work. Take a look. These folks are seriously good:
* Ryan Jesena - http://tinyurl.com/6k8epez
* Curious Josh - http://tinyurl.com/66mdqt3
* Steve Payne - http://www.paynie.net/
* Liana Bandžiulytė - http://tinyurl.com/5s8ucmx
* Kevin Rolly - http://www.kevissimo.com

So what they have to say about photographing on the playa is going to be worth your while. And we'll get to some of their tips in a minute, but there's some fine print that should come first. Lots has been written already about the rights and responsibilities of photographers on the playa, and we don't have to go over it all again. But what a lot of it boils down to is:

Don't be that guy (or girl).

Don't be that guy with the long lens snapping pics of people you don't know who don't have any clothes on.

Don't be that guy who posts compromising pictures of people he doesn't know and whose permission he doesn't have on Facebook and Flickr. As panelist Steve (Paynie) Payne said, there is powerful face-recognition technology built in to Facebook, and maybe that schoolteacher having a good time in the desert doesn't need her picture showing on her students' streams.

In the end, you want to be the the face of photography when you are out there. Be nice. Ask permission (before or after you take the picture). If someone objects, delete the picture for them. "Own your shit," as Kevissimo put it. "Don't be creepy. … Examine your intent every time you take a picture. What am I doing this for? … Are you being predatory with your camera? … Be acting in consciousness out there."

Or consider Paynie's solution to the problem of "sensitive" photos: He doesn't take them. He doesn't take pictures of naked people. Period. And yes, you can do it, too. There are LOTS of things to photograph besides women with bare breasts.
Of course, if you intend to do anything more with your photos than share them with family and friends, you're going to need permission from Burning Man. You'll also need to register your camera with Media Mecca. (They are really nice people, and you'll meet lots of other nice photogs there, too.)

There's more to find out about, and you can read the rules on the Burning Man site. But for now, let's talk about getting good shots and what you can do to take care of your camera.

You should realize right from the get-go that it's likely your camera is going to take a beating in the desert. The dust on the playa is infinitesimally small. It's going to get inside even the best weathersealed camera body. Even if you're staying in an RV, there's going to be dust everywhere. It's just the nature of the beast. But there are steps you can take to minimize the damage. "I'm no harder on my camera than I am on myself," Kevissimo said. But Kevissimo is realllly hard on himself, and his cameras, so you may not want to look at him as your role model. But he gets really great pictures, and you may want to damn the torpedoes and ride bareback, too.

At the other end of the spectrum, Curious Josh is an expert at protecting his camera. He's used the same one three years running, and it still looks brand new. He puts it in a ziplock bag, then cuts holes for the important button functions and seals them with heavy-duty electrical tape. He keeps his LCD screen encased in the kind of plastic hood you can buy at camera stores. He uses one lens, and he never takes it off the camera. (If you take off your lens, no matter where you are, dust is going to get into the innards.) He also says the best protection comes from underwater housings, and you can try that too, if you can pay the freight for one.

: Kevissimo and his battered Nikon: "I'm no harder on my camera than I am on myself."

If the worst happens and something DOES go wrong with your camera, don't despair. Ryan's DSLR shut down the first day last year, and he "did what photographers do: adjust." He used his cameraphone for the rest of the week, and he took absolutely stunning photographs. Consider getting a couple of disposable cameras, or buying a broke-ass point-and-shoot off Craigslist for backup in case disaster strikes.

If you're buying a camera to take with you, consider buying a warranty, too. We won't get into brand names here, but there are some stores and chains that have liberal return policies. Three years and nine months after he bought his camera, Paynie brought his battered brick back to the box store where he bought it, and they took it back without a blink. His camera model had been discontinued, so they gave him full credit for it, and he bought a better one. Not bad.

Let's say you just took a fabulous photo and you want to be able to get in touch with the person or people in the picture when you get back to the default world. How are you going to match up the image with the contact information a couple of weeks later? Simple. Write down their information and take a picture of it. Then it'll be right there on your files, right next to the person's picture. Don't have a notebook? Write it in the dust, and snap a picture of it. Simple, no?

Don't think you have to get all the "big" shots out there. There are going to be lots of stunning pics of the Man and the Temple and all the great artwork. What there won't be are amazing photos of you and your friends having an amazing time. Kevissimo mostly skips the iconic imagery now. "For me, that kind of shooting is isolating," he said. So he takes photos of his campmates as they are right here, right now, and will never be again.

Consider not bringing a camera at all. Ryan Jesena, a photography professional, had been to the playa for five years before he brought his camera. Now he makes some of the best pictures there, and he looks at his work as his gift to the Burner community.

If you bring a serious camera to the desert, get it cleaned IMMEDIATELY when you get back. And before you get it to the shop, put it in a ziplock back with a bag of desiccant. The dust is going to get inside the camera, and when you get off the playa and back into your normal climate, that dust is going to attract moisture, and moisture is going to wreck the camera's electronics. The danger is particularly acute for people from high-humidity places like the Bay Area.

Tag your camera. Put your name on it, and where you're camping. "It might be the only place in the world where you can lose a camera and it will find its way back to you," Paynie said. And it's a GREAT idea to have your information on your memory cards, too. Write down your name and maybe a stirring plea about how important your camera is to you, and take a picture of it. Then leave that picture on all your memory cards. If someone finds your camera and takes a look at the pictures, they'll see you and your smiling face and how to get in touch with you.

Turn your flash off. It's just not going to work. Most times all you'll get are crappy, blown-out pictures with what looks like blowing snow in the air. (The dust is always in the air, and the flash will light it up. You won't like it.)
Ryan encourages you to "examine as many angles as you can think of for every shot you take. … Every shot is an opportunity to push the boundaries of what you do."

And finally, think of what you're doing as a gift. Liana pointed out that there's no way that everyone can see everything that's out there. No way. She's a documentary photographer, and she views what she does as a service.
Have fun, and see you out there.

: Photography on the playa can take it out of you, as your correspondent has found out. For the past three years, he's documented the building of Black Rock City for the Burning Blog. (Photo by Carmen Martines)

hard times in Tonopah, Nevada

noreply@blogger.com (John Curley) — Mon, 18 Apr 2011 18:30:00 +0000

hard times in Tonopah, Nevada
Originally uploaded by john curley

a road trip to Death Valley, with stops in hardscrabble towns along Route 95 in Nevada.

This is a layered exposure, and all shooting and editing was done in an iPhone.

Some of the most beautiful time-lapse photography you'll ever see, from an upcoming feature film

noreply@blogger.com (John Curley) — Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:51:00 +0000

These pieces by photographer Tom Lowe are truly gorgeous, and the Timescapes site includes a blog with information about the locations and methods that are being used in making the film. Awesome and inspiring.

What dogs look like at 1,000 FPS

noreply@blogger.com (John Curley) — Tue, 08 Feb 2011 23:44:00 +0000

This video has been around a little while (at 3 million views currently maybe MORE than a little while), but I came across it again today, it's just plain fun to look at. (It's a commercial video, made with the amazing Phantom HD camera.)

Here's the link

Katy Perry not hot enough for Rolling Stone

noreply@blogger.com (John Curley) — Fri, 04 Feb 2011 19:36:00 +0000

Cover designers decided she needed some "help" from Photoshop. Here are the before and after shots:

The differences are obvious, but jeez! She wasn't good-looking enough already?

via Business Insider

Landscape shooters, take heart: This one sold for $1 million

noreply@blogger.com (John Curley) — Fri, 04 Feb 2011 19:01:00 +0000

Peter Lik, a self-taught Australian landscape photographer, has sold one of his photographs for a whopping $1 million to an anonymous private art collector. The photograph, titled “One”, was shot on the banks of the Androscoggin River in New Hampshire just after dawn. Only one print of the photo will ever be produced. Lik states,

I will never forget this morning for the rest of my life. It was calm, and the scent of the fall forest filled my lungs. The mist cleared, and a magical reflection in the river briefly appeared. White birch trees, black trunks, a kaleidoscope of foliage combining to reveal an illusion of three dimensions. I pressed the shutter – once – and then the scene vanished with the morning breeze, never to be seen again.”

Although the amount of the sale is a first for Lik, he’s no stranger to bringing in the big bucks with his photography — according to Wikipedia, Lik has sold over $150 million in limited edition prints to date.

(via PetaPixel)

The best of the best from 2010

noreply@blogger.com (John Curley) — Thu, 30 Dec 2010 20:01:00 +0000

Sean Heavey's photograph of a supercell thunderstorm in Montana won honorable mention in National Geographic's nature category

---

The last week of the year is often one of the slowest weeks for news, so organizations prepare wrap-up stories and year-end features to fill the void. For you, the news consumer, it's a great opportunity to sample some of the best photography from the previous year. Here are some of the best collections from 2010 (click on the photos to go to the sites):

The best in photojournalism for 2010 from the New York Times:

We all know the interwebs have made it incredibly easy to find in-depth information about just about anything, and photography may be one of the best examples. Techniques, equipment, marketing, inspiration ... it's all there for the finding. The folks at Photo Shelter came up with a list of the best blog posts of 2010, and the amount and breadth of information is astonishing. Bookmark the post for ready-reference during the year:

The contest run by National Geographic consistently turns up some of the most stunning photography of the year. The winners in the People, Places and Nature categories have been selected:

Some of the best photojournalism happens on the playing field, and the editors at Sports Illustrated have a roundup of the best of 2010:

The Guardian also has a terrific year-end wrap-up of its best imagery from 2010:

Here's the collection that Reuters put together for 2010:

And the collection from Time Magazine:

Want to get into the act yourself? Pictures of the Year International is calling for entries in its 68th annual competition. Prizes and categories have been increased, including one for Multimedia Portfolio of the Year. Details are at the site (and the results from previous years' competitions are also fun to look at):

And speaking of getting into the act yourself: Google has a very cool new feature (still in beta) that gathers the best photographic moments from people in your social network and links it all together as a search result. So, if you searched for "Year in Pictures 2010," one of the results will be the collections of people you're connected with. (Let's leave the discussion of how they've collected this information for another day.) Here are my results:

Happy New Year, fellow photography enthusiasts. May your shutters never stick, may your light always be right, and may your backups never fail.

Photo apps you'd like to find under the tree

noreply@blogger.com (John Curley) — Tue, 07 Dec 2010 18:23:00 +0000

sent via iphone with Hipstamatic and Motion Picture app effects. (and thanks richard koci hernandez for the app suggestion.)

----

Added later:

I hadn't see any iPhone apps that could upload directly to Blogger, so we tried the Motion Picture app, and here are the results. Pretty slick. Also, the tremendous number of photo apps for mobile phones makes makes me wish that we had as many choices when we're editing photos at the desktop.

Along those lines, here's a list of the photo apps I like the best. I'm always watching for new ones, and you probably are too. Feel free to share any that you like a lot:

Hipstamatic: Of course. Easily one of the all-time greats. They got the effects really right, and so what if you see them everywhere? They're beautiful.

Instagram: The latest and the greatest way to share photos with your friends and the photo community. (See post below for more thoughts.)

Mill Colour: A very sophisticated set of controls for adjusting gamma, exposure, and other values, with a nice set of effects, as well.

Best Camera: The mobile phone app from Chase Jarvis, based on the thinking that the best camera is the one you have with you. Heavy emphasis on sharing and participating, but the effects aren't the most interesting. But it's impossible to argue with the logic: Photography isn't about the equipment, it's about vision.

Camera Bag: One of the best early apps, and I find myself still using it for the "Helga" effect alone. Simple and straightforward, a very easy way to take, process, and share mobile photos.

PS Express: The photo app from Photoshop, and how can you quibble with the masters of image handling? Still, it's not my favorite app for adjusting values; the sliders are clunky and inexact when I use them, but your results may vary.

Lo Mob: An extensive library of film-like effects, everything from overlapping 35mm film in a medium format camera to through-the-viewfinder looks. Worth it just for the niche factor.

Photogene: My favorite app for making simple adjustments to exposure and levels and for cropping. Easy and straightforward, and easy sharing, too.

The Photographers Ephemeris: An amazingly powerful app that can help you get that picture of, say, the full moon rising over Alcatraz Island. The app lets you plot the paths of the rising and setting sun and moon, and figure out when and where you have to be to get the shot you want. Really good for when you're getting ready to travel.

Quad Camera: Take four shots in quick succession, and this app will combine them into one photo for you. You can also adjust the time between shutter clicks.

Photo Calc: A very nice reference tool to have in your pocket for figuring out equivalent exposures, depth of field values and other basic but sometimes complicated stuff. No math required, which in my book is a big plus.

Photo Studio: A vast selection of effects, and the cool thing here is that you can layer them any way you like, then save the process as a preset to use again.

Strobox: Did you come up with a lighting configuration that you'd like to save? Or did you come across one that you'd like to try later? This app makes it easy to generate lighting diagrams.

Camera Plus: The interesting thing here is that pictures are saved to a "lightbox," where you can process and post them later. It makes it possible to take pictures faster and then let the phone crunch the big files later.

Shake It: Instant photography for the mobile phone. Development is affected by motion, so you can shake your phone like you used to shake your Polaroid while it developed.

True HDR: This app takes three exposures at different exposure values, then merges them for an HDR-like result. I've had mixed success with this one, but they seem to be rolling out updates on a regular basis, so it's worth watching as the app evolves.

Blend Cam: Take multiple exposures with your phone, or layer images from your photo library. You get to choose a variety of blending modes, too. Very cool, very fun.

360: A very easy way to take 360-degree panoramic photographs. No stitching necessary.

Get the truth about your photos

noreply@blogger.com (John Curley) — Thu, 02 Dec 2010 20:59:00 +0000

Gary Fong gives extremely valuable photo critiques at the We Are Photographers photo site.

This isn't the Gary Fong who sells the Lightsphere and other flash modifiers. This is the Gary Fong who, among other things, has been a jurist for the Pulitzer Prize, been a judge for the Picture of the Year competition run by the National Press Photographers Association, was twice named the Photographer of the Year by the California Press Photographers Association, and five times was named the Photographer of the Year by the SF Bay Area Press Photographers Association.

You want credentials? He's got credentials.

If you'd like to improve your photography, and especially if you want to become a better photojournalist, Gary has opinions worth listening to. I haven't summoned the courage to undergo one of his critiques, but I sure learn a lot from reading what he has to say about the work of other photographers. Gary tells the truth, and that's a rare gift.

On Instagram and Flickr

noreply@blogger.com (John Curley) — Wed, 01 Dec 2010 06:16:00 +0000

I signed up with Instagram the other day, like a lot of other people have been doing lately. The new photo-sharing site has about 500,000 members now, after going live only about six weeks ago. Amazing. Lightning in a bottle.

And as Robert Scoble found out during an interview with Instagram CEO Kevin Systrom, most of those new users are from places other than Silicon Valley and New York, which is good. It may seem like Instagram is just a new photo fad for the cool kids, but it's obviously become a lot more than that, and fast.

(A personal ancedote: The other night, I took a look at the photostream of someone who had started following me on Instagram, and I was blown away. Beautiful stuff, and the photos were obviously not generated solely from the Instagram filters, which are admittedly cool, but limiting. These photos were layered and double-exposed and imaginatively original and just plain fun to see. And the other fun thing was, I didn't recognize a single place I was seeing. Turns out the user was from southern Australia, near the water. A powerful new loose connection.)

So now Instagram has been a featured app of the week on iTunes, and the four very bright young people at the helm have the happy task of figuring out what to do next. No, Systrom told Scoble, they don't plan to go to the web immediately, but when they do they want to keep things simple and let users have a fresh new experience. No, they're not looking for ways to make money yet, they're just trying to keep up with demand on their infrastructure. Good for them, I say. (But Tech Crunch reported that they did sign their first major partnership today, and it was with National Geographic. Not a bad place to start.)

Instagram is taking off because it is a simple, well-executed platform for launching your photos across most of the major social media outlets -- Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr, Foursquare and .... oh the irony, Flickr!

Flickr! The original photo-sharing site of the digital age, or at least the one that made everyone stop and think about the possibilities. And It makes you wonder why Flickr didn't see, or chose to ignore, what was happening around them. Why aren't you able to send photos from Flickr to Facebook or Twitter? Rather than ride the tsunami it created, Flickr turned inward. Their universe is limited to the people who are photographers and enthusiasts. Flickr invented photo sharing, ferchrissakes, and they should own the whole sector. But they don't.

Instagram, on the other hand, is positioning itself as the photo sharing site for all of social media. That's a very powerful place to be.

Stunning and amazing stop-motion graffiti

noreply@blogger.com (John Curley) — Fri, 09 Jul 2010 01:09:00 +0000

BIG BANG BIG BOOM - the new wall-painted animation by BLU from blu on Vimeo.

Street artist BLU released a breathtaking new stop-motion graffiti video called “Big Bang Big Boom.” It’s a fascinating artistic piece on the beginning, and potential end to life on Earth. Blu also created MUTO, another wall animation in the same way, using public walls and street objects as an enormous canvas.

from PetaPixel

A completely fabulous look at Los Angeles ... with no cars

noreply@blogger.com (John Curley) — Tue, 01 Jun 2010 22:14:00 +0000

Running on Empty from Ross Ching on Vimeo.

via Jim Heid

What if you could take the same picture 30 years later?

noreply@blogger.com (John Curley) — Thu, 27 May 2010 01:00:00 +0000

British amateur photographer and paramedic Chris Porsz likes to take pictures around his home town of Peterborough. Over the years, he's put together quite a large body of work. But in recent years he's become fascinated with the idea of re-creating some of the pictures he took in the early '80s. But he wouldn't be satisfied with then-and-now photographs of buildings or intersections -- he wanted to track down the people in his pictures and get them to re-create the moment he captured 30 years ago.

Porsz got a local newspaper to help; they'd run the original photographs with an appeal for information. And some of the subjects have come forward. The amazing thing is, these weren't posed photographs. Porsz didn't know any of his subjects; they were captured as he practiced his street photography.

"I love capturing spontaneous moments and taking pictures of people," he told the Mail Online. "If something caught my eye, I would snap it. But if I'd asked the subjects to pose, it would have ruined it."

Porsz is continuing his project and hopes to eventually produce a book.

More images and a story are over here.

Re-Creating "The Girl With the Pearl Earing" using just a Bic pen

noreply@blogger.com (John Curley) — Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:08:00 +0000

via New York Magazine

Yes, this blog is about photography, but sometimes we come across image-making that we just can't pass up.

A day in the life of New York City, in miniature

noreply@blogger.com (John Curley) — Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:44:00 +0000

The Sandpit from Sam O'Hare on Vimeo.
Here's a beautiful stop-motion, tilt-shift type short film done by Sam O'Hare with production assistance from Aero Film. (The original music is gorgeous, as well.)

Some tech notes: Although it looks like it was shot with tilt-shift lenses, it wasn't: Sam says:

It is shot on a Nikon D3 (and one shot on a D80), as a series of stills. I used my Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 and Sigma 50-150mm f/2.8 lenses for all of these shots. Most were shot at 4fps in DX crop mode, which is the fastest the D3 could continuously write out to the memory card. The boats had slower frame rates, and the night shots used exposures up to two seconds each. The camera actually has an automatic cut off after 130 shots, so for longer shots I counted each click and quickly released and re-pressed the shutter release after 130 to keep shooting.

After he amassed his 35,000 stills over the course of five hot days and two evenings in August of 2009, he began putting the look together in post.

The footage was shot as raw NEFs, which I organised and colour graded in Adobe Lightroom. I always shoot raw, as it gives you so much more latitude when grading. These were then output as 720p jpg sequences and quickly stabilised to do the initial edit. Once the edit was mostly locked, all the final footage was re-output at full 2800px resolution, tracked, stabilised and the DOF effect and movement added in Eyeon Fusion, using Frischluft Lenscare. I output the final shots at 1080p. Although most shots stay with the basic tilt-shift effect, some have focus pulls, or more complex depth mattes were built up along with some paint work to allow buildings to drop out of focus next to the in-focus ground. This would not have been possible if I had shot using tilt shift lenses on the camera, which works best with relatively flat landscapes. New York City is anything but flat!

Why didn't he use actual tilt-shift lenses? He needed more flexibility than they could provide:
I did some initial tests a while back using a rented 24mm tilt-shift lens, which is the standard way to do this. However, after my tests, I found it made much more sense to do this effect in post, rather than in camera. Shooting tilt-shift requires a tripod, as it is very hard to stabilise afterwards, and gives less flexibility in the final look. I opted to shoot it on normal lenses, which allowed me options in the depth of field and shot movement in post. I used a tripod for the night shots, and my Gorillapod (which is much more portable) where possible, but many locations—like hanging over the edge of a roof or through a gap in fencing on a bridge-- had to be shot hand held, and the inevitable wobble removed afterwards.

Nice stuff, Sam.

(And a tip of the cap to Carlos Gonzales for the heads-up.)

The Indianapolis Star had a funny photo illustration of Coach K at Duke, but then they stopped the presses

noreply@blogger.com (John Curley) — Tue, 06 Apr 2010 21:49:00 +0000

Yes, it's hard to root for the Duke University basketball team if you didn't go to school there. The school is expensive, the kids are really smart, and someday they'll likely be your boss.

But maybe more than anything, Duke wins a lot. It's a little like rooting for the Yankees, or U.S. Steel.

On Monday night Duke won its fourth national championship under coach Mike Krzyzewski, and in the process ruined the storybook season of the Butler Bulldogs, the little school (4,200-enrollment) that made it all the way to the NCAA championship game.

The Indianapolis Star ran a story last Friday that pointed out how easy it was to root against Duke. The art department created an illustration for the story that looked like someone had doodled all over Coach K's face. But the illustration only ran in only the early editions of the paper. One of the upper executives of the paper, alerted by staffers, decided that the illustration didn't meet the paper's "standards," and he ordered it pulled. Here's what they ran in later editions:
Coach K called the first illustration "juvenile," and he's right. But then, what's he going to say?

And I know I'm a bad person and all, but I really like the first illustration a lot better. It was fresh and original, not tired and familiar like the second one. And which illustration might make you more likely to read the story? It seems harmless enough to me, and it had the kind of creative verve that newspapers could use right now.

And I'd bet the Duke students themselves might have thought it was funny. They are famously clever fans, and on Monday night, as the sportscasters set up the game, there was one student in the background crowd holding up a hand-made poster that said, "Distracting Poster."

So here's to you, nameless art department person who created the original illustration. Go Bulldogs.

Video shows Reuters photographers in Baghdad killed by US forces

noreply@blogger.com (John Curley) — Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:57:00 +0000

WikiLeaks acquired and today released classified military video footage that shows two Reuters photographers killed by fire from an Apache helicopter as the journalists carried their cameras in a Baghdad neighborhood.

About a dozen people were killed in the incident, and two children were also seriously wounded.

From Wikileaks:

"After demands by Reuters, the incident was investigated and the U.S. military concluded that the actions of the soldiers were in accordance with the law of armed conflict and its own "Rules of Engagement".
"WikiLeaks wants to ensure that all the leaked information it receives gets the attention it deserves. In this particular case, some of the people killed were journalists that were simply doing their jobs: putting their lives at risk in order to report on war. Iraq is a very dangerous place for journalists: from 2003- 2009, 139 journalists were killed while doing their work."

Addendum:
More discussion of the video is here, and at the NYTimes, among many other places.

Nope, this is not a painting. And it's not Photoshop, either.

noreply@blogger.com (John Curley) — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 17:42:00 +0000

This one's been around a bit, but just in case you haven't seen it.

A makeup company set up a display in a store window that caught the eye of many people, including University of Hawaii professor Peter Kun Frary, who snapped this photo. The company was trying to make the setting look like it was a painting. They succeeded.

First seen on Laughing Squid. Also on Rocketboom. Also on Urlesque (which maybe had it first? I can't determine which.)