<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Julian Browne</title>
    <link>http://www.julianbrowne.com/</link>
    <description>Recent postings, essays and related stuff on the julianbrowne.com site</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    
    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/julianbrownerecent" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fjulianbrownerecent" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fjulianbrownerecent" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fjulianbrownerecent" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://feeds.feedburner.com/julianbrownerecent" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fjulianbrownerecent" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fjulianbrownerecent" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fjulianbrownerecent" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:browserFriendly>Thanks for subscribing to my site. It's always nice to know people are out there.</feedburner:browserFriendly><item>
      <title>Gangstas Don't Scale</title>
      <category>general</category>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A common anti-pattern in distributed systems design comes about because of the belief that scale is easily achieved by making all communication asynchronous. And to be fair, there is some logic to why this misconception occurs. If you take the real-life analogy of making a phone call as a synchronous option for communication, with sending a letter as its asynchronous counterpart, then you can more efficiently increase a team's workload (assuming the team performs simple, repetitive, tasks), in proportion to increases in its size, if they spend all day banging out letters rather than dialling n ... &lt;a href="http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/gangsta-scale" title="Gangstas Don't Scale"&gt;[more]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/julianbrownerecent/~4/z3Wlq4QlSxs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:01:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/gangsta-scale</link>
      <guid>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/gangsta-scale</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Walking the Walk</title>
      <category>general</category>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This short series started with &lt;a href="http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/planning-the-plan"&gt;Planning the Plan&lt;/a&gt;, an article that tried to put into context some of the roadmap and planning activities that take place before projects get approved and started. I suggested using the McFarlan Matrix as a way of categorising potential projects so that they might be more likely to deliver benefits in line with whatever the business strategy is for that year. There are plenty of good ways of doing this, but the McFarlan Matrix is simple and quick, and forces conversations about what good looks like for the coming 12 months of f ... &lt;a href="http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/walking-the-walk" title="Walking the Walk"&gt;[more]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/julianbrownerecent/~4/hickNn-k_Ig" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 18:34:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/walking-the-walk</link>
      <guid>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/walking-the-walk</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Estimation Game</title>
      <category>general</category>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In trying to put down some words on project estimation I've had to come to terms with an internal contradiction which I guess goes all the way back to the origins of software engineering. Logic tells me that because the ultimate goal of a software project is a series of machine instructions that perform some useful task, and because at the lowest level these are almost wholly predictable in their nature (strange microcode bugs notwithstanding, although these are far more rare than they used to be), and because enough analysis should empirically capture &lt;em&gt;precisely&lt;/em&gt; what this useful task looks ... &lt;a href="http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/estimation-game" title="The Estimation Game"&gt;[more]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/julianbrownerecent/~4/cxMKaFcyJR0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 07:36:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/estimation-game</link>
      <guid>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/estimation-game</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Was that Tactegic or Stractical?</title>
      <category>general</category>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;You've been assigned to a project. The requirements are well understood and they make sense. The team is capable and the project manager reasonable. The one thing you don't have, because we never do, is time. This is a project with a David Beckham date.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The David Beckham date is a term I use for an immoveable launch target. I once worked on a project where David Beckham had been booked to do the release publicity. That pretty much fixes when you need to be done. Firstly, he isn't going to be able re-arrange international football fixtures to accommodate a project slippage and second he's no ... &lt;a href="http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/tactegic-stractical" title="Was that Tactegic or Stractical?"&gt;[more]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/julianbrownerecent/~4/MMV8FsR7xvA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 09:09:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/tactegic-stractical</link>
      <guid>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/tactegic-stractical</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Planning the Plan</title>
      <category>general</category>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Wherever you are in the world and whatever business you are in, 2009 is going to be a tougher year than usual. If you aren't at the pointy end of the economic downturn then your customers will be. For a lot of IT departments that's going to mean less to spend. For the lucky ones without budget cuts there's going to be a higher expectation of return on that spend.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As it's January, and the start of a new year, I thought an article on planning what to do with those budgets might be both useful and topical. This year, more than ever, I suspect planning (and replanning) skills will be important  ... &lt;a href="http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/planning-the-plan" title="Planning the Plan"&gt;[more]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/julianbrownerecent/~4/pnKXQ0ffI30" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 10:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/planning-the-plan</link>
      <guid>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/planning-the-plan</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Brewer's CAP Theorem</title>
      <category>general</category>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;On Friday 4th June 1976, in a small upstairs room away from the main concert auditorium, the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_Pistols"&gt;Sex Pistols&lt;/a&gt; kicked off their first gig at Manchester's &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Trade_Hall"&gt;Lesser Free Trade Hall&lt;/a&gt;. There's some confusion as to who exactly was there in the audience that night, partly because there was another concert just six weeks later, but mostly because it's considered to be a gig that &lt;a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/print/manchester/content/articles/2006/05/11/110506_sex_pistols_gig_feature.shtml"&gt;changed western music culture&lt;/a&gt; foreve ... &lt;a href="http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/brewers-cap-theorem" title="Brewer's CAP Theorem"&gt;[more]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/julianbrownerecent/~4/7-mhOJs4b9I" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/brewers-cap-theorem</link>
      <guid>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/brewers-cap-theorem</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Super-Geek Top Ten</title>
      <category>general</category>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Let's end the year on a lighter note. Working in corporate IT is tough enough without another 2000 word essay on architecture or the pop-psychology of a management technique for the holiday period.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Recently I've been putting together a treatment for a TV documentary on some of the extraordinary computer scientists behind the bodacious awesomeness that powers the best IT today. During some random research I came across a game called "&lt;a href="http://www.malevole.com/mv/misc/killerquiz/"&gt;Programming Language Inventor or Serial Killer&lt;/a&gt;?", an amusing distraction that needs no explanation. I got 10/10 ... &lt;a href="http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/super-geek-top-ten" title="The Super-Geek Top Ten"&gt;[more]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/julianbrownerecent/~4/QnBveYNrnC8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:22:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/super-geek-top-ten</link>
      <guid>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/super-geek-top-ten</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Event-Driven Architecture</title>
      <category>general</category>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Michelangelo famously said that he didn't just take a piece of stone and sculpt it into the shape he wanted, but rather he believed that every hunk of rock already has a sculpture inside and the job of the sculptor is simply to remove all the pieces that aren't it. He added that the way to distinguish between that which should go and that which should stay is to "obey intellect" and understand that even the greatest of artists cannot conceive of anything more beautiful than that which already exists within the stone. The quote is from one of his best known sonnets "[Non ha l'ottimo artista alc ... &lt;a href="http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/event-driven-architecture" title="The Event-Driven Architecture"&gt;[more]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/julianbrownerecent/~4/FU2Gav7sbD0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 08:37:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/event-driven-architecture</link>
      <guid>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/event-driven-architecture</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Wife Swapping and the Art of Conflict</title>
      <category>general</category>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The problem with books on management is they rarely address what actually makes teams successful. One of the best books I've come across is &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1591391105?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=julibrow-21&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;camp=1634&amp;amp;creative=19450&amp;amp;creativeASIN=1591391105"&gt;The First Ninety Days&lt;/a&gt; by Michael Watkins, which explores how to guard against common mistakes leaders make when they start new roles. A big theme with Watkins is how not to bring your last job with you, however successful you may have been in it. He points put that many managers, even good ones, will often rush to make deci ... &lt;a href="http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/wife-swapping-art-conflict" title="Wife Swapping and the Art of Conflict"&gt;[more]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/julianbrownerecent/~4/2j0_LHD40K8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:22:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/wife-swapping-art-conflict</link>
      <guid>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/wife-swapping-art-conflict</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Role Models and Services</title>
      <category>general</category>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;SOA - an architectural style centred around the concept of a service. It's a popular approach though not without a few &lt;a href="http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/soa-myths"&gt;difficult questions&lt;/a&gt; if you want to get it right, chief amongst these being: what exactly is a service anyway? Next time someone is trying to sell you SOA as the answer to all technology's evils, try asking them that simple question. SOA may well be the answer, but it does presuppose we can distinguish a service from a hole in the ground.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://service-architecture.blogspot.com/"&gt;Steve Jones&lt;/a&gt; is a fairly prolific blogger on the subject of SOA a ... &lt;a href="http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/role-models-services" title="Role Models and Services"&gt;[more]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/julianbrownerecent/~4/tMXxBcaePOw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 18:28:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/role-models-services</link>
      <guid>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/role-models-services</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
