<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Julian Browne</title>
    <link>http://www.julianbrowne.com/</link>
    <description>Recent postings, essays and related stuff on the julianbrowne.com site</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    
    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/julianbrownerecent" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fjulianbrownerecent" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fjulianbrownerecent" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fjulianbrownerecent" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://feeds.feedburner.com/julianbrownerecent" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fjulianbrownerecent" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fjulianbrownerecent" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fjulianbrownerecent" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:browserFriendly>Thanks for subscribing to my site. It's always nice to know people are out there.</feedburner:browserFriendly><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
      <title>Strained Relationships</title>
      <category>general</category>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;About four years ago I sat in a meeting that had finished early. We were chatting away and the subject turned, as it always does, to the lamentable state of IT. In the preceding weeks I'd asked finance to run me off a number of reports showing just what we were spending on various aspects of our integration architecture. They made pretty scary reading. Wherever we had invested significant funds to improve and mature our infrastructure we were now spending significantly more and taking longer per-project even for minor changes. So this wasn't one of those daily, common-or-garden, grumbles about ... &lt;a href="http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/strained-relationships" title="Strained Relationships"&gt;[more]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/julianbrownerecent/~4/-g9NwRiEmVg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:33:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/strained-relationships</link>
      <guid>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/strained-relationships</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Law and Order</title>
      <category>general</category>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;In the technology justice system, the people are represented by two separate yet equally important groups: the architects who investigate standards and the developers who commit the offences. These are their stories.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;doink doink&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;INT. COURTROOM - MORNING&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The case before us has troubled me deeply over recent years. It's a question that periodically pops up in various online forums and one which often invites heated debate - probably why it never seems to achieve any sense of resolution.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My serious and honest question is this:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;Has the experiment failed? Is it time t ... &lt;a href="http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/law-and-order" title="Law and Order"&gt;[more]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/julianbrownerecent/~4/3lH-HeJ64b8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 07:42:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/law-and-order</link>
      <guid>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/law-and-order</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Quixotics Anonymous </title>
      <category>general</category>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It's intervention time. You know on TV, whenever they show a meeting of alcoholics/gamblers/narcotics anonymous, the first thing a member has to state before they get to address the group is "Hello. My Name is &lt;em&gt;name&lt;/em&gt; and I'm a &lt;em&gt;whatever&lt;/em&gt;"? Admitting you are a &lt;em&gt;whatever&lt;/em&gt; is step one of the so-called twelve step program. It's powerful because, regardless of the story or anecdote that follows, you must begin by facing the reality of things. No excuses. You may have just had a great week but there's no resting on your laurels because you're still a &lt;em&gt;whatever&lt;/em&gt;. You must never forget that because to ... &lt;a href="http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/quixotics-anonymous" title="Quixotics Anonymous "&gt;[more]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/julianbrownerecent/~4/1rtScAjTtao" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 09:07:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/quixotics-anonymous</link>
      <guid>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/quixotics-anonymous</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gangstas Don't Scale</title>
      <category>general</category>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A common anti-pattern in distributed systems design comes about because of the belief that scale is easily achieved by making all communication asynchronous. And to be fair, there is some logic to why this misconception occurs. If you take the real-life analogy of making a phone call as a synchronous option for communication, with sending a letter as its asynchronous counterpart, then you can more efficiently increase a team's workload (assuming the team performs simple, repetitive, tasks), in proportion to increases in its size, if they spend all day banging out letters rather than dialling n ... &lt;a href="http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/gangsta-scale" title="Gangstas Don't Scale"&gt;[more]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/julianbrownerecent/~4/z3Wlq4QlSxs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:01:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/gangsta-scale</link>
      <guid>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/gangsta-scale</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Walking the Walk</title>
      <category>general</category>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This short series started with &lt;a href="http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/planning-the-plan"&gt;Planning the Plan&lt;/a&gt;, an article that tried to put into context some of the roadmap and planning activities that take place before projects get approved and started. I suggested using the McFarlan Matrix as a way of categorising potential projects so that they might be more likely to deliver benefits in line with whatever the business strategy is for that year. There are plenty of good ways of doing this, but the McFarlan Matrix is simple and quick, and forces conversations about what good looks like for the coming 12 months of f ... &lt;a href="http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/walking-the-walk" title="Walking the Walk"&gt;[more]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/julianbrownerecent/~4/hickNn-k_Ig" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 18:34:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/walking-the-walk</link>
      <guid>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/walking-the-walk</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Estimation Game</title>
      <category>general</category>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In trying to put down some words on project estimation I've had to come to terms with an internal contradiction which I guess goes all the way back to the origins of software engineering. Logic tells me that because the ultimate goal of a software project is a series of machine instructions that perform some useful task, and because at the lowest level these are almost wholly predictable in their nature (strange microcode bugs notwithstanding, although these are far more rare than they used to be), and because enough analysis should empirically capture &lt;em&gt;precisely&lt;/em&gt; what this useful task looks ... &lt;a href="http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/estimation-game" title="The Estimation Game"&gt;[more]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/julianbrownerecent/~4/cxMKaFcyJR0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 07:36:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/estimation-game</link>
      <guid>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/estimation-game</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Was that Tactegic or Stractical?</title>
      <category>general</category>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;You've been assigned to a project. The requirements are well understood and they make sense. The team is capable and the project manager reasonable. The one thing you don't have, because we never do, is time. This is a project with a David Beckham date.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The David Beckham date is a term I use for an immoveable launch target. I once worked on a project where David Beckham had been booked to do the release publicity. That pretty much fixes when you need to be done. Firstly, he isn't going to be able re-arrange international football fixtures to accommodate a project slippage and second he's no ... &lt;a href="http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/tactegic-stractical" title="Was that Tactegic or Stractical?"&gt;[more]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/julianbrownerecent/~4/MMV8FsR7xvA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 09:09:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/tactegic-stractical</link>
      <guid>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/tactegic-stractical</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Planning the Plan</title>
      <category>general</category>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Wherever you are in the world and whatever business you are in, 2009 is going to be a tougher year than usual. If you aren't at the pointy end of the economic downturn then your customers will be. For a lot of IT departments that's going to mean less to spend. For the lucky ones without budget cuts there's going to be a higher expectation of return on that spend.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As it's January, and the start of a new year, I thought an article on planning what to do with those budgets might be both useful and topical. This year, more than ever, I suspect planning (and replanning) skills will be important  ... &lt;a href="http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/planning-the-plan" title="Planning the Plan"&gt;[more]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/julianbrownerecent/~4/pnKXQ0ffI30" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 10:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/planning-the-plan</link>
      <guid>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/planning-the-plan</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Brewer's CAP Theorem</title>
      <category>general</category>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;On Friday 4th June 1976, in a small upstairs room away from the main concert auditorium, the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_Pistols"&gt;Sex Pistols&lt;/a&gt; kicked off their first gig at Manchester's &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Trade_Hall"&gt;Lesser Free Trade Hall&lt;/a&gt;. There's some confusion as to who exactly was there in the audience that night, partly because there was another concert just six weeks later, but mostly because it's considered to be a gig that &lt;a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/print/manchester/content/articles/2006/05/11/110506_sex_pistols_gig_feature.shtml"&gt;changed western music culture&lt;/a&gt; foreve ... &lt;a href="http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/brewers-cap-theorem" title="Brewer's CAP Theorem"&gt;[more]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/julianbrownerecent/~4/7-mhOJs4b9I" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/brewers-cap-theorem</link>
      <guid>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/brewers-cap-theorem</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Super-Geek Top Ten</title>
      <category>general</category>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Let's end the year on a lighter note. Working in corporate IT is tough enough without another 2000 word essay on architecture or the pop-psychology of a management technique for the holiday period.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Recently I've been putting together a treatment for a TV documentary on some of the extraordinary computer scientists behind the bodacious awesomeness that powers the best IT today. During some random research I came across a game called "&lt;a href="http://www.malevole.com/mv/misc/killerquiz/"&gt;Programming Language Inventor or Serial Killer&lt;/a&gt;?", an amusing distraction that needs no explanation. I got 10/10 ... &lt;a href="http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/super-geek-top-ten" title="The Super-Geek Top Ten"&gt;[more]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/julianbrownerecent/~4/QnBveYNrnC8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:22:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/super-geek-top-ten</link>
      <guid>http://www.julianbrowne.com/article/viewer/super-geek-top-ten</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
