JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast http://www.iplawpodcast.com Just another WordPress site Tue, 16 Apr 2019 01:38:58 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.3 noJurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,propertyJurisDiction is the international intellectual property law podcast featuring interviews of the top-rated IP law practitioners from around the world talking about patent, trademark and copyright law issues. Hosted by Don Cameron of Bereskin & Parr LLP in Toronto, Canada. Available at iplawpodcast.com.The International Intellectual Property Law PodcastBereskin & Parr LLPdon@cameronmackendrick.comBereskin & Parr LLP Episode 53 — April 2019 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2019/04/16/episode-53-april-2019/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2019/04/16/episode-53-april-2019/#respond Tue, 16 Apr 2019 01:38:58 +0000 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/?p=151 David Pekarek Krohn and Danielle Grant-Keane of Perkins Coie LLP discuss “The Coming Wave – Preparing for the Rise of Patent Litigation in the Augmented and Virtual Reality Sector”. (Length:27:28)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2019/04/16/episode-53-april-2019/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noDavid Pekarek Krohn and Danielle Grant-Keane of Perkins Coie LLP discuss “The Coming Wave – Preparing for the Rise of Patent Litigation in the Augmented and Virtual Reality Sector”. (Length:27:28) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPDavid Pekarek Krohn and Danielle Grant-Keane of Perkins Coie LLP discuss “The Coming Wave – Preparing for the Rise of Patent Litigation in the Augmented and Virtual Reality Sector”. (Length:27:28) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property Episode 52 — February 2019 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2019/03/21/episode-52-february-2019/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2019/03/21/episode-52-february-2019/#respond Thu, 21 Mar 2019 01:49:26 +0000 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/?p=145 Johannes Hsu of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP in Irvine, California discusses the Tabaian v. Intel Corp. decision and his paper “Disqualifying an Expert: When is an Expert’s Prior Relationship Prejudicial to the Opposing Party?” (Length:10:20)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2019/03/21/episode-52-february-2019/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noJohannes Hsu of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP in Irvine, California discusses the Tabaian v. Intel Corp. decision and his paper “Disqualifying an Expert: When is an Expert’s Prior Relationship Prejudicial to the Opposing Party?” (Length:10:20) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPJohannes Hsu of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP in Irvine, California discusses the Tabaian v. Intel Corp. decision and his paper “Disqualifying an Expert: When is an Expert’s Prior Relationship Prejudicial to the Opposing Party?” (Length:10:20) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property Episode 51 — November 2018 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2018/11/30/episode-51-november-2018/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2018/11/30/episode-51-november-2018/#respond Fri, 30 Nov 2018 02:41:06 +0000 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/?p=141 Dr. Sarah Kagan of Banner & Witcoff in Washington D.C. discusses “Patent Wars: Genome Editing” and the latest developments in the CRISPR patent wars: U Cal v. Broad. (Length: 19:55)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2018/11/30/episode-51-november-2018/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noDr. Sarah Kagan of Banner & Witcoff in Washington D.C. discusses “Patent Wars: Genome Editing” and the latest developments in the CRISPR patent wars: U Cal v. Broad. (Length: 19:55) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPDr. Sarah Kagan of Banner & Witcoff in Washington D.C. discusses “Patent Wars: Genome Editing” and the latest developments in the CRISPR patent wars: U Cal v. Broad. (Length: 19:55) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property Episode 50 — November 2018 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2018/11/30/episode-50-november-2018/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2018/11/30/episode-50-november-2018/#respond Fri, 30 Nov 2018 02:30:34 +0000 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/?p=139 Eric Ball and Athul Acharya of Fenwick & West discuss their article “Honey Badger Don’t Care, but the Lanham Act Might” regarding Gordon v. Drape Creative and trademarks vs freedom of speech. (Length: 13:21)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2018/11/30/episode-50-november-2018/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noEric Ball and Athul Acharya of Fenwick & West discuss their article “Honey Badger Don’t Care, but the Lanham Act Might” regarding Gordon v. Drape Creative and trademarks vs freedom of speech. (Length: 13:21) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPEric Ball and Athul Acharya of Fenwick & West discuss their article “Honey Badger Don’t Care, but the Lanham Act Might” regarding Gordon v. Drape Creative and trademarks vs freedom of speech. (Length: 13:21) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property Episode 49 — October 2018 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2018/10/27/episode-49-october-2018/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2018/10/27/episode-49-october-2018/#respond Sat, 27 Oct 2018 21:35:16 +0000 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/?p=136 Christopher Loh of Fitzpatrick Cella Harper & Scinto in New York City discusses the Amgen v. Sanofi CAFC decision and his paper “End of ‘well characterized antigen’ test?” (Length: 20:08)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2018/10/27/episode-49-october-2018/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noChristopher Loh of Fitzpatrick Cella Harper & Scinto in New York City discusses the Amgen v. Sanofi CAFC decision and his paper “End of ‘well characterized antigen’ test?” (Length: 20:08) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPChristopher Loh of Fitzpatrick Cella Harper & Scinto in New York City discusses the Amgen v. Sanofi CAFC decision and his paper “End of ‘well characterized antigen’ test?” (Length: 20:08) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property Episode 48 — September 2018 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2018/09/16/episode-48-september-2018/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2018/09/16/episode-48-september-2018/#respond Sun, 16 Sep 2018 19:20:14 +0000 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/?p=132 Linda Wadler and Alissa Lipton of Finnegan discuss the SCOTUS decision in WesternGeco v. Ion Geophysical regarding recovering foreign lost profits damages for patent infringement. Their case comment. (Length: 21:06)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2018/09/16/episode-48-september-2018/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noLinda Wadler and Alissa Lipton of Finnegan discuss the SCOTUS decision in WesternGeco v. Ion Geophysical regarding recovering foreign lost profits damages for patent infringement. Their case comment. (Length: 21:06) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPLinda Wadler and Alissa Lipton of Finnegan discuss the SCOTUS decision in WesternGeco v. Ion Geophysical regarding recovering foreign lost profits damages for patent infringement. Their case comment. (Length: 21:06) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property Episode 47 — April 2018 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2018/08/09/episode-47-april-2018/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2018/08/09/episode-47-april-2018/#respond Thu, 09 Aug 2018 02:30:14 +0000 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/?p=129 Don Cameron of Bereskin & Parr LLP and Jerry Chen of JZC Intellectual Property Law discuss their involvement as counsel in Canada’s first electronic patent trial. (Length: 24:40)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2018/08/09/episode-47-april-2018/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noDon Cameron of Bereskin & Parr LLP and Jerry Chen of JZC Intellectual Property Law discuss their involvement as counsel in Canada’s first electronic patent trial. (Length: 24:40) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPDon Cameron of Bereskin & Parr LLP and Jerry Chen of JZC Intellectual Property Law discuss their involvement as counsel in Canada’s first electronic patent trial. (Length: 24:40) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property Episode 46 — January 2018 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2018/02/11/episode-46-january-2018/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2018/02/11/episode-46-january-2018/#respond Sun, 11 Feb 2018 23:27:49 +0000 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/?p=123 Prof. Ben Alarie of BlueJ Legal on “Using Machine Learning to Predict Legal Outcomes”. (Length: 43:19)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2018/02/11/episode-46-january-2018/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noProf. Ben Alarie of BlueJ Legal on “Using Machine Learning to Predict Legal Outcomes”. (Length: 43:19) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPProf. Ben Alarie of BlueJ Legal on “Using Machine Learning to Predict Legal Outcomes”. (Length: 43:19) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property Episode 45 — July 2017 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2017/08/12/episode-45-july-2017/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2017/08/12/episode-45-july-2017/#respond Sat, 12 Aug 2017 22:57:59 +0000 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/?p=120 Micheline Gravelle, Don MacOdrum, Mike Fenwick and Don Cameron of Bereskin & Parr LLP discuss “The Promise of the Patent” and the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Astrazeneca (Length: 55:16)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2017/08/12/episode-45-july-2017/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noMicheline Gravelle, Don MacOdrum, Mike Fenwick and Don Cameron of Bereskin & Parr LLP discuss “The Promise of the Patent” and the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Astrazeneca (Length: 55:16) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPMicheline Gravelle, Don MacOdrum, Mike Fenwick and Don Cameron of Bereskin & Parr LLP discuss “The Promise of the Patent” and the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Astrazeneca (Length: 55:16) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property Episode 44 — March 2017 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2017/03/28/episode-44-march-2017/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2017/03/28/episode-44-march-2017/#respond Tue, 28 Mar 2017 05:07:26 +0000 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/?p=118 John Crittenden of Cooley discusses reverse confusion of trademarks in “Squirrels Armed with Bazookas”. (Length: 28:29)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2017/03/28/episode-44-march-2017/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noJohn Crittenden of Cooley discusses reverse confusion of trademarks in “Squirrels Armed with Bazookas”. (Length: 28:29) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPJohn Crittenden of Cooley discusses reverse confusion of trademarks in “Squirrels Armed with Bazookas”. (Length: 28:29) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property Episode 43 — November 2016 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2016/12/11/episode-43-november-2016/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2016/12/11/episode-43-november-2016/#respond Sun, 11 Dec 2016 20:15:15 +0000 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/?p=114 Prof. Christopher Robertson of the University of Arizona on blinding expert witnesses to reduce bias: Bias in Litigation Science and Blind Expertise. (Length: 21:25)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2016/12/11/episode-43-november-2016/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noProf. Christopher Robertson of the University of Arizona on blinding expert witnesses to reduce bias: Bias in Litigation Science and Blind Expertise. (Length: 21:25) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPProf. Christopher Robertson of the University of Arizona on blinding expert witnesses to reduce bias: Bias in Litigation Science and Blind Expertise. (Length: 21:25) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property Episode 42 — July 2016 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2016/08/11/episode-42-july-2016/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2016/08/11/episode-42-july-2016/#respond Thu, 11 Aug 2016 03:43:14 +0000 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/?p=111 Jeanne M. Gills of Foley & Lardner LLP in Chicago discusses “What’s Reasonable? Protecting And Enforcing Trade Secrets” (article, slides). (Length: 39:22)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2016/08/11/episode-42-july-2016/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noJeanne M. Gills of Foley & Lardner LLP in Chicago discusses “What’s Reasonable? Protecting And Enforcing Trade Secrets” (article, slides). (Length: 39:22) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPJeanne M. Gills of Foley & Lardner LLP in Chicago discusses “What’s Reasonable? Protecting And Enforcing Trade Secrets” (article, slides). (Length: 39:22) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property Episode 41 — May 2016 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2016/07/07/episode-41-may-2016/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2016/07/07/episode-41-may-2016/#respond Thu, 07 Jul 2016 02:46:37 +0000 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/?p=108 Philip Petti of USG Corporation in Chicago discusses “Protecting Trade Secrets”

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2016/07/07/episode-41-may-2016/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noPhilip Petti of USG Corporation in Chicago discusses “Protecting Trade Secrets” Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPPhilip Petti of USG Corporation in Chicago discusses “Protecting Trade Secrets” Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property January 2016 — Episode 40 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2016/02/08/january-2016-episode-40/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2016/02/08/january-2016-episode-40/#respond Mon, 08 Feb 2016 03:38:24 +0000 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/?p=103 Philip Harrison of Venner Shipley discusses the “Patentability of Computer Implemented Inventions in Europe”

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2016/02/08/january-2016-episode-40/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noPhilip Harrison of Venner Shipley discusses the “Patentability of Computer Implemented Inventions in Europe” Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPPhilip Harrison of Venner Shipley discusses the “Patentability of Computer Implemented Inventions in Europe” Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property July 2015 — Episode 39 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2015/07/29/july-2015-episode-39/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2015/07/29/july-2015-episode-39/#respond Wed, 29 Jul 2015 01:16:50 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.com/?p=188 Marco Quina of Foley Hoag discusses Kimble v Marvel and “How Not to Get Snared in Brulotte’s Web” (Length: 29:50)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2015/07/29/july-2015-episode-39/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noMarco Quina of Foley Hoag discusses Kimble v Marvel and “How Not to Get Snared in Brulotte’s Web” (Length: 29:50) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPMarco Quina of Foley Hoag discusses Kimble v Marvel and “How Not to Get Snared in Brulotte’s Web” (Length: 29:50) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property June 2015 — Episode 38 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2015/07/01/june-2015-episode-38/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2015/07/01/june-2015-episode-38/#respond Wed, 01 Jul 2015 04:55:34 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.com/?p=185 Bruce Sunstein of Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP discusses Patent Strategies for Getting a Software Patent Invention Through the Alice Thicket. (Sunstein Law Review article on Alice) (Length: 33:23)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2015/07/01/june-2015-episode-38/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noBruce Sunstein of Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP discusses Patent Strategies for Getting a Software Patent Invention Through the Alice Thicket. (Sunstein Law Review article on Alice) (Length: 33:23) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPBruce Sunstein of Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP discusses Patent Strategies for Getting a Software Patent Invention Through the Alice Thicket. (Sunstein Law Review article on Alice) (Length: 33:23) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property April 2015 – Episode 37 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2015/04/30/april-2015-episode-37/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2015/04/30/april-2015-episode-37/#respond Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:14:01 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.com/?p=183 William Jay of Goodwin Procter LLP discusses issue preclusion and the SCOTUS decision in B&B Hardware v. Hargis. (Length: 30:32)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2015/04/30/april-2015-episode-37/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noWilliam Jay of Goodwin Procter LLP discusses issue preclusion and the SCOTUS decision in B&B Hardware v. Hargis. (Length: 30:32) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPWilliam Jay of Goodwin Procter LLP discusses issue preclusion and the SCOTUS decision in B&B Hardware v. Hargis. (Length: 30:32) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property March 2015 – Episode 36 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2015/03/27/march-2015-episode-36/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2015/03/27/march-2015-episode-36/#respond Fri, 27 Mar 2015 03:08:12 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.com/?p=174 Elliot Cook of Finnegan Henderson discusses patent eligibility in the wake of Alice, Ultramercial and DDR. (Length: 22:49)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2015/03/27/march-2015-episode-36/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noElliot Cook of Finnegan Henderson discusses patent eligibility in the wake of Alice, Ultramercial and DDR. (Length: 22:49) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPElliot Cook of Finnegan Henderson discusses patent eligibility in the wake of Alice, Ultramercial and DDR. (Length: 22:49) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property January 2015 – Episode 35 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2015/02/22/january-2015-episode-35/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2015/02/22/january-2015-episode-35/#respond Sun, 22 Feb 2015 23:57:34 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.com/?p=170 Cynthia Rowden and Scott MacKendrick of Bereskin & Parr LLP in Toronto discuss “Canada Takes the Battle on Counterfeits to its Borders”. (Length: 21:05)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2015/02/22/january-2015-episode-35/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noCynthia Rowden and Scott MacKendrick of Bereskin & Parr LLP in Toronto discuss “Canada Takes the Battle on Counterfeits to its Borders”. (Length: 21:05) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPCynthia Rowden and Scott MacKendrick of Bereskin & Parr LLP in Toronto discuss “Canada Takes the Battle on Counterfeits to its Borders”. (Length: 21:05) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property September 2014 – Episode 34 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2014/10/07/september-2014-episode-34/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2014/10/07/september-2014-episode-34/#respond Tue, 07 Oct 2014 03:28:30 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.com/?p=163 Katharine Stephens of Bird & Bird, London, England, discusses Unitary Patents and the Unified Patent Court. (Length: 16:37)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2014/10/07/september-2014-episode-34/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noKatharine Stephens of Bird & Bird, London, England, discusses Unitary Patents and the Unified Patent Court. (Length: 16:37) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPKatharine Stephens of Bird & Bird, London, England, discusses Unitary Patents and the Unified Patent Court. (Length: 16:37) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property August 2014 – Episode 33 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2014/08/26/august-2014-episode-33/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2014/08/26/august-2014-episode-33/#respond Tue, 26 Aug 2014 03:04:47 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.com/?p=160 Mark Powell and Maria Holtmann of The Office for International Patent Cooperation, USPTO, Washington D.C., discuss “The Global Dossier Initiative”. (Video) (Length: 16:54)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2014/08/26/august-2014-episode-33/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noMark Powell and Maria Holtmann of The Office for International Patent Cooperation, USPTO, Washington D.C., discuss “The Global Dossier Initiative”. (Video) (Length: 16:54) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPMark Powell and Maria Holtmann of The Office for International Patent Cooperation, USPTO, Washington D.C., discuss “The Global Dossier Initiative”. (Video) (Length: 16:54) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property July 2014 – Episode 32 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2014/08/19/july-2014-episode-32/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2014/08/19/july-2014-episode-32/#respond Tue, 19 Aug 2014 02:24:53 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.com/?p=158 Cynthia Rowden and Scott MacKendrick of Bereskin & Parr LLP in Toronto describe “Big Changes to the Canadian Trade-marks Act – What You Need to Know, Now”. (Length: 57:38)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2014/08/19/july-2014-episode-32/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noCynthia Rowden and Scott MacKendrick of Bereskin & Parr LLP in Toronto describe “Big Changes to the Canadian Trade-marks Act – What You Need to Know, Now”. (Length: 57:38) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPCynthia Rowden and Scott MacKendrick of Bereskin & Parr LLP in Toronto describe “Big Changes to the Canadian Trade-marks Act – What You Need to Know, Now”. (Length: 57:38) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property October 2013 – Episode 31 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2013/10/12/october-2013-episode-31/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2013/10/12/october-2013-episode-31/#respond Sat, 12 Oct 2013 04:57:25 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.com/?p=154 Rob Reid, author of “Year Zero” discusses the absurdity of copyright law, aliens and treble damages. See also his Ted Talk on The $8 billion iPod and the ABA Landslide book review of Year Zero. (Length: 20:36)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2013/10/12/october-2013-episode-31/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noRob Reid, author of “Year Zero” discusses the absurdity of copyright law, aliens and treble damages. See also his Ted Talk on The $8 billion iPod and the ABA Landslide book review of Year Zero. (Length: 20:36) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPRob Reid, author of “Year Zero” discusses the absurdity of copyright law, aliens and treble damages. See also his Ted Talk on The $8 billion iPod and the ABA Landslide book review of Year Zero. (Length: 20:36) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property July 2013 – Episode 30 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2013/07/31/july-2013-episode-30/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2013/07/31/july-2013-episode-30/#respond Wed, 31 Jul 2013 03:08:40 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.com/?p=148 Continue reading →]]> Mark Wine of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP in Irvine, California discusses “The Extraterritorial Reach of the ITC in SI Group v. Sino Legend”. See also Orrick’s quarterly report “The World in US Courts” and Trade Secrets Watch blog. (Length: 27:29)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2013/07/31/july-2013-episode-30/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noMark Wine of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP in Irvine, California discusses “The Extraterritorial Reach of the ITC in SI Group v. Sino Legend”. See also Orrick’s quarterly report “The World in US Courts” and Trade Secrets Watch blog. (Length: … Continue reading →Bereskin & Parr LLPMark Wine of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP in Irvine, California discusses “The Extraterritorial Reach of the ITC in SI Group v. Sino Legend”. See also Orrick’s quarterly report “The World in US Courts” and Trade Secrets Watch blog. (Length: … Continue reading →JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property June 2013 – Episode 29 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2013/07/07/june-2013-episode-29/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2013/07/07/june-2013-episode-29/#respond Sun, 07 Jul 2013 23:01:42 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.com/?p=139 Christopher Carani of McAndrews Held & Malloy Ltd in Chicago Illinois and DesignPatentAttorney.com on “Apple v. Samsung” (Length: 39:12)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2013/07/07/june-2013-episode-29/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noChristopher Carani of McAndrews Held & Malloy Ltd in Chicago Illinois and DesignPatentAttorney.com on “Apple v. Samsung” (Length: 39:12) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPChristopher Carani of McAndrews Held & Malloy Ltd in Chicago Illinois and DesignPatentAttorney.com on “Apple v. Samsung” (Length: 39:12) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property May 2013 – Episode 28 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2013/06/03/may-2013-episode-28/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2013/06/03/may-2013-episode-28/#respond Mon, 03 Jun 2013 05:21:35 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.com/?p=132 Selvyn Seidel of Fulbrook Capital Management in New York City on “Third Party Financing of Patent Litigation” (Length: 26:27)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2013/06/03/may-2013-episode-28/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noSelvyn Seidel of Fulbrook Capital Management in New York City on “Third Party Financing of Patent Litigation” (Length: 26:27) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPSelvyn Seidel of Fulbrook Capital Management in New York City on “Third Party Financing of Patent Litigation” (Length: 26:27) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property January 2013 – Episode 27 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2013/03/02/january-2013-episode-27/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2013/03/02/january-2013-episode-27/#respond Sat, 02 Mar 2013 04:59:25 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.com/?p=130 Continue reading →]]> Belinda Scrimenti of Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geraldson LLP in Chicago discusses her papers entitled “100 Years of Seeing RED – A Historical Perspective on the Second Circuit’s “Red-Sole Shoe” Mark Decision in Louboutin v. Yves Saint Laurent” and “A Legal Kaleidoscope – Single Color Trademarks, From pre-Owens-Corning Pink Insulation to Louboutin Red-Soled Shoes” (Length: 30:19)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2013/03/02/january-2013-episode-27/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noBelinda Scrimenti of Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geraldson LLP in Chicago discusses her papers entitled “100 Years of Seeing RED – A Historical Perspective on the Second Circuit’s “Red-Sole Shoe” Mark Decision in Louboutin v. Yves Saint Laurent” and … Continue reading →Bereskin & Parr LLPBelinda Scrimenti of Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geraldson LLP in Chicago discusses her papers entitled “100 Years of Seeing RED – A Historical Perspective on the Second Circuit’s “Red-Sole Shoe” Mark Decision in Louboutin v. Yves Saint Laurent” and … Continue reading →JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property November 2012 – Episode 26 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2013/01/25/november-2012-episode-26/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2013/01/25/november-2012-episode-26/#respond Fri, 25 Jan 2013 03:54:09 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.com/?p=127 Donald M. Cameron of Bereskin & Parr LLP in Toronto Canada explains the Canadian Supreme Court decision in Teva v. Pfizer on the VIAGRA use patent. (Length: 12:39)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2013/01/25/november-2012-episode-26/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noDonald M. Cameron of Bereskin & Parr LLP in Toronto Canada explains the Canadian Supreme Court decision in Teva v. Pfizer on the VIAGRA use patent. (Length: 12:39) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPDonald M. Cameron of Bereskin & Parr LLP in Toronto Canada explains the Canadian Supreme Court decision in Teva v. Pfizer on the VIAGRA use patent. (Length: 12:39) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property July 2012 – Episode 25 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2012/08/10/july-2012-episode-25/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2012/08/10/july-2012-episode-25/#respond Fri, 10 Aug 2012 04:23:17 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.com/?p=115 Karen Canady of canady + lortz LLP in Los Angeles provides a patent attorney’s view of the basics of genes and the hotly-contested litigation over biotechnology patents. (Length: 11:12)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2012/08/10/july-2012-episode-25/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noKaren Canady of canady + lortz LLP in Los Angeles provides a patent attorney’s view of the basics of genes and the hotly-contested litigation over biotechnology patents. (Length: 11:12) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPKaren Canady of canady + lortz LLP in Los Angeles provides a patent attorney’s view of the basics of genes and the hotly-contested litigation over biotechnology patents. (Length: 11:12) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property June 2012 – Episode 24 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2012/06/30/june-2012-episode-24/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2012/06/30/june-2012-episode-24/#respond Sat, 30 Jun 2012 05:17:03 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.com/?p=111 Trevor Cook of Bird & Bird, London England discusses “English Patent Litigation – Under New Management” (Length: 17:53)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2012/06/30/june-2012-episode-24/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noTrevor Cook of Bird & Bird, London England discusses “English Patent Litigation – Under New Management” (Length: 17:53) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPTrevor Cook of Bird & Bird, London England discusses “English Patent Litigation – Under New Management” (Length: 17:53) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property May 2012 – Episode 23 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2012/06/10/may-2012-episode-23/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2012/06/10/may-2012-episode-23/#respond Sun, 10 Jun 2012 03:40:28 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.com/?p=106 James Gould, of Locke Lord LLP, New York City discusses “Comics and Copyright and a Super Legal Battle” (Length: 15:20)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2012/06/10/may-2012-episode-23/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noJames Gould, of Locke Lord LLP, New York City discusses “Comics and Copyright and a Super Legal Battle” (Length: 15:20) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPJames Gould, of Locke Lord LLP, New York City discusses “Comics and Copyright and a Super Legal Battle” (Length: 15:20) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property April 2012 – Episode 22 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2012/06/08/april-2012-episode-22/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2012/06/08/april-2012-episode-22/#respond Fri, 08 Jun 2012 04:10:34 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.com/?p=101 Cynthia Lopez Beverage of ST Ericsson in Santa Clara California discusses “Surviving in a Secondary Patent Marketplace”. (Length: 22:23)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2012/06/08/april-2012-episode-22/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noCynthia Lopez Beverage of ST Ericsson in Santa Clara California discusses “Surviving in a Secondary Patent Marketplace”. (Length: 22:23) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPCynthia Lopez Beverage of ST Ericsson in Santa Clara California discusses “Surviving in a Secondary Patent Marketplace”. (Length: 22:23) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property March 2012 – Episode 21 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2012/04/27/march-2012-episode-21/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2012/04/27/march-2012-episode-21/#respond Fri, 27 Apr 2012 04:25:18 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=79 Robert Fischer of Fitzpatrick Cella Harper & Scinto in New York City discusses the history and recent cases involving patentable subject matter in the computer and business methods areas. (Length: 26:11)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2012/04/27/march-2012-episode-21/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noRobert Fischer of Fitzpatrick Cella Harper & Scinto in New York City discusses the history and recent cases involving patentable subject matter in the computer and business methods areas. (Length: 26:11) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPRobert Fischer of Fitzpatrick Cella Harper & Scinto in New York City discusses the history and recent cases involving patentable subject matter in the computer and business methods areas. (Length: 26:11) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property December 2011 – Episode 20 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2011/12/07/december-2011-episode-20/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2011/12/07/december-2011-episode-20/#respond Wed, 07 Dec 2011 06:42:44 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=77 Gareth Morgan of Winston & Strawn LLP, London, England explains the Human Genome Sciences v. Eli Lilly decision of the UK Supreme Court and the meaning of “industrial applicability” for protein related inventions. (Length: 35:19)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2011/12/07/december-2011-episode-20/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noGareth Morgan of Winston & Strawn LLP, London, England explains the Human Genome Sciences v. Eli Lilly decision of the UK Supreme Court and the meaning of “industrial applicability” for protein related inventions. (Length: 35:19) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPGareth Morgan of Winston & Strawn LLP, London, England explains the Human Genome Sciences v. Eli Lilly decision of the UK Supreme Court and the meaning of “industrial applicability” for protein related inventions. (Length: 35:19) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property November 2011 – Episode 19 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2011/11/26/november-2011-episode-19/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2011/11/26/november-2011-episode-19/#respond Sat, 26 Nov 2011 06:42:05 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=75 Bart Showalter of Baker Botts LLP in Dallas, Texas on “The Top US Patent Decisions of 2010-2011” and why these decisions were worthy of receiving a “Markey” award for their individual category. (Length: 34:12)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2011/11/26/november-2011-episode-19/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noBart Showalter of Baker Botts LLP in Dallas, Texas on “The Top US Patent Decisions of 2010-2011” and why these decisions were worthy of receiving a “Markey” award for their individual category. (Length: 34:12) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPBart Showalter of Baker Botts LLP in Dallas, Texas on “The Top US Patent Decisions of 2010-2011” and why these decisions were worthy of receiving a “Markey” award for their individual category. (Length: 34:12) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property December 2010 – Episode 18 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2010/12/12/december-2010-episode-18/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2010/12/12/december-2010-episode-18/#respond Sun, 12 Dec 2010 06:41:25 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=73 Paul England of the London Office of Simmons & Simmons discusses “Cross-border Injunctions in Europe” (Length: 18:22)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2010/12/12/december-2010-episode-18/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noPaul England of the London Office of Simmons & Simmons discusses “Cross-border Injunctions in Europe” (Length: 18:22) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPPaul England of the London Office of Simmons & Simmons discusses “Cross-border Injunctions in Europe” (Length: 18:22) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property November 2010 – Episode 17 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2010/11/22/november-2010-episode-17/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2010/11/22/november-2010-episode-17/#respond Mon, 22 Nov 2010 06:40:27 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=71 Thomas M. Williams of Howrey’s False Marking Task Force in Chicago, Illinois: “False Patent Marking and the Solo Cup Case”.

Donald M. Cameron of Cameron MacKendrick LLP, Toronto, Canada: “The Amazon.com one-click Canadian Patent Decision” (Length: 14:24)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2010/11/22/november-2010-episode-17/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noThomas M. Williams of Howrey’s False Marking Task Force in Chicago, Illinois: “False Patent Marking and the Solo Cup Case”. Donald M. Cameron of Cameron MacKendrick LLP, Toronto, Canada: “The Amazon.com one-click Canadian Patent Decision” (Length: 14:24) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPThomas M. Williams of Howrey’s False Marking Task Force in Chicago, Illinois: “False Patent Marking and the Solo Cup Case”. Donald M. Cameron of Cameron MacKendrick LLP, Toronto, Canada: “The Amazon.com one-click Canadian Patent Decision” (Length: 14:24) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property October 2010 – Episode 16 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2010/10/09/october-2010-episode-16/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2010/10/09/october-2010-episode-16/#respond Sat, 09 Oct 2010 06:39:42 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=69 Continue reading →]]> Christopher Marchese of Fish & Richardson, San Diego, California: “Runaway Patent Damages Awards: Is Statutory Reform on the Way?” See also Chris’ Patent Damages blog, on Twitter (patentdamages), the F&R patent damages web page and Patent Damages Law and Practice book. (Length: 15:13)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2010/10/09/october-2010-episode-16/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noChristopher Marchese of Fish & Richardson, San Diego, California: “Runaway Patent Damages Awards: Is Statutory Reform on the Way?” See also Chris’ Patent Damages blog, on Twitter (patentdamages), the F&R patent damages web page and Patent Damages Law and Practice … Continue reading →Bereskin & Parr LLPChristopher Marchese of Fish & Richardson, San Diego, California: “Runaway Patent Damages Awards: Is Statutory Reform on the Way?” See also Chris’ Patent Damages blog, on Twitter (patentdamages), the F&R patent damages web page and Patent Damages Law and Practice … Continue reading →JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property September 2010 – Episode 15 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2010/09/09/september-2010-episode-15/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2010/09/09/september-2010-episode-15/#respond Thu, 09 Sep 2010 06:38:52 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=67 DeAnn Smith of Foley Hoag LLP in Boston, Mass.: “Chemically Complicated: Effective Arguments to Combat “Obvious to Try” Rejections with respect to Takeda and the Chemical Arts“. (Length: 14:24)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2010/09/09/september-2010-episode-15/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noDeAnn Smith of Foley Hoag LLP in Boston, Mass.: “Chemically Complicated: Effective Arguments to Combat “Obvious to Try” Rejections with respect to Takeda and the Chemical Arts“. (Length: 14:24) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPDeAnn Smith of Foley Hoag LLP in Boston, Mass.: “Chemically Complicated: Effective Arguments to Combat “Obvious to Try” Rejections with respect to Takeda and the Chemical Arts“. (Length: 14:24) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property August 2010 – Episode 14 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2010/08/29/august-2010-episode-14/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2010/08/29/august-2010-episode-14/#respond Sun, 29 Aug 2010 06:38:05 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=65 Frederick L. Whitmer of Kilpatrick Stockton LLP in New York City explains the Cybor Uncertainty Principle in “Claim Construction in Patent Law: A Question of Law?”. (Length: 30:37)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2010/08/29/august-2010-episode-14/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noFrederick L. Whitmer of Kilpatrick Stockton LLP in New York City explains the Cybor Uncertainty Principle in “Claim Construction in Patent Law: A Question of Law?”. (Length: 30:37) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPFrederick L. Whitmer of Kilpatrick Stockton LLP in New York City explains the Cybor Uncertainty Principle in “Claim Construction in Patent Law: A Question of Law?”. (Length: 30:37) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property July 2010 – Episode 13 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2010/07/18/july-2010-episode-13/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2010/07/18/july-2010-episode-13/#respond Sun, 18 Jul 2010 06:37:11 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=63 Dale Lazar, of DLA Piper in Reston, Virginia discusses the Supreme Court of the United State’s Bilski decision on the patentability of business methods. (Length: 17:00)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2010/07/18/july-2010-episode-13/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noDale Lazar, of DLA Piper in Reston, Virginia discusses the Supreme Court of the United State’s Bilski decision on the patentability of business methods. (Length: 17:00) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPDale Lazar, of DLA Piper in Reston, Virginia discusses the Supreme Court of the United State’s Bilski decision on the patentability of business methods. (Length: 17:00) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property December 2009 – Episode 12 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2009/12/15/december-2009-episode-12/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2009/12/15/december-2009-episode-12/#respond Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:36:23 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=61 Jennifer Silverman of Ellenoff Grossman and Schole LLP in New York City discusses U.S. trademark dilution and the Dec. 3, 2009 decision in Starbucks vs. Wolfe’s Borough (Charbucks) lawsuit. (Length: 17:00)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2009/12/15/december-2009-episode-12/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noJennifer Silverman of Ellenoff Grossman and Schole LLP in New York City discusses U.S. trademark dilution and the Dec. 3, 2009 decision in Starbucks vs. Wolfe’s Borough (Charbucks) lawsuit. (Length: 17:00) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPJennifer Silverman of Ellenoff Grossman and Schole LLP in New York City discusses U.S. trademark dilution and the Dec. 3, 2009 decision in Starbucks vs. Wolfe’s Borough (Charbucks) lawsuit. (Length: 17:00) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property November 2009 – Episode 11 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2009/11/15/november-2009-episode-11/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2009/11/15/november-2009-episode-11/#respond Sun, 15 Nov 2009 06:35:40 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=59 Continue reading →]]> The New Jersey Patent Rules – one year later. Guests Stephen Roth of Lerner David Littenberg Krumholz and Mentlik, LLP in Westfield, New Jersey and Philip Johnson, Chief Intellectual Property Counsel at Johnson and Johnson in New Brunswick, New Jersey discuss how patent cases are now litigated in New Jersey. Roth slides. (Length: 34:25)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2009/11/15/november-2009-episode-11/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noThe New Jersey Patent Rules – one year later. Guests Stephen Roth of Lerner David Littenberg Krumholz and Mentlik, LLP in Westfield, New Jersey and Philip Johnson, Chief Intellectual Property Counsel at Johnson and Johnson in New Brunswick, New Jersey … Continue reading →Bereskin & Parr LLPThe New Jersey Patent Rules – one year later. Guests Stephen Roth of Lerner David Littenberg Krumholz and Mentlik, LLP in Westfield, New Jersey and Philip Johnson, Chief Intellectual Property Counsel at Johnson and Johnson in New Brunswick, New Jersey … Continue reading →JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property October 2009 – Episode 10 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2009/10/15/october-2009-episode-10/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2009/10/15/october-2009-episode-10/#respond Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:35:19 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=56 Continue reading →]]> In Re Bose and Fraud on the US Trademarks Office regarding declarations of use. Guests: Jonathan Hudis of Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier and Neustadt, LLP and Kimberley Seluga of Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP Bose case comment. (Length: 16:54)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2009/10/15/october-2009-episode-10/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noIn Re Bose and Fraud on the US Trademarks Office regarding declarations of use. Guests: Jonathan Hudis of Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier and Neustadt, LLP and Kimberley Seluga of Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP Bose case comment. (Length: 16:54) … Continue reading →Bereskin & Parr LLPIn Re Bose and Fraud on the US Trademarks Office regarding declarations of use. Guests: Jonathan Hudis of Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier and Neustadt, LLP and Kimberley Seluga of Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP Bose case comment. (Length: 16:54) … Continue reading →JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property September 2009 – Episode 9 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2009/09/28/september-2009-episode-9/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2009/09/28/september-2009-episode-9/#respond Mon, 28 Sep 2009 06:34:01 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=54 Krista Schwartz of Jones Day on “Software and Scenes a Faire” in computer copyright cases and Charles Weiss of Kenyon and Kenyon on “Ariad: Federal Circuit to Consider Existence of Written Description Requirement”. (Length: 39:16)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2009/09/28/september-2009-episode-9/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noKrista Schwartz of Jones Day on “Software and Scenes a Faire” in computer copyright cases and Charles Weiss of Kenyon and Kenyon on “Ariad: Federal Circuit to Consider Existence of Written Description Requirement”. (Length: 39:16) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPKrista Schwartz of Jones Day on “Software and Scenes a Faire” in computer copyright cases and Charles Weiss of Kenyon and Kenyon on “Ariad: Federal Circuit to Consider Existence of Written Description Requirement”. (Length: 39:16) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property August 2009 – Episode 8 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2009/08/19/august-2009-episode-8/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2009/08/19/august-2009-episode-8/#respond Wed, 19 Aug 2009 06:33:24 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=51 Continue reading →]]> Niri Shanmuganathan of the London office of Taylor Wessing discusses Liability for User Generated Content on the Internet and Ed Reines of the Silicon Valley office of Weil, Gotshal and Manges LLP discusses Interlocutory Appeals of Claim Construction in the Patent Reform Act of 2009. (Length: 26:40)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2009/08/19/august-2009-episode-8/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noNiri Shanmuganathan of the London office of Taylor Wessing discusses Liability for User Generated Content on the Internet and Ed Reines of the Silicon Valley office of Weil, Gotshal and Manges LLP discusses Interlocutory Appeals of Claim Construction in the … Continue reading →Bereskin & Parr LLPNiri Shanmuganathan of the London office of Taylor Wessing discusses Liability for User Generated Content on the Internet and Ed Reines of the Silicon Valley office of Weil, Gotshal and Manges LLP discusses Interlocutory Appeals of Claim Construction in the … Continue reading →JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property July 2009 – Episode 7 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2009/07/12/july-2009-episode-7/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2009/07/12/july-2009-episode-7/#respond Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:55:03 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=22 Continue reading →]]> Chris Hansen of the ACLU in New York City and Warren Woessner of Schwegman Lundberg Woessner in Minneapolis discuss the Complaint filed by doctor and patient groups against the patents on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 cancer genes exclusively licensed to Myriad Genetics and their attack on gene patents on constitutional grounds. See also Warren Woessner’s blog’s comment on the lawsuit at patents4life.com.

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2009/07/12/july-2009-episode-7/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noChris Hansen of the ACLU in New York City and Warren Woessner of Schwegman Lundberg Woessner in Minneapolis discuss the Complaint filed by doctor and patient groups against the patents on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 cancer genes exclusively licensed to … Continue reading →Bereskin & Parr LLPChris Hansen of the ACLU in New York City and Warren Woessner of Schwegman Lundberg Woessner in Minneapolis discuss the Complaint filed by doctor and patient groups against the patents on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 cancer genes exclusively licensed to … Continue reading →JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property June 2009 – Episode 6 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2009/06/12/june-2009-episode-6/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2009/06/12/june-2009-episode-6/#respond Fri, 12 Jun 2009 04:51:35 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=20 Continue reading →]]> The Honourable Michael Black AC, the Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Australia, discusses the Fast Track Direction that affects trade-mark and copyright cases issued April 2009. It is part of an aggressive overhaul of the case management and individual docket system the Court has instigated to make litigation faster, more efficient and less expensive. The Court has similar procedures for patent, tax and admiralty cases.

See also the Canadian Federal Court’s Practice Direction on Streamlining Complex Litigation. (Length: 34:52)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2009/06/12/june-2009-episode-6/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noThe Honourable Michael Black AC, the Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Australia, discusses the Fast Track Direction that affects trade-mark and copyright cases issued April 2009. It is part of an aggressive overhaul of the case management and … Continue reading →Bereskin & Parr LLPThe Honourable Michael Black AC, the Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Australia, discusses the Fast Track Direction that affects trade-mark and copyright cases issued April 2009. It is part of an aggressive overhaul of the case management and … Continue reading →JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property May 2009 – Episode 5 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2009/05/30/may-2009-episode-5/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2009/05/30/may-2009-episode-5/#respond Sat, 30 May 2009 04:37:04 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=16 Continue reading →]]> The Right Honourable Sir Robin Jacob of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales discusses his submissions to the European Commission Pharma Sector Inquiry.

Baila Celedonia of Cowan Liebowitz and Latman of New York City discusses Honda v. Winkelmann and the right way and the wrong way to apply for a U.S. intention to use trademark application based on a foreign registration. (case comment) (Length 28:20)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2009/05/30/may-2009-episode-5/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noThe Right Honourable Sir Robin Jacob of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales discusses his submissions to the European Commission Pharma Sector Inquiry. Baila Celedonia of Cowan Liebowitz and Latman of New York City discusses Honda v. Winkelmann … Continue reading →Bereskin & Parr LLPThe Right Honourable Sir Robin Jacob of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales discusses his submissions to the European Commission Pharma Sector Inquiry. Baila Celedonia of Cowan Liebowitz and Latman of New York City discusses Honda v. Winkelmann … Continue reading →JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property April 2009 – Episode 4 http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2009/04/24/april-2009-episode-4/ http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2009/04/24/april-2009-episode-4/#respond Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:35:44 +0000 http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=14 Continue reading →]]> Rowan Freeland of Simmons and Simmons in London discusses the UK House of Lords decision in Lundbeck on sufficiency of disclosure in UK patents. See also his case comment.

Robert Yoches of Finnegan in Washington, D.C. discusses US patent practice in the wake of In Re Bilski. Also listen to his Webinar. (Length: 30:46)

Download MP3

]]> http://www.iplawpodcast.com/2009/04/24/april-2009-episode-4/feed/ 0 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP)noRowan Freeland of Simmons and Simmons in London discusses the UK House of Lords decision in Lundbeck on sufficiency of disclosure in UK patents. See also his case comment. Robert Yoches of Finnegan in Washington, D.C. discusses US patent practice … Continue reading →Bereskin & Parr LLPRowan Freeland of Simmons and Simmons in London discusses the UK House of Lords decision in Lundbeck on sufficiency of disclosure in UK patents. See also his case comment. Robert Yoches of Finnegan in Washington, D.C. discusses US patent practice … Continue reading →JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property