<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Just Enough Governance for Notes Blog - Comments</title>
<description>Just Enough Governance for Notes Blog - Comments</description>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:15:53 +0500</lastBuildDate>
<link>http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf</link>

<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/justenoughgovernance-comments" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
<title>Comment</title>
<author>Scott Johnsen</author>
<link>http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7GNKXN-changing-network-passwords#comment-7321E66EAE03184985257490004D1E17</link>
<author />
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7GNKXN-changing-network-passwords#comment-7321E66EAE03184985257490004D1E17</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ SF Stand-Off Resolved! But I still don't get why this happened in the first place.
<br  />
<br  />{ <a href="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security/SF-Mayor-Breaks-Up-IT-Standoff/?kc=EWKNLNAV07242008FEATURED" rel="nofollow" target ="blank">Link</a> } ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:02:19 +0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment</title>
<author>Dan Lowden</author>
<link>http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-78JQ8M#comment-5D546EB4DD2678CE8525748E00101BB4</link>
<author />
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-78JQ8M#comment-5D546EB4DD2678CE8525748E00101BB4</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Cant wait to read more on the ITIL style adoption policies. My company is currently rolling in ITIL and Domino had real issues implementing it with segregation of duties.. ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:55:56 +0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment</title>
<author>JYR</author>
<link>http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7GNKXN-changing-network-passwords#comment-55B1DA350A9703A48525748A005BB456</link>
<author />
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7GNKXN-changing-network-passwords#comment-55B1DA350A9703A48525748A005BB456</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Similar problem <img alt="Emoticon" src="http://dev.blogsphere.net/blogsphere/bsphere3.nsf/emoticons/DLYH-5MZVLY/$File/smile.gif" /><br  /><br  />Dead Men Tell No Passwords<br  />{ <a href="http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2002/06/52997" rel="nofollow" target ="blank">Link</a> } ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:41:39 +0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment</title>
<author>Aman</author>
<link>http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/tban-7dkkjm#comment-E6D472C62C46A9D585257489004E798B</link>
<author />
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/tban-7dkkjm#comment-E6D472C62C46A9D585257489004E798B</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ I agree with you ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:17:09 +0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment</title>
<author>Scott Johnsen</author>
<link>http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7FWRAJ_Notes_Threat#comment-9BDE88B3003E77CA85257474003F0D1E</link>
<author />
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7FWRAJ_Notes_Threat#comment-9BDE88B3003E77CA85257474003F0D1E</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ I just read Ed Brill's post on Unify { <a href="http://www.edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/and-what-did-all-that-marketing-get-them" rel="nofollow" target ="blank">Link</a> } If Salesforce.com has the same success that Unify has had, they might as hang it up right now. And I have no reason to believe their results will be any different. ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 07:28:41 +0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment</title>
<author>Anon</author>
<link>http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7FWRAJ_Notes_Threat#comment-F72071B35344E02C85257473007B7773</link>
<author />
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7FWRAJ_Notes_Threat#comment-F72071B35344E02C85257473007B7773</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ @6 -<br  /><br  />I realize that IBM has added capabilities to Notes/Domino.  But, my question was/is, what "innovation" has been added to the platform? ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:28:35 +0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment</title>
<author>Richard Moy</author>
<link>http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7FWRAJ_Notes_Threat#comment-EA5BDBF24C20E97885257473000F20D6</link>
<author />
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7FWRAJ_Notes_Threat#comment-EA5BDBF24C20E97885257473000F20D6</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ @5,
<br  />
<br  />I am surprise you said that.  Though I am very critical about some of the directions that IBM is heading, they have added a number of capabilities and improvement that we feel is very important for our company and clients including: 
<br  /> 
<br  />1) Increased server performance
<br  />2) The ability to consume and provide web services
<br  />3) Composite applications both the IBM way and the Taishan Works way
<br  />4) Bandwidth usage reduction
<br  />5) Ubuntu support (coming)
<br  />6) Symphony integration (coming)
<br  />
<br  />There are others, but they are less important to us including the Eclipse client which the latest 8.02 is suppose to be better, Web Portal integration.
<br  />
<br  />Yes, there are a number of things that I believe IBM should be doing including improving the look of the Basic client which I believe is very important and fixing bugs that have existed for years, but it is still the most versatile development environment around.  ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:45:14 +0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment</title>
<author>Anon</author>
<link>http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7FWRAJ_Notes_Threat#comment-5B805A52D7B79CC8852574720083B99A</link>
<author />
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7FWRAJ_Notes_Threat#comment-5B805A52D7B79CC8852574720083B99A</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ @4 - Do you really think that Notes/Domino will be around for a long time based on what IBM has done/is doing to it?  What exact innovations has IBM brought about in Notes/Domino lately?   ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:58:47 +0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment</title>
<author>Richard Moy</author>
<link>http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7FWRAJ_Notes_Threat#comment-8FA49D005AFBD72D8525747200774E5D</link>
<author />
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7FWRAJ_Notes_Threat#comment-8FA49D005AFBD72D8525747200774E5D</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ As any hunter will tell you, it is very hard to kill something if it is constant moving and adjusting to its environment.  Domino and Notes is a moving target that is constantly be changed and improved on to meet the market needs. I do not agree in having a bloated client like Notes 8 standard, but IBM has constantly improved the capabilities of Domino and Notes to adjust to the changing market and will be around for a long time not just in large enterprises but in small and medium businesses.   ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:43:08 +0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment</title>
<author>Ian White</author>
<link>http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7FWRAJ_Notes_Threat#comment-E79D2523CAECE176852574720076E549</link>
<author />
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7FWRAJ_Notes_Threat#comment-E79D2523CAECE176852574720076E549</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Thanks for the shout <img alt="Emoticon" src="http://dev.blogsphere.net/blogsphere/bsphere3.nsf/emoticons/DLYH-5N3GKD/$File/rolleyes.gif" />  ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:38:39 +0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment</title>
<author>Scott Johnsen</author>
<link>http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7FWRAJ_Notes_Threat#comment-5B1D5DDE6A9D9467852574720075750C</link>
<author />
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7FWRAJ_Notes_Threat#comment-5B1D5DDE6A9D9467852574720075750C</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Another interesting take on the Salesforce.com announcement can be found at { <a href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/it-collaboration-technology-blog/2008/06/savaged-by-a-dead-sheep.html" rel="nofollow" target ="blank">Link</a> }
<br  />
<br  />Do you think they believe their own marketing sh... stuff? ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:22:56 +0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment</title>
<author>Richard Moy</author>
<link>http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7FWRAJ_Notes_Threat#comment-84AFDE5DE394E4EA852574720073883A</link>
<author />
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7FWRAJ_Notes_Threat#comment-84AFDE5DE394E4EA852574720073883A</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ I am a marketing person and Notes developer.  I have tried the Google Docs and Salesforce and they have a long away to go.  We write complex Notes applications and it is not possible to have an automatic way of converting it to their platform.  I have talked to a few users that have used Salesforce.com and they all have said that for simple things it is okay, but for more complex things it is no different then have a development team create it from scratch.  None of this is covered in the basic package and it is all at extra cost.
<br  /> ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:01:55 +0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment</title>
<author>A. Guy</author>
<link>http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7FQJYP-supporting-notes-8.5-beta#comment-F44151A5B2F99DB78525746C0055D0E5</link>
<author />
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7FQJYP-supporting-notes-8.5-beta#comment-F44151A5B2F99DB78525746C0055D0E5</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ FYI:<br  />TwitNotes - why it doesn't run in Notes 8.5 beta and why IBM should care<br  />{ <a href="http://lekkimworld.com/2008/06/18/twitnotes_why_it_doesnt_run_in_notes_8_5_beta_and_why_ibm_should_care.html" rel="nofollow" target ="blank">Link</a> } ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:37:20 +0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment</title>
<author>Pablo Barlow</author>
<link>http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7FHNYQ-Customer-Fears#comment-B4AAA9119614CDA885257467004ED152</link>
<author />
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7FHNYQ-Customer-Fears#comment-B4AAA9119614CDA885257467004ED152</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ I dont know how to measure a function points in Lotus Notes. I know that Java FP are about 14 PH. As Notes is not a broadly known technology I can manage to "invent" FPs.<br  /><br  />Is there any way to find out market FPs? ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:20:53 +0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment</title>
<author>Scott Cochrane</author>
<link>http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7F5RT6#comment-6054CD474BD0953585257462007429B6</link>
<author />
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7F5RT6#comment-6054CD474BD0953585257462007429B6</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Short answer - rarely.<img alt="Emoticon" src="http://dev.blogsphere.net/blogsphere/bsphere3.nsf/emoticons/DLYH-5MZVLS/$File/biggrin.gif" />  ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 17:08:48 +0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment</title>
<author>Scott Johnsen</author>
<link>http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7F9LGM-Compliance_Requirements#comment-FA0B324C67EA6FEB8525745F00436D50</link>
<author />
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7F9LGM-Compliance_Requirements#comment-FA0B324C67EA6FEB8525745F00436D50</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The comment about Java is funny in light of some of the Java blog discussion going on about the demise of Java. 
<br  />
<br  />{ <a href="http://web.mac.com/jonathan.locke/iWeb/JonathanLocke/Blog/D837029B-5A03-4D94-8EEC-927B07078A26.html" rel="nofollow" target ="blank">Link</a> }
<br  />
<br  />As mentioned previously, there is always something new. And we all know how "latest" doesn't necessarily mean "greatest"! But that's another discussion entirely. ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 08:16:28 +0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment</title>
<author>Jean-Francois Arseneault</author>
<link>http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/Domino_Designer_Not_Installed_No_Problem#comment-D66B68A30451473B8525745F0019985A</link>
<author />
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/Domino_Designer_Not_Installed_No_Problem#comment-D66B68A30451473B8525745F0019985A</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ I've tried this with the latest 8.5 Beta for OSX. Navigating to the /MacOS folder in the Notes package, I created a file called 'Designer', did a "chmod x+u" and when I relaunched the client, the Designer option was indeed there. But clicking on it does nothing... OS X probably has other reqs beside that single change... ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:39:34 +0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment</title>
<author>Ed Maloney</author>
<link>http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7F9LGM-Compliance_Requirements#comment-C3436141863C1A538525745D00646459</link>
<author />
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7F9LGM-Compliance_Requirements#comment-C3436141863C1A538525745D00646459</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ @1 and 2, no disagreement that Lotus Notes provides a superior RAD environment and can meet compliance requirements.  My original post was a lament about how Notes is being displaced by Java and .NET because these are somehow considered better suited to governance requirements.  The irony is that when you take away Notes, users will turn to less secure/unregulated automation tools like Excel and Google Apps to meet their needs. ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:16:32 +0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment</title>
<author>J Pop</author>
<link>#comment-894D4C0E99AF42E58525745D00615325</link>
<author />
<guid isPermaLink="true">#comment-894D4C0E99AF42E58525745D00615325</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ @1  My entire world right now is compliance at the company where I work.  In fact we have found that RAD using Lotus Notes tends to be much more compliant than anything else we've seen.  Lotus Notes offers Security right out of the box, and is very secure.  Where as every single application we've had written in VS has only IIS as its line of defense. (which 90% of the time is configured incorrectly)<br  /><br  />Now you may say that we should have configured our VS projects to support forms authentication, and I say, thats no long RAD....  <br  /><br  />  ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:43:02 +0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment</title>
<author>Scott Johnsen</author>
<link>http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7F9LGM-Compliance_Requirements#comment-24602DF11DA66D888525745D005BC2D5</link>
<author />
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.governancefornotes.com/blog/governanceblog.nsf/d6plinks/TBAN-7F9LGM-Compliance_Requirements#comment-24602DF11DA66D888525745D005BC2D5</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ It's interesting that you should mention spreadsheets as the last opportunity for automating tasks below the compliance radar. There is probably more sensitive data stored on uncontrolled, unsecured and unprotected spreadsheets than in most database applications. But somehow the same compliance requirements don't seem to apply. ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:42:16 +0500</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
