Comments for katy lindemann // seemingly unconnected

Comment on Let’s Play! by Let's Play! // katy lindemann // seemingly unconnected | Social Games Developer

Let's Play! // katy lindemann // seemingly unconnected | Social Games Developer — Tue, 06 Jul 2010 19:30:58 +0000

[...] more here: Let's Play! // katy lindemann // seemingly unconnected fantastic, game-design, game-designer, history, lustrating-the-history, other-people, people, [...]

Comment on The Value of Real by tüp bebek istanbul

tüp bebek istanbul — Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:43:58 +0000

was an article I liked. Thanks for sharing….

Comment on by new roof Wilmington de

new roof Wilmington de — Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:47:25 +0000

Hey we was just viewing your page on my Google Phone and I was thinking about how good it will work on the new ipad coming out . Fleeting thought…. Anyway thanks!

Comment on Human Brands by Nico Brooks

Nico Brooks — Wed, 12 May 2010 02:48:09 +0000

I think I agree with your underlying point, but I am drawn to the examples you mention specifically because they are *not* brands, they are people. I couldn’t give a rat’s ass about CP+B, but Alex Bogusky is cool. Same for Apple and most of the others. Charismatic, brilliant and inspiring people have been around as long as history, while branding is a fairly new idea. Maybe it’s a semantic difference, but I think the notion of “human brand” cheapens the human.

Comment on IPA Social Principle 05 – Marketing with people not to people by Prinzipien der Neuen Werbung | zwanzig-zehn.me

Prinzipien der Neuen Werbung | zwanzig-zehn.me — Thu, 06 May 2010 02:22:01 +0000

[...] Marketing mit den Leuten nicht an die Leute – Katy Lindemann, Quelltext [...]

Comment on The Value of Real by Tweets that mention The Value of Real // katy lindemann // seemingly unconnected -- Topsy.com

Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:41:44 +0000

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by SeeminglyUnconnected. SeeminglyUnconnected said: Blogging: The Value of Real http://bit.ly/cGzyvO [...]

Comment on IPA Social Principle 05 – Marketing with people not to people by Marketing mit Leuten nicht zu den Leuten– IPA Soziales Prinzip 5 von Katy Lindemann | NeueWerbung

Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:10:42 +0000

[...] Marketing mit Leuten nicht zu den Leuten – Katy Lindemann [...]

Comment on Ada Lovelace Day – celebrating Brenda Laurel by Tweets that mention Ada Lovelace Day – celebrating Brenda Laurel // katy lindemann // seemingly unconnected -- Topsy.com

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:07:59 +0000

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Katy Lindemann, Katy Lindemann, Katy Lindemann, Caroline Drucker, mario and others. mario said: RT @katylindemann: ok HOW many hashtags for ada lovelace day?! once more w/ feeling! celebrating brenda laurel http://tr.im/T6vO #ald10 #findingada #allday [...]

Comment on Ada Lovelace Day – celebrating Brenda Laurel by uberVU - social comments

uberVU - social comments — Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:54:57 +0000

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by unconnectedblog: Blogging: Ada Lovelace Day – celebrating Brenda Laurel http://bit.ly/aOA23n...

Comment on Rules of Engagement by The cull « TheAntiSofa

The cull « TheAntiSofa — Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:12:15 +0000

[...] many friends do you have on Facebook? Too many? I was reading Katy Lindeman’s post on digital etiquette and I got to wondering if I shouldn’t make my Facebook circle a bit more selective. How many of [...]

Comment on Gamechanging and Change Through Play – Playful 2009 by Planner Reads » Blog Archive » Its a niner..Change through play

Planner Reads » Blog Archive » Its a niner..Change through play — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:01:43 +0000

[...] Try to avoid being part of the 90% who just look. And become one f the 9% who link. So here's a great presentation from Katy Lindeman who presented this at Interesting 2009 and at Playful. And is I believe at the [...]

Comment on IPA Social Principle 05 – Marketing with people not to people by Wandel wird nie wieder so langsam von statten gehen – IPA Soziales Prinzip 10 von Graeme Wood | NeueWerbung

Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:03:14 +0000

[...] Marketing mit den Leuten nicht an die Leute – Katy Lindemann [...]

Comment on Human Brands by dan burgess

dan burgess — Mon, 01 Mar 2010 21:45:49 +0000

i love a human brand ;-)

http://danburgess.typepad.com/tap_tap/2007/01/human_brands.html

Comment on Human Brands by Friday Round Up | Spearfish Labs

Friday Round Up | Spearfish Labs — Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:10:51 +0000

[...] Human Brands – Katy [...]

Comment on Time to move on from military marketing by jane phelps

jane phelps — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:05:56 +0000

Interesting post, you may enjoy this video, along the same lines.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-wK6AUyZiA

Comment on Human Brands by TwittLink - Your headlines on Twitter

TwittLink - Your headlines on Twitter — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:04:23 +0000

[...] Tweets about this great post on TwittLink.com [...]

Comment on Human Brands by Erinn

Erinn — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:55:07 +0000

I completely agree- when you see the face behind a brand, that brand is much more desirable- it’s no longer just a logo or a product. You can trust a face easier than a logo, slogan, or any other type of branding paraphernalia !

Comment on Human Brands by uberVU - social comments

uberVU - social comments — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:48:59 +0000

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by unconnectedblog: Blogging: Human Brands http://bit.ly/akT8HI...

Comment on When earned media isn’t earned, Part II by If social media is earned media then how do you buy it? | Rubber Republic

If social media is earned media then how do you buy it? | Rubber Republic — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:05:20 +0000

[...] Some will argue that social media cannot be bought, and as such is earned media. A philosophy we always strive to practice. [...]

Comment on Human Brands by Dennis

Dennis — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:13:49 +0000

The other thing they have in common is whether the company will outlive their departures.

I have a LT bet about Apple not surviving post-Jobs for 10 yrs in its current form.

Am I wrong?