<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Criminal and DUI Defense in Washington, D.C. | Koehler Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://koehlerlaw.net/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://koehlerlaw.net</link>
	<description>Criminal and DUI Defense in Washington, D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 17:07:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>D.C. Court dismisses petition for anti-stalking order</title>
		<link>https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/08/d-c-court-dismisses-petition-for-anti-stalking-order/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamison Koehler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 16:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Protection Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C. Superior Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Violence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://koehlerlaw.net/?p=19088</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>People seek anti-stalking orders (ASOs) in Washington, D.C. for many different reasons. Some petitions involve conduct that legitimately falls within the protections provided by the ASO statute. Others arise from interpersonal disputes that, while frustrating or upsetting, do not satisfy the statutory requirements for stalking. For example, a person may seek an anti-stalking order because of problems with a neighbor, ... </p>
<div><a href="https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/08/d-c-court-dismisses-petition-for-anti-stalking-order/" class="more-link">Read More</a></div>
The post <a href="https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/08/d-c-court-dismisses-petition-for-anti-stalking-order/">D.C. Court dismisses petition for anti-stalking order</a> first appeared on <a href="https://koehlerlaw.net">Koehler Law</a>.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crowded dockets delay CPO and ASO hearings in D.C.</title>
		<link>https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/08/crowded-dockets-delay-cpo-and-aso-hearings-in-dc/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamison Koehler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 17:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Protection Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C. Superior Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Violence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://koehlerlaw.net/?p=19079</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Presiding over civil protection order (CPO) and anti-stalking order (ASO) cases is one of the most demanding assignments for D.C. Superior Court judges. Each morning, parties begin logging on at 8:30 a.m. The calendar typically includes 20 to 40 cases. Two judges—currently Judge McCabe in Courtroom 113 and Judge Truong in Courtroom 114—must move through that crowded docket while dealing ... </p>
<div><a href="https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/08/crowded-dockets-delay-cpo-and-aso-hearings-in-dc/" class="more-link">Read More</a></div>
The post <a href="https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/08/crowded-dockets-delay-cpo-and-aso-hearings-in-dc/">Crowded dockets delay CPO and ASO hearings in D.C.</a> first appeared on <a href="https://koehlerlaw.net">Koehler Law</a>.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Willful blindness in the reflecting pool cases</title>
		<link>https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/08/willful-blindness-in-the-reflecting-pool-cases/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamison Koehler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 12:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C. Superior Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional Responsibility/Ethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://koehlerlaw.net/?p=19031</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>At some point, there will be a reckoning.  The reckoning may be a public one:  Lawyers hauled before the D.C. bar to face potential disciplinary proceedings. It may also be a purely private reckoning.  It may be looking into the mirror and asking oneself the question:  Am I proud of how I acted during this time? ***** On June 20, ... </p>
<div><a href="https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/08/willful-blindness-in-the-reflecting-pool-cases/" class="more-link">Read More</a></div>
The post <a href="https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/08/willful-blindness-in-the-reflecting-pool-cases/">Willful blindness in the reflecting pool cases</a> first appeared on <a href="https://koehlerlaw.net">Koehler Law</a>.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Burglary, robbery and assault charges dismissed</title>
		<link>https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/06/burglary-robbery-and-assault-charges-dismissed/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamison Koehler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 11:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Assault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Criminal Offenses]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://koehlerlaw.net/?p=19011</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The government&#8217;s case was problematic from the outset. Ring cameras do not lie. Body-worn cameras do not lie. CCTV footage does not lie. Phone records do not lie. The physical evidence gathered by our investigator, Robert Kapler, overwhelmingly demonstrated that the complainant&#8217;s allegations were false. Every objective source of evidence contradicted her account. The Burglary Charge The complainant told police ... </p>
<div><a href="https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/06/burglary-robbery-and-assault-charges-dismissed/" class="more-link">Read More</a></div>
The post <a href="https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/06/burglary-robbery-and-assault-charges-dismissed/">Burglary, robbery and assault charges dismissed</a> first appeared on <a href="https://koehlerlaw.net">Koehler Law</a>.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should your CPO/ASO case &#8220;trail&#8221; your criminal matter?</title>
		<link>https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/04/should-your-cpo-aso-case-trail-your-criminal-matter/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamison Koehler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 11:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Protection Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C. Superior Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Violence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://koehlerlaw.net/?p=19003</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Domestic violence charges in criminal court are frequently accompanied by a petition for a civil protection order (CPO) or anti-stalking order (ASO). This is because one incident can lead to two separate cases – one criminal and the other civil.  The target of misconduct allegations can be simultaneously the defendant in a criminal case and the respondent in a civil ... </p>
<div><a href="https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/04/should-your-cpo-aso-case-trail-your-criminal-matter/" class="more-link">Read More</a></div>
The post <a href="https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/04/should-your-cpo-aso-case-trail-your-criminal-matter/">Should your CPO/ASO case “trail” your criminal matter?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://koehlerlaw.net">Koehler Law</a>.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hit-and-run charges dismissed in D.C.</title>
		<link>https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/03/hit-and-run-charges-dismissed-in-dc/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamison Koehler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 11:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Criminal Offenses]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://koehlerlaw.net/?p=19001</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The government has dismissed charges against a Koehler Law client in a hit-and-run case.  Our client was accused of leaving the scene of an accident involving personal injury without calling police or providing identifying information.  We were able to produce evidence that our client had in fact called 3-1-1, which is the non-emergency number for police.  We also had an ... </p>
<div><a href="https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/03/hit-and-run-charges-dismissed-in-dc/" class="more-link">Read More</a></div>
The post <a href="https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/03/hit-and-run-charges-dismissed-in-dc/">Hit-and-run charges dismissed in D.C.</a> first appeared on <a href="https://koehlerlaw.net">Koehler Law</a>.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should I consent to a &#8220;CPO without admissions?&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/03/should-i-consent-to-a-cpo-without-admissions/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamison Koehler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 11:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Violence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://koehlerlaw.net/?p=18998</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>If you are the Respondent in a civil protection order case, everyone else involved in the proceedings will want you to agree to a “consent CPO without admissions.” With 30 to 40 cases on the docket each day, the court wants to avoid a trial.  The petitioner will be awarded the protection order risk-free. And it will be attorney-negotiator’s job ... </p>
<div><a href="https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/03/should-i-consent-to-a-cpo-without-admissions/" class="more-link">Read More</a></div>
The post <a href="https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/03/should-i-consent-to-a-cpo-without-admissions/">Should I consent to a “CPO without admissions?”</a> first appeared on <a href="https://koehlerlaw.net">Koehler Law</a>.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Resisting arrest charges dismissed in D.C.</title>
		<link>https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/03/resisting-arrest-charges-dismissed-in-dc/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamison Koehler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 11:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Assault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Criminal Offenses]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://koehlerlaw.net/?p=18994</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Resisting arrest charges against a Koehler Law client were dismissed recently by the government.  This was after our trusty investigator Robert Kapler secured surveillance recordings that conclusively disproved the claims of Secret Service officers. As I often tell Robert, sometimes our wins are attributable to my legal acumen.  Other times we win because of what he produces.  This win belongs ... </p>
<div><a href="https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/03/resisting-arrest-charges-dismissed-in-dc/" class="more-link">Read More</a></div>
The post <a href="https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/03/resisting-arrest-charges-dismissed-in-dc/">Resisting arrest charges dismissed in D.C.</a> first appeared on <a href="https://koehlerlaw.net">Koehler Law</a>.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Koehler Law honored as top 100 legal blog</title>
		<link>https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/03/koehler-law-honored-as-top-100-legal-blog/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamison Koehler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 13:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law Bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media and Technology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://koehlerlaw.net/?p=18989</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I received notice the other day that my criminal defense blog – the Koehler Law blog – has been included as a top 100 legal blog by Feedspot. This is an honor. I know that many such honors are extended as a way either to generate revenue for the party doing the honoring or to attract clicks through back-linking. Many ... </p>
<div><a href="https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/03/koehler-law-honored-as-top-100-legal-blog/" class="more-link">Read More</a></div>
The post <a href="https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/03/koehler-law-honored-as-top-100-legal-blog/">Koehler Law honored as top 100 legal blog</a> first appeared on <a href="https://koehlerlaw.net">Koehler Law</a>.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>D.C.’s ban on 11+ magazines is unconstitutional</title>
		<link>https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/03/d-c-s-ban-on-11-magazines-is-unconstitutional/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamison Koehler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 16:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C. Superior Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firearms/Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Concepts/Principles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions/Cases]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://koehlerlaw.net/?p=18987</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The D.C. Court of Appeals has struck down as unconstitutional the District’s ban on high capacity magazines for firearms.    Specifically, the court found recently in Benson v. United States, 2026 D.C. App. LEXIS 80, that the prohibition against magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition – what the court refers to as 11+ magazines – violates ... </p>
<div><a href="https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/03/d-c-s-ban-on-11-magazines-is-unconstitutional/" class="more-link">Read More</a></div>
The post <a href="https://koehlerlaw.net/2026/03/d-c-s-ban-on-11-magazines-is-unconstitutional/">D.C.’s ban on 11+ magazines is unconstitutional</a> first appeared on <a href="https://koehlerlaw.net">Koehler Law</a>.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
