tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20252732008-10-15T02:27:57.867-05:00DESnoreply@blogger.comBlogger515125This is an XML content feed. It is intended to be viewed in a newsreader or syndicated to another site.tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2025273.post-40329722513492091632008-09-27T17:55:00.003-05:002008-09-27T18:06:44.019-05:00

Governor Steve Beshear of Kentucky is seeking to seize more than one hundred gambling-related domain names. A judge initially rejected the governor's bid and has scheduled a hearing for October 7. See coverage in the Louisville Courier-Journal, DomainNews, and The Iconoclast. John Levine's take on the issue sounds right to me. I doubt very much that Kentucky has adequate grounds for

DESnoreply@blogger.comhttp://www.lawblog.com/2008/09/kentuckys-internet-gamble.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2025273.post-19707504467973244502007-09-27T08:33:00.001-05:002007-09-27T08:53:51.487-05:00

As anyone who has flown Southwest Airlines well knows, Southwest doesn't assign seats in advance. Instead, you are assigned a boarding priority when you check in at the airport or online, up to 24 hours before the flight. At the gate, you line up with others in your boarding group, and then when your group is called, you stampede onto the plane looking for anything other than a middle seat. (

DESnoreply@blogger.comhttp://www.lawblog.com/2007/09/gimme-a.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2025273.post-23175695172198363242007-05-15T13:44:00.001-05:002007-05-15T13:44:29.521-05:00

The Rev. Jerry Falwell died today. I met him once, in 1986 or so, when he came to my law school to give a talk. While I disagreed (and still do) with most of what he stood for politically, I enjoyed talking with him then and have always had a great deal of respect for him.A few years ago I served on a dispute resolution panel that awarded the domain name fallwell.com to Dr. Falwell. I

DESnoreply@blogger.comhttp://www.lawblog.com/2007/05/rip.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2025273.post-1164119198802480362006-11-21T08:00:00.000-06:002006-11-21T08:51:59.646-06:00

A couple of cases involving service provider immunity under the CDA (47 U.S.C. § 230(c)) came down within the past week. In Chicago Lawyers' Committee v. Craigslist, Inc. (N.D. Ill. Nov. 14, 2006), the court held that the CDA bars Craigslist from being held liable for publishing discriminatory housing ads in violation of the Fair Housing Act, although the court in dicta rejected the "essentially

DESnoreply@blogger.comhttp://www.lawblog.com/2006/11/more-cda-immunity-cases.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2025273.post-1161175031197865262006-10-18T07:30:00.000-05:002006-10-18T17:16:26.550-05:00

I'm following the E360-Spamhaus dispute with great interest, and have been discussing it in my Cyberspace Law seminar at The John Marshall Law School. The case presents some fascinating issues in the areas of spam law, Internet governance, civil procedure, and international law -- and it happens to have a handful of connections with John Marshall. In the district court, the case was heard by

DESnoreply@blogger.comhttp://www.lawblog.com/2006/10/e360-insight-v-spamhaus-project.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2025273.post-1156364506609380842006-08-23T15:09:00.000-05:002006-08-23T16:59:41.040-05:00

Google apparently has been sending out cease-and-desist letters complaining about the word "google" used as a generic term for searching the Internet (E-Commerce News; ZDNet News). I don't think we really need "google" (or "googling") as a synonym for "search the web," but I'm amused that the word has taken on so quickly.On the other hand, "tivo" as a generic term for a DVR (and as a verb

DESnoreply@blogger.comhttp://www.lawblog.com/2006/08/watch-out-for-googly-eyes.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2025273.post-1155930186223383322006-08-18T14:39:00.000-05:002006-08-18T14:44:50.836-05:00

TiVo, which manufactures digital video recorders (DVRs), is involved in a patent dispute with EchoStar, the owner of Dish Network. TiVo alleges that the generic DVRs offered by Dish to its subscribers infringe upon various patents held by TiVo. A federal court yesterday ordered EchoStar to stop selling the allegedly infringing DVRs. The court also gave EchoStar 30 days to disable both the

DESnoreply@blogger.comhttp://www.lawblog.com/2006/08/dont-mess-with-my-tivo-generically.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2025273.post-1149243050263885082006-06-02T05:00:00.000-05:002006-08-16T08:47:31.606-05:00

In the spirit of my now-static Don't Link website, here is an unauthorized link to a Canadian website that apparently doesn't like being linked to: "Captain Copyright" is a site operated by Access Copyright, the Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency. The site's "Intellectual Property Notice and Disclaimer" prohibits other sites from linking to Captain Copyright if a site's contents, in their

DESnoreply@blogger.comhttp://www.lawblog.com/2006/06/captain-copyright-is-stinkybutt.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2025273.post-1143036885650975112006-03-22T08:12:00.000-06:002006-03-22T08:28:10.590-06:00

I recently ran across this item on Amazon.com: a book entitled Ventriloquism for Dummies (Black Moss Press, 2002). It doesn't appear to be approved or licensed by Wiley, but it does look a lot like Wiley's Dummies books.(A few bloggers have previously made note of this book, including The Honest Hypocrite and J-Walk. Other bloggers have suggested the title, apparently without realizing it

DESnoreply@blogger.comhttp://www.lawblog.com/2006/03/parody-for-dummies.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2025273.post-1139433360890745982006-02-08T15:14:00.000-06:002006-02-11T15:59:44.763-06:00

OK, I admit I've been delinquent in posting to this blog; it's just not particularly high on my priority list at the moment. But I couldn't resist posting about this item (via Marty Schwimmer's Trademark Blog):Jason McCabe Calacanis writes in his blog today that he has received a couple of nastygrams from Wiley Publishing after a member of his blogging network used "for dummies" in the title of

DESnoreply@blogger.comhttp://www.lawblog.com/2006/02/blogging-for-dummies.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2025273.post-1118254805278046942005-06-08T13:20:00.000-05:002005-06-08T13:23:48.630-05:00

The Kentucky Attorneys' Advertising Commission apparently has taken the position that every post on a lawyer's blog constitutes an advertisement, requiring the lawyer to submit a copy of the post to the Commission along with a $50 filing fee. See Ben Cowgill's Legal Ethics Blog, Evan Schaeffer's Legal Underground, Dennis Kennedy in Between Lawyers, and David Giacalone in f/k/a. Eugene Volokh

DESnoreply@blogger.comhttp://www.lawblog.com/2005/06/blogs-as-lawyer-advertising.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2025273.post-1116271038811981742005-05-16T14:17:00.000-05:002005-05-16T14:17:18.846-05:00

The Supreme Court today handed down Granholm v. Heald, striking down (by a 5-4 majority) state laws that ban direct sales to consumers by out-of-state wineries while permitting direct sales by in-state wineries, on the ground that such laws violate the dormant Commerce Clause.

DESnoreply@blogger.comhttp://www.lawblog.com/2005/05/wining-across-state-lines.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2025273.post-1113315279318054742005-04-12T09:14:00.000-05:002005-04-12T09:14:39.316-05:00

If you're planning to commit a crime, don't brag about it in your blog. (State v. Velardi (N.C. App. Apr. 5, 2005), via InternetCases.com)

DESnoreply@blogger.comhttp://www.lawblog.com/2005/04/watch-what-you-blog.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2025273.post-1113230427937449962005-04-11T09:40:00.000-05:002005-04-13T14:31:28.576-05:00

The Ninth Circuit held last week (in McNeil v. Verisign, Inc.) that ICANN isn't a state actor and therefore isn't required to respect free speech or due process rights under the U.S. Constitution. (For general background, see these law review symposium issues: 6 J. Small & Emerging Bus. L. no. 1 (Spring 2002) and 15 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. no. 3 (Spring 1997).) UPDATE: Eric Goldman

DESnoreply@blogger.comhttp://www.lawblog.com/2005/04/icann-do-whatever-i-want.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2025273.post-1110312030938726002005-03-08T14:00:00.000-06:002005-03-08T14:00:30.936-06:00

(Via Kings & Things)  Elvis tribute artist Matthew Tuttle last week won a seat in the public lottery to watch a day of Michael Jackson's child molestation trial. The Sonora (Cal.) Union Democrat reports that Tuttle was a criminal defense lawyer before giving up the law to live life as Elvis.

DESnoreply@blogger.comhttp://www.lawblog.com/2005/03/king-v-king-of-pop.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2025273.post-1109766174057154712005-03-02T06:22:00.000-06:002005-03-02T06:22:54.056-06:00

Oral arguments in MGM v. Grokster are scheduled for March 29. The briefs of the parties along with numerous amicus briefs are available from EFF. (I signed onto the brief submitted by 60 Technology Law Professors and USACM.)

DESnoreply@blogger.comhttp://www.lawblog.com/2005/03/mgm-v-grokster.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2025273.post-1109213104376307292005-02-23T20:45:00.000-06:002005-02-27T15:07:30.626-06:00

A class action suit filed in California last week alleges fraud and unconscionability in eBay's bidding system. The suit focuses on the manner in which eBay handles proxy bids, and characterizes eBay's actions as tantamount to "shill bidding." The plaintiffs' firm has issued a press release; Reuters [alternate link] and InternetNews.com have more.The plaintiffs may have a point, but the impact

DESnoreply@blogger.comhttp://www.lawblog.com/2005/02/ebay-accused-of-shill-bidding.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2025273.post-1108909437244033592005-02-20T08:23:00.000-06:002005-02-20T08:23:57.243-06:00

Karl Auerbach notes that cows infected with mad cow disease enjoy greater privacy protection than people who register domain names. I told you we were on the wrong side of the cow.

DESnoreply@blogger.comhttp://www.lawblog.com/2005/02/no-spam-for-cows.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2025273.post-1108909319621360282005-02-20T08:21:00.000-06:002005-02-20T08:21:59.620-06:00

CircleID reports that spam now represents 70%-85% of all email. That sounds very low to me -- those numbers must be based upon email that is actually delivered (i.e., they don't include spam that is blocked successfully).

DESnoreply@blogger.comhttp://www.lawblog.com/2005/02/all-your-mail-is-spam.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2025273.post-1108250648726297182005-02-12T17:24:00.000-06:002005-02-15T10:58:27.620-06:00

Last year the FTC rejected my suggestion that it permit domain-wide opt-out in a national Do Not E-Mail Registry ... but the FCC has now done precisely that in its registry of Wireless Domain Names.

DESnoreply@blogger.comhttp://www.lawblog.com/2005/02/dont-spam-my-domain.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2025273.post-862343742002-12-18T14:33:00.000-06:002002-12-18T14:33:51.000-06:00