According to the FBI, investigators believe Castillo primarily targeted minors participating in volleyball leagues between 2010 and March 2026 in multiple states, with a focus on New York City. Federal authorities have notified high schools, colleges, and volleyball clubs in the New York metropolitan area that Castillo is being investigated in connection with a reported sexual assault that occurred earlier this year.

The investigation is ongoing, and no criminal findings have yet been made public. Esser-Weidenfeller and Dragovic said the firm’s role at this stage is to listen to potential survivors, help them understand their options, and coordinate with law enforcement and trauma-informed resources. They emphasized that any conversations with the firm will be confidential and voluntary.

“Many people who were harmed as teenagers by adults in positions of authority do not recognize what happened as abuse until years later,” Esser-Weidenfeller said. “We are talking with current and former athletes who may have had contact with Mr. Castillo to help them sort through their experiences in a safe, informed way.”

The FBI has indicated that the potential conduct under investigation may span club, school, and collegiate volleyball programs and may cross state lines. Youth and young adults who participated in volleyball leagues in or around New York City during the identified period are considered a particular focus, according to federal authorities’ outreach to institutions.

Dragovic noted that coaches and trainers in youth sports often hold significant power over playing time, scholarship opportunities, and team status, which can complicate how young athletes understand coercive or abusive behavior. “When the authority figure is a coach, the pressure to comply or to stay silent can be intense,” he said. “Years later, former players may still question whether what happened to them ‘counts’ as abuse. Those are exactly the kinds of questions we are prepared to discuss.”

Advocates and law enforcement officials have long warned that abuse in youth sports can remain hidden for extended periods, particularly when incidents occur off campus or outside official team activities. In some cases, investigators learn of patterns of misconduct only after multiple individuals step forward independently.

Esser-Weidenfeller said the firm is paying particular attention to the unique challenges faced by those who may still be in school or living near the volleyball programs where they once played. “We understand that coming forward can feel risky, especially if a survivor worries about their education or their standing in the athletic community,” she said. “No one is obligated to take any specific legal path; simply sharing information and learning about available support can be an important first step.”

Sommers Schwartz, P.C. stressed that any person who believes they may have been harmed by Castillo, or who has information that may be relevant to the FBI’s inquiry, can choose to contact federal authorities directly. The firm also said it is available to speak with individuals and families who want to better understand their civil rights and options without making any immediate decisions.

Lisa Esser-Weidenfeller
Sommers Schwartz, P.C.
(800) 783-0989
LEsser@sommerspc.com

Andy Dragovic
Sommers Schwartz, P.C.
(800) 783-0989
adragovic@sommerspc.com

As Vice Chair, she will assist in organizing the committee’s activities, contributing to educational programs and helping to coordinate input on legislative and regulatory initiatives affecting the agricultural sector.

The Agricultural Law Committee examines legal issues affecting rural and agricultural communities across Pennsylvania. The committee reviews questions and problems farmers and agricultural businesses face and tracks legislative and regulatory proposals. In her role on the committee, Straub is expected to continue contributing to discussions on how state and federal law affects farm families, agribusiness operations and the broader rural economy.

Straub is looking forward to the opportunity to continue contributing to those efforts as Vice-Chair. Straub’s law practice at Hazen Law Group centers on representing clients in the agricultural sector, particularly in succession and farm transfer planning. She advises farm families and agribusiness owners on long-term ownership and management transitions, with attention to preserving both the viability of the enterprise and the interests of family members who may or may not be directly involved in farming.

The Michigan Veterans Affairs Agency (MVAA) uses the Gold-Level Veteran-Friendly Employer Award to recognize employers who make strong commitments to recruit, train, and retain veterans as employees.

The most recent awards went to AlixPartners, the Michigan Gaming Control Board, and the Michigan State Lottery.

AlixPartners became a Silver-level member of the VFE program in 2019. Since then, the company has launched its Military and Uniformed Service Team (MUST), a resource group that offers employment and community support for veterans. The company has also created a military leave policy. 

The Michigan Gaming Control Board received Silver-level recognition in 2023. Since then, the agency has made it a top priority to recruit and hire veterans and service members, offering benefits like service credit and supplemental pay for emergency active-duty members. The MGCB has a 95 percent retention rate for its veteran employees and is a member of the MVAA Veteran Connector Program.

The Michigan State Lottery also became a Silver-level VFE member in 2023. The Michigan State Lottery’s veterans’ offerings echo those offered by the Michigan Gaming Control Board. The Michigan State Lottery’s current retention rate for its veteran employees is 100 percent.

AlixPartners, the Michigan Gaming Control Board, and the Michigan State Lottery join 33 previous Gold-Level Veteran-Friendly Award winners, bringing the total number of Gold-Level winners up to 36 statewide. About 190 Michigan employers are active participants in the VFE program.

“The Gold-Level Veteran-Friendly Employer Award demonstrates that these employers are doing their best to support our veterans,” say attorneys at Legal Help for Veterans PLLC. “They’re setting a standard that serves as a goal for all Michigan employers.”

MVAA’s Veteran-Friendly Employer program awards Bronze, Silver, and Gold awards to employers that commit to recruiting, training, and retaining veterans within their workforces. The agency also helps employers develop the practices and programs they need to find qualified veterans and help them thrive in the workplace.

Managing Attorney, John “Tony” Ross shared, “The billboards are less about branding, but about signaling a local point of contact after a serious car crash or commercial trucking accident. An injured victim can feel startled, dazed, and confused about what their options are.”

The designs focus on clear identification of the firm, its North Texas roots, and its personal injury focus. “We see these billboards as an extension of our front door,” said Ross. “For people driving on I-35, 287, 380, or any of the other main thoroughfares in and around North Texas the message is simple: There is a highly effective LOCAL law firm down the road that handles injury cases and understands the community.”

According to transportation planners, the I-35 and U.S. 380 corridors in particular have seen sustained increases in daily vehicle counts as development pushes outward from both Dallas and Fort Worth. “As the county grows, it becomes easier for people to feel disconnected from institutions that used to feel close by,” Ross stated. “Our intention is to remind residents that if they are dealing with serious injuries after an accident, there is a law firm based here in North Texas that handles those issues every day.”

The billboards are scheduled to rotate creative elements over the coming months, while maintaining a consistent emphasis on location and accessibility. Each display includes the firm’s name, a brief reference to its personal injury practice, and contact information.

Chandler Ross Injury Attorneys focuses its practice on representing individuals in serious personal injury and wrongful death matters. The firm’s lawyers say the new billboards are one piece of a larger strategy to maintain a neighborhood-level presence as the North Texas area continues to expand and grow.

The full report titled Chicago Car Accidents, Injuries, and Fatalities Higher in First Quarter of 2026, is available on the Briskman Law website.

“The first quarter of 2026 was a winter-weather story, and the numbers are clear about it,” said Paul Greenberg, managing member and senior personal injury attorney at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg. “When snow and slush take over the roads, stopping distances double, reaction times shrink, and the margin for error disappears. What we saw in Q1 is what happens when drivers don’t adjust to those conditions.”

Key Findings from the Car Accident Report

Chicago recorded 25,929 traffic crashes in Q1 2026, up from 24,724 in Q1 2025. The increase amounts to roughly 1,205 additional collisions in 90 days. Fatal crashes climbed from 18 to 21, while incapacitating injuries fell from 281 to 250, a divergence that suggests the crashes producing the worst outcomes may operate under different conditions than those producing serious but survivable ones.

Winter weather accounted for the overwhelming majority of the year-over-year increase. Snow-condition crashes rose 49.1%. Collisions on snow or slush covered roads jumped 63.6%, adding 975 crashes on compromised surfaces. Blowing snow conditions and fog both more than tripled compared to the prior year. By contrast, dry-road crashes rose just 1.0%, confirming that the underlying baseline of driving risk remained essentially flat.

Driver behavior shifted in ways that compounded the weather hazard. Failing to reduce speed to avoid a crash rose 14.7%. Following too closely increased 7.0%. Failing to yield right-of-way climbed 9.2% and remained the most common identifiable cause of crashes in the city. At the same time, crashes caused by running red lights fell 10.2%, a bright spot that suggests enforcement and infrastructure at signalized intersections are producing results.

Morning Commuters Most Likely to Be Involved in a Car Accident in Chicago

The morning commute absorbed the largest absolute increase. Crashes at 8:00 a.m. rose by 200 collisions year over year. The 10:00 p.m. hour experienced the sharpest percentage spike at 18.3%. Mid-week driving also shifted dramatically: Wednesday crashes surged 24.5%, making it the single busiest day of the week in Q1 2026.

Crashes at signalized intersections climbed 10.2% even as red-light running declined, pointing to turning conflicts, lane-change errors, and weather-impaired braking as growing sources of risk at the city’s busiest junctions.

A Safety-First Message for Chicago Drivers

Briskman Briskman & Greenberg urges Chicago drivers to maintain at least six seconds of following distance on compromised road surfaces, reduce speed during the peak crash windows identified in the report, and yield deliberately rather than reactively at intersections and merge points.

Former Prosecutors Continue to Deliver Hard-Hitting Defense While Expanding Attorney Wellness Initiatives

PARSIPPANY, NJ – The Bianchi Law Group, LLC, a premier New Jersey criminal defense firm founded by former prosecutors, proudly celebrates 13 years of serving clients across all 21 counties of New Jersey. Founded in 2013 by Robert A. Bianchi, Esq., former Morris County Prosecutor, and David J. Bruno, Esq., former Major Crimes Assistant Prosecutor, the firm has built a reputation for aggressive, knowledgeable criminal defense rooted in insider prosecutorial experience.

“After leaving the Prosecutor’s Office, Bob and I were excited to build BLG from the ground up, and 13 years later, we are still standing, still fighting, and still growing,” said David J. Bruno, founding partner at The Bianchi Law Group. 

What sets The Bianchi Law Group apart is the rare combination of credentials and experience that its founding partners bring to the table. Robert A. Bianchi served as Morris County Prosecutor from 2007 to 2013, appointed by the Governor of New Jersey and unanimously confirmed by the New Jersey Senate. He is the only practicing criminal defense attorney in New Jersey who is both a New Jersey Supreme Court Certified Criminal Trial Attorney and a former Governor-appointed County Prosecutor.

David J. Bruno served alongside Bianchi in the Morris County Prosecutor’s Office from 2007 to 2013, where he was assigned to the Major Crimes Unit prosecuting the most serious criminal offenses, as well as the Professional Standards Unit monitoring police misconduct and the Fraud Unit investigating white collar crimes.

Both partners hold the prestigious designation of Certified Criminal Trial Attorney by the New Jersey Supreme Court, a credential held by less than 1% of the more than 93,000 attorneys licensed in New Jersey.

The transition from prosecution to criminal defense was driven by a deep understanding of the justice system and a commitment to ensuring fair representation for those accused of crimes.

“Our team of former prosecutors brings the kind of experience and dedication that allows us to deliver hard-hitting criminal defense work. We do this while Bob and I expand our reach to serve more people through both representation and our attorney wellness and performance mindset initiatives,” Bruno added.

The firm’s attorneys understand prosecution strategies, courtroom procedures, and the inner workings of the New Jersey criminal justice system from years of experience on the other side. This insider knowledge has proven invaluable in defending clients facing charges ranging from criminal cases and domestic violence to complex white collar crimes and serious felonies.

Beyond case results, the firm has made a commitment to giving back to the legal community by lecturing or numerous Bar Associations, as well as, supporting attorney wellness, an often-overlooked aspect of legal practice. The firm’s attorney wellness initiatives reflect the partners’ dedication to supporting their colleagues and promoting a healthier, more sustainable approach to legal practice.

“Thirteen years ago, we set out to build a different kind of criminal defense firm, one grounded in prosecutorial experience and unwavering commitment to our clients. Today, I’m proud of what we’ve accomplished, not just in the courtroom, but in giving back to the legal community and supporting our colleagues through our attorney wellness initiatives. This is only the beginning.” This is not to mention all of the mentoring and performance mindset practices we give to the entire community of lawyers, and non-lawyers alike,” said Robert A. Bianchi, founding partner at The Bianchi Law Group.

Robert Bianchi and David Bruno have become a prominent legal voice on national television, having appeared as legal analysts on Court TV, CNN, ABC, FOX News, NBC, CBS, and MSNBC. Bianchi served for 6 years as a host and anchor at the Law & Crime Network, providing expert commentary on high profile criminal cases across the country. Both he and David host the Nothing but the Truth Podcast–a show about resilience and mindset practices. 

Throughout their career, Robert and Dave have been recognized with numerous awards, including:

• Prosecutor of the Year Award from the New Jersey Narcotics Enforcement Officers Association
• Honored speaker for both the Hudson and Morris County 200 Club(s)
• District Attorney of the Year Award from the National Council of Columbia Associations in Civil Service
• Community Service Award from the New York/New Jersey Asian-American Law Enforcement Advisory Board
• Man of the Year from the Italian American Police Society of New Jersey
• Man of the Year from The Columbian Foundation
• Bianchi Proudly serves his community as an EMT and rides as a volunteer ambulance member for the South Orange Rescue Squad. 

The Bianchi Law Group provides comprehensive legal representation in the following practice areas:

• Criminal Defense
• DWI/DUI Defense
• Domestic Violence Defense
• Municipal Court Cases
• Juvenile Crimes
• Drug Offenses
• Assault & Aggravated Assault
• Sex Crimes Defense
• White Collar Crimes
• Theft Crimes
• Murder & Manslaughter Defense
• Appeals
• Restraining Orders

The firm serves clients in all 21 counties of New Jersey, with a particular focus on Morris County, Monmouth County, Somerset County, Bergen County, and surrounding areas. Offices are located in Parsippany, with a strong presence serving Morristown and the greater Morris County region, as well as offices in Red Bank, NJ. .

As The Bianchi Law Group enters its next chapter, the firm remains committed to its founding principles: aggressive advocacy, insider prosecutorial knowledge, and unwavering dedication to client service.

“We are deeply grateful for every client who trusted us, every colleague who sends referrals our way, and a community that has supported us every step of the journey,” said Bruno. “The first 13 years built the foundation. The best is still ahead, and we are committed to delivering impact, service, and community at the highest level.”

The firm continues to expand its services while maintaining the personalized attention and high-level representation that has become its hallmark. With a team of former prosecutors who understand the system from the inside, The Bianchi Law Group is uniquely positioned to defend clients facing criminal charges and to advocate for those injured by the negligence of others.

For more information, visit bianchilawgroup.com.

The Pennsylvania Lemon Law also covers vehicles that are out of service for 30 days or more due to significant defects within that same 12-month or 12,000-mile period. Those days do not need to be consecutive or related to the same issue. The law covers new cars, pickup trucks, SUVs, and motorcycles that are purchased or leased and registered for the first time in Pennsylvania, or purchased in another state and registered for the first time in Pennsylvania. Kimmel & Silverman was directly responsible for ensuring that leased vehicles are covered under the statute.

The New Jersey Lemon Law covers vehicles with a significant defect that occurs within the first 24 months or 24,000 miles, whichever comes first, and continues despite three or more repair attempts. The New Jersey Lemon Law also covers vehicles that are out of service for 20 days or more due to significant defects within the first 24 months or 24,000 miles. Those days do not need to be consecutive or for the same issue. The law covers new cars, pickup trucks, SUVs, and motorcycles that are leased, purchased, or registered in New Jersey.

Bob Silverman, founding partner of Kimmel & Silverman, worked with the late Center for Auto Safety Executive Director Clarence Ditlow to help expand the statute to cover defects within 24,000 miles, helping make New Jersey’s Lemon Law one of the strongest in the country. Mr. Silverman’s role in strengthening the New Jersey Lemon Law earned him the Leader in Litigation Award from the New Jersey Law Journal.

The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act is a federal law that covers vehicles that have been repeatedly out of service for the same issue while under warranty, but fall outside state lemon law parameters. This law provides consumers with compensation that reflects the diminished value of their vehicle resulting from the defect.

Both state Lemon Laws and the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act include fee-shifting provisions. This means that if the client prevails, the manufacturer must pay all attorney fees and legal costs in addition to any recourse, or as part of a settlement. This allows Kimmel & Silverman to provide completely cost-free legal representation with no risk to the client, win or lose.

Over the last 35 years, Kimmel & Silverman has secured more than 200,000 successful outcomes for clients, with more repurchases and replacements than any other law firm of its kind in the country. The firm’s work has been featured in more than 1,000 television, radio, and print stories, and its attorneys have received dozens of national and state honors for their efforts. The firm is also proud to have more than 2,000 five-star online reviews from satisfied clients.

During the first quarter, Kimmel & Silverman secured numerous full Lemon Law repurchases and partial refunds for clients with a wide range of vehicles, including:

• 2025 Audi SQ5, four repair visits for a transmission warning light
• 2026 Kia Sportage, out of service 20+ days for a slipping transmission
• 2025 Volkswagen Atlas, repeated connectivity issues
• 2024 Kia Forte, repeated dashboard warning lights
• 2023 Lincoln Aviator, four repair visits for an oil leak
• 2024 Cadillac Lyriq, repeated blank infotainment screen
• 2025 Volvo S90, repeated Apple CarPlay issues
• 2025 Mercedes-Benz GLC350e, six repair visits for a no-start issue
• 2023 Jeep Grand Cherokee 4xe, out of service for three months due to battery issues
• 2022 Kia Sorento, three repair visits for transmission issues
• 2025 Maserati Grecale, repeated dashboard warning lights
• 2023 Jeep Grand Wagoneer, repeatedly in for overheating
• 2022 Ram 1500, repeated oil leak
• 2024 Ford Bronco, five repair visits for a transmission warning light
• 2024 Chevrolet Trailblazer, four repair visits for an oil leak
• 2023 Chevrolet Tahoe, three repair visits for a check engine light
• 2026 Kia Sportage EX X-Line, four repair visits for vibration

During the course of the litigation, attorneys at Gustin Law Firm developed evidence that, at the time of the crash, the rideshare driver’s license had expired. That information, drawn from discovery materials and official records, became a key point in settlement discussions.

The settlement was funded by two insurance carriers. The combined payments totaled $935,000 and resolved the client’s claims. 

“Our client was doing nothing more than using Houston’s roads when a rideshare vehicle entered her path and changed the course of her life,” attorney Charlie Gustin said. “This settlement will help address the financial consequences of those injuries and provide some measure of stability for her going forward.”

Gustin said the evidence concerning the driver’s expired license underscored questions about oversight in rapidly expanding app-based transportation services. “When people use or share the road with rideshare vehicles, they rely on systems that are supposed to ensure drivers are properly licensed and qualified,” Gustin said. “This case raised serious concerns about whether those safeguards were functioning as intended.”

Rideshare companies have faced growing scrutiny over vetting and monitoring practices as their services have become a staple of urban transportation. Personal injury cases arising from crashes often involve multiple layers of insurance coverage, including policies held by individual drivers and policies maintained on behalf of rideshare platforms.

The client’s name is being withheld to protect the parties’ privacy. According to the firm, the settlement funds are expected to be used to cover past medical treatment, anticipated future care, and the economic impact of losing her ability to perform her job.

Based in Houston, Gustin Law Firm represents individuals in Texas who pursue claims after being injured in motor vehicle crashes, including those involving rideshare drivers. The firm said it continues to monitor developments involving insurance coverage and safety standards in the rideshare industry.

Truck‑specific sourcing, not generic PI traffic

Under the new model, truck accident acquisition begins at the campaign layer, with strategy, targeting, and messaging built specifically around tractor‑trailer, semi‑truck, 18‑wheeler, and other commercial vehicle collisions rather than broad auto‑accident traffic. The program focuses on the kinds of matters that justify meaningful attorney attention—catastrophic injury, wrongful death, multi‑vehicle and cargo‑related crashes, and cases with substantial commercial policy exposure.

Instead of routing prospects to a general personal‑injury landing page, campaigns drive them to a dedicated truck accident authority experience that reflects the realities of FMCSA‑regulated operations, carrier responsibility, and higher‑limit commercial insurance structures. From the first interaction, the prospect journey is framed as a truck and commercial transportation conversation, not a standard motor‑vehicle claim with a “truck” checkbox.

Authority‑site experience and FMCSA‑informed workflow

At the center of the acquisition model is a truck accident authority site built for claimants who have been involved in collisions with commercial trucks, tractor‑trailers, delivery vehicles, and other DOT‑regulated fleets. The authority site is structured to mirror how sophisticated plaintiff firms analyze trucking matters: venue, carrier status, vehicle type, initial injury presentation, and potential coverage tiers.

Claimants move through an FMCSA‑informed intake and settlement‑estimator workflow that prompts them to provide structured information about:

• How the crash occurred and the type of trucks or commercial vehicles involved.
• The nature and severity of their injuries, medical treatment to date, and work loss.
• Indicators of commercial involvement, such as carrier branding, trailer configuration, and roadway context.

As they progress, the experience introduces concepts such as carrier responsibility, hours‑of‑service compliance, maintenance and inspection obligations, and commercial policy limits in accessible language. The goal is to educate claimants about why a truck accident claim is different from an ordinary car crash while collecting the data points trial teams actually use to evaluate trucking files.

Police‑report‑oriented verification before submission

Before an opportunity can be submitted, the workflow layers in a police‑report‑oriented verification step designed to encourage serious, documentation‑focused behavior. Claimants are prompted for details that tend to appear in an official crash report:

• Date, time, and location of the incident.
• Number and type of vehicles involved, including any commercial carriers.
• Basic crash description, including direction of travel and point of impact.
• Whether law enforcement responded and whether a report number is available or anticipated.

This pre‑submission structure is intended to filter out casual inquiries and low‑information “truck accident” contacts, and to surface prospects who can describe an event in a way that maps to a verifiable commercial vehicle collision. By the time the intake process is complete, the resulting record reflects more than a simple “truck” notation; it reflects a potential trucking matter described in police‑report and carrier language.

“Our objective was to move beyond the conventional ‘truck accident leads’ label and build a front‑end experience that actually looks and feels like a trucking intake,” said Ed Mohr of Mohr Marketing. “If a firm is serious about truck and commercial transportation work, it should not have to reverse‑engineer basic facts from a thin web form. The acquisition model should arrive at the firm already oriented around carrier involvement, documentation, and exposure.”

ReportLink: Intake intelligence and file‑readiness

Once a claimant completes the authority‑site and verification sequence, Mohr Marketing’s ReportLink framework takes over as the intake‑intelligence layer. ReportLink is designed to convert the raw submission into a structured opportunity file that intake teams and attorneys can review quickly and consistently.

Within ReportLink, trucking opportunities are organized around fields that matter to high‑end PI and trial practices, including:

• Claimant identity and contact details.
• Jurisdiction, venue, and basic routing cues.
• Commercial vehicle context, including carrier indicators where available.
• Injury patterns and treatment clues relevant to case valuation and resource allocation.
• Documentation signals, including police‑report information and crash‑scene details when supplied.

For leads, this structure supports faster triage and prioritization—firms can rank opportunities based on severity, commercial involvement, and documentation indicators rather than treating every “truck accident lead” as interchangeable. For signed truck accident cases, the same framework functions as an early file, giving litigation teams a more coherent starting point for coverage analysis, liability assessment, and strategic planning.

“ReportLink is intended to close the gap between a marketing contact and an attorney‑ready opportunity,” Mohr explained. “When a commercial trucking accident reaches a firm through this model, the information is structured in a way that aligns with how those cases are actually screened and advanced inside a serious plaintiff practice.”

Two offerings: exclusive truck leads and signed cases

Mohr Marketing’s truck‑specific program is built around two related offerings that draw on the same acquisition and structuring framework:

• Exclusive truck accident leads – Opportunities arising from the truck authority‑site and FMCSA‑informed intake flow are aligned to a single participating firm on an exclusive basis. Firms receive structured truck accident leads with commercial‑vehicle context and verification signals already present, rather than shared, marketplace‑style contacts with minimal differentiation.
• Signed truck accident cases – In select markets and subject to capacity, Mohr Marketing also supports delivery of signed truck and commercial transportation matters for firms that prefer engagement‑ready files over lead volume. These signed opportunities originate from the same truck‑specific campaigns, authority experience, and ReportLink structuring, but arrive at the firm in executed‑engagement status for further evaluation.

In both models, the emphasis is on truck‑specific sourcing, front‑end documentation, and structured intake, rather than high‑volume distribution of generic personal‑injury leads. The program is intended for firms that want to build or deepen a trucking docket in a deliberate, data‑driven manner rather than relying on incidental truck cases that happen to appear within general auto campaigns.

Joint advertising and administrative‑support structure

Mohr Marketing positions the truck acquisition program under a joint advertising and administrative‑support framework rather than as the sale of legal matters. Mohr Marketing serves as the media‑strategy and campaign‑management provider, coordinating truck‑specific advertising, authority‑site experiences, and the ReportLink intake‑intelligence layer. A separate administrative support partner may be available to assist with intake handling and document coordination, depending on firm preference and program design.

Participating firms remain responsible for their own legal, ethical, and jurisdiction‑specific compliance, including adherence to advertising, solicitation, and fee‑sharing rules in the jurisdictions where they practice. The program is structured to give firms a defined, transparent path from truck‑focused campaign to structured opportunity while preserving the independence of the attorney‑client relationship and each firm’s own professional obligations.

Availability and participation

Availability for the truck‑specific program is limited and will vary by market, jurisdiction, and firm capacity. Mohr Marketing is prioritizing firms that:

• Treat truck and commercial transportation cases as a distinct practice area.
• Have the infrastructure to respond promptly to higher‑value trucking inquiries.
• Are interested in a more disciplined, evidence‑oriented approach to truck accident lead generation and signed case acquisition.

Firms interested in exclusive truck accident leads, signed truck accident cases, or a blended approach can request a discussion of available markets, volume expectations, and case‑criteria alignment.

Media Contact
Ed Mohr
Mohr Marketing, LLC
Allentown, PA 18104
Phone: 610‑510‑7577
Email: ed@mohrmktg.com

About Mohr Marketing

Mohr Marketing is a legal‑industry marketing and intake strategy firm focused on helping plaintiff law practices build higher‑value dockets through structured acquisition models. The company designs and manages programs for personal injury and mass‑tort firms that need more than generic lead volume—prioritizing opportunities that are better documented, more selectively sourced, and aligned with how trial teams actually evaluate cases.

Through its truck‑specific acquisition framework and ReportLink intake‑intelligence platform, Mohr Marketing supports firms that treat truck and commercial transportation litigation as a distinct, high‑stakes practice area. The firm’s work spans campaign architecture, authority‑site experiences, FMCSA‑informed intake flows, and data‑driven intake structuring, with an emphasis on converting raw inquiries into opportunities that are closer to attorney‑ready files.

Mohr Marketing is based in Allentown, Pennsylvania, and works with plaintiff firms and litigation teams nationwide that are intentionally growing their inventories in areas such as motor‑vehicle accidents, trucking, and other complex injury matters.

David W. Magann, P.A., a veterans disability law firm serving Tampa, explained that the data illustrate a need for more proactive outreach, prompt treatment, and legal guidance for servicemembers and their loved ones. 

According to the VA’s National Veteran Suicide Prevention Annual Report, 6,398 veterans died by suicide in 2023, down from 6,442 in 2022. The daily average also declined slightly, from 17.6 to 17.5 deaths per day. At the same time, the report states that 61 percent of veterans who died by suicide in 2023 had not received VA health care during the year before their deaths.

The report also found that suicide rates increased for both male and female veterans in 2023. The rate for women rose from 13.7 to 13.9 per 100,000, while the rate for men increased from 37.3 to 37.8 per 100,000. VA identified elevated risk among veterans ages 18 to 34 and among those facing homelessness, pain, and other health problems.

Magann said those figures show that many veterans still face barriers to accessing care and benefits. He noted that support does not begin and end with crisis response. In his view, veterans often need a network that includes mental health treatment, stable housing, financial support, and help understanding available benefits.

Magann also noted that many service organizations provide valuable assistance, but they are not always staffed by attorneys. He said legal counsel can play a different role when a claim involves disputed eligibility, missing records, denied benefits, or appeal rights. In those situations, an attorney may help a veteran or surviving family member understand legal options and present evidence in a way that supports the claim.

The VA report outlines several recent prevention efforts, including same-day emergency mental health care access at VA facilities and the Veterans Interoperability Pledge, which has helped identify and contact 140,000 at-risk veterans. The agency also reported that the Veterans Crisis Line handled 1.3 million calls, texts, and chats in fiscal year 2025.

The report further reflects VA’s emphasis on broader prevention efforts outside traditional clinical settings. That approach matters because many risk factors develop in everyday life and often involve housing, employment, physical pain, and social isolation. VA has also expanded community-based funding through its suicide prevention grant program to reach veterans who may not already be connected to VA services.

Magann said the report should prompt continued attention from policymakers, health care providers, and community organizations. He added that legal assistance cannot replace mental health care, but it can help remove barriers related to benefits and documentation that may add stress during an already difficult period.

More information about veterans disability benefits is available from David W. Magann, P.A.

The Advocates Society is a well-respected legal organization focused on supporting attorneys of Polish heritage, encouraging professional development, and strengthening the legal community throughout Chicago. Drewniak’s election to this prominent role highlights the confidence his peers have in his leadership abilities and his passion for fostering collaboration within the profession.

Born in Brzesko, Poland, and raised in Chicago, Drewniak is fluent in Polish and has remained closely connected to the Polish-American community. His background and experiences have shaped his commitment to advocacy, both in his legal practice and through his service to professional organizations. In his new role, he will help guide the organization’s initiatives and further its mission of building strong professional relationships among attorneys across the city.

At the firm, Drewniak focuses his practice on personal injury law, representing individuals who have been harmed due to the negligence or wrongdoing of others. He handles a wide range of cases, including car accidents, truck accidents, motorcycle accidents, premises liability claims, and other serious injury matters. His work is centered on helping clients pursue compensation for medical expenses, lost income, and the long-term impact of their injuries.

The firm takes a proactive approach to every case, gathering evidence such as witness testimony, expert analysis, accident scene documentation, and other critical proof needed to establish liability. Personal injury claims are often based on negligence, requiring a clear demonstration that another party failed to exercise reasonable care. By building strong cases, attorneys help clients seek damages for pain and suffering, lost wages, and medical costs.

The Chicago personal injury lawyers at Abels & Annes, P.C. have helped hundreds of accident victims recover compensation after injuries caused by negligence or misconduct. Their commitment to client advocacy includes standing up to insurance companies, negotiating effectively, and pursuing favorable outcomes through litigation when necessary.

Drewniak’s appointment as First Vice President underscores both his professional achievements and the firm’s continued dedication to leadership within the legal community. For more information or to schedule a free consultation, contact the firm today.

The sponsorship helps cover uniforms, equipment, field management and maintenance expenses, and various operating costs the association incurs each year. Managing Attorney John “Tony” Ross, said the decision reflects both a parental connection and a broader interest in supporting youth sports in the area.

“Youth sports introduce kids to more than just competition,” Ross said. “They learn how to be accountable to their teammates, how to handle setbacks, and how to show up for something bigger than themselves. As a parent, I see that every week. As a lawyer, I see how those same values matter when families are facing difficult circumstances.”

The Trophy Club Roanoke Youth Baseball Association operates multiple teams and age divisions on fields shared by families throughout the region. Volunteers manage practices, games, and field maintenance, while local sponsors help keep registration fees within reach for many households.

Chandler Ross Injury Attorneys, based in Denton, Texas, and serving all of North Texas, focuses its legal practice on representing individuals in personal injury matters, including motor vehicle collisions and other accident-related claims. Ross says that working with clients in the aftermath of injuries has heavily influenced his views on community safety, youth activities, and motor vehicle safety.

The firm has indicated it will continue to look for ways to participate in community-based programs, with youth sports remaining a focus for the foreseeable future.

The case arises from a September 2021 shooting at Towson University in which Catherine Torney, a student, was one of three people injured during an unsanctioned late-night gathering in Freedom Square, a common area at the center of campus. The party grew from approximately 100 to 400 attendees as conditions escalated. There was underage drinking, cannabis use, and increasing unruliness. The DJ stopped the music and attempted to calm the crowd. Two of the four Towson University police officers on scene recommended shutting the event down. The university president and chief of police directed officers to stand down. Shortly after, gunfire erupted.

Ms. Torney sued the university for negligence, alleging in her complaint that campus police had the opportunity and the obligation to intervene and chose not to do so.The Baltimore County Circuit Court dismissed the case. The Appellate Court of Maryland affirmed that decision. The Supreme Court of Maryland agreed to hear the appeal.

Mr. Cammarata, arguing on behalf of Ms. Torney alongside co-counsel Stephen Ollar, challenged the lower courts’ application of Maryland premises liability law on two fronts.

First, he argued that both sides had treated Ms. Torney as an invitee — a legal status requiring the highest duty of care from a landowner — throughout the entire litigation, from the trial court through the petition for certiorari. The university raised the argument that she should be reclassified as a bare licensee for the first time before the Supreme Court. Mr. Cammarata contended this reclassification was improper at this stage.

Second, and centrally, Mr. Cammarata pressed the court on the standard of foreseeability. Under Maryland law, the question is not whether a landowner can predict the specific mechanism of injury, but whether the harm falls within what courts have described as the “general field of danger.” He argued that the university was attempting to narrow foreseeability to the point where it required direct, physical sight of a weapon or a specific threat — a standard he said has never been the law in Maryland.

“Did we have to know that a gun was going to be used? No. Was it within the general field of danger that she was going to be harmed under the facts of this case? Yes. Does it matter the mechanism? No. Does it matter the instrumentality? No,” Cammarata told the court during his rebuttal. “And therefore, this case should proceed to allow Ms. Torney to develop the facts.”

Mr. Cammarata also pointed to the university’s own post-incident investigation, in which the supervising corporal on duty was suspended for failing to contact Baltimore County police for backup and for failing to intervene — facts he argued validate Ms. Torney’s position that the circumstances called for action.

The justices engaged extensively with both sides, questioning the implications of the ruling for unsanctioned events on university property, fraternity parties, post-game celebrations, and the broader question of when the presence of law enforcement at an event gives rise to a duty to act. One justice raised the potential applicability of the state-created danger doctrine — a legal theory not formally briefed in the case but implicated by the facts.

The Supreme Court of Maryland’s opinion is expected later this year. If the court rules in Ms. Torney’s favor, her lawsuit will be permitted to resume in the Baltimore County Circuit Court.

Mr. Cammarata is a dual board-certified civil trial attorney with more than four decades of experience. He was selected as a Class of 2026 Virginia Lawyers Hall of Fame Honoree by Virginia Lawyers Weekly and was named the 2025 Trial Lawyer of the Year by the Trial Lawyers Association of Metropolitan Washington, D.C. He is nationally recognized for his role as lead counsel in Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (1997) — a unanimous United States Supreme Court decision establishing that a sitting president may be sued in civil court while in office. He co-founded the Brain Injury Association of D.C. and authored the District of Columbia’s Athletic Concussion Protection Act of 2011.

The full oral argument is available on the Supreme Court of Maryland’s website. WBAL-TV also reported on the case.

For more information, visit https://www.chaikinandsherman.com or contact the firm at (202) 659-8600.

CASE INFORMATION

Supreme Court of Maryland, Annapolis, MD (on appeal from Baltimore County Circuit Court)
Catherine Torney v. Towson University
Case No. 53

The crash involved a teenage driver who struck the rear of the client’s vehicle. From the beginning, the defense challenged fault and argued their driver was not primarily responsible. They also claimed the client’s injuries were minor and short-lived.

After the collision, the client experienced a worsening of prior medical conditions. The defense argued the surgery would have been needed regardless of the crash. They also focused on gaps in treatment and presented opinions from two medical experts to support their position.

DM Injury Law filed suit and moved forward with a detailed investigation. The legal team gathered testimony from the drivers involved, witnesses to the crash, and individuals who knew the client before and after the incident. This included family members and others who could speak to the changes in the client’s condition. Medical providers and expert witnesses were also questioned to help explain how the crash affected the client’s health.

During mediation, the defense offered $210,000. They continued to argue that the injuries were temporary, that the surgery was unrelated to the crash, and that their driver was not at least half at fault. The offer was rejected.

As the case moved closer to trial, DM Injury Law continued to build its position. The firm challenged the defense’s liability expert and succeeded in preventing that testimony from being presented at trial. This ruling limited the defense’s ability to dispute fault.

Preparation for trial included additional expert depositions, court filings, and legal arguments. As this work continued, the strength of the case became clearer. The evidence showed that the crash had a direct impact on the client’s condition and led to the need for surgery.

One week before the trial in Johnson County District Court, the case was resolved for $600,000. The result reflects both the seriousness of the injuries and the impact the crash had on the client’s daily life.

A representative from DM Injury Law said the outcome was the result of consistent work and a willingness to push forward despite the defense’s position. The firm remained focused on presenting a clear account of how the crash affected the client and why compensation was warranted.

The settlement provides financial recovery for medical care and addresses the lasting effects of the injuries. DM Injury Law continues to represent individuals who have been harmed by the actions of others and works to secure fair outcomes based on the facts of each case.

The total includes verdicts and settlements in cases brought under California’s lemon law, formally known as the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act. The statute allows qualifying buyers and lessees to seek repurchase, replacement or cash compensation when a manufacturer cannot repair a substantial defect within a reasonable number of attempts. The $76 million covers matters resolved in courts throughout California as well as settlements reached before trial, with recoveries paid through vehicle buybacks, civil penalties and other monetary relief.

“Many vehicle owners are surprised to learn that they have legal options after multiple unsuccessful repair attempts,” said Richard Wirtz, managing attorney at Wirtz Law Lemon Law Attorneys. “They assume that because the car still technically drives, there is little they can do. The cases we have handled show that the law can provide meaningful recourse when a manufacturer does not fix a serious defect.”

Lemon law claims typically arise when vehicles develop persistent transmission, engine, electrical, braking or structural problems that undermine safety, use or value. Documentation plays a central role. Service records, repair orders and warranty booklets frequently become key exhibits when courts evaluate whether a manufacturer had sufficient opportunity to correct a defect.

The firm has represented clients across California, including San Diego County, Los Angeles, the Inland Empire and the Central Valley, in cases involving both mass-market and luxury brands. Recurring fact patterns sometimes emerge across a particular model year or powertrain configuration, and service bulletins obtained through discovery have revealed how manufacturers identify and respond to known defects.

Under California’s lemon law, prevailing consumers may also recover attorneys’ fees from manufacturers. That provision can make it feasible for car owners to pursue claims even when the value of the vehicle is modest. The law contains time and mileage considerations, and used vehicles sold with warranties may also qualify for protection.

The firm expects lemon law cases to remain an active area of litigation as vehicles become more technologically complex and drivers confront new categories of defects in software, sensors and electronic systems.

The case was led by attorney Cassandra Hardy, a skilled litigation attorney focusing on personal injury, premises liability, and wrongful death. The jury found the defendants 99% at fault after just two hours of deliberation, delivering a decisive outcome that underscores the strength of the plaintiff’s case and trial presentation.

The client sustained a fractured humerus that required surgical intervention and may necessitate a future joint replacement. The jury awarded $309,043.32 in economic damages and $2.3 million in non-economic damages, reflecting the profound and lasting impact the injury has had on the client’s quality of life. Notably, the final settlement offer prior to trial was only $90,000, highlighting the firm’s commitment to pursuing full and fair compensation through trial when necessary.

Cassandra Hardy brings a unique perspective to her practice. Before joining the firm in 2025, she spent several years representing insurance companies as defense counsel. This background provides her with valuable insight into defense strategies, allowing her to effectively advocate for injured clients.

A graduate of Quinnipiac University and Quinnipiac University School of Law, Cassandra earned her law degree summa cum laude and received numerous academic honors. During law school, she served as a publication editor for the Quinnipiac Law Review and was an active member of the mock trial society. She also gained early legal experience by clerking for an insurance defense firm.

Cassandra is admitted to practice in Connecticut and the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut. She is a member of the Connecticut Trial Lawyers Association and the American Association for Justice.

“This verdict represents not only justice for our client but also accountability for negligent property owners,” said a spokesperson for the firm. “We are proud of our team’s dedication and relentless pursuit of results that truly make a difference in our clients’ lives.”

For more information about this case or to schedule a consultation, contact The Flood Law Firm LLC in Middletown, CT, today.

As one of Houston’s most anticipated annual traditions, the Houston Livestock Show and Rodeo draws more than 2 million attendees each year. Known as the world’s largest indoor livestock exhibition and rodeo, the multi-week event features rodeo competitions, live concerts, a carnival, and agricultural showcases, all while raising millions of dollars in scholarships to support Texas youth.

Through this collaboration, Suits & Boots Accident Injury Lawyers aligned its brand with several high-profile KPRC programs that highlight the culture, energy, and community spirit of RodeoHouston.

The firm sponsored a special Houston Rodeo opening day episode of Houston Life, KPRC’s popular weekday lifestyle show airing from 1–2 p.m. Hosted by Tessa Barrera and Derrick Shore, Houston Life is dedicated to showcasing the best of the greater Houston area. The opening day episode brought viewers directly into the excitement of the rodeo, featuring live coverage, local personalities, and behind-the-scenes moments that captured the spirit of the event.

In addition, Suits & Boots supported a Rodeo-themed episode of Eat Like a Local, hosted by acclaimed Houston chef Chris Shepherd. A James Beard Award winner for Best Chef: Southwest, Shepherd is widely recognized for his contributions to the culinary world. In this special episode, he explored the diverse and beloved food offerings at the rodeo, spotlighting local vendors and fan-favorite dishes that define the Houston experience. Among the highlights were the rodeo’s iconic corn dogs (widely considered a must-have) featuring standout options like the freshly made, Filipino-style jalapeño-cheese corn dog from “Corn Dog with No Name,” praised by Top Chef finalist Evelyn Garcia for its made-to-order quality and unique flavor.

Further extending its presence, the firm sponsored Randy McIlvoy’s “Rough Ride” of the Night, a nightly segment airing during KPRC Channel 2’s 10 p.m. news broadcast. The segment highlights the most thrilling bull ride of each evening, delivering high-energy recaps that resonate with rodeo fans across the region.

“Our collaboration with KPRC during the Houston Livestock Show and Rodeo gave us the opportunity to connect with Houstonians through programming that captures the energy and pride of this iconic event,” said Kip Brar, Founding Partner, Suits & Boots Accident Injury Lawyers. “The rodeo is more than an event, it’s a tradition that brings people together, supports local youth, and showcases everything that makes Houston unique. We’re proud to support programming that celebrates that spirit.”

Suits & Boots Accident Injury Lawyers continue to show up for Houston by supporting local events and partnering with the people and traditions that bring the community together.

For more information about Suits & Boots Accident Injury Lawyers, visit suitsaccidentinjurylawyers.com.

Gustin, who represents plaintiffs in personal injury and insurance coverage disputes, was first admitted to the Texas Bar in 2011. He was previously recognized on the Texas Rising Stars list from 2016 through 2021, and was named to Super Lawyers each year from 2022 through 2026.

Super Lawyers, a Thomson Reuters business, describes itself as a rating service of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The annual selections are made through a patented multiphase process that includes a statewide survey of lawyers, independent research on candidates, and peer reviews by practice area.

The process is designed to produce a credible, comprehensive, and diverse listing of attorneys. Factors evaluated may include verdicts and settlements, honors and awards, bar and professional activity, community service, and other indicators of professional performance.

At the Gustin Law Firm, based in Houston, Gustin’s practice centers on representing individuals in motor vehicle collisions, rideshare incidents, drunk driving crashes, premises liability claims, and insurance disputes across Texas. 

Gustin has served as lead counsel on TopVerdict’s No. 1 rideshare/Uber settlement in Texas and the No. 1 reported drunk driving settlement in Harris County, as well as co-counsel on a Top 50 jury verdict in Texas. The Gustin Law Firm was recently named a Top 3 finalist in the Houston Chronicle’s “Best of the Best” in personal injury litigation, and Houstonia Magazine has listed Gustin among Houston’s “Top Lawyers.”

A graduate of the University of Texas at Austin, Gustin earned his law degree from South Texas College of Law Houston, where he was part of the school’s advocacy program and a national champion in moot court. 

He is licensed in all Texas state courts and in the U.S. District Courts for the Northern, Southern, Eastern, and Western Districts of Texas. He serves on the board of directors of the Houston Trial Lawyers Association and is a member of the Texas Trial Lawyers Association, the American Association for Justice, and the North American Brain Injury Society.

The firm has helped secure more than $50 million in verdicts and settlements for injured clients. Recent notable case settlements include securing $935,000 for a rideshare accident, $650,000 for a serious car accident, and $500,000 against a wastewater truck company.

For more information about the firm, visit https://gustin.law/.

Slowik Estate Planning focuses on helping individuals and families organize their affairs in anticipation of life changes, incapacity, and the transfer of assets to the next generation. It will continue to serve both current and new clients from its new headquarters, offering legal guidance for estate planning, elder law, wills and trusts, asset protection, and probate and trust administration.

The move places the firm closer to a growing corridor of professional services and medical offices along the Glenridge Connector, an area that has seen an influx of families and retirees in recent years. The new location is intended to offer greater convenience to existing clients while accommodating the steady increase in inquiries about wills, trusts, and long-term care planning.

The Sandy Springs-based firm is led by attorney Jake Slowik, a Harvard Law School graduate with more than a decade of experience in estate planning and related matters. The firm’s approach is grounded in careful documentation and in communicating options in plain language, particularly for older adults and families navigating complex financial and medical decisions.

To learn more about the firm, visit https://slowikestateplanning.com/.

The Workers’ Compensation Conference, organized by the Arkansas Bar Association, will be held April 9–10 at The Lodge at Mount Magazine in Paris, Arkansas. Jason M. Hatfield, who serves as chair of the association’s Workers’ Compensation Section, is one of the program planners and will present a session titled “Demystifying the Functional Capacity Exam.”

Functional capacity exams, or FCEs, have become a central feature of many workers’ compensation disputes, influencing determinations of impairment, return-to-work decisions and settlement valuations. Hatfield’s presentation, scheduled for 9:30 a.m. April 10, is expected to examine how attorneys, claims professionals and injured workers can better understand the methodology and limits of these exams.

“In many cases, the functional capacity exam ends up carrying outsized weight in how a claim is resolved,” Hatfield said in a prepared statement. “Our goal with this program is to take a closer look at what these exams actually measure, what they do not measure and how lawyers on both sides can approach them with more precision and transparency.”

As section chair, Hatfield has helped guide the Workers’ Compensation Section’s educational programming, which often reflects evolving pressures in the system, from rising medical costs to more complex return-to-work issues. Organizers say the Mount Magazine conference is intended to provide a forum for discussion across the bar, including attorneys who primarily represent injured workers and those who represent employers and insurers.

“The section has long tried to make sure that our programs are useful to lawyers regardless of which side of the docket they are on,” Hatfield said. “Functional capacity exams are a prime example of an area where everyone benefits from better, shared understanding — judges, lawyers, doctors and the workers whose futures are affected by these reports.”

For the Law Office of Jason M. Hatfield, P.A., participation in the program reflects a continued engagement with statewide discussions on workplace safety, medical evaluation and access to benefits in Arkansas’ workers’ compensation system.

Learn more at https://www.jhatfieldlaw.com/