Lehigh Valley Media

L V Independent Press

2007-04-16T23:08:00.000-04:00

Check it out: New online newspaper called the Lehigh Valley Independent Press , started by Joe DeRaymond, Tim Chadwick, and others. -Peter

You can't be neutral on net neutrality

2007-02-24T12:02:00.000-05:00

Check out this piece from today's Washington Post: opposing net neutrality has become politically costly, and the principle has earned near-universal support from Democrats.

What a remarkable achievement: Just a year ago, no one had ever heard of "net neutrality." Thanks to the media reform movement and, in particular, the Save the Internet Coalition, there is an excellent chance that the internet will remain a free marketplace of ideas.

HUGE news: WHOLE FCC coming to Harrisburg THIS Friday

2007-02-18T20:44:00.000-05:00

It is extremely rare for all five of the Federal Communications Commissioners--as opposed to the two Democrats, who appear frequently--to host a genuine public hearing. And the next, just-announced venue is Harrisburg--this Friday!

The hearing is one of only five or so promised by the FCC on proposals to loosen[!] already weakened media consolidation limits. At the last event in LA, over a 1000 people showed up, and nearly everyone spoke in opposition to the giveaway to big media companies.

The "Stop Big Media Coalition" has a terrific site with basics about the FCC and the proposed rule changes. (Stop Big Media is organized by Free Press, the indefatigable nonprofit media reform organization, which takes no corporate money.)

I'll be there. Please consider making the trip too: it would be great to have a large Lehigh Valley showing.

Here are the details:

Whitaker Center for Science and the Arts
Sunoco Performance Theater
222 Market Street
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101

9:00 a.m. – 9:30 a.m.: Welcome/Opening Remarks  9:30 a.m. – 11:00 a.m.: Panel Discussion  11:00 a.m. – 12:30 p.m.: Public Comment  12:30 p.m. – 1:00 p.m.: Break  1:00 p.m. – 2:30 p.m.: Public Comment

Morning Call editorial pages

2007-02-03T07:27:00.000-05:00

There is a major factual error in John Brinson's column (January 28), for which the Morning Call refused to print a Correction. (Most of the other errors, unsubstantiated claims, and misinterpretations can, I suppose, be excused as matters of 'opinion'.)

The column stated that "We spend more on Medicaid -- free health insurance for ''the poor'' -- than on the entire national defense budget."

According to figures published by the Office of Management and Budget and the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, we spend almost twice as much on national defense as we do on Medicaid. So Brinson's statement is just plain false, and the Morning Call has an obligation to correct an error of this magnitude.

When called to the attention of the editor of the opinion pages, he said, "I took a look at Brinson's interpretation of figures and my judgment is that this is a matter of opinion, rather than factual error."

In other words, it's a matter of opinion -- not basic math -- whether $200-billion is greater than $640-billion.

Morning Call acknowledges global warming

2007-02-03T07:20:00.000-05:00

It's nice to see the Morning Call finally acknowledge that global warming is a major concern for scientists and the general population ["Authoritative Report Confirms Human Activity Driving Global Warming", Feb 3]. Maybe the report from the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) is such a big story that they couldn't ignore it completely. Anyway, it's good to see them finally mention what may be the most important news story in decades, but why do they ignore all the local efforts -- by cities, counties, colleges, nonprofits, and businesses -- to do something about it? -Peter

Allentown Times, RIP

2007-01-25T09:14:00.000-05:00

So S.I. Newhouse and his Advance Publications have shuttered the Allentown Times, the city's only English-language community weekly.

The rationale was revealing: Advance is killing the Times not because the paper isn't profitable--it is--but because the company wants to invest more money in its online presence. (It's true that the company's PennLive site--which hosts the online versions of the Express-Times, the Allentown Times, and the --is painfully bad.)

It's worth noting that Time Inc., the nation's largest magazine publisher, announced cutbacks at its flagship, Time Magazine, for very similar reasons: to free up money for online investments.

One reason this trend is disturbing: (a) journalism is expensive; (b) most revenue--and journalists' salaries--still comesfrom print advertising; and (c) the revenue from online advertising remains relatively tiny. Right now, it's not at all clear that the internet can financially support real, professional journalism. As media companies shift resources to the web, they are diverting some of that print revenue away from reporting, and onto a platform that, at the moment at least, can't do the economic heavy-lifting necessary to support journalism.

We all know that online news is the newspaper's future, but all of us that care about quality journalism should be worried about the economics: The New York Times' 1200-reporter newsroom is expensive, and no army of bloggers can reproduce the Times' shoeleather reporting.

The other Times--Allentown's--was the city's only community weekly (not counting the Morning Call Weekly, which is a slimmed-down repackaging of the mother paper). The Valley is blanketed with community weeklies in other communities (owned, for the most part, by two chains, the Lehigh Valley News Group and the Times News group). Now the state's third-largest city has no community paper.

The Times had some good reporting, though it seemed wrong that it was reported and produced out of Bethlehem. Before the announced closure, I had intended to post about its recent, disturbing, circulation strategy: To deliver the paper only to affluent West-Enders in the 18104 area code, relegating the rest of the city to scattered kiosks. Advertising-driven demographics, of course.

Even so, the Times will be missed.

Call Parent Receives Bid

2007-01-18T15:16:00.000-05:00

Ron Burkle and Eli Broad, the two LA billionaires, submitted a complex bid today to take control of 31% of Tribune Co. stock. Here's the NYT story--long on details of the deal, but with mere speculation concerning the various Tribune papers' futures.

It's significant that none of the private equity firms that had been circling Tribune ended up submitting bids. Burkle and Broad's was the only bid--though the Chandler family (already the largest Tribune shareholder) may yet set up its own deal to take the company private.

Philly Media Forum TONIGHT

2007-01-18T15:15:00.000-05:00

Morning Call Parent Tribune Co. Taking Bids Tomorrow

2007-01-16T13:17:00.000-05:00

Today's New York Times has an interesting piece focused on likely Tribune Co. bidding partners (and billionaires) Eli Broad and Ron Burkle--two men who both claim to care about newspapers' civic duty. The same claim is made by another likely bidder, David Geffen, the music mogul. The handful of private equity firms hovering around, it is safe to assume, would be ruthless in their profit-maximization.

What will a sale to one (or a pair) of these billionaires mean for journalism at the Call? Though all three assert that profit margins will be reasonable--and not at the disastrous 20+ percent that is currently expected at publicly traded newspaper companies--they may turn around and sell the Call and other papers. The reason is that all three are interested mainly in Tribune's flagship, the LA Times.

Stay tuned. The Call will almost certainly have new owners within a year--and almost any owner would be better than Tribune.

Wireless in Allentown?

2007-01-12T21:30:00.000-05:00

NPR's On the Media has an excellent segment on municipal wireless--with a measured (but inconclusive) compare-and-contrast of Philly's private, St. Cloud's public, and Boston's hybrid systems.

Community wifi was one of the original reasons we formed Media Action of the Lehigh Valley. As we move into 2007, let's pressure city officials--including Allentown's Ed Pawlowski--to name a task force to start exploring options.

A Reporter Stands Up to the Army

2007-01-12T06:43:00.000-05:00

San Francisco Bay Guardian 9 January---Independent Oakland reporter Sarah Olson could face felony charges for refusing to testify against a conscientious objector whose court-martial "stem[s] from interviews he gave Olson...in which he openly criticized the Bush administration and the war on Iraq." She explains why she expects little relief from journalist shield laws that "probably wouldn't even cover me, and they probably wouldn't cover bloggers ever."

Entering into a conversation about who is or isn't a journalist (as the San Francisco Police Department and the District Attorney's Office have sought to do in imprisoned idependent reporter Josh Wolf's case), Olson says, "is degrading for the whole profession. And what it doesn't do is stand up for the civil liberties that are constitutionally afforded to everyone, nor does it protect a meaningful and independent press."... "My duty," Olson says, "is the public and its right to know and not to the government. www.sfbg.com

Inquirer Layoffs: The View from Inside

2007-01-06T13:05:00.000-05:00

On the Inquirer layoffs, these comments on the Inky's own blog tell the whole story...

Update on Tribune Co. Sale

2007-01-06T12:39:00.000-05:00

Via Huffington Post's Eat the Press, an update on the ongoing drama around the probable sale of the Tribune Co., the newspaper giant that owns the Morning Call.

Philly Inquirer to Lay Off 17% of Editorial Staff

2007-01-03T10:54:00.000-05:00

Local ownership was supposed to save newspapers from the ruthless profit expectations of the big chains. Wishful thinking: the new private owners of the Philadelphia Inquirer, a group of local businessmen headed by Brian Tierney, first engaged in hard-ball negotiations with the newspaper union. Now the owners have dropped the ax on about 70 editorial employees. This means that, after the cuts, the Inquirer will have 400 newsroom staff--down from its 80s and 90s staff of 500 +, with 15 foreign bureaus.

The New York Times reports that the paper's gambling beat reporter is one of the victims--even as gambling becomes one of the top state issues. This excerpt from the Times story is revealing (and helps to explain the Call's own meager reporting on the slots license aftermath):

Among those who received calls last night and was told he was losing his job was Jeff Shields, a reporter who covers gambling, a young and growing industry in Pennsylvania.

“These last two weeks, knowing this was coming, have really been Kafkaesque,” said Mr. Shields, 41, who has been at the paper for almost four years. He said he hoped to parlay his knowledge of the gambling industry into a job at a paying Web site or doing research.

A subject he would like to write about is the effect of casinos on their hometowns — “the kind of story you might pitch to an editor but in this day and age would never get approved,” he said, alluding to declining ambitions at many daily newspapers.

His editor, Eugene Kiely, 47, who made the call to Mr. Shields, is also leaving The Inquirer, although voluntarily, and will take a job at USA Today. He said he wanted to continue his newspaper career at a place he thought would be “stable.”

Reminder: Media Reform Meeting in Philly 1/18

2007-01-02T13:31:00.000-05:00

Poll Finds Local TV News Most Trustworthy

2007-01-01T15:09:00.000-05:00

Confirming a long trail of perplexing findings, the latest Pew Center poll on the public's attitude toward the press finds that local television news--that ratings-driven journalistic nightmare--is trusted by more people than any other news platform. Baffling, especially since corporate "video news releases" are aired, often unedited, at local stations across the country.

Big Victory for Net Neutrality

2006-12-29T16:13:00.000-05:00

AT&T, battling to complete its $85 billion merger with BellSouth in the face of opposition from the two Democrats on the FCC, agreed last night to strict network neutrality safeguards. Columbia law professor Tim Wu explains why the agreement is so important for the future of the internet.

Strong Overview of Tribune Maneuverings

2006-12-28T13:27:00.000-05:00

I just came across this detailed overview of the wheeling-and-dealing of Morning Call parent Tribune Co.....

Sins of Omission

2006-12-23T00:57:00.000-05:00

The Call's post-announcement coverage of the gambling license story has been surprisingly spotty and otherwise breathless. I keep scanning the headlines, looking for analysis of reactions, regional impact, and, in particular, the implications for Allentown. The Allentown angle is especially important, as Ed Rendell's announcement-eve $18 million gift to Bethlehem seemed timed to influence the board and--taken together with the Bethlehem nod--a sucker punch aimed at the state's third-largest city. On this point LVCurmudgeon's post is a must-read.

Net Neutrality Meets YouTube

2006-12-19T21:36:00.000-05:00

Great new video on net neutrality from savetheinternet.com. It's short, smart, and worth viewing.

Important: Media Ownership Forum In Philly 1/18

2006-12-16T12:25:00.000-05:00

A Media Ownership Forum is coming to Philadelphia on January 18 (see details below), and Commissioners Michael Copps and Jonathan Adelstein have committed to attend!

Media Action LV will send at least one car-full of activists to the event, so please email Media Action LV if you are interested...

When: January 18, 6pm
Where: Temple University, Gladfelter Hall

The event is sponsored by various Philadelphia-based media reform groups, including Media Tank, Prometheus Radio Project, PennPIRG and the Mid-Atlantic Community Papers Association are planning a Media Ownership Forum in Philadelphia on January 18, 2007 at Temple University, from 6 to 9pm.

Update on Morning Call Parent Company

2006-12-13T07:36:00.001-05:00

Today's New York Times has an update on the ongoing effort to sell the Tribune Company, the Morning Call's corporate parent. The Chandler family, which had owned the Call, the LA Times and other papers before selling to Tribune, is reportedly interested in purchasing Tribune's newspapers. The family's motive appears, however, to be strictly mercenary, and not some larger sense that the papers have a public interest obligation.

Morning Call fails again!

2006-12-13T07:36:00.000-05:00

We might disagree on the significance of the following events, but I think it is strange -- astonishing, really -- that The Morning Call failed to report any of them, although they were notified in advance and, in at least one case, had a reporter on the scene.

* On July 19, the Mayors of Allentown, Bethlehem, and Easton signed the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement, the first in this region to do so. (Over 330 cities throughout the U.S have signed; the only other cities in PA to sign are Philadelphia and Erie.)

* On October 15, the County Executives of Lehigh and Northampton Counties signed a similar Climate Protection Agreement for counties -- the first counties to do so -- making this the only region where cities and counties have united in their commitment to reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to protect us from global warming.

* This Monday, December 11, the Bethlehem Area School District adopted a Climate Protection Agreement that pledges the district to a variety of efforts to reduce GHG emissions.

Why would a responsible newspaper fail to report when local officials take important positive steps? (Do they only want to report problems?)

Does The Morning Call expect us to report the news via letters to the editor?

Is it any surprise that newspaper circulation declines in proportion to their coverage of local news?

The Morning Call's Irresponsible Allentown Coverage

2006-12-12T09:19:00.000-05:00

Here was the Morning Call's lede in its December 5 arrest follow-up of a homicide in center city Allentown the day before:

It's become a familiar scene in center city Allentown.

The "familiar scene", according to the Call? Murder in downtown Allentown.

It's one of the most consistent findings in media research that heavy media consumers grossly overestimate the rate of crime. (We all do; it's just that heavy media consumers assume the world's even more dangerous than the rest of us.) Crime is far less prevelant than we think.

The problem is that this distortion--and the inflammatory, 'if it bleeds it leads' style of coverage--has the potential to become self-fulfillng. The picture of downtown Allentown in the heads of most Lehigh Valley residents comes from the Call and Channel 69. The more they believe that murder is a "familiar scene"--however ridiculous as a claim to reality--the less likely they will venture downtown. They will warn off newcomers, and urge their downtown friends to leave. The downtown--which hardly needs an additional challenge--may become more unsafe, as the unintended consequence of a media distortion.

It is impossible to overestimate the importance of perception to the health of any neighborhood. And most people's perception of American cities--Allentown included--comes from the images that we see and the stories we read in the media.

So what are the homicide figures for 2006? With three weeks or so remaining in the year, Allentown has 14 homicides. 2005? 21 (a record). And the past few years (the only that I could track down data for)?:

2004: 11
2003: 12
2002: 9
2001: 8
2000: 9
1999: 11

There are, of course, too many murders in Allentown, and the city's ongoing police hiring should help.

But murder as a "familiar scene"?

Nobel winner calls for new 'social business' legal category

2006-12-11T11:27:00.000-05:00

Muhammad Yunus, this year's Nobel Peace Prize winner and micro-credit pioneer, proposed a new legal category in his acceptance speech over the weekend: the social business. Could something like this be adopted as a model for newspaper and other media ownership?

Here's the key passage from the New York Times' coverage of the speech:

He called for legal recognition of a new category of corporation that would be neither profit-maximizing nor nonprofit. It would be a “social business,” like Grameen Bank, the Dhaka-based microcredit institution he started 30 years ago. The bank has lent nearly $6 billion to help some of the poorest people on earth to start businesses, build shelters and go to school.

Grameen Bank — with which Dr. Yunus shared the prize today — is an interest-charging, profit-making business with more than 2,200 branches. But it is owned primarily by its poor clients and run for their benefit. Similarly structured institutions, he said, could bring health care, information technology, education and energy to the poor without requiring infusions of aid.

“By defining ‘entrepreneur’ in a broader way, we can change the character of capitalism radically and solve many of the unresolved social and economic problems within the scope of the free market,” he said.