<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5062506838143767255</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Feb 2020 09:22:27 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>individual liberty</category><category>economic liberty</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>political liberty</category><category>economics</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>keynesianism</category><category>Ethics</category><category>dollar</category><category>health care</category><category>liberty</category><category>what is money</category><category>justice</category><category>Ron Paul</category><category>free market money</category><category>intellectual property</category><category>Catholicism</category><category>Subsidiarity</category><category>foreign policy</category><category>intervention</category><category>natural law</category><category>self-reliance</category><category>marginal revolution</category><category>methodology</category><category>property rights</category><title>Liberty For Laymen</title><description>Thoughts on Economics, Politics, and Ethics</description><link>http://www.libertyforlaymen.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Andy Katherman)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>48</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5062506838143767255.post-1568590597614407993</guid><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 05:12:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2015-09-16T00:15:46.353-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">intellectual property</category><title>Copyright Kills “Men at Work” Flautist, Greg Ham</title><atom:summary type="text">I meant to share this a long time ago and just never got around to posting it.

Stephan Kinsella has an important blog post about Copyright on his research site, C4SIF (Center for the Study of Innovative Freedom).  

Personally, I was confused for a long time on the ethical justification for copyright law (as well as other forms of intellectual property).  I have since rejected any type of legal </atom:summary><link>http://www.libertyforlaymen.com/2015/09/copyright-kills-men-at-work-flautist.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Andy Katherman)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5062506838143767255.post-7301551487660124592</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2014 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-01-27T10:42:55.628-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">economics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">intervention</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">justice</category><title>Tom Woods on the Misplaced Fear of “Monopoly”</title><atom:summary type="text">Tom Woods wrote a great post back in 2012 for the Future of Freedom Foundation on the Misplaced Fear of “Monopoly”.  Monopoly is a confusing term which has various meanings and definitions.  It is an important concept within economics as well as political philosophy (especially in the libertarian realm).   What is one to think of monopoly?  Woods explains.     Those of us who get drawn, often </atom:summary><link>http://www.libertyforlaymen.com/2014/01/tom-woods-on-misplaced-fear-of-monopoly_26.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Andy Katherman)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://lh6.ggpht.com/-HplsANi8lAs/UuKDCnUNemI/AAAAAAAAAXo/nKWRpIvcUEA/s72-c/monopoly_1_thumb%25255B2%25255D.jpg?imgmax=800" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5062506838143767255.post-4970343975655329465</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 12:05:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-01-24T09:19:07.655-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">intellectual property</category><title>Thoughts on Intellectual Property</title><atom:summary type="text">Robert Wenzel blogs at EconomicPolicyJournal.com and has blogged numerous times in the past about “Intellectual Property” or “IP” as it is known shorthand.  Earlier this year, I blogged about the debate between Wenzel and Stephan Kinsella.  While I generally agree with Wenzel on many things, we do differ on the ethical basis of whether intellectual property is justified and can exist in some type</atom:summary><link>http://www.libertyforlaymen.com/2014/01/thoughts-on-intellectual-property.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Andy Katherman)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://lh5.ggpht.com/-qBw8iXtKMac/UszcdmG-8yI/AAAAAAAAAWk/8y63vyClcbs/s72-c/SS658%25255B3%25255D.jpg?imgmax=800" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5062506838143767255.post-8787413633474999227</guid><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2014 18:05:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-01-04T12:05:19.372-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">individual liberty</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">justice</category><title>The Right to Remain Out of Prison</title><atom:summary type="text">An informative and helpful legal guide to knowing one&#39;s rights. 


Source: Online-Paralegal-Programs.com</atom:summary><link>http://www.libertyforlaymen.com/2014/01/the-right-to-remain-out-of-prison.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Andy Katherman)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5062506838143767255.post-8029759529133674752</guid><pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 04:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-12-03T10:18:07.193-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">economics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">methodology</category><title>Austrian School Methodology</title><atom:summary type="text">I want to thank Luke Westman from The Analytical Economist blog for devoting the time to have this friendly, serious, &amp; meaningful discussion on the subject of how best to study economics from a methodological perspective. I will be presenting the case for the Austrian methodology while Luke will be presenting the methodology used by the Chicago School and others in the Neoclassical tradition.  </atom:summary><link>http://www.libertyforlaymen.com/2013/09/austrian-school-methodology.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Andy Katherman)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5062506838143767255.post-3766856693440356584</guid><pubDate>Sun, 11 Aug 2013 03:28:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-08-10T23:23:28.761-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">dollar</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">economics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">monetary policy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">what is money</category><title>Richard Ebeling: Money Central Planning and the State</title><atom:summary type="text">  I stumbled upon a terrific in depth history on the debate about money, banking, and monetary policy written by Richard Ebeling and produced by FEE called Monetary Central Planning and the State.  It is a 40 part series with an A to Z look at the differing schools of thought on all things money and specific quotes from the various economists.  Amazing stuff, especially if one is a nerd (like me)</atom:summary><link>http://www.libertyforlaymen.com/2013/08/richard-ebeling-money-central-planning.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Andy Katherman)</author><thr:total>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5062506838143767255.post-8801292984124819685</guid><pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-08-09T11:49:52.260-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">dollar</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">free market money</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">monetary policy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">what is money</category><title>Deflation, Inflation, &amp; Money II: A reply to Jacob Westman</title><atom:summary type="text">Jacob Westman, who blogs at the Analytic Economist, has replied to my initial blog post on the topic of deflation, money, monetary history, etc.  It’s an important topic and I’m happy to elaborate on my positions on this subject.  Here is one of the questions posed by Jacob:     Like I said before and explained in my previous post they disfavor cuts in the money supply.  One argument the </atom:summary><link>http://www.libertyforlaymen.com/2013/07/deflation-inflation-money-ii-reply-to.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Andy Katherman)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://lh3.ggpht.com/-lfDSxXtTM90/UgRQ9Bu6OZI/AAAAAAAAASs/y1QtQiBuNU8/s72-c/9646432-inflation--decreasing-value-of-money_thumb.jpg?imgmax=800" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5062506838143767255.post-7097443254278847218</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 06:29:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-07-26T11:24:51.039-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">dollar</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">economics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">monetary policy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">what is money</category><title>Deflation, Inflation, &amp; Money: A Reply to Jacob Westman</title><atom:summary type="text">Jacob Westman who blogs at The Analytic Economist wrote a critique of the exchange between Jeff Herbener and Tom Woods regarding deflation (shown below).  I have a lot to say on the subject of Deflation &amp; Inflation as do other Austrian economists.  In actuality, it is one of my favorite subjects and something I’ve spent the better part of the last 4 years trying to better understand.  So, I </atom:summary><link>http://www.libertyforlaymen.com/2013/07/deflation-inflation-money-reply-to.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Andy Katherman)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://lh6.ggpht.com/-SkvzMF0ohKI/Ue_jFGEyV6I/AAAAAAAAAR4/ZhBvA-sidi0/s72-c/finance-deflation_thumb%25255B3%25255D.png?imgmax=800" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>4</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5062506838143767255.post-1895771968541613787</guid><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 17:36:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-06-10T12:38:57.750-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ethics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">foreign policy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">justice</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">political liberty</category><title>Edward Snowden: hero or heretic?</title><atom:summary type="text">My article on DefineLiberty.com   Glenn Greenwald from the Guardian conducted an exclusive interview with Edward Snowden — the now admitted leaker and source of the highly controversial NSA surveillance programs disclosure.  The 29 year-old NSA Computer Technician contractor decided to come out to the world and had acknowledged he provided details to the Guardian and the Washington Post about </atom:summary><link>http://www.libertyforlaymen.com/2013/06/edward-snowden-hero-or-heretic.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Andy Katherman)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://lh4.ggpht.com/-1d3XBeIJ3vs/UbYOoBjBUiI/AAAAAAAAARE/lU-5MZAxTQQ/s72-c/screen-shot-2013-06-10-at-12-57-59-pm_thumb%25255B1%25255D.png?imgmax=800" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5062506838143767255.post-1029722131031553519</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:48:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-03-28T14:52:50.608-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">intellectual property</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">justice</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">property rights</category><title>Wenzel vs. Kinsella Debate on IP</title><atom:summary type="text">



The Robert Wenzel vs. Stephan Kinsella debate is set to air on Monday, April 1st (2013) on both gentlemen&#39;s podcasts (found here and here)..  This is sure to be an interesting April Fools Day.  But, who will be made out to be the fool: Wenzel or Kinsella? 

To this question, my money is, sadly, on Robert Wenzel (whom I do follow and regard as a great liberty advocate).  Kinsella has reason, </atom:summary><link>http://www.libertyforlaymen.com/2013/03/wenzel-vs-kinsella-debate-on-ip.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Andy Katherman)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-GcM0Z7WWeVU/UVSdTcmpd4I/AAAAAAAAAPY/TxGYAyUwf_k/s72-c/robert+wenzel.jpg" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5062506838143767255.post-3257796646052671825</guid><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 07:07:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-01-09T01:11:20.452-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">political liberty</category><title>Thoughts on Guns</title><atom:summary type="text">Given all of the discussion and debate on the subject of gun control, the 2nd Amendment, and the amount of violence that exists in the United States recently, I thought I&#39;d post some compelling videos which make valid arguments why the 2nd Amendment imbues the essence of self-defense and self-preservation.  


























</atom:summary><link>http://www.libertyforlaymen.com/2013/01/thoughts-on-guns.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Andy Katherman)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://img.youtube.com/vi/n9z1wfgNf9E/default.jpg" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5062506838143767255.post-687422095078375588</guid><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 05:07:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-12-01T16:11:39.071-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">economics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">fiscal policy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">monetary policy</category><title>Liberty for Laymen Podcast: The Upside Down World of MMT- with Robert Murphy</title><atom:summary type="text">
      
Right Click This Link To Download





Your browser does not support the audio element.


    var audioTag = document.createElement(&#39;audio&#39;);
    if (!(!!(audioTag.canPlayType) &amp;&amp; (&quot;no&quot; != audioTag.canPlayType(&quot;audio/mpeg&quot;)) &amp;&amp; (&quot;&quot; != audioTag.canPlayType(&quot;audio/mpeg&quot;)))) {
     document.getElementById(&#39;auidoplayerhtml5podbean163c17444c30f943009d6cf6453b919e&#39;).parentNode.removeChild(</atom:summary><enclosure type='audio/mpeg' url='http://libertyforlaymen.podbean.com/mf/web/k44rfd/Upside_Down_World_of_MMT_with_Robert_Murphy.mp3' length='0'/><link>http://www.libertyforlaymen.com/2012/11/liberty-for-laymen-podcast-mmt-with.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Andy Katherman)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-9N6uX6Sk6vU/ULg6PaiaNCI/AAAAAAAAAOY/2Wgaz_n1FdI/s72-c/robert_murphy.jpg" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5062506838143767255.post-5489090166482324199</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:09:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-11-05T22:01:15.304-06:00</atom:updated><title>Voting: an exercise in futility</title><atom:summary type="text">Republished from Define-Liberty.com – please click here to read the full article.  I was compelled to write this after family and friends prodded me about the upcoming Presidential elections.  Also, Chance Stoodt had a great post a few weeks at “Define-Liberty” (an online magazine dedicated to spreading the ideas of liberty).  I hope to expound on his theme.  Who will I be voting for in November?</atom:summary><link>http://www.libertyforlaymen.com/2012/10/voting-exercise-in-futility_29.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Andy Katherman)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5062506838143767255.post-1202297492482315606</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 04:45:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-09-05T23:45:45.863-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">economics</category><title>Rethinking Democracy</title><atom:summary type="text">These people actually vote.   Are folks like these that much in the minority?  God help us.

</atom:summary><link>http://www.libertyforlaymen.com/2012/09/rethinking-democracy.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Andy Katherman)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://img.youtube.com/vi/07fTsF5BiSM/default.jpg" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5062506838143767255.post-1861100602312543638</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-08-24T09:31:24.419-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">economics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">fiscal policy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">keynesianism</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">monetary policy</category><title>Government spending is always a &quot;net good&quot; - not so much (continued)</title><atom:summary type="text">

Here is the breakdown of the latest counterpoints my friend submitted to me.  The debate continues as follows:


I 100% agree that there are major problems within our current government structure on spending policies, taxation policies, and regulation policies. I am for capitalism and less government embedded in the bedrock of our economy. I am for major reform in all of these areas. I do also </atom:summary><link>http://www.libertyforlaymen.com/2012/08/government-spending-is-always-net-good_22.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Andy Katherman)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5062506838143767255.post-1757415461017965267</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 02:05:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-08-24T09:31:02.564-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">economics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">fiscal policy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">keynesianism</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">monetary policy</category><title>Government spending is always a &quot;net good&quot; - not so much</title><atom:summary type="text">I recently got into a debate with a friend on facebook about fiscal policy. He posits the following:

&quot;Economics 101: Fiscal Policy levers are taxation and government spending to regulate the economy. In a recovering economy we need to keep taxes low and keep government spending. I find it very interesting that of our two future leaders claim to want to help the economy, one wants to increase </atom:summary><link>http://www.libertyforlaymen.com/2012/08/government-spending-is-always-net-good.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Andy Katherman)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5062506838143767255.post-2190149840841498005</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:41:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-08-22T17:05:21.216-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ethics</category><title>Against Facebook Nationalization</title><atom:summary type="text">
The other day I was poking around on the internet (Facebook to be specific) and saw an opinion piece from Slate.com with the headline:


“Let&#39;s Nationalize Facebook”

Clearly, the title is provocative to say the least and my initial reaction was to laugh. I immediately figured this piece was written by a comedian, satirist, or some journalist trying to be cute.



To say the least, I was sorely </atom:summary><link>http://www.libertyforlaymen.com/2012/08/against-facebook-nationalization_21.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Andy Katherman)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-1NcuBRJtSrs/UDP_Qr7LyRI/AAAAAAAAAE4/VrILXFlE9xU/s72-c/face_1798365b.jpg" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5062506838143767255.post-6844328282485377036</guid><pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 04:26:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-05-18T23:28:08.353-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">liberty</category><title>Does the State OWN You?</title><atom:summary type="text">This week, the Facebook IPO was all over the news.  What a phenomenal story of how a few Harvard kids turned an idea into a global entity worth upwards of $100 Billion dollars.  Entrepreneurs created Facebook, not the State.

Now comes the side story of one of the founders, Eduardo Saverin, who is a native-born Brazilian.  In 1998, he became a U.S. citizen after his family fled Brazil.  Saverin </atom:summary><link>http://www.libertyforlaymen.com/2012/05/does-state-own-you.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5062506838143767255.post-5010013957321628937</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 04:29:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-05-16T23:29:37.440-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">liberty</category><title>How to Advance Liberty - by Leonard E. Reed</title><atom:summary type="text">Leonard E. Reed (famous for his great work, I, Pencil) founded the Foundation for Economic Education (FEE) and is one of the best champions of liberty.

Here is a lecture of Reed back in the late 1970s.  How fortunate and privileged are we to have access to his insights and ideas!?  Simply amazing.

Now, the lecture does move a bit slow and groggy at times, but nuggets of gold are sprinkled </atom:summary><enclosure type='audio/mpeg' url='https://s3.amazonaws.com/fee/audio/archive/How+to+Advance+Liberty.mp3' length='0'/><link>http://www.libertyforlaymen.com/2012/05/how-to-advance-liberty-by-leonard-e.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://img.youtube.com/vi/9UE3JeowaaE/default.jpg" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5062506838143767255.post-7441016108802201492</guid><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 04:27:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-05-15T00:16:16.217-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ethics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">liberty</category><title>Why Marxism: C. Bradley Thompson</title><atom:summary type="text">Professor C. Bradley Thompson recently gave an excellent seminar on Marxism that deserves anyone and everyone’s attention.  I’ve always wondered what the alluring “siren song” or stream of thought about Marxism that people were attracted  I believe Bradley Thompson does an excellent job of examining that stream of thought of most true believers.  Here is a short abstract of Prof. Thompson’s </atom:summary><link>http://www.libertyforlaymen.com/2012/05/why-marxism-c-bradley-thompson.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://img.youtube.com/vi/vmUUPstdp6Y/default.jpg" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5062506838143767255.post-6167694917530373944</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 04:54:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-05-10T23:54:22.338-05:00</atom:updated><title>Intellectual Property and Ideas - Oracle vs. Google</title><atom:summary type="text">As a software developer, strong opinions exist on the &quot;open source&quot; versus &quot;proprietary&quot; software debate with regards to &quot;intellectual property&quot;.  Are patents or copyrights legally justified?  Does open-source software hinder or hurt innovation?

These are the sorts of questions that have been in the news lately as wireless and mobile phone carriers strive to limit competition and corner the </atom:summary><link>http://www.libertyforlaymen.com/2012/05/intellectual-property-and-ideas-oracle.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5062506838143767255.post-3345990243307213263</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 04:10:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-12-06T13:28:16.711-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ethics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">liberty</category><title>**Coercion vs. Cooperation: Against the State** with Professor Gerard Casey</title><atom:summary type="text">




Your browser does not support the audio element.


    var audioTag = document.createElement(&#39;audio&#39;);
    if (!(!!(audioTag.canPlayType) &amp;&amp; (&quot;no&quot; != audioTag.canPlayType(&quot;audio/mpeg&quot;)) &amp;&amp; (&quot;&quot; != audioTag.canPlayType(&quot;audio/mpeg&quot;)))) {
     document.getElementById(&#39;auidoplayerhtml5podbean163c17444c30f943009d6cf6453b919e&#39;).parentNode.removeChild(document.getElementById(&#39;</atom:summary><enclosure type='mp3' url='http://dl.dropbox.com/u/55039317/Against_the_State_Gerard_Casey_Katherman_05_02_2012_final.mp3' length='0'/><link>http://www.libertyforlaymen.com/2012/05/coercion-vs-cooperation-against-state.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5062506838143767255.post-3988983523136416902</guid><pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 03:49:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2018-01-17T11:22:05.498-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">what is money</category><title>Situational Awareness - Money and its Origin</title><atom:summary type="text">The problems which exist in our nation are too great to adequately quantify.  Having studied these problems for the greater part of two years, one of the best places to start is with the things we interact with every day - money.
Money is what we as humans use as a means of indirect exchange with others in society.

Knowing everything you can get your hands on about MONEY will take you very far </atom:summary><link>http://www.libertyforlaymen.com/2012/04/situational-awareness-money-and-its.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5062506838143767255.post-2858248614631213517</guid><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:36:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-02-01T00:56:19.333-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">liberty</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ron Paul</category><title>Ron Paul: Freedom brings people together</title><atom:summary type="text">From Snoop Dogg to Barry Manilow, the message of liberty presented by Ron Paul&#39;s presidential campaign is beyond profound. The United States is full of so many folks stuck in their red versus.blue tribal corners, yet the message of freedom cuts across divisions and unites people.        While other candidates take pot shots at each other for what they did or said on this and that policy, no one </atom:summary><link>http://www.libertyforlaymen.com/2012/01/ron-paul-freedom-brings-people-together.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5062506838143767255.post-3993266189972260441</guid><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 06:46:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-01-24T08:38:27.229-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Catholicism</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ron Paul</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Subsidiarity</category><title>A Catholic Case for Ron Paul: Subsidiarity</title><atom:summary type="text">Yesterday, I blogged about Tom Woods&#39; persuasive case for Ron Paul over Rick Santorum from a Catholic perspective.  If you are unfamiliar with Tom Woods’ Catholic bona fides, please check out his website and his books (four of which are exclusively about the Catholic Church).  Now, as a faithful and devout Catholic, I have a foundation of moral principles which guides me on what is just – right </atom:summary><link>http://www.libertyforlaymen.com/2012/01/catholic-case-for-ron-paul-subsidiarity.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item></channel></rss>