<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" --><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>logical.order.of.chaos</title>
	<link>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com</link>
	<description>Bringing order to chaos</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 20:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/logicalorderofchaos" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="logicalorderofchaos" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Been Busy…</title>
		<link>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/been-busy.htm</link>
		<comments>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/been-busy.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 20:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Caminiti</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/been-busy.htm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &#8216;democratization&#8217; of media has really been keeping me busy.  I spoke about this previously.  I&#8217;ve been busy working on a few projects.  I launched my first full length documentary Pawtucket Rising: Reviving a city with The Arts a few years ago now.  Since then I&#8217;ve been working on other non-related things.  But recently, I have a couple [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8216;democratization&#8217; of media has really been keeping me busy.  I spoke about this <a href="http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/fair-use-and-the-democratization-of-media.htm" >previously</a>.  I&#8217;ve been busy working on a few projects.  I launched my first full length documentary <a href="http://www.pawtucketrising.info/" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.pawtucketrising.info');">Pawtucket Rising: Reviving a city with The Arts</a> a few years ago now.  Since then I&#8217;ve been working on other non-related things.  But recently, I have a couple of things to talk about.My TV Show Partner Mike and I have started back up our <a href="http://www.massafterdark.com" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.massafterdark.com');">Public Access TV Show</a>  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/ntsecrets" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.youtube.com');">Mass After Dark on YouTube</a>.  I&#8217;ve also just started my own <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/IntroToGenealogy?feature=mhum" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.youtube.com');">Introduction to Genealogy</a> (Which is mostly what I&#8217;ve been wasting my time on the past few years) to help people learn how to get started in the mind boggling, but super fun hobby.So why am I telling you about it here?  On my technology/security blog?  Well, because it fits.  This is the first time that Mass After Dark has been done 100% over the internet!  We&#8217;re using mid to high powered machinery to do it, and it it couldn&#8217;t be easier.  I&#8217;m working on making my setup work easier, as well as look and sound better.  Parodoxically, if I didn&#8217;t have such high end equipment, I&#8217;d probably be better off.  I&#8217;m trying to get analog cameras to work in a digital world.  You can get any webcam nowadays, set it up, and upload a show to YouTube.Yes, that means there is a lot more junk out there, but it also means there is a lot more good stuff out there.  There are so many people we may never have heard from that have a lot to offer us.So, thanks technology!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/been-busy.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crossing the Chasm: The Linux Desktop is HERE!</title>
		<link>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/crossing-the-chasm-the-linux-desktop-is-here.htm</link>
		<comments>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/crossing-the-chasm-the-linux-desktop-is-here.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Caminiti</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/crossing-the-chasm-the-linux-desktop-is-here.htm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve previously complained bitterly about Linux as a Desktop operating system.  it just never seemed to be &#8216;there&#8217; yet.  Not enough ease of use for the end user.  Not enough compatibility, and not enough of what you need to do work.  My last post was as recent as Ubuntu 7.0.4 Feisty Fawn.Recently I&#8217;ve been reading Understanding the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve previously complained bitterly about Linux as a Desktop operating system.  it just never seemed to be &#8216;there&#8217; yet.  Not enough ease of use for the end user.  Not enough compatibility, and not enough of what you need to do work.  My <a href="http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/dell-ships-ubuntu.htm" >last post was as recent as Ubuntu 7.0.4 Feisty Fawn</a>.Recently I&#8217;ve been reading <a href="http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596005658/" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/oreilly.com');">Understanding the Linux Kernel 3rd Edition</a>, and decided rather than messing with my live servers, I would like to play around with it on my desktop at home.I really wasn&#8217;t expecting much.  I was expecting my usual issues of having to figure out how to install programs using the .deb packages, and checking dependencies like the last time I installed Ubuntu.  But I have to say, I was pleasantly surprised.I have been using Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx for a few months now as my primary desktop OS at work.WHAT?!!?!?That&#8217;s right, I said it!  And guess what?  Not only do I LOVE it, I don&#8217;t want to go back!Sure, we&#8217;ve had a few run ins and scrapes here and there.  I&#8217;ve rubbed Lucid the wrong way a few times.  But, when it comes down to it.  It just works!  The only real trouble I had was when I was playing around with installing Kubuntu (not a fan) to test the KDE Desktop (Really, I don&#8217;t get this thing at all).  I&#8217;ll stick to GNOME.I&#8217;ve done everything I need to do at work with this.  I can connect to servers, with RDP or with VNC.  I can edit and save files on the network with OpenOffice.org.  I even found a nice tool called Dia from GNU that let me diagram my network finally.  FOR FREE!In the immortal words of Ronald.  I&#8217;m lovin&#8217; it!I will report back later with my progress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/crossing-the-chasm-the-linux-desktop-is-here.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google wins landmark copyright case</title>
		<link>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/google-wins-landmark-copyright-case.htm</link>
		<comments>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/google-wins-landmark-copyright-case.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 16:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Caminiti</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/google-wins-landmark-copyright-case.htm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This could all still pan out, and go in any direction, but for now it is a big win.  A big win not only for google, but for all Service Providers.  It would be cost prohibitive, if not impossible, to police copyright on your systems.Sure, Google&#8217;s YouTube allows people to upload copy written content.  However, if Google is liable for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could all still pan out, and go in any direction, but for now it is a big win.  A big win not only for google, but for all Service Providers.  It would be cost prohibitive, if not impossible, to police copyright on your systems.Sure, Google&#8217;s YouTube allows people to upload copy written content.  However, if Google is liable for copy right infringement, to me, it means that even email companies could be held liable.This reminds me of what someone told me early on in the dotcom days.  &#8221;The Internet is one big copy machine, and there is nothing you can do to control it.&#8221;<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-31001_3-20008636-261.html?tag=nl.e703" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/news.cnet.com');">http://news.cnet.com/8301-31001_3-20008636-261.html?tag=nl.e703</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/google-wins-landmark-copyright-case.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another one bites the dust…</title>
		<link>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/another-one-bites-the-dust.htm</link>
		<comments>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/another-one-bites-the-dust.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Caminiti</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/another-one-bites-the-dust.htm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[T.J. Maxx Hacker Sentenced to 20 years in prisonhttp://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-20001207-38.html?tag=nl.e703
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T.J. Maxx Hacker Sentenced to 20 years in prison<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-20001207-38.html?tag=nl.e703" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/news.cnet.com');">http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-20001207-38.html?tag=nl.e703</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/another-one-bites-the-dust.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Electrical Grid Compromised!</title>
		<link>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/us-electrical-grid-compromised.htm</link>
		<comments>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/us-electrical-grid-compromised.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 12:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Caminiti</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/us-electrical-grid-compromised.htm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a report the United States Electrical Grid is being compromised by Russian, and Chinese attackers. 
This leads me to ask two questions.
1.  Why is our electrical grid on the internet?
This question is ridiculous that I have to ask it.  But at the very least if you are going to put the computers that run [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a report the United States Electrical Grid is being compromised by <a href="http://news.cnet.com/Report-U.S.-electrical-grid-penetrated-by-spies/2100-7349_3-6249453.html?tag=html.alert.comp" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/news.cnet.com');">Russian, and Chinese attackers</a>. </p>
<p>This leads me to ask two questions.</p>
<p>1.  Why is our electrical grid on the internet?</p>
<p>This question is ridiculous that I have to ask it.  But at the very least if you are going to put the computers that run the electrical grid online, you could put some security in place. </p>
<p> 2.  Why do we STILL not have a national firewall? </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been harping on this since I started this blog.  Why don&#8217;t we have a national firewall?  We should be severely restricting access to our US based networks from other countries.  This makes sense for a number of reasons.  First we&#8217;d kill most spam outright.  But more importantly, we would keep attackers from breaking into computers in the US.  The estimates vary, but probably a large number of servers and home computers are compromised as part of large botnets.  Some of these are being run from countries around the world.  Then we read of things like this, where our electrical grid is compromised?!  We should be blocking a lot of the traffic coming from overseas.</p>
<p> You would think by now we&#8217;d be moving away from the internet&#8217;s wild west period&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/us-electrical-grid-compromised.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fair Use and the democratization of media</title>
		<link>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/fair-use-and-the-democratization-of-media.htm</link>
		<comments>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/fair-use-and-the-democratization-of-media.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Caminiti</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tech Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/fair-use-and-the-democratization-of-media.htm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is an interesting judgment regarding fair use. 
 There is a continuum of legality for copyright.  Somewhere along the continuum is the ability to use something in a work that you make.  For instance, a 30 second youtube video with a baby dancing to a Prince song.  Somewhere along the line is outright copyright infringement.  For [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10021999-93.html" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/news.cnet.com');">Here</a> is an interesting judgment regarding fair use. </p>
<p> There is a continuum of legality for copyright.  Somewhere along the continuum is the ability to use something in a work that you make.  For instance, a 30 second youtube video with a baby dancing to a Prince song.  Somewhere along the line is outright copyright infringement.  For instance, posting an entire Prince song on Youtube, with original video.</p>
<p> Somewhere in the middle lies Youtube content.  I don&#8217;t know which way this whole thing will go.  I just hope that we don&#8217;t lose more freedoms than we already have.  I can&#8217;t tell you how many older people than I have told me how many freedoms we no longer have compared to them. </p>
<p> I think the digital revolution could be the best thing yet for democracy.  It allows people to communicate directly without having to incur a large cost.  This democratization is happening all over digital media.  From blogs, where you can post a news story within seconds of it happening, and within minutes it can be linked to and copied all over the world.  To the democratization of digital video.  This allowed me recently to film, direct, edit and produce my own Documentary <a href="http://www.pawtucketrising.info" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.pawtucketrising.info');">Pawtucket Rising</a>.   As I get closer to the release, I will post more about my documentary.  But, this is such a great time to be alive.  So much is changing so fast.  It must be what it felt like to live in the 60s. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/fair-use-and-the-democratization-of-media.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spammer goes to jail</title>
		<link>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/spammer-goes-to-jail.htm</link>
		<comments>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/spammer-goes-to-jail.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Caminiti</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/spammer-goes-to-jail.htm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In more good news on the spam front, a spammer from New York goes to jail for spamming to AOL.  He was order to pay 180k to AOL in restitution.  I don&#8217;t see that as a good enough amount, but at least he gets 30 months in the slammer.  Maybe this will make spammers think twice [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In more <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080715/wr_nm/crime_usa_spam_dc" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/news.yahoo.com');">good news</a> on the spam front, a spammer from New York goes to jail for spamming to AOL.  He was order to pay 180k to AOL in restitution.  I don&#8217;t see that as a good enough amount, but at least he gets 30 months in the slammer.  Maybe this will make spammers think twice about their line of work. </p>
<p> Based on other information we&#8217;ve seen about spam <a href="http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/why-do-i-get-all-this-spam.htm" >recently</a>, I wonder how much money he was making on spam.  I wonder if the IRS will be looking into his finances.  It seems low to only charge him 180k for his crimes.  What about all the money he must have made on this scheme?  Unless  he wasn&#8217;t very good I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/spammer-goes-to-jail.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If you only install one patch this year…</title>
		<link>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/dns-fix-patch.htm</link>
		<comments>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/dns-fix-patch.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Caminiti</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Maintenance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/dns-fix-patch.htm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t ordinarilly send out these types of things.  (Goes the mantra from your friends who always send you junk.)  It is true, I try not to be reactionary and alarmist.  I try not to rile people up with bug fixes they need to install NOW.  Most bug fixes can wait.  They tend to not be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t ordinarilly send out these types of things.  (Goes the mantra from your friends who always send you junk.)  It is true, I try not to be reactionary and alarmist.  I try not to rile people up with bug fixes they need to install NOW.  Most bug fixes can wait.  They tend to not be that important.  But, this one is big, or at least it appears to be from what I can tell from <a href="http://www.doxpara.com" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.doxpara.com');">www.doxpara.com</a>.</p>
<p>Recently some of the top names of the industry have come together to work on fixing a bug in DNS.  A bug that has apparently been there for a very long time.  It affects many dns systems across many platforms.  Translation:  It is huge.  The amazing part is that it was found quietly by a security researcher.  All of the biggest names in DNS including Microsoft, Cisco, Nominum, Neustar and OpenDNS got together to simultaneously release a bug fix for their platforms.  There is now a patch for all the major dns systems.  If you are using Bind8 upgrade, otherwise get to patching your systems asap.  It doesn&#8217;t appear to be only isolated to the dns servers, they want everyone to patch their pc&#8217;s as well.</p>
<p>Basically what the vulnerability will do is allow what is called DNS Cache poisoning, but on a grander scale than which we are accustomed.  It will allow an attacker to change the location you go to when you type in a domain name.  So for instance if you type in blog.logicalorderofchaos.com you will be sent to somewhere the hacker (known as a Phisher) sends you.  This has been used to trick unsuspecting users into giving up their credit card information, and social security numbers.  Imagine if it weren&#8217;t some tech guy&#8217;s blog, but instead was bankofAmerica.com.  You can see where this could be a problem. </p>
<p>Phishing happens all the time, but usually newer browsers can tell if it is a trick or not based on the way the url is formed or domain or IP reputation, and can stop you from going there without warning.  However, this will actually allow the attacker to change the location you actually go to, when navigating to a trusted domain.  This is bad because many sites use multiple IPs for one domain Even if they have a static IP it isn&#8217;t easy to find out what it is supposed to be once the dns is poisoned.</p>
<p> The short of this is, patch your system.  Patch your system now, today, before the end of the month.  You have to do it, because this could be potentially really really bad.  End of the world kind of bad, so bad in fact that&#8230;</p>
<p>Ok there, I was alarmist.  But for good reason.  So get to it, now!</p>
<p>There is a voluntary ban on speculation as to what exactly the issue is, since they don&#8217;t want the bad guys to figure it out before the good guys get to patching their systems.  I will follow up on this in a month or two when we have more information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/dns-fix-patch.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So long, and thanks for all the bugs…</title>
		<link>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/so-long-and-thanks-for-all-the-bugs.htm</link>
		<comments>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/so-long-and-thanks-for-all-the-bugs.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 14:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Caminiti</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/so-long-and-thanks-for-all-the-bugs.htm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[XP is finally leaving us.  It has been end of lifed by Microsoft.  They wanted to put a spike through its head the day Vista came out.  But, the business world wasn&#8217;t having it.  To be honest, Vista is still considered junk by businesses.  Maybe it has something to do with mission critical programs not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>XP is finally leaving us.  It has been <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/07/01/27NF-windows-xp-requiem-tease_1.html" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.infoworld.com');">end of lifed</a> by Microsoft.  They wanted to put a spike through its head the day Vista came out.  But, the business world wasn&#8217;t having it.  To be honest, Vista is still considered junk by businesses.  Maybe it has something to do with mission critical programs not working on it.  It does seem to have less bugs than XP did.  How soon we forget, that XP almost took the internet down with its vulnerabilities to worms like Zotob previous to Service Pack 2.  That being said, XP has become known as a pretty solid operating system after SP2.  At home, I do run Vista, but at work I&#8217;ll be running it, probably for years.  I go by the mantra, if it ain&#8217;t broke.. don&#8217;t fix it.  Why bother trying to upgrade when I don&#8217;t need the bells and whistles of XP. </p>
<p>For now though, So long, and thanks for all the bugs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/so-long-and-thanks-for-all-the-bugs.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do I get all this spam?</title>
		<link>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/why-do-i-get-all-this-spam.htm</link>
		<comments>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/why-do-i-get-all-this-spam.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Caminiti</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/why-do-i-get-all-this-spam.htm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have ever wondered why you get so much spam, this article will take that question away.
&#8220;Our research has revealed a smoking gun that shows that Storm and other botnet spam generates commissionable orders, which are then fulfilled by the supply chains, generating revenue in excess of $150 million per year.&#8221;
 That&#8217;s Million.  With an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have ever wondered why you get so much spam, <a href="http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=156139&amp;WT.svl=news1_1" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.darkreading.com');">this article </a>will take that question away.</p>
<blockquote><p><em><strong>&#8220;Our research has revealed a smoking gun that shows that Storm and other botnet spam generates commissionable orders, which are then fulfilled by the supply chains, generating revenue in excess of $150 million per year.&#8221;</strong></em></p></blockquote>
<p> That&#8217;s Million.  With an M.  It is a lot of money, and that is why you get spam. </p>
<p>This report links canadian drug sales, or probably placebos, with the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storm_botnet" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/en.wikipedia.org');">Storm virus</a>.  These groups capture large amounts of computers running on desktops all over the country, and use them as BotNets.  This allows them to send out emails from several different locations at once, or at different times.  So, blocking specific IP addresses is useless. </p>
<p> One would have thought this would have been fixed with XP SP2.  However, it appears botnets will be with us for a while.  As long as you make it lucrative for someone to send spam, you will get spam. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.logicalorderofchaos.com/why-do-i-get-all-this-spam.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

