<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6771977746402586452</id><updated>2025-10-30T13:59:08.840-05:00</updated><category term="politics"/><category term="election"/><category term="Obama"/><category term="democrats"/><category term="GOP"/><category term="Government"/><category term="Congress"/><category term="cult"/><category term="religion"/><category term="social media"/><category term="Nancy Pelosi"/><category term="digg"/><category term="google"/><category term="humor"/><category term="mixx"/><category term="polygamy"/><category term="republicans"/><category term="ACORN"/><category term="China"/><category term="Clinton"/><category term="McCain"/><category term="Olympics"/><category term="Palin"/><category term="bill clinton"/><category term="business"/><category term="internet"/><category term="law"/><category term="media"/><category term="satire"/><category term="spam"/><category term="superdelegate"/><category term="voter fraud"/><title type="text">Mainstream180 News and Commentary</title><subtitle type="html">A slightly different take on the news.</subtitle><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default" rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default?redirect=false" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/><link href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" rel="hub"/><author><name>Peter Egan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04506163104131342796</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image height="32" rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" src="//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDyjkT6CXJuarQRmONqZFpcBXWGzupLprYtYUPvxMpD13cVW2tzxGc88bkKbPexvTUfWmJOD6o1-bOV5LK-V_nTAh06zxH7ImsOfyZ5FkNCKlbEGbgXky6GKMq1816Wg/s1600/head.JPG" width="32"/></author><generator uri="http://www.blogger.com" version="7.00">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>19</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><xhtml:meta content="noindex" name="robots" xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"/><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6771977746402586452.post-1446859988898755808</id><published>2010-03-27T03:05:00.005-05:00</published><updated>2010-03-27T04:56:57.306-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Congress"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="democrats"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="GOP"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Government"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Nancy Pelosi"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Obama"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="politics"/><title type="text">Despite the Hype, Obamacare is Dead</title><summary type="text">By:  Peter Egan

Obamacare is dead in the water. Yes, I said it and no, I'm not crazy.

Despite what you may have heard, Obamacare still has a long, long way to go before it ever manifests itself as a reality. In addition to the myriad of court challenges by individual states (which may or may not have valid points - I'm not a lawyer), Obamacare still must pass the test of voters this November, </summary><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/feeds/1446859988898755808/comments/default" rel="replies" title="Post Comments" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2010/03/despite-hype-obamacare-is-dead.html#comment-form" rel="replies" title="1 Comments" type="text/html"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/1446859988898755808" rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/1446859988898755808" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2010/03/despite-hype-obamacare-is-dead.html" rel="alternate" title="Despite the Hype, Obamacare is Dead" type="text/html"/><author><name>Peter Egan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04506163104131342796</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image height="32" rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" src="//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDyjkT6CXJuarQRmONqZFpcBXWGzupLprYtYUPvxMpD13cVW2tzxGc88bkKbPexvTUfWmJOD6o1-bOV5LK-V_nTAh06zxH7ImsOfyZ5FkNCKlbEGbgXky6GKMq1816Wg/s1600/head.JPG" width="32"/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6771977746402586452.post-9156989772156340661</id><published>2010-03-19T02:43:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2010-03-19T02:43:34.841-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Congress"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="democrats"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="election"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="GOP"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Government"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="politics"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="republicans"/><title type="text">Republicans Need a Leader Like Newt Gingrich Was in 1994</title><summary type="text">
Author's Note: This post is a response to a comment made on a post on Mixx entitled: A History Lesson on Healthcare Reform... Remember 1994?
That was the title for the Mixx page for the recent Mainstream 180 post entitled: Democrats Have Short Memories, But An Elephant Never Forgets. The comment was a response to a remark from my friend Janejas, who had this to say:@FatLester The difference is </summary><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/feeds/9156989772156340661/comments/default" rel="replies" title="Post Comments" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2010/03/republicans-need-leader-like-newt.html#comment-form" rel="replies" title="0 Comments" type="text/html"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/9156989772156340661" rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/9156989772156340661" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2010/03/republicans-need-leader-like-newt.html" rel="alternate" title="Republicans Need a Leader Like Newt Gingrich Was in 1994" type="text/html"/><author><name>Peter Egan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04506163104131342796</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image height="32" rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" src="//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDyjkT6CXJuarQRmONqZFpcBXWGzupLprYtYUPvxMpD13cVW2tzxGc88bkKbPexvTUfWmJOD6o1-bOV5LK-V_nTAh06zxH7ImsOfyZ5FkNCKlbEGbgXky6GKMq1816Wg/s1600/head.JPG" width="32"/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6771977746402586452.post-5247618465891655124</id><published>2010-03-17T19:46:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2010-03-17T19:46:30.349-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="democrats"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="GOP"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Government"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="politics"/><title type="text">Democrats Have Short Memories, But An Elephant Never Forgets</title><summary type="text">President Barack Obama, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and a plethora of other House and Senate Democrats either have extremely short memories, or are completely inept in their political strategies being deployed in hopes of passing Obamacare, a complete federal takeover of the U.S. healthcare industry.
They are not the first Democrats to pursue such a strategy.&amp;nbsp; As I recall, in the early-to-mid</summary><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/feeds/5247618465891655124/comments/default" rel="replies" title="Post Comments" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2010/03/democrats-have-short-memories-but.html#comment-form" rel="replies" title="4 Comments" type="text/html"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/5247618465891655124" rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/5247618465891655124" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2010/03/democrats-have-short-memories-but.html" rel="alternate" title="Democrats Have Short Memories, But An Elephant Never Forgets" type="text/html"/><author><name>Peter Egan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04506163104131342796</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image height="32" rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" src="//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDyjkT6CXJuarQRmONqZFpcBXWGzupLprYtYUPvxMpD13cVW2tzxGc88bkKbPexvTUfWmJOD6o1-bOV5LK-V_nTAh06zxH7ImsOfyZ5FkNCKlbEGbgXky6GKMq1816Wg/s1600/head.JPG" width="32"/></author><thr:total>4</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6771977746402586452.post-7832454584394111733</id><published>2010-03-15T00:30:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2010-03-15T03:47:39.262-05:00</updated><title type="text">Tea Party Movement Should Not Field Candidates in Elections</title><summary type="text">Tea Party: Good as a Movement, Bad as a Political Party

The 'Tea Party' movement is a good thing as long as it doesn't attempt to become its own party, which would ensure the democrats a number of House and Senate seats they would otherwise not have.

How could this be? Well, think about it. The mere presence of a 'Tea Party Candidate' on a ballot would do little other than siphon votes away </summary><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/feeds/7832454584394111733/comments/default" rel="replies" title="Post Comments" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2010/03/tea-party-movement-should-not-field.html#comment-form" rel="replies" title="1 Comments" type="text/html"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/7832454584394111733" rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/7832454584394111733" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2010/03/tea-party-movement-should-not-field.html" rel="alternate" title="Tea Party Movement Should Not Field Candidates in Elections" type="text/html"/><author><name>Peter Egan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04506163104131342796</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image height="32" rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" src="//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDyjkT6CXJuarQRmONqZFpcBXWGzupLprYtYUPvxMpD13cVW2tzxGc88bkKbPexvTUfWmJOD6o1-bOV5LK-V_nTAh06zxH7ImsOfyZ5FkNCKlbEGbgXky6GKMq1816Wg/s1600/head.JPG" width="32"/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6771977746402586452.post-2963416693406693448</id><published>2010-02-04T18:00:00.006-06:00</published><updated>2013-01-22T19:19:28.754-06:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="business"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="law"/><title type="text">In Defense of Private Companies</title><summary type="text">Private Businesses Aren't Out To Get Their Employees

By: Fat LesterAuthor's Note: This was originally written in response to a post I saw on Amplify about unjust firings by private corporations.As someone who has worked in managerial and executive positions at 100+ employee companies, I can personally attest to the contrary of the main point made by this article.A Director of Human Resources is </summary><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/feeds/2963416693406693448/comments/default" rel="replies" title="Post Comments" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2010/02/in-defense-of-private-companies.html#comment-form" rel="replies" title="0 Comments" type="text/html"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/2963416693406693448" rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/2963416693406693448" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2010/02/in-defense-of-private-companies.html" rel="alternate" title="In Defense of Private Companies" type="text/html"/><author><name>Peter Egan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04506163104131342796</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image height="32" rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" src="//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDyjkT6CXJuarQRmONqZFpcBXWGzupLprYtYUPvxMpD13cVW2tzxGc88bkKbPexvTUfWmJOD6o1-bOV5LK-V_nTAh06zxH7ImsOfyZ5FkNCKlbEGbgXky6GKMq1816Wg/s1600/head.JPG" width="32"/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6771977746402586452.post-1200902262658928996</id><published>2010-01-25T12:45:00.009-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-25T14:01:17.760-06:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Congress"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="GOP"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Government"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="politics"/><title type="text">An Open Letter to Republicans in Congress (House and Senate)</title><summary type="text">This post originated as a response to a post I came across by Joe Barton, Republican Congressman from Texas.Congressman Barton had submitted a story from the Wall Street Journal about the validity of climate science.Rep. Barton's commentary goes as follows: "We need to continue looking into the validity of the science before changing our entire economy. There are just too many embellished claims.</summary><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/feeds/1200902262658928996/comments/default" rel="replies" title="Post Comments" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2010/01/open-letter-to-republicans-in-congress.html#comment-form" rel="replies" title="0 Comments" type="text/html"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/1200902262658928996" rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/1200902262658928996" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2010/01/open-letter-to-republicans-in-congress.html" rel="alternate" title="An Open Letter to Republicans in Congress (House and Senate)" type="text/html"/><author><name>Peter Egan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04506163104131342796</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image height="32" rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" src="//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDyjkT6CXJuarQRmONqZFpcBXWGzupLprYtYUPvxMpD13cVW2tzxGc88bkKbPexvTUfWmJOD6o1-bOV5LK-V_nTAh06zxH7ImsOfyZ5FkNCKlbEGbgXky6GKMq1816Wg/s1600/head.JPG" width="32"/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6771977746402586452.post-3864545830888001744</id><published>2009-03-24T18:23:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2009-03-24T18:42:51.175-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="bill clinton"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="humor"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="politics"/><title type="text">A trip down memory lane (part one)</title><summary type="text">Whenever I'm having a bad day, I find that reminiscing and thinking back to the 'good ole days' often helps cheer me up.I admit, during the democrat primaries last year I was secretly hoping to see Hillary Clinton pull out a victory over Obama.  At first I thought it was merely a case of me cheering for the underdog.  However, today I realized that was not the case at all.It wasn't so much that I</summary><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/feeds/3864545830888001744/comments/default" rel="replies" title="Post Comments" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2009/03/trip-down-memory-lane-part-one.html#comment-form" rel="replies" title="1 Comments" type="text/html"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/3864545830888001744" rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/3864545830888001744" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2009/03/trip-down-memory-lane-part-one.html" rel="alternate" title="A trip down memory lane (part one)" type="text/html"/><author><name>Peter Egan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04506163104131342796</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image height="32" rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" src="//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDyjkT6CXJuarQRmONqZFpcBXWGzupLprYtYUPvxMpD13cVW2tzxGc88bkKbPexvTUfWmJOD6o1-bOV5LK-V_nTAh06zxH7ImsOfyZ5FkNCKlbEGbgXky6GKMq1816Wg/s1600/head.JPG" width="32"/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6771977746402586452.post-1519278829872913381</id><published>2008-10-28T20:30:00.008-05:00</published><updated>2008-10-28T21:28:27.213-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="cult"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="democrats"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="election"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Obama"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="politics"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="religion"/><title type="text">Barack Obama is definitely NOT a Muslim</title><summary type="text">There have been some nasty rumors swirling around throughout the course of the election season purporting that Barack Obama is actually Muslim. As best I can tell, the rumors appear to stem from the fact that Obama's middle name is Hussein. The fact is that this claim (that Obama is Muslim) could not be any further from the truth --- and the proof is below.To even suggest that Barack Obama is </summary><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/feeds/1519278829872913381/comments/default" rel="replies" title="Post Comments" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2008/10/barack-obama-is-definitely-not-muslim.html#comment-form" rel="replies" title="2 Comments" type="text/html"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/1519278829872913381" rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/1519278829872913381" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2008/10/barack-obama-is-definitely-not-muslim.html" rel="alternate" title="Barack Obama is definitely NOT a Muslim" type="text/html"/><author><name>Peter Egan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04506163104131342796</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image height="32" rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" src="//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDyjkT6CXJuarQRmONqZFpcBXWGzupLprYtYUPvxMpD13cVW2tzxGc88bkKbPexvTUfWmJOD6o1-bOV5LK-V_nTAh06zxH7ImsOfyZ5FkNCKlbEGbgXky6GKMq1816Wg/s1600/head.JPG" width="32"/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6771977746402586452.post-1733114398732455838</id><published>2008-10-27T23:14:00.019-05:00</published><updated>2008-10-28T08:04:29.671-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="election"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="humor"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Obama"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="politics"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="satire"/><title type="text">Michelle Obama caught using racial slur during NH campaign stop</title><summary type="text">Disclaimer:  The following post is an attempt at political satire.  For those of you in Rio Linda, that means that the story below is not true (make believe), and is intended to be funny.Portsmouth, New Hampshire  -  Michelle Obama has again come under scrutiny for allegedly using a racial slur during a routine campaign stop in the key battleground state of New Hampshire on Monday.  While having </summary><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/feeds/1733114398732455838/comments/default" rel="replies" title="Post Comments" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2008/10/michelle-obama-caught-using-racial-slur.html#comment-form" rel="replies" title="3 Comments" type="text/html"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/1733114398732455838" rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/1733114398732455838" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2008/10/michelle-obama-caught-using-racial-slur.html" rel="alternate" title="Michelle Obama caught using racial slur during NH campaign stop" type="text/html"/><author><name>Peter Egan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04506163104131342796</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image height="32" rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" src="//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDyjkT6CXJuarQRmONqZFpcBXWGzupLprYtYUPvxMpD13cVW2tzxGc88bkKbPexvTUfWmJOD6o1-bOV5LK-V_nTAh06zxH7ImsOfyZ5FkNCKlbEGbgXky6GKMq1816Wg/s1600/head.JPG" width="32"/></author><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6771977746402586452.post-7987694368889711832</id><published>2008-10-23T23:49:00.006-05:00</published><updated>2008-10-24T00:08:13.775-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="election"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="media"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Obama"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Palin"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="politics"/><title type="text">Sarah Palin's Wardrobe and Michelle Obama's Room Service Bill</title><summary type="text">There has been much controversy surrounding the ever-important development of the RNC spending roughly $150,000 on Governor Sarah Palin's wardrobe.  The RNC has been criticized for spending excessively on the prospective Vice President's attire.  The media has also taken some heat for making an issue of this.It is with that said that I offer the following defense of mainstream reporters and </summary><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/feeds/7987694368889711832/comments/default" rel="replies" title="Post Comments" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2008/10/sarah-palins-wardrobe-and-michelle.html#comment-form" rel="replies" title="9 Comments" type="text/html"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/7987694368889711832" rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/7987694368889711832" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2008/10/sarah-palins-wardrobe-and-michelle.html" rel="alternate" title="Sarah Palin's Wardrobe and Michelle Obama's Room Service Bill" type="text/html"/><author><name>Peter Egan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04506163104131342796</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image height="32" rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" src="//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDyjkT6CXJuarQRmONqZFpcBXWGzupLprYtYUPvxMpD13cVW2tzxGc88bkKbPexvTUfWmJOD6o1-bOV5LK-V_nTAh06zxH7ImsOfyZ5FkNCKlbEGbgXky6GKMq1816Wg/s1600/head.JPG" width="32"/></author><thr:total>9</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6771977746402586452.post-6109046226932175588</id><published>2008-10-23T19:19:00.007-05:00</published><updated>2008-10-23T19:50:25.638-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ACORN"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="election"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Obama"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="politics"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="voter fraud"/><title type="text">ACORN's Bloodless Coup D'Etat</title><summary type="text">The following is a response to an article entitled "The Dangers of Elections", which appeared at thebiglifeonline.com.Freedom ain't free!  It took a lot of bloodshed, death and violence to implement the electoral system of the American republic.  The result is that for the past couple centuries elections in the United States have been largely free of violent intimidation tactics such as those </summary><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/feeds/6109046226932175588/comments/default" rel="replies" title="Post Comments" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2008/10/acorns-bloodless-coup-detat.html#comment-form" rel="replies" title="0 Comments" type="text/html"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/6109046226932175588" rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/6109046226932175588" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2008/10/acorns-bloodless-coup-detat.html" rel="alternate" title="ACORN's Bloodless Coup D'Etat" type="text/html"/><author><name>Peter Egan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04506163104131342796</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image height="32" rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" src="//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDyjkT6CXJuarQRmONqZFpcBXWGzupLprYtYUPvxMpD13cVW2tzxGc88bkKbPexvTUfWmJOD6o1-bOV5LK-V_nTAh06zxH7ImsOfyZ5FkNCKlbEGbgXky6GKMq1816Wg/s1600/head.JPG" width="32"/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6771977746402586452.post-7715681325766862265</id><published>2008-05-01T01:17:00.009-05:00</published><updated>2008-05-01T04:25:00.700-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="cult"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="polygamy"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="religion"/><title type="text">Big Brother Not Behind Raid on Polygamist Compound</title><summary type="text">Despite my flawless logic, the early returns on my recent post regarding the raid on the compound of a fundamentalist Mormon group alleged to have been engaging in systematic abuses (including sexual abuse) of their own children seem to indicate that there are still a lot of people out there who believe the raid never should have happened.  You can check out some of the reader responses to the </summary><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/feeds/7715681325766862265/comments/default" rel="replies" title="Post Comments" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2008/05/big-brother-not-behind-raid-on.html#comment-form" rel="replies" title="0 Comments" type="text/html"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/7715681325766862265" rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/7715681325766862265" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2008/05/big-brother-not-behind-raid-on.html" rel="alternate" title="Big Brother Not Behind Raid on Polygamist Compound" type="text/html"/><author><name>Peter Egan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04506163104131342796</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image height="32" rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" src="//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDyjkT6CXJuarQRmONqZFpcBXWGzupLprYtYUPvxMpD13cVW2tzxGc88bkKbPexvTUfWmJOD6o1-bOV5LK-V_nTAh06zxH7ImsOfyZ5FkNCKlbEGbgXky6GKMq1816Wg/s1600/head.JPG" width="32"/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6771977746402586452.post-1326892654152619766</id><published>2008-04-29T14:40:00.014-05:00</published><updated>2008-04-29T17:16:31.736-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="cult"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="polygamy"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="religion"/><title type="text">Authorities were right to bust-up Texas polygamist cult</title><summary type="text">In the aftermath of the recent raid on a polygamist cult in Texas, I have been shocked and dismayed by some of the comments I've been reading on various social media sites and blogs by people who feel that the children should not have been removed from the compound or separated from their parents.I came across the following comment today in a story at Mixx about the aftermath of the raid:  "they </summary><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/feeds/1326892654152619766/comments/default" rel="replies" title="Post Comments" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2008/04/authorities-were-right-to-bust-up-texas.html#comment-form" rel="replies" title="0 Comments" type="text/html"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/1326892654152619766" rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/1326892654152619766" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2008/04/authorities-were-right-to-bust-up-texas.html" rel="alternate" title="Authorities were right to bust-up Texas polygamist cult" type="text/html"/><author><name>Peter Egan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04506163104131342796</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image height="32" rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" src="//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDyjkT6CXJuarQRmONqZFpcBXWGzupLprYtYUPvxMpD13cVW2tzxGc88bkKbPexvTUfWmJOD6o1-bOV5LK-V_nTAh06zxH7ImsOfyZ5FkNCKlbEGbgXky6GKMq1816Wg/s1600/head.JPG" width="32"/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6771977746402586452.post-8191243247361633497</id><published>2008-04-12T02:56:00.006-05:00</published><updated>2008-05-01T01:07:04.613-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="digg"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="google"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="mixx"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="social media"/><title type="text">Don't count your Diggs before they hatch</title><summary type="text">This post began as a comment I was writing in response to an article on Jason Calcanis' blog entitled "Who should Digg sell to: Newscorp, Microsoft, or Google?".It's one thing for two opposite sides of a negotiation to have reached an agreement in principle over a proposed sale -- one in which the price is off-the-table and only the final details are left to be worked out.  It is a completely </summary><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/feeds/8191243247361633497/comments/default" rel="replies" title="Post Comments" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2008/04/dont-count-your-diggs-before-they-hatch.html#comment-form" rel="replies" title="2 Comments" type="text/html"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/8191243247361633497" rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/8191243247361633497" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2008/04/dont-count-your-diggs-before-they-hatch.html" rel="alternate" title="Don't count your Diggs before they hatch" type="text/html"/><author><name>Peter Egan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04506163104131342796</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image height="32" rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" src="//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDyjkT6CXJuarQRmONqZFpcBXWGzupLprYtYUPvxMpD13cVW2tzxGc88bkKbPexvTUfWmJOD6o1-bOV5LK-V_nTAh06zxH7ImsOfyZ5FkNCKlbEGbgXky6GKMq1816Wg/s1600/head.JPG" width="32"/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6771977746402586452.post-2737738271882255827</id><published>2008-04-10T13:28:00.012-05:00</published><updated>2008-04-11T16:52:29.783-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="digg"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="google"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="internet"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="social media"/><title type="text">Waltz Rumor Part of Google's Negotiating Strategy with Digg</title><summary type="text">The social media world was recently rocked by the news/rumor that Google may be planning to punish websites and blogs that are frequently linked to by social media sites. For those not yet familiar with the situation, here are a couple of links to write-ups covering this recent development:Google to punish pagerank for Digg stories?How to avoid the next Google slap on social marketingPlan </summary><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/feeds/2737738271882255827/comments/default" rel="replies" title="Post Comments" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2008/04/waltz-rumor-part-of-googles-negotiating.html#comment-form" rel="replies" title="1 Comments" type="text/html"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/2737738271882255827" rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/2737738271882255827" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2008/04/waltz-rumor-part-of-googles-negotiating.html" rel="alternate" title="Waltz Rumor Part of Google's Negotiating Strategy with Digg" type="text/html"/><author><name>Peter Egan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04506163104131342796</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image height="32" rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" src="//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDyjkT6CXJuarQRmONqZFpcBXWGzupLprYtYUPvxMpD13cVW2tzxGc88bkKbPexvTUfWmJOD6o1-bOV5LK-V_nTAh06zxH7ImsOfyZ5FkNCKlbEGbgXky6GKMq1816Wg/s1600/head.JPG" width="32"/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6771977746402586452.post-8512851923362230236</id><published>2008-04-02T06:17:00.012-05:00</published><updated>2008-04-29T17:17:34.335-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Nancy Pelosi"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Olympics"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="politics"/><title type="text">Kudos to Nancy Pelosi for standing-up to China's thuggery</title><summary type="text">I wish more of America's so-called leaders would stand up and join House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in condemning the Chinese communist government and calling for an American boycott of the 2008 Olympics in Beijing.  China's oligarchy and the bloodthirsty regime it controls makes the late Fidel Castro look like Mr. Rogers by comparison.  Castro was what he was when he was alive (see footnote), but he </summary><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/feeds/8512851923362230236/comments/default" rel="replies" title="Post Comments" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2008/04/kudos-to-nancy-pelosi-for-standing-up.html#comment-form" rel="replies" title="3 Comments" type="text/html"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/8512851923362230236" rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/8512851923362230236" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2008/04/kudos-to-nancy-pelosi-for-standing-up.html" rel="alternate" title="Kudos to Nancy Pelosi for standing-up to China's thuggery" type="text/html"/><author><name>Peter Egan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04506163104131342796</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image height="32" rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" src="//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDyjkT6CXJuarQRmONqZFpcBXWGzupLprYtYUPvxMpD13cVW2tzxGc88bkKbPexvTUfWmJOD6o1-bOV5LK-V_nTAh06zxH7ImsOfyZ5FkNCKlbEGbgXky6GKMq1816Wg/s1600/head.JPG" width="32"/></author><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6771977746402586452.post-6750094678351124609</id><published>2008-03-18T00:36:00.005-05:00</published><updated>2008-03-18T02:18:12.407-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Clinton"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="democrats"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="election"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="GOP"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="McCain"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Obama"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="politics"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="republicans"/><title type="text">Presidential Race is McCain's to Lose</title><summary type="text">Even before he knows who his opponent will be, the 2008 presidential election looks to be developing into a shoe-in for Senator John McCain and the Republicans.Granted, there is a lot of time between now and November, and a lot can happen in a very short time when it comes to presidential elections.  Heck, three of the four names on the ballot have yet to be determined.  How then, can one </summary><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/feeds/6750094678351124609/comments/default" rel="replies" title="Post Comments" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2008/03/presidential-race-is-mccains-to-lose.html#comment-form" rel="replies" title="1 Comments" type="text/html"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/6750094678351124609" rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/6750094678351124609" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2008/03/presidential-race-is-mccains-to-lose.html" rel="alternate" title="Presidential Race is McCain's to Lose" type="text/html"/><author><name>Peter Egan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04506163104131342796</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image height="32" rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" src="//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDyjkT6CXJuarQRmONqZFpcBXWGzupLprYtYUPvxMpD13cVW2tzxGc88bkKbPexvTUfWmJOD6o1-bOV5LK-V_nTAh06zxH7ImsOfyZ5FkNCKlbEGbgXky6GKMq1816Wg/s1600/head.JPG" width="32"/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6771977746402586452.post-7606151379117335047</id><published>2008-03-11T03:06:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2008-03-11T03:28:01.888-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="democrats"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="election"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="politics"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="superdelegate"/><title type="text">The Irony with the Democrats' Superdelegate System</title><summary type="text">Has anyone else noticed the irony in the Democratic Party's Superdelegate system being used to determine its nominee?  This is a far more Republican primary system than the one the Republicans use to choose a nominee, if you go by the literal definitions of the terms "democratic" and "republican".The Superdelegate system is different from the traditional primary system in that some influential </summary><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/feeds/7606151379117335047/comments/default" rel="replies" title="Post Comments" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2008/03/irony-with-democrats-superdelegate.html#comment-form" rel="replies" title="0 Comments" type="text/html"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/7606151379117335047" rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/7606151379117335047" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2008/03/irony-with-democrats-superdelegate.html" rel="alternate" title="The Irony with the Democrats' Superdelegate System" type="text/html"/><author><name>Peter Egan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04506163104131342796</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image height="32" rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" src="//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDyjkT6CXJuarQRmONqZFpcBXWGzupLprYtYUPvxMpD13cVW2tzxGc88bkKbPexvTUfWmJOD6o1-bOV5LK-V_nTAh06zxH7ImsOfyZ5FkNCKlbEGbgXky6GKMq1816Wg/s1600/head.JPG" width="32"/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6771977746402586452.post-6618171913303489911</id><published>2008-02-19T15:51:00.010-06:00</published><updated>2008-03-19T03:19:43.972-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="mixx"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="social media"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="spam"/><title type="text">The Devil's Take: Naivety and Spam Taste the Same</title><summary type="text">   By:  The InsiderWith all the talk of spam circulating around the Mixx community of late, I can't help but offer a somewhat contrarian take on the matter.  Make no mistake, I'm not any more fond of spam than anyone else involved in the social media scene.That said, I think that the spam on Mixx is mild relative to comparable sites. That is not to suggest it be taken lightly, but let's not make </summary><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/feeds/6618171913303489911/comments/default" rel="replies" title="Post Comments" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2008/02/devils-take-naivety-and-spam-taste-same.html#comment-form" rel="replies" title="0 Comments" type="text/html"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/6618171913303489911" rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6771977746402586452/posts/default/6618171913303489911" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"/><link href="http://mainstream180.blogspot.com/2008/02/devils-take-naivety-and-spam-taste-same.html" rel="alternate" title="The Devil's Take: Naivety and Spam Taste the Same" type="text/html"/><author><name>Peter Egan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04506163104131342796</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image height="32" rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" src="//blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDyjkT6CXJuarQRmONqZFpcBXWGzupLprYtYUPvxMpD13cVW2tzxGc88bkKbPexvTUfWmJOD6o1-bOV5LK-V_nTAh06zxH7ImsOfyZ5FkNCKlbEGbgXky6GKMq1816Wg/s1600/head.JPG" width="32"/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>