You won’t see these sponsored definitions every time as they’re interspersed with Twitter definitions that are not sponsored but simply informational or helpful, I guess.  An example of a sponsored definition is Exec Tweets and Cinema Tweets — essentially text ads in the guise of being factoids and links to useful apps and services.

According to a blog post I found on blog.twitter.com from back in March, it looks like Federated Media is handling the Twitter sponsored definitions, “It turns out the folks over at Federated Media have both the resources and the expertise. So if you’re a major brand and you want to sponsor a topic-focused social media experience with Twitter, we suggest Federated Media—they’ll fix you up right,” which could be a real score for Federated.

Twitter has done a very good job of working this is organically — I never noticed it, as I said, until this morning.

Doing a cursory search, nobody is freaking out and there hasn’t been any direct reference to advertising on Twitter short of a coy post on May 20 — Does Twitter Hate Advertising?, “Do we hate advertising? Of course not. It’s a huge industry filled with creativity and inspiration. There’s also room for new innovation in advertising, marketing, and public relations and Twitter is already part of that.”

So, no direct mention of the “sponsored definition” campaign.  Very smooth and with zero blowback.

That said, if you have a Twitter app or service and want to get into the loop, I guess you should reach out to Federated Media, though I wonder if there might be a secret handshake or password to get yourself into an ad on Twitter.

And, to look at the Twitter-to-come, Seth Simonds also mentions that there are proper 185px ×185px image ads showing on Twitter Japan, which you can see for yourself, “You can see for yourself by visiting the account settings of your Twitter account and changing the language preference to Japanese.” — in this case, the ad is static and sells Windows 7 and Windows Vista from the Japanese Microsoft Store.

Very interesting.  What do you think? (Via Socialmedia.biz)

Currently, we’re doing a blogger outreach and social media campaign on behalf of OLX in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. In July, we’ll be adding Russian into the mix; in August, we’ll be adding Polish.  Last year, we did a crisis management and online reputation defense campaign for a financial services client in German and French as well, in addition to English, Spanish, and Portuguese.

We really enjoy doing these these multinational, multilingual, and multicultural campaigns because we have staff all over the world, in seven countries on four continents.  Our CEO, Mark Harrison, is a polyglot, with German his co-fluent language – he is in Berlin, our European base – additionally, he speaks Spanish, French, Portuguese, and Swahili.

While there most surely are quite a few cultural differences (call or email us for many funny examples), the Internet community has an over-arching global protocol, which I argue is simply “being human”: one needs to listen, be responsive,  engage on a human level, and always assume good intent — especially when it comes to earned media blogger campaigns.  This works worldwide.

Logistically, the most important hire for our foreign language campaigns is the native-speaker project lead in each language, especially in the languages that you and your polyglot CEO can’t read.  Just because you can read, write, and/or speak fluent [insert language here] it doesn’t mean you think like [insert nationality here].  The cultural knowledge, and the “nativeness” of the (written) voice are very import to getting the communications across most effectively.

It is essential to work directly with a native-speaker who is well in touch with his/her native culture. When doing communications work internationally, how you say something is as important as what you say.

Also, technologically, it is essential to make certain you have your email solution set up to support 8-bit character sets and that you have tested and re-tested because having Cyrillic or Kanji arrive corrupted or poorly-rendered is unacceptable.

Test, retest, consult an expert.  When it comes to reducing accented and special-character Roman characters to ASCII, Internet denizens are sort of used to it, be it turning the German “ß” (ess-zett) to “ss” or realizing that much of the world doesn’t use our quotes but often uses <<>> or ‘  ’.

Additionally, numbers are rendered differently in different languages, such as “€10,00″ instead of “€10.00″ and the like.  These are the gaffs that make you seem like you don’t know what you’re doing – and as if you are not taking the time to respect the reader.

At the end of the day, don’t let these details prevent you from giving it a go. The big secret is that there is a vibrant blogosphere, Twittersphere, and forumsphere everywhere now, no matter what anyone says or thinks they know.

Since I recently spent a year in Berlin, I know that I have heard this a hundred times, “what you’re doing in the US with bloggers is very cool, but in Germany there are very few bloggers and they’re all friends and they’re very cliquey and it would never work here,” which is, strangely enough, what everyone I have spoken to says about their country’s bloggers, including the United Kingdom, which is patently untrue.  Every new country we begin interacting with we discover has a whole world of bloggers, etc. outside these supposed monolithic A-list cliques.  It’s just that no one seems to be making the effort to check if the consensus reality is the truth, or is actually the Emperor’s new clothes.

We’re having a lot of fun on these campaigns and expect to begin new campaigns in German and French as well in the short-term as well.

If you would like more information on what we do or if you would like to set up a call, please email me at chris.abraham@abrahamharrison.com or call our main line, +1 202-657-4769 and we’d be happy to help.

Please scroll down and explore some of the blogger-types we have collected and engage on a daily-basis.  Of course, when a client needs something new — such as our upcoming engagement with Russian and Polish bloggers — we’re very efficient and experienced in researching, locating, and harvesting the most appropriate bloggers. (Via Abraham Harrison)

• A-list Bloggers
• Academic Bloggers
• Activist Bloggers
• Africa Bloggers
• African-American Bloggers
• Alumni Bloggers
• Animal Bloggers
• Anti-Facebook Bloggers
• Asia English Speaking Bloggers
• Baseball Bloggers
• Big Brothers/Sisters Bloggers
• Cancer Survivor’s Bloggers
• College Students Bloggers
• Colorado Bloggers
• Combined Top & Marketing Bloggers
• Contest Aggregation Bloggers
• Corporate Social Responsibility Bloggers
• Craigslist/Online Auction Bloggers
• Daddy Bloggers
• Deaf Community Bloggers
• Democrats Bloggers
• eBay User Bloggers
• Education Bloggers
• Environmental Bloggers
• Ex-Patriate Bloggers
• ExPatriate Health Insurance Bloggers
• Food Bloggers
• Foster Family / Adoption Bloggers
• General Political Bloggers
• Grandparents Bloggers
• Green Bloggers
• Health Bloggers
• Hearing Impaired
• Illinois Bloggers
• India (english speaking) Bloggers
• Investment Bloggers
• Job Seeker Bloggers
• Lawyer Blogs / Blawgs and Blawgers
• Liberal Bloggers
• Marketing Bloggers
• Military Bloggers
• Moderate Bloggers
• Mommy Bloggers
• New Education Bloggers
• New Mexico Bloggers
• Newest Marketing Bloggers
• NY Area Bloggers
• Ohio Bloggers
• Online Dating Bloggers
• Pennsylvania Bloggers
• Photography Bloggers
• Portuguese Speaking College Bloggers
• Portuguese Speaking Daddy Bloggers
• Portuguese Speaking Job Seekers Bloggers
• Portuguese Speaking Mommy Bloggers
• Portuguese Speaking Real Estate Bloggers
• Portuguese Speaking Saving Money Bloggers
• Portuguese Speaking Tech Bloggers
• Real Estate Bloggers
• Real Estate Brokers /NYC Bloggers – TriState Area
• Rebate and Coupon Sites Bloggers
• Recent College Grads Bloggers
• Reconnectors Bloggers
• Running/Jogging/Marathon Bloggers
• Russian Mommy Bloggers
• Russian Tech Bloggers
• Saving Money Bloggers
• Social Networks Bloggers
• Spanish Language Job Seeker Bloggers
• Spanish Language Saving Money Bloggers
• Spanish Language Speaking College Bloggers
• Spanish Language Speaking Mommy Bloggers
• Spanish Language Speaking Real Estate Bloggers
• Spanish Language Speaking Tech Bloggers
• Spirituality Bloggers
• Sustainers Bloggers
• Tech Bloggers
• Teen Lifestyle Influencers/Teen Bloggers
• Top Blog Bloggers
• Top Environmental Bloggers
• Top Liberal Bloggers
• USA: North-East State Bloggers
• Video Sharing Sites Bloggers
• Washington DC Bloggers
• Women’s Lifestyle Bloggers
• Women’s Self Help Bloggers
• World Food Day Bloggers
• Yoga/Soccer/Martial Arts & Sports Nutrition Bloggers
• Young Volunteer Bloggers

When I wrote Twitter Is What Second Life Wasn’t: Light, Cheap and Open I was addressing something simple:

“the hype surrounding Twitter may well be hype but isn’t the same sort of hype that Second Life enjoyed 2-3 years ago, and here’s why.”

Well, I forgot how passionate Second Lifers are and so it goes.  So it was delicious to discover the 20-or-so comments in response to my recent AdAge DigitalNext article.  Here’s the comments through to today:

By jason_miletsky | totowa, NJ June 26, 2009 05:32:15 pm:

I’m not a fan of Second life by any means – I’ve written plenty of scathing blog posts on its demise myself (http://bit.ly/Qat0k), and I am absolutely a fan of Twitter. But I don’t think Second Life vs. Twitter is a fair comparison. Far from the cliched apples and oranges, this is more like apples and marshmallows.

Twitter exists as a source of information, news, gossip, updates, conversation – it’s a platform for communication between friends, families or even brands and their consumers. But all it takes is a little effort to follow people who share your interest, and all of sudden every column of TweetDeck is filled with life – the empty room we’re all tweeting in at the start can get pretty crowded pretty quickly. Same with Facebook – maybe it’s a walled in environment, but anybody who makes the slightest effort to connect with people can log in and see some activity.

None of that is true with Second Life, which would have benefited from a few more boundaries (vitutally geographically speaking). Second Life offers so much space there simply aren’t enough people to occupy it, so it becomes very lonely very quickly. Really, there’s nothing more depressing than wandering around an enormous Second Life mall and being the only one there. It’s right about them when you look up and realize, huh…maybe my first life isn’t so bad after all. So once the joy of flying is over (usually after the first 5 minutes), there’s just not a lot more to do there.

However, I think both Facebook and Twitter face some of the same dangers that Second Life ultimately succumbed to, and that the increasingly visible presence of spammers, get-rich-quick schemes and sex pushers. More and more often I find myself unfollowing someone on Twitter who wants to show me how they made $5,000 posting Tweets, or how I can get thousands of new followers. Facebook is no different – I’m sure by now everyone on there has gotten a few suspicious e-mails from crooks trying to steal their name and password. If it happens enough, people will eventually stay away from these networks and look elsewhere for their networking. They’ll still be around, but they’ll be a shadow of their former selves – Second Life still exists, but it’s little more than a virtual Red Light District in some seedy part of town.

I’m sorry – did I say that there was nothing more depressing than wandering around an empty Second Life mall? That was wrong – watching a Second Life stripper grind against a virtual pole goes well beyond depressing, and border on simply pathetic.

Jason Miletsky
CEO, PFS Marketwyse
Author, ‘Perspectives on Marketing’ and ‘Perspectives on Branding’

http://www.pfsmarketwyse.com

http://twitter.com/jason_miletsky

Permalink

By chrisabraham | Berlin June 26, 2009 07:08:19 pm:

I agree with you. I don’t think you can compare them either, which is why I wrote this. People keep on saying, “Twitter hype is just like what happened with Second Life. Nope.

Permalink

By jason_miletsky | totowa, NJ June 26, 2009 07:24:17 pm:

Ah – Sorry, Chris, if I misunderstood your point there. Thanks for clarifying, and for bringing the topic to attention. Good piece.

Jason

Permalink

By chrisabraham | Berlin June 26, 2009 08:39:58 pm:

Well, I am glad we’re on the same page. Actually, I am glad that you commented here — thanks!

Permalink

By valencio | Dubai June 27, 2009 03:26:38 am:

I will recommend using Email Charger for all bulk email marketing needs. Its the best bulk email marketing software I have used so far.

Permalink

By MarcoP123 | Philadelphia, PA June 27, 2009 09:26:48 am:

There’s really no comparison between Second Life and Twitter. Second Life is a vehicle for people to escape reality and create new ones. Twitter is a vehicle for people to share reality quickly and succinctly. I do strategic consulting work for a Philadelphia based full-service marketing communications agency (http://www.domusinc.com). I also have some musings on the Domus blog site (http://domusinc.blogspot.com). In those two capacities, I see and work with customers who immediately understand and want to be part of the Twitter community – a much faster adoption rate than so many previous technologies.

Permalink

By ASantiago23 | Lakeland, FL June 27, 2009 12:44:45 pm:

Thank you for this great article. I find it so interesting how Ad Age writing are so pro or against “social media.” Twitter is phenomenal. It has given me and my projects more real readers and followers than MySpace, Facebook, Live Journal, and Pure Volume together.

I am really intrigued with what will come next from them. And yes, the Iran explosion via Twitter, I think, is the separating factor between Twitter and the rest.

But ultimately, I think that Google Wave will CRUSH everyone!

Permalink

By chrisabraham | Berlin June 27, 2009 12:54:58 pm:

“But ultimately, I think that Google Wave will CRUSH everyone!”

I will believe it when I see it — and I sort of believe it already — however, Twitter has an amazing lead and might very well benefit from making itself more of a need than a want.

Seeing the State Department preempt a scheduled Twitter maintenance because of what was going on in Iran was huge. I don’t think any of us have realized how much of a change agent Twitter must really be if State is doing interventions.

I wonder if there may very well be Government and Homeland Security interest in the wellness and prosperity and success.

However, don’t even quote me as saying that Twitter is too big to fail, but I have never seen anything with this level of ubiquity.

Sure, Twitter could very well — surely — fly high and then crash. Who knows. I don’t think so. Thousands of companies have invested big bucks, big resources, and a lot of “face” into Twitter — and I have invested over 18,000 tweets into Twitter.

I personally have a lot invested in Twitter. How about you?

Permalink

By Spartanic | london, NY June 27, 2009 01:24:49 pm:

This is a short sighted and ill informed article. So you are saying twitter is a sucess? How on – what basis, that lots of people use it?

Whats the usual measure of success? – the bottom line… How much money does twitter make? $0 – Second life is a monetised and profitable product.

Permalink

By chrisabraham | Berlin June 27, 2009 06:36:03 pm:

@Spartanic I would say that obsessing about “bottom line” is the kind of short-sightedness that got us (all — even the Brits) into this financial mess. Twitter is dominating a space that is actually a mad land-grab rush (you might not aware of it because Facebook, MySpace, and Twitter are so far about everyone else) and it is essential not to spook anyone off… especially the earlier adopters who are looking to diss anything that “sells out” — and, when it hearty competition with Facebook, it is essential to make certain that this “new” — 2007? — tool wins the race.

Permalink

By Spartanic | london, NY June 28, 2009 01:46:25 pm:

I’m a big fan of Twitter don’t get me wrong. I just think its a bit wrong to take pop shots at ‘unfashionable’ platforms such as SL because they are not the flavour of the month.

The end of the day these services are a business model – and so far twitter only exists because someone is paying its bills (i’d hate to think about their hosting costs). If its trying to “win the race” as you say – when is the payout day for the investor? Twitter seems very reluctant to find a way to monetise – Either because they think it might put people off – or they cant think of an effective way to get people to pay.

“This financial mess” as you put it, I fear comes from the whole attitude of throwing money at something in the hope that some bigger fish will buy them off – rather than building a strategy that will profit enough to pay the running costs (at minimum). The bottom line isn’t short sightedness – its a reality.

If Twitter does have a strategy and is holding back – all well and good. But I wouldn’t start throwing around claims its a success over an already profitable company just yet.

Permalink

By chrisabraham | Berlin June 28, 2009 02:45:28 pm:

I don’t think I come across as anti-SL, I just wanted to explain why I believe Second Life failed (did it fail? I don’t hear much about it at all) — my only reason for writing this article is to say that Twitter will continue expanding because it is permanent and not ephemeral, it is free and not cost-dependent (you stop paying in SL, you lose your dream house), it is open system and not a proprietary walled village (Google is not allowed into Second Life and even if it were, there is really no there there to index), and finally, Twitter has gone a lot further down the road towards making Twitter into a household name — even if it doesn’t actually have as much registration penetration as does Facebook.

Twitter knows — and their investors know — that the Twitterati will bail to FriendFeed, to Plurk, and to Laconi.ca the moment that Twitter start heavily monetization. Good timing is essential here and I think Twitter will focus, at first, on making money through B2B licensing, through Twitter PRO services (which might charge users money for extra API calls since we are only allotted 100 calls per/hour, which is a serious impairment when you follow tens of thousands of people — hell I would pay for more API calls — Twitter, hello?).

Anyway, I am coming from the assumption that Second Life is a wasteland, the only people who are really participating are academics who are researching and sharing and educating using Second Life’s virtual world and a small cadre of faithfuls. I am assuming that most brands have abandoned SecondLife, though I may be mistaken.

I may be wrong, please enlighten me.

Permalink

By Spartanic | london, NY June 28, 2009 07:19:16 pm:

Well this is where you contradict yourself. In your opening statement you are saying “ascent and crash of Second Life”

An then in your previous comment you say “did it fail? & “I am coming from the assumption that Second Life is a wasteland” & I don’t hear much about it at all” – I suggest when making sweeping and provocative statements you do some research, otherwise someone might come along and challenge it ;)

You article talks of “Outlive[ing] the Hype Cycle” – Well second Life seems to be surviving without the hype cycle doesn’t it? Believe me I don’t think its perfect by any means. But its standing on its own two feet which a lot of web companies cannot claim.

You say that Twitter is open, free and you cant lose your content on it? really? Is this so? – Again – someone else is bankrolling your content here – if Twitter would fold over night – so would all of its content (unless you’ve read it into an external db of course, have you done that?).

In regard to Google, yes Google does index Second Life – Google is used for its search engine and also its mapping system. that content is just not shown on web search.

I think you are right to say that people will jump ship if Twitter were to start to heavily charge for its services. That’s why I think they may just be waiting for someone like Google to buy them out. Their competitors have much more functionality, all they don’t have is the brand recognition. That’s hardly a recipe for outlasting the Hype Cycle either is it? Twitter has trouble meeting the load as it is, let alone with more functionality.

I agree that the nature of Twitter would make it easier to survive in theory. Text messages are a lot simpler to deal with than a complex persistent 3d environment. But, like I was saying – if it can’t sustain itself then it its not really going to live much past the free lunch.

Permalink

By ProkofyNeva | Second Life, NY June 28, 2009 08:16:20 pm:

Chris, your over-exaggeration of Twitter and banging on Second Life is typical of what I would call a technocommunist world view that abhors free enterprise — except for yourself and your ideologically approved cronies of the left. You betray your hand by praising IRC. Twitter is proprietary software just as much as Second Life is — Twitter is a “walled garden” too. The presence of APIs have made it useful for power usages and automatic following and searching, but SL is a freemium service with very low barriers to entrepreneurism — and that’s a good thing (not just for you). Your strange belief that SL is marred by “greedyness and avarice” (I guess that’s what you call “capitalism” and “commerce” practiced by people other than the heads of new digital social media ad firms lol) while Twitter is sanctified by its APIness is just plain ridiculous.

Most Twitter APIs are used by SEO and new media gurus in all kinds of money-making schemes of what many see as the most shoddy and greedy kind (just look on Twitter and who uses it for God’s sake), and the really major power usage of Twitter is by firms that want to scrape the data to sell ads or sell commercial information about users for commercial purposes. *And that’s ok*. Isn’t that what YOU do?

Why would somebody putting up a commercial island for a campaign or a long-time customer relations presence in SL be “greedy” and someone scraping all the data of tracking trends for commercial purposes be blessed as “cool”? Makes no sense. Different tools for different purposes and outcomes.

Trying to compare Twitter with its massive numbers of users and Second Life with its small number of users is like complaining that CNN has a lot of users and the New Yorker only has a small number of subscribers. They are different forms of media, used differently and one need not cancel out the other.

Your take on SL seems to have evolved mainly through its hyping by a few of the very ad agencies that prop up this very site here storming on the scene in 2007 and deciding, at a time when they were hugely nervous and scared over huge amounts of loss of ad revenue from dying newspapers, that perhaps virtual worlds and games were the “next big thing”. They were too early and too clueless with this, but that’s a function of their expectations. These same ad companies have gotten no more ROI from Twitter than they’ve gotten out of SL (Skittles, anyone?)SL is good for a deeper, more intensive purpose, for meetings and raising of awareness and support — really building communities; and also for small business inworld.

SL offers you that more intensive interaction that is essentially a replacement for f2f meetings because you are in an immersive environment and able to reach people at an intellectual and emotional level, with real-time interactive 3-D communication, that you just can’t reach with a 140 tweet. Serendipity rules in SL

Permalink

By ProkofyNeva | Second Life, NY June 28, 2009 08:24:29 pm:

The lease persuasive of your arguments is that there is something “ephemeral” about Second Life and not about Twitter. What, you save somewhere *inside* the service of Twitter which is, er, “eternal” all the thousands of updates you’ve made. I have 15,000 updates in two years of tweeting and some 1300 followers whose updates I follow — like…I access this somewhere? lol Please. I use search for *real-time* needs, not research as I would Google. In the same way, in five years of SL, I have 25,000 pieces of inventory, many of them notecards from meetings, tutorials, discussions, etc. all of which save within that system (unlike anything twitter offers). Even if SL were to go down tomorrow, I could still cut and paste out of that application — I’d be lucky to successfully page through all the Twitter updates past a few months given its lag and error messages.

But the point of social media is not to keep communications in some big file — both SL and Twitter are on Google, and there are applications such as those your digital PR new media firm uses for clients.

Twitter is not a place where you can build relationships and collaborat — it’s a signal pusher with a lot of noise pushing against it, for life-casting or mind-casting, but little means of taking it beyond the cursory clipped expression except by going into Friendfeed or on Skype or into Second Life or Metaplace or some other venue for voice or text chat without Twitter restrictions.

You don’t need to defend Twitter by bashing on Second Life. Your assessment of SL’s hype cycle is based on superficial media reports and not research of the sort you wouldn’t accept as true if they were about Twitter. Twitter is overhyped and will undergo a crash in old media coverage, too, just like Second Life. You’re oblivious to the role that dying old media played in touting both Twitter and SL, and tone deaf to the possibilities for both Twitter and SL *after* the old media hype is over. In fact the two services are complementary and not contradictory.

Permalink

By ProkofyNeva | Second Life, NY June 28, 2009 08:43:29 pm:

Jason, how is it that you came to view SL through this cynical keyhole? Did you type “sex” or “mall” or “stripper” or “shopping” into a search engine? Is that how you use the Internet at large?

Or are you saying you didn’t even bother to search that one time you came to Second Life, and just made a lazy click on the old “Popular Places”? By popular outcry, that list was removed because it was all gamed by bots and camping (SEO tricks) — there is a more curated and meaningful list of suggestions now under Showcase and at many resident-made infohubs like mine in Ross.

While SL can have a steep learning curve, the very basics — search on topics to go to events and places — are just like Google and just as easy to use. Talking to other people is as easy as it is on Twitter.

If you typed in words like Obama, Iran, non-profit, government, science, history, literature, etc. you might have a very different experience than visiting clubs with AFK dancers on sex poles — something that in fact really does make up a small portion of Second Life even if it gets inflated traffic from bots like the SEO gurus on Twitter now get seemingly enormous numbers of followers using automatic scripts).

You *do* put filters on your email to get rid of the Viagra ads, right? You can do the same in SL.

In the last few weeks, here are some of the things I’ve done in Second Life:

o hosted an event to talk to people around the world who came through serendipity — educators, journalists, human rights activists, etc. to talk about Iran and the “Twitter Revolution” and talk about ways to be supportive to democracy in Iran.

o followed a lecture by a U.S. government official about Obama’s technology programs and social media strategies

o visited the MacArthur Foundation’s island to learn about their programs funding all kinds of interesting projects around the world

o visited three amazing art installations and discussed with fellow visitors

o attended 3 live music concerts by artists with original music

o wrote a 3-D interactive science fiction story and interacted with other people in the story to discuss what new technology will bring to us — and take away from us in the future

o made US $200 from my rentals and content business above costs to use on real-life bills

What did I do on Twitter? I *talked* about the Iranian revolution but didn’t *do* anything about it. I spent an hour trying to weed out all the SEO goofs following me to get follow-backs using scripts. I learned about a few interesting articles — but often the same articles I get pasted to me in numerous groups and chats in SL on all different subjects.

I’m an early adapter of Twitter and it’s all good, but a time suck.

Permalink

By jason_miletsky | totowa, NJ June 29, 2009 12:02:15 am:

ProkofyNeva You asked me the following question: “How is it that you came to view SL through this cynical keyhole?…Are you saying you didn’t even bother to search that one time you came to Second Life, and just made a lazy click on the old “Popular Places”?

Actually, I came to my conclusions based on pretty extensive research I did for the college textbook I’ve recently had published, “Principles of Internet Marketing” (http://bit.ly/63dB5). In the book, I dedicate a good part of one chapter to virtual worlds, with a specific focus on SL, including an interview with an organization that runs a fairly significant island there. While I didn’t editorialize in the book, I was able to come to some pretty sound conclusions. If I had any preconceived notions at all before I first went on SL, they were positive – I wanted to like it.

But neither my comment nor Chris’ original post were about whether or not we like SL. Like has nothing to do with it. It’s about SL’s place in the online universe as a widely used tool for social networking and/or marketing.

I always find it amusing, however, how people who are so crazed and passionate about Second Life are so incapable of seeing the reality behind the business of the Internet. I’m sure you generated $200 last week, and have had plenty of conversations with other people there. But the fact of the matter is that if it ever reached critical mass in terms of a being a viable marketing or social networking vehicle, it did so awhile ago and shows little chance of recapturing any former glory. If you’d like, I’d be more than happy to spend a few minutes finding links to charts showing the significant loss of media attention and brand usage over the past year or more.

Fanatics, whether their obsessions be for Star Wars, Star Trek, Second Life or something else, are welcomed to have their passion. But don’t let your love of something cloud your ability to see the reality behind it.

Jason Miletsky
CEO, PFS Marketwyse
Author, ‘Perspectives on Marketing’ and ‘Perspectives on Branding’

http://www.pfsmarketwyse.com

http://twitter.com/jason_miletsky

Permalink

By chrisabraham | Berlin June 30, 2009 08:45:38 am:

Wow, this is an awesome comment string! This is 100% why I blog. @ProkofyNeva — this article is 100% about the Hype surrounding Second Life back in 2006/2007 and the Hype surrounding Twitter in 2009 — and why *I* believe Twitter is more sustainable in its Hype than Second Life. That said, thank you Second Life denizens for making this true social media — I might download Second Life again if you’re willing, maybe, to give me a proper tour of Second Life.

Permalink

By GwynethLlewelyn | Lisbon June 30, 2009 06:20:17 pm:

Chris, I hardly understand why you bother to mention Second Life on your description of Twitter then — unless, of course, the whole point is to gather the attention of Second Life users, who are quite keen in following *all* news, bad or good, that mention it ;) (A very interesting effect known by so-called SEO experts who have noticed that anything Second Life-related will gather WAY more attention than… almost anything else).

I totally agree with your description of Twitter vs. Facebook/Plurk/others, about the openness of Twitter and its myriad applications, about how it resembles IRC, about how people use it as an “intelligent RSS feed” (I’m certainly one of them!). There is nothing to disagree with :)

However, I completely fail to understand the relationship with Second Life. Twitter is owned by a company of geeks that just raised venture capital and burn it like crazy keeping the servers up, without a business plan, without a revenue model, and thriving on — numbers and hype. That, in itself, is nothing wrong — after all, all the others are *exactly like that* (when Facebook burned out all their money in 2007, they invented a fake number for their value and sold a share to Microsoft, which should be enough to keep them going on for a few years more — until they sell another share, and so on). Twitter is a cool idea which is simply impossible to monetise; like, unfortunately, almost all Web 2.0 applications out there. One day we’ll look back to them all, after the Web 2.0 bubble bursts, and think how we could have done the same mistake *twice*. But we did :)

Second Life has nothing to do with that. It’s probably one of the rarest cases where not only it turns a healthy profit but has already paid its return on investment. Since the “hype years” of 2006/7, Second Life has grown in all areas — number of users; stickiness (number of hours users spend in-world); and other metrics which are only relevant to Second Life users (landmass; internal economy; etc.) — up to three to four times *after* the “hype days”, it never grew so fast *after* the media lost interest in it. And it still grows — 12-15,000 new users every day. It’s not only a “playground for universities and research labs” — like the Internet overall, and the World-Wide Web, isn’t seen as a “playground for academics” any more. That doesn’t mean that universities aren’t doing incredible things with Second Life — but that’s just a very small chunk of what’s being done. Prokofy Neva above gave a lot of good examples. There are more. Far more. And most interestingly, more and more projects in Second Life are starting *now* with a development time of 2-3 years…

Too closed? Weird that you mention that. The Second Life client is *open source* and there is an open source server solution (think Apache vs. MS IIS). Second Life can fully communicate with the outside world using HTTP/XML-RPC and SMTP…

Permalink

By chrisabraham | Berlin June 30, 2009 09:05:51 pm:

@GwynethLlewelyn Unless you have not been following the news — or have not read my article at all — I am comparing hypes: the world was going nuts over Second Life 2-3-years ago and there are many people who have been comparing the fickle hype surrounding Second Life with what they’re anticipating is the writing on the wall for Twitter, too: how the mighty will have fallen. So, I wasn’t doing a “compare and contrast: Second Life and Twitter: a study,” I was just saying why Twitter’s ascension will not be as transient as Second Life’s. Does that make sense? Either way, I appreciate these comments something awful!

Permalink

How awesome is that? What a beautiful thing. I love blogging! I heart social media!

Twitter Is What Second Life Wasn’t: Light, Cheap and Open — And That’s Why It’ll Outlive the Hype Cycle

I run into many skeptics who believe that Twitter is rife with the sort of hype associated with the ascent and crash of Second Life. This is not true. Twitter is suffused with hype, for sure, but it is a much different and more sustainable hype than Second Life.

Here’s why: Twitter is light, cheap, open and permanent, whereas Second Life is heavy, expensive, closed and ephemeral. Twitter does things right where Second Life failed.

Second Life is amazingly heavy, requiring lots of computer, lots of bandwidth and a commitment to client software. Second Life is a closed system, a walled city, completely invisible to serendipity and coincidence. Second Life is greedy, pushing avarice and commerce. Second Life is ephemeral and anti-textual, meaning that all of the work and energy one spent on Second Life invariably went away the moment people stopped investing time and money into the platform. While there was a programming language, a scripting language and lots of room for creativity, Second Life was not nearly as agnostic and open a platform as it could have been.

On the other hand, Twitter is open and has a fantastically generous API (an open API as opposed to a closed API, which is why so many developers have created such useful applications on top of the service). Twitter is highly textual, highly contagious and very much real time.

Consider its effect on content discovery. Google, the search king, always wants to know it is up to date, that it is on top of everything. It’s constantly insecure that it will lose the war to upstarts. And when it comes to zeitgeist 2.0 — real-time trend tracking and trend recognition — Twitter moves even faster than breaking news scrawls and updates.

The most famous example is the rapidity with which the Twittersphere responds to tragic events like earthquakes, tornadoes, and terrorist events like the shootings in #mumbai and the #iranelection.

For a second, let’s forget Twitter the website and look at how differently people access and engage with Twitter. Not only can one interface via the web or SMS, but there are also hundreds of desktop clients, iPhone and smart phone apps, and third-party mashups of sites and services.

That’s what’s funny: A large proportion of the API calls to Twitter these days aren’t even made by humans twittering all day long. Rather, they’re made by third-party search engines and services offering sundry services: finding friends, tracking news, graphing conversation, tracking searches, plotting trends, collecting metrics, following people, un-following people.

In many ways, the Twitter platform has become almost a fungible input-output flow of data, like IP, tap water, or the electrical mains — all the creativity and all of the development is happening as a result of this relatively featureless and structure-less raw platform.

Everybody admits that the elegance of Facebook’s interface does an amazing job of hand-holding the diverse levels of technological prowess that Facebook users possess. However, Facebook shares many things in common with Second Life: It is a walled-garden, cliquey and hard to cross-pollinate. And finally, Facebook works very hard at defining what the user experience is to the best of its ability in a world where openness and open access can often work for you instead of against you.

The biggest mistake that social network services and online virtual communities make is being too invested in the outcome of how the community will grow and develop. To be successful in community development and community creation, one must be committed to the community and meeting their needs versus being committed to giving them what the community producer thinks the community wants and needs — often very different things.

At the end of the day, Twitter has always been more like the cardboard box holding the toy than the toy itself. Twitter seems to have built the perfect box to play in and with until you decide what sort of toy you want to build — and then Twitter makes it possible for everyone and his brother to take a go at building the toy in the box, always just focusing on being the most amusing, easy-to-use, scalable and compelling box possible.

To me, Twitter is a lot like IRC from back in the day. When you install Internet Relay Chat, there are no rooms and there are no members. Only by engaging and by creating rooms and groups does it become truly useful. (Twitter and IRC share the same conventions in terms of using the hash, #, to indicate a self-organizing group that only exists as long as people choose to use it.)

The strange thing is is that Twitter is one of the very few applications — Web 2.0 or not — that gets the benefit of everybody trying to train each other via — believe it or not — morning talk shows, news spots, news specials, local get-togethers. Oprah! Ellen! The View! I mean, how many dot-com/Web 2.0 platforms have the benefit of that? On the flip side, the downside to Twitter’s choosing not to carefully control every aspect of the user experience is that it’s not always intuitive or apparent how to use it. The third-party apps may be more useful, but most newbies begin their experience at Twitter.com.

People who don’t get Twitter really have not spent enough time with it. There are tons of ways people can use Twitter: Many people use Twitter as an alternative to an RSS feed news reader, following Twitter feeds of news organizations and news alerts, including links and so forth. Twitter doesn’t care how you use it: passive reading or active conversation.

In fact, Twitter is such a neutral solution that you might very well forget that you’re a member, which is why there might be a perception that over 60 percent of all of the users who visit the site don’t go back the next month: Twitter doesn’t want to be too much trouble.

~ ~ ~
Chris Abraham, president of the digital-PR firm Abraham Harrison, is a blogger who specializes in social-media marketing with a focus on blogger outreach, blogger engagement and search-reputation management. Chris lives in Berlin and Washington and can be reached via Twitter, Facebook, or email.

Via Advertising Age Digital Next

1. Blogging For Two
2. Texas Tumble Weed Travels
3. Beauty And The Little Beast
4. Aberdeen NJ Life
5. Acorn Pies
6. A Darker Shade Of Midnight
7. Adieska Newbie Blogger
8. Adventurous Women Blog
9. Soul of A Citizen
10. All That You Have Is Your Soul
11. A.Mountain.Bride
12. Another Las Vegas Daily Photo
13. Proud Mommy Of Four
14. Aspiring Polyglot
15. Backstage Blog Stage
16. Beauty Cottage
17. Flagrantdisregard
18. Birding Girl
19. Blessed Serenity’s Weblog
20. The Orrell Group
21. Great Dad Blog
22. Readaholic
23. Around the World in beautiful Shoes
24. Catholic Dads
25. Celebrate Your Freedom
26. Surroundings
27. Danny Fisher
28. Charlotte’s Library
29. Chen Chow
30. Chez Bez
31. Chicgalleria
32. Children From Mom And Dad
33. Christifideles
34. Christ, My Righteousness
35. Observations and Musings
36. ClearlyEnlight’s Travel Blog
37. Clearly Personal
38. Art School Scum
39. Conversations in the Book Trade
40. Mummy & Baby Moon
41. CPS – A System Out of Control
42. Creative Type Dad
43. Daddy Forever
44. Confessing My Dad Attitude
45. DadThing
46. Daily Contributor
47. Our Little Family
48. Not Just A Mommy!
49. Scream Quietly
50. Deb’s Search and Rescue Stories
51. It’s a Boy
52. Drivin’ 55: A Distraction
53. DubaiBIZZ.net
54. Dyslexia Tutor
55. Education Notes Online
56. Eighty MPH Mom
57. Emilio & Gladys Padilla
58. Everything Leb
59. Exotic Mommies’ Pregnancy and Parenting
60. Father’s Discovery
61. Felish…Da Dish
62. Ferdy On Films
63. Freebies 4 Me and U
64. Article Navigator
65. Fresh Net
66. Funky Brown Chick
67. Portrait of a Writer
68. Girlebooks
69. Give Away Today
70. Motherhood and Other Ramblings
71. Glory Feathers
72. All Because Two People Fell in LOVE!
73. A Catholic Mom in Hawaii
74. Hijos de Mama Y Papa
75. My Life as a Hotfessional
76. A Reasonably Prudent Law Student
77. Timeless Imagination
78. Miss Jade Monfils
79. Jakartass
80. Thoughts And Theology
81. The City and the World
82. Parental Alienation And Other Such Things
83. Juanita’s Blah Blah Blog
84. Beyond the Pale
85. Rock Star Mommy
86. Just Kiss N Makeup
87. Kappa Kreations
88. Whykay’s Happenings
89. Scrambled Dregs
90. A Parent’s Life To Behold
91. Knitty Kitty
92. Shade And Sweetwater
93. Laughing Through The Chaos
94. Tales From Bloggeritaville
95. Lighting Fingers
96. Breathing Is Political
97. For The Love Of Oats
98. Shambles Manor
99. Miracles on Mama Street
100. Mentoring Mommy
101. Mia Bella Wahm Blog
102. Mittelmommy
103. Pottstown’s Blog
104. Mom-Blog
105. Baby Boos
106. Mommy Rulez
107. Mom Start
108. Monkeys On The Bed
109. It’s A Blog Eat Blog World
110. MsMomster
111. Multiples And More Blog Network
112. A Brilliant Place For Every Kid
113. Mylifeasastayathomedad
114. Mystique Vintage Clothing
115. The Napkin Dad Daily
116. 901 Blogs
117. The In Box
118. New York Portraits
119. Orchid & Pastry
120. Orchid & Pastry
121. Marketime
122. Paravanes: Christian Meditations
123. Peace Corps Diary: Botswana 2008
124. Praise and Coffee
125. Jamie’s Precious Peas
126. MySpace
127. Mighty Quinn Media Machine
128. From Politics To Fashion
129. Roosevelt Island 360
130. Salamu Kenya!
131. Samotalis
132. She Scribes
133. Simply Freckles
134. Sistah Goddess
135. SNAFU-ed …. Situation Normal
136. Solo-Dad.com
137. Soup
138. Spinning Lovely Days
139. Your Daily Fix Of Entrepreneurial Ideas
140. Steph in Burkina Faso
141. Stories From A Weird Wizard
142. Sugar Ridge
143. Texas Daisey Garden
144. The Lewis Family
145. The New Author
146. The 160 Acre Woods
147. The Buddha Diaries
148. The Fascinating Woman
149. The Good Heart
150. The Practicing Church
151. The Vintage Sister
152. The Way The Ball Bounces
153. Twitter
154. Twitter
155. Twitter
156. Twitter
157. Twitter
158. Twitter
159. Twitter
160. Twitter
161. Twitter
162. Twitter
163. Twitter
164. Twitter
165. Twitter
166. Twitter
167. Twitter
168. Twitter
169. Twitter
170. Twitter
171. Twitter
172. Twitter
173. Twitter
174. Twitter
175. Twitter
176. Our Little Family
177. I Never Grew Up
178. Twitter
179. Twitter
180. Twitter
181. Twitter
182. Twitter
183. Twittter
184. Twitter
185. Twitter
186. Twitter
187. Twitter
188. Twitter
189. Twitter
190. Twitter
191. Twitter
192. Twitter
193. TMT
194. Twitter
195. Twitter
196. Relz Reviewz
197. Twitter
198. Twitter
199. Twitter
200. Twitter
201. Twitter
202. Twitter
203. Twitter
204. Twitter
205. Twitter
206. Twitter
207. Twitter
208. Twitter
209. Twitter
210. Twitter
211. Twitter
212. Twitter
213. Twitter
214. Twitter
215. It’s a Goat’s Life…….
216. Will-O’-the-Wisp
217. The Welcome Mat
218. Wahm Phenom
219. Ninaivugal…Thoughts
220. Ninaivugal…Thoughts
221. The Word Mechanic
222. 3Quarks Daily
223. 4thletter
224. Boarding School Blog
225. Americantowns
226. Novel Inspiration
227. A Year From Oak Cottage
228. What I Learned Today
229. Black Celebrity Kids
230. Blog Denovo
231. Book Dads – Fathers That Read
232. Boondock Ramblings
233. Dad Blogs
234. Daddy Papersurfer
235. Dave’s Bargain
236. The Dear Dr.MOZ Baby Blog
237. Diva in a carry on
238. Earnest Parenting
239. Facebook
240. Fervent Heart
241. Freaked Out Fathers
242. The Business 401
243. Green Dads
244. A Thing (or Two) About Holly Jean
245. Hungama Blog
246. Indulgent Reviews: An Indulgent Beauty Blog
247. Indy Dads
248. The Jolly Mom
249. Cottage Works
250. Mademoiselle Robot
251. The Mama Bird Diaries
252. Minnesota Reads
253. The Mommy Journey
254. Mommy Perks
255. Mothers Fighting for Others
256. Chic and Style
257. Say It, Don’t Spray It
258. Our Little Family
259. No, You’re A Towel
260. The Online Degree Dorm Room
261. Out Numbered Online
262. The Pakistani Spectator
263. Pensive Thoughts
264. peterwknox.com
265. Ram Nation
266. Seniors World Chronicle
267. Servant of Chaos
268. Socal Mom
269. Squidoo
270. TMT
271. Televisionary
272. Black Bath Water
273. The New Dad Blog
274. Total Wellbeing Blog
275. Sports Analyzer
276. Whispers From The Unseen
277. Verastically Livin
278. We Survived The Teens
279. Why are you Stalking Me
280. Yoga and Judaism Center
281. Yorkville: Stoops to Nuts
282. Twitter
283. Eighty MPH Mom
284. Twitter
285. Total Wellbeing Blog
286. Twitter

We have an existing lead and appointment system running well with around 20 proposals out waiting to be closed, 200 existing warm relationships with potential for proposal, and around 1,000 leads needing call scheduling – and more being continuously generated.  The backed-up deal pipeline is currently around $4MM.

We need a closer.  We are excellent at creating branding, getting calls with the decision-makers, building trusted relationships.  We need someone to turn these into done deals.

The salesperson can work from anywhere, but the client base is currently 99% US-based, primarily in DC/NYC, so there will be an advantage to being based in that area.  We will also consider a UK-based salesperson for that market on a commission-only basis.

The salesperson will have the support of an existing lead-generation/scheduling team as well as the President/COO for face-to-face meetings in DC/NYC.

Compensation is Negotiable.  Contact jobs@abrahamharrison.com for more information. (Via Abraham Harrison)

In this particular case, the innovation is what I call a “Twitterish” innovation — stealing something directly from Twitter. A couple weeks ago, I stayed up until 12:01AM to secure another hype-drenched Twitterish innovation: vanity URLS: facebook.com/chrisabraham — I am such a sucker!

However, Facebook is an equal-opportunity thief and also quite creative as well. Next innovation inspired by Utterli, FriendFeed, or LinkedIn?  Who knows!

I hate to admit it but I am used to lazy web applications.  I am used to apps like Flickr, Delicious, Craigslist, Ebay, MySpace, Twitter, and YouTube — sites that are pretty much the same as they were when they were born. Facebook, on the other hand, innovates almost constantly. In fact, Facebook tends to innovate so aggressively that there are millions of members who constantly picket Facebook to revert itself to the way it was when it was a college-only service. The reason why most apps don’t innovate is because of this vocal minority — the change-averse.

Another thing I love about Facebook is that they’re not wed to their innovations.  When Facebook Beacon pissed off the world, they scaled it back. The developers at Facebook are smart — land grab with ten new innovations, throw them agains the Wall, and then see what people adopt and then, over time, remove the fails.

Facebook is willing to spitball, Facebook is willing to steal ideas shamelessly from other platforms, and Facebook is willing to fail fast and move on.  That’s what you’re supposed to do!  That’s why I love Facebook.