Megablaix - All Comments

Comment on 'Rails setup and deployment with Capistrano 2.0 on Ubuntu 7.04 (Feisty)' by kihjsoagp

2008-04-19T02:46:24Z

w6ZjZo cgfogqszmgbe, [url=http://hsykkkxzhdkg.com/]hsykkkxzhdkg[/url], [link=http://kxybzywmtnzx.com/]kxybzywmtnzx[/link], http://mtmlzguiyufg.com/

Comment on 'Foxy Fixtures Gotcha' by ashes999

2008-04-17T01:47:52Z

Brilliant! Thank you! You just saved me lots of time running around trying to figure out why my associations are null ...

Comment on 'A better Basecamp' by John

2008-03-31T21:47:17Z

Fun project. What are going to develop it with?

Comment on 'A better Basecamp' by bill

2008-02-26T15:49:27Z

you forgot git / svn integration

Comment on 'undefined method `last' for {}:Hash' by Ben Tucker

2008-02-19T18:44:52Z

Thanks for the google-friendly title! This was very helpful.

Comment on 'A better Basecamp' by Justin Blake

2008-02-19T04:47:34Z

Probably Merb + Datamapper + Rspec.

Comment on 'A better Basecamp' by james

2008-02-19T04:23:12Z

Are you going to do it in django?

Comment on 'A better Basecamp' by sintaxi

2008-02-18T17:48:23Z

looks like a fun project. I would be all over this if I didnt have so much on my plate. Ill have to keep an eye on it.

Comment on 'Getting a jump on Merb 0.9' by Greg

2008-02-15T20:48:25Z

I don't know what it is, but after looking at the pretty site, I have to have whatever it is to use for my whatever it does.

Comment on 'undefined method `last' for {}:Hash' by rgc

2008-02-02T00:07:04Z

Thanks for the tip - this saved me.....

Comment on 'Rspec and associations' by Justin Blake

2008-01-10T13:22:45Z

Apologies for the lack of comment formatting. I'm working on it.

Comment on 'Rspec and associations' by Justin Blake

2008-01-10T13:16:10Z

David: I don't usually test normal getters/setters (i.e. those magically created by AR from db fields), but I consider model relationships part of the model's behavior, and the best way I know to test that they exist is to test for the setter and the collection object. Was just wondering if there was a better way than that. Matt: I tried the rspec_on_rails_matchers plugin and wasn't crazy about it. I don't like that it just reflects on the AR associations. Calling has_many :whatever doesn't guarantee that you have a working association (e.g. if the database fields are incorrect the test will still pass).

Comment on 'Rspec and associations' by David Chelimsky

2008-01-03T23:57:03Z

Hey Justin, Keep in mind that RSpec is intended to support BDD with examples of behaviour driving out the implementation. There is a TDD guide line that says "test anything that can break." Based on these two things, I generally don't spec simple getters/setters. In my view, they shouldn't exist unless they are necessary for some behaviour, in which case they come to be through examples of behaviour. Why do we care if the butter belongs to a specific biscuit? Perhaps the reverse relationship might prove an easier example:


describe Biscuit do
  it "should be delicious with butter on it" do
    biscuit = Biscuit.new

    biscuit.spread Butter.new

    biscuit.should be_delicious
  end
end

Comment on 'Rspec and associations' by Matt Aimonetti

2007-12-14T21:04:58Z

install http://svn.integrumtech.com/public/plugins/rspec_on_rails_matchers/ and you will be able to do @user.should belong_to(:site) @user.should have_many(:posts) etc... -Matt

Comment on 'Rails setup and deployment with Capistrano 2.0 on Ubuntu 7.04 (Feisty)' by Justin

2007-12-05T12:27:15Z

Kad, the mongrel instances are running on the same server as apache, which is why you're proxying to localhost. If mydomain points to the server where your mongrels are running, you'd use that instead.