<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>misc.ience</title>
	
	<link>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience</link>
	<description>a miscellany of science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:10:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/miscience" /><feedburner:info uri="miscience" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>miscience</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>Carl Zimmer’s Science Reader Survey</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/miscience/~3/75SWQsX15UY/</link>
		<comments>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/03/18/carl-zimmers-science-reader-survey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aimee Whitcroft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Zimmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/?p=732</guid>
		
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/03/18/carl-zimmers-science-reader-survey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<description>In a fit of market-research madness, Carl Zimmer (one of my favourite science writers)  assembled a little survey looking into people&amp;#8217;s science reading habits.
In essence, it asked how people get their &amp;#8217;science fix&amp;#8217;, where they get it from, and how they feel about paying for it.
Now, it must be said &amp;#8211; and it&amp;#8217;s admitted to [...]&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[Click on the hyperlinked headline for more of the goodness]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/miscience/~4/75SWQsX15UY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/03/18/carl-zimmers-science-reader-survey/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>You know your ‘type’?  It’s stress dependent…</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/miscience/~3/vK9nSqcRcOc/</link>
		<comments>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/03/12/you-know-your-type-its-stress-dependent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aimee Whitcroft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[female]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[male]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mate choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/?p=721</guid>
		
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/03/12/you-know-your-type-its-stress-dependent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		<description>A number of interesting revelations to be had here, and all to do with our choices of &amp;#8216;mate&amp;#8217;.

And by mate, I don&amp;#8217;t mean the antipodean colloquialism meaning &amp;#8216;friend&amp;#8217;.  Nope, I mean mate as in, you know, someone you want to shag.  As it were.
The first revelation in this paper* is that, for the most part, [...]&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[Click on the hyperlinked headline for more of the goodness]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/miscience/~4/vK9nSqcRcOc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/03/12/you-know-your-type-its-stress-dependent/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Why GeoNet rocks my world</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/miscience/~3/KR7aV8ezxxk/</link>
		<comments>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/03/08/why-geonet-rocks-my-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 22:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aimee Whitcroft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earthquakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geonet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landslides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural hazards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tsunamis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volcanoes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/?p=699</guid>
		
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/03/08/why-geonet-rocks-my-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<description>Last week, my colleague Dacia and I were fortunate enough to go out to Avalon to meet Ken Gledhill and Kevin Fenaughty, two of the people involved in GeoNet.
The website will be one familiar to many Kiwis &amp;#8211; a GNS initiative, it is the  public face of a project which aims to collect data for [...]&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[Click on the hyperlinked headline for more of the goodness]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/miscience/~4/KR7aV8ezxxk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/03/08/why-geonet-rocks-my-world/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>An exhortation to Research Bloggers</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/miscience/~3/s8lcs8eSbTY/</link>
		<comments>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/03/05/an-exhortation-to-research-bloggers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aimee Whitcroft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Blogging Awards 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/?p=692</guid>
		
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/03/05/an-exhortation-to-research-bloggers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<description>Good morning everyone, and welcome.

As those of you who are part of Research Blogging are likely aware (following a missive that should have appeared in your inbox in the last few hours), voting has opened to choose the winners of the Research Blogging Awards 2010.
And this is where the exhortation bit comes in: do go [...]&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[Click on the hyperlinked headline for more of the goodness]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/miscience/~4/s8lcs8eSbTY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/03/05/an-exhortation-to-research-bloggers/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>How to get sober quicker</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/miscience/~3/p-YBZSvAm-Y/</link>
		<comments>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/03/02/superoxygenation-how-to-prevent-alcohols-nasty-side-effects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 03:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aimee Whitcroft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biochemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethanol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metabolism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxygenation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/?p=671</guid>
		
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/03/02/superoxygenation-how-to-prevent-alcohols-nasty-side-effects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		<description>This is great news for all of us drinkers.  And, frankly, if I was just a little better at actual chemistry, how I&amp;#8217;d make my first couple of fortunes*
And now I have the song &amp;#8216;Tiny Bubbles&amp;#8216; stuck, unfortunately, in my head. (When I first heard it, though, it was an Aero jingle.  Possibly)

So yes.  To [...]&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[Click on the hyperlinked headline for more of the goodness]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/miscience/~4/p-YBZSvAm-Y" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/03/02/superoxygenation-how-to-prevent-alcohols-nasty-side-effects/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Incredible infographic: the evidence for health supplements</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/miscience/~3/LoPPcWaSdLo/</link>
		<comments>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/26/incredible-infographic-the-evidence-for-health-supplements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 03:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aimee Whitcroft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supplements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/?p=661</guid>
		
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/26/incredible-infographic-the-evidence-for-health-supplements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		<description>To paraphrase: not much, and what there is is often conflicting.

So says a fantastic new infographic from my favourite data visualisation prOn website, Information Is Beautiful.  Even better, the graphic is actually interactive,  which means you can have a look at individual conditions, from sex to cancer and plenty in between, and split it down [...]&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[Click on the hyperlinked headline for more of the goodness]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/miscience/~4/LoPPcWaSdLo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/26/incredible-infographic-the-evidence-for-health-supplements/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>I’m a Research Blogging Awards finalist!</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/miscience/~3/n_s-KkiRiME/</link>
		<comments>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/26/im-a-research-blogging-awards-finalist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aimee Whitcroft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Blogging Awards 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/?p=655</guid>
		
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/26/im-a-research-blogging-awards-finalist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<description>Bizarre, I know.  O_o
In the category &amp;#8216;best blog &amp;#8211; chemistry, physics or astronomy&amp;#8216;.  And I&amp;#8217;m a newbie&amp;#8230; No one&amp;#8217;s confessed to nominating me, though.

To be perfectly honest, I had no idea they existed, let alone that I had been nominated, until fellow Sciblogger David Winter popped up on chat this morning to say congratulations.
David&amp;#8217;s also [...]&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[Click on the hyperlinked headline for more of the goodness]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/miscience/~4/n_s-KkiRiME" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/26/im-a-research-blogging-awards-finalist/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Would you like something scanned with an electron microscope?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/miscience/~3/T9iRMID_BRw/</link>
		<comments>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/22/would-you-like-something-scanned-with-an-electron-microscope/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 23:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aimee Whitcroft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASPEX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scanning electron microscope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/?p=638</guid>
		
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/22/would-you-like-something-scanned-with-an-electron-microscope/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<description>Of course you would!  Who wouldn&amp;#8217;t?

And have it you can.  As I came into the work this morning, blearily clearing emails as I attempted to mainline some caffeine, I came upon an email most arresting.
From an American company, ASPEX, it said that the company in question had a bit of an offer going at the [...]&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[Click on the hyperlinked headline for more of the goodness]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/miscience/~4/T9iRMID_BRw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/22/would-you-like-something-scanned-with-an-electron-microscope/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Geopolitics and science activity: 30 years’ worth</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/miscience/~3/5k1WtpHYF9I/</link>
		<comments>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/18/geopolitics-and-science-activity-30-years-worth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 04:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aimee Whitcroft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geopolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science publishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/?p=630</guid>
		
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/18/geopolitics-and-science-activity-30-years-worth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<description>I just boggled.  Quite a lot.

I&amp;#8217;ve just started skimming through an extremely interesting paper entitled 30 Years in Science: Secular Movements in Knowledge Creation.
It takes global publication data from the Web of Science (Thomson Reuters) database over the last 30 years, and then plots the change in papers published against geopolitical events that have happened.  [...]&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[Click on the hyperlinked headline for more of the goodness]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/miscience/~4/5k1WtpHYF9I" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/18/geopolitics-and-science-activity-30-years-worth/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>BioScience in NZ: some statsy goodness Pt II</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/miscience/~3/DsaI_TO-uh8/</link>
		<comments>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/17/bioscience-in-nz-some-statsy-goodness-pt-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 03:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aimee Whitcroft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/?p=588</guid>
		
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/17/bioscience-in-nz-some-statsy-goodness-pt-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<description>Part II: How far along they are, how they&amp;#8217;re battling and how we&amp;#8217;re benefiting
Having set out the basics of the bioscience industry &amp;#8211; who&amp;#8217;s doing what, in essence &amp;#8211; I though it would be interesting to see how the organisations involved are doing.
So, first up, let&amp;#8217;s have a look at how far into the development [...]&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[Click on the hyperlinked headline for more of the goodness]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/miscience/~4/DsaI_TO-uh8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/17/bioscience-in-nz-some-statsy-goodness-pt-ii/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>BioScience in NZ: some statsy goodness Pt I</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/miscience/~3/NlsZUzTA2bM/</link>
		<comments>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/15/bioscience-in-nz-some-statsy-goodness-pt-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 07:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aimee Whitcroft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/?p=558</guid>
		
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/15/bioscience-in-nz-some-statsy-goodness-pt-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		<description>Part I: The basics
Today, StatisticsNZ released a, well, release on bioscience in NZ.  Who&amp;#8217;s doing it, where, what it&amp;#8217;s costing them and what they&amp;#8217;re making of of it.  And, of course, what they&amp;#8217;re actually doing.
To explain, then: the bioscience survey replaces its predecessor, the biotech survey.  Apparently, it was to enable the survey to track [...]&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[Click on the hyperlinked headline for more of the goodness]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/miscience/~4/NlsZUzTA2bM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/15/bioscience-in-nz-some-statsy-goodness-pt-i/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Science articles some of NYT’s most emailed</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/miscience/~3/XdS1YtmpBpc/</link>
		<comments>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/10/science-articles-some-of-nyts-most-emailed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aimee Whitcroft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science and Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popular science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science communication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/?p=552</guid>
		
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/10/science-articles-some-of-nyts-most-emailed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<description>Apparently, the New York Times has a list of its most emailed articles, and researchers looking at the list have found something surprising (and wonderful) &amp;#8211; that science-related articles are amongst the most emailed.

I know!  One would have thought articles about politics, gossip, sex and diets would win outright but it would appear that NYT&amp;#8217;s [...]&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[Click on the hyperlinked headline for more of the goodness]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/miscience/~4/XdS1YtmpBpc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/10/science-articles-some-of-nyts-most-emailed/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Drink up!  Beer benefits bones…</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/miscience/~3/xxwvKfHSu00/</link>
		<comments>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/08/drink-up-beer-benefits-bones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 05:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aimee Whitcroft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science and Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bone health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osteoporosis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/?p=540</guid>
		
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/08/drink-up-beer-benefits-bones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		<description>I can hear the whoops of joy emanating around the world.  Joined, of course, by mine.

For years, we&amp;#8217;ve known that a glass or two of the vino has its benefits.  However, I&amp;#8217;ve never heard of anything particularly beneficial coming as a result of drinking beer (apart from general joi de vivre, of course).
But now, praise [...]&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[Click on the hyperlinked headline for more of the goodness]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/miscience/~4/xxwvKfHSu00" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/08/drink-up-beer-benefits-bones/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Living with robots – don’t panic</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/miscience/~3/VfGCnAuhHR0/</link>
		<comments>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/05/living-with-robots-dont-panic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aimee Whitcroft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science and Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asimo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robots]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/?p=528</guid>
		
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/05/living-with-robots-dont-panic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<description>Yes, that was indeed an H2G2* reference.  I sneak &amp;#8216;em in whenever I can&amp;#8230;
This is just a short post to point you all in the direction of a marvellous little video put together by the makers of Asimo.  And various cars and bikes over the years.
In it, Honda** talks to a number of very interesting [...]&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[Click on the hyperlinked headline for more of the goodness]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/miscience/~4/VfGCnAuhHR0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/05/living-with-robots-dont-panic/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Hydrogels or, how to replace petroleum-based plastics</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/miscience/~3/tTgJlQ-3osU/</link>
		<comments>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/04/hydrogels-or-how-to-replace-petroleum-based-plastic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 01:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aimee Whitcroft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrogel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petroleum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plastic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/?p=490</guid>
		
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/04/hydrogels-or-how-to-replace-petroleum-based-plastic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<description>Well, wonders will never cease.  Not only is water already one of the strangest,and most interesting fluids/substances around, but clever scientists from the University of Tokyo just added another layer of WTFness.
In essence, they have developed a sort of non-fluid, yet still transparent and flexible, water.  A hydrogel.  That&amp;#8217;s flexible.  And transparent.  (That was worth [...]&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[Click on the hyperlinked headline for more of the goodness]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/miscience/~4/tTgJlQ-3osU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://sciblogs.co.nz/misc-ience/2010/02/04/hydrogels-or-how-to-replace-petroleum-based-plastic/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
