<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Investing for beginners | Money Relations</title>
	
	<link>http://www.moneyrelations.com</link>
	<description>Investing for beginners</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 05:02:38 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/moneyrelationscomments" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:browserFriendly></feedburner:browserFriendly><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>Comment on Pet peeve: Ignorant people serving me financial platitudes by Wpilot88</title>
		<link>http://www.moneyrelations.com/2007/08/21/pet-peeve-ignorant-people-serving-me-financial-platitudes/comment-page-1/#comment-5890</link>
		<dc:creator>Wpilot88</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 05:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneyrelations.com/?p=40#comment-5890</guid>
		<description>What are some of the Index funds you are in?  I'm just looking for some ones that are diversifed and have a low fee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are some of the Index funds you are in?  I&#8217;m just looking for some ones that are diversifed and have a low fee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Would Google Acquiring Twitter Be a Bad Move? by Build Passive Income</title>
		<link>http://www.moneyrelations.com/2009/04/07/would-google-acquiring-twitter-be-a-bad-move/comment-page-1/#comment-4691</link>
		<dc:creator>Build Passive Income</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 04:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneyrelations.com/?p=209#comment-4691</guid>
		<description>I keep hearing how Twitter has yet to turn a profit, how it continues to seek venture capital for its very survival.  Google might be coming along at just the right moment. I never warmed up to Twitter, but it looks to be very popular and perhaps there is some financial potential?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep hearing how Twitter has yet to turn a profit, how it continues to seek venture capital for its very survival.  Google might be coming along at just the right moment. I never warmed up to Twitter, but it looks to be very popular and perhaps there is some financial potential?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Would Google Acquiring Twitter Be a Bad Move? by Investools</title>
		<link>http://www.moneyrelations.com/2009/04/07/would-google-acquiring-twitter-be-a-bad-move/comment-page-1/#comment-4686</link>
		<dc:creator>Investools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneyrelations.com/?p=209#comment-4686</guid>
		<description>I think it should be pointed out that Google has bought a number of companies in the past that they have shown no intention of monetizing. Let's not fool ourselves. Google is less of a search engine than it is a media company (and the largest media company in the world at that). They've gone way past search and content ads to offer newspaper, tv and radio ads. 

The most valuable asset to a media company (other than the channels on which to sell advertising), is information on consumers, industries, markets, brands, trends, .... INFORMATION. This allows a company like Google to forecast the future and accurately mold their business objectives around "what will be."  That is why they purchased companies like Urchin and offered it as Google Analytics for free (for those of you who don't know, you have to opt out of your site's analytics being aggregated and used by Google for research). 

Twitter would be just one more outlet for them to mine information on trends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it should be pointed out that Google has bought a number of companies in the past that they have shown no intention of monetizing. Let&#8217;s not fool ourselves. Google is less of a search engine than it is a media company (and the largest media company in the world at that). They&#8217;ve gone way past search and content ads to offer newspaper, tv and radio ads. </p>
<p>The most valuable asset to a media company (other than the channels on which to sell advertising), is information on consumers, industries, markets, brands, trends, &#8230;. INFORMATION. This allows a company like Google to forecast the future and accurately mold their business objectives around &#8220;what will be.&#8221;  That is why they purchased companies like Urchin and offered it as Google Analytics for free (for those of you who don&#8217;t know, you have to opt out of your site&#8217;s analytics being aggregated and used by Google for research). </p>
<p>Twitter would be just one more outlet for them to mine information on trends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Would Google Acquiring Twitter Be a Bad Move? by the weakonomist</title>
		<link>http://www.moneyrelations.com/2009/04/07/would-google-acquiring-twitter-be-a-bad-move/comment-page-1/#comment-4440</link>
		<dc:creator>the weakonomist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 02:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneyrelations.com/?p=209#comment-4440</guid>
		<description>Not to plug my own blog but my post for today talks about how twitter can monetize.  As for Google buying Twitter, they likely aren't interested in a purchase.  A partnership would make perfect sense though.  And don't worry, there won't be adsense anywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to plug my own blog but my post for today talks about how twitter can monetize.  As for Google buying Twitter, they likely aren&#8217;t interested in a purchase.  A partnership would make perfect sense though.  And don&#8217;t worry, there won&#8217;t be adsense anywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are Berkshire Hathaway shares overpriced? by Repair Firms</title>
		<link>http://www.moneyrelations.com/2008/03/10/are-berkshire-hathaway-shares-overpriced/comment-page-1/#comment-4208</link>
		<dc:creator>Repair Firms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 05:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneyrelations.com/2008/03/10/are-berkshire-hathaway-shares-overpriced/#comment-4208</guid>
		<description>I wanted to comment and thank the author, good stuff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to comment and thank the author, good stuff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss><!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.552 seconds -->
