....more semantic!

Open PhD Positions in Semantic Multimedia Retrieval Project

2009-10-26T15:01:00.004+01:00

OPEN Ph.D. POSITIONS at Hasso-Plattner-Institute (HPI), Potsdam (Germany) starting on the fourth quarter of 2009

Hasso-Plattner-Institute (HPI) is a privately financed institute affiliated with the University of Potsdam, Germany. The Institute's founder and benefactor Professor Hasso Plattner, who is also co-founder and chairman of the supervisory board of SAP AG, has created an opportunity for students to experience a unique education in IT systems engineering in a professional research environment with a strong practice orientation.

(for more information on HPI, c.f. http://www.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/ )

Project Description:
MEDIAGLOBE is part of the THESEUS research program initiated by the German Federal Ministry of Economy and Technology (BMWi), with the goal of developing a new Internet-based infrastructure in order to better use and utilize the knowledge available on the Internet. The focus of the research program is on semantic technologies, which determine contents (words, images, sounds, and videos) not through conventional methods (e.g., combinations of letters) but which are able to recognize and place the meaning of a content in its proper context. MEDIAGLOBE deals with digitalization, analysis, and semantic retrieval of historical, documentary audiovisual content. (for more information on MEDIAGLOBE, c.f. http://theseus-programm.de/theseus-mittelstand-2009/ )

The ideal candidate holds a MS degree in Computer Science or related field and is able to consider both theoretical and practical/implementation aspects in her/his work. Fluent english communication and programming skills are fundamental requirements. Since we are working on a multimedia repository with resources in German language, German language skills are welcome! Preferably the candidate has a background in one of the following
fields:
• semantic web technologies
• knowledge representations and ontology engineering
• audiovisual retrieval and analysis
• semantic search
• innovative web development
• user interface design for audiovisual content

The position starts as soon as possible and is full-time (40h/week) for the duration of the project until Oct 2011. Review of applications will begin immediately and will continue until the position is filled. The successful candidate will tightly work with international partners and has the possibility to pursue PhD work within the scope of the project.

How to apply:
Excellent candidates are invited to apply with:
• Curriculum vitae and copies of degree certificates/transcripts,
• Writing samples/copies of relevant scientific papers (e.g. thesis, etc.),
• Letters of recommendation.

Please send your application in PDF format indicating in the subject 'Application for PhD position‘ via email or via traditional mail to the following contact.

Contact and application:
Harald Sack
Hasso-Plattner-Institut für Softwaresystemtechnik GmbH
Universität Potsdam
Prof.-Dr.-Helmert-Str. 2-3
D-14482 Potsdam, Germany
phone: +49 (0)331-5509-527
fax: +49 (0)331-5509-325
email: harald.sack@hpi.uni-potsdam.de
web: http://www.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/meinel/persons/sack.html

Opening of the German/Austrian W3C-Office / Teaching the Web at FH Potsdam

2009-10-15T10:09:00.038+02:00

Today, I'm visiting the Opening of the German/Austrian W3C-Office at FH Potsdam (only 20 minutes away from HPI with public transportation), which is entitled "Teaching the Web".

Short Opening address by Prof. Johannes Vielhaber, rector of FH Potsdam and by Felix Sasaki, followed by the first speaker.
Klaus Birkenbihl on "W3C and W3C Offices - an Overview", who gives some general information about W3C and some overview about the worldwide W3C offices and their duties. Today, there are 18 W3C offices and on of their main tasks is the recruiting of local stakeholders to become W3C (paying) members. But also have to be mentioned better synergies with local hosts for community building, acquisition of local projects, and fostering new cooperations.

Andrew Vande Moere from the University of Sidney on "Visualization for the Web", author of the information aesthetics blog. He starts with giving an overview on visualization technology ranging from simple data graphs to information art (e.g. the Web2DNA website for visualizing your website as DNA-Sequence...). The main message....ok, open up your data and make your data publicly available (that's my point! Go one step further and make it Linked Open Data!). Then, there are lots of new possibilities for intelligent data mashups (as e.g. the 'the city is the future web'), making use of the data in a completely new way. Two interesting examples for web online visualizations are Google's visualization API and IBM's Many Eyes ('the youtube of visualization'), not to forget tha ultimate data mining &visualization application on your personal data (only for 'the data addicted'), http://your.flowingdata.com/.

Malgorzata Machol from FU Berlin (instead of the announced Prof. Tolksdorf...) on "Why Semantic Web " and the "Semantic Technology Institute". Sorry, but I can't stand those web2.0/3.0/xxx timelines any more. I've seen better motivations for the Semantic Web (at least with better/newer examples). Unfortunately, in this talk the Semantic web is motivated with a rather coarse conception of 'semantics' and (human/machine) 'understanding'. There is too much of human perception (and complex human understanding) mixed up with formal semantics and technology working on formal semantics (and what can be achieved with it w.r.t where are its limits). Please try to achieve more and better differentiation. The second part of the talk is about the STI in Germany and its activities around the semantic web.

After the lunch break, the event continues with Lambert Heller from TIB/UB Hannover on 'Library 2.0 – how the web has (and is) changing education of librarians?'. Today, the library catalogue is nothing but highly structured data, but the problem of uniquely identifying strings (symbols) with subjects (catalogue entries) is only solved on the surface and in a superficial way. There are commonly used (and elaborated) data sources such as the 'Schlagwortnormdatei' or the 'Personennormdatei' that contain reliable structured information about persons (authors) or keywords. But, today these datasets are not publicly available (while it is also not certain, who really owns the copyright, and what kind of copyright at all...). Let's get all these data, triplify it and make it Linked Open Data!!!
Finally, come and visit 3rd BibCamp in Hannover in May 2010:

Patrick H. Lauke from (web evangelist at) Opera Software on 'Standards education - what students need to know about web standards and accessibility'. It', about telling the big picture to the students. Not really the complete design specification or code implementation. ('Standards are Code....and Designers don't care about code') Make clear why...not necessarely how. On the other hand, there's accessibility. Web accessibility is more than blind users and screen readers. accessibility doesn't have to be hard. In fact, a lot of accessibility is just usability! Opera accordingly is invoved in outreach and educational activities on 'Teaching the Web' (Opera: We want to make the Web a better place!).

Petra Rauschenbach from Bundesarchiv on 'Conversion, Digitisation and Internet Gateways. Strategies and their implementation at the Federal Archives of Germany'. Starting with an overview on overview of their stocks and a lot of German archival vocabulary, which I cannot translate into English. Unfortunately, Mrs. Rauschenbach is 'reading' the talk and not talking freely...Also the term 'Findbuch' (i.e. concordance, index) sounds somehow very 'retro' for computer scientiest like me. But anyhow, the content of the Bundesarchiv (Federal Archive) is available on the web....why not make it Linked Open Data??

Henry S. Thompson from University of Edinburgh on 'Teaching Web Architecture'.
students:WWW::fish:water i.e. the relationship between students and the WWW is similar to the relationship of fish and water. So, why teaching a fish about the water? Learn to think about something which usually is invisible (i.e. the technology we are using everyday). So how should we teach web standards? Basic didactic principles like 'Analysis' (decomposing concepts), Contradiction (to something taken for granted), Analogies (being offered for confounding expectations) are presented. I like the last one: E.g. 'Standards come from official standards bodies', but consider the following: IEEE (semi-private bodies) / IETF (bunch of volunteers, left-overs of a hippie community) / W3C (2 private Universities, one semi-private body and companies paying some fee)...all of them have NO legal authority. More on this can also be here: 'Identity, URIs and Semantic Web'.
Conclusion: Teaching needs to draw on theatre as well as educational theory, 'Keeping people engaged is the core of education.'

Jens Meiert from Google Inc. on 'Modern Web development – a view on the future of HTML, CSS and development practices'. As expected, we are starting in the past, 1990 HTML 1.0 by Tim Berners-Lee. What about development practices? Problems in the past ranged from technological limitations, support limitations over low output quality up to bad user experience. In the Present, more and more we are facing a separation between behavior, structure, and presentation.

Erik Wilde from School of Information, UC Berkeley on 'Information Engineering' (BTW, my very first on lecture on web technology back at FSU Jena was based on Erik Wilde's book, this was before I had written my own ;-). He's using Google sidewiki for his lecture handouts and presentations, which can be annotated by the students simply by installing the Google toolbar in your browser.
Information Engineering is bigger than the web. It includes high level skills such as information and service modelling, or knowledge about complementary architectures. The Web of Things is nothing but applied Information Engineering. Engineering can be defined as constrained-based design and implementation.

[to be continued]

Corporate Semantic Web Workshop in Berlin, 15.09.2009

2009-09-15T09:11:00.021+02:00

Heute findet im Rahmen der XInnovations 2009 der Corporate Semantic Web Workshop an der HU Berlin statt, der heute abend im 3. Semantic Web Meetup seinen Abschluss finden wird.

9 Uhr morgens, noch ist alles ruhig. Kaffee allerdings scheint am morgen ein Fremdwort zu sein. Zumindest reicht es 30 Minuten vor Beginn der Veranstaltung lediglich für ein anscheinend vom Vorabend "geplündertes" Buffet mit zwei leeren Thermoskannen und ein Paar verlorener und zum Teil gebrauchter Kaffeetassen. Da lob ich mir doch Graz und die I-Semantics, bei der wir vor gut einer Woche rund um die Uhr mit leckerem illy-Kaffee (Ja! ich würde mich über eine Product-Placement-Vergütung sehr freuen...:) und Espresso versorgt wurden....

Prof. Adrian Paschke von der FU Berlin eröffnet den Corporate Semantic Web Workshop mit einer kurzen vorstellung der 'Vision' des Corporate Semantic Web Projekts, das vom BMBF seit 2008 gefördert wird. Für mich natürlich interessant der Unterpunkt und Forschungsbereich 'Corporate Semantic Search', also bin ich auf den später geplanten Vortrag zum Thema gespannt.

Gökhan Coskun aus Adrian Paschkes Forschungsgruppe schließt an mit einem Vortrag über 'Effiziente Verwaltung von Unternehmenswissen - Corporate Ontology Management'. Wozu braucht man Ontologien in einem Unternehmen? Ganz einfach, zur Steigerung der Produktivität und der Effizienz der Informationsverarbeitung (typische Wirtschaftsinformatikerantwort...). Als Hinderungsgrund für den Einsatz im Unternehmen identifiziert Coskun die 'Akademische Orientierung' vorhandener Werkzeuge. Er sieht Ontologien als normativ und allgemeingültig, was einen weiteren Hinderungsgrund bzgl. deren Einführung im Unternehmen darstelle. Dem möchte ich widersprechen, da Ontologien stets auf einer 'gemeinschaftlichen Vereinbarung' beruhen (explicit, formal specification of a shared conceptualization), die den jeweiligen Blickwinkel der Beteiligten abbildet. Allgemeingültigkeit wäre eine Eigenschaft, die gar nicht erreicht werden soll. Wir betreiben ja schließlich Informatik und nicht Metaphysik, d.h. unser Ziel ist nicht die normative und allgemeingültige Beschreibung der gesamten Welt, da eine Ontologie stets der Interpretation des Benutzers, seinem Kontext und seiner Pragmatik unterliegt.

Nach der viel zu kurz geratenen Kaffeepause geht es weiter mit Olga Streibel von der FU Berlin und dem Thema 'Semantische Suche: Tagging und Wissensgewinnung'. Als 'Extreme Tagging' werden jetzt Tags eingeführt, die selbst als Objekte für das Tagging hergenommen werden können, d.h. die eigentliche Tag-Relation lässt sich taggen. Was gewinnt man dadurch? Streibels Erklärung, dass man 'durch Tags Assoziationen bildet, mit denen man Ontologien erzeugt', hilft mir hier nicht besonders weiter. Leider wurde meine diesbezügliche Frage am Ende mit der Bemerkung, dass wir das offline diskutieren sollten, etwas unschön abgebügelt. Dabei wäre es meines Erachtens für den Vortrag von zentraler Bedeutung, eben diesen Vorteil des Ansatzes herauszustellen und gegenüber einem einfachem (individuellem) Konzept-Mapping abzugrenzen.

Ralf Heese von der FU Berlin referiert als nächstes über 'Einfach Verlinken in Wikis / Experten mittels Wikis finden'. Es geht beim ersten Thema dabei darum, den Benutzer mit Hilfe von Hintergrundwissen beim Setzen von Links durch entsprechende Vorschläge zu unterstützen. Das zweite Thema widmet sich der Frage, wie sich aus den History-Logdaten eines Wikis Experten zu bestimmten Themen bestimmen lassen.

Gleich Mittagspause....! Leider nur mit Gulaschsuppe/Möhrensuppe und Rundgang über den 'Büchermarkt' im Hof vor dem HU-Hauptgebäude.

Wieder einmal ein paar Minuten zu spät bei Richard Hubers (FIZ Chemie GmbH) Kurzvortrag über 'ChemgaPedia - virtuelle Forschungsumgebung'. Und schon wieder eine Wortneuhülse: 'Wissenscloud' - ohne sich darüber im Klaren zu sein, was exakt damit gemeint ist.

Änderung im Programm, 'Semantic Profiles in Universal Plug and Play AV', Vortrag eines Diplomanden zur semantischen Anreicherungen von UPnP AV Daten.

Weiter geht es mit Johannes Krug von x:hibit, der das Berliner Museumsportal (finanziert durch entsprechende E-Commerce Anteile, z.B. E-Ticketing, u.a.) vorstellt, gefolgt von Radoslav Oldakowski von der FU Berlin mit dem Thema 'Semantische Datenintegration und Suche im Museumsportal Berlin'. Semantisch unterstützte Suche, die Suchbegriffe um verwandte Begriffe ergänzt...mal sehen, ob sie dies auch (1) intelligent und (2) visuell ansprechend tut.

Sebastian Hellmann gibt mit 'DBPedia Live Extraction' als erstes eine kurze Einführung in das zentrale Hub der Linked Open Data Cloud, der DBPedia, gefolgt von diversen Anwendungen rund um die DBPedia. Übrigens nutzt yovisto.com (including semantic features) ebenfalls DBPedia-Daten zur Implementierung einer echten explorativen (semantischen) Suche.

[...to be continued @ Semantic Web Meetup ]

W3C-Tag an der HU Berlin, 14.09.2009

2009-09-14T10:01:00.019+02:00

Es ist mal wieder soweit: W3C-Tag an der HU Berlin im Rahmen der XInnovations 2009, diesmal mit Prof. Felix Sasaki als Vertreter des lokalen W3C-Büros an der Uni Potsdam....und es geht auch schon gut los. Prof. Robert Tolksdorf, der die Veranstaltung eröffnen sollte, steckt im Berliner Verkehr fest und so warten wir erst einmal 20 Minuten bis hier irgendetwas heute morgen passiert.

Atemlos kommt Herr Tolksdorf mit 20 minütiger Verspätung an, entschuldigt sich kurz (ohne dabei nicht auch einen kurzen Hinweis auf die Situation der Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe zu geben und auf seine Solidarität mit den Berliner S-Bahn-Fahrern hinzuweisen) und stellt das STI (Semantic Technology Institute) vor.

Interessanter wird es jetzt schon mit dem ersten, dem 'Semantic Web' gewidmeten Vortrag, genauer geht es dem Titel entsprechend über das 'Rule Interchange Format' (RIF) und das neue OWL 2, von Prof. Adrian Paschke von der FU Berlin. OWL 2 verwirft die übliche Dreiteilung in OWL-Light, OWL DL und OWL full und definiert verschiedene OWL DL Sprachprofile bzgl. ihrer 'worst case' Berechnungskomplexität. Dabei lässt sich OWL EL sogar in Polynomialzeit berechnen (daneben existieren noch OWL QL und OWL RL). RIF als Austauschformat für Regeldialekte bringt ebenfalls wieder eine Unmenge an neuen Syntaxvarianten. In diesem Zusammenhang wird auch auf ein Handbuch hingewiesen (Handbook of Research on Emerging Rule-Based Languages and Technologies, IGI Global), das sich allerdings nicht gerade durch seinen Preis (> 300 Euro) empfiehlt...

Prof. Felix Sasaki vom deutsch-österreichischen W3C-Office stellt als nächstes die aktuellen Entwicklungen rund um den neuen HTML5 Standard vor (hier ein Link auf die im Vortrag gezeigten Beispiele). Warum eigentlich jetzt HTML 5, nachdem bereits 2000 XHTML 1.0 veröffentlicht wurde und die Entwicklung von XHTML 2.0 auf vollen Touren lief? Nun, die Entwicklung von XHTML 2.0 wurde abgebrochen, der Anspruch ein 'sortenreines' XML im Browser einzuführen (eine 'Revolution') ist gescheitert. Nach einer von Opera durchgeführten Studie 2008, ist lediglich 4.13% des gesamten Web-Codes tatsächlich valide. Daher versucht man mit HTML 5 eine (fehlertolerante) 'Evolution' des alten Standards zu realisieren.

Eigentlich ist HTML5 genau genommen sogar ein Rückschritt, da es auf eine dezentrale Erweiterung über einzubindende Namensräume zugunsten eines eindeutig zu interpretierenden DOM-Baumes verzichtet. Dahingehend sind Probleme mit semantischen Erweiterungen, wie z.B. RDFa oder Microformats vorprogrammiert!

Mittagspause im Café Chagall mit Bliny und saurer Sahne mit anschließendem Rundgang zu Dussmanns Kulturtempel...

Thomas Caspers spricht zunächst einmal über Barrierefreiheit (Die deutsche Übersetzung der WCAG 2.0 a.k.a. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines). 'POUR' steht für die vier Grundprinzipien der Richtlinien für barrierefreie Webanwendungen: Perceivable, Operable, Understandable und Robust. Allerdings konnte ich die beschriebenen Übersetzungsprobleme ('programmatically determined' usw.) nicht nachvollziehen...vielleicht hätte man mal einen Informatiker fragen sollen....

Mit gut 20 minütiger Verspätung (dank der Ausdauer des Vorredners) beginnt der Vortrag von Joachim Neuberth über SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization Systems). Warum müssen manche Vortragende nur immer so leise sprechen. Das Verfolgen des Vortrags gestaltet sich nicht wirklich einfach (was nicht etwa in der Komplexität des Themas begründet liegt). Zugegebenermaßen ist aber auch die Entwicklung von SKOS und das dahinter liegenden Datenmodell nicht so besonders spannend. Besser wird es erst, als unterschiedliche Ressourcen, wie z.B. die Library of Congress Headings oder die französische Nationalbibliothek aufgezeigt werden und am Ende dann doch Linked Open Data angesprochen wird.

Prof. Felix Sasaki widmet sich als nächstes dem Thema Metadaten für Multimedia und berichtet von der W3C Metadata Annotations Group. Das Ziel der Metadata Annotation Group kann als "DublinCore + X" paraphrasiert werden, also ein minimales Multimediametadatenschemas mit Mapping zu bereits existierenden Formaten. Der zweite Teil des Vortrags beschäftigt sich mit XProc (XML Pipeline Language) zur Modellierung und Beschreibung von XML-Verarbeitungsketten, die eine Pipeline-artige Verarbeitung von wechselnden Validierungs- und Transformationsschritten unter Ausnutzung einer rudimentären Programmlogik (konditionale Verarbeitung, Iterationen, Selektive Verarbeitung, Ausnahmebehandlung, u.a.) mit heterogenen XML-Daten erlaubt.

[Nach der noch folgenden Diskussion, weiter mit "Brezeln und Wein" im Foyer..... :)]

Links:

Felix Sasaki: Das Web der Daten und das Web der Menschen, Pressemitteilung zum aktuellen W3C-Tag

i-Semantics 2009 in Graz (Day 03)

2009-09-04T10:03:00.010+02:00

The second day of i-Semantics ended with party and dancing to live music performed by 'Egon 7', and of course with a lot of interesting talks with interesting and nice people :) This morning at breakfast, Jörg really looked as if he had not really had got enough sleep (he continued to party after the official ending somewhere downtown :)

Keynote

Peter Kropsch (Austrian Press Agency): When technologies are drivers, integrated concepts are needed for success,

talking about scenarios of future media convergence, the development of the information technologies and the possibilities opened up by them, esp. about the expectations of APA what to get out of semantic technologies. In general, keynotes without some slides (to get hold of the information structure of this 60 minutes talking) are rather difficult to follow, if the speaker is not able to awake sufficient enthusiasm in the audiences...

The Role of Semantic Technologies in Future Internet Track,

Klaus Tochtermann (Know-Center, TU Graz): The Role of Semantic Technologies in the Future Internet

explained, why the vision of the future internet is not only 'old wine in some new bottles'. Although all the components that consttute the Future Internet (Content, Services, Security, People, etc.) is already around, the main contribution of FI is the integrated view and interaction of thes components.

Marco Pistore (FBK): Highlights of the Future Internet Conference Berlin

In parallel to i-Know/i-Semantics in Berlin the 2nd Future Internet Symposium took place...

Jan Reichelt (Mendeley): Mendeley - A Last.fm for Research?

Mendeley wants to help researchers to manage their resources. Research is inherently social. Mendeley offers a desktop tool, similar to last.fm audioscrobbler that (a) analyzes your search papers and enables full-text search and (2) smart metadata extraction and generation. The mendeley web service offers an online backup of your own research library and enables on-click import from google scholar and other citation services.

Interesting stuff...I have just registered and download my desktop client for Mac OSX...

Paolo Rosso (Universidad Politecnica de Valencia): Geographical Information Retrieval and Toponym Disambiguation

Geographical filtering of information retrieval results by expanding query strings with semantically related geographical information (...like that stuff!).

I-Semantics 2009 in Graz (Day 02)

2009-09-03T11:55:00.006+02:00

The first day of i-Semantics ended with a guided tour through the old section of the town (that we already had enjoyed the day before), and a welcoming party located in the Kunsthaus Graz. The Kunsthaus Graz has some extraordinary architecture and reminds me more of some strange submarine lifeform than of a building. Unfortunately we had to leave earlier to prepare our talk for today....

The second day of i-semantics 2009 started in a very conveniant way - again great espresso, fresh fruits, and nice talking.

Linked Data Track

Harald Sack (HPI): How can Software Developers benefit from Linked Data Vocabulary,

Well, the title is misleading somehow. Of course software developers do benefit from the use of linked data, but.....the problem is the feasibility of APIs and automated tools for mapping knowledge representations to object-oriented data structures. I had to deliver the talk (instead of Matthias, who actually was the main contributor, but is STIL on vacations) and I'm afraid that I have overstressed my audience with lots of software engineering details (bad for an introductory first talk of a session on linked data...).

Jörg Waitelonis (HPI): How to augment Video Search with Linked Data,

Jörg introduced yovisto.com and its connection to the Linked Open Data cloud, featuring our 'exploratory search' widget, suggesting additional search results to the user and providing seredipenditios findings.

Atif Latif (Know-Center, TU Graz): The Linked Data Value Chain: A Lightweight Model for Business Engineers

First, Atif stated significant differences between the aims of the scientific community and enterprise level business. He introduced the concept of Linked Data Value Chain, where the most valuable output consists out of an increase of the (code/data) readability for the human engineer, thus also serving the same duty as Matthias work in making semantic web software engineering very, very simple. So.....let's make Semantic web a No-Brainer (finally) ;-)

I had to skip parts of the afternoon sessions (Poster/Short-Paper and Student Sessions) due to interesting talks and reviewing work (deadline today...unfortunately). But I'm looking forward to more interesting contacts, lots of delicious espresso, maybe again some cake and pastries, and then of course the Gala Diner in the evening...

The Gala Diner startet with an interesting performance of Austrian cultural heritage. In particular, we listened to a musical performance of 4 original "Wurzelhorns" (Wurzelhorn is a variation of the well known Alphorn).

i-Semantics 2009 in Graz (Day 01)

2009-09-02T09:09:00.016+02:00

Although already having been at the PC of i-Semantics some years ago, this year it's the very first time for me being in Graz. We've already arrived yesterday and spent an beautiful day with sight seeing in the baroque historic section of the town (including the Schlossberg with 260 steps in the midday sun).

The conference is starting right now with greetings by Hermann Maurer (TU Graz) and Klaus Tochtermann (Know-Center, TU Graz). I will report about all upcoming the conference highlights...

Keynote 01,

Paolo Traverso: Towards a future Internet of Services and Content
Pointing out differences between real worl services and software services (duration, accessibility, time contraints, etc.) towards the proposition of a 'Future Internet', where research is focussed on modeling, compositing, and monitoring real world services...

Social Semantic Web Track,

Liana Razmerita: Towards a New Generation of Social Networks: Merging Social Web with Semantic Web

Conclusion: Semantic Web Technologies will enable the development of a new generation of social networking applications...nothing new up to now..

Web 2.0 und Neue Medien Track,

Watraud Wiedermann (APA Defactor): Semantische Suche in Medienarchiven

Demonstration of search application on newspapers, deploying synonym search and search for significant co-occurrences.

Knowledge Visualization Track,

Sven Havemann (TU Graz): Patterns of shape Design

Raising the question 'What's the point on semantic enrichment of images?' One of the problems in computer graphics is that different communities use slightly different vocabularies with inherent ambiguities. Furthermore, there is also a 'semantic gap' in the way that (correct) CG-algorithms often do not deliver the expected result, due to the lack of a proper vocabulary. This leads Haveman to the development of a conceptual reference model (like CIDOC-CRM) for shapes.

Innovative Funktionen für E-Learning Track,

Viktoria Pammer (TU Graz): Intelligente Ad-hoc Erstellung von Lerninhalten mit semantischen Technologien

Presentation of the APOSDLE system that proposes learning material to the learner according to his current skills and needs. Seems to be an Intranet (non web based) system...

...and now on for some espresso and sone 'real Austrian' cake and pastries ;-)

Corporate Semantic Web Track,

Fan Bai (Uni Duisburg/Essen): Exchanging Knowledge in Concise Bounded Descriptions. An Approach to Support Collaborative Ontology Development in an Distributed Environment

Interesting variant of versioning of ontologies (for distributed ontology development). Using simple cvs is not suitable, simply because most ontologies simply consist out of one huge file...

Usage and Case-Studies Track,

Sanja Vranes: Maturity and Applicability Assessment of Semantic Web Technologies

ok...ready for 'Guided Tour from Conference Venue to Welcome Receiption' at Kunsthaus Graz

[see you again tomorrow...]

Digitale Kommunikation

2009-06-21T13:28:00.004+02:00

Am 21. Mai 2009 ist unser Neues Buch 'Ch. Meinel, H. Sack: Digitale Kommunikation' bei Springer erschienen, das ich hier heute vorstellen möchte. Hervorgegangen ist das Buch aus dem Absicht, unserem 2003 erschienenen Buch 'WWW - Kommunikation, Internetworking, Web-Technologien' eine zweite Auflage folgen zu lassen. Dies allerdings erwies sich als schwierig. 1200 Seiten in einer Disziplin, die sich so rasant weiterentwickelt, dass sich in den mehr als 5 Jahren, die seither vergangen sind eine Stofffülle angesammelt hat, die in einem Band einfach nicht mehr ausreichend behandelt werden kann.

Daher unternahmen wir Absprache mit dem Verlag das Wagnis, den Band in seine drei Grundbestandteile zu zerlegen und diese separat als einzelne Bände einer Trilogie zu veröffentlichen. Deren erster Band, die 'Digitale Kommunikation' liegt nunmehr vor. Die beiden Folgebände 'Internetworking' und 'Web-Technologien' sind in Vorbereitung und werden bald erscheinen.

Worum geht es im ersten Band der WWW-Trilogie? Wie schon im ersten Teil des 2003 erschienenen WWW-Buches dreht es sich in diesem Band um die Grundlagen der Rechnerkommunikation, die durch eine ausführliche historische Betrachtung eingeleitet werden und insbesondere die Gebiete der Kodierungstheorie und der Multimedia-Kodierung und -Komprimierung, sowie die Grundlagen der Kryptografie abdecken.

Hier das Inhaltsverzeichnis:

DIGITALE KOMMUNIKATION

(1) Prolog
(2) Geschichtlicher Rückblick
(3) Grundlagen der Kommunikation in Rechnernetzen
(4) Multimediale Daten und ihre Kodierung
(5) Digitale Sicherheit
(6) Epilog

In den Anhängen befindet sich ein ausführliches Personenregister, das vom ägyptischen Pharao Ramses II. und seiner 'ersten' Bibliothek bis hin zum 1970 geborenen Vincent Rijmen, dem Miterfinder des AES-Verschlüsselungsverfahren reicht. Das Buch stellt auf gut 430 Seiten mit zahlreichen Abbildungen die fundamentalen Grundlagen der digitalen Kommunikation dar. 17 einzelne Exkurse vertiefen dabei wichtige Themengebiete, die vielleicht nicht für jeden Leser gleichermaßen von Interesse sind. Jedes Kapitel ist mit einem ausführlichen Glossar abgeschlossen und über 250 Literaturverweise und Referenzen regen zum Weiterlesen an.

Weitere Informationen:

Hier das ausführliche Inhaltsverzeichnis als pdf

'Digitale Kommunikation' bei amazon.de

'Digitale Kommunikation' bei springer.de

ESWC 2009 at Heraklion, Greece, Day #01

2009-05-31T08:41:00.004+02:00

Perfect loction for a summer holiday....as well as for the European Semantic Web Conference 2009. Arriving yesterday afternoon at a beautiful sea resort, blue skies, blue sea, white beaches...Kind of an environment that makes it hard for speakers and presenters at a scientific conference keeping their audience interested ;-)

First Day starts with several Tutorials and a Workshop. I have chosen the "Evaluation of Semantic Technologies" workshop for the morning. I cam a little bit late, thus the first presentation I fully attended was Ulrich Küster's ''evaluation of Semantic Web Service technology", which is not exactly my research topic. Interesting was the discussion whether a binary measurement for ranking results of service matching is appropriate or not (it's not...).

In the following presentation, Jerome Euzenat is talking about 'Ontology matching Evaluation". This topic for me is much more interesting (although not being my research topic).

Unfortunately the internet connection was so bad at ESWC 2009 that 'Live Blogging' was almost not possible. Sorry for that! But, at last I switched to twitter to give some 'live' updates. Just search for the hashtag #eswc2009 at twitter to get a timeline of tweets related to the conference program of ESWC 2009.

Chris Bizer from FU Berlin is the last presenter in the tutorial with a talk about 'Evaluation of Semantic Storage Systems'.

Artifacts of modern information society

2009-03-23T11:51:00.002+01:00

Artifact, i.e. an error or misrepresentation introduced by a technique and/or technology. Most obvious are artifacts in lossy image compression techniques such as, e.g. the jpeg compression algorithm. For jpeg, the entire image is divided into 8x8 pixel squares (of course for all three color channels... but not RGB. For jpeg the RGB picture is first transposed into the YCrCb color space, i.e. Y for luminance and Cr, Cb for chrominance being subdivided into red and blue. BTW, there is also subsampling, i.e. luminance is sampled with higher accuracy than chrominance w.r.t the human sensory perceiption). Then these 8x8 squares of intensity values are transformed into the frequency domain via a discrete cosine transformation. Up to now, no artefacts, no data loss.....

But, next comes a quantification algorithm that rounds the frequency values within the 8x8 squares. If this is done with high accuracy, often one doesn't even notice it within the picture. But, increasing quantification also results in higher data compression, which also results in more data loss, which creates ... artifacts. You can see the typical jpeg raster effect, whenever using high jpeg compression.Here's a cool animation of an image being jpeg compressed 600 times (in a 20 second short movie). The simple algorithm goes:

Open the last saved jpeg image
Save it as a new jpeg image with slightly more compression
Repeat 600 times.

Generation Loss from hadto on Vimeo.

CeBIT 2009 - Aftermath

2009-03-09T13:04:00.007+01:00

So, how was this year's CeBIT computer fair? The media have been rather pessimistic beforehand. 25% less exhibitors, 20% less visitors, but despite the worlwide economic crisis you'll find confidence everywhere ... at least now.

This year, I visited CeBIT only for a single day as exhibitor as well as a visitor. On friday, March 6th 2009, there was 'startup day' at the HPI booth in hall 9, B.10., and we presented our video search engine yovisto (well, it was almost only Jörg who did the presentation, while I was playing 'visitor'...). As every other year, for me hall 9, the 'future parc', is the most interesting hall of all 26 (!) halls. BTW, did you now that the Hannover fair area is the largest in the world? In hall 9 you could find the latest research of universities and research institutions (as well as some government and public administration...).

One thing that was pretty obvious was that hall 9 was not as crowded with exhibitors as the years before (at least in the rear areas this could be realized pretty heavily). I also was a little bit disappointed about our former booth at the joint exhibition stand of the universities Thüringen, Sachsen, and Sachsen-Anhalt (=Mitteldeutschland), because there was nothing really interesting to see, and most exhibitors were busily sitting in front of their computer screens.....presenting their 'backside' to the visitors and avoiding contact...not really inviting at all. No wonder, if they don't make it in the run for excellence...

But, on the other hand, I really liked the exhibition stands of the Fraunhofergesellschaft and the THESEUS research programme. Esp., at THESEUS (user scenario CONTENTUS) they demonstrated the workflow for digitalization, restauration, and indexing audiovisual media (...just my subject). While digitalization and restauration work pretty well, the indexing capabilities are still rather limited. You might search for 'similar' motives, but identifying individual persons is still subject to ongoing research.

After all, I was really happy to stay just for one day. Some of our co-workers had to stay for the entire week (my sincere condolences!). Was it worth while? For one single day, of course yes it was!

P.S. Alas, there really was a Latvian company that showed 'brains' in various colors.... ;-)

Radio Fritz in der Semantic Web Vorlesung

2009-02-18T08:57:00.007+01:00

Vor einigen Wochen saß ein tatsächlich Radioreporter in meiner "Semantic Web" Vorlesung hier am HPI in Potsdam. Allerdings - so steht zu befürchtet - hatte er nicht unbedingt viel Spaß am Thema der aktuellen Stunde, denn es stand die "Semantik von OWL" auf dem Programm, die ohne jegliches Vorwissen genossen, doch zu erheblichen Nebenwirkungen (z.B. Zweifel am eigenen Selbst- und Weltverständnis, Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit oder Schlafstörungen) führen kann ;-)

Der Grund für den Besuch lag (leider) nicht am Thema der Vorlesung als vielmehr an der Aufzeichnung derselben und dem aktuellen Angebot an HPI-Lehrveranstaltungen auf itunesU (von dem hier schon berichtet wurde). Radio Fritz hat ein kurzes "special" produziert, in dem über dieses Angebot berichtet wird und auch einige (unserer) Studenten -- und am Ende auch ich -- zu Wort kommen. Nette Sache ... aber ich zweifle daran, dass der Reporter tatsächlich, wie von ihm behauptet, erst "nach 10 Minuten" nichts mehr verstanden hat ;-)

-> Link zum podcast

HPI Vorlesungen auf iTunesU

2009-01-14T09:55:00.006+01:00

Seit gestern (Montag, 13.1.2009) bieten neben dem Hasso-Plattner-Institut der Universität Potsdam auch die Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, die RWTH Aachen und die LMU München Vorlesungsaufzeichnungen und Lehrangebote via iTunesU als Video/Audio-Podcasts an. Das Ganze startete mit gehörigem Presse-Rummel (siehe Links) und ich bin schon einmal auf die Nutzungszahlen gespannt, über die ich hier natürlich wieder berichten werde....

Natürlich ist das Thema Vorlesungsaufzeichnungen und deren Distribution via Podcasts nichts Neues. Bislang war der "exklusive" Distributionsweg über Apple iTunes' separate "Bildungs-Channels" nur englischsprachigen -- also vorwiegend US-amerikanischen -- Universitäten vorbehalten. Nichtsdestotrotz findet man aber auch im regulären iTunes Angebot den ein oder anderen Bildungshappen, vielleicht auch von einer nicht ganz so exklusiven Universität.

Und wenn man nicht unbedingt zum proprietären "Marktführer" Apple gehen möchte gibt es da natürlich auch noch das universelle akademische Videoportal yovisto mit seinem unschlagbaren Vorlesungsangebot von mehr als 6000 Vorlesungen und wissenschaftlichen Vorträgen, das zudem auch noch inhaltlich durchsucht werden kann...

Links:

Videobeitrag: Lehrmaterialien und Vorlesungen von Elite-Unis im Internet als Podcast verfügbar (Max Ruppert, RBB, tagesschau 13:00 Uhr, 13.01.2009)

Vorlesung zum Mitnehmen. Apple steigt ins E-Learning-Geschäft ein. (auch als mp3 verfügbar, Claudia van Laak, Deutschlandradio Kultur, 13.1.2009)

HPI auf iTunesU

3. tele-TASK Symposium am HPI in Potsdam

2008-11-13T12:05:00.002+01:00

Heute und morgen (13./14. November 2008) findet am Hasso-Plattner-Institut in Potsdam das 3. tele-Task Symposium statt. Ich freue mich auf ein spannendes Programm als auch auf interessante Gäste (unter anderem von der ETH Zürich mit dem Projekt REPLAY, Andreas Nürnberger von der Uni Magdeburg, das Fraunhoher IDM aus Illmenau und viele mehr...).

Natürlich werde ich selbst auch im Programm vertreten sein zum Thema "Semantisch unterstützteu Suche und Navigation in audiovisuellen Datenbeständen" (Slides gibt es später hier via slideshare).

Trendseminar "Semantische Technologien" in Stuttgart am 5. Nov. 2008

2008-11-04T22:01:00.003+01:00

Morgen werde ich in Stuttgart die Moderation durch das Seminar "Semantische Technologien - Wissen intelligent und gezielt nutzen", initiiert durch die MFG Fazit Forschung - Informations- und Medientechnologien in Baden-Würtemberg. Dabei geht es insbesondere um die Anwendung von Semantic-Web Technologien in Unternehmen.

Auf der Gästeliste stehen unter anderem Prof. Rudi Studer vom AIFB Karlsruhe und Tassilo Pellegrini von der Semantic Web Company aus Wien, und ich freue mich schon auf die abschließende Podiumsdiskussion, in der ich von den Gästen ihre Meinung zum aktuellen Marktpotenzial der semantischen Technologien, den Chancen für mittelständische Unternehmen und die Zukunft des Semantic Web erfragen werde....

W3C-Day, Berlin, 2008 (at XInnovations 2008)

2008-09-24T09:27:00.005+02:00

Today, I'm going to visit the annual W3C-Day being connected with the XInnovations 2008 in Berlin. According to the program the sessions were supposed to start at 9 am (For this reason I got up rather early thismorning....) but also the first speaker seemd to think that 9 am is a little bit early ;-) So we started with a 20 minutes delay. In the introducing talk, Klaus Birkenbihl from W3C Semantic Web Activity Group is giving an introductory talk on the Semantic Web, solving the question, how to explain Semantic Web to an (more or less' ordinary web user. Not a simple task, but the best you can do ist to explain it via examples, showing that integrating information in the web today is a rather tedious and extensive manual work. Of course, with semantic web technologies, automated integration of heterogeneous data might soon be possible...

Unfortunately, the speaker for the second talk did not show up. Moreover, it should have been a presentation about the semantic search engine ConWeaver, which I know very well and I was rather curious about its progress. Therefore, the session continues with some kind of RDF tutorial being presented by Lars Bröker from Fraunhofer IAIS. Next, a short introduction in SPARQL is given by Thomas Tikwinski from Fraunhofer IAIS und W3C DE/AT.

[to be continued]

XInnovations 2008, Berlin, Day 02 - Sept. 23, 2008

2008-09-23T10:24:00.012+02:00

Today, I'm going to visit the 'Corporate Semantic Web' workshop at XInnovations 2008 in Berlin. At least it seams that semantic technology has reached industry and corporations. "There is no market for semantic technology", as Christoph Tempich from Detecom Int. quotes a former oracle statement in his talk "Analytics drive the Corporate Semantic Web". Therefore, you just have to provide another label, which is 'Enterprise Information Management' with semantic web technology as underlying technology.

During the coffee break I followed a discussion on the planning of an 'Asocial Semantic Web Workshop' for the next WWW conference or ESWC conference. The goal o fthe workshop should be to show in which way the semantic web is vulnerble by SPAM or other offensive techniques, as e.g. denial of service by providing a deadly RDF-sequence that causes temporary data to grow exponentially.....sounds rather intriguing. I'm looking forward wo contribute ;-)

The 2nd session this morning starts with a presentation from Markus Luczak-Rösch from FU Berlin on 'Corporate Ontology Engineering'. Next, Holger Seubert from IBM is presenting 'Enriched Content Browsing', i.e. during page load in the traditional web, the web page is enriched with additional content. The text of the web page is analysed and terms of interest (info spots) are selected and linked with additional contextual information (from the web, from corporate data bases, etc. in another frame of the same window) without leaving the current context.

We had lunch in a small cafe underneath the nearby public railway with russian dishes (Cafe Chagall, Georgenstr. 4, 10117 Berlin). The pelmeni was really delicious!

The afternoon session starts with Thomas Hoppe from Ontonym with a presentation on 'Corporate Semantic Web'. According to his interpretation, the general 'Semantic Web' concept of Tim Berners Lee cannot be simply transported into the corporation as it is. Inside the corporation, it's a different world compared to the outside. All users are employees, vocabulary is (most times) strictly controlled, there are strict access restrictions, services have to be integrated in portals and corporations have to support corporate processes. The session continues with a presentation by Ralf Heese from FU Berlin on 'Corporate Semantic Collaboration'. He introduces the simple text-annotation tool loomp which has the purpose to enable nonexpert users to provide semantic annotations.

[to be continued tomorrow, W3C-Day, XInnovations 2008, Berlin, Day 03...]

XInnovations 2008, Berlin, Day 01, Sept. 22, 2008

2008-09-22T09:57:00.011+02:00

For the third time, I'm attending the XInnovations (formerly known as XML-Days) 2008 in Berlin. Although I was often rather dissapointed about the quality of the conference program (you might refer to my previous posts about XML-Tage Berlin here), I decided to give it another try (simply because I can reach Humboldt University in Berlin with local public transportation in about 45 minutes). Also this time, there seemes to be some emphasis on semantic web technology (at least considering the program, there are Semantic Wikis in the Corporate Wiki track and anoteher Corporate Semantic Web Workshop, not to forget the Semantic Web topic in the PhD-Forum).

I started the first day of the coference with participating the Coprporate Wiki Infotag. Denny Vrandecic is talking about the "Semantic Media Wiki" from AIFB Karlsruhe. Denny is starting his talk with some historical facts about WIkipedia. Interesting thing to mention, according to a study from Aaron Swartz, only 2% of all Wikipedia users (it come up to 1.400 people) are primarily responsible for all article changes. This contradicts the commonly assumed opinion that wikipedia is written by millions of users. Then he was introducing the semantic web in general, by stating that the semantic web is nothing but things (nodes, concepts) being connected by certain relationships, forming graphlike structures that can again be related to each other. According to his definition, a semantic wiki is nothing but graphs being created from wiki data.

The next talk I'm attending is in the Ph.D workshop. Olaf Hartig is talking about 'Trustworthiness of Data on the Web'. With the Semantic Web more and more software agents are taking decisions based on (RDF-based) data on the web. But how can we trust those data? Olaf is developing an RDF trust model as a basis for trust assesment and trust-aware data acces. He suggests a scale from [1-;1], where -1 represents 'absolute distrust' and +1 'absolute trust' for a statement. Now, all relationships in an RDF-graph can be weighted with according trust values ranging from [-1] to [+1]. Trust into a set of statements can be expressed with aggregated trust functions ranging from a cautious (conservative) minimum to a slightly optimistic median. The formal trust vocabulary can be found here. Next, criteria for trust assessment are collected and three different trust assessment strategies are defined: user-based (ask the user on his/her opinion about the trustworthiness), provenance-based (taking into account the trustworthiness of the referring users), and opinion-based (recommendations by other users according to their own trustworthiness).

The afternoon session started with Nils Barnickel from Fraunhofer IOCS with a talk on 'Semantic Mediation between Loosely-Coupled Information Models in Service Oriented Architectures'. Semantic descriptions of Web Services are supposed to enable data and service interoperability. One problem being addresses ist the lack of efficient ontology mapping options in current existing onlology languages (although OWL does have a differentFrom or sameAs operator, complex mappings deploying concepts with totally different subgraphs or 1:n, n:m mappings are missing).

Ok, now it's definitely time for a coffee break. after that, I will be joining the 'World Cafe' session, where I will participate in the discussions instead of writing blog.

[to be continued tomorrow, XInnovations Day 02, Corporate Semantic Web Workshop]

Happy 50th Birthday NASA

2008-07-29T09:09:00.007+02:00

Well, NASA, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, celebrates its 50th birtday. On July 29th, 1958 US-President Eisenhower signed the „National Aeronautics and Space Act“ and NASA started to work on October 1st, 1958. Just a few months earlier in autumn 1957, the Soviet Union launched the very first artificial satellite SPUTNIK 1, resulting in the so called "Sputnik shock", paraphrasing that the western world was shocked that the USSR was really able to do this...and by doing so the entire western world (esp. USA) was commited to an atomic thread. We all know the story of the Cold War.... (BTW, for this reason Eisenhower also founded ARPA, the "mother" of the Internet).
The race began and now, 50 years later, Russian and US-american astronauts are working together in the International Space Station ISS.

Although I'm quite younger than NASA, NASA made a big impression on my childhood days. Remember the Apollo program and the first man on the moon. As almost every child I wanted to become an astronaut - or at least a scientist (got it!). Belief it or not, my very first memories of television are pre-launch cuntdowns of the Apollo Program (I really don't know which mission, but obviously one of the later). I remember the countdown was stopped several times and I was very angry, because I had to go to bed and could not watch the lift-off. I dimly remember even the Skylab program (as well as its early "re-entry" in 1979) and of course the first launch of the Space Shuttle in 1981 (and again with delayed countdown..., at Google Video you may watch the lift-off video of STS-1 Columbia).

But, the most interesting thing for me always have been NASA's planetary missions, giving us wonderful pictures of Jupiter or Saturn (Pioneer and Voyager) and the other planets.

NASA has opend up its Picture Archive with tons of pictures for free use. Nicely organized you may find pictures from Hubble, planetary missions, the space program, and many more....(But beware, today their servers have to keep up with an intense workload because of their birthday event).

Google findet mehr als 1 Billion(!) Web-Adressen...

2008-07-28T09:31:00.006+02:00

Ich hatte es ja schon immer gewusst, dass der Gogle Suchindex "ziemlich" gross ist. Die letzten "offiziellen" Zahlenangaben, die mehr oder minder indirekt gemacht wurden, besagten, dass Google im Jahr 2005 einen Datenbestand von 24 Milliarden Webseiten im Index verwaltet [1]. Aber die Zeit bleibt ja nicht stehen und das Web wächst beständig....und jetzt schreibt der "official Google Blog" am Wochenende, das der Google-Suchindex die magische Marke von 1 Billion (!) Webseiten überschritten hätte.....[2]

Natürlich muss man bei US-amerikanischen Zahlenangaben stets vorsichtig sein. "One billion" steht ja lediglich für unsere "Milliarde". "Eine Billion" dagegen sind tatsächlich 10^12 (1.000.000.000.000), im Englischen "one trillion", also eine ganze Menge. Jetzt stellen wir uns einmal vor, wir haben diese Billion Indexeinträge, die zudem noch untereinander verlinkt sind. Würde man diese Datenstruktur klassischerweise als Matrix speichern, bräuchte man 10^24 Einträge, von denen die allermeisten ja leer wären. Also speichert man eine derartige Datenstruktur doch besser auf effizientere Weise. Allerdings muss man dabei bedenken, dass der Zugriff auf Links immer noch sehr schnell erfolgen muss, da die iterative PageRank-Berechnung ja auch nicht ohne ist [3]. Ich wäre wirklich einmal daran interessiert, wie lange jetzt eigentlich eine komplette Berechnung des PageRanks für den Gesamt-Datenbestand heute dauert....

[NACHTRAG:]
Tja...man soll ja den Tag nicht vor dem Abend loben...
Der San Francisco Chronicle setzte heute einen Nachtrag zu o.a. Google Meldung, in der es hieß, dass der GoogleBot zwar mehr als 1 Billion Webseiten gefunden hätte, von diesen aber lediglich 30 - 50 Milliarden im Google-Suchindex verwaltet werden [4]. Naja, immerhin haben wir jetzt einen Anhaltspunkt, wie groß das WWW sein könnte.....und dass tatsächlich auch nicht alles bei Google gefunden werden kann.

References:
[1] TNL Blog: Google has 24 billion items index, considers MSN search nearest competitor, September 2005.
[2] The Official Google Blog: We knew the Web was Big....., Juli 25, 2008.
[3] Sergey Brin and Lawrence Page: The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine, Computer Networks and ISDN Systems30(1-7):107--117(1998).
[4] SFGate: New Search Enging challenges Google, July 28, 2008.

Ceci n'est pas Stockholm.....

2008-07-11T08:41:00.003+02:00

...or even more "ceci n'est pas Google?"

Very nice allusion to Google's image search found at blogoscoped.com. I hope we will soon find more of that kind :)

Das magische Medium....

2008-07-08T13:50:00.003+02:00

...unter diesem Titel stand ein Artikel von Christian Schmidt-Häuer im ZEIT-Bildungskanon am 19. Juni 2008 (...jaja, ich weiss, ich bin z.Z. wieder einmal etwas hinterher, was das Lesen meiner ZEIT betrifft). Aber schön, dass sich hier einmal ein Artikel findet, der die Ursprünge unserer Basiskulturtechnik - die Schrift - zum Thema hat, zu dem ich ja auch schon publiziert habe (siehe unten). Ebenso war das Thema Schriftentwicklung auch schon in einigen meiner Vorlesungen mit von der Partie.

Daher habe ich den ZEIT-Artikel mit großem Vergnügen gelesen, insbesondere da als Aufhänger der Geschichte sogenannte Quipus auftauchen, präkolumbianische Knotenschnüre, also weniger ein echtes Schriftsystem als vielmehr eine Art komplexer Merkzettel oder - um mit heutigen Hilfsmitteln zu sprechen - eine Art frühzeitliche Excell-Tabelle.

Interessante Bemerkung am Rande: Quipus sind auch eines der wenigen Schriftsysteme, die nicht Einzug in den universellen Unicode-Standard genommen haben - was wohl auch an der schwierigen Darstellungsform inkl. Farbe und Dreidimensionalität liegt (zumindest wurde mir dies in einem lange schon zurückliegenden Vortrag eines Vertreters des Unicode-Konsortiums so erläutert...).

Links:

Christian Schmidt-Häuer: Das magische Medium, Die ZEIT, Nr. 26, 19.06. 2008

Ch. Meinel, H. Sack: WWW - Kommunikation, Internetworking, Web-Technologien, Kap. 2: Kommunikationsmedien im Wandel -- von der Hölenmalerei zum WWW, pp. 55-90., Springer, 2004.

Video: Die Entwicklung der Schrift, aus der Vorlesung "Informatik der digitalen Medien, WS 2005/06, Dr. Harald Sack, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena

Adaptive Multimedia Retrieval 2008 in Berlin, June 26-27, 2008 - Day 02

2008-06-27T09:07:00.017+02:00

After the dinner cruise along the river Spree, the second day of Adaptive Multimedia Retrieval 2008 again starts with an interesting invited talk on the European answer to Google search engine technology - THESEUS.

Karsten Müller from Fraunhofer Heinrich-Hertz-Institute is presenting on "THESEUS Project - Applications and Core Technologies for the Semantic Web". First, Karsten makes clear, that THESEUS doesn't want to be Google ;-) THESEUS is a research program for a new internetbased knowledge infrastructure....which from my point of view means nothing else but "the semantic web"....
One part of the THESEUS project is ALEXANDRIA, the virtual library, being lead by Yahoo! with the objective of semantic processing of different forms of content to enable faster access to relevant content, which again means an increase in information quality. Concepts such as an automated tagging framework (including language error correction, synonym & tag merging, and topic focussing, identification of semantic relations), innovative navigation (by presenting thematically related contents) and interaction concepts are involved.
Another part is ORDO, which deals with "Organizing your digital life" with the goal to unify various data formats, multilingual information, structured and unstructured data on the web to enable homogeneous information sources.Problems such as separating important from unimportant, ordering information instead of searching, priorization, identification and visualization of interrelations are addressed.
TEXO is another part with the objective of "Realizing the internet of services" (being lead by SAP Research), offering personalized customized services, community involvement to improve services, as well as a smooth & seamless (userfriendly) adaption and integration of services.
PROCESSUS deals with the "Optimization of business processes" aiming for the objective of anytime providing the user with theright information at any stage of the business process.
MEDICO is another subproject dealing with "Towards Scalable Semantic Image Search in Medicine" and being lead by Siemens.
CONTENTUS, as being the last Use case "Content access and generation from cultural institutions is lead by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Being part of CONTENTUS are tasks such as Digitizing books as well as audiovisual material (including the German Music Archive in Berlin) protecting the cultural heritage. The goal is the semantically interlinked collection of content to achieve a next generation multimedia library.
.....impressive and ambitious project!

The upcoming section this morning is on "Image Tagging" and Marius Renn (at least I hope so) from TU Kaiserslautern is givig a presentation on "Automatic Image Tagging using Community-Driven Online Image Database". Automatic image tagging requires a lot of training data....and flickr is delivering tons of tags per day...but are these flickr data really good candidates for learning? So, in the end, unfiltered community image sets directly do not provide satisfying results. Alas, these databases at least allow large scale image aggregation...
The next talk in this session is given by Christian Hentschel from Fraunhofer HHI Berlin about "Automatic Image Annotation Refinement using Object Co-Occurences". Again, flickr is the target image set with its huge collection of more than 2 billion images, growing by 3 million photos every day. Objects always appear and are perceived in a semantic context.

The following session is on "Symbolic Music Retrieval" and starts with Rainer Typke from Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence (ÖFAI), but I had to skip this talk. Anyway, the samples of the reduced MIDI files were quite interesting (although I'm not a fan of the Scorpions!). OK, I had to ask afterwards about the usefulness and application of his approach. In music retrieval it can be used to reduce the index size down to 30% of the original index. Also QBE-processing will become much easier while on the other hand you might connect this MIDI-collection to real music files.
The last talk of the morning session is given by Giancarlo Vercellesi from University of Milan on "Automatic synchronization between audio and partial music score presentation". He presents the ParSi architecture, which perfoms an alignment of PCM signal and partial MIDI scores.

The afternoon session is simply entitled with "Systems". Fernando Lopéz from Madrid is giving a presentation on "Towards a fully MPEG-21 compliant adaption engine: complementary description tools and architectural models". Within the MPEG-21 framework several aspects of metadata-driven adaption is not clearly covered. He introduces CAIN, a tool for adapting Digital Items e.g. to different output devices.
The session continues with a presentation on "Mobile museum guide based on fast SIFT recognition" with the objective to identify paintings in galleries simply with the help of mobile pattern recognition without any extra installation on site. The SIFT (Scale Invariant Feature Transform) method is a rather cool algorithm for detecting local features within images that are used to map photographs taken with your PDA or mobile phone in the image gallery with reference pictures from a given database. And actually the live demo did work :)
I guess, we will also use the SIFT-algorithm in yovisto for synchronization of ppt/pdf-slides with the lecture video.

For the last session - "Structuring of Image Collections" - only one speaker showed up. Marc Gelgon is presenting on "Geo-temporal structuring of a personal image database with two-level variational Bayes mixture estimation".

[to be continued...]

Adaptive Multimedia Retrieval 2008 in Berlin, June 26-27, 2008

2008-06-26T09:59:00.025+02:00

The next two days, we are attending the Berlin Adaptve Multimedia Retrieval 2008 Workshop at the Heinrich Hertz Institute being located in downtown Berlin. So, it's pretty close to home and the only travelling involved was by S-Bahn :)

The first speaker is Francois Pachett from Sony CSL giving a keynote entitled "What are our audio features worth?"
The fundamental questions are "What makes objects what they are?", ""What are the features of subjectivity?", "How do we perceive objects and how can we transfer this to a machine?" Pachet's research is concerned with the classification of musical objects based on the so called polyphonic timbre that describes the sum of all features of a music object. Interesting thing is the identification of hubs, i.e. songs that are pretty close to every other song. Hubs in general seem to be mere artefacts of static models.
Interesting fact ist that there are companies now, predicting if your song is going to be a hit. Their judgement also relies on feature analysis and they even give recommendations how your song can be improvent to become a hit. Of course you have to pay for that service...but does it really work??

After the coffee break, there's a session on User-Adaptive Music Retrieval. The first talak is presented by Kay Wolter from Fraunhofer IDMT Ilmenau on "Adaptive User-Modelling for Content-Based Music Retrieval". They are adapting a content-based music retrieval system (CBMR) according to user preferences that are determined by acceptances and rejections of recommended songs by the user, which is furthermore used to improve the quality of music recommendations....Reminds me somehow to Pandora or last.fm...
The second talk is presented by Sebastian Stober from Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg on "Towards User-Adaptive Structuring and Organization of Music Collections". So, wouldn't it be nice to structure your music collection automatically...but not in the way the software tells you, but the way you like it? The presented system is based on an general adaption approach using self-organizing maps that can be adapted by user interaction.

The first afternoon session is on "User-adaptive Web Retrieval" and starts with a presentation of Florian König from Johannes-Kepler-Universität Linz on "Using thematic ontologies for user- and group-based adaptive personalization in web searching". He introduces Prospector, which is a generic meta-search layer for Google, not constrained only to web search, based on re-ranking of search results and deploying user modells based on Open Directory Project (ODP) taxonomies. As far as I have understood, the applcation is based on the carrot2 framework for open source search engine result clustering.
Next, David Zellhöfer from BTU Cottbus presents on "A Poset Based Approach for Condition Weighting". Similarity search can be determined according to different conditions w.r.t. the search query. Esp. different people have different expectations if it comes to similarity. So, condition weights have to be determined by psychological experiments.

The second afternoon session is about "Music Tracking and Tumbnailing" and starts with a presentation of Tim Pohle from Johannes-Kepler-Universität Linz on "An Approach to Automatically Tracking Music Preference on Mobile Players". Ok, so the basic problem is, someday you will get bored by the music selection on your ipod. Therefore, the goal is to remove songs that you don't like anymore and replace them with new songs that you probably will like. How do you achieve this? Well, with according user feedback, i.e. by tracking the user's decision on choosing or skipping tracks. Tracks that have recently been skipped often will be dropped and replaced by tracks that are similar (according to some feature analyses) to the remaning tracks.
Next, Björn Schuller from Technische Universität Münschen is presenting on "One Day in Half an Hour: Music Thumbnailing Incorporating Harmony- and Rythm Structure". Music thumbnailing is some really cool feature, Just imagine, your sitting in your car and you are looking for another track to hear, but your player always starts songs at the beginning and they have long and boring intros. Therefore, getting to the most interesting (or significant) part of the song immediately would really be something...

The sessions close with an invited talk given by Stefan Weinzierl and Sascha Spors on "The Future of Audio Reproduction. Technology - Formats - Applications". Promissing title, let's see.... We start with a brief history of audio recording and reproduction technology starting from the very first phonograph to modern multichannel spatial surround sound systems. So, the future seems to be real sound field synthesis (wavefield synthesis, WFS) instead of relying on psycho-acustic effects as in today's stereo. Here, an array of loudspeakers reproduces exactly the wave front of the original sound source. For transmitting signals like this, no single channels are recorded anymore, but the original sound signal (without spatial characteristics of the room where it has been recorded, because this would interfere with the characteristics of the room, where it is reproduced) including movement and position of the sound source. Besides existing VRML and MPEG-4 Audio BIFS that focus more on visual scene description than on audio scene descriptions, there is the proposal of a new modeling language for high resolution spatial sound events called ASDF (Audio Scene Description Format).

[...to be continued in Adaptive Multimedia Retrieval 2008 in Berlin, June 26-27, 2008 - Day 02]

Visualization of large document data sets

2008-06-25T13:44:00.003+02:00

Of course, there are a lot of books at amazon. To find a specific book, you have several possibilities. Either you try the 'search'-frame (be careful to write your keywords in the correct way as they do appear e.g. in the title) or you try to follow the categories and the proposed selections (Top10 lists, etc.) of books there. A great feature of course is the similarity based search or the search based on recommendations. This is the only way to discover something new by serendipity, something you did'nt even know to exist . In real life this way to find a book comes equal to finding by recommendation of friends or by your local librarian or book seller.

But, what about good old window-shopping. If I come to a bookstore or to a library, I love to wander around the book shelves and to look here and there and to spend (sometimes to waist...) lots of time.

Something that comes visually close to this experience is zoomii.com. It's an amazon add-on for browsing (a considerably large set of) books (they say its about 20.000 books right now) with the look and feel of book shelves, ordered by categories, with (right sized) book covers in the shelves. You can walk around, zoom in and out, and of course you can browse by categorie or search via keyword.

It's really some nice way to visualize large sets of documents. I would like to see an API for visualizing documents on the web that way!!

[via netbib.log]