<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Moritz Petersen</title>
	
	<link>http://blog.moritzpetersen.de</link>
	<description>A blog about software, photography and random thoughts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:58:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/moritzpetersen/blog/comments" /><feedburner:info uri="moritzpetersen/blog/comments" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:browserFriendly></feedburner:browserFriendly><item>
		<title>Comment on Test Panasonic Lumix LX-3 by moritz</title>
		<link>http://blog.moritzpetersen.de/2009/07/test-panasonic-lumix-lx-3/comment-page-1/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>moritz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.moritzpetersen.de/?p=58#comment-325</guid>
		<description>Hi Uwe,

für mich gehört die Nachbearbeitung zur Digitalfotografie wie die Dunkelkammer zum Film. Daher habe ich mich immer intensiv damit beschäftigt. Ich verwende Lightroom seit den frühen Betaversionen und bin nach wie vor begeistert. Man kann ziemlich viel aus den RAW Dateien herausholen. Speziell für die LX-3 ist es aber nicht.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Uwe,</p>
<p>für mich gehört die Nachbearbeitung zur Digitalfotografie wie die Dunkelkammer zum Film. Daher habe ich mich immer intensiv damit beschäftigt. Ich verwende Lightroom seit den frühen Betaversionen und bin nach wie vor begeistert. Man kann ziemlich viel aus den RAW Dateien herausholen. Speziell für die LX-3 ist es aber nicht.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Test Panasonic Lumix LX-3 by Uwe</title>
		<link>http://blog.moritzpetersen.de/2009/07/test-panasonic-lumix-lx-3/comment-page-1/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>Uwe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.moritzpetersen.de/?p=58#comment-324</guid>
		<description>Schade, dass ich das nicht eher gelesen habe! Ich habe seit kurzem auch die LX3 und den gleichen Eindruck. 
Nun bin ich auf der Suche nach Tipps fuer die EBV (fuer jemand der wenig mit EBV macht) angepasst an die LX3.
Man liest sonst im Internet so viele positive Kommentare, die ich nicht ganz nachvollziehen kann (im sicher unfairen Vergleich zu DSLR)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Schade, dass ich das nicht eher gelesen habe! Ich habe seit kurzem auch die LX3 und den gleichen Eindruck.<br />
Nun bin ich auf der Suche nach Tipps fuer die EBV (fuer jemand der wenig mit EBV macht) angepasst an die LX3.<br />
Man liest sonst im Internet so viele positive Kommentare, die ich nicht ganz nachvollziehen kann (im sicher unfairen Vergleich zu DSLR)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu: positiver erster Eindruck by rainwebs</title>
		<link>http://blog.moritzpetersen.de/2009/06/ubuntu-positiver-erster-eindruck/comment-page-1/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>rainwebs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 19:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.moritzpetersen.de/?p=54#comment-315</guid>
		<description>Ubuntu ist absichtlich sehr mager. Kommt der Security sehr entgegen. Das ist sehr interessant, wenn es als Server-System im Hosting läuft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ubuntu ist absichtlich sehr mager. Kommt der Security sehr entgegen. Das ist sehr interessant, wenn es als Server-System im Hosting läuft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using JAXP 1.4.x with Java 5 by Praveen</title>
		<link>http://blog.moritzpetersen.de/2009/04/using-jaxp-14x-with-java-5/comment-page-1/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>Praveen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.moritzpetersen.de/?p=22#comment-301</guid>
		<description>Great!
This helped me to fix issue</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great!<br />
This helped me to fix issue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which focal length do you use most? by Fabrizio Giudici</title>
		<link>http://blog.moritzpetersen.de/2009/09/which-focal-length-do-you-use-most/comment-page-1/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabrizio Giudici</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.moritzpetersen.de/?p=109#comment-240</guid>
		<description>Do you mind if I copy the code sketch to the jrawio blog and link yo this post :-) ? I'm trying to blog about sample code and this is really cool.

Back to the topic, today I was in a store (for other reasons) and I was intrigued by these small sized cameras. Sometimes I travel for business all of a sudden and for a few days, and I can't carry all my weapons with me. But - have you looked at the smallest Nikons? D60 and D80 (can't remember which I saw today). The other problem is that the smaller cameras with high crop factor are a problem if you like wide angles like me. The 7-14mm for the Lumix costs about 900 euros (the same as my 12-24mm for the Nikon DX format), which is not cheap... 

So now for me the doubt is whether to shift my D200 to secondary and take a D300s+ (I'm not satisfied with the D300s, so I'm waiting for possible news at PhotoKina), or to keep the D200 as primary and replace the old D100 with a "small" Nikon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you mind if I copy the code sketch to the jrawio blog and link yo this post :-) ? I&#8217;m trying to blog about sample code and this is really cool.</p>
<p>Back to the topic, today I was in a store (for other reasons) and I was intrigued by these small sized cameras. Sometimes I travel for business all of a sudden and for a few days, and I can&#8217;t carry all my weapons with me. But &#8211; have you looked at the smallest Nikons? D60 and D80 (can&#8217;t remember which I saw today). The other problem is that the smaller cameras with high crop factor are a problem if you like wide angles like me. The 7-14mm for the Lumix costs about 900 euros (the same as my 12-24mm for the Nikon DX format), which is not cheap&#8230; </p>
<p>So now for me the doubt is whether to shift my D200 to secondary and take a D300s+ (I&#8217;m not satisfied with the D300s, so I&#8217;m waiting for possible news at PhotoKina), or to keep the D200 as primary and replace the old D100 with a &#8220;small&#8221; Nikon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Comparing camera sizes [Update] by Moritz Petersen » Blog Archive » Which focal length do you use most?</title>
		<link>http://blog.moritzpetersen.de/2009/09/comparing-camera-sizes/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Moritz Petersen » Blog Archive » Which focal length do you use most?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.moritzpetersen.de/?p=98#comment-237</guid>
		<description>[...] Moritz Petersen A blog about software, photography and random thoughts.      « Comparing camera sizes [Update] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Moritz Petersen A blog about software, photography and random thoughts.      &laquo; Comparing camera sizes [Update] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on To D300 or not to D300 by Fabrizio Giudici</title>
		<link>http://blog.moritzpetersen.de/2009/07/to-d300-or-not-to-d300/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabrizio Giudici</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.moritzpetersen.de/?p=61#comment-144</guid>
		<description>D300s has been just officially announced:

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0907/09073007nikond300s.asp

Yes, it's 720p, not 1080p.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D300s has been just officially announced:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0907/09073007nikond300s.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/news/0907/09073007nikond300s.asp</a></p>
<p>Yes, it&#8217;s 720p, not 1080p.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Street Photography by moritz</title>
		<link>http://blog.moritzpetersen.de/2009/05/street-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>moritz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.moritzpetersen.de/?p=34#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Meiner Meinung nach, ist da durchaus Interpretationsspielraum. Aber schon richtig: Street Photography ist durchaus auch ohne Menschen möglich. Interessiert mich persönlich nur weniger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meiner Meinung nach, ist da durchaus Interpretationsspielraum. Aber schon richtig: Street Photography ist durchaus auch ohne Menschen möglich. Interessiert mich persönlich nur weniger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on To D300 or not to D300 by moritz</title>
		<link>http://blog.moritzpetersen.de/2009/07/to-d300-or-not-to-d300/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>moritz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.moritzpetersen.de/?p=61#comment-111</guid>
		<description>The summary of the article is: I'd like to upgrade my equipment, but can't decide which way to go. The rumored D300s will have video, but most likely not FullHD. Video is not exactly relevant to me - at the moment. But it would be a nice feature to experiment with. I think Canon has the leading position here, as they have a history of building camcorders. Nikon is specialized in photo equipment. I think, Nikon will take some time to come up with a really good video feature. Let's see what the next days will reveal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The summary of the article is: I&#8217;d like to upgrade my equipment, but can&#8217;t decide which way to go. The rumored D300s will have video, but most likely not FullHD. Video is not exactly relevant to me &#8211; at the moment. But it would be a nice feature to experiment with. I think Canon has the leading position here, as they have a history of building camcorders. Nikon is specialized in photo equipment. I think, Nikon will take some time to come up with a really good video feature. Let&#8217;s see what the next days will reveal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Street Photography by Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://blog.moritzpetersen.de/2009/05/street-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.moritzpetersen.de/?p=34#comment-110</guid>
		<description>street photography ist nicht street portraiture. äpfel und birnen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>street photography ist nicht street portraiture. äpfel und birnen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

