<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367577693271785749</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:24:18 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>looking</category><category>baited</category><category>quotation</category><category>amid</category><category>misspelling</category><category>jenna bush</category><category>celebrity names</category><category>drug</category><category>served</category><category>damages</category><category>ap style</category><category>mr. rewrite</category><category>grammar mistake</category><category>daylight</category><category>grizzly</category><category>misspelled celebrity name</category><category>wimbeldon</category><category>nonprofit</category><category>teaming</category><category>lightening</category><category>fannie mae</category><category>valentines</category><category>your's</category><category>spelling</category><category>incorrect</category><category>misspelled</category><category>haus</category><category>greenlight</category><category>savings</category><category>illegal immigration</category><category>buses</category><category>searching</category><category>abbreviation</category><category>it's</category><category>taxpayer's dime</category><category>sex in the city</category><category>bus</category><category>cesarian</category><category>trying</category><category>bernanke</category><category>eager</category><category>presidential campaign viral</category><category>while</category><category>july fourth</category><category>section</category><category>at worst</category><category>misspellings</category><category>everyday</category><category>spelling errors. useless quotation marks</category><category>effect</category><category>bated</category><category>wimbledon</category><category>capital</category><category>staunch</category><category>chicago manual of style</category><category>embarassment</category><category>beau</category><category>mtv</category><category>tactic</category><category>whilst</category><category>dan quayle</category><category>redundant</category><category>noun</category><category>tact</category><category>cord</category><category>cd's</category><category>barack obama</category><category>its</category><category>bow</category><category>bloc</category><category>potatoe</category><category>totaled</category><category>adjective</category><category>band together</category><category>complements</category><category>fallacy</category><category>ph.d.'s</category><category>error</category><category>tow the line</category><category>space</category><category>pressure</category><category>ph.d.s</category><category>plural</category><category>merrill lynch</category><category>the paper</category><category>deserts</category><category>misspelled celebrity names</category><category>prosecutors</category><category>shuttle</category><category>evoke</category><category>web page</category><category>hillary clinton</category><category>Buzzkill</category><category>spelling mistake spelling mistakes</category><category>hinkley</category><category>word choice</category><category>cords</category><category>1990's</category><category>msnbc</category><category>complement</category><category>fewer</category><category>diplomas</category><category>grammar</category><category>it</category><category>eliot spitzer</category><category>punctuation</category><category>arizona cardinals</category><category>stationery</category><category>st. patrick's day</category><category>zip code</category><category>saving</category><category>longtime bow</category><category>agreement</category><category>father's day</category><category>signs</category><category>longtime beau</category><category>bureaucratese</category><category>complimentary</category><category>invoke</category><category>born</category><category>semicolon</category><category>canada geese canadian hudson crash usage grammar error spelling</category><category>unecessary</category><category>bonds</category><category>misspelled celebrities</category><category>at the worst</category><category>desserts</category><category>vs.</category><category>new york times</category><category>every day</category><category>july</category><category>election</category><category>most misspelled</category><category>additional</category><category>potato</category><category>pronouns</category><category>steelers</category><category>homonyms</category><category>stanch</category><category>premier</category><category>premiere</category><category>april</category><category>hilary</category><category>redundancies</category><category>grammar error</category><category>chord</category><category>embarassed</category><category>extra</category><category>nearest</category><category>spelling mistake</category><category>emmanuel</category><category>among</category><category>adjecitive</category><category>spelling errors</category><category>taxpayers' dime</category><category>embarrass</category><category>suv's</category><category>awards</category><category>human-caused</category><category>adding</category><category>web site</category><category>underway</category><category>told</category><category>fool</category><category>national grammar day</category><category>spelling mistakes</category><category>fear</category><category>writing</category><category>vocal</category><category>use</category><category>webpage</category><category>spellign errors</category><category>busses</category><category>adjectives</category><category>plus</category><category>block</category><category>caesarian</category><category>suffice to say</category><category>web</category><category>grammy's</category><category>verb</category><category>peak</category><category>misspelled sign</category><category>mormon</category><category>proper nouns</category><category>capitol</category><category>chords</category><category>hinckley</category><category>barak</category><category>writers strike</category><category>valentine's day</category><category>marks</category><category>matzo matzah matzoh spelling</category><category>test</category><category>apostrophes</category><category>borne</category><category>all of the sudden</category><category>literally</category><category>plurals</category><category>associated press style</category><category>pronoun</category><category>barry</category><category>caesarean</category><category>suffice it to say</category><category>greengrocer's apostrophe</category><category>fool's</category><category>mispell</category><category>complementary</category><category>incentivize</category><category>pique</category><category>bureaucratic language</category><category>politicians</category><category>affect</category><category>apostrophe</category><category>dvd's</category><category>undo</category><category>bad</category><category>lightning</category><category>asne</category><category>cesarean</category><category>evel knievel</category><category>fourth</category><category>possessive personal pronoun</category><category>pittsburg</category><category>hear hear</category><category>mistakes</category><category>stationary</category><category>acronyms</category><category>4th of july</category><category>elliott</category><category>endeavour</category><category>idioms</category><category>sex and the city</category><category>usage</category><category>fools'</category><category>correct</category><category>fourth of july</category><category>style</category><category>an</category><category>building</category><category>hurtle</category><category>compliments</category><category>under way</category><category>plusses</category><category>pluses</category><category>buffet</category><category>writer's strike</category><category>try</category><category>city</category><category>sign</category><category>grammies</category><category>errors</category><category>yours</category><category>actively</category><category>flagstaff</category><category>green-light</category><category>geography</category><category>adverb</category><category>seeking</category><category>redundancy</category><category>hurdle</category><category>embarrassed</category><category>writers' strike</category><category>fathers day</category><category>4th</category><category>influence</category><category>poor</category><category>media</category><category>teeming</category><category>mistake</category><category>july 4th</category><category>compliment</category><category>principal</category><category>grammar errors</category><category>spelling error</category><category>apostrophe s</category><category>fools</category><category>tolled</category><category>possessive personal pronouns</category><category>all</category><category>embarass</category><category>misspell</category><category>compound adjective</category><category>embarrassment</category><category>fathers' day</category><category>mark</category><category>subject</category><category>jargon</category><category>all of a sudden</category><category>hauser</category><category>celebrities</category><category>proper noun</category><category>anxious</category><category>starbucks</category><category>speling</category><category>enthusiasm</category><category>right</category><category>peek</category><category>valentine's</category><category>trys</category><category>rahm emanuel</category><category>corrections</category><category>veterans day</category><category>just</category><category>brian williams</category><category>embarassing</category><category>unnecessary</category><category>non-profit</category><category>grammy</category><category>acronym</category><category>amidst</category><category>grammar mistakes</category><category>elliot</category><category>endeavor</category><category>tack</category><category>ban together</category><category>undue</category><category>nbc</category><category>warren buffett</category><category>newsmakers</category><category>bear</category><category>come</category><category>valentine</category><category>greengrocer</category><category>first</category><category>website</category><category>pittsburgh</category><category>valentines day</category><category>toe the line</category><category>idiom</category><category>time</category><category>pore</category><category>grisly</category><category>day</category><category>green light</category><category>pour</category><category>principle</category><category>diploma</category><category>super bowl</category><category>correction</category><category>misspelled signs</category><category>at worse</category><category>house</category><category>freddie mac</category><category>versus</category><category>damage</category><category>less</category><category>amongst</category><category>zip</category><category>breath</category><title>Mr. Rewrite</title><description>Spelling, grammar and usage tips served with a dash of humor.</description><link>http://www.irewrite.net/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Mr. Rewrite)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>362</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/MrRewrite" /><feedburner:info uri="mrrewrite" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367577693271785749.post-5470355422538130154</guid><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:14:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-07-25T11:14:38.976-07:00</atom:updated><title>This 6-foot-4 blogging legend says ...</title><atom:summary>


Mr. Rewrite is excited that student journalists from his place of employment are covering the Summer Olympics in London. That has him thinking about AP style for various Olympic events.

First, the AP Stylebook notes that it's decathlon rather than decathalon. AP is kind enough not to point it out, but Mr. Rewrite will note that many articles are already making this mistake (example: this PR </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MrRewrite/~3/18SOmEz_oKE/this-6-foot-4-blogging-legend-says.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Mr. Rewrite)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-v0jxIM7ERpo/UBAxCGM_cfI/AAAAAAAACHQ/cI_wN2QDqlY/s72-c/decathlon.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MrRewrite/~4/18SOmEz_oKE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.irewrite.net/2012/07/this-6-foot-4-blogging-legend-says.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367577693271785749.post-1099167571356605700</guid><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 15:48:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-07-25T10:46:26.999-07:00</atom:updated><title>Childrens' and womens' service too!</title><atom:summary>



Uh, since men is already plural the possessive is men's. The same goes when making possessives of other nouns with irregular plurals (examples: women's, children's,  people's, oxen's and mice's).

Someone took the time to explain this so Mr. Rewrite doesn't have to. Here's a link.
</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MrRewrite/~3/UvfKn0VGPM8/childrens-and-womenses-service-too.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Mr. Rewrite)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-DKO9-i1HOes/UAWJRpd073I/AAAAAAAACGY/GG6vhQckmgM/s72-c/7.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MrRewrite/~4/UvfKn0VGPM8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.irewrite.net/2012/07/childrens-and-womenses-service-too.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367577693271785749.post-2776749790614715870</guid><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 09:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-07-18T06:55:34.556-07:00</atom:updated><title>Getting this right tests one's mettle</title><atom:summary>Welcome to homophone hell.After finally pulling a bunch of boxes out of the attic of Rewrite Sr. and Mother Rewrite, Mr. Rewrite was savoring a trip down memory lane until he came upon this award.Metal winner? Unless someone handed Mr. Rewrite a hunk of copper, nickel or tin, he won a medal for an awesome piñata he and a classmate made for this parade.It's more common to see writers confuse </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MrRewrite/~3/NKeI3RrUzuM/getting-this-right-tests-ones-mettle.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Mr. Rewrite)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-oWHpy6AG1j8/UAOjEciNspI/AAAAAAAACFg/2vwiP2kMIzY/s72-c/Screen+Shot+2012-07-15+at+10.13.16+PM.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MrRewrite/~4/NKeI3RrUzuM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.irewrite.net/2012/07/getting-this-right-tests-ones-mettle.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367577693271785749.post-6889836407178672980</guid><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-07-14T06:46:59.985-07:00</atom:updated><title>The week's tweets: 'mobil' services?</title><atom:summary>


While he's having this burst of blogging energy, Mr. Rewrite will resume summing up tweets from the past week ...

In the photo above, this mobile glass-replacement firm apparently has mistaken itself for a service station.



Mr. Rewrite was proud of his contributions to Mashable's request for #canceledwebshows, suggestions of TV program names tweaked to have Web/social media themes:

"BFFy </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MrRewrite/~3/NOiXWQSMfoU/fun-with-signs-mobil-service.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Mr. Rewrite)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-4EISnGBs9CI/T_2WAQtr_II/AAAAAAAACC4/mZp62MIg75w/s72-c/399551_489897697710006_570175765_n.jpeg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MrRewrite/~4/NOiXWQSMfoU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.irewrite.net/2012/07/fun-with-signs-mobil-service.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367577693271785749.post-1431173993986974023</guid><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-07-13T11:29:08.796-07:00</atom:updated><title>Mr. Rewrite would rather not have to post on this</title><atom:summary>


The Penn State news of the past 24 hours can't be dealt with lightly. But Mr. Rewrite should note, while acknowledging the gravity of the news being conveyed, that the AP Stylebook calls for cover-up, not coverup, as a noun and adjective and cover up as a verb. So the Freeh report alleges that certain officials engaged in a cover-up, at least if a news organization bound by AP style is </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MrRewrite/~3/YUbLXpYVleY/mr-rewrite-would-rather-not-have-to.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Mr. Rewrite)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-WWe99QDM4T8/UABlvTSgC9I/AAAAAAAACDw/BbhJNkwJrMw/s72-c/coverup.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MrRewrite/~4/YUbLXpYVleY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.irewrite.net/2012/07/mr-rewrite-would-rather-not-have-to.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367577693271785749.post-8775030973233717523</guid><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-07-12T08:54:53.049-07:00</atom:updated><title>To whom should Mr. Rewrite address this gripe?</title><atom:summary>


Hey rama! This Yahoo! blurb fails to follow Mr. Rewrite's First Rule of Who/Whom: If ever one feels like using whom, simply write around the problem or risk the wrath of mean-spirited and-or wannabe grammarians who live for the opportunity to savage writers over who/whom errors. Rewriting also helps because whom usually suggests that a passage is far from conversational. William Safire, as </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MrRewrite/~3/x24dMGjM95w/to-whom-should-mr-rewrite-address-this.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Mr. Rewrite)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-UJudt9Tjfsc/T_za6XyYQAI/AAAAAAAACCA/F9HYfGXQ-wE/s72-c/whom.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MrRewrite/~4/x24dMGjM95w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.irewrite.net/2012/07/to-whom-should-mr-rewrite-address-this.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367577693271785749.post-1276704704224912327</guid><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 08:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-07-11T08:38:48.568-07:00</atom:updated><title>Time to tune up their AP style knowledge</title><atom:summary>


Mr. Rewrite's summer editing work reinforces another AP style point: One tunes up (v.) a car, provides a tuneup (noun) or is a tuneup (adj.) mechanic.



In no case does AP allow tune-up. But that's how it appears in many, many articles by news organizations claiming to follow AP style. For example:
















This appears to be an especially big problem for sports sections, which throw </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MrRewrite/~3/bmqYsqBAdmU/time-to-tune-up-their-ap-style.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Mr. Rewrite)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-umvh6Ip-kmE/T_xm95UkLVI/AAAAAAAACAo/2mvY_4bASfc/s72-c/tuneup.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MrRewrite/~4/bmqYsqBAdmU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.irewrite.net/2012/07/time-to-tune-up-their-ap-style.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367577693271785749.post-3972152885019575817</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-07-10T06:33:53.366-07:00</atom:updated><title>Another redundancy -- again</title><atom:summary>




Mr. Rewrite did a double take when he and Rewrite Jr. passed this sign on the way to a scary ride.

Entire duration? Since duration means the time that something lasts, per the Webster's New World College Dictionary, Fourth Edition, entire adds nothing but redundancy.</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MrRewrite/~3/bMPlE60YFCA/another-redundancy-again.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Mr. Rewrite)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Qn6xf5NNMYg/T_uuW2Fbx-I/AAAAAAAAB_s/xGTw-xR6xpE/s72-c/duration.jpeg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MrRewrite/~4/bMPlE60YFCA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.irewrite.net/2012/07/another-redundancy-again.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367577693271785749.post-96575355434962630</guid><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-07-09T01:00:08.942-07:00</atom:updated><title>Mr. Rewrite puts 'crosshairs' in his cross hairs</title><atom:summary>


Is there any news story these days that doesn't have the word crosshairs in the headline? Some examples:



Politico: Outsourcing in Senate's crosshairs
CNN: US Midwest in crosshairs of child sex trafficking fight
National Journal: Obama puts 'Romneycare' in crosshairs
Fortune: Why the FTC has hackers' victims in its crosshairs
CBS News: Public sector unions in crosshairs after the Wisconsin </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MrRewrite/~3/xSeXXlbVrUg/mr-rewrite-puts-crosshairs-in-his-cross.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Mr. Rewrite)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-D8OLGtbPjAo/T_pVaXmkE2I/AAAAAAAAB_Y/1aV3iVYWwMk/s72-c/crosshairs+copy.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MrRewrite/~4/xSeXXlbVrUg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.irewrite.net/2012/07/mr-rewrite-puts-crosshairs-in-his-cross.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367577693271785749.post-7284411099435472255</guid><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 08:05:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-07-08T07:51:58.578-07:00</atom:updated><title>This error damages one's reputation</title><atom:summary>Unless the shopping carts at this Trader Joe’s are suing customers, they cause damage, not damages. The AP Stylebook and pretty much every other style/usage guide reserve damages for compensation that courts assign for injury or loss.</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MrRewrite/~3/wAqV3wpwYfg/this-mistake-damages-ones-reputation.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Mr. Rewrite)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-PNvsvDFwcbk/T_kBGiEmbPI/AAAAAAAAB_M/ORYcAiQjjIU/s72-c/7.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MrRewrite/~4/wAqV3wpwYfg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.irewrite.net/2012/07/this-mistake-damages-ones-reputation.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367577693271785749.post-7241935745690669629</guid><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 14:50:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-07-07T08:15:43.238-07:00</atom:updated><title>A backhanded compliment from Mr. Rewrite</title><atom:summary>Mr. Rewrite is recycling a 2008 graphic to compliment the many, many media accounts that correctly spell Wimbledon (not Wimbeldon). Now let's slam (overhead, of course) those that don't. Check out the carnage via Google News. It isn't just lower-seeded journalism organizations making this unforced error.When Mr. Rewrite began his service as a journalist he had to look such things up in reference </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MrRewrite/~3/q8rI1g862nY/backhanded-compliment-from-mr-rewrite.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Mr. Rewrite)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MrRewrite/~4/q8rI1g862nY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.irewrite.net/2012/07/backhanded-compliment-from-mr-rewrite.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367577693271785749.post-2995563728773895540</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-07-06T09:41:42.169-07:00</atom:updated><title>On the matter of a Higgs boson ...</title><atom:summary>



Until now, Mr. Rewrite postulated that attention to grammar, a stylebook and the dictionary held the universe together. That left him quite depressed about the state of the universe.

Now the newspaper tells him that something called a Higgs boson does the job. Mr. Rewrite has included a picture of one above. One may have to squint to make it out.

Well, guess what: Attention to grammar, </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MrRewrite/~3/C2CtkCMGKUU/some-thoughts-on-matter-of-higgs-boson.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Mr. Rewrite)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-iBBHoLRN_tQ/T_cHIttZIHI/AAAAAAAAB-w/llcy_PpOysE/s72-c/9.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>2</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MrRewrite/~4/C2CtkCMGKUU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.irewrite.net/2012/07/some-thoughts-on-matter-of-higgs-boson.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367577693271785749.post-5707593177262129896</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 18:43:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-07-07T22:35:05.998-07:00</atom:updated><title>Let us ponder</title><atom:summary>


Let us (or let's) consider why this sign lacks an apostrophe. Perhaps it's to warp young minds.

Here's one from across the way that's better.





</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MrRewrite/~3/HMn3ugprq7k/let-us-ponder.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Mr. Rewrite)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-4e3SR6DBxCo/T_XgPyWSc4I/AAAAAAAAB-c/YDSDTWMqP9g/s72-c/7.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MrRewrite/~4/HMn3ugprq7k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.irewrite.net/2012/07/let-us-ponder.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367577693271785749.post-5614143656422051631</guid><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 07:26:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-07-02T06:31:59.270-07:00</atom:updated><title>No such thing as a 'pre-game' ceremony to AP</title><atom:summary>

Mr. Rewrite is getting into his summer editing gigs. Those summer editing gigs lead to lots of interesting AP style discoveries. And those, along with not wanting to work in the yard or prepare for the fall semester, renew his interest in blogging.

So enjoy it while it lasts, Community of Concern. Mr. Rewrite is blogging again. He usually flames out after several months.

Today's discovery: </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MrRewrite/~3/3PEohXEUJHI/no-such-thing-as-pre-game-ceremony-to.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Mr. Rewrite)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-nMpXxW8Bdvc/T_Eu2L7LC1I/AAAAAAAAB-Q/mX_5zz23IWA/s72-c/pregame.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MrRewrite/~4/3PEohXEUJHI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.irewrite.net/2012/07/no-such-thing-as-pre-game-ceremony-to.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367577693271785749.post-1350431433785451067</guid><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 17:23:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-07-01T10:18:41.889-07:00</atom:updated><title>AP's hyphenation-can-go-too-far guidance</title><atom:summary>




Mr. Rewrite's morning paper hyphenates pretty much every compound modifier (see health-care law and social-media annoyances in the above).

It's just fine for a news organization to have its own style, applied consistently. But Mr. Rewrite must point out to students and the broader Community of Concern that this is a departure from Associated Press style.



Per the stylebook entry on  </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MrRewrite/~3/B0TFRPRr9qI/ap-hyphenation-can-go-too-far-guidance.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Mr. Rewrite)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-2aq592VfzFY/T_CGYvlIUgI/AAAAAAAAB94/66xc37hT-rk/s72-c/Untitled-1.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MrRewrite/~4/B0TFRPRr9qI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.irewrite.net/2012/06/ap-hyphenation-can-go-too-far-guidance.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367577693271785749.post-6578457041176502624</guid><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 14:17:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-07-01T08:22:57.724-07:00</atom:updated><title>Mr. Rewrite's advice: Use a dictionary</title><atom:summary>


Mr. Rewrite has given in to vices such as "Modern Family," reading books and working, but perhaps it's time to get back to blogging. 

This one should be vise. Look it up.</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MrRewrite/~3/eoODejZ_FoU/mr-rewrite-advice-use-dictionary.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Mr. Rewrite)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-4il2AjJfAqg/T-XP3QxB0WI/AAAAAAAAB9I/2WdGuI5BFe8/s72-c/4.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>1</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MrRewrite/~4/eoODejZ_FoU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.irewrite.net/2012/06/mr-rewrite-advice-use-dictionary.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367577693271785749.post-1385403447581594175</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 03:47:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-02-20T20:47:23.160-07:00</atom:updated><title>Doesn't inspire optimism</title><atom:summary>Props to Mrs. Rewrite for spotting  this glitch from the PBS Clinton documentary.</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MrRewrite/~3/6p_F696fiSU/doesn-inspire-optimism.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Mr. Rewrite)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-V2S6-QHuGPo/T0MTyfQoV7I/AAAAAAAABz8/85YZk9RMEtw/s72-c/4.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MrRewrite/~4/6p_F696fiSU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.irewrite.net/2012/02/doesn-inspire-optimism.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367577693271785749.post-2209135679917723998</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 18:05:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-02-19T15:50:22.961-07:00</atom:updated><title>Mr. Rewrite honors all presidents</title><atom:summary>
Unless you've chosen to honor just one president, keep in mind that it's Presidents Day weekend. Mr. Rewrite also will accept Presidents' Day. The AP Stylebook goes with Presidents Day, as shown below.

</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MrRewrite/~3/SKDu-nnDwfg/mr-rewrite-honors-all-presidents.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Mr. Rewrite)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-2VbZn32_rFk/Tz_oSgQac-I/AAAAAAAABzs/o646We2BKBM/s72-c/4.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MrRewrite/~4/SKDu-nnDwfg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.irewrite.net/2012/02/mr-rewrite-honors-all-presidents.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367577693271785749.post-4198370242130983705</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-02-19T15:50:53.935-07:00</atom:updated><title>Another redundancy again</title><atom:summary>
Mr. Rewrite isn't making light of this story, but he must note that a fire that kills is necessarily deadly. No need for clarification.</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MrRewrite/~3/nafDQmj-bd0/another-redundancy-again.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Mr. Rewrite)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-FXKuu488Xfo/Tz5u-_Q9XSI/AAAAAAAABzk/yKvpqu5zhvw/s72-c/4.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MrRewrite/~4/nafDQmj-bd0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.irewrite.net/2012/02/another-redundancy-again.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367577693271785749.post-2778380108123607466</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:29:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-01-06T08:49:00.842-07:00</atom:updated><title>An 'effect' defect</title><atom:summary>

Greetings, gentle readers. Mr. Rewrite is trying to emerge from his end-o'-semester, holiday-exacerbated fog by pointing out this boo-boo in today's paper.

In general, "affect" is going to be the verb and "effect" the noun. But not always. He'll let Paul Brians take it from here, as Mr. Rewrite remains a tad foggy.</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MrRewrite/~3/Vttmkqk7avI/defect.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Mr. Rewrite)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://lh3.ggpht.com/-kwOWWpeUTzc/TwcTUozx_JI/AAAAAAAABzM/VddSI8hZbAQ/s72-c/4.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MrRewrite/~4/Vttmkqk7avI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.irewrite.net/2012/01/defect.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367577693271785749.post-1082567026057947714</guid><pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-12-24T09:33:50.422-07:00</atom:updated><title>No compliments for this mess</title><atom:summary>
How does one compliment free checking? "Nice checkbook" would do, Mr. Rewrite supposes.

A music player accompanying free checking, however, is a complement.

Here's Paul Brians' explanation from Common Errors in English Usage. Mr. Rewrite must return to keeping Rewrite Jr. away from the tree.</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MrRewrite/~3/nfduVlUF7o8/no-compliments-for-this.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Mr. Rewrite)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://lh3.ggpht.com/-L6pYF9-dLm0/TvX704yyNTI/AAAAAAAABzE/w9jaR5wuTvo/s72-c/4.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MrRewrite/~4/nfduVlUF7o8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.irewrite.net/2011/12/no-compliments-for-this.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367577693271785749.post-7812941316965521860</guid><pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-12-13T11:56:52.911-07:00</atom:updated><title>Don't send Mr. Rewrite 'hand-written' notes</title><atom:summary>
Mr. Rewrite had occasion to confirm today that a note, grocery list, etc., is handwritten, not hand-written. The AP Stylebook offers no help, but Webster's New World College Dictionary, Fourth Edition, where AP turns for matters not covered by the stylebook, goes with handwritten.

It's the same story with handwriting. But the AP Stylebook goes with hand-washing, and the New World goes with </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MrRewrite/~3/48NeFCXbjns/dont-send-mr-rewrite-hand-written-notes.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Mr. Rewrite)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-aeVYunBLgfc/TueeKCnY-vI/AAAAAAAABy4/_TfOaK6Xg3c/s72-c/handwritten.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>2</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MrRewrite/~4/48NeFCXbjns" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.irewrite.net/2011/12/dont-send-mr-rewrite-hand-written-notes.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367577693271785749.post-7107860514318844443</guid><pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 07:22:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-12-10T00:22:00.350-07:00</atom:updated><title>Nice! Another 'everyday' error -- every week</title><atom:summary>

Well, Mr. Rewrite doesn't find it nice (Nice!) when a store pays money for a sign misusing everyday vs. every day. For the record, whatever nice (Nice!) is happening here is nice every day (adv.).</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MrRewrite/~3/UDDQAvU_ToE/nice-another-everyday-error-every-week.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Mr. Rewrite)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://lh5.ggpht.com/-2Q8cIEzAvb0/TqL78rMIB9I/AAAAAAAABws/TdKtPr4NGwA/s72-c/4.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MrRewrite/~4/UDDQAvU_ToE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.irewrite.net/2011/12/nice-another-everyday-error-every-week.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367577693271785749.post-2985628497468051005</guid><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 07:02:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-12-07T00:02:00.183-07:00</atom:updated><title>Mr. Rewrite ignores 'socioeconomic' data</title><atom:summary>



Mr. Rewrite always learns though editing. Today's lesson: The AP Stylebook calls for socio-economic (with the hyphen) rather than socioeconomic. 
There's no stylebook entry on socio-economic, but a search of the electronic version yielded a reference in the hyphen (-) entry.
This differs from the Websters New World College Dictionary, Fourth Edition, which calls for socioeconomic. Mr. Rewrite</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MrRewrite/~3/VtPUHZxB45I/mr-rewrite-ignores-socioeconomic-data.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Mr. Rewrite)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-kER74BgBA-8/Tt5ZWyMFgBI/AAAAAAAAByw/-WQC-g9efvg/s72-c/socioeconomic.gif" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>1</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MrRewrite/~4/VtPUHZxB45I" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.irewrite.net/2011/12/mr-rewrite-ignores-socioeconomic-data.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1367577693271785749.post-6694594678179618322</guid><pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 07:02:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-12-06T00:02:00.389-07:00</atom:updated><title>Once upon a 'matress'?</title><atom:summary>

Oh, for crying out loud. It's mattress, of course.</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MrRewrite/~3/wTyUPBtjUh8/once-upon-matress.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Mr. Rewrite)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://lh5.ggpht.com/-Cc7q2GEoDN0/TqxNPHscWGI/AAAAAAAABxo/Rh7fk1nZm2s/s72-c/4.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MrRewrite/~4/wTyUPBtjUh8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.irewrite.net/2011/12/once-upon-matress.html</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>
