<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>MuxCo.com</title>
	
	<link>http://www.muxco.com</link>
	<description>Operators of, and bidders for, local DAB Digital Radio multiplexes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 13:56:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/muxco/blog" /><feedburner:info uri="muxco/blog" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Would you like to broadcast on DAB?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/muxco/blog/~3/tiIwU4Kgn9A/</link>
		<comments>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2010/05/07/would-you-like-to-broadcast-on-dab/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 13:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gregory</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muxco.com/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As we develop our launch plans for the new multiplexes, if you are interested in providing a service on any multiplex, please let us know.
We have a MuxCo Service Provider Questionaire, which can be downloaded from this page.
The application process is:

All applicants must complete the attached questionnaire.
Only valid and completed application form will be assessed. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we develop our launch plans for the new multiplexes, if you are interested in providing a service on any multiplex, please let us know.</p>
<p>We have a MuxCo Service Provider Questionaire, which can be downloaded from this page.</p>
<p>The application process is:</p>
<ol>
<li>All applicants must complete the attached questionnaire.</li>
<li>Only valid and completed application form will be assessed. Further information may be sought to assist in the evaluation of applications.</li>
<li>Applications which we wish to enter a contract with, will be contacted as to this fact and will be sent a draft contract.</li>
<li>Before entering into any contract, we will wish to seek confirmation of the following:</li>
</ol>
<ul>
<li>Sight of a valid DSPS licence</li>
<li>Confirmation of the applicant’s ability to pay the fees detailed in the contract. This would involve confirmation from a bank or financial adviser, and sight of a business plan.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://www.muxco.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/muxco-service-provider-questionnaire.doc">Muxco Service Provider Questionnaire</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.muxco.com/service-providers/" target="_blank">Click here </a>for more information about being service provider</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/muxco/blog/~4/tiIwU4Kgn9A" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2010/05/07/would-you-like-to-broadcast-on-dab/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2010/05/07/would-you-like-to-broadcast-on-dab/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The Digital Economy Act</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/muxco/blog/~3/WLQQr3qR8ig/</link>
		<comments>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2010/03/11/update-on-the-digital-economy-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gregory</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muxco.com/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Digital Economy Act
Summary of Radio Clauses
The Digital Economy Act entered Statute on 9th April
Like all legislation, the Act is incredibly complex, and like all radio legislation it is pretty impenetrable, not least because it does not simply set out a new framework, but instead amends three previous pieces of legislation to achieve its objectives (the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Digital Economy Act<br />
<em>Summary of Radio Clauses</em></strong></p>
<p>The Digital Economy Act entered Statute on 9th April</p>
<p>Like all legislation, the Act is incredibly complex, and like all radio legislation it is pretty impenetrable, not least because it does not simply set out a new framework, but instead amends three previous pieces of legislation to achieve its objectives (the 1990, 1996 and 2003 Acts).</p>
<p><em><strong>Clause 30 – Digital Switchover<br />
</strong></em>This clause sets the framework for digital radio switchover. It is an ‘empowering’ clause in that it allows the Secretary of State to set a date, but does not require one to be set, or<br />
indicate when the date might be. The details of the clause are as follows:</p>
<ul>
<li>The Secretary of State may set a date for digital switchover. There may be different dates for different services.  <em>This is good news: the power rests with the Secretary of State, not Ofcom, and there can be different dates for different services.</em></li>
<li>Having set a date, the date may be withdrawn. An alternative date may then be set.</li>
<li>When deciding what date to set, the SofS must have regard to a report submitted by Ofcom or the BBC. That report must consider current and future: provision of digital services, coverage and digital set ownership. It must also involve consultation with all sectors of the industry as well as wider stakeholders including groups representing listeners.</li>
<li>Once the SofS has set a date, Ofcom must shorten the analogue licence of any service which will be part of the switchover process so that the licence end date is the same as the switchover date. At least two years notice must be given (unless the licence holder consents).</li>
</ul>
<p><em><strong>Clause 35 – Local radio multiplex services: frequency and licensed area<br />
</strong></em>This clause is important as it gives Ofcom important flexibility to facilitate any changes that the industry might want to make to the local multiplex layer.</p>
<ul>
<li>Ofcom may change the frequency of a local multiplex licence and may reduce/extend its licensed area.</li>
<li>However, it must first have received an application from the licence holder. The licence holder must have submitted a technical plan.</li>
<li>Ofcom must consult before granting its approval, and may only consent to this if it does not unacceptably narrow the range of programmes available.</li>
</ul>
<p><em><strong>Clause 36 – Renewal of radio multiplex licences</strong></em><br />
This clause allows a further rollover for multiplex licences. It does so by setting a framework to allow a new piece of (secondary) legislation to be brought forward.</p>
<ul>
<li>The new piece of legislation may grant a rollover for a multiplex licence. It may also set out how long the roll-over is for, and other licence conditions.</li>
<li>The powers to bring forward this piece of secondary legislation expire at the end of 2015.</li>
</ul>
<p>Follow the progress of the Bill at <a href="http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2009-10/digitaleconomy.html" target="_blank">services.parliament.uk/digitaleconomy</a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/muxco/blog/~4/WLQQr3qR8ig" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2010/03/11/update-on-the-digital-economy-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2010/03/11/update-on-the-digital-economy-bill/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Progress</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/muxco/blog/~3/pQZGlbQMXZA/</link>
		<comments>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2009/07/23/progress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muxco.com/?p=135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Hello.
We&#8217;ve been reading and replying to lots of the comments you&#8217;ve been writing and I thought it was probably time for a blog update.
To prove that there are some developments, honest, I snapped the picture above at a meeting we had recently. From the left David Peters and Paul Eaton (from Arqiva) and Nicky Tate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-136" title="Meeting" src="http://www.muxco.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/arqiva-muxco.jpg" alt="Meeting" width="350" height="263" /></p>
<p>Hello.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been reading and replying to lots of the comments you&#8217;ve been writing and I thought it was probably time for a blog update.</p>
<p>To prove that there are some developments, honest, I snapped the picture above at a meeting we had recently. From the left David Peters and Paul Eaton (from Arqiva) and Nicky Tate and Gregory Wastson (from Folder Media/MuxCo). We met up to discuss the current situation and progress on the multiplexes. But what does that really mean?</p>
<p>First we compared notes on what we think is happening to local multiplexes across the UK, whether we felt that any were likely to merge or change shape, and whether this would affect frequency allocation or availability of frequencies. We then talked about our own areas and the pros and cons of combining any areas and especially what this would mean for frequencies &#8211; ie would we want to use one frequency for any enlarged areas or would we want to maintain the existing allocations and muxticast a combined multiplex across two frequencies. We were also weighing up the affect this could have over coverage (positive and negative) and how it would impact or benefit potential service providers. We&#8217;re now going to be investigating some our thoughts with Ofcom&#8217;s technical teams.</p>
<p>One question we&#8217;re asked, is why change anything? Well, for me the key thing is looking at whether any of the industry changes will mean we can have better coverage for less money. I&#8217;m also keen to maximise the flexibility on the multiplexes going forward and to allow us to provide innovative (read cheap) solutions for service providers. In DAB&#8217;s current development, is it better to cover larger local areas with some services that might traditionally appear on neighbouring multiplexes in the short term, and then split the multiplexes again when demand increases later on? Or does it really not make that much difference and should we proceed as planned? They&#8217;re the kind of decisions we&#8217;re making.</p>
<p>We also had some good discussions with Arqiva about how the contribution part (ie stations getting their signals to the multiplex) as well as the distribution (getting the multiplex feed) to the transmitters. Contribution is usually a fixed cost, whereas the cost of capacity depends on bitrates, therfore for smaller services it will be good to try and drive that cost down and hopefully encourage services to join the multiplex and to allow short-term services to take part as well.</p>
<p>All these discussions mean that Arqiva can now give us some firm quotations for the transmission costs of some of the earlier multiplexes planned. We can then move to final negotiations with them and then set prices for the service providers &#8211; allowing us to formally contract with them for carriage.  Then we can give Arqiva the OK to build the network, and away we&#8217;ll go!</p>
<p>Matt.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/muxco/blog/~4/pQZGlbQMXZA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2009/07/23/progress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2009/07/23/progress/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>MuxCo Welcomes Digital Britain</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/muxco/blog/~3/lbAKvAip1ew/</link>
		<comments>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2009/07/01/muxco-welcomes-digital-britain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nicky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muxco.com/?p=130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Muxco welcomes the Digital Britain Report, published on the 16th June 2009.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-120 alignleft" title="digitalbritain" src="http://www.foldermedia.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/digitalbritain-150x150.gif" alt="digitalbritain" width="150" height="150" /></strong></p>
<p>The UK Government published its Digital Britain White Paper on 16 June.  The key points of the report in relation to radio are:</p>
<p><strong>Digital migration </strong></p>
<p>•    Confirmation of a digital radio “upgrade” by the end of 2015 (and which will be confirmed at least two years in advance).<br />
•    All national and local services currently on DAB to migrate from analogue.<br />
•    Small ultra-local stations and community radio to upgrade from MW to FM, or remain on FM.<br />
•    Target for criteria (i.e. 50% of listening to be digital; national DAB coverage comparable to FM; and local DAB to reach 90% of population) to be met by 2013.<br />
•    Five point plan for DAB in vehicles, supported by major car manufacturers including Ford and Vauxhall.<br />
<strong><br />
DAB coverage</strong></p>
<p>•    BBC to achieve comparable coverage to FM for its national multiplex by the end of 2014.<br />
•    BBC to bear significant proportion of the costs of local DAB coverage roll-out.<br />
•    Some cost savings delivered by Digital Britain to be re-invested to support transmitter investment.<br />
•    Government will support a re-plan of local and regional DAB (merging multiplexes where agreed, and creating a second national multiplex).</p>
<p>The White Paper is very positive and is supported cross party.</p>
<p>In overall terms, we at Folder Media / MuxCo support the proposals in the White Paper, which we believe will help underpin DAB.<br />
In summary:<br />
<strong><br />
•    We support a set date for switch over, rather than a rolling set of criteria.  This gives a clear flag to achieve, and we feel confident that the radio industry will be able to achieve the criteria by 2013.</strong></p>
<p><strong>•    We have always advocated that DAB is one of several digital radio platforms, and is likely to continue to be the primary terrestrial platform in the short to medium term, and hopefully longer.</strong></p>
<p><strong>•    We support the proposal for clear labelling of the DAB technology.</strong></p>
<p><strong>•    We have been involved in the initial industry discussions about converting the regional DAB layer into the basis of a second national layer and in principle support the proposal.</strong></p>
<p><strong>•    We have been involved in the initial industry discussions about ‘merging’ multiplex areas.  We support the view that where such mergers make economic and efficiency sense for both multiplex operators and service providers, then the multiplex operator should have the right to approach Ofcom to merge, but that merging should not be artificially forced upon multiplexes.  In addition, any re-plan needs to take account of potential long term interest rather than a short term view.</strong></p>
<p><strong>•    We have always stated that functionality and interactivity will be the bedrock of DAB, hence our intention to hold capacity for the provision of data rather than audio services.  We currently maintain a watching brief on this aspect of the opportunity, as whilst we can create services, we need devices on which they can operate.  To that end, we have good relationships with a number of manufacturers.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Through the MuxCo application process we interviewed thousands of people who are current DAB listeners as well as those who had not yet taken the plunge. Current listeners are nearly all huge advocates for the technology and how it has improved their radio listening. We&#8217;re keen to work hard to make digital radio an even better proposition &#8211; coverage, content and features &#8211; and we&#8217;ll work strongly with all radio operators and the Government to provide a service that betters listeners&#8217; analogue radio experience and keeps radio a vibrant medium.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/muxco/blog/~4/lbAKvAip1ew" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2009/07/01/muxco-welcomes-digital-britain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2009/07/01/muxco-welcomes-digital-britain/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Arqiva to take full ownership of Digital One.</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/muxco/blog/~3/kPtam2dKM2I/</link>
		<comments>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2009/04/08/arqiva-to-take-full-ownership-of-digital-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 08:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nicky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[dab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dab digital radio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muxco.com/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Muxco welcomes the news that Arqiva will take full control of the Digital One multiplex.
Read the full article here.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Muxco welcomes the news that Arqiva will take full control of the Digital One multiplex.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.arqiva.com/press-office/press-releases/press-releases-2009/arqiva-to-take-full-ownership-of-digital-one-commercial-dab-mult" target="_blank">Read the full article here.</a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/muxco/blog/~4/kPtam2dKM2I" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2009/04/08/arqiva-to-take-full-ownership-of-digital-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2009/04/08/arqiva-to-take-full-ownership-of-digital-one/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>MuxCo updates plans for a New DAB Digital Radio Multiplex serving Liverpool, Cheshire and North Wales</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/muxco/blog/~3/uXqmzCX_x9g/</link>
		<comments>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2009/02/12/muxco-updates-plans-for-a-new-dab-digital-radio-multiplex-serving-liverpool-cheshire-and-north-wales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gregory</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northeast wales and west cheshire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muxco.com/?p=116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
MuxCo updates plans for its new DAB Digital Radio multiplex that will serve Liverpool, Cheshire and North Wales.
Using transmitters at Moel-y-Parc, Wrexham Rhos and St.John&#8217;s Beacon, the multiplex will serve around 1.4m adults (15+) and enabling a range of existing and new services to broadcast in digital.
The multiplex will carry BBC Radio Wales, BBC Radio [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--[endif]--></p>
<p>MuxCo updates plans for its new DAB Digital Radio multiplex that will serve Liverpool, Cheshire and North Wales.</p>
<p>Using transmitters at Moel-y-Parc, Wrexham Rhos and St.John&#8217;s Beacon, the multiplex will serve around 1.4m adults (15+) and enabling a range of existing and new services to broadcast in digital.</p>
<p>The multiplex will carry BBC Radio Wales, BBC Radio Cymru, 107.6 Juice FM and Dee 106.3, allowing these existing services to both broadcast in digital quality and be heard by a wider audience than can currently hear them on analogue.<span> </span>In addition, the multiplex will carry a number of new services, only available on DAB Digital Radio.<span> </span>These will include Traffic Radio, a 24/7 traffic news and information service from the Highways Agency, a new music service from Town &amp; Country Broadcasting and a range of data services from Folder Media.</p>
<p>The multiplex has opportunities for additional radio services to join this exciting multiplex.</p>
<p>MuxCo is currently finalising its contract with Arqiva, with proposals for the multiplex to launch in the second half of 2010.</p>
<p><strong><em>More news to follow soon.</em></strong></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/muxco/blog/~4/uXqmzCX_x9g" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2009/02/12/muxco-updates-plans-for-a-new-dab-digital-radio-multiplex-serving-liverpool-cheshire-and-north-wales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2009/02/12/muxco-updates-plans-for-a-new-dab-digital-radio-multiplex-serving-liverpool-cheshire-and-north-wales/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>MuxCo welcomes the findings of the Digital Radio Working Group</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/muxco/blog/~3/dFpvXX-ln_g/</link>
		<comments>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2008/12/19/muxco-welcomes-the-findings-of-the-digital-radio-working-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gregory</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[dab digital radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muxco.com/blog/2008/12/19/muxco-welcomes-the-findings-of-the-digital-radio-working-group/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Digital Radio Working Group (‘DRWG’) has today (19 Dec 2008) published its final report on the status and strategy for digital radio.
In the UK, 31.4% of all adults every week currently listen to radio via a digital radio platform, and this results in the digital platforms having a total share of all radio listening [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Digital Radio Working Group (‘DRWG’) has today (19 Dec 2008) published its final report on the status and strategy for digital radio.</p>
<p>In the UK, 31.4% of all adults every week currently listen to radio via a digital radio platform, and this results in the digital platforms having a total share of all radio listening of 18.7% (Rajar Q3 2008).  DAB is and is set to remain the principal digital radio platform – 8m sets sold to date, and DAB accounts for over 11% of total listening.</p>
<p>MuxCo agrees with the DRWG that a radio-specific broadcast platform is an essential part of radio’s future and that “DAB, unlike both DTT and the internet, is the most effective and financially viable way of delivering digital radio, particularly large local radio services, for the foreseeable future”.</p>
<p>We welcome the DRWG’s suggestions for a migration path which would be triggered by at least 50% of total radio listening is to digital platforms, and that the DRWG believe this could be achieved between 2015 and 2020.</p>
<p>Gregory Watson, MD at MuxCo, says “It is great news that the Digital Radio Working Group, and its members which include the BBC, Radiocentre and DRDB, has reaffirmed its commitment to the development of a sustainable and successful digital future for radio.    Today’s announcement gives us even more comfort with the development of DAB.  We look forward to the publication of the Government&#8217;s Digital Britain Report in early 2009, and urge Government and Ofcom to consider the recommendations set out in the DRWG report”.</p>
<p>The full DRWG report can be downloaded <a href="http://www.culture.gov.uk/reference_library/publications/5700.aspx" target="_blank">http://www.culture.gov.uk/reference_library/publications/5700.aspx</a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/muxco/blog/~4/dFpvXX-ln_g" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2008/12/19/muxco-welcomes-the-findings-of-the-digital-radio-working-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2008/12/19/muxco-welcomes-the-findings-of-the-digital-radio-working-group/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Cloud 9</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/muxco/blog/~3/r1nSwOo0z7U/</link>
		<comments>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2008/06/24/cloud-9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[north wales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muxco.com/blog/2008/06/24/cloud-9/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, our final application has been awarded &#8211; North Wales! This completes the first round of MuxCo applications and overall we&#8217;re very happy. Whilst HBB, Northants and especially Oxford would have fitted in beautifully to the MuxCo family, you can&#8217;t have everything can you?
We&#8217;re now getting on and building these things so we can get [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, our final application has been awarded &#8211; <a href="http://www.muxco.com/applications/northwales/">North Wales</a>! This completes the first round of MuxCo applications and overall we&#8217;re very happy. Whilst HBB, Northants and especially Oxford would have fitted in beautifully to the MuxCo family, you can&#8217;t have everything can you?</p>
<p>We&#8217;re now getting on and building these things so we can get the services on air.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/muxco/blog/~4/r1nSwOo0z7U" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2008/06/24/cloud-9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2008/06/24/cloud-9/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Somerset Awarded to MuxCo</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/muxco/blog/~3/XbbYDtxVDLY/</link>
		<comments>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2008/05/21/somerset-awarded-to-muxco/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 16:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[somerset]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muxco.com/blog/2008/05/21/somerset-awarded-to-muxco/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ofcom has just called Gregory to say that we&#8217;ve been successful with our application for the Somerset DAB Digital Radio multiplex. This is good news for MuxCo and its local partners who can now more easily make the transition to DAB. It also means that new stations and services will be able to start broadcasting on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ofcom has just called Gregory to say that <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media/news/2008/05/nr_20080521a">we&#8217;ve been successful</a> with our application for the Somerset DAB Digital Radio multiplex. This is good news for MuxCo and its local partners who can now more easily make the transition to DAB. It also means that new stations and services will be able to start broadcasting on digital radio in a cost-effective manner.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve also submitted today our application for North Wales, the details of which i&#8217;ll try and put up online for tomorrow.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/muxco/blog/~4/XbbYDtxVDLY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2008/05/21/somerset-awarded-to-muxco/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2008/05/21/somerset-awarded-to-muxco/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Surrey &amp; Sussex Won and Somerset Submitted</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/muxco/blog/~3/HP1-dp4TF8Y/</link>
		<comments>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2008/04/23/surrey-sussex-won-and-somerset-submitted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[somerset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surrey and sussex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muxco.com/blog/2008/04/23/surrey-sussex-won-and-somerset-submitted/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry for the late update about our win yesterday for Surrey and Sussex, but we&#8217;ve been buys finishing off our application for Somerset, which i&#8217;ve just submitted. Thankfully Will at Ofcom&#8217;s told me that they&#8217;ve received it (you&#8217;re never quite sure if it might disappear into the black whole of the internet when you hit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the late update about <a href="http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media/news/2008/04/nr_20080422" target="_blank">our win yesterday</a> for <a href="/applications/surrey-and-sussex/">Surrey and Sussex</a>, but we&#8217;ve been buys finishing off our application for <a href="/applications/somerset/">Somerset</a>, which i&#8217;ve just submitted. Thankfully Will at <a href="http://www.ofcom.org.uk" target="_blank">Ofcom</a>&#8217;s told me that they&#8217;ve received it (you&#8217;re never quite sure if it might disappear into the black whole of the internet when you hit send on the email) which means I can finish writing up the pages for the website.</p>
<p>Somerset&#8217;s been an interesting one to do, it&#8217;s a relatively small multiplex and a quite a few of the stations have small but specific coverage areas. It&#8217;s something that&#8217;s meant we have to work really hard with from a cost basis to ensure that it&#8217;s economic enough to get the stations on board.</p>
<p>In these financially tight times it&#8217;s MuxCo structure (with TLRC and UKRD as partners) that allows us to roll out DAB digital radio to this area.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/muxco/blog/~4/HP1-dp4TF8Y" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2008/04/23/surrey-sussex-won-and-somerset-submitted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.muxco.com/blog/2008/04/23/surrey-sussex-won-and-somerset-submitted/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
