<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>Naive Harmonies - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-c7529b8e" type="application/json" /><link>http://naiveharmonies.disqus.com/</link><description /><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:47:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/naiveharmonies/comments" /><feedburner:info uri="naiveharmonies/comments" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item><title>Re: Mull Historical Society, &amp;#8220;Animal Cannabus&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~3/UqrFGwO1UOo/</link><description>Boy did I love those first two MHS records. I haven't heard anything since then, have you? Unfortunately, those records are lost to the mists of periodic record purges, but I never knew I missed them until now. Thanks?&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~4/UqrFGwO1UOo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pscan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:47:41 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://naiveharmonies.com/2012/02/mull-historical-society-animal-cannabus/#comment-434681959</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: Mull Historical Society, &amp;#8220;Animal Cannabus&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~3/75nG2UR1C58/</link><description>I was just listening to this yesterday.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~4/75nG2UR1C58" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hans Meyer</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:30:31 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://naiveharmonies.com/2012/02/mull-historical-society-animal-cannabus/#comment-433473729</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: Saint Etienne, &amp;#8220;Woodcabin&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~3/X4P2FBC0GBQ/</link><description>You're not sure why you gave &lt;i&gt;Good Humor&lt;/i&gt; a chance?   Mr. Meyer probably had something to do with it.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While I agree that &lt;i&gt;Fairfax High&lt;/i&gt; sounds like a collection of extras, it shouldn't be dismissed.  "4:35 in the Morning" is a magnificent song, and "Zipcode" is another favorite of mine..   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I find most of their catalog to be hit-and-miss, but I really love the &lt;i&gt;Good Humor/Fairfax High&lt;/i&gt; package.  Don't miss &lt;i&gt;Foxbase Alpha&lt;/i&gt; (1991), either.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~4/X4P2FBC0GBQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dlee</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:51:40 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://naiveharmonies.com/2012/01/woodcabin/#comment-428994366</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: Saint Etienne, &amp;#8220;Woodcabin&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~3/wCj6iFYxg8g/</link><description>I do have Fairfax High, but I haven't been as blown away by it as most other people. I think it sounds like a really good collection of extras, but it still sounds like a collection of extras.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~4/wCj6iFYxg8g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Reid</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:26:05 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://naiveharmonies.com/2012/01/woodcabin/#comment-426641122</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: Saint Etienne, &amp;#8220;Woodcabin&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~3/KbRg7X5OJU8/</link><description>Funny you posted this - I was just listening to Good Humour. Such a great album! I was still in Manila when this came out &amp;amp; played it out a bunch when I DJ'd there. Do you have the 2 disc version of Good Humour, the one with Fairfax High?&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~4/KbRg7X5OJU8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Les Talusan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:18:33 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://naiveharmonies.com/2012/01/woodcabin/#comment-425795317</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: They say that the world was built for Fine Tune Friday</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~3/BWROm7PpNcU/</link><description>...and right there, I think you hit on why so many people are so bothered by it: because it gets so fawned over, and there's really nothing &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; exceptional about it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That said, I do find that the "is that true" line doesn't leave my head for days at a time.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~4/BWROm7PpNcU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Reid</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 22:00:28 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://naiveharmonies.com/2011/12/they-say-that-the-world-was-built-for-fine-tune-friday/#comment-389610734</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: They say that the world was built for Fine Tune Friday</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~3/eL8Cdvagr3s/</link><description>I don't find it offensive and I don't dislike it; I just think it's kinda boring. This sounds like a melody that I start humming in the shower and try to make it into a song afterward until I remember that I can't play any instruments or write any songs.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~4/eL8Cdvagr3s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Annie D.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 21:13:05 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://naiveharmonies.com/2011/12/they-say-that-the-world-was-built-for-fine-tune-friday/#comment-389575151</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: They say that the world was built for Fine Tune Friday</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~3/T_MQO2friEc/</link><description>Maybe? But for every line that might be read as a critique, there's four others that show that it's clearly just a song that's a string of meaningless observations with a "everything I do, I do it for you"-style chorus. And if she's really pointing out the "stunted emotional capacities of men", then the song also says that she's REALLY into the stunted emotional capacities of men. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I really do love this song, but I constantly have to remind myself that it's a dumb pop song. Not that I have a problem with picking at the bad points about it, obviously...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~4/T_MQO2friEc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Reid</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 14:24:31 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://naiveharmonies.com/2011/12/they-say-that-the-world-was-built-for-fine-tune-friday/#comment-388857222</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: They say that the world was built for Fine Tune Friday</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~3/fQyp6wHzMAM/</link><description>I really like the version Kasabian did on BBC Radio 1 Live Lounge.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~4/fQyp6wHzMAM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ivaner</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 19:27:37 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://naiveharmonies.com/2011/12/they-say-that-the-world-was-built-for-fine-tune-friday/#comment-388374024</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: They say that the world was built for Fine Tune Friday</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~3/Zop0EBSIMs4/</link><description>Lyrically, maybe it's like a fight-fire-with-fire kinda thing? As in a vapid attempt to cast a light on the vapidness of men? Would that be giving it too much credit? That's the sense I get from what the Pitchfork writer was saying anyways. IE, what's the use in trying to actually commuicate to you; I give up, let's play video games.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I dunno...that's like the second time I've heard the song. I don't feel compelled to go out of my way for a third. I don't mind it. I dig the music, but the vocals less so.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I bet someone has already made a really great hip hop track with the instrumental though?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~4/Zop0EBSIMs4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xtianDC</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 16:15:26 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://naiveharmonies.com/2011/12/they-say-that-the-world-was-built-for-fine-tune-friday/#comment-388249230</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: They say that the world was built for Fine Tune Friday</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~3/XBo0ObGmqvY/</link><description>Avoided this song for the longest time because of this very debate. Finally listened a few weeks ago and, sorry to say, I find it quite catchy. But your analysis is dead-on. The lyrics are mostly vapid and ascribing some sort of deep meaning to the song is a fool's errand. It's a pop song in indie clothes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for the music, I prefer Joy Orbison's remix of "Video Games." Gives it a little more spirit than the woozy original. Hear it here: &lt;a href="http://soundcloud.com/alanheathisalegend/lana-del-rey-video-games-joy" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://soundcloud.com/alanheat...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~4/XBo0ObGmqvY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Barth</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:19:14 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://naiveharmonies.com/2011/12/they-say-that-the-world-was-built-for-fine-tune-friday/#comment-388212507</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: The Eight Best Albums of 2011</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~3/t4yVvD57WAA/</link><description>Excellent work, Reid! (As always.) A refreshing change of pace from many of the other year-end rankings out there. Plus, I'll get behind any list that features Slow Club so prominently.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~4/t4yVvD57WAA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:43:18 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://naiveharmonies.com/2011/12/the-eight-best-albums-of-2011/#comment-387610904</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: I can never leave the Fine Tune Friday behind</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~3/OAPBBIlLK8U/</link><description>Thanks! Yeah, maybe I was hasty in taking down that question, but you're the only one who answers them, so...this will work just fine.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I really liked the Handsome Furs record, though it made me want to DJ again. I never got around to checking out the DEJJ album, so I'll put them in my library. Thanks as always for the recommendations...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~4/OAPBBIlLK8U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Reid</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:21:21 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://naiveharmonies.com/2011/11/i-can-never-leave-the-fine-tune-friday-behind/#comment-374295734</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: I can never leave the Fine Tune Friday behind</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~3/hLWP1pTpWu8/</link><description>Yeah, it's hard to not completely surrender to that chorus!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Abrupt segue: I'm full of regret for not responding to your Facebook post about 2011 albums, so I'll do it here. I'm not sure I would classify them as "not to be missed," but I kept returning to "Sound Kapital" by Handsome Furs and "It's a Corporate World" by Dale Earnhardt Jr. Jr. back in the summer. (While listening to the latter, I recommended ignoring the fact that their name is Dale Earnhardt Jr. Jr.)&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~4/hLWP1pTpWu8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 20:25:22 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://naiveharmonies.com/2011/11/i-can-never-leave-the-fine-tune-friday-behind/#comment-372539477</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: Fine Tune Friday is just a window</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~3/OT9lNA3Gov0/</link><description>Hey man, listen, I think the Horn Swells are great, okay? I mean I'm probably the biggest Horn Swells fan in the world. If it were up to me, it'd be Horn Swells all the time. But unfortunately it's not up to me, it's up to the kids buying the records, and I gotta tell ya, as sad as it is to say, the kids just don't like the Horn Swells. They just don't. I think they're crazy too, but they're the ones buying the records, and they don't like the Horn Swells, so the Horn Swells have got to go, capiche?&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~4/OT9lNA3Gov0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hans Meyer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:09:14 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://naiveharmonies.com/2011/11/fine-tune-friday-is-just-a-window/#comment-368483859</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: A reflection/review/rambling on Achtung Baby</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~3/NmD6fLEykkc/</link><description>"This was a time when “Funky Drummer” was being sampled on every other song"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;...so true. And to no greater effect than on The Mekons' "Having a Party," which simultaneously prefaced and mocked the trend. But that would be another column, another time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for U2, the turning point in their career was "Bad," which in video game terms was the puzzle that needed to be completed before access to the next room was granted. Without it, none of this (this stuff of which you write) could've happened, and U2 would have soldiered forth on a similar path as, say, Big Country.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~4/NmD6fLEykkc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WJPurdy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 06:49:30 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://naiveharmonies.com/2011/11/a-reflectionreviewrambling-on-achtung-baby/#comment-360983579</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: A reflection/review/rambling on Achtung Baby</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~3/rsDEZjfEMpY/</link><description>In addition to my grammar and typing sucking, I should consolidate my comments into one!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyways, I think you really did a fantastic job of distilling what makes the album so amazing. I remember being alternatively befuddled and disappointed by The Fly, when I first heard it as a pre-album single. It took hearing it in context of the album to realize that it was not only genius, it was very possibly a top 5 moment in the life of a band full of very good arguments for top 5 moments.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~4/rsDEZjfEMpY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xtianDC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 17:15:33 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://naiveharmonies.com/2011/11/a-reflectionreviewrambling-on-achtung-baby/#comment-360399956</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: A reflection/review/rambling on Achtung Baby</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~3/SxchvduoVx8/</link><description>(I'm saying the "hey hey sha la la" is an resounding and resonating nod to the girl group era. And its sonic signature is as good an example as any of what I recall from a review once as the album's characteristic "The Berlin Wall of Sound".)&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~4/SxchvduoVx8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xtianDC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 17:08:43 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://naiveharmonies.com/2011/11/a-reflectionreviewrambling-on-achtung-baby/#comment-360395243</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: A reflection/review/rambling on Achtung Baby</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~3/qvNc03-NCcs/</link><description>I agree. As crazy as it sounds, their cover of "Christmas, Baby Please Come Home" and "Who's Gonna Ride..." provided this music enthusiast an apt gateway to the work of Phil Spector. How can that be a bad thing?&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~4/qvNc03-NCcs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xtianDC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 17:03:55 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://naiveharmonies.com/2011/11/a-reflectionreviewrambling-on-achtung-baby/#comment-360391953</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: A reflection/review/rambling on Achtung Baby</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~3/L0OEcb2bx8M/</link><description>Do not understand the seemingly widespread hate for Who's Gonna Ride... It's always been one of my favorites on the album, and there's a great remix on the recent box set that I've never heard before. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In my recent U2 listening, one thing that has really jumped out at me is Bono's voice and how Achtung Baby is really the best he ever sounded on record. His control and range are at their absolute peak here, and is no small part of AB's continuing appeal. It's really striking to hear how much his voice has degraded in the years since, to my ears being the main contributing factor of the relative weakness of No Line on the Horizon.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~4/L0OEcb2bx8M" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pscan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:40:29 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://naiveharmonies.com/2011/11/a-reflectionreviewrambling-on-achtung-baby/#comment-360231180</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: A reflection/review/rambling on Achtung Baby</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~3/cls8IypWzgg/</link><description>Fantastic piece!&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~4/cls8IypWzgg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Morse</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:52:01 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://naiveharmonies.com/2011/11/a-reflectionreviewrambling-on-achtung-baby/#comment-360056892</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: A reflection/review/rambling on Achtung Baby</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~3/0BVJMIP5pwI/</link><description>I mostly just like to write "Madchester". See? Did it again.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't know about obsolete, though. Remember that U2 went into the studio for Achtung Baby in 1990, the same year that Pills and Thrills and Bellyaches was released, and Screamadelica (not Manchester, but still the same sort of sound) was released in 1991. But maybe it would have been more accurate to say that they thought that Baggy was the sound of the future.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Glad you liked it!&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~4/0BVJMIP5pwI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Reid</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:41:12 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://naiveharmonies.com/2011/11/a-reflectionreviewrambling-on-achtung-baby/#comment-360050469</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: A reflection/review/rambling on Achtung Baby</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~3/P9OM46NuITo/</link><description>one of u2s best and luckiest but Madchester was obsolete the time U2 got to it. Now, not so much predicting the future, it's enjoying a wave of nostalgia. It was their last great reinvention. &lt;br&gt;Unforgettable Fire is the white soul boy classic though but I Will Follow is their best ever skinny punk song (also their first). &lt;br&gt;Like the piece though and yeah.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~4/P9OM46NuITo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Blasto</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:32:45 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://naiveharmonies.com/2011/11/a-reflectionreviewrambling-on-achtung-baby/#comment-360045547</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: A reflection/review/rambling on Achtung Baby</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~3/e0cWs76Lbck/</link><description>I really want to see that doc. I've heard it's great. And that wouldn't surprise me that Larry Mullen was forced into role as a drum machine (not that his work up to that point suggests that he would have minded at all), but that's one of the things that I love about it: as futuristic as the album was trying to be, that beat was so much of the time.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~4/e0cWs76Lbck" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Reid</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:24:19 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://naiveharmonies.com/2011/11/a-reflectionreviewrambling-on-achtung-baby/#comment-360040579</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: A reflection/review/rambling on Achtung Baby</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~3/mKpcFyukBjU/</link><description>I just watched a documentary about the making of this album--something like From the Sky Down?--and you've nailed it, I think. The Fly and One were the brilliant inspirations and the rest were experiments as they tried to figure out who they were after being scathingly criticized after Rattle and Hum and all the Bono-ing. Poor Larry Mullen was basically told to become a drum machine, it turns out. (Side note -- my friends and I drove to a record store right after school and grabbed the album and listened to it in silence in the car. I loved it, except for Wild Horse, which I still loathe, but others were definitely more mixed.)&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/naiveharmonies/comments/~4/mKpcFyukBjU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Meg</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:19:09 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://naiveharmonies.com/2011/11/a-reflectionreviewrambling-on-achtung-baby/#comment-360037780</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>

