<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0"><generator uri="http://www.habariproject.org/" version="0.7-alpha">Habari</generator><id>tag:newlyancient.com,2009-11-15:atom/a6c0e3ff41506815fc284c01ffa64cadf2f8ec03</id><title type="text">Newly Ancient (Links)</title><updated>2009-10-14T14:53:52-04:00</updated><link rel="alternate" href="http://newlyancient.com/" /><link rel="first" href="http://newlyancient.com/feed/links?page=1" type="application/atom+xml" title="First Page" /><link rel="next" href="http://newlyancient.com/feed/links?page=2" type="application/atom+xml" title="Next Page" /><link rel="last" href="http://newlyancient.com/feed/links?page=13" type="application/atom+xml" title="Last Page" /><subtitle type="html">Newly Ancient is the personal blog of Morgante Pell, a high school web developer and chronic pundit. This feed only carries linkies, which are short posts with a link.</subtitle><link rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/newlyancient/links" type="application/atom+xml" /><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fnewlyancient%2Flinks" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fnewlyancient%2Flinks" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fnewlyancient%2Flinks" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://feeds.feedburner.com/newlyancient/links" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fnewlyancient%2Flinks" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fnewlyancient%2Flinks" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fnewlyancient%2Flinks" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.plusmo.com/add?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fnewlyancient%2Flinks" src="http://plusmo.com/res/graphics/fbplusmo.gif">Subscribe with Plusmo</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/_/hp/AddRSS.aspx?http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fnewlyancient%2Flinks" src="http://img.tfd.com/hp/addToTheFreeDictionary.gif">Subscribe with The Free Dictionary</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bitty.com/manual/?contenttype=rssfeed&amp;contentvalue=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fnewlyancient%2Flinks" src="http://www.bitty.com/img/bittychicklet_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Bitty Browser</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsalloy.com/?rss=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fnewlyancient%2Flinks" src="http://www.newsalloy.com/subrss3.gif">Subscribe with NewsAlloy</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.live.com/?add=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fnewlyancient%2Flinks" src="http://tkfiles.storage.msn.com/x1piYkpqHC_35nIp1gLE68-wvzLZO8iXl_JMledmJQXP-XTBOLfmQv4zhj4MhcWEJh_GtoBIiAl1Mjh-ndp9k47If7hTaFno0mxW9_i3p_5qQw">Subscribe with Live.com</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://mix.excite.eu/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fnewlyancient%2Flinks" src="http://image.excite.co.uk/mix/addtomix.gif">Subscribe with Excite MIX</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://download.attensa.com/app/get_attensa.html?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fnewlyancient%2Flinks" src="http://www.attensa.com/blogs/attensa/WindowsLiveWriter/BadgeredintoBadges_10C02/attensa_feed_button5.gif">Subscribe with Attensa for Outlook</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.webwag.com/wwgthis.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fnewlyancient%2Flinks" src="http://www.webwag.com/images/wwgthis.gif">Subscribe with Webwag</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.podcastready.com/oneclick_bookmark.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fnewlyancient%2Flinks" src="http://www.podcastready.com/images/podcastready_button.gif">Subscribe with Podcast Ready</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.flurry.com/pushRssFeed.do?r=fb&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fnewlyancient%2Flinks" src="http://www.flurry.com/images/flurry_rss_logo2.gif">Subscribe with Flurry</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.wikio.com/subscribe?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fnewlyancient%2Flinks" src="http://www.wikio.com/shared/img/add2wikio.gif">Subscribe with Wikio</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.dailyrotation.com/index.php?feed=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fnewlyancient%2Flinks" src="http://www.dailyrotation.com/rss-dr2.gif">Subscribe with Daily Rotation</feedburner:feedFlare><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><entry><title>Smart People Cause Problems</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/newlyancient/links/~3/uF5Y2GbwPTw/wall-street-smarts" /><link rel="edit" href="http://newlyancient.com/wall-street-smarts/atom" /><author><name>morgante</name><uri>http://newlyancient.com</uri></author><id>tag:newlyancient.com,2009:wall-street-smarts/1255545446</id><updated>2009-10-14T14:53:52-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-10-14T14:55:13-04:00</app:edited><published>2009-10-14T14:53:52-04:00</published><category term="economics" /><category term="financial collapse" /><category term="nytimes" /><category term="wall street" /><content type="html">&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you really want to know why the financial system nearly collapsed in the fall of 2008, I can tell you in one simple sentence...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;That sentence, paraphrased: smart people started working on Wall Street. For most of its existence, Wall Street was mundane, run by Ivy League jocks with old money. It wasn't run by idiots, but it also wasn't run by geniuses. Then, with the rise in college costs and Wall Street income, truly smart people started showing up&amp;mdash;the kind of people who would otherwise be doing precedent-setting legal work or breakthrough physics research. These geniuses weren't content with the easy wealth old Wall Street afforded&amp;mdash;they wanted to experiment, they wanted to &lt;em&gt;use&lt;/em&gt; their tremendous brainpower. And if they made boatloads of money in the process, that was just an added bonus.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;The problem came when all that complicated math started collapsing under the weight of excessive greed and ignorant bosses.&lt;sup class="footnote-link" id="footnote-link-199-1"&gt;&lt;a href="http://newlyancient.com/2009/10/14/wall-street-smarts#footnote-199-1" rel="footnote"&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; An already complex global financial system become a tangled web of math which eventually unraveled. Some things, particularly economic and physical infrastructures, are best run by conservatively intelligent people who won't experiment. I don't want a genius doing my plumbing and I don't want one doing my taxes.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
&lt;p class="note via"&gt;&lt;span&gt;This excellent &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/14/opinion/14trillin.html"&gt;Op-Ed&lt;/a&gt; from the New York Times was recommended by &lt;a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2009/10/14/trillin-wall-street"&gt;John Gruber&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://newlyancient.com/2009/10/14/wall-street-smarts?refer=atom"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/newlyancient/links/~4/uF5Y2GbwPTw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://newlyancient.com/link/redirect/wall-street-smarts?refer=atom</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><title>Billions &amp; Billions</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/newlyancient/links/~3/rssncy2BcZ8/billions" /><link rel="edit" href="http://newlyancient.com/billions/atom" /><author><name>morgante</name><uri>http://newlyancient.com</uri></author><id>tag:newlyancient.com,2009:billions-visualization/1254357109</id><updated>2009-09-30T20:36:13-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-09-30T21:00:37-04:00</app:edited><published>2009-09-30T20:36:12-04:00</published><category term="finance" /><category term="infographic" /><category term="politics" /><category term="visualization" /><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Every day, the news media confronts us with enormous budgets: $3,000,000,000,000 for the Iraq war, $2,800,000,000,000 for the financial recovery, $16,000,000,000 for Facebook. Except they're usually reported with the ambiguous numerical categories of trillion and billion. When your daily budget is a dollar, $10 billion and $10 trillion both look astronomically large&amp;mdash;but difficult to compare. While I think listing out zeroes is helpful, despite the added space required (Hey, everything is online now anyways!), visualizations can make that comparison even easier. &lt;a href="http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/"&gt;David McCandless&lt;/a&gt; has put together a good &lt;a href"http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/the-billion-dollar-gram/"&gt;visualization&lt;/a&gt; of various world budgets. Though I would disagree about some of the categorizations, since government stimulus money is not actually &lt;a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/29/the-true-fiscal-cost-of-stimulus/"&gt;lost&lt;/a&gt;, the boxes themselves are relatively useful.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
&lt;div class="image bigger col1"&gt;&#xD;
&lt;a href="http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/the-billion-dollar-gram/" title="Visualization of Billions"&gt;&lt;img src="http://s3.amazonaws.com/infobeautiful/billion_dollar_550n.gif" alt="Visualization of Billions" width="460" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;
&lt;p class="caption left"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Right&lt;/strong&gt;: &lt;a href="http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/the-billion-dollar-gram/"&gt;Visualization&lt;/a&gt; of budgets and other big numbers.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
&lt;p class="via note"&gt;&lt;span&gt;(Via &lt;a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2009/09/30/billion-dollar-gram"&gt; John Gruber&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://newlyancient.com/2009/09/30/billions?refer=atom"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/newlyancient/links/~4/rssncy2BcZ8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://newlyancient.com/link/redirect/billions?refer=atom</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><title>Memorization Spacing</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/newlyancient/links/~3/iNErLf5uszc/30-minutes" /><link rel="edit" href="http://newlyancient.com/30-minutes/atom" /><author><name>morgante</name><uri>http://newlyancient.com</uri></author><id>tag:newlyancient.com,2009:30-minutes/1252312870</id><updated>2009-09-07T04:49:12-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-09-07T04:50:06-04:00</app:edited><published>2009-09-07T04:49:12-04:00</published><category term="education" /><category term="learning" /><category term="memory" /><category term="vocabulary" /><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://jackcheng.com/30-minutes-a-day"&gt;Jack Cheng&lt;/a&gt; elaborates on a learning method developed by &lt;a href="http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/33/41/47.pdf"&gt;Paul Pimsleur&lt;/a&gt; for memorizing language vocabulary:&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;[Pimsleur] observed that the first time you learned a new word, you’d forget it almost immediately. But if you reviewed it again as you were about to forget it, each subsequent review would exponentially increase the staying power of the word. To put it another way, if you could only remember the word for 5 seconds at first, reviewing it after those five seconds would boost your retention time to 25 seconds, then 2 minutes, 10 minutes, and so on. At this rate, the tenth review wouldn’t have to take place until about four months after the first.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;I've been employing a similar method for building my vocabulary (in preparation for the unavoidable SAT). Essentially, whenever I run across an unfamiliar word, I note it as an alarm in iCal set to go off 5 minutes later. Once prompted, I try to recall the word (and look it up if I forgot), then change the alarm to go off in 10 minutes, gradually increasing until it's up to a year. Right now, I'm working on writing some software to automate this process, including the ability to add words from my iPhone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://newlyancient.com/2009/09/07/30-minutes?refer=atom"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/newlyancient/links/~4/iNErLf5uszc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://newlyancient.com/link/redirect/30-minutes?refer=atom</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><title>La Premiere</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/newlyancient/links/~3/KImYzUQ5Hg4/premiere" /><link rel="edit" href="http://newlyancient.com/premiere/atom" /><author><name>morgante</name><uri>http://newlyancient.com</uri></author><id>tag:newlyancient.com,2009:premiere/1252174477</id><updated>2009-09-05T14:22:28-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-09-05T14:22:28-04:00</app:edited><published>2009-09-05T14:22:28-04:00</published><category term="cinematography" /><category term="film" /><category term="france" /><category term="history" /><category term="invention" /><category term="video" /><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;La Premiere&lt;/em&gt; is an excellent short film chronicling the invention of the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinematographe"&gt;cinematograph&lt;/a&gt; by the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auguste_and_Louis_Lumi%C3%A8re"&gt;Lumière brothers&lt;/a&gt;, whose last name appropriately translates from French as &lt;em&gt;light&lt;/em&gt;. Watching it was delightful way to spend twenty minutes.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
&lt;p class="note via"&gt;&lt;span&gt;(Via &lt;a href="http://shawnblanc.net/2009/09/la-premiere/"&gt;Shawn Blanc&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://newlyancient.com/2009/09/05/premiere?refer=atom"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/newlyancient/links/~4/KImYzUQ5Hg4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://newlyancient.com/link/redirect/premiere?refer=atom</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><title>The Paradox of Craigslist</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/newlyancient/links/~3/d14dQcwtOo4/craiglist" /><link rel="edit" href="http://newlyancient.com/craiglist/atom" /><author><name>morgante</name><uri>http://newlyancient.com</uri></author><id>tag:newlyancient.com,2009:craiglist/1251582293</id><updated>2009-08-29T17:48:06-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-08-29T22:46:00-04:00</app:edited><published>2009-08-29T17:48:06-04:00</published><category term="classifieds" /><category term="craigslist" /><category term="web 2.0" /><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wired has published an in-depth &lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/entertainment/theweb/magazine/17-09/ff_craigslist?currentPage=all"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; about Craigslist that exposes the peculiar personality of the site, and its founder. I have never been a fan of Craigslist&amp;mdash;its usability is terrible. The Craiglist management has a somewhat hypocritical stance. Supposedly, the site is simple because business growth isn't a priority; it's all about the users. Yet those same users (or potential ones) complain about how backwards the site is, with extremely poor technology running it. Worst yet, Craigslist actively discourages innovation by not offering any kind of API to external clients. Hopefully, just as newspaper classifieds were defated by newer media, Craiglist will eventually fall to companies willing to innovate.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
&lt;p class="note via"&gt;&lt;span&gt;(Via &lt;a href="http://www.kungfugrippe.com/post/174846421/craig-newmark-already-has-a-parking-space-a"&gt;Merlin Mann&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://newlyancient.com/2009/08/29/craiglist?refer=atom"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/newlyancient/links/~4/d14dQcwtOo4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://newlyancient.com/link/redirect/craiglist?refer=atom</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><title>Musical Sorting Algorithms</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/newlyancient/links/~3/TCvPk5fjwME/musical-sorting-algorithms" /><link rel="edit" href="http://newlyancient.com/musical-sorting-algorithms/atom" /><author><name>morgante</name><uri>http://newlyancient.com</uri></author><id>tag:newlyancient.com,2009:musical-sorting-algorithms/1250867144</id><updated>2009-08-21T11:13:33-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-08-21T11:13:33-04:00</app:edited><published>2009-08-21T11:13:33-04:00</published><category term="computer science" /><category term="education" /><category term="mathematics" /><category term="music" /><category term="sorting" /><category term="teaching" /><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Sorting algorithms (like &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quicksort"&gt;Quicksort&lt;/a&gt;) are frequently represented visually, but they can also be represented musically. Through guitars and drums, a UCLA grad student has created auditory &lt;a href="http://www.math.ucla.edu/~rcompton/musical_sorting_algorithms/musical_sorting_algorithms.html"&gt;demonstrations&lt;/a&gt; of sorting algorithms. Showing what sorting algorithms sound like would be an excellent opener for a lesson. These demonstrations connect an abstract concept to something we can hear, making it far easier to grasp.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://newlyancient.com/2009/08/21/musical-sorting-algorithms?refer=atom"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/newlyancient/links/~4/TCvPk5fjwME" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://newlyancient.com/link/redirect/musical-sorting-algorithms?refer=atom</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><title>Murinoids, Cretins &amp; Boodles</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/newlyancient/links/~3/8H-PQS__Zrw/dated-definitions" /><link rel="edit" href="http://newlyancient.com/dated-definitions/atom" /><author><name>morgante</name><uri>http://newlyancient.com</uri></author><id>tag:newlyancient.com,2009:dated-definitions/1250394557</id><updated>2009-08-15T23:59:22-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-08-16T03:07:17-04:00</app:edited><published>2009-08-15T23:59:22-04:00</published><category term="English" /><category term="language" /><category term="New York Times" /><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Are you a &lt;em&gt;boodle&lt;/em&gt;? (That would be a stupid noodle.) Perhaps &lt;em&gt;prothodaw&lt;/em&gt; more fittingly describes you as &lt;q&gt;a prime simpleton, a noodle of the first rank.&lt;/q&gt; The Oxford English Dictionary contains many of these amusing archaic definitions, including &lt;em&gt;murinoid&lt;/em&gt;: resembling the mouse or its allies. Sadly, with the online revision begun in 2000, these definitions are going the way of the Dodo. In a recent &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/16/magazine/16FOB-onlanguage-t.html"&gt;column&lt;/a&gt; for the New York Times, Ammon Shea morns their loss and highlights some of the more humorous specimens. An excellent read for a lazy weekend.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://newlyancient.com/2009/08/15/dated-definitions?refer=atom"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/newlyancient/links/~4/8H-PQS__Zrw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://newlyancient.com/link/redirect/dated-definitions?refer=atom</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><title>iPhone Customer Satisfaction</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/newlyancient/links/~3/q1lonotaIu0/iphone-satisfaction" /><link rel="edit" href="http://newlyancient.com/iphone-satisfaction/atom" /><author><name>morgante</name><uri>http://newlyancient.com</uri></author><id>tag:newlyancient.com,2009:iphone-satisfaction/1250277082</id><updated>2009-08-14T15:13:19-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-08-14T15:33:20-04:00</app:edited><published>2009-08-14T15:13:19-04:00</published><category term="apple" /><category term="customer satisfaction" /><category term="iphone" /><category term="palm" /><category term="pre" /><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;A &lt;a href="http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/08/14/iphone-vs-pre-satisfaction-bakeoff/"&gt;survey&lt;/a&gt; by RBC Capital and ChangeWave Research found that &lt;strong&gt;99%&lt;/strong&gt; of iPhone 3GS customers are satisfied with their phone. Of them, 82% are very satisfied. These numbers are simply astounding; only &lt;strong&gt;1%&lt;/strong&gt; of iPhone 3GS are dissatisfied. This shows just what kind of force Palm and Android are up against. Palm's numbers&amp;mdash;with 45% very satisfied with their Pre&amp;mdash;are excellent, but pale in comparison to Apple's astronomical customer satisfaction.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
&lt;p class="note via"&gt;&lt;span&gt;(Via &lt;a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2009/08/14/3gs-pre-satisfaction"&gt;Daring Fireball)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://newlyancient.com/2009/08/14/iphone-satisfaction?refer=atom"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/newlyancient/links/~4/q1lonotaIu0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://newlyancient.com/link/redirect/iphone-satisfaction?refer=atom</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><title>Language Shapes Thought</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/newlyancient/links/~3/WvZfas9NUY0/language-shapes-thought" /><link rel="edit" href="http://newlyancient.com/language-shapes-thought/atom" /><author><name>morgante</name><uri>http://newlyancient.com</uri></author><id>tag:newlyancient.com,2009:language-shapes-thought/1250016819</id><updated>2009-08-11T14:55:44-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-08-11T14:57:00-04:00</app:edited><published>2009-08-11T14:55:44-04:00</published><category term="English" /><category term="French" /><category term="language" /><category term="philosophy" /><category term="psychology" /><category term="thought" /><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;George Orwell posited that thought could be controlled and manipulated through the language we speak (in his case, &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newspeak"&gt;Newspeak&lt;/a&gt;). Many other philosophers and scientists have pondered this question, while most politicians simply accept it as fact and use it to their advantage. However, there has been a disturbing lack of empirical evidence for this phenomena. A psychologist at Stanford has conducted a &lt;a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/205985"&gt;study&lt;/a&gt; showing that the gender of nouns in a language influence our perceptions of that noun. The French, who use the masculine &lt;em&gt;pont&lt;/em&gt; for bridges, generally highlight their elements of power and strength, while Germans (who use the feminine &lt;em&gt;Brücke&lt;/em&gt;) describe bridges as elegant and airy. You can see the bridge for yourself at &lt;a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=102518565"&gt;NPR&lt;/a&gt; and see which set of adjectives matches your perceptions. Does this make English more neutral and accurate, since it largely lacks gender?&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
&lt;p class="note via"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Via the excellent linguistic twit &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/thatwhichmatter/status/3250004494"&gt;ThatWhichMatter&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://newlyancient.com/2009/08/11/language-shapes-thought?refer=atom"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/newlyancient/links/~4/WvZfas9NUY0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://newlyancient.com/link/redirect/language-shapes-thought?refer=atom</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><title>Health Care Chart Design</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/newlyancient/links/~3/VSOBjX81Ta8/health-care-chart" /><link rel="edit" href="http://newlyancient.com/health-care-chart/atom" /><author><name>morgante</name><uri>http://newlyancient.com</uri></author><id>tag:newlyancient.com,2009:health-care-chart/1250015134</id><updated>2009-08-11T14:29:54-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-08-11T14:29:54-04:00</app:edited><published>2009-08-11T14:29:54-04:00</published><category term="design" /><category term="health care" /><category term="infographic" /><category term="politics" /><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;In response to a horrendous chart by &lt;a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2009/07/when_health-care_reform_stops.html"&gt;John Boehner&lt;/a&gt;, Robert Palmer released a well-designed &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/robertpalmer/3743826461/"&gt;visual aid&lt;/a&gt; to the Democrat's health care proposal. At its best, information design can help the general public to understand a complicated issue. At its worst, as demonstrated by the House Minority Leader, information design becomes a tool for obfuscation and political maneuvering rather than education. Instead of muddying the waters with absurd "death panel" &lt;a href="http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=113851103434"&gt;claims&lt;/a&gt; and confusing charts, Republicans should commit to an honest debate about policy and ideology. Of course, that'll never happen: they'd lose.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;
&lt;div class="image bigger"&gt;&#xD;
&lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/robertpalmer/3743826461/" title="Health Care Infographic"&gt;&lt;img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2523/3743826461_8252621bb7.jpg" width="460" alt="Health Care Infographic" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;
&lt;/div&gt;&#xD;
&lt;p class="note via"&gt;&lt;span&gt;(Via &lt;a href="http://www.idsgn.org/posts/making-sense-of-health-care/"&gt;idsgn&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://newlyancient.com/2009/08/11/health-care-chart?refer=atom"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/newlyancient/links/~4/VSOBjX81Ta8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://newlyancient.com/link/redirect/health-care-chart?refer=atom</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>
