<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>News - propertyfinder.com</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/" />
    
   <id>tag:blogs.propertyfinder.com,2009:/news/10</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10" title="News" />
    <updated>2009-04-21T09:15:26Z</updated>
    <subtitle>News</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.2</generator>
 
<link rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/news/propertyfinder" type="application/atom+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><entry>
    <title>Fraud alert</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/2009/04/fraud_alert.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=1428" title="Fraud alert" />
    <id>tag:blogs.propertyfinder.com,2009:/news//10.1428</id>
    
    <published>2009-04-20T08:47:15Z</published>
    <updated>2009-04-21T09:15:26Z</updated>
    
    <summary>fraud, fraudulent, scam, money transfer, funds transfer, wire, deposit, rent, bond</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Danielle Candler</name>
        <uri>www.propertyfinder.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Fraud" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Have you received an email from ‘propertyfinder.com’ asking for funds to be transferred by MoneyGram?</p>

<p>A company or individual is fraudulently using our name and logo to email people seeking rental properties in the Middle East. The company or individual asks prospective tenants to transfer money via ‘MoneyGram’ to secure a rental property.</p>

<p><strong>THESE EMAILS ARE A SCAM.</strong></p>

<p>The emails have nothing to do with propertyfinder.com.  We are taking appropriate action in an attempt to stop the emails.  </p>

<p>Propertyfinder.com deals only with estate agents and does not act on behalf of landlords or vendors.  We will never ask for money on behalf of a landlord or act as an agent for a property. </p>

<p>Do not send money to anyone representing themselves as being from propertyfinder.com and acting on behalf of a landlord or vendor or as agent for a property.</p>

<p><br />
<strong>IF YOU ARE IN ANY WAY SUSPICIOUS OF FRAUD PLEASE CONTACT KYRENIA GROSS ON +44 (0)844 502 1000.</strong></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Spectre of negative equity returns</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/2009/04/spectre_of_negative_equity_ret_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=1427" title="Spectre of negative equity returns" />
    <id>tag:blogs.propertyfinder.com,2009:/news//10.1427</id>
    
    <published>2009-04-17T15:26:22Z</published>
    <updated>2009-04-17T15:29:41Z</updated>
    
    <summary>18 months of dropping house prices mean many more homes are now worth less than their mortgages, research reveals. Up to 900,000 homeowners are facing negative equity as plummeting house prices take their toll on the UK property Read the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Danielle Candler</name>
        <uri>www.propertyfinder.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Property News" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/">
        <![CDATA[<p>18 months of dropping house prices mean many more homes are now worth less than their mortgages, research reveals. </p>

<p>Up to 900,000 homeowners are facing negative equity as plummeting house prices take their toll on the UK property </p>

<p>Read the <a href="http://www.propertyfinder.com/doc/news/negative-equity.htm">full story</a>.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Government rolls out mortgage rescue scheme</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/2009/02/government_rolls_out_mortgage.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=1417" title="Government rolls out mortgage rescue scheme" />
    <id>tag:blogs.propertyfinder.com,2009:/news//10.1417</id>
    
    <published>2009-02-02T12:35:44Z</published>
    <updated>2009-02-02T13:45:26Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Homeowners at risk of repossession can rest a little easier now after the government announced that it is to roll out a mortgage rescue scheme across England. The move is part of a £200 million scheme that, the government claims,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Danielle Candler</name>
        <uri>www.propertyfinder.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="mortgages" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Homeowners at risk of repossession can rest a little easier now after the government announced that it is to roll out a mortgage rescue scheme across England.</p>

<p>The move is part of a £200 million scheme that, the government claims, will ensure that repossession is always a last resort for householders in financial trouble.</p>

<p>Households with incomes under £60,000 a year and which contain vulnerable individuals including those with children and the elderly or disabled, will be eligible for help from the scheme.</p>

<p>Homeowners facing repossession can either sell a share of their home to a housing association, enabling their monthly mortgage payments to be significantly reduced, or they can sell the entire property to a housing association  and remain in the property as tenants – and pay a subsidised rent.</p>

<p>The government says that the scheme will help up to 6,000 households avoid repossession over the next two years, and has been expanded after being trialled by 80 fast-track councils in December.</p>

<p>Also, anyone facing repossession now needs to only wait 13 weeks instead of 39 weeks after losing their job before receiving financial help from the government, and a Homeowner Mortgage Support Scheme is also to be introduced in partnership with lenders to enable borrowers to defer part of their mortgage payments for up to two years after being made redundant.</p>

<p>“We know that some families are worried about their mortgage payments right now, and we are determined to do everything possible to ensure repossession is always a last resort,�? says housing minister Margaret Beckett. “Whatever the situation, the clear message for households struggling with their payments is to speak to their lender as soon as possible.�?</p>

<p>For a full list of fast track councils offering the mortgage rescue plan visit www.communities.gov.uk/housing/buyingselling/mortgagerescuemeasures/<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Land Registry's unprecendented warning over land bank scams</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/2009/02/land_registrys_unprecendented.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=1416" title="Land Registry's unprecendented warning over land bank scams" />
    <id>tag:blogs.propertyfinder.com,2009:/news//10.1416</id>
    
    <published>2009-02-02T12:29:17Z</published>
    <updated>2009-02-02T13:34:30Z</updated>
    
    <summary>As returns on property investment dip during the credit crunch the Land Registry is warning investors not to plough their cash into the many so-called land banking schemes, many of which claim to offer attractive profits to investors. The move...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Danielle Candler</name>
        <uri>www.propertyfinder.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Buying Advice" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/">
        <![CDATA[<p>As returns on property investment dip during the credit crunch the Land Registry is warning investors not to plough their cash into the many so-called land banking schemes, many of which claim to offer attractive profits to investors.</p>

<p>The move is unprecedented in the Land Regsitry's history as it has rarely given advice on property investments such as land banking schemes - but after nearly a decade of the schemes running, it has decided to act.</p>

<p>Most land banking companies offer small plots of land for sale within fields that they say are soon to be granted planning permission when usually, the Land Registry says, the likelihood of permission being given to build on the land is almost zero.</p>

<p>The first sign that a land banking company is up and running on a field comes when paint or poles are used to identify the ‘plots’.</p>

<p>These strips of land are offered for sale, often online, and sometimes with the claim that there will be huge returns when planning permission is obtained for housing or other development – all for just a couple of thousand pounds. </p>

<p>But the land is usually in areas near or within green belts protected from development by planning law, and those offering the schemes often boost their credibility by claiming that major banks and developers back their schemes, when in reality this is ‘not the case’, the Land Registry says.</p>

<p>“In some extreme cases forged Land Registry letters have been produced to suggest that there is official Land Registry planning approval,�? says Mike Westcott Rudd, head of corporate legal affairs at the Land Registry. “However, we play no part in the planning process.�?</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Why homes are happier when kids leave</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/2009/01/why_homes_are_happier_when_kid.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=1418" title="Why homes are happier when kids leave" />
    <id>tag:blogs.propertyfinder.com,2009:/news//10.1418</id>
    
    <published>2009-01-29T12:40:12Z</published>
    <updated>2009-02-02T13:42:40Z</updated>
    
    <summary>It’s official – when children finally leave home the couples left behind enjoy happier marriages, researchers at a US university have revealed. A hundred women were interviewed at regular intervals between the ages of 18 and 61 as they passed...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Danielle Candler</name>
        <uri>www.propertyfinder.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Lifestyle" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/">
        <![CDATA[<p>It’s official – when children finally leave home the couples left behind enjoy happier marriages, researchers at a US university have revealed.</p>

<p>A hundred women were interviewed at regular intervals between the ages of 18 and 61 as they passed through marriage, child-rearing and finally empty-nester life stages, and many of them reported that they were more happily married after their children left home. </p>

<p>Spending more quality time with their spouses was said to be the main reason for their increased marital bliss – as the benefits of fewer parenting responsibilities and less stress kicked in.</p>

<p>And while being interviewed by researchers from the University of California, the empty-nesters were keen to show their relief: “Twenty years ago, we were in the battle of the children – today, we can enjoy one another for who we are,�? one woman said. “Once the kids grow up some of that stress – and responsibility – is removed so things are a little more relaxed.�?</p>

<p>Researcher Sarah Gorchoff, who headed up the study, told The Times newspaper: “There is this idea that women are bereft when the children leave, but our data suggest that in fact they are happier�?. She also added that “the take-home message for couples with young children is ‘hang in there’.</p>

<p>Her team’s research also revealed how the women, who were all born in the 1930s, faired in life and love – 84 per cent of them married before age 25 and 30 per cent divorced by age 45 which, Gorchoff says, is typical of their generation.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Foreigners fly in to buy up ‘bargain’ Britain</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/2009/01/foreigners_fly_in_to_buy_up_ba.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=1419" title="Foreigners fly in to buy up ‘bargain’ Britain" />
    <id>tag:blogs.propertyfinder.com,2009:/news//10.1419</id>
    
    <published>2009-01-25T12:44:03Z</published>
    <updated>2009-02-02T13:45:36Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Britain’s swankiest addresses are being bought up by an increasingly large army of overseas buyers as both sliding prices and a weakening pound lure investors over, estate agents are reporting. According to Knight Frank London in particular remains a popular...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Danielle Candler</name>
        <uri>www.propertyfinder.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Property News" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Britain’s swankiest addresses are being bought up by an increasingly large army of overseas buyers as both sliding prices and a weakening pound lure investors over, estate agents are reporting. <br />
According to Knight Frank London in particular remains a popular destination with people from overseas and the firm says that the proportion of prime London property being bought by well-heeled overseas house hunters increased by 17 per cent during 2008.<br />
 The slide in property prices in famous-name London areas such as Belgravia, Canary Wharf, Chelsea, Hampstead, Kensington, Knightsbridge, Fulham and St John’s Wood is tempting over buyers from Europe, the Middle East and the US who know that much of London’s high-end property now represents a ‘bargain’.<br />
For example, Knight Frank says prime residential prices in central London fell in October 2008 by 3.9 per cent, the fastest rate of decline on record .<br />
“Up until the summer [of 2008] many vendors were holding to their pre-crunch asking prices,�? says Liam Bailey, head of residential research at Knight Frank. “After what has taken place in the financial world, an increasing number of vendors have decided to cut prices to achieve a sale. Our index shows this trend clearly – with the rate of month-on-month price drops gathering pace.�?<br />
Independent prime London property consultant Charles McDowell says that such rapid price drops are making prime London property attractive to many foreign buyers for the first time. <br />
“Well-heeled buyers from Euro and US dollar-dominated countries are arriving in London by the private planeload, as this is currently the best buying opportunity for them in many years,�? he says. <br />
And who would blame them when, he says, “a superb home that may have sold last year for £10 million is now on the market for £8.5 million�?.<br />
But it’s not just falling house prices enticing foreign buyers over. For years Brits have been buying up swathes of Spain, France, Italy and the US on the back of a strong pound – but now the parlous state of sterling means buying in the UK is now up to 30 per cent cheaper for anyone using dollars or euros to buy property in the UK.<br />
“This increased foreign interested is not only at the top of the London market – we are also seeing something of a run on London boltholes around the £1 million mark too,�? says Charles McDowell.<br />
“For Italians buyers, for example, London now offers an excellent opportunity to escape an unfavourable domestic tax environment, but was until recently not a realistic property option.<br />
“And It will be interesting to see if the capital freed up in London remains here or is moved to the country market.�? <br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>What can landlords and tenants expect when it is time to renew?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/2008/08/what_can_landlords_and_tenants.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=1384" title="What can landlords and tenants expect when it is time to renew?" />
    <id>tag:blogs.propertyfinder.com,2008:/news//10.1384</id>
    
    <published>2008-08-06T12:09:38Z</published>
    <updated>2008-08-06T13:12:34Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[Before the term &ldquo;credit crunch&rdquo; entered the public domain and the market was soaring, most agents experienced a higher than average level of renewals as tenants tried to insulate themselves from escalating rents and increased demand for property. Come renewal...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ben Henzell</name>
        <uri>www.propertyfinder.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Q&amp;A: Agents answer your questions" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Before the term &ldquo;credit crunch&rdquo; entered the public domain and the market was soaring, most agents experienced a higher than average level of renewals as tenants tried to insulate themselves from escalating rents and increased demand for property. Come renewal time, many tenants found that they had to negotiate their rentals afresh and accept significant increases in order to remain in situ. </p><p>Now that conditions have changed dramatically, lettings departments are still presiding over a record number of renewals. This time around, however, everyone involved in the process is increasingly sensitive to increased outgoings. Tenants may be deciding whether or not to downsize as landlords are struggling to make their numbers come right with the higher cost of finance. </p><p>That being said, tenants realise that rents have moved on to a higher level generally and that relocating themselves, their families and belongings has its own significant costs. In turn, landlords are reluctant to incur void periods. Furthermore, a good landlord appreciates and respects a good tenant and is usually willing to accommodate them as much as is reasonable. </p><p>By way of a fair resolution, we are negotiating an upward adjustment for inflation in line with RPI. This figure (4.2% at time of going to press) is readily available from the Office of National Statistics as well as Lonres, the trade website. As agents, we also benefit from having an objective standard to assist us in carrying out our responsibility to our clients, as well as our duty of care to our customers. </p><p>Tessa Lang <br />Lettings Manager <br />Des Res Ltd. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Q&amp;A What is the difference between freehold and leasehold?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/2008/07/qa_what_is_the_difference_betw.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=1380" title="Q&amp;A What is the difference between freehold and leasehold?" />
    <id>tag:blogs.propertyfinder.com,2008:/news//10.1380</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-07T12:05:59Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-07T13:32:55Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[The terms &lsquo;freehold&rsquo;, &lsquo;leasehold&rsquo; and 'commonhold' refer to the different ways in which properties in England and Wales only can be owned.&nbsp;(Scotland follows separate&nbsp;regulations)&nbsp;Property expert Nicholas Leeming provides an overview of the terms......]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ben Henzell</name>
        <uri>www.propertyfinder.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Q&amp;A: Agents answer your questions" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The terms &lsquo;freehold&rsquo;, &lsquo;leasehold&rsquo; and 'commonhold' refer to the different ways in which properties in England and Wales only can be owned.&nbsp;(Scotland follows separate&nbsp;regulations)&nbsp;</p><p><img height="145" alt="lease.jpg" src="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/upload/2008/07/lease.jpg" width="272" border="0" /><br /><br />Property expert Nicholas Leeming provides an overview of the terms... </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>What is freehold?</strong> <br />Freehold title gives you absolute ownership of land and property. These properties are therefore more desirable and worth more. </p><p><strong>What is leasehold?</strong> <br />Leasehold title gives you the right to occupy property for the period of the lease only after which it reverts to the freeholder. The leaseholder owns everything within the walls while the freeholder owns structure and the land which it is built on. The length of the lease has a direct impact on the value of the property. </p><p><strong>What is a lease?</strong> <br />A lease entitles a tenant to occupy a property in return for paying a rent, subject to any conditions contained in the lease. A legally binding document stating the terms and conditions under which the property is occupied and used. </p><p><strong>What is commonhold?</strong> <br />This form of ownership was introduced in September 1994 and applies to interdependent properties so allowing flats to be held on a freehold basis. </p><p><strong>What is a Rent Act tenancy?</strong> <br />These are older leases which fall under the jurisdiction of the Rent Acts and which may, among other things, limit the amount by which rents can be increased at any one time. </p><p><strong>What is an Assured Shorthold tenancy? <br /></strong>These are more modern forms of leases which most properties are now let under and are for a minimum term of 6 months. </p><p><strong>What is Leasehold Enfranchisement?</strong> <br />This is the process by which a qualifying leaseholder may acquire the freehold for their property for a market value </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Q&amp;A: How to manage your property finances after the credit crunch</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/2008/06/qa_how_to_manage_your_property_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=1375" title="Q&amp;A: How to manage your property finances after the credit crunch" />
    <id>tag:blogs.propertyfinder.com,2008:/news//10.1375</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-05T14:32:07Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-05T15:40:56Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The credit crunch has had a big impact on the property markets and has created both challenges and opportunities. One of the biggest frustrations which it has resulted in has been the lack of mortgage availability for even buyers with...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ben Henzell</name>
        <uri>www.propertyfinder.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Q&amp;A: Agents answer your questions" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The credit crunch has had a big impact on the property markets and has created both challenges and opportunities. One of the biggest frustrations which it has resulted in has been the lack of mortgage availability for even buyers with a relatively good financial record. </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><img height="100" alt="invest.jpg" src="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/upload/2008/06/invest.jpg" width="250" border="0" /> </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Property expert Nicholas Leeming gives his advice:</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>For those looking to buy a home now could be a good time if you can get your finances in order.</strong></p><p>There is a large stock of property for sale and, as the months progress, there will be more vendors prepared to discount their guide prices. This cycle in the market brings opportunities for buyers who understand that the long term fundamentals of property ownership remain positive, even if short term comment in the press is negative. </p><p><strong>So what should you do if you want to buy a home and make the most of this opportunity?</strong></p><p>First of all get your own property (if you have one) valued and be realistic about the net proceeds that this will realise. It is a brave person in any market who commits to buy without having agreed the sale of their own property first, so look at renting as an interim solution. Then do your research on what funding options may be available to you. If you need a mortgage then spend time in looking at what offers are out there....but it is not just the rates that you should check, it is the terms such as the deposit and income cover which can be just as important. With satisfaction on this front you should be ready to start your search. </p><p><strong>Needless to say the internet is one of the most efficient ways of finding property and is the best research tool.</strong> </p><p>When looking at property think carefully about how the building society or bank will look at it for security purposes and will an independent valuer confirm the level that you are proposing to bid. Also will the lender require additional work to be done to the property which may be expensive to carry out. Without a mortgage offer being confirmed you may not get very far with your purchase and you may land up with some hefty abortive costs! </p><p>The general advice to property buyers in the light of the current credit crunch is to do you homework in advance and be sure that you do not expose yourself to unnecessary financial risk. There are opportunities in the current market as well as challenges....make sure that you make the most of it! </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Q &amp; A: Stamp Duty</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/2008/05/q_a_stamp_duty.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=1368" title="Q &amp; A: Stamp Duty" />
    <id>tag:blogs.propertyfinder.com,2008:/news//10.1368</id>
    
    <published>2008-05-08T13:16:37Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-08T15:55:24Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Property expert Nicholas Leeming of propertyfinder.com answers your questions on stamp duty:...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ben Henzell</name>
        <uri>www.propertyfinder.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Finance, Mortgages &amp; Tax" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Property expert Nicholas Leeming of propertyfinder.com answers your questions on stamp duty: </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Why do we pay stamp duty?</strong> </p><p>Stamp duty is the oldest tax administered by the Inland Revenue and was introduced in 1694 to pay for the war against France. The tax was extended to property sales in 1808 and its sole purpose now is to generate revenues for the government. </p><p><strong>How much is stamp duty?</strong> </p><p>Stamp duty used to be levied at 1% on the sale price of a property above a basic threshold. In July 1997 Gordon Brown increased the tax to 1.5% on properties between &pound;250,000 and &pound;500,000. There have been a number of subsequent changes and the current rates are shown below: </p><p>Purchase price of residential property&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Rate of Stamp Duty Land Tax (% of the total purchase price)</p><p>&nbsp;&pound;0 - &pound;125,000&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 0% </p><p>&pound;125,001 - &pound;250,000&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;1% </p><p>&pound;250,001 - &pound;500,000&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;3% </p><p>&pound;500,001 or more&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;4% </p><p><strong>What is the result of the tax?</strong> </p><p>The tax take for HMRC in 2007/8 will be around &pound;6,863m with an average bill for each property sold of &pound;4,950 this tax year. The comparable figure 10 years ago was &pound;709 representing an increase of nearly 600%. In London the affect is even worse with average stamp duty paid on a property reaching &pound;12,409. Three London boroughs alone paid more stamp duty last year than Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland combined! Today&rsquo;s first time buyers will pay around &pound;20,000 in stamp duty over their lifetime. </p><p><strong>Is it possible to reduce or avoid stamp duty?</strong> </p><p>The most common way of avoiding stamp duty was to attribute a high percentage of the agreed sale price to the fixtures and fittings so as to reduce the value of the property to below the threshold for stamp duty. While this could create worthwhile savings, this practice has now been stopped and there are now no effective ways of avoiding the tax. </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>The rental market is increasing</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/2008/04/the_rental_market_is_increasin.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=1360" title="The rental market is increasing" />
    <id>tag:blogs.propertyfinder.com,2008:/news//10.1360</id>
    
    <published>2008-04-09T20:16:55Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-09T21:23:58Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Nicholas Leeming, major client director of propertyfinder.com, commented on the CML buy-to-let figures and the escalating demand for private rented homes:...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ben Henzell</name>
        <uri>www.propertyfinder.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Rental Property News" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Nicholas Leeming, major client director of propertyfinder.com, commented on the CML buy-to-let figures and the escalating demand for private rented homes:</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>'The vast majority of the rental sector is booming at the moment, driven by tenant demand. The number of people searching for rented homes on our site has increased 36% since last August when the credit crunch began. Mortgage costs are high and confidence in the housing market is low &ndash; in the short term, a lot of potential first-time buyers are choosing to remain in rented accommodation, at least until the picture of the market is a little clearer. </p><p>In the long term, the role of buy-to-let in the UK housing market is likely to get bigger rather than smaller. We estimate that around 3.1 million of today&rsquo;s over 30s who had expected to retire in their own homes will actually live out their golden years in rented accommodation due to affordability constraints. Most of these people will find homes in the private rented sector.&rsquo; </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>With the legislation about to be extended to new build properties, how have HIPs already affected the housing market?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/2008/04/with_the_legislation_about_to_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=1359" title="With the legislation about to be extended to new build properties, how have HIPs already affected the housing market?" />
    <id>tag:blogs.propertyfinder.com,2008:/news//10.1359</id>
    
    <published>2008-04-09T10:19:08Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-05T14:09:30Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Nicholas Leeming, major client director of propertyfinder.com: Where HIPs are concerned, the only thing the government has been consistent on is indecision. The main impact on the market has been from dithering over implementation, rather than the actual legislation. Now...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ben Henzell</name>
        <uri>www.propertyfinder.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Home Information Packs (HIPs)" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Nicholas Leeming, major client director of propertyfinder.com: </p><p>Where HIPs are concerned, the only thing the government has been consistent on is indecision. The main impact on the market has been from dithering over implementation, rather than the actual legislation. Now that HIPs are compulsory for almost all properties, they are just an expensive, unavoidable inconvenience &ndash; much like death and taxes. </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Where were they introduced?</strong></p><p>The legislation was initially intended to speed up the process of buying and selling a home by making vital information on a property available to buyers upfront. This would prevent people pulling out of purchases further down the line. But after several U-turns, the government burdened the market with a diluted HIP that does not provide the information a buyer needs. Without a structural survey, a buyer and their mortgage lender don&rsquo;t have the information to guarantee they can proceed with buying the property. </p><p><strong>Agent Response</strong></p><p>Agents tell me HIPs have done nothing to speed up transactions for this reason &ndash; there&rsquo;s nothing in them of use. Buyers aren&rsquo;t even looking at them and don&rsquo;t ask to see them. Solicitors often refuse to rely on the information they contain. </p><p><strong>EPCs</strong></p><p>Supporters (mostly those with a vested interest) make a lot of positive noise about EPCs. But buying a home is an emotive process and the energy efficiency of the property will not influence the decision of the vast majority of buyers. HIPs have become about complying with an EU directive on reducing carbon emissions, not about helping buyers and sellers of property. </p><p><strong>New Build Properties</strong></p><p>Which is precisely why this pointless legislation is being extended to recent new build properties. New properties are built to the latest building regulatory standards. A HIP won&rsquo;t tell buyers anything new but with guaranteed high standards of energy efficiency, dragging them under the legislative net will undoubtedly boost the government&rsquo;s energy efficiency statistics. So the government can furnish their green credentials at the expense of others. The only other outcome of extending the reach of HIPs will be to create work to placate the HIP providers who suffered from the earlier indecision and are now struggling in a slower housing market. </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>London Property News</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/2008/04/london_property_news_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=1357" title="London Property News" />
    <id>tag:blogs.propertyfinder.com,2008:/news//10.1357</id>
    
    <published>2008-04-07T09:26:44Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-08T13:13:53Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The London property market is more resilient than most other parts of the country. Despite hype about the reliance of London on financial services, the city has a strong and diverse labour market which shows little sign of faltering. Nicholas...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ben Henzell</name>
        <uri>www.propertyfinder.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Property News" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The London property market is more resilient than most other parts of the country. Despite hype about the reliance of London on financial services, the city has a strong and diverse labour market which shows little sign of faltering. </p><p>Nicholas Leeming, major client director of propertyfinder.com comments: </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Although prices of million and multi-million pound homes may be more vulnerable to weaker City bonuses, prices of normal family homes will ultimately be supported by the strong jobs market, continued migration to the capital and the shortage of housing. </p><p>Worryingly, there are reports emerging that a growing number of people are thinking of selling their home and moving into rented accommodation until property prices fall. </p><p>It&rsquo;s a dangerous game to say the least. Speculating on the property market with your own home is definitely not for the faint-hearted. The average London property has to fall over 7% in value before you even break even once you take into account all the costs of selling, moving and then buying again; stamp duty is the biggest cost. </p><p>For people in more expensive homes, the market has to fall further still &ndash; over 8%. So you need the market to drop a very long way before this starts to look like an attractive prospect. And you have to consider how much the hassle and upheaval is worth to you. </p><p>The London rental market is certainly very busy at the moment. Tenant demand is strong and rents are rising rapidly. There is a lot of competition from tenants for the nicest homes, so those selling up to move into a rented home will have to fight for the best property. Good rented accommodation for a family in a decent school catchment area is like gold dust. </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>How should you make an offer for a property?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/2008/04/how_much_should_you_offer_for.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=1355" title="How should you make an offer for a property?" />
    <id>tag:blogs.propertyfinder.com,2008:/news//10.1355</id>
    
    <published>2008-04-01T17:14:57Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-04T15:54:01Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Deciding on what and how to bid for a property is one of the most challenging parts of the house buying process. There is no set formula and this is a straightforward commercial negotiation, made all the more difficult because...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ben Henzell</name>
        <uri>www.propertyfinder.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Buying Advice" />
            <category term="For sale" />
            <category term="Q&amp;A: Agents answer your questions" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Deciding on what and how to bid for a property is one of the most challenging parts of the house buying process. There is no set formula and this is a straightforward commercial negotiation, made all the more difficult because the individuals involved may have widely differing standards and business experience. </p><p>Property expert Nick Lemming gives his advice..</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Vendor Research</strong></p><ul><li>Before even thinking of submitting and offer you need to do as much research as possible into the background of why the property is on the market and how long has it been for sale. </li><li>A vendor with a deadline is more likely to negotiate than one who does not have to move. Similarly a property which has been on the market for some months may sell well below its guide price. </li><li>Remember also that the vendor is human... he or she will probably be more prepared to negotiate if you take the trouble to be courteous and show them respect. Discuss why they want to move, what their ideal timescales are and how you can help them in the process. This can be particularly important if they are elderly. </li></ul><p><strong>Competition</strong></p><ul><li>You also need to find out what the competition is. Ask the agent if it is worth viewing the property if you only have budget of &pound;x (set discretely below the guide price): if he says no then you know that they feel in a strong position, if yes then it may indicate that there will be room for negotiation. </li><li>When looking around the house ask how many other viewers there have been and how long it has been on the market for. </li></ul><p><strong>Hidden Costs</strong></p><ul><li>With this information to hand you must also work out what you are able to bid for a property and what it is worth to you. </li><li>There are many hidden costs that you will have to pay, not the least of which is stamp duty which, at its highest and most penal rate, is charged at 4% of the value of the property. Add to that legal fees, the cost of improvements and moving, then the net funds available to bid with are soon reduced </li></ul><p><strong>Final Offers</strong></p><ul><li>How you submit your offer will depend on how the sale is being conducted. &ldquo;Best &amp; final&rdquo; offers are submitted in writing and have to be with the agent before the relevant deadline.</li><li>Otherwise a verbal offer by telephone will usually suffice...but make sure that you keep a record of the agent&rsquo;s name and time of your call. It is also often worth putting a deadline of, say, 48 hours for your offer to be accepted otherwise it is withdrawn: this makes it more difficult for the agent to use this to get other prospective buyers to submit a competing bid. </li><li>Unless submitting a best and final offer (which needs to be exactly that) you should pitch your opening offer at slightly below the price that you would be happy paying. </li><li>It is quite normal for an agent to ask for a better bid and, that you have offered below what the vendor is expecting, may well help to readjust their sights accordingly. Offering the guide price first time is not normally a good tactic! </li></ul><p><strong>Room for Negotiation?</strong></p><ul><li>The agent has a legal responsibility to report your offer in writing to their client. Beyond that the vendor decides on what course of action should be taken, often as advised by their agent. Particularly in the current market you need to be clear as to whether you already have a mortgage agreed in principle and whether your offer is subject to survey or any other conditions. </li><li>The cleaner your offer, then the stronger your negotiating position is and the more likely that an offer below the guide price will be accepted. </li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><p>If all this fills you with horror, then you can always ask a buying agent to represent you in the process, but otherwise the best advice is do not set your heart on a house until the vendor&rsquo;s signature is on the contract....only then do you have certainty! </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Stamp Duty bills soar far above home buyers' expectations</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/2008/03/stamp_duty_bills_soar_far_abov.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=1351" title="Stamp Duty bills soar far above home buyers' expectations" />
    <id>tag:blogs.propertyfinder.com,2008:/news//10.1351</id>
    
    <published>2008-03-18T16:11:54Z</published>
    <updated>2008-03-19T06:07:48Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[The stamp duty paid on a home in the UK has reached an average of &pound;4,950 this tax year, according to the latest research by propertyfinder.com, based on predictions using HMRC data. This is up from &pound;3,828 last year and...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ben Henzell</name>
        <uri>www.propertyfinder.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Buying Advice" />
            <category term="Finance, Mortgages &amp; Tax" />
            <category term="Property News" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.propertyfinder.com/news/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The stamp duty paid on a home in the UK has reached an average of &pound;4,950 this tax year, according to the latest research by <a title="propertyfinder.com" href="http://www.propertyfinder.com/">propertyfinder.com</a>, based on predictions using HMRC data. </p><p>This is up from &pound;3,828 last year and just &pound;709 ten years ago (a ten year increase of nearly 600%). During the tax year 2007/2008, the HMRC will have collected a total of &pound;6,863m from home buyers.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>But the amount collected from region to region varies enormously. The average stamp duty paid on a <a title="London property" href="http://www.propertyfinder.com/uk/property/london">London property</a> is now &pound;12,409, more than 7x the average &pound;1,730 levy in the North East. </p><p>Nicholas Leeming, major client director of propertyfinder.com commented: &quot;Stamp duty has become a major earner for the Treasury. But its burden is far from evenly spread. Three London boroughs alone paid more stamp last year than Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland combined! We can expect the same pattern this tax year.&rdquo; </p><p>London buyers massively underestimate how much they must fork out in stamp duty. On average, Londoners expect to have to pay &pound;5,479 in stamp duty &ndash; the real figure is &pound;12,409. Buyers in the south west, south east and east anglia also underestimate their liability. The midlands are almost spot on with their estimates of the stamp they must pay, whilst Wales, Yorkshire and the north think they are paying more stamp tax than they actually are. </p><p>However, almost every region in the country overestimates how much stamp duty they paid ten years ago. </p><p>Nicholas Leeming continued: &ldquo;People have become so accustomed to being taxed heavily on their home &ndash; they can&rsquo;t remember that this hasn&rsquo;t always been the case. Taxes on our property assets - in particular through stamp tax - have rocketed over the last ten years. The average person will <a title="http://www.propertyfinder.com/" href="http://www.propertyfinder.com/uk/property">buy a home</a> around four times in their lifetime &ndash; this means today&rsquo;s first time buyers will pay &pound;20.000 to the Treasury, just through stamp duty by the time they retire. Those towards the south of the country will pay many times this amount.&rdquo; </p><p>Not only do people not remember the lower levels of tax they paid ten years ago, but they think that stamp duty has increased at a slower rate than council tax. Even though 50 percent of people think that council taxes have risen the fastest, in fact on average it has less than doubled when stamp duty has increased by a factor of seven. </p><p>&ldquo;This year, revenues are higher and there are certainly more homes than ever dragged into the tax net by <a title="house price" href="http://www.propertyfinder.com/">house price </a>inflation. The best reforms would be to raise the lower threshold to a sensible level to help first time buyers on to the ladder, and to introduce marginal bands for everyone. These are the changes we&rsquo;d like to see made in the budget. But it is such an easy tax to collect and with the government finances looking precarious, the chances of change look remote to say the least.&quot; </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
