<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<generator>https://textpattern.com/?v=4.7.3</generator>
	<title>newsonaut</title>
	<link>https://www.newsonaut.com/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.newsonaut.com/index.php?rss=1" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Outer space? What about inner space?</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 01:32:36 GMT</pubDate>
	
	<item>
		<title>What can I say? This site has been made impure by AI</title>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can get a badge for your blog declaring that you never, ever use AI. While it’s true that I never, ever use AI for my writing, I did use it once to make a graphic for an <a href="https://www.newsonaut.com/index.php?id=700">April Fools Day joke</a> about how Apple is making the corners on its windows rounder than ever. </p>
<p>Also, I use AI quite a bit to help me with coding problems, although I can’t remember if I’ve done this for Newsonaut. Let’s just say it’s possible.</p>
<p>I definitely used it to help me create a WordPress theme from scratch for my wife’s blog, <a href="https://theanimalreporter.com/">The Animal Reporter</a>. It used to be the common wisdom was to take someone else’s theme and tweak it. I always hated this because it took away my creative freedom.</p>
<p>I initially thought of using WordPress for Newsonaut back in 2010 when it started up, but could not get my head around it. I settled on <a href="https://textpattern.com/">Textpattern</a> for this reason, and have been happy with it ever since. It makes me glad there was no AI back then because I believe to this day that Textpattern is the better choice.</p>
<p>Still, AI has opened up new worlds for me beyond WordPress templates. For example, it has helped me deploy a website based on a static site generator and create a PHP-based guestbook, among other things.</p>
<p>The many hours I used to spend in Stack Overflow have been replaced by as little as a few minutes in Lumo or Le Chat.</p>
<p>So there you have it — full disclosure.</p>
<p>Thinking back on it, what would I have done for my April Fools Day graphic in the days before AI? I guess I could have made a crude approximation and tried to pass it off as a mockup. Maybe that would have been funnier. It’s something to keep in mind for next time.</p>]]>
</content:encoded>
		<link>https://www.newsonaut.com/index.php?id=704</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 19:42:28 GMT</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Rogers</dc:creator>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:www.newsonaut.com,2026-05-13:ffb877a31ca47efc7e875c1fcd880eb8/e0264dcd889688ea32c1da52847f9d21</guid>


	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to make your blog or forum post hard to read</title>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s how to make your post as hard to read as possible.</p>
<p><b>Step 1:</b> Make it all one paragraph, the longer the better.</p>
<p><b>Step 2:</b> Don’t put in any subheadings. If you’ve followed step 1, you won’t be able to do this anyway.</p>
<p><b>Step 3:</b> Resist the urge to reformat some sentences as bulleted lists. Keep those sentences nice and long.</p>
<p><b>Step 4:</b> Most importantly, make everything lower case. This includes the starts of sentences, the word “I” and any proper nouns.</p>
<p>This final step ensures that readers will balk at even attempting to read your post. Seeing a formless blob of grey, they will move on to something more appealing.</p>
<p>Good job. You’ve accomplished your goal.</p>
<p>What’s that you say? All lower-case is more conversational and authentic? Maybe so, but it's still hard to read.</p>]]>
</content:encoded>
		<link>https://www.newsonaut.com/index.php?id=703</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 18:05:35 GMT</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Rogers</dc:creator>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:www.newsonaut.com,2026-05-11:ffb877a31ca47efc7e875c1fcd880eb8/f0f79763fe64ac651d022e16abace5f8</guid>


	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Don&#39;t give up your voice to AI</title>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There’s a guy who occasionally publishes reviews on Reddit that are honest, informed and non-monetized. I trust him and have in fact bought one of the things he recommended. I use it often, and I’m glad to have it.</p>
<p>Lately, though, I’ve noticed something different about his reviews. They seem to flow a little better, the sentences are a little less awkward, the rough edges have been sanded off. Has he suddenly become a better writer? I would like to think so, but more likely he’s taken to running his reviews through AI.</p>
<p>What a shame.</p>
<p>Before, he had a voice, a personality that I could imagine with a passion he enjoyed writing about. Now, he’s . . . I don’t know what to call it. Some words on the internet?</p>
<p>If you really want to improve your writing, there are some great books to help you do that. A good start is <a href="https://dn790000.ca.archive.org/0/items/OnWritingWell/on-writing-well.pdf">On Writing Well by William Zinsser</a>, which is itself well written and thus an easy read.</p>
<p>Here’s what he wrote in the book’s introduction in 2001:</p>
<blockquote>
Ultimately, however, good writing rests on craft and always will. I don't know what still newer electronic marvels are just around the corner to make writing twice as easy and twice  as fast in the next 25 years. But I do know they won't make writing twice as good. That will still require plain old hard work — clear thinking — and the plain old tools of the English language.
</blockquote>
<p>Whatever you do, keep your own voice, even if it is unvarnished. It’s part of who you are, and we appreciate it.</p>]]>
</content:encoded>
		<link>https://www.newsonaut.com/index.php?id=702</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 20:48:08 GMT</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Rogers</dc:creator>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:www.newsonaut.com,2026-05-05:ffb877a31ca47efc7e875c1fcd880eb8/35ecf3e15d1da442625886c0d6a24478</guid>


	</item>
	<item>
		<title>From random to recommended: exploring the indie web</title>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been interested in the concept of the indie web for a few years now, but have struggled to take part in a meaningful way.</p>
<p>I wrote about an early attempt in 2024 when I discovered that you can get <a href="https://www.newsonaut.com/index.php?id=665">a random RSS feed</a> from indieblog.page. To this day, I continue to get 10 random posts every day in my feed reader.</p>
<p>The problem, though, is that those posts are rarely of any interest. They tend to be extremely niche. Typically, they are about a technology I don’t understand or something personal suitable mainly for friends and relatives.</p>
<p>I haven’t given up, though.</p>
<p><a href="https://kagi.com/smallweb/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.asciimx.com%2Flog%2Fvcs-1%2F">Kagi Small Web</a> is another way to randomly find indie web posts. I find that it’s good for filling in a few minutes of boredom, but I’m pretty sure I’ve found only a few articles that I enjoyed reading.</p>
<p>There is a more recent effort called <a href="https://blogosphere.app/">Blogosphere</a>, where you can go through the latest posts of indie sites chosen by the developer. With a fair bit of scrolling, I can find one or two articles worth reading — so it's not bad. You can also sign up and follow your favourites, but why not do that with your feed reader?</p>
<p>The latest I’ve come across is <a href="https://bubbles.town/">Bubbles</a>, which came out about a month ago. It allows for up-voting and comments, both of which help surface articles worthy of your attention. It’s like getting recommendations from like-minded people. There is also a daily briefing for the top posts, and a hall of fame for the top blogs.</p>
<p>It might seem a little too close for comfort to the corporate world of Reddit, but I’m willing to live with that. If the indie world is going to flourish, it needs a way to make itself known. Bubbles might not be the best way to do this, but it’s the best I’ve found so far.</p>]]>
</content:encoded>
		<link>https://www.newsonaut.com/index.php?id=701</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 19:30:27 GMT</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Rogers</dc:creator>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:www.newsonaut.com,2026-04-28:ffb877a31ca47efc7e875c1fcd880eb8/515648c483a4d29dcdfcf4e6beb6b98a</guid>


	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Apple goes round the bend</title>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, Apple likes those big-ass round corners so much that they have decided to go all-in with what they&rsquo;re calling &ldquo;circular&rdquo; design. Here&rsquo;s an example I found for TextEdit.</p>
<img src="https://www.newsonaut.com/images/circular.png" alt="circular TextEdit">]]>
</content:encoded>
		<link>https://www.newsonaut.com/index.php?id=700</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 14:26:57 GMT</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Rogers</dc:creator>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:www.newsonaut.com,2026-04-01:ffb877a31ca47efc7e875c1fcd880eb8/1cbab76513394dc44f67e96447c35cce</guid>


	</item>
</channel>
</rss>