NIGERIAN CURIOSITY

YAR'ADUA HANDING OVER TO VICE PRESIDENT?

noreply@blogger.com (SOLOMONSYDELLE) — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 22:15:00 PST

On November 23rd, 2009, Nigeria's President Yar'Adua was rushed to Saudi Arabia for a medical emergency. It was later revealed that he had pericarditis, a hardening of the lining around the heart. His absence from Nigeria and a lack of forthcoming information on his condition or when he would return, created a power vacuum. An interpretation of the Constitution suggested that a formal letter from the President was necessary to temporarily transfer powers to the Vice President. This interpretation left the Vice President seemingly powerless to use executive powers and some citizens in outrage over the ensuing political confusion. However, in the over 75 days since the President went to Saudi Arabia, and after various court cases and judgments, it appears Nigeria's President may be ready to bow to public pressure and send a letter indicating intent to temporarily transfer executive power to his second in command.

Source: Yar'Adua-Goodluck Youth Support League

BACKGROUND
Yar'Adua has repeatedly been rushed abroad for medical purposes to Germany and Saudi Arabia. This reality has resulted in repeatedly vocal complaints and questions about his capacity to lead the country. In 2008, he canceled a planned diplomatic visit to Brazil when his health made the trip impossible. He was flown to Saudi Arabia but the nation was told that he was there for the 'lesser hajj'.The lack of transparency led to criticism and questions about the constitutionality of prolonged Presidential absences due to Section 145 of the Constitution. Section 145 was interpreted to suggest that a letter is necessary from the President for executive powers and functions to be temporarily handed over to the Vice President.

Consequently, before leaving on a 2 week vacation in January 2009, the President made it known that he would issue a letter to legislators informing them of his absence. Although most Nigerians thought that this letter was transmitted, it now appears that the letter was never formally given to the legislative body. Instead, it was held in the possession of the President's adviser, who now asserts that the letter was never handed over because the President never took the vacation due to the death of an acquaintance.

Nevertheless, when President Yar'Adua was rushed to Saudi Arabia in November 2009, many called for him to honor their interpretation of Section 145 of the Nigerian Constitution. They expected him to inform the legislative body of his absence so that executive power could temporarily be transferred to the Vice President, Goodluck Jonathan. Many groups and influential individuals encouraged the President to formally declare Jonathan the acting President. The Senate equally requested a letter from the President informing of his absence. However, a court decision that the President is not obligated to formally inform the National Assembly of prolonged absences helped to clarify the Constitutional ambiguity of Section 145.

A TEMPORARY HANDOVER?
Although a High Court ruled in favor of the President and his supporters who asserted that Section 145 does not require a letter for the Vice President to assume executive powers, Yar'Adua is allegedly set to send a letter to the National Assembly. According to an adviser to the president, he will submit a letter by the end of the second week in February 2010 (by the 12th) specifying "medical vacation" as the basis for his absence. Speaking before Senators, the Special Adviser to the President on National Assembly Matters, Senator Mohammad Abba-Aji stated,

"The Senate has resolved and the resolution has been transmitted and we all know the President to be a man who respects the rule of law; so I have no doubt in my mind that the President has never refused to comply with a law passed by the legislature, not to my knowledge."

QUESTIONS REMAIN
In his statement, Abba-Aji mentioned that the president respects the rule of law, and it is true that Yar'Adua appropriated the term as a public mantra. Sadly, it remains questionable whether or not the President will indeed issue a formal letter to the National Assembly given that he never actually promised to do so. Although most Nigerians wish their President the best, it remains unclear whether he is capable of making any promises as he has not been seen in over two months.Furthermore, a direct challenge to a recent BBC interview and thus his capacity, has been left unanswered. Therefore, even though Abba-Aji's pronouncement was allegedly made on behalf of the President, it cannot be considered as fact until the President himself says so. Besides, there has been enough 'information' to come out of the Presidency in the last few months that has proven to be false, thus lending little credibility to Abba-Aji's statement, despite his intentions.

This disturbing reality - questions about Yar'Adua's capacity - lends itself to any letter that might be issued and signed by him. Already, there is a court case alleging that the 2010 budget introduced during the President's absence has a forged signature on it. Hence, it is likely that any letter supposedly signed by the President to the National Assembly will equally be questioned and rightly so as it remains unclear whether President Yar'Adua is in a position, healthwise, to perform such functions. And, if he is capable, then how long will he be gone for? Will this time be added to the almost 80 days he has been gone? The questions are limitless, but if he does transfer power to Jonathan, Nigerians will have an acting President whose wife is involved in a serious corruption scandal involving $13.5 million. For all that can be said about Yar'Adua, it cannot be said that he or his wife were caught trying to move large sums of money outside normal, legal channels.

ANAMBRA GUBERNATORIAL ELECTION
Finally, the President's absence has put in doubt the constitutionality of the recently held Anambra State gubernatorial election. The polls were thankfully non-violent, but featured irregularities that the federal government has already admitted to. But, most importantly, a court decision handed down the day before the election determined that its results would be illegal as the electoral body charged with administering the elections, INEC, lacked the required quorum of board members to function. According to the court's judgement, INEC requires 5 members for a quorum, but there are currently only 4 members. Only the President has the power to select that 5th member and since it is unclear whether the Vice President has executive powers*, the election and its results are unconstitutional. This court ruling therefore puts in jeopardy the results of the Anambra polls, subjecting the outcome to future litigation which will likely slow down the Anambra state government if such a legal challenge arises. The President's absence and the confusion over the Vice President's ability to function as an acting president has far reaching consequences that not only put the future of the Presidency in jeopardy, but the bread and butter issues of ordinary citizens.

It remains to be seen whether President Yar'Adua will indeed transfer executive power to the Vice President. A 'rule of law' President all the way in Saudi Arabia does not help the average Nigerian and the confusion this absence leaves in its wake only compounds issues. What is beyond confusion, nevertheless, is that the political disorientation Nigeria currently experiences will not soon abate.

* Although a federal high court ruled that a formal letter is not necessary to transfer executive powers, the matter is no final until the Supreme Court makes a decision.

From the Archives:
- Nigeria's President Absent During Crisis
- Yar'Adua Health, Resignation & Nigerian Cost
- More Yar'Adua Health Uncertainty
- Yar'Adua Health, Resignation & Nigerian Cost
- Yar'Adua And The Continuing Heath Issue
- The Consequences of Yar'Adua's Mysterious Health

PRESIDENT "ECOMINI" OF GHANA

noreply@blogger.com (SOLOMONSYDELLE) — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 21:55:00 PST

I cannot believe nobody told me how much fun President Atta Mills of Ghana is! And here I was 'wasting my time' with Nigerian officials and my favorite member of Nigeria's legislative body - Patrick Obahiagbon. While the Honorable Obahiagbon is an indecipherable delight to listen to, Atta Mills has entire tracks that have been made, remixed and transformed into ringtones on his behalf.

In 2009, John Atta Mills, once a tax law professor, came to power in an election that was heralded as one of Africa's freest and fairest elections. Within no time, Mills illustrated an uncanny ability to speak English very differently from most people. He constantly mixes up and mispronounces words. In fact, when being sworn in as President of Ghana, he slipped up more times that President Obama of the United States who needed to redo his inaugural swearing in just to get things right. No wonder Obama picked Ghana as the first black African country to visit as America's President.

Ghanaians have taken advantage of their President's verbal mistakes and the most prominent of them is 'ecomini', said instead of 'economy', while speaking before that nation's parliament. The error has become an internet sensation with various workings of the mispronunciation transformed into songs. Mills was speaking before his nation's Parliament when he made the gaffe -

That incident elicited many jokes and remixed versions such as -

And, the much shorter -

But, despite the goodnatured songs, there has been much political tension in Ghana and Mills has been labeled a dull,"non performer". Nevertheless, the presence of such songs and a robust political discourse are good signs of freedom of speech - a key indicator of democracy. In neighboring Nigeria, such would possibly have been met with either arrests (as has been the case for political bloggers and journalists), detention, interrogation or accusations of treason. One would rather have a President that is considered dull and bungles his words that one that is considered dull and whose absence is creating unrest and a growing constitutional battle.

BRITAIN RETURNING LOOTED MILLIONS TO NIGERIA

noreply@blogger.com (SOLOMONSYDELLE) — Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:14:00 PST

British officials are working with Nigeria's Independent Corrupt Practices Commission (ICPC) to return £43 million illegally stolen and placed in British banks by certain Nigerian officials. This is not the first time that stolen monies have been returned to Nigeria. In fact, over $500 million was recovered from former dictator Sani Abacha's foreign accounts. Enrico Manfrini, a lawyer hired by the previous administration to track and recover Nigeria's stolen wealth, also achieved the return of $160 million, stolen by Abacha, from Jersey in 2003.[1] And by 2009, "the tally of recovered Abacha loot stood at about $2 billion."[2]

Consequently, when it comes to recovering such stolen monies, £43 million (N11.25 billion) is a mere "drop in the ocean when compared to the vastness of all of the looted wealth."[3] However, this move by Britain must be seen within the context of other intriguing factors as it is more than the simple and honorable return of stolen monies found in British controlled banks.

SIGNIFICANCE OF ICPC PARTNERSHIP
During what were considered the heydays of Nigeria's anti-corruption crusade, much was made of the Economic Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC or 'Commission') and its then chair, Nuhu Ribadu. However, with the 2008 removal of Ribadu from the EFCC's helm, doubts arose regarding the current administration's commitment to fighting Nigeria's endemic corruption problem. These doubts were soon solidified with the 2009 judgment in the James Ibori case. There, more than 170 corruption-related charges were dropped against the former governor who once offered a $15 billion bribe to avoid prosecution. The case scandalized many and generated serious allegations of purposeful bungling of the case by the current EFCC and its new chief, Farida Waziri.

As such, the decision to partner with the ICPC instead of the EFCC can be interpreted as a clear condemnation of the Commission. This lack of trust and confidence in the EFCC's capacity to handle anti-corruption cases is but one more indicator that the Yar'Adua administration, despite its claims otherwise, is beholden to its powerful and corrupt friends.

IMPROVEMENT FROM PREVIOUS BRITISH ATTITUDE
For years, foreign backs turned a blind eye to the source of the billions shuffled to their safekeeping by devious characters from around the world. British banks have particularly been complicit in the receipt of funds illegally acquired by far too many Nigerian criminals, both government officials and ordinary individuals. Britain's Financial Services Authority revealed that by 2001, at least $1.3 billion of stolen Nigerian money passed through 23 London financial institutions.[4] And, that money was tied to one person alone - Sani Abacha! This information caused much embarrassment for the British government which had previously frustrated efforts to find Nigeria's stolen monies hidden within its institutions.

The revelation spurred a more aggressive stance against receiving illegally obtained wealth. In light of this attitude change, Britain investigated the UK based assets of various Nigerian officials such as Joshua Dariye, DSP Alamieyeseigha and the previously mentioned James Ibori, to name a few. Dariye was ordered by a British High Court to return over £4 million to the Nigerian government, which eventually created a scandal of its own. In Ibori's case, it was determined that many of his assets were obtained with stolen funds and British authorities froze them. This case against him is still ongoing.

PRESSING CONCERNS
One can only wonder from which Nigerian person(s) the £43 million to be returned was obtained. Such information would prove rather enlightening and in the spirit of transparency, which is necessary in such corruption cases, British authorities should provide a detailed account of the monies and from whom it was obtained. The British government should provide this accounting because it is repatriating the money and also, because it is unlikely that the Nigerian government will do so.

The issue of transparency remains significant with regard to Nigeria and the monies it has retrieved from all over the globe. There is no single, easily accessible place where a detailed, up to date accounting of all recovered loot. In 2008, it was revealed that under Ribadu, the EFCC recovered $600 billion in stolen public funds. An online accounting of these and other recovered assets would go a long way in assuring concerned Nigerians that the billions retrieved have not simply ended back in the pockets of looters once again.

Additionally, there is the issue of Enrico Monfrini. Is he still working for the Nigerian government to retrieve stolen funds? If not, then why? Currently, Monfrini is working with the Haitian government (hired pre-earthquake) to recover monies stolen by that countries notorious dictator Jean-Claude "Baby Doc" Duvalier. While it is not impossible for Monfrini and his firm to work on more than one asset recover case at the same time, considering Nigeria's unfortunate history of looting and President Yar'Adua's questionable commitment to anti-corruption, one can only hope that Monfrini or someone else equally capable is still on the hunt for Nigeria's money.

Then of course, there is the great 'elephant in the room' of a question - does it make sense to return stolen money to the Nigerian government? It pains this writer to even broach this subject, but, it has unfortunately become unavoidable given the mounting questions many have raised about the fate of the money. Firstly, as noted above, there is a distinct lack of transparency with regard to the return of stolen monies. Nigerians remain in the dark as to what money has been returned, from whom and when. Nigeria's 'Punishment Problem' means that there continue to be little to no legal cases that citizens can turn to as an indicator of who has returned money. Secondly, Nigeria is presently experiencing a power vacuum with its President apparently sick and recovering in a Saudi hospital. The Vice President, Goodluck Jonathan, is technically in charge of the nation and he is not corruption-free as $13.5 million was seized from his wife and she was once the subject of a corruption investigation. This begs the question of what will happen to the repatriated funds upon arriving in the hands of Nigerian officials.

Nevertheless, despite these concerns, it is best that Britain return the money as it rightfully belongs to Nigeria. The Nigerian government can misplace that money and Britain has no control over that. It is the Nigerian people that are responsible for demanding that retrieved monies be preserved, preferably in a trust of some sort, and that information on these funds be readily accessible. Until that happens, Nigerians will continue to doubt their government's commitment to anti-corruption. And millions of women, men and children will continue to suffer the consequences of a government that fails to stem corruption - money intended for the greater good will make its way into the pockets of a small minority.

[1] - Peel, M., A Swamp Full Of Dollars:Pipelines & Paramilitaries at Nigeria's Oil Frontier, I.B. Tauris, 2009:122.
[2] - Ibid.
[3] - Blogger Anengiyefa tweeted the comment in response to a tweet from sharing the news about the announcement.
[4] - Peel, M., A Swamp Full Of Dollars:Pipelines & Paramilitaries at Nigeria's Oil Frontier, 122.

JOS - THE POWER OF TEXTS & POVERTY

noreply@blogger.com (SOLOMONSYDELLE) — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:33:00 PST

Cell phones have transformed Nigeria. It was previously too expensive to obtain a landline from the government owned NITEL, which lacked the capacity to service the growing population. Cellphones have thus become a more efficient and affordable means of communication, not to mention the fact that unlike landlines, they are mobile. Additionally, their texting functionality enables even cheaper communication across wide distances, making them a blessing for most. However, this blessing has proven to be a curse for the people of Jos who recently experienced another devastating round of religious violence that left over 300 dead.

RECENT RELIGIOUS VIOLENCE
According to the BBC, a series of text messages, some sent to Christians, others sent to Muslims, played a role in creating the recent Jos fighting that began on January 17th. One such message went as follows -

"War, war, war. Stand up... and defend yourselves. Kill before they kill you. Slaughter before they slaughter you. Dump them in a pit before they dump you."

Such an inflammatory message seemingly compelled violence in Jos, but much more than that was necessary to trigger the violence that in the days since has seen bodies found in wells, burnt beyond recognition. More than just text messages are the realities of poverty and the fight for resources in a region of Nigeria where religion is used to stoke fires and encourage intolerance. That was the case in November 2008 when political disagreements and manipulations soon took on a religious slant resulting in at least 300 deaths. This poverty and a growing lack of hope that is spreading across the country, is likely a contributing factor in the violence sparked by Islamic sects such as Boko Haram and Kato Kalo whose actions reveal the weakness of the state to prevent religious violence and protect or adequately provide for innocent citizens affected by the resulting chaos.

CONFOUNDED BY CONFUSION
Shortly after the last outbreak of violence in 2008, President Yar'Adua stated, via a spokesperson, that he was "on top of the situation having been fully briefed on the phone by the governor." he then summoned the governor for a discussion. Now that Yar'Adua is not around due to his illness and the power vacuum in Aso Rock, exactly who should be held accountable for the constant failures to prevent such violence from occurring and spreading. If the President cannot be held accountable for the unnecessary loss of life, who will be held accountable?

IMPROVE LIVING CONDITIONS TO STEM A REPEAT
What is beyond confusion is the fact that steps must be taken to improve living conditions for the residents of Jos and indeed citizens the nation over. From better healthcare to education which is struggling with Nigerians fleeing to the UK and elsewhere for the purpose of learning. There is a need for consistent electricity supply which will have an exponential impact on various industries and thus, lead to job creation.

Besides, the revelation that there are 10 million child beggars, predominantly in northern Nigeria, raises the stakes on the future viability of peace in areas like Jos. It is therefore imperative that all stakeholders - government, private organizations and individuals, remedy the poverty situation. If not, religion will continue to be used by political opportunists to divide the people and the results will be even worse death and destruction. And now, that a North African Al Qaeda group has publicly offered to "train Muslim Nigerians to fight against Nigerian Christians", the stakes are higher than ever.

UPDATE (02/07/10): The Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs has formally rejected the offer from the North African Al Qaeda group. Also, 108 suspects have been arraigned for their alleged part in contributing to the recent Jos violence. Finally, the Vice president, Goodluck Jonathan, set up a committee to review the causes of the violence and create a map for lasting peace.

Related Articles of Interest:
- Religious & Political Violence in Jos
- Nigeria - List of Intolerant Nations
- Nigeria's 10MN Child Beggars

UZOMA OKERE WON N100 MN (VIDEO)

noreply@blogger.com (SOLOMONSYDELLE) — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:26:00 PST

Uzoma Okere is the young Nigerian lady whose assault by military officers became a viral video that raised the ire of many. In November 2008, a military convoy belonging to Rear Adm. Arogundade overreacted when Okere's Mitsubishi Colt did not move out of their way. Arogundade's ratings beat Okere mercilessly beating with gun butts and horsewhips in the street. A brave citizen recorded the incident and put it on the internet, exposing Arogundade, and other officials who take for granted that they need to share the streets with civilians and use violence against innocents.

The incident spurred the Lagos State governor to make illegal traditional convoys which rush through the streets of Lagos which horns blaring, with little regard for anyone in their way. Okere took advantage of the free legal services provided by Lagos State government and sued Rear Admiral Arogundade and his military ratings for assault and battery. After much legal delay and wrangling, a judgment was finally issued in the Okere case and she won a judgment of N100 MN which is to be paid to her, and a fellow plaintiff, by Arogundade, the Nigerian Navy and the four ratings who carried out the attack.

When reading the 37-page judgment, Justice Opeyemi Oke referred to the acts of the navy officers as "barbaric" and stated that the men involved showed a disrespect for women and shouuld undergo psychiatric observation. Specifically,

"These ratings can only be described as barbarians in uniforms as they have shown by this incident that they have no respect for womanhood dragging a woman on the road and partially getting her naked. They have no fear of God at all ... It is highly shameful and unimaginable that such could happen in this 21st Century in a civilized society and democratic one. It should therefore be condemned in very strong language. The naval ratings have disgraced the uniform they wear as officers of the Nigerian Navy. They are therefore a disgrace to the whole nation. The rebranding gospel should therefore be commenced with this group of officers."

The judgment also requires a public apology to Ms. Okere in at least 4 print and television outlets within one month of the decision.

Immediately after the announcement, the defendant's lawyer told news cameras that it would appeal, thereby dragging the already sullied reputation of the military through the mud. The better option for the swift resolution of this matter would be to pay up, issue an apology, announce that the entire military will undergo training/courses on how to better relate to civilians and quietly allow the dust to settle. Unfortunately, this is Nigeria, the land of the Big Man, where anyone with power or influence can slap someone and get away with it and even steal millions and have 170 counts of fraud dismissed with the aid of the nation's Attorney General. Thus, this writer's hopes are slim that the Navy will take the high road and do what is right. Hopefully, no matter what happens, this case sets the precedent that no matter one's power, be it economic or military, the flagrant abuse of another human being will not be tolerated by Nigeria's courts. The case also cements the crucial role courts continue to play on the road to the entrenchment of true democracy in Nigeria. And, that is definitely a sign of progress.

Hattip to reader, Webround, for sharing this clip with me.

From the Archives:
- When Nigeria's Military Attack Citizens
- Confronting A Culture of Brutality and Injustice
- Chinyere Igwe: Reflective Of A Bigger Nigerian Issue
- Nigeria's New Kingmakers
- Turning Away from Democracy
- Nigerian Blogger Arrested!!!
- Channels TV Shut Down By Yar'Adua
- Suppression In A Democratic Regime

ARE NIGERIANS TOO TOUGH ON YAR'ADUA?

noreply@blogger.com (SOLOMONSYDELLE) — Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:48:00 PST

During a recent conversation, I was informed by a fellow Nigerian that some of us Nigerians are far too critical of President Yar'Adua. According to my friend, most Nigerians have never given him a chance to do anything right and have little compassion for the difficulties Yar'Adua must face as President of a nation with many problems and many interested in preventing solutions.

After listening to the well argued sentiment of my friend, I had to take some time to consider whether I am too harsh on President Yar'Adua. That lasted only a few seconds, however. I was quickly reminded of many incidents from the current administration that lessened any possible guilt on my part.

When Yar'Adua came to power he took some incredible steps that will forever distinguish him from previous heads of State. He disclosed his assets, and reached out to militants in the Niger Delta. Unlike other heavy handed leaders, Yar'Adua made a point of ensuring that the judicial reviews of most of the flawed and fraudulent election results occurred without any Presidential influence. Unfortunately, Yar'Adua's mysterious health ailments, random disappearances, the fact that many suspected/shown to have stolen from public coffers do not face legal procedures, missteps like sending former dictator Babangida as a national envoy to Guinea (where the military junta has now opted to ignore the need for democracy) and much more, has diminished much of the goodwill he had earlier in his term.

While I can agree that it is not easy being president of any nation, it would be foolhardy to ignore that most presidents, for whatever their reasons, actively seek out the position. As such, they should be fully aware of the consequences of that decision and the pressures that will come to bear. By all accounts, Yar'Adua was hand selected by former President Obasanjo to succeed as President and Yar'Adua campaigned diligently for the position. Consequently, I unfortunately have a hard time feeling sorry for him.

I once wrote a post title "Nigeria, Be Careful What You Wish For" in which I cautioned that a lot of the pressure many Nigerians had placed on Yar'Adua regarding his ability to be an effective leader, likely influenced his violent reaction in 2008 when bloggers Asiwe and Elendu were arrested, Channels TV was shut down and Leadership's staff were arrested and later sued (thankfully, the court threw out the President's case). Although I can understand that when a mere mortal feels threatened, he/she is capable of reacting irrationally and violently, I find it hard to dismiss the aggressively negative actions of this administration with regard to civil liberties to a "He felt threatened" analysis. Again, President Yar'Adua knew exactly what he was getting into and notwithstanding the pressures he faces, he is under a constitutional obligation to not violate the freedoms guaranteed to citizens and journalists.

And now that the President has officially been away from Nigeria for over 30 days - it is simply a travesty that a nation and its people are forced to go without a President on seat for such a considerable period of time.Still, President Yar'Adua who fashioned himself and his administration as the champion of the rule of law, has failed to follow the Constitution and handover temporary power to the Vice President. Instead, a President that has not been seen or heard publicly in over a month, is picking a Chief justice and citizens are not expected to question, criticize or outright condemn such clearly unethical actions that in any sane nation would be illegal and unconstitutional. Maybe some Nigerians are too tough on Yar'Adua, but in all fairness, much more Nigerians need to get tougher!

Yes, the job of President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria is not an enviable position, unless one is simply interested in lining their pockets. But, the job of President comes with much responsibility and anyone in that position must expect his or her actions and inactions to be carefully scrutinized and publicly questioned. Emotions and sentiments have little to do with it.

From The Archives:
- Much Ado Over a Nickname?
- Of Pilgrimage, Hajj & Nigerians
- Nigeria, Be Careful What You Wish For
- Suppression In A Democratic Regime
- Turning Away From From 'Democracy'

OJO MADUEKWE ON BBC'S HARDTALK (FULL VIDEO)

noreply@blogger.com (SOLOMONSYDELLE) — Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:27:00 PST

Ojo Maduekwe is Nigeria's Minister of Foreign Affairs. Like other Nigerian government officials who have the fortune/misfortune of an audience, he can be very interesting to listen to. Maduekwe is notorious for publicly stating that the unfortunate 'child witches of Akwa Ibom' were frauds, paid to put on a show. He once famously and incredulously claimed that there were no homosexuals in Nigeria, an assertion that only one man has ever been able to make in the recent past - Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. And, right before the Abdulmutallab suicide bomb attempt that has created a diplomatic problem for Nigeria, Ojo Maduekwe defended the N2.7 billion he spent solely on travel by claiming Nigeria needed the "visibility" that his many foreign trips afforded the nation.

And now, in an apparent quest to live up to his new nickname,"Mr. Visibility", Ojo Maduekwe is taking to the airwaves to do some damage control almost a month since Abdulmutallab's attempt, Nigeria's inclusion on the "Terror Prone" countries list and over 2 months since Nigeria's President was last seen alive. Specifically, Mr. Visibility was interviewed on BBC's Hardtalk.

DID MR. VISIBILITY DO MORE HARM THAN GOOD?
It must be said that during scandals of international proportion, a swift offensive response is always the best defense. Abdulmutallab's suicide bomb attempt occurred on December 25th, 2009. Nigeria was publicly placed on the "Terror Prone" list ten days later on January 3rd. As the Foreign Minister, and considering the President's 'absence', Maduekwe would have done well to start giving interviews earlier than mid-January. After all, Dora Akunyili, Nigeria's Minister of Information was on many a show, expressing her disappointment and frustration, sometimes a little too forcefully, but clearly nonetheless. Yet, it is a good thing that finally, a high ranking official sat down to answer questions about what exactly, if anything, is going on in Nigeria's hallways of power. It is regrettable that just like his boss, he chose to give that first long interview to a foreign news outlet - a significant miscalculation that should not be easily forgiven.

"Without being immodest about it, when this President chose ... his Foreign Minister, he chose a Minister who has had considerable experience in government. Ten years, consistently. This is my third outing as a minister. So the important thing is to understand the President's policy, his vision, his goals...And he believes this Foreign Minister understands what those visions are..."

- Ojo Maduekwe on BBC Hardtalk (January 21, 2010).

Although Maduekwe was able to dodge a few direct questions, he did not do as well as he should have considering the serious situation Nigeria and its citizens are presently in. Admitting that he is yet to speak with President Yar'Adua, who many believe is no longer alive despite a phone interview with him, was the death knell that discredited everything else he had to offer. No matter what Maduekwe thinks and/or wants the viewing audience to think, a Minister cannot replace a President, not even if their brains are synced to each other. Maduekwe's proclamation that he knows the wishes of Nigeria's missing President, despite said President's absence and lack of communication, came across as aloof, inexperienced and pompous.

"The more dignifying thing to do is to ... ensure that his absence is not, in any way, putting the momentum of government's activities at a low ebb..."

- Ojo Maduekwe on BBC Hardtalk (January 21, 2010).

Maduekwe's attempt to deflect questions on the lack of transparency regarding Yar'Adua's condition was infantile. His apparent conviction that the President's disappearance and lack of communication was "not unusual in history" illustrate that he no longer is suited for any form of public office. It is unacceptable to claim that one is doing better than before when one is doing miserably and that simply because one is doing better than before, they should not be expected to do more. These basic tenets go for Nigeria, its president, its government and mouthpieces, as well.

When the interviewer attacked with a statement that there was a failure of intelligence in Nigeria with regard to Abdulmutallab, Maduekwe failed miserably. There was no need for the long winded response about "collective responsibility" on his part. A simple answer pointing out that Abdulmutallab was introduced to radical Islamic thought in the United Kingdom and specifically at the United College of London, an institution very familiar to the London-headquartered BBC and many of its viewers would have sufficed. Adding to that, the fact that Abdulmutallab was trained in Yemen by terrorists released from Guantanamo Bay by US former President George W. Bush would have been enough to pivot from such a loaded and biased question. Plus, a comment about how American officials had information on the matter that they did not share with Nigeria would have been a crucial tool to create a diversion in the line of questioning by illustrating that Nigeria, America's ally, was erroneously left out of the loop. Maduekwe could have thrown in the fact that in the last few years many admitted and captured terrorists were countrymen of the interviewer and many of his British peers, not Nigerian. He did, however, note that the airport in Amsterdam failed to use adequate devices that would have caught Abdulmutallab's bomb-laced knickers.

Despite all this, Maduekwe did emit a quotable notable - "facts are sacred, opinions are free." One can only hope he will remember that statement as it will undoubtedly haunt him. But, his comment that he would not have encouraged President Yar'Adua to discuss the diplomatic problems with his counterpart in the White House is frankly disturbing. That he is a minister with at least 10 years experience in government and that he is currently a Foreign Minister fuels the 'lack of vision'-argument that President Yar'Adua has been consistently accused of. Diplomacy and the very history Maduekwe oft quoted, has procedures and precedent for situations such as when a Nigerian citizen was found to be a terrorist. Diplomacy requires that President Yar'Adua communicate immediately with the American President to convince him/her that Nigeria's President, not a Vice President (with little executive power) or a Minister (no matter how 'experienced') takes the matter of terrorism seriously and will work tirelessly as a partner in investigating and preventing a possible repeat. But, alas, Nigeria's President remains absent during these times of confusion and so, the Minister of Information can make statements that only serve to deepen the growing diplomatic rift. And, the Minister of Foreign Affairs appears before the foreign press and does not do as well as he should have.

From the Archives:
- Nigeria's President Absent During Crisis
- Nigeria Placed on "Terror Prone" List
- African Travel Post Abdulmutallab
- A Nigerian Terrorist & A People's Passivity
- 'Is Nigeria A Breeding Ground For Terrorism' (May 2007)
- America Speaks...Does Nigeria Respond?
- How to Shoot Yourself in the Foot With Al Qaeda
- More Yar'Adua Health Uncertainty
- Yar'Adua Health, Resignation & Nigerian Cost
- Yar'Adua And The Continuing Heath Issue
- The Consequences of Yar'Adua's Mysterious Health

If you enjoyed this article, please use the tools below to DIGG it, share this post on your favorite social networking site and/or bookmark it. Thank you.

IBORI: CASE DISMISSED

noreply@blogger.com (SOLOMONSYDELLE) — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:23:00 PST

James Ibori is a former governor of one of Nigeria's oil rich states, Delta State. In 2007, British authorities froze his British assets in a case that is still ongoing, on suspicion that he "laundered at least 30 million through that country between 2005 and ... 2007."* Ibori also faced a list of 170 charges involving corruption and fraud in Nigeria and reports soon emerged that he bribed former anti-corruption czar, Nuhu Ribadu, to the tune of $15 billion. Despite all this, the Federal High Court in Asaba granted Ibori a wonderful present to end 2009 as the 170 charges against him were dropped.

The judge in the case, Marcel Awokulehin, held that the Economic & Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) failed to prove with sufficient evidence that Ibori was in fact guilty of the laundering and corruption charges. Specifically, Justice Awokulehin stated,

"There is no witness statement ... from any of the EFCC officers who purportedly investigated. Furthermore, there is no interim or final report of the investigations carried out by the EFCC which is a basic requirement in proof of criminal trials."

The EFCC spokesperson, Femi Babafemi, responded to the decision by stating that the Commission was not surprised by the verdict and that it would appeal.

"[W]e have instructed our lawyers to immediately file an appeal against Justice Awokulehin’s judgement at a higher court...This kind of judgement if not challenged is capable of deepening the menace of corruption in our country rather than contributing in any way to the cause of justice which is the basis of sustaining our democratic governance.”

REACTIONS
Many have questioned the acquittal, such as the Delta State Elders, Leaders and Stakeholders Forum who announced that the decision was "dangerous" and could encourage further corruption.The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) called the decision a "a travesty of justice and let down of the millions of victims of high level official corruption in the country." The group further criticized the court for failing to at least require Ibori to provide a credible explanation for how he amassed his wealth while a governor, something the group claimed was possible under Nigerian laws, the UN Convention Against Corruption and the African Union Convention on Preventing and Combating Corruption.

However, some Nigerian lawyers such as Emmanuel Majebi believed that justice prevailed because Ibori was tried and condemned in the court of public opinion, something that will undoubtedly not hold up in a court.

NIGERIA'S PUNISHMENT PROBLEM EXEMPLIFIED?
There is no question that the overwhelming belief is that any Nigerian with enough money and the right connections can escape even the most gruesome offenses. In Ibori's case, he has had the support of the present administration in the form of President Yar'Adua and Attorney general of the Federation, Michael Aondoakaa. From the very beginning, Aondoakaa sabotaged the EFCC's domestic case against Ibori, but he equally traveled on behalf of Ibori to detract from the case against him in the U.K. As such, there is little surprise at the outcome of this case thus far.

On December 18th, 2007, I stated,

"The Ibori case is the perfect opportunity for Nigeria to prove that it is tough on crime. The legal system should be allowed to deal with this case with little to no intervention from Aondoakaa, Yar'Adua or their 'masters'. If that happens, this case will set the example for others who have stolen money or used their positions to enrich themselves and will make them willing to cooperate with authorities."

Alas, although it is very possible that the EFCC failed to present a strong enough case, almost 2 years to the date of the above warning, the Ibori case allies has further solidified the fact that Nigeria has a serious Punishment Problem. The only question that remains is whether as a collective, Nigerians will continue to watch as their nation is controlled by unscrupulous men and their peers who take directly from the mouths of the people to fuel their already full bellies and bank accounts.

**************
IBORI POLL

**************

* - Peel, M., A Swamp Full Of Dollars:Pipelines & Paramilitaries at Nigeria's Oil Frontier, I.B. Tauris, 2009:113-4.

Hattip to the Grandiose Parlor blog

From The Archives:
- EFCC Wants Death Penalty For Corrupt
- Ibori, The EFCC & The Future of Nigeria's Anti-Corruption Crusade
- RIP EFCC

- An EFCC Revival?
- Nigeria's Persisting Punishment Problem
- Nigeria's Punishment Problem
- Crime & Punishment: The Nigerian Edition

HAITI: NIGERIA NEEDS TO RESPOND

noreply@blogger.com (SOLOMONSYDELLE) — Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:50:00 PST

By now, most people are aware of the horrible earthquake that happened in Haiti on January 12th. It registered as the strongest earthquake on that island nation in 200 years and the death toll will likely be very high. Many individuals around the world have contributed in one way or another, as have large organizations and countries to the recovery effort, trying to rescue and assist as many as possible. Currently, the African governments of Gabon, Ghana, Benin, Liberia Morocco, Rwanda and South Africa have pledged/donated money ranging from $50,000 to $1 million. Senegal's government has gone a step further of offering free land parcels and/or accommodation to Haitians who opt to repatriate and settle there. As more African countries will undoubtedly join in the global chorus to assist the Haitian people, the Nigerian government must use this opportunity to show kindness to Haiti.

Source: NECN

A HISTORY OF HELPING THE DIASPORA
Today, Nigeria is unfortunately known for its corrupt government, international organizations like Siemens which have gone down for bribing Nigerian officials, online scammers and most recently Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab's suicide bomb attempt. However, Nigeria also has a historical reputation for using its weight to assist fellow Africans and those of African-heritage that might be in need. Nigeria once helped out Guyana's civil service to make its payroll. Nigeria contributed a gift via Ike Nwachukwu to Howard University - a prestigious, predominantly black institution in Washington, DC. Nigeria even committed $1 million in the wake of the Hurricane Katrina disaster that destroyed New Orleans. Nigeria has consistently and continuously committed military assistance to war torn parts of the continent from Sierra Leone to Darfur. Nigeria housed many Liberians who sought refuge during that nation's civil war. And, Nigeria played an integral part in gaining autonomy for black Zimbabweans and South Africans, whose ANC party received donations from Nigerian workers for many years in an effort to get that country to where it is today. Furthermore, Nigeria's Technical Assistance Corps has been and continues to be a means by which the nation sends medical staff to the diaspora such as the Commonwealth of Dominica. Nigeria has and continues to have a long history of interceding when necessary to help those in the African diaspora.

WHY THE DELAYED RESPONSE TO HAITI?
Nigeria is burdened with the confusion of a sick and absent president, a Vice President incapable of taking executive actions but relegated to hosting winners of reality shows and legislators that continue to say that their "hands are tied" on various sensitive matters. And, currently, many continue to question whether the President is actually alive or dead. Clearly, Nigeria and its people are at a point of bewildering political disorder. Nigeria's President Yar'Adua is also the chairman of the West African organization - ECOWAS, which is also yet to respond to the devastation in Haiti.

Nevertheless, there is still time for the Nigerian government to illustrate the leadership Nigeria has previously shown and help Haiti. So, while Nigeria's government is yet to issue an official response and/or commit either financial or human assistance, given its previous leadership on issues concerning the Diaspora, one hopes that a response is forthcoming.

WHY NIGERIA MUST HELP HAITI
It is no secret that Nigeria's influence and impact within the West African region has diminished over the last few years. While the previous administration was able to diplomatically squash a military coup in neighboring Sao Tome & Principe, the current administration experienced a compromising embarrassment with regard to the military junta in Guinea. President Yar'Adua's envoy, former military dictator Ibrahim Babangida, was sent to convey that the coup was unacceptable, but returned with nothing but praises for the Guinean military junta. And, now, with the placement of Nigeria on a list of "Terror Prone" countries, it seems that Nigeria's government and in fact the nation's relevance and power, despite its oil and historical influence is being challenged.

Although assisting Haiti would be a humanitarian effort, it would display a seriousness by the current administration to keeping in line with Nigeria's grand history of acting in the interest of the Diaspora. Haitians are the descendants of Africans (most likely Nigerians) sold into slavery, as such their lineage links to the continent and specifically to Nigeria and other West African countries. It is only natural for Nigeria to act charitably towards Haitians. Furthermore, caring for others and assisting them is an attribute ingrained in Nigerian culture, regardless of tribe - the Nigerian government should be able to take advantage of that cultural aspect and send some form of assistance to the people of Haiti quickly. There are presently Nigerian police officers in Haiti, as part of a UN peacekeeping effort and they thankfully all survived the earthquake.

Many will read this and immediately note that the Nigerian government is yet to do right by its own people considering the fact that many Nigerians live on less than $2 a day,the failure to achieve a promise of higher power generation rates and much more. While all that might be true, being charitable is not for the very rich alone, as evidenced by the many in Nigeria and around the world who sacrifice what little they have for others. Besides, Nigerians have always been able to do incredible things with little. If nothing more, the Nigerian government should consider that assisting Haiti would go a long way in rebuilding Nigeria's image especially given the fallout from Abdulmutallab's suicide bomb attempt. And, considering that Nigeria is allegedly pursuing rebranding its image, such an act would provide exponential benefits. But, most importantly, such an act, no matter how small, would be helpful to Haiti - an act that will likely never be forgotten. Let it not be forgotten that Haiti defeated the French and became the first black nation to achieve independence. And, in this year, when Nigeria will celebrate 50 years of independence, such generosity and leadership could be an essential part of setting the tone for the next 50 years for Nigerians and the Nigerian government - helping a nation that shed blood to set the path of independence for all Africans everywhere.

Regardless of where you are from, please take the time to say a prayer for Haiti. Survivors are still being found but that nation has experienced a devastating catastrophe that requires assistance, as well. So, if you are in a position to give money, please do so by contacting a reputable organization. Or, you can donate food, clothing and other items at the Haitian embassy where you live (if one is available). Also, you can click on the Bloggers Unite image for more information.

UPDATE: There are Nigerian organizations at home and abroad that are making it easier for Nigerians and others to support relief efforts in Haiti. The Nigeria Global Diaspora Committee is not affiliated with the Nigerian government and is apparently legitimate. It is actually among a list of many groups doing what they can to make a difference. Hattip to Omotade at Tade's Joint.
UPDATE (01/20): Lagos State, in conjunction with Nigerian Eagle, are working to raise funds for the Haitian relief effort. Lagos State government has donated $1 million on behalf of the citizens of that State.
UPDATE (01/21): The Nigerian Senate observed a minute of silence in respect for all Haitians who lost their lives in the earthquake. Nigeria's government donated $1 million to the Haitian effort with each of the antion's 36 Senators giving an additional $20,000.

THE LIGHTER SIDE OF A TERRORIST'S ACT

noreply@blogger.com (SOLOMONSYDELLE) — Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:54:00 PST

In 2003, Nigerians were deemed the "Happiest People in the World", a title they happily accepted and have held onto ever since. Keeping in line with that, it seems Nigerians are using comedy to deal with the fallout from Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab terrorist attempt on Christmas Day, 2009.

The following is a tongue in cheek reflection on what Nigerian travelers will go through with security to travel to the United States.

And another one using the Blackberry -

And, another video clip created by Gbenga Sesan uses Hitler to question the rationality of Nigeria's inclusion on the "Terror Prone" list by the U.S., and mention some positive aspects about Nigeria and Nigerians.

At some point, all people try to use comedy to deal with their issues. Clearly, Nigerians are no exception.

What do you think about the clips and picture above? Do you find them funny? Or, do you think they are inappropriate given the serious issues they involve? Please share your thoughts in the comment section.

If you enjoyed this article, please use the tools below to share this post on your favorite social networking site and/or bookmark it. Thank you.

IS YAR'ADUA BRAIN DAMAGED OR NOT?

noreply@blogger.com (SOLOMONSYDELLE) — Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:16:00 PST

For 7 weeks, Nigerians had no idea where their president was. They did not even know whether he was alive or dead. After being rushed to Saudi Arabia for emergency care, Nigerian officials could only give flimsy reassurances as to the well being of President Yar'Adua, leading to calls for his resignation and many rumors. Amidst the resulting confusion, a NEXT article asserted that the President was "brain damaged" thus raising the Constitutional matter of whether the President should be deemed permanently unfit to lead and be replaced by the Vice President. Two days after that report, however, President Yar'Adua gave a 3-minute telephone interview to the BBC Hausa service to clarify that he is not dead and plans to resume his duties. Reacting to the interview, the NEXT news organization chose to stand by its original article about the President's brain damage. This is a decision that puts the journalists in the crosshairs of Yar'Adua and his sometimes violent handlers. In the past, Yar'Adua has reacted harshly to discussions of his health, begging the question of whether this current situation could lead to a repeat of the 2008 arrests and unlawful detentions carried out by the administration. But above all else, the main issue remains - Is the President brain damaged or not?

YAR'ADUA VS. NEXT NEWS
In the BBC interview, a weak sounding Yar'Adua thanked citizens for their prayers, wished the national football team luck at the ongoing Africa Cup of Nations and hoped that his treatments will produce "tremendous progress, which will allow me to get back home..." Editors at NEXT directly challenged the interview with an article entitled "A man claiming to be Yar'Adua speaks to the BBC". In it, they stated,

"we stand by our story, to wit: we have it on good authority that the president has suffered brain damage and other impairments, and is no longer able to effectively discharge the office of president. Anyone who claims we are wrong should please produce our president, so that he can speak to us directly as Nigerians, and not via an audio clip through a foreign news organization."

NEXT went on to assert that it is willing to send its correspondents to verify that the President is indeed well enough to speak and would immediately do so if given the green light by the Executive office.
The significance of this challenge cannot be lost on observers of the current political debacle in Nigeria. The Nigerian Constitution provides for the removal of the President if the Federal Executive Council (FEC) determines that the President is permanently incapable of satisfying his duties. Hence, the report that Yar'Adua was brain damaged, and the growing reception it received from the Nigerian public, likely forced the hand of Yar'Adua and his handlers to try and convince citizens that he is still capable of being President. It is disappointing that this is the news that forced the President out of 'hiding' because the ensuing international problem of Nigeria being placed on a list of "Terror Prone" countries should have been the more appropriate impetus needed to force Yar'Adua to speak.

THE BBC HAUSA SERVICE ANGLE
Additionally, the decision to reveal himself solely to the BBC Hausa service was not just poor but indelicate. This is not the first time that Yar'Adua has made this mistake as the first time was declared dead during the 2007 presidential campaign, he opted to give an interview to the BBC Hausa service as well. However, doing so only fuels tribal anger, concerns and distrust. It is of no consequence that the BBC Hausa radio service primarily caters to Nigeria's Hausa speakers, as Hausa is not the official language of Nigeria. Yar'Adua should at least have given an interview on film to the Nigerian Television Authority or any of the other news organizations in the country. The choice to give a foreign outlet this key interview also shows a complete disrespect for Nigerian news outlets and Nigerians themselves who deserve to have their President speak to them directly and not via foreign outlets.

SUPPRESSION IN A 'DEMOCRATIC REGIME', AGAIN?
In 2008, the Yar'Adua administration, which had lauded itself as being focused on the 'rule of law', opted for draconian measures in addressing concerns over the President's health and leadership ability. Although he had publicly committed himself to selflessly serving the people, Yar'Adua's personal intelligence unit, the SSS, now rebranded as the DSS, arrested and unlawfully detained 2 political bloggers. In reaction to an inaccurate news report that he would step down on account of health problems, Yar'Adua's SSS shut down Channels TV and temporarily withdrew its broadcast license. The administration also had journalists from Leadership Newspaper arrested over another health related report. These are just some of the more glaring acts of suppression carried out by the current administration.

Given these overreactions to a frank discourse on the President, one can only wonder what the result of NEXT's challenge will be. It will be interesting to see if Yar'Adua and the SSS will once again resort to draconian measures in trying to stem NEXT and its stories on Yar'Adua's capacity to be President. What is certain is the fact that it is time for the National Assembly to pass the Freedom of Information bill that Nigerians have been waiting for as it would give more access to basic information that should be the right of every citizen especially in regard to the President and other officials.

Whatever the fallout may be as a result of NEXT's challenge, President Yar'Adua and his handlers would do well to remember something important. Nigerians are a passionate people, and that passion should be tapped into, not repressed, if Nigeria is to truly accomplish the feats its leaders have declared that it will. Clamping down on free speech and expression is not the way lead Nigeria. Consequently, this administration should not bother to 'deal' with anyone as a result of its failures to take appropriate steps at the appropriate time during the Presidents absence. Instead, the President should simply produce concrete evidence (i.e. not audio evidence) that he is capable of fulfilling his duties and he should return to Nigeria immediately to recover fully from whatever ailments he was treated for. His presence in Nigeria might lower the rhetoric calling for his resignation, no matter how fragile he might be. In fact, him revealing himself in a fragile state would be a perfect opportunity to turn the discussion to his side if done properly and with considerable humility. Nigerians would love nothing more than a concrete reason to pray even harder for their frail president if he gave them a chance. Such a move would require a savviness that this President is yet to show. Hopefully it is not too late to rectify mistakes and dampen the confusion created by Yar'Adua's absence and the NEXT article.

* The 'Missing' Poster was borrowed from N.I.M.M.O.'s site.

From The Archives:
- Nigeria's President Absent During Crisis
- More Yar'Adua Health Uncertainty
- Yar'Adua Health, Resignation & Nigerian Cost
- Suppression In A Democratic Regime
- Yar'Adua And The Continuing Heath Issue
- The Consequences of Yar'Adua's Mysterious Health
- Nigerian Blogger Arrested!!!
- Channels TV Shut Down By Yar'Adua
- Nigeria, Be Careful What You Wish For

If you enjoyed this article, please use the tools below to DIGG it, share this post on your favorite social networking site and/or bookmark it. Thank you.

NIGERIAN STUDENTS SPEND N246 BN IN U.K.

noreply@blogger.com (SOLOMONSYDELLE) — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 21:44:00 PST

For decades, Nigerians have traveled to the United Kingdom to receive their education. As far back as the colonial era, young Nigerians were shipped abroad to study and soon returned to teach others or apply their education in the country. Nigeria's education system soon became a shining star on the African continent, with students coming from as far away as Asia and the Caribbean to take advantage of the nation's institutions. Over time, however, Nigerian schools began to lose their shine and those with the resources opted for educations anywhere other than Nigeria. And now, according to Business Day Online, Nigerian money fuels the UK education sector to the tune of N246 billion.

"United Kingdom has become a preferred destination for most Nigerian students seeking education following no clear cut government policy and subsequent rot in the sector."

Nigerian students are extremely coveted by the English educational system because they not only bring in billions, but the students apparently do very well, meaning very good business for the U.K. which sells its educational system not just in Nigeria, but across the world. Companies like Global Education Study Centres make a considerable profit packaging and selling education in the U.K. to weary Nigerians simply seeking to educate their children in a reliable system.

According to statistics from the British Council, since 2002, the number of Nigerians being educated in the UK increased by over 75%. That number was generated in 2006 and so it can be expected that the percentage is higher given the continued dilapidation of the Nigerian education system. In a 2007-2008 list of countries sending students to the U.K., Nigeria ranked 8th. But, as parents rush to send their children to the U.K., the recent incident with Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab revealed that young Muslim men are being radicalized in English schools, an issue no parent can ignore.

It is beyond question that Nigeria would be much better off if that N246 billion that was spent in the US had been spent, efficiently, in Nigeria itself. However, the question remains - what will happen to Nigeria's educational system? Already, the nation was informed that 23mn of its youths are unemployable thus complicating matters further. Thankfully there are private institutions picking up the slack but what of those who cannot afford those schools? Will they simply go without a reasonable education? And, if so, what does that say of Nigeria today and tomorrow?

What do you think about the increased number of Nigerian students studying abroad?

Hattip to Dr. U for sending this news story for consideration.

From The Archives:
- 23mn Of Nigeria's Youth Are Unemployable
- Nigeria's 10MN Child Beggars

If you enjoyed this article, please use the tools below to DIGG it, share this post on your favorite social networking site and/or bookmark it. Thank you.

SOUND SULTAN - 2010

noreply@blogger.com (SOLOMONSYDELLE) — Thu, 07 Jan 2010 21:44:00 PST

This is 2010, by Sound Sultan. Sound Sultan has been featured before at Nigerian Curiosity for his politically conscious music. With this tune, 2010, he calls for Nigerians to "Rise Up" and demand electricity, using the well recognized "LightUpNaija" call.

"We've been living in the darkness for too long."

In my opinion, it is definitely time for the people to take more control of what happens in their own country and stop allowing a small minority, be it scammers, violent criminals or corrupt and inept officials, to determine an entire people's fate. Furthermore, considering the fact that the current administration promised the generation of 6000MW by December 2009, a promise the administration and President failed to accomplish, it is definitely time to for Nigerians to hold their officials accountable for these glaring failures. The upcoming elections of 2011 will give Nigerians an opportunity to elect officials that will be held accountable if they fail to perform as expected.

So, without further ado, enjoy Sound Sultan's 2010 featuring MI.

"2010 don come"

NIGERIA'S PRESIDENT ABSENT DURING CRISIS

noreply@blogger.com (SOLOMONSYDELLE) — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 21:26:00 PST

Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab became a household name on Christmas Day, 2009 when he attempted to explode a plane carrying 278 people to Detroit, MI. Since then, there has been considerable fallout for Nigerian and non-Nigerian travelers the world over. From long security lines, to extra scrutiny for Nigerians traveling into the United States and other countries. And, Nigeria was recently placed on a list of "Terror Prone" countries, putting it in far too close proximity with countries on the State Sponsors of Terrorism list - Cuba, Iran, Sudan and Syria. During the days that have passed, the reaction from Nigerian authorities has been less than organized and far from effective. But, even more disturbing is the fact that Nigeria's President Yar'Adua, has been not just silent, but entirely absent from the resulting discourse and activity. This begs the question - Where is Nigeria's President during this time of incredible diplomatic crisis?

YAR'ADUA'S HEALTH ISSUES
Even before he became President, Yar'Adua was known to be a sick politician. While governor of Katsina State, it was believed that he had a kidney condition, but that information was, and still has, never been officially confirmed. As President, Yar'Adua made several impromptu medical trips to Germany and Saudi Arabia. He even failed to attend a scheduled diplomatic trip to meet with Brazil's President in 2008 due to an apparent health emergency. Public discussion of his health resulted in the unlawful arrest of bloggers and journalists, and even the temporary shut down of a local independent news channel. The irony of these actions is significant because Yar'Adua came to power touting the importance of the "rule of law" and, he became President in the first successful transition of one democratic government to another in modern Nigerian history.

Although he had once been criticized for leaving the country impromptu and not following Constitutional requirements to leave the Vice President in power, all be it temporarily, on November 23rd, Yar'Adua was again rushed to Saudi Arabia without following protocols. And, once again, Nigerians were not informed when he would return. Foreign media outlets soon began to report that the President suffered a heart condition, in addition to his rumored kidney problem. Despite calls for his resignation, as at the date of publication of this article, Yar'Adua has been away and not seen or directly heard from for exactly 6 weeks and 3 days. That is a total of 44 days, costing N30 million* and counting.

A LEADERSHIP VACUUM DURING A DIPLOMATIC CRISIS
In the days after the 9/11 terrorist attack, Saudi officials of all kinds, from Princes to diplomats, were on multiple international networks working hard to deflect the negative attention the kingdom and its royals were receiving. As more details of the 9/11 suicide terrorists emerged, Saudi Arabia took steps to let the world know that it was cooperating with American authorities in the investigation and hunt for those connected to the tragedy.

Unlike Saudi Arabia's prompt handling of its international image and public message after 9/11, only a few Nigerian officials initially spoke publicly about the event. Instead, the various heads of responsible agencies and other authorities are busy playing the blame game, but they have no boss - no President - to require and demand that key steps be taken to address the growing diplomatic consequences of Abdulmutallab's terrorist attempt. The Vice President has taken executive action in instructing Nigerian officials to work with American authorities following the terrorist attempt. However, he is yet to follow the necessary steps to be officially declared acting President and apparently, he is loathe to do so.

Although a formal statement was issued on behalf of the federal government, it was not until Nigeria's inclusion on the "Terror Prone" countries list that authorities began to react with vigor. Nigeria's Minister of Information and national rebranding manager, Dora Akunyili, publicly exclaimed that the list was "discriminating" against Nigerian nationals and Nigeria's Senators expressed that they were "unhappy" with the list but would not do anything about it until they return from their vacation.

Alas, it is little surprise that Nigeria failed to launch an adequate offensive in the days since the 'knicker bomber' incident. And so, while Nigerians endure embarrassing treatment at airports the world over, their President is somewhere only he knows (hopefully recovering), their legislators are on holiday and those officials who speak on the incident and its fallout, have little to no diplomatic authority to engage international allies and persuade them and Nigerians themselves that steps are being taken to address valid concerns. Granted, Abdulmutallab only spent 23 minutes in Nigeria en route to Detroit. Yes, his radicalization likely began in England and obviously was completed in Yemen. Of course, valuable information from his father, Great Britain, and other informants was not shared/acted upon efficiently by US agencies. Also, it cannot be ignored that the Bush Administration actually released from Guantanamo the alleged masterminds of this terrorist attempt, allowing them to attempt to kill so many through Abdulmutallab. And, of course, Nigerians, as a people, are not known for such extremism as suicide bombings and such - key points that should be stressed by Nigeria's mouthpiece - its government.

But, despite these facts, the reality is that Nigerians are directly impacted by Abdulmutallab's attempt and their government should be on the offensive, not the defensive in addressing these and other related issues. Nigeria's placement on the "Terror Prone" list is very damaging for the nation's reputation and the ability of its citizens and businesses to travel and conduct commerce abroad. Serious diplomatic and public efforts are necessary to remedy the situation before things get worse. Unfortunately, Nigeria's President is missing in action, the national ship has no official captain and during a time of international crisis, shipmates flounder with little to no direction.

* Link to the source, Punch Newspaper (NG) is inactive/dead, but is available here. The link will be updated once the Punch website is up and running again.

Hattip to BabaJide Salu whose recent statement - "How on earth will any country take Nigeria serious when a serious issue such as the “Xmas g-string failed bomber” has failed to bring out our President into the open" prompted this article.

From the Archives:
- Nigeria Placed on "Terror Prone" List
- African Travel Post Abdulmutallab
- A Nigerian Terrorist & A People's Passivity
- 'Is Nigeria A Breeding Ground For Terrorism' (May 2007)
- America Speaks...Does Nigeria Respond?
- How to Shoot Yourself in the Foot With Al Qaeda
- More Yar'Adua Health Uncertainty
- Yar'Adua Health, Resignation & Nigerian Cost
- Yar'Adua And The Continuing Heath Issue
- The Consequences of Yar'Adua's Mysterious Health

If you enjoyed this article, please use the tools below to DIGG it, share this post on your favorite social networking site and/or bookmark it. Thank you.

NIGERIA PLACED ON "TERROR PRONE" LIST

noreply@blogger.com (SOLOMONSYDELLE) — Sun, 03 Jan 2010 21:59:00 PST

Nigerians have been waiting to learn the immediate consequences of the 'knicker bomber', Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab's, attempt to blow up a plane headed to Detroit, MI. While various authorities have publicly played the blame game, the U.S. has gone ahead and listed Nigeria on a list of "terrorism prone" countries and placed special directives for all travelers coming from Nigeria and flying through Nigeria. While it is understandable that Nigerians would be disappointed by their nation's inclusion on such a list, they should not be surprised by this unfortunate reality.

TERRORISM PRONE LIST
All citizens from countries on this new list, created by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), will endure more stringent screening. So will non-citizen passengers traveling through or from airports in those countries. The list includes the four countries currently on the State Sponsors of Terrorism list, Cuba, Iran, Sudan and Syria, and countries of "special interest", Afghanistan, Algeria, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Nigeria, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Somalia and Yemen.

Noticeably absent from the list are other countries involved in the 'knicker bomber' incident - Ghana, where Abdulmutallab purchased his fateful ticket and likely commenced his journey. And, Amsterdam, where he boarded the last leg of his journey, the Delta flight to Detroit. One other country that is involved in the attempted bombing incident is in fact, the United Kingdom, where the 'knicker bomber' went to school and according to reports, likely began his radicalization.

Source: NY Daily News (Online)

FAR TOO MANY DROPPED THE BALL
Since the announcement that Nigeria was included on the 'terrorism prone' list, there has been a quick negative reaction from Nigerians around the world. There has even been much surprise from some who believe certain factors are being conveniently ignored. Abdulmutallab's father warned the U.S. government about his son's radicalization and that he was possibly a threat. The young man's ability to get on the flight from Amsterdam reflects a failure of US authorities to act on credible intelligence as it relates to the war on terror. Abdulmutallab also spent less time in Nigeria than he did in any other country he flew through to attempt his suicide mission - approximately 23 minutes. Additionally, American intelligence also had information about a Nigerian in Yemen for terrorist purposes. Plus, the fact that although Abdulmutallab was on a British 'watch list' such information was not shared with either American or Nigerian authorities. Furthermore, and most critically, the masterminds of the Christmas Day attempt were known Al Qaeda leaders, previously held in Guantanamo but released by the Bush administration to return to Yemen, a failed state and terrorist haven. And despite these facts, Nigerians will pay the repercussions for something that could have been prevented if certain other actors had not dropped the ball.

NOT FAIR, BUT NO SURPRISE
However, the addition to this list must be seen through the context of various additional facts. America has publicly associated Nigeria with terrorists before. In 2007, the U.S. put Nigeria on a list of countries with ties to terrorism and announced that "it had received information that Western and U.S. interests were at threat from a terrorist attack in Nigeria." The U.S. State Department eventually removed Nigeria from that list and later said that there were no specific threat to American interests in the country. Moreover, Nigerian authorities, for whatever reason, have publicly referenced Al Qaeda with regard to Nigerian security as was the case with the former head of Nigeria's Police Force, Mike Okiro in 2008. There is also the issue of MEND and other Niger Delta militants who have, in the past, wrought havoc in the Delta region and Lagos. Then, there is Boko Haram which wrought carnage in northern Nigeria not too long ago. And, of course the newest entrant to security issues in Nigeria, the Kalo Kato sect, whose fighting in Bauchi State resulted in over 30 deaths, many of the victims children. These examples of insecurity, Nigeria's porous borders, corrupt officials at all levels that can be paid to look the other way and the fact that Nigeria already had body scanners which were not used on Abdulmutallab when he traveled, would, regrettably, compel any relatively sane person to treat travelers coming from or via Nigeria with caution.

There should have been a serious offensive by spokespersons on international programing highlighting that most of the lapses in this case where not of Nigerian origin (true or not). The Minister of Foreign Affairs who spent N2.7 billion on "visibility" should have dispatched diplomats around the world to speak about the incident and distance Nigeria and Nigerians from it. In addition to the official statement released from the Minister of Information's office, the official statement could have been published in major newspapers across the world. While that might seem like a waste of time and money, it would provide at least Nigerians with the confidence that their government is beginning to react, as it should, to the incident and the expected fallout. That and much more could have been done to effectively counter the negativity Nigerians are beginning to and will experience as a result of the kicker bomber's actions. The official Nigerian response, save for Harold Demuren defending the Nigerian government (albeit he seemingly lacked crucial information about the body scanners already in Nigeria's possession), is a clear example of how not to react when a nation is faced with a grave international event that directly affects its image and thus, will have future consequences. Once again, the duty of doing right by the nation has been left to Nigerians themselves who have released multiple press statements (such as that from Champions For Nigeria), spoken out to the media against the terrorist act (such as Nigerian Muslims in Detroit), and collectively expressed their condemnation online in a Facebook group that is over 82,000 members strong and possibly growing.

For now, it will be much more difficult for Nigerians to travel, and even those merely traveling from or through Nigeria will come under much more strict scrutiny given the new list. As long as Nigeria remains on the "terrorism prone" list, some potential tourists and business persons will likely be discouraged from visiting, as well. What remains to be seen is what else Nigerian officials will do to combat the stigma from Abdulmutallab's actions, beyond committing to the purchase of full body scanners and stepping up armed officers at the nation's international airports. A concrete and sustainable plan to ensure that Nigerian airports are not a passageway for international terrorists, coupled with a zero tolerance for militancy and a commitment to security within Nigeria will go a long way in convincing the world that Nigeria is not to be associated with terrorism. These factors, and the steps necessary to make them happen, would equally convince Nigerians themselves that the country's leadership has a sound understanding of how to steer the national ship during these trying times - something that has been seriously lacking the last 2 years.

From the Archives:
- African Travel Post Abdulmutallab
- A Nigerian Terrorist & A People's Passivity
- 'Is Nigeria A Breeding Ground For Terrorism' (May 2007)
- America Speaks...Does Nigeria Respond?
- How to Shoot Yourself in the Foot With Al Qaeda

If you enjoyed this article, please use the tools below to share this post on your favorite social networking site and/or bookmark it. Thank you.

AFRICAN TRAVEL POST ABDULMUTALLAB

noreply@blogger.com (SOLOMONSYDELLE) — Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:19:00 PST

Air travel has transformed the world over the last few decades. The ability to be get from continent to continent in a matter of hours has meant an increase in transatlantic commerce, tourism and much more. Despite the access that air travel has created, travel to the African continent has always been much more difficult than travel to other regions. Flights to African airports continue to be expensive, cumbersome (due to a lack of direct flights) and sometimes, dangerous as evidenced by the recent near crashes at Lagos' Murtala Mohammed Airport when new radar equipment shut down unexpectedly. Furthermore, African travelers typically complain of bad customer service, older airplanes, and outright disrespect as was the case with the 2008 Brutish Airways incident when 130 Nigerians were unceremoniously thrown off a flight at Heathrow Airport. But, now, with the recent revelations that Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab (now deemed the 'Nigerian Terrorist') attempted to blow up a plane, it is likely that travel to and from the continent could get more complicated.

DISAPPOINTMENT FOR KENYANS & LIBERIANS
Direct flights to African airports are often hard to find, so when in June 2009, the United States decided on whether direct flights would be possible from certain African destinations, there were strong reactions. These flight routes were significant because they would ease the access of expatriates, tourists, and business people to specific regions of the continent. Kenyans, in particular, were expecting a new flight route from Atlanta, GA to Kenya's capital, Nairobi, a first between both countries in over 10 years. Kenyan officials planned to welcome the flight and the Minister of Transport bought a ticket on the sold out Delta Airlines flight just to commemorate the event. Not too long before takeoff, however, the U.S. government indefinitely suspended the Atlanta-Nairobi route, citing safety concerns. Kenyans, and others depending on the accessibility of that flight route, were left disappointed. Liberians were equally disappointed when the US government refused to permit direct flights to that West African nation's capital, Monrovia.

THE NIGERIAN FLIGHT ROUTE
Unlike Kenya, Delta Airlines received permission to fly directly to Abuja, Nigeria, thus expanding its reach in the country and region, in general. Nigeria's airports had to satisfy strict inspections and requirements and , were deemed safe. In fact, on December 2nd, 2009, Nigeria's national carrier, Nigeria Eagle, entered into a contract with Delta Airline to expand benefits to customers. The contract has a potential to increase business ties between both airlines.

However, given the recent incident with Abdulmutallab, one can only assume that travel to and from the African continent might become more cumbersome. It can be expected that the introduction of additional flight routes to the continent from the U.S. will be harder to come by, a reality that will affect millions. Travelers going to and leaving from certain African airports will likely be required to endure longer searches and security checks. Not to mention that the already difficult process of acquiring travel visas will become even more problematic for many. Nonetheless, one good thing that has already come out of this situation is that Nigeria announced it will implement full body scanners at airports. When challenged as to whether that announcement was a "vague promise", Harold Demuren of the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority, reacted forcefully, defending the Nigerian government's intentions to ensure that no terrorists could pass through a Nigerian airport ever again. It is quite possible that other African countries will equally invest in such technology, but most importantly, the focus on the need for better airport security is crucial, particularly in Nigeria which suffers from power outages even at airports.

One can only hope that this push for better airport security will have exponential benefits and in time will result in less difficult air travel to and from the African continent.The reality of Nigeria's economic importance will require that there be some level of accessibility and the growing number of African expatriates across the world will likely guarantee that travel increases, not diminishes between African airports and various international destinations. The only question remaining is how long will it take for the heightened security alerts to calm down. Unfortunately, the answer to that question depends on too many unknowns, but it will reveal itself eventually.

From The Archives:
- A Nigerian Terrorist & A People's Passivity
- Electricity Problems At Nigerian Airport
- N4.6BN For Electricity At Nigerian Airport
- How to Shoot Yourself in the Foot With Al Qaeda
- 'Is Nigeria A Breeding Ground For Terrorism'(May 2007).

A NIGERIAN TERRORIST & A PEOPLE'S PASSIVITY

noreply@blogger.com (SOLOMONSYDELLE) — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 22:23:00 PST

When the spate of kidnappings began in the Niger Delta, Nigerians could disassociate from the expatriates being kidnapped. When the kidnapping sprees became a full fledged 'cottage industry' of sorts, Nigerians, collectively, wrote it off as something that only happened to wealthy Nigerians. When Boko Haram wrought havoc across the northern part of the country in an effort to achieve its radicalized Muslim ideas, the full fledged discourse necessary to address, analyze and solve that problem failed to fully materialize. And now, as a Nigerian has been identified as the alleged terrorist that attempted to blow up an aircraft, on Christmas Day, will Nigerians once again opt to disassociate from the matters at hand and fail to tackle the obvious realities that must be addressed?

Source: NY Daily News (Online)

WHO IS THE NIGERIAN TERRORIST?
Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab boarded a KLM flight in Lagos, Nigeria, connecting in Amsterdam on his way to Detroit, Michigan. The 23 year old Abdulmutallab, allegedly the son of an elite northern Nigerian banker, has been charged with attempting to explode a device over the continental United States. His father apparently warned the U.S. government of his son's radicalization. The younger Abdulmutallab lived in a luxury apartment in London and before his failed terror attempt, was allegedly groomed in Yemen to become a radical monster.

THE REALITY
Despite the growing facts that continue to be revealed about this story, some Nigerians continue to argue amongst themselves that Abdulmutallab is not really Nigerian, because no Nigerian wants to die. Others assert that no Nigerian is interested in waiting for his 72 virgins in Allah's heaven. Regardless of these theories, the reality is that Abdulmutallab is in fact a Nigerian, and he did detonate an incendiary device on an airplane carrying 278 people. Alas, although his acts were those of one man, supported by others who will be hopefully be determined by the appropriate authorities, this incident is another blemish on the Nigerian reputation already put asunder by corrupt and unaccountable government officials, so-called 'Princes' selling wealth in online schemes of greed, Hollywood/South African films and a host of other factors. But, most importantly, it is Nigerians themselves who must overwhelmingly state that the "buck stops here" - with each individual. Abdulmutallab and other radical Nigerian Muslims are a product of a society that fuels rage and dissatisfaction. It just so happened that this instrument of terror was a rich child, which is understandable because a less connected or wealthy Nigerian would have been unable to get the travel documents necessary to attempt such an act. But, Boko Haram is a clear and recent reminder of what poverty, lack of adequate education or options ( both not a factor in Abdulmutallab's case), brainwashing and Islamic radicalization, and rich northern elites financing such endeavors can accomplish in little time.

SOLUTIONS, NOT DELAY, IS NECESSARY
Consequently, Nigerians must not forget the recent daunting figures that there are approximately 10 million child beggars of northern decent currently living miserable existences in a nation that supplies the world oil. These children, someday, could be rife for the murderous philosophies Abdulmutallab fell for, and he came from a wealthy northern elite family. That is a possibility that Nigerians must not allow to come to pass. And when one considers that additionally incredible numbers that 23mn of the nation's youths are currently unemployable, unemployment stands at 28.57%,, schools are repeatedly on strike, basic amenities (reliable light, clean water, etc) are hard to come by and the nation's leaders (its missing President included) prefer to spend the people's money traveling to the tune of N2.7 billion, Nigerians should not simply be troubled, or call on God for help. They should be upset, upset enough to collectively prevent their representatives from leaving the National Assembly without producing concrete results that are meaningful and measurable. As such, Nigerians must begin to make demands of their government to satisfy the role of a government and not deter/derail honest, hardworking citizens' efforts to improve the nation, as is currently the case.

WHERE IS THE RESPONSE?
Since news broke about the "Nigerian Terrorist", not a single Nigerian official has taken to the international airways to publicly address the incident and provide a voice to counterbalance the information shared by the media and growing anti-Nigerian sentiment. The government, however, has issued an official statement reacting to the incident, specifying,

"The Federal Government of Nigeria received with dismay the news of attempted terrorist attack on a U.S. airline. We state very clearly that as a nation, we abhor all forms of terrorism. The Vice-President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Dr Goodluck Ebele Jonathan, has directed Nigerian security agencies to commence full investigation of the incident. [O]ur security agencies will cooperate fully with the American authorities in the on-going investigations. Nigerian government will be providing updates as more information becomes available.” [sic]

The attempted terrorist attempt occurred on December 25th, and as at the time of this publication, 2 days had passed. Those are two days that could have been used to begin damage control. Nevertheless, it is not too late to achieve that goal and salvage the nation's reputation. Nigerians need to know that their government is addressing the incident and of course, the world would like to know how the Nigerian government and people will prevent a recurrence - questions that the government is obviously better suited to answer. As noted above N2.7 billion was spent by Maduekwe to give the nation "visibility", and if ever there was a time Nigeria needed some positive visibility, it would be now. Add to this the disappearance of Nigeria's President Yar'Adua since November 23rd, 2009 and the fact that Nigeria is working on rebranding its image. As such, there is no more time for the usual delay tactics historically employed by the Nigerian government when faced with challenges.

Nigerians cannot continue to be passive as their nation, its image, and its people continue to fall apart and succumb to pressures that produce a level of inhumanity and insanity that is absolutely unacceptable. It would be redundant to state that Abdulmutallab's terrorist attempt has unfairly complicated the lives of Nigerians and other nationals attempting international travel. Regardless, it puts a spotlight on the need for Nigerians to address and solve militancy, violent kidnappings, corruption, radicalization and the many home grown factors that contribute to them. Additionally, Nigerians themselves cannot simply disassociate from the realities of poverty, northern child beggars and other issues that require a national discourse. Finally, the Nigerian government must not be allowed to skate by without truly representing the people they are meant to serve as such unaccountability only feed the nation's enduring punishment problem and the continuing distrust that fuels tribal and religious violence. So will Nigerians again not address the issues staring them in the face? Only time will tell but now is the right time to no longer tolerate the problems that are poisoning a nation and its future.

* Nigerian Curiosity condemns the terrorist attempt by Abdulmutallab and whoever he worked in concert with.

Please read 'Is Nigeria A Breeding Ground For Terrorism'(May 2007).

From The Archives:
- America Speaks...Does Nigeria Respond?
- How to Shoot Yourself in the Foot With Al Qaeda
- 23mn Of Nigeria's Youth Are Unemployable
- War in the Delta

NIGERIA'S 10MN CHILD BEGGARS

noreply@blogger.com (SOLOMONSYDELLE) — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:27:00 PST

When I was a child living in Lagos, Nigeria, I would sometimes see children begging. As a naive child, I would always plead with my mother to adopt them so that they would be able to go to school, be clean and not have to beg. I incorrectly assumed that these children, who I was told were from the northern part of the country, were parentless, but I soon came to realize that the money these children received was taken to a parent who usually watched from not to far away. Despite this, it came as a shocking surprise to learn that Nigeria, and specifically, the northern part of the country, is home to approximately 10 million child beggars. The child I used to be would want to adopt all these children but the adult I am today knows that this issue goes far beyond adoption and requires serious strategic planning to address the problem.

During a popular Hausa radio show, Nigeria's Minister of State for Education, Aishatu Jibrin Dukku, shared the highly depressing news, saying,

"We are yet to finish our compilation, but at the moment we have over ten million child beggars roaming our streets, and that's a conservative estimate."

She continued,

"It is very alarming that parents are becoming so insensitive to the welfare of their children that they dispatch them to unknown places to take care of themselves...
"They just send them away without making any arrangement for their feeding, medical care, shelter and other necessities... Most of these children, because of the harsh realities they found themselves in, end up becoming juvenile delinquents and, subsequently, adult criminals."

Whether The Minister's assessment of the fates of these child beggars is correct or not, what is clear is that it is unacceptable for children to have to beg for their keep. They did not ask to be brought into the world, but now that they are here, it is the collective job of all to cater for those in need.

Apparently, the current administration has plans to get many of these children in schools so that they can get an education of some sort. I cannot help but wonder what prior administrations, Ministers of Education, and other responsible parties did. Actually, assuming that the numbers announced by Dukku are relatively accurate, it is clear that those previously responsible did absolutely nothing, unfortunately.

Regardless, steps must definitely be taken to create educational opportunities for these youngsters. Especially as Nigerians were recently informed that 23mn of the nation's youths are unemployable. That information, coupled with this latest revelation puts in serious doubt the ability of Nigeria's young to compete in the global economy - a necessity for any nation to survive. Private individuals and groups will also need to step in to help fill the educational gap these children face and the catching up that needs to be done. Hopefully, that will be the case because 10mn uneducated Nigerian children, regardless of what part of the country they hail from, puts the entire nation at a global disadvantage.

From The Archives:
- 23mn Of Nigeria's Youth Are Unemployable

- Yar'Adua & The Pay Cut Issue
- Should Yar'Adua Get A Pay Raise?
- How To Become A Millionaire
- Look To The Ivory Coast For Inspiration
- Getting The Senate We Paid For
- Getting The House Of Representatives We Paid For

N4.6BN FOR ELECTRICITY AT NIGERIAN AIRPORT

noreply@blogger.com (SOLOMONSYDELLE) — Sun, 20 Dec 2009 21:07:00 PST

Earlier this year, I shared a video clip of a power outage at Nigeria's Murtala Mohammed Airport in Lagos, Nigeria. The video, shot by a Nigerian travelling through the airport, showed a complete blackout in the terminal section of the airport.

Well, it seems the federal government aims to address the issue by pumping N4.6BN in electricity investment into the location. That money will specifically be used to purchase generators for the airport and a contract was given to Mantrac Nigeria Ltd. An official of the Federal Aviation Authority of Nigeria (FAAN), explained the need for new generators, saying,

"the existing 2.25MVA generators are over 30 years old and they can no longer cope with the present load demand, with increase in passenger and aircraft traffic... The condition necessitates the upgrading of the existing generators to the 3.88MW which have all the necessary accessories to cope with the increasing load demand at the airport."

MY THOUGHTS
It must be pointed out that even if Nigeria had consistent electricity supply, its airports would still need generators to function. Generators are typically installed for backup purposes to ensure safety and security. In the case of MMA, the problem is that these generators have become a primary means of managing and maintaining electricity supply at the airport. Nevertheless, it is better to have the necessary equipment to keep the airport running smoothly. And now that a near crash was thankfully avoided due to the failure of the airport's new radar equipment, one can only hope that authorities will wake up and do things properly and professionally. Hopefully, the rest of the nation will have better electricity supply, and not diesel powered generators or darkness to rely upon.

MUSIC XVII: OMO NAIJA

noreply@blogger.com (SOLOMONSYDELLE) — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:43:00 PST

Here is a patriotic song created by DJ Jamix and featuring some of Nigeria's hottest stars of the moment - Terry G, 9ice and M.I. And for those unfamiliar with Yoruba, the title simply means "Nigerian" or "Child of Nigeria".

Enjoy.

EFCC WANTS DEATH PENALTY FOR CORRUPT

noreply@blogger.com (SOLOMONSYDELLE) — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:10:00 PST

The head of Nigeria's anti-corruption agency, Farida Waziri , recently voiced her frustration with the slow progress her agency is making in its quest to reduce fraud and corruption in the country. Waziri opined that Chinese-style capital punishment for corruption convicts,

"is the only thing that will save the country, truly. Because corruption is much and the people are not concerned. If someone steals public funds, they will honour him without condemning the person. With this, our country will continue to be backward."[sic]

The real question is, would the death penalty be an apt deterrent to those considering ro already participating in corruption?
Nigerians are known to be very happy people who love life. There is even a common joke that Nigerians like life too much to die or do anything to quicken death's door. However, that mentality has not stopped Nigerians from committing crimes that have the death penalty as the final repercussion. Consequently, there is little reason to believe that the death penaly will be a true deterrent to those who practice corruption.

The same Waziri who would want the death penalty for the corrupt, once argued that the legal system delayed the ability of her agency to bring more individuals to justice. So, would it be this same legal system that Waziri believes will issue death penalties for the many individuals her organization is yet to charge or even take to court? Particularly the big fish who wantonly steal from the people to finance their expensive lifestyles. The very issues Waziri allegedly faces in trying the corrupt, particularly those with the money to hire very efficient counsel, will be present whether or not the death penalty is the punishment of choice for corruption convictions. As such, the death penalty will not deter the powerful, many of whom reportedly hire young touts to carry out online scams, from engaging in fraudulent activties.

Unfortunately, the only thing a death penalty for corruption convictions will do is skew the number of poorer people who are arrested and judged as corrupt, thus increasing conviction rates, executions and statistics for Waziri to claim success. As is typically the case, the disadvantaged usually suffer the negatively overwhelming effects of such punishment schemes.

While it is understandable why Waziri or others might consider the Chinese execution-for-corruption style as enviable, it must not be forgotten that China's legal system, while swift does not provide much room for accused to actually get a fair day in court. The Chinese system is known to favor the objectives of the Communist party which uses individuals as examples to retain an image of control and stability not just for citizens but for foreign observers. If Nigeria is to be a democracy, it cannot aspire for Chinese-justice, no matter how delectable it might initially appear.

The EFCC would do better to work harder, and get more funding so as to hire better lawyers with more resources so as to successfully tackle the corrupt in court. Doing that will improve the agency's reputation and possibly create more goodwill and trust of its actions and intentions. Most importantly, whether or not the death penalty ever becomes the punishment for those convicted of corruption, the hard work needed to reduce corrupt practices in the country will still need to be done. No amount of executions will ever reduce that burden.

Related Articles of Interest:
- Nigeria's Persisting Punishment Problem
- Nigeria's Punishment Problem
- Crime & Punishment: The Nigerian Edition
- Nigeria is Not The Home Of Cyber Crime
- Microsoft, Nigeria & Cyber Crime
- Greed, Scammers & A Recession

OF PILGRIMAGES, HAJJ & NIGERIANS

noreply@blogger.com (SOLOMONSYDELLE) — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:01:00 PST

Nigeria's President is currently recovering from surgery to combat a heart condition called Pericarditis, which according to the BBC, is likely "triggered by cancer". Despite this, his spokesman made it clear, at that time, that the President would still attend Hajj in Mecca. This revelation indicates how seriously the President and his handlers take the Hajj, that a sick man should feel the need to publicly commit to attending the Hajj. It also illustrates how importantly Nigerians, Muslims and Christians take their religious practices of participating in the Hajj and/or Pilgrimage to Israel (for Christians).

The Hajj is an Islamic tradition. According to the Koran, every able bodied Muslim must make at least one trip to Mecca to participate in the Hajj. In 2009, over 95,000 Nigerians from across the country are participating in the Hajj. The Nigerian government has historically subsidized every Nigerian's trip to the Hajj and picks the Amirul Hajj or leader of the Nigerian Hajj contingency. Also, local cell phone companies even offer roaming for Nigerian customers in Saudi Arabia during the period. The National Hajj Commission of Nigeria (NAHCON) facilitates the travels for Nigerians.

Source: Ilyani

Nigerian Christians also take their Pilgrimage to Israel seriously. While the Christian religion does not require a trip to the Holy Land, Nigerian Christians have historically taken advantage of government subsidies to visit Israel as part of their religious customs. In 2009, Nigeria's 20,000 Pilgrims will be the largest contingent from any other country in the world to Israel. Christians also take a government subsidized trip to Rome, Italy on account of a religious pilgrimage. The Nigeria Christian Pilgrims Commission (NCPC) acts just like NAHCON to facilitate these journeys.

Nigerian Pilgrims at the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem

ISSUES
There is great debate over whether or not the Federal government should participate in funding these pilgrimages. Some Nigerians argue that the government should simply regulate the travel of pilgrims and not provide financial and other subsidies. Being that the Constitution does not mandate this act, it is clear that the government facilitates these events as a way of seeking goodwill from citizens, which in itself is not a bad thing. The main issue is the financial commitment the nation makes to help citizens attend either pilgrimage. Given the current economic downturn, and the fact that the 2010 budget is said to be at a deficit already, the financial commitment to the pilgrimage might be an issue worthy of review. However, given that politicians continue to make millions, despite a requirement to reduce their pay, it would be unconscionable to deprive pilgrims of the assistance they receive from the government. What is more important than how much is spent on pilgrimage travels is whether the federal government, and particularly this administration fulfills certain goals especially those involving electricity generation and supply, infrastructural development , health care and education. These objectives are likely not significantly impacted by the amount spent sending Nigerians on pilgrimages. But, only if the federal government satisfies its obligations to the populace.

PRESIDENTS & PILGRIMAGES
Of particular interest is the fact that Nigeria's President has been to the Hajj at least once as President and plans to do so again, despite his health issues. This begs the question of whether the nation's President should attend the Hajj more than once while in office. Considering that the Quran only requires one trip, and that Nigeria needs its President in the country to effectively carry out his responsibilities, it might be time for the president to reconsider making any more trips to the Hajj while in office. This is especially important because the cost of sending the President to the Hajj is likely enough to send a good number of average citizens who end up sleeping in tents at Mina, Saudi Arabia and not fancy 5 star hotels in the Saudi Kingdom.

Yar'Adua's predecessor, a Christian, is not recorded as having made any pilgrimage trips to Israel or Vatican, save for official state visits. But despite this, he spent much of his first term traveling all over instead of staying in the country. he was heavily criticized for this. Yar'Adua would do well to learn from that mistake, particularly as his health, and the fact that he is currently still in hospital, lends to concerns over his ability to govern in the first place.

Regardless, it is clear that Nigerians take their religious ceremonies and practices quite seriously. Whether that makes them better Christians or Muslims is another matter that this writer will leave to others to decipher.

From the Archives:
- More Yar'Adua Health Uncertainty
- Yar'Adua And The Continuing Heath Issue
- The Consequences of Yar'Adua's Mysterious Health
- Nigeria, Be Careful What You Wish For
- Suppression In A Democratic Regime
- Wanted Dead Or Alive
- Rest In Peace
- "We Need Fresh Blood Haba !!!! Bones Are Weak!!!"

"NO NEED FOR GENERATORS IN 2010" - V.P.

noreply@blogger.com (SOLOMONSYDELLE) — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:02:00 PST

Nigeria's vice President, Goodluck Jonathan, recently promised that Nigerians will not need generators in 2010. According to the Vice President, the federal government has taken the necessary steps to improve electricity supply in 2010 and thus limit the necessity for generators. However, it seems that while ordinary Nigerians might not need generators, Aso Rock, the residence of Nigeria's President Yar'Adua is scheduled to use generators. Not up to 1 after that declaration, it was revealed that N542.4 million is budgeted to buy generator fuel to power the President's residence and another N100 million for generator equipment at the Vice President's mansion.

Source: Marc Cowerman's blog

The irony of this basic information is glaring and saddening. It continues to be a shame that politicians fail to be consistent in not just their message, but their alleged commitments. Jonathan's promise on electricity reinforces the need for the federal government to accomplish its promise to generate at least 6000MW before January 2010. The nation's electricity provider, PHCN, claims it now generates 5300MW & will hit the 6000MW deadline on time. While this is encouraging news, the unfortunate reality is that electricity generation does not equal power supply. Consequently, even if the 6000MW target is achieved, the federal government must still find a way of getting that power to homes and businesses on a consistent basis. So far, that goal has not been achieved, but it is not out of reach.

Hattip to blogger NoLimit who helped find a picture of a generator in Lagos that had, shall we say, 'character'.

From The Archives:
- Nigeria To Build Nuclear Power Plant

- Electricity Problems At Nigerian Airport
- A Smart Grid for Nigeria's Energy Woes
- Banning Generators in Nigeria
- The Mission To Light Up Nigeria (#lightupnigeria)
- More Solar Energy Plans
- Solar Energy Plans
- Could Coal Be A Power Solution For Nigeria
- Nigeria Is Full Of Gas
- Power Blackouts Loom Across Nigeria
- Nigerian Power Scandal: Authority Stealing

YAR'ADUA HEALTH, RESIGNATION & NIGERIAN COST

noreply@blogger.com (SOLOMONSYDELLE) — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:37:00 PST

It is practically an oxymoron to use the word "dead" in a sentence with Nigeria's President Umaru Musa Yar'Adua. Even before he attained the titles of President, Head of State, Chief Executive of the Federation and Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces (Nigerians and their titles), he had died a few times in the court of public opinion. Yar'Adua's health condition, simply referred to as a kidney problem, has forced him to flee to Germany and Saudi Arabia for regular checkups and surgeries on numerous occasions. Each trip has been met with ever increasing criticism. Yar'Adua's most recent trip to Saudi Arabia, where he was treated for a "heart infection", has created debate over issues such as resignation, wazobia/tribal politics and power sharing amongst tribes and much more.

CALLS FOR RESIGNATION
Yar'Adua is allegedly no longer in the hospital's intensive care unit, and his doctor has now stated that he can return to Nigeria sometime after December the 13th, almost 3 weeks since he left. But, while he has been recovering in Saudi Arabia, a heated debate has been on going over whether or not he should resign. More than 50 Nigerians, including legislators and other prominent individuals issued a statement calling for the President's resignation. The President of the Nigerian Bar Association has also demanded that Yar'Adua step down and lawmakers from the Lagos State House of Assembly have equally advised the President to resign. There is even a Facebook page called 'A National Call on President Umaru Yar'Adua to Step Down'. And now, there are newspaper reports that northern leaders and former President Obasanjo are preparing for Yar'Adua to step down. Obasanjo, who selected Yar'Adua to be his replacement, is allegedly lobbying to place the governor of Jigawa State and a northerner, Sule Lamido, as the new Vice President to presumably serve under Goodluck Jonathan.

Despite these calls, the President has received plenty of public support from the majority of the Senate, the House of Representatives, the Vice President, a group of governors and many others. The Deputy President of the Senate even went as far as saying that Yar'Adua can remain in Saudi Arabia because there is no Constitutional requirement on how much time a President must spend in the country. The Northern Union has even gone ahead to warn that the "stability of [the] country [which] is hinged [on] power rotation between the North and the South."

MY THOUGHTS
Although no individual would want to be ill and it is unfortunate that Nigeria's President is unwell, the President's sickness and his stay in a Saudi hospital is especially embarrassing. Even before Yar'Adua became President, his ability to lead was always in doubt because of his illness and his frequent trips for health care served to damn the nation for its lack of adequate health care and the lack of vision by the administration to outfit at least one health institution with the equipment and know how necessary to cater to his health needs. This most recent trip is widening divisions amongst Nigerians that are dangerous and do not forebode well for the nation's future. Statements like that shared by the Northern Union about power sharing does nothing for Nigerian democracy. While the Northern union and others that think like them believe that wazobia politics is necessary for national stability, they incorrectly ignore that democracy, transparency and a leader that at least appears to be working in the interest of the nation are key. Yar'Adua has been questioned since his first day, and him hanging on to the office of President simply to satisfy some power rotation deal is unconstitutional, unconscionable and not helpful for his health or the nation. One would hope that this is not the main reason why he has chosen to not resign given his serious health problems (heart problems and a kidney condition), but, evidence points to the contrary. While that might be good for those focused on power sharing, it might not be good for those concerned with the nation's best interests - a cost the people must not pay.

Many continue to focus on this need for power sharing with little concern for the potential outcomes if Yar'Adua were to die on seat. If Yar'Adua died in office, there is the possibility of certain elements using that time to accuse various tribes or groups of causing his death and then use the anger and confusion to stir violence that could quickly get out of control and detract from a peaceful handover to the Vice President. As things stand, given the President's sickness, this current situation is the perfect opportunity for Yar'Adua and others to do the right thing and allow for a peaceful transition. It definitely does nothing positive for other countries to see that Nigeria's President is so sick to warrant constant emergency trips and the questions as to who is in charge leaves the nation open to opportunists that might not have the nation's interests at heart, be they Nigerian or otherwise. As such, the people need a strong leader it can trust to do what is necessary to steer the national ship. They should not have to endure seemingly unending confusion because a strong stance cannot be taken by a President yet to return home.

Although the Constitution allows for a President to resign it is little help at this time. It provides for the removal of the President, but only if the Federal Executive Council (FEC) determines that the President is permanently incapable of satisfying his duties. This provision is devoid of substance for many reasons. First, the FEC consists of individuals hand picked by the President. As such, it is highly unlikely that any or some of those individuals would sacrifice their highly coveted and influential positions by trying to remove the President. Second, as things currently stands, there is no concrete evidence that Yar'Adua is permanently incapable of being President. Hence, even though there is no proof that Yar'Adua is indeed capable of handling the position of President, the Constitution is useless at handling this particular situation. And, since Yar'Adua's handlers have consistently repeated that he will not resign, it might be best for those who do not want Yar'Adua as president to prevent a repeat of the rampant fraud in the last polls when the 2011 election period arrives. That would be a peaceful option, but the violent option could involve death, a return of military rule and other highly unattractive possibilities that hopefully, will not come to pass.

The current confusing situation in Nigeria is quite unreal and unheard of - a President in hospital abroad for a heart condition, calls for his resignation, warnings from groups reminding the nation that tribalism trumps democracy and common sense and unnecessary confusion as to who controls the nation and what will happen next. It also does not help that the Constitution lacks the necessary provisions to bring about a resolution, whatever that would be. Yar'Adua and others might want to follow the example of Segun Ayobolu, who gave up his appointment in the Lagos State government due to acute ulcer and high blood pressure, so as not to be a disservice to the public. Or, they could simply think about the interests of the nation and not their tribe or pocket. Nevertheless, Nigerians are ultimately a resilient people, and whether or not Yar'Adua resigns, the people will continue with their lives. Nigeria is bigger than any person or group, but one can only hope that the deepening national fissures will not become so deep and wide so as to make future peace and progress impossible.

UPDATE (12/09/09): Reports now indicate that Yar'Adua's situation is much worse than originally revealed. His doctors are considering sending him to either Germany or the US for treatment. While most well meaning individuals wish the President the best of luck, one cannot help but wonder how much money is being spent by the federal government to not just care for the President but pay for any inconveniences his absence might cause or has caused. (Hattip to Nneoma of the Pyoowata blog for sharing this information about a possible move to another country).

From the Archives:
- More Yar'Adua Health Uncertainty
- Yar'Adua And The Continuing Heath Issue
- The Consequences of Yar'Adua's Mysterious Health
- Nigeria, Be Careful What You Wish For
- Suppression In A Democratic Regime
- Wanted Dead Or Alive
- Rest In Peace
- "We Need Fresh Blood Haba !!!! Bones Are Weak!!!"

GRAMMY NOMINATION FOR FEMI KUTI

noreply@blogger.com (SOLOMONSYDELLE) — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 21:00:00 PST

Nigeria's Femi Kuti is now a Grammy nominated artist. The 2010 nominees were recently announced and Femi received a nod for his current album titled 'Day By Day'.

Femi joins King Sunny Ade as the only other Nigerian to have received a Grammy nod. Unlike King Sunny Ade, this is Femi's second nomination. Other artists of Nigerian heritage have won Grammy awards and they are Sade and Seal who are both British citizens.

Below is a fan made video for his song, "Tell Me" off the album 'Day By Day'.

Congratulations to Femi Kuti, one of many carrying on the tradition of Afrobeat music as a tool of political discourse, education and empowerment, just as Fela Kuti once did.