The post FUGITIVE: Steven Craig Sumner $25,000 REWARD appeared first on Not Before Coffee.

As state control of the agricultural industry increased, Venezuela’s food production fell 75% in two decades while the country’s population increased by 33%. This was a recipe for shortages and economic disaster. After agriculture, the regime nationalized electricity, water, oil, banks, supermarkets, construction, and other crucial sectors. And in all these sectors, the government increased payrolls and gave away products at low cost, resulting in days-long countrywide blackouts, frequent water service interruptions, falling oil production, and bankrupt government enterprises.

Yet taking over the most important sectors of the economy was not enough for the socialist regime. In 2003, Chavez implemented a foreign currency control scheme where the government set an overvalued exchange rate between the Venezuelan currency and the U.S. dollar.

One goal of the scheme was to reduce inflation by overvaluing the currency, subsidizing imported products. But the currency control meant the regime had to ration available U.S. dollars to importers since, at an overvalued (cheap) exchange rate, there was more demand for U.S. dollars than supply. Naturally, a black market for foreign currency emerged and corrupt regime members and lucky individuals assigned cheap U.S. dollars obtained large profits. Even worse, the scheme actually increased inflation since overvaluing the currency reduced government oil revenues in Venezuelan currency, leading the regime to print money to cover the ensuing budget deficit.

The socialist regime also implemented price ceilings on hundreds of basic products such as beef, milk and toilet paper. At artificially low prices, more people were willing to buy these products but the few private factories left—not nationalized—could not profit at the government-capped price, so they reduced or halted their production. Instead of benefiting the poor, price ceilings predictably resulted in shortages that forced them to stand in lines for hours, while supermarket employees and the well-connected obtained the products they needed.

But perhaps the most harmful part of the Venezuelan socialist project is the part that the international media and leftist figures used to praise most frequently: welfare programs. The socialist regime created social “missions” aimed at tackling poverty, illiteracy, healthcare, and more. But despite enjoying higher government oil revenues due to a tenfold rise in oil prices from $10 a barrel in 1999 to more than $100 in 2008, the regime financed a growing deficit by printing more currency. Expansive welfare programs and massive public-works projects provided ever-growing opportunities for still greater corruption. Printing money to pay for endless state programs unsurprisingly led to high rates of inflation.

In this way, socialism run rampant—not cronyism, corruption, falling oil prices, or U.S. sanctions—caused the crisis in Venezuela. Welfare programs that were supposed to help the poor actually increased the cost of living. A foreign currency control that aimed to reduce inflation only increased it and allowed for massive corruption. And nationalizations that should have given “power” to workers only left them unemployed and hungry.

Corrupt regimes can certainly cause many problems, but without socialism, hyperinflation and widespread shortages are not usually among them. Moreover, even at today’s lower oil prices, Venezuelan oil sells for two to three times as much as in 1999 adjusting for inflation. And the only U.S. sanction with some chance of affecting regular Venezuelans, the ban on oil imports, has not been in effect for even two months while inflation and shortages have plagued the country for years.

So do not make excuses. As Venezuelans have learned over the past 30+ years of socialism, “free things” come at a high price.

Source: Daniel Di Martino, Manhattan Institute

The post How Socialism Destroyed Venezuela appeared first on Not Before Coffee.

People will always see what they see. I hope this is an example of WHY major organizations should have a panel to run their ideas by. Feedback from likely viewers would help decrease or eliminate these issues. In our tumultuous times, when conservatives are censored for using or refusing to use pronouns, I think non-conservatives should be held to similar standards.

When I saw the replay, because I didn’t watch it, I instantly saw The Last Supper, just like most of their audience did.

Organizers HAD to know what viewers would see. There is plenty of data available showing more people are familiar with The Last Supper than people who know anything about the Greek God they claim to be the inspiration for the performance. With feedback, they COULD have presented the performance revealing the Greek God reference. I do think they knew, didn’t care, and had their “canned excuse” ready to rebut.

MOST people have no clue about Greek mythology. MOST people DO know the Olympics is ancient, competitive sports, and strength. Save the obese, promiscuous mythological party references for the arts, off Broadway and the people who appreciate that sort of thing. Stick to performances that highlight what the Olympics IS and has ALWAYS been about.

Offending half of the viewers who value SPORTS is a serious disservice to the athletes. That’s the real tragedy here.

SPORTS people are NOT the same breed as artsy-tartsy people.

If organizers were not aware, they should resign and make make a career change. It’s their JOB to know how their product will be received.

I was most disturbed by the severed head scene. I instantly “got” the historical reference but my first thought went to all the CHILDREN watching and daydreaming about being an Olympian someday.

Our kids are already subjected to broad desensitization as it is. It’s no wonder kids today are so darned mean. Families deserve to have their own “normal” and access to programming that doesn’t cram gruesome or uncomfortable images in their face. I never thought the Olympics would sensationalize things I am NOT prepared to explain to my grandkids.

I already had the uncomfortable question about two men kissing in a commercial on the cartoon channel. I’m not ready for that shit! I’m NOT homophobic at all, it’s just not part of our “normal.” There should ALWAYS be a slow, natural process to exposing children to the vast differences in the world. Too much in their little minds IS confusing. Let them be innocent children as long as they can.

For the first time EVER. The Olympics SHOULD have had a parental warning in the opening credits.

Politics, media, television networks, nor public schools have the right to force progressive ideology on our kids. Indoctrination, regardless of how it’s packaged and served, is unacceptable!!!

The post Olympics Opening Ceremony Missed The Mark appeared first on Not Before Coffee.

Connect with me:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/noleftturnpodcast
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@gayla.taylor
Instagram: https://instagram.com/gaylabaer
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gayla
X: https://x.com/Gayla
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/gaylataylor

The post No Left Turn Q&A with Gayla Baer-Taylor appeared first on Not Before Coffee.

Listen Now:

https://gayla.buzzsprout.com/2020422/14280693

I look forward to hearing from you!

The post No Left Turn with Gayla Baer-Taylor Podcast Trailer appeared first on Not Before Coffee.