<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>NEWScience Policy</title>
	
	<link>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org</link>
	<description>At the intersection of scientific research and public policy; Featuring the Week in Review, a weekly summary of activities and events in Washington, DC impacting science, technology, and innovation policy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 11:56:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/nsp-feed" /><feedburner:info uri="nsp-feed" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Week in Review, or Replacing Sequestration</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nsp-feed/~3/jYOx1A3J6Mc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/05/14/week-in-review-or-replacing-sequestration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 07:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>abby-benson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week in Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ARPA-E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burton Richter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FERMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FY 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FY 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Majumdar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mildred Dresselhaus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIFA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonny Ramaswamy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/?p=2158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Members of the House and Senate were back in DC last week after their previous one-week recess. As I reported in my last update, the House considered a reconciliation bill, which has been marketed as a replacement for &#8220;sequestration,&#8221; the process by which significant spending cuts will begin in January 2013. The bill, which identifies [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Members of the House and Senate were back in DC last week after their previous one-week recess. <a title="Week in Review, or Reconciliation Revisited" href="http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/05/07/week-in-review-or-reconciliation-revisited/#reconciliation" target="_blank">As I reported in my last update</a>, the House considered a <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d112:HR05652:@@@R" target="_blank">reconciliation bill</a>, which has been marketed as a replacement for &#8220;sequestration,&#8221; the process by which significant spending cuts will begin in January 2013. The bill, which identifies cuts to entitlement programs to counter planned cuts to discretionary spending, passed in a vote of 218-199. 16 Republicans opposed the bill, and no Democrats supported it. The vote on the reconciliation bill was somewhat symbolic, however, as neither the Senate nor the President are likely to accept it.</p>
<p>The House also <a href="http://appropriations.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=294991" target="_blank">passed its first <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 spending bill</a>, which provides research funding for the National Institute of Standards and Technology (<span class="domtooltips">NIST<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institute of Standards and Technology</span></span>), the National Science Foundation (<span class="domtooltips">NSF<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Science Foundation</span></span>), the National Aeronautics and Space Agency (<span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span>), and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (<span class="domtooltips">NOAA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration</span></span>). The Commerce, Justice, Science (CJS) bill was approved in a 247 to 163 vote. Several amendments affecting research accounts were adopted during floor consideration, including one that would cut all funding for political science research at the <span class="domtooltips">NSF<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Science Foundation</span></span>, one that would cut cross-agency support at <span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span> by $126 million to fund a Department of Justice program, and others that would reduce funding for climate change research and education at <span class="domtooltips">NSF<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Science Foundation</span></span> and <span class="domtooltips">NOAA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration</span></span>. The House did defeat a concerning amendment, introduced by Rep. Flake (R-AZ), which would have cut $1.2 billion (17 percent!) from the <span class="domtooltips">NSF<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Science Foundation</span></span>, in order to offset the federal deficit.</p>
<p>The White House has threatened to veto the CJS spending bill, given that its top line number does not comport with the overall <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 number agreed to in the <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:S.365:" target="_blank"><em>Budget Control Act</em></a> last summer.  While the Senate Appropriations Committee has approved its version of the bill, it is not clear when that bill will go to the Senate floor.</p>
<p>The House and Senate Appropriations Committees will consider <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 spending this week for some defense accounts, the Department of Homeland Security (<span class="domtooltips">DHS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Homeland Security</span></span>, including its Science and Technology Directorate), and the Environmental Protection Agency (<span class="domtooltips">EPA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Environmental Protection Agency</span></span>) (more info below).</p>
<h2>Also of Note</h2>
<p><em><strong>Appointments.</strong></em> <em><strong> </strong>ScienceInsider</em> reports that <a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2012/05/senior-doe-official-resigns.html" target="_blank">Dr. Arun Majumdar</a>, Acting Undersecretary of Energy and Director of the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (<span class="domtooltips">ARPA-E<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Advanced Research Projects Agency--Energy</span></span>) at the Department of Energy (<span class="domtooltips">DOE<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Energy</span></span>), announced his resignation, effective immediately. Assistant Secretary for Policy and International Affairs, David Sandalow, will serve as Acting Under Secretary, while <span class="domtooltips">ARPA-E<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Advanced Research Projects Agency--Energy</span></span> Deputy Director, Eric Toone, will serve as Acting Director of <span class="domtooltips">ARPA-E<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Advanced Research Projects Agency--Energy</span></span>.</p>
<p>Nature&#8217;s news blog reports that <a href="http://blogs.nature.com/news/2012/05/entomologist-takes-charge-of-us-agricultural-research-institute.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+news%2Frss%2Fnewsblog+%28News+Blog+-+Blog+Posts%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader" target="_blank">Dr. Sonny Ramaswamy</a> was sworn in as the new director of the U.S. Department of Agriculture&#8217;s National Institute of Food and Agriculture (<span class="domtooltips">NIFA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institute of Food and Agriculture</span></span>).</p>
<p><em><strong>Appropriation</strong><strong>s.</strong></em> The House Appropriations Committee released the <a href="http://appropriations.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=294116" target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 defense spending bill</a> which, according to the committee press release, &#8220;contains $70 billion – $2.4 billion below last year’s level and $576 million above the President’s request – for research, development, testing, and evaluation (RDT&amp;E) of new defense technologies.&#8221; RDT&amp;E includes basic and applied research, and is broken down by service (<a href="http://appropriations.house.gov/UploadedFiles/BILLS-112HR-SC-AP-FY13-Defense.pdf" target="_blank">see bill text for more detail</a>).</p>
<p>The House Appropriations Committee also held a subcommittee markup of the <a href="http://appropriations.house.gov/UploadedFiles/BILLS-112HR-SC-AP-FY13-Homeland.pdf" target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 homeland security spending bill</a>. The bill includes $825 for the <span class="domtooltips">DHS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Homeland Security</span></span> Science and Technology Directorate, an almost $160 million increase from the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2012 enacted level. This significant increase from last year reflects restoration of significant cuts that were made to S&amp;T during the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2012 appropriations process. A full committee markup is scheduled for this week.</p>
<p><em><strong>Manufacturing. </strong></em>Back in January, the Administration announced a new initiative called the <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/03/09/president-obama-announce-new-efforts-support-manufacturing-innovation-en" target="_blank">National Network for Manufacturing Innovation (NNMI)</a>. This program aims to partner research agencies such as <span class="domtooltips">NIST<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institute of Standards and Technology</span></span>, <span class="domtooltips">NSF<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Science Foundation</span></span>, <span class="domtooltips">DoD<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Defense</span></span>, and <span class="domtooltips">DOE<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Energy</span></span>, with industry and academia to advance manufacturing technologies in the U.S. The government <a href="http://www.nist.gov/director/nnmi-050412.cfm" target="_blank">issued a request for information</a> (RFI) in the Federal Register last week, seeking input on how to shape this initiative.</p>
<p><em><strong>Recognition</strong></em>. The White House and the <span class="domtooltips">DOE<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Energy</span></span> awarded the annual <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/05/09/fermi-award-winners-saluted?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+whitehouse%2Fostp+%28WhiteHouse.gov+Blog+Feed%3A+Office+of+Science+and+Technology+Policy%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader" target="_blank">Fermi Prize </a>to <span class="domtooltips">MIT<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</span></span> Professor Dr. Mildred Dresselhaus and Stanford Professor and Nobel Prize winner Dr. Burton Richter. The prestigious Fermi Prize is a Presidential award administered by the <span class="domtooltips">DOE<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Energy</span></span>&#8217;s Office of Science &#8220;to honor individuals who have given unstintingly over their careers to advance energy science, and to inspire future scientists to follow their example.&#8221;</p>
<h2>In Print</h2>
<p>Ezra Klein writes in the <em>Washington Post</em>, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/jeff-flakes-plan-to-politicize-the-national-science-foundation/2012/05/12/gIQAVuddKU_blog.html" target="_blank">Jeff Flake’s plan to politicize the National Science Foundation</a>, about Flake&#8217;s efforts to stop the <span class="domtooltips">NSF<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Science Foundation</span></span> from funding political science research. Klein accuses Flake of trying to politicize the <span class="domtooltips">NSF<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Science Foundation</span></span>, and also shares some of his own views on public access of federally funded research. Flake <a href="https://www.facebook.com/JeffFlake1/posts/10150956958826419" target="_blank">responded</a> to the piece on his Facebook page.</p>
<p>Reps. Bud McKeon (R-CA), Chair of the House Armed Services Committee, and Paul Ryan (R-WI), Chair of the House Budget Committee, penned an op-<span class="domtooltips">ed<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Education</span></span> entitled <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/05/09/military_crippling_sequester_must_be_stopped_114089.html" target="_blank">Military-Crippling Sequester Must Be Stopped</a> in <em>RealClearPolitics.com</em>. The op-<span class="domtooltips">ed<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Education</span></span> outlines the pairs&#8217; concerns about cuts to the military that would occur if sequestration were to take place. In addition to defense spending, however, the piece also mentions concerns about &#8220;deep cuts to programs like the National Institutes of Health and border security, squeezing critical priorities while letting entitlement spending remain on autopilot.&#8221;</p>
<p>In a piece entitled <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/other/226889-advocates-warn-automatic-cuts-would-hit-medical-research" target="_blank">Advocates warn automatic cuts would hit medical research</a><em>, The Hill</em> reports on how advocacy organizations are communicating the effect that sequestration would have on biomedical research.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re interested in learning more about what the Appropriations Committees have to say about how federal research agencies should spend their money in <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013, I recommend visiting <a href="http://www.aip.org/fyi/" target="_blank">AIP&#8217;s FYI blog</a>. There, you will find key excerpts of report language accompanying the <span class="domtooltips">DOE<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Energy</span></span>, <span class="domtooltips">NIST<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institute of Standards and Technology</span></span>, <span class="domtooltips">NSF<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Science Foundation</span></span>, and <span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span> <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 spending bills.</p>
<p>For any enrolled students reading this, the Task Force on American Innovation is still looking for students to submit videos highlighting the importance of federal funding for basic research. Prizes included a visit to Washington, DC and cash. Visit the contest&#8217;s <a href="https://communities.acs.org/groups/american-taskforce-video-contest" target="_blank">website </a>for more information on the competition.</p>
<h2>What&#8217;s on Deck</h2>
<p><em><strong>Tuesday (5/15)</strong></em></p>
<ul>
<li>The Senate Appropriations Committee will hold a subcommittee markup of the <a href="http://www.appropriations.senate.gov/events.cfm?date=5/15/2012" target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 homeland security spending bill</a>.</li>
<li>The <a href="http://www.cnsfweb.org/" target="_blank">Coalition for National Science Funding (CNSF)</a> will hold a reception on Capitol Hill highlighting researchers from across the country that are supported by the <span class="domtooltips">NSF<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Science Foundation</span></span>.</li>
</ul>
<p><em><strong>Wednesday (5/16)</strong></em></p>
<ul>
<li>The House Appropriations Committee will hold a full committee markup of the <a href="http://appropriations.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=295120" target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 homeland security spending bill.</a></li>
<li>The House Judiciary Committee will hold a full committee on hearing on <a href="http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/Hearings%202012/hear_05162012.html" target="_blank">Implementation of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act</a> (patent reform).</li>
<li>The Senate Appropriations Committee will hold a subcommittee markup of the <a href="http://www.appropriations.senate.gov/events.cfm?fuseaction=calendar.list&amp;date={ts%20%272012-05-16%2000:00:00%27}" target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 spending bill for the Environmental Protection Agency (<span class="domtooltips">EPA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Environmental Protection Agency</span></span>)</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><em><strong>Thursday</strong><strong> (5/17)</strong></em></p>
<ul>
<li>The Society of Women Engineers (SWE) will holding a Capitol Hill briefing on <a href="http://fs19.formsite.com/rsvp/12STEMcb/index.html" target="_blank">Improving <span class="domtooltips">STEM<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Science, Technology, Engineering, Math</span></span> Outreach through Strategic Partnerships</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nsp-feed/~4/jYOx1A3J6Mc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/05/14/week-in-review-or-replacing-sequestration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/05/14/week-in-review-or-replacing-sequestration/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Week in Review, or Reconciliation Revisited</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nsp-feed/~3/gDFDBakdFNQ/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/05/07/week-in-review-or-reconciliation-revisited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 07:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>abby-benson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week in Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Vest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decadal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FY 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golden Goose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCATS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reconciliation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/?p=2123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Members of Congress return to Washington this week after a week long recess.  Today, the House Budget Committee will mark up two bills —The Sequester Replacement Act of 2012 (H.R. 4966) and The Sequester Replacement Reconciliation Act of 2012—aimed at replacing sequestration, the mandatory cuts scheduled to begin in January 2013. CQ reports that the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a name="reconciliation"></a>Members of Congress return to Washington this week after a week long recess.  Today, the House Budget Committee will mark up two bills <strong>—</strong><a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d112:h.r.4966:" target="_blank">The Sequester Replacement Act of 2012 (H.R. 4966) and The Sequester Replacement Reconciliation Act of 2012</a><strong>—</strong>aimed at replacing sequestration, the mandatory cuts scheduled to begin in January 2013.<em> <strong></strong> CQ</em> reports that the first bill would stop sequestration from happening, while the second would outline a series of cuts to entitlement programs such as health care and food stamps that would replace the cuts to discretionary spending expected through sequestration. The latter measure stems from the recently passed House budget resolution which, in addition to setting a top-line spending level for <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 at $19 billion less than the amount agreed to in the <em><a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:S.365:" target="_blank">Budget Control Act</a></em>, directed six appropriations committees to conduct reconciliation. In this process, each committee identifies spending and revenue adjustments that bring their spending into alignment with the budget resolution. The savings each committee identified are outlined in this reconciliation bill, and would ultimately replace the discretionary cuts required by the <em>Budget Control Act</em>.</p>
<p>Yes, this is confusing! Bottom line, nobody wants sequester, and the reconciliation process represents one way the House Republicans propose to stop it. House Democrats likely won&#8217;t buy into this proposed solution, as evidenced by a report released last week by House Budget Committee Ranking Member, Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), entitled <a href="http://democrats.budget.house.gov/committee-report/republican-reconciliation-bills-reflect-wrong-priorities">Republican Reconciliation Proposals Reflect the Wrong Priorities.</a></p>
<p>In other news, Newt Gingrich formally ended his campaign to become the Republican nominee for President last week, further cementing Mitt Romney’s position as the presumptive GOP nominee.  If you&#8217;re interested in where various candidates fall on the subject of science, you <span class="domtooltips">can<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Cures Acceleration Network</span></span> visit the American Association for the Advancement of Science (<span class="domtooltips">AAAS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">American Association for the Advancement of Science</span></span>) <a href="http://election.aaas.org/" target="_blank">election website</a>, or a website created by Research!America, an advocacy group focused on biomedical research, called<a href="http://www.yourcandidatesyourhealth.org/" target="_blank"> Your Candidate Your Health. </a></p>
<h2>Also of Note</h2>
<p><em><strong>Appointments.</strong></em> <em>ScienceInsider</em> reports that <a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2012/05/engineering-academy-looks-for.html" target="_blank">Dr. Chuck Vest, President of the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) and former President of <span class="domtooltips">MIT<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</span></span>, has decided not to pursue a second term</a>. A search committee has been set up to identify Dr. Vest&#8217;s successor.</p>
<p><em><strong>Health.</strong></em> The National Institutes of Health&#8217;s (<span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span>) National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (<span class="domtooltips">NCATS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences</span></span>) announced a new initiative called <a href="http://www.ncats.nih.gov/research/reengineering/rescue-repurpose/therapeutic-uses/therapeutic-uses.html" target="_blank">Discovering New Therapeutic Uses for Existing Molecules</a>. This partnership between <span class="domtooltips">NCATS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences</span></span> and Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Eli Lilly, would give <span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span>-funded researchers access to molecules sitting with the companies that could be used to identify new therapies.</p>
<p><em><strong>Space.</strong></em> The National Research Council (<span class="domtooltips">NRC<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Research Council</span></span>) released an alarming report entitled<a href="http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13405" target="_blank"> Earth Science and Applications from Space: A Midterm Assessment of <span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span>&#8217;s Implementation of the Decadal Survey</a>. The <span class="domtooltips">NRC<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Research Council</span></span> press release indicates the report finds that &#8220;budget shortfalls, cost-estimate growth, launch failures, and changes in mission design and scope have left U.S. earth observation systems in a more precarious position than they were five years ago.  The report cautions that the nation&#8217;s earth observing system is beginning a rapid decline in capability, as long-running missions end and key new missions are delayed, lost, or cancelled.&#8221;</p>
<h2><strong>In Print</strong></h2>
<p>A <em>New York Times</em> piece entitled <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/01/opinion/of-geese-and-fleece.html?_r=1&amp;ref=opinion">Of Geese and Fleece</a> praises the <a href="http://cooper.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=597&amp;Itemid=73" target="_blank">Golden Goose Award</a> announced last week on Capitol Hill. This award intends to reward scientists whose &#8220;silly sounding&#8221; research has led to significant societal benefits.</p>
<h2><strong>What&#8217;s on Deck</strong></h2>
<p><strong><em>Monday (5/7)</em></strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The House Budget Committee will hold a markup of <a href="http://budget.house.gov/HearingSchedule/Hearing572012.htm" target="_blank">H.R. 4966, The Sequester Replacement Act of 2012 and The Sequester Replacement Reconciliation Act of 2012</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><em>Tuesday (5/8)</em></strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The House Science, Space, and Technology Committee will hold a subcommittee hearing on <a href="http://science.house.gov/hearing/subcommittee-investigations-and-oversight-hearing-green-building-rating-systems" target="_blank">Green Building Rating Systems</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><em>Wednesday (5/9)</em></strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The House Appropriations Committee will hold a subcommittee markup of the <a href="http://appropriations.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=294002" target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 Department of Homeland Security</a> spending bill.</li>
<li>The House Armed Services Committee will hold a full committee markup on the<a href="http://armedservices.house.gov/index.cfm/hearings-display?ContentRecord_id=7d4e5060-6c0a-4fae-9209-ef409e860d8c&amp;ContentType_id=14f995b9-dfa5-407a-9d35-56cc7152a7ed&amp;Group_id=13e47ffa-0753-47a7-ad5e-1ba7592015c9" target="_blank"> <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 National Defense Authorization Act</a>.</li>
<li>The House Energy and Commerce Committee will hold a subcommittee hearing on <a href="http://energycommerce.house.gov/hearings/hearingdetail.aspx?NewsID=9495" target="_blank">Budget and Spending Concerns at the Department of Health and Human Services (<span class="domtooltips">HHS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Health and Human Services</span></span>)</a>.</li>
<li>The House Homeland Security Committee will hold a joint subcommittee hearing on <a href="http://homeland.house.gov/hearing/joint-subcommittee-hearing-first-responder-technologies-ensuring-prioritized-approach" target="_blank">First Responder Technologies: Ensuring a Prioritized Approach for Homeland Security Research and Development</a>.</li>
<li>The House Science, Space, and Technology Committee will hold a subcommittee hearing on <a href="http://science.house.gov/hearing/subcommittee-research-and-science-education-hearing-american-taxpayer-dollars-nsf" target="_blank">American Taxpayer Dollars at the <span class="domtooltips">NSF<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Science Foundation</span></span></a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><em>Thursday (5/10)</em></strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee will hold a<span style="text-decoration: underline;"> <a href="http://commerce.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=Hearings&amp;ContentRecord_id=b6710fb2-1694-4920-98ae-943c2a00c7a8&amp;ContentType_id=14f995b9-dfa5-407a-9d35-56cc7152a7ed&amp;Group_id=15b72923-032d-43d0-8d4b-5c206b9ec988" target="_blank">nomination hearing</a> </span>for Dr. Patricia K. Falcone to be Associate Director of National Security and International Affairs at the Office of Science and Technology Policy (<span class="domtooltips">OSTP<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Office of Science and Technology Policy</span></span>).</li>
<li>The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee will hold a full committee hearing on <a href="http://www.energy.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/hearings-and-business-meetings?ID=d5cf8894-15b9-410b-b4e8-5915d2c2b321" target="_blank">The Helium Stewardship Act of 2012</a>.</li>
<li>The House Science, Space, and Technology Committee will hold a subcommittee hearing on <a href="http://science.house.gov/hearing/subcommittee-energy-and-environment-hearing-challenges-and-opportunities-unconventional" target="_blank">Challenges and Opportunities of Unconventional Resources Technology</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nsp-feed/~4/gDFDBakdFNQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/05/07/week-in-review-or-reconciliation-revisited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/05/07/week-in-review-or-reconciliation-revisited/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Week in Review, or Fêting Science</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nsp-feed/~3/DR72LdsWlQA/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/04/30/week-in-review-or-feting-science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 06:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>abby-benson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week in Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFRI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ARPA-E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chimpanzees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Kaiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DATA Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FY 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golden Goose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Glenn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myth Busters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIGMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NNI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Medal of Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/?p=2076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Washingtonians had another opportunity to celebrate science last week, when the second annual U.S.A. Science and Engineering Festival took place at the Washington Convention Center. The festival included hundreds of scientific exhibits and opportunities to meet real live researchers, as well as celebrity appearances the likes of the Discovery Channel&#8217;s Myth Busters. On Capitol Hill, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Washingtonians had another opportunity to celebrate science last week, when the second annual <a href="http://www.usasciencefestival.org/" target="_blank">U.S.A. Science and Engineering Festival</a> took place at the Washington Convention Center. The festival included hundreds of scientific exhibits and opportunities to meet real live researchers, as well as celebrity appearances the likes of the Discovery Channel&#8217;s<a href="http://dsc.discovery.com/tv/mythbusters/" target="_blank"> Myth Busters</a>.</p>
<p>On Capitol Hill, the House Appropriations Committee approved its <a href="http://appropriations.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=292277" target="_blank">302(b) allocations</a>, which sets the amount of spending each of its 12 subcommittees <span class="domtooltips">can<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Cures Acceleration Network</span></span> allocate. These allotments are based on the recently passed House budget, which shaves $19 billion off the amount agreed to in last year&#8217;s <em><a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:S.365:" target="_blank">Budget Control Act (BCA)</a></em>. As a result, the House subcommittee allocations are generally less than <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2012 levels and the the <a href="http://www.appropriations.senate.gov/news.cfm?method=news.view&amp;id=bbed8db5-dd2d-4933-8e2a-212376e40597" target="_blank">Senate&#8217;s 302(b) allocations</a>. This disparity in funding levels between the Senate and House will certainly make resolution of the two bills challenging later in the year, especially since the <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/legislative/letters/letter-regarding-fy2013-apps.pdf" target="_blank">Director of the White House&#8217;s Office of Management and Budget wrote to House Appropriators</a> last week indicating the President would not sign any spending bill that did not use the BCA agreed-to top line spending amount for <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013.</p>
<p>The full House Appropriations Committee also approved its Commerce, Justice, Science (CJS) and Energy and Water (E&amp;W) bills, without any significant changes to the amounts provided in last week&#8217;s update. In addition, the Senate Appropriations Committee held subcommittee and full committee markups of its <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 E&amp;W and Agriculture  spending bills (more details below).</p>
<h2>Also of Note</h2>
<p><em><strong>Appointments.</strong></em> Dr. Henry Kelly, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary and, until recently, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Department of Energy&#8217;s (<span class="domtooltips">DOE<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Energy</span></span>) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), will leave <span class="domtooltips">DOE<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Energy</span></span> for a position as a senior advisor to the President&#8217;s Science Advisor, John Holdren, at the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (<span class="domtooltips">OSTP<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Office of Science and Technology Policy</span></span>).</p>
<p><em>ScienceInsider</em> reports that just one week before he was supposed to take over as head of the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), <a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2012/04/incoming-director-of-nihs-basic.html?rss=1" target="_blank">Chris Kaiser of <span class="domtooltips">MIT<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</span></span> </a>has withdrawn his nomination, citing personal reasons in his decision.<em> ScienceInsider</em> also reports that <a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2012/04/epa-selects-new-science-adviser.html?rss=1" target="_blank">Glenn Paulson</a> has been named the next Environmental Protection Agency (<span class="domtooltips">EPA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Environmental Protection Agency</span></span>) science advisor. Paulson hails most recently from the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey.</p>
<p>Among the list of winners of this year&#8217;s <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/04/26/president-obama-names-presidential-medal-freedom-recipients" target="_blank">Presidential Medal of Freedom</a> are John Glenn, former astronaut and U.S. Senator, and William Foege, a physician and epidemiologist who helped to eradicate smallpox.</p>
<p><em><strong>Appropriations</strong></em>. The Senate Appropriations Committee held subcommittee and full committee markups of its <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 <a href="http://www.appropriations.senate.gov/news.cfm?method=news.view&amp;id=eaa626fc-9ba7-4477-ae48-25767c9ae814" target="_blank">E&amp;W</a> and <a href="http://www.appropriations.senate.gov/news.cfm?method=news.view&amp;id=93bc5fd3-238e-4e3b-bbdf-09fc833ed801" target="_blank">Agriculture</a> spending bills. The E&amp;W bill provides $4.9 billion for the <span class="domtooltips">DOE<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Energy</span></span> Office of Science, $35 million above the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2012 enacted level. The bill also includes $312 million for the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (<span class="domtooltips">ARPA-E<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Advanced Research Projects Agency--Energy</span></span>), $37 million more than the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2012 enacted level. Within the Agriculture bill, the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI), which funds competitive research, receives $298 million, an increase of $33.5 million over the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2012 enacted level.</p>
<p><em><strong>Health.</strong></em> The White House released its <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/04/26/national-bioeconomy-blueprint-released" target="_blank">National Bioeconomy Blueprint</a>. This document &#8220;outlines steps that agencies will take to drive the bioeconomy—economic activity powered by research and innovation in the biosciences—and details ongoing efforts across the Federal government to realize this goal.&#8221; The report includes five strategic goals to strengthen the bioeconomy, including increased support for basic research and translational efforts, more efficient regulation, and better training.</p>
<p>The American Association for the Advancement of Science (<span class="domtooltips">AAAS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">American Association for the Advancement of Science</span></span>), the Association of American Universities (<span class="domtooltips">AAU<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Association of American Universities</span></span>), the Association of Public and Land-grant Universities (<span class="domtooltips">APLU<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Association of Public and Land Grant Universities</span></span>), and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) issued a new report entitled <em><a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=1&amp;ved=0CCUQFjAA&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fcstsp.aaas.org%2Ffiles%2FAAAS-AAU-APLU-FBI%2520Final%2520Report.pdf&amp;ei=uHyeT8zqCMjiggf94fyDDw&amp;usg=AFQjCNFiuoxRrLmGH763nzaXez4XhIq72A" target="_blank">Bridging Science and Security for Biological Research: A Dialogue between Universities and the Federal Bureau of Investigation</a></em>. This report summarizes recent meetings between research universities and the FBI to discuss the agency&#8217;s role in biosecurity.</p>
<p><em><strong>Research. </strong></em>The House passed the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act (DATA Act) by voice vote. This bill has caused some <a href="http://www.aau.edu/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=13356" target="_blank">concern</a> with research universities as it would require a new central reporting system for federal grants and contracts without removing existing agency-specific reporting requirements. A Senate version of the bill has been introduced but is stalled with the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.</p>
<p>The President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) released a <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/PCAST_2012_Nanotechnology_FINAL.pdf" target="_blank">Report to the President and Congress on the Fourth Assessment of the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI)</a>. This biennal report is required by Congress to update them on the progress of the NNI.</p>
<p>In a press conference on Capitol Hill last week, three members of Congress, with the support of several associations including the <span class="domtooltips">AAAS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">American Association for the Advancement of Science</span></span>, announced a new award called the <a href="http://cooper.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=597&amp;Itemid=73" target="_blank">&#8220;Golden Goose Award.&#8221;</a> This award, a play on the Golden Fleece award of the 1970s, will reward scientists who conducted research that on the surface sounded silly, but ultimately had significant societal benefit. The first award will be selected by an expert panel and presented in September of 2012.</p>
<h2>In Print</h2>
<p>In a <em>Washington Post</em> op-<span class="domtooltips">ed<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Education</span></span> entitled <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/obama-should-push-for-investments-not-buffett-rule/2012/04/25/gIQALOxkhT_story.html" target="_blank">The Right Economic Investment for America</a>, Fareed Zakaria includes the President&#8217;s proposed 5% increase in federal R&amp;D on a list of investments that could contribute to long-term economic growth.</p>
<p>The <em>Washington Post</em> also covered the announcement of the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/why-the-sex-life-of-the-screwworm-deserves-taxpayer-dollars/2012/04/26/gIQAQvT1iT_blog.html" target="_blank">Golden Goose Award</a>, as described above.</p>
<p><em>Nature&#8217;s</em> blog reports on two hearings of interest to the research community, including a Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing on <a href="http://blogs.nature.com/news/2012/04/senate-hearing-on-h5n1-papers-exposes-political-divisions.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+news%2Frss%2Fnewsblog+%28News+Blog+-+Blog+Posts%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader" target="_blank">dual use research</a>, and a Senate Environment and Public Works Committee hearing on legislation that would <a href="http://blogs.nature.com/news/2012/04/chimpanzee-bill-recieves-first-hearing.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+news%2Frss%2Fnewsblog+%28News+Blog+-+Blog+Posts%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader" target="_blank">ban research conducted on great apes</a>.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.aaas.org/news/releases/2012/0427fstp_holdren.shtml?sa_campaign=Internal_Ads/AAAS/RSS_News/2012-04-27/" target="_blank">President&#8217;s Science Advisor, John Holdren, made remarks at the <span class="domtooltips">AAAS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">American Association for the Advancement of Science</span></span> annual Science and Technology Policy Forum</a>, where he affirmed the President&#8217;s belief that &#8220;investments in research, in infrastructure related to science, technology, and innovation, and in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education are not the places to cut back,” and that “We need to maintain those investments&#8230; in order to build a basis for our ongoing economic prosperity, for our national security, for our environmental quality, and for our quality of life.”</p>
<h2>What&#8217;s on Deck</h2>
<p>The House and Senate are both in recess this week.</p>
<p><em><strong>Monday (4/30)</strong></em></p>
<ul>
<li>The American Geophysical Union will hold a Capitol Hill briefing on &#8220;<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=2&amp;ved=0CDIQFjAB&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fsites.agu.org%2Fspconference%2Ffiles%2F2012%2F04%2FAGU-Gulf-of-Mexico-Miss-River-Water-Quality-Briefing.pdf&amp;ei=BNSdT4vwJ4ikgweSodjoDg&amp;usg=AFQjCNEssTD6BhpmJiDSLf4KcAwp2E9rVQ" target="_blank">From the Mississippi to the Gulf: Water Quality and Security</a>.&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nsp-feed/~4/DR72LdsWlQA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/04/30/week-in-review-or-feting-science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/04/30/week-in-review-or-feting-science/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Week in Review, or Shuttle Sightings</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nsp-feed/~3/ebMoDdg6AmQ/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/04/22/week-in-review-or-shuttle-sightings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 19:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>abby-benson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week in Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bayh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kauffman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sebelius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shuttle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STEM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/?p=2046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Science was at the forefront of many Washingtonians&#8217; minds (and TVs) last week as they staked out spots from the National Mall to Dulles airport to watch the space shuttle Discovery, perched on the back of a 747, make its final flight. While I missed the overflight due to a meeting on the Hill (about science!), [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Science was at the forefront of many Washingtonians&#8217; minds (and TVs) last week as they staked out spots from the National Mall to Dulles airport to watch <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/space-shuttle-discovery-makes-final-flight-over-washington-dc/2012/04/18/gIQAMtqcQT_story.html" target="_blank">the space shuttle Discovery, </a><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/space-shuttle-discovery-makes-final-flight-over-washington-dc/2012/04/18/gIQAMtqcQT_story.html" target="_blank">perched on the back of a 747</a><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/space-shuttle-discovery-makes-final-flight-over-washington-dc/2012/04/18/gIQAMtqcQT_story.html" target="_blank">, make its final flight</a>. While I missed the overflight due to a meeting on the Hill (about science!), I enjoyed hearing all the buzz about science, space, and discovery that surrounded the flight.</p>
<p>Science was also on the minds of House and Senate Appropriators last week as they marked up <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 spending bills that would fund the National Science Foundation (<span class="domtooltips">NSF<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Science Foundation</span></span>), the National Institute of Standards and Technology (<span class="domtooltips">NIST<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institute of Standards and Technology</span></span>), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (<span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span>), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (<span class="domtooltips">NOAA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration</span></span>), and the Department of Energy (<span class="domtooltips">DOE<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Energy</span></span>) Office of Science (more details below).</p>
<p>The Senate Appropriations Committee also approved its <a href="http://www.appropriations.senate.gov/news.cfm?method=news.view&amp;id=bbed8db5-dd2d-4933-8e2a-212376e40597" target="_blank">302 (b) allocations</a>, which designate how much money each subcommittee <span class="domtooltips">can<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Cures Acceleration Network</span></span> appropriate. Despite the fact that the Senate hasn&#8217;t passed an official budget resolution (although Senate Budget Committee Chair, Kent Conrad (D-ND), <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-congress/2012/04/a-democratic-senate-budget-sort-of-120852.html" target="_blank">came close last week</a>), these allocations are based on the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 spending level agreed to in the <em><a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:S.365:" target="_blank">Budget Control Act (BCA)</a></em> last summer. Two Republican members of the Appropriations committee approved the allocations, including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), a move at odds with his counterpart in the House, Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH), who approved a House budget that would cut total spending $19 billion below the <em>BCA</em>-agreed-to level.</p>
<p>The American Association for the Advancement of Science (<span class="domtooltips">AAAS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">American Association for the Advancement of Science</span></span>) last week released an <a href="http://www.aaas.org/spp/rd/fy2013/HouseBudgetBrief.shtml" target="_blank">analysis of the impacts of this House budget to research accounts</a>. According to the estimate, the budget would result in total R&amp;D cuts of 3%, and non-defense R&amp;D cuts of 5% below <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2012. These reductions would be even further exacerbated by sequestration, which is supposed to kick in in January 2013. The <span class="domtooltips">AAAS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">American Association for the Advancement of Science</span></span> analysis estimates that this could result in combined R&amp;D  cuts of up to 12% below current levels.</p>
<h2>Also of Note</h2>
<p><em><strong>Appropriations.</strong></em> The Senate Appropriations Committee held subcommittee and full committee markups of its Commerce, Justice, Science (CJS) <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 spending bill and the House Appropriations Committee held subcommittee markups of both its CJS bill and its Energy and Water Development (E&amp;W) bill. I&#8217;ve included some of the research highlights below, visit the links for more details:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.appropriations.senate.gov/news.cfm?method=news.view&amp;id=bbed8db5-dd2d-4933-8e2a-212376e40597" target="_blank">Senate <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 CJS Bill: </a></p>
<ul>
<li><strong><span class="domtooltips">NSF<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Science Foundation</span></span></strong>: The bill provides $7.3 billion, an increase of $240 million over the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2012 enacted level.</li>
<li><strong><span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span>:</strong> The bill provides $19.4 billion, an increase of $1.6 billion over the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2012 enacted level. Within <span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span>, the bill provides $5 billion for Science, $69 million below the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2012 level, and includes a restoration of the controversial President&#8217;s budget request that would cut the planetary science account.</li>
<li><strong><span class="domtooltips">NIST<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institute of Standards and Technology</span></span>:</strong> The bill provides $826 million, $75 million above the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2012 enacted level. This includes an increase for <span class="domtooltips">NIST<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institute of Standards and Technology</span></span> laboratories and $14.5 million for new Advanced Manufacturing Technology Consortia.</li>
<li><strong><span class="domtooltips">NOAA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration</span></span></strong>: The bill provides $3.4 billion, which is $1.47 billion below the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2012 enacted level. This big reduction is due to a proposed transfer of funding for weather satellites from <span class="domtooltips">NOAA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration</span></span> to <span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span>.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://appropriations.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=290672" target="_blank">House <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 CJS Bill:</a></p>
<ul>
<li><strong><strong><span class="domtooltips">NSF<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Science Foundation</span></span>: </strong></strong>The bill provides <strong><strong></strong></strong>$7.3 billion,$299 million above the Fiscal Year 2012 enacted level.</li>
<li><strong><span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span>:</strong> The bill provides $17.6 billion, $226 million below the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2012 enacted level. Within <span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span>, Science receives $5.1 billion, an increase from <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2012, and a restoration of planetary science funding contingent on a <a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2012/04/house-panel-wants-nasa-to-plan.html?rss=1" target="_blank">National Research Council (<span class="domtooltips">NRC<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Research Council</span></span>) certification</a>.</li>
<li><strong><span class="domtooltips">NIST<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institute of Standards and Technology</span></span>:</strong> The bill provides $830 million, $79 million above the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2012 enacted level. This includes an increase to <span class="domtooltips">NIST<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institute of Standards and Technology</span></span>&#8217;s laboratories and $21 million for the new Advanced Manufacturing Technology Consortia.</li>
<li><strong><span class="domtooltips">NOAA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration</span></span>:</strong> The bill provides $5.0 billion for <span class="domtooltips">NOAA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration</span></span>, $68 million above the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2012 enacted level. This bill does not include the proposed transfer of satellites to <span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span> included in the Senate bill.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://appropriations.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=290398" target="_blank">House E&amp;W Bill:</a></p>
<ul>
<li><strong><span class="domtooltips">DOE<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Energy</span></span>:</strong> The bill provides $26.3 billion, $358 million below the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2012 enacted level. Within <span class="domtooltips">DOE<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Energy</span></span>, the Office of Science receives $4.8 billion, $64 million below the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2012 level. The Advanced research Projects Agency -Energy (<span class="domtooltips">ARPA-E<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Advanced Research Projects Agency--Energy</span></span>) receives $200 million, $75 million below the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2012 enacted level.</li>
</ul>
<p><em><strong>Defense.</strong></em> The Rand Corporation released a new report entitled <a href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1176.html" target="_blank">Improving Basic Army Research</a>, which summarizes activities of a panel of experts who looked at &#8220;national trends in basic research and R&amp;D, including trends in Department of Defense research funding; conducted an in-depth examination of the Army research enterprise; and profiled several non-Army laboratories known for their high-quality basic research, to gain insight into how the Army might better structure and fund its own labs.&#8221; The report gives a strong endorsement of the importance of Army basic research, but provides recommendations for management improvements.</p>
<p><em><strong>Education.</strong></em> The White House released the <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/04/18/ostp-releases-data-stem-education" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;"><span style="color: #0000ff;">2010 Federal <span class="domtooltips">STEM<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Science, Technology, Engineering, Math</span></span> Education Inventory Data Set</span></span></a>. This data set includes &#8220;information on what <span class="domtooltips">STEM<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Science, Technology, Engineering, Math</span></span> education programs the government funded in 2010, what audiences were targeted, what outcomes were monitored, and much more. The data set, which includes information from 13 Federal agencies that support education programs focused on <span class="domtooltips">STEM<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Science, Technology, Engineering, Math</span></span> subjects, is the most comprehensive description of Federal <span class="domtooltips">STEM<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Science, Technology, Engineering, Math</span></span> education programs.&#8221;</p>
<p><em><strong>Energy.</strong></em> The Brookings Institution, the Breakthrough Institute, and the World Resources Institute released a report called <a href="http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2012/0418_clean_investments_muro.aspx" target="_blank">Beyond Boom and Bust: Putting Clean Tech On a Path To Subsidy Independence</a>. This report outlines challenges in the U.S. clean tech industry that is heavily dependent on waning federal investments in the forms of R&amp;D, loans, and subsidies.</p>
<p><em><strong>Health. </strong></em>The National Institutes of Health (<span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span>) released a checklist that will help research entities ensure they are abiding by new <a href="http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/coi/checklist_policy_dev_20120412.pdf" target="_blank">Federal Conflict of Interest (FCOI) rules</a>. According to the document, it&#8217;s purpose is &#8220;to provide an overview of the requirements of the 2011 revised FCOI regulation to serve as a checklist resource when developing, revising or reviewing an Institution’s FCOI policy to determine compliance with all regulatory requirements.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Director of the <span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span>, Dr. Francis Collins, announced that he and the Secretary of Health and Human Services (<span class="domtooltips">HHS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Health and Human Services</span></span>), Kathleen Sebelius, would <a href="http://www.nih.gov/about/director/04202012_NSABB.htm" target="_blank">formally accept the recommendation of the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB)</a> to publish two manuscripts on avian flu research that have been at the center of a <a href="http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/03/05/week-in-review-or-deficit-deja-vu/#avianagain" target="_blank">swirling controversy</a> over dual use research of concern.</p>
<p>The Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology released <a href="http://www.faseb.org/Portals/0/PDFs/opa/4.16.12%20Sequestration%20Analysis%20Press%20Release.pdf" target="_blank">its analysis of how sequestration would affect funding for the <span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span></a>, including a breakout of impacts by state. The report assumes a 9.1% cut to <span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span>, with a 11.1% cut to extramural grants, taking into account that some funding, such as that which supports salaries, is more difficult to cut than other kinds.</p>
<p><em><strong>Research. </strong></em>It looks like the <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d112:h.r.2146:" target="_blank"><em>Digital Accountability and Transparency Act (DATA Act)</em></a> will come to the House floor this week for a vote. The goal of this legislation is to improve transparency and accountability of federal grant-making, through increased reporting requirements. Several research entities, including the <a href="http://www.aau.edu/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=13342" target="_blank">Association of American Universities</a>, are concerned that this legislation puts in place duplicative reporting requirements that will be overly burdensome to research entities. <em><strong><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"> </span> </strong></em></p>
<h2>In Print</h2>
<p>In an <em>Atlantic</em> op-<span class="domtooltips">ed<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Education</span></span> entitled <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/04/school-power-the-case-for-keeping-innovation-in-the-hands-of-universities/255751/" target="_blank">School Power: The Case for Keeping Innovation in the Hands of Universities</a><em>,</em> former Senator Birch Bayh and Joseph Allen write about the importance of maintaining the current technology transfer regime in which universities, rather than individual researchers, manage the technology transfer of the result of federally funded research. This regime has been challenged in recent years by the Kauffman Foundation, which recommends a <a href="http://www.kauffman.org/newsroom/kauffman-foundation-experts-solution-named-to_list-of-ten-breakthrough-ideas-for_2010-by-harvard-business-review.aspx" target="_blank">&#8220;free agency&#8221; proposal</a>, under which researchers would retain the right to manage the tech transfer of their discoveries.</p>
<p>The American Institute of Physics (AIP) FYI blog summarizes some key excerpts from a recent House Appropriations<a href="http://www.aip.org/fyi/2012/054.html?source=rssfyi" target="_blank"> CJS Subcommittee hearing </a>and an <a href="http://www.aip.org/fyi/2012/053.html" target="_blank">E&amp;W Subcommittee hearing</a>.</p>
<p>The Task Force on American Innovation has posted the video of a recent Capitol Hill briefing describing how <a href="http://vimeo.com/40104374" target="_blank">federally funded research influenced the technologies used in the iPad</a>.</p>
<h2>What&#8217;s on Deck</h2>
<p><em><strong>Tuesday (4/24)</strong></em></p>
<ul>
<li>The Senate Appropriations Committee will hold a subcommittee markup on the <a href="http://www.appropriations.senate.gov/events.cfm?date=4/24/2012" target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 Energy and Water spending bill</a>.</li>
<li>The House Committee on Homeland Security Committee will hold a subcommittee hearing on <a href="http://homeland.house.gov/hearing/subcommittee-hearing-america-under-cyber-attack-why-urgent-action-needed" target="_blank">America is Under Cyber Attack: Why Urgent Action is Needed</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><em>Wednesday (4/25)</em></strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee will hold an Executive Session on the <a href="http://www.help.senate.gov/hearings/hearing/?id=c042aa0f-5056-9502-5d26-7103b0fba398" target="_blank">Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act</a>.</li>
<li>The House Appropriations Committee will hold a full committee hearing on the <a href="http://appropriations.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=291780" target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 Energy and Water spending bill.</a></li>
<li>The House Science, Space, and Technology Committee and House Small Business Committee will hold a joint hearing on <a href="http://science.house.gov/hearing/committee-science-space-technology-subcommittee-investigations-oversight-and-committee-small" target="_blank">How the Report on Carcinogens Uses Science to Meet its Statutory Obligations, and its Impact on Small Business Jobs</a>.</li>
<li>The National Science Foundation, Senator Harry Reid, and Discover Magazine will host a Capitol Hill briefing on Road to the <a href="http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=123915&amp;WT.mc_id=USNSF_51&amp;WT.mc_ev=click" target="_blank">New Energy Economy: Re-engineering Water for Power</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><em><strong>Thursday (4/26)</strong></em></p>
<ul>
<li>The House Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee will hold a hearing on <a href="http://www.hsgac.senate.gov/hearings/biological-security-the-risk-of-dual-use-research" target="_blank">Biological Security: The Risk of Dual-Use Research</a>.</li>
<li>The House Committee on Education and Workforce will hold a hearing on the <a href="http://edworkforce.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=291024" target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 budget request for <span class="domtooltips">HHS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Health and Human Services</span></span></a>.</li>
<li>The House Committee on Homeland Security will hold a subcommittee hearing on <a href="http://homeland.house.gov/hearing/subcommittee-hearing-ensuring-efficiency-effectiveness-and-transparency-homeland-security" target="_blank">Ensuring the Efficiency, Effectiveness, and Transparency of Homeland Security Grants (Part II): Stakeholder Perspectives</a>.</li>
<li>The House Science, Space, and Technology Committee will hold a hearing on <a href="http://science.house.gov/hearing/subcommittee-space-and-aeronautics-hearing-overview-nasa-aeronautics-research-mission" target="_blank">An Overview of the <span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span> Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate Budget for <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013</a>.</li>
<li>The House Armed Services Committee Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities will hold a markup on <a href="http://armedservices.house.gov/index.cfm/hearings-display?ContentRecord_id=b8169116-1405-4142-a7da-b14583a0bc7e" target="_blank">The National Defense Authorization Act of 2013</a>.</li>
</ul>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nsp-feed/~4/ebMoDdg6AmQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/04/22/week-in-review-or-shuttle-sightings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/04/22/week-in-review-or-shuttle-sightings/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Weeks in Review, or Spring has Sprung</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nsp-feed/~3/rIosWZg9FYc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/04/16/weeks-in-review-or-spring-has-sprung/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>abby-benson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week in Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cherry blossoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conrad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DARPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TEDMED]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/?p=1992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been lovely and quiet in Washington, with schools on spring break, Congress in recess, and the cherry blossoms already come and gone. When both chambers return to the capitol this week, they will continue on with the appropriations process, despite the looming election impasse expected later in the year. Contrary to previous reports, CQ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been lovely and quiet in Washington, with schools on spring break, Congress in recess, and the cherry blossoms already come and gone. When both chambers return to the capitol this week, they will continue on with the appropriations process, despite the looming election impasse expected later in the year.</p>
<p>Contrary to previous reports, <em>CQ</em> indicates that the Senate Budget Committee will now markup a budget resolution for <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013. Committee Chairman Kent Conrad (D-ND) had previously indicated that he wouldn&#8217;t bother with such a markup, since the <em><a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:S.365:" target="_blank">Budget Control Act </a></em>already specified a top-line number for this year&#8217;s spending. The change of heart may have come about, however, after the House passed a budget resolution before recess that would cut $19 billion from the previously agreed to amount. A Senate budget resolution would send a strong counter signal, further solidifying the differing views of the two chambers&#8217; majority parties on how to deal with the federal deficit.</p>
<h2>Also of Note</h2>
<p><em><strong></strong></em><em><strong>Defense.</strong></em> The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) announced a new <a href="http://www.darpa.mil/NewsEvents/Releases/2012/04/10.aspx" target="_blank">Robotics Challenge</a> that will launch in October 2012. For this initiative, which supports the broader <a href="http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=503641&amp;org=CISE" target="_blank">National Robotics Initiative</a>, DARPA seeks teams &#8220;to compete in challenges involving staged disaster-response scenarios in which robots will have to successfully navigate a series of physical tasks corresponding to anticipated, real-world disaster-response requirements. &#8221;</p>
<p><em><strong>Health.</strong></em> National Institutes of Health (<span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span>) Director Francis Collins participated in the TEDMED 2012 conference in Washington where,  according to the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, he spoke about<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2012/04/11/bridge-the-gap-between-basic-research-and-patient-care-nih-head-urges/?mod=google_news_blog" target="_blank"> challenges related to the translation of research results into useful therapies</a>. He also brought his guitar along, performing an entertaining rendition of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKJiYkcWs0M&amp;feature=youtu.behttp://on.wsj.com/IAehLy" target="_blank">Disease Don&#8217;t Care</a>.</p>
<p>The <span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span> and the Food and Drug Administration (<span class="domtooltips">FDA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Food and Drug Administration</span></span>) announced an upcoming workshop on &#8220;<a href="http://www.team-share.net/Natural_History_Studies_Rare_Diseases/overview.aspx" target="_blank">Natural History Studies of Rare Diseases: Meeting the Needs of Drug Development and Research</a>.&#8221; This workshop will be held in May, and &#8220;aims to bring together thought leaders in the design, conduct, and evaluation of natural history studies to discuss the role of these studies in the development of therapeutic candidates.&#8221;</p>
<p>Dr. Collins has named <a href="http://www.nih.gov/news/health/apr2012/nhlbi-05.htm" target="_blank">Gary Gibbons as the new director of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)</a>. Dr. Gibbons comes to the position from the Morehouse School of Medicine in Atlanta.</p>
<p><em><strong>Innovation.</strong></em> The Office of Science Technology Policy (<span class="domtooltips">OSTP<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Office of Science and Technology Policy</span></span>) announced that it plans to hold a conference this summer on <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/04/09/21st-century-grand-challenges" target="_blank">21st Century Grand Challenges</a>. &#8220;Grand Challenges&#8221; have been a consistent theme during President Obama’s Administration, and are highlighted in the Administration&#8217;s <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/nec/StrategyforAmericanInnovation" target="_blank">Strategy for American Innovation</a>. Examples of grand challenges include the sequencing of the human genome, and making electric vehicles affordable and accessible for all. In support of this strategy, <span class="domtooltips">OSTP<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Office of Science and Technology Policy</span></span> also announced a new report on the<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/04/10/identifying-steps-forward-use-prizes-spur-innovation?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+whitehouse%2Fostp+%28WhiteHouse.gov+Blog+Feed%3A+Office+of+Science+and+Technology+Policy%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader" target="_blank"> use of prizes to spur innovation</a>.</p>
<p><em><strong>Research</strong></em>. The National Science Foundation (<span class="domtooltips">NSF<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Science Foundation</span></span>) released a notice on March 27th outlining its plan to implement the National Science Board (<span class="domtooltips">NSB<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Science Board</span></span>) recommendations on <a href="http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2012/in132/in132.pdf?WT.mc_id=USNSF_80" target="_blank">updating merit review criteria used to evaluate research proposals</a>. While the agency doesn&#8217;t intend to change the merit review criteria, the notice outlines the process they intend to use to &#8220;articulate the underlying principles&#8221; of the existing criteria.</p>
<p>The White House released a new report entitled <a href="http://1.usa.gov/Ihdgos" target="_blank">A Report To Congress on the Coordination of Policies Related to the Dissemination and Long-Term Stewardship of the Results of Federally Funded Scientific Research.</a> This report, as required by the America COMPETES Act of 201o, outlines the various initiatives the government has undertaken to receive input on public access, including the outcomes of several requests for information (RFIs) and task forces on the subject.</p>
<p>The White House announced that a <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/04/06/scientific-integrity-policies-released?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+whitehouse%2Fostp+%28WhiteHouse.gov+Blog+Feed%3A+Office+of+Science+and+Technology+Policy%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader" target="_blank">majority of federal departments and agencies have now posted scientific-integrity guidelines</a> online. These guidelines are designed to ensure that agencies use science appropriately in supporting and accomplishing their missions.</p>
<p><em><strong>Space.</strong></em> <span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span> announced that its <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/apr/12-112_MPPG_Update.html" target="_blank">working group on the future of Mars Exploration is now accepting abstracts and input from the public on its future path</a>. This working group was put in place after the President&#8217;s <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 budget request for <span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span> included a significant cut to the Planetary Science account, effectively delaying existing Mars exploration plans.</p>
<h2>In Print</h2>
<p>The <a href="http://www.aip.org/fyi/" target="_blank">American Institute of Physics FYI blog</a> summarizes several research-related hearings, including a March hearing on keeping America competitive through R&amp;D<a>, three recent hearings</a> related to the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 <span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span> budget, and a House Science, Space, and Technology Committee hearing on public access to federally funded research.</p>
<p><em>SpacePolicyOnline</em> reports on a recent <a href="http://www.spacepolicyonline.com/news/no-prohibition-against-science-flagship-missions-omb-tells-nrc?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Spacepolicyonline+%28SpacePolicyOnline+News%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader" target="_blank">discussion between the National Research Council (<span class="domtooltips">NRC<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Research Council</span></span>) and Office of Management and Budget (<span class="domtooltips">OMB<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Office of Management and Budget</span></span>) officials</a> about the Administration&#8217;s stance toward <span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span>&#8217;s &#8220;flagship missions.&#8221; <span class="domtooltips">OMB<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Office of Management and Budget</span></span> officials indicated they are not against flagship missions, but rather are trying to operate within a constrained fiscal environment.</p>
<p>Dr. Gordon Tomaselli, President of the American Heart Association, writes in a <em>ScienceProgress</em> piece entitled <a href="http://scienceprogress.org/2012/04/protect-the-national-institutes-of-health-from-the-sequester/" target="_blank">Protect the National Institutes of Health from Sequester </a>about what sequester would mean for biomedical research at <span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span>.</p>
<h2>What&#8217;s On Deck</h2>
<p><em><strong>Monday (4/16)</strong></em></p>
<ul>
<li>The President&#8217;s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) will hold a <a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2012/03/28/2012-7433/presidents-council-of-advisors-on-science-and-technology-pcast" target="_blank">conference call</a> to discuss two new reports, one on Advanced Manufacturing Partnership and another on Advancing Innovation in Drug Development and Evaluation.</li>
</ul>
<p><em><strong>Tuesday (4/17)</strong></em></p>
<ul>
<li>The Senate Appropriations Committee will hold subcommittee markups of its <a href="http://www.appropriations.senate.gov/events.cfm?date=4/17/2012" target="_blank">Commerce, Justice, Science <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 spending bill and its Transportation, Housing and Urban Development</a> <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 spending bill.</li>
<li>The Senate Armed Services Committee will hold a subcommittee hearing on the<a href="http://armed-services.senate.gov/e_witnesslist.cfm?id=5289" target="_blank"> health and status of the Department of Defense science and technology laboratories and enterprise.</a></li>
<li>The House Armed Services Committee will hold a subcommittee hearing on <a href="http://armedservices.house.gov/index.cfm/hearings-display?ContentRecord_id=89a71112-996d-48a8-be9f-5579475818db&amp;ContentType_id=14f995b9-dfa5-407a-9d35-56cc7152a7ed&amp;Group_id=13e47ffa-0753-47a7-ad5e-1ba7592015c9">Fiscal Year 2013 National Defense Budget Request for Atomic Energy Defense Activities and Nuclear Forces Programs</a>.</li>
<li>The House Science, Space, and Technology Committee will hold a full committee hearing on <a href="http://science.house.gov/hearing/full-committee-tapping-america%E2%80%99s-unconventional-oil-resources-job-creation-and-affordable">Tapping America’s Unconventional Oil Resources for Job Creation and Affordable Domestic Energy: Technology and Policy Pathways.</a><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-family: University;"><br />
</span></span></span></span></li>
</ul>
<p><em><strong>Wednesday (4/18)</strong></em></p>
<ul>
<li>The Senate Armed Services Committee will hold a subcommittee hearing on the <a href="http://armed-services.senate.gov/e_witnesslist.cfm?id=5292" target="_blank">National Nuclear Security Administration management of its National Security Laboratories</a>.</li>
<li>The House Appropriations Energy and Water Subcommittee will mark up its<a href="http://appropriations.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=289850" target="_blank"> Energy and Water Development <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 spending bill</a>.</li>
<li>The House Energy and Commerce Committee will hold subcommittee hearings on <a href="http://energycommerce.house.gov/hearings/hearingdetail.aspx?NewsID=9451" target="_blank">budget and spending concerns at the <span class="domtooltips">DOE<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Energy</span></span></a> and <a id="Newsroomlistcontrol1_NewsDataList_ctl03_TitleLink" href="http://energycommerce.house.gov/hearings/hearingdetail.aspx?NewsID=9450"><span class="domtooltips">FDA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Food and Drug Administration</span></span> User Fees 2012: How Innovation Helps Patients and Jobs</a>.</li>
<li>The House Science, Space, and Technology Committee will hold subcommittee hearings on<a href="http://science.house.gov/hearing/subcommittee-research-and-science-education-hearing-nsf-major-multi-user-research-facilities"> <span class="domtooltips">NSF<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Science Foundation</span></span> Major Multi-User Research Facilities Management</a> and <a href="http://science.house.gov/hearing/subcommittee-technology-and-innovation-hearing-%E2%80%93-growing-wireless-economy-through-innovation">Growing the Wireless Economy through Innovation.</a></li>
</ul>
<p><em><strong>Thursday (4/19)</strong></em></p>
<ul>
<li>The House Homeland Security Committee will hold a subcommittee hearing on the<a href="http://homeland.house.gov/hearing/subcommittee-hearing-dhs-and-doe-national-labs-finding-efficiencies-and-optimizing-outputs"> Department of Homeland Security (<span class="domtooltips">DHS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Homeland Security</span></span>) and <span class="domtooltips">DOE<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Energy</span></span> National Labs: Finding Efficiencies and Optimizing Outputs in Homeland Security Research and Development</a>.</li>
<li>The House Science, Space, and Technology Committee will hold a subcommittee hearing on <a href="http://science.house.gov/hearing/subcommittee-investigation-and-oversight-subcommittee-energy-and-environment-%E2%80%93-joint-hearing">Impact of Tax Policies on the Commercial Application of Renewable Energy Technology</a>.</li>
<li>The American Chemical Society will hold a Capitol Hill briefing on <a href="http://www.congressplus.com/events/index.cfm?action=Registration_Form&amp;eventcode=PGutRu&amp;bypass=true" target="_blank">Cybersecurity and Smart Infrastructure: Ensuring Resilience and Deterrence.</a></li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nsp-feed/~4/rIosWZg9FYc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/04/16/weeks-in-review-or-spring-has-sprung/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/04/16/weeks-in-review-or-spring-has-sprung/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Week in Review, or Springing into Recess</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nsp-feed/~3/a2VkPHjZ80g/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/04/02/week-in-review-or-springing-into-recess/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 11:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>abby-benson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week in Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avian flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[danielson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FY 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mcconnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UMR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/?p=1970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House and Senate began their two-week spring recess last Friday after passing the House budget resolution for FYFiscal Year 2013. As described last week, this plan would cut $19 billion from the FYFiscal Year 2013 spending level outlined in the Budget Control Act. A significant portion of those cuts would be aimed at non-defense [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The House and Senate began their two-week spring recess last Friday after passing the House <a href="http://budget.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=288099" target="_blank">budget resolution</a> for <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013. <a title="Week in Review, or Budget Backtracking" href="http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/03/26/week-in-review-or-budget-backtrackin/#ryan" target="_blank">As described last week</a>, this plan would cut $19 billion from the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 spending level outlined in the <em><a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d112:s.365:" target="_blank">Budget Control Act</a>.</em> A significant portion of those cuts would be aimed at non-defense discretionary spending (which supports most research agencies), while defense discretionary spending would be increased. The House voted along party lines to approve the budget resolution, while also voting down a number of alternative symbolic proposals including one put forth by the conservation House <a href="http://rsc.jordan.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=287885" target="_blank">Republican Study Committee</a> and another put forth by a bipartisan group of moderate members echoing principals outlined in the <a href="http://www.fiscalcommission.gov/" target="_blank">Bowles-Simpson commission</a>.</p>
<h2>Also of Note</h2>
<p><em><strong>Energy.</strong></em> A group of 60 House Members from both sides of the aisle sent a <a href="http://www.aau.edu/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=13238" target="_blank">letter</a> to House appropriators requesting support for the Department of Energy (<span class="domtooltips">DOE<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Energy</span></span>) Office of Science, which funds basic research. Although the letter does not reference a specific dollar figure for <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013, it does ask for “robust and substantial funding.”</p>
<p>The Senate <a href="http://energy.gov/articles/energy-department-nominees-confirmed-us-senate" target="_blank">confirmed</a> a number of Presidential nominees before breaking for recess, including <span class="domtooltips">MIT<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</span></span> alum David Danielson as Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), and Charles McConnell as Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy.</p>
<p><em><strong>Health.</strong></em> A group of 49 Senators from both sides of the aisle <a href="http://www.aau.edu/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=13270" target="_blank">wrote</a> to Senate appropriators in support of funding for the National Institutes of Health (<span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span>). Unlike <a title="Week in Review, or Budget Backtracking" href="http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/03/26/week-in-review-or-budget-backtrackin/#nihhouse" target="_blank">a similar letter</a> completed last week in the House requesting $32 billion for the agency, this letter does not request a specific dollar figure for <span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span>, but rather asks for a &#8220;strong commitment to funding&#8221; for the agency.</p>
<p>The Department of Health and Human Services (<span class="domtooltips">HHS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Health and Human Services</span></span>) released a new <a href="http://oba.od.nih.gov/biosecurity/news_events_oba.html#NSABB" target="_blank">policy</a> related to federally supported research on certain biological agents or toxins that are considered potential threats to public health and safety. This policy would require federal research agencies to regularly review existing grants to identify research that involves any of 15 named agents, and to identify concerns related to &#8220;dual use&#8221; (i.e., potential misuse). This policy likely emerged in response to a recent controversy surrounding <a title="Week in Review, or Deficit Deja Vu" href="http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/03/05/week-in-review-or-deficit-deja-vu/#avianagain" target="_blank">the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB)&#8217;s recommendation that results of avian flu research not be published due to concerns for public safety. </a> According to <em>ScienceInsider</em>, this decision was <a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2012/03/breaking-news-nsabb-reverses-pos.html?rss=1" target="_blank">reversed by the NSABB last Friday</a>.</p>
<p>United for Medical Research released an <a href="http://www.unitedformedicalresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/UMR-Sequestration-Impact-on-NIH-2012.pdf" target="_blank">update</a> to their <a title="Week in Review, or Budget Backtracking" href="http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/03/26/week-in-review-or-budget-backtrackin/#umr">recent report on the economic impact of research funding at the <span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span></a>. This addendum revises the report&#8217;s estimates to reflect cuts that are anticipated if sequestration takes place in January 2013. According to the report, sequestration would result in a 7-8% cut in funding for the agency.</p>
<p><em><strong>Research.</strong></em> The White House announced a new &#8220;<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/03/29/big-data-big-deal?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+whitehouse%2Fostp+%28WhiteHouse.gov+Blog+Feed%3A+Office+of+Science+and+Technology+Policy%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader" target="_blank">Big Data Research and Development Initiative</a>&#8221; during a ceremony at the White House. This initiative includes funding opportunities from six federal agencies aiming to &#8220;improve our ability to extract knowledge and insights from large and complex collections of digital data.&#8221;</p>
<p><em><strong>Space.</strong></em> <span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span> announced that it will launch the <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-096_Aero_Research_Inst.html" target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span> Aeronautics Research Institute (NARI)</a>, a &#8220;virtual institute to solicit and foster innovative ideas that address technological challenges facing aviation and the U.S. air transportation system today and in the future.&#8221;</p>
<h2>In Print</h2>
<p>The American Institute of Physics AIP blog summarized a recent Senate Appropriations subcommittee hearing on <a href="http://www.aip.org/fyi/2012/045.html?source=rssfyi" target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">DOE<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Energy</span></span>&#8217;s <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 budget request.</a></p>
<p><em>ScienceInsider</em> reported on a House Science, Space, and Technology Committee hearing on <a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2012/03/house-science-panel-examines-pub.html?rss=1" target="_blank">public access</a>, and a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee hearing on the <a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2012/03/senate-panel-questions-nihs-2012.html" target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span> <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 budget</a>.</p>
<p><em>Space Politics</em> reported on a recent Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee hearing on <a href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/03/29/in-the-senate-more-criticism-of-commercial-crew/" target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span>&#8217;s <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 budget request</a>.</p>
<h2>What&#8217;s on Deck</h2>
<p>Both chambers are in recess for two weeks. Keep an eye out for my next Week in Review update on April 16th!<span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><br />
</span></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nsp-feed/~4/a2VkPHjZ80g" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/04/02/week-in-review-or-springing-into-recess/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/04/02/week-in-review-or-springing-into-recess/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Week in Review, or Budget Backtracking</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nsp-feed/~3/bfgK4NCM1bc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/03/26/week-in-review-or-budget-backtrackin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>abby-benson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week in Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AUTM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCATS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zeints]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/?p=1935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday, House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) broke from the bipartisan agreement reached in the Budget Control Act (BCA) when he released a proposed FY2013 budget that would reduce the top-line spending number by $19 billion. The budget also proposed reforms to the U.S. tax code and entitlements, and offered alternatives to dealing with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a name="ryan"></a>On Tuesday, House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) broke from the bipartisan agreement reached in the <em><a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:S.365:" target="_blank">Budget Control Act</a></em> (BCA) when he released a <a href="http://budget.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=286221" target="_blank">proposed FY2013 budget</a> that would reduce the top-line spending number by $19 billion<em></em>. The budget also proposed reforms to the U.S. tax code and entitlements, and offered alternatives to dealing with automatic spending cuts set to begin in January 2013.</p>
<p>Within the proposed budget, the two pots of discretionary funding<strong></strong><strong>—</strong>defense and non-defense<strong>—</strong>would be treated quite differently. Defense spending would receive $8 billion more than the level specified in the BCA, while non-defense discretionary spending would receive $27 billion less than the level specified in the BCA. This second number is important for research funding, as it is the pot which supports most federal research agencies.</p>
<p>The budget proposal does mention research once, affirming the general Republican view that government support of basic research, versus applied, represents a more appropriate federal role. The document states “this budget would continue funding essential government missions, including energy security and basic research and development, while paring back duplicative spending and non-core functions, such as applied and commercial research or development projects best left to the private sector.”</p>
<p>In a <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/03/21/ryan-republican-budget-consequences-imbalance" target="_blank">blog post written after the release</a>, Acting Director of the Office of Management and Budget (<span class="domtooltips">OMB<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Office of Management and Budget</span></span>) Jacob Zients criticized the proposed budget, including this statement on its effects on research, &#8220;Investments in science, medical research, space, and technology would be cut by more than $100 billion over the next decade. The number of new grants  from <span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span> for promising research projects would shrink by more than 1,600 in 2014 and by over 16,000 over a decade, potentially curtailing or slowing research to fight Alzheimer’s disease, cancer, and AIDS.  The National Science Foundation would cut over 11,000 grants over the next decade, eliminating support for over 13,000 researchers, students, and teachers in 2014 alone.&#8221;</p>
<p>While the House will likely approve Ryan&#8217;s budget measure this week, the Senate will continue to use the higher <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 level specified in the BCA, all making for a fun conference later in the year.</p>
<h2>Also of Note</h2>
<p><em><strong><a name="nihhouse"></a>Health.</strong></em> A group of over 150 House representatives sent a <a href="http://www.aau.edu/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=13204" target="_blank">letter to House Appropriators in support of increased funding for the National Institutes of Health (<span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span>)</a>, whose <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 budget request is flat from last year. The letter cites concerns over increased competition in biomedical research with Asian countries, and cites <span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span> as an important driver of economic growth.</p>
<p><a name="UMR"></a>A new report out from advocacy group United for Medical Research (<span class="domtooltips">UMR<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">United for Medical Research</span></span>) entitled <a href="http://www.unitedformedicalresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/NIHs-Role-in-Sustaining-the-US-Economy-2011.pdf" target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span>’S Role in Sustaining the U.S. Economy</a>, finds that <span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span> funding supported 432,000 jobs in 2011, broken down by state. A <em>GenomeWeb Daily News</em> <a href="http://www.genomeweb.com/report-nihs-2011-funds-supported-621b-economic-activity" target="_blank">article </a>outlines efforts by the report authors to identify the full multiplier effect of <span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span> funding, not simply the jobs created by investigators conducting research.</p>
<p><em><strong>Innovation.</strong></em> The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (<span class="domtooltips">USPTO<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">U.S. Patent and Trademark Office</span></span>) and the Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM) announced a new joint training <a href="http://www.uspto.gov/news/pr/2012/12-17.jsp" target="_blank">Patent Examiners Training Initiative</a>. This program is &#8220;designed to improve the strength and quality of U.S. patents through specialized training between patent examiners, innovators and scientists.&#8221;</p>
<h2>In Print</h2>
<p><em>Nature&#8217;s</em> blog reports on a recent House Appropriations Committee hearing focused on <span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span>&#8217;s new <a href="http://blogs.nature.com/news/2012/03/nih-director-grilled-over-translational-research-center.html" target="_blank">National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (<span class="domtooltips">NCATS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences</span></span></a>).</p>
<p>The American Institutes of Physics (AIP) FYI blog has summaries of a recent House Appropriations subcommittee hearing on the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 request for the Department of Energy (<a href="http://www.aip.org/fyi/2012/043.html?source=rssfyi" target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">DOE<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Energy</span></span>) Office of Science</a>, and a House Science, Space, and Technology Committee hearing focus on the National Science Foundation (<span class="domtooltips">NSF<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Science Foundation</span></span>) <a href="http://www.aip.org/fyi/2012/042.html?source=rssfyi" target="_blank">Major Research Equipment and Facilities Management (MREFC)</a> program.</p>
<p><em>SpacePolicyOnline</em> reports on a House Appropriations subcommittee hearing on the <a href="http://www.spacepolicyonline.com/news/house-appropriators-fight-for-planetary-science?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Spacepolicyonline+%28SpacePolicyOnline+News%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader" target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 budget request for <span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span>, with a particular focus on cuts to the planetary science program</a>.</p>
<p>The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) reports on a recent House Appropriations Subcommittee hearing on the <a href="https://www.aamc.org/advocacy/washhigh/highlights2012/277506/houseappropriatorsdiscussnihfunding.html" target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 budget request for <span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span></a>.</p>
<p><em>The Chronicle</em> reports on a <a href="http://chronicle.com/article/Supreme-Court-Ruling-Throws/131264/?sid=at&amp;utm_source=at&amp;utm_medium=en" target="_blank">Supreme Court ruling invalidating a patent on a medical testing process</a>, which could have a huge effect on biomedical patenting more broadly.</p>
<h2>What&#8217;s on Deck</h2>
<p><em><strong>Tuesday (3/27)</strong></em></p>
<ul>
<li>The House Appropriations Committee will hold a subcommittee hearing on the<a href="http://appropriations.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=281218" target="_blank"> <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 request for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) &amp; Fossil Energy &amp; Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability.</a></li>
<li>The House Science, Space, and Technology Committee will hold a hearing on <a href="http://science.house.gov/hearing/subcommittee-technology-and-innovation-hearing-fostering-us-competitive-edge" target="_blank">Fostering the U.S. Competitive Edge</a>.</li>
<li>The American Association for the Advancement of Science (<span class="domtooltips">AAAS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">American Association for the Advancement of Science</span></span>) will hold a Capitol Hill briefing on the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 budget request. Contact mhouriha (at) <span class="domtooltips">aaas<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">American Association for the Advancement of Science</span></span>.org for more information.</li>
</ul>
<p><em><strong>Wednesday (3/28)</strong></em></p>
<ul>
<li>The Senate Appropriations Committee will hold subcommittee hearings on the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 budget requests for the <a href="http://www.appropriations.senate.gov/events.cfm?date=3/28/2012" target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span> and <span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span></a>.</li>
<li>The Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee will hold a hearing on <a href="http://commerce.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=Hearings&amp;ContentRecord_id=7665a46c-571e-4e73-8068-6c6402df2ae1&amp;ContentType_id=14f995b9-dfa5-407a-9d35-56cc7152a7ed&amp;Group_id=b06c39af-e033-4cba-9221-de668ca1978a" target="_blank">The Science and Standards of Forensics</a>.</li>
<li>The House Appropriations Committee will hold a subcommittee hearing on <a href="http://appropriations.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=281221" target="_blank">the <span class="domtooltips">DOE<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Energy</span></span> Advanced Research Projects Agency &#8211; Energy (<span class="domtooltips">ARPA-E<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Advanced Research Projects Agency--Energy</span></span>) &amp; Loan Guarantee Programs.</a></li>
<li>The House Appropriations Committee will hold a full committee hearing on <a href="http://science.house.gov/hearing/full-committee-hearing-securing-promise-international-space-station-challenges-and" target="_blank">Securing the Promise of the International Space Station: Challenges and Opportunities</a> and a subcommittee hearing on <a href="http://science.house.gov/hearing/subcommittee-energy-and-environment-hearing-how-noaa-procures-data-weather-forecasting" target="_blank">How <span class="domtooltips">NOAA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration</span></span> Procures Data for Weather Forecasting</a>.</li>
<li>The House Transportation and Infrastructure committee will hold a hearing on <a id="Newsroomlistcontrol1_NewsDataList_ctl00_TitleLink" href="http://transportation.house.gov/hearings/hearingdetail.aspx?NewsID=1566" target="_blank">A Review of the President&#8217;s Fiscal Year 2013 Budget Request for the Environmental Protection Agency.</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_M12-051_NASA_Tech_Day_Hill.html" target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span> will hold an event highlighting &#8220;<span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span> Technology: Imagine. Innovate. Explore&#8221; on Capitol Hill.</a></li>
</ul>
<p><em><strong>Thursday (3/29)</strong></em></p>
<ul>
<li><span class="domtooltips">NSF<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Science Foundation</span></span> and the Coalition for National Science Funding will hold a luncheon on Capitol Hill on <a href="http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=123606&amp;WT.mc_id=USNSF_51&amp;WT.mc_ev=click" target="_blank">How basic research discoveries underpin technological advances in the marketplace</a>.</li>
<li>The House Science, Space, and Technology Committee will hold a hearing on <a href="http://science.house.gov/hearing/subcommittee-investigations-and-oversight-hearing-examining-public-access-and-scholarly" target="_blank">Examining Public Access and Scholarly Publication Interests</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><em><strong><br />
</strong></em></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nsp-feed/~4/bfgK4NCM1bc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/03/26/week-in-review-or-budget-backtrackin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/03/26/week-in-review-or-budget-backtrackin/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Week in Review, or Budget Resolve</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nsp-feed/~3/SLz-V4j8j4A/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/03/19/week-in-review-or-budget-resolve/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>abby-benson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week in Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bolden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chimpanzees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continuing resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dugan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suresh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/?p=1900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the House in recess last week, work continued behind the scenes to draft the FYFiscal Year 2013 budget resolution which is expected to be marked up this week.  CQ reports that this budget resolution will likely come in about $20 less than the top-line number agreed to in the Budget Control Act and currently [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the House in recess last week, work continued behind the scenes to draft the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 budget resolution which is expected to be marked up this week.  <em>CQ</em> reports that this budget resolution will likely come in about $20 less than the top-line number agreed to in the <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:S.365:" target="_blank"><em>Budget Control Act</em></a> and currently being used in the Senate. The resolution may also may include provisions aimed at limiting the impact of <a title="Week in Review, or Like Ducks Talking to Chickens" href="http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2011/11/28/week-in-review-or-like-ducks-talking-to-chickens/#sequestration" target="_blank">sequestration</a>, the automatic spending cuts scheduled to begin in January of 2013 that would result in just under $100 billion in defense and non-defense discretionary spending reductions. Any effort to address sequestration through this budget resolution or subsequent legislation will likely come down to a tug-of-war between protection of defense spending vs. protection of entitlements.</p>
<h2>Also of Note</h2>
<p><em><strong>Defense.</strong></em> <em>Wired</em> reported that <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/03/dugan-darpa-google/" target="_blank">Regina Dugan, head of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA),</a> will be leaving that agency for a position with Google. DARPA, part of the Department of Defense (<span class="domtooltips">DoD<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Defense</span></span>), conducts high-risk, high-reward research.</p>
<p><em><strong>Education.</strong></em> The Director of <span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span>, Charles Bolden, joined the President&#8217;s Jobs Council to announce <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12_043_Bolden_Facebook_Pres_Jobs.html" target="_blank">STAY WITH IT</a>, the &#8220;first student outreach campaign connecting engineering students with experienced engineers, role models and peers to motivate them to stay in their field of study and graduate with an engineering degree.&#8221;</p>
<p><em><strong>Health.</strong></em> Over 900 organizations, including several higher education associations, <a href="http://www.aau.edu/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=13194" target="_blank">wrote to House and Senate Appropriations leaders,</a> asking them to &#8220;provide the largest possible <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 302(b) allocation to the Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and Related Agencies Appropriations Subcommittee (Labor-<span class="domtooltips">HHS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Health and Human Services</span></span>-<span class="domtooltips">Ed<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Education</span></span>) within the discretionary cap established by the BCA.&#8221; The &#8220;302 (b)&#8221; allocation is the term for what each appropriations subcommittee gets to appropriate as their piece of the entire budget pie (called the 302(a)). The Labor-<span class="domtooltips">HHS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Health and Human Services</span></span>-<span class="domtooltips">Ed<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Education</span></span> appropriations subcommittees fund the National Institutes of Health (<span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span>).</p>
<p><em><strong>Innovation</strong></em>. <em>Politico</em> reported on efforts by Senator Jerry Moran (R-KS) <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/74031.html" target="_blank">to push for support of <em>The Startup Act</em></a> (<a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:S.1965:" target="_blank">S.965</a>), a bill co-sponsored by Senator Mark Warner (D-VA) aimed at removing barriers to entrepreneurship. The bill, introduced last December, includes provisions related to taxes, immigration, regulations, and commercialization of university research. The commercialization provisions have caused concern at some research universities, as they would existing research dollars to support grants to universities that allow faculty members to use technology transfer offices at institutions other than their home institution.</p>
<p><em><strong>Research.</strong></em> The Office of Management and Budget (<span class="domtooltips">OMB<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Office of Management and Budget</span></span>) issued a 30-day extension to the comment period for on its <a href="  http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-02-28/pdf/2012-4521.pdf" target="_blank">Advanced Notice of Proposed Guidance</a> (ANPG) regarding <a title="Week in Review, or Returning from Recess" href="http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/02/27/week-in-review-or-returning-from-recess/#A21" target="_blank">reforms to circular A-21</a> and other circulars governing cost recovery associated with federal grants.</p>
<p><em><strong>Robotics.</strong></em>  <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/03/16/navy-opens-cutting-edge-lab-robotics-and-autonomous-systems?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+whitehouse%2Fostp+%28WhiteHouse.gov+Blog+Feed%3A+Office+of+Science+and+Technology+Policy%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader" target="_blank">The</a><a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/03/16/navy-opens-cutting-edge-lab-robotics-and-autonomous-systems?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+whitehouse%2Fostp+%28WhiteHouse.gov+Blog+Feed%3A+Office+of+Science+and+Technology+Policy%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader" target="_blank"> President&#8217;s Scientific Advisor, John Holdren, </a>attended the opening of the Naval Research Lab&#8217;s new <a href="http://www.nrl.navy.mil/media/news-releases/2012/inside-nrls-laboratory-for-autonomous-systems-research" target="_blank">Laboratory for Autonomous Systems Research (LASR)</a>. This new lab will support &#8220;cutting-edge research in robotics and autonomous systems of interest to the Navy, the Marine Corps, and the Department of Defense, such as unmanned underwater vehicles, autonomous firefighting robots, and sensor networks.&#8221;</p>
<p><em><strong>Transportation.</strong></em> The Association of Public and Land Grant Universities (<span class="domtooltips">APLU<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Association of Public and Land Grant Universities</span></span>) sent a letter to House and Senate leadership <a href="https://www.aplu.org/document.doc?id=3734" target="_blank">expressing support for university transportation centers</a> that are included in the ongoing reauthorization of the surface transportation bill. The Senate passed <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d112:s.1813:" target="_blank">their version of the bill</a> (S.1813) last week, which included language authorizing these research centers administered by the Department of Transportation (DOT).</p>
<h2>In Print</h2>
<p>In his piece in <em>The Scientist</em> entitled <a href="http://the-scientist.com/2012/03/14/slipping-from-the-top/" target="_blank">Slipping from the Top</a>, Jef Aksts reported on a recent panel discussion during which Francis Collins, Director of the <span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span>, and Subra Suresh, Director of the National Science Foundation (<span class="domtooltips">NSF<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Science Foundation</span></span>), were among the panelists discussing concerns over the U.S. losing its science and technology edge.</p>
<p>The Albany <em>Times Union</em> reported in its piece, <a href="http://www.timesunion.com/business/press-releases/article/Medical-Researchers-Up-in-Arms-About-Delayed-3398972.php#page-2" target="_blank">Medical Researchers Up in Arms About Delayed Cures and Shuttered Labs as Obama Proposes Flat Research Grant Budget,</a> on concerns over the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 proposed budget for the <span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span> and efforts to mount a petition through the White House to bring attention to the matter.</p>
<p><em>ScienceInsider</em> reported on recent polling conducted by Research!America finding that &#8220;<a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2012/03/poll-many-us-voters-have-gloomy.html" target="_blank">nearly 60% believe that a country other than the United States will lead the world in science and technology by that time.</a>&#8221;</p>
<p><em>Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News</em> reports on the <a href="http://www.genengnews.com/insight-and-intelligenceand153/nih-expects-to-have-new-policies-for-research-using-chimpanzees-next-year/77899569/" target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span> committee looking at the use of chimpanzees in biomedical research</a>.</p>
<p>Kenneth Chang writes in the <em>New York Times</em> piece &#8220;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/13/science/space/life-on-mars-funds-for-nasa-to-find-the-answer-fade.html" target="_blank">Life on Mars? Funds to Find Answer Fade</a>&#8221; about proposed cuts to the <span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span> Mars program in the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 budget.</p>
<p>The American Institute of Physics&#8217;s AIP blog provides summaries of several recent hearings on the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 budget requests for the <a href="http://www.aip.org/fyi/2012/040.html" target="_blank">National Institutes of Standards and Technology (<span class="domtooltips">NIST<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institute of Standards and Technology</span></span>)</a>, <a href="http://www.aip.org/fyi/2012/039.html" target="_blank">the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)</a>, and <a href="http://www.aip.org/fyi/2012/038.html" target="_blank">the <span class="domtooltips">NSF<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Science Foundation</span></span>.</a></p>
<p>The National Science Foundation (<span class="domtooltips">NSF<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Science Foundation</span></span>) National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics issued an info brief finding that <a href="http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf12310/?WT.mc_id=USNSF_179" target="_blank">R&amp;D Spending Suffered a Rare Decline in 2009, but Outpaced the Overall Economy</a>.</p>
<h2>What&#8217;s on Deck</h2>
<p><em><strong>Tuesday (3/20)</strong></em></p>
<ul>
<li>The Senate Armed Services Committee will hold a subcommittee hearing on <a href="http://www.armed-services.senate.gov/e_witnesslist.cfm?id=5280" target="_blank">cybersecurity research and development in review of the Defense Authorization Request for Fiscal Year 2013 and the Future Years Defense Program.</a></li>
<li>The House Appropriations Committee will hold subcommittee hearings on the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 budget requests for <a href="http://appropriations.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=284323" target="_blank">the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (<span class="domtooltips">NOAA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration</span></span>)</a>, the <a href="http://appropriations.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=281042" target="_blank">Department of Energy Office of Science, </a>and the <a href="http://appropriations.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=281151" target="_blank">National institutes of Health (<span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span>).</a></li>
<li>The House Science, Space, and Technology Committee will hold a subcommittee hearing on <a href="http://science.house.gov/hearing/subcommittee-space-and-aeronautics-hearing-overview-office-commercial-space-transportation">An Overview of the Office of Commercial Space Transportation Budget for <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><em><strong>Wednesday (3/21)</strong></em></p>
<ul>
<li>The Senate Armed Services Committee will hold a subcommittee hearing on <a href="http://www.armed-services.senate.gov/e_witnesslist.cfm?id=5279" target="_blank">military space programs in review of the Defense Authorization Request for Fiscal Year 2013 and the Future Years Defense Program</a>.</li>
<li>The Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee will hold a hearing on the <a href="http://www.hsgac.senate.gov/hearings/the-homeland-security-departments-budget-submission-for-fiscal-year-2013" target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 budget request for the Department of Homeland Security (<span class="domtooltips">DHS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Homeland Security</span></span>)</a>.</li>
<li>The House Appropriations Committee will hold subcommittee hearings on the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 budget requests for Department of Agriculture (<span class="domtooltips">USDA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">U.S. Department of Agriculture</span></span>) <a href="http://appropriations.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=284771"> Under Secretary for Research, Education, and Economics</a> and <a href="http://appropriations.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=284324" target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span></a>.<span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-family: University;"><br />
</span></span></span></span></li>
</ul>
<p><em><strong>Thursday (3/22)</strong></em></p>
<ul>
<li>The <span class="domtooltips">DOE<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Energy</span></span> will hold a <a href="http://energy.gov/articles/got-questions-about-women-science-tech-engineering-or-math-stem-tweet-us" target="_blank">&#8220;twitter conversation&#8221;</a> on women in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (<span class="domtooltips">STEM<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Science, Technology, Engineering, Math</span></span>) fields.</li>
<li>The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee will hold a hearing on the <a href="http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&amp;Hearing_ID=1868be4d-802a-23ad-43ef-2b56bbe724db" target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 budget request for the Environmental Protection Agency (<span class="domtooltips">EPA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Environmental Protection Agency</span></span>).</a></li>
</ul>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nsp-feed/~4/SLz-V4j8j4A" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/03/19/week-in-review-or-budget-resolve/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/03/19/week-in-review-or-budget-resolve/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Week in Review, or Widening the Gap</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nsp-feed/~3/9PPmG9t-vaM/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/03/12/week-in-review-or-widening-the-gap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>abby-benson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week in Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continuing resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCATS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ScienceInsider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sebelius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SpacePolicyOnline]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/?p=1868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both the House and Senate were in session last week, with their attention largely focused on passing the JOBS Act and continuing to debate the contentious transportation bill. On the appropriations front, as reported last week, House Republicans have been mulling over enacting a top-line spending number for FYFiscal Year 2013 that is less than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both the House and Senate were in session last week, with their attention largely focused on passing the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/09/us/politics/house-passes-jobs-act-by-large-margin.html" target="_blank">JOBS Act</a> and continuing to debate the contentious <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/73761.html" target="_blank">transportation bill</a>. On the appropriations front, <a title="Week in Review, or Deficit Deja Vu" href="http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/03/05/week-in-review-or-deficit-deja-vu/#spending">as reported last week</a>, House Republicans have been mulling over enacting a top-line spending number for <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 that is less than what was agreed to by Democrats and Republicans last summer in the <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c112:5:./temp/~c112DYG5xM::" target="_blank">Budget Control Act (BCA)</a>. That plan appeared to solidify last week as Republicans bandied about a number $19 billion below the BCA level of $1.047 billion. According to <em>CQ</em>, in return for appeasing conservative Republicans on this lower top line number, they will offer less resistance when it comes to actually passing appropriations bills and the inevitable continuing resolution that will keep the government running until after the election. Of course, the bigger the gap between House and Senate appropriations bills, the bigger the fight will likely be to finalize the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 spending plan.</p>
<h2>Also of Note</h2>
<p><em><strong>Appointments.</strong></em> President Obama announced that he would nominate <a href="http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome?contentid=2012/03/0091.xml&amp;contentidonly=true" target="_blank">Dr. Sonny Ramaswamy as Director of the U.S. Department of Agriculture&#8217;s National Institute of Food and Agriculture (<span class="domtooltips">NIFA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institute of Food and Agriculture</span></span>),</a> and <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/03/09/todd-park-named-new-us-chief-technology-officer" target="_blank">Todd Parks as the next U.S. Chief Technology Officer.</a></p>
<p><em><strong>Innovation.</strong></em> The House New Democrat Coalition, a group of fiscally conservative Democratic members of the House, released a set of <a href="http://newdemocratcoalition-crowley.house.gov/press-release/new-dems-release-principles-innovation-and-competitiveness" target="_blank">Principles for Innovation and Competitiveness</a> aimed at allowing &#8220;businesses and entrepreneurs to be more innovative and competitive in the global marketplace.&#8221; Included in the list of 10 principles are &#8220;supporting basic research&#8221; and &#8220;incentivizing research and development.&#8221; Reps. Ron Kind (D-WI) and Gerry Connolly (D-VA) wrote an <a href="http://www.rollcall.com/issues/57_105/gerry-connolly-ron-kind-refuel-us-innovation-engine-job-growth-212918-1.html?zkPrintable=true" target="_blank">op-<span class="domtooltips">ed<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Education</span></span> in <em>Roll Call</em> </a>to accompany the release .</p>
<p><em><strong>Health.</strong></em> The National Institutes of Health (<span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span>) newest center, the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (<span class="domtooltips">NCATS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences</span></span>), has issued a request for information (RFI) on how it <span class="domtooltips">can<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Cures Acceleration Network</span></span> strengthen the <a href="http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-TR-12-003.html" target="_blank">Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA)</a> program. the CTSA program provides &#8220;infrastructure to facilitate translational research, to promote the training and career development of translational researchers, and to develop innovative methods and technologies to strengthen translational research.&#8221; Comments are due April 6, 2012.</p>
<p><em><strong>Homeland Security.</strong></em> The Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, announced the creation of the <a href="http://www.dhs.gov/ynews/releases/20120301-napolitano-announces-academic-advisory-council.shtm" target="_blank">Homeland Security Academic Advisory Council (HSAAC)</a>. This new council, composed of university presidents and other academic leaders, will advise the Secretary on &#8220;student and recent graduate recruitment; international students; academic research; campus and community resiliency, security and preparedness; and faculty exchange.&#8221;<span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><br />
</span></p>
<p><em><strong>Manufacturing.</strong></em> The President announced a new $1 billion proposal called the <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/03/09/president-obama-announce-new-efforts-support-manufacturing-innovation-en" target="_blank">National Network for Manufacturing Innovation</a>, which would create 15 institutes around the country to “bring together industry, universities and community colleges, federal agencies, and our states to accelerate innovation by investing in industrially-relevant manufacturing technologies with broad applications to bridge the gap between basic research and product development, provide shared assets to help companies – particularly small manufacturers – access cutting-edge capabilities and equipment, and create an unparalleled environment to educate and train students and workers in advanced manufacturing skills.” Although funding for this program is included in the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 budget request, it will require legislation to be enacted before funding <span class="domtooltips">can<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Cures Acceleration Network</span></span> be appropriated.</p>
<p><em><strong>Patent Reform.</strong></em> The blog <em>PatentlyO</em> reports on efforts by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (<span class="domtooltips">USPTO<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">U.S. Patent and Trademark Office</span></span>) to <a href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2012/03/backlog-down-and-up.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=Feed:+PatentlyO+%28Dennis+Crouch%27s+Patently-O%29" target="_blank">reduce the backlog of patent applications at that agency</a>, a main focus of the <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.1249:" target="_blank"><em>America Invents Act</em></a>, patent reform legislation that was enacted last year.<br />
<em><strong></strong></em></p>
<p><em><strong>Space.</strong></em> <em>SpacePolicyOnline</em> reports that Representative Frank Wolf  (R-VA), Chair of the House Appropriations Commerce, Justice, Science Subcommittee, wrote to <span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span> Administrator, Charles Bolden, telling him that <a href="http://www.spacepolicyonline.com/news/rep-wolf-tells-bolden-no-to-china-on-iss" target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span> should not enter into cooperative agreement with China on the International Space Station (ISS)</a>. This direction stems from an ongoing <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/tech/the-wolf-s-at-the-door-for-white-house-science-office-20111117?mrefid=site_search" target="_blank">dispute between Wolf and the White House on scientific collaboration with China</a>.</p>
<h2>In Print</h2>
<p>With appropriations hearing season in full swing, I will do my best to include in this section research-related hearing summaries drafted  by other organizations.</p>
<p><em>SpacePolicyOnline</em> provides a summary of recent <a href="http://science.house.gov/hearing/full-committee-hearing-overview-nasa-fy13-budget" target="_blank">House Science, Space, and Technology Committee</a> and <a href="http://commerce.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=Hearings&amp;ContentRecord_id=a2593bd3-8859-4e7d-869d-7e670a654664&amp;ContentType_id=14f995b9-dfa5-407a-9d35-56cc7152a7ed&amp;Group_id=b06c39af-e033-4cba-9221-de668ca1978a" target="_blank">Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee</a> hearings focused on <a href="http://www.spacepolicyonline.com/news/congress-still-concerned-about-sls-versus-commercial-crew?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Spacepolicyonline+%28SpacePolicyOnline+News%29" target="_blank">the future of human spaceflight</a>.</p>
<p><em>ScienceInsider</em> reports on a recent <a href="http://science.house.gov/hearing/subcommittee-research-and-science-education-hearing-overview-nsf-budget-fy-2013" target="_blank">House Science, Space, and Technology Committee hearing</a> during which the <a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2012/02/legislator-berates-nsf-for-rising.html" target="_blank">Director of the National Science Foundation (<span class="domtooltips">NSF<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Science Foundation</span></span>) was questioned on that agency&#8217;s efforts to reduce gas prices</a>, and a <a href="http://appropriations.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=281330" target="_blank">House Appropriations Commerce, Science, and Justice Subcommittee hearing</a> on the <a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2012/03/house-panel-pummels-holdren-over.html " target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span> budget and cuts to its planetary science program</a>.</p>
<p>The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) reports on <a href="http://appropriations.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=280506" target="_blank">House</a> and <a href="http://appropriations.senate.gov/ht-labor.cfm?method=hearings.view&amp;id=51048ead-0fe8-4152-9dc9-e6f8c91a5bb9" target="_blank">Senate</a> Appropriations Labor-<span class="domtooltips">HHS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Health and Human Services</span></span>-Education Subcommittee hearings with <a href="https://www.aamc.org/advocacy/washhigh/highlights2012/276140/030912appropriationssubcommitteesheartestimonyfromsecretarysebel.html" target="_blank">Secretary of Health and Human Services (<span class="domtooltips">HHS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Health and Human Services</span></span>) Kathleen Sebelius on that department&#8217;s <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 budget request</a>.</p>
<p>The American Institute of Physics (AIP) reports on <a href="http://energycommerce.house.gov/hearings/hearingdetail.aspx?NewsID=9344" target="_blank">House Energy and Commerce Committee</a> and <a href="http://appropriations.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=281015" target="_blank">House Appropriations Energy and Water Subcommittee</a> hearings <a href="http://www.aip.org/fyi/2012/036.html" target="_blank">with Secretary Chu on the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 <span class="domtooltips">DOE<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Energy</span></span> budget request</a>.</p>
<p>For those of you interested in working in science for the government, the Office of Personnel and Management has launched a pilot website aimed at <a href="http://careers.science.gov/" target="_blank">inspiring science and technology careers in government.</a> This pilot website is supported by six Federal agencies—the Department of Energy (<span class="domtooltips">DOE<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Energy</span></span>), Department of Homeland Security (<span class="domtooltips">DHS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Homeland Security</span></span>), Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Department of Labor (DOL), Department of State (DOS), and <span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span>. Hopefully other science-focused agencies such as the <span class="domtooltips">NSF<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Science Foundation</span></span> and <span class="domtooltips">HHS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Health and Human Services</span></span> will eventually join in!</p>
<h2>What&#8217;s on Deck</h2>
<p>The House is in recess this week, the Senate is in session.</p>
<p><em><strong>Wednesday, March 14th</strong></em></p>
<ul>
<li>The Senate Appropriations Committee will hold a subcommittee hearing on the <a href="http://www.appropriations.senate.gov/events.cfm?fuseaction=calendar.list&amp;date={ts%20%272012-03-14%2000:00:00%27}" target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 <span class="domtooltips">DOE<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Energy</span></span> budget request</a>.</li>
<li>The American Chemical Society will hold a Capitol Hill briefing on <a href="http://portal.acs.org/portal/acs/corg/content?_nfpb=true&amp;_pageLabel=PP_ARTICLEMAIN&amp;node_id=222&amp;content_id=CNBP_029511&amp;use_sec=true&amp;sec_url_var=region1&amp;__uuid=a316793a-60a5-42fd-b30c-a1a023b23280" target="_blank">Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (<span class="domtooltips">STEM<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Science, Technology, Engineering, Math</span></span>) Education for an Innovative Workforce</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><em><strong>Friday, March 16th</strong></em></p>
<ul>
<li>A group of nine national scientific and engineering societies will host a Capitol Hill briefing on <a href="http://www.congressplus.com/events/index.cfm?action=Registration_Form&amp;eventcode=CwiM0g&amp;bypass=true" target="_blank">Research that Pays Off: The Economic Benefits of Federally Funded R&amp;D.</a></li>
</ul>
<p align="CENTER"><span style="color: #000080;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><strong><span style="font-size: medium;">  </span></strong></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><strong> <span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="color: #000080;"><br />
</span></span></strong></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nsp-feed/~4/9PPmG9t-vaM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/03/12/week-in-review-or-widening-the-gap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/03/12/week-in-review-or-widening-the-gap/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Week in Review, or Deficit Deja Vu</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nsp-feed/~3/2iLuwRCw-zQ/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/03/05/week-in-review-or-deficit-deja-vu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>abby-benson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week in Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A-21]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amicus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAMR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stem cell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USGS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/?p=1823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With members of Congress back in town last week and appropriations season heating up, reports emerged once again about renewed efforts to identify solutions to address the federal deficit. CQ reports that the Senate &#8220;Gang of Six&#8221; and members of the bipartisan, bicameral Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction are among those rumored to have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With members of Congress back in town last week and appropriations season heating up, reports emerged once again about renewed efforts to identify solutions to address the federal deficit.<em> CQ</em> reports that the Senate <a title="Week in Review, or a Bipartisan Bravo" href="http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2011/05/09/week-in-review-or-a-bipartisan-bravo/#Gang" target="_blank">&#8220;Gang of Six&#8221;</a> and members of the bipartisan, bicameral <a title="Week in Review, or Like Ducks Talking to Chickens" href="http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2011/11/28/week-in-review-or-like-ducks-talking-to-chickens/#sequestration" target="_blank">Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction</a> are among those rumored to have resumed work on these efforts, perhaps in an effort to put forward proposals for adoption before sequestration kicks in early next year. Of course, even the most reasonable approach could struggle to see floor action in an election year. Recognizing this, former Senator Pete Domenici (R-NM) and Alice Rivlin, who co-chaired a deficit reduction task force at the Bipartisan Policy Center, wrote an <a href="http://thehill.com/special-reports-archive/1265-budget-february-2012/210713-election-doesnt-mean-wasted-fiscal-year" target="_blank">op-<span class="domtooltips">ed<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Education</span></span> in <em>The Hill </em></a>imploring both the President and the Congress to not use the election as an excuse to avoid addressing the nation&#8217;s fiscal challenges.</p>
<p><a name="spending"></a>Meanwhile, members in both the House and Senate are sorting out how to handle budget resolutions this year. Resolutions effectively set the top-line number that appropriators work from when processing their spending bills. In the Senate, Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) has essentially said that he won&#8217;t pass a budget resolution this year since the top-line number for <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 was already set in the <em><a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:S.365:" target="_blank">Budget Control Act</a></em> (BCA). This decision could allow several Senators, especially those facing elections, to avoid a tough vote. In the House, Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) has indicated that a budget resolution will be passed, but its members may choose to reduce the top-line spending number as agreed to in the BCA. If this occurs and the appropriators  follow suit, they could end up with two very different sets of spending bills in the House and Senate, making conference even more complicated than it already promises to be.</p>
<p>House and Senate appropriations committees will  hold more <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 hearings this week, following up on their <a title="Week in Review, or Returning from Recess" href="http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/02/27/week-in-review-or-returning-from-recess/#hearings" target="_blank">busy schedule last week</a>. The heads of the National Institutes of Health (<span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span>), the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), and the National Science Foundation (<span class="domtooltips">NSF<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Science Foundation</span></span>) are among those making the trek to Capitol Hill this week to defend their budge requests. In the House, the Appropriations Committee is also reacting to last week&#8217;s announcement that its ranking member, <a href="http://www.house.gov/apps/list/speech/wa06_dicks/morenews1/march2.shtml" target="_blank">Norm Dicks (D-WA),</a> will not seek re-election.</p>
<h2>Also of Note</h2>
<p><em><strong><a name="avianagain"></a>Health.</strong></em> According to <em>ScienceInsider</em>, the <span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span> has asked the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) to <a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2012/02/us-biosecurity-board-to-reconsid.html" target="_blank">revisit its prior decision to withhold publication of potentially sensitive research results related to avian flu</a>. This may be a response to the recent <a title="Week in Review, or Returning from Recess" href="http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/02/27/week-in-review-or-returning-from-recess/#avian" target="_blank">World Health Organization</a> (WHO) review of the decision, which recommended that the research results be published.</p>
<p>For those of you interested in the debate on the use of federal funds to support embryonic <span class="domtooltips">stem<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Science, Technology, Engineering, Math</span></span> cell research, the Association of American Universities (<span class="domtooltips">AAU<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Association of American Universities</span></span>) reports that the Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a <a href="http://www.aau.edu/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=13118" target="_blank">new brief</a> in the ongoing case of <span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><em>Sherley v. Sebelius,</em> in which the plaintiffs argue that using federal funds to support <span class="domtooltips">stem<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Science, Technology, Engineering, Math</span></span> cell research</span> violates an existing law related to embryo destruction. In addition to the DOJ&#8217;s brief, the advocacy group <span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">Coalition for the Advancement of Medical Research </span> (CAMR) also filed an <a href="http://www.aau.edu/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=13120" target="_blank">amicus brief</a> in opposition of those claims.</p>
<p><em><strong>Manufacturing</strong></em>. The National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) released its <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/iam_advancedmanufacturing_strategicplan_2012.pdf">National Strategic Plan for Advanced Manufacturing</a>, as required by the <em><a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.5116:" target="_blank">America COMPETES Act of 2010</a></em>. The plan includes several recommendations on how to support advanced manufacturing in the U.S., including &#8220;optimizing federal advanced manufacturing R&amp;D investments by taking a portfolio perspective.&#8221; Cited investment areas include advanced materials, production technology platforms, advanced manufacturing processes, and data and design infrastructure.</p>
<p><em><strong>Research</strong></em><strong>.</strong> As previously reported, a bill in the House called the <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.3699:" target="_blank"><em>Research Works Ac</em>t</a> (RWA) has pushed for limited public access to the results of federally-funded research. Last week, after a major publisher of scientific journals<a href="http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/intro.cws_home/newmessagerwa" target="_blank"> indicated they would not support the bill</a>, the House sponsors of RWA <a href="https://plus.google.com/u/0/107980702132412632948/posts/a4DzVk9n7fG" target="_blank">announced that they would no longer move the bill forward</a>.</p>
<p><a title="Week in Review, or Returning from Recess" name="A-21" href="http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/02/27/week-in-review-or-returning-from-recess/#A21" target="_blank"></a><a title="Week in Review, or Returning from Recess" href="http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/02/27/week-in-review-or-returning-from-recess/#A21">As reported last week</a>, the Office of Management and Budget (<span class="domtooltips">OMB<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Office of Management and Budget</span></span>) officially released its <a href="  http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-02-28/pdf/2012-4521.pdf" target="_blank">advanced notice of proposed guidance</a> regarding reforms to circular A-21 and other government circulars which govern cost recovery associated with federal grants. The deadline for public comment on the proposed reforms is March 29, 2012.</p>
<p><em><strong>Space.</strong></em> The General Accountability Office (GAO) released a <span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span>-focused report entitled <a href="http://www.gao.gov/assets/590/589016.pdf" target="_blank">Assessments of Selected Large-Scale Projects</a>. In the report, GAO criticizes <span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span>&#8217;s management of large projects such as the James Webb Telescope (JWT) and the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL), which have experienced significant costs overruns and schedule delays. According to the report, these two projects alone &#8220;account for approximately $11.4 billion—or 51 percent—of the total life-cycle costs for the 15 projects in implementation during our review.&#8221;</p>
<p>After recent concerns over the <span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span> <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 budget request, which included a cut to its Mars program, <span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span> announced that it would create a Mars Planning Group to identify the path forward for robotic Mars exploration. <a href="http://www.spacepolicyonline.com/news/nasa-starts-planning-for-smaller-mars-mission-in-2018?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=Feed:+Spacepolicyonline+%28SpacePolicyOnline+News%29" target="_blank">According to <em>SpacePolicyOnline</em></a>, <span class="domtooltips">NASA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Aeronautics and Space Administration</span></span>&#8217;s Associate Administrator for Science, John Grunsfeld, in making the announcement stated that &#8220;he strongly believes it is important to keep Mars exploration vibrant to retain critical workforce skills as well as public and political interest in exploring the planet both with robots and humans.&#8221;</p>
<h2>In Print</h2>
<p>The <em>Washington Post&#8217;s</em> <span class="domtooltips">Ed<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Education</span></span> O&#8217;Keefe reports on a <a href=" http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-eye/post/gao-overlapping-government-programs-cost-billions/2012/02/27/gIQAnSPdeR_blog.html?hpid=z2" target="_blank">new report from GAO outlining instances of duplication in federal spending</a>. According to the report, one example of this duplication is &#8220;the lack of a coordinated reporting system makes it difficult for the <span class="domtooltips">NIH<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institutes of Health</span></span>, Defense Department and Department of Veterans Affairs to track health research funded by other federal agencies&#8230;meaning agencies may issue duplicative grants to different research projects on the same topic.&#8221;</p>
<p>Pennsylvania Congressman Chaka Fattah (D-PA) writes in the American Physical Society&#8217;s <em>Capitol Hill Quarterly</em> about how <a title="Permalink to U.S. Rep. Chaka Fattah: Government-backed scientific research key to America’s competitiveness" href="http://physicsfrontline.aps.org/2012/03/01/u-s-rep-chaka-fattah-government-backed-scientific-research-key-to-americas-competitiveness/" rel="bookmark" target="_blank">government-backed scientific research is a key to America’s competitiveness</a>.</p>
<p>Louis Sullivan, President George H. W. Bush&#8217;s Secretary of Health and Human Services (<span class="domtooltips">HHS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Health and Human Services</span></span>), writes in Florida&#8217;s <em>Bradenton Herald </em>about how <a href="http://www.bradenton.com/2012/02/23/3896244/medical-research-funding-cuts.html" target="_blank">medical research funding cuts could be hazardous to America&#8217;s health</a>.</p>
<p>The Task Force on American Innovation recently announced a <a href="https://communities.acs.org/groups/american-taskforce-video-contest" target="_blank">video contest</a>, encouraging students to submit short videos demonstrating how federally funded scientific research in the physical sciences has resulted in discoveries that have enhanced competitiveness and job creation, improved quality of life, and/or strengthened national security. Prizes include cash and a trip to Washington, DC for the first place winner.</p>
<h2>What&#8217;s on Deck</h2>
<p><em><strong>Tuesday</strong></em></p>
<ul>
<li>The Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee will hold a hearing on <a href="http://commerce.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=Hearings&amp;ContentRecord_id=4a6a33b4-4a48-41f2-a7b3-1073944381f9&amp;ContentType_id=14f995b9-dfa5-407a-9d35-56cc7152a7ed&amp;Group_id=b06c39af-e033-4cba-9221-de668ca1978a" target="_blank">Keeping America Competitive Through Investments in R&amp;D</a>.</li>
<li>The House Appropriations Committee will hold subcommittee hearings on the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 budget requests for the <a href="http://appropriations.house.gov/Calendar/?Earliest=3%2f6%2f2012&amp;Latest=3%2f6%2f2012" target="_blank">Department of Health and Human Services (<span class="domtooltips">HHS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Health and Human Services</span></span>), the USGS, and the <span class="domtooltips">NSF<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Science Foundation</span></span></a>.</li>
<li>The House Science, Space, and Technology Committee will hold subcommittee hearings on the <span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 budget requests for the <a href="http://science.house.gov/hearing/subcommittee-technology-and-innovation-hearing-overview-nists-budget-fo-fy13" target="_blank">National Institute of Standards and Technology (<span class="domtooltips">NIST<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Institute of Standards and Technology</span></span>),</a> the <a href="http://science.house.gov/hearing/subcommittee-energy-and-environment-hearing-overview-noaa-epa-fy13-budget" target="_blank">Environmental Protection Agency (<span class="domtooltips">EPA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Environmental Protection Agency</span></span>), and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (<span class="domtooltips">NOAA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration</span></span></a>).</li>
</ul>
<p><em><strong>Wednesday</strong></em></p>
<ul>
<li>The Senate Appropriations Committee will hold a hearing on the <a href="http://appropriations.senate.gov/news.cfm?method=news.view&amp;id=8c7fe733-b98a-4966-a3a5-3466945424db" target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 budget request for the <span class="domtooltips">HHS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Health and Human Services</span></span></a>.</li>
<li>The Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee will hold hearings on <a href="http://commerce.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=Hearings&amp;ContentRecord_id=5b7a1990-39a6-41cf-89f5-cc4b612b4e88&amp;ContentType_id=14f995b9-dfa5-407a-9d35-56cc7152a7ed&amp;Group_id=b06c39af-e033-4cba-9221-de668ca1978a" target="_blank">the FY2013 budget requests for the Coast Guard and <span class="domtooltips">NOAA<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration</span></span>,</a> and on <a href="http://commerce.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=Hearings&amp;ContentRecord_id=a2593bd3-8859-4e7d-869d-7e670a654664&amp;ContentType_id=14f995b9-dfa5-407a-9d35-56cc7152a7ed&amp;Group_id=b06c39af-e033-4cba-9221-de668ca1978a" target="_blank">Priorities, Plans, and Progress of the Nation&#8217;s Space Program</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><em><strong>Thursday</strong></em></p>
<ul>
<li>The Senate Appropriations Committee will hold a hearing on the <a href="http://appropriations.senate.gov/news.cfm?method=news.view&amp;id=8c7fe733-b98a-4966-a3a5-3466945424db" target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 budget request for the Department of Homeland Security (<span class="domtooltips">DHS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Homeland Security</span></span>)</a>.</li>
<li>The Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee will hold a hearing on the <a href="http://www.hsgac.senate.gov/hearings/the-homeland-security-departments-budget-submission-for-fiscal-year-2013" target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 budget request for the <span class="domtooltips">DHS<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Homeland Security</span></span></a>.</li>
<li>The Senate Armed Services Committee will hold a hearing on the <a href="http://armedservices.house.gov/index.cfm/hearings-display?ContentRecord_id=ff6df563-822a-48dd-a658-c62615b27379&amp;ContentType_id=14f995b9-dfa5-407a-9d35-56cc7152a7ed&amp;Group_id=13e47ffa-0753-47a7-ad5e-1ba7592015c9" target="_blank">Fiscal Year 2013 National Defense Authorization Budget Request for National Security Space Activities</a>.</li>
<li>The House Energy and Commerce Committee will hold a hearing on the <a href="http://energycommerce.house.gov/hearings/hearingdetail.aspx?NewsID=9344" target="_blank"><span class="domtooltips">FY<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Fiscal Year</span></span> 2013 budget request for the Department of Energy (<span class="domtooltips">DOE<span class="domtooltips_tooltip" style="display: none">Department of Energy</span></span>)</a>.</li>
</ul>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nsp-feed/~4/2iLuwRCw-zQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/03/05/week-in-review-or-deficit-deja-vu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.newsciencepolicy.org/2012/03/05/week-in-review-or-deficit-deja-vu/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>

