<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for numerodix blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog</link>
	<description>A blog about nothing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:51:47 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on lettera agli ebrei by numerodix</title>
		<link>http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2012/07/02/lettera-agli-ebrei/#comment-356961</link>
		<dc:creator>numerodix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/?p=3873#comment-356961</guid>
		<description>Sarà un caso?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarà un caso?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on lettera agli ebrei by luca massaro</title>
		<link>http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2012/07/02/lettera-agli-ebrei/#comment-356955</link>
		<dc:creator>luca massaro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 11:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/?p=3873#comment-356955</guid>
		<description>Un tal Lucas imperatore romano?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Un tal Lucas imperatore romano?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on why agnosticism is a pointless stance by Roderick Tamney</title>
		<link>http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2009/02/08/why-agnosticism-is-a-pointless-stance/#comment-349876</link>
		<dc:creator>Roderick Tamney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 22:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/?p=1951#comment-349876</guid>
		<description>Agnostics are intellectually dishonest. They are the quislings of secular humanism.
You don&#039;t have to disprove the existence of anything. It is the claimant who bears the burden
of providing proof of the great Sky Daddy.
http://mukto-mona.net/Articles/vstenger/not_agnostic.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agnostics are intellectually dishonest. They are the quislings of secular humanism.<br />
You don&#8217;t have to disprove the existence of anything. It is the claimant who bears the burden<br />
of providing proof of the great Sky Daddy.<br />
<a href="http://mukto-mona.net/Articles/vstenger/not_agnostic.htm" rel="nofollow">http://mukto-mona.net/Articles/vstenger/not_agnostic.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on il faut bien falloir de plus by Nicodème</title>
		<link>http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2012/05/02/il-faut-bien-falloir-de-plus/#comment-346781</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicodème</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 12:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/?p=3835#comment-346781</guid>
		<description>Littré dit :

falloir
 
vi (fa-loir)
 1 - Faire besoin (le sens étymologique de falloir étant manquer). Il lui fallait cent francs. Que vous faut-il encore ? J&#039;ai le cheval qu&#039;il vous faut. 

faute
 
nf (fô-t&#039;)
 1Action de faillir, manquement contre. 
Ce n&#039;est pas ma faute, c&#039;est-à-dire je n&#039;ai pu y mettre obstacle, prévenir la chose, elle ne m&#039;est pas imputable. 

Dans les  2 cas, il y a l&#039;idée de manque/manquement, de &quot;dé-faut&quot;.
@+

Nic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Littré dit :</p>
<p>falloir</p>
<p>vi (fa-loir)<br />
 1 &#8211; Faire besoin (le sens étymologique de falloir étant manquer). Il lui fallait cent francs. Que vous faut-il encore ? J&#8217;ai le cheval qu&#8217;il vous faut. </p>
<p>faute</p>
<p>nf (fô-t&#8217;)<br />
 1Action de faillir, manquement contre.<br />
Ce n&#8217;est pas ma faute, c&#8217;est-à-dire je n&#8217;ai pu y mettre obstacle, prévenir la chose, elle ne m&#8217;est pas imputable. </p>
<p>Dans les  2 cas, il y a l&#8217;idée de manque/manquement, de &#8220;dé-faut&#8221;.<br />
@+</p>
<p>Nic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Michael Jackson is a woman (?) by MJDirtyDiana829</title>
		<link>http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2006/11/06/michael-jackson-is-a-woman/#comment-342192</link>
		<dc:creator>MJDirtyDiana829</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 23:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2006/11/06/michael-jackson-is-a-woman/#comment-342192</guid>
		<description>This is so true. I mean, Yanni has long hair and so does MJ (my two fav composers btw). But I don&#039;t think it&#039;s women saying this(cuz most of the women in this world are in love with Michael(so am I)), I think it&#039;s men. They&#039;re probably just jealous of his immensely good looks. 
;–)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so true. I mean, Yanni has long hair and so does MJ (my two fav composers btw). But I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s women saying this(cuz most of the women in this world are in love with Michael(so am I)), I think it&#8217;s men. They&#8217;re probably just jealous of his immensely good looks.<br />
;–)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GPL vs BSD, a matter of sustainability by acc</title>
		<link>http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2007/12/15/gpl-vs-bsd-a-matter-of-sustainability/#comment-341915</link>
		<dc:creator>acc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 12:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2007/12/15/gpl-vs-bsd-a-matter-of-sustainability/#comment-341915</guid>
		<description>It is inherently obvious that &quot;the code *has* to stay free&quot; is un-free.

The GPL is democracy looking down the barrel of a gun.  This fact is parroted repeatedly by its adherents.  How much more obvious does it have to be?

The BSD license may not be perfect, but it&#039;s the most reasonably free and open license of them all (apart from the MIT license and public domain).  It lets authors reap the benefits of copyright while giving themselves enough legal protection without being caught up in a bunch of legalese.  The GPL, on the other hand, is purely idealistic and micro-managing.

Personally, I&#039;ll take reason over pipe dreams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is inherently obvious that &#8220;the code *has* to stay free&#8221; is un-free.</p>
<p>The GPL is democracy looking down the barrel of a gun.  This fact is parroted repeatedly by its adherents.  How much more obvious does it have to be?</p>
<p>The BSD license may not be perfect, but it&#8217;s the most reasonably free and open license of them all (apart from the MIT license and public domain).  It lets authors reap the benefits of copyright while giving themselves enough legal protection without being caught up in a bunch of legalese.  The GPL, on the other hand, is purely idealistic and micro-managing.</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;ll take reason over pipe dreams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ellen DeGeneres not funny by Shirley</title>
		<link>http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2005/03/06/ellen-degeneres-not-funny/#comment-325812</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 03:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-325812</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that she is very funny at all either and that she only has the success on her show because she is gay.  Cover girl is fake, her audience is more amusing than she is and she is scary at times.  Behind the scenes she is a different person than on stage... total fake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that she is very funny at all either and that she only has the success on her show because she is gay.  Cover girl is fake, her audience is more amusing than she is and she is scary at times.  Behind the scenes she is a different person than on stage&#8230; total fake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ellen DeGeneres not funny by Shirley Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2005/03/06/ellen-degeneres-not-funny/#comment-325811</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirley Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 03:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-325811</guid>
		<description>ridiculous dance routine is right!!!
and if she would stop dressing like a man and be more of a woman.... maybe I might tend to like her more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ridiculous dance routine is right!!!<br />
and if she would stop dressing like a man and be more of a woman&#8230;. maybe I might tend to like her more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ellen DeGeneres not funny by Shirley</title>
		<link>http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2005/03/06/ellen-degeneres-not-funny/#comment-325809</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 03:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-325809</guid>
		<description>Exactly!!!  she even looks confused at times grasping for something to say.  She only has the success on her show because she is gay and people worship her because she has brain washed them all into thinking she is funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly!!!  she even looks confused at times grasping for something to say.  She only has the success on her show because she is gay and people worship her because she has brain washed them all into thinking she is funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Michael Jackson is a woman (?) by ARSI EAGLE</title>
		<link>http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2006/11/06/michael-jackson-is-a-woman/#comment-325568</link>
		<dc:creator>ARSI EAGLE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 10:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matusiak.eu/numerodix/blog/index.php/2006/11/06/michael-jackson-is-a-woman/#comment-325568</guid>
		<description>Yaaaa You r right jani.... I m with u.... LETS F*CK THOSE WHO THINK HIM TO BE A WOMAN. HE WAS THE ONE AND ONLY &quot;KING&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yaaaa You r right jani&#8230;. I m with u&#8230;. LETS F*CK THOSE WHO THINK HIM TO BE A WOMAN. HE WAS THE ONE AND ONLY &#8220;KING&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.315 seconds -->
