<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>nzriskmanager.com</title>
	
	<link>http://www.nzriskmanager.com</link>
	<description />
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:19:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9-RC1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/nzriskmanager/feed" /><feedburner:info uri="nzriskmanager/feed" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>New regulation in Canada</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nzriskmanager/feed/~3/ClzI7jXE90w/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2010/02/new-regulation-in-canada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nzriskmanager</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Credit risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nzriskmanager.com/?p=328</guid>
		<description>Canada’s government has this week decided introduce new banking regulations.
From mid April borrowers in Canada will have loans assessed as if they were taking out a five-year, fixed-rate mortgage, for which rates are higher than on shorter, variable-rate loan. 
Equity withdrawals will also be limited where someone refinances, with an upper limit on refinancing of [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nzriskmanager/feed/~4/ClzI7jXE90w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2010/02/new-regulation-in-canada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2010/02/new-regulation-in-canada/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>New APRA liquidity rules</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nzriskmanager/feed/~3/VxbszLERwK8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2009/12/new-apra-liquidity-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nzriskmanager</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Liquidity management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Core funding ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liquidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swaps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nzriskmanager.com/?p=322</guid>
		<description>APRA has announced that it is looking to introduce prescribed liquidity requirements for Aussie Banks. Its early days, but it appears the proposal is that banks would be allowed to count only government and semi-government bonds as liquid assets. 
Effectively, Banks will have restraints on other bank paper or bank bills in their liquid assets [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nzriskmanager/feed/~4/VxbszLERwK8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2009/12/new-apra-liquidity-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2009/12/new-apra-liquidity-rules/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Credit risk modeling</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nzriskmanager/feed/~3/Rvd7CtvsMkM/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2009/12/credit-risk-modeling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 07:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nzriskmanager</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt servicing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DTI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial ratios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portfolio risk ratios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk grade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nzriskmanager.com/?p=319</guid>
		<description>Financial institutions have been taking on more complex types of credit risk than ever before resulting in the need to be able to manage credit risk more effectively. Credit risk modeling enables these institutions to estimate how much credit is &amp;#8216;at risk&amp;#8217; in the event of default or due to changes in credit risk factors. [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nzriskmanager/feed/~4/Rvd7CtvsMkM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2009/12/credit-risk-modeling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2009/12/credit-risk-modeling/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Securitisation</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nzriskmanager/feed/~3/21z3QgtWq8g/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2009/12/securitisation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nzriskmanager</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derivatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securitisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swaps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nzriskmanager.com/?p=307</guid>
		<description>Securitisation is the process of converting tranches of assets, such as residential mortgages, into tradeable securities. Some banks securitise components of their loans for the following reasons;

Reduce their regulatory capital requirement
Achieves a lower cost funding source
Transfers their portfolio credit risk
Liquidity management

Securitisation options are either &amp;#8220;traditional&amp;#8221; or &amp;#8220;synthetic&amp;#8221;. 
The traditional method requires the bank to sell [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nzriskmanager/feed/~4/21z3QgtWq8g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2009/12/securitisation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2009/12/securitisation/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Policy – Income and employment requirements</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nzriskmanager/feed/~3/-iVFXWpDxYA/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2009/12/policy-income-and-employment-requirements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 05:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nzriskmanager</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Credit risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt servicing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DTI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nzriskmanager.com/?p=299</guid>
		<description>The following is a policy guide on appropriate employment and income evidence requirements to support personal lending:
PAYE – Full time 	
100% of the gross monthly income may be utilised for DTI calculation purposes subject to:
Borrower must be employed by current employer for twelve (12) months or more, alternatively a borrower may be employed by their [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nzriskmanager/feed/~4/-iVFXWpDxYA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2009/12/policy-income-and-employment-requirements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2009/12/policy-income-and-employment-requirements/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Updated: Are Australasian banks that strong ?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nzriskmanager/feed/~3/xXqj3hmDZ7I/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2009/11/are-australasian-banks-that-strong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nzriskmanager</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capital ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&P]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nzriskmanager.com/?p=292</guid>
		<description>UPDATE: Standard &amp;#038; Poor&amp;#8217;s Ratings Services said today (26 Nov) that Australian major banks&amp;#8217; AA/Stable ratings remained unchanged in the context of recently released research on our risk-adjusted capital framework (RACF). &amp;#8220;While Australian banks&amp;#8217; RAC scores are close to or slightly higher than the global average for major banks, and capital is a slight weakness [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nzriskmanager/feed/~4/xXqj3hmDZ7I" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2009/11/are-australasian-banks-that-strong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2009/11/are-australasian-banks-that-strong/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Job advert</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nzriskmanager/feed/~3/f4soSx5S41c/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2009/11/job-advert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nzriskmanager</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Credit risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operational risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Op risk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nzriskmanager.com/?p=285</guid>
		<description>I had to cringe when I saw the following job recently advertised. This would be one of the primary reasons why we have seen so many failures in the Finance Company sector in NZ. There needs to be a clear segregation of duties between sales and credit.

Related postsNew regulation in CanadaPolicy &amp;#8211; Income and employment [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nzriskmanager/feed/~4/f4soSx5S41c" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2009/11/job-advert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2009/11/job-advert/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Models assessing risk</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nzriskmanager/feed/~3/ww7JjMgyaAU/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2009/11/models-assessing-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nzriskmanager</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Credit risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Models]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nzriskmanager.com/?p=275</guid>
		<description>I have just read a interesting article from the Harvard Business Review, most of their articles are &amp;#8220;pay per view&amp;#8221;, but this was a free one. The most interesting part for me was a small segment on the models used for assessing risk. 
Pretty obvious stuff, but some of the comments were:
Models are not decision [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nzriskmanager/feed/~4/ww7JjMgyaAU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2009/11/models-assessing-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2009/11/models-assessing-risk/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Loss provisions – the difference between IFRS and Basel II</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nzriskmanager/feed/~3/OA3pj9y5BRg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2009/11/loss-provisions-the-difference-between-ifrs-and-basel-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nzriskmanager</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basel II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IFRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loss provisions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nzriskmanager.com/?p=262</guid>
		<description>This is a short post to highlight the different loss provisioning principles between IFRS and Basel. 
Basel objectives are to ensure the Bank has sufficient provisions to absorb &amp;#8220;expected losses&amp;#8221; and sufficient capital to absorb &amp;#8220;unexpected losses&amp;#8221;. 
IFRS objectives are to ensure that the financial statements of the bank reflect the true financial position of [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nzriskmanager/feed/~4/OA3pj9y5BRg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2009/11/loss-provisions-the-difference-between-ifrs-and-basel-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2009/11/loss-provisions-the-difference-between-ifrs-and-basel-ii/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Loss provisions</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nzriskmanager/feed/~3/10LwarDRcjQ/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2009/11/loss-provisions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nzriskmanager</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Credit risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basel II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IFRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loss provisions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nzriskmanager.com/?p=236</guid>
		<description>This is a high level review of loan provisioning &amp;#8211; the recognition of potential losses is prescibed in both the Basel accord and IAS 39 (International Accounting Standards).
Note. IFRS 9 (Intl Financal Reporting Standards) is soon to replace IAS 39 and uses a single approach to determine whether a financial asset is measured at &amp;#8220;amortized [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nzriskmanager/feed/~4/10LwarDRcjQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2009/11/loss-provisions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.nzriskmanager.com/2009/11/loss-provisions/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
