<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2titles.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemtitles.css"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" --><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Oaktree Imaging</title>
	<link>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog</link>
	<description>Ramblings on Digital Photography and Post-Production</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 18:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/oaktree-imaging" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>oaktree-imaging</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>Slew of Adobe Software Updates</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/oaktree-imaging/~3/3orPUbD3Khs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/11/17/151/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 18:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Post Production]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/11/17/151/</guid>
		<description>Adobe has released several updates for Photoshop, Lightroom and Bridge. These updates are primarily bug fix updates though there are some new features in the Lightroom update.

Lightroom has been updated to work properly on OS X 10.5 Leopard, includes some UI changes and the start of the long waited SDKs for third-party additions. The first [...]</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/11/17/151/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/11/17/151/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Raw Without The FUD</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/oaktree-imaging/~3/6p-VBWFT7E0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/10/05/136/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 23:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Post Production]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/10/05/136/</guid>
		<description>Michael Tapes of Raw Workflow has fairly well done video tutorial series explaining the mysteries of raw capture titled Raw Without The FUD. This series has been circulating the net with high praise and from what I can see, it looks well deserved.

There looks to be a downside though. From what I can gleam on [...]</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/10/05/136/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/10/05/136/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Keyword Worklists</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/oaktree-imaging/~3/9PHa4fLKoms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/10/05/135/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 22:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Lightroom Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/10/05/135/</guid>
		<description>Eric Scouten from Adobe has an excellent article on creating work-lists using keywords. Prior to this I was using collections as a means of organizing images I needed to keyword and caption, but I found myself forgetting to update them as new images came in.

Eric&amp;#8217;s solution is much more convenient approach that utilizes a search [...]</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/10/05/135/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/10/05/135/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Moving the Lightroom Tips</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/oaktree-imaging/~3/0ydUbG7yXiI/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/10/05/134/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 22:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/10/05/134/</guid>
		<description>For a while now, I&amp;#8217;ve been thinking of a ways to better organize my Lightroom Tips article. Early on, I recognized that as tips were added to the page, it would become difficult to find subject matter without some sort of organizational structure. The more I thought about it, the more I realized I already [...]</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/10/05/134/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/10/05/134/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Move The Preview Cache in OS X</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/oaktree-imaging/~3/ZyPXnlAGSuY/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/10/05/133/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 22:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Lightroom Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/10/05/133/</guid>
		<description>As a former windows user (since the 3.1 days) I would have never thought this tip was possible. I&amp;#8217;ve been running with my preview folder linked as Sean describes since he first posted. It works like a charm.

Read: Moving the Preview folder (Mac OSX)</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/10/05/133/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/10/05/133/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D300, Slower than Canon’s 40D</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/oaktree-imaging/~3/3rKFvcx5Q2I/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/22/131/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 20:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/22/131/</guid>
		<description>I was checking out the DPReview preview on the Nikon D300 (the implementation of live view is sweet) and I noticed something I&amp;#8217;m surprised more sites and camera fanatics haven&amp;#8217;t picked up on much; at least I haven&amp;#8217;t noticed them pick up on it yet.

The continuous shooting mode for the D300 is listed as 6 [...]</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/22/131/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/22/131/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>It’s a SLR, Not a DSLR</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/oaktree-imaging/~3/8z07S8496y8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/22/132/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 17:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/22/132/</guid>
		<description>I was over at DPReview drooling over the new D3 and I started to wonder; why do we keep calling digital SLR cameras DSLRs?

The point in adding the "D" to "SLR" was to reduce confusion when discussing cameras. That, however, was during a time when digital SLRs were fairly young and many photographers still shot film...</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/22/132/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/22/132/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick B&amp;W in Lightroom</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/oaktree-imaging/~3/Y0E-4WzDzQE/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/06/129/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Lightroom Tips]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Post Production]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/06/129/</guid>
		<description>A super fast means of converting images to BW from almost anywhere in Lightroom.</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/06/129/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/06/129/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Beta HD Photo plug-ins for Photoshop</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/oaktree-imaging/~3/0hlnxQoTWs4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/04/128/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 01:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Post Production]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/04/128/</guid>
		<description>For those interested in fooling around with Microsoft&amp;#8217;s HD Photo format, here you go.

Oh, and it should be noted, once HD Photo clears standardization, it will be renamed to the terrible JPEG XR moniker. How in the world does that name make a lick of sense? I&amp;#8217;m sure the JPEG group is very proud of [...]</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/04/128/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/04/128/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Optimal Copyright Term is 14 Years</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/oaktree-imaging/~3/PBPOp0eQ8ik/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/04/127/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 00:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/04/127/</guid>
		<description>"It's easy enough to find out how long copyrights last, but much harder to decide how long they should last�??but that didn't stop Cambridge University PhD candidate Rufus Pollock from using economics formulas to answer the question. In a newly-released paper, Pollock pegs the "optimal level for copyright" at only 14 years."</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/04/127/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/04/127/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Google, MS &amp; Others Defend Fair-Use</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/oaktree-imaging/~3/EdTNbDYSxGk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/04/126/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 00:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/04/126/</guid>
		<description>Earlier this month, the Computer &amp;#38; Communications Industry Association1 filed a complaint with the FTC alleging that professional sports leagues, Hollywood studios, and book publishers were all using copyright notices that misrepresented the law. Now, the group has launched a web site called Defend Fair Use that shows they are serious about making [...]</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/04/126/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/04/126/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Must Read CA Sales Tax Information</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/oaktree-imaging/~3/3EDBY9B1vDo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/03/125/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 02:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/03/125/</guid>
		<description>California Sales Tax clarification for photographers.</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/03/125/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/03/125/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Multiple Lightroom Catalogs Done Easy</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/oaktree-imaging/~3/9uOhrKMHbow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/03/124/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 23:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Lightroom Tips]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Post Production]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/03/124/</guid>
		<description>A recent article on O&amp;#8217;Reily&amp;#8217;s Inside Lightroom blog talks about the catalog selection screen in Lightroom. In short, if you have multiple catalogs you can set LR to ask you which catalog you wish to use each time LR launches. While convenient, there is an even easier way.





Rather than managing another dialog box with each [...]</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/03/124/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/09/03/124/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Once Agian, Rootkits &amp; Sony (Updated)</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/oaktree-imaging/~3/AqPFjwOVAsg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/08/25/123/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 01:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/08/25/123/</guid>
		<description>In 2005 Sony suffered a tremendous debacle over installing rootkits onto people&amp;#8217;s Windows computers causing severe compromises to security and even damaging said computers. Judging by Sony&amp;#8217;s handling of the situation I doubted they learned anything from their experience.

It would seem I was right. According to Engaget, Sony is at it again. This time it [...]</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/08/25/123/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/08/25/123/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Photography is not Dead</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/oaktree-imaging/~3/oIG03nAlq-c/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/08/17/121/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/08/17/121/</guid>
		<description>In a few corners of the internet a debate rages on over whether photography&amp;#8212;or &amp;#8220;true&amp;#8221; photography&amp;#8212;is dead or not. The featured commentator, Adam Isler, on this TOP post sums things up nicely.


  Perfect illustration of one of the points I tried to make during the furious &amp;#8216;Photography is Dead&amp;#8217; debate. This is a real [...]</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/08/17/121/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.oaktree-imaging.com/blog/archives/2007/08/17/121/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
