<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="0.91" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[OB Rag — Grassroots and Progressive views on local, national and world news]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://follow.it/ob-rag-grassroots-and-progressive-views-on-local-national-and-world-news/rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
        <description>Follow OB Rag — Grassroots and Progressive views on local, national and world news, filter it, and define how you want to receive the news (via Email, RSS, Telegram, WhatsApp etc.)</description>
        <link>https://follow.it/ob-rag-grassroots-and-progressive-views-on-local-national-and-world-news</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 13:10:29 +0200</lastBuildDate>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[City Council Votes for Some Restrictions on SB-79 — Next Move: SANDAG]]></title>
                <link>https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDxFnBH-7G0E670azLbRlgyM?utm_source=follow.it</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-loaded/v1/BC24p9zhS-XTqTFNOSAHrN3hDS9njgCr" border=0 width="1" height="1" alt="City Council Votes for Some Restrictions on SB-79 — Next Move: SANDAG" title="City Council Votes for Some Restrictions on SB-79 — Next Move: SANDAG"> <em><strong><img class="aligncenter wp-image-313691" src="https://obrag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/sd-city-council-1-27-26-park-permits.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="270" />By Geoff Hueter</strong> of Neighbors for a Better San Diego</em>

First, it is important to highlight that on <a href="https://obrag.org/2026/05/call-to-action-help-limit-the-impact-of-sb-79-at-special-city-council-meeting-thursday-may-7/">Thursday night, May 7th</a>, the San Diego City Council voted to follow the City Planning Department’s restriction of SB 79 to 1 mile walking distance and the phased approach to implementing SB 79 in the following areas:
<ul>
 	<li>high fire hazard zones,</li>
 	<li>low resource areas,</li>
 	<li>historic resources, and</li>
 	<li>areas subject to sea level rise.</li>
</ul>
This is the most important outcome of the ordinance that was adopted last night and what we supported.]]></description>
                <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 23:10:14 +0200</pubDate>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDxFnBH-7G0E670azLbRlgyM?utm_source=follow.it</guid>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[State Farm vs. State of California]]></title>
                <link>https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDxVkc2GfPqPPNkCJXkaxXTv?utm_source=follow.it</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-loaded/v1/6czq8CYhfqWmRXfgqYPHzd3hDS9njgCr" border=0 width="1" height="1" alt="State Farm vs. State of California" title="State Farm vs. State of California"> <em><img class="aligncenter wp-image-313684" src="https://obrag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/state-farm-sign-in-wreckage.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="300" />By Zain Khan / <a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/sectors/healthcare/articles/state-farm-crisis-mode-watchdog-184425356.html">Yahoo Finances</a> New York Post  / May 4, 202</em>

State Farm is in crisis mode in California as officials look to slap it with massive fines and suspend its license over the handling of the deadly 2025 Palisades Fire.

The California Department of Insurance issued a damning verdict on the state’s largest insurer after an investigation into its actions towards customers following the inferno.

The probe, released in part on Monday, found a staggering 398 violations of state law in 114 of the 220 sample claims it looked into.

Among the key findings was claims were not investigated or resolved within required timelines, payouts were unreasonably low and policyholders were frequently reassigned to different adjusters — creating confusion some described as “adjuster roulette.”

Smoke damage claims, which made up nearly half of all complaints, were also mishandled, with delays, denials and missing explanations cited by investigators.

Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara said Monday: “Wildfire survivors came to us for help, and we followed the facts.]]></description>
                <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 20:07:55 +0200</pubDate>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDxVkc2GfPqPPNkCJXkaxXTv?utm_source=follow.it</guid>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Balboa Park Operating Funds: What a Tangled Web]]></title>
                <link>https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDxVkc2GfPqPPPIGg4NdYvKo?utm_source=follow.it</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-loaded/v1/6czq8CYhfqXTqTFNOSAHrN3hDS9njgCr" border=0 width="1" height="1" alt="Balboa Park Operating Funds: What a Tangled Web" title="Balboa Park Operating Funds: What a Tangled Web"> <strong><em><img class="alignleft wp-image-313670" src="https://obrag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/money-bag-hand-281x300.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="160" /><img class="alignright wp-image-313674" src="https://obrag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/balboa-Park-night-lit-300x163.jpg" alt="" width="280" height="152" />OB Rag Staff Report</em></strong>

Rag stories about Balboa Park have what reporters call “legs” — they get lots of views and comments. This has been especially true since City Hall imposed parking fees that have threatened the Park’s solvency by driving away visitors.

So we weren’t surprised when our<a href="https://obrag.org/2026/04/city-is-reducing-its-fy2027-funding-for-balboa-park/"> April 27 story</a> on a $1.8 million reduction in the 2027 Park budget became a “top post.” Commenters generally agreed that the city has utterly failed the park and must turn over its management to an independent nonprofit.

But one comment piqued our interest. Don said the city hadn’t actually cut $1.8 million from the park. He contended that the city was simply going to shift $1.8 million from a “Developed Regional Parks” fund over to pay for Balboa Park operating expenses.]]></description>
                <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 19:49:45 +0200</pubDate>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDxVkc2GfPqPPPIGg4NdYvKo?utm_source=follow.it</guid>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[OB Band Slightly Stoopid Wins ‘Song of the Year’ at Annual San Diego Music Awards]]></title>
                <link>https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDy7bUQGx3BA7UyOj3nC9F6r?utm_source=follow.it</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-loaded/v1/deN8dkAk8V4Q1hAz_qjwT93hDS9njgCr" border=0 width="1" height="1" alt="OB Band Slightly Stoopid Wins ‘Song of the Year’ at Annual San Diego Music Awards" title="OB Band Slightly Stoopid Wins ‘Song of the Year’ at Annual San Diego Music Awards"> <h4><img class="aligncenter wp-image-313663" src="https://obrag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/slighty-stoopid-album-stepIntotheSun-1024x371.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="181" />“Step Into The Sun" Winning Song</h4>
<em>by Peter Blackstock / Special to <a href="https://www.msn.com/en-us/music/news/slightly-stoopid-schizophonics-cullins-score-top-honors-at-san-diego-music-awards/ar-AA22CWoE">Times of San Diego</a> / May 7, 2026</em>

The Schizophonics, Anthony Cullins, Slightly Stoopid and Tigers In Cairo took home top honors at the 35th annual San Diego Music Awards, which drew a sold-out crowd from the local music community on a cool Wednesday evening at Humphreys by the Bay.

Garage-rock trio the Schizophonics were named Artist of the Year. Fallbrook blues/soul artist Cullins won Album of the Year for “Inside Out &#38; Backwards.” Ocean Beach reggae-rockers Slightly Stoopid won Song of the Year for <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEfn48ISogs">“Step Into The Sun.</a>” And postpunk band Tigers In Cairo was named Best New Artist.

Awards shows can be difficult propositions, and SDMA’s organizers should be commended for getting through an extensive program in three hours. In addition to handing out 28 awards, SDMA presented six performances by nominated artists, plus another by musicians from the educational nonprofit Young Lions Jazz Conservatory.]]></description>
                <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 18:59:41 +0200</pubDate>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDy7bUQGx3BA7UyOj3nC9F6r?utm_source=follow.it</guid>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Non-Profit Seeks to Become Conservancy for Mission Bay Park in Wake of Devastating City Budget]]></title>
                <link>https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDwdbuqrj6_7yqKA5KIhHLWI?utm_source=follow.it</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-loaded/v1/VAHGbLFe7vYyRtTaus1Unt3hDS9njgCr" border=0 width="1" height="1" alt="Non-Profit Seeks to Become Conservancy for Mission Bay Park in Wake of Devastating City Budget" title="Non-Profit Seeks to Become Conservancy for Mission Bay Park in Wake of Devastating City Budget"> <em> <img class="aligncenter wp-image-313656" src="https://obrag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/mission-bay-master-plan-graf.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="358" />by Staff and Wire Reports / <a href="https://timesofsandiego.com/environment/2026/05/06/nonprofit-effort-mission-bay-plan/">Beach &#38; Bay Press</a> / May 6, 2026</em>

In the wake of a devastating proposed city budget, a citizen-led initiative to assist the city of San Diego meet its <a href="https://www.sandiego.gov/sites/default/files/000_mission_bay_park_master_plan_2021_revised_figure_32_0.pdf">Mission Bay Park Master Plan</a> began Wednesday.

The initiative invites locals to help steer the direction of the city’s largest aquatic park.

The <a href="https://www.missionbaypark.org/">Mission Bay Park Conservancy</a> seeks to maintain city-owned structures around the bay, including the visitor’s center and 25 restrooms, which are at risk of seasonal closure as San Diego seeks to patch a more than $120 million hole in its Fiscal Year 2027 budget.

Additionally, 14 city jobs in the park would be eliminated under San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria’s proposed budget.
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">“This nonprofit is designed to be a community catalyst — bringing together public and private efforts to turn vision into action,” said Bradley Schnell, Mission Bay Park Conservancy founder and president.</p>]]></description>
                <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 18:45:12 +0200</pubDate>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDwdbuqrj6_7yqKA5KIhHLWI?utm_source=follow.it</guid>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Larry Turner Endorses Richard Bailey for San Diego City Council D2]]></title>
                <link>https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDwCLIOjIxIjBczQoU1b-Tyb?utm_source=follow.it</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-loaded/v1/81Y7WybJVp2yeCUJHE5dv93hDS9njgCr" border=0 width="1" height="1" alt="Larry Turner Endorses Richard Bailey for San Diego City Council D2" title="Larry Turner Endorses Richard Bailey for San Diego City Council D2"> <em><img class="alignright wp-image-313643" src="https://obrag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/larry-turner-podium.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="151" /></em><img class="alignleft wp-image-313644 size-full" src="https://obrag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/richard-bailey-balboa-pk-rally-1-24-26-ed.jpg" alt="" width="135" height="165" /><em>From the Richard Baily Campaign</em>

San Diego is facing serious challenges. A growing budget deficit, mounting infrastructure backlogs, and declining basic services didn’t happen overnight - they are the result of years of bad policy, irresponsible spending, and a lack of accountability at City Hall. Fixing these problems will require better policies from experienced leadership with a clear vision for how city government should function..

That’s why I’m proud to endorse Richard Bailey for San Diego City Council.

Bailey is by far the most qualified candidate in the field and centers his entire campaign platform around policies, not politics.

Richard brings something that is increasingly rare in government today: a deep command of the actual policies and decisions that shape our city.]]></description>
                <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 18:11:59 +0200</pubDate>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDwCLIOjIxIjBczQoU1b-Tyb?utm_source=follow.it</guid>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Supreme Court’s Decision Against Voting Rights Act Is Devastating]]></title>
                <link>https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDw4a38oJfzYmtp5VRQTAb3v?utm_source=follow.it</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-loaded/v1/msPTpTKZ6IiEZlQ_9FtTcd3hDS9njgCr" border=0 width="1" height="1" alt="Supreme Court’s Decision Against Voting Rights Act Is Devastating" title="Supreme Court’s Decision Against Voting Rights Act Is Devastating"> <em><strong><img class="aligncenter wp-image-313639" src="https://obrag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/voting-rights-Black-man-voting.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="282" />By Erwin Chemerinsky</strong> / Op-Ed <a href="https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2026-04-30/supreme-court-voting-rights-act">Los Angeles Times</a> / April 30, 2026</em>

The Supreme Court has again dealt a devastating blow to voting equality in the United States.

On Wednesday, April 29th, in Louisiana vs. Callais, six justices effectively nullified a 1982 federal statute that prohibits states from running or establishing election systems, such as election districts, that have a discriminatory effect against voters of color. Simply put, unless it can be shown that a state or local government acted with the intent of racial discrimination — something very difficult to prove — it will be impossible to successfully challenge laws as having violated the Voting Rights Act of 1965 or the Constitution.

The Voting Rights Act is, simply put, one of the most important federal laws adopted during my lifetime. Although the 15th Amendment, adopted in 1870, prohibits denying someone the right to vote based on race, this was a hollow promise due to an array of practices used to keep Black individuals from voting. In Mississippi in 1964, for example, only 6.7% of eligible Black citizens were registered to vote. At the time it had the highest Black population of any state in the U.S.]]></description>
                <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 20:37:30 +0200</pubDate>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDw4a38oJfzYmtp5VRQTAb3v?utm_source=follow.it</guid>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[New Owner of Mega-ADU Project in Pacific Beach Says Foreclosure Notices Are Without Merit]]></title>
                <link>https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDw222FgBZXiUfx3o3vNCgAV?utm_source=follow.it</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-loaded/v1/GJKLBpcF4y_G2jxc6BhQwN3hDS9njgCr" border=0 width="1" height="1" alt="New Owner of Mega-ADU Project in Pacific Beach Says Foreclosure Notices Are Without Merit" title="New Owner of Mega-ADU Project in Pacific Beach Says Foreclosure Notices Are Without Merit"> <em> <img class="aligncenter wp-image-313633" src="https://obrag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/pb-chalcifica-project.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="331" />by Dorian Hargrove / <a href="https://timesofsandiego.com/politics/2026/05/06/pacific-beach-mega-adu-project-foreclosur/">Times of San Diego</a> / May 6, 2026</em>

The saga over a proposal to build a 136-unit accessory dwelling unit project in Pacific Beach continues.

Pacific Beach residents discovered public notices were placed near the parcels on Pacifica Drive and Chalcedony, indicating the property, referred to as Chalcifica, is in default and heads to auction on May 28 if developer SDRE does not catch up on the amount owed.

Opponents of the project should not get their hopes up.

The president of the development company that now owns the Chalcifica says the notices are part of a dispute with the lender.

“The foreclosure is without merit,” said Brian Doyle, president of Infill Innovation. Doyle says his company acquired ADU-developer SDRE in April 2026.]]></description>
                <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 20:23:25 +0200</pubDate>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDw222FgBZXiUfx3o3vNCgAV?utm_source=follow.it</guid>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Informational Meeting on Sunset Cliffs Seawall ‘Improvement’ –Tuesday, May 12th at Point Loma Library]]></title>
                <link>https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDw_EmIto9FkLf_j4jDCNi9Y?utm_source=follow.it</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-loaded/v1/ivdVtVWFkpPEws5Se3CMI93hDS9njgCr" border=0 width="1" height="1" alt="Informational Meeting on Sunset Cliffs Seawall ‘Improvement’ –Tuesday, May 12th at Point Loma Library" title="Informational Meeting on Sunset Cliffs Seawall ‘Improvement’ –Tuesday, May 12th at Point Loma Library"> <img class="aligncenter wp-image-313626" src="https://obrag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/sunset-cliffs-adair-to-osprey-aerial-e1778177081389.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="286" />The City of San Diego is holding an informational meeting on Tuesday, May 12th about a proposed seawall along Sunset Cliffs. It will be held at the Point Loma Library from 5 to 7 p.m.

Please see the following City documents.

<img class="aligncenter wp-image-313619" src="https://obrag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/sunset-cliffs-2026-seawall-SDp1a.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="265" />]]></description>
                <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 20:05:56 +0200</pubDate>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDw_EmIto9FkLf_j4jDCNi9Y?utm_source=follow.it</guid>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[A Retired San Diego Judge Looks at Some of the Candidates Running for California Governor]]></title>
                <link>https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDyC7OCZlqR8smNJ3VIbb4xz?utm_source=follow.it</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-loaded/v1/6WVcPdyrZU6yeCUJHE5dv93hDS9njgCr" border=0 width="1" height="1" alt="A Retired San Diego Judge Looks at Some of the Candidates Running for California Governor" title="A Retired San Diego Judge Looks at Some of the Candidates Running for California Governor"> <strong><em><img class="aligncenter wp-image-313613" src="https://obrag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/calif-greetings-old-postcard.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="326" />By Judge Runston "Tony" Maino</em></strong>

There are 61 people running for Governor. This includes one of the most interesting candidates, one Eric Swalwell,  who has decided to not run due to unfounded allegations made against him, namely his Peter Problem.

The first thing I noticed was the interesting names of some of the candidates: Living for God and Country Demott and Barrack D. Obama Shaw. These are real names and not AKAs.

More interesting than the names are the candidates' statements as to why they wish to be Governor and what vision they have for California. Clean water, affordable housing, leadership, affordable health care and on and on with the usual buzz words.

I found it interesting that many of the candidates are going to abolish ICE, forgetting, or maybe not knowing, that ICE is a federal function and the California governor, legislature, and judiciary cannot abolish ICE.

But I digress. If you will spare me a few moments I will go over some of the more colorful statements from some of the candidates.]]></description>
                <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 19:40:44 +0200</pubDate>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDyC7OCZlqR8smNJ3VIbb4xz?utm_source=follow.it</guid>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Are We Still at War With Iran or Not? Somebody Please Tell Us.]]></title>
                <link>https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDytbgTJ7obwNlSxOVOHqeGI?utm_source=follow.it</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-loaded/v1/BM_cLXOUmeFzzO7woTndS93hDS9njgCr" border=0 width="1" height="1" alt="Are We Still at War With Iran or Not? Somebody Please Tell Us." title="Are We Still at War With Iran or Not? Somebody Please Tell Us."> <img class="wp-image-313605 alignright" src="https://obrag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/iran-2026-us-strik-Khamenei-comp.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="521" />Are you confused as I am about whether we're still at war with Iran?

For me to even ask the question displays a lot about this particular moment. Are we at war still, after over 2 months of war? Who knows? I wish somebody would please tell us, to get us out of this confusion.

We have good reasons for our confusion. The Trump White House, Trump himself, and his cabinet secretaries all are saying different things. We aren't at war, we are at war, it's an "excursion," a "blip", it's an operation, not war.

Yet, for good times, try this.

Supposedly, the White House and Iran are looking at an agreement spelled out in a one-page memorandum of understanding to end the war and set a framework for more detailed nuclear negotiations. On this news, the DOW shot up.

Then also Trump put Project Freedom on pause last night,]]></description>
                <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 22:16:47 +0200</pubDate>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDytbgTJ7obwNlSxOVOHqeGI?utm_source=follow.it</guid>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[OB’s Chili Cook Off faces city budget cuts]]></title>
                <link>https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDzRFORyX9ej69xvkJwoztQv?utm_source=follow.it</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-loaded/v1/4N2eBIMKIV6T4KO4XJXG093hDS9njgCr" border=0 width="1" height="1" alt="OB’s Chili Cook Off faces city budget cuts" title="OB’s Chili Cook Off faces city budget cuts"> <em><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-313591" src="https://obrag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/OB-Chili-cookoff-gen-foto.jpg" alt="" width="288" height="236" />By Steve Anderson / Beach &#38; Bay Press - <a href="https://timesofsandiego.com/newsletter/chili-cook-off-faces-city-budget-cuts/">Times of San Diego</a> / April 30, 2026</em>

Recently, Mayor Todd Gloria proposed major cuts to San Diego’s arts and culture funding. As the city faces an $118 million deficit, the proposed arts cuts alone would save $11.8 million. Like much of Gloria’s decisions as mayor, this was met with backlash, especially among the local arts community.

On top of that, it seems like the cuts will affect other beloved aspects of our community — street fairs and parades are also under threat of losing major funding. Within Point Loma and OB that would be annual events, like the OB Street Fair and Chili Cook Off.

That doesn’t necessarily mean the OB Street Fair will cease to exist, but it might raise attendance fees and the organizations that support the events may experience layoffs.]]></description>
                <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 21:24:10 +0200</pubDate>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDzRFORyX9ej69xvkJwoztQv?utm_source=follow.it</guid>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[At Our Peril: Ignoring the Canary in the Coal Mine of Arts and Culture Defunding]]></title>
                <link>https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDxwIwGLWOhC0ims0NF0o9qz?utm_source=follow.it</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-loaded/v1/-OUMIB80N-Bm8GE74vSxC93hDS9njgCr" border=0 width="1" height="1" alt="At Our Peril: Ignoring the Canary in the Coal Mine of Arts and Culture Defunding" title="At Our Peril: Ignoring the Canary in the Coal Mine of Arts and Culture Defunding"> <em> <img class="aligncenter wp-image-313582" src="https://obrag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/sd-city-seal-glassdoor-lit-back-300x177.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="236" />by Linda Caballero Sotelo / <a href="https://voiceofsandiego.org/2026/05/05/at-our-peril-ignoring-the-canary-in-the-coal-mine-of-arts-and-culture-defunding/?goal=0_c2357fd0a3-ede6f192da-84176869">Voice of San Diego</a> / May 5, 2026</em>

Over a recent phone conversation, a friend conveyed her sense of disillusionment with how cities are being managed. The expression “tone-deaf” came up, and that warnings are all around us. Across the United States, cities are making budget decisions that reveal far more than their fiscal priorities. They reveal their values, their imagination, and their sense of responsibility to future generations.

In San Diego, the mayor’s proposed budget would virtually eliminate nearly the entire $12 million arts and culture budget, effectively dismantling the cultural ecosystem of educational organizations filling the gaps for student art education-based programming, artist support to produce works that attracts visitors and creates a livable and forward city to enjoy, visit and invest in. An ecosystem that extends across borders and has taken decades to build.

This is not simply a budget cut. It is a cultural alarm, a canary in the coal mine warning us about the direction of our civic life.]]></description>
                <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 21:18:00 +0200</pubDate>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDxwIwGLWOhC0ims0NF0o9qz?utm_source=follow.it</guid>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[CALL TO ACTION: Help Limit the Impact of SB 79 at Special City Council Meeting — Thursday, May 7]]></title>
                <link>https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDyiHqdkKjluiDEBLp1Teg2z?utm_source=follow.it</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-loaded/v1/vQCHjdvJPGKmRXfgqYPHzd3hDS9njgCr" border=0 width="1" height="1" alt="CALL TO ACTION: Help Limit the Impact of SB 79 at Special City Council Meeting — Thursday, May 7" title="CALL TO ACTION: Help Limit the Impact of SB 79 at Special City Council Meeting — Thursday, May 7"> <img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-313560" src="https://obrag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/sb-79-large-apt-bldg-300x201.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="201" />This Thursday, May 7th, the City Council is holding a "Special Meeting" to vote on an ordinance implementing Senate Bill 79, the new state law that allows 5+ story apartments within one-half mile of trolley stops and certain major bus routes.

And a Call to Action has been announced for residents to help limit the impact of SB 79 by attending or by using the city's online comment system.

It's Agenda Item 600.

Here's more on the situation from Neighbors For A Better San Diego (NFABSD):
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">To use the protections allowed under the law, San Diego must adopt an implementing ordinance before SB 79 takes effect on July 1.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;"> While Neighbors For A Better San Diego (NFABSD) opposed the bill in Sacramento, the Planning Department’s <strong><em>phased approach</]]></description>
                <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 20:47:15 +0200</pubDate>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDyiHqdkKjluiDEBLp1Teg2z?utm_source=follow.it</guid>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[OB Rag Endorses Mandy Havlik for District 2 of City Council]]></title>
                <link>https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDy6yteGGtLJhPscj1ExZrij?utm_source=follow.it</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-loaded/v1/09UcxE5Qiny3bGBjgc9RnN3hDS9njgCr" border=0 width="1" height="1" alt="OB Rag Endorses Mandy Havlik for District 2 of City Council" title="OB Rag Endorses Mandy Havlik for District 2 of City Council"> <img class="aligncenter wp-image-313555" src="https://obrag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/mandy-havlik-d2-prim2026.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="425" />Based on a polling of our writers, the OB Rag now endorses Mandy Havlik for District 2 of the San Diego City Council.

Mandy has long been active in the communities of Point Loma and Ocean Beach and has ingrained the wishes, dreams and complaints of the residents of this sector of District 2. For instance, she's been the first vice-chair of the Peninsula Community Planning Board for years, has been active in helping maintain Sunset Cliffs as a local treasure, active in the local Rotary and among the leadership of the local Democratic club.

In housing issues, she has actively opposed the overdevelopment of ADUs, favors real affordable homes, opposes Midway Rising, shows compassion for those suffering homelessness, has maintained her unbridled support for the 30-foot height limit at the coast, and is opposed to Measure A, the proposed tax on vacant homes.]]></description>
                <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 20:18:00 +0200</pubDate>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDy6yteGGtLJhPscj1ExZrij?utm_source=follow.it</guid>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[A Sign of the Times … on the Parking Meter]]></title>
                <link>https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDyh3vW7bths38zQoU1b-Tyb?utm_source=follow.it</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-loaded/v1/XOQzBWzS96yyeCUJHE5dv93hDS9njgCr" border=0 width="1" height="1" alt="A Sign of the Times … on the Parking Meter" title="A Sign of the Times … on the Parking Meter"> <img class="aligncenter wp-image-313550" src="https://obrag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/parking-meter-rev-sign.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="531" />The picture snapped in Hillcrest yesterday]]></description>
                <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 19:10:13 +0200</pubDate>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDyh3vW7bths38zQoU1b-Tyb?utm_source=follow.it</guid>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Happenings in May for the Peninsula]]></title>
                <link>https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDxYOOkC_HgqMuJLQaPFxyaH?utm_source=follow.it</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-loaded/v1/1qSz69fodtIS-ne5OxckH93hDS9njgCr" border=0 width="1" height="1" alt="Happenings in May for the Peninsula" title="Happenings in May for the Peninsula"> <img class="aligncenter wp-image-313530" src="https://obrag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/d2-2026-candidate-forum-5-14.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="503" /><img class="aligncenter wp-image-313531 size-full" src="https://obrag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/pen-happ-2026-may1.jpg" alt="" width="501" height="649" />]]></description>
                <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 20:53:41 +0200</pubDate>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDxYOOkC_HgqMuJLQaPFxyaH?utm_source=follow.it</guid>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Framing the News About Bicycling? Let’s Try ‘Safety First’]]></title>
                <link>https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDzgkzw-HcYOZnx9MCMotad2?utm_source=follow.it</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-loaded/v1/PWXPXuu3Vp4MSzAj-bC2b93hDS9njgCr" border=0 width="1" height="1" alt="Framing the News About Bicycling? Let’s Try ‘Safety First’" title="Framing the News About Bicycling? Let’s Try ‘Safety First’"> <strong><em><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-313525" src="https://obrag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/bicycle-man-on-300x230.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="230" />By Kate Callen</em></strong>

Shortly before 12 noon on May 4, I nearly killed a bicyclist.

After I made a full stop at the 30th &#38; Upas four-way stop sign, I stepped on the accelerator to start moving through the intersection. Within seconds, a speeding cyclist ran the stop sign meant for him and flew past the front of my car.

If I hadn’t slammed on the brakes, I would have crashed into him, and it’s doubtful he would have survived. News stories would have accurately reported that I hit him. Biking activists would have vilified me as a murderer.

This awful scenario happens all too frequently in neighborhoods across San Diego because too many cyclists think stop signs and stoplights are a nuisance.

They will literally bet their lives that they can frighten motorists into giving them the right-of-way that the law doesn’t grant them. If they lose the bet, motorists who obeyed the law can still face criminal prosecution and civil lawsuits.

Bicycling activists often talk about “bike safety.” For them, the term seems to mean that drivers should always be deferential to the needs of cyclists.]]></description>
                <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 20:32:46 +0200</pubDate>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDzgkzw-HcYOZnx9MCMotad2?utm_source=follow.it</guid>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Mission Bay: From Wetlands to Resorts to Largest Aquatic Park on West Coast]]></title>
                <link>https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDzWbG6wMROhqgcUS7HS2lRa?utm_source=follow.it</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-loaded/v1/EpCU4vB9IJwMrOs4hnoD5N3hDS9njgCr" border=0 width="1" height="1" alt="Mission Bay: From Wetlands to Resorts to Largest Aquatic Park on West Coast" title="Mission Bay: From Wetlands to Resorts to Largest Aquatic Park on West Coast"> <em> <img class="aligncenter wp-image-313511" src="https://obrag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/mission-bay-his-aerial-40s.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="394" />by Debbie L. Sklar /<a href="https://timesofsandiego.com/arts/2026/05/04/history-mission-bay-wetland-resort/"> Times of San Diego</a> / May 4, 2026</em>

Mission Bay didn’t start as a destination. It started as water that refused to sit still.

Just inland from the oceanfront homes and boardwalk of Mission Beach, the waters of the bay stretch across what was once a wide, shifting tidal wetland. Before it became a center of recreation, the bay was part of a dynamic coastal system of marshes, mudflats and seasonal channels— land that helped shape the surrounding beach communities as they developed.

<strong>Early waters and wetlands</strong>
For centuries, the San Diego River spread across a wide tidal basin here, carving through a shifting wetland of mudflats, marsh channels, and seasonal flood zones. Long before development, this was part of a larger coastal ecosystem used by the Kumeyaay, whose presence in the region predates Spanish settlement by thousands of years.

By the mid-20th century, that landscape was already being redesigned.]]></description>
                <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 20:10:05 +0200</pubDate>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDzWbG6wMROhqgcUS7HS2lRa?utm_source=follow.it</guid>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[City Council to Ponder Library and Rec Center Cuts — Cabrillo Set to Close]]></title>
                <link>https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDwrmxdMGDLU_G8QEJxXlLeN?utm_source=follow.it</link>
                <description><![CDATA[<img src="https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-loaded/v1/n8HalEbrnUnNsSOGqiMkEt3hDS9njgCr" border=0 width="1" height="1" alt="City Council to Ponder Library and Rec Center Cuts — Cabrillo Set to Close" title="City Council to Ponder Library and Rec Center Cuts — Cabrillo Set to Close"> <img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-313501" src="https://obrag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/cabrillo-rec-center-300x179.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="179" />On April 27, the mayor sent a memo to the City Council laying out three options for cutting costs at libraries:
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">Option 1 focuses on preserving hours in Districts 4, 8, and 9 (historically underserved communities), while cutting hours at 14 other branches. Six of these branches would eliminate a full day of service. Eight branches would be reduced to a half-day on Saturdays.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">Option 2 would result in more uniform cuts across the city for branches open Monday-Saturday. Most locations would lose Saturday hours, and four locations (Carmel Valley, North Park, University Heights, and Allied Gardens) would lose Monday hours entirely.</p>]]></description>
                <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 19:05:43 +0200</pubDate>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/6LOs7Hf7uDwrmxdMGDLU_G8QEJxXlLeN?utm_source=follow.it</guid>
            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>
