<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>One LLP » Infringement Nation</title>
	
	<link>http://onellp.com/blog</link>
	<description>Copyrights, Trademarks, Trade Secrets, &amp; Patents</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:23:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/onellp" /><feedburner:info uri="onellp" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>onellp</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>Levi’s Jeans Stitching Trademark Claim Marches On</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/onellp/~3/vZ1qlVrGJCI/</link>
		<comments>http://onellp.com/blog/levis-jeans-stitching-trademark-claim-marches-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>One LLP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infringement Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onellp.com/blog/?p=1114</guid>
		<description>Levis and Abercrombie have had a long-running battle over the stitching of their jeans.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/onellp/~4/vZ1qlVrGJCI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://onellp.com/blog/levis-jeans-stitching-trademark-claim-marches-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://onellp.com/blog/levis-jeans-stitching-trademark-claim-marches-on/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Software Patents</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/onellp/~3/kV4AwOfpnX4/</link>
		<comments>http://onellp.com/blog/software-patents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 16:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>One LLP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infringement Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Validity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onellp.com/blog/?p=1128</guid>
		<description>The Federal Circuit finally issued its long-anticipated decision in a high-profile software patent lawsuit called CLS Bank v. Alice Corp.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/onellp/~4/kV4AwOfpnX4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://onellp.com/blog/software-patents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://onellp.com/blog/software-patents/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Electronic Arts Copyright Lawsuit Continues</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/onellp/~3/39mNxL0Fpjo/</link>
		<comments>http://onellp.com/blog/electronic-arts-copyright-lawsuit-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 15:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>One LLP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright Ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infringement Nation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onellp.com/blog/?p=1119</guid>
		<description>The Ninth Circuit reversed the dismissal of a copyright lawsuit against Electronic Arts recently.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/onellp/~4/39mNxL0Fpjo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://onellp.com/blog/electronic-arts-copyright-lawsuit-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://onellp.com/blog/electronic-arts-copyright-lawsuit-continues/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Up, Up &amp; Away – Superman Copyright Saga Winds Down</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/onellp/~3/CYRu2MEIx9E/</link>
		<comments>http://onellp.com/blog/up-up-away-superman-copyright-saga-winds-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>One LLP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infringement Nation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onellp.com/blog/?p=1108</guid>
		<description>Image taken by Keven Law, Los Angeles, CA and under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike License, Wikimedia Commons.  In the long-running Superman litigation, the Ninth Circuit has addressed large parts of the dispute.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/onellp/~4/CYRu2MEIx9E" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://onellp.com/blog/up-up-away-superman-copyright-saga-winds-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://onellp.com/blog/up-up-away-superman-copyright-saga-winds-down/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Trade Secrets</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/onellp/~3/Gj3kvEUFzoY/</link>
		<comments>http://onellp.com/blog/federal-trade-secrets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>One LLP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infringement Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Secrets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onellp.com/blog/?p=1100</guid>
		<description>Image - les petits secrets, 1872, Public Domain courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.  The net effect of the law is that employers have a stronger federal remedy in their arsenal to address employee or competitor trade secret violations.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/onellp/~4/Gj3kvEUFzoY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://onellp.com/blog/federal-trade-secrets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://onellp.com/blog/federal-trade-secrets/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>$60 Million Trademark Verdict Reversed</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/onellp/~3/m3-Lo-f0Cso/</link>
		<comments>http://onellp.com/blog/60-million-trademark-verdict-reversed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 16:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>One LLP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infringement Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onellp.com/blog/?p=1084</guid>
		<description>The Ninth Circuit reversed Judge Real in a federal trademark case.  After the plaintiff secured a $60 million verdict, the Ninth Circuit vacated the judgment and reversed.  Specifically, the court found that Judge Real misstated the law to the jury in several respects regarding fraudulent trademark registrations, and also failed to instruct the jury on the legal basis to challenge an “incontestable” mark.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/onellp/~4/m3-Lo-f0Cso" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://onellp.com/blog/60-million-trademark-verdict-reversed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://onellp.com/blog/60-million-trademark-verdict-reversed/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade Secret Experts and Damages</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/onellp/~3/QtI_tQUPNQM/</link>
		<comments>http://onellp.com/blog/trade-secret-experts-and-damages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 16:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>One LLP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infringement Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Secrets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onellp.com/blog/?p=1082</guid>
		<description>In Management &amp;#038; Engineering Technologies, Inc. v. Information Systems Support, Inc., the plaintiff filed suit for trade secret misappropriation based upon the defendant’s use of the plaintiff’s profit margin and general expense rate information.  The jury found that such data could constitute a trade secret because the information was maintained in a vault, was password protected and was marked “confidential.”&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/onellp/~4/QtI_tQUPNQM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://onellp.com/blog/trade-secret-experts-and-damages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://onellp.com/blog/trade-secret-experts-and-damages/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Software and Copyrights</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/onellp/~3/CE2_MpI_050/</link>
		<comments>http://onellp.com/blog/software-and-copyrights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 17:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>One LLP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infringement Nation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onellp.com/blog/?p=1078</guid>
		<description>Copyrights in software often trigger work for hire and employer-employee agency questions because of the fact that so much software development occurs within corporation or through 1099 independent contractors.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/onellp/~4/CE2_MpI_050" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://onellp.com/blog/software-and-copyrights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://onellp.com/blog/software-and-copyrights/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Scenes a Faire and Dangerous Driving</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/onellp/~3/blNvVqCmpNU/</link>
		<comments>http://onellp.com/blog/scenes-a-faire-and-dangerous-driving/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 21:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>One LLP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infringement Nation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onellp.com/blog/?p=1069</guid>
		<description>Under the doctrine of scenes a faire, a court will protect a copyrighted work from infringement if the expression embodied in the work necessarily flows from a commonplace idea.  Scenes a faire has been literally translated to “scenes which ‘must’ be done.”&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/onellp/~4/blNvVqCmpNU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://onellp.com/blog/scenes-a-faire-and-dangerous-driving/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://onellp.com/blog/scenes-a-faire-and-dangerous-driving/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Software &amp; Copyright, Employees and Works for Hire</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/onellp/~3/QDT88BLpdJE/</link>
		<comments>http://onellp.com/blog/software-copyright-employees-and-works-for-hire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>One LLP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infringement Nation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onellp.com/blog/?p=1079</guid>
		<description>The Ninth Circuit recently applied in the software context the rule that absent a written agreement to the contrary, the employer is the author of a work made for hire.  Copyrights in software often trigger work for hire and employer-employee agency questions because of the fact that so much software development occurs within corporation or through 1099 independent contractors.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/onellp/~4/QDT88BLpdJE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://onellp.com/blog/software-copyright-employees-and-works-for-hire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://onellp.com/blog/software-copyright-employees-and-works-for-hire/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
